Item - 2024.AU6.2
Tracking Status
- City Council adopted this item on November 13, 2024 with amendments.
- This item was considered by Audit Committee on October 15, 2024 and was adopted with amendments. It will be considered by City Council on November 13, 2024.
- See also 2021.DM30.1
AU6.2 - Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 13 and 14, 2024, adopted the following:
1. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Procurement Officer, to review the City’s Unsolicited Quotations for Proposals Policy and Process for Receiving and Reviewing Unsolicited Quotations and Proposals, and update the policy and process where necessary; such review to consider:
a. clarifying the roles and responsibilities of the Strategic Partnerships Office, Purchasing and Materials Management Division, and client divisions;
b. requiring the Chief Procurement Officer be advised immediately of any unsolicited proposals received where City staff have expressed interest in moving forward, and be kept informed of all significant actions and decisions made with respect to such unsolicited proposals;
c. providing additional guidance to help clarify pre-conditions for considering unsolicited proposals;
d. adding criteria or guidance on what types of proposal, project size or delivery model can be considered through the unsolicited proposals policy and process versus the traditional competitive procurement processes;
e. adding more flexibility to design a transaction and procurement structure for unsolicited proposals that is best suited to delivering the project and protecting the public interest;
f. addressing situations where it may be beneficial to conduct a pilot or a proof of concept; and
g. ensuring the policy and related process are consistent and aligned.
2. City Council request the City Manager to ensure all Division Heads and applicable staff who are responsible for receiving demonstrations by potential suppliers receive training on the City’s Unsolicited Quotations for Proposals Policy and Process for Receiving and Reviewing Unsolicited Quotations and Proposals as well as the procedure for Conducting a Swiss Challenge Request for Proposal.
3. City Council request the City Manager to direct Division Heads to:
a. ensure City Council is presented with business cases for City-wide projects that present outcomes that can realistically be achieved within the timeframes desired, as well as potential risks, drawbacks, and disadvantages; and
b. ensure that any business case that involves a City-wide project implementation has a project charter, implementation plan and timeline agreed by all relevant City Divisions and stakeholders.
4. City Council request the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to report:
a. the annual amounts PayIt is receiving from the City and its customers compared to what the City would have paid if the City processed those transactions directly; and
b. the actual return on investment on the PayIt agreement achieved over the duration of the initial agreement (i.e., three years plus the two one-year renewal options, where applicable).
5. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Customer Experience (311), Revenue Services, and Technology Services and the Office of the Chief Information Security Officer, to clarify roles and responsibilities and establish a protocol for monitoring PayIt’s performance and for receiving and reviewing reports, underlying source data, and other deliverables that demonstrate PayIt’s ongoing compliance with key contract requirements and key performance indicators for:
a. financial reports that support reconciliation of payments and reporting;
b. technical performance and compliance with agreed upon standards, including security and privacy metrics; and
c. operational performance, adoption, and customer satisfaction and efficiency.
6. City Council request the Executive Director, Customer Experience (311), in collaboration with the Director, Revenue Services, to:
a. log all complaints and support calls received related to the PayIt platform (or any future platform adopted by the City in support of its digital government services including electronic billing and payments processing); and
b. leverage data to identify and address trends in questions, concerns, issues, or complaints received, to improve service delivery to residents, businesses, and visitors.
7. City Council request the City Manager to develop and implement a governance framework and methodology to improve ownership and accountability of the planning, procurement, contracting, and delivery of City-wide technology projects (or projects that span across multiple divisions); this would include creating mandates for each project which would include:
a. identifying which Division has overall ownership and accountability of the project, obtaining buy-in from all stakeholders, identifying and addressing risks and opportunities, and measuring and reporting of key performance measures and outcomes achieved;
b. developing a multi-faceted/cross divisional steering committee, that would collaborate to govern and oversee the project and contract compliance; and
c. reporting progress and material changes to the strategy, project scope, budget, and timelines to City Council.
8. City Council request the City Manager to ensure the Strategic Partnership Office enforces adherence to the City’s Unsolicited Quotations or Proposals Policy and Process for Receiving and Reviewing Unsolicited Quotations and Proposals, including retention of appropriate records.
9. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Procurement Officer and the City Solicitor, to direct the Deputy City Managers, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and all Division Heads to ensure they maintain and retain minutes of meetings and conversations where significant discussions are held and decisions are made in relation to procurement and contracts.
10. City Council request the City Manager to ensure the MyToronto Pay platform is decommissioned by the date the City’s current contract term with PayIt LLC expires, on June 2, 2025.
11. City Council request the City Manager, in collaboration with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and the Chief Communications Officer to develop an appropriate transition plan, including public communications on existing alternative payment options offered by the City of Toronto.
12. City Council request the Chief Procurement Officer to develop a clear procurement project covering docket which includes a checklist and log of required contents for non-competitive over $500,00, including unsolicited proposals, and negotiated requests for proposals.
13. City Council request the Chief Procurement Officer to develop a clear sign-off sheet as part of the procurement project record and approval process which identifies key participants such as project sponsor or owner, client program areas, internal staff consultants and the procurement and partnership office staff, as applicable, for non-competitive over $500,000, including unsolicited proposals, and negotiated requests for proposals.
14. City Council request the City Manager to ensure that reporting on procurement projects that require City Council authority, have been signed and approved by participants involved in approving the recommendations.
15. City Council request the Auditor General to consider further investigating the following:
a. the decision-making process that resulted in the score sheet used for the Request for Proposal;
b. whether there are additional City records located on the City's servers or on private cell phones and emails of senior City staff that merit further investigation; and
c. whether a further forensic investigation on the procurement is required.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council recessed its public session and met as Committee of the Whole in closed session on November 13, 2024, to consider confidential information on this Item as it pertains to personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees; litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board; and labour relations or employee negotiations.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-249087.pdf
Audit at a Glance - Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-249088.pdf
Revised Attachment 1: Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-249479.pdf
Attachment 1: Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-249089.pdf
Presentation from the Auditor General and the Deputy Auditor General on Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-249550.pdf
Presentation - Management Response from the City Manager on Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-249551.pdf
Sample Scoring Sheets used for Evaluating Proposals, provided by the Chief Procurement Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-249741.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-184426.pdf
Motions (City Council)
That:
1. City Council request the Auditor General to consider further investigating the following:
a. the decision-making process that resulted in the score sheet used for the Request for Proposal;
b. whether there are additional City records located on the City's servers or on private cell phones and emails of senior City staff that merit further investigation; and
c. whether a further forensic investigation on the procurement is required.
Vote (Amend Item (Additional)) Nov-13-2024 6:13 PM
Result: Carried | Majority Required - AU6.2 - Fletcher - motion 1 |
---|---|
Total members that voted Yes: 21 | Members that voted Yes are Paul Ainslie, Brad Bradford, Alejandra Bravo, Jon Burnside, Lily Cheng, Rachel Chernos Lin, Mike Colle, Paula Fletcher, Stephen Holyday, Parthi Kandavel, Nick Mantas, Josh Matlow, Jennifer McKelvie, Amber Morley, Jamaal Myers, Frances Nunziata (Chair), James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Dianne Saxe, Michael Thompson |
Total members that voted No: 0 | Members that voted No are |
Total members that were Absent: 5 | Members that were absent are Shelley Carroll, Olivia Chow, Vincent Crisanti, Ausma Malik, Chris Moise |
That:
1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff contained in the confidential attachment to this motion.
2. City Council direct that the confidential information in the attachment to this motion remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal information about an identifiable individual.
Vote (Amend Item (Additional)) Nov-13-2024 6:15 PM
Result: Lost (tie) | Majority Required - AU6.2 - Perks - motion 2 |
---|---|
Total members that voted Yes: 11 | Members that voted Yes are Alejandra Bravo, Lily Cheng, Rachel Chernos Lin, Mike Colle, Vincent Crisanti, Paula Fletcher, Parthi Kandavel, Josh Matlow, Amber Morley, Jamaal Myers, Gord Perks |
Total members that voted No: 11 | Members that voted No are Paul Ainslie, Brad Bradford, Jon Burnside, Stephen Holyday, Nick Mantas, Jennifer McKelvie, Frances Nunziata (Chair), James Pasternak, Anthony Perruzza, Dianne Saxe, Michael Thompson |
Total members that were Absent: 4 | Members that were absent are Shelley Carroll, Olivia Chow, Ausma Malik, Chris Moise |
November 13, 2024 at 5:57 p.m. - Speaker Nunziata advised that City Council had completed its closed session consideration of Item AU6.2 headed "Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal". No motions were placed in the closed session. City Council would now proceed with the public debate on the Item.
AU6.2 - Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Audit Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Procurement Officer, to review the City’s Unsolicited Quotations for Proposals Policy and Process for Receiving and Reviewing Unsolicited Quotations and Proposals, and update the policy and process where necessary. Such review to consider:
a. Clarifying the roles and responsibilities of the Strategic Partnerships Office, Purchasing and Materials Management Division, and client divisions;
b. Requiring the Chief Procurement Officer be advised immediately of any unsolicited proposals received where City staff have expressed interest in moving forward, and be kept informed of all significant actions and decisions made with respect to such unsolicited proposals;
c. Providing additional guidance to help clarify pre-conditions for considering unsolicited proposals;
d. Adding criteria or guidance on what types of proposal, project size or delivery model can be considered through the unsolicited proposals policy and process versus the traditional competitive procurement processes;
e. Adding more flexibility to design a transaction and procurement structure for unsolicited proposals that is best suited to delivering the project and protecting the public interest;
f. Addressing situations where it may be beneficial to conduct a pilot or a proof of concept; and
g. Ensuring the policy and related process are consistent and aligned.
2. City Council request the City Manager, to ensure all Division Heads and applicable staff who are responsible for receiving demonstrations by potential suppliers receive training on the City’s Unsolicited Quotations for Proposals Policy and Process for Receiving and Reviewing Unsolicited Quotations and Proposals as well as the procedure for Conducting a Swiss Challenge Request for Proposal.
3. City Council request the City Manager to direct Division Heads to:
a. Ensure City Council is presented with business cases for City-wide projects that present outcomes that can realistically be achieved within the timeframes desired, as well as potential risks, drawbacks, and disadvantages; and
b. Ensure that any business case that involves a City-wide project implementation has a project charter, implementation plan and timeline agreed by all relevant City Divisions and stakeholders.
4. City Council request the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to report:
a. The annual amounts PayIt is receiving from the City and its customers compared to what the City would have paid if the City processed those transactions directly; and
b. The actual return on investment on the PayIt agreement achieved over the duration of the initial agreement (i.e., three years plus the two one-year renewal options, where applicable).
5. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Customer Experience (311), Revenue Services, and Technology Services Divisions and the Office of the Chief Information Security Officer, to clarify roles and responsibilities and establish a protocol for monitoring PayIt’s performance and for receiving and reviewing reports, underlying source data, and other deliverables that demonstrate PayIt’s ongoing compliance with key contract requirements and key performance indicators for:
a. Financial reports that support reconciliation of payments and reporting;
b. Technical performance and compliance with agreed upon standards, including security and privacy metrics; and
c. Operational performance, adoption, and customer satisfaction and efficiency.
6. City Council request the Executive Director, Customer Experience (311) Division, in collaboration with the Director, Revenue Services Division, to:
a. Log all complaints and support calls received related to the PayIt platform (or any future platform adopted by the City in support of its digital government services including electronic billing and payments processing); and
b. Leverage data to identify and address trends in questions, concerns, issues, or complaints received, to improve service delivery to residents, businesses, and visitors.
7. City Council request the City Manager to develop and implement a governance framework and methodology to improve ownership and accountability of the planning, procurement, contracting, and delivery of City-wide technology projects (or projects that span across multiple divisions). This would include creating mandates for each project which would include:
a. Identifying which Division has overall ownership and accountability of the project, obtaining buy-in from all stakeholders, identifying and addressing risks and opportunities, and measuring and reporting of key performance measures and outcomes achieved;
b. Developing a multi-faceted / cross divisional steering committee, that would collaborate to govern and oversee the project and contract compliance; and
c. Reporting progress and material changes to the strategy, project scope, budget, and timelines to City Council.
8. City Council request the City Manager to ensure the Strategic Partnership Office enforces adherence to the City’s Unsolicited Quotations or Proposals Policy and Process for Receiving and Reviewing Unsolicited Quotations and Proposals, including retention of appropriate records.
9. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Procurement Officer and City Solicitor, to direct the Deputy City Managers, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and all Division Heads to ensure they maintain and retain minutes of meetings and conversations where significant discussions are held and decisions are made in relation to procurement and contracts.
10. City Council request the City Manager to ensure the MyToronto Pay platform is decommissioned by the date the City’s current contract term with PayIt LLC expires, on June 2, 2025.
11. City Council request the City Manager, in collaboration with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and the Chief Communications Officer develop an appropriate transition plan, including public communications on existing alternative payment options offered by the City of Toronto.
12. City Council request the Chief Procurement Officer develop a clear procurement project covering docket which includes a checklist and log of required contents for non-competitive over $500,00, including unsolicited proposals, and negotiated requests for proposals.
13. City Council request the Chief Procurement Officer to develop a clear sign-off sheet as part of the procurement project record and approval process which identifies key participants such as project sponsor or owner, client program areas, internal staff consultants and the procurement and partnership office staff, as applicable, for non-competitive over $500,000, including unsolicited proposals, and negotiated requests for proposals.
14. City Council request the City Manager to ensure that reporting on procurement projects that require City Council authority, have been signed and approved by participants involved in approving the recommendations.
Decision Advice and Other Information
Tara Anderson, Auditor General, and Ina Chan, Deputy Auditor General, gave a presentation on Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal.
Paul Johnson, City Manager, gave a presentation on Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal.
Origin
Summary
In March 2021, City Council considered a staff report, DM30.1 – Swiss Challenge Negotiated Request for Proposals for a Digital Government Platform, that detailed the Swiss Challenge Negotiated Request for Proposals process and outlined next steps for negotiation with the successful supplier, PayIt. At that time, City Council adopted a motion requesting the Auditor General to consider a review of the Strategic Partnerships Office (also known as the Toronto Office of Partnerships) as part of the next Auditor General’s Annual Work Plan, with a focus on its relationship to public procurement[1]. An audit was subsequently added to the Auditor General’s Office Work Plan[2].
The objective of this audit was to review the procurement of the PayIt Platform and outcomes achieved to date, to identify lessons learned and opportunities to clarify and / or improve the City’s Unsolicited Quotations for Proposals Policy and Process for Receiving and Reviewing Unsolicited Quotations and Proposals. The audit aimed to answer the following questions:
- Did the procurement with PayIt properly follow the City’s policy and process for unsolicited proposals?
- Did the implementation of the PayIt Platform achieve the intended financial and non-financial outcomes and benefits (as reported to City Council)?
Our audit report does not comment on the quality and advantages of the PayIt platform, as the audit solely focused on whether the City followed its unsolicited proposals policy and process and whether the City’s reported intended outcomes were achieved. In general, we found that PayIt followed the lead of City project staff.
This report presents the result of the audit. The report highlights that:
a. The policy and process for unsolicited proposals were not followed, even after concerns were raised internally amongst City management.
b. Expected benefits and outcomes of the PayIt implementation were not fully realized within the original timeframes indicated in the business case included in staff reports to City Council.
c. Records supporting key decisions were not properly retained.
The nine recommendations in this report are aimed at strengthening the oversight, and policy and process for receiving, reviewing, and responding to unsolicited proposals. This audit report also reinforces the importance of management’s leadership and commitment to ensuring openness, fairness, and transparency in City procurement.
[1] Agenda Item History - 2021.DM30.1 (toronto.ca)
[2] Refer to the Project Horizon for 2022-2023 included in Auditor General's Office 2022 Work Plan (toronto.ca) and the Project Horizon for 2024 included in Auditor General's Office 2023 Work Plan (toronto.ca)
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-249087.pdf
Audit at a Glance - Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-249088.pdf
Revised Attachment 1: Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-249479.pdf
Attachment 1: Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-249089.pdf
Presentation from the Auditor General and the Deputy Auditor General on Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-249550.pdf
Presentation - Management Response from the City Manager on Reinforcing the Importance of Openness, Fairness and Transparency in City Procurement: An Audit of the Procurement and Implementation of the PayIt Unsolicited Proposal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-249551.pdf
Sample Scoring Sheets used for Evaluating Proposals, provided by the Chief Procurement Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-249741.pdf
Speakers
Motions
That the Audit Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the City Manager to ensure the MyToronto Pay platform is decommissioned by the date the City’s current contract term with PayIt LLC expires, on June 2, 2025.
2. City Council request the City Manager, in collaboration with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and the Chief Communications Officer develop an appropriate transition plan, including public communications on existing alternative payment options offered by the City of Toronto.
That the Audit Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the Chief Procurement Officer develop a clear procurement project covering docket which includes a checklist and log of required contents for non-competitive over $500,00, including unsolicited proposals, and negotiated requests for proposals.
2. City Council request the Chief Procurement Officer to develop a clear sign-off sheet as part of the procurement project record and approval process which identifies key participants such as project sponsor or owner, client program areas, internal staff consultants and the procurement and partnership office staff, as applicable, for non-competitive over $500,000, including unsolicited proposals, and negotiated requests for proposals.
3. City Council request the City Manager to ensure that reporting on procurement projects that require City Council authority, have been signed and approved by participants involved in approving the recommendations.