Item - 2025.IE24.13
Tracking Status
- This item was considered by the Infrastructure and Environment Committee on September 26, 2025 and adopted without amendment. It will be considered by City Council on October 8, 9 and 10, 2025.
- See also 2025.IE22.4
IE24.13 - Optimizing the Automated Speed Enforcement Program to Stop Speeding
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Caution: Motions are shown below. Any motions should not be considered final until the meeting is complete, and the decisions for this meeting have been confirmed.
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services consider making operational adjustments to the Automated Speed Enforcement program to prevent a driver from receiving a second ticket from a given Automated Speed Enforcement camera until at least seven days after their first ticket to provide an opportunity for the driver to be notified of their first ticket prior to receiving additional tickets.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to install additional and larger signs near Automated Speed Enforcement cameras, as requested in 2025.IE22.4, by October 31, 2025 to better inform drivers of Automated Speed Enforcement enforcement.
3. City Council request the General Manager Transportation Services provide the Province and local Members of Provincial Parliament a map of every Automated Speed Enforcement location and all the schools, child care centres, playgrounds, long-term care and seniors homes within 500 meters of an Automated Speed Enforcement location in their riding.
4. City Council request the General Manager Transportation Services provide notification to the local Member of Provincial Parliament and local Councillor when a road death or injury occurs and the vehicle was speeding, including a summary of these tragedies over the past 5 years.
5. City Council request the City Manager send notification to every household within 500 meters of an Automated Speed Enforcement location advising of the potential loss of this road safety measure in their community, including relevant data on road injuries in the area from the past 5 years, the number of offences issued and average speed, and the contact information for their local Member of Provincial Parliament and City Councillor for more information.
6. City Council request the Government of Ontario provide the rationale for removing Automated Speed Enforcement, beyond media comments, with the supporting road safety data to understand why removing Automated Speed Enforcement is a preferable option to improve road safety from the perspective of the Government of Ontario.
7. City Council informs the Government of Ontario of its continued support for automated speed enforcement as an important tool to reduce deaths and serious injuries from motor vehicle collisions in our communities.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2025/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-258814.pdf
(September 25, 2025) Letter from Mayor Olivia Chow on Optimizing the Automated Speed Enforcement Program to Stop Speeding
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2025/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-258813.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(September 26, 2025) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (IE.Supp)
Communications (City Council)
(October 5, 2025) Letter from Arthur Geringas, The ABC Residents Association and The Avenue Road Safety Coalition (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2025/cc/comm/communicationfile-196565.pdf
Motions (City Council)
That:
1. City Council request the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to request the Toronto Police Service to provide information on what the additional cost would be to Toronto taxpayers to maintain the current level of safety by deploying sufficient police officers to replace Toronto’s speed cameras with an equivalent level of speed enforcement, without degrading other police services, and to report this information to the November 12, 13, 14 2025 meeting of City Council.
That City Council amend Recommendation 7 by adding the words "in school zones" after the words "speed enforcement" so that it now reads as follows:
7. City Council informs the Government of Ontario of its continued support for automated speed enforcement in school zones as an important tool to reduce deaths and serious injuries from motor vehicle collisions in our communities.
That:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to review speed limits in the community safety zones where the road way is four or more lanes, and recommend appropriate changes consistent with Vision Zero goals, roadway designs and common sense.
REVISED
That:
1. City Council direct that effective immediately:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to consider implementing the following changes to the operation of speed enforcement cameras:
a. two thirds of the automated speed enforcement cameras are to be in operation during school hours of 7 am to 5 pm, Monday to Friday; and
b. one third of the automated speed enforcement cameras are to operate at random times as a pilot initiative.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services report to City Council by the end of the first quarter of 2026 on the impacts of Parts 1.a. and 1.b. above.
That:
1. City Council direct that the number of automated speed enforcement cameras be reduced to 100.
That:
1. City Council direct that all speed enforcement cameras be located within school safety zones.
That:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to create a pilot project to place decorative high-visibility vinyl wrap onto select relocatable automated speed enforcement cameras, including consideration of integration into a street art program.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to report to City Council by the end of first quarter of 2026 on any measured impacts to improved driver behaviours as a result of the high-visibility wraps.
That City Council amend part a. of motion 1.a. by Councillor Holyday by deleting the words "to 5 p.m." and replacing them with the words "to 9 p.m." so that part 1.a. of the motion reads as follows:
1. a. two thirds of the automated speed enforcement cameras are to be in operation during school hours of 7 a.m. to 9 p.m., Monday to Friday; and
IE24.13 - Optimizing the Automated Speed Enforcement Program to Stop Speeding
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services consider making operational adjustments to the Automated Speed Enforcement program to prevent a driver from receiving a second ticket from a given Automated Speed Enforcement camera until at least seven days after their first ticket to provide an opportunity for the driver to be notified of their first ticket prior to receiving additional tickets.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to install additional and larger signs near Automated Speed Enforcement cameras, as requested in 2025.IE22.4, by October 31, 2025 to better inform drivers of Automated Speed Enforcement enforcement.
3. City Council request the General Manager Transportation Services provide the Province and local Members of Provincial Parliament a map of every Automated Speed Enforcement location and all the schools, child care centres, playgrounds, long-term care and seniors homes within 500 meters of an Automated Speed Enforcement location in their riding.
4. City Council request the General Manager Transportation Services provide notification to the local Member of Provincial Parliament and local Councillor when a road death or injury occurs and the vehicle was speeding, including a summary of these tragedies over the past 5 years.
5. City Council request the City Manager send notification to every household within 500 meters of an Automated Speed Enforcement location advising of the potential loss of this road safety measure in their community, including relevant data on road injuries in the area from the past 5 years, the number of offences issued and average speed, and the contact information for their local Member of Provincial Parliament and City Councillor for more information.
6. City Council request the Government of Ontario provide the rationale for removing Automated Speed Enforcement, beyond media comments, with the supporting road safety data to understand why removing Automated Speed Enforcement is a preferable option to improve road safety from the perspective of the Government of Ontario.
7. City Council informs the Government of Ontario of its continued support for automated speed enforcement as an important tool to reduce deaths and serious injuries from motor vehicle collisions in our communities.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee considered this item together with item IE24.4.
Origin
Summary
Speed kills. Since 2024, 250 Torontonians have died or been seriously injured on our roads. We must do everything we can to eliminate these tragedies, including optimizing our use of tools like automated speed enforcement.
Earlier this year, 15-year-old Christina Huang was killed on a neighbourhood street near Finch Avenue East and McCowan Road in Scarborough. Neighbours say cars regularly drive well over the speed limit in that area even though there were multiple schools nearby. This risk to life is never worth saving a few seconds here or there.
We know that speed is a major factor in whether a pedestrian lives or dies. A collision at 30 kilometres per hour has a 90 percent survival rate for pedestrians. At 45 kilometres per hour the survival rate drops to 50 percent and at 80 kilometres per hour survival is near zero.
Fortunately, we have a tool that is proven to reduce speeding. automated speed enforcement cameras have been used in Toronto since 2020. Toronto only places cameras in designated community safety zones and operates automated speed enforcement in accordance with provincial law. A recent study by SickKids and Toronto Metropolitan University researchers found that automated speed enforcement reduced speeding by 45 percent in Toronto. These cameras are making our streets safer and saving lives.
While I acknowledge that automated speed enforcement is not universally supported, it is regularly requested by communities and endorsed by a wide range of road safety experts, including the Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police. Based on what I hear from Torontonians, the most common criticisms of automated speed enforcement are from those who have received tickets through this program and those who feel automated speed enforcement is a “cash grab.” To those critics, I suggest following the speed limit to avoid ever paying a fine. I also point out that Toronto’s annual Vision Zero budget - initiatives dedicated to road safety - is twice as high as the revenue generated by automated speed enforcement tickets. Additionally, millions of dollars of automated speed enforcement revenue is dedicated to supporting Victim Services. We prefer to not collect a single fine, but instead that drivers follow the rules of the road.
Though I strongly believe in automated speed enforcement, it must be fair and focused on changing behaviours to reduce speeding. One criticism of the current automated speed enforcement system that has merit is that a driver may be ticketed many times by the same camera if they are unaware of its presence. To address this valid concern, I am recommending that following the first time a driver is fined for speeding, they cannot be fined again for seven (7) days to provide an opportunity for that driver to receive their fine in the mail and therefore be aware of a given automated speed enforcement camera. I also recommend adding more and larger signs to notify drivers of any automated speed enforcement cameras to provide for fair warning.
Automated speed enforcement works and is an important part of keeping our communities safe. As the discussion on the future of automated speed enforcement continues, I am also recommending that City Council formally state its support for the continuation of automated speed enforcement.
These actions are intended to signal to the Provincial Government that we are open to making changes, but to do away with the automated speed enforcement would be a mistake that will hurt communities in Toronto and across Ontario.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2025/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-258814.pdf
(September 25, 2025) Letter from Mayor Olivia Chow on Optimizing the Automated Speed Enforcement Program to Stop Speeding
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2025/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-258813.pdf
Communications
(September 26, 2025) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (IE.Supp)
Motions
Vote (Adopt Item) Sep-26-2025
Result: Carried | Majority Required - Adopt Recommendation 2 |
---|---|
Total members that voted Yes: 7 | Members that voted Yes are Rachel Chernos Lin, Mike Colle, Paula Fletcher (Chair), Amber Morley, James Pasternak, Anthony Perruzza, Dianne Saxe |
Total members that voted No: 0 | Members that voted No are |
Total members that were Absent: 0 | Members that were absent are |
Vote (Adopt Item) Sep-26-2025
Result: Carried | Majority Required - Adopt Recommendation 4 |
---|---|
Total members that voted Yes: 6 | Members that voted Yes are Rachel Chernos Lin, Mike Colle, Paula Fletcher (Chair), Amber Morley, James Pasternak, Dianne Saxe |
Total members that voted No: 1 | Members that voted No are Anthony Perruzza |
Total members that were Absent: 0 | Members that were absent are |
Vote (Adopt Item) Sep-26-2025
Result: Carried | Majority Required - Adopt Recommendation 1 |
---|---|
Total members that voted Yes: 7 | Members that voted Yes are Rachel Chernos Lin, Mike Colle, Paula Fletcher (Chair), Amber Morley, James Pasternak, Anthony Perruzza, Dianne Saxe |
Total members that voted No: 0 | Members that voted No are |
Total members that were Absent: 0 | Members that were absent are |
Vote (Adopt Item) Sep-26-2025
Result: Carried | Majority Required - Adopt Recommendation 5 |
---|---|
Total members that voted Yes: 5 | Members that voted Yes are Rachel Chernos Lin, Mike Colle, Paula Fletcher (Chair), Amber Morley, Dianne Saxe |
Total members that voted No: 2 | Members that voted No are James Pasternak, Anthony Perruzza |
Total members that were Absent: 0 | Members that were absent are |
Vote (Adopt Item) Sep-26-2025
Result: Carried | Majority Required - Adopt Recommendation 6 |
---|---|
Total members that voted Yes: 7 | Members that voted Yes are Rachel Chernos Lin, Mike Colle, Paula Fletcher (Chair), Amber Morley, James Pasternak, Anthony Perruzza, Dianne Saxe |
Total members that voted No: 0 | Members that voted No are |
Total members that were Absent: 0 | Members that were absent are |
Vote (Adopt Item) Sep-26-2025
Result: Carried | Majority Required - Adopt Recommendation 7 |
---|---|
Total members that voted Yes: 7 | Members that voted Yes are Rachel Chernos Lin, Mike Colle, Paula Fletcher (Chair), Amber Morley, James Pasternak, Anthony Perruzza, Dianne Saxe |
Total members that voted No: 0 | Members that voted No are |
Total members that were Absent: 0 | Members that were absent are |
Vote (Adopt Item) Sep-26-2025
Result: Carried | Majority Required - Adopt Recommendation 3 |
---|---|
Total members that voted Yes: 7 | Members that voted Yes are Rachel Chernos Lin, Mike Colle, Paula Fletcher (Chair), Amber Morley, James Pasternak, Anthony Perruzza, Dianne Saxe |
Total members that voted No: 0 | Members that voted No are |
Total members that were Absent: 0 | Members that were absent are |