Item - 2024.EA12.7
Tracking Status
- This item was considered by Compliance Audit Committee on October 7, 2024 and was adopted with amendments.
EA12.7 - Gavin Tighe - A Contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor Who Appears to Have Contravened Contribution Limits Under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
Statutory - Municipal Elections Act, SO 1996
Committee Decision
The Compliance Audit Committee:
Has decided not to commence legal proceedings against Gavin Tighe (the “Contributor”).
1. The Compliance Audit Committee (the “Committee”) met on October 7, 2024, to hear Item EA12.7 – Gavin Tighe - A contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor who appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
2. Section 88.34(2) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 requires the City Clerk to prepare a report identifying each contributor to a candidate for office on a council who appears to have contravened any of the contribution limits under Section 88.9.
3. Section 88.9(3) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 states that the maximum total contribution that a contributor may make to a candidate for the office of Mayor in the City of Toronto is $2,500.
4. The report dated September 10, 2024, from the City Clerk identified Gavin Tighe as a Contributor that appeared to have exceeded the $2,500 contribution limit to the election campaign of Mark Saunders (the “Candidate”). The report (September 10, 2024) from the City Clerk identified Gavin Tighe to have contributed $2,750.
5. The auditor, BDO Canada LLP, explained their report, attached as Attachment 1 to the report from the City Clerk, dated September 10, 2024, setting out the audit process and the findings with respect to Gavin Tighe.
6. The Contributor, Gavin Tighe did not appear but provided a written submission, where the Contributor explained that the alleged overage that caused the contravention of the contribution limit was due to human error. The written submission explained that the overcontribution was a result of an administrative error and was inadvertent. The Contributor also stated that the Candidate did not advise him of the overcontribution.
7. For the reasons stated below, the Compliance Audit Committee has decided not to commence a legal proceeding against contributor Gavin Tighe for the contravention of Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
8. There was a contravention of the contribution limit because the individual made a contribution of $2,750, which exceeded the applicable limit of $2,500 due to human error and inadvertence.
9. The Committee is not bound to commence proceedings in the face of a breach or contravention of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996. The Committee is entitled to consider all of the circumstances to determine whether legal proceedings should be commenced. This has been recognized by the courts in Lancaster v. Compliance Audit Committee et al., 2012 ONSC 5629.
10. In accordance with s. 88.22(2) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, it is a candidate’s obligation to ensure that each contributor is informed of the total maximum of $2,500. In the Committee's view, the responsibility rests with a candidate(s) to fully understand their legal obligations with respect to the receipt of contributions and contribution limits. When a candidate chooses to seek office, they accept that they must understand and comply with the rules including campaign finance rules. A candidate should seek professional or legal advice in order to ensure that they meet their obligations in the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
11. Consequently, the Committee has determined it is not in the public interest to commence a proceeding against the Contributor.
Decision Advice and Other Information
Peter Hearn, BDO Canada LLP gave a presentation on Gavin Tighe - A Contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor Who Appears to Have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
The Compliance Audit Committee recessed its public session to meet in closed session to deliberate in private on Item EA12.7 - Gavin Tighe - A Contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor Who Appears to Have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 and to receive advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Origin
Summary
The Municipal Elections Act, 1996 requires the City Clerk to review all contributions reported in financial statements submitted by candidates and registered third party advertisers in the 2023 by-election for mayor and to prepare a separate report for each contributor who appears to have exceeded any of the contribution limits.
The City Clerk retained an external auditor, BDO Canada LLP, through a competitive procurement process to review all candidates and registered third party advertisers' financial statements and to report on each apparent over-contribution.
This report transmits a report from the external auditor to the Compliance Audit Committee for consideration. The external auditor completed its review of initial and supplementary financial statements filed for the 2023 by-election for mayor and identified Gavin Tighe as a contributor who appears to have exceeded the contribution limits in the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
Within 30 days of receiving this report, the Compliance Audit Committee is required to decide whether to: (1) commence legal proceedings against the contributor for an apparent contravention; or (2) not to commence legal proceedings against the contributor. The Committee must also provide brief written reasons for its decision.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ea/bgrd/backgroundfile-249171.pdf
(September 10, 2024) Report from the City Clerk on Gavin Tighe - A Contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor Who Appears to Have Contravened Contribution Limits Under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ea/bgrd/backgroundfile-248732.pdf
Attachment 1 - BDO Canada LLP Report - Gavin Tighe - A Contributor Who Appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits Under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 and Excerpt of Financial Statements for Mark Saunders
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ea/bgrd/backgroundfile-248753.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ea/comm/communicationfile-183035.pdf
Motions
1:58 p.m. - That the Compliance Audit Committee recess its public session to meet in closed session to deliberate in private on Item EA12.7 - Gavin Tighe - A Contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor Who Appears to Have Contravened Contribution Limits Under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 and to receive advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
The Compliance Audit Committee:
Has decided not to commence legal proceedings against Gavin Tighe (the “Contributor”).
1. The Compliance Audit Committee (the “Committee”) met on October 7, 2024, to hear Item EA12.7 – Gavin Tighe - A contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor who appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
2. Section 88.34(2) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 requires the City Clerk to prepare a report identifying each contributor to a candidate for office on a council who appears to have contravened any of the contribution limits under Section 88.9.
3. Section 88.9(3) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 states that the maximum total contribution that a contributor may make to a candidate for the office of Mayor in the City of Toronto is $2,500.
4. The report dated September 10, 2024, from the City Clerk identified Gavin Tighe as a Contributor that appeared to have exceeded the $2,500 contribution limit to the election campaign of Mark Saunders (the “Candidate”). The report (September 10, 2024) from the City Clerk identified Gavin Tighe to have contributed $2,750.
5. The auditor, BDO Canada LLP, explained their report, attached as Attachment 1 to the report from the City Clerk, dated September 10, 2024, setting out the audit process and the findings with respect to Gavin Tighe.
6. The Contributor, Gavin Tighe did not appear but provided a written submission, where the Contributor explained that the alleged overage that caused the contravention of the contribution limit was due to human error. The written submission explained that the overcontribution was a result of an administrative error and was inadvertent. The Contributor also stated that the Candidate did not advise him of the overcontribution.
7. For the reasons stated below, the Compliance Audit Committee has decided not to commence a legal proceeding against contributor Gavin Tighe for the contravention of Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
8. There was a contravention of the contribution limit because the individual made a contribution of $2,750, which exceeded the applicable limit of $2,500 due to human error and inadvertence.
9. The Committee is not bound to commence proceedings in the face of a breach or contravention of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996. The Committee is entitled to consider all of the circumstances to determine whether legal proceedings should be commenced. This has been recognized by the courts in Lancaster v. Compliance Audit Committee et al., 2012 ONSC 5629.
10. In accordance with s. 88.22(2) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, it is a candidate’s obligation to ensure that each contributor is informed of the total maximum of $2,500. In the Committee's view, the responsibility rests with a candidate(s) to fully understand their legal obligations with respect to the receipt of contributions and contribution limits. When a candidate chooses to seek office, they accept that they must understand and comply with the rules including campaign finance rules. A candidate should seek professional or legal advice in order to ensure that they meet their obligations in the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
11. Consequently, the Committee has determined it is not in the public interest to commence a proceeding against the Contributor.