Item - 2024.PH16.13
Tracking Status
- City Council adopted this item on November 13, 2024 with amendments.
- This item was considered by the Planning and Housing Committee on October 30, 2024 and adopted without amendment. It will be considered by City Council on November 13, 2024.
PH16.13 - Building More Missing Middle - Addressing Gaps in Multiplex Permissions
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 13 and 14, 2024, adopted the following:
1. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as part of the Multiplex Monitoring Program, to clarify multiplex permissions in semi-detached residential buildings and report back with any potential zoning by-law amendments in the second quarter of 2025.
2. City Council request the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and other appropriate divisions, to consider amendments to the development charges by-law for multiplex properties with more than four units and report back at the earliest opportunity through the planned report reviewing development charges.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-249832.pdf
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-184124.pdf
Motions (City Council)
That:
1. City Council request the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and other appropriate divisions to consider amendments to the development charges by-law for multiplex properties with more than four units and report back at the earliest opportunity through the planned report reviewing development charges.
Vote (Amend Item (Additional)) Nov-14-2024 2:36 PM
Result: Carried | Majority Required - PH16.13 - Bradford - motion 1 |
---|---|
Total members that voted Yes: 24 | Members that voted Yes are Paul Ainslie, Brad Bradford, Alejandra Bravo, Jon Burnside, Shelley Carroll, Lily Cheng, Rachel Chernos Lin, Olivia Chow, Mike Colle, Vincent Crisanti, Paula Fletcher, Parthi Kandavel, Ausma Malik, Nick Mantas, Josh Matlow, Jennifer McKelvie, Chris Moise, Amber Morley, Jamaal Myers, Frances Nunziata (Chair), James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Michael Thompson |
Total members that voted No: 2 | Members that voted No are Stephen Holyday, Dianne Saxe |
Total members that were Absent: 0 | Members that were absent are |
Vote (Adopt Item as Amended) Nov-14-2024 2:38 PM
Result: Carried | Majority Required - PH16.13 - Adopt the item as amended |
---|---|
Total members that voted Yes: 24 | Members that voted Yes are Paul Ainslie, Brad Bradford, Alejandra Bravo, Jon Burnside, Shelley Carroll, Lily Cheng, Rachel Chernos Lin, Olivia Chow, Mike Colle, Vincent Crisanti, Paula Fletcher, Parthi Kandavel, Ausma Malik, Nick Mantas, Josh Matlow, Jennifer McKelvie, Chris Moise, Amber Morley, Jamaal Myers, Frances Nunziata (Chair), James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Dianne Saxe, Michael Thompson |
Total members that voted No: 2 | Members that voted No are Stephen Holyday, Anthony Perruzza |
Total members that were Absent: 0 | Members that were absent are |
PH16.13 - Building More Missing Middle - Addressing Gaps in Multiplex Permissions
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as part of the Multiplex Monitoring Program, to clarify multiplex permissions in semi-detached residential buildings and report back with any potential zoning by-law amendments in the second quarter of 2025.
Origin
Summary
On May 10, 2023, City Council adopted Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit multiplexes city-wide. In recent years, Toronto City Council has made significant strides toward eliminating exclusionary zoning and promoting gentle density in Neighbourhoods across the city, including by legalizing multiplexes, garden suites, laneway suites, and permitting small-scale apartments on Major Streets.
A primary objective of the award-winning Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods (EHON) program is to legalize diverse housing types as-of-right. The minor variance process often leads to delays and increased costs, hindering the construction of new housing units. It is essential to address gaps in the zoning by-law to ensure consistent interpretations, rather than relying on the discretion of individual planners or the Committee of Adjustment.
Stakeholders have raised concerns that the current interpretation of the Zoning By-law 569-2013 amendment to permit multiplexes is creating obstacles to building multiplex housing. Recently, applications for semi-detached fourplexes have been classified as one single apartment building instead of two multiplexes. This classification impacts building code requirements, financing options, and incentives – creating a barrier to building more missing middle housing.
One of the most powerful policy tools we have to enable more missing middle housing is development charge (DC) exemptions. Multiplexes with four or fewer units on a single property have development charges waived on the second, third, and fourth units. This waiver is vital: on a smaller missing middle project, the tens of thousands of dollars in development charges can make the difference between a project being financially feasible or cost prohibitive.
However, if an applicant intends to build a five-unit multiplex – the threshold at which they can access low-cost Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation financing – they have to pay development charges on all five units, making such projects less financially feasible.
A gap in the policy also exists where a builder or developer is building a four-plex in addition to a garden suite and/or a laneway suite. While Council has approved the development charge exemption for up to four units and a separate deferral program for development charges on laneway and garden suites, attempting to build both at once can trigger development charges on all units in the multiplex. This runs counter to the policy objective of maximizing the number of housing units in missing middle projects and must be addressed.
The Multiplex Study Final Report recommended establishing a monitoring program to track the uptake of new builds and to identify challenges in achieving multiplex housing. In line with that planned report, this motion requests that City Planning staff provide clarity on the correct interpretation of the zoning by-law. This motion is also requesting that the City Solicitor and Finance and Treasury Services consider revising the development charge bylaw to help enable more missing middle projects to move forward.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-249832.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-184124.pdf