Item - 2024.EA12.1

Tracking Status

EA12.1 - Richard Peddie - A Contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor Who Appears to Have Contravened Contribution Limits Under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Amended
Wards:
All

Statutory - Municipal Elections Act, SO 1996

Committee Decision

The Compliance Audit Committee: 
  
Has decided not to commence legal proceedings against Richard Peddie (the “Contributor”). 
 
1. The Compliance Audit Committee (the “Committee”) met on October 7, 2024, to hear Item EA12.1 – Richard Peddie - A contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor who appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996. 
  
2. Section 88.34(2) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 requires the City Clerk to prepare a report identifying each contributor to a candidate for office on a council who appears to have contravened any of the contribution limits under Section 88.9. 
  
3. Section 88.9(4) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 states that the maximum total contribution that a contributor may make to multiple candidates for office on the same council or local board is $5,000. 
 
4. The report dated September 10, 2024, from the City Clerk identified Richard Peddie as a Contributor that appeared to have exceeded the $5,000 contribution limit to the election campaign of Josh Matlow, Chloe Brown, and Olivia Chow (the “Candidates”). The report (September 10, 2024) from the City Clerk identified Richard Peddie to have contributed $5,500. 
  
5. The auditor, BDO Canada LLP, explained their report, attached as Attachment 1 to the report from the City Clerk, dated September 10, 2024, setting out the audit process and the findings with respect to Richard Peddie. 
  
6. The Contributor, Richard Peddie did not appear but did provide a written submission, where the Contributor explained that the alleged overage that caused the contravention of the contribution limit was due to human error. The Contributor was asked for a second contribution to the election campaign of candidate, Josh Matlow. The Contributor mistakenly believed a total of $3,900 had been contributed when asked for a second contribution.   
  
7. For the reasons stated below, the Compliance Audit Committee has decided not to commence a legal proceeding against contributor Richard Peddie for the contravention of Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996. 
  
8. There was a contravention of the contribution limit because the individual made a contribution of $5,500, which exceeded the applicable limit of $5,000 due to human error.  
  
9. The Committee is not bound to commence proceedings in the face of a breach or contravention of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996. The Committee is entitled to consider all of the circumstances to determine whether legal proceedings should be commenced. This has been recognized by the courts in Lancaster v. Compliance Audit Committee et al., 2012 ONSC 5629.     
  
10. Consequently, the Committee has determined it is not in the public interest to commence a proceeding against the Contributor.

Decision Advice and Other Information

Peter Hearn, BDO Canada LLP gave a presentation on Richard Peddie - A Contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor Who Appears to Have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.

 

The Compliance Audit Committee recessed its public session to meet in closed session to deliberate in private on Item EA12.1 - Richard Peddie - A Contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor Who Appears to Have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 and to receive advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Origin

(September 10, 2024) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The Municipal Elections Act, 1996 requires the City Clerk to review all contributions reported in financial statements submitted by candidates and registered third party advertisers in the 2023 by-election for mayor and to prepare a separate report for each contributor who appears to have exceeded any of the contribution limits.

 

The City Clerk retained an external auditor, BDO Canada LLP, through a competitive procurement process to review all candidates and registered third party advertisers' financial statements and to report on each apparent over-contribution.

 

This report transmits a report from the external auditor to the Compliance Audit Committee for consideration. The external auditor completed its review of initial and supplementary financial statements filed for the 2023 by-election for mayor and identified Richard Peddie as a contributor who appears to have exceeded the contribution limits in the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.

 

Within 30 days of receiving this report, the Compliance Audit Committee is required to decide whether to: (1) commence legal proceedings against the contributor for an apparent contravention; or (2) not to commence legal proceedings against the contributor. The Committee must also provide brief written reasons for its decision.

Background Information

(October 2, 2024) Presentation from BDO Canada LLP on Richard Peddie- A Contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor Who Appears to Have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ea/bgrd/backgroundfile-249125.pdf
(September 10, 2024) Report from the City Clerk on Richard Peddie - A Contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor Who Appears to Have Contravened Contribution Limits Under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ea/bgrd/backgroundfile-248737.pdf
Attachment 1 - BDO Canada LLP Report - Richard Peddie - A Contributor Who Appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits Under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 and Excerpt of Financial Statements for Multiple Candidates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ea/bgrd/backgroundfile-248738.pdf

Communications

(September 28, 2024) Submission from Contributor Richard Peddie (EA.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ea/comm/communicationfile-183154.pdf

Motions

Motion to Meet in Closed Session moved by Sara Gelgor (Carried)

10:35 a.m. - That the Compliance Audit Committee recess its public session to meet in closed session to deliberate in private on Item EA12.1 - Richard Peddie - A Contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor Who Appears to Have Contravened Contribution Limits Under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 and to receive advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.


Motion to Amend Item moved by Sara Gelgor (Carried)

The Compliance Audit Committee: 
  
Has decided not to commence legal proceedings against Richard Peddie (the “Contributor”). 
 
1. The Compliance Audit Committee (the “Committee”) met on October 7, 2024, to hear Item EA12.1 – Richard Peddie - A contributor in the 2023 By-Election for Mayor who appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996. 
  
2. Section 88.34(2) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 requires the City Clerk to prepare a report identifying each contributor to a candidate for office on a council who appears to have contravened any of the contribution limits under Section 88.9. 
  
3. Section 88.9(4) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 states that the maximum total contribution that a contributor may make to multiple candidates for office on the same council or local board is $5,000. 
 
4. The report dated September 10, 2024, from the City Clerk identified Richard Peddie as a Contributor that appeared to have exceeded the $5,000 contribution limit to the election campaign of Josh Matlow, Chloe Brown, and Olivia Chow (the “Candidates”). The report (September 10, 2024) from the City Clerk identified Richard Peddie to have contributed $5,500. 
  
5. The auditor, BDO Canada LLP, explained their report, attached as Attachment 1 to the report from the City Clerk, dated September 10, 2024, setting out the audit process and the findings with respect to Richard Peddie. 
  
6. The Contributor, Richard Peddie did not appear but did provide a written submission, where the Contributor explained that the alleged overage that caused the contravention of the contribution limit was due to human error. The Contributor was asked for a second contribution to the election campaign of candidate, Josh Matlow. The Contributor mistakenly believed a total of $3,900 had been contributed when asked for a second contribution.   
  
7. For the reasons stated below, the Compliance Audit Committee has decided not to commence a legal proceeding against contributor Richard Peddie for the contravention of Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996. 
  
8. There was a contravention of the contribution limit because the individual made a contribution of $5,500, which exceeded the applicable limit of $5,000 due to human error.  
  
9. The Committee is not bound to commence proceedings in the face of a breach or contravention of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996. The Committee is entitled to consider all of the circumstances to determine whether legal proceedings should be commenced. This has been recognized by the courts in Lancaster v. Compliance Audit Committee et al., 2012 ONSC 5629.     
  
10. Consequently, the Committee has determined it is not in the public interest to commence a proceeding against the Contributor.

Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council