Agenda
City Council
- Meeting No.:
- 40
- Contact:
- Sylwia Przezdziecki, Manager
- Meeting Date:
- Wednesday, April 22, 2026
- Thursday, April 23, 2026
- Phone:
- 416-338-6614
- Start Time:
- 9:30 AM
- E-mail:
- councilmeeting@toronto.ca
- Location:
- Council Chamber, City Hall/Video Conference
This meeting of City Council will be conducted with Members participating in person and remotely and the proceedings of City Council will be conducted publicly.
Notice to people writing to Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006, and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees. The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it - such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address - available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.
Closed Meeting Requirements: If Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a Member of Council must place a motion to do so and give the reason why Council has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).
April 17, 2026
toronto.ca/council
This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.
Routine Matters - Meeting 40
RM40.1 - Call to Order
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
City Council will consider the following items at specific times:
On Wednesday, April 22, 2026:
First Item to be considered:
Mayor's First Key Matter - EX30.11 - Fighting for the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line
On Thursday, April 23, 2026:
First Item to be considered:
Mayor's Second Key Matter - PH29.4 - RentSafeTO Update
First Item to be considered after Mayor’s Second Key Matter:
- EX30.1 - Critical Investments in Streetlight Infrastructure for Public Safety
City Council will consider the following items together:
- CC40.4 - Legal Options to Defend City of Toronto's Interests at Billy Bishop Airport Lands and Other City-Owned Waterfront Lands and MM40.46 - Opposing the Provincial Land Grab at Bathurst Quay and the Island - by Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik
- IE28.13 - Repairs and Rehabilitation on Wilson Avenue Due to Contract BFPP (21 ECS-LU-04FP) and IE28.14 - Watermain Cleaning and Relining on Various Streets in the Sheppard Avenue / Chesswood Drive Area
Summary
- O Canada
- Moment of Silence
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286350.pdf
Condolence Motion for Sophie Constantopoulos
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286339.pdf
Condolence Motion for Stephen Lewis
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286342.pdf
Condolence Motion for Medhat Mahdy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286343.pdf
Condolence Motion for Barry Edmond McDermott
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286344.pdf
Condolence Motion for Marilyn Morrison
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286345.pdf
Condolence Motion for Charles (Charlie) Searle
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286346.pdf
Condolence Motion for Charles (Charlie) Henry Silson
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286349.pdf
RM40.2 - Confirmation of Minutes
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Summary
City Council will confirm the Minutes from the regular meeting held on March 25 and 26, 2026.
RM40.3 - Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from City Officials
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Summary
Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 30 on April 15, 2026
Submitted by Mayor Olivia Chow, Chair
Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 34 on April 17, 2026
Submitted by Councillor Lily Cheng, Chair
Report of the Corporations Nominating Panel from Meeting 28 on April 8, 2026
Submitted by Councillor Paula Fletcher, Chair
Report of the Economic and Community Development Committee from Meeting 27 on April 9, 2026
Submitted by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, Chair
Report of the General Government Committee from Meeting 28 on April 8, 2026
Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair
Report of the Infrastructure and Environment Committee from Meeting 28 on April 7, 2026
Submitted by Councillor Paula Fletcher, Chair
Report of the Planning and Housing Committee from Meeting 29 on April 14, 2026
Submitted by Councillor Gord Perks, Chair
Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 30 on March 31, 2026
Submitted by Councillor Stephen Holyday, Chair
Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 31 on March 31, 2026
Submitted by Councillor James Pasternak, Chair
Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 30 on April 1, 2026
Submitted by Councillor Nick Mantas, Vice Chair
Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 31 on April 1, 2026
Submitted by Councillor Chris Moise, Chair
New Business from City Officials
RM40.4 - Declarations of Interest
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Summary
Members of Council will declare interests under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act.
RM40.5 - Petitions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Summary
Members of Council may file petitions.
RM40.6 - Presentations, Introductions and Announcements
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Summary
Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.
RM40.7 - Review of the Order Paper
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Summary
City Council will review the Order Paper.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286351.pdf
(April 22, 2026) Amendments to the Order Paper on April 22, 2026
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286329.pdf
Order Paper April 23, 2026
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286372.pdf
Financial Impact Summary Sheet for Member Motions MM40.1 to MM40.41 from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286407.pdf
(April 23, 2026) Amendments to the Order Paper on April 23, 2026
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286385.pdf
Deferred Items - Meeting 40
EY29.3 - 327 Royal York Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
The Interim Executive Director, Development Review has submitted a supplementary report and attachment 1 on this Item (EY29.3a) with recommendations.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, for the lands municipally known as 327 Royal York Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (February 2, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends the approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit two 43-storey buildings (145.8 metres including the mechanical penthouse) with a gross floor area (GFA) of 70,700 square metres. The proposal includes approximately 1,046 residential units, 106 vehicular parking spaces, 795 bicycle parking spaces and 233 square metres of non-residential uses.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-284280.pdf
Attachment 5: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-264736.pdf
(January 21, 2026) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-284170.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286312.pdf
Attachment 1 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286295.pdf
Speakers
Tom Giancos, King Sett Capital
Communications (Community Council)
(February 17, 2026) E-mail from Vesna Miskic (EY.New)
(February 17, 2026) Letter from Angela Barnes and Les Veszlenyi, Co-Chairs, Mimico Lakeshore Community Network (MLCN) (EY.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/comm/communicationfile-205180.pdf
(February 18, 2026) Letter from Jim Foster, Board Member, Mimico Residents Association (EY.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/comm/communicationfile-205189.pdf
(February 18, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EY.New)
Executive Committee - Meeting 30
EX30.1 - Critical Investments in Streetlight Infrastructure for Public Safety
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
A Communication has been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to negotiate and execute, on behalf of the City, amendments to the 2006 Street and Expressway Lighting Service Agreement with Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. based on the key terms attached as Attachment 1 to the report (March 30, 2026) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and on such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to provide input, collaborate with Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. and to approve, as needed, any modifications to the annual Streetlighting Program Plan as necessary for delivery of maintenance, capital works, capital coordination or operational requirements; any adjustments must remain within City Council-approved funding, preserve the program's overall scope and maintain the terms of the Street and Expressway Lighting Service Agreement.
3. City Council delegate standing authority to the General Manager, Transportation Services to negotiate and execute on behalf of the City any subsequent amendments to the 2006 Street and Expressway Lighting Service Agreement with Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc., on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, subject to the following conditions:
a. any amendment shall not increase the overall funding commitment approved by City Council; and
b. any amendment shall not materially impact the potential liability of the City.
Origin
Summary
Toronto’s streetlighting infrastructure, which includes 173,100 luminaires, 56,900 poles and 2,477 km of overhead and underground cables, is a critical public safety and quality of life asset that supports mobility, goods movement, nighttime visibility, and economic activity across the City. The streetlighting infrastructure is owned by Toronto Hydro due to a sale that occurred in late 2005. The City of Toronto currently compensates Toronto Hydro for the operation and maintenance of the system via a 30-year service agreement (known as the “Street and Expressway Lighting Service Agreement”, or “Services Agreement”). This agreement governs the delivery of streetlighting services and is separate and distinct from the City’s other relationships with Toronto Hydro.
Much of the streetlighting infrastructure has reached or exceeded its useful life, creating service and asset management challenges that require a more structured, long‑term renewal approach. Toronto Hydro has identified widespread deterioration in key components, particularly underground cables and structural streetlighting elements, which require strategic planned renewal rather than continued reactive maintenance. To address these risks and align the network with modern lighting standards, in collaboration with Toronto Hydro, and consistent with approvals included in the 2026 Budget, the City is recommending an enhanced, multi-year investment framework to renew the streetlighting system and support citywide conversion to energy‑efficient LED lighting.
The 2026 Budget included funding for a total investment of $577 million over 10 years in the City’s Capital Plan to support a comprehensive streetlighting program, including full LED conversion, enhanced capital renewal and rehabilitation investments, and sustained service standards across the citywide network. This report provides the next step by setting out the details of that investment and seeks authority to amend the Services Agreement between the City and Toronto Hydro to enable implementation. Amendments to the Services Agreement (Attachment 1) are needed to establish a revised funding model with updated terms for accountability and assurance related to program delivery, payment, and other conditions that align with the enhanced investment intended to enable the expanded scope of work.
The streetlighting system includes both regulated and unregulated assets. Any additional City funding provided under the proposed amendments would be applied only to streetlighting assets attributable to the City of Toronto as the customer and used to deliver municipal services, regardless of regulatory classification. Importantly, these costs are not recovered through general electricity distribution rates, ensuring that there is no cross‑subsidization to other electricity ratepayers.
While the Services Agreement includes expressway lighting assets, streetlighting assets located on the Gardiner Expressway and Don Valley Parkway are in transition (per the New Toronto Deal provincial upload commitment) and, as such, are not included within the City’s enhanced funding framework. Should the Province elect to support enhanced investments for these assets once the transfer is complete, the Province can work with the City and Toronto Hydro to advance enhanced maintenance activities.
The recommended infrastructure investment is consistent with the City’s Capital Prioritization Framework, Corporate Asset Management Plan, and state of good repair (SOGR) objectives. Work has been and will continue to be coordinated between Transportation Services and Toronto Hydro and aligned with the City’s capital coordination and congestion management frameworks, to coordinate construction and support capital delivery.
The enhanced investment is expected to support the following outcomes:
- Improved public safety through more reliable lighting and fewer “lights‑out” conditions.
- Renewal of aging underground and structural infrastructure to reduce failures, system outages and emergency repairs.
- Full LED conversion to improve nighttime visibility and lighting consistency.
- Strong governance, accountability, and budgetary control under the amended Services Agreement.
- Long term operating savings through energy efficiency and reduced reliance on temporary fixes.
- Improved compliance with modern lighting standards, including IES RP‑8 illumination requirements.
This report is supported by the Streetlighting Infrastructure Investment Report (Attachment 2), prepared by Toronto Hydro in response to City Council’s request for a more detailed report examining the costs and benefits of a citywide LED streetlighting conversion initiative, with further direction to assess the incremental requirement for streetlight system infrastructure renewal (2022.EX34.9). Toronto Hydro’s supporting report provides detailed analysis of asset condition, safety risks, LED conversion benefits, infrastructure renewal needs, and options considered. The recommended approach in this report draws on that analysis and reflects a balanced response to critical system risks, while recognizing the City’s need to manage competing capital priorities within limited available funding.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285806.pdf
Attachment 1 - Services Agreement Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285807.pdf
Attachment 2 - Streetlighting Infrastructure Investment Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285808.pdf
Speakers
Councillor Stephen Holyday
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209914.pdf
(April 14, 2026) Letter from William Denning (EX.New)
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EX.New)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210103.pdf
EX30.2 - Toronto Personal Watercraft Safety Plan
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the Personal Watercraft Safety Plan as described in Attachment 1 to the report (March 30, 2026) from the City Manager, the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the Interim Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.
2. City Council thank Toronto Port Authority for the implementation of Motorized Watercraft Exclusion Zone by-laws at Hanlan's Point Beach, Humber Bay Shores and Woodbine Beach for the 2026 season, and request the Toronto Port Authority to continue implementation of Motorized Watercraft Exclusion Zone by-laws at Hanlan's Point Beach, Humber Bay Shores and Woodbine Beach for the 2027 and future summer seasons.
3. City Council request the Toronto Port Authority to affirm that the Motorized Watercraft Exclusion Zones they have agreed to establish prohibit all motorized watercraft including sailboats with motors, and powerboats as well as personal watercraft.
4. City Council request the Toronto Port Authority to extend the Motorized Watercraft Exclusion Zone 200 metres from the shoreline of Hanlan’s Point Beach as implemented in the 2025 season and install a minimum of 4 large navigation buoys.
5. City Council request the Toronto Port Authority to absorb the costs associated with the 2026 removal, maintenance and storage of the large buoys used to mark the Motorized Watercraft Exclusion Zones at Woodbine Beach, Hanlan's Beach, and Humber Bay Shores (east side of Humber Bay Park).
6. City Council request the Toronto Port Authority, in consultation the General Manager Parks and Recreation and the local Councillor, to implement a Motorized Watercraft Exclusion Zone for Cherry Beach and the Outer Harbour, at the earliest opportunity, and to develop an ongoing seasonal implementation plan such as those at Humber Bay Shores, Hanlan’s Point Beach, Woodbine Beach, Marie Curtis Park and Bluffers Park Beach.
7. City Council, as part of the consultation process, request the appropriate City staff or Agency to convene a Stakeholder Advisory Committee in order to consult and advise on the details of the Motorized Watercraft Exclusion Zone at Cherry Beach and the Outer Harbour, including key members of the Outer Harbour Sailing Federation.
8. City Council request the City Manager to report to the May 6, 2026 meeting of the Infrastructure and Environment Committee on implementation of Motorized Watercraft Exclusion Zonefor the 2026 summer season and subsequent years.
9. City Council request the Toronto Port Authority to provide additional protections for non-motorized watercraft in the Eastern Gap to ensure safe crossings between Cherry Beach, Toronto Islands and Biidaasige Park.
10. City Council request the Toronto Port Authority and the Toronto Police Service to develop and publicize an education and enforcement protocol for Motorized Watercraft Exclusion Zones for the 2026 season.
11. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Toronto Port Authority, the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the Toronto Police Marine Unit, to install signage on each side of the eastern gap to indicate the permitted speed allowed in that area.
12. City Council request the Director, Waterfront Secretariat, in consultation with the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Toronto Police Service Marine Unit and other City officials as required, to finalize requested boundaries and submit an application to Transport Canada to establish a Vessel Operation Restriction Regulations which prohibits power driven vessels and vessels driven by electric propulsion in the waters off of Marie Curtis Park, Humber Bay Park East, and Bluffer's Park Beach and in the Humber River.
13. City Council request the Federal Minister of Transportation to enact an Interim Order to restrict motorized watercraft offshore of Marie Curtis Park, Humber Bay Park East and Bluffer’s Park for the 2026 season.
14. City Council request to the Toronto Police Service Board to request the Chief of Police to further enhance boating and water-safety enforcement through a multi-year strategy that reflects City-wide policing needs.
15. City Council request the Director, Waterfront Secretariat, in consultation with the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, the General Manager, Parks and Recreation as well as the Toronto Port Authority, Waterfront Toronto, CreateTO and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, to explore potential sites that could be feasible for use by compliant Personal Watercraft rental companies and report back to the appropriate committee in 2027 with an assessment of feasible site options.
Origin
Summary
Toronto has experienced increasing safety risks, compliance challenges, and public concern related to the use of Personal Watercraft (PWCs) along the waterfront, particularly in near‑shore and high‑use areas. Unsafe operation of PWCs can conflict with swimmers and paddlers, and unpermitted commercial PWC rental activity in City parks and beaches have highlighted the need for a coordinated, multi‑jurisdictional response that takes into account the various roles and responsibilities of the City, the Toronto Police Service (TPS) Marine Unit, and external partners such as the Toronto Port Authority and Transport Canada.
PWC is the regulatory and industry term for a vessel less than four metres in length that uses an internal combustion engine powering a water-jet pump as its primary source of propulsion, and that is designed to be operated by a person sitting, standing, or kneeling on the vessel rather than inside it. Common brands of PWCs include Jet Skis, Sea-Doos, and WaveRunners. PWCs do not refer to non-motorized, human powered pleasure craft such as canoes, kayaks, and stand-up paddle boards.
This report presents Toronto's Personal Watercraft Safety Plan for Council's consideration. The Plan provides an integrated strategy to improve safety, reduce risk, and strengthen compliance related to PWC activity along Toronto’s waterfront. It responds to City Council direction (2025.MM32.16 and 2025.MM33.20) and has been developed collaboratively with key partners noted above as well as through engagement with waterfront stakeholders.
The Plan focuses on actions within the City’s control, while coordinating with federal authorities responsible for on‑water regulation. Key components include enhanced land‑ and water‑based enforcement, targeted public education and signage, and continued collaboration with federal partners on exclusion zones for motorized watercraft. The Plan also proposes exploring and identifying potential sites for compliant PWC rental operations to launch, subject to Council direction and applicable approvals.
Collectively, the actions outlined in the Plan aim to reduce the risk of incidents, deter unpermitted commercial activity on City property, improve public awareness and voluntary compliance, and strengthen coordination across agencies. The plan supports safe and equitable access to the waterfront while protecting swimmers, boaters, and Toronto’s natural environment.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285820.pdf
Attachment 3 - Letter dated April 1, 2026 from the Toronto Port Authority
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285823.pdf
Attachment 4 - Letter dated March 17, 2026 from the Ontario Region of Transport Canada
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285824.pdf
Attachment 5 - Executive Summary of Stakeholder Input to Inform the Toronto Personal Watercraft Safety Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285825.pdf
Speakers
Raj Mehta, Jetti Inc.
Jane Anderson, Toronto Beaches Open Water Swimmers
Richard Bartkowski, Toronto Windsurfing Club
Ed Hore, Waterfront for All
Nicole Corrado
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-207289.pdf
(April 9, 2026) Letter from Raj Mehta, Chief Executive Officer, Jetti (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209786.pdf
(April 11, 2026) Presentation from Roland Brunner, Hanlan’s Motorized Watercraft Exclusion Zone Community Watch (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209799.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Letter from Ingrid Buday, Founder and Executive Director, No More Noise (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209860.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Letter from Jane Anderson, Jessica Campbell, and Mitsy Layton, Toronto Beaches Open-Water Swimmers (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209883.pdf
(April 13, 2026) E-mail from John Carley, Co-Chair, Friends of the Spit (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209885.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Submission from Gerry Berman (EX.Supp)
(April 13, 2026) E-mail from Jeffrey Levitt (EX.Supp)
(April 13, 2026) E-mail from Ruth Allen (EX.Supp)
(April 13, 2026) Letter from Jessica Campbell, Jane Anderson, Jennifer Penney, Alan Lysne, and Steve Hulford, Friends of Cherry Beach and Outer Harbour (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209913.pdf
(April 14, 2026) Letter from Ed Hore, Chair, Waterfront for All (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209919.pdf
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Matt Lemche (EX.Supp)
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Peter Simm (EX.Supp)
(April 14, 2026) Submission from Jennifer Penney, President, Toronto Windsurfing Club; Commodore, Outer Harbour Sailing Federation (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209928.pdf
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Kelly MacWilliam (EX.Supp)
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Jenny Wawrow (EX.Supp)
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Allana Macaulay (EX.New)
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Daniel Navarro (EX.New)
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Douglas Millar (EX.New)
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Maddy Foote (EX.New)
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EX.New)
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Faelix Kayn (EX.New)
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Alexandra Hartford (EX.New)
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Eric Savory (EX.New)
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Arden Hagedorn (EX.New)
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Eric Huang (EX.New)
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Mike Lewandowski (EX.New)
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Jonathan Flynn (EX.New)
(April 15, 2026) Submission from Councillor Paula Fletcher (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209948.pdf
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Spencer Kerr (EX.New)
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Alex Adams (EX.New)
Communications (City Council)
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Jonathan Flynn (CC.Main)
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Alexandra Hartford (CC.Main)
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Douglas Millar (CC.Main)
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Ashley Abbott (CC.Main)
(April 16, 2026) E-mail from Allana Macaulay (CC.Main)
(April 16, 2026) E-mail from Matt Lemche (CC.Main)
(April 16, 2026) E-mail from Cathy Gatlin (CC.Main)
(April 16, 2026) E-mail from Eric Huang (CC.Main)
(April 16, 2026) E-mail from Akshay Gupta (CC.Main)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Jane Anderson, Jessica Campbell, and Mitsy Layton, Toronto Beaches Open-Water Swimmers (CC.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209578.pdf
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Jennifer Good (CC.Supp)
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Alex Adams (CC.Main)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Susan MacDonald (CC.Supp)
(April 17, 2026) Letter from Howie Colt, Vice President and Director, Passenger & Commercial Vessel Association (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209618.pdf
(April 17, 2026) Letter from Tim Kocur, Executive Director, and Oliver Hierlihy, Director, Operations, Waterfront BIA (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209624.pdf
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Melvin Chan (CC.Supp)
(April 18, 2026) E-mail from Jack Fallon (CC.Supp)
(April 18, 2026) E-mail from Jeff Sobil (CC.Supp)
(April 18, 2026) E-mail from Melissa Szopa (CC.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Bryan Good (CC.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Dana Baryckyj (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Katy Klosowski (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Eva von Tiesenhausen (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Jessica Campbell, Mitsy Layton and Jane Anderson on behalf of Toronto Beaches Open Water Swim Group (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210028.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Alyson Burns (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Jennifer Harding (CC.Supp)
(April 14, 2026) Letter from Jennifer Penney, Commodore, Outer Harbour Sailing Federation (CC.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209653.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Peter Fodor (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Eric Olesen (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Sophie Farines, Commodore, Westwood Sailing Club (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209655.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Maureen Hughes (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Clare Barker (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Tristan Truyens (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Heather Tay (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Laurie Frame (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Janice Wright (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Norman Leung (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Michael Mallinson (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Kristin Simpson (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Eric Szonyi (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Jane Anderson, on behalf of Friends of Cherry Beach and the Outer Harbour (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209671.pdf
(April 18, 2026) Letter from Greg Swanson, Chief Regulatory Officer, Safety Awareness Boating Alliance (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209672.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Cintia Cristia (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Shelagh Baker (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) Letter from Roland Brunner, on behalf of Hanlan’s MWEZ Community Watch (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209696.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Diana Whitcomb (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Alexandra Retchkiman (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Trish Cislak (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Rachael Kearns (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Bonnie and Jerry Good (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Dianne Davis (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Brenda Lucas (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Susan Wright (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Sunny Edmunds (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Craig Thompson (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Andrew Macdonald (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Marta Saunders (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Jill Tinmouth (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Janet Bolton (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Kathryn Quan (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Frances Burchat (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Richard Derham (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Sally Bliss (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Nick Adams (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Mary Plain (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Jeff Doolan (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Matt Lemche (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from John Carley, Co-Chair, Friends of the Spit (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210137.pdf
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Kelly Brigley (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Emily Deeth (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Mary Bredin (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Susan Durst (CC.New)
EX30.3 - Towards a Beautiful City: Update on Priority Items
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council receive the report (March 30, 2026) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, the Acting General Manager, Transportation Services, the Chief Procurement Officer and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services for information.
Origin
Summary
This report provides updates on eight priority items identified by City Council through the April 2025 report titled "Towards a Beautiful City - A Path Forward" (2025.EX22.3) as well as a related Member Motion from July 2025 (MM32.14). It also responds to a separate City Council directive from May 2024 to improve the public realm through graffiti removal and the creation of 1,000 new murals (IE13.9). Responses to these items are organized under the following themes:
1. Governance, Oversight and Leadership for Design Excellence
2. Maintenance of the Public Realm
3. Education and Awareness
The public realm consists of streets, parks, plazas, the waterfront, and other shared spaces that support civic life. Responsibility for the public realm is shared across multiple City divisions, each contributing distinct expertise and resources to ensure quality, functionality, and safety. While not exhaustive of all activities, the key updates outlined within this report reflect this cross-divisional approach to deliver a public realm that is well-designed and maintained, meets diverse needs, fosters creativity and inclusion, supports sustainability and climate resilience, demonstrates good stewardship, and strengthens the City's economic health by positioning Toronto as a desirable place to live, work, and visit. Additional future progress that is advanced on these individual items will continue to be reported by the lead divisions through their regular reporting processes.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285732.pdf
Speakers
Daniel Kryzhanovski
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209796.pdf
(April 14, 2026) Letter from Ingrid Buday, Founder and Executive Director, No More Noise (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209522.pdf
(April 14, 2026) Letter from Michael Longfield, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209927.pdf
(April 14, 2026) Letter from Barbora Vokac Taylor, Chair, Kfir Gluzberg, Vice Chair, and Joël León Danis, Executive Director, Toronto Society of Architects (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209537.pdf
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EX.New)
Communications (City Council)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Yvonne Coldridge (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) Letter from Al Smith, Executive Director, Old Town Toronto Business Improvement Area (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210232.pdf
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Oliver Olsen (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Roger Pepler (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Aaron Matthews (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Barbi Lazarus (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) Multiple Communications from Multiple Communications from 748 Individuals (from April 21 and 22, 2026) (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210271.pdf
EX30.4 - 2026 Property Tax Clawback Rate Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt reductions in tax decreases for the 2026 taxation year on properties in the commercial, industrial and multi-residential property classes by the percentage of the tax decrease set out in Column II in order to recover the revenues foregone as a result of capping, and to allow the decrease percentages set out in Column III:
|
Column I |
Column II |
Column III |
|
Property Class |
2026 Clawback Percentage |
2026 Allowable Decrease |
|
Commercial |
41.251301 percent |
58.748699 percent |
|
Industrial |
78.766027 percent |
21.233973 percent |
|
Multi-residential |
48.000988 percent |
51.999012 percent |
2. City Council authorize the introduction of the necessary Bills in City Council to give effect to City Council's decision.
Origin
Summary
In accordance with legislative requirements, City Council must annually adopt the following by-laws associated with property taxes:
- the municipal levy;
- the education levy; and
- the clawback rates.
These by-laws are required to enable the City to issue the final property tax bills for the year, for both municipal and school purposes. Following City Council's adoption of the 2026 municipal and education property tax rates at its meeting on February 10, 2026, this report sets the clawback rates and requirements for the commercial, industrial and multi-residential property classes.
In February 2026, City Council adopted the continued policy of limiting ('capping') allowable tax increases to a maximum of 10 percent of a property's prior year's annualized taxes for properties in those classes with a property tax bill increase greater than $500. This capping policy protects commercial, industrial, and multi-residential properties from significant annual tax increases.
The tax capping and clawback policy as well as the property tax rates must be adopted by City Council prior to setting the clawback rates. Once adopted, staff can then determine the funding requirements of the program and, to capture the lost revenue from properties that are capped, calculate a clawback rate. This clawback rate effectively withholds part of a property’s decrease due to reassessment, as applicable.
This report recommends the 'clawback percentage', which represents the amount the City will retain from any decreases in property tax bills, to offset the capping policy. As a result, properties that would otherwise see a tax reduction due to reassessment may not receive the full decrease, since a portion is withheld to help offset the revenue lost from capped tax increases on other properties. Given the Province continues to postpone reassessment, the number of properties impacted by this policy is minimal in 2026.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285496.pdf
Communications (Committee)
EX30.5 - FIFA World Cup 2026: Non-Competitive Procurement with the FIFA Fan Festival™ Toronto vendor
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
The Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto Secretariat and the Chief Procurement Officer have submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EX30.5b) with recommendations.
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat, in consultation the Chief Procurement Officer, and in accordance with Section 195-7.1(E) of the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195, to negotiate and execute a non-competitive agreement with The Fifth Social Club Inc. DBA Rendezvous w/ Candice & Alison Inc. and One Twenty Eight Inc., Loft Entertainment Inc., & Paquin Entertainment Group (FIFA Fan Festival™ Toronto Vendor), in an amount not to exceed $9.0 million net of all applicable taxes and charges, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for City Manager Services by $7.1 million gross and $0 net, fully funded by third party contributions and FIFA Fan Festival™ revenues.
3. City Council direct the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat to create a free general admission ticket category for FanFest.
4. City Council direct the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat to seek out private sponsorship to offset any costs incurred in expanding free access to FanFest.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Executive Committee requested the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat to report directly to the April 22, 23 and 24, 2026 meeting of City Council with details on the planned free community access to FanFest including the approximately 11,000 free tickets being provided to community groups.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to seek authority to negotiate and execute a non-competitive agreement with The Fifth Social Club Inc. DBA Rendezvous w/ Candice & Alison Inc., and One Twenty Eight Inc., Loft Entertainment Inc., & Paquin Entertainment Group (FIFA Fan Festival™ Toronto Vendor) for the provision of additional services, which will have no net financial impact to the City and will result in an improved visitor experience at FIFA Fan Festival™.
In December 2025, the FIFA Fan Festival™ Toronto Vendor was awarded a contract, valued at $16.0 million, to manage and deliver site production and programming of FIFA Fan Festival™ in Toronto. Subsequent to the awarding of this contract, the City and the Province executed the Provincial Contribution Agreement in February 2026, which allowed for the allocation of funds from both the Provincial and Federal Governments to primarily cover the costs of FIFA Fan Festival™. Further to this, the City has been in discussions with FIFA related to the delivery of an additional FIFA-led activation at FIFA Fan Festival™. To improve the fan experience and bolster safety and security at the event, authority is being sought to enter into a non-competitive contract by an incremental value of $9.0 million with the FIFA Fan Festival™ Toronto Vendor. All incremental operating costs associated with the non-competitive procurement (NCP) are either fully revenue‑supported or accommodated through internal reallocations. There is no net financial impact to the City, and no change to the $380.0 million FIFA World Cup 2026 budget. Execution of the proposed additional services will start immediately upon approval to ensure completion before the FIFA World Cup begins in June 2026. The FIFA Fan Festival™ Toronto Vendor contract, valued at $16.0 million was previously competitively procured and included within the $380.0 million FIFA World Cup 2026 budget. Approval of the non-competitive contract would bring the total cost of FIFA Fan Festival to $25.0 million.
Non-competitive procurements may be undertaken where both the proposed procurement and supplier can be justified in good faith based on an exception set out in Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195, Procurement. This non-competitive procurement will be proceeding under the exception code related to additional deliveries of services that were not included in the original procurement, but a change of supplier cannot be made for economic and technical reasons. The City has determined in good faith that both the proposed procurement and the selected supplier, along with the terms and conditions of the contract, are beneficial to the City (Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 195, Procurement, Section 7.1E.).
Pursuant to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195, Procurement, Section 195-7.3 (D), Standing Committee and Council approval is required for all non-competitive procurements valued up to or over $500,000, or where the term of the contract exceeds five (5) years or exceeds the projected capital funding for the project as approved by Council. Approval is also required under City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 71, Financial Control, Section 71-11A., as the procurement value exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of HST allowed under staff authority.
Adopting the recommendations in this report will have no impact on the $380.0 million overall budget for the FWC26 Toronto Secretariat.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-286120.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286325.pdf
Communications (Committee)
Communications (City Council)
5a - FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto: Request Authority to Enter into a Non-competitive Procurement Agreement with Respect to FIFA Fan Festival™
Origin
Summary
The Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto Secretariat (FWC26 Toronto Secretariat) will be submitting a supplementary report to the Executive Committee before its meeting on April 15, 2026 that seeks authority to make an amendment to a previously awarded contract with respect to FIFA Fan Festival™.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285729.pdf
EX30.6 - FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto: By-law Exemptions to Facilitate Planning and Delivery of the FIFA World Cup 2026 Events at Fort York and the Bentway, and at Nathan Phillips Square
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize an exemption with respect to the sale and distribution of plastic bottled water to support expected large audiences and potentially unmet hydration needs, in addition to providing multiple hydration options, including HTO To Go water trailers, for the duration of the FIFA Fan Festival™ to be held at Fort York and the Bentway from June 10 to July 19, 2026, inclusive, and at the events set out in Attachment 1 to the report (March 26, 2026) from the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to be held at Nathan Phillips Square from May 18 to July 20, 2026, inclusive.
2. City Council authorize the use of special effects pyrotechnics as part of events to be held at Fort York and the Bentway from June 10 to July 19, 2026, inclusive, and at events set out in Attachment 1 to the report (March 26, 2026) from the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to be held at Nathan Phillips Square, from May 18 to July 20, 2026, inclusive, with all permissions contingent upon securing a permit from Toronto Fire Services to discharge fireworks under Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 466, Fireworks, and providing sufficient protective measures for Fort York to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
3. City Council authorize the operation of a beer and wine Vintners Quality Alliance garden and the sale and distribution of alcohol as part of events set out in Attachment 1 to the report (March 26, 2026) from the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to be held at Nathan Phillips Square from May 18 to July 20, 2026, inclusive, contingent upon the following conditions:
a. approval from the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario;
b. approval of the Medical Officer of Health;
c. compliance with the City of Toronto's Municipal Alcohol Policy; and
d. receipt of all the necessary permits associated with the production of the event, including building permits and a Noise By-law extension permit.
4. City Council authorize the use of sound amplification from May 18 to July 20, 2026, inclusive, between the hours of 08:00 to 23:00, which is beyond the accepted Nathan Phillips Square's amplification schedule policy hours, contingent upon securing a Noise Bylaw Exemption permit through the Municipal Licensing and Standards Division and adhering to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 591, Noise, along with mandatory sound monitoring by the City's preferred audio company, Production Service Industries, throughout the event to ensure compliance with schedules.
5. City Council authorize sports demonstrations at Nathan Phillips Square as part of events set out in Attachment 1 to the report (March 26, 2026) from the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture from May 18 to July 20, 2026, inclusive.
6. City Council authorize the placement of objects, including a mini-soccer pitch, in the reflecting pool at Nathan Phillips Square for the purposes of providing free access to the public and community organizations and associated event activation and programming, as part of events set out in Attachment 1 to the report (March 26, 2026) from the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to be held at Nathan Phillips Square from May 18 to July 20, 2026, inclusive.
7. City Council grant permission to the FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat with respect to the installation of banners, decals and other pageantry elements on the City Hall building and on Nathan Phillips Square structures, including windows, walkways and other surfaces deemed suitable through review with Heritage Planning and Corporate Real Estate Management from May 4 to July 23, 2026, inclusive.
8. City Council request the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to explore the opportunity of a revenue sharing agreement in the sale and distribution of beer and wine for events being held at Nathan Phillips Square for the period of May 18 to July 20, 2026.
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on March 30, 2026, the FIFA World Cup 2026 Subcommittee considered Item FWC11.1 and made a recommendation to the Executive Committee.
Summary from the report (March 26, 2026) from the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture:
The FIFA World Cup 2026™ (FWC26) represents an unprecedented opportunity for the City of Toronto to showcase its global reputation as a diverse, inclusive, and vibrant city. As preparations advance, this report seeks delegated authorities and/or exemptions to specific by-laws to facilitate the planning and delivery of several initiatives supporting Toronto’s role as a Host City.
This report is a coordinated response, led by the FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto Secretariat (FWC26 Secretariat), in collaboration with Solid Waste Management Services, Economic Development and Culture, Corporate Real Estate Management, and Parks and Recreation.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285736.pdf
(March 26, 2026) Report and Attachment 1 from the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto: By-law exemptions to facilitate planning and delivery of the FIFA World Cup 2026 events at Fort York and the Bentway, and at Nathan Phillips Square
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285737.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Committee)
EX30.7 - FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto Mobility Plan: Temporary Adjustments to Traffic and Parking Regulations
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Bills 350 and 377 have been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the temporary traffic and parking By-law amendments required to support the FIFA World Cup 2026 as set out in Attachment 1 to the report (March 30, 2026) from the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat and the Acting General Manager, Transportation Services, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any other By-law or chapter of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, with such amendments to be in effect for the periods provided in Attachment 1 to the report (March 30, 2026) from the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat and the Acting General Manager, Transportation Services.
2. City Council delegate authority to the General Manager, Transportation Services, notwithstanding any City of Toronto By-law to the contrary, for the period of June 10 to July 31, 2026, inclusive, to further amend the appropriate traffic and parking Chapters of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, including any applicable Schedules, as may be required to support the FIFA World Cup 2026; and City Council authorize such amendments that may arise during the preparation for, and during the FIFA World Cup 2026, and that are not otherwise included in Recommendation 1 above.
3. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 937, Temporary Closing of Highways, to delegate to the General Manager, Transportation Services, notwithstanding any City of Toronto By-law to the contrary, until July 31, 2026, the authority to temporarily close to vehicular and pedestrian traffic any highway or portion of a highway, for a period up to and including 90 consecutive days as required for the purposes of managing traffic movements during preparation for, during, and after the FIFA World Cup 2026 and exempt the General Manager, Transportation Services, in carrying out this delegated authority, from the requirement in section 937-5 of Chapter 937, that being the requirement to notify the local Ward Councillor of the pending closure and the requirement to report on the proposed closure if so requested.
4. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to consider the FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto Mobility Plan when exercising the delegated authority in Recommendations 2 and 3 above.
5. Despite any other By-law, including but not limited to §950-505 and Schedule XXV to Chapter 950, City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to open the Westbound on-ramp to the Frederick G Gardiner Expressway from westbound Lake Shore Boulevard West at Jameson Avenue at any time between 2:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday to Friday from June 11, 2026 until July 19, 2026, inclusive, when, in the General Manager, Transportation Services’ opinion, opening is warranted to assist traffic flow in the area, such authority to extend for the duration of the FIFA World Cup 2026.
6. City Council amend §27-18.4B(6)(b) of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 27, Council Procedures to omit references to Chapter 937, where authority to close roads has been delegated to the General Manager, Transportation Services.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bills to give effect to City Council's decision, including but not limited to, the introduction of necessary Bills to amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking and Chapter 925, Permit Parking, Chapter 937, Temporary Closing of Highways, and Chapter 27, Council Procedures, and to make any necessary clarifications, refinements, minor modifications, technical amendments or By-law amendments as may be identified by the City Solicitor or the General Manager, Transportation Services, in order to give effect to City Council's decision, and that such Bills and amendments shall take precedence over anything to the contrary in any other By-law or chapter of the Municipal Code.
8. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to submit directly to City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to reinstate the traffic and parking regulations, and remove the delegated authority in Recommendation 3 above, to what they were immediately prior to the By-law amendments made in the Item.
Origin
Summary
The FIFA World Cup 2026™ (FWC26) represents an unprecedented opportunity for the City of Toronto to showcase its global reputation as a diverse, inclusive, and vibrant city. As preparations advance, this report provides an update on several key initiatives supporting Toronto’s role as a Host City.
To implement the FIFA World Cup 2026™ (FWC26) Toronto Mobility Plan, which was considered by the FIFA World Cup 2026 Subcommittee at its meeting on March 30, 2026, this report recommends a number of temporary measures including traffic and parking measures, permit parking exemptions and delegated authority for further traffic and parking measures, and full or partial road closures that may be required during the tournament period. These measures will enable the City to manage increased travel demand, support transit reliability, facilitate emergency access and maintain safe operations for pedestrians and cyclists in areas experiencing significant activity and respond to any emerging needs.
This report is a coordinated response, led by the FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto Secretariat (FWC26 Secretariat), in collaboration with Transportation Services.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285731.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285826.pdf
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209855.pdf
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EX.New)
7a - FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto Mobility Plan
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on March 30, 2026, the FIFA World Cup 2026 Subcommittee considered Item FWC11.2 and made a recommendation to the Executive Committee.
Summary from the report (March 25, 2026) from the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat:
The FIFA World Cup 2026™ (FWC26) represents an unprecedented opportunity for the City of Toronto to showcase its global reputation as a diverse, inclusive, and vibrant city. As preparations advance, this report provides an update on the FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto Mobility Plan in support of Toronto’s role as a Host City.
As part of the preparations, staff, with the support of Arcadis, a design, engineering and management consulting company, and in collaboration with many internal and external partners including the Transportation Services Division, Toronto Transit Commission (TTC), Metrolinx, the Ministry of Transportation, Toronto Police Service and Toronto Emergency Management, have developed a comprehensive FWC26 Toronto Mobility Plan (Mobility Plan), included as Attachment 1. The Mobility Plan will support the safe and efficient movement of residents, visitors, transit services, emergency vehicles and event-related operations during the tournament period. The plan outlines coordinated transportation and traffic management measures to address increased travel demand around event venues, fan zones, transit hubs, and key transportation corridors.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285752.pdf
(March 25, 2026) Report from the Executive Director, FIFA World Cup 2026, Toronto Secretariat on FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto Mobility Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285753.pdf
Attachment 1 - FIFA World Cup 2026 Toronto Mobility Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-285754.pdf
EX30.11 - Fighting for the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Mayor's First Key Matter and First Item of Business on April 22, 2026.
The City Manager has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EX30.11a) with recommendations.
Confidential Attachment - Proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the City of Toronto and criteria to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the City of Toronto.
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council establish the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line as its top transit expansion priority that has yet to receive financial commitments from Provincial and Federal Governments, inform both Provincial and Federal Governments of this priority and City Council request that each order of government commit to funding an equal, one-third share of the cost to build the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line.
2. City Council increase the 2026 Capital Budget for Transit Expansion by $10 million, fully funded by the City Building Fund Reserve, from funds specifically allocated for the purposes of investing in Scarborough transit, to expedite the work to advance the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line to 30 percent design, and direct the Executive Director, Transit Expansion to report to City Council by the second quarter of 2027 on the progress of this work and recommendations to continue to advance the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line.
3. City Council request the Provincial Government establish streamlined regulatory requirements for the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line to expedite and reduce costs for the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line’s design, planning, early works and other stages of development.
4. City Council request the Government of Canada’s Toronto Caucus to write a letter of public support for tri-government funding of the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line.
5. City Council request the Federal Ministry of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities and Ontario Ministry of Transportation to provide input on the City of Toronto’s Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line plan to inform what version of the project they would support funding and to ensure it connects with other transit expansion projects.
6. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, to conduct an analysis of the national economic impact of building the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line including number of Canadian jobs created, impact on Scarborough’s growth and development, and the projected economic loss for Scarborough residents and businesses if the project is not built.
7. City Council direct the City Manager to establish a Scarborough Transit Working Group, consisting of the Mayor, the Deputy Mayor for Scarborough, the City Manager, the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, the Federal Minister of Transportation, the Provincial Minister of Transportation, the Chair, Toronto Transit Commission, the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, and the Chief Executive Officer, Metrolinx, or their designate(s) with the following purpose:
a. advancing an integrated, multi-modal transit network for Scarborough that includes the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line; and
b. identifying funding from all levels of government to support implementation of the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line.
8. City Council direct the City Manager to establish a Scarborough East Rapid Transit Program Advisory Body for the purpose of advocating for tri-government funding of the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line and maximizing the benefit of the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line to Scarborough communities; the Program Advisory Body is chaired by the Deputy Mayor for Scarborough and a non-elected member of the Scarborough community and composed of Members of Scarborough Community Council and Scarborough community leaders.
9. City Council request the Mayor to allocate funds during the 2027 Budget process from the City Building Fund to support future advancement of the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line.
10. City Council endorse changing this project’s name from Eglinton East LRT to Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Executive Committee requested the City Manager, in consultation with the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, provide a supplementary report to the April 22, 23 and 24, 2026 meeting of City Council that resolves the Council direction to report in 2025.EX20.9 and includes any additional recommendations to advance the Scarborough East Rapid Transit, including recommendations related to advancement of overall project design, a maintenance and storage facility, and expediting permitting and approvals processes, as well as recommendations to authorize capital expenditures and negotiation and execution of necessary agreements related the next phases of work on the Waterfront East Transit.
Origin
Summary
Scarborough residents deserve fast, reliable and affordable transit. We must build the Scarborough East Rapid Transit (SERT) Line. To get it done, we need a concerted effort to bring the Provincial and Federal Governments to the table to help fund it.
For a number of years, Toronto has been designing both the Waterfront East LRT and SERT (formerly Eglinton East LRT) in tandem. All along, we have been working to demonstrate the value of each line to our Provincial and Federal partners and secure funding to build them both.
Over the past few weeks, the Provincial and Federal governments have committed to funding their one-third shares of the Waterfront East LRT. That’s $2 billion secured to build more transit. I am grateful for their partnership on this new line.
Now it is time to redouble our efforts and land a funding deal to build the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line. Scarborough cannot be left out.
As Mayor, I am not waiting. The City of Toronto is ready with our share of the funding and moving forward designing the line, while we work on landing a funding deal. Some of the work to date includes:
- In 2023, as soon as I arrived as Mayor, we approved funding to proceed with designing the SERT, even though we have no provincial or federal commitment. To date we’ve invested over $18 million of City funds to design the SERT.
- In my 2026 budget, I provided additional funds to look at how we could separate the line from street traffic, so it is truly rapid transit.
- My 2026 budget also increases the contribution to the reserve fund for Scarborough transit by over $4.3 million every year, to a total of $45 million per year dedicated to build new transit in Scarborough.
- By the end of this year, we will have $377.9 million set aside to build the SERT. This is enough for the City to put a down payment on the SERT and finance the capital costs of the City’s share of the SERT.
Since becoming Mayor, I’ve raised the need for intergovernmental partnership to fund and build the SERT with two Prime Ministers, the Premier, local MPs and MPPs, and community groups. The chorus of support is growing. I know that Provincial and Federal decision-makers are listening. It’s time to turn up the volume.
That is why I recommend allocating a further $10 million to expedite design work. These additional funds will move up the completion of the 30 percent design milestone. Further, I am seeking the Province’s support to expedite the planning and design phases of work based on their learnings from Provincially-led transit expansion projects.
To support this work, I recommend establishing two bodies: a Scarborough Transit Working Group (STWG) with multi-government and multi-agency representation and a Public Advisory Body (PAB) composed of Scarborough community leaders and councillors. The STWG will bring together key decision-makers to ensure financial, technical and political alignment. The PAB will catalyze community support for the SERT, communicate with local stakeholders, and ensure the SERT serves local needs.
My motions below ask all of Council, not just Scarborough councillors, to join me in fighting for this line.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-286156.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286353.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Project Details
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286354.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Preferred Alternative Maintenance and Storage Facility Site Selection
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/comm/communicationfile-209949.pdf
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EX.New)
EX30.12 - Implementation of O.Reg 1/26 under the Liquor Licence and Control Act, 2019 in the City of Toronto
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Bill 374 has been submitted on this Item.
The City Clerk has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EX30.12a) with recommendations.
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the City Clerk, to distribute information on “bring-your-own event” liquor application process to cultural and community event producers, including good practices to support small businesses.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Chief Technology Officer, Technology Services, in consultation with the City Clerk, to integrate information of the municipal designation process for “bring-your-own events” into the Guidance for Planning Events in the City webpage.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Executive Committee directed the City Clerk, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to report directly to the April 22, 2026 meeting of City Council with any required by-law or delegated authority amendments for the implementation of the regulatory changes made by O. Reg. 1/26 for “bring-your-own events”, including:
a. amendments to the Delegation of Authority for the Endorsement of Temporary Liquor Licences (as established by 2019.EX3.7 and amended by 2023.EX3.8) to include “bring-your-own" events; and
b. a definition of “cultural and community event” for the purposes of liquor licensing to include consideration to permitted Street Events, Special Events in City Parks, and Arts & Music in City Parks Events.
Origin
Summary
On March 17, 2026, the Province of Ontario announced an expansion of the liquor licence permit category for “bring-your-own” events (formerly known as tailgate events) to include cultural and community outdoor events such as neighbourhood festivals, movie screenings, art exhibits, and farmer’s markets. This creates new opportunities for local events across Toronto happening this summer, if they wish to participate.
In order to implement the expanded permit category created by this new regulation, Toronto City Council needs to establish a process for municipal designation of cultural and community events for the purpose of liquor licensing. As such, this item requests the City Clerk and General Manager, Economic Development & Culture to report directly to the next meeting of City Council with the required amendments needed to create a municipal designation process in advance of the regulation coming into force on April 30, 2026.
Enabling new ways to save on overhead costs for cultural producers aligns with the objectives of Culture Connects: An Action Plan for Culture in Toronto (2025-2035) and creating new opportunities for local small businesses supports the drivers of Sidewalks to Skylines: A 10-Year Action Plan for Toronto’s Economy (2025-2035).
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-286129.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286365.pdf
Attachments 1 and 2 - Delegation of Authority to the City Clerk related to Bring-your-own Event permits and Proposed Amendments to Administrative Procedures Regarding the Existing Delegation of Authority to the City Clerk for Temporary Liquor Licences
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286336.pdf
Communications (Committee)
Civic Appointments Committee - Meeting 34
CA34.2 - Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto Zoo Board
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Toronto Zoo Board
Committee Recommendations
The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:
1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Toronto Zoo Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on March 28, 2030, and until successors are appointed:
Camilo Garay
Fernando Valencia
2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1 to 4 to the report (April 7, 2026) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Zoo Board.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
Candidates' Biographies
Camilo Garay
Camilo Garay is a fundraising and partnerships executive with over a decade of experience in the non-profit and public sectors. He has raised over millions for education, innovation, and equity-focused initiatives through roles at Seneca Polytechnic, CivicAction, and Visions of Science. Camilo brings expertise in governance, strategic partnerships, and civic engagement, with a strong commitment to conservation, education, and community-building.
Fernando Valencia
Fernando Valencia is a Toronto scientist and holds a PhD in Cell and Systems Biology from the University of Toronto. His research examines how biological systems respond to physical and environmental cues and has been published in scientific journals and academic textbooks. His work has been recognized with awards and grants. Fernando wants to share his love of science and biology with everyone he meets. He has formal training in science communication from the Royal Canadian Institute for Science and is strongly committed to science education. He has taught and mentored university students and led science workshops for high school students. He has also served in leadership roles within academic organizations, including co-chairing international scientific conferences. Fernando has a personal connection to the Toronto Zoo, where he was married, and holds a deep appreciation for the Zoo’s role as a trusted public institution dedicated to conservation, education, and community engagement.
Origin
Summary
The Civic Appointments Committee will conduct interviews and recommend two candidates to City Council for appointment to the Toronto Zoo Board of Management.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-285883.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1a - List of Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Toronto Zoo Board
Confidential Attachment 1b - List of Ineligible Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information, and Applications for Appointment to the Toronto Zoo Board
Confidential Attachment 2 - Diversity Summary of Current Public Members on the Toronto Zoo Board
Confidential Attachment 3 - Board Matrix for the Interview Candidates for the Toronto Zoo Board
Confidential Attachment 4 - Interview schedule for April 17, 2026
Communications (Committee)
CA34.3 - Appointment of a Public Member to the Exhibition Place Board
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Exhibition Place Board of Governors
Committee Recommendations
The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:
1. City Council appoint Bhutila Karpoche to the Exhibition Place Board of Governors, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on March 28, 2030, and until a successor is appointed.
2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1 to 4 to the report (April 1, 2026) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Exhibition Place Board.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
Candidate's Biography
Bhutila Karpoche
Bhutila Karpoche is a former MPP for Parkdale–High Park (2018–2025) who served as Deputy Speaker of the Ontario Legislature and Vice-Chair of the Standing Committee on Social Policy. She brings award-winning public service experience and a strong background in strategic governance, stakeholder engagement, and collaborative leadership.
Origin
Summary
The Civic Appointments Committee will conduct interviews and recommend one candidate to City Council for appointment to the Exhibition Place Board of Governors.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-285877.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1a - List of Eligible Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Exhibition Place Board
Confidential Attachment 1b - List of Ineligible Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Exhibition Place Board
Confidential Attachment 2 - Diversity Summary of Current Members of the Exhibition Place Board
Confidential Attachment 3 - Interview Schedule for April 17, 2026
Confidential Attachment 4 - Board Matrix for the Interview Candidates for the Exhibition Place Board
Communications (Committee)
Corporations Nominating Panel - Meeting 28
NC28.1 - Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto Hydro Board
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Toronto Hydro Board.
Panel Recommendations
The Corporations Nominating Panel recommends that:
1. City Council treat the portion of the City Council meeting at which the Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto Hydro Board of Directors is considered as a special meeting of the Shareholder for Toronto Hydro Corporation, and
a. waive the provisions of the Public Appointments Policy that require the Corporations Nominating Panel to short-list and interview candidates, and adopt the following as a resolution of the Shareholder of the Toronto Hydro Corporation:
Notwithstanding the Shareholder Direction, City Council, as Shareholder, reappoint the following candidates to the Toronto Hydro Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office starting on June 28, 2026, and ending on June 28, 2028, and until successors are appointed:
Michael Eubanks
Ersilia Serafini
b. waive the provisions of the Public Appointments Policy that require the Corporations Nominating Panel to short-list and interview candidates and the provisions that the term of appointment to corporations is 2 years and that the limit on length of service for any citizen member on the board of directors is 8 consecutive years, and adopt the following as a resolution of the Shareholder of the Toronto Hydro Corporation:
Notwithstanding the Shareholder Direction, City Council, as Shareholder, reappoint Brian Topp to the Toronto Hydro Board, as Chair, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office starting on June 28, 2026, and ending on June 28, 2029, and until a successor is appointed.
2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1a, 1b, 2, and 3 to the report (March 31, 2026) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Hydro Board.
Panel Decision Advice and Other Information
Candidates' Biographies
Michael Eubanks
Michael leverages more than 30 years of diverse experience across the retail, financial services and digital and information technology sectors in both Canada and the United States as a leader in enterprise strategic planning, he specializes in implementing complex technology changes to meet shifting business models for public and private companies.
Before Michael’s appointment at goeasy in 2020, he was Chief Information Officer at the Liquor Control Board of Ontario and the Ontario Cannabis Store. He has also held senior technology management roles at Canadian Tire Corporation and Best Buy International.
Michael is a graduate of York University and has completed the Institute Corporate Director’s Program Certification from the Rotman School of Business at the University of Toronto.
Ersilia Serafini
Ersilia Serafini is President and Chief Executive Officer of Summerhill, a national firm delivering conservation and demand-side management programs for utilities and governments across Canada. For more than 25 years, she has worked at the intersection of public policy, customer engagement, and energy market transformation, helping organizations design and deliver large-scale programs that drive measurable environmental and economic impact.
She currently serves on the Board of Directors of Toronto Hydro and has previously served on the Board of the Independent Electricity System Operator. She is the Treasurer on the Board of the Clean Economy Fund and the incoming Chapter Chair for the Gold Toronto Chapter of Young President’s Organization.
Brian Topp (Chair)
Brian Topp is currently chair of the Board of Toronto Hydro. He is also a member of the Prime Minister’s Council on Canada-United States Relations; is a member of the Mayor of Toronto’s Economic Action Team; and is a partner at GT & Company Executive Advisors. He has extensive experience in government and public policy across Canada, most recently serving as chief of staff to Alberta Premier Rachel Notley. He previously served as executive director at the Alliance of Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists Toronto, co-chaired Film Ontario, and was a director at Pinewood Toronto Studios. He is a graduate of McGill University.
Origin
Summary
The Corporations Nominating Panel will select candidates to be interviewed for appointment to the Toronto Hydro Board. The Corporations Nominating Panel will conduct interviews at its next meeting and recommend three candidates, including a Chair, to City Council for appointment.
Background Information (Panel)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/nc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285760.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1a - List of Eligible Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Toronto Hydro Board
Confidential Attachment 1b - List of Ineligible Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Toronto Hydro Board
Confidential Attachment 2 - Skills Matrix for Highly Qualified Candidates for the Toronto Hydro Board
Confidential Attachment 3 - Diversity Information Summary for Current Public Members of the Toronto Hydro Board
Communications (Panel)
Economic and Community Development Committee - Meeting 27
EC27.1 - Update on the Business Licence and Permit Applications Action Plan and Other Outstanding Directives
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Public Notice Given
Committee Recommendations
The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 545, Licensing as follows:
a. Amend Article XXIII, 545-282 and Article XXIV, 545-291 by deleting requirements pertaining to hours and days of operation.
b. Amend Article XXIII, 545-285 and Article XXIV, 545-293 by:
A. Deleting the requirement that the register of goods received be kept in the form of a book, and written in ink in a plain, legible hand; and
B. Adding that the register shall be in a format satisfactory to the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.
c. Amend Article XXIII, 545-286 to remove the requirement that information from the Second-Hand Goods Register book be submitted to the Executive Director.
d. Amend Article XXIV, 545-293.1 by deleting the requirement that information from the Old Gold or Old Jewellery Register book be submitted to the Executive Director.
2. City Council repeal Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 832, Videotape Stores, Licensing.
3. City Council direct that Recommendation 1 and Recommendation 2 come into effect on September 30, 2026.
4. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to work with industry stakeholders on the definition of Entertainment Establishment/Nightclub and report back with any recommended changes to the June 9, 2026 meeting of Economic and Community Development Committee.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Interim Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards gave a presentation on Update on the Business Licence and Permit Applications Action Plan and Other Outstanding Directives.
Origin
Summary
The City of Toronto’s Municipal Licensing and Standards (MLS) Division continues to refine the administration of its business licence and permit services to remain responsive to client needs and reduce regulatory burden. MLS issues and enforces 89 business licence and permit types, with 56 of them contained in Chapter 545, Licensing (the Licensing Bylaw). In 2025, MLS issued and renewed a total of 32,906 business licences and processed 7,552 service requests associated with businesses licensed under Chapter 545.
In July 2025, City Council adopted MLS’ Business Licence and Permit Applications Action Plan (the Action Plan) (2025.EC22.7), which sets out a four-year roadmap to review and modernize regulations for various licence categories. This report provides a progress update on implementation of the Action Plan and responds to outstanding directives. Specifically, it:
- Outlines recent customer service enhancements, including simplifying licence applications, launching a Business Licensing Information Phone Line and upgrading the Division’s licence renewal portal;
- Describes operational enhancements for food, beverage and entertainment businesses based on insights from the implementation of updated licensing and zoning regulations, which includes process and system changes to advance the Division’s client-centered/business friendly approach when supporting businesses in changing into a new licence type (2025.EC24.7);
- Responds to outstanding directives and proposes minor bylaw amendments to reduce regulatory burden and provide clarity for businesses.
In 2026, staff will continue to advance the Action Plan by proposing amendments to street vending regulations, launching a new online licence application portal, launching user engagement research, and preparing for implementation of new regulations for pet establishments. Staff are also preparing to report back in 2027 regarding regulations for temporary sign providers; certain trade licences, such as home renovation trades; certain driver/vehicle owner licences; second-hand goods related businesses; a regulatory sandbox framework for new business models; and a further review of holistic centres and adult services establishments.
This report was prepared in collaboration with the Economic Development and Culture Division and the Technology Services Division.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285600.pdf
(March 31, 2026) Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285611.pdf
(April 9, 2026) Presentation from the Interim Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on the Business Licence and Permit Applications Action Plan and Other Outstanding Directives
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285935.pdf
Speakers
Michael Pesce, Bambi's
Callum Sheedy
Rae Abunahla, Buddies In Bad Times Theatre
Councillor Paula Fletcher
Communications (Committee)
(April 9, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EC.New)
(September 15, 2025) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/comm/communicationfile-209461.pdf
EC27.2 - Review of Toronto’s Street Vending and Artists By-laws
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Bills 354 and 355 have been submitted on this Item.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Committee Recommendations
The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:
Interim Amendments to Chapter 740
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 740, Street Vending by deleting section 740-11(the moratorium on new applications for Sidewalk Vending Permits for food vendors in Wards 10, 11 and 13).
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 740, Street Vending by deleting the phrase “five hours” in section 740-17A(6) and replacing it with the phrase “twelve hours” to permit Mobile Food Vending permit holders to operate for up to twelve hours on the same block within a 24 hour period.
3. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 740, Street Vending by amending section 740-20 so it reads:
§ 740-20. Transition.
If, immediately prior to the coming into force of this chapter, a R55 Curb Lane Vending Permit is in effect under a former City of Toronto by-law or Code Chapter, the R55 Curb Lane Vending Permit shall, until December 31, 2028, be governed by the regulations in effect on May 14, 2014 as long as those conditions and § 740-20.1 continue to be complied with and any required fees are paid in accordance with Chapter 441, Fees and Charges. As of January 1, 2029, the R55 Curb Lane Vending Permits will, without notice, automatically be cancelled.
Adoption of a New Chapter 740
4. City Council adopt a new vending permit regime and amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 740, Street Vending and Artists, as follows:
a. Delete Articles I, II, III, IV, V, VI and VII and add Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 as set out in the second revised Attachment 1 to the revised report (March 24, 2026) from the Interim Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.
b. Rename Schedule D “Short Stop Vending Permit Locations”;
c. Add a new Schedule E, “Artist Permit Restrictions” as set out in the secord revised Attachment 1 to the revised report (March 24, 2026) from the Interim Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards;
d. Rename Chapter 740 “Street Vending and Artists”; and
e. Amend section 740-3.7, as set out in Second Revised Attachment 1 to the report (March 24, 2026) from the Interim Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to read as follows:
§ 740-3.7. Transition.
If, immediately prior to the coming into force of this chapter, a R55 Curb Lane Vending Permit is in effect under a former City of Toronto by-law or Code Chapter, the R55 Curb Lane Vending Permit shall, until December 31, 2028, be governed by the regulations in effect on May 14, 2014 as long as those conditions and § 740-3.8 continue to be complied with and any required fees are paid in accordance with Chapter 441, Fees and Charges. As of January 1, 2029, the R55 Curb Lane Vending Permits will, without notice, automatically be cancelled.
5. City Council delete section 313-44.1 from former City of Toronto Chapter 313, Streets and Sidewalks, which contains dated provisions relating to buskers and portrait artists.
Interim Amendments to Chapter 545, Licensing
6. City Council remove the requirement for Pedlar Assistants to obtain a business licence, as mentioned in 545-226(A).
Adoption of New Articles in Chapter 545, Licensing
7. City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 545 to repeal Article IV Refreshments Sold from Vehicles, and replace it with provisions substantially in the form of draft Article IV Refreshment Vehicles, attached as Attachment 2 to the report (March 24, 2026) from the Interim Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to simplify and clarify licence conditions.
8. City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 545, to add a new licence requirement for any owner or operator carrying on business as a Refreshment Vendor on Foot and a corresponding Article that contains the following requirements:
a. Every owner or operator of a business selling refreshments for consumption by the public, traveling on foot without a vehicle, shall:
(1) At the time of application for a licence:
i. File with the Municipal Licensing and Standards Division a detailed scaled drawing of any equipment to be used in the sale of refreshments;
ii. Produce a written report from the Medical Officer of Health confirming that the refreshments to be sold and any equipment to be used in the business are sanitary and suitable for purpose;
(2) Ensure that containers or apparatuses from which the refreshments are sold are of a type approved by the Municipal Licensing and Standards Division;
(3) Ensure that every person selling or handling refreshments is wearing clean clothes, is clean and neat in appearance, and has clean hands;
(4) Ensure that any equipment used for dispensing refreshments is clean and sanitary;
(5) At all times conspicuously display their refreshment vendor licence such that it is visible to members of the public;
(6) Ensure that all parts, equipment, and processes used for the preparation, storage, or dispensing of refreshments meet the requirements of Ontario Regulation 493/17 and are approved by the Medical Officer of Health; and
(7) Obtain liability insurance with respect to bodily injury and property damage in the amount of $1,000,000, require that Municipal Licensing and Standards be notified of any change to the policy within 10 calendar days of such change, and require that a certificate of the policy be submitted to Municipal Licensing and Standards as a requirement of any licence application.
9. City Council delete Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 545, Article XVII Hawkers and Pedlars.
Fee Amendments
10. City Council amend Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Appendix C – Schedule 12, Municipal Licensing and Standards to lower certain street vending fees by amending the following fees so that they read as in the table below:
|
Ref |
Service Fee |
Description |
Category |
Fee Basis |
Fee |
Annual Adj. |
|
428 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Sidewalk Vending Permit: Major Arterial Road |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$4,465.84 |
Yes |
|
429 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Sidewalk Vending Permit: Minor Arterial Road |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$2,429.07 |
Yes |
|
430 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Mobile Vending Permit (12 Month) |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$5,000.00 |
Yes |
|
432 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Mobile Vending Permit (6 Month) |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$2,500.00 |
Yes |
|
433 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Mobile Vending Permit (9 month) |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$3,750.00 |
Yes |
11. City Council add new permitting and licensing fees to Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Appendix C – Schedule 12, Municipal Licensing and Standards, as shown in the table below:
|
Ref |
Service Fee |
Description |
Category |
Fee Basis |
Fee |
Annual Adj. |
|
518 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Short Stop Vending Permit (12 Month) |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$512.66 |
Yes |
|
519 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Short Stop Vending Permit (9 Month) |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$387.50 |
Yes |
|
520 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Short Stop Vending Permit (6 Month) |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$258.33 |
Yes |
|
521 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Reduced fee: Short Stop Vending Permit – Motorized – Fruit and Vegetable Vendor |
City Policy |
Per application |
$25.63 |
Yes |
|
522 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Reduced fee: Mobile Vending Permit – Fruit and Vegetable Vendor |
City Policy |
Per application |
$250.00 |
Yes |
|
523 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Application Fee: Refreshment Vendor on Foot Licence |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$140.00 |
Yes |
|
524 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Renewal Fee: Refreshment Vendor on Foot Licence |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$65.00 |
Yes |
|
525 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Artist Permit |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$47.58 |
Yes |
12. City Council add new fees related to seizures to Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Appendix C – Schedule 12, Municipal Licensing and Standards, as shown in the table below:
|
Ref |
Service Fee |
Description |
Category |
Fee Basis |
Fee |
Annual Adj. |
|
526 |
Public Spaces |
Chapter 740, Street Vending Permit – storage fee for portable equipment, small property, non-motorized refreshment vehicles, carts |
Full Cost Recovery |
Daily |
$25.08 |
Yes |
|
527 |
Public Spaces |
Chapter 740, Street Vending Permit – retrieval fee for portable equipment, small property, instruments |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per Retrieval |
$100.00 |
Yes |
|
528 |
Public Spaces |
Chapter 740, Street Vending Permit – retrieval fee for cart |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per Retrieval |
$200.00 |
Yes |
|
529 |
Public Spaces |
Chapter 740, Street Vending Permit – retrieval fee for motorized or non-motorized refreshment vehicle |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per Retrieval |
Variable |
Yes |
13. City Council delete from Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Appendix C – Schedule 12, Municipal Licensing and Standards, the following, as shown in the table below:
|
Ref |
Service Fee |
Description |
Category |
Fee Basis |
Fee |
Annual Adj. |
|
337 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Application fee: Pedlar Assistant licence |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$474.52 |
Yes |
|
338 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Renewal fee: Pedlar Assistant licence |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$351.16 |
Yes |
|
339 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Application fee: Hawker Pedlar on Foot licence |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$758.01 |
Yes |
|
340 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Renewal fee: Hawker Pedlar on Foot licence |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$370.08 |
Yes |
|
393 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Application fee: Hawker/Pedlar licence – with motor vehicle |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$1,407.83 |
Yes |
|
394 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Renewal fee: Hawker /Pedlar licence – with motor vehicle |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$955.92 |
Yes |
|
395 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Application fee: Hawker/Pedlar licence – with push cart |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$1,407.83 |
Yes |
|
396 |
Licence and Permit Issuance |
Renewal fee: Hawker / Pedlar licence – with push cart |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per application |
$955.92 |
Yes |
14. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to waive the application fee for existing Hawker/Pedlar licensees transitioning to a Motorized Refreshment Vehicle Licence, Non-Motorized Refreshment Vehicle Licence, or Refreshment Vendor on Foot Licence between March 1, 2027 and March 1, 2028, with applicants required to pay only the applicable renewal fee.
Other Directives
15. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to work with the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, to explore programs, options, incentives or other measures to reduce emissions generated by street vendors.
16. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards in collaboration with the Chief Congestion Office and other relevant divisions to monitor the implementation of the proposals in this report and report back to the appropriate committee, as needed, with any proposed bylaw amendments or operational measures required to address noted noise, congestion or other impacts.
17. City Council amend Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use of, to align with the provisions in Chapter 740, Street Vending, by adding the following subsection G to §743-18:
G. Notwithstanding §743-18A(1), a person with a valid permit issued pursuant to Chapter 740, Street Vending is exempted from the obligation to obtain a permit to temporarily occupy the street.
18. City Council amend Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, to align with the provisions in Chapter 740, Street Vending by:
a. Deleting §950-400C and replacing it with the following:
C. Sales from Vehicles.
(1) No person who sells, offers for sale or takes orders for goods, wares, merchandise, produce, refreshments, beverages or other food from a vehicle shall, for the purpose of carrying on business, stop the vehicle on any part of the highway without a valid permit issued under Chapter 740, Street Vending.
(2) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to permit the stopping or parking of a vehicle where stopping or parking is prohibited.
b. Adding the following subsection (c) to §950-400D(5):
(c) Subsection D(5) does not apply to a vehicle with a valid permit issued under Chapter 740, Street Vending that permits parking for longer than three hours
19. City Council amend Municipal Code Chapter 910, Parking Machines and Meters, by adding the phrase “, unless otherwise authorized to park and vend for a longer time under a permit issued in accordance with Chapter 740, Street Vending” to sections 910-6, 910-9.7 and 910-16.
Implementation Timing
20. City Council direct that recommendations 17, 18 and 19, which align other city by-laws with Chapter 740, come into effect immediately on the date the by-law is adopted.
21. City Council direct that the following by-law amendments come into effect June 15, 2026:
a. Recommendation 1 on repealing the sidewalk vending moratoriums in Wards 10, 11 and 13;
b. Recommendation 2 on permitting Mobile Food Vending Permit holders to operate up to twelve hours per block, within a 24 hour period; and
c. Recommendation 3 on removing the expiry of R55 Curb Lane Vending Permits.
22. City Council direct that Recommendation 10 on amending Chapter 441, Fees and Charges to lower permit fees for Sidewalk Vending Permits and Mobile Vending Permits come into effect January 1, 2027.
23. City Council direct that the following by-law amendments come into effect March 1, 2027:
a. Recommendation 4 to repeal Chapter 740, Street Vending and adopt a new Chapter 740, Street Vending and Artists;
b. Recommendation 5 to repeal the busking and artist provisions in former City of Toronto Chapter 313, Streets and Sidewalks;
c. Recommendation 6 to remove the need for Pedlar Assistants to obtain a licence;
d. Recommendation 7 to repeal Chapter 545, Licensing, Article IV, Refreshments Sold from Vehicles and replace it with a new Article;
e. Recommendation 8 to add a new article to Chapter 545, Licensing for Refreshment Vendors on Foot;
f. Recommendations 11 and 12, on amending Chapter 441, Fees and Charges to make permit and licence fee additions, and add fees for retrieval of seized items; and
g. Recommendation 14 to not charge Hawker / Pedlars an application fee if they get a different licence, between March 1, 2027 to March 1, 2028.
24. City Council direct that the following by-law amendments come into effect March 1, 2028:
a. Recommendation 9 on deleting Chapter 545, Article XVII Hawkers and Pedlars; and
b. Recommendation 13, on deleting Hawker/Pedlar fees from Chapter 441, Fees and Charges.
25. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municpal Licensing and Standards and the General Manager, Transportation Services to consult with Business Improvement Areas (BIAs), the Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas (TABIA), and the Toronto Festival Association to understand issues around conflict between street vending permits and street festivals and work to improve communication, dispute resolution and enforcement, where needed.
26. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to report to the Economic and Community Development Committee in fourth quarter of 2027 with:
a. A summary of noise-related service requests and associated enforcement outcomes pertaining to street busking, and the status of public education materials for buskers, following the implementation of the by-law changes; and
b. Updates on the outcome of engagement with relevant stakeholders, Business Improvement Areas (BIAs), and local Councillor offices during the implementation of the by-law.
27. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to work with General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the General Manager, Transportation Services to conduct an analysis of expanding access of the R55 locations to new and additional vendors in alignment with the Inclusive Economic Development Framework, including exploring the feasibility of preserving those locations as mobile vending zones or spaces designated for specific vendors.
Origin
Summary
In a city as large and vibrant as Toronto, investing in a strong local economy supports a high quality of life for residents. Street vendors and artists contribute to these efforts by adding to the vibrancy of the public realm, strengthening community relationships, and offering the public opportunities to conveniently access food, goods and art.
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 545, Licensing, outlines licence requirements that certain businesses, including mobile vendors, need to meet to operate their business in Toronto. City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 740, Street Vending establishes rules for vendors operating on the public Right-of-Way for the purpose of selling refreshments, including food, drink and ice cream, as well as art made by portrait artists. Additionally, former City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 313, Streets and Sidewalks regulates the City’s buskers and sidewalk artists.
As directed by City Council, the City’s Municipal Licensing and Standards Division (MLS) undertook a review of the City’s street vending and artist by-laws in 2025, with the goals of:
- Improving opportunities for street vendors and artists by identifying ways to support entrepreneurship, cultural expression, and equitable access to public space, while enhancing City vibrancy and consumer options;
- Modernizing licensing requirements and processes to reflect evolving business models and reduce regulatory and financial burdens; and
- Updating and clarifying by-law language to improve consistency, comprehension, and enforceability.
The review included public and industry consultation to identify options to enhance and update the regulatory framework and address the goals of the review. Recommendations in this report include:
- Adopting a revised Chapter 740, Street Vending and Artists, that updates permit types and makes rules easier to understand for permit-holders;
- Lifting a moratorium on new sidewalk vending locations, originally established in 2002, and expanding opportunities for musical buskers by allowing them to sell original media and use amplification in their performances (under certain conditions);
- Establishing new regulations for travelling vendors, to clarify rules and increase opportunities;
- Increasing mobile vending daily limits from 5 to 12 hours; removing permit expiry for legacy curb-lane vendors; allowing more items to be sold under the current ice cream truck model and permitting the sale of non-food items to expand opportunities for mobile vendors; and,
- Reducing fees for most vending and artist permits to increase opportunities for vendors, right-sizing and harmonizing fees, and reflecting consultation feedback and jurisdictional research, while continuing to address the costs associated with administration, enforcement, and the management of public spaces.
The proposals have sought to mitigate any potential congestion impacts of an increase in vending activity through operating conditions on permits when operating in the right of way. In consultation with the Chief Congestion Officer, the recommendations in this report are not anticipated to have any significant immediate impacts on congestion, however, staff will monitor the implementation of the recommendations in this report to assess operational or congestion-related impacts that may arise from these changes.
As part of a monitoring plan, staff are proposing to report back on the implementation of the recommendations in this report, which would include an assessment of noise, congestion and/or operational issues, and propose any necessary further refinements or actions to address those issues.
This report was developed in consultation with Transportation Services, Toronto Public Health, Parks and Recreation, Environment, Climate and Forestry, Economic Development and Culture, and the Chief Congestion Officer.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285903.pdf
(March 24, 2026) Report from the Interim Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Review of Toronto’s Street Vending and Artists By-laws
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285603.pdf
Second Revised Attachment 1: Proposed Chapter 740, Street Vending and Artists
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285904.pdf
Revised Attachment 1: Proposed Chapter 740, Street Vending and Artists
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285851.pdf
Attachment 1: Proposed Chapter 740, Street Vending and Artists
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285604.pdf
Attachment 2: Proposed Chapter 545, Licensing Revised Article IV
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285586.pdf
Attachment 3: Summary of Rules for Vendors and Artists
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285587.pdf
Attachment 4: Consultation Report from Barnes Management Group
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285588.pdf
Attachment 5: Recommendations for By-law Harmonization, Burden Reduction and Administrative Updates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285589.pdf
Attachment 6: Data Overview of Licenses and Permits Types
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285590.pdf
Attachment 7: Proposed Licence and Permit Fee Changes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285591.pdf
Attachment 8: Summary of Proposed Changes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285592.pdf
(March 31, 2026) Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285610.pdf
Speakers
Cameron Pounder, Feasto Food Inc.
Stuart Brignell
Gabriel Blanc
Spencer Scurr
Councillor Dianne Saxe
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/comm/communicationfile-207062.pdf
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Daniel Busse, Chill Delights Ice Cream LTD. (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/comm/communicationfile-207217.pdf
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Anthony Carrier (EC.New)
(April 6, 2026) E-mail from George Bell (EC.New)
(April 8, 2026) E-mail from Spencer Scurr (EC.New)
(April 9, 2026) Letter from Ingrid Buday, Founder and Executive Director, No More Noise (EC.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/comm/communicationfile-207298.pdf
(April 7, 2026) Letter from John Kiru, Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas (TABIA) (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/comm/communicationfile-209438.pdf
(April 8, 2026) Letter from Laura Burnham, Executive Director, Yonge North York Business Improvement Area (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/comm/communicationfile-209445.pdf
(April 8, 2026) Letter from Cheryll Diego, Public Realm Director, Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/comm/communicationfile-209452.pdf
(April 8, 2026) E-mail from Kyle Sipkens (EC.New)
(April 8, 2026) Letter from Councillor Dianne Saxe (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/comm/communicationfile-209453.pdf
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209607.pdf
(April 15, 2026) Letter from Al Smith, Janet McCausland, Amy Harrell, Dana Duncanson, Pauline Larsen, and Tim Kocur, Downtown Toronto BIA Alliance (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209676.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Ada Mok and Cameron Pounder, FeasTO Food Truck (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210058.pdf
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Dimitar Georgiev (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Garo Garabedian (CC.New)
(April 23, 2026) Letter from Russel Ward, Board Chair, The Beach Business Improvement Area Board of Management (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210318.pdf
Declared Interests (Committee)
Councillor Nick Mantas - EC27.2 - Review of Toronto’s Street Vending and Artists By-laws My Family Member operates a vending truck.
Written Declaration: https://secure.toronto.ca/council/declared-interest-file.do?id=12942
EC27.3 - City of Toronto Inclusive Economic Development Framework
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the Inclusive Economic Development Framework, as outlined in Attachment 1 to the report (March 24, 2026) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Executive Director, Social Development as part of the implementation of Sidewalks to Skylines: A 10‑Year Action Plan for Toronto’s Economy (2025–2035).
2. City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to include a summary of progress toward inclusive employment and entrepreneurship outcomes within Sidewalks to Skylines: A 10‑Year Action Plan for Toronto’s Economy (2025–2035) annual progress reports.
3. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to work with Economic Development and Culture, Social Development, and other relevant City divisions, as part of new or updated Secondary Plans, to identify opportunities to advance inclusive economic development through land use, commercial space, and related policies that support local employment, diverse business activity, and improved access to jobs.
4. City Council request the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Executive Director, Social Development, to consider approaches to monitor and address the impacts of transit expansion projects on the Toronto labour force, including promotion of employment opportunities and other community benefits associated with future City-led projects, in alignment with the Inclusive Economic Development Framework.
5. City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to:
a. leverage the Sidewalks to Skylines interdivisional working group to track relevant external partnerships and how the Inclusive Economic Development Indicator Development Tool was used by City Divisions, identifying good practices and lessons learned; and
b. report back through Sidewalks to Skylines annual progress reports and to continue to review potential additional inclusive economic indicators to be added to the City of Toronto Economic Dashboard to monitor whether inclusive economic development objectives are being achieved.
Origin
Summary
Sidewalks to Skylines: A 10-Year Action Plan for Toronto’s Economy (2025-2035), adopted by City Council in November 2024, identifies economic polarization as a key challenge. It recognizes that attracting investment and sustaining economic growth requires a different approach—one that ensures that residents and workers across the city can participate in, and benefit from, economic growth. To advance this shift, Action #4 directs the City to collaborate with external partners to reduce barriers to economic inclusion. This was further complemented by direction in EC17.2 – A Partnered Approach to Inclusive Economic Development in December 2024 for the City to work with partners to develop an Inclusive Economic Development (IED) Framework.
This report presents the IED Framework, co‑developed over one year with an external IED Working Table representing different sectors and organizations. The IED Framework consists of definitions and principles previously approved by Council, a set of indicators of an inclusive economy, and a clear scope for City action:
- Inclusive employment and sector pathways
- Inclusive entrepreneurship and ownership
The IED Framework aims to support alignment, coordination, and accountability across existing and new City initiatives while reinforcing Council’s direction that inclusive economic development be embedded within the City’s broader economic strategy, Sidewalks to Skylines. Progress on the IED Framework will be tracked in Sidewalks to Skylines annual reporting, including the forthcoming Year One update report in Q2 2026. The IED Framework was developed through a collaboration among Economic Development and Culture (EDC); Social Development (SD); Toronto Employment and Social Services (TESS); City Planning; Purchasing and Materials Management (PMMD); People and Equity (P&E); Parks and Recreation (P&R); Children’s Services; Housing Secretariat; and Environment, Climate & Forestry (ECF).
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285575.pdf
Attachment 1: City of Toronto Inclusive Economic Development (IED) Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285576.pdf
Attachment 2: Inclusive Economic Development Actions in Sidewalks to Skylines
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285577.pdf
Attachment 3: Overview - Anticipated 2026 City of Toronto Work with Key Updates aligned with the Inclusive Economic Development (IED) Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285578.pdf
Speakers
Walied Khogali Ali, Regent Park Neighbourhood Association
Miguel Avila Velarde
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/comm/communicationfile-209779.pdf
(April 9, 2026) Letter from Rosemarie Powell, Executive Director, Toronto Community Benefits Network (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/comm/communicationfile-209457.pdf
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209998.pdf
(April 20, 2026) Letter from Matthew Mendelsohn, Chief Executive Officer, Social Capital Partners (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209681.pdf
(April 20, 2026) Letter from Colette Murphy, Chief Executive Officer, Atkinson Foundation (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209711.pdf
(April 21, 2026) Letter from Nation Cheong, Vice President, Community Impact and Mobilization, United Way Greater Toronto (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210089.pdf
(April 21, 2026) Letter from Adriana Beemans, Inclusive Local Economies Program Director, Metcalf Foundation (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209766.pdf
(April 21, 2026) Letter from Sahar Ghafouri, Senior Director, Operations, North York Harvest Food Bank (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210162.pdf
EC27.6 - Applegrove Community Complex: Update on Relocation Options
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Confidential Attachment - This report deals with a proposed or pending acquisition of property.
Committee Recommendations
The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct that Revised Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2026) from the Executive Director, Social Development and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the General Manager, Parks and Recreation remain confidential at this time as it relates to a proposed or pending acquisition of a property by the City and a plan to be applied to negotiations carried on by the City.
2. City Council authorize the public release of Revised Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2026) from the Executive Director, Social Development and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the General Manager, Parks and Recreation following the closing of any real estate transactions.
3. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in consultation with the Executive Director, Social Development, to negotiate and enter into an agreement of purchase and sale, and such related and ancillary agreements as may be required or desirable to complete the acquisition of the property identified in Revised Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2026) from the Executive Director, Social Development, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, (the “Property”), on such terms and conditions as are acceptable to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
4. City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to include any necessary capital funding requirements to complete all renovations, fit-out and finishing required to operationalize the Property in a future Corporate Real Estate Management’s capital budget submission.
5. City Council authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to take all necessary actions to secure and accept third-party funding, including entering into any required agreements with a provincial contributor for the transfer of funds in the amount listed in Revised Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2026) from the Executive Director, Social Development, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to be contributed to the City for capital projects in Ward 14 (Toronto–Danforth), through negotiations undertaken pursuant to City Council direction on a cost-sharing funding contribution agreement in 2025.TE19.28.
6. City Council authorize the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, subject to the confirmation and receipt of third-party funding noted in Recommendation 5 above, to create a new capital project with a total acquisition cost in the amount listed in Revised Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2026) from the Executive Director, Social Development, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, fully funded by the amount listed in Revised Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2026) from the Executive Director, Social Development, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the General Manager, Parks and Recreation from a provincial contributor and report to City Council with any adjustments to Parks and Recreation’s 2026–2035 Capital Budget and Plan, in order to proceed with the acquisition of the Property, including the reallocation of the remaining funding amount listed in Revised Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2026) from the Executive Director, Social Development, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the General Manager, Parks and Recreation.
Origin
Summary
The City of Toronto operates ten community centres, known as Association of Community Centres (AOCCs), managed by volunteer Boards of Management appointed by City Council. These multi-purpose facilities serve as catalysts for neighbourhood transformation—providing inclusive spaces that strengthen civic engagement, build local leadership capacity, and advance equity-focused outcomes. All Board-approved programming is carried out by AOCC staff, who operate as City employees within the AOCC Relationship Framework, ensuring operational accountability and alignment with City standards. The City Council adopted AOCC Expansion Framework and Implementation Strategy affirm the AOCC model as essential community development infrastructure that advances equity, social cohesion, and neighbourhood resilience.
Applegrove Community Complex (“Applegrove”) became an AOCC in 1983 and is one of two AOCCs located in leased premises, occupying 7,911 square feet at the Toronto District School Board’s (TDSB) Duke of Connaught Public School, which serves as its primary program and administrative location. Facility constraints were first documented in 1988 by the City‑appointed Applegrove Relocation Task Force, which concluded that the existing space could not meet program or service requirements, and a purpose‑built City‑owned facility was required. Sustained capital funding pressures, combined with limited suitable real estate opportunities, have constrained progress toward securing a relocation facility.
This report responds to City Council direction (2026.CC38.1), and evaluates multiple relocation options for Applegrove, each assessed for program fit, facility adequacy, capital and operating cost implications, and implementation feasibility. The facility scenarios currently under consideration include:
1. Maintain operations at the existing TDSB-leased facility at 60 Woodfield Road;
2. Relocate or expand S.H. Armstrong Community Recreation Centre at 56 Woodfield Road, as a hybrid ‘Integrated Facility’ with a global operating budget;
3. Acquire and fit-up a privately owned building in the Greenwood‑Coxwell area; or
4. Incorporate Applegrove within the mixed‑use Toronto Builds development at 1631 Queen Street East.
While several relocation options may be viable under varying future conditions, the analysis identifies that the acquisition and fit-up of a privately owned facility in the Greenwood–Coxwell area presents the strongest potential alignment with long‑term programmatic and operational requirements, contingent upon the availability of new capital funding. Additional site‑specific and financial details associated with this option are outlined in Confidential Attachment 1.
The AOCC portfolio faces significant state of good repair obligations, as well as expansion and relocation pressures. The City Council-directed (EC24.2) AOCC Facilities and Operations Plan will build upon and operationalize the AOCC Implementation Strategy by establishing a prioritized, citywide, multi‑year framework to support the long‑term sustainability and strategic growth of the AOCC portfolio. Through this Plan, Social Development and Corporate Real Estate Management will consider facility renewal and capital improvement needs across all AOCC locations, with reinvestment decisions aligned with lifecycle asset‑management principles and for consideration through the City's Budget process.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285919.pdf
Revised Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 1
Speakers
Hamdi Abdo
Sara Ehrhardt, Toronto District School Board
Sandra Knapp
Councillor Paula Fletcher
Communications (Committee)
(April 7, 2026) E-mail from Maureen Daigle (EC.New)
(April 8, 2026) Letter from Tammy Rogers, Chair, On behalf of the Board of Management Applegrove Community Complex (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/comm/communicationfile-207309.pdf
(April 8, 2026) Letter from Jill Fitzmaurice (EC.New)
(April 8, 2026) Letter from Susan Fletcher (EC.New)
(April 9, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EC.New)
(April 9, 2026) E-mail from Emily Nicholas Angl (EC.New)
6a - Applegrove Community Complex: Update on Relocation Options
Origin
Summary
The Executive Director, Social Development, Executive Director, the Corporate Real Estatement Management and the General Manager, Parks and Recreation will be submitting a report to evaluate relocation options for Applegrove Community Complex, as directed by City Council (2026.CC38.1), to the Economic and Community Development Committee before its meeting on April 9, 2026.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285535.pdf
EC27.7 - Refreshing Food and Beverage Offerings in Park and Recreation Spaces
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the park mobile vending program as described in Section 2 of the report (April 2, 2026) from the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to implement the program, based on the park selection criteria in Section 2.2 and in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to execute licence agreements for food concessions with interested community-based non-profit groups for a term of up to five years, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, provided that the community based non-profit group pays the negotiated market licence fees, and provides recreation benefits in adjacent spaces as outlined in Section 3.2 of the report (April 2, 2026) from the General Manager, Parks and Recreation , as determined by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation.
3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to execute licence agreements with concession operators selected through a concession program application process to be established by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation as outlined in Section 3.3 of the report (April 2, 2026) from the General Manager, Parks and Recreation for an initial term of three to five years, including an option to renew for up to five additional years at the discretion of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, all on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
4. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to report back to City Council in 2027 with an update on the park mobile vending program and the four-year food and beverage strategy as described in Section 4 of the report (April 2, 2026) from the General Manager, Parks and Recreation.
5. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in the selection of suitable park locations to understand local context, to consult with local Business Improvement Areas and park user groups where applicable.
6. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, as part of the report back to City Council in 2027, to seek feedback from Business Improvement Areas and park user groups as part of the evaluation of the park mobile vending program’s performance, including consideration of impacts on the local economy.
7. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to consider approaches that specifically attract new vendors that reflect diverse, local and low-cost options to become licensed with the City in connection with the 2026 Park Mobile Vending Program, and to monitor the Program for learnings to be applies in connection with the 2027 Roadmap to the Food and Beverages Strategy.
Origin
Summary
In response to City Council direction (2025.MM29.8), this report outlines near-term actions to increase food and beverage options in parks, where appropriate, including an assessment of existing physical structures and operating models. The report also establishes a clear pathway toward a comprehensive four-year food and beverage strategy to be brought forward for Council consideration in 2027.
Toronto’s parks are among the City’s most valued public spaces, but food and beverage services remain limited, inconsistent, and developed on a site-by-site basis. A more coordinated, city-wide approach is needed to improve access, modernize infrastructure, and reduce barriers for small businesses and community organizations. To that end, this report:
- Describes the current state of mobile vending, concessions, and restaurant services in parks, including key benefits and challenges;
- Recommends launching a City-coordinated mobile vending program with a phased rollout across selected parks starting June 25, 2026, supported by clear rules, consistent oversight, and engagement with local Councillors and communities;
- Recommends a simplified concession application process, improving access for non-profits and small operators, while maintaining competitive processes at high-demand sites; and
- Establishes four guiding principles and a roadmap for the development of a four-year food and beverage strategy to be presented to Council in 2027 to guide long-term decisions on investment, infrastructure, operating models, and service standards.
Implementation of the proposed actions will include targeted engagement with Ward Councillors, Business Improvement Areas, community stakeholders, and prospective operators, with ongoing monitoring and evaluation to assess program performance and inform future refinements. This report was prepared in consultation with Municipal Licensing and Standards (MLS), Toronto Public Health (TPH), Solid Waste Management Services (SWMS), Purchasing and Materials Management Division (PMMD), and other internal City Divisions, as appropriate.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285770.pdf
Speakers
Gil Penalosa, Toronto for Everyone
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/comm/communicationfile-207307.pdf
(April 9, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EC.New)
7a - Refreshing Food and Beverage Offerings in Park and Recreation Spaces
Origin
Summary
This report responds to City Council’s direction in item 2025.MM29.8 to provide options for expanding food and beverage services in parks, where appropriate, including an assessment of existing physical structures and operating models.
It outlines improvements for the 2026 season and sets out four key principles that will guide development of a comprehensive four‑year food and beverage strategy for Toronto’s parks and recreation system, to be brought forward for Council consideration in 2027.
This report approach will be organized into four sections:
- Review of Current Food and Beverage Offerings: An overview of existing services, including mobile vending, concessions, and restaurants, along with an assessment of their benefits and challenges.
- Immediate Options to Increase Food and Beverage Availability: Actions that can be implemented quickly to improve access and respond to public demand, while leveraging existing assets and partnerships.
- A Simplified Concession Program Application Process: A new process to make it easier for community‑based non‑profits and small operators to access concession spaces.
- Introduction of Four Guiding Principles for the 2027 Food and Beverage Strategy: A set of principles and a public engagement plan that will shape long‑term planning and inform future decisions related to investment, operating models, and infrastructure across the parks and recreation system.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285542.pdf
EC27.8 - Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2026 Operating Budgets - Report 2
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 1 - Etobicoke North, 3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore, 5 - York South - Weston, 7 - Humber River - Black Creek, 8 - Eglinton - Lawrence, 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 13 - Toronto Centre, 23 - Scarborough North
Bill 356 has been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt and certify the 2026 recommended Operating Budgets and Levy requirements of the following Business Improvement Areas:
|
Business Improvement Area |
2026 Operating |
2026 Levy Funds |
|
Albion Islington Square BIA |
343,838 |
187,751 |
|
Bloorcourt Village BIA |
446,976 |
246,781 |
|
Bloordale Village BIA |
295,881 |
177,278 |
|
Church-Wellesley Village BIA |
593,489 |
316,540 |
|
College Promenade BIA |
329,251 |
199,113 |
|
College West BIA |
53,436 |
24,208 |
|
Dovercourt Village BIA |
8,967 |
8,645 |
|
Emery Village BIA |
5,182,201 |
2,161,162 |
|
Korea Town BIA |
205,398 |
116,632 |
|
Marketo District BIA |
166,802 |
113,100 |
|
Mimico by the Lake BIA |
73,082 |
57,453 |
|
Mimico Village BIA |
50,299 |
41,264 |
|
Mount Dennis BIA |
223,080 |
41,448 |
|
Oakwood Village BIA |
104,596 |
50,873 |
|
Ossington Avenue BIA |
216,129 |
88,640 |
|
Queen Street West BIA |
704,599 |
371,990 |
|
Regal Heights Village BIA |
106,853 |
51,507 |
|
Business Improvement Area |
2026 Operating |
2026 Levy Funds |
|
Sheppard East Village BIA |
231,345 |
207,781 |
|
Shop The Queensway BIA |
235,907 |
159,518 |
|
Trinity Bellwoods BIA |
135,963 |
57,574 |
|
Upper Village BIA |
226,166 |
156,988 |
|
Total |
9,934,258 |
4,836,246 |
2. City Council adopt and certify the amended 2026 recommended Levy Funds requirements of the Upper Avenue Business Improvement Area to $187,298.
3. City Council elect to have the subclasses for the commercial and industrial property classes apply for 2026, and to apply the respective Business Improvement Area special levy rate reductions to the subclasses, all as set out in Appendix C to the report (March 23, 2026) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.
Origin
Summary
This report brings forward Business Improvement Area (BIA) annual Operating Budget for approval by City Council as required by the City of Toronto Act, 2006. City Council approval is required to permit the City to collect funds through a special levy on the rateable commercial and industrial properties within the respective BIA boundaries. Special levy rate reductions for the subclasses have been set out in Appendix C, for properties in the subclasses of the commercial and industrial property classes.
The BIA is an association, independently managed from the City and operated by local businesses and property owners, joining together to organize, finance, and deliver capital streetscape improvements, and to promote economic development in a district with its own governance structure as set out in Chapter 19 of the Toronto Municipal Code and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
There are currently 86 established BIAs in the City of Toronto. City Council previously approved the 2026 Operating Budgets for 64 BIAs through Report 1 at its meeting on February 4, 2026 (Item 2026.CC36.5). Included in this Report 2 is the 2026 Operating Budgets for the 21 BIAs for City Council approval. One BIA, Historic Queen East, is inactive. Report 2 also contains a recommended technical adjustment to 2026 Levy Funds Required outlined in Recommendation 1 of Report 1, specifically pertaining to the Upper Avenue BIA. No City funding is required since the financing of individual Business Improvement Area Operating Budgets is raised by a special levy on the rateable commercial and industrial properties within the respective BIA boundaries.
Under current Chapter 19 of the Toronto Municipal Code, the Business Improvement Areas By-law does not have specific provision requiring a BIA maintain a certain amount in their accumulated surplus. Should a BIA find itself in a deficit, be dissolved or becomes inactive, City Council has the authority to collect funds required and liabilities including interests, through the BIA levy as stipulated under the By-law. If a board is dissolved and the liabilities exceed the assets assumed by the City, Council shall recover the difference.
The recommendation in this report reflects the board-adopted 2026 Operating Budgets by the respective BIAs’ Boards of Management and General Membership. Complete budgets and supporting documentation have been reviewed by City staff to ensure that the 2026 Operating Budgets for BIAs reflect Council’s approved policies and practices.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285497.pdf
Appendix A - Summary of 2026 Operating Budget by Business Improvement Area
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285498.pdf
Appendix B - Status of Business Improvement Area 2026 Operating Budget Approvals
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285539.pdf
Appendix C - 2026 BIA Special Levy Rate Reductions for Subclasses
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-285540.pdf
General Government Committee - Meeting 28
GG28.4 - Purchase Order Amendments for Professional Services and Non-Competitive Contract with Jordan Sook Studios Inc., for the Provision of Public Art - New Etobicoke Civic Centre
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council, in accordance with Section 71- 11.C of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71 (Financial Control), grant authority to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to amend Purchase Order Number 6053353 with Adamson Associates Architects, increasing the current purchase order value by $1,705,928 net of all applicable taxes ($1,735,952 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) revising the total purchase order value from $20,234,075 net of all applicable taxes ($20,590,194 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) to $21,940,002 net of all applicable taxes ($22,326,146 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries).
2. City Council, in accordance with Section 71- 11.C of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71 (Financial Control), grant authority to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to amend Purchase Order Number 6053178 with MGAC Canada ULC, increasing the current purchase order value by $2,310,827 net of all applicable taxes ($2,351,498 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) revising the total purchase order value from $5,018,707 net of all applicable taxes ($5,107,036 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) to $7,329,534 net of all applicable taxes ($7,458,533 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries).
3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to negotiate and execute a non-competitive agreement with Jordan Sook Studios for the provision of public art in the amount of $514,250 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($523,301 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) for a term beginning at the date of the contract award to September 1, 2028, with the option to extend for an additional one-year period, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Origin
Summary
The new Etobicoke Civic Centre is a hallmark City-building project, located within the newly redeveloped Etobicoke Civic Centre precinct (formerly the Westwood Theatre Lands). It is the focal point of the Six Points development in Etobicoke Centre, a City building project that features the delivery of the City Council adopted initiatives HousingNow, and TransformTO. The new Etobicoke Civic Centre, located at 3755 Bloor Street West, is designed as a mixed-use building comprising of office spaces, a multi-purpose council chamber, a childcare centre, library, public health clinic, recreation centre, retail spaces and a civic square located steps away from a new affordable housing community.
In December 2023, City Council approved the award for general contracting services to Multiplex Construction Canada Limited (Multiplex) and construction of the new Etobicoke Civic Centre commenced in March 2024. Construction has advanced to the above‑grade phase, with concrete work on the podium floors nearing completion. As vertical construction continues, the pace of activity is expected to accelerate over the coming months. The building exterior is in production with installation planned to begin later this year. The project currently remains on budget and on schedule.
The purpose of this report is to seek the necessary procurement authorities to amend the following existing purchase order agreements for contract administration and project management services to proactively strengthen elements of project delivery (e.g. extending the warranty period, enhancing contract administration and project management oversight services) and address client‑driven program and functional changes that emerged after the design was completed:
- Amendment to Purchase Order Number 6053353 with Adamson Associates Architects (Adamson) to perform additional construction contract oversight services associated with the construction of the new Etobicoke Civic Centre. The total value of the purchase order amendment being requested is $1,705,928 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($1,735,952 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), revising the current purchase order value from $20,234,075 net of all applicable taxes ($20,590,194 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) to $21,940,002 net of all applicable taxes ($22,326,146 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries).
- Amendment to Purchase Order Number 6053178 with MGAC Canada ULC (MGAC), to perform continued project management services associated with the construction of the new Etobicoke Civic Centre. The total value of the purchase order amendment for MGAC being request is $2,310,827 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($2,351,498 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), revising the current purchase order value from $5,018,707 net of all applicable taxes ($5,107,036 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) to $7,329,534 net of all applicable taxes ($7,458,533 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries).
Strategic project management efforts generated cost savings from other project components that fully offset the requested purchase order amendments, enabling staff to proactively take measures to ensure the project remains positioned for successful delivery on budget and on time which is currently anticipated for the end of 2028. City Council approval is required to amend the purchase orders, in accordance with Section 71-11.1C of the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71 Financial Control By-Law, where the current request exceeds the allowable threshold of $500,000.
Additionally, this report seeks authority to enter into the following non-competitive contract for the provision of public art to be displayed in the multi-level atrium of the new Etobicoke Civic Centre:
- Non-competitive contract with Jordan Sook Studios for the provision of public art at the new Etobicoke Civic Centre in the amount of $514,250 net of all applicable taxes and charges.
Jordan Sook Studios was selected through a national design competition led by Economic Development and Culture in collaboration with Corporate Real Estate Management to create a landmark public sculpture that will be displayed in the multi-level atrium of the new Etobicoke Civic Centre. The competition was conducted following Economic Development and Culture's established practices for commissioning public art works, in alignment with the Council-approved Public Art Strategy. Under Municipal Code Chapter 195-7.1.(M), Procurement, a non-competitive procurement may be used to award a contract to the winner of a design contest, provided that the contest is organized in a manner that is consistent with the principle of fair competition contained in the Chapter, in particular relating to public advertising; and the participants are judged by an independent jury with a view to a design contract being awarded to a winner.
City Council approval is required to award the contract, in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195, Procurement, Article 7, Section 195.7.3 (D) and to make a commitment as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71, Financial Control, Section 71-11(A), where the request exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-285534.pdf
GG28.5 - Amendment to Non-Competitive Blanket Contract 4300000085 with City Dispensers Inc., for the Non-Exclusive Supply and Delivery of Prescription Eyewear for Toronto Employment and Social Services
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council, in accordance with Section 71-11.1.C of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71 (Financial Control), grant authority to the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services to amend Blanket Contract 4300000085 issued to City Dispensers Inc., for the supply and delivery of prescription eyewear, to extend the expiry date from May 31, 2026 to February 28, 2027 and increase the contract value by $1,500,000 net of all taxes and charges, increasing the value from $500,000 to $2,000,000 net of all applicable taxes and charges.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to request authority to amend Blanket Contract 4300000085 to City Dispensers Inc., for the supply and delivery of prescription eyewear for Toronto Employment and Social Services Division. The total amendment value being requested is $1,500,000 net of all taxes and charges, increasing this non-competitive contract from $500,000 to $2,000,000 net of all applicable taxes and charges and to extend the expiry date from May 31, 2026 to February 28, 2027.
This amendment will enable staff to explore new, innovative ways to deliver vision care benefits in 2027 while avoiding any service interruption concerning the supply and delivery benefit. City Dispensers Inc., has confirmed their willingness to extend services under the same terms and conditions for the duration of the contract period.
As part of the Ontario Works program, Toronto Employment and Social Services delivers medical benefits to residents in receipt of Ontario Works, Ontario Disability Support Program, and low-income earners not in receipt of social assistance. One of the key medical benefits provided are eyeglasses. In 2025, over 8,000 clients were provided vision care benefits with the associated costs covered by the Province.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-285464.pdf
Communications (Committee)
GG28.6 - Non-Competitive Extension with Moneris Solutions Corporation for Payment Processing Services
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Controller and Chief Accountant in accordance with Section 195-7.1(E.) of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195 (Procurement), to negotiate and execute a non-competitive agreement with Moneris Solutions Corporation for payment processing services, merchant services, and all related equipment and services for a non-competitive contract extension term of three years from January 1, 2027 to December 31, 2029 with no additional renewal periods for a total potential cost of $2,000,000, net of all applicable taxes and charges ($2,035,200, net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Controller and Chief Accountant, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to seek City Council authority for the Controller and Chief Accountant to enter into a non-competitive agreement with Moneris Solutions Corporation (“Moneris”) for payment processing services, merchant services, and all related equipment and support from January 1, 2027 to December 31, 2029.
The City’s contract with its payment processor, Moneris, is set to expire on December 31, 2026. The contract with Moneris was initially awarded in 2016 following a competitive procurement conducted through Request for Proposal Number 3401- 16-3008.
In anticipation of contract expiration, a competitive procurement for payment processing services commenced in June 2024. However, the procurement was paused as staff focused on exploring opportunities to modernize the City’s payments landscape. This work is ongoing, and as a result, staff require a non-competitive agreement with Moneris to support continuity of services to process credit and debit card payments. The three-year contract extension term will provide sufficient time for City staff to complete a new competitive procurement in alignment with broader organizational initiatives aimed at enhancing the City’s overall payment environment.
City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195, Procurement, where the current request exceeds the Chief Procurement Officer’s authority of the cumulative five-year commitment limit for each vendor under Article 7, Section 195-7.3(D) of the Procurement By-law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71, Financial Control, Section 71-11(A).
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-285467.pdf
GG28.7 - Non-Competitive Agreements Required to Support the Existing and New Electric Ferries
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
The General Manager, Fleet Services has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (GG28.7a) with a recommendation.
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Fleet Services, to negotiate and execute a non-competitive agreement with Bureau Veritas Marine (Canada) Inc., for marine survey and certification services, including issuance of Canadian Maritime Documentation on behalf of Transport Canada, for an initial term from June 1, 2026, to May 31, 2027, with four (4) optional one-year renewal periods, for a total potential cost of $1,017,845 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries ($1,000,241 net of Harmonized Sales Tax, $1,130,272 including all taxes and charges), on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Fleet Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Fleet Services, to negotiate and execute a non-competitive agreement with Lloyd's Register Canada Limited for marine survey and certification services, including issuance of Canadian Maritime Documentation on behalf of Transport Canada, for an initial term from June 1, 2026, to May 31, 2027, with four (4) optional one-year renewal periods, for a total potential cost of $1,596,314 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries ($1,568,705 net of Harmonized Sales Tax, $1,772,637 including all taxes and charges), on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Fleet Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Fleet Services, to negotiate and execute a non-competitive agreement with Ontario Shipyards Inc., for the non-exclusive supply of labour, equipment, materials, dry docking services, warranty and non-warranty repairs, transportation, permits, and incidentals required for vessel maintenance for an initial term from June 1, 2026, to May 31, 2027, with four (4) optional one-year renewal periods, for a total potential cost of $8,799,461 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries ($8,647,269 net of Harmonized Sales Tax, $9,771,414 including all taxes and charges), on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Fleet Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
4. City Council authorize the General Manager, Fleet Services, to negotiate and execute a non-competitive agreement with Aspin Kemp and Associates Inc., for the non-exclusive supply of labour, parts, equipment, diagnostics, repairs, training, travel, and Original Equipment Manufacturer warranty and non-warranty services for the Shore Electrical System, Automatic Shore Charging System Towers and Vessel Electrical System, for an initial term from June 1, 2026, to May 31, 2027, with four (4) optional one-year renewal periods, for a total potential cost of $6,070,337 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries ($5,965,347 net of Harmonized Sales Tax, $6,740,842 including all taxes and charges), on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Fleet Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The General Manager, Fleet Services, gave a presentation on Non-Competitive Agreements Required to Support the Existing and New Electric Ferries.
The General Government Committee:
1. Requested the General Manager, Fleet Services, report directly to the April 22, 23 and 24, 2026 meeting of City Council with an overview of the Capital and Operating costs of the ferry fleet, including specific costs or savings attributable to electrification.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to seek authority for the General Manager, Fleet Services, to enter into four (4) separate non-competitive agreements required to ensure the safe, reliable, and compliant operation of the City of Toronto's ferry services. These agreements support regulatory certification, vessel maintenance and repair, and specialized electrical systems support for both the existing and new electrical ferries entering service in 2026 and 2027.
The agreements are required to meet legislative obligations under the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 (CSA 2001), including maintaining continuity with existing certification service providers and ensuring access to specialized infrastructure, as well as securing Original Equipment Manufacturer support that cannot be competitively sourced.
The General Manager, Fleet Services and the Chief Procurement Officer support and recommend non-competitive procurements for the services noted in this report, to:
- Align with industry best practices;
- Maintain critical business continuity, particularly important during an upcoming and sustained critical period (i.e., 2026 FIFA World Cup and the arrival of two new vessels); and,
- Respond to unique market conditions where no other suitable vendor can deliver certain ferry services needed by the City.
The General Manager, Fleet Services, and the Chief Procurement Officer support and recommend non-competitive procurements for the following:
- Bureau Veritas Marine (Canada) Inc., and Lloyd's Register Canada Limited to provide mandatory marine surveys, inspections, and certification services under the CSA 2001 through the Delegated Statutory Inspection Program. Continuity with current Classification Societies aligns with industry best practice and avoids significant operational and regulatory risks.
- Ontario Shipyards Inc., to provide required dry docking and ship repair services. This is the only facility on Lake Ontario capable of accommodating the size and weight of the new electric ferries.
- Aspin Kemp and Associates Inc., (AKA Energy Systems) to provide Original Equipment Manufacturer warranty and non-warranty maintenance, diagnostics, repair, training and parts for the ferry electrical and charging systems, including the Shore Electrical System, Automatic Shore Charging System, and Vessel Electrical System.
The initial term for each agreement will be from June 1, 2026, to May 31, 2027, with the option to renew each agreement for four (4) additional one (1) year periods.
The total combined cost to the City for the initial term is $4,060,288 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries ($3,990,063 net of Harmonized Sales Tax, $4,508,771 including all taxes and charges). The total combined potential cost, including all renewal options, is $17,483,958 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries ($17,181,562 net of Harmonized Sales Tax, $19,415,165 including all taxes and charges).
City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195- Procurement, where the current request exceeds the Chief Procurement Officer's authority of the cumulative five-year commitment for each supplier, under Article 7, Section 195- 7.3 (D) of the Procurement By-Law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax allowed under staff authority.
Adoption of the recommendations in this report will enable Fleet Services to continue delivering safe, reliable, and compliant ferry service to Toronto Island residents and visitors.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-285529.pdf
(April 8, 2026) Staff Presentation from the General Manager, Fleet Services, and the Chief Procurement Officer, on Non-Competitive Agreements Required to Support the Existing and New Electric Ferries
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-285872.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286286.pdf
GG28.8 - Non-Competitive Contract with Microsoft Canada Inc., for M365 Software Licenses, Cloud Subscriptions, and Support Services
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Confidential Attachment - The attachment to this report contains a plan in the form of a strategic approach as well as an instruction to be applied to negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the City of Toronto. The instruction includes financial information which, if disclosed, could reasonably be expected to significantly prejudice the City’s negotiating position or interfere with contractual arrangements and other negotiations undertaken by the City of Toronto.
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Chief Technology Officer in accordance with Section 195-7.1(C) of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195 (Procurement), to negotiate and enter into an agreement with Microsoft Canada Inc., commencing from June 1, 2026 for a contract term of five (5) years in total which may include three (3) years initial with the option to extend for two (2) additional one-year periods, for up to the total amount set out in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 23, 2026) from the Chief Technology Officer, and the Chief Procurement Officer, subject to terms and conditions in a form satisfactory to the Chief Technology Officer and City Solicitor.
2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 23, 2026) from the Chief Technology Officer, and the Chief Procurement Officer, remain confidential in its entirety as it pertains to a strategic negotiation approach including financials.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Technology Officer to amend the authority for the Chief Technology Officer under GG24.9 with Microsoft Canada Inc., for Unified Support to extend the contract term for an additional five (5) months from December 31, 2030 to May 31, 2031 with no increase in the contract value.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to request City Council authority to:
- Enter into a non-competitive contract with Microsoft Canada Inc., ("Microsoft"), a Canadian business subsidiary, for software licenses, cloud subscriptions, and support services for five (5) years in total which may include three (3) years initial with the option to extend for two (2) additional one-year periods.
- Amend authority previously approved under GG24.9 for Microsoft Unified Support, extending it by an additional five (5) months with no increase in the contract value, to ensure access to the enterprise support service for Microsoft products for the full duration of the proposed non-competitive Microsoft agreement.
Microsoft 365 (M365) is a set of cloud‑based solutions and applications that help staff communicate and collaborate with each other, including Outlook, MS Teams, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Office applications like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. The City’s current agreement with Microsoft provides access and support to these tools for about 32,000 City staff. The current contract expires on May 31, 2026.
A non-competitive agreement directly with Microsoft is recommended to secure favourable commercial terms and enhanced discounts not offered through resellers. This proposed non‑competitive contract ensures uninterrupted access to these essential services and allows the City to purchase additional pay‑per‑use Microsoft tools (e.g., Copilot, Power BI, etc.), when there is a business need.
The total contract value is outlined in Confidential Attachment 1. This report also seeks the establishment of a total ceiling authority, with no commitment to spend the full amount. The Technology Services Division engaged an independent third-party firm to provide objective market insight to ensure the City negotiates fair and competitive pricing.
City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195, Purchasing, where the current request exceeds the Chief Procurement Officer’s authority of the cumulative five-year commitment limit for each vendor under Article 7, Section 195-7.3(D) of the Purchasing By-law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71, Financial Control, Section 71-11(A).
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-285462.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
GG28.9 - Non-Competitive Contract with Upland Software Inc., for Telecom Expense Management Service
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Chief Technology Officer to negotiate and enter into a non-competitive agreement with Upland Software Inc. / Logiciels Upland Inc., in the amount of $2,625,000 net of all taxes and applicable charges ($2,671,200 net of Harmonized Sales Tax Recoveries) for a three (3) year period, commencing on December 1, 2026, with two (2) additional one (1) year optional periods, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Technology Officer and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to request City Council authority to enter into a non-competitive contract with Upland Software Inc. / Logiciels Upland Inc., for Cimpl, a Telecom Expense Management Service, for a term of three (3) years with option to extend the contract by two (2) additional one (1) year periods in the value of $2,625,000 net of all taxes and applicable charges ($2,671,200 net of Harmonized Sales Tax Recoveries).
Cimpl was procured through competitive Request for Proposal Number 3405-19-0085 in 2020. Cimpl provides the City with a platform to manage the full lifecycle of monthly expenses for network, telephony, Voice over IP, and wireless for all City Divisions. It is integrated into existing workflows and tools, like SAP and ServiceNow, to ensure effective expense management and compliance with AU16.16 - Controls Over Telecommunication Expenses Need Improvement.
This report recommends proceeding with a non-competitive agreement with Upland Software Inc., to ensure continuity of access to this integrated platform.
A non-competitive procurement may be undertaken where both the proposed procurement and supplier can be justified in good faith based on an exception set out in Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195, Procurement. This procurement will be proceeding under the exception related to Exclusive Rights, where Upland Software Inc. / Logiciels Upland Inc., and the City have determined in good faith that both the proposed procurement and the selected supplier, along with the terms and conditions of the contract, are beneficial to the City (Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 195, Procurement, Section 7.1.C).
City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195, Procurement, where the current request exceeds the Chief Purchasing Officer's authority of the cumulative five-year commitment for each supplier, under Article 7, Section 195- 7.3 (D) of the Purchasing By-Law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax allowed under staff authority.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-285461.pdf
GG28.10 - Non-Competitive Contract with Wajax Limited for Repairs, Maintenance, Service Calls and Authorized Warranty Work on Allison Automatic Transmissions for Toronto Fire Services
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services to negotiate and enter into an agreement with Integrated Distribution Systems LP, operating as Wajax Limited, and other business names ("Wajax Limited") for the supply and delivery of, on an as and when required basis, of the Repairs, Maintenance, Service Calls, and Authorized Warranty Work, concerning automatic transmissions manufactured by Allison Transmissions Inc., (the "Work"), in the maximum total amount of $1,167,038 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($1,187,578 net of Harmonized Sales Tax Recoveries) for the period commencing on June 1, 2026, and concluding on December 30, 2030, inclusive and otherwise on the terms and conditions satisfactory to the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to seek City Council authority to permit the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services to negotiate and enter into an agreement with Integrated Distribution Systems LP, operating as Wajax Limited, Wajax Equipment and Wajax Power Systems and Wajax Power Systems for the supply, on an as and when needed basis, of all Original Equipment Manufacturer parts, labour, materials, equipment and supplies, necessary to perform repairs, maintenance, service calls and authorized warranty work (the "Work") concerning automatic transmissions manufactured by Allison Transmissions Inc., for Toronto Fire Services firefighting apparatus. The total value of the agreement is in the maximum total amount of $1,167,038 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($1,187,578 net of Harmonized Sales Tax Recoveries).
Toronto Fire Services operates a fleet of approximately 190 firefighting apparatus, all of which utilize Allison brand transmissions. The City currently has an existing agreement with Wajax Limited for the supply and delivery of Repairs, Maintenance, Service Calls, and Authorized Warranty Work for automatic transmissions manufactured by Allison Transmissions Inc., with respect to Toronto Fire Services vehicles. The term of the current agreement concludes as of November 30, 2026. Allison Transmissions Inc., has identified to the City that Wajax Limited has an agreement with Allison Transmission Inc., for the exclusive right to provide maintenance and Original Equipment Manufacturer parts for automatic Transmissions manufactured by Allison Transmissions Inc., within Ontario, and that this arrangement is set to expire as of December 31, 2030.
Therefore, it is not practical to commence a competitive procurement process at this time, as there is only one (1) available supplier. A further agreement with Wajax Limited, the current exclusive supplier for the necessary goods and services is required to ensure that the City can continue to receive the critical parts and service required to maintain the Allison brand transmissions in the Toronto Fire Services fleet of firefighting apparatus. Toronto Fire Services believes that any gaps between the current contract and the future contract should be avoided as such gaps in necessary goods and services could potentially compromise the safety and reliability of the firefighting apparatus. The term of the agreement sought would be approximately four and a half (4.5) years and would commence as soon as possible due to the current rate of spend of the current agreement and conclude in accordance with the current exclusivity agreement between Allison Transmissions Inc., and Wajax Limited.
Non-competitive procurements may be undertaken where both the proposed procurement and supplier can be justified in good faith based on an exception set out in Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195, Procurement. This non-competitive procurement with Wajax Limited will be proceeding under the exception code related to Exclusive Rights, the City has determined in good faith that both the proposed procurement and the selected supplier, along with the terms and conditions of the contract are beneficial to the City (Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 195, Procurement, Section 7.1E.).
City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195, Purchasing, where the current request exceeds the Chief Procurement Officer’s authority of the cumulative five-year commitment limit for each vendor under Article 7, Section 195-7.3(D) of the Purchasing By-law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71, Financial Control, Section 71-11(A).
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-285470.pdf
GG28.11 - Non-Competitive Procurement Contract with Motorola Solutions Canada Inc., for the Provision of Enhanced Radio Communications Equipment at the St. Lawrence Market North Building
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council grant authority to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to enter into a non-competitive agreement with Motorola Solutions Canada Inc., for the design and installation of enhanced Toronto Radio Infrastructure Program equipment at the St. Lawrence Market North building, in the amount of $887,354 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($902,971 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to request City Council authority to enter into a Non-Competitive Procurement contract with Motorola Solutions Canada Inc., (Motorola), to deliver the technical design and installation of additional radio communication equipment to extend the existing Bi-Directional Amplifier system from the Toronto Radio Infrastructure Program within the St. Lawrence Market North building at 92 Front Street East.
Toronto Radio Infrastructure Program provides voice radio communications for the City's first responders and is a critical system used by Toronto Police Services, Toronto Fire and Toronto Paramedic Services to ensure public safety through coordinated emergency response. The program began implementation in 2012 and has been operational since 2015 providing reliable voice radio communications to the City's emergency services.
The St. Lawrence Market North building reached substantial completion in November 2024. During the construction of the St. Lawrence Market North building, Motorola provided partial radio communication coverage connected to Toronto Radio Infrastructure Program. This was implemented and funded by the Toronto Police Services to cover specific building areas for their operational requirements. Following occupancy, Corporate Real Estate Management building staff, who utilize point-to-point radio communications and are not current Toronto Radio Infrastructure Program users at St. Lawrence Market North, identified areas requiring improved radio communication. These issues were not evident during construction.
Following a review and assessment of potential solutions, it was determined that the most reliable and cost-effective solution was to extend the Bi-Directional Amplifier system from specific areas in the building to all areas of the St. Lawrence Market North building. This solution ensures continuity of services, and maintains required technical and operational standards. As Motorola provided and installed the existing Bi-Directional Amplifier equipment connected to Toronto Radio Infrastructure Program and previously completed design work within the St. Lawrence Market North building, Motorola has a significant understanding of the building and the City’s equipment requirements for Toronto Radio Infrastructure Program compatibility.
The Purchasing and Materials Management Division has advised that an Non-Competitive Procurement is the appropriate procurement method as the original Blanket Contract 47016848 with Motorola did not allow for a piggyback purchase order amendment as per the Co-operative Purchasing Procedure. In addition, a piggyback purchase order amendment would not be permitted due to the scope of work not directly overlapping. Approval of this Non-Competitive Procurement will allow installation to begin in second quarter of 2026 with expected completion in the fourth quarter of 2026. Once complete, the St. Lawrence Market North building will have additional radio coverage to improve responsiveness and effectiveness of Corporate Real Estate Management's building staff during emergency situations and daily operations.
Non-competitive procurements may be undertaken where both the proposed procurement and supplier can be justified in good faith based on an exception set out in Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195, Procurement. This procurement will be proceeding under the exception code related to “Compatibility” where both Motorola and the City have determined in good faith that both the proposed procurement and the selected supplier, along with the terms and conditions of the contract are beneficial to the City (Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 195, Procurement, Section 7.1.E.)
City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195, Procurement, where the current request exceeds the Chief Procurement Officer’s authority of the cumulative five-year commitment limit under Article 7, Section 195-7.3(D) of the Procurement By-law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71, Financial Control, Section 71-11(A).
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-285489.pdf
GG28.12 - Non-Competitive Contract with Bramic Creative Business Products Ltd., for the Provision and Installation of Specialized Dispatch Consoles and Related Maintenance Services for Paramedic Services
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Chief, Toronto Paramedic Services, to negotiate and enter into an agreement with Bramic Creative Business Products Ltd., for the provision and installation of Specialized Dispatch Consoles and Related Maintenance Services in the amount of $3,723,977 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($3,789,519 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries). for a period of one (1) year from the date of award with the option to renew for four (4) additional one (1) year periods, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief, Toronto Paramedic Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to request authority to enter into an agreement with Bramic Creative Business Products Ltd., for the provision and installation of Specialized Dispatch Consoles and Related Maintenance Services in the amount of $3,723,977 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($3,789,519 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), for a period of one (1) year from the date of award with the option to renew for four (4) additional one (1) year periods.
Toronto Paramedic Services' current dispatch consoles are manufactured by Bramic. The consoles continue to be used in a high-demand, 24/7 emergency dispatch environment and, as a result, experience ongoing wear and tear. As the manufacturer, Bramic holds exclusive rights and is the only vendor certified to provide servicing, parts and maintenance (including specialized cleaning) of the consoles. Procuring new dispatch consoles is necessary to support Toronto Paramedic Services’ growing workforce, rising 9-1-1 call volumes, and enhanced dispatch capabilities enabled by modernized layouts and workflows. This contract supports procurement of dispatch consoles required at the Backup Ambulance Communication Centre. The current Backup Ambulance Communications Centre is overcrowded and is undergoing a relocation and expansion within the same building to increase capacity to at least 40 workstations. The current agreement with Bramic Creative Business Products Ltd., will expire on December 31, 2026.
Non-competitive procurements may be undertaken where both the proposed procurement and supplier can be justified in good faith based on an exception set out in City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 195, Procurement. This procurement will be proceeding under the exception related to compatibility where Bramic Creative Business Products Inc., and the City have determined in good faith that both the proposed procurement and the selected supplier, along with the terms and conditions of the contract, are beneficial to the City (Chapter 195, Section 195-7.1E).
City Council approval is required in accordance with the requirements of City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 195, Procurement, as the current request for the Agreement would exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax as specified under Article 7, Section 195-7.3(D); and Chapter 71, Financial Control, Section 71-11(A). Further, the Agreement would result in an arrangement with the vendor in excess of the cumulative five-year commitment limit.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-285599.pdf
GG28.13 - 130 Merton Street - Designation of a Portion of the Property used by Senior Peoples' Resources in North Toronto as a Municipal Capital Facility
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Bill 368 has been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council pass a By-law pursuant to section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to:
a. enter into a Municipal Capital Facility Agreement with Brigham Holdings Inc., the landlord, which leases approximately 10,295 square feet at 130 Merton Street, Suite 600 (the "Leased Premises") to the City of Toronto, used as a community centre; and
b. exempt the Leased Premises from taxation for municipal and school purposes, with the tax exemption being effective from the latest of:
1. the commencement date of the Lease,
2. the date the Municipal Capital Facility Agreement is entered into, and
3. the date the Tax Exemption By-law is enacted.
2. City Council declare that the municipal capital facility detailed in Recommendation 1 is for the purposes of the City and is for a public use.
3. City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the By-law to the Minister of Finance, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, le Conseil scolaire Viamonde, and le Conseil scolaire catholique MonAvenir.
Origin
Summary
This report seeks City Council’s authority to adopt the necessary By-law to designate a portion of the property owned by Brigham Holdings Inc., leased to the City, and used by Senior Peoples’ Resources in North Toronto, as a Municipal Capital Facility, and to provide an exemption from municipal and education taxes. The Municipal Capital Facility Agreement authorized by the By-law will provide a tax exemption for Unit 600, comprising approximately 10,295 square feet, located at 130 Merton Street.
The Senior Peoples' Resources in North Toronto located at 130 Merton Street, Suite 600 is a non-profit community support service agency offering a wide range of practical and low-cost services to seniors and their caregivers. The space is used as a community centre to offer home care services, house calls, transportation services, etc. to seniors living independently in the surrounding neighbourhood.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-285303.pdf
Infrastructure and Environment Committee - Meeting 28
IE28.1 - Congestion Management Plan - 2026 Spring Update
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
The Chief Congestion Officer and Executive Director, Strategic Capital Coordination Office and the Acting General Manager (A), Transportation Services have submitted a supplementary report on this Item (IE28.1a) with a recommendation.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Bill 351 has been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use of, to provide clarity and improve compliance with respect to Road Disruption Activity Reporting System applications, fees, inspections, and enforcement, and to add an exemption from certain fees for street events, consistent with the amendments described in the report (March 20, 2026) from the Chief Congestion Officer and Executive Director, Strategic Capital Coordination Office, and the General Manager, Transportation Services, and detailed in Attachment 3A: Proposed Changes to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743 and Attachment 3B: Proposed Draft Amendments to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743 to the report (March 20, 2026) from the Chief Congestion Officer and Executive Director, Strategic Capital Coordination Office, and the General Manager, Transportation Services, and direct the City Solicitor to prepare and submit the necessary bill directly to the next meeting of City Council.
2. City Council,
a. Adopt the Eligible Affordable and Rent-Controlled Housing Project Road Disruption Activity Reporting System Fee Policy, attached as Attachment 3C: Proposed Eligible Affordable and Rent-Controlled Housing Project Road Disruption Activity Reporting System Fee Policy (the “Road Disruption Activity Reporting System Fee Policy”) to the report (March 20, 2026) from the Chief Congestion Officer and Executive Director, Strategic Capital Coordination Office, and the General Manager, Transportation Services, to exempt residential development projects containing eligible affordable and rent-controlled housing units approved under the City’s Rental Housing Supply Program and Toronto Builds Policy Framework from the Road Disruption Activity Reporting System application fee and reduce applicable Traffic Management Recovery Fees in accordance with the Road Disruption Activity Reporting System Fee Policy, and that such policy come into force sixty (60) days from Council approval;
b. Direct the City Solicitor to prepare and submit the necessary bills required to amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use of consistent with the amendments described in Attachment 3A: Proposed Changes to Chapter 743 to the report (March 20, 2026) from the Chief Congestion Officer and Executive Director, Strategic Capital Coordination Office, and the General Manager, Transportation Services, and detailed in Attachment 3B: Proposed Draft Amendments to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743 to the report (March 20, 2026) from the Chief Congestion Officer and Executive Director, Strategic Capital Coordination Office, and the General Manager, Transportation Services, to the next meeting of City Council, and that such bill amendments come into force sixty (60) days from Council approval.
3. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, and the Executive Director, Housing Development Office, jointly and severally, to negotiate and enter into, on behalf of the City, municipal housing project facility agreements, including any necessary amendments, to secure the financial assistance referenced in Part 2 above for the affordable housing to be developed and operated, on such terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, and / or Executive Director, Housing Development Office, and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.
4. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission Board to report on the resources required to accelerate the installation of Enhanced Transit Signal Priority through the 2027 Budget Process.
5. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to report on the resources required to accelerate the installation of Enhanced Transit Signal Priority through the 2027 Budget Process.
6. City Council request the Ontario Minister of Transportation to take action based on the following recommendations raised in the Toronto Region Board of Trade’s report "Breaking Gridlock: Finishing the Job through Provincial Action" to address traffic congestion in the City of Toronto:
a. Amend Provincial legislation to enable the City to make use of automated enforcement tools to enhance enforcement of traffic by-laws for offences such as blocking intersections, parking violations, bike lane violations, transit lane violations, and similar infractions that contribute to increased traffic congestion;
b. Reduce the impact of lane closures on City streets and enhance the coordination of construction by directing Provincial agencies to participate in, and comply with, all City-led processes that manage access to the City’s right-of-way;
c. Ensure the scope of any studies or planning associated with increasing 400 series highway capacity take into account the full cost of traffic congestion, including impacts on the City’s street and transit networks;
d. Support the growth of transit and mobility in the City and in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area region, building on capital investment by contributing to state-of-good-repair;
e. Support the City financially with the rollout of a comprehensive smart signal system;
f. Partner with the City, and potentially other municipalities in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area region, in the development of a digital twin of the transportation network to support collaborative and coordinated traffic management; and
g. Direct Ministry of Transportation Ontario (MTO) staff to work with the City of Toronto’s Chief Congestion Officer in a collaborative manner to advance the objectives related to congestion management including those outlined in the Congestion Management Report update.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Chief Congestion Officer and Executive Director, Strategic Capital Coordination Office, gave a presentation on Congestion Management Plan - 2026 Spring Update.
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee:
1. Directed the Chief Congestion Officer and Executive Director, Strategic Capital Coordination Office, to report directly to to the April 22, 23, and 24 City Council meeting with recommendations to improve public and research access to congestion-related data such as signal timings.
2. Requested the Chief Congestion Officer and Executive Director, Strategic Capital Coordination Office, to report directly to the April 22, 23 and 24, 2026 meeting of City Council with the following supplementary information:
a. the daily number of cars displaced by the long term closure of Queen and Yonge for the construction of Ontario Line;
b. other intersections and other street closures that are lasting more than a year; and
c. the number of streetcar routes impacted by the closure of Queen and Yonge and if there is any impact on streets that these routes have moved onto.
Origin
Summary
Managing congestion is a top priority for the City of Toronto (the “City”). Like many large and thriving urban centres, Toronto experiences congestion as demand for road space exceeds available capacity. In Toronto, this challenge has been exacerbated by a history of car-oriented land use planning; transit expansion that has not kept pace with growth; extensive state-of-good-repair and growth-related capital work; rapid population growth; and a substantial increase in development activity. Since 2013, the City has maintained a Congestion Management Plan, under which it has advanced measures to reduce and manage congestion.
In 2025 City Council approved the creation of Toronto’s first Chief Congestion Officer. This new senior role has a mandate to reduce and mitigate congestion in the city by providing strategic advice and guidance to the City’s senior leadership, Mayor and City Council, working across divisions to coordinate city actions, and engaging as the primary liaison with external partners on congestion-related matters. The Chief Congestion Officer commenced duties on January 5, 2026.
This report provides the initial observations of the Chief Congestion Officer in relation to the management of congestion. It also outlines the early actions of the Chief Congestion Officer in the role, areas identified for further work and the approach envisioned by the Chief Congestion Officer to deliver long-term congestion management in the city. The approach identifies four streams for focus: policy and planning, capital investment, operations, and internal City processes.
This broader approach to managing congestion will require a more robust and holistic Performance Measurement Framework. The Chief Congestion Officer in collaboration with other City divisions and agencies will develop and implement a robust new Performance Measurement Framework, including several key performance indicators. This Performance Measurement Framework will be aligned with the City’s objectives for managing congestion, and strive to capture the impact of current and future initiatives and external factors, in a transparent, consistent, and data-driven manner. This will help ensure that investments and operational initiatives to manage congestion deliver tangible benefits for the public and advance core objectives around congestion management.
This report also provides a Spring 2026 update on initiatives detailed in previous Congestion Management Plans, including ongoing efforts to expand successful programs, strategically upgrade infrastructure, and implement new data-driven technologies.
Since 2013, successive Congestion Management Plans have advanced several key operational and tactical measures to reduce the impact of the various pressures on the transportation network. These measures are having a positive impact, as demonstrated by improvements to the City’s Travel Time Index, implementation of the Road Disruption Activity Reporting System leading to a reduction of average road occupancy duration, and faster transit travel times as a result of signal priority on Lines 5 and 6. Other positive outcomes are associated with increased Traffic Agent presence, and expansion of Smart Traffic Signals and Intelligent Intersections infrastructure.
Five key tactical pillars underpin the multi-year Congestion Management Plan (2026-2028) outlined in this report:
- Pillar 1: Reduce the Impact of Construction;
- Pillar 2: Expand Traffic Management;
- Pillar 3: Improve Surface Transit;
- Pillar 4: Use AI and Smart Technologies; and
- Pillar 5: Shift How People Travel.
As part of Pillar 1, Transportation Services proposes updates to Chapter 743 of the Toronto Municipal Code which will support enhancements to managing the impact of construction encroachments in the public right-of-way. These Chapter 743 updates include structural changes and additions to enhance clarity and better reflect the current regulatory process related to the intake and review of applications, requests for modifications, and inspections; they also refine the Road Disruption Activity Reporting System system by strengthening enforcement tools, clarifying fees, and adding a close-out process. Finally, the report proposes exemptions and / or a proportional reduction of certain Road Disruption Activity Reporting System fees for street events and for residential development projects with eligible affordable and rent-controlled housing.
In response to Council direction (2025.MM35.15), and aligned with efforts under Pillar 3, Transportation Services has reviewed the existing Transit Signal Priority program and has begun implementing measures under an Enhanced Transit Signal Priority policy along the two new Light Rail Transit corridors and the Spadina streetcar route. This includes working with the Chief Congestion Officer on a plan to accelerate implementation of Enhanced Transit Signal Priority measures at current and new Transit Signal Priority locations in 2026 and beyond.
Implementation of this Congestion Management Plan requires a $299.4 million total investment between 2026 to 2028. The recently approved Transportation Services 2026 Budget includes the funding and resources to deliver the initiatives described in this report (see Appendix 4 for more details).
The report is jointly delivered by the Chief Congestion Officer and Transportation Services.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285482.pdf
Attachment 1 - Congestion Management Plan 2026-2028
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285483.pdf
Attachments 2, 3A to 3C, 4, 5A to 5B, 6, and 7
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285484.pdf
Presentation from the Chief Congestion Officer and Executive Director, Strategic Capital Coordination on Congestion Management Plan-Spring 2026 Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285801.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286314.pdf
Speakers
Dominic Roszak, Toronto Region Board of Trade
Hamish Wilson
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/comm/communicationfile-207234.pdf
(April 3, 2026) Letter from Katherine Berton, Manager of Policy and Advocacy, Building Industry and Land Development Association; and Richard Lyall, President of Residential Construction Council of Ontario (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/comm/communicationfile-207220.pdf
(April 7, 2026) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/comm/communicationfile-207257.pdf
(April 6, 2026) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (IE.Supp)
(April 6, 2026) Submission from George Bell (IE.Supp)
(April 7, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (IE.New)
(April 7, 2026) Letter from Roselle Martino, Executive Vice President, Policy and Strategic Affairs, Toronto Region Board of Trade (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/comm/communicationfile-207283.pdf
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209594.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.Supp)
IE28.2 - Redesign Study of the Intersection of Eglinton Avenue West and the Allen Road Expressway - April 2026 Update
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 8 - Eglinton - Lawrence, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council receive the report (March 20, 2026) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, for information.
Origin
Summary
Since the opening of the newly designed Eglinton Avenue West and Allen Road expressway intersection in 2023, traffic capacity issues at the intersection have caused traffic congestion along Eglinton Avenue West. With many neighbourhood streets being used as short-cuts to Allen Road, traffic congestion is also significantly impacting neighbourhood streets.
On February 5, 2025, City Council directed the General Manager, Transportation Services, to initiate a study to examine redesign options to improve the operation of the Eglinton Avenue West and Allen Road intersection, and to report to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in the first quarter of 2026 with a progress update and recommended workplan.
This report includes:
- An update on the status and work plan of the Eglinton and Allen Intersection Study as per Council request; and
- A summary of the recent monitoring results following the traffic pattern changes implemented in December 2025 to reduce infiltration on local streets in the neighbourhood.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285427.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Committee)
(April 2, 2026) E-mail from Elio Kaakee (IE.Supp)
(April 7, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (IE.New)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209595.pdf
IE28.3 - Approach to Public Electric Vehicle (EV Charging) Three-Year Plan
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
The Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (IE28.3b) with a recommendation.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Confidential Attachment - The attachment to this report contains information that is confidential in its entirety in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it involves a position, plan, procedure, criteria, or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the City in relation to the proposed Collaboration Agreement (Confidential Attachment 1). Disclosure of this information could reasonably be expected to prejudice the City’s negotiating position.
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the three‑year public electric vehicle charging funding and implementation plan outlined in the report (April 2, 2026) from the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, as the framework to achieve the City’s Public Electric Vehicle Charging Program goals and objectives.
2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, in consultation with the President, Toronto Parking Authority, to report back on the status of the City’s Public Electric Vehicle Charging Program’s goals and objectives annually, during the term of the Collaboration Agreement as further described in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 2, 2026) from the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry.
3. City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, in consultation with the President, Toronto Parking Authority to negotiate, enter into, and execute the Collaboration Agreement between the Proponent, City of Toronto and Toronto Parking Authority for the purpose of establishing a multi-year Toronto-wide Public Electric Vehicle Charging Program, subject to the major negotiated terms outlined in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 2, 2026) from the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, and on such other terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
4. City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services or their designate, in consultation with the President, Toronto Parking Authority, throughout the Term of the Collaboration Agreement as further described in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 2, 2026) from the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, to negotiate, enter into, and execute non-procurement agreements related or ancillary to the Collaboration Agreement and that are necessary to support the delivery of the Public Electric Vehicle Charging Program described in this report, with each non-procurement agreement being on terms and conditions acceptable to the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and each being in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
5. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 2, 2026) from the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, remain confidential in its entirety in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it involves a position, plan, procedure, criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiation carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the City.
6. City Council direct the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, to include in the annual report described in Recommendation 2 an assessment of opportunities to use bidirectional Electric Vehicle charging to meet Toronto's peak electrical demand and to reduce the cost of electricity for Torontonians.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee:
1. Requested the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, to submit a supplementary report to the April 22, 23 and 24 City Council meeting specifying the quantitative and qualitative goals and objectives of the City’s Public Electric Vehicle Charging Program.
2. Requested the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, in consultation with the Toronto Parking Authority, to report directly to the April 22, 23 and 24, 2026 meeting of City Council with the following supplemental information:
a. Upgraded charts in Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (April 2, 2026) from the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, to show the revenue costs for charging and the installation costs and to report Green P lots (Toronto Parking Authority) and street parking in the same fashion on both charts;
b. The market surveys that support the demonstrated Electric Vehicle uptake as well as results and from surveys that show desire to purchase Electric Vehicles and any reasons that residents give for not buying;
c. Documentation regarding access to charging as factor as to whether or not to purchase and Electric Vehicle in areas with and without garages and suitable driveways;
d. Options to deal with extremely low utilization rates at Green P lots (Toronto Parking Authority), including downsizing the number of stations that would free up revenue producing spots at the busiest lots and / or adding faster charging stations at popular locations;
e. The factors that led to the decision to install only 109 street ports, both permit parking and Green P (Toronto Parking Authority), and include all difficulties experienced with Toronto Hydro and all issues related to cost of installation by Toronto Parking Authority and Transportation Services;
f. Level of oversight by the funder on the implementation of the Toronto Parking Authority Electric Vehicle plan and advice to the former Toronto Parking Authority Board on its oversight role;
g. The inclusion of between 100 and 200 new street installations in permit parking areas for 2026-29; and,
h. All annual revenues from Permit parking areas including sale of permits, and fines, and the amount that has been raised for Electric Vehicle installation by the dedicated increase to permit parking fees to accommodate Electric Vehicle installation.
Origin
Summary
This report provides an initial three‑year implementation and funding plan to expand equitable access to public Electric Vehicle charging to residents and workers in the City of Toronto, leveraging a delivery model for City-owned property that is focused on prioritizing Canadian suppliers, along with complimentary initiatives that aim to remove barriers to the development of charging infrastructure on non-City owned lands.
A commercial agreement between the City of Toronto, the Toronto Parking Authority, and a Proponent (the “Collaboration Agreement”) is proposed as the most effective mechanism to finance and deliver at‑scale public Electric Vehicle charging on City‑owned properties. The Collaboration Agreement enables accelerated deployment through an experienced Canadian partner, while significantly reducing long-term operational risks and financial risks to the City by leveraging the partner’s capital rather than requiring major upfront municipal investment. During the initial three-year phase of the Collaboration Agreement, the Proponent's investment in the City's Electric Vehicle Charging Program ("the Program") is estimated to be $35.8 million.
The City’s initial three-year plan, supported through the proposed Collaboration Agreement, with major negotiated terms outlined in Confidential Attachment 1, aims to address the need for accessible public Electric Vehicle charging, and is aligned with Council direction, including the Key Negotiating Principles adopted by Council in IE23.8 – Approach to Public Electric Vehicle Charging Delivery Model, existing City strategies, and the City’s Strategic Planning Framework. Additionally, the plan was informed by initial demand and utilization modeling to estimate energy demand from the bottom up by incorporating local community, visitor, commercial (including vehicle-for-hire), and corridor-based requirements, complemented by external initiatives such as The Atmospheric Fund’s work on non-City private and public properties.
To date the siting of the City's existing network of Electric Vehicle chargers was focused exclusively on locations operated by the Toronto Parking Authority, including their off-street parking lots and Pay and Display parking spaces. Building on the Council direction in IE16.5, going forward the approach to determining locations will take a more holistic view of opportunities to leverage City real estate and assets where they can support the greatest uptake of charging, including on-street permit parking spaces and other city owned parking lots, where appropriate and aligned with broader city objectives. Decisions will be based on demonstrated need and access, and Council-approved policy directions, rather than discretionary or ad hoc considerations.
To address any gaps in service, the following City-owned properties are being considered as possible charging locations:
- On-street, residential paid permit parking;
- Toronto Parking Authority on-street, pay-and-display locations;
- Corporate locations with public parking access; and
- Toronto Parking Authority off-street Car Park locations.
The three‑year plan will advance Electric Vehicle charger network growth in areas with demonstrated Electric Vehicle uptake while ensuring equity‑focused investments where private‑market delivery is unlikely. Implementation will follow a dual‑track approach:
- Commercially financed deployments under the Collaboration Agreement, and
- City‑led, data‑driven investments to address system gaps and priority use‑cases.
Attachment 1 includes utilization data related to both Toronto Parking Authority on-street and off-street locations, illustrating the need to refine modelling efforts to increase usage, and highlighting the benefit of the Proponent's investments in outreach and education that will assist in enabling broader Electric Vehicle adoption. Attachment 2 details the proposed siting and deployment process, along with the City inputs that will factor into future demand and utilization modeling to ensure public access is clearly factored into decision making when determining site locations.
The negotiated terms of the proposed Collaboration Agreement provides strong protections for residents and Electric Vehicle users by ensuring transparent pricing for Electric Vehicle charging, based around the cost of electricity, that does not employ surge‑style or dynamic peak‑pricing practices.
In addition, the Collaboration Agreement embeds clear procurement and supply‑chain controls that require the Proponent’s compliance with Canadian trade obligations, including Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and other relevant agreements. These controls ensure a fair, competitive process among qualified Canadian and Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement‑compliant suppliers and vendors, prioritizing local economic participation, and support high‑quality, standards‑aligned infrastructure delivery.
Together, these customer‑focused safeguards aim to protect the City’s interest in providing equitable access to public Electric Vehicle charging, while mitigating investment risks and maintaining alignment with TransformTO, Sidewalks to Skylines (2025–2035), and the City’s Carbon Accountability Framework.
This approach is timely; there is a renewed focus on improving the domestic supply chain and promoting Electric Vehicle adoption as a result of recent federal announcements, and recent oil price volatility is expected to lead to accelerated Electric Vehicle adoption from 2026-2029. The federal government has earmarked $1.5 billion in investment for Electric Vehicle charging infrastructure, provided through the Canada Infrastructure Bank. Additionally, recently updated standards as part of a broader national automotive strategy are anticipated to drive up Electric Vehicle adoption and the need for Electric Vehicle charging infrastructure for urban households who rely on public chargers, Electric Vehicle drivers in condos, and commercial fleets that benefit from fast charging options. This Collaboration Agreement positions the City to proactively and successfully ensure the required infrastructure is put in place to meet anticipated needs.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285816.pdf
Attachment 1 - Toronto Parking Authority Parking and Electric Vehicle Charging Utilization
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285817.pdf
Attachment 2 - Siting and Deployment Process
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285818.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286289.pdf
Attachment 1 - TPA Parking and Electric Vehicle Charging Utilization (Updated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286290.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Committee)
(April 7, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (IE.New)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209598.pdf
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.New)
3a - Approach to Public Electric Vehicle (EV Charging) Three-Year Plan
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to advise that Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry will be submitting a report that provides an update on the approach to public electric vehicle charging three-year plan to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee on April 7, 2026.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285485.pdf
IE28.4 - The Electrification Advantage
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council endorse the coordinated approach outlined in Section 4 of the revised report (April 2, 2026) from the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, and the continued expansion and acceleration of the deployment and strategic management of renewable energy and distributed energy resources including, without limitation, rooftop solar, battery electricity storage, demand flexibility, net-metering, and low-carbon thermal energy networks.
2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, in consultation with Toronto Hydro and The Atmospheric Fund, to maximize the use of available federal and provincial funding for electrification, distributed energy resources, and low‑carbon technologies, including facilitating community access to eligible funding programs.
3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, to engage with the Government of Ontario, including the Ontario Energy Board and the Independent Electricity System Operator, on further opportunities to support electrification and distributed energy resources aligned with TransformTO climate objectives.
4. City Council direct the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, to report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee on progress made on the resolutions adopted by Council as part of item IE28.4 and other components of The Electrification Advantage through the Annual TransformTO Net Zero Progress and Accountability Report.
5. City Council direct the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, in consultation with Toronto Hydro and The Atmospheric Fund, to develop and implement a plan to increase public awareness of Peak Perks with the goal of increasing Peak Perks participation among Toronto’s residential and small business customers who have eligible thermostats to 90 percent by January 1, 2030.
6. City Council direct the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, in consultation with Toronto Hydro and The Atmospheric Fund, to advise the Electrical Safety Authority that availability of certified plug-in balcony solar units would help the City of Toronto reach its climate and affordability goals, and to review City guidelines and bylaws to ensure that if Electrical Safety Authority approval is given units are installed safely.
7. City Council direct the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to continue reviewing zoning and other municipal obstacles to energy conservation and to distributed energy resources, and to report back with recommendations to the appropriate committee in the second quarter of 2027.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, gave verbal presentation on The Electrification Advantage.
Origin
Summary
This report responds to multiple directives related to increasing local renewable energy generation and reducing dependence on natural gas combustion at the Portlands Energy Centre. Specifically, this report responds to direction received as part of the Mayor’s Economic Action Plan in Response to United States Tariffs for City Staff to work with Toronto Hydro and The Atmospheric Fund to develop a report titled “The Electrification Advantage”.
This report also addresses recommendations in Item 2025.IE26.14 that were referred to the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry. As it relates to recommendation 1 in 2025.IE26.14, while the Independent Electricity System Operator’s (IESO) provincially-developed 2025 Integrated Regional Resource Plan for Toronto is not incompatible with the City's TransformTO Net Zero Strategy Action Plan, the plan alone will not achieve the City's climate goals. This report outlines actions the City is continuing to take, within its authority, that will build on the Integrated Regional Resource Plan by pursuing all cost-effective local energy efficiency, renewable energy and storage options, as well as maximizing local energy conservation/efficiency and local distributed energy resources.
This report also outlines the City's actions to improve affordability, air quality, and reduce climate pollution and avoid unnecessary natural gas combustion at the Portlands Energy Centre. These include significantly increasing local distributed energy generation and storage, and through measures that shift electricity demand off-peak, above the minimums outlined in the Independent Electricity System Operator's Integrated Regional Resource Plan, in alignment with the City's 2040 net zero target.
As it relates to recommendation 2 in 2025.IE26.14, Toronto Hydro cannot develop a separate electricity plan for the City of Toronto. The electricity sector involves multiple actors, including the Ontario Ministry of Energy and Mines, the Ontario Energy Board, the Independent Electricity System Operator, Ontario Power Generation, Hydro One, and local distribution companies such as Toronto Hydro. The City and Toronto Hydro operate within provincial regulatory and market frameworks and cannot act unilaterally.
The report sets out four interconnected advantages of electrification for Toronto:
- Energy Security Advantage: Investment in the electricity grid and widespread electrification enables Toronto to be more self-sustaining and resilient in the face of geopolitical challenges;
- Economic Growth Advantage: Affordable and reliable electricity supports economic development in cleantech, mixed-use development, clean infrastructure, and transit expansion;
- Affordability Advantage: Through thoughtful grid investment and rate design, electrification can reduce overall energy costs for Torontonians; and
- Climate Advantage: Electrification is the most effective and scalable pathway to achieving Toronto’s Council-adopted TransformTO climate goals.
Through coordinated efforts by the City, Toronto Hydro, and The Atmospheric Fund, actions are underway and planned (as outlined in Section 4) to reduce soft costs (e.g., connection timelines), accelerate rooftop and parking lot solar and battery storage (including on City assets), expand demand flexibility and non-wires alternatives, enable low-carbon thermal energy networks (e.g., Enwave’s Deep Lake Water Cooling System), and advance provincial and federal collaboration to remove barriers and unlock financing.
Ultimately, progress will depend on collaboration with the Government of Ontario, regulators, system operators, and market participants to evolve policies, programs, and planning approaches over time.
Progress will be reported through the Annual TransformTO Net Zero Progress and Accountability Report.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285809.pdf
(March 23, 2026) Report from the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry, on The Electrification Advantage
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285488.pdf
Speakers
Emily Hunter, Environmental Defence Canada
Melanie Duckett-Wilson, Climate Action Newmarket Aurora and the Alliance for a Liveable Ontario - York Region
Mili Roy, Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, Ontario Regional Committee
Kate Mills, For Our Kids Toronto
Hamish Wilson
Richard van der Jagt
Lyn Adamson, ClimateFast
Diana Mills, Fridays For Future
Shelagh Adamson
Anne Keary
Linda Nicolson, ClimateFast
Karen Templin
Brian MacLean, Etobicoke Climate Action
Laura Lindberg
Carol Essex
Joyce Hall, Ontario Climate Emergency Campaign
Communications (Committee)
(April 2, 2026) Letter from Kate Mills, Co-Leader, For Our Kids Toronto (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/comm/communicationfile-207219.pdf
(April 2, 2026) Letter from Bryan Purcell, Vice President of Policy and Programs, The Atmospheric Fund (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/comm/communicationfile-207222.pdf
(April 2, 2026) Letter from Diana Mills (IE.Supp)
(April 2, 2026) Letter from Eva Shields (IE.Supp)
(April 3, 2026) Letter from Kathryn Humphrey (IE.Supp)
(April 3, 2026) Letter from Beryl Pilkington (IE.Supp)
(April 6, 2026) E-mail from George Bell (IE.Supp)
(April 6, 2026) Letter from Janet Young, Don Valley West for Environmental Action (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/comm/communicationfile-207255.pdf
(April 6, 2026) Letter from Michael Green (IE.Supp)
(April 6, 2026) Letter from Scott Lewis (IE.Supp)
(April 6, 2026) Letter from Cynthia Loch-Drake (IE.Supp)
(April 6, 2026) Letter from Catherine Hamilton (IE.Supp)
(April 6, 2026) Letter from Jane Garthson (IE.Supp)
(April 6, 2026) E-mail from Ronny Yaron (IE.Supp)
(April 6, 2026) E-mail from Diane Keating (IE.Supp)
(April 6, 2026) Letter from Shelagh Adamson (IE.Supp)
(April 6, 2026) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (IE.Supp)
(April 6, 2026) E-mail from Jonathan Dostrovsky (IE.Supp)
(April 6, 2026) E-mail from Kyle Duncan (IE.Supp)
(April 6, 2026) Submission from Linda Nicolson (IE.Supp)
(April 7, 2026) Submission from Dr Mili Roy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Co-chair, Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, Ontario Regional Committee, Co-chair, Ontario Climate Emergency Campaign (IE.New)
(April 7, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (IE.New)
(April 7, 2026) Letter from How-Sen Chong, Climate Campaigner, Toronto Environmental Alliance (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/comm/communicationfile-207284.pdf
(April 7, 2026) E-mail from Roberta Tevlin (IE.New)
(April 7, 2026) E-mail from Judith Lawrence (IE.New)
(April 7, 2026) Submission from Richard van der Jagt, Member, Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) (IE.New)
(April 7, 2026) Letter from Lyn Adamson, Co-Chair, ClimateFast (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/comm/communicationfile-207288.pdf
(April 7, 2026) Letter from Anne Keary (IE.New)
(April 7, 2026) E-mail from Marjorie Nichol (IE.New)
(April 7, 2026) Submission from Melanie Duckett-Wilson (IE.New)
Communications (City Council)
(April 10, 2026) E-mail from Melanie Duckett-Wilson (CC.Main)
(April 7, 2026) Letter from Gail Fairley, Seniors for Climate Action Now (CC.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209586.pdf
(April 8, 2026) Letter from Marilyn McKim (CC.Main)
IE28.6 - Seeking Clarity on the City of Toronto's Application to the Community Sport and Recreation Infrastructure Fund
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council express its profound disappointment to the Province of Ontario that the City of Toronto was denied funding under the Community Sport and Recreation Infrastructure Fund.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to contact the Province of Ontario’s Minister of Sport and debrief on the declined application and express our disappointment on why Ontario’s largest city was denied funding under the Community Sport and Recreation Fund.
3. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to determine when the next cycle of funding for the Community Sport and Recreation Fund is opening and secure a City of Toronto application for funding.
4. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to update the Infrastructure and Environment Committee on relevant updates on the next stream of funding for Community sport and recreation new build projects.
Origin
Summary
City Council on December 16 and 17, 2025, referred Administrative Inquiry IA35.3 from Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 6, York Centre, regarding Seeking Clarity on the City of Toronto's Application to the Community Sport and Recreation Infrastructure Fund, and Answer IA35.3a from the City Manager to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee for consideration.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285425.pdf
Letter from Councillor James Pasternak on Administrative Inquiry on Seeking Clarity on the City of Toronto's Application to the Community Sport and Recreation Infrastructure Fund (IA35.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285426.pdf
(December 12, 2025) Answer from the City Manager on Administrative Inquiry regarding Seeking Clarity on the City of Toronto's Application to the Community Sport and Recreation Infrastructure Fund (IA35.3a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285424.pdf
(October 10, 2025) Attachment to the Answer from the City Manager on Administrative Inquiry regarding Seeking Clarity on the City of Toronto's Application to the Community Sport and Recreation Infrastructure Fund
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285423.pdf
Communications (Committee)
IE28.7 - Delegation of Authority for Crossing Agreements
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
A Communication has been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council delegate standing authority to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to negotiate, enter into and execute on behalf of the City any crossing agreement, crossing permit, or related document required to give effect to an agreement or permit necessary to permit the construction, installation, maintenance, repair, alteration, replacement and expansion of City parks, multi-use trails, roads, park bridges, recreational infrastructure or utility purposes, across, over, under or along lands or infrastructure owned by third parties, including, without limitation, any renewals, extensions or subsequent amendments to a crossing agreement or permit (a "Crossing Agreement"), on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and to make payments of amounts owing under the crossing agreements or crossing permits, subject to the following conditions:
a. the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, is satisfied that the crossing work is part of an Approved capital or operating budget;
b. the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, is satisfied that the City infrastructure cannot be reasonably constructed without crossing the lands or infrastructure of third-party; and
c. the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in consultation with the City Solicitor on legal matters, is of the opinion that the terms and conditions of the Crossing Agreement are commercially reasonable in the circumstances.
2. City Council delegate standing authority to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to file any Crossing Agreement with any relevant regulatory or governmental authority (e.g., the Canadian Transportation Agency) if the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, determines that such filing is appropriate or necessary.
Origin
Summary
This report seeks standing delegated authority for the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, to enter into crossing agreements, or permits for construction of a crossing, necessary to allow City infrastructure to cross a third party's lands or infrastructure. This would include parks, multi-use trails, roads, park bridges, recreation infrastructure, and construction access routes, which are required to cross another organization's lands or infrastructure (e.g., railway corridors or oil and gas pipelines) in the course of implementing an approved City capital project. Delegating this standing authority would streamline existing authorities and provide a consistent approach aligned with other Divisions (Engineering and Construction Services, Toronto Water and Transportation Services) that have similar delegated Authority for crossing agreements granted through Item - 2013.PW20.4 for their respective infrastructure work.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285389.pdf
Communications (City Council)
IE28.8 - Community Sports Equipment Sponsorship
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
A revised supplementary report, appendices A and B, and confidential attachment 1 (April 23, 2026) from the General Manager, Parks and Recreation has been submitted on this Item. Minor changes were made to include financial values related to the listed sponsorships, donations, and grants.
The General Manager, Parks and Recreation has submitted a supplementary report, appendices A and B, and confidential attachment 1 from the General Manager, Parks and Recreation on this Item (IE28.8b) with recommendations.
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve a one-year Community Sports Equipment Sponsorship pilot program.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Infrastructure and Environment Committtee:
1. Directed the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to report directly to the April 22, 23 and 24, 2026 meeting of City Council with such report to include the following supplemental information:
a. A Ward-based chart of proposed parks with proposed installations for the 50 locations;
b. The map of the original proposal for the 50 locations;
c. The process used by City staff to approve each location and the proposed equipment at each location;
d. The Process by which partnerships get vetted and then are brought to Councillors and Council for approval;
e. A list of all partnership proposals currently being discussed at the City and Ward levels and a list of all current partnership projects underway at the city and in each ward; and
f. The process for City staff that will ensure that that Ward Councillors can opt-in to the pilot if there are no park locations proposed in their Ward.
Origin
Summary
This report responds to City Council direction in Item 2025.MM33.18 requesting the Deputy City Manager, Community and Emergency Services to work with Canadian Tire Jumpstart Charities to identify a Canadian vendor to install and operate community sports equipment stations in City parks, with at least one station installed in each of the Community Council areas by the start of summer 2026, and to report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee on the proposed sponsorship, including consideration of a series of conditions specified by Council.
Jumpstart approached the City with a proposal to introduce community-based sports equipment lending in City parks. Jumpstart identified Equip Club SA (“Equip”) as its delivery partner in participating Canadian municipalities, including Vancouver, Ottawa, Surrey, and Coquitlam to date.
In response to Council direction, staff conducted an interdivisional review of the proposal against Council’s specified conditions to consider, including Canadian vendor participation, at least one station installed in each of the Community Council areas by the start of summer 2026, data privacy, digital access considerations, and alignment with City policy frameworks.
This report summarizes the assessment and provides additional information on a potential one-year pilot sponsorship.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285815.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286415.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of all partnership proposals currently being discussed
(April 21, 2026) Supplementary report and Appendices A and B from the General Manager, Parks and Recreation on Supplementary Report - IE28.8 - Community Sports Equipment Sponsorship (IE28.8b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286315.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of all partnership proposals currently being discussed
Communications (Committee)
8a - Community Sports Equipment Sponsorship
Origin
Summary
This report responds to City Council direction in Item 2025.MM33.18, requesting the Deputy City Manager, Community and Emergency Services, to work with the Canadian Tire Jumpstart Foundation to identify a Canadian vendor to install and operate community sports equipment stations in City parks, with at least one station installed in each of the Community Council areas by the start of summer 2026, and to report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee on the feasibility of a partnership, based on considerations specified by Council.
In response to Council direction, staff conducted an interdivisional review of the proposal for each of the specified conditions, including Canadian vendor participation, Ward Councillor consultation, compliance with privacy and record-keeping legislation, alignment with the City’s Sponsorship Policy, measures to bridge the digital divide, data governance considerations related to minors, and alignment with the Parks and Recreation Facilities Plan.
The report provides the outcome of the proposal review by staff and will outline recommended next steps.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285459.pdf
IE28.9 - Durham Boundary Facilities Agreement Renewal - Kingston Road Bridge over the Rouge River
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to negotiate, enter into and execute a new or amended boundary agreement with the Regional Municipality of Durham for the ongoing maintenance and construction of the Kingston Road Bridge over the Rouge River, as well as the winter maintenance of the extended segment of Kingston Road to Altona Road east of the bridge, with terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to seek City Council approval to renew an agreement between the City of Toronto and the Regional Municipality of Durham (Durham Region) for the cost-sharing and maintenance of the Kingston Road Bridge, which is shared equally by both parties. The agreement also covers winter road maintenance for the extended segment of Kingston Road to Altona Road, for which Durham Region is fully responsible for all associated costs. The previous agreement between the two jurisdictions was in effect from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2025. The proposed renewal agreement is based largely on the same terms and conditions as the previous agreement.
The renewed agreement would have an initial term of one (1) year from the date of execution by both parties and would automatically renew annually thereafter. It may be terminated by either party with sixty (60) days written notice, or on another date mutually agreed upon. If substantive changes to the agreement's terms or responsibilities arise that could result in additional costs or risk to either party, Transportation Services would report to City Council to seek authority for any necessary amendments.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285766.pdf
(March 20, 2026) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Durham Boundary Facilities Agreement Renewal - Kingston Road Bridge over the Rouge River
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285443.pdf
Communications (City Council)
IE28.10 - Traffic Control Signals - Victoria Park Avenue
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 16 - Don Valley East, 21 - Scarborough Centre
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at Victoria Park Avenue and Belmore Avenue.
2. City Council prohibit pedestrian crossings on Victoria Park Avenue, between the south curb line of Belmore Avenue and a point 30.5 metres north of the north curb line of Belmore Avenue, in conjunction with the installation of traffic control signals as set out in Part 1 above.
3. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at Victoria Park Avenue and Sloane Avenue.
4. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at Victoria Park Avenue and Ruscica Drive / Innismore Crescent.
5. City Council prohibit pedestrian crossings on Victoria Park Avenue, between the north curb line of Ruscica Drive / Innismore Crescent and a point 30.5 metres south of the south curb line of Ruscica Drive / Innismore Crescent, in conjunction with the installation of traffic control signals as set out in Part 4 above.
Origin
Summary
As Victoria Park Avenue borders two Community Council areas, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to install traffic control signals at the following intersections:
- Victoria Park Avenue and Belmore Avenue
- Victoria Park Avenue and Sloane Avenue
- Victoria Park Avenue and Ruscica Drive/Innismore Crescent
Based on the assessments undertaken, the installation of traffic control signals at these intersections are recommended and should enhance safety for all road users.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285782.pdf
(March 20, 2026) Report and Attachments 1 to 3 from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Traffic Control Signals - Victoria Park Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285444.pdf
Communications (City Council)
IE28.13 - Repairs and Rehabilitation on Wilson Avenue Due to Contract BFPP (21 ECS-LU-04FP)
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 6 - York Centre
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to work with the general contractor for Contract 21 ECS‑LU‑04FP, which is responsible for repairing damages caused in the construction of the contract, in consultation with the Wilson Village Business Improvement Area and the local Councillor, to expedite repairs and restoration of the affected infrastructure, ensuring all traffic lanes are reopened by May 23, 2026, with any remaining works completed in July 2026, during a period when no concerts are scheduled at Rogers Stadium.
Origin
Summary
Over many years the Wilson Village Business Improvement Area invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in wonderful public realm and beautification initiatives along Wilson Avenue. Extra funding was given to these improvements via s 37 contributions. During the implementation of BFPP (21 ECS-LU-04FP) much of the work including garden beds, interlocking brick, decorative sidewalks had been damaged or destroyed. While some disruption was expected this goes beyond the reasonable. Recent attempts to get the restoration work underway have not been overly successful.
Quite frankly, the road and sidewalks and the public realm are a complete mess. After much urging a modest clean up of litter and debris did take place but this has been insufficient. The roadway is severely damaged and years of investment by local businesses is at risk. It is essential that repairs be done immediately. No road closures will be granted after May 26, 2026 due to the opening of the Roger’s Stadium concern season which is just down the street.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285845.pdf
IE28.14 - Watermain Cleaning and Relining on Various Streets in the Sheppard Avenue / Chesswood Drive Area
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 6 - York Centre
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water, to adjust the work related to Contract 26TW-CPI-03CWD so that an effective construction management plan is clear and a traffic management plan is in place that mitigates, in good faith, any impact on traffic flow and Roger’s Stadium concerts.
Origin
Summary
On March 20, 2026 a construction notice was distributed by Toronto Water concerning Contract 26TW-CPI-03CWD. This is a watermain cleaning and relining on various streets in the area.
There are growing concerns about the above referenced project. Chesswood Drive was the subject of a major construction project in 2023 which included road resurfacing, off road cycle tracks and sidewalk construction. The project was highly disruptive to local businesses. There were unjustified lane closures and periods of time when the project was abandoned by subcontractors. A town hall with local businesses had to take place the local Councillor received numerous complaints throughout the term of the project. There is deep concern at the possible inconvenience and cost of tearing up the street again with the proposed watermain work. There are also considerable questions being raised as to why such recent work could be torn up again.
Second, the construction route for 26TW-CPI-03CWD includes Sheppard Avenue which is a key entry and exit point to the Roger’s Stadium, which holds 52,200 people and has 17 concerts booked in May 2026. The concert season starts on May 26, 2026. It is unclear from the notice whether there will be lane and / or road closures and the notice seems written for home owners even though it the work is to take place on streets that are in employment lands. If there are lane and / or road closures during the construction period this will result in total mayhem, traffic congestion and gridlock in the area.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-285846.pdf
Planning and Housing Committee - Meeting 29
PH29.1 - 601, 625, and 673 Lake Shore Boulevard East, 185 Villiers Street, and 300 Commissioners Street - City-initiated "Meanwhile Use" enabling Policy and Zoning, and Update on McCleary District Planning Work
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for 601, 625, and 673 Lake Shore Boulevard East, 185 Villiers Street and 300 Commissioners Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (March 30, 2026) from the Interim Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for 601, 625, and 673 Lake Shore Boulevard East, 185 Villiers Street and 300 Commissioners Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 7 to the report (March 30, 2026) from the Interim Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Prior to the enactment of Bills, City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to obtain the joint approval, if required, of the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing and the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry pursuant to the Natural Hazards policies of the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, and the Protocol for the Lower Don Special Policy Area as it applies to Priority Projects; and that the requirements of the public authorities referred to in the Protocol Regarding the Lower Don Special Policy Area have been satisfied, which may include terms of indemnification and the development of an emergency management plan have been satisfied.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Planning and Housing Committee held a Statutory Public Meeting on April 14, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the City-initiated Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments for "Meanwhile Uses" in the McCleary District. Meanwhile Uses, are temporary non-residential uses and activities to occupy land or buildings that are vacant, underused, or awaiting permanent, long-term development. These uses include film, creative industries, sports, cultural, entertainment and retail uses.
The proposed amendments are consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conform to the City's Official Plan and the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan. The proposed amendments advance good planning and City-building as the Port Lands build out incrementally.
This report also provides an update of planning work to date in the McCleary District. The McCleary District is unlike any other in Toronto. Located in the Port Lands, the District is envisioned to be a mixed-use community and a nexus of creative industry.
Given that approximately two-thirds of the lands are in public ownership, the McCleary District represents an opportunity to advance city priorities related to affordable housing, Reconciliation Action Plan implementation, and economic development approaches that strengthen the cluster of creative industries in the area.
This report describes the next stages of analysis, infrastructure planning and coordination required to finalize the Precinct Plan and the final implementing zoning and policies. Staff are expecting to complete the next phases of work to complete the Precinct Plan in 2028 and provide Council with recommended implementation tools in early 2029.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285686.pdf
Attachment 6: Draft Official Plan Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285687.pdf
Attachment 7: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285688.pdf
(March 20, 2026) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285748.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Committee)
PH29.3 - Status Update Report on Transit Oriented Communities
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Communications have been submitted on this item.
Confidential Attachment - Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to this report contain information explicitly supplied in confidence to the City of Toronto by the Province as represented by Infrastructure Ontario that will be applied to ongoing negotiations carried on or to be carried on by the City of Toronto.
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Manager or designate to execute a Transit Oriented Communities Program resourcing agreement between the City and His Majesty the King as represented by the Province of Ontario for the period of April 1, 2025 to March 31, 2029 on terms satisfactory to the City Manager and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the City Manager or designate to execute a Memorandum of Understanding for the Eastern Transit Oriented Community proposal generally in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 30, 2026) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and on such other terms as may be satisfactory to the City Manager and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.
3. City Council authorize the City Manager or designate to execute a Memorandum of Understanding for the Exhibition Transit Oriented Community proposal generally in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Confidential Attachment 2 to the report (March 30, 2026) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and on such other terms as may be satisfactory to the City Manager and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.
4. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (March 30, 2026) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning remain confidential at this time as they pertain to information explicitly supplied in confidence to the City of Toronto by the Province as represented by Infrastructure Ontario that will be applied to ongoing negotiations carried on or to be carried on by the City of Toronto.
5. City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (March 30, 2026) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, following the signing of the Memoranda of Understanding with the Province for the Eastern and Exhibition Transit Oriented Communities projects.
6. City Council request Infrastructure Ontario to revise the Guildwood GO Transit Oriented Communities Proposal to achieve city building objectives and policies, including but not limited to:
a. Review the massing to reduce heights of proposed towers to better respond to existing and future surrounding scale of buildings, parks, and open space; and incorporate enhanced building setbacks for public realm improvements;
b. Maintain GO Station parking requirements;
c. Enhance size and configuration of proposed parkland and open spaces to meet City standards;
d. Ensure that increased non-residential Gross Floor Area is designed for a mix of uses and "at-grade" community-oriented uses, prioritizing a full-scale grocery store and medical offices; and
e. Enhance size and configuration of the proposed parkland dedication, Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Spaces (POPS) and other open spaces to meet City standards.
7. City Council request Infrastructure Ontario to hold all Guildwood GO Transit Oriented Community (TOC) future public consultation and Local Advisory Committee meetings in person within the Guildwood community.
8. City Council request Infrastructure Ontario to ensure the Guildwood Transit Oriented Community (TOC) project protects lands required for the Scarborough East Rapid Transit Line (Eglinton East LRT), including the Traction Power Substation (TPSS) and other essential infrastructure for this transit project.
9. City Council request Infrastructure Ontario to deliver benefits to the community that includes, but not limited to improvements such as a daycare, library branch, recreation centre and a commitment to affordable housing units.
10. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Executive Director, Development Review, to notify Infrastructure Ontario that a comprehensive rat management plan must be included as part of site plan approval in the Construction Management Plan for the Guildwood GO Transit Oriented Community (TOC) project.
11. City Council direct that prior to the City Manager executing a Memorandum of Understanding for the Exhibition Transit Oriented Community, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning work with Infrastructure Ontario to secure a right of first refusal for the City for non-residential space in the Exhibition Transit Oriented Community, with such space to be appropriate to deliver community services including, but not limited to, public educational facilities, a library branch, a childcare facility, a community kitchen, or a community hub that includes some combination of these and other services.
12. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to continue to seek a firm commitment from Infrastructure Ontario on the number of affordable housing units to be included in the Exhibition Transit Oriented Community development, recognizing City Council’s direction to staff to seek a commitment to 20 percent affordable housing.
Origin
Summary
The Ministry of Infrastructure's Transit Oriented Communities (TOC) program continues to expand and evolve, both in the City of Toronto and in surrounding municipalities. The most recent TOC proposal at Guildwood GO station is the first Toronto TOC project as part of IO's expanded program to facilitate development opportunities at existing Metrolinx-owned GO stations.
This report provides updates on several TOC program matters including Provincial resourcing of City staff involved in reviewing TOC proposals, affordable housing in TOCs, community benefits, and site-specific TOC Memoranda of Understanding. The report also responds to EX22.8 which requested staff to assess commuter parking at the under-construction Sheppard East subway station.
A preliminary review of Guildwood GO TOC follows these items. Final City positions and interests are also outlined for Exhibition, Gerrard Carlaw South, Lawrence-McCowan, Cosburn and Eastern TOCs.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285705.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1: Draft Terms of Site-Specific Transit Oriented Communities Memorandum of Understanding for Eastern Transit Oriented Communities
Confidential Attachment 2: Draft Terms of Site-Specific Transit Oriented Communities Memorandum of Understanding for Exhibition Transit Oriented Communities
Speakers
Communications (Committee)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210100.pdf
(April 22, 2026) Letter from Mark J. Richardson, Techinical Lead, HousingNowTO (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210238.pdf
PH29.4 - RentSafeTO Update
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Mayor's Second Key Matter and First Item of Business on April 23, 2026.
Bill 375 has been submitted on this Item.
A Communication has been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council establish a fee for reissuing an apartment building colour-coded sign and amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Appendix C – Schedule 12, Municipal Licensing and Standards by adding the following fee shown in the table below:
|
Reference |
Service Fee |
Description |
Category |
Fee Basis |
Fee |
Annual Adjustment |
|
NEW |
Private Properties |
Apartment building colour-coded sign re-issuance |
Full cost recovery |
Each |
Variable: $42.73-$46.81 |
Yes |
2. City Council direct that the amendments to Toronto Municipal Chapter 441, Fees and Charges in Recommendation 1 come into effect on June 15, 2026.
3. City Council waive the fee in Recommendation 1 for the following social housing providers:
a. Toronto Community Housing Corporation;
b. Non-profit providers of assisted or social housing under a program administered by the City of Toronto; and
c. Dedicated supportive housing providers funded by the Province of Ontario.
4. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to waive the fee in Recommendation 1 on a case-by-case basis.
5. City Council amend the fees related to undertaking remedial work in Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Appendix C – Schedule 12, Municipal Licensing and Standards by amending the fees and annual adjustments as shown in bold in the table below:
|
Reference |
Service Fee |
Description |
Category |
Fee Basis |
Fee |
Annual Adjustment |
|
61 |
Private Properties |
Remedial work for contracts up to $500 |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per remedial work |
$100.00 |
Yes |
|
62 |
Private Properties |
Remedial work for contracts ranging from $501-$1,000 |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per remedial work |
$200.00 |
Yes |
|
63 |
Private Properties |
Remedial work for contracts ranging from $1,001-$2,000 |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per remedial work |
$400.00 |
Yes |
|
64 |
Private Properties |
Remedial work for contracts ranging from $2,001-$5,000 |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per remedial work |
$1,000.00 |
Yes |
|
65 |
Private Properties |
Remedial work for contracts ranging from $5,001-$10,000 |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per remedial work |
$2,000.00 |
Yes |
|
66 |
Private Properties |
Remedial work for contracts over $10,000 |
Full Cost Recovery |
Per remedial work |
Variable: 20 percent of contract cost |
Yes |
6. City Council direct that the amendments to Toronto Municipal Chapter 441, Fees and Charges in Recommendation 5 come into effect immediately.
7. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to monitor the implementation of changes made to the RentSafeTO program, including changes to the building evaluation tool and colour-coded signage system and include data about colour-coded signage in future iterations of the RentSafeTO Annual report.
8. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to continue ongoing tenant education and engagement through RentSafeTO to promote awareness of building maintenance standards, program updates, and the rights and responsibilities of tenants and building owners and operators.
Origin
Summary
Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 354, Apartment Buildings, outlines maintenance and operational standards for purpose-built rental buildings with three or more storeys and ten or more rental units. These standards are enforced through the City's RentSafeTO: Apartment Building Standards program, which aims to strengthen compliance with City bylaws, enhance tenant engagement and access to information, and promote proactive maintenance in apartment buildings to prevent the deterioration of critical housing stock.
At its meeting on April 17, 2024, City Council directed Municipal Licensing and Standards (MLS) to report back on several directives pertaining to the program, including the building evaluation tool, remedial action processes, and other program updates (2024.PH11.8). At its meeting on July 23, 2025, City Council further directed MLS to establish a colour-coded rating system and to report back in 2026 on an implementation plan for the system (2025.MM32.23). Bylaw amendments for the system were approved by Council on October 8, 2025, and will come into effect on June 15, 2026 (2025.CC33.25).
This report responds to Council direction by:
- Enhancing the design of the program’s building evaluation tool, including amending risk level weightings of higher risk building evaluation categories, extending re-evaluation timelines, increasing score deductions for active violations, incorporating reactive scores into the program’s audit threshold calculation, and changing the timing of audits and evaluations.
- Providing an update on the implementation of a colour-coded signage system for RentSafeTO, which will be in effect on June 15, 2026.
- Outlining the development of a remedial action framework to support MLS staff and prioritize addressing persistent non‑compliance.
- Summarizing actions taken to respond to other outstanding directives.
This report also proposes amendments to Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, to support the implementation of the colour-coded signage system and MLS’ remedial action framework.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285682.pdf
Attachment 1: Stakeholder Engagement Summary and Survey Results
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285655.pdf
Attachment 2: Colour-Coded Signage
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285656.pdf
Attachment 3: Roster of Contractors for Municipal Licensing and Standards’ Rental Standards Services (RSS) Team
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285657.pdf
(April 7, 2026) Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285658.pdf
Speakers
Stacey Semple, Downtown Toronto ACORN
Alejandra Ruiz Vargas, East York ACORN
Ryan Endoh, Dawes ACORN Tenants’ Association
Mason Fitzpatrick, Federation of Metro Tenants' Associations
Daryl Chong, Greater Toronto Apartment Association
Ann Lee
Nicole Corrado
Arnold Margulis
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209797.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Letter from Jason Ash and Liz Morellato, Co-chairs, Leaside Towers Tenants Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209842.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Submission from Ryan Endoh, Chair, Dawes ACORN Tenants’ Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209874.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Submission from Ty Riches, Lead Organizer, on behalf of the Toronto ACORN Board (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209881.pdf
(April 13, 2026) E-mail from Arnold Margulis (PH.New)
(April 14, 2026) Letter from Yaroslava Avila Montenegro, Executive Director, Federation Of Metro Tenants' Associations (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209509.pdf
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (PH.New)
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Jennie Worden (PH.New)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210139.pdf
PH29.5 - Advancing the City’s Affordable Housing Access System
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
The Executive Director, Housing Secretariat has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PH29.5a) for information.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to approve an allocation method of 100 percent Random Draw for Affordable Rental Homes included in the centralized access system for both initial occupancy and unit turnover.
2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to review and approve targeted allocation requests made by housing providers for Affordable Rental Homes (excluding any homes that must be reserved for households in receipt of housing benefits), in alignment with the priority populations identified in the HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan or as directed by Council.
3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to implement the allocation request process as described in Recommendation 2 above, to Affordable Rental Homes approved by the City for financial incentives on or after the third quarter of 2026.
4. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to report back on implementation of the centralized access system for Affordable Rental housing by the end of the fourth quarter of 2027.
5. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to continue engaging stakeholders including not-for-profit housing providers, including one-on-one engagement, to inform implementation of the new Affordable Housing Access system.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Planning and Housing Committee:
1. Requested the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to report directly to the April 22, 23, 24, 2026 City Council meeting with a report outlining the current and proposed frameworks for the affordable access system, including income eligibility requirements for affordable housing applicants, and requests for targeted allocation of affordable rental housing by housing providers.
Origin
Summary
A centralized access system that provides ‘one window access’ for affordable and deeply affordable, Rent-Geared-to-Income (RGI) rental housing is essential to simplify the application process for people seeking housing, better inform applicants of housing opportunities, and connect them more quickly to homes. In addition, a centralized access system will provide the City with increased oversight, better data to inform decision-making, and more efficient program management.
The City is establishing a centralized access point for applicants seeking Affordable Rental housing, leveraging the existing Choice-Based Housing Access System (the System) for RGI housing and its applicant-facing online portal.
Currently, Affordable Rental housing providers run and manage random draws for each new building, screen applicants, and manage building-specific waiting lists. Applicants must apply for every individual building through the building-specific application.
A centralized access system will provide a more efficient, transparent and consistent approach to finding and filling Affordable Rental homes for applicants and housing providers. Once Affordable Rental homes are integrated in the System, applicants will be able to apply through MyAccesstoHousingTO for two distinct types of housing – RGI which provides deeply affordable homes to residents receiving social assistance or earning low incomes, and Affordable Rental that provides homes affordable to people with moderate incomes who can sustain higher rental costs.
Implementing a centralized access system to ensure fair and efficient allocation of Affordable Rental homes is a key action in the HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan (“HousingTO Plan”), which provides a blueprint to guide actions and investments across the housing spectrum to enhance access to safe, secure and affordable homes for Toronto residents.
The launch of the System in 2021 for RGI homes has made it easier for residents to apply and manage their applications. The System has increased transparency for applicants, made it faster for available homes to be rented, and improved consistency of program administration. The City has also made several changes to improve access, reduce the administrative burden on applicants, and reduce barriers to participation as a result of the digital divide.
In 2022, through Item PH35.20, City Council directed staff to integrate Affordable Rental homes into the System and to implement several program rules and requirements, including an allocation methodology that used a mix of a random draw and a chronological approach that gave credit for time spent waiting on the RGI waiting list. Additionally, in 2025, through Item CC27.1, Council directed that the Housing Secretariat provide for the inclusion of sector-specific housing. This report addresses both directions from Council.
Subject to the adoption of the recommendations in this report, the City will create a single, centralized access point for residents to apply for both RGI housing and Affordable Rental housing with implementation anticipated by Q3 2026.
To support the successful integration, this report recommends two program changes intended to increase clarity and improve efficiency for applicants and housing providers including establishing:
- Random draw allocation for all Affordable Rental homes, a best practice which leverages and improves upon the current allocation methodology (rather than a mix of using random draw and chronological allocation)
- A mechanism to address requests for targeted allocations for new Affordable Rental homes.
Access to housing options across the full housing spectrum provides a foundation for improving social and economic outcomes for all. Integrating Affordable Rental homes into the System will provide applicants with a single, streamlined access point to two different types of housing, enable housing providers to quickly and easily advertise available rental homes to all eligible households, and allow for improved City oversight and monitoring as the City advances the HousingTO Action Plan so all Torontonians live in safe, stable, affordable housing.
The adoption of the MyAccesstoHousingTO applicant portal for Affordable Rental homes is a key component in helping the City of Toronto achieve its commitments to the right to adequate housing under the Toronto Housing Charter and the HousingTO Action Plan, by ensuring housing options can be easily navigated in a transparent way and accessed by all eligible households, including equity deserving groups.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285673.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286320.pdf
Speakers
Rosalea Thompson
Yusheng Cheng
Councillor Paula Fletcher
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209812.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Letter from David Plant, Executive Director, Performing Arts Lodges (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209830.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Letter from Neiland Brissenden, Chair, Mount Dennis Community Land Trust (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209832.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Letter from Angus Palmer, Chief Executive Officer, Wigwamen Incorporated (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209840.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Letter from Andrew Joyner, Senior Managing Director and Head of Multi-Family, Tricon Residential (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209876.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Letter from Adrian Rocca, Cheif Executive Officer, Fitzrovia (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209880.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Letter from Wayne Carson, President, Kilmer Infrastructure Developments Inc. (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209882.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Letter from Lesley Ackrill, Executive Co-Director, Interval House (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209497.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Letter from Amina Yassin-Omar, Vice President, Community and Placemaking, The Learning Enrichment Foundation (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209498.pdf
(April 14, 2026) Letter from Yaroslava Avila Montenegro, Executive Director, Federation Of Metro Tenants' Associations (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209508.pdf
(April 13, 2026) E-mail from Arnold Margulis (PH.New)
(April 13, 2026) Letter from Michael Tsourounis, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Information Officer, Hazelview Investments (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209897.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Letter from Jude Tersigni, Senior Vice President, Planning and Development, Menkes Developments Ltd. (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209901.pdf
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (PH.New)
(April 14, 2026) Letter from Howard Paskowitz, Senior Vice President, Development and Public Affairs Starlight Investments (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209525.pdf
(April 14, 2026) Letter from Rob Kansun, Managing Partner, Sierra Communities (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209529.pdf
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210056.pdf
(April 21, 2026) Letter from Michael Owen, Executive Director, Trade Routes Canada (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210119.pdf
PH29.6 - 105-109 Vanderhoof Avenue and 10 Brentcliffe Road - Official Plan Amendment Application - Appeal Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 15 - Don Valley West
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Official Plan Amendment for the lands at 105-109 Vanderhoof Avenue and 10 Brentcliffe Road and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other appropriate City Staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision, including requesting any conditions of approval that would be in the City's interest, in the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part.
Origin
Summary
On May 27, 2025, an application to amend the Official Plan was submitted to redesignate 105-109 Vanderhoof Avenue and 10 Brentcliffe Road (the “Site”) from Core Employment Areas to Mixed Use Areas. The application was deemed complete on September 5, 2025. The application does not propose any new buildings or building additions at this time.
On January 27, 2026, the applicant appealed the Official Plan Amendment (“OPA”) application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (“OLT”) due to Council not making a decision within the timeframe prescribed by the Planning Act. A Case Management Conference has not yet been scheduled.
This report recommends that the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the Official Plan Amendment application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285609.pdf
Speakers
Geoff Kettel, Leaside Residents Association Incorporated
Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-207306.pdf
(April 10, 2026) Letter from Annissa Rodriguez, President, Leaside Business Park Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209468.pdf
(April 13, 2026) Letter from Craig McLuckie, President, Toronto Industry Network (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209811.pdf
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (PH.New)
Declared Interests (Committee)
Councillor Brad Bradford - The nature of my interest is that my wife is a planner on the file.
Written Declaration: https://secure.toronto.ca/council/declared-interest-file.do?id=12941
PH29.7 - 108-162 Vine Avenue - Official Plan Amendment Application - Appeal Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Official Plan Amendment for the lands at 108-162 Vine Avenue and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other appropriate City Staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision, including requesting any conditions of approval that would be in the City's interest, in the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part.
Origin
Summary
On September 11, 2025, an application to amend the Official Plan was submitted to redesignate 108-162 Vine Avenue (the “Site”) from Core Employment Areas to Mixed Use Areas and Parks. The application does not propose any new buildings or building additions at this time.
On February 19, 2026, the applicant appealed the Official Plan Amendment (“OPA”) application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (“OLT”) due to Council not making a decision within the timeframe prescribed by the Planning Act. A Case Management Conference has not yet been scheduled.
This report recommends that the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the Official Plan Amendment application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285595.pdf
Communications (Committee)
PH29.8 - 110 West Toronto Street - Official Plan Amendment Application - Appeal Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 5 - York South - Weston
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Official Plan Amendment for the lands at 110 West Toronto Street and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other appropriate City Staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision, including requesting any conditions of approval that would be in the City's interest, in the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part.
Origin
Summary
On March 3, 2025, an application to amend the Official Plan was submitted to redesignate 110 West Toronto Street (the “Site”) from General Employment Areas to Mixed Use Areas. The application was deemed complete on July 10, 2025. The application does not propose any new buildings or building additions at this time.
On December 15, 2025, the applicant appealed the Official Plan Amendment (“OPA”) application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (“OLT”) due to Council not making a decision within the timeframe prescribed by the Planning Act. A Case Management Conference has not yet been scheduled.
This Report recommends that the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the Official Plan Amendment application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285606.pdf
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-209886.pdf
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (PH.New)
PH29.9 - 2700 Dufferin Street - Official Plan Amendment Application - Appeal Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 8 - Eglinton - Lawrence
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Official Plan Amendment for the lands at 2700 Dufferin Street and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other appropriate City Staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision, including requesting any conditions of approval that would be in the City's interest, in the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part.
Origin
Summary
On July 3, 2025, an application to amend the Official Plan was submitted to redesignate the majority of 2700 Dufferin Street (the “Site”) from General Employment Areas to Mixed Use Areas. The application does not propose any new buildings or building additions at this time.
On January 26, 2026, the applicant appealed the Official Plan Amendment (“OPA”) application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (“OLT”) due to Council not making a decision within the timeframe prescribed by the Planning Act. A Case Management Conference has not yet been scheduled.
This report recommends that the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the Official Plan Amendment application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285605.pdf
Communications (Committee)
PH29.10 - 817 Mount Pleasant Road - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 15 - Don Valley West
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 817 Mount Pleasant Road under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance for 817 Mount Pleasant Road St. Peter's Estonian Evangelical Lutheran Church (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 1 to the report (March 4, 2026) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. If there are no objections to the designation, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the Bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 817 Mount Pleasant Road under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value according to the Statement of Significance which includes a description of heritage attributes found in Attachment 1.
The subject property at 817 Mount Pleasant Road is located on the southeast corner of Mount Pleasant Road and Roehampton Avenue one block north of Eglinton Avenue East in the Mount Pleasant East neighbourhood. It contains a Mid-Century Modernist style church, bell tower, and columbarium. A location map and current photograph of the heritage property is found in Attachment 2.
The distinctive A-Frame Mid-Century Modernist style church with bell tower is an architectural landmark on Mount Pleasant Road. Commissioned by Estonian immigrants and designed by Estonian-Canadian architect and church member Michael Bach (1916-1972), St. Peter's Estonian Evangelical Lutheran Church was constructed in 1955 and dedicated as a memorial to the thousands of Estonians who died in both World Wars, the Estonian War of Independence, and as refugees. Since its construction it has continuously served as an active place of worship and commemoration site for Toronto’s Estonian Evangelical Lutheran community and as a cultural hub for the broader Estonian-Canadian community for over 70 years.
Staff have determined that the property at 817 Mount Pleasant Road has cultural heritage value and meets 5 of the Ontario Regulation 9/06 criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. A property may be designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, if it meets two or more of the nine criteria.
In accordance with 3.1.6.50 of the Official Plan and the City's Protocol for the Identification and Review of Heritage Places of Worship, Heritage Planning staff consulted members of the Council of St. Peter's Estonian Evangelical Lutheran Church to determine if any of the heritage attributes identified in the Statement of Significance and in a future designating by-law were liturgical elements, and therefore not subject to regulation while the property remained in use by the congregation. St. Peter's Estonian Evangelical Lutheran Church confirmed that none of the identified attributes were liturgical elements.
The property was listed on the City's Heritage Register on June 14-15, 2023. While staff were consulting with the Church, the property was deemed removed from the Register on June 14, 2025, two years after its listing date in accordance with the Act, however this does not restrict Council's ability to designate the property at this time.
Designation enables City Council to review proposed alterations or demolitions to the property and enforce heritage property standards and maintenance.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285142.pdf
Communications (Committee)
10a - 817 Mount Pleasant Road - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on March 12, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB41.1 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (February 24, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 817 Mount Pleasant Road under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value according to the Statement of Significance which includes a description of heritage attributes found in Attachment 1.
The subject property at 817 Mount Pleasant Road is located on the southeast corner of Mount Pleasant Road and Roehampton Avenue one block north of Eglinton Avenue East in the Mount Pleasant East neighbourhood. It contains a Mid-Century Modernist style church, bell tower, and columbarium. A location map and current photograph of the heritage property is found in Attachment 2.
The distinctive A-Frame Mid-Century Modernist style church with bell tower is an architectural landmark on Mount Pleasant Road. Commissioned by Estonian immigrants and designed by Estonian-Canadian architect and church member Michael Bach (1916-1972), St. Peter's Estonian Evangelical Lutheran Church was constructed in 1955 and dedicated as a memorial to the thousands of Estonians who died in both World Wars, the Estonian War of Independence, and as refugees. Since its construction it has continuously served as an active place of worship and commemoration site for Toronto’s Estonian Evangelical Lutheran community and as a cultural hub for the broader Estonian-Canadian community for over 70 years.
Staff have determined that the property at 817 Mount Pleasant Road has cultural heritage value and meets 5 of the Ontario Regulation 9/06 criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. A property may be designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, if it meets two or more of the nine criteria.
In accordance with 3.1.6.50 of the Official Plan and the City's Protocol for the Identification and Review of Heritage Places of Worship, Heritage Planning staff consulted members of the Council of St. Peter's Estonian Evangelical Lutheran Church to determine if any of the heritage attributes identified in the Statement of Significance and in a future designating by-law were liturgical elements, and therefore not subject to regulation while the property remained in use by the congregation. St. Peter's Estonian Evangelical Lutheran Church confirmed that none of the identified attributes were liturgical elements.
The property was listed on the City's Heritage Register on June 14-15, 2023. While staff were consulting with the Church, the property was deemed removed from the Register on June 14, 2025, two years after its listing date in accordance with the Act, however this does not restrict Council's ability to designate the property at this time.
Designation enables City Council to review proposed alterations or demolitions to the property and enforce heritage property standards and maintenance.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-285283.pdf
Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 30
EY30.1 - 2775 Jane Street - Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 7 - Humber River - Black Creek
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council forwards the item to City Council without recommendation as the motion to adopt the item lost.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on March 31, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 27-storey (89.4 metres, excluding the mechanical penthouse) infill residential building north of the existing 17-storey apartment building at 2775 Jane Street. The proposed building includes approximately 420 dwelling units and a residential gross floor area of 26,593 square metres.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-285138.pdf
Attachment 5: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-285136.pdf
(March 2, 2026) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-285137.pdf
Speakers
Erez Sussman
Gailene Durrant
Communications (Community Council)
(February 18, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EY.Main)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EY.New)
(March 31, 2026) Letter from Erez Sussman (EY.New)
EY30.2 - 611, 619, 623 and 623A Keele Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 5 - York South - Weston
Bills 372 and 373 have been submitted on this Item.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 611, 619, 623 and 623A Keele Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (March 13, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 611, 619, 623 and 623A Keele Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (March 13, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on March 31, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This Report recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 33-storey mixed-use building at 611-623A Keele Street including approximately 395 dwelling units, 587 square metres of ground floor retail space and 63 underground parking spaces.
The Official Plan Amendment application is required to increase the permitted height of the building and reduce the required non-residential uses for the site.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-285140.pdf
Attachment 5: Draft Official Plan Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-285159.pdf
(March 24, 2026) Revised Attachment 6: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-285533.pdf
Attachment 6: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-285141.pdf
(March 5, 2026) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-284952.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Community Council)
(March 16, 2026) E-mail from Devon Khusial (EY.Main)
(March 26, 2026) Letter from Jonathan Rodger, Principal Planner, Zelinka Priamo Limited on behalf of Loblaw Companies Limited (EY.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/comm/communicationfile-206748.pdf
(March 30, 2026) Letter from Susan Rosenthal, Davies Howe LLP on behalf of VVorking Properties Inc. (EY.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/comm/communicationfile-206972.pdf
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EY.New)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209569.pdf
(April 21, 2026) Letter from Susan Rosenthal, Professional Corporation, Davies Howe LLP (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210169.pdf
EY30.3 - 2351 and 2355 Keele Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application- Appeal Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 5 - York South - Weston
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal for the lands at 2351-2355 Keele Street, and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City Staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision, including requesting any conditions of approval that would be in the City's interest, in the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part.
Origin
Summary
On September 23, 2022, the City received Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications for a 25‑storey residential building proposed at 2351 and 2355 Keele Street with approximately 22,540 square metres of gross floor area and 311 residential units.
On June 30, 2023, the applicant appealed the applications to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) citing City Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time period prescribed under the Planning Act. A Case Management Conference was held on September 26, 2023 (OLT Case No. OLT-23-000689 and OLT-23-000690). The OLT hearing date has not been scheduled.
This Report recommends that the City Solicitor with the appropriate City Staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve any outstanding issues.
An Official Plan Amendment application (25 206929 OZ WET 05 OZ) has been submitted for the entire North Park Plaza site, including the portion of the site that is the subject of this report. The Official Plan Amendment application proposes to establish principles for the entire plaza site, should it be redeveloped in the future. It does not propose any specific buildings. The Official Plan Amendment application has not been appealed and is currently under review.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-285285.pdf
Speakers
David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP
Communications (Community Council)
(March 22, 2026) E-mail from John Mari (EY.New)
(March 23, 2026) E-mail from David Ferro (EY.New)
(March 23, 2026) E-mail from Linda Cellucci (EY.New)
(March 23, 2026) E-mail from Melissa Haber-Tonks (EY.New)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Fabio Morresi (EY.New)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Irene Leslie (EY.New)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EY.New)
EY30.11 - Grand Avenue and Algoma Street - Pedestrian Crossing Protection
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Bill 378 has been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council not authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Algoma Street.
2. City Council authorize the installation of a pedestrian crossover at the intersection of Grand Avenue and Algoma Street.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Grand Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services has reviewed the need for pedestrian crossing protection at Grand Avenue and Algoma Street. Based on the assessment undertaken, Transportation Services does not recommend the installation of pedestrian crossing protection at Grand Avenue and Algoma Street as the warrant criteria was not met for either a pedestrian crossover (PXO) or traffic control signals.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-285164.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Community Council)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Kate Porter (EY.New)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Greg Zajac (EY.New)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Jessica Rashotte (EY.New)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Josh Hjartarson (EY.New)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Craig McNamee (EY.New)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Werner Schwarz and Kathleen Bartlett (EY.New)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Emily King (EY.New)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Susan Andrews (EY.New)
Communications (City Council)
EY30.12 - The East Mall and West Deane Park Drive - Pedestrian Crossing Protection
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 2 - Etobicoke Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals on The East Mall, approximately 35 metres north of West Deane Park Drive.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on The East Mall, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to install traffic control signals on The East Mall approximately 35 metres north of West Deane Park Drive. The traffic control signals will provide enhanced safety for all road users and is justified based on the assessment undertaken.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-285185.pdf
EY30.13 - Highway 27 and Rexdale Boulevard - Pedestrian Crossing Protection
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 1 - Etobicoke North
Bill 379 has been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of three pedestrian crossovers at the right-turn channels at the northwest, northeast and southeast corner of the intersection of Highway 27 and Rexdale Boulevard.
2. City Council authorize two yield controls on the right turn channels at the northwest and southeast intersections of Highway 27 and Rexdale Boulevard.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Highway 27, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services has reviewed the need for pedestrian crossing protection at the northbound, southbound and westbound right-turn channels at the intersection of Highway 27 and Rexdale Boulevard. Based on the assessment undertaken, Transportation Services is recommending the installation of a pedestrian crossover (PXO) at these locations. The PXOs will provide enhanced safety for vulnerable road users.
During the course of the investigation, it was noted that there is a discrepancy between posted signs and the yield sign regulations. Recommendation 2 will correct this inconsistency.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-285162.pdf
EY30.16 - 54 Atomic Avenue Driveway and North Queen Street - Turn Prohibition
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Bill 380 has been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council prohibit northbound left-turn movements at all times at the intersection of North Queen Street and the private driveway at 54 Atomic Avenue, located on the south side of North Queen Street, approximately 193 metres west of Atomic Avenue.
Origin
Summary
Transportation Review is requesting approval for the implementation of a left-turn prohibition at the North Queen Street access driveway for the industrial redevelopment at 54 Atomic Avenue. As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates transit service on North Queen Street, City Council approval of this report is required. The proposed regulation is needed to address operational and safety concerns related to conflicting turning movements and driveway spacing. Restricting left-turn movements for vehicles exiting the westerly driveway at 54 Atomic Avenue onto North Queen Street will support safer and more efficient traffic operations along North Queen Street.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-285115.pdf
North York Community Council - Meeting 31
NY31.2 - 93 York Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 15 - Don Valley West
Bill 333 has been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 93 York Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (March 13, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on March 31, 2026, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act, RSO 1990.
Origin
Summary
This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit six three-storey (11 metre) townhouse units at 93 York Road.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment application. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan. The proposal represents an appropriate townhouse infill development and meets the intent of the Bayview Townhouse Design Guidelines. The built form and setbacks meet the Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods (EHON) Major Street Zoning By-law, as such the proposed site-specific by-law will provide minor exceptions to implement the applicant's proposal.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285210.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285428.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285211.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/comm/communicationfile-206235.pdf
(March 25, 2026) E-mail from Guanmin Li (NY.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (NY.Supp)
NY31.3 - 609 Roehampton Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Appeal Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 15 - Don Valley West
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment Application appeal for the lands municipally known as 609 Roehampton Avenue and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City Staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision, including requesting any conditions of approval that would be in the City's interest, in the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part.
Origin
Summary
On February 18, 2025, an application to amend the Zoning By-law was submitted and deemed complete on May 8, 2025, satisfying the City's minimum application requirements. The application seeks to permit two 15 storey (56.9 metres, plus mechanical penthouse) residential apartment buildings with a total floor space index of 7.31. The proposal would contain a total gross floor area of approximately 15,285.1 square metres, representing 209 residential apartment dwellings.
On December 15, 2025 the applicant appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment Application to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the time frame under the Planning Act.
This Report recommends that the City Solicitor with the appropriate City Staff attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing to oppose the application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve any outstanding issues.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285139.pdf
Speakers
Geoff Kettel, Leaside Residents Association
Communications (Community Council)
(March 31, 2026) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Leaside Residents Association Incorporated (NY.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/comm/communicationfile-207012.pdf
NY31.4 - 45 Grenoble Drive - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 16 - Don Valley East
Bill 370 has been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 45 Grenoble Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (March 13, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council be advised that the Executive Director, Development Review will secure through the Site Plan Control process pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, the owner's obligation to undertake improvements to the existing rental building, at its sole expense and at no cost to tenants, at 45 Grenoble Drive, as follows:
a. Access to new outdoor amenities and indoor amenities in the proposed new building for tenants of the existing rental apartment building;
b. Upgrades including the installation of automatic door openers on ground floor common entrances including lobby, garbage and laundry room access;
c. Pool revitalization including concrete repair work and renovated change rooms;
d. Laundry room upgrades based on the Laundry Room Plan dated October 22, 2025; and
e. Parts 3b. and 3d. above must be completed by prior to Site Plan Approval for the proposed development.
4. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review to require the Owner to develop a Construction Mitigation and Tenant Communication Plan, including a parking plan, to mitigate the impacts of construction of the development on tenants of the existing rental building prior to Site Plan Approval, all to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on March 31, 2026, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act, RSO 1990.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law for the property at 45 Grenoble Drive in order to allow a new 40-storey (126 metre plus 7 metre mechanical penthouse) residential building connected to a 5-storey (18 metre) podium. The proposed development would contain 405 residential units.
The existing 28-storey (71.1 metres) residential building containing 217 rental dwelling units would be retained.
The proposed development conforms to the Official Plan by retaining the existing purpose-built rental building and adding a new building that adds to the housing stock in the Flemingdon Park neighbourhood. The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024).
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. The proposed development represents an efficient and compatible use of a property within a Major Transit Station Area, conveniently located near public transit, and incorporates energy-efficient design features.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285146.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285213.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Community Council)
NY31.5 - 1800 Sheppard Avenue East - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 17 - Don Valley North
Communications were submitted on this Item.
Bills 359 and 360 have been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 1800 Sheppard Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (March 12, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 for the lands municipally known as 1800 Sheppard Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (March 12, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. City Council require the Owner to enter into an Amending Agreement pursuant to Section 37.1 of the Planning Act and the repealed and transitioned subsections 37(1) and (3) of the Planning Act to reflect the increase in height and density relative to that permitted in Zoning By-law 818-2003, to implement the requirements of the recommended Zoning By-law Amendment, in addition to the previously secured items, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on March 31, 2026, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act, RSO 1990.
Origin
Summary
This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit the redevelopment of a portion of the Phase 1 lands (being 1A) at 1800 Sheppard Avenue East (Fairview Mall).
The Phase 1A redevelopment proposes a 48-storey mixed use building with an 8-storey podium fronting onto Sheppard Avenue East. The building includes a total gross floor area of 38,413 square metres, 585 residential dwelling units, 184.4 square metres of non-residential gross floor area, and a total of 81 parking spaces. A 985.3 square metre landscaped Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Space area adjacent to the entrance to the Don Mills Subway Station is also proposed.
The Official Plan Amendment application is a technical amendment seeking to remove the requirement for a Draft Plan of Subdivision for a portion of the Phase 1 lands in Official Plan Amendment 775 which was approved by City Council on November 13 and 14, 2024. In addition, the proposed Official Plan Amendment seeks to split Phase 1 into Phase 1A and Phase 1B to facilitate the redevelopment of the southern portion of Phase 1 which fronts onto Sheppard Avenue East.
The Zoning By-law Amendment amend various performance standards in order to facilitate the development and amend an existing Section 37 Agreement in order to secure 3 percent of the total residential gross floor area for affordable rental housing. Based on the proposed unit sizes and unit mix 18 affordable rental units would be provided.
Based on the proposed unit sizes and unit mix 18 affordable rental units would be provided.
This report reviews and recommends approval of both applications. The proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications are consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conform to the City's Official Plan and have appropriate regard for the matters of provincial interest listed in Section 2 of the Planning Act. The draft Official Plan Amendment also conforms with the Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan, including the previously approved Official Plan Amendment application (22 135661 NNY 17 OZ), which permits the redevelopment of the whole of the lands with a masterplan concept (Official Plan Amendment 775).
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285122.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Official Plan Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285123.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285674.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285125.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286327.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Community Council)
(March 13, 2026) E-mail from Pingping Han (NY.Supp)
(March 13, 2026) E-mail from Xiang Cui (NY.Supp)
(March 13, 2026) E-mail from De Ly (NY.Supp)
(March 14, 2026) E-mail from Tsz Ying (Emily) Chan (NY.Supp)
(March 16, 2026) E-mail from Zhang Yujie (NY.Supp)
(March 21, 2026) E-mail from Jordan Lau (NY.Supp)
(March 25, 2026) Letter from Mona Dai, Build A Better Fairview (NY.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/comm/communicationfile-206774.pdf
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Sumedha Kumar (NY.Supp)
(March 28, 2026) E-mail from George Dyke (NY.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Mark Cowley (NY.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) Letter from Joshua Mistry, More Neighbours Toronto (NY.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/comm/communicationfile-206900.pdf
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Ravi Teja (NY.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (NY.Supp)
Communications (City Council)
(April 3, 2026) E-mail from Gigi Yu (CC.Main)
NY31.6 - 41 to 47 Talara Drive - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Refusal
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 17 - Don Valley North
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council refuse the application for the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment (Application Number 26 101193 NNY 17 OZ) for the lands municipally known as 41 - 47 Talara Drive for the reasons identified in the revised report (March 30, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. In the event the applications are appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal, City Council, pursuant to subsections 22(8.1) and 34(11.0.0.1) of the Planning Act, use mediation, conciliation or other dispute resolution techniques in an attempt to resolve the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor.
3. City Council direct the City Clerk, should an appeal be filed, to notify all persons or public bodies who may have filed an appeal to this decision of City Council’s intention to rely on subsections 22(8.1) and 34(11.0.0.1) of the Planning Act and the City Clerk shall provide notice to all prescribed persons or public bodies under subsections 22(8.2) and 34(11.0.0.2) of the Planning Act.
4. City Council direct the City Clerk, should an appeal be filed, to notify the Ontario Land Tribunal of City Council’s intention pursuant to subsections 22(8.1) and 34(11.0.0.1) of the Planning Act, and that the Ontario Land Tribunal shall receive the record, the notice of appeal and other prescribed documents and materials seventy-five (75) days after the last day for filing a notice of appeal for these matters
5. Should the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application be resolved, and there is no appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal or the appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal has been withdrawn, City Council direct the Director, North York District, Community Planning to bring forward an Approval Report to North York Community Council for a statutory public meeting as required under the Planning Act.
6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other appropriate City Staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision, including requesting any conditions of approval that would be in the City's interest, in the event an appeal of Council's decision is allowed by the Ontario Land Tribunal, in whole or in part.
Origin
Summary
This Report recommends refusal of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a development consisting of a 43-storey (141.2 metres, plus 6-metre mechanical penthouse) residential tall building with a 5-storey podium. The proposal includes a total of 369 residential units with 30,285 square metres of gross floor area for a maximum Floor Space Index of 14.75 times the lot area. A related Rental Housing Demolition application has also been submitted as the proposal includes the demolition of eight residential units of which five are rental units.
The application does not conform with the Official Plan and the Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan. The proposal in its current form does not have appropriate regard for the Council-adopted Renew Sheppard East Secondary Plan.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285704.pdf
(March 12, 2026) Report and Attachments 1 to 6 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on 41 to 47 Talara Drive - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Refusal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285126.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/comm/communicationfile-206974.pdf
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (NY.Supp)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210270.pdf
NY31.7 - 52 Finch Avenue West - Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 18 - Willowdale
Bill 346 has been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known 52 Finch Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (March 12, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on March 31, 2026, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act, RSO 1990.
Origin
Summary
This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a three-storey (11 metres, plus a 3.6-metre elevator enclosure) mixed-use building with two residential units and office uses at 52 Finch Avenue West. A total of three vehicular parking spaces are proposed, including one accessible parking space and a total of 12 bicycle parking spaces, including nine short-term and three long-term spaces. The application proposes a total gross floor area of 409.6 square metres, including 229.9 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. Vehicular access to the subject site is proposed from Finch Avenue West.
A Holding provision will be added to the By-law in order to ensure that there is adequate sewer, water and stormwater capacity available, and for the applicant to provide reports or material that ensures safe vehicle access to the site can be provided.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285119.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285385.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285121.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (NY.Supp)
NY31.11 - 4580 Dufferin Street - Turn Prohibition
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 6 - York Centre
Bill 387 has been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council prohibit northbound left-turns at all times on Dufferin Street at the driveway access to 4580 Dufferin Street located on the west side of Dufferin Street, at a point approximately 95 metres north of Finch Avenue West.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission operates a transit service on Dufferin Street, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to prohibit northbound left turns at all times on Dufferin Street at the private driveway to 4580 Dufferin Street, approximately 95 metres north of Finch Avenue West.
The proposed prohibition of northbound left turns will enhance traffic flow, reduce potential conflicts, and improve safety for all road users in the area. Displaced left turns to the driveway can be accommodated at the property's two driveway accesses located off of Finch Avenue West.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285163.pdf
NY31.20 - Dallimore Circle - Request for a Don Valley Parkway Sound Barrier
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 16 - Don Valley East
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council request the Minister of Transportation, following the transfer of the Don Valley Parkway to the Province, to consider the construction of a noise barrier along a portion of the west side of the Don Valley Parkway to mitigate noise impacts experienced by residents of Dallimore Circle.
Origin
Summary
Residents living on Dallimore Circle have contacted my office requesting a sound barrier between their property and the Don Valley Parkway. I support this initiative, but recognize this highway is being uploaded to the province.
Therefore, I am requesting that the City ask the Province to build a sound barrier once the transfer of land is completed.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-285040.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 30
SC30.1 - 5445 Steeles Avenue East Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 23 - Scarborough North
Bill 348 has been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 5445 Steeles Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (March 13, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District to explore opportunities for retaining additional trees and /or potential cash-in-lieu of planting through the Site Plan Control Application process.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on April 1, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the redevelopment of the existing gas station and will add a vehicle washing establishment at 5445 Steeles Avenue East. Along with the revised list of land use permissions, the proposal would renovate the existing facility to consist of four new gas pumps, two electric vehicle charging stations, an expansion of the existing retail store and the removal of the existing drive through restaurant.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan. The expanded commercial service uses support in creating an appropriate mix of uses to serve the needs of the community.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285143.pdf
(March 25, 2026) Revised Attachment 5: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285574.pdf
Attachment 5: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285144.pdf
(March 9, 2026) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-284999.pdf
Speakers
Nicole Corrado
Communications (Community Council)
SC30.2 - 2740 Lawrence Avenue East - Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 21 - Scarborough Centre
Bill 401 has been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend By-law 1201-2024 to extend the Part Lot Control Exemption for the lands municipally known as 2740 Lawrence Avenue East for an additional two year period from the date of the enactment of the By-law, substantially in accordance with the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law in Attachment 3 to the report (March 13, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.
3. Prior to the enactment of the Amending Part Lot Control Exemption By-law, City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
4. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title to the lands municipally known as 2740 Lawrence Avenue East.
Origin
Summary
On November 14, 2024, City Council adopted the Part Lot Control Exemption Application Decision Report (2024.SC17.4) and enacted the associated Part Lot Control Exemption By-law (By-law 1201-2024) for the development located at 2740 Lawrence Avenue East. The intent of the Part Lot Control Exemption Application and associated by-law were to facilitate the creation and conveyance of 65 three-storey townhouse units with maintenance easements for the development within Blocks 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 and 45 on Plan 66M-2589. The plan of subdivision including a public street was registered on April 11, 2023. The enacted By-law contained an expiry period of two years after enactment, a time period which the current application proposes to extend.
This Report recommends approval of the application to permit the exemption from Part Lot Control to be extended for an additional two years to facilitate completion of the development and to implement the necessary land transactions.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285114.pdf
SC30.8 - Nightstar Road - Traffic Calming (Speed Cushions) and Heavy Vehicle Prohibition
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park
Bill 388 has been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic calming (four speed cushions) on Nightstar Road, between Morningside Avenue and Mantis Road/Knotwood Crescent/Flower Crescent, generally as shown in Attachments 2 and 3, on the attached Drawing Nos. TC-671 and TC-671-1 to the report (March 17, 2026) from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services.
2. Subject to approval of Recommendation 1 above and in conjunction with the installation of traffic calming (four speed cushions) on Nightstar Road, between Morningside Avenue and Mantis Road/Knotwood Crescent/Flower Crescent:
a. City Council reduce the speed limit from 40 km/h to 30 km/h on Nightstar Road, between Morningside Avenue and Mantis Road/Knotwood Crescent/Flower Crescent;
b. City Council amend the existing maximum 30-minute parking regulation, in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the south side of Nightstar Road between a point 13 metres west of Pogonia Street and a point 24 metres east of Knotwood Crescent (west intersection), to be in effect between a point 13 metres west of Pogonia Street and Knotwood Crescent (west intersection); and
c. City Council prohibit standing as generally described in Attachment 5 to the report (March 17, 2026) from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services, in conjunction with the installation of speed cushions on Nightstar Road.
3. City Council prohibit heavy vehicles at all times on Nightstar Road, between Morningside Avenue and Mantis Road/Knotwood Crescent/Flower Crescent.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Nightstar Road, and the report includes non-delegated matters, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services has reviewed the need for speed cushions on Nightstar Road, between Morningside Avenue and Mantis Road/Knotwood Crescent/Flower Crescent. The assessment indicates the warrant criteria as set out in the updated Traffic Calming Policy has not been satisfied. Therefore, staff do not recommend the installation of speed cushions on Nightstar Road.
During the course of the investigation, it was noted that there is discrepancy between the by-lawed heavy vehicle prohibition and the posted sign on Nightstar Road. Recommendation 2 will correct this inconsistency.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285242.pdf
SC30.10 - Kennedy Road, at a point 140 metres north of Dancy Avenue -Traffic Control Signals
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 22 - Scarborough - Agincourt
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals on Kennedy Road at a point 140 metres north of Dancy Avenue.
2. Subject to the approval of Recommendation 1 above and in conjunction with the installation of traffic control signals on Kennedy Road at a point 140 metres north of Dancy Avenue, City Council authorize the removal of the existing pedestrian refuge island on Kennedy Road, approximately 50 metres north of Dancy Avenue.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Kennedy Road, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to install traffic control signals on Kennedy Road at a point 140 metres north of Dancy Avenue and to remove the existing pedestrian refuge island (PRI) on Kennedy Road, approximately 50 metres north of Dancy Avenue. The traffic control signals will provide enhanced safety for all road users and is justified based on the assessment undertaken.
There are several factors for the proposed recommendations:
- PRI's do not provide right-of-way for pedestrians and are not considered an enhanced form of pedestrian crossing protection.
- The heavy traffic on the five-lane cross-section of Kennedy Road poses potential safety concerns for pedestrians crossing at the PRI to access the TTC bus shelters located on both sides of Kennedy Road in the vicinity of the PRI.
- The distance between the nearest protected pedestrian crossings (traffic control signals) on Kennedy Road is approximately 790 metres.
Additionally, staff recommend relocating the existing TTC bus stops and shelters on Kennedy Road to new locations, adjacent to the proposed traffic control signals. This work would be undertaken in conjunction with the installation of the traffic control signals and the removal of the PRI.
The above recommendations will provide improved accessibility and a safer and more convenient crossing of Kennedy Road pedestrians, including TTC passengers.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285237.pdf
SC30.11 - Pharmacy Avenue and Stellarton Road/Camilla Crescent - Traffic Control Signals
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 20 - Scarborough Southwest
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Pharmacy Avenue and Stellarton Road/Camilla Crescent.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Pharmacy Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to install traffic control signals at the intersection of Pharmacy Avenue and Stellarton Road/Camilla Crescent. The traffic control signals will provide enhanced safety for all road users and is justified based on the assessment undertaken.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285241.pdf
SC30.16 - Morrish Road - Traffic Calming
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic calming (two speed cushions) on Morrish Road, between Ellesmere Road and Canmore Boulevard, generally as shown on Attachments 3 and 4, Drawings No. TC-674-2 and TC-674-3, to the Letter (March 30, 2026) from Councillor Neethan Shan.
2. City Council authorize the installation of traffic calming (19 speed humps) on Morrish Road, between Canmore Boulevard and the north end of Morrish Road, and between Ellesmere Road and the south end of Morrish Road, generally as shown on Attachments 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Drawings No. TC-674, TC-674-1, TC-674-2, TC-674-3, and TC-674-4, to the Letter (March 30, 2026) from Councillor Neethan Shan.
3. Subject to approval of Recommendations 1 and 2 above and in conjunction with the installation of speed cushions and speed humps:
a. City Council rescind the speed limit of 40 km/h on Morrish Road, between the east end of Military Trail and Ellesmere Road.
b. City Council designate a 30 km/h speed limit on Morrish Road, between the south end of Morrish Road and the north end of Morrish Road.
4. Subject to approval of Recommendation 1 above and in conjunction with the installation of the traffic calming (two speed cushions) on Morrish Road, between Ellesmere Road and Canmore Boulevard:
a. City Council prohibit standing at all times on both sides of Morrish Road, between a point 124 metres north of Ellesmere Road and a point 44 metres further north.
b. City Council prohibit standing at all times on both sides of Morrish Road, between Grantown Avenue and a point 44 metres south.
Origin
Summary
This letter is a follow-up to the request of community members to implement traffic calming measures on Morrish Road. Staff have completed the necessary drawings for the installation of speed humps. Community members and the Highland Creek Community Association have asked our office for this, and our office surveyed the residents who live on the road who are fully supportive. The recommendations to install speed humps and cushions is another step towards the introduction of additional traffic calming measures in an area that has a need for increased traffic safety.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285713.pdf
Attachment 1: Drawing No. TC-674
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285714.pdf
Attachment 2: Drawing No. TC-674-1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285715.pdf
Attachment 3: Drawing No. TC-674-2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285716.pdf
Attachment 4: Drawing No. TC-674-3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285717.pdf
Attachment 5: Drawing No. TC-674-4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285718.pdf
Attachment 6: Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management on Morrish Road - Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-285719.pdf
Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 31
TE31.2 - 3286, 3290, 3296, 3298, 3300, 3308 and 3316 Dundas Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Bill 403 has been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 3286, 3290, 3296, 3298, 3300, 3308 and 3316 Dundas Street West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (March 16, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at as 3286, 3290, 3298, 3300, 3308 and 3316 Dundas Street West from Permit Parking Area 1F.
4. City Council direct the City Solicitor to withhold the necessary Bills for enactment until City Council has approved the Rental Housing Demolition Application 25 165365 STE 04 RH under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of six existing rental dwelling units at 3286, 3290, 3296, 3298, 3300, 3308 and 3316 Dundas Street West to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, securing all rental housing-related matters necessary to implement City Council's decision.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on April 1, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit an 11-storey mixed-use rental building at 3286, 3290, 3296, 3298, 3300, 3308 and 3316 Dundas Street West. The application proposes a total of 191 residential units (including 6 rental replacement units) with a residential gross floor area of 12,937 square metres and 384 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. 99 vehicular and 212 bicycle parking spaces are also proposed.
A Rental Housing Demolition application has also been received by the City to address rental replacement obligations for the six existing rental units on site in conjunction with the Zoning By-law amendment application. A Rental Housing Demolition report will be considered in conjunction with this report at the April 1, 2026, Toronto and East York Community Council meeting. The proposal includes the demolition of six rental housing units, to be replaced by a total of six rental units as part of the new development of the site. A Tenant Assistance Plan is proposed that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan. The proposed development will provide diversity of unit types, retail ground floor use along Dundas Street West and an improved public realm.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285223.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285274.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285224.pdf
Speakers
Michael Mueller
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-206971.pdf
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
TE31.3 - 3286-3316 Dundas Street West - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application File 25 165365 STE 04 RH in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of six existing rental dwelling units located at 3286-3316 Dundas Street West, subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain six replacement rental dwelling units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement;
b. the replacement rental dwelling units required by Recommendation 1.a. above shall collectively have a total gross floor area of at least 404 square metres and be comprised of 1 studio unit, 4 one-bedroom units and 1 three-bedroom unit, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to City Planning dated January 20, 2026; any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
c. the owner shall, as part of the six replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above, provide at least 1 one-bedroom unit at affordable rent, 2 one-bedroom units at mid-range (affordable) rent and 1 studio unit, 1 one-bedroom unit and 1 three-bedroom unit at mid-range (moderate) rent, as currently defined in the City's Official Plan, all for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit;
d. the owner shall provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the six existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
e. the owner shall provide tenants of all six replacement rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed 11-storey building at no extra charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
f. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry and central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit at no extra charge;
g. the owner shall provide tenants of all replacement rental dwelling units with access to storage lockers, bicycle, vehicle and visitor parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed development;
h. the replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the proposed development, exclusive of the replacement rental dwelling units, are made available and ready for occupancy, subject to any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
i. the owner shall enter into, and register on title to the lands, an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 1.a. through 1.h. above all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the demolition of the six existing rental dwelling units located at 3286-3316 Dundas Street West after all the following have occurred:
a. all conditions in Recommendation 1 above have been fully secured;
b. the Zoning By-law Amendment for Application 25 165357 STE 04 OZ has come into full force and effect;
c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Executive Director, Development Review or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, or as otherwise determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits (conditional or full permit) for the approved development on the site; and
e. the owner has confirmed, in writing, that all existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished are vacant.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate, has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.
4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 3286-3316 Dundas Street West after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 pursuant to section 6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:
a. the owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;
b. the owner erects solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
c. the owner erects the proposed building on the site no later than three (3) years from the date that the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units commences, subject to the timeframe being extended at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
d. should the owner fail to complete the proposed building within the time specified in Recommendation 4.c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, as with municipal property taxes, an amount equal to the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such amount shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the Residential Demolition Permit is issued.
5. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement and any other related agreements.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on April 1, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 6 rental dwelling units located at 3286-3316 Dundas Street West. The 6 rental units are proposed to be replaced as part of the new development on the site. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
The proposed development on the site at 3286-3316 Dundas Street West is the subject of a related Zoning By-law Amendment application (25 165357 STE 04 OZ). The proposed development would permit a 11-storey (35m including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building with 191 dwelling units, including 6 replacement rental units. An approval report for the Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.
This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-284985.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285048.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
TE31.4 - 3459 and 3461 Dundas Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Bill 361 has been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 3459 and 3461 Dundas Street West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (March 13, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to report to the May 28, 2026 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council with the necessary amendments to Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 3459 and 3461 Dundas Street West from Permit Parking Area 1E.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on April 1, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a seven-storey mixed-use building at 3459 and 3461 Dundas Street West. The application proposes a total of 2,520 square metres of gross floor area (GFA), including 45 dwelling units and 65 square metres of non-residential GFA.
The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024 (PPS, 2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan. The proposed development will provide a diversity of unit types, retail space at grade along Dundas Street West and an improved public realm.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285180.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285275.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285182.pdf
Speakers
Renee Proulx
Joan Krammer
Nathan Bishop
Debra Reynolds
Phil McCordic, Chief Executive Officer, Executive Producer, Windy Isle Entertainment Inc.
Shereen Ali
Tara Muzumdar
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-206572.pdf
(March 29, 2026) E-mail from Renee Proulx (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Sabrina Campolucci (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Nathan Bishop (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Tara Muzumdar (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Brittany Lavery (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Scott Prudham (TE.Supp)
(April 1, 2026) Letter from Damiel Moule, More Neighbours Toronto (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207129.pdf
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Matthew Bucci (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Joan Krammer (TE.New)
Communications (City Council)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Tara Muzumdar (CC.Supp)
TE31.5 - 1423 Dufferin Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Bill 341 has been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 1423 Dufferin Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (March 13, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 1423 Dufferin Street from Permit Parking.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on April 1, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 9 storey mixed-use building at 1423 Dufferin Street. The proposed building includes 60 purpose-built rental units, with a total gross floor area of 3,961 square metres including 123 square metres of ground floor commercial-retail space along Dufferin Street. The proposed development includes a 1.37 metre laneway widening on Lane W Bristol N Geary. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285186.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285247.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285187.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Community Council)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Antero and Elisa Rebelo (TE.New)
TE31.6 - 333 Lake Shore Boulevard East, 200 Queens Quay East, and 2, 11, and 11 R Small Street (Quayside Blocks 3, 4 and 5) - Draft Plan of Subdivision Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. In accordance with the delegated approval under Section 415-16 of the Toronto Municipal Code, as amended, City Council be advised that the Executive Director, Development Review intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision for 333 Lake Shore Boulevard East, 200 Queens Quay East, and 2, 11, and 11 R Small Street, and portions of the current Parliament Street alignment and Queens Quay East, as generally illustrated in Attachment 3 to the report (March 16, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to:
a. draft approval conditions which must be fulfilled prior final approval and the release of the Plan of Subdivision for registration;
b. resolution of outstanding matters arising from the technical review of the application, as set out in the report (March 16, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to the satisfaction of the City; and
c. any revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any additional modified conditions as the Executive Director, Development Review may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the ongoing technical review of this development.
2. City Council approve that in accordance with Section 51 of the Planning Act, the owner shall convey to the City, an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 8,992 square metres (Blocks 2, 3 and 6), to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor in accordance with the timing established in the Quayside Projects Delivery Agreement dated April 29, 2024.
3. City Council approve the acceptance of on-site parkland dedication, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances and encroachments (with the exception of Dock Wall and Temporary Easement requirements), in an acceptable environmental condition; the owner may propose the exception of encumbrances of tiebacks, where such an encumbrance is deemed acceptable by the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the City Solicitor; and such an encumbrance will be subject to the payment of compensation to the City, in an amount as determined by the Executive Director, Development Review and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on April 1, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report advises that the Executive Director, Development Review, acting under delegated authority, intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision necessary to facilitate the second phase of development of the Quayside lands, encompassing 333 Lake Shore Boulevard East, 200 Queens Quay East, and 2, 11, and 11 R Small Street, as well as portions of the current Parliament Street alignment and Queens Quay East ("Quayside Phase Two"), subject to conditions.
The application proposes to create a total of eight blocks, consisting of an extension of Queens Quay East, the creation of two development blocks with a combined size of 1.015 hectares, two public streets, two public parks (Silo Park and the Water’s Edge Promenade) and Parliament Slip lake fill. The approval of the Draft Plan of Subdivision will be subject to conditions that require the transfer of streets and parkland into public ownership, the reservation of a block for a school site, construction of municipal services, and other matters that will facilitate the orderly development of Quayside Phase Two lands.
The application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024). The application also conforms to the City's Official Plan, Central Waterfront Secondary Plan, Keating Channel Precinct Plan, and has regard for the criteria in Section 51(24) of the Planning Act, subject to addressing outstanding matters from the ongoing technical review of the application.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285216.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285217.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(March 31, 2026) Letter from Sidonia J. Tomasella, Aird & Berlis LLP (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207066.pdf
(March 31, 2026) Letter from Anne Benedetti, Goodmans LLP (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207173.pdf
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
TE31.10 - 55-77 Davisville Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 55-77 Davisville Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Revised Attachment 6 to the report (March 16, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review to require the owner to develop a Construction Mitigation and Tenant Communication Plan to mitigate the impacts of construction of the development on tenants of the existing rental building prior to Site Plan Approval, all to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review.
4. City Council request that the Executive Director, Development Review secure through the Site Plan Control process pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, the owner's obligation to undertake improvements to the existing rental building, at its sole expense and at no cost to tenants, at 77 Davisville Avenue, as follows:
a. laundry room upgrades including new washers and dryers and accessible washer dryer stations;
b. new indoor amenity space with programming to be determined in the future; and
c. repairs and updates to the existing pool.
5. City Council approve that in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act prior to the first above grade building permit, the owner shall convey to the City, an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 406 square metres located in the southwest portion of the development site.
6. City Council approve the acceptance of on-site parkland dedication, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition; the owner may propose the exception of encumbrances of tiebacks and an underground parking garage, where such encumbrances are deemed acceptable by the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the City Solicitor; and such encumbrances will be subject to the payment of compensation to the City, in an amount as determined by the Executive Director, Development Review and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.
7. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
8. City Council request the applicant, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Executive Director, Development Review, to establish a Neighbourhood Liaison Committee with key community stakeholders, including the South Eglinton Davisville Residents Association, the Davisville Junior Public School and the 77 Davisville Tenant Association, and consult the Neighbourhood Liaison Committee on the Site Plan Application and the Construction Management Plan.
9. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and the City Solicitor, to work with the applicant to explore an in-kind community benefit contribution pursuant to Section 37(6) of the Planning Act, to provide streetscape and public realm improvements, and to report back to City Council for further instruction on any offer of in-kind community benefits made by the applicant.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on April 1, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 121.5-metre (37-storeys excluding mechanical penthouse) residential building with approximately 29,271 square metres of total gross floor area at 55-77 Davisville Avenue. A new mid-block connection is proposed along the east lot line from Davisville Avenue to Balliol Street. A new 406-square-metre park is also proposed on site, with frontage along Balliol Street.
The application also proposes to retain the existing 29-storey rental apartment building at 77 Davisville containing 483 rental dwelling units.
The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan and the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285262.pdf
Revised attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285746.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285263.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285276.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-206605.pdf
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Haley McGean (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Brian McClelland (TE.Supp)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Melanie Warren (TE.New)
TE31.11 - 10 Rosehill Avenue - City-Initiated Temporary Use Zoning By-law - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Bill 342 has been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council enact the temporary use Zoning By-law amendment for the lands municipally known as 10 Rosehill Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Revised Attachment 5 to the report (March 16, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on April 1, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends the approval of a City-initiated Temporary Use Zoning By-law to temporarily permit concert hall, place of amusement, place of assembly and communications and broadcasting establishment uses within the existing building at 10 Rosehill Avenue for a period of three years.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285221.pdf
Revised attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285549.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285222.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285273.pdf
Speakers
TE31.12 - 1196-1210 Yonge Street and 2-8 Birch Avenue - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application File 21 239181 STE 12 RH in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of eight existing rental dwelling units located at 1196-1210 Yonge Street and 2-8 Birch Avenue, subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain eight replacement rental dwelling units on the lands at 257 and 261 Poplar Plains Road for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement;
b. the replacement rental dwelling units required by Recommendation 1.a. above shall collectively have a total gross floor area of at least 852 square metres and be comprised of 1 one-bedroom unit, 3 two-bedroom units, and 4 three-bedroom units, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to the City Planning Division dated February 23, 2026; any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
c. the owner shall, as part of the eight replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above, provide at least 2 two-bedroom units replacement rental dwelling units at affordable rents, defined as gross monthly rent no greater than one times the average City of Toronto rent by unit type, as reported annually by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, and 1 one-bedroom unit and 1 two-bedroom unit at mid-range rents, defined as gross monthly rent that exceeds Affordable Rent but is no greater than 1.5 times the average City of Toronto rent by unit type, all for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit; the rents of the remaining 4 replacement rental dwelling units shall be unrestricted;
d. the owner shall provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the eight existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
e. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry and central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit at no extra charge; and
f. the owner shall enter into, and register on title to the lands at 1196-1210 Yonge Street and 2-8 Birch Avenue and 257 and 261 Poplar Plains Road, an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 1.a. through 1.e. above, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the demolition of the eight existing rental dwelling units located at 1196-1210 Yonge Street and 2-8 Birch Avenue after all the following have occurred:
a. all conditions in Recommendation 1 above have been fully secured;
b. the Zoning By-law Amendments for Application 21 239174 STE 12 OZ have come into full force and effect;
c. the replacement units at 257 and 261 Poplar Plains Road are ready for occupancy;
d. the lands at 257 and 261 Poplar Plains Road are owned by a single entity, as a single, consolidated parcel of land; and
e. the owner has confirmed, in writing, that all existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished are vacant.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate, has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.
4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 1196-1210 Yonge Street and 2-8 Birch Avenue after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 pursuant to section 6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:
a. the owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;
b. the owner erects solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
c. the owner erects the proposed building on the site no later than three (3) years from the date that the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units commences, subject to the timeframe being extended at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
d. should the owner fail to complete the proposed building within the time specified in Part 4.c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, as with municipal property taxes, an amount equal to the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such amount shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the Residential Demolition Permit is issued.
5. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement and any other related agreements.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on April 1, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 8 rental dwelling units located at 1196-1210 Yonge Street and 2-8 Birch Avenue. The 8 rental units are proposed to be replaced offsite within new multiplexes at 257 and 261 Poplar Plains Road. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to move directly from their existing unit to one of the replacement units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
The properties at 1196-1210 Yonge Street and 2-8 Birch Avenue are the subject of a Zoning By-law Amendment application (21 239174 STE 12 OZ), which was appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT). The OLT issued a written decision on October 10, 2024, approving a settlement on the Zoning Bylaw Amendment for a 31-storey mixed-used building with 122 dwelling units, with the final Order being withheld until all outstanding matters, including the necessary agreements with the City and rental housing matters, are secured. City Council subsequently endorsed a revised proposal by the applicant to revise the OLT decision to allow for a 32 storey mixed-use building with 64 units. The revised proposal is subject to approval by the OLT.
This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285172.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285173.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
TE31.13 - 509 Parliament Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Appeal
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal to oppose the appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 509 Parliament Street in its current form.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeals and to resolve the matter on behalf of the City at the City Solicitor’s discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Executive Director, Development Review.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary to implement this decision.
4. In the event Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of the final Order be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that the final form and content of the Zoning By-law Amendment are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Executive Director, Development Review, and any other conditions deemed advisable by the Executive Director, Development Review.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other appropriate staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a public meeting on January13, 2026 and February 19, 2026 that continued on April 1, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 10-storey mixed-use building (38.5 metres including mechanical penthouse) at 509 Parliament Street. The proposal includes 60 dwelling units and approximately 278 square metres of ground floor retail.
The property was identified by City Council as meriting designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. The Designation By-law is currently under appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal and is not yet in force and effect. The proposal includes partial retention of the front façade within the new development. A separate report from Heritage Planning regarding the proposed alterations to the designated heritage property will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this report.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-284619.pdf
Revised Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-284595.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-284598.pdf
(January 5, 2026) Revised Report and Attachments 1-5 and 7-9 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 509 Parliament Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-284596.pdf
(December 18, 2025) Report and Attachments 1-5 and 7-9 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 509 Parliament Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-284620.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-284597.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(January 2, 2026) E-mail from Patricia Brubaker-Poulin (TE.Main)
(January 19, 2026) E-mail from Tina Card (TE.Main)
(January 5, 2026) E-mail from Gilles Huot (TE.Main)
(January 8, 2026) E-mail from Frank Chester (TE.Main)
(January 9, 2026) Letter from Heather Wilberforce (TE.Main)
(January 12, 2026) Submission from Sean McGaffey and Naomi Mares, WND Associates (TE.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-205409.pdf
(January 12, 2026) E-mail from Victoria Hadden (TE.Main)
(January 12, 2026) Letter from Steve Frost (TE.Main)
(January 12, 2026) E-mail from Lisa Sakulensky (TE.Main)
(January 12, 2026) E-mail from Vanda Palter (TE.Main)
(January 13, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Main)
(February 10, 2026) E-mail from Jennifer Cowan (TE.Main)
(February 17, 2026) Letter from Damien Moule, More Neighbours Toronto (TE.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-205404.pdf
(February 18, 2026) Letter from Naomi Mares, Aird and Berlis LLP (TE.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-205405.pdf
(February 19, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Main)
(February 19, 2026) E-mail from Jennifer Cowan (TE.Main)
Communications (City Council)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Harry G. Black (CC.Supp)
13a - 509 Parliament Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Appeal Report
Origin
Summary
On January 13, 2026, Toronto and East York Community Council considered a Zoning By-law Amendment application, and an application for alterations to the proposed designated heritage property at 509 Parliament Street, to permit a 10-storey mixed use building. Toronto and East York Community Council adjourned the public meeting and deferred consideration on both the Zoning By-Law Amendment application and the alterations to the proposed heritage property until the following meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.
On February 19, 2026, Toronto and East York Community Council considered a Zoning By-law Amendment application and an application for alterations to the proposed designated heritage property at 509 Parliament Street. Toronto and East York Community Council adjourned the public meeting and deferred both the Zoning By-Law Amendment application and the alterations to the proposed heritage property until the April 1, 2026, meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.
On March 18, 2026, the applicant appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (“OLT”) due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the time frame in the Planning Act.
This Report is provided as an update in response to the OLT appeal and recommends that the City Solicitor with the appropriate City Staff attend the OLT hearing to support the application in its current form.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285601.pdf
TE31.14 - 509 Parliament Street (Carlton Theatre) - Alterations and Demolition of Heritage Attributes of a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 and 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council forwards the Item to City Council without recommendation.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Section 33 and Section 34(1) 1 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter and demolish heritage attributes of a designated heritage property at 509 Parliament Street (the Carlton Theatre), in connection with a Zoning By-law amendment application on the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.
The subject property contains a one-storey brick masonry building constructed in 1929 as a movie theatre. The property is designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Toronto City Council adopted Designation By-law 103-2024 on February 7, 2024; however, the Designation By-law is currently under appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal and is not in force and effect.
On March 21, 2023, the City received a Zoning By-law amendment application related to the proposed development of the subject property to permit a 10-storey mixed-use building. The proposed development includes the in-situ retention of the west (primary) elevation of the theatre along Parliament Street. A Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated June 20, 2025, was submitted to support the development application.
Through revisions to the application, Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposal conserves the designated heritage property and is consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-284609.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(January 8, 2026) E-mail from Frank Chester (TE.Main)
(January 12, 2026) E-mail from Harry Black (TE.Main)
(January 12, 2026) Letter from Steve Frost (TE.Main)
(January 12, 2026) E-mail from Marni Jackson and Brian Johnson (TE.Main)
(January 13, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Main)
(January 13, 2026) E-mail from Sean O'Donovan and Amanda O'Donovan (TE.Main)
(February 10, 2026) E-mail from Jennifer Cowan (TE.Main)
(February 19, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Main)
(February 19, 2026) E-mail from Jennifer Cowan (TE.Main)
14a - 509 Parliament Street (Carlton Theatre) - Alterations and Demolition of Heritage Attributes of a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 and 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on November 18, 2025 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB37.6 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (October 28, 2025) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Section 33 and Section 34(1) 1 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter and demolish heritage attributes of a designated heritage property at 509 Parliament Street (the Carlton Theatre), in connection with a Zoning By-law amendment application on the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.
The subject property contains a one-storey brick masonry building constructed in 1929 as a movie theatre. The property is designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Toronto City Council adopted Designation By-law 103-2024 on February 7, 2024; however, the Designation By-law is currently under appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal and is not in force and effect.
On March 21, 2023, the City received a Zoning By-law amendment application related to the proposed development of the subject property to permit a 10-storey mixed-use building. The proposed development includes the in-situ retention of the west (primary) elevation of the theatre along Parliament Street. A Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated June 20, 2025, was submitted to support the development application.
Through revisions to the application, Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposal conserves the designated heritage property and is consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285304.pdf
TE31.15 - 419, 421, 423 and 425 Woodbine Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council forwards the Item to City Council without recommendation.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on April 1, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit an 11-storey mixed use building at 419, 421, 423 and 425 Woodbine Avenue. The proposed development would include 123 dwelling units including 11 rental replacement units, 132 square metres of new non-residential gross floor area and two levels of underground parking.
The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, conforms to the City's Official Plan, and represents appropriate intensification that is compatible with the existing and planned context.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285265.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285685.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285266.pdf
Speakers
Katy Phillips
Adam Bletsoe
Adam Smith
Stephen Dunn
Christian Chan, Land Use Planner, The Planning Agency - formerly C2 Planning
Laurie Tennant
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-205983.pdf
(March 19, 2026) E-mail from Shannon Arbek (TE.Supp)
(March 20, 2026) E-mail from Katy Phillips (TE.Supp)
(March 20, 2026) E-mail from Sharon Morgan (TE.Supp)
(March 24, 2026) E-mail from Linda Rume (TE.Supp)
(March 25, 2026) E-mail from Campbell Mauchan (TE.Supp)
(March 25, 2026) E-mail from Katy Phillps (TE.Supp)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Leo Vernik (TE.Supp)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Shilpa Mandhan (TE.Supp)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Myan Marcen-Gaudaur (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Jim Brown (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Laurie and David Tennant (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) Letter from Will de la Guardia, More Neighbours Toronto (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-206954.pdf
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Gwen and Gord Fogel (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Jennifer Farr (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Kelly Greer (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Alex Little (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Teresa Ko (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Colm and Betty O’Brien (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Jeffrey Levitt (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Ana Rios (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Helen Siomos (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Shannon Arbek (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) Presentation from Christian Chan, Land Use Planner, The Planning Agency - formerly C2 Planning (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207096.pdf
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Katy Phillips and John Fyfe (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Campbell Mauchan (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Shannon Arbek (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Elizabeth McGregor and Eric MacLennan (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) Letter from Earnest “Ejay” Tupe (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Tomas Mlcek (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Stephen Dunn (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Eric Hiltunen (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) Multiple Communications from 83 individuals with similar text were received from Saturday, March 21, 2026 at 4:37 a.m. to Tuesday, March 31, 2026 at 4:21 p.m. (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207118.pdf
(April 1, 2026) Letter from Greg Peake and Joanne Kilgour (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Kristi Holtam (TE.New)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Marg Wilson (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Mary Papadopoulos (TE.New)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Cassidy Timlin (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Jennifer Schengili (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Lisa Reid (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Bessie Kalpakis (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Kevin Sullivan (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Robert Gusevs (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Tammy Heermann (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Naima Alam (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Mike and Jennilee Lo Nam (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) Submission from Katy Phillips (TE.New)
Communications (City Council)
(April 2, 2026) E-mail from Lise Desrochers (CC.Main)
(April 2, 2026) E-mail from John Greville (CC.Main)
(April 4, 2026) E-mail from Sandy Douros (CC.Main)
(April 4, 2026) E-mail from Terry-Lee Gaudreau (CC.Main)
(April 3, 2026) E-mail from Angie Valentine (CC.Main)
(April 4, 2026) E-mail from Katy O’Ruanaidh (CC.Main)
(April 4, 2026) E-mail from Joanne Steeves (CC.Main)
(April 7, 2026) E-mail from Sharon Shoot (CC.Main)
(April 7, 2026) E-mail from Michael Genin (CC.Main)
(April 11, 2026) E-mail from Karin Serre (CC.Main)
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Ray Freebury (CC.Main)
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Jim Brown (CC.Main)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Sharon Morgan (CC.Main)
(April 16, 2026) E-mail from Adam Bletsoe (CC.Main)
(April 16, 2026) E-mail from Jane Werniuk (CC.Main)
(April 16, 2026) E-mail from Danielle Amiel (CC.Main)
(April 16, 2026) E-mail from Akshay Gupta (CC.Main)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Marie Harrison (CC.Supp)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Carly Cweef (CC.Supp)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Susan Malloy (CC.Supp)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Resa Fink (CC.Supp)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Nandan Sawant (CC.Supp)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Lucila Hernández (CC.Supp)
(April 18, 2026) E-mail from Matthew Ayearst (CC.Supp)
(April 18, 2026) E-mail from Brian Graff (CC.Supp)
(April 18, 2026) E-mail from Jessica Arseneau (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Jeffrey Levitt (CC.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Charlotte Delouche (CC.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Teresa Ko (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Laurie TenBroeck (CC.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Sharon Morgan (CC.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Jessica Martin (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Katrine Handley-Derry (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from April Wilson-Lange (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Elizabeth McGregor and Eric MacLennan (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) Submission from Katy Phillips (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209733.pdf
(April 19, 2026) Submission from Shannon Arbek (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) Presentation from Laurie Tennant (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Stephen Dunn (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Carolyn Ross (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Jaclyn Crocker (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Laurie and David Tennant (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210093.pdf
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from David Tennant (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Alex Little (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Angeli Humilde (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) Presentation from Elizabeth McGregor (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Tyler Keizer (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Manny Alamwala (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Shilpa Mandhan (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Sophie Courtois (CC.New)
TE31.16 - 419, 421, 423 and 425 Woodbine Avenue - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council forwards the Item to City Council without recommendation.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on April 1, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 11 rental dwelling units located at 419, 421, 423 and 425 Woodbine Avenue. The 11 rental units are proposed to be replaced as part of the new development on the site. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
The proposed development on the site at 419, 421, 423 and 425 Woodbine Avenue is the subject of a related Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application (25 131074 STE 19 OZ). The proposed development would permit a 11-storey residential building with 123 dwelling units, including 11 replacement rental units. An approval report for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.
This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285208.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285209.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-205984.pdf
(March 19, 2026) E-mail from Shannon Arbek (TE.Supp)
(March 25, 2026) E-mail from Campbell Mauchan (TE.Supp)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Leo Vernik (TE.Supp)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Shilpa Mandhan (TE.Supp)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Myan Marcen-Gaudaur (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Kelly Greer (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) Presentation from Christian Chan (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207097.pdf
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Katy Phillips and John Fyfe (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Campbell Mauchan (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Shannon Arbek (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Elizabeth McGregor and Eric MacLennan (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Laurie and David Tennant (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) Multiple Communications from 83 individuals with similar text were received from Saturday, March 21, 2026 at 4:37 a.m. to Tuesday, March 31, 2026 at 4:21 p.m. (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207119.pdf
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Kristi Holtam (TE.New)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Marg Wilson (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Mary Papadopoulos (TE.New)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Cassidy Timlin (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Jennifer Schengili (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Lisa Reid (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Bessie Kalpakis (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Kevin Sullivan (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Robert Gusevs (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Tammy Heermann (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Naima Alam (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Mike and Jennilee Lo Nam (TE.New)
Communications (City Council)
(April 2, 2026) E-mail from Lise Desrochers (CC.Main)
(April 2, 2026) E-mail from John Greville (CC.Main)
(April 4, 2026) E-mail from Sandy Douros (CC.Main)
(April 4, 2026) E-mail from Terry-Lee Gaudreau (CC.Main)
(April 4, 2026) E-mail from Angie Valentine (CC.Main)
(April 4, 2026) E-mail from Katy O’Ruanaidh (CC.Main)
(April 4, 2026) E-mail from Joanne Steeves (CC.Main)
(April 7, 2026) E-mail from Sharon Shoot (CC.Main)
(April 7, 2026) E-mail from Michael Genin (CC.Main)
(April 11, 2026) E-mail from Karin Serre (CC.Main)
(April 14, 2026) E-mail from Ray Freebury (CC.Main)
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Jim Brown (CC.Main)
(April 15, 2026) E-mail from Sharon Morgan (CC.Main)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Adam Bletsoe (CC.Main)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Jane Werniuk (CC.Main)
(April 16, 2026) E-mail from Danielle Amiel (CC.Main)
(April 16, 2026) E-mail from Akshay Gupta (CC.Main)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Marie Harrison (CC.Supp)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Carly Cweef (CC.Supp)
(April 17, 2026) E-mail from Resa Fink (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Tracey Savein (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Kevin Sullivan (CC.Supp)
TE31.17 - 19 to 37 Queens Quay East (Pier 27, Phase 3) - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Appeal Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application appeal for the lands municipally known as 19-37 Queens Quay East and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City Staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision, including requesting any conditions of approval that would be in the City's interest, in the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part.
Origin
Summary
On April 21, 2021, an application to amend the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law was submitted to amend the development permissions for the two remaining buildings to be constructed on the Pier 27 development site at 19-37 Queens Quay East (the "Pier 27 Lands").
Building A (25 Queens Quay East) has Site Plan Approval for a 13 storey building, comprising 132 residential units, at-grade retail fronting onto Queens Quay East, and a childcare centre. The application proposes to reduce the number of storeys at Building A to 11 storeys, while increasing the number of residential units to 136 units. Building F (35 Queens Quay East) also has Site Plan Approval for 13 storeys, comprising 139 residential units. The application proposes to increase the height of Building F to 45 storeys and to increase the number of residential units to 449 units.
On October 27, 2025, the applicant appealed the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) due to Council not making a decision within the time frame required in the Planning Act.
This report recommends that the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the application in its current form and continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285165.pdf
TE31.18 - 353 and 355 Adelaide Street West, 46 Charlotte Street and 16 Oxley Street - Community Benefits Charge In-kind Contribution
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council allow the owner of 353 and 355 Adelaide Street West, 46 Charlotte Street and 16 Oxley Street (the "Site") to design, construct, finish, provide and maintain on the Site 10 affordable rental housing units, as part of the development, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, as an in-kind contribution pursuant to subsection 37(6) of the Planning Act in accordance with the following terms (the "in-kind contribution"):
a. the in-kind contribution shall be comprised of 10 one-bedroom units (the "Affordable Rental Housing Units");
b. the average unit size of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be no less than the average unit size of all the market units, by unit type, of the proposed development; the Affordable Rental Housing units shall collectively have a total gross floor area of at least 623.3 square metres (6,709 square feet);
c. the minimum unit size of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be no less than the minimum unit sizes of all market units, by unit type, of the proposed development;
d. the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be provided in contiguous groups of at least six rental dwelling units;
e. the general configuration, location and layout of the Affordable Rental Housing Units in the development shall be to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review;
f. tenants of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be provided with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the development on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building, without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
g. all Affordable Rental Housing Units will be provided with ensuite laundry facilities and central air conditioning at no extra charge;
h. tenants of the Affordable Rental Housing Units will be provided with access to long-term and short-term bicycle parking, and, where provided, visitor vehicular parking, in accordance with the Zoning By-law and on the same basis as other units within the development;
i. the initial rent (inclusive of utilities) charged to first tenants and upon turnover of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall not exceed Affordable Rent as defined in the Official Plan for a minimum 25-year period, beginning with the date each such unit is first occupied (the "Affordability Period"); during the first 25 years of occupancy, increases to initial rents charged to tenants occupying any of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be in accordance with the Residential Tenancies Act and shall not exceed the provincial rent guideline, regardless of whether the provincial rent guideline applies to the Affordable Rental Housing Units under the Residential Tenancies Act;
j. the owner shall provide and maintain the Affordable Rental Housing Units as rental dwelling units at the rents identified in Recommendation 1.i. above for the duration of the Affordability Period; the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall not be registered as a condominium or any other form of ownership, such as life lease or co-ownership, which provide a right to exclusive possession of a dwelling unit, and no application for conversion for non-rental housing purposes, or application to demolish any Affordable Rental Housing Unit shall be made for the duration of the Affordability Period; and upon the expiration of the Affordability Period, the owner shall continue to provide and maintain the Affordable Rental Housing Units as rental dwelling units, unless and until such time as the owner has applied for and obtained all approvals necessary to do otherwise;
k. the owner will use the City's Centralized Affordable Housing Access System to advertise and select tenants for the Affordable Rental Housing Units, provided it is in place, unless otherwise agreed to by the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat; and at least six months in advance of any Affordable Rental Housing Unit being made available for rent, the owner shall develop and implement an Access Plan which will outline how the Affordable Rental Housing Units will be rented to eligible households in consultation with, and to the satisfaction of, the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat; and
l. the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the proposed development erected on the site are available and ready for occupancy.
2. City Council attribute a value to the in-kind contribution set out in Recommendation 1 above equal to 100 percent of 4 percent of the value of the land (net of any exclusions or exemptions authorized under the Community Benefits Charge By-law), as determined the day before the day the first building permit is issued in respect of the development.
3. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Development Review to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Subsection 37(7.1) of the Planning Act (the "In-kind Contribution Agreement") to address the provision of the in-kind contribution identified in Recommendation 1 above to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor.
Origin
Summary
On March 20 and 21, 2024, City Council directed staff to continue discussions with the owner of 353 and 355 Adelaide Street West, 46 Charlotte Street and 16 Oxley Street on the provision of affordable housing on the lands as a Community Benefits Charge (CBC) in-kind contribution and report back to City Council on the outcome of any proposed agreement.
On June 7, 2024, the Ontario Land Tribunal held a settlement hearing to consider a Zoning By-law Amendment application for a 58-storey mixed-use building with 557 dwelling units, which was approved in principle in the Tribunal's decision issued on June 24, 2024. The final Order was issued on December 3, 2025.
The purpose of this report is to report back to City Council on the applicant's offer to provide 10 affordable rental housing units for 25 years as a CBC in-kind contribution at 353 and 355 Adelaide Street West, 46 Charlotte Street and 16 Oxley Street. The proposed in-kind contribution represents 100 percent of 4 percent of the value of the site, in accordance with the CBC By-law.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285234.pdf
Attachment 2 - In-kind Offer Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285236.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
TE31.19 - 333 College Street and 303 Augusta Avenue - Community Benefits Charge In-kind Offer
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council accept the offer of the owner of 333 College Street and 303 Augusta Avenue (the "Site") dated March 13, 2026 attached as Attachment 1 to the revised report (March 24, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District in respect of in-kind community benefits for the development.
2. City Council allow the owner of 333 College Street and 303 Augusta Avenue (the "Site") to contribute as part of the development, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, an in-kind contribution pursuant to subsection 37(6) of the Planning Act, in accordance with the following terms:
a. pave Ellen Avenue in concrete to City standards to the satisfaction of Transportation Services, including necessary below-grade work as specified in the offer dated March 13, 2026; and
b. provide to the City the following searches in support of bringing the lane abutting 333 College Street (i.e. Ellen Avenue) and the lanes that abut and provide emergency access to Kensington Community School into City ownership, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor:
i. the execution and genealogy searches as further specified in the offer dated March 13, 2026; and
ii. the title searches of adjacent properties as further specified in the offer dated March 13, 2026
3. City Council attribute a value to the in-kind contribution set out in Recommendation 2 above, equal to 48 percent of four percent of the value of the land (net of any exclusions or exemptions authorized under the Community Benefits Charge By-law), as determined the day before the day the building permit is issued in respect of the development and direct staff to advise the owner of such valuation.
4. City Council request the Mayor, as part of the Budget process, to revise the percentage of the Community Benefits Charges funds collected from the development at 333 College Street to be allocated to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation for capital upgrades to Toronto Community Housing Corporation affordable housing properties in Ward 11, in consultation with the local Councillor, from 60 percent to 52 percent.
5. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Development Review to enter into an Agreement pursuant to subsection 37(7.1) of the Planning Act (the "In-kind Contribution Agreement") to address the provision of the in-kind contribution identified in Recommendation 2 above, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, with such agreement to be registered on title to the lands, which agreement shall be evidence of arrangements for the provision of the in-kind contribution that are satisfactory to City Council.
Origin
Summary
On December 16, 2025 City Council approved Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit the construction of a 62.3 metre (20 storeys) mixed-use building containing 638 privately-owned student residence units at 333 College Street and the rear part of 303 Augusta Avenue.
As part of the approval, City Council directed that the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and the City Solicitor, to work with the applicant to finalize an in-kind community benefit contribution pursuant to Section 37(6) of the Planning Act, of up to forty (40) percent of the Community Benefits Charges value, to provide such genealogical and/or other research as the City may require to support bringing into City ownership the lanes that abut 333 College Street (known as Ellen Avenue) and the lanes that abut and provide emergency access to Kensington Community School, and to provide lighting, paving, and public realm improvements for such lanes to the reasonable satisfaction of Transportation Services, and to report back to City Council for further instruction, if required.
Council also requested the Mayor, as part of the Budget process, to allocate sixty (60) percent of the Community Benefits Charges funds collected from the development at 333 College Street to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation for capital upgrades to Toronto Community Housing Corporation affordable housing properties in Ward 11, in consultation with the local Councillor.
The purpose of this report is to report back to City Council on the agreed-to CBC in-kind contribution that will be used toward paving the lane adjacent to the site (known as Ellen Avenue) in concrete to City standards, including related subgrade work, and genealogical or other research to support bringing Ellen Avenue and the lanes that abut and provide emergency access to Kensington Community School into City ownership.
Staff have determined that the value of the Community Benefits Charge would not be sufficient to achieve improvements to the lane abutting and providing access to Kensington Community School in addition to the work on Ellen Avenue. Potential future acquisition of these lanes by the City would allow for further opportunities for the city to implement improvements.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285563.pdf
(March 16, 2026) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 333 College Street and 303 Augusta Avenue - Community Benefits Charge In-kind Offer
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286356.pdf
TE31.20 - Chinatown Tomorrow Planning Initiative - Proposals Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to use the draft West Chinatown Planning Framework included as Attachment 9, the proposed Official Plan Amendments included as Attachments 10, 11 and 12, and the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment as Attachment 13 to the report (March 16, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, as the basis for public and stakeholder consultation, and bring forward final recommendations to the July 9, 2026 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council.
2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to consult with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat in completing the Chinatown Planning Framework and to ensure it considers opportunities to support the stability and growth of community, cooperative and non-market housing, including land trusts, in Chinatown, including Chinatown’s existing stock of community and nonprofit owned housing.
3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review, in collaboration with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to ensure that the final Chinatown Planning Framework adequately supports the proposed Chinatown Cultural District designation and to report back as part of the final Chinatown Planning Framework with:
a. any appropriate changes to the draft Chinatown Planning Framework, including any recommended changes with respect to land use, built form and massing, and to supports for mixed-use, or live-work forms of housing;
b. recommendations for a Community Improvement Plan;
c. recommendations relating to community requests for a Heritage Conservation District Study and for a Secondary Plan;
d. any other appropriate tools through which the City can support renovations, landscaping and facade improvements to buildings in disrepair;
e. next steps for including inclusionary zoning for affordable housing in the Protected Major Transit Stations Areas in Chinatown, once the City is able to do so;
f. any appropriate changes to the draft Chinatown Planning Framework to address Public Realm, Open Space and Public Art as well as a strategy for Laneway Improvement and Animation;
g. recommendations relating to inclusion of the anti-displacement policies found in the Mount Dennis Community for All Action Plan; and
h. a procedure to ensure that the Chinatown Planning Framework and Cultural District designation are considered in the review of all development applications.
4. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to commence a Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment in Chinatown in the fourth quarter of 2026, which will include an analysis of potential cultural heritage resources, and to report back on recommendations for any appropriate implementation tools related to heritage conservation.
5. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to take necessary steps to designate West Chinatown as a Community Improvement Project Area, with the boundaries proposed in Attachment 2 to the report (March 16, 2026) from Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
6. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in collaboration with the Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, through the reporting on the Community Improvement Plan for West Chinatown, to evaluate the potential for the Community Improvement Plan to include supports for affordable retail and cultural space.
7. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in collaboration with the Executive Director, Development Review, to assess the feasibility of creating Urban Design Guidelines for West Chinatown and to report back as part of the Final Report on the Chinatown Tomorrow Planning Initiative.
8. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to conduct a jurisdictional scan, including consultation with local stakeholders, to identify whether any secondary plans in Ontario include enforceable anti-displacement measures and to report back as part of the Final Report on the Chinatown Tomorrow Planning Initiative.
9. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report back to the appropriate committee in the second quarter of 2026 with recommendations relating to pedestrianizing Huron Street as a cultural plaza in the immediate vicinity of the current plaza just north of Dundas Street West.
Origin
Summary
West Chinatown is a vibrant, inclusive and culturally rich community with an important history. This report provides an update on the Chinatown Tomorrow Planning Initiative, which aims to understand the unique character of West Chinatown and how to effectively plan for new development that will conserve and support the existing built form and cultural heritage; preserve the unique retail character; contribute to affordable housing; and ensure that the public realm, parkland and community services meet the needs of the community.
This proposals report presents a draft West Chinatown Planning Framework as well as proposed policy changes through Official Plan Amendments and a Zoning By-law Amendment, to guide future development in the area. The purpose of this recommendation is to bring together and translate community priorities into directions on community and economic development, land use planning and development. Additional community consultation will be completed in Q2 of 2026 and staff intend to bring forward a Final Report in July 2026.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285268.pdf
Attachment 8 - Community Consultation Final Report - Part 1 - English
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285269.pdf
Attachment 8 - Community Consultation Final Report - Part 2 - Chinese - Simplified
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285270.pdf
Attachment 8 - Community Consultation Final Report - Part 3 - Chinese - Traditional
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285271.pdf
Speakers
Anson Ng
Agnes Man, Executive Director, Chinese Canadian National Council for Social Justice
Sandy Geen Lup Yep, Education Programs Coordinator, JIA Foundation
Diana Yoon
Jeanette Liu, Yueh Tung Restaurant
Joanna Liu, Yueh Tung Restaurant
Meghan Reidy, Chinatown Business Improvement Area
Hannia Cheng, Toronto Chinatown Land Trust
Arlene Chan
Sebastian Tansil, Kensington Market Community Land Trust
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-205874.pdf
(March 24, 2026) E-mail from Rick Wong (TE.Supp)
(March 25, 2026) E-mail from Lily Ruble (TE.Supp)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Neve Adams (TE.Supp)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Joseph Banh (TE.Supp)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Nigel Carvalho (TE.Supp)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Gloria Yip (TE.Supp)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Pansy Lee (TE.Supp)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Amy Wang (TE.Supp)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Helene Kwong (TE.Supp)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Nicholas Wong (TE.Supp)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Van Gonzales (TE.Supp)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Ying Wong (TE.Supp)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Jhony Li Feng (TE.Supp)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Keisha St. Louis-McBurnie (TE.Supp)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Brenda Joy Lem (TE.Supp)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Dean Sgouromitis (TE.Supp)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Soda Wang (TE.Supp)
(March 27, 2026) E-mail from Michael Chong (TE.Supp)
(March 28, 2026) E-mail from Adriel Ngo (TE.Supp)
(March 28, 2026) E-mail from Phat Le (TE.Supp)
(March 28, 2026) E-mail from Jenny Park (TE.Supp)
(March 28, 2026) E-mail from Ivy Farquhar-McDonnell (TE.Supp)
(March 28, 2026) E-mail from Adrienne Tang (TE.Supp)
(March 28, 2026) E-mail from Cheesan Chew (TE.Supp)
(March 28, 2026) E-mail from Irina Rouby Apelbaum (TE.Supp)
(March 28, 2026) E-mail from Kaitlyn Chan (TE.Supp)
(March 28, 2026) E-mail from Brian Chang (TE.Supp)
(March 29, 2026) E-mail from Richard Fung (TE.Supp)
(March 29, 2026) Letter from Kai Wong and Sara Constant, Co-Chairs, Board of Directors, Toronto Chinatown Land Trust (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-206913.pdf
(March 29, 2026) E-mail from Tim Maxwell (TE.Supp)
(March 28, 2026) E-mail from Alison Read (TE.Supp)
(March 29, 2026) E-mail from Bryan Hong (TE.Supp)
(March 29, 2026) E-mail from Gloria Zhou (TE.Supp)
(March 29, 2026) Letter from Agnes Man, Executive Director, Chinese Canadian National Council for Social Justice (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-206918.pdf
(March 29, 2026) E-mail from Thaddaeus Kwan (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Karen Kar Yen Law (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Alix Aylen (TE.Supp)
(March 29, 2026) E-mail from Nali Mikail (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Connie Lee (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Emily Chan (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Ian Weir (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Amber Edwards (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Angela Wang (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Howard Eng (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Shivam Chadha (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Angela Pang (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Nicholas Yu (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Lily Jeon (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Shulan Tien (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Mike Yam (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Elizabeth MacLeod (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Pam Frache (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Kal Nong (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Linda Zhang (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Simone Pegis (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Faizaan Khan (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Kallen Law (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Cara Habayeb (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Yumi Numata (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Simon Tang (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Mengzhu Fu (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Rosa Wan (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Sami Yam (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) Letter from Helen Lee (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Jen Chow (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Kyeng Wan Seo (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Hannah Weiss (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Andrea Luu (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Adrianne Yiu (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) Letter from Sandy Geen Lup Yep, JIA Foundation (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207009.pdf
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Christie Carriere (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Rahul Sehijpaul (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Jess Misak (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Ryan Collins-Swartz, Co-Executive Director, Tapestry Community Capital (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207032.pdf
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Robyn Letson (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Vivienne Chartrand (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Trang Nguyen (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Nam Hoang, Director of Multimedia, Makeshift Collective (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Christopher Hardy (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Aysha Natsheh (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Ujwal Mantha (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Nicholas Di Genova (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Marie Sotto (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Denise Martins (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Kiera Chion (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Lulu Wei (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Karian Chen (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Faye Pang (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Carol Mark (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Cam Wong (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Wenting Li (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Morris Lum (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) Letter from Alix Aylen, Co-Chair, Kensington Market Community Land Trust (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207071.pdf
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Lillian Baker (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Christie Wong (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Chanel Vinet (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Asha Legendre-Simpson (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Eugene Wang (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Jessica Wu (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Susie Lee-Guillaumont (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Vesna Jocic (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Po-Tsing, J. Thian (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Anson Ng (TE.Supp)
(March 30, 2026) Letter from Cheryll Case, Founder and Executive Director, Community in Public (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207056.pdf
(March 30, 2026) Letter from Diana Yoon (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207085.pdf
(March 30, 2026) E-mail from Adrien Hall (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Courtney Ayukawa (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Richard Chan (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Mohamed Serageldin (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) Letter from Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, President, Grange Community Association (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207105.pdf
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Lily Lu (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Alex Chin (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Smadar Carmon (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Kirk Philipps (TE.Supp)
(March 31, 2026) Letter from Mercedes Sharpe Zayas, Project Manager, Social Planning Toronto (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207134.pdf
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Esther Lee (TE.New)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Pablo Rincon (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Lily Shulman (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Rosel Kim (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Julie Tian (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Lunan Zhao (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) Letter from Sebastian Tansil, Kensington Market Community Land Trust (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-207127.pdf
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Connor Wan (TE.New)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Justine Wong (TE.New)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Emmett McCourt (TE.New)
(March 31, 2026) E-mail from Anna Geng (TE.New)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Marcee Botembe (TE.New)
Communications (City Council)
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Celestija Mesic (CC.Main)
TE31.22 - 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of three new buildings above the Warehouse Building on the lands known municipally as 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated February 14, 2026, prepared by architectsAlliance and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and the Heritage Impact Assessment, prepared by Giaimo + Associates Architects Inc., dated March 9, 2026, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
2. City Council direct that its consent to the application to alter the designated heritage property at 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East, in accordance with Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, are also subject to the following conditions:
a. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall:
1. amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated February 14, 2026, prepared by architectsAlliance and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by Giaimo + Associates Architects Inc., dated March 9, 2026, and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.a.2. below, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;
2. provide a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East prepared by Giaimo + Associates Architects Inc., dated March 9, 2026, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
3. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.a.2. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
4. provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
5. provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
6. provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
7. submit a Signage Plan for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
b. prior to the release of an existing Letter of Credit the owner shall:
1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation and Interpretation Plans and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
2. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in City Council to amend the Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the designated heritage property at 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with the proposed development of the subject property. The application for Site Plan Control is subject to a Heritage Permit application under the Ontario Heritage Act because a previously approved application related to an approved Zoning By-law Amendment has been revised.
The development site, known as the Liquor Control Board of Ontario complex, comprises a buff brick Office Building and Warehouse Building. The buildings are purpose-built rare examples of a provincial headquarters and a commercial and industrial complex from the development of Toronto's Central Waterfront in the 20th-century.
On May 11 and 12, 2022, City Council approved recommendations to alter the heritage property to allow for the construction of three towers above the Office Building and the Warehouse Building. Since the previous scheme was approved, the applicant has revised the conservation strategy accompanying the related Site Plan Control application and a new Heritage Impact Assessment was prepared by Giaimo + Associates Architects Inc., dated March 9, 2026, that considers the impact of the revised proposal.
The proposed development application for the subject property proposes to place the tower above the Warehouse Building only. As a result of the proposed changes to the previous scheme, an amended Heritage Easement Agreement will be required.
Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations continue to conserve the onsite and adjacent heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285261.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
22a - 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on March 30, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB42.3 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (March 30, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the designated heritage property at 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with the proposed development of the subject property. The application for Site Plan Control is subject to a Heritage Permit application under the Ontario Heritage Act because a previously approved application related to an approved Zoning By-law Amendment has been revised.
The development site, known as the Liquor Control Board of Ontario complex, comprises a buff brick Office Building and Warehouse Building. The buildings are purpose-built rare examples of a provincial headquarters and a commercial and industrial complex from the development of Toronto's Central Waterfront in the 20th-century.
On May 11 and 12, 2022, City Council approved recommendations to alter the heritage property to allow for the construction of three towers above the Office Building and the Warehouse Building. Since the previous scheme was approved, the applicant has revised the conservation strategy accompanying the related Site Plan Control application and a new Heritage Impact Assessment was prepared by Giaimo + Associates Architects Inc., dated March 9, 2026, that considers the impact of the revised proposal.
The proposed development application for the subject property proposes to place the tower above the Warehouse Building only. As a result of the proposed changes to the previous scheme, an amended Heritage Easement Agreement will be required.
Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations continue to conserve the onsite and adjacent heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285709.pdf
TE31.23 - Bloor - Yorkville Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment - Final Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Communications have been submitted on this item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council identify the properties listed in Attachment 2 to the report (February 25, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning as having potential cultural heritage value or interest, as identified through the Bloor-Yorkville Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment study.
2. City Council direct the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to undertake all necessary steps, including community consultation, to determine whether the Yorkville Village Core, or a part thereof, merits authorization for study as a potential Heritage Conservation District under Section 40(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Origin
Summary
This report summarizes the findings of the Bloor-Yorkville Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment (CHRA). Staff recommend that Council adopt the list of identified properties with potential cultural heritage value or interest in Attachment 2. Staff also recommend that Council direct staff to review a portion of the Yorkville Village Core to determine if the area, or a part thereof, merits Council’s authorization of a Heritage Conservation District study under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act.
In April 2017, Council directed the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to prepare a new Site and Area Specific Policy for the Bloor-Yorkville Area. In early 2021, City Planning initiated the Bloor-Yorkville Secondary Plan Study, inclusive of a Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment (CHRA). A CHRA documents and analyzes an area’s development history to identify properties with potential cultural heritage value and to make heritage conservation recommendations.
A Historic Context Statement (HCS) is produced within the CHRA to explain the area’s contemporary form and character. The HCS identifies significant periods of historical evolution, analyzes key themes, studies individual properties in relation to themes and historic periods and considers the relationship of properties to one another and their context, to inform the identification of buildings and landscapes with potential cultural heritage value.
In February 2021, Heritage Planning staff and a consultant team, Common Bond Collective, initiated the CHRA, which included community engagement within the Secondary Plan study and through a Heritage Focus Group. In the fall of 2022, the Secondary Plan study was put on hold, and the related CHRA was paused.
On June 19, 2024, Official Plan Amendment 720 came into effect City-wide, which among other matters, established the requirement for a Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report (CHER) under Schedule 3 of the Official Plan for Official Plan Amendments, Zoning By-law Amendments and Plan of Subdivision applications where a property has been adopted by City Council through a City-led study as having potential cultural heritage value or interest, but which is not included on the Heritage Register.
As the Provincial Planning Policy (PPS 2024) Policy 4.6.4 (b) encourages planning authorities to develop and implement proactive strategies for conserving significant built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes, Heritage Planning along with its consultants re-activated the CHRA in summer 2025 and completed the final report in December 2025.
This report presents the methodology and results of the City-led Bloor-Yorkville CHRA consultant study and provides staff recommendations, including the identification of 88 properties with potential cultural heritage value and the potential to authorize a study of a portion of the Yorkville Village Core as a potential Heritage Conservation District. The CHRA also identified the need for city staff to continue Indigenous engagement within the study area to identify places that hold cultural heritage value for Indigenous communities.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-284916.pdf
Attachment 3 - Bloor-Yorkville Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-284917.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-206779.pdf
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210009.pdf
(April 20, 2026) Letter from Jason Park, Kagan Shastri DeMelo Winer Park LLP (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210086.pdf
23a - Bloor - Yorkville Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment - Final Report
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on March 12, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB41.4 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (February 25, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report summarizes the findings of the Bloor-Yorkville Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment (CHRA). Staff recommend that Council adopt the list of identified properties with potential cultural heritage value or interest in Attachment 2. Staff also recommend that Council direct staff to review a portion of the Yorkville Village Core to determine if the area, or a part thereof, merits Council’s authorization of a Heritage Conservation District study under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act.
In April 2017, Council directed the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to prepare a new Site and Area Specific Policy for the Bloor-Yorkville Area. In early 2021, City Planning initiated the Bloor-Yorkville Secondary Plan Study, inclusive of a Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment (CHRA). A CHRA documents and analyzes an area’s development history to identify properties with potential cultural heritage value and to make heritage conservation recommendations.
A Historic Context Statement (HCS) is produced within the CHRA to explain the area’s contemporary form and character. The HCS identifies significant periods of historical evolution, analyzes key themes, studies individual properties in relation to themes and historic periods and considers the relationship of properties to one another and their context, to inform the identification of buildings and landscapes with potential cultural heritage value.
In February 2021, Heritage Planning staff and a consultant team, Common Bond Collective, initiated the CHRA, which included community engagement within the Secondary Plan study and through a Heritage Focus Group. In the fall of 2022, the Secondary Plan study was put on hold, and the related CHRA was paused.
On June 19, 2024, Official Plan Amendment 720 came into effect City-wide, which among other matters, established the requirement for a Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report (CHER) under Schedule 3 of the Official Plan for Official Plan Amendments, Zoning By-law Amendments and Plan of Subdivision applications where a property has been adopted by City Council through a City-led study as having potential cultural heritage value or interest, but which is not included on the Heritage Register.
As the Provincial Planning Policy (PPS 2024) Policy 4.6.4(b) encourages planning authorities to develop and implement proactive strategies for conserving significant built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes, Heritage Planning along with its consultants re-activated the CHRA in summer 2025 and completed the final report in December 2025.
This report presents the methodology and results of the City-led Bloor-Yorkville CHRA consultant study and provides staff recommendations, including the identification of 88 properties with potential cultural heritage value and the potential to authorize a study of a portion of the Yorkville Village Core as a potential Heritage Conservation District. The CHRA also identified the need for city staff to continue Indigenous engagement within the study area to identify places that hold cultural heritage value for Indigenous communities.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285197.pdf
TE31.24 - 9 Drumsnab Road - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - Refusal
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council forwards the Item to City Council without recommendation.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council refuse the alteration to the designated heritage property at 9 Drumsnab Road under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The subject site is a "B-rated" property located in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD). The applicant proposes to remove the existing original windows and to enlarge certain features of the entryway assembly, including the sidelights, transom window, and door opening. These alterations do not comply with the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan, the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, and the Official Plan. As such, staff are recommending that this application be refused.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-284621.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-205422.pdf
(February 18, 2026) E-mail from Ian Andres, Goodmans LLP (TE.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-205421.pdf
(February 19, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Main)
24a - 9 Drumsnab Road - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - Refusal
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on February 11, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB40.7 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (January 20, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council refuse the alteration to the designated heritage property at 9 Drumsnab Road under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The subject site is a "B-rated" property located in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD). The applicant proposes to remove the existing original windows and to enlarge certain features of the entryway assembly, including the sidelights, transom window, and door opening. These alterations do not comply with the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan, the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, and the Official Plan. As such, staff are recommending that this application be refused.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285288.pdf
TE31.25 - 8 Prince Arthur Avenue - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property Under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the construction of a three-storey rear addition on top of the existing building for the heritage property at 8 Prince Arthur Avenue, in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by Bloom Architects, dated January 30, 2026, and Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by GBCA Architects Inc. dated March 2, 2026, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, subject to the following additional conditions:
a. the owner shall:
1. provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 8 Prince Arthur Avenue dated March 2, 2026 prepared by GBCA Architects. to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
2. provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the property at 8 Prince Arthur Avenue, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such a Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
b. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 8 Prince Arthur Avenue, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the property as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall:
1. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.1. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
2. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications that are keyed to the approved Landscape Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2. above, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
3. provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan; and
c. prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.b.3. above, the owner shall:
1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work has been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the property at 8 Prince Arthur Avenue under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act in connection with the construction of a rear addition on the fourth through six storeys of an existing three storey addition to provide expanded office accommodation.
The subject property is located on the north side of Prince Arthur Avenue between Bedford Road and Avenue Road and contains a three-storey building with stucco cladding constructed circa 1886 with a non-original three-storey brick clad rear addition. The subject lands are part of the East Annex Heritage Conservation District (EAHCD).
The development proposal includes adding three additional floors at the rear half of the existing three-storey building for a total of six storeys. The new addition would be three storeys higher than the ridge of the existing heritage building and would therefore not comply with the guidelines for additions in the EAHCD Plan which state that additions should be lower than the height of the existing ridge. Notwithstanding this, the EAHCD Plan recognises that substantial development in the rear yards is possible on some portions of Prince Arthur Avenue and that rear additions here should not "over-power the existing buildings and preferably should have low visibility from the street."
Staff are supportive of the proposed rear addition which is set behind the roof ridge of the existing building and setback over 20 metres from the street and would therefore not "over-power" the existing heritage building. The visual prominence of the heritage building within the public realm would remain. Similar rear additions have been approved on other properties along Prince Arthur Avenue, although they were only four or five storeys in height.
The conservation strategy will fully retain in situ the existing building with minor alterations proposed to the exterior and the existing roof. Alterations include new landscaping to the front yard, a new porch roof and general repairs including a new slate roof, if required. The existing mature tree in the front yard is to be retained.
On March 11, 2026, a minor variance application for this proposal was considered by the Committee of Adjustment.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285203.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
25a - 8 Prince Arthur Avenue - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property Under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Approval
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on March 30, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB42.2 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (March 13, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the property at 8 Prince Arthur Avenue under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act in connection with the construction of a rear addition on the fourth through six storeys of an existing three storey addition to provide expanded office accommodation
.
The subject property is located on the north side of Prince Arthur Avenue between Bedford Road and Avenue Road and contains a three-storey building with stucco cladding constructed circa 1886 with a non-original three-storey brick clad rear addition. The subject lands are part of the East Annex Heritage Conservation District (EAHCD).
The development proposal includes adding three additional floors at the rear half of the existing three-storey building for a total of six storeys. The new addition would be three storeys higher than the ridge of the existing heritage building and would therefore not comply with the guidelines for additions in the EAHCD Plan which state that additions should be lower than the height of the existing ridge. Notwithstanding this, the EAHCD Plan recognises that substantial development in the rear yards is possible on some portions of Prince Arthur Avenue and that rear additions here should not "over-power the existing buildings and preferably should have low visibility from the street."
Staff are supportive of the proposed rear addition which is set behind the roof ridge of the existing building and setback over 20 metres from the street and would therefore not "over-power" the existing heritage building. The visual prominence of the heritage building within the public realm would remain. Similar rear additions have been approved on other properties along Prince Arthur Avenue, although they were only four or five storeys in height.
The conservation strategy will fully retain in situ the existing building with minor alterations proposed to the exterior and the existing roof. Alterations include new landscaping to the front yard, a new porch roof and general repairs including a new slate roof, if required. The existing mature tree in the front yard is to be retained.
On March 11, 2026, a minor variance application for this proposal was considered by the Committee of Adjustment.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285689.pdf
TE31.26 - 699 and 707 Yonge Street - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Refusal
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council refuse the application to alter the designated heritage property/properties at 699 and 707 Yonge Street under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a 64-storey (217 metres, including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building, in accordance with the plans and drawings dated September 15, 2022 prepared by DIALOG on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated September 15, 2022 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
2. If the owner appeals City Council’s decision to refuse the application for alterations to the heritage property at 699 and 707 Yonge Street under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the necessary City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing in opposition to the appeal.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council refuse alterations to the property at 699 and 707 Yonge Street under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the site.
The property at 699 and 707 Yonge Street contains a 3-storey brick row building constructed in 1887. The Brass Rail Tavern has operated at 699 Yonge Street since 1948. Both halves of the commercial row at 699 and 707 Yonge Street have been over-clad, obscuring the original brick walls underneath.
In conjunction with an Official Plan and Zoning Amendment application, the redevelopment proposes a 64-storey plus mechanical penthouse mixed-use building, which retains the façade of the heritage building and incorporates it into the three-storey base of the tower, with a stepback depth of 3 metres from the heritage façade on the Yonge Street (west) elevation.
The proposed 3-metre tower stepback from Yonge Street above the heritage building and the proposed treatment of the front elevation at the ground floor do not adequately conserve the property's cultural heritage values and attributes. Therefore, the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment does not conform with the policies of the Official Plan and does not conserve the cultural heritage values and attributes of the property at 699 and 707 Yonge Street.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-284914.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-206641.pdf
(April 1, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
26a - 699 and 707 Yonge Street - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Refusal
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on March 12, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB41.2 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (February 18, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council refuse alterations to the property at 699 and 707 Yonge Street under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the site.
The property at 699 and 707 Yonge Street contains a 3-storey brick row building constructed in 1887. The Brass Rail Tavern has operated at 699 Yonge Street since 1948. Both halves of the commercial row at 699 and 707 Yonge Street have been over-clad, obscuring the original brick walls underneath.
In conjunction with an Official Plan and Zoning Amendment application, the redevelopment proposes a 64-storey plus mechanical penthouse mixed-use building, which retains the façade of the heritage building and incorporates it into the three-storey base of the tower, with a stepback depth of 3 metres from the heritage façade on the Yonge Street (west) elevation.
The proposed 3-metre tower stepback from Yonge Street above the heritage building and the proposed treatment of the front elevation at the ground floor do not adequately conserve the property's cultural heritage values and attributes. Therefore, the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment does not conform with the policies of the Official Plan and does not conserve the cultural heritage values and attributes of the property at 699 and 707 Yonge Street.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285194.pdf
TE31.27 - 171 East Liberty Street - Inclusion on the Heritage Register
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council include 171 East Liberty Street (including structure addresses at 165 – 167 East Liberty Street, 171 East Liberty Street and 37 Hanna Avenue) on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) attached as Attachment 1 to the report (March 13, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council include 171 East Liberty Street (including structure addresses at 165 – 167 East Liberty Street, 171 East Liberty Street and 37 Hanna Avenue) on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register for its cultural heritage value and interest according to the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) found in Attachment 1.
The subject property at 171 East Liberty Street is located at the southeast corner of East Liberty Street and Hanna Avenue in the Fort York – Liberty Village neighbourhood. The property is a former factory complex containing three brick buildings constructed in 1942 as the John Inglis Company Bren Gun Assembly and Test Buildings. The site comprises buildings at 171 East Liberty Street (the north structure), 37 Hanna Avenue (the south structure) and 165-167 East Liberty Street (the northeast structure with associated smokestack). The property contributes to an important collection of surviving industrial buildings in Liberty Village. A location map and current photograph of the heritage property are found in Attachment 1.
The property recommended for inclusion on the City’s Heritage Register has been researched and evaluated by staff using the criteria prescribed in Ontario Regulation 9/06 and meets one or more of the provincial criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest and is believed to be of cultural heritage value or interest.
On January 1, 2023, amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (the Act) through the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill 23) came into effect. Under the Act, as amended, a municipal heritage register may include properties that have not been designated but Council believes to be of “cultural heritage value or interest", and that meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining whether they are of cultural heritage value or interest. The Act now also limits listing to a period of two years.
As of January 1, 2023, should a property be subject to an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, properties must be listed on the heritage register prior to Part IV designation and before the occurrence of a prescribed event. A prescribed event is a point of time when the application for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application has been deemed complete and the City Clerk provides notice of that complete application to the public in accordance with the Planning Act.
The listing of non-designated properties on the municipal heritage register under the Act also extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Act should a development or demolition application be submitted.
Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed properties.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285204.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
27a - 171 East Liberty Street - Inclusion on the Heritage Register
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on March 30, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB42.1 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (March 13, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council include 171 East Liberty Street (including structure addresses at 165 – 167 East Liberty Street, 171 East Liberty Street and 37 Hanna Avenue) on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register for its cultural heritage value and interest according to the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) found in Attachment 1.
The subject property at 171 East Liberty Street is located at the southeast corner of East Liberty Street and Hanna Avenue in the Fort York – Liberty Village neighbourhood. The property is a former factory complex containing three brick buildings constructed in 1942 as the John Inglis Company Bren Gun Assembly and Test Buildings. The site comprises buildings at 171 East Liberty Street (the north structure), 37 Hanna Avenue (the south structure) and 165-167 East Liberty Street (the northeast structure with associated smokestack). The property contributes to an important collection of surviving industrial buildings in Liberty Village. A location map and current photograph of the heritage property are found in Attachment 1.
The property recommended for inclusion on the City’s Heritage Register has been researched and evaluated by staff using the criteria prescribed in Ontario Regulation 9/06 and meets one or more of the provincial criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest and is believed to be of cultural heritage value or interest.
On January 1, 2023, amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (the Act) through the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill 23) came into effect. Under the Act, as amended, a municipal heritage register may include properties that have not been designated but Council believes to be of “cultural heritage value or interest", and that meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining whether they are of cultural heritage value or interest. The Act now also limits listing to a period of two years.
As of January 1, 2023, should a property be subject to an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, properties must be listed on the heritage register prior to Part IV designation and before the occurrence of a prescribed event. A prescribed event is a point of time when the application for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application has been deemed complete and the City Clerk provides notice of that complete application to the public in accordance with the Planning Act.
The listing of non-designated properties on the municipal heritage register under the Act also extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Act should a development or demolition application be submitted.
Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed properties.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285708.pdf
TE31.35 - Quayside Infrastructure and Public Realm Project (Phase 2) - Construction Staging Area
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the closure of the Martin Goodman Trail on Parliament Street, between Merchant's Wharf and Lake Shore Boulevard East, from April 22, 2026 to December 31, 2026, inclusive.
2. City Council authorize the closure of the east boulevard on Parliament Street, between Merchant's Wharf and Lake Shore Boulevard East to establish a temporary bi-directional bicycle lane, from April 22, 2026 to December 31, 2026.
3. City Council authorize the continuation of the closure of the north side walk and an 8 metre wide portion of the westbound curb lane on Queens Quay East, between Bonnycastle Street and Small Street, from October 4, 2026 to December 31, 2026, inclusive.
4. City Council authorize the continuation of the temporary full closure of Small Street to all road users, where access and egress to existing local properties shall be maintained, between Queens Quay East and Lake Shore Boulevard East, from October 4, 2026 to December 31, 2026, inclusive.
5. City Council direct the applicant to continue to pressure wash or sweep (weather permitting) the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
6. City Council direct the applicant to continue to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
7. City Council direct the applicant to continue to provide sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
8. City Council direct the applicant to continue to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large-scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
9. City Council direct the applicant to continue to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
10. City Council direct the applicant to continue to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
11. City Council direct the applicant to continue to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City Engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance, and construction activities to municipal infrastructure with the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
12. City Council direct that Queens Quay East, Parliament Street and Small Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) when the project is complete.
13. City Council direct the applicant, in consultation with Transportation Services, to continue to maintain any bicycle lanes and install appropriate signage to inform drivers and cyclists of any changes to the bicycle lanes.
14. City Council direct the applicant to continue to provide monthly community meetings, to discuss any concerns raised by the community.
15. City Council direct the applicant to continue to suspend truck movements including deliveries to the site between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. weekdays.
Origin
Summary
As Queens Quay East is a major arterial road, City Council approval of this report is required.
Waterfront Toronto is delivering development enabling infrastructure and public space in the Quayside precinct bounded by Lake Shore Boulevard to the north, Bonnycastle Street to the west, Lake Ontario to the south and the Victory Soya Mills Silos to the east under the Quayside Infrastructure and Public Realm (QIPR) project. The QIPR project will realign Parliament Street, extend Queens Quay east to the Silos, normalize the Parliament Street and Queens Quay East intersection, deliver necessary servicing connections and improve Bonnycastle Street and Small Street. The QIPR implementation will unlock development parcels that include commitments for affordable housing and deliver much needed public realm improvements to the area. As a result, there will be a realignment and lane reconfiguration of Queens Quay East, from Lower Sherbourne Street to Parliament Street.
At its meeting on May 21, 2025, City Council authorized the:
- Temporary closure of the north sidewalk and a portion of the westbound curb lane on Queens Quay East, between Small Street and Bonnycastle Street; and
- Temporary closure of Small Street to all road users, between Lake Shore Boulevard East and Queens Quay East for a period of 16 months, from June 2, 2025 to October 4, 2026.
The delivery of servicing connections and improvements to Small Street are currently underway. The next phase of construction includes the realignment of Parliament Street and extension of Queens Quay East which requires the closure of the Martin Goodman Trail in the vicinity of Parliament Street to accommodate the construction of the new roadways and associated public realm. As a result, a temporary and protected bi-direction bicycle lane will be implemented in the existing boulevard area of the northbound curb lane on Parliament Street. The existing pedestrian sidewalk on the east side of Parliament Street will continue to be maintained. Under the existing staging plan, vehicle lane capacity will be maintained with no changes required
Due to a delay in the Release for Construction and changes in scope for the work, the existing construction staging on Small Street and Queens Quay are required to be extended to complete the works in those areas.
Therefore, Transportation Services is requesting authorization for the following:
- Temporary detour of the Martin Goodman Trail on Parliament Street, between Merchant's Wharf and Lake Shore Boulevard East and;
- Temporary closure of the east side boulevard on Parliament Street between Merchant's Wharf and Lake Shore Boulevard East and the provision of a temporary bi-direction bicycle lane for a period of 9 months between April 22, 2026 and December 31, 2026
- Extension of the existing temporary closure of the north sidewalk and a portion of the westbound curb lane on Queens Quay East, between Small Street and Bonnycastle Street from October 4, 2026 to December 31, 2026; and
- Extension of the existing temporary closure of Small Street to all road users, between Lake Shore Boulevard East and Queens Quay East from October 4, 2026 to December 31, 2026.
As there are no changes to vehicle lane capacity, a new traffic impact study has not been conducted.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285260.pdf
TE31.38 - 49 Ontario Street (Phase 1) - Construction Staging Area
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Bills 392 and 393 have been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the closure of the north sidewalk and the northerly eastbound cycle track on Adelaide Street East, between Ontario Street and Berkeley Street, and a provision of a temporary bicycle lane within the eastbound lane, from April 23, 2026, to September 30, 2027, inclusive.
2 City Council authorize the closure of a 5.5 metre wide portion of the east sidewalk and east boulevard allowance on Ontario Street, between a point 31.5 metres north of Adelaide Street East and a point 32.5 metres further north, from April 23, 2026, to September 30, 2027, inclusive.
3. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday at a rate of $4.25 per hour and for a maximum of 3 hours, on the east side of Ontario Street, between a point 31.5 metres north of Adelaide Street and a point 89 metre south of Richmond Street East.
4. City Council rescind the existing permit parking on the odd side of Ontario Street, between a point 31.5 metres north of Adelaide Street East and a point 55 metres further north, from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., at all times.
5. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the east side of Ontario Street, between a point 31.5 metres north of Adelaide Street East and a point 58 metres further north.
6. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash or sweep (weather permitting) the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
7. City Council direct the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected and unobstructed walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices, for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and ensure it is compliant with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
8. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
9. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
10. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to install converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
11. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
12. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
13. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
14. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
15. City Council direct the applicant to include a minimum of 75 percent of advertisement surface area on the construction hoarding to be allocated to artwork with adequate spotlighting at their sole cost; design is to be reviewed and approved by the local Ward Councillor.
16. City Council direct the applicant, in consultation with Transportation Services, to install appropriate signage to inform drivers and cyclists of any changes to the bicycle lanes.
17. City Council direct the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City Engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance and construction activities to municipal infrastructure with the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work. Construction staging is not permitted on Berkeley Street until the City watermain replacement project is completed.
18. City Council direct that the occupation permit for construction staging on Ontario Street, Adelaide Street East and Berkeley Street be conditional, subject to there being no conflicts with Metrolinx transit project construction.
19. City Council direct that Ontario Street, Adelaide Street East and Berkeley Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) when the project is complete.
20. City Council authorize the temporary installation of a Pedestrian Crossover Level 2 Type C on Ontario Street, at a point approximately 71 metres north of Adelaide Street East, to be in operation from April 23, 2026, to September 30, 2027, which the issuance of the construction staging permit must be conditional on the Pedestrian Crossover being operational.
21. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to temporarily install a Pedestrian Crossover Level 2 Type C on Ontario Street, approximately 71 metres north of Adelaide Street East, to be in operation until September 30, 2027 or completion of the 49 Ontario Street Project.
22. City Council direct the applicant to establish a Construction Management Working Group that meets monthly and invite local stakeholders including Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto Buildings, adjacent neighbours, local resident groups, local Business Improvement Areas and local school administration.
23. City Council direct the applicant to create a publicly accessible website with regular construction updates and post the website address on the construction site hoarding, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
24. City Council direct the applicant to mitigate light pollution by installing a shield/barrier on any lighting standards in close proximity to adjacent residential properties, such as cranes.
25. City Council direct the applicant to email monthly construction progress reports to the local Councillor, local residents’ association and Business Improvement Area Board of Management.
Origin
Summary
As Adelaide Street East is classified as a major arterial street, City Council approval of this report is required.
DCC 49 Ontario Inc. is constructing two rental towers including affordable housing at 49 Ontario Street. The site is located on the north side of Adelaide Street East, between Ontario Street and Berkeley Street.
Construction will be undertaken in two phases with varying degrees of sidewalk and lane closures taking place on Ontario Street, Adelaide Street East, and Berkeley Street. This report deals with the matters related to Phase 1 (below grade construction). Phase 2 (above grade construction) will be discussed in a future staff report.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to temporarily close the following:
- The north sidewalk and the northerly eastbound cycle track on Adelaide Street East, for a period of 18 months from April 23, 2026 to September 30, 2027; and
- The east boulevard allowance and full sidewalk closure on Ontario Street.
Pedestrians on the north side of Adelaide Street East will be redirected to cross to the south side at the traffic control signals located at the intersections of Adelaide Street East with Ontario Street and Berkeley Street. Advance warning signage will be installed upstream at the intersection of Richmond Street East and Berkeley Street. Due to the density of residential buildings and businesses on Ontario Street, a temporary pedestrian crossover will be installed to facilitate safe pedestrian crossings.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285681.pdf
(March 16, 2026) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services on 49 Ontario Street (Phase 1) - Construction Staging Area
TE31.39 - 53-55 Yonge Street - Construction Staging Area Time Extension
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the closure of the east sidewalk and a 3.2 metre wide portion of the northbound curb lane on Yonge Street, between a point 31 metres north of Wellington Street East and a point 37 metres further north, from May 1, 2026 to July 31, 2026, inclusive.
2. City Council authorize the closure of the south sidewalk and a 4.6 metre wide portion of the eastbound curb lane on Colborne Street, between Yonge Street and a point 52 metres east, from May 1, 2026 to July 31, 2026 inclusive.
3. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the south side of Colborne Street, between a point 31.5 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 20.5 metres further east.
4. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of Colborne Street, between a point 31.5 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 15 metres further east.
5. City Council rescind the existing commercial loading zone in effect at all times on the south side of Colborne Street, between a point 31.5 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 15 metres further east.
6. City Council designate Colborne Street, between Yonge Street and a point 52 metres east, as one-way for westbound traffic only.
7. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Colborne Street between Yonge Street and a point 52 metres east.
8. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday, from April 1 to October 31, inclusive, at a rate of $6.75 for one hour and for a maximum of three hours, on the north side of Colborne Street, between a point 9 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 27 metres further east.
9. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation designated as a motorcycle parking zone in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday; 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday, from April 1 to October 31, inclusive, at a rate of $0.00, no period limit, on the north side of Colborne Street, between a point 9 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 18 metres further east.
10. City Council prohibit westbound left turns at the intersection of Colborne Street and Yonge Street.
11. City Council prohibit northbound right turns at the intersection of Yonge Street and Colborne Street.
12. City Council prohibit southbound left turns at the intersection of Yonge Street and Colborne Street.
13. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition at all times on the east side of Yonge Street, between Wellington Street East and King Street East.
14. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays on the east side of Yonge Street, between Wellington Street East and King Street East.
15. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the east side of Yonge Street, between Wellington Street East and King Street East.
16. City Council direct the applicant to continue to pressure wash or sweep (weather permitting) the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
17. City Council direct the applicant to continue to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
18. City Council direct the applicant to continue to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to install converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
19. City Council direct the applicant to continue to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
20. City Council direct the applicant to continue to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large-scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
21. City Council direct the applicant to continue to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
22. City Council direct the applicant to continue to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
23. City Council direct the applicant to continue to provide monthly community meetings, to discuss any concerns raised by the community.
24. City Council direct the applicant to create a publicly accessible website with regular construction updates and post the website address on the construction site hoarding, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
25. City Council direct the applicant to mitigate light pollution by installing a shield/barrier on any lighting standards in close proximity to adjacent residential properties, such as cranes.
26. City Council direct the applicant to establish a Construction Management Working Group that meets monthly and invite local stakeholders including Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto Buildings, adjacent neighbours, local resident groups, local Business Improvement Areas and local school administration.
27. City Council direct the applicant to email monthly construction progress reports to the local Councillor and local residents’ associations.
28. City Council direct that Yonge Street and Colborne Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) when the project is complete.
29. City Council direct the applicant to continue to suspend truck movements including deliveries to the site between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. weekdays.
30. City Council direct the applicant to continue to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City Engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance, and construction activities to municipal infrastructure within the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work; more specifically, Toronto Water watermain replacement work planned on Yonge Street in 2026-2027.
Origin
Summary
As Yonge Street is classified as a major arterial street, City Council approval of this report is required.
H&R REIT is demolishing the properties at 53 and 55 Yonge Street in preparation for a future development. The site is located on the east side of Yonge Street, between Wellington Street East and Colborne Street.
At its meeting on July 23 and 24, 2025, City Council authorized the:
- Temporary closure of a portion of the east sidewalk and northbound curb lane of Yonge Street between Wellington Street East and Colborne Street, for a period of 10 months, from July 28, 2025 to May 1, 2026; and
- Temporary closure of a portion of the south sidewalk and eastbound curb lane on Colborne Street between Yonge Street and Scott Street, for a period of 10 months, from July 28, 2025 to May 1, 2026.
The above noted construction staging area overlaps with the existing staging by the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Easier Access project for the King Station until May 2026.
Due to delays in establishing construction staging area delineation between the two constructors, the construction start date was delayed and a time extension is required.
TTC has confirmed that the TTC Easier Access project for the King Station is expected to be complete by May 1, 2026. Therefore, the developer has requested to adjust the existing staging area for the demolition work after May 1, 2026, once TTC has demobilized and removed their existing construction staging. The result is that the developer will take over a portion of the existing TTC construction staging area so that the existing footprint is no longer shared between both constructors.
Pedestrians will continue to be redirected from the east side of Yonge Street to the opposite sidewalk. Pedestrian movements on the south side of Colborne Street will be redirected to the north side.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization for the following:
- Extension of the temporary closure of a portion of the east sidewalk and northbound curb lane of Yonge Street between Wellington Street East and Colborne Street, for a period of three months, from May 1, 2026 to July 31, 2026; and
-Extension of the temporary closure of a portion of the south sidewalk and eastbound curb lane on Colborne Street between Yonge Street and Scott Street for a period of three months, from May 1, 2026 to July 31, 2026.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285244.pdf
TE31.41 - Market Street - Temporary Street Closure
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to temporarily close Market Street to vehicular traffic between The Esplanade and Front Street East from May 10, 2026 to January 9, 2027.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council does not have delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to temporarily close Market Street to vehicular traffic between The Esplanade and Front Street East from May 10, 2026, to January 9, 2027. This temporary closure is required to facilitate the Market Street Closure hosted by the Old Town Toronto BIA.
Given that Transportation Services does not have the authority to close a road for longer than four (4) days, approval from City Council is required in accordance with Section 937-3 of Municipal Code Chapter 937, Temporary Closing of Highways.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285154.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-206151.pdf
(March 22, 2026) E-mail from James Law (TE.Supp)
(March 26, 2026) E-mail from Gary Smith (TE.Supp)
TE31.49 - Accessible Parking Spaces - April 2026 (Non-Delegated)
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Bill 394 has been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of on-street accessible parking spaces at the locations identified in Attachment 1 to the report (March 16, 2026) from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the subject streets, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services is requesting approval for the installation of on-street accessible parking spaces for persons with disabilities.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285215.pdf
TE31.51 - Bayview Avenue - Parking Amendments
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Bill 395 has been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect at all times on the west side of Bayview Avenue, between a point 48 metres north of Mill Street and Lawren Harris Square (north leg).
2. City Council prohibit standing at all times on the west side of Bayview Avenue, between Front Street East and a point 32 metres south of Lawren Harris Square (south leg).
3. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the west side of Bayview Avenue, between a point 48 metres north of Mill Street and Front Street East.
4. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the west side of Bayview Avenue, between a point 32 metres south of Lawren Harris Square (south leg) and Lawren Harris Square (north leg).
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Bayview Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services is recommending that the existing stopping prohibition within the exclusive right-turn lane on the west side of Bayview Avenue, between Front Street East and Lawren Harris Square (south leg), be changed to a standing prohibition. The proposed amendment will allow motorists, including TTC buses at an existing transit stop, to pick-up/drop-off passengers.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285231.pdf
TE31.53 - Traffic and Parking Amendments - Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Traction Power Upgrade Project
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Bills 396 and 397 have been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday at a rate of $6.75 per hour and for a maximum of 3 hours, on the south side of Granby Street, between Church Street and a point 31 metres east of Yonge Street, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
2. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sunday at a rate of $6.75 per hour and for a maximum of 3 hours, on the south side of McGill Street, between Church Street and a point 53.5 metres west, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
3. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sunday at a rate of $6.75 per hour and for a maximum of 3 hours, on the south side of McGill Street, between Sheard Street and a point 60.5 metres west of Church Street, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
4. City Council rescind the existing permit parking on the odd side of Granby Street, between Church Street and Sheard Street, from 12:01 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
5. City Council rescind the existing permit parking on the odd side of McGill Street, between Church Street and Sheard Street, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., at all times, from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
6. City Council rescind the existing permit parking on the odd side of Granby Street, between Church Street and Sheard Street, from 12:01 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., at all times, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
7. City Council rescind the existing permit parking on the odd side of McGill Street, between Church Street and Sheard Street, from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., at all times, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
8. City Council authorize permit parking on the odd side of Granby Street, between Church Street and Sheard Street, from 12:00 midnight of one day to 12:00 midnight of the following day, at all times, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
9. City Council authorize permit parking on the odd side of McGill Street, between Church Street and Sheard Street, from 12:00 midnight of one day to 12:00 midnight of the following day, at all times, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
10. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition at all times on the north side of Granby Street, between a point 31 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 36.6 metres east of Church Street, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
11. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition at all times on the north side of McGill Street, between Church Street and a point 31 metres east of Yonge Street, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
12. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition at all times on the north side of McGill Street, between Church Street and a point 83 metres west, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
13. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition at all times on the east side of Yonge Street, between a point 91 metres south of Carlton Street and a point 41 metres further south, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
14. City Council rescind the existing standing prohibition at all times on the north side of McGill Street, between Sheard Street and a point 83 metres west of Church Street, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
15. City Council rescind the existing one-way westbound traffic only on Granby Street, between Church Street and Sheard Street, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
16. City Council rescind the existing one-way eastbound traffic only on McGill Street, between Church Street and Sheard Street, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
17. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Granby Street, between Church Street and Sheard Street, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
18. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of McGill Street, between Church Street and Sheard Street, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
19. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east side of Yonge Street, between a point 137.5 metres south of Carlton Street and a point 61 metres further south, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
20. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the east side of Yonge Street, between a point 137.5 metres south of Carlton Street and a point 61 metres further south, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
21. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the east side of Yonge Street, between a point 137.5 metres south of Carlton Street and a point 61 meters further south, in effect from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
22. City Council designate a commercial loading zone in effect at all times on the east side of Yonge Street, between a point 91 metres south of Carlton Street and a point 41 metres further south, from April 1, 2026 to August 31, 2026.
23. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
24. City Council direct that Yonge Street, McGill Street, Granby Street, and Sheard Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.
25. City Council direct the applicant, Toronto Transit Commission (TTC), to continue to engage the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area and McGill-Granby Village Residents’ Association as the project progresses.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Yonge Street, City Council approval of this report is required.
City Council, at its meeting on July 23 and 24, 2025, adopted Item 2025.IE23.5, and in doing so, authorized delegated authority to temporarily close vehicular and pedestrian traffic any highway or portion of highway, with the exception of those highways listed in Section 937-4 of Code Chapter 937, as required for the purpose of construction of the Traction Power Upgrade Project contract number S75-7.
The TTC Traction Power Upgrade program involves critical upgrades to TTC’s traction power substations (TPSS), necessary to support the power demands for increased train service and expanded subway station capacity. To upgrade its TPSS infrastructure, TTC needs to upgrade and install new electrification and servicing infrastructure within the public right-of-way.
The Granby Traction Power Substation (TPSS) and Duct Bank Replacement Project is the first project to commence construction within the larger Traction Power Upgrade program. Contract S75-7 involves upgrades to the existing TPSS facility, located on Granby Street between Yonge Street and Church Street. The work requires the replacement of duct banks within the right-of-way to install the required electrical infrastructure needed to provide power to the TTC subway system.
To facilitate construction staging operations, McGill Parkette and Sheard Street, from Granby Street to McGill Street will be temporarily closed to all vehicular traffic. As a result of this full closure, the existing one-way eastbound and westbound traffic operations on McGill Street and Granby Street, respectively, will be temporarily converted to a two-way traffic operation to maintain local access and egress. In addition, the parking machine spaces on Granby Street and McGill Street will be temporarily removed to accommodate 24/7 permit parking operations, to mitigate the traffic and construction impacts to the neighborhood.
Furthermore, the businesses fronting on Yonge Street, with rear access from Sheard Street, will not be able to access Sheard Street to load and unload deliveries. In order to accommodate deliveries, a temporary loading zone will be designated on the east side of Yonge Street, between a point 91 metres south of Carlton Street and a point 41 metres further south.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285672.pdf
(March 16, 2026) Report from the Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services on Traffic and Parking Amendments - Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Traction Power Upgrade Project
TE31.54 - Lake Shore Boulevard East - Mid-Block Pedestrian and Cyclist Traffic Control Signal and Public Realm Improvements
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council forwards the Item to City Council without recommendation.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is providing an update on plans to construct a multi-use trail connection along Lake Shore Boulevard East to close a gap in the Lake Shore Boulevard East Trail between Cherry Street and the Don River bridge, and seeking authority to install a necessary pedestrian and cyclist traffic control signal on Lake Shore Boulevard East.
This report also responds to City Council's request on November 12 and 13, 2025 for a report on public realm improvement plans along Lake Shore Boulevard East, between Carlaw Avenue and Leslie Street.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285191.pdf
TE31.55 - Bay Street and Edward Street - Traffic Control Signals
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Bill 398 has been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Bay Street and Edward Street.
2. Subject to approval of Recommendation 1 above, City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the south side of Edward Street, between Bay Street and a point 15 metres east, in conjunction with the installation of traffic control signals.
3. Subject to approval of Recommendation 1 above, City Council rescind the standing prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of Edward Street, between a point 14 metres west of Bay Street and a point 42 metres further west, in conjunction with the installation of traffic control signals.
4. City Council rescind the parking prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Edward Street, between Yonge Street and Bay Street.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Bay Street, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to install traffic control signals at the intersection of Bay Street and Edward Street. The traffic control signals will provide enhanced safety for all road users and is justified based on the assessment undertaken.
During the investigation, Transportation Services discovered discrepancies between the by-lawed parking regulations and the posted signage on Edward Street. Recommendation 4 will rectify this inconsistency.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285178.pdf
TE31.61 - Exclusion of Bloor-Dufferin from On-Street Residential Permit Parking
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 980 Dufferin Street and 1141 Bloor Street West Street from Permit Parking.
Origin
Summary
I am requesting that the development at the Bloor-Dufferin site be excluded fron the on-street permit parking program.
Excluding new developments from on-street permit parking helps manage the parking supply and encourages residents to adopt more sustainable transportation options such as walking, cycling, and transit. This aligns with the City’s broader goals to reduce congestion and lower emissions, and the expectation that all new developments provide parking to address the demand they generate.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285225.pdf
TE31.67 - Mirvish Village - Traffic Amendments (Non-Delegated)
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Bill 399 has been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council prohibit northbound left turns at all times on Bathurst Street and the private driveway at 758 Bathurst Street, located on the west side of Bathurst Street, approximately 72 metres south of Bloor Street West.
2. City Council prohibit southbound right turns at all times on Bathurst Street and the private driveway at 758 Bathurst Street, located on the west side of Bathurst Street, approximately 72 metres south of Bloor Street West.
Origin
Summary
The Mirvish Village Redevelopment includes properties municipally known as 571-597 Bloor St W, 742-754 and 760-782 Bathurst St, 26-38 Lennox Street, and 581-603 and 588-612 Markham Street with frontage on Bloor Street W, Bathurst Street, Lennox Street, and Markham Street. The owner of the project is Westbank Project Corp, and the corresponding site plan application no 17 187476 STE 19 SA. The proposed mixed-use development includes several mid-rise and tall buildings, ranging from 2 storeys to 27 storeys.
This motion is to implement components of the approved 2021 site plan agreement with Westbank Project Corp. The following are the required turn prohibitions that will operate at all times:
- Bathurst Street and the private driveway at 758 Bathurst Street – _Southbound right-turns
- Bathurst Street and the private driveway at 758 Bathurst Street – _Northbound left-turns
As part of this new development, Markham Street, between Lennox Street and Bloor Street West, will operate one-way in a northbound direction. This development will also incorporate a new private east-west driveway located south of Bloor Steet West, between Markham Street and Bathurst Street. This private driveway will operate one-way in an eastbound direction. The implementations of these turning prohibitions will help reinforce the designated traffic operation surrounding the new mixed-use development (Mirvish Village) and will help deter motorist from making unsafe turns.
The completion of construction and traffic access on Markham Street is scheduled for the middle of April 2026. As a standard condition of a development site plan approval process, the applicant must contact Transportation Services six months prior to completion for staff to prepare the necessary report to Community Council for by-law approval of traffic and parking amendments. This by-law approval is being expedited because this condition was not included in the site plan application process by Development Review.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285741.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management on Mirvish Village - Parking and Traffic Amendments (Non-Delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285742.pdf
TE31.72 - Implementation of a Commercial Loading Zone on Queen Street East
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Bill 400 has been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday, at a rate of $3.25 for 1 hour and for a maximum of three hours, on the north side of Queen Street East, between a point 36 metres east of Jones Avenue and a point 30.5 metres further east.
2. City Council designate a commercial loading zone to be in effect at all times, on the north side of Queen Street East, between a point 36 meters east of Jones Avenue and a point 30.5 meters further east.
3. City Council direct that Queen Street East be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking machine regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) when the project is complete.
Origin
Summary
Reconstruction of the laneway located on the east side of Jones Avenue, approximately 23 metres north of Queen Street East will commence in May. This laneway is the primary loading zone for many businesses on Queen Street East, east of Jones Avenue. The installation of a temporary loading zone on Queen Street East is important for businesses to continue their commercial activities during this construction period.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285767.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services on Implementation of a Commercial Loading Zone on Queen Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-285768.pdf
New Business - Meeting 40
CC40.1 - Payment of Legal Expenses Related to an Integrity Commissioner Investigation
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Clerk recommends that:
1. City Council approve the reimbursement of legal expenses of $20,807.61 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recovery plus any interest owing to the law firm retained by Councillor Chris Moise to assist him in responding to the Integrity Commissioner’s investigation.
Summary
The purpose of this report is for Council, in accordance with the Members of Council Operations Policy, to consider approving the reimbursement of legal fees incurred by Councillor Moise in relation to the recent Integrity Commissioner investigation.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286118.pdf
Communications
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Arnaud Marthouret (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from George Kostiuk (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Reney Gitajn (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Rick Jackson (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Susan Stronell (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Yvonne Whelan (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Brenden Hewko (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Dave Hopper (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from James Maclean (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Jayson Brown (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Karen Seto (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Drew Robertson (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209697.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Peter Rozanec (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209698.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Vincent Giugni (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209699.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Andreas Kalogiannides (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Robin Dixon (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Shahalam Khatri (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Steven Graham (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Tom Caswell (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Bonnie Easterbrook (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210046.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Daniel Mandel (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210047.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Mercedes Smolders (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210048.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Adam Poole (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Brook Coatsworth (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from David Mitchelson (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Jeff Teravainen (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Mark Hagan (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Meredith Mednick (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210054.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Rob Goldstein (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Ben Robinson (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209706.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Nancy Martin (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209707.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Alejandro Bedoya (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Brock Seymour (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from David Arteaga (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Serguei Zernov (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Leon Kushner (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Ian Mitchell (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Carl Doose (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Aman Shanto (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Ray Ravikanthan (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Scott Anderson (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) Letter from Daniel Tate, Executive Director, IntegrityTO (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209724.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Michael See (CC.Main)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Orlando Arruda (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Christopher Colby (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Christopher Bockner (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from John De Leo (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Alan Crossley (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Winston Siegel (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Curt Martin (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Howard Bockner (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Rita Dempster (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209735.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Michael Richards (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Steve Romano (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209737.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Cindi Miller (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Cheryl Eves (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209740.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Brian Cole (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from John De Marco (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209742.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Diane Shears (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Darlene Barrowman (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Kim Kozovski (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209745.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Stavro Stathonikos (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210070.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Deborah Lechter (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Cecil Cicchelli (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210071.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Sheila A. Lippiatt (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Andreas Kalogiannides (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209747.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Michelle Shemilt (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Maurice Bent (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Sue McIntyre (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Sara Urbanowicz (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) Letter from Rick Price (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-209764.pdf
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Pat and Colin Perkel (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Theresa Bubis (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Daniel Kolber (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Andrew Bourgeois (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Brent Snowden (CC.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Catherine Claridge (CC.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Andrew Chapman (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from James Yoon (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Richard Singh (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Erin Atkinson (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Michael Essex (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Glen Kliks (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Randy Byers (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Andrew Wong (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Susan McAllister (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Serafina Galota (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Joe Rankovic (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Andrea Mucciarone (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Jacqueline Connors (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210145.pdf
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Stephanie Nooza (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Liam Collins (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Donny Morgan (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Xavier Kleinermann (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Jared Stein (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Randa Issa (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Xavier Kleinermann (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Allison Chan (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Laura Turner (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Andrey Vul (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Clinton Bonnet (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Jack St. John (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Jason Smith (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Cristiano Santos (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Rhonda Koerner (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Yana Porszt (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Sheila Alma Bloomberg (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210176.pdf
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Jonathan Lewis (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Allan Saenz (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Cinzia Ruffolo (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Giuseppe Scoleri (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/comm/communicationfile-210181.pdf
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Conrad Genee (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from David Alexander Choy (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Bernard Francisco (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Dan Foster (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Brooke Marion (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Kristi Meluck (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Susan Nushis (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Reema Monzer (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Tina Megahey (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from John Norton (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Sean Melzack (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Michael Prior (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Laura Allen (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Manuel A. Medina (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Jonathan Nicoloff (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Izabella Gabowicz (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Duncan Weenen (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Sylvia Adamcik (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Karen Meluck (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Christine Musial (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Deborah Sabadash (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Barbara Indriliunas Snow (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Jessica Krayz (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Chloe Cronin (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Jack Mayer (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Joel Beaulne (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Eric Shedden (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Shane Miersch (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Vivian Yu (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Jean Gillis (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Richard Ethier (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Anna Ardashkina (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Amy Sorrenti (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Nancy Ribeiro (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Daniel Filipe (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Ashley Arora (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Carolyn Morgan (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Samantha Maria Afua Patton (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Cal Lee (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Rob Vellone (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Jerry Jonus (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Roberto De Lauro (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Shawna Shah (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Ben Mulroney (CC.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Cal L (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Hugo Fernandes (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Suzanne Calder (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Ralph Petrungaro (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Darko Joksimovic (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Terry Booth (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Kelly Phan (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Lindsey Stewart (CC.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Joss Rey (CC.New)
(April 23, 2026) E-mail from Sinaya Esposito (CC.New)
(April 23, 2026) E-mail from Joshua Doner (CC.New)
(April 23, 2026) E-mail from Martin Sheppard (CC.New)
(April 23, 2026) E-mail from Lindsay Blackwell (CC.New)
(April 23, 2026) E-mail from Lydia Gilmour (CC.New)
(April 23, 2026) E-mail from Lindsay Shields (CC.New)
(April 23, 2026) E-mail from Eitan Straisfeld (CC.New)
(April 23, 2026) E-mail from Sheldon Hellin (CC.New)
(April 23, 2026) E-mail from Nicki Ward (CC.New)
(April 23, 2026) E-mail from Fernando Freitas (CC.New)
(April 23, 2026) E-mail from Eduino De Melo (CC.New)
CC40.2 - Appointment of Public Members to the Sign Variance Committee
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Sign Variance Committee.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Nominating Panel - Sign Variance Committee.
The Nominating Panel - Sign Variance Committee recommends that:
1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Sign Variance Committee for a term of office ending on April 24, 2030, and until successors are appointed:
Stephen Job
Farzana Jiwani
2. City Council appoint Derek Lett as Chair of the Sign Variance Committee for the remainder of his term ending December 16, 2027, and until a successor is appointed.
The City Clerk further recommends that:
3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the Decision Letter (April 9, 2026) from the Nominating Panel - Sign Variance Committee remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Sign Variance Committee.
Candidates' biographies:
Farzana Jiwani
Farzana brings to the position her expertise as an auditor in the Ontario College Quality Assurance Service, prior mediation experience, and as a trusted advisor in strategic planning and business development. She holds a Master’s degree in Dispute Resolution from the University of Massachusetts - Boston, and a PhD in Public Policy from Carleton University. She is eager to leverage her skills and experience to contribute to her community.
Stephen Job
Stephen Job, a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners, is an experienced manager and adjudicator of complex regulatory matters involving land use planning, environmental compliance, provincial and federal statutes and regulations, municipal by-laws and policies, and public-sector decision-making. He applies specialized expertise, clear analysis, and respectful communication in order to deliver fair and well-reasoned outcomes to complex challenges and contested matters.
Derek Lett
Derek Lett is a retired Ontario Public Service executive. His extensive public sector experience includes leadership roles in line ministries, central agencies and legislative oversight agencies of the provincial government. He is a Course Director in the School of Public Policy and Administration at York University; a trained mediator, the chair of the board of directors of the Canadian Black Policy Network and a former member of City of Toronto’s Committee of Adjustment (North York Panel).
Summary
At its meeting on April 9, 2026, the Nominating Panel - Sign Variance Committee considered Item NS4.1 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (March 24, 2026) from the City Clerk:
The Nominating Panel - Sign Variance Committee will conduct interviews and recommend two candidates and a Chair to City Council for appointment to the Sign Variance Committee.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286188.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Recommended Candidate Package for Appointment to the Sign Variance Committee
(March 24, 2026) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Public Members to the Sign Variance Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286189.pdf
CC40.3 - Appointment of Public Members to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal.
The Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal recommends that:
1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal for a term of office ending April 25, 2030, and until successors are appointed:
Barbara Cappell
Hillary Cook
Anne Gottlieb
Diane Hall
Paulette Haynes
Gavin Leeb
Taivi Lobu
Shirley Nguyen
Emile Ramlochan
Janet Ross
Chantelle Russell
Paul Sommerville
2. City Council appoint Paul Sommerville as Chair of the Administrative Penalty Tribunal for a term of office ending April 25, 2030, and until a successor is appointed.
The City Clerk further recommends that:
3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the Decision Letter (April 7 and 9, 2026) from the Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal.
Candidates' biographies:
Barbara Cappell
Barbara Cappell is a retired lawyer and qualified adjudicator. Before becoming a lawyer, she earned a master’s degree in psychology and worked in educational research. After being called to the Bar in 1983, she worked in private practice for several years until she joined the Legal Department of the City of Toronto in 1991, where she worked until retiring in 2016. After retiring, she qualified as an adjudicator and worked for 5 years as a part-time Vice-Chair at the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal. She was first appointed to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal in 2021.
Hillary Cook
Hilary Cook brings over 20 years of experience litigating before boards and tribunals in labour, employment, and human rights contexts to her practice as a mediator and arbitrator. She holds certificates in Adjudication for Administrative Agencies, Boards and Tribunals, and in Dispute Resolution. She has taught University level courses in Educational Law, Ethics, and Professional Conduct, Employment and Labour Law, and Employment Mediation. She sits on the executives of the Ontario Bar Association’s ADR, Education Law, and Labour and Employment sections where she is also the Continuing Professional Development liaison. She is committed to fairness and to enhancing access to justice for everyone. She is fluent in English and French.
Anne Gottlieb
Anne Gottlieb is an adjudicator and mediator experienced in the delivery of online services. She serves on the Condominium Authority Tribunal and is on the Board of Directors of the Society of Adjudicators and Regulators (SOAR). Anne has been involved in many charitable and not for profit organizations. She holds the following degrees: Hons. B.A., LL.B., LL.M. (ADR).
Diane Hall
Diane Hall is a bilingual professional with significant community service and employment experience relating to human rights, family violence and Ontario's Indigenous people. She has adjudicated appeals for municipal government tribunals and appeal bodies for eleven years. She is also an accomplished dispute resolution specialist achieved through nineteen years experience doing mediation and appeals resolution for the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario and Ombudsman Ontario.
Diane Hall is a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/C)and holds the Advanced Certificate in Adjudication from Osgoode Hall Law School/SOAR and the Dispute Resolution Certificate from the University of Windsor Law School. She is a registered member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals, Ontario's College of Social Workers, and a member of the Society for Ontario Adjudicators and Regulators (SOAR).
Paulette Haynes
Paulette S. Haynes received her Bachelor of Social Science in Political Science from the University of Ottawa and her Bachelor of Laws from Osgoode Hall Law School. She started her own law practice shortly after she was called to the Bar of Ontario in 1994. Ms. Haynes has appeared before all levels of court in Ontario, the Federal Court of Canada, the Tax Court of Canada, and various administrative tribunals. She is also a trained mediator and former By-law Prosecutor with the City of Toronto.
Gavin Leeb
Gavin Leeb was the Legal Director of a large national social justice organization from 2016 until 2023 when he commenced early retirement to pursue other interests. He started with the organization as a staff lawyer in 2008 after being in private practice as a sole practitioner for five years. Prior to attending law school, Gavin worked as an advocate elsewhere in the social justice community. Over the course of his career Gavin was a dedicated litigator who regularly appeared before statutory and ad hoc administrative tribunals and in the Courts. Gavin has lived in Toronto his entire life and maintained an active local presence having coached minor league hockey in a number of programs over a period of 20 plus years. He continues to contribute to civic life through participation in a variety of other community activities. Gavin holds an M.I.R. and a LL.B. from the University of Toronto and a B.A. (C. Hons.) from McMaster University. He was called to the Ontario Bar in 2002.
Taivi Lobu
With a rich history of community-based activity and with legal clinics, Taivi has played an active role in many Toronto neighbourhoods. She has served as the Executive Director of both Community Legal Education Ontario and of the Ontario Justice Education Network. In addition to a law practice, Taivi has had a long career as an adjudicator - primarily with the Health Professions and Health Services Appeal and Review Boards and later, with the Licence Appeal Tribunal. She has been a speaker and multi-year contributor with many justice sector organizations, including the Society for Ontario Adjudicators and Regulators and the Council of Canadian Administrative Tribunals. In 2025 Taivi was awarded the SOAR medal for her contributions to administrative justice. She supports many local initiatives, including Scarborough’s Acoustic Harvest, the Cabbagetown Community Arts Centre and Doors Open Toronto.
Shirley Nguyen
Shirley Nguyen is an adjudicator and dispute resolution professional with extensive experience in administrative justice. She holds a Master of Laws (LL.M.) in Dispute Resolution from Osgoode Hall Law School. In addition to her leadership role sand contributions to legal education, Ms. Nguyen has also volunteered with non-profit organizations in mediation and education through community-based initiatives.
Emile Ramlochan
Emile Ramlochan has held numerous appointments with administrative decision-making bodies created at the federal, provincial, and municipal levels of government. His roles included serving as an adjudicator, arbitrator, tribunal member, mediator, ombudsman investigator, and dispute resolution professional. Currently, he holds a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) degree from York University and is a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School holding three Master of Laws (L.L.M.) degrees in Dispute Resolution, Health Law, and Administrative Law.
Janet Ross
Janet Ross is a graduate of the University of Manitoba, where she earned a Bachelor of Arts degree. She is also a graduate of Osgoode Hall Law and completed the Ontario Bar Admission Course. She practiced law in the private sector before joining the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Hearings Determination Division as a Tribunal Officer and Analyst until retiring in 2019. She was appointed to the Sign Variance Committee in 2022 and became Chair in 2024. She completed her service on the Committee in 2026.
Chantelle Russell
Chantelle Russell is a Licensed Paralegal and Hearing Officer with extensive experience in administrative decision-making and adjudication. She currently serves as a Resolution Officer with the Canadian Transportation Agency, a federal quasi-judicial tribunal, where she analyzes evidence, interprets legislation, and issues fair and impartial decisions. She also serves as a Hearing Officer for the City of Markham's Administrative Monetary Penalty System, conducting hearings in accordance with the Statutory Powers Procedure Act. Chantelle is the owner of TR at Law Paralegal Services and has previously held investigative and adjudicative roles with Service Canada in Employment Insurance programs. She has served as Vice President of CEIU Local 569 and as a Racism and Diversity Facilitator with the Canada School of Public Service. Chantelle is committed to promoting accessibility, fairness, and integrity in administrative justice.
Paul Sommerville
An experienced regulatory professional, with extensive experience in adjudication and policy development. As an executive has led a variety of organizations through evolving mandates, and regulatory environments.
Summary
At its meeting on April 7 and 9, 2026, the Nominating Panel – Administrative Penalty Tribunal considered Item NM5.1 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (March 25, 2026) from the City Clerk:
The Nominating Panel – Administrative Penalty Tribunal will conduct interviews and recommend thirteen candidates, including one as Chair, to City Council for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286190.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Recommended Candidates Package for Appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal
(March 25, 2026) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Public Members to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286211.pdf
CC40.4 - Legal Options to Defend City of Toronto's Interests at Billy Bishop Airport Lands and Other City-Owned Waterfront Lands
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Confidential Attachment - Advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and information about litigation or potential litigation that affects the City of Toronto.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential in its entirety as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege and information about litigation or potential litigation that affects the City.
Summary
At its meeting on March 25 and 26, 2026, City Council requested the City Solicitor to report to its April 22, 23 and 24, 2026 meeting on potential legal options to defend the City of Toronto’s interests, including property ownership, in the Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport lands and other important City-owned Waterfront lands. Confidential Attachment 1 provides further information and advice regarding potential legal options.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286174.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential information from the City Solicitor
CC40.5 - 34 to 70 Montgomery Avenue - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Consent to Review Tribunal Decision
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 8 - Eglinton - Lawrence
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
On July 22, 2024, the Ontario Land Tribunal issued a decision in respect of a settlement of appeals filed by First Capital Realty Inc. from City Council's failure to make a decision on its applications for an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment for the lands municipally known as 34 to 70 Montgomery Avenue. The Ontario Land Tribunal withheld its final order on the Appeals pending the Applicant's satisfaction of various conditions. The Ontario Land Tribunal decision is attached as Public Attachment 2.
On March 30, 2026, the City Solicitor's office received a letter from the solicitor for the new owner of the Site, Graywood Montgomery Limited Partnership, wherein the Owner seeks City Council's consent to file a review request of the Tribunal's July 22, 2024 decision to proceed with a revised proposal. The letter is attached as Public Attachment 1.
The City Solicitor requires further directions in respect of the Owner's request for consent to file a review request of the July 22, 2024 decision with the Tribunal.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286107.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Letter from Goodmans LLP, dated March 30, 2026, on behalf of Graywood Montgomery Limited Partnership
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286108.pdf
Public Attachment 2 - Ontario Land Tribunal Decision (OLT-23-000647), dated July 22, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286109.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Attachment 1 to motion 1 by Councillor Mike Colle
CC40.6 - 2461 to 2475 Dundas Street West - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1, along with the entirety of Confidential Appendix A and Confidential Appendix B to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
On July 24, 2024, the City received a Zoning By-law Amendment application for 2461 to 2475 Dundas Street West to permit the construction of a 29-storey mixed-use building. The application proposed a total of 288 residential units, including nine replacement rental units, and an overall gross floor area of 19,645 square metres, with 360 square metres of ground-floor retail space.
At its meeting of November 13 and 14, 2024, City Council refused the application. The applicant appealed City Council's refusal of the Zoning By-law Amendment application, to the Ontario Land Tribunal on December 4, 2024.
The City Solicitor requires further directions on this matter as it is under appeal at the Ontario Land Tribunal.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286071.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix B - Confidential Information
CC40.7 - 110 Sheppard Avenue East - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 18 - Willowdale
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1, along with the entirety of Confidential Appendix A and Confidential Appendix B to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
An application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit the construction of a 49-storey residential building and 53-storey mixed-use building at 110 Sheppard Avenue East was received. The proposal contains 1,313 residential market-based condominium units and has a total residential gross floor area of 77,968.55 square metres. A 362.16 square metre retail unit fronting Sheppard Avenue East is provided on the ground floor of the 53-storey building. The overall proposal results in a density of 16.88 times the area of the lot. A total of 169 residential parking spaces are provided including 15 visitor parking spaces.
The Applicant appealed City Council's neglect or failure to make a decision on its applications for the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision to the Ontario Land Tribunal. The Ontario Land Tribunal has set this matter down for a hearing commencing July 20, 2026.
The City Solicitor requires further direction as the hearing will start in July 2026.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286077.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Part 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Part 2 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix B - Confidential Information
Confidential Attachment 1 to motion 1 by Councillor Morley
Confidential Appendix A to motion 1 by Councillor Morley
CC40.8 - 59 to 81 Lawton Boulevard - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1, along with the entirety of Confidential Appendix A and Confidential Appendix B to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
On February 14, 2025, an application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the construction of a 38-storey residential building and 43-storey residential building at 59 to 81 Lawton Boulevard was received.
On July 14, 2025, the applicant appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to City Council’s neglect or failure to make a decision on the application for the Zoning By-law Amendment. The Ontario Land Tribunal has set this matter down for a hearing commencing June 8, 2026.
The City Solicitor requires further direction as the hearing will start in June, 2026.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286101.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix B - Confidential Information
CC40.9 - Expropriation of 1430 Gerrard Street East - Request for Directions Regarding Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Confidential Attachment - Contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this Report.
2. City Council direct that all information contained in Confidential Attachment 1, including the confidential recommendations, is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor as it contains advice and information which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
On February 6 and 7, 2024, City Council authorized the expropriation of the property municipally known as 1430 Gerrard Street East (the "Property") which are lands comprised of approximately 9,135 square feet, for municipal purposes including Permanent Affordable Rental Housing (the "Project").
On April 29, 2024, the City registered Plan AT6560961 which expropriated the fee simple interest in the Property.
The Property is located on the north side of Gerrard Street East and west of Coxwell Avenue. At the time of the expropriation, the Property was leased by the owner to the City of Toronto and sub-leased to a non-profit provider of transitional housing.
Parties with security interests in the Property, namely Dramel Limited, Empire Capital Inc., and His Majesty The King In Right of Canada as Represented by the Minister of National Revenue (collectively, the "Security Interest Holders"), have filed claims against the City in respect of their interests. A two-week hearing at the Ontario Land Tribunal has been scheduled to commence on May 17, 2027.
This report deals with litigation that affects the City and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-286204.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Recommendations and Confidential Information
Member Motions - Meeting 40
MM40.1 - Prioritizing Expansion of Roseneath Park - by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to continue to prioritize expansion of Roseneath Park as a key implementation action of the Oakwood-St. Clair Parks Plan.
Summary
In 2021, Parks and Recreation Division studied the Oakwood - St. Clair neighbourhood as a priority area for new and improved parkland. This area has low parkland provision, which is expected to decline with continued residential growth. The Oakwood–St. Clair Parks Plan is a tailored local parks plan informed by community feedback that was collected through multiple online and in-person engagement activities.
The Plan establishes key directions for improving the area’s parks and open spaces, including expansion of existing parkland. Roseneath Park, Charles Breteton Park, and the new park at 261 Nairn Avenue are identified as priority opportunities. Future expansion of the 261 Nairn Avenue park has been secured through off-site parkland dedication. Expansion opportunities for Charles Brereton Park have not yet been secured; however seating improvements are being explored for 2026.
Roseneath Park is a 2340 square metre park serving an area of very low parkland provision near Oakwood Avenue and St. Clair Avenue West. Expansion opportunities have been actively pursued through off-site parkland dedication and direct acquisitions.
In December 2025, the City successfully purchased the property at 252 Winona Drive (Delegated Approval Form 2025-123) to advance this goal. Off-site parkland dedications from the development at located 1500 St. Clair Avenue West have also been secured. Parks and Recreation Division is actively exploring land assembly opportunities with these secured properties to maximize expansion of Roseneath Park.
This motion directs City staff to continue to prioritize Roseneath Park expansion opportunities to improve the size and functionality of this important community asset.
Background Information
MM40.2 - Improving Pedestrian Safety at Ossington Avenue and Dupont Street - by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Councillor Dianne Saxe
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Bill 407 has been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Councillor Dianne Saxe, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of pedestrian crossover signage at the right-turn channel at the northwest corner of the intersection of Ossington Avenue and Dupont Street.
2. City Council authorize yield control on the right-turn channel at the northwest corner of the intersection of Ossington Avenue and Dupont Street.
Summary
The intersection of Ossington Avenue and Dupont Street is at the center of a growing community experiencing rapid development and attracting new businesses. The surrounding area is home to a diverse mix of residents, including families with young children, seniors, and cyclists, who rely on safer streets to experience the best of their neighbourhoods.
Many residents have noted that Ossington Avenue and Dupont Street is not a safe intersection, and that drivers too often speed through turns and nearly hit crossing pedestrians. The City of Toronto has already recognized Dupont Street as a priority corridor for urgent safety improvements through a complete street project that aims to enhance traffic safety and accessibility for all road users. However, as a result of changes to provincial law through Bill 212, the Dupont Complete Street project is currently paused pending review of options before additional consultation resumes.
As an interim measure, the City focused efforts on quick-build intersection safety improvements beginning in October 2025. New curb extensions, curb radius reductions, bright pavement markings, and bollards are now at intersections on Dupont Street, between St. Clarens Avenue and Manning Avenue. These measures are slowing speeding vehicles, reducing crossing distances, and improving visibility for crossing pedestrians.
To further address resident concerns, the City’s Transportation Services Division recommends additional improvements to the pedestrian crossing at Ossington Avenue and Dupont Street to enhance safety. This motion will authorize the installation of signage requiring southbound drivers to yield before turning right onto Dupont Street. This cost-effective measure will build on existing improvements that are reducing turning speeds and improving safety for all road users.
Background Information
Communications
MM40.3 - Re-opening and Amending Item 2025.NY28.10 - 2925 Keele Street (Stanley Greene Block G) Subdivision - Assumption of Services, Correction to Reference Registered Plan 66M-2554 - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Jon Burnside
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 6 - York Centre
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item 2025.NY28.10 only as it pertains to the number of the registered plan. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.
Recommendations
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Jon Burnside, recommends that:
1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.NY28.10 by:
a. deleting the words in Part 1 “Plan of Subdivision 66M-2520” and replacing them with the words “Plan of Subdivision 66M-2554”, so that Part 1 now reads as follows:
1. City Council assume the municipal services relating to Plan of Subdivision 66M-2554;
b. deleting the words in Part 3 “Plan of Subdivision 66M-2520” and replacing them with the words “Plan of Subdivision 66M-2554”, so that Part 3 now reads as follows:
3. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to prepare an assumption By-law to assume the public highway within Plan of Subdivision 66M-2554 and to bring it forward for enactment; and
c. deleting the words in Part 5 “Plan of Subdivision 66M-2520” and replacing them with the words “Plan of Subdivision 66M-2554”, so that Part 5 now reads as follows:
5. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within Plan of Subdivision 66M-2554 to Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc.
Summary
This motion seeks to re-open and amend City Council Item 2025.NY28.10 – Assumption of Services, Registered Plan 66M‑2520, 2925 Keele Street (Stanley Greene Block G) Subdivision, which was adopted by City Council on December 16 and 17, 2025. A typographical error was identified in the title and recommendations of the item, incorrectly referencing Registered Plan 66M‑2520 instead of the correct Registered Plan 66M‑2554. As a result of this error, Legal Services is unable to prepare and enact the Assumption By-law required to formally assume the municipal services and public highways.
The proposed amendments correct the registered plan number throughout the decision to ensure consistency with the actual subdivision registration. These corrections will allow Legal Services to proceed with the Assumption By-law, authorize the assumption of municipal services and public highways within the subdivision Registered Plan 66M‑2554, and enable the transfer of ownership of the street lighting system to Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc.
Requires Re-opening:
North York Community Council Item 2025.NY28.10 (December 16 and 17, 2025 Council Meeting), only as it pertains to the number of the registered plan.
Background Information
MM40.4 - 1666 St. Clair Avenue West - Liquor Licence Application - Sporting Clube Portugues de Toronto - Licence 3605953 - by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
*This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.
Recommendations
Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the issuance of a liquor licence for Sporting Clube Portugues de Toronto, 1666 St. Clair Avenue West is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents unless conditions are placed on the licence, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.
2. City Council request that the Licence Appeal Tribunal provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and be directed to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
Summary
An application has been submitted to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for a liquor licence at the premises at 1666 St. Clair Avenue West operating under the name Sporting Clube Portugues de Toronto. The application is for an indoor and outdoor area. This Motion requests that City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.
This premises is located in close proximity to residential units. There are concerns related to noise, litter, safety, and other potential disturbances to residents in the area. If conditions are put in place, these concerns may be mitigated. Under no circumstance should the establishment be granted a liquor sales license without conditions attached.
Background Information
MM40.5 - Addressing Inaccurate Supporting Documentation Submitted to the Committee of Adjustment - by Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review to report back to City Council in the first quarter of 2027 on the procedures in place to verify the accuracy of supporting documentation submitted to the Committee of Adjustment, including any recommendations for process improvements to address inaccurate supporting documentation.
Summary
Applications brought before the Committee of Adjustment are considered based on their adherence to the four tests as provided by the Planning Act: is the application minor, is the change desirable for the appropriate development of the site and neighbouring lands, does it maintain the intent and purpose of the zoning bylaw, and does it maintain the intent and purpose of the official plan.
There are a range of materials that are submitted to accompany a Committee of Adjustment application, such as letters or petitions of support or opposition. While these materials may not directly impact the four tests, they may nonetheless raise points of consideration and provide context for the Committee‘s review of the application.
It is important that efforts are made to verify these materials and ensure the accuracy of information presented to the Committee of Adjustment.
Background Information
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210150.pdf
(April 21, 2026) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Co-President, Leaside Residents Association (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210177.pdf
MM40.6 - Clarifying the Distinction Between Duplexes and Secondary Suites - by Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to provide clarification on what constitutes a “duplex” versus a secondary suite under the City-wide Zoning By-law, including recommendations on minimum unit size or proportionality between dwelling units to uphold the intent of multiplexes and potential updates to secondary suite definition and permissions to reflect distinctions between the two forms, in their upcoming Multiplex Monitoring Program report.
2. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, to explore the ability to track whether secondary units created under duplex permissions are retained post-construction through the Multiplex Monitoring Program report.
Summary
Since 2023, permissions for multiplexes have existed in neighbourhoods across Toronto. In the years since, the City has monitored the rollout of duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes citywide to identify issues, address challenges and improve the City’s approach to their implementation. This approach has already resulted in a range of improvements to our multiplex by-laws, responding directly to situations that were not anticipated in the initially adopted permissions.
An issue as-of-yet unaddressed in the City’s approach to multiplexes arises from the definition of “duplex” as it currently exists, which is a subset of the broader “houseplex” definition. Houseplexes are entitled to expanded permissions beyond what would typically be allowed for a single-family dwelling, or a detached dwelling with a secondary suite, including relaxed restrictions for height and setbacks.
To meet the definition of a duplex, an applicant must only provide two units on separate levels. No requirements are in place for proportionality between the units in a multiplex, or for minimum unit size beyond what is prescribed in the Ontario Building Code. Notably, this definition is almost indistinguishable from existing “secondary suite” permissions, which are proposed to be harmonized under houseplex permissions.
In practice this has resulted in applications where a minimal secondary dwelling is proposed in the basement of a home, effectively allowing for a larger home than would typically be permitted for a single-family detached building. Where the City’s multiplex policy intends to deliver multiple livable units on lots throughout the City, the lack of clarity around expectations for duplexes results in builds that in some cases do not deliver more than could be accommodated through the existing secondary suite permissions, while receiving the benefit of relaxed restrictions intended to provide more substantial living space.
Reviewing our approach to duplexes will help to align the City’s policy with intended outcomes. If applicants are granted permissions for larger buildings as a result of the inclusion of a second unit, those permissions should be justified by the unit’s scale or proportionality to the primary dwelling unit. Buildings with secondary units achieving the bare minimum required under the Ontario Building Code do not warrant expanded building envelopes and should continue to be regulated under secondary suite permissions.
Background Information
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210151.pdf
(April 21, 2026) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Co-President, Leaside Residents Association (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210170.pdf
MM40.7 - Proclaiming November 19 as Early Age Onset Cancer Awareness Day - by Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, seconded by Councillor Lily Cheng
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, seconded by Councillor Lily Cheng, recommends that:
1. City Council proclaim November 19 as Early Age Onset Cancer Awareness Day.
2. City Council request the Chief Communications Officer, in consultation with the Medical Officer of Health, to conduct a public education campaign in support of Early Age Onset Cancer Awareness Day.
Summary
Early age onset cancers are an increasing concern among Canadians, with rates of diagnosis increasing significantly in Canadians born after 1980 than in earlier generations. Late diagnosis can complicate outcomes for patients, compromising treatment options and leading to poorer outcomes compared to those over the age of 50, who are more regularly screened for cancer.
The Colorectal Cancer Resource and Action Network, a Toronto-based patient focused-organization leading support, education and advocacy efforts for all Canadians impacted by cancer, is a leader in awareness for those diagnosed at an early age.
On November 19 and 20, 2026, Colorectal Cancer Resource and Action Network will be hosting its 6th annual Early Age Onset Cancer Symposium, connecting patients, experts and policymakers to support young Canadians battling this disease.
By proclaiming November 19 as Early Age Onset Cancer Awareness Day, City Council can help raise awareness of this critical issue and affirm our commitment to supporting those affected by cancer in Toronto, and across Canada more broadly.
Background Information
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-209710.pdf
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Christopher Mammoliti (MM.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Mark Gomes (MM.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Jazzmine Freitas (MM.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Steve Slack (MM.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Peter Laneas (MM.New)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Mauricio Castano (MM.New)
(April 22, 2026) Letter from Sean Delaney, Publisher & Owner, Emery Village Voice Ltd. (MM.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Anna Vona (MM.New)
MM40.8 - Proclaiming April as Nepali Heritage Month - by Councillor Neethan Shan, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Neethan Shan, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley, recommends that:
1. City Council proclaim April as “Nepali Heritage Month” for the City of Toronto in 2026, and for future years.
2. City Council request the Province of Ontario to proclaim April as “Nepali Heritage Month” for the Province in 2026 and for future years.
3. City Council request the Government of Canada to proclaim April as “Nepali Heritage Month” for the country in 2026, and for future years.
Summary
April 14th marks the celebration of Nepali New Year, one of the most significant cultural occasions for the Nepali community. The celebration marks a time of renewal, unity, and reflection for Nepali-Canadians and is traditionally celebrated through cultural gatherings, community service, and the sharing of Nepal’s rich heritage with the wider public.
Toronto’s Nepali community continues to be a vibrant and growing part of the City’s diverse population. Nepali‑Canadians actively make meaningful contributions to support the City’s social, cultural, economic, and civic life through supporting healthcare, education, entrepreneurship, public service, arts, sports, and volunteerism.
Recognizing April as Nepali Heritage Month provides an important opportunity to celebrate Nepal’s history, language, arts, literature, traditions, and values, while fostering cross‑cultural understanding, inclusion, and community cohesion citywide.
Background Information
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-209631.pdf
(April 18, 2026) Letter from Bimal Basnet, Chair, and Sudarshan Sapkota, President, Nepalese Canadian Community Services (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-209632.pdf
(April 18, 2026) Letter from Nil Paudel, President, Pashupatinath Nepali Canadian Cultural Centre (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-209633.pdf
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Naresh Budhayer, President, Scarborough Nepali Cricket Club (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-209634.pdf
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Laxman Ghimire (MM.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Vishnu Kanel (MM.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) Letter from Toronto Nepalese Sports Club (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-209637.pdf
(April 18, 2026) Letter from Sudarshan Sapkota (MM.Supp)
(April 18, 2026) E-mail from Manash Rimal (MM.Supp)
(April 18, 2026) Letter from Durga Acharya (MM.Supp)
(April 18, 2026) E-mail from Dipak Mahatara (MM.Supp)
(April 18, 2026) E-mail from Dhiraj Gharti (MM.Supp)
(April 18, 2026) E-mail from Bishnu Poudel (MM.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Ramesh Acharya (MM.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Deepen Rahut Chhetri (MM.Supp)
(April 18, 2026) E-mail from Sonia Panthee (MM.Supp)
(April 18, 2026) E-mail from Gita Gautam (MM.Supp)
(April 18, 2026) E-mail from Chandra Panthee (MM.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Sangeet Paudel (MM.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Roshan Khatri (MM.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Rabina Chhetri (MM.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Nabin Basnet (MM.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) E-mail from Jyoti Khatiwada and Sujata Bhattarai (MM.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) Letter from Shailendra Berma, President, Fishtail Sports Club (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-209712.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Pradeep Raj Subedi (MM.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Roshan Bhattarai (MM.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Sijan Niure (MM.Supp)
(April 20, 2026) Letter from Lilen Gurung, President, and Chunu KC, Secretary, Trillium Foundation (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-209756.pdf
(April 20, 2026) Letter from Ananta Gautam, President, Fishtail Investment Group Inc. (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210083.pdf
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Sujan Dhakal (MM.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) Multiple Communications from Multiple Communications from 149 Individuals (from April 18 to 22, 2026) (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210099.pdf
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Nikesh Pathak (MM.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Som Gurung, on behalf of Tamu Dhee Canada (MM.New)
(April 22, 2026) Letter from Smita Upadhaya, President, Hamilton Nepali Community Organization and Network (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210257.pdf
(April 22, 2026) Letter from Debendra Karki, President, Srijansil Nepali Samaj, Canada (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210247.pdf
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Bikash Karki (MM.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Nabaraj Poudel (MM.New)
(April 20, 2026) Letter from Yam Khatri, President and Suresh Gautam, General Secretary for Baglung Sewa Samaj Canada (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210303.pdf
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Laxmi Pandey Dahal (MM.New)
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Gokarna Lamichhane, General Secretary and Bijay Paudel, Founder President, Federation of Canada Nepal Chamber of Commerce (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210289.pdf
MM40.9 - Cricket Day - by Councillor Neethan Shan, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
April 21, 2026 - A revised Member Motion was posted.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Neethan Shan, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that:
1. City Council proclaim September 24, 2026, as Cricket Day in the City of Toronto.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to engage with international and local cricket organizations, leagues, and other relevant stakeholders to initiate discussions on the potential of hosting cricket events and activities in Toronto.
3. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation in consultation with other relevant divisions to review and identify how the booking processes for park facilities used by cricket leagues and organizations can be improved to support and promote local cricket communities across Toronto.
Summary
Cricket is one of the fastest‑growing sports in the City of Toronto, with participation, demand, and a passionate fan base continuing to expand across the City. While its popularity is rising today, cricket has deep historical roots in Canada. The first international cricket match in the sport’s history was played between Canada and the United States from September 24 to 26, 1844, with Canada claiming victory in the competition hosted at the St. George’s Cricket Club in New York. Reflecting its early significance, cricket was officially declared Canada’s first national sport in 1867. Proclaiming September 24th 2026, as Cricket Day highlights cricket’s cultural heritage, historical importance, and ongoing contributions to Toronto’s diverse communities.
In addition, Cricket Day provides an opportunity to reaffirm the City’s commitment to incorporating cricket into the City, focusing on how to expand access to cricket facilities and programming to provide more equitable, high-quality infrastructure and programming.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286294.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-209651.pdf
(April 19, 2026) Letter from Ken Jeffers, President, Ontario Schools Cricket Association (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-209670.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Dave Simpson, Executive Director, Etobicoke & District Cricket League (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210037.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Jason Sookram, Manager, WI Sports Toronto (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210038.pdf
(April 20, 2026) Letter from Vinod Sharma, Coordinator, Ontario Schools Cricket Association (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210039.pdf
(April 20, 2026) E-mail from Mohnish Bhagat (MM.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) Letter from Paul Hillman (MM.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Virroshi Sriganesh (MM.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) Letter from Paul Turnbull (MM.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from Ravi Mohan (MM.Supp)
(April 21, 2026) E-mail from David Pakirappa (MM.New)
(April 21, 2026) Letter from Parbhat Sharma (MM.New)
(April 19, 2026) Letter from Peter McKenzie (MM.Supp)
(April 19, 2026) Letter from Patrick Russell (MM.Supp)
(April 22, 2026) Letter from Jabeen Akhtar (MM.New)
(April 22, 2026) Letter from Marvin Rotrand, Director General, United Against Hate Canada (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210278.pdf
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Silvio Altomare (MM.New)
(April 19, 2026) Letter from Rosan Lee (MM.Supp)
(April 23, 2026) Letter from Ahil Ahilesan, Chair, The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210309.pdf
MM40.10 - Authorization to Release Section 42 Funds to the Wigmore Park Improvements Project - by Councillor Jon Burnside, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 16 - Don Valley East
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Jon Burnside, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that:
1. City Council amend the 2026–2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Parks and Recreation to increase the project budget for the “Wigmore Park Improvements” project, on a one-time basis, by $367,905.77 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by local Section 42 parkland dedication funds secured in Ward 16 (Source Account: XR2213-4201714), for the purpose of park improvements at Wigmore Park.
Summary
The motion authorizes the release of $367,905.77 in Section 42 funds secured from the development at 1648 Victoria Park Avenue to the Parks and Recreation 2026 – 2035 Capital Budget and Plan for capital improvements at Wigmore Park.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286193.pdf
Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286382.pdf
MM40.11 - Authorization to Release Section 42 Funds to the Ferrand Park Improvements Project - by Councillor Jon Burnside, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 16 - Don Valley East
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Jon Burnside, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that:
1. City Council amend the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Parks and Recreation to increase the project budget for the “Ferrand Park Improvements” project, on a one-time basis, by $439,600 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by local Section 42 parkland dedication funds secured in Ward 16 (Source Account: XR2213-4201076), for the purpose of park improvements at Ferrand Park.
Summary
The motion authorizes the release of $439,600 in Section 42 funds secured from the development at 1185 Eglinton Avenue East to the Parks and Recreation 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for capital improvements at Ferrand Park.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286213.pdf
Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286383.pdf
MM40.12 - Metrolinx Accountability on Joe Shuster Way Fence Graffiti and Public Art - by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that:
1.City Council request Metrolinx, with the engagement of residents of Joe Shuster Way, to provide ongoing graffiti removal services on the Metrolinx-owned wall on the north side of Joe Shuster Way as soon as possible, and to provide funding and a plan for community artwork on the fence to beautify the neighbourhood and deter future graffiti.
Summary
Engaged residents of Joe Shuster Way have long raised concerns regarding the Metrolinx-owned fence on the north side of their street. This fence is a hub for graffiti, sometimes of an offensive nature. My office organized a community walk of the area alongside residents in Summer of 2025 to identify local issues, and this was an outstanding concern.
In the absence of sustained and committed action from Metrolinx on this issue, residents have taken to using their own time and resources to clean this fence, which is unacceptable.
Since last Summer, there have been ongoing efforts from the local councillor’s office and residents to engage appropriate teams at Metrolinx and to get clear commitments for a regular cadence of graffiti clearing on Metrolinx property. Local residents have clearly and consistently expressed the desire to pursue community art on the fence as a long-term strategy to deter graffiti: despite this, no substantive action has been taken. Community art programming is upcoming at select sites on the Ontario Line, and so there is precedent for this type of work to be led by Metrolinx with input from our local communities.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286194.pdf
MM40.13 - "Have Your Say" Amplified: Enhancing Public Consultations and Surveys - Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A Communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, reommends that:
1. City Council direct the Chief Communications Officer to provide on-going centralized communications coordination to ensure all consultations published by the City of Toronto that are open to the general public shall be listed on the City’s "Have Your Say" website, to commence by no later than the first quarter of 2027.
2. City Council direct the Chief Communications Officer to develop formal definitions for each form of public consultation, and include such definitions on the City’s "Have Your Say" website by no later than the first quarter of 2027.
3. City Council direct the Chief Communications Officer to ensure the listing of all consultations published by the City of Toronto that are open to the general public on the City’s "Have Your Say" website contain:
a. a prominently visible “open date” (for clarity, meaning the first date that a member of the public may participate in the consultation); and
b. “close date” (again for clarity, meaning the last date that a member of the public may participate in the consultation).
4. City Council direct the Chief Communications Officer to ensure that the City’s “Toronto.ca" homepage contains a prominent link to the City’s "Have Your Say" website so that members of the public can easily navigate the City’s "Have Your Say" website as soon as practicable.
5. City Council direct the Chief Communications Officer to modify the City’s "Have Your Say" website to provide updated functionalities that allow members of the public to filter the list of consultations published by geographical area and topic, as soon as may be practicable.
6. City Council direct the Chief Communications Officer to ensure that the existing Weekly Councillor Updates provided by the Communications Division include a listing of all new consultations published by the City of Toronto published on the "Have Your Say" website in the preceding week, as soon as may be practicable.
7. City Council direct that the Division Head of any City division which is going to conduct a consultation published by the City of Toronto that is open to the general public, shall ensure that the Communications Division is informed prior to the commencement of the public consultation and provide all information necessary to enable the Communications Division to include the proposed public consultation on the City’s "Have Your Say" website’s listing of public consultation.
Summary
The City of Toronto conducts more than 120 public consultations annually, the majority of which are organized in silos by divisional teams without centralized communications oversight. As a result, Councillors and community members frequently learn of active consultations too late to participate meaningfully.
I would like to ensure that Have Your Say can function as a one-stop shop for Torontonians to have their say. One clearly advertised link with advanced search functions can help drive citizen-engagement and widen the City’s reach.
In order to ensure public input always informs City policy, this motion directs the City's Communications Office to provide centralized oversight of all public consultations and surveys, with mandatory listing on Have Your Say as a condition before any consultation may inform City staff decisions.
Background Information
Communications
MM40.14 - Renewing Official Recognition of Toronto as a Certified Bird Friendly City - by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:
1. City Council support the efforts of Nature Canada’s Bird Friendly Cities program to pursue the potential re-certification of Toronto in the program.
Summary
Nature Canada provides certification of Bird Friendly Cities through an application process conducted by a Bird Team in the municipality composed of engaged stakeholders.
Certification is determined when a municipality has met or exceeded a minimum standard with regard to reducing threats to birds, protecting and restoring natural habitat and increasing climate resiliency; and actively engaging communities in these actions through education and outreach.
One of the requirements of the application is formal municipal support through Council resolution.
City Council at its April 7 and 8, 2021 meeting adopted MM31.22- Officially Recognizing Toronto as a Certified Bird Friendly City. Nature Canada certified Toronto through the stakeholder-led application process. Endorsement by City Council must now be renewed for an updated application and certification process.
Toronto was the first city in North America to establish bird-friendly policies and many cities in Canada and the United States have since followed suit.
All new City development projects must adhere to Toronto Green Standard Version 4, which includes bird collision deterrence measures such as bird-friendly glazing. The City implements the life-saving practice of turning off unnecessary lighting at City-owned facilities during bird migration seasons. And the City leads the Lights Out Toronto campaign, encouraging residents, businesses, and building owners across Toronto to turn off non-essential nighttime lighting during migration seasons.
The City of Toronto has also developed various plans and strategies to protect biodiversity and natural habitat in and around the City, which is essential for birds to thrive as they return to Canadian landscapes during their breeding seasons.
Every May, the City of Toronto participates in the Toronto Bird Celebration, a two week long celebration of birds, culminating in the Colonel Sam Smith Bird Festival, co-hosted by the City of Toronto and community partners.
A Bird Friendly City certification strengthens a municipality’s legacy as a champion for bird conservation and celebrates the efforts of a municipality, as well as the local community organizations, to protect birds in their own backyards.
Background Information
Communications
MM40.15 - Strengthening Racial Equity in City Programs and Services - by Councillor Neethan Shan, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Neethan Shan, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development, in consultation with relevant City divisions, to explore opportunities to highlight best practices, examples of transformative racial equity initiatives underway, lessons learnt from previous initiatives and publishing these initiatives on our website and through a yearly report.
2. City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development to explore the feasibility of establishing a racial justice program advisory body to provide community-informed expertise to City staff, with membership reflecting the diversity of Toronto’s racial and ethnic communities.
3. City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development and relevant City partners assess the potential to support community initiatives that target structural racism through existing grant streams or through new dedicated grant streams, subject to the City’s Budget process.
4. City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development to provide a briefing note as part of the 2027 budget process that includes parts 1 through 3 above.
Summary
The City of Toronto is committed to ensuring fair and accessible services for all residents, regardless of race, ancestry, place of origin, disability, citizenship, creed, gender identity, sexual orientation, family or marital status, socioeconomic status, or other protected grounds.
Despite these commitments, many equity-deserving communities continue to identify gaps in access and outcomes. These gaps may be addressed, in part, through increased awareness of existing City programs and services, improved coordination and targeted investments. Strengthening the City’s capacity to assess inequities and enahnce inclusive program delivery are important steps towards eliminating discrimination and ensuring all Torontonians benefit from City initiatives.
Background Information
Communications
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (MM.New)
MM40.16 - Responding to Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026 - by Councillor Jamaal Myers, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Jamaal Myers, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, recommends that:
1. City Council express its support for the Toronto Transit Commission board's decision on Item 2026.TTC14.18 outlining key principles for staff participation in consultations with the Province of Ontario on the province’s regulatory framework under the Fare Alignment and Seamless Transit Act, 2026.
Recommendations in TTC Item 2026.TTC14.18:
1. Endorse the following key principles to guide TTC staff participation in consultations with the Province of Ontario on the province’s regulatory framework under the Fare Alignment and Seamless Transit Act, 2026:
a. Local authority to develop local solutions to transportation needs – Preserve the autonomy of local transit systems to introduce fare and service policies that meet the needs of local communities and riders, keep transit affordable, and treat all Toronto residents equitably as a key component of the City’s approach to local transportation and congestion management.
b. Protect local transit service quality – Preserve service quality and standards relied upon by our customers – proposals must not negatively impact the experience of most customers who travel within the City of Toronto in efforts to improve cross-boundary travel for the 18% who currently make a connecting trip to GO or a 905-transit system.
c. No unfunded provincial mandates – Provincial decisions to set fares and/or service be matched with full funding (operating and capital) by the Province of Ontario.
d. Value for money – where provincial directives require the use of specific fare payment systems, unified booking systems, or other changes that have a financial impact to the TTC, there must be clear demonstration that the systems offer value for money, respect Toronto taxpayers, and are efficiently and effectively delivered.
e. Respect local transit system expertise and planning process – Consultation that respects the expertise and planning processes of local transit systems, customers and its employees, during both the development of the regulatory framework and when decisions are made using the regulations enacted under the Act.
f. Good governance – ensure opportunities for local transit systems, communities, and labour partners to have voice in decision making supported by a sustainable provincial funding model for public transit.
2. Request the Ontario Minister of Transportation provide an opportunity for public feedback on any regulatory framework or regulations proposed under Bill 98, Schedule 4, the Fare Alignment and Seamless Transit Act, 2026.
3. Request TTC staff to support public advocacy efforts by transit riders and other stakeholders to advance the principles outlined in Recommendation 1.
Summary
On March 30th, 2026, Ontario’s Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing introduced Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026, and on April 14, 2026, the legislation passed Second Reading.
Schedule 4 of Bill 98 will enact the Fare Alignment and Seamless Transit Act, 2026, which enables the Minister of Transportation to exercise sweeping powers over service and fare policies to further integrate transit in the region. Consultation may commence as early as May 2026 on proposals under this new legislation.
The Toronto Transit Commission’s mission is to “serve the needs of transit riders by providing a safe, reliable, efficient and accessible mass public transit service through a seamless integrated network to create access to opportunity for everyone.” The Toronto Transit Commission’s role providing transit that keeps Toronto moving is integral to our city’s economy and the lives of people who rely on the Toronto Transit Commission to get around.
The ability for the Toronto Transit Commission to make decisions about service and fares are fundamental to our ability to deliver transit services that meet the needs of Torontonians and our city’s goals for transportation, congestion, and climate outcomes. These decisions are made by the Toronto Transit Commission Board through the Annual Network Plan, Operating and Capital Budgets, and other plans and strategies, which are informed by community input and considered at public meetings. Bill 98, Building Homes and Improving Transportation Infrastructure Act, 2026 proposes substantial power to the Minister of Transportation to introduce directives via regulation that would impact the Toronto Transit Commission’s authority in these areas.
As a partner in the One Fare program and operator of cross-boundary service on Line 1 into York Region, the Toronto Transit Commission has worked to contribute to a regional transportation network that serves people from across Ontario. These partnerships have been the result of collaboration across agencies and levels of government, and serve as a reminder of how we can work together to continue advancing stronger public transit in Ontario, together. If Bill 98 is adopted, regulations made under the Fare Alignment and Seamless Transit Act, 2026, (Schedule 4 of Bill 98) should be informed by the needs of local communities and continue that history of collaboration and mutual agreement.
At the Toronto Transit Commission Board’s meeting on April 16, 2026, the Board endorsed key principles to guide staff participation in consultations with the Province of Ontario on the regulatory framework under the Fare Alignment and Seamless Transit Act, 2026. This motion seeks Council’s affirmation of that decision.
Background Information
Communications
MM40.17 - 171 Parkside Drive - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This motion relates to a Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing and has been deemed urgent.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment’s approval of the Application A0075/26TEY in respect of the property municipally known as 171 Parkside Drive (the “Appeal”) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing with appropriate City staff.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the Appeal and settle the matter on behalf of the City at their discretion in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
Summary
The Applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment to request variances from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 (Application No. A0075/26TEY) to alter the existing rear one-storey ancillary building by constructing a complete second storey addition which will be converted into a garden suite (the “Application”). The variances required to By-law 569-2013 include rear yard soft landscaping, minimum required rear yard setback for an ancillary building containing a garden suite, minimum required side yard setback for an ancillary building containing a garden suite, distance between ancillary building containing a garden suite and a residential building, and height of an ancillary building containing a garden suite.
On April 9, 2026, the Toronto and East York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment approved the Application (the “Decision”). A copy of the Decision is attached as Attachment 1. The last date of appeal is April 21, 2026.
In a report from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District dated March 26, 2026, Community Planning Staff raised concerns with respect to the Application and recommended that the Application be refused. In particular, Community Planning Staff had concerns that the proposed separation distance between the primary dwelling and garden suite, the increased height of the garden suite, and the reduced year yard soft landscaping may negatively affect the functional quality of the rear yard as well as the privacy and amenity of the primary dwelling and garden suite.
This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the Decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body and to resolve the matter on behalf of the City in their discretion.
This matter is time-sensitive and urgent as the City Solicitor has already appealed the Decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body to preserve its statutory rights.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286220.pdf
Attachment 1 - Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment regarding 171 Parkside Drive, Application No. A0075/26TEY, dated April 9, 2026
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286221.pdf
Attachment 2 - Planning Staff Report dated March 26, 2026
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286222.pdf
Communications
MM40.18 - Authorization to Release Section 42 Funds to the Dieppe Park Baseball Lighting Improvements Project - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2026–2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Parks and Recreation, on a one-time basis, by $170,000 gross and $0 debt in 2026, for a new capital project titled “Dieppe Park Baseball Lighting Improvement”, for the purpose of new lighting for the baseball field at Dieppe Park, fully funded by local Section 42 parkland dedication funds, with such funds to be drawn from the following source accounts:
a. $20,000 from Section 42 Reserve Fund (Source Account: XR2213-4201592);
b. $22,000 from Section 42 Reserve Fund (Source Account: XR2213-4201698);
c. $18,000 from Section 42 Reserve Fund (Source Account: XR2213-4201789);
d. $16,000 from Section 42 Reserve Fund (Source Account: XR2213-4201593);
e. $25,000 from Section 42 Reserve Fund (Source Account: XR2213-4201387);
f. $14,000 from Section 42 Reserve Fund (Source Account: XR2213-4201591);
g. $15,000 from Section 42 Reserve Fund (Source Account: XR2213-4201518);
h. $15,000 from Section 42 Reserve Fund (Source Account: XR2213-4201047); and
i. $25,000 from Section 42 Reserve Fund (Source Account: XR2213-4201649).
Summary
Dieppe Park is a neighbourhood park in Toronto named in honour of the Canadian soldiers who fought in the Dieppe Raid during the Second World War. The park was established in the mid-20th century as part of the former Borough of East York’s efforts to provide sports recreational space for its growing community. From early on, it served as a local hub for sports and outdoor activities, including baseball, skating, and informal recreation.
Over the decades, Dieppe Park has evolved to reflect changing community needs, with additions such as sports fields, a ball diamond, playground areas, and seasonal amenities. Today, it continues to function as an important community park, supporting both organized sports and everyday use, with ongoing upgrades to improve accessibility and facilities.
The baseball/softball diamond at Dieppe Park is currently rated as a ‘B’ diamond. The ball diamond was installed in 1950s. The ball diamond is of great significance for the surrounding community and used for youth baseball programs, adult slo-pitch leagues and permitted recreational groups.
The ball diamond at Dieppe Park is currently undergoing several upgrades in spring 2026 to improve playability and drainage through a donation secured from East York Baseball. The infield will be expanded and rebuilt using new layers of sand and clay to create a more durable and better-draining surface. Crews will remove old material, reshape the field, and ensure proper grading so water drains effectively.
New equipment will also be installed, including:
a. a new home plate; and
b. new base anchors at both 65' and 90' distances (with a double first base at 65').
The lighting at the ball diamond is old and requires upgrading. With ongoing improvements to the ball diamond, this is an opportune time to incorporate lighting upgrades as part of the Phase 2 improvements for Dieppe Park. Replacing the existing lighting with energy-efficient LED fixtures will improve illumination of the diamond and enhance the overall player experience. The lighting scope is not currently included in the Parks and Recreation capital budget or plan.
This motion seeks authority to release Section 42 funds for the Dieppe Park Phase 2 project to facilitate completion of the lighting upgrades.
The motion authorizes the release of $170,000 in Section 42 funds secured from various developments in Ward 14 – Toronto Danforth to the Parks and Recreation 2026 – 2035 Capital Budget and Plan for lighting improvements at Dieppe Park baseball diamond.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286223.pdf
Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286404.pdf
Communications
MM40.19 - Towards a Vision for a Design Standard for Future Toronto Subway Stations - by Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission board to work with the City and Metrolinx to examine the feasibility of:
a. creating a design standard for all new transit stations that includes platform screen edge doors, public washrooms, bike parking and bike share, and well-lit two-storey high ceilings above subway platforms, and maximizing the creation of real estate assets for commercial and community use;
b. including passenger pick-up and drop-off and commuter parking lots with electric vehicle charging solutions in the design plans for all new subway stations outside Downtown Toronto; and
c. installing platform edge doors on all new stations along the Yonge North Subway Extension and Scarborough Subway Extension, and request the Chief Executive Officer of the Toronto Transit Commission provide updates to the Toronto Transit Commission Board through the Toronto Transit Commission’s regular Transit Expansion Updates, and the City Manager provide those updates to City Council.
2. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to work with Metrolinx, in consultation with the Executive Director of Transit Expansion, the Executive Director of Corporate Real Estate Management, the Executive Director of the Housing Development Office, the Chief Executive Officer of CreateTO and the Executive Director of Social Development to initiate conversations regarding the feasibility of a more visionary station design at Steeles Station and Sheppard-McCowan Station that incorporates surface transit operations, new housing, affordable housing, underground real estate opportunities, including potential community space, and the integration of the Station with surrounding buildings, and provide an update to City Council.
3. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO, the President, Toronto Parking Authority, the Chief Strategy and Customer Experience Officer, Toronto Transit Commission and local Business Improvement Areas, to explore the need and opportunities for commuter parking at Steeles Station and Sheppard-McCowan Station, while also considering future parking in nearby developments.
4. City Council direct City Manager and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to provide all updates to the Ontario Ministry of Transportation to strengthen collaboration on future transit stations.
Summary
In light of sustained population growth, increasing development pressure, and rising demand on Toronto’s transit system, there is an opportunity to rethink how transit infrastructure is designed and integrated into the city. Major projects such as the Yonge North Subway Extension and the Scarborough Subway Extension present a rare chance to move beyond a narrow focus on transportation function toward a more holistic approach to station planning.
Historically, many subway stations in Toronto have been designed primarily for mobility, often with limited amenities such as public washrooms, minimal architectural ambition, and weak integration with surrounding communities. As the city evolves, there is growing recognition that stations can function as civic hubs that support not only transit use, but also safety, accessibility, economic activity, housing, and community life.
Global transit systems, including those in Taipei, demonstrate how stations can be designed as open-concept, well-lit, and highly visible environments, often incorporating two-storey configurations, platform screen doors, and stations that are integrated into buildings rather than stand alone structures. Their example also shows how transit agencies can manage real estate assets that generate long-term revenue while bringing vibrancy through retail and community space within stations.
In Toronto, there is an increasing interest in exploring similar approaches to improve safety, accessibility, and financial sustainability. At the same time, it is important to recognize that stations outside the downtown core serve different travel patterns and must accommodate a broader range of access needs, including commuters arriving by car. This requires thoughtful integration of pick-up and drop-off areas, parking, and multi-modal connections that support efficient access while aligning with broader mobility and climate goals.
As Toronto continues planning for expansion, stations such as the future Steeles and Sheppard-McCowan Stations represent a significant opportunity to advance a more ambitious, integrated model of station design. Their scale and locations make them well-suited for transit-oriented development that includes housing, particularly affordable housing, as well as commercial, community, and underground uses. Coordinated planning across City divisions, agencies, and regional partners will be essential to ensure these stations contribute to city-building objectives, support ridership growth, and help generate revenue that can be reinvested in transit. This motion reflects a shift toward viewing transit infrastructure not only as a transportation investment, but as a catalyst for inclusive growth and complete communities. We seek to work collaboratively with Metrolinx towards a visionary design standard to ensure how future stations can be optimized.
Background Information
Communications
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Sharon Yetman (MM.New)
(April 23, 2026) E-mail from Sharon Yetman (MM.New)
MM40.20 - Reinstating Paddle the Don for 2027 - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Toronto Regional Conservation Authority to reinstate Paddle The Don for 2027.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, the Director, Urban Forestry and the Director, Waterfront Secretariat to enter into discussions with Toronto Regional Conservation Authority to determine how the City, and other partners who may be identified, can support the reintroduction of this event in 2027 in a manner consistent with the Toronto Ravine Strategy and Don River watershed objectives and report on these discussions to the June 10, 2026, meeting of the Infrastructure and Environment Committee.
Summary
The City of Toronto has made significant and ongoing investments in the restoration, naturalization, and public accessibility of the Don River and its valley lands, including through implementation of the Toronto Ravine Strategy, improvements to the Lower Don River Trail, and the Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood Protection Project.
Paddle the Don is a long‑standing community event that provided residents with a direct, experiential understanding of the Don River as a living system. Reinstating the event in 2027 would support Toronto Regional Conservation Authority and City objectives to encourage safe enjoyment of ravines, foster environmental education, and strengthen public stewardship of revitalized waterways, consistent with current Toronto Regional Conservation Authority and City Council approved.
Background Information
Communications
MM40.21 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds for the Acquisition of Community Space in the Church Wellesley Village - by Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Confidential Attachment - Proposed or pending acquisition of properties by the City.
Recommendations
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Corporate Real Estate Management by the amount set out in Confidential Attachment 1, fully funded from Section 37 community benefits from the developments identified below in the amounts as set out in Confidential Attachment 1, to advance next steps for the development of community space in Ward 13:
a. 20-26 Maitland Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701376), for new and existing capital improvements in City owned community, cultural, and recreational centres in Ward 13;
b. 244-262 Church Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701311), for new and existing capital improvements in City owned community, cultural, and recreational centres in Ward 13;
c. 319-323 Jarvis Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701209), secured and to be allocated at the discretion of the Chief Planner, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purposes are identified in the Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands;
d. 308-314 Jarvis Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701216), secured and to be allocated for uses that will benefit the community in the vicinity of the Site at the discretion of the Chief Planner in consultation with the Ward Councillor;
e. 454-464 Yonge Street (Source Account: XR3026-3700672), toward the purchase and improvement of new or existing community space for community or non-profit use within Ward 13 - Toronto Centre;
f. 365-375 Church Street (Source Account: XR3028-4500158), toward the purchase and improvement of new or existing community space for community or non-profit use within Ward 13 - Toronto Centre;
g. 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 to 4 Dundonald Street, 7 to 9 Gloucester Street (Source Account: XR3026-3700894), toward the purchase and improvement of new or existing community space for community or non-profit use within Ward 13 - Toronto Centre;
h. 2,6,8 Gloucester Street & 601-613 Yonge Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701144), toward the purchase and improvement of new or existing community space for community or non-profit use within Ward 13 - Toronto Centre;
i. 608-618 Yonge Street, 5-9 St Joseph Street, 15-25 St. Nicholas Street (Source Account: XR3028-4500155), toward community improvements in an area bounded by the north side of College Street to the south, Charles Street to the north, Bay Street to the west and Church Street to the east;
j. 45 Charles Street East (Source Account: XR3026-3700433), secured the purchase and improvement of new or existing community space for community or non-profit use within Ward 13 - Toronto Centre;
k. 480-494 Yonge Street (Source Account: XR3026-3700911), to be allocated towards capital improvements for new or existing cultural and/or community space in the Ward;
l. 55-61 Charles Street East (Source Account: XR3026-3701046), to be allocated towards community, cultural, or recreational facilities capital improvements within Ward 13;
m. 40 Wellesley Street East (Source Account: XR3026-3700721), for improvements to community and cultural facilities in the Ward; and
n. 45 Charles Street East (Source Account: XR3028-4500094), towards the construction of an indoor swimming pool at the Wellesley Community Centre, located at 495 Sherbourne Street, or construction of other community recreation facilities in the vicinity of the lot, and/or to the purchase and improvement of new or existing community space for community or non-profit use within Ward 13, Toronto Centre.
2. City Council direct that the use of Section 37 community benefits be prominently recognized in documents and promotional materials related to any community space expansion work in Ward 13, including on any construction hoarding, in consultation with the Ward Councillor as a requirement within the Undertaking between the City and The 519 Community Centre.
3. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in consultation with the Executive Director, Social Development, to negotiate and enter into an agreement of purchase and sale and such related and ancillary agreements as may be required or desirable to complete the acquisition and activation of the property identified in Confidential Attachment 1 (the “Property”), on such terms and conditions as are acceptable to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
4. City Council direct that the Confidential Attachment remain confidential at this time as it relates to a proposed or pending acquisition of properties by the City.
5. City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Attachment 1 following the closing of any purchase transaction of the property identified in Confidential Attachment 1, at the discretion of the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.
Summary
Toronto Centre is among the fastest-growing wards in the city, and maintaining pace with the demand for community space is essential to preserving the social, cultural, and livability foundations that define strong, resilient neighbourhoods.
The Church-Wellesley Village has long served as a cornerstone of Toronto's identity and a vital cultural and social hub for the city's 2SLGBTQ+ community. In recent years, however, intensified development pressure within the area has significantly reduced the availability of accessible space for 2SLGBTQ+ organizations, eroding the community infrastructure that has historically supported and empowered marginalized residents and visitors alike.
In early 2025, a unique opportunity was presented to acquire an existing building within The Village. Since that time, my office has been working collaboratively with City Staff –from Corporate Real Estate Management, Social Development, The 519, and key community stakeholders, to assess an opportunity to expand community space through partnerships between the City and community organizations. This effort has been coordinated with the Council-adopted Association of Community Centres Expansion Framework and Implementation Strategy, the Community Space Tenancy Policy, and the anticipated Cultural District Program.
As part of this process, in June 2025, City Council approved a staff report on City-Initiated Zoning By-law Amendments re-allocating Section 37 Planning Act funds within Ward 13 from four developments. A Community Consultation Meeting was hosted by City Planning in early June 2025 in connection with that re-allocation. My office has worked collaboratively with City staff to ensure the full cost of this initiative will be covered by Section 37 Community Benefits funds identified and approved for this purpose by City Staff.
This opportunity is about revitalizing The Village by bringing organizations such as Glad Day Bookshop, Pride Toronto, and other 2SLGBTQ+ organizations and agencies back into the neighbourhood. Enriching the Village strengthens Toronto’s long standing place as the nation's champion of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Securing necessary funding through the dedication of section 37 funds represents a significant first step. Next steps include further collaboration between City staff and community organizations to finalize the operating model that will underpin this new opportunity and typical due diligence on any proposed acquisition, including feasibility assessments, facility enhancements, and specific property due diligence. Due to the real estate nature of this matter, the property location has been identified in a confidential attachment, which will be released publicly following the closing of any purchase transaction.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286226.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential information
Communications
MM40.22 - It’s Time to Reinstate Cummer Station for the North York Centre - by Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 18 - Willowdale
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Federal and Provincial governments to consider funding the previously descoped Cummer Station to ensure transit infrastructure can support the current and projected density in the North York Centre Secondary Plan and Yonge North Secondary Plan, noting that these areas will experience significantly higher density than any other stations on the Yonge North Subway Extension outside of Toronto.
Summary
Work on the Yonge North Subway Extension is now underway, with key design and alignment decisions actively advancing. At the same time, the City of Toronto is progressing the North York Centre Secondary Plan (Phase 3), which contemplates the addition of 100,000 new residents in the area. This growth builds on the significant intensification already planned under the Yonge North Secondary Plan. Together, these plans confirm that the Yonge Street corridor between Finch and Steeles is one of the most rapidly intensifying urban areas in the Greater Toronto Area.
This motion is informed by previous City of Toronto staff analysis and Council direction, including the December 2023 “Cummer Station – Supplemental Report” (Background File 241560), which assessed the inclusion of Cummer Station within the Yonge North Subway Extension and confirmed the technical and planning implications of the current alignment.
The current alignment of the Yonge North Subway Extension excludes a station at Cummer Avenue. This omission results in a notably long station spacing of approximately 2 km between Finch and Steeles, which is atypical for a high-density urban context and inconsistent with established Toronto Transit Commission network patterns. In comparison, downtown Line 1 stations such as King, Queen, Dundas, College, and Wellesley are spaced at approximately 500–700 metres, reflecting a planning approach that prioritizes accessibility and walkable station catchments in dense urban environments.
Once construction proceeds beyond a certain point, the opportunity to incorporate a future Cummer Station will become increasingly cost-prohibitive and technically complex. The current design, including track profile considerations that are not flat through this segment, risks making future station insertion at this location practically infeasible without major disruption, including potential multi-year shutdowns of the line.
City modelling indicates that the current five-station extension is projected to serve approximately 94,000 daily riders, while a station at Cummer alone is forecast to accommodate over 23,000 daily boardings by 2051. This level of ridership is comparable to several existing Toronto Transit Commission subway stations and demonstrates that Cummer would function as a major node within the network, rather than a marginal stop.
The case for reinstating Cummer Station is grounded in several key considerations:
- High Ridership Potential: City forecasts indicate Cummer Station would exceed projected ridership levels of approved stations such as Clark and Royal Orchard.
- Active Development and Growth: The surrounding area is designated for significant intensification, with planned densities of approximately 249 people and jobs per hectare by 2051, exceeding typical Major Transit Station Area targets.
- Future-Proofing and Infill Potential: As demonstrated by the historical addition of North York Centre Station to Line 1, strategic infill stations can be successfully integrated to better serve evolving urban form and demand. Constructing Cummer Station now would avoid substantially higher costs and future disruption.
- Local Connectivity: The station would directly serve multiple secondary schools, including Drewry Secondary School, École secondaire catholique Monseigneur-de-Charbonnel, and Avondale Secondary Alternative School, while improving access to the 97 Yonge bus corridor.
- High Future Risk: Delaying consideration of this station risks necessitating full or partial shutdown of the Yonge North Subway Extension for extended periods if a station is added post-construction, as identified in City technical discussions.
As construction proceeds, nearby communities will inevitably experience significant disruption. While such impacts are inherent to major infrastructure delivery, they must be balanced with meaningful local benefits. Incorporating Cummer Station would help ensure that the corridor directly benefits from the substantial investment being made, while improving overall network utility and accessibility.
In light of these considerations, reinstating Cummer Station represents sound planning, improved network efficiency, and a commitment to equitable transit investment that aligns infrastructure with the scale of growth already planned and underway along the Yonge Street corridor.
Background Information
Communications
MM40.23 - Update on the Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Transportation Study - by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Transportation Services to report back to the Planning and Housing Committee in the second quarter of 2026, along with the report-back for Item 2026.PH29.11 - Impact Assessment of Extended Flightpath at Billy Bishop Airport, on the current status of land-side transportation directions and matters related to Billy Bishop Airport and the surrounding area, including a preliminary identification and assessment of transportation impacts and issues, and an overview of the comprehensive analysis that will be included in the multi-modal transportation study, directed for the third quarter of 2027 by Item 2026.TE29.69 - Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Transportation Study.
Summary
Through Item 2026.PH29.11 - Impact Assessment of Extended Flightpath at Billy Bishop Airport, a report back was directed to Planning and Housing Committee in the second quarter of 2026 on the prospective impact that expanding the flightpath to accommodate jets at Billy Bishop Airport would have on new housing supply.
Toronto and East York Community Council has previously directed through Item 2026.TE29.69 - Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Transportation Study a report back on a multi-modal transportation study for this area.
To inform the report back to Planning and Housing Committee on housing impacts, a status of land-side transportation directions and matters related to Billy Bishop Airport and the surrounding area, including a preliminary identification and assessment of transportation impacts and issues, and an overview of the comprehensive analysis that will be included in the multi-modal transportation study, should be included in this report-back.
Background Information
Communications
MM40.24 - Urgent Action to Address Safety and Public Realm Conditions at 464-470 Queen Street West - by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and the Executive Director, Development Review to work with the developer to implement immediate safety improvements and ongoing maintenance of the fencing surrounding the vacant site of the future park at 464–470 Queen Street West, prior to the land being conveyed to the City.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to undertake scoped and targeted engagement with local stakeholders, including the Queen Street West Business Improvement Area, on opportunities to improve and beautify the site and its fencing, and to report back on progress to the May 28, 2026, meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council.
Summary
The future park at 464–470 Queen Street West is progressing well on the design and demolition front; however, the City of Toronto is still awaiting conveyance of the remaining parcel of land. There has been no clear movement on this matter.
In the interim, the condition of the temporary fencing on-site has become an urgent issue for residents and businesses in the area. The fencing is now being blown or pushed over on a regular basis impacting sidewalk accessibility and perceived deterioration of a key intersection. The Queen Street West Business Improvement Area has been requesting improvements for several years - particularly with FIFA activities approaching this summer.
The prolonged lack of resolution is no longer reasonable. This motion seeks to direct City staff to explore all options to resolve this issue with the dedication that it deserves.
To ensure City staff have sufficient time to implement necessary measures before FIFA-related restrictions take effect and before the anticipated increase in visitors to the area.
Background Information
Communications
MM40.25 - Community Engagement Process to Assess Local Community Support for Echoes and Nighttime Closure of Barbara Hall Park - by Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers, recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to continue to review the Echoes proposal brought forward by AIDS Service Organizations and explore the feasibility of incorporating all, or parts, of the proposed elements in the final design of Barbara Hall Park.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to undertake a community engagement process to assess local community support for the nighttime closure of Barbara Hall Park, and to consult with relevant Divisions on any operational considerations, and to report back to the Economic and Community Development Committee by the second quarter of 2027 on findings and next steps.
Summary
Barbara Hall Park is a critical urban green space in the Church-Wellesley Village, home to two memorials of profound importance: the AIDS Memorial and the Trans Memorial. The park has experienced persistent health and safety concerns, significantly intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic and a rise in opioid-related incidents. These issues, particularly pronounced during overnight hours, include vandalism, violence and lateral violence, and maintenance challenges – especially around the Memorials which are in secluded areas in the park. These memorials are central to the 2SLGBTQ+ community and are located in sections of the park that make them particularly vulnerable to damage and misuse.
In response to ongoing issues, the City of Toronto established the Barbara Hall Park Response Team, comprised of municipal staff, local agencies, and community partners, to pursue sustainable solutions. This work aligns with the Downtown East Action Plan (adopted July 24, 2024, 2024.EC14.8), which emphasizes the need to balance public safety with support for community members and businesses.
Current mitigation measures include:
a. Routine Maintenance: is serviced for litter and maintenance three times per day;
b. Needle Collection: twice daily visits to remove sharps, hazards and debris;
c. Crisis Outreach and Support Team Patrols: daily multidisciplinary crisis intervention and de-escalation;
d. Here to Help (H2H): is a mutli-service, community-based mobile team that responds to immediate concerns in the community to assist with conflict resolution, crisis intervention and de-escalation. This program is funded through the Downtown East Action Plan; and
e. Security Presence: mobile contracted guards as part of the Interdivisional Protocol for Encampments in Toronto.
Despite these efforts, overnight safety challenges persist. The Community Response Unit in Toronto Police Service 51 Division conducts regular bike patrols and responds to high-priority incidents in the park, including violent behaviour, threats to public safety, and medical emergencies. However, due to the high volume of priority calls in the area, officers must prioritize urgent responses, limiting their ability to consistently address ongoing lower-priority nuisance and quality-of-life issues in the park.
Residents and community members have called for stronger interventions to address late-night activity through public feedback, meetings, and direct communications to staff and 311.
As part of the ongoing Barbara Hall Park Master Plan project, there is an opportunity to consult the broader public and stakeholders on the potential nighttime closure and other safety enhancements to determine public support and identify potential mitigation measures. The Master Plan’s extensive process of stakeholder and public engagement to date has identified safety and vandalism concerns from the community members, specifically late night crowding.
Background Information
Communications
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (MM.New)
MM40.26 - Support for Minister’s Zoning Order (MZO) to Maintain Lands in the City of Toronto as Employment Lands to Protect the Ontario Food Terminal - by Councillor Amber Morley, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Communications have been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Amber Morley, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, recommends that:
1. City Council support in principle the intent of the proposed Minister’s Zoning Order for 125 The Queensway, being the protection of the Ontario Food Terminal from encroaching residential and other sensitive uses.
2. City Council reaffirm its support for the protection and preservation of employment lands within the City of Toronto, including encouraging the Province to bring Official Plan Amendment 804 into force to align the City’s employment area policies with the provincial policy framework and provide greater certainty for the protection of employment lands.
Summary
This motion is to express support in principle for the intent of the provincial government’s proposal to ministerially zone the lands known as 125 the Queensway (“the Site”) to maintain the existing zoning for the property and prevent the introduction of incompatible land uses (e.g., residential).
The motion also reaffirms City Council’s longstanding position on the protection and preservation of employment lands across Toronto.
The Ontario Food Terminal Board, with the support of the Minister of Agriculture, Food and Agribusiness, has requested an Minister’s Zoning Order in order to safeguard the continued operational viability of the Ontario Food Terminal. The site is directly adjacent to the Ontario Food Terminal, a key employer in Toronto’s west end that supports 2,500 direct jobs and contributes to the employment of approximately 168,000 people indirectly, including farm workers and the operations of 5,000 registered buyers. Currently the Site is occupied by a retail and commercial plaza with surface parking.
An application was submitted on March 28, 2025 to redesignate the Site from General Employment Areas to Mixed Use Areas to permit residential uses. On October 30, 2025, the application was appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to Council not making a decision within the timeframe prescribed in the Planning Act.
The proposed Minister’s Zoning Order is consistent with City Council’s February 4, 2026, adoption of an appeal report (PH27.11) for 125 The Queensway, which recommends that the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing to oppose the current application.
The Ontario Food Terminal is a critical distribution centre for independent grocers across the Greater Toronto Area and plays an essential role in maintaining food security. Allowing residential uses near the site could lead to complaints, constrain operations, and create a precedent that threatens the long-term viability of the Ontario Food Terminal. Maintaining the employment use of the Site will help ensure stability for the terminal and protect the significant economic and community benefits it provides to Toronto and the surrounding region.
More broadly, maintaining the employment use of the Site supports the City’s policy framework for Employment Areas and helps avoid land use conflicts that could constrain existing operations. Bringing Official Plan Amendment 804 into force would further strengthen this framework and provide greater certainty for the long-term protection of employment lands across the city, including sites experiencing conversion pressures.
Background Information
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/comm/communicationfile-210136.pdf
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (MM.New)
MM40.27 - Accepting a Donation from the Friends of University Avenue for the Lighting Installation at University Median Park, Between Elm Street and College Street on University Avenue - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to accept an in-kind donation valued at approximately $755,000.00 which consists of the Enhancement project along the University Avenue median between Elm Street and College Street known as Radiant Journey and a cash donation of $32,500.00 for the maintenance of the Enhancements and flowers to be planted in the median in the fall of 2026.
2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks and Recreation to execute an agreement with the Friends of University Avenue to accept the Enhancements and cash donation on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, in accordance with the City’s Donations Policy, and in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Summary
Radiant Journey (previously known as Reimaging University Avenue.) is an enhancement project of the University Avenue median between Elm Street and College Street, consisting of lighting installations and plantings (the “Enhancements”), that was led by the non-profit Friends of University Avenue. Founded in 2017 by Christine Ralphs, inspired by time spent on University Avenue during her husband Peter’s cancer treatment and her own care at Princess Margaret Hospital she wanted to make the area safer, brighter, and more welcoming for patients, families, healthcare workers, and the community. The project involved collaboration with design, architecture, and landscape experts along with the City, with a focus on urban lighting, greening, and public art. It features a 380‑metre illuminated display with 20,000 lighting control points, including the Lightwave installation synchronized to a heartbeat audio track and median plantings restored with durable, low‑maintenance, year‑round species. These Enhancements were installed through a construction and licence agreement authorized through 2021.MM30.18.
The Friends of University Aveenue is proposing an in-kind donation of the Enhancements valued at approximately $755,000.00 and a cash donation of $32,500.00 of which $30,000.00 will be allocated to maintenance and $2,500.00 will be allocated to Parks and Recreation for flower replacement in the fall of 2026. The Friends of University Avenue do not have the resources to continue their obligations under a new agreement and the existing licence agreement is currently in overhold. This in-kind donation would be accepted through a donation agreement with Parks and Recreation. Parks and Recreation staff have been consulted and have agreed to accept the Enhancements for a minimum term of five (5) years, after which they will advise the Friends of University Avenue on whether Parks and Recreation will continue maintenance for an additional term or retire the project at the City’s discretion.
The total donation amount is valued at $787,500.00. Under the City of Toronto Donation Policy, Council authority is required to accept donations over $0.050 million. The maintenance requirements of these Enhancements have been reviewed and approved by staff. Ongoing maintenance for a minimum of five (5) years will be covered through this donation. The Friends of University Avenue, as non-profit organization, will not require a charitable tax receipt for this donation.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286233.pdf
Communications
MM40.28 - Direction to Finalize Section 37 Agreement for 765 Steeles Avenue West - by Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 18 - Willowdale
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to bring forward a City-initiated amendment to By-laws 1089-2022 and 1090-2022 to provide the City with greater flexibility in the use, design, finishing and equipping of the future City facility secured through Section 37 provisions in the by-laws.
2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development and the General Manager, Children’s Services, in consultation with the Executive Director, Development Review, to explore future funding options to finish, furnish and equip the future City facility to support the ultimate use of the space.
Summary
This motion ensures that community space, secured through Section 37 as part of an infill development at 765 Steeles Avenue West, has sufficient flexibility to support the needs of the surrounding residents. In our efforts to finalize the Section 37 agreements for the subject development application, we are bringing forward the following direction to City Council to support flexibility in the use of the secured community space.
Background Information
Communications
MM40.29 - Cabbagetown Cycling Connects - Ontario Street Parking By-law Amendments - by Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Bills 408 and 409 have been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that:
1. City Council approve the parking, bike lane and traffic by-law amendments in Attachment 1 to this motion as part of the Cabbagetown Cycling Connections project.
Summary
In February 2025, City Council approved the installation of the Ontario Street cycling connection from Wellesley Street East to Prospect Street, as part of 2025.IE19.1, and in July 2025, City Council approve changes to the bikeway on Ontario Street between Aberdeen Avenue and Carleton Street as part of 2025.IE23.6.
In 2026, Ontario Street, between Wellesley Street East and Carlton Street, will undergo watermain, road resurfacing, and public realm improvements, in conjunction with new bike lanes. The project will enhance existing sidewalk and boulevard conditions impacted by tree root upheaving, strengthen connections between existing cycling routes, building on earlier cycling upgrades south of Winchester Square Park through the Cabbagetown Cycling Connections project in 2023. There is no change to existing motor vehicle lanes.
Most residents supported the plans during public consultation, and concerns about parking, loading, and safety were addressed through design adjustments without changing overall permit parking arrangements. Proposed changes include:
a. universally accessible sidewalks and replacing asphalt in boulevard with pavers north of the park;
b. new contra-flow bike lanes north of the park;
c. reconfiguring the contra-flow cycle track between Aberdeen Avenue and Carlton Street to a contraflow bike lane next to parking to allow curbside on-street parking;
d. a new permanent loading zone near Garner Lane; and
e. safety upgrades south of the park such as a raised pedestrian crossing at Aberdeen Avenue, curb extension with landscape elements at intersection with Carlton Street.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286235.pdf
Attachment 1 - Ontario Street Parking By-law Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286241.pdf
Communications
MM40.30 - Ward-Based Maintenance Teams Pilot - by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor Nick Mantas
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
*Notice of this Motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor Nick Mantas, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Manager to report to the next meeting of City Council on a pilot program to establish a Ward-Based Maintenance Team, composed of City staff trained and equipped to perform:
a. litter collection and illegal dumping clean up;
b. grass cutting and landscaping;
c. minor tree trimming and debris removal;
d. pothole and minor sidewalk repair; and
e. general public realm maintenance.
2. City Council direct the City Manager to include in the report requested in Recommendation 1 above the following elements in the design of the Ward-Based Maintenance Team pilot:
a. use existing staff and resources, with a focus on improving coordination across divisions;
b. include a locally informed work plan, developed in consultation with the ward Councillor, resident associations and community groups, and Local Business Improvement Areas; and
c. be implemented in four wards across the City with one in each Community Council District.
3. City Council direct the City Manager to include in the report on the Ward-Based Maintenance Team pilot program requested in Recommendation 1 above:
a. operational feasibility within existing collective agreements;
b. opportunities to integrate existing staff and resources;
c. opportunities to reduce 311 service backlogs and repeat calls;
d. cost implications and potential efficiencies; and
e. potential service level improvements and response times.
Summary
The City of Toronto delivers essential local maintenance services through multiple divisions, including road repair, tree maintenance, grass cutting, and waste collection. Residents of Toronto consistently identify slow response times, repeated service requests, and lack of coordination as key frustrations with local maintenance services.
Routine issues such as potholes, overgrown grass, minor tree maintenance, litter, and illegal dumping often require multiple service requests across different divisions, increasing costs and delaying resolution. A more coordinated, neighbourhood-focused approach to service delivery has the potential to reduce duplication, improve response times, and deliver better value for taxpayers.
Local residents, Business Improvement Areas, and community organizations have direct, on-the-ground knowledge of maintenance priorities and can help the City respond more effectively. A clean, beautiful, well maintained city must be a priority.
Background Information
Communications
MM40.31 - Financial Assistance for Covenant House’s Redevelopment Project at 20 Gerrard Street East and 21 McGill Street - by Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, recommends that:
1. City Council waive site plan fees set out in Schedule 13, Appendix C in Municipal Code Chapter 441 in connection with the development of the new Covenant House proposal at 20 Gerrard Street East and 21 McGill Street that would otherwise be payable.
2. City Council waive building permit fees that would otherwise be payable by Covenant House for the Proposal at 20 Gerrard Street East and 21 McGill Street.
3. City Council exempt the redevelopment of 20 Gerrard Street East and 21 McGill Street by Covenant House Toronto from parkland dedication requirements and applicable development charges, unless already exempted by Provincial legislation.
4. City Council request the Toronto Catholic District School Board to waive the Education Development Charge applicable to the redevelopment by Covenant House Toronto at 20 Gerrard Street East and 21 McGill Street.
5. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to work with Covenant House, if approved for financial incentives under the Rental Housing Supply Program, to secure the value of those financial incentives for eligible transitional housing units in a municipal housing facility agreement ("Contribution Agreement").
6. City Council request the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the Executive Director Housing Development to report to City Council by the first quarter of 2027 on the status of the project and make any such further recommendations to support Covenant House Toronto in the redevelopment of 20 Gerrard Street East and 21 McGill Street.
Summary
Covenant House Toronto is Canada’s largest agency serving youth who require effective pathways to transitional and permanent affordable housing. For more than 40 years, it has provided a range of supports to youth including emergency shelter, transitional housing, health care, education, and employment supports, supporting more than 110,000 young people. To meet the needs of youth in the twenty first century there is a critical need for more youth focused transitional and permanent affordable housing with comprehensive support services to enable young people to transition from crisis to stability and helping youth reach their full potential.
To meet today and tomorrow’s challenges faced by youth in Toronto, Covenant House Toronto is launching an ambitious program to redevelop its main site at 20 Gerrard Street East and 21 McGill Street and pivot to a housing-focused new modern building providing improved services. The existing buildings have reached the end of their useful lifespan and require redevelopment to continue providing essential services.
The project would deliver up to 121,000 square feet of a new home for youth with an estimated 118 supportive and transitional homes, integrated with on-site health, education, housing and employment services aimed at improving long-term housing outcomes for youth.
Covenant House has initiated pre-application consultations with City staff and has begun engagement with neighbouring residents, institutions, businesses, and landowners in advance of filing the formal applications. To support the overall capital cost of the redevelopment, Covenant House will also be making an application to Build Canada Homes for capital funding and financing and will shortly launch an ambitious public fund-raising campaign.
The motion recommends that the City reduce financial barriers to the redevelopment by waiving applicable planning application and building permit fees, exempt the redevelopment from parkland dedication requirements, and applicable development charges (if not exempted by Provincial legislation). The City is responsible for the collection of the education development charges on behalf of the Toronto Catholic District School Board, as required by the Education Act, 1990. This motion also recommends requesting that the Toronto Catholic District School Board waive the education development charges for this redevelopment.
Lastly, the motion requests that the Executive Director, Housing Development Office, and General Manager, Toronto Shelter and Support Services work with Covenant House in support of this important youth serving city-building project, and report to City Council in the first quarter of 2027 on the status of the project.
This matter is urgent as Covenant House is poised to submit a Site Plan Control application and an application for minor variance to the Committee of Adjustment.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286303.pdf
Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286405.pdf
Communications
MM40.32 - Enforcing the Westray Amendments to Keep Workers Safe - by Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Province of Ontario to ensure that Crown Attorneys and health and safety regulators are trained in the application of the Westray Amendment, and ensure that there are sufficient resources for training and investigation of workplace fatalities or injuries.
2. City Council request the Toronto Police Service Board to ensure that all police officers have training on how to apply the Westray Amendment and the resources necessary to investigate workplace fatalities and injuries.
Summary
On May 9, 1992, 26 miners at the Westray Mine in Nova Scotia died in an explosion. Advocacy for better protections for workers and a subsequent Royal Commission led to changes to the law around criminal negligence, which allowed for employers to be held accountable when workers are killed or injured on the job.
Police and prosecutors have used this law to prosecute employers who are negligent in protecting their workers, including in Toronto in the Metron case. However, with over 1,000 workers a year still dying on the job across Canada, more needs to be done.
This motion makes requests of the Province and the Toronto Police Service Board to ensure that the training and resources are in place to ensure that the Westray Law is being enforced and workers are being protected.
Reason for urgency: April 28 is the National Day of Mourning for workers killed or injured in workplace accidents and May 9th is the anniversary of the Westray Mine Disaster. The motion is urgent in order to meet these significant milestones.
Background Information
Communications
MM40.33 - State of Good Repair at the Jarvis and Sherbourne Underpasses Within the Union Station Rail Corridor - by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, to negotiate, enter into and execute an agreement with Metrolinx, as required, to receive funds up to $500,000 from Metrolinx for the purpose of the City performing state of good repair work, including graffiti prevention and management strategies at the Bridge Underpasses, on such terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to receive a contribution of up to $500,000 from Metrolinx for state of good repair work, including graffiti prevention and management strategies on the Bridge Underpasses delivered through the StreetARToronto program.
3. City Council authorize a one-time increase of $280,000 gross and $0 debt to the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Transportation Services (CTP426-02) for the purpose of ideating, developing, and delivering state of good repair work, including graffiti prevention and management strategies on the Bridge Underpasses.
4. City Council authorize a one-time transfer of $220,000 to Transportation Services’ deferred revenue account (220098) subject to the execution of a funding agreement with Metrolinx, for the purpose of future operating maintenance and upkeep of the Union Station Rail Corridor underpasses at Lower Jarvis Street and Lower Sherbourne Street.
5. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Executive Director, Transit Expansion to enter into any necessary contracts, agreements, or arrangements in relation to the adoption of Recommendations 1 to 4 above.
Summary
The Union Station Rail Corridor is 6.4 kilometres long, stretching from approximately Bathurst Street in the west to the Don River in the east. There are seven underpasses within the corridor, including at Lower Sherbourne Street and Lower Jarvis Street (the “Bridge Underpasses”), which cross the City of Toronto’s right of way. Metrolinx owns the Union Station Rail Corridor and, among other things, has overall responsibility for maintaining its infrastructure in a state of good repair and ensuring safety, functionality, and long-term asset sustainability. Given the City’s expertise in maintaining components of the Bridge Underpasses, and to address their construction impacts, Metrolinx has agreed to provide up to $500,000 to the Transportation Services Capital Budget, to be allocated towards general maintenance and upkeep at the Bridge Underpasses.
Reason for Urgency:
This matter is urgent as it involves time-sensitive third-party funding from Metrolinx tied to upcoming work along the Union Station Rail Corridor. Council authorization is required immediately to secure the funding and coordinate activities within scheduled construction timelines. Delay would risk loss of funding and missed implementation window.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286347.pdf
Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286406.pdf
Communications
MM40.34 - Authorization to Release Section 42 Funds for Advancing Safety Improvements Through an Upgraded Playground Structure at Canoe Landing - by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2026-2035 Capital Budget and Plan for Parks and Recreation on a one-time basis with cash flow commitment of $450,000.00 gross and $0 debt in 2026, fully funded by Section 42 Community Benefits obtained from the development at 11 Charlotte Street (Internal Order XR2213-4200288), for the purpose of improving the playground structure at Canoe Landing.
Summary
This motion is to release Section 42 funds for the design and implementation of a replacement playground structure for the Canoe Landing shared use space used by Jean Lumb Public School, Bishop Macdonell Catholic School, and the Canoe Landing Community Recreation Centre.
After two injuries in 2025, the former structure was deemed unsafe and removed. A new playground is needed to provide play opportunities that are safe, creative, and age appropriate. Design consultation with all members of the Block 31 shared-use agreement and stakeholders will continue in 2026.
This motion is urgent to ensure design consultation can proceed as planned this Spring.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286304.pdf
Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286384.pdf
Communications
MM40.35 - Amending Item 2025.TE19.8 - 1 to 19 Thelma Avenue - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that:
1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.TE19.8 by:
a. deleting parts 1.i. and j.:
1. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application 20 192647 STE 12 RH in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of 11 rental dwelling units located at 1-19 Thelma Avenue, subject to the following conditions:
Parts to be deleted:
i. the owner shall enter into, and register on title to the lands at 1-19 Thelma Avenue and 2470 Bayview Avenue, Agreements pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Parts 1.a. to 1.h. above, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
j. the owner has registered, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands at 1-19 Thelma Avenue and 2470 Bayview Avenue, without prior written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate.
and replacing them with the following new parts:
i. the owner shall enter into, and register on title to the lands at 1-19 Thelma Avenue, an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Parts 1.a. to 1.h. above, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
j. the owner has registered, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands at 1-19 Thelma Avenue, without prior written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate.
b. deleting part 2.c.i.:
2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate, to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code for the demolition of the 11 rental dwelling units located at 1-19 Thelma Avenue after all the following have occurred:
c. the owner has provided a Letter of Credit for a portion of the value of the cost of the replacement housing required in Part 1 (“Financial Security”) above, in a form and in an amount satisfactory to the City, and such security shall not be released until the replacement housing is ready and available for occupancy, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; the Financial Security may be drawn upon and used towards the provision of affordable and/or mid-range rental housing in the City if the replacement housing is not ready and available for occupancy prior to the earlier of:
Part to be deleted:
i. a new dwelling unit erected in the new residential building 1-19 Thelma Avenue is ready and available for occupancy; or
and replacing it with the following new part:
i. the issuance of an above-grade grade building permit for 1-19 Thelma Avenue where an above-grade building permit has not been issued on an alternative off-site replacement site; or
Summary
At its meeting of February 5, 2025, Toronto City Council adopted Item 2025.TE19.8 approving the Rental Housing Demolition Application to demolish 11 rental dwelling units located at 1-19 Thelma Street and replace them at an off-site location, which included conditions that must be met prior to issuance of the rental housing demolition permit.
The existing dwelling units at 1-19 Thelma Street are vacant, in a state of disrepair and pose safety concerns to the public. In order to advance construction of an approved 7-storey apartment building on the existing site, this motion recommends amending requirements to register certain agreements at the off-site rental replacement location and the draw upon conditions for financial securities.
This motion is urgent as the condition of the vacant properties poses health and safety concerns for the community and demolition is urgently required.
Background Information
Communications
MM40.36 - Community Mailboxes: Protecting our Public Space - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin, recommends that:
1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.MM33.45 by adding the words in Part 1 “no later than the second quarter of 2026” after the words “City Council”, so that Part 1 now reads as follows:
1. City Council request the City Manager to request Canada Post to provide the following information on the implementation of the community mailbox program in Toronto and report to City Council no later than the second quarter of 2026 with an assessment of the impacts:
a. the number and location of current residential and business mailboxes that will be affected and the number and location of community mailboxes that will be installed;
b. the specific timelines for implementation;
c. the design options for community mailboxes being considered by Canada Post, including any modifications to the standard mailbox format;
d. Canada Post’s siting guidelines and performance standards for assessing site feasibility;
e. a detailed communications plan to inform Toronto residents about the conversion to community mailboxes; and
f. a plan for addressing barriers to accessing postal services, including social isolation, literacy, linguistic, cognitive and mobility barriers and ensuring equitable outcomes for all Torontonians.
2. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.MM33.45 by adding the following new parts:
1.City Council request the City Manager to engage in advocacy for continued door-to-door delivery to the maximum extent possible, particularly for areas where community mailboxes are not feasible, including in postal codes where community mailboxes have already been announced.
2. City Council request the City Manager to report to City Council no later than the second quarter of 2026 on the potential costs associated with the implementation and operation of community mailboxes, and the progress of negotiations to recover these costs from Canada Post, including costs related to:
a. community mailbox siting and installation;
b. street lighting;
c. traffic management;
d. snow clearing; and
e. litter collection.
Summary
Canada Post’s decision to eliminate door-to-door delivery will have serious implications for affected Torontonians and for our public realm.
Our first priority must be that community mailboxes are safe and accessible. They must be located in areas that are well-lit, secure, and free from physical barriers. This will require careful site selection and consistent maintenance.
We must also ensure that the program does not undermine our commitment to a cleaner, more livable and more beautiful city. There must be adequate waste receptacles, and measures need to be taken to manage traffic and mitigate litter.
There will be considerable budget implications, and efforts must be made to recoup those costs from Canada Post so that residents are not paying more for reduced service.
This motion seeks to ensure that these priorities and local feedback are reflected as the City works with Canada Post to implement this program, and to provide enhanced transparency and accountability.
Reason for Urgency:
Canada Post has announced that it is proceeding with community boxes to replace door-to-door delivery in some Toronto postal codes.
Background Information
Communications
MM40.37 - 109 Knox Avenue - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the development proposed in application A0033/24TEY.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal, and that the City Solicitor be authorized to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, in her discretion, after consulting with the Ward Councillor and the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
Summary
The Applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment to request variances from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 (Application A0033/24TEY) to alter the existing two-storey detached dwelling by constructing complete third and fourth storey additions to accommodate a total of 6 residential dwelling units on this lot. The variances required to By-law 569-2013 include height, minimum required front yard setback, minimum required rear yard setback, roof eaves projection, maximum permitted height of all side exterior main walls, and minimum rear yard soft landscaping.
On January 14, 2026, the Toronto and East York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment refused the Application. A copy of the Decision is attached as Attachment 1.
The applicant has appealed the Decision to Toronto Local Appeal Body.
In a report from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District dated January 13, 2026, Community Planning Staff recommended that, should the application be approved, certain conditions be imposed including tying the approval to the revised plans and ensuring no space above the fourth storey be used as habitable residential dwelling unit or living space.
This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor to appear at the Toronto Local Appeal Body and to resolve the matter on behalf of the City in their discretion.
This matter is time-sensitive and urgent as the applicant has already appealed the Decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body to preserve its statutory rights.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286359.pdf
Attachment 1: Notice of Decision of the Committee regarding Application A0033/24TEY, dated January 20, 2026
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286360.pdf
Communications
MM40.38 - Improving Communication for Planned Cinematic “Shock and Awe” Explosion and Fireball Effects in Movie Production near Local Neighbourhoods: Lessons Learned from Downsview - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Anthony Perruzza
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services and Explosive Disposal Unit, to review the process by which surrounding residential and commercial notification requirements related to City-permitted pyrotechnic events are determined and applied, and report back to the Economic and Community Development Committee with proposed process improvements by end of the second quarter of 2026, with such a review to consider a standardized notification protocol with a longer notification period, wider catchment area and expanded media platforms for a clearly-defined category of high impact activities which may be reasonably expected to have significant have community impacts.
Summary
On the evening of April 16, 2026, a movie production company was working on a music video on federal lands commonly referred to as the Festival Terrace. The Project Title was Project Bot Factory. Advance notice described the main scene as a “one time flash from 8 motars/13 drums as well as falling (movie) snow.” This was to be contained in a 100 foot by 100 foot zone, and with a 200 foot safety perimeter around the SPFX zone.” Posters were affixed at various locations in Downsview Park and there was a direct to home and businesses flyer distribution. This proved to be inadequate.
At approximately 10:40 p.m. a controlled explosion occurred creating a large fire ball, mushroom cloud, loud explosive noise and vibrations that was seen and heard through out the Ancaster-Downsview neighbourhoods. Many residents were not aware of the film shoot and were shocked when the explosion took place. The local Councillor received dozens of e-mails, calls and online notifications from people worried that a major industrial accident or plane crash occurred. This was the same neighbourhood that was impacted by the Sunrise Propane Explosion in 2008. The landowner, Canada Lands Company, was also inundated with inquiries and has since issued an apology.
While the movie industry is a cherished part of Toronto’s economy and culture, there must be a review of notification protocols when major controlled explosions are planned. Residents were deeply disturbed and frightened by these events, and it is incumbent on the City of Toronto to have an urgent review of its community/neighbourhood notification protocols when a movie production includes explosive devices and other special effects.
This motion is urgent as we are going into an outdoor filming season, and our residents need to know that this stressful situation will not happen again.
Background Information
Communications
MM40.39 - Requesting an Equitable Approach to the Canada Post Community Mailbox Conversions in Ward 1 - by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, seconded by Councillor Stephen Holyday
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 1 - Etobicoke North
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Vincent Crisanti, seconded by Councillor Stephen Holyday, recommends that:
1. City Council request Canada Post to pause their Community Mailbox Conversion Program in Etobicoke North until staff from Canada Post and the City of Toronto develop a plan to support program roll-out in collaboration with the City Councillor and report back by June 2026.
2. City Council direct the City Manager to work with Canada Post, the Executive Director, Transportation Services, the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, other relevant city divisions, and the local Councillor to develop a plan to support the implementation of the Community Mailbox Conversion Program in Etobicoke North including:
a. a detailed implementation timeline with key dates identified for internal planning purposes.
b. a consultation plan to guide site selection for community mailboxes, as well as a comprehensive communications plan to share this change with the public.
c. details on the legal, fiscal, planning, and social impacts of the Community Mailbox Conversion Program to the City of Toronto.
3. City Council request the federal Minister of Government Transformation, Public Works and Procurement to pause the Community Mailbox Conversion Program until an implementation plan has been established that addresses the potential impact of the conversion on seniors, people with disabilities, and other marginalized communities.
Summary
Etobicoke North is home to many residents with mobility, health, and accessibility challenges. For these individuals, door-to-door mail delivery is an essential service that keeps them connected to healthcare, income support, and other government services they depend on.
Canada Post’s proposed shift to community mailboxes raises significant concerns, not just for impacted residents, but for the City of Toronto that is being asked to accommodate this change without proper engagement.
If granted, a pause on the conversion from door-to-door mail delivery to community mailboxes in Etobicoke North would provide the City with the opportunity to assess the implications of the decision and allow for local collaboration on a plan that works for the people of Toronto.
The challenges Canada Post is facing are recognized, as well as its goal to modernize service. Through collaboration with the City, approaches can be identified that balance operational objectives with the need to ensure equitable access to essential services, especially for seniors and people with accessibility needs.
Reason for Urgency:
On April 16, 2026, Canada Post announced the start of preliminary work for a multi‑year community mailbox conversion program. Canada Post has already commenced preparation work, with Etobicoke North identified as the only community in Toronto where conversions are planned to begin in late 2026 and early 2027.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286363.pdf
Attachment 1 - Letter from Councillor Vincent Crisanti to the Federal Minister of Government Transformation, Public Works and Procurement (Request for Pause - Canada Post Community Mailbox Conversions in Etobicoke North)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286364.pdf
Communications
MM40.40 - Starting Construction of the Waterfront East Rapid Transit Line in 2026 - by Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission and Chief Executive Officer, Waterfront Toronto, to establish a governance model for the delivery of the Waterfront East Rapid Transit project.
2. City Council authorize the City Manager in consultation with relevant City Divisions, Toronto Transit Commission and Waterfront Toronto to:
a. design, procure and construct the following work packages either directly or through a third-party, including but not limited to Waterfront Toronto or the Toronto Transit Commission, or a combination thereof:
i. early works for Queens Quay East Extension from Street A to Cherry Street;
ii. early works for Queens Quay East Extension Reconstruction from Yonge Street to Street A; and
iii. Traction Power Substation building envelope and enabling infrastructure within the Quayside development.
b. either directly or through Waterfront Toronto or the Toronto Transit Commission, or a combination thereof to:
i. retain a construction manager to undertake general design and construction readiness for priority Waterfront East Rapid Transit scope elements; and
ii. complete the necessary environmental approvals, and advance design to 30% for rail tracks through the central waterfront.
3. City Council authorize an increase to the Transit Expansion Division’s 2026 Capital Budget of $70 million in project cost and associated cash flow, fully funded through recoverable debt supported by the City Building Fund, to advance the design and construction of the Waterfront East Rapid Transit project.
4. City Council authorize the City Manager, or designate, to negotiate and execute all necessary agreements, including amendments thereto, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Manager, or designate, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to facilitate the implementation of the works described above.
5. City Council authorize the City Manager, or designate, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to negotiate and execute any necessary agreements related to the Waterfront East Rapid Transit project with orders of government, including amendments thereto, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Manager, or designate, and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
6. City Council endorse changing this project’s name from Waterfront East Light Rail Transit to Waterfront East Rapid Transit Line.
Summary
In March, we secured a historic investment from the Provincial and Federal Governments to build the Waterfront East Rapid Transit Line - $2 billion to match the City’s $1 billion contribution. This motion provides the funding and authority needed to begin building the fully designed components of the Waterfront East Rapid Transit Line this year.
Waterfront East Rapid Transit is transformational new transit infrastructure that will help revitalize Toronto’s Eastern waterfront and the Port Lands, including Ookwemin Minising (formerly known as Villiers Island). It will support 75,000 homes and serve more than 150,000 people who will live and work along the eastern waterfront. When it’s built, we are expecting 50,000 daily riders.
Now that we have the funding commitment, we can advance the work on the new line. The motions below establish a governance model and authorizes the required funding and authorities to begin early work on this new transit line.
The reason for urgency is that we need to ensure construction can begin in the 2026 construction season.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286368.pdf
Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286403.pdf
Communications
MM40.41 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to Midtown Yonge Business Improvement Area for Implementation Two Interactive Public Murals at 2075 Yonge Street and 1980 Yonge Street - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 8 - Eglinton - Lawrence, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
A communication has been submitted on this item.
Recommendations
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2026 Operating Budget for Non-Program on a one-time basis by $48,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 39, 41 Roehampton Avenue and 50 Eglinton Avenue East (Source Account: XR3026-3701067), secured for public realm improvements, to install two outdoor murals near the intersection of Yonge Street and Manor Road East (Cost Centre: NP2161).
2. City Council direct that the $48,000 be forwarded to the Midtown Yonge Business Improvement Area upon the signing of an Undertaking that governs the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.
Summary
This Motion seeks to contribute one-time capital funding amounted to $48,000.00 of Section 37 funds, to Midtown Yonge Business Improvement Area with the implementation of a mural on the sides of 2075 Yonge Street and 1980 Yonge Street.
This proposal presents a premium festival art experience centered on the live creation of two original murals in Toronto. The project is designed to operate on three levels at once: as a high-value visual installation, as a live performance that activates the site during the annual Arraiá on Yonge Festival, and as an audience engagement tool. The Interactive/Public aspect will take place on June 20, 2026, at the second annual Arraiá Festival on Yonge.
Midtown Yonge Business Improvement Area is collaborating with LiberArt Studio to bring this vision to the streets of Toronto with a project vision that promises to create two visually striking murals that do not function only as decoration, but as a public-facing cultural moment.
This motion is urgent as the murals are to be completed as a part of an upcoming community festival in Spring 2026 and the Business Improvement Area urgently requires the funding to move forward.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286367.pdf
Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286402.pdf
Communications
MM40.42 - Improving the City’s Laneway Conveyance Process - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
Recommendations
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to report by the July 9, 2026 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council with an update regarding the purchase and sale and permanent closure of the public laneway west of Yonge Street and South of Lola Road, as it relates the development application for 2010 to 2050 Yonge Street and 15 Lola Road.
2. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review and the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the City Solicitor and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to develop a clear and transparent process for applicants when development applications are proposed to involve the sale and closure of city-owned public lanes associated with a development application, that outlines requirements of the applicant, divisional roles and responsibilities, timelines, relevant policies, and how this process aligns with the timing and reporting of a development application to City Council.
Summary
The City of Toronto has a vast number of public laneways, particularly adjacent to main streets where there is significant development activity. These laneways serve as primary access routes for abutting properties but are frequently in disrepair due to inadequate maintenance.
When a developer or landowner seeks to purchase a portion of a public laneway – including as part of a rezoning application that would deliver laneway improvements – this triggers an internal process involving Transportation Services, Corporate Real Estate Management, Legal, Development Review, and other divisions.
That process currently lacks clear roles, timelines, and defined responsibilities across divisions, creating delays that are impacting several development applications across the city, including at 2010 to 2050 Yonge and 15 Lola Road in Toronto–St. Paul's.
City staff in Development Review, Transportation Services, and Corporate Real Estate management agree on the importance of resolving this issue and support this motion.
This motion is urgent as delays in the laneway conveyance process are impeding the ability of several development projects across the city to proceed and this matter urgently needs to be resolved.
Background Information
MM40.43 - Re-opening and Amending Item 2025.TE26.49 - Improving Traffic Flow on College Street, between Dufferin Street and Gladstone Avenue - by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item 2025.TE26.49. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.
Recommendations
Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that:
1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2025.TE26.49 by:
a. deleting the following entry in Attachment 2 to the Letter (October 2, 2025) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo on Improving Traffic Flow on College Street, between Dufferin Street and Gladstone Avenue:
Chapter 950, Schedule XIV – No Stopping
|
Highway |
Side |
Between |
Prohibited Times and/or Days |
|
College Street |
North |
A point 30.5 meters east of Dufferin Street and Gladstone Avenue |
Anytime |
b. authorizing the following new parking regulations for College Street between Dufferin Street and Gladstone Avenue:
Chapter 950, Schedule XIV – No Stopping
|
Highway |
Side |
Between |
Prohibited Times and/or Days |
|
College Street |
North |
A point 30.5 meters east of Dufferin Street and Gladstone Avenue |
7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Mon. to Fri., except public holidays |
Chapter 910, Schedule I – Parking Machines
|
Highway |
Side Parking |
Between |
Hours (daily as indicated below) |
Fee/Time Limit |
Maximum Parking Period |
|
College Street |
North |
A point 30.5 meters east of Dufferin Street and Gladstone Avenue |
9:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., |
$3.25 for 1 hour |
3 hours |
Summary
At the November meeting of City Council, a no-stopping parking restriction was approved to improve streetcar service and reduce congestion near College Street and Dufferin Street. I have recently heard from residents and business owners about the challenges of fully restricting access to parking at all times and on all days of the week, which has resulted in delayed deliveries to small businesses and limited access to homes.
Transportation Services staff advised that amending the recommendations to prohibit stopping during the morning and afternoon rush hours will support the original intent of speeding up streetcar service and reducing congestion along this corridor. I have consulted with residents and business owners on this section of College Street, and there is support for this updated approach.
City Council approval of this motion is required to re-open and amend this item.
Reason for Urgency:
This motion is urgent as residents and business owners are currently without access to parking, and approval of these recommendations will allow Transportation Services to immediately begin the process of updating necessary signage.
Requires Re-opening:
City Council Item 2025.TE26.49 (November 12 and 13, 2025)
Background Information
MM40.44 - Ontario Land Tribunal Appeal for 4949 Bathurst Street - Request for Directions - by Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 18 - Willowdale
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
Confidential Attachment - Information regarding ongoing litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal.
Recommendations
Councillor Lily Cheng, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain external land use planning consultants to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing in respect of 4949 Bathurst Street to provide opinion evidence in support of City Council’s adoption of the Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject property.
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor and the Executive Director, Development Review and their designates, to continue negotiations with the Appellant of the Ontario Land Tribunal appeal of 4949 Bathurst Street in respect of the maximum height/number of storeys, minimum non-residential gross floor area, and minimum number of visitor, residential and commercial parking spaces, among other matters, in an attempt to resolve the appeal prior to the hearing.
3. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this motion.
4. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it pertains to ongoing litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal.
Summary
On October 8 and 9, 2025, City Council adopted an amendment to Zoning By-law 569-2013, to permit a 26-storey mixed use building located at 4949 Bathurst Street. The revised permissions would allow a building measuring 92.45 metres in height and include retail, office, and private daycare space within the 6-storey podium and residential units in the podium and tower above. The total gross floor area is 27,192 square metres, including 2,789 square metres of retail/commercial uses. (https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.NY26.6)
The applicant for the development (the “Appellant”) appealed Council’s decision to amend the by-law as Council’s approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment permitted the development of fewer storeys than requested in the original application and instituted additional changes. The appeal is filed at the Ontario Land Tribunal as File No. OLT-25-000904.
The hearing of the appeal is scheduled to commence on May 25, 2026, for five days.
City planning staff are unavailable to provide evidence at the hearing due to unforeseen circumstances. The City Solicitor requires authority to retain an external planning consultant for the purposes of the hearing.
This motion is being filed without notice as an external planning consultant is urgently needed and directions are being provided to the City Solicitor.
The City Solicitor requires further instructions on this matter. This motion is about ongoing litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal.
Reason for Urgency:
This motion is being filed without notice because this matter is time-sensitive due to the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing scheduled to begin on May 25, 2026. The City Solicitor requires authority to retain an external planning consultant for the purposes of the hearing, as City planning staff are unavailable to provide evidence at the hearing due to unforeseen circumstances. Without timely consideration, the City will incur significant costs in preparing for the hearing. Urgent consideration of this motion is therefore required.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-286378.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
MM40.45 - Love Parade - Remembering Claude Cormier - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
Recommendations
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that:
1. City Council recognize the significance of 5 outstanding parks by the late Claude Cormier his studio Claude Cormier and Associates along Toronto’s Waterfront and request the Director, Waterfront Secretariat and to:
a. work with General Manager, Parks and Recreation, Waterfront Toronto, CreateTO, the Ontario Association of Landscape Architects and the local Councillors in the development and promotion of “Love Parade! Remembering Claude Cormier” with a bike tour of these Waterfront Parks to take place in May, 2026.
b. work with General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and other partners, such as Ontario Association of Landscape Architects and Bikeshare, on the feasibility and promotion of these 5 parks being part of the Visitor Experience for Toronto’s Waterfront.
Summary
The late Claude Cormier (1960-2023) was an outstanding Canadian landscape architect whose firm CCxA designed 5 beautiful landmark parks - HTO, Love Park, Berczy, Sugar Beach and Leslie Lookout – along Toronto’s Waterfront.
This string of five original, exceptional, colourful, whimsical and joyous waterfront parks by this prestigious Canadian landscape designer and his studio is unique and should be celebrated. Love Parade! 2026 can be the start of such a recognition initiative could become part of the city’s waterfront story for visitors to Toronto as well as Torontonians who love parks and green spaces.
Reason for Urgency:
This matter is deemed urgent as the need to recognize and celebrate these outstanding landmarks is best achieved in the current season.
Background Information
MM40.46 - Opposing the Provincial Land Grab at Bathurst Quay and the Island - by Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
Recommendations
Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that:
1. City Council express its strong opposition to the expropriation of any City land, including Little Norway Park, by the Province of Ontario.
2. City Council express its strong opposition to the compensation framework contemplated in the Bill and express the expectation that fair market value for best and highest use be the floor for any discussion regarding compensation for expropriations should the associated Bill be passed by the Government of Ontario.
3. City Council request the Province of Ontario to reimburse the City of Toronto for all capital expenses adjusted to inflation related to Little Norway Park incurred over the last 40 years, including provincial and federal government stimulus funding that funded the 2010 park improvements project.
4. City Council request the Province to provide funding for land, capital, public consultation, and any other costs to acquire and develop replacement parkland, playground and sports facilities equivalent to what is proposed to be expropriated in Little Norway Park, as well as to relocate the Waterfront Neighbourhood Centre community centre, Waterfront Elementary School, The City School, and the Lakeside Waterfront Child Care centre currently located next to Little Norway Park and Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport, should that be required.
5. City Council direct the City Manager to notify the families at The Waterfront School, The City School, and the Lakeside Waterfront Child Care centre, people who access the Waterfront Neighbourhood Centre community centre and the Corleck Building (Irish community centre) residents of the nearby condos, and recreation groups who hold permits for sports leagues at Little Norway Park of the Provincial expropriation and impact on their access to these vital community assets.
6. City Council request the Province of Ontario provide the option for all residents within 500m of the expropriation area to move, at province’s expense, and purchase or provide rent equivalent homes at fair market value with an apology for the disruption to their community.
7. City Council request the Province compensate any and all recreational sports leagues, including softball, baseball, cricket, and other leagues, for loss of access to a favourite sports facility.
8. City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, to review all leases held by the City with the Toronto Port Authority in anticipation of expropriation.
9. City Council request the federal government to disallow this land grab from the province and to clarify their position on the land grab.
10. City Council direct the City Solicitor to explore all legal options in response to the provincial legislation and authorize the City Solicitor to pursue legal action to protect the City’s interests.
11. City Council reiterate its request of the Province to work collaboratively with the City on the future of Toronto’s waterfront.
12. City Council request the Executive Director, Waterfront Secretariat, or designates, to appear before any public hearings held by the Ontario Legislature regarding the Bill to give testimony in accordance with the position outlined in this item.
13. City Council request the City Manager to submit written comments to any consultations by the Government of Ontario that reflect the City’s positions outlined in this item, including Council’s opposition to the unilateral expropriation of waterfront parkland.
14. City Council adopt the position that no costs associated with compliance with the provincial legislation should be incurred or paid by the City of Toronto, including staff time, and that the City must be compensated at fair market value for best and highest use for any land expropriated by the Province.
Summary
The Provincial Government has introduced legislation to take City of Toronto land on Toronto Island and at Bathurst and Queen’s Quay.
At the March Council Meeting, City Council overwhelmingly voted to oppose any unilateral expropriation of City land by the Government of Ontario. Further, we voted to include Toronto residents and their democratically elected municipal government in all significant decisions impacting Toronto, including decisions about the uses and future of the Toronto waterfront.
Through their legislation today, the Government of Ontario has chosen to ignore the decisions of Toronto’s government.
Worse, the Provincial Government is going to take parkland and pave it at Little Norway Park, in a neighbourhood that needs more precious green space and public space, not less.
We need to send a clear message to the Provincial Government that this is not acceptable to us as a municipal government. Nor is it acceptable to the residents of waterfront neighbourhoods, or any resident of Toronto, as they learn there is nothing stopping the Provincial Government from taking parks, roads, public spaces or anything they decide they want.
To date, no one has seen concrete or draft plans for the airport expansion. We do not know what it will look like, or the impact it will have on our city. Toronto residents and their municipal government only have media statements from the Province. Further, we know this work cannot move forward without Federal support for airport expansion, through the Port Authority and the Federal Minister, yet we have no clear indication that they support the Province’s plans.
What we do know for certain is that Torontonians are being kept in the dark by higher orders of government and their land is being taken. As a Council, we must make our opposition clear.
Reason for urgency:
The Provincial government has introduced legislation to expropriate City land and the City must respond quickly.
Background Information
Bills and By-laws - Meeting 40
BL40.1 - Introduction of General Bills and Confirming Bills
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Summary
City Council will introduce General Bills and Confirming Bills.