Item - 2024.EA6.8
Tracking Status
- This item was considered by Compliance Audit Committee on February 28, 2024 and was adopted with amendments.
EA6.8 - Hasina Jamal - A contributor in the 2022 Municipal Election who appears to have contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
Statutory - Municipal Elections Act, SO 1996
Committee Decision
The Compliance Audit Committee:
Has decided not to commence a legal proceeding against Hasina Jamal.
1. The Compliance Audit Committee met on February 28, 2024, to hear Item EA6.8 – Hasina Jamal - A Contributor in the 2022 Municipal Election who appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
2. Section 88.34(2) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 requires the City Clerk to prepare a report identifying each contributor to a candidate for office on a council who appears to have contravened any of the contribution limits under Section 88.9.
3. Section 88.9(1) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 states that the maximum total contribution that a contributor may make to a candidate for the office of Councillor in the City of Toronto is $1,200.
4. The report dated February 13, 2024, from the City Clerk identified Hasina Jamal as a contributor that appeared to have exceeded the $1,200 contribution limit to the election campaign of Shaker Jamal. The report (February 13, 2024) from the City Clerk identified Hasina Jamal to have contributed $1,226.
5. The auditor, BDO Canada LLP, explained their February 12, 2024, report attached as Attachment 1 to the report (February 13, 2024) from the City Clerk, setting out the audit process and the findings with respect to Hasina Jamal.
6. The candidate and contributor attended via web portal and provided written information to the Committee. The contributor and candidate explained that the alleged overage that caused the contravention of the contribution limit was due to human error. An original $26 test contribution was made when the Candidate’s website first launched, around 4 months later the contributor then made another contribution of $1,200.
7. For the reasons stated below, the Compliance Audit Committee has decided not to commence a legal proceeding against contributor Hasina Jamal for the contravention of Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
8. There was an apparent contravention of the contribution limit because the contributor made a contribution of $1,226 which exceeded the applicable limit of $1,200 due to human error. This appears to have been an inadvertent overcontribution due to two separate donations made by the contributor with the first being a test contribution. The contributor is remorseful.
9. The Committee is also aware of the absurdity or "de minimus" principle recognized by the Court (for example: Ontario v. Canadian Pacific Ltd., [1995] 2 SCR 1031). In short, it is the view of the Committee that the legislature did not intend to attach penal consequences to extremely minor breaches, done inadvertently, and that doing so would be inflexibly severe.
10. Consequently, the Committee has determined it is not in the public interest to commence a proceeding against the contributor.
Decision Advice and Other Information
Katrina Amodeo, BDO Canada LLP gave a presentation on Hasina Jamal - A contributor in the 2022 Municipal Election who appears to have contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
The Compliance Audit Committee recessed its public session to meet in closed session to deliberate in private on Item EA6.8 - Hasina Jamal - A contributor in the 2022 Municipal Election who appears to have contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 and to receive advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Origin
Summary
This report transmits the external auditor's report for consideration. The external auditor completed its review of initial and supplementary financial statements filed for the 2022 municipal election and identified Hasina Jamal as a contributor who appears to have exceeded the contribution limits in the Municipal Elections Act, 1996. Within 30 days of receiving this report, the Compliance Audit Committee is required to decide whether to: (1) commence legal proceedings against the contributor for an apparent contravention; or (2) not to commence legal proceedings against the contributor for an apparent contravention. The Committee must also provide brief written reasons for its decision.
The Municipal Elections Act, 1996 requires the City Clerk to review all contributions reported in financial statements submitted by candidates and registered third party advertisers in the 2022 municipal election and to prepare a separate report for each contributor who appears to have exceeded any of the contribution limits. The City Clerk retained an external auditor, BDO Canada LLP, through a competitive procurement process, to review all candidates and registered third party advertisers' financial statements and to report on each apparent over-contribution.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ea/bgrd/backgroundfile-243240.pdf
(February 13, 2024) Report from the City Clerk on Hasina Jamal - A contributor in the 2022 Municipal Election who appears to have contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ea/bgrd/backgroundfile-243144.pdf
Attachment 1 - BDO Canada LLP Report - Hasina Jamal - A Contributor Who Appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 and Excerpt of Financial Statement for Candidate Shaker Jamal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ea/bgrd/backgroundfile-243145.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ea/comm/communicationfile-177660.pdf
(February 27, 2024) Submission from Candidate Shaker Jamal (EA.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ea/comm/communicationfile-177703.pdf
Speakers
Hasina Jamal
Motions
The Compliance Audit Committee:
Has decided not to commence a legal proceeding against Hasina Jamal.
1. The Compliance Audit Committee met on February 28, 2024, to hear Item EA6.8 – Hasina Jamal - A Contributor in the 2022 Municipal Election who appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
2. Section 88.34(2) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 requires the City Clerk to prepare a report identifying each contributor to a candidate for office on a council who appears to have contravened any of the contribution limits under Section 88.9.
3. Section 88.9(1) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 states that the maximum total contribution that a contributor may make to a candidate for the office of Councillor in the City of Toronto is $1200.
4. The report dated February 13, 2024, from the City Clerk identified Hasina Jamal as a contributor that appeared to have exceeded the $1200 contribution limit to the election campaign of Shaker Jamal. The report from the City Clerk identified Hasina Jamal to have contributed $1226.
5. The auditor, BDO Canada LLP, explained their February 12, 2024 report, attached as Attachment 1, to the City Clerk’s report, setting out the audit process and the findings with respect to Hasina Jamal.
6. The candidate and contributor attended via web portal and provided written information to the Committee. The contributor and candidate explained that the alleged overage that caused the contravention of the contribution limit was due to human error. An original $26 test contribution was made when the Candidate’s website first launched, around 4 months later the contributor then made another contribution of $1200.
7. For the reasons stated below, the Compliance Audit Committee has decided not to commence a legal proceeding against contributor Hasina Jamal for the contravention of Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
8. There was an apparent contravention of the contribution limit because the contributor made a contribution of $1226 which exceeded the applicable limit of $1200 due to human error. This appears to have been an inadvertent overcontribution due to two separate donations made by the contributor with the first being a test contribution. The contributor is remorseful.
9. The Committee is also aware of the absurdity or "de minimus" principle recognized by the Court (for example: Ontario v. Canadian Pacific Ltd., [1995] 2 SCR 1031). In short, it is the view of the Committee that the legislature did not intend to attach penal consequences to extremely minor breaches, done inadvertently, and that doing so would be inflexibly severe.
10. Consequently, the Committee has determined it is not in the public interest to commence a proceeding against the contributor.