Item - 2026.PH30.8

Tracking Status

PH30.8 - Mid-Rise Housing Implementation Initiative - Proposals Report

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Amended
Wards:
All

Committee Decision

 

The Planning and Housing Committee:

 

1. Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to undertake public and stakeholder consultation on the proposed directions outlined in the report (April 22, 2026) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as amended below, and report back with any recommended Official Plan Amendments, Zoning By-law Amendments, or other implementing actions no later than the second quarter of 2027:

 

a. prioritize public and stakeholder consultation on options for managing and collecting waste, recyclable materials and organics that do not require curbside staging.

Origin

(April 22, 2026) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report provides an update on the work advancing under the Mid-Rise Housing Implementation Initiative (the "Initiative") in response to PH23.6 Missing Middle and Midrise Housing Implementation Initiative, adopted by City Council on July 23, 2025.

 

Enabling new mid-rise housing is a key component of the City's overall housing strategy and the goal of creating a more diverse housing supply. Over the past 2 to 3 years, the City has advanced a number of policy and zoning initiatives, that now permit mid-rise housing in many more locations across the city. The focus of the Mid-Rise Housing Implementation Initiative is to support that policy work by addressing barriers and challenges that impact the viability of delivering new mid-rise housing.

 

For the purposes of this Initiative, mid-rise residential buildings are defined as all buildings 5- to 14-storeys in height. Mid-rise buildings help fill the gap in housing options between single-family homes/ low-rise buildings and high-rise buildings, with their size and form varying across contexts within in the city. They can range from smaller buildings up to 6-storeys within Neighbourhoods, to larger and taller 10- to 14-storey projects along Avenues.

 

As highlighted in PH23.6, there are several challenges which can make it difficult to implement the City’s updated land use policies and regulations which are intended to expand opportunities for mid‑rise housing. These challenges include unpredictable construction costs, high land and borrowing costs, and broader economic uncertainty intensified by global tariffs and trade disruptions.

 

While many of these factors lie beyond the authority of the City, the work and proposed actions described in this report reflect a coordinated, inter-divisional effort by City staff to assess opportunities to improve the feasibility and delivery of missing‑middle and mid‑rise projects, unlocking more housing supply and creating greater choice for residents. Specifically, City Council directed staff to analyze requirements for indoor and outdoor amenity space, loading and garbage collection (particularly Type G loading space), and bicycle parking.

 

This work was supported by:

 

-  a financial feasibility analysis, completed by Parcel Economics Inc.;

-  professional advice and industry engagement, led by Batory Planning + Management;

-   engagement with residents living in mid-rises through a targeted survey, led by City Planning;

- Bicycle parking utilization count for mid-rise buildings, undertaken by BA Group;

- Design test fit scenarios, led by City Planning;

-  Policy research, led by City Planning; and,

-  Research on mid-rise buildings in Berlin, Oslo, Vancouver, Paris, Stockholm, and New York City, led by post-secondary students.

 

Pending Committee's direction, City staff will advance and consult on the proposed actions outlined in this report. Additional actions may be incorporated as further analysis is completed. Final recommendations will be presented to City Council for consideration and approval no later than the second quarter of 2027.

 

While the actions identified in this report are intended to help enable a wider range of housing options, as prioritized by the Official Plan, mid‑rise construction may continue to face challenges due to a range of factors. Many housing developments, including missing middle and mid-rise projects, are often at the margin of feasibility, though incremental improvements can support the successful delivery of more projects, which is crucial at a time where there has been a significant decrease in project launches.

Background Information

(April 22, 2026) Report and Attachments 1 to 6 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Mid-Rise Housing Implementation Initiative - Proposals Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-286379.pdf
Attachment 7: Executive Summary of the Financial Feasibility Analysis
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-286380.pdf

Communications

(May 4, 2026) Letter from Claire Malcolmson, Environmental Consultant, The Mid-Rise Advocacy Group (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-211003.pdf
(May 5, 2026) Letter from Adam Layton, Goldberg Group on behalf of Wycliffe Royal York Limited (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-211012.pdf
(May 5, 2026) Letter from Katherine Merton, Manager, Policy and Advocacy, BiLD (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-211021.pdf
(May 6, 2026) Letter from Ian Carmichael and John Caliendo, Co-Chairs, ABC Residents Association (ABCRA) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-211037.pdf
(May 6, 2026) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Co-Chair, Federation of North Toronto Residents’ Associations Incorporated (FoNTRA) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-211099.pdf
(May 6, 2026) Letter from Philip Pothen, Ontario Environment Program Manager, Environmental Defence (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-211101.pdf
(May 6, 2026) Letter from Councillor Dianne Saxe (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-211103.pdf
(May 7, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (PH.New)
(May 7, 2026) Letter from Colleen Bailey, More Neighbours Toronto (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-211081.pdf
(May 7, 2026) Letter from Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/ph/comm/communicationfile-211126.pdf

Speakers

Claire Malcolmson, The Mid-Rise Advocacy Group
Geoff Kettel, Federation of North Toronto Residents Association
Brian Cheung, More Neighbours Toronto
Councillor Rachel Chernos Lin

Motions

Motion to Amend Item (Additional) moved by Councillor Jamaal Myers (Carried)

That:

 

1. The Planning and Housing Committee request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to prioritize public and stakeholder consultation on options for managing and collecting waste, recyclable materials and organics that do not require curbside staging.


Motion to Adopt Item as Amended moved by Councillor Gord Perks (Carried)
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council