Item - 2022.TE34.15
Tracking Status
- City Council adopted this item on July 19, 20, 21 and 22, 2022 with amendments.
- This item was considered by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 29 and 30, 2022. It is being forwarded to City Council without recommendations. It will be considered by City Council on July 19, 20, 21 and 22, 2022.
- See also By-law 1034-2022
TE34.15 - Alterations to a Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 95 St. Joseph Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on July 19, 20, 21 and 22, 2022, adopted the following:
1. City Council consent to the application to alter the designated property at 95 St. Joseph Street, with conditions, under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the reasons stated in the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and with such alterations substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated October 20, 2021 prepared by CORE Architects Inc. on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated March 10, 2022 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with an approved Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to the following conditions:
a. the related site specific Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment have come into full force and effect.
b. the owner:
1. enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 95 St. Joseph Street in accordance with the plans and drawings dated October 20, 2021 prepared by CORE Architects Inc., and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared ERA Architects Inc., dated March 10, 2022, and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Part 1.b.2 below to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;
2. provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 95 St. Joseph Street prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated March 10, 2022, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
3. Parts 1b.1. and 2. above are required to be satisfied prior to the introduction of the Bill for any Zoning By-law Amendment related to the property, unless other legal mechanisms are utilized so as to satisfy the City Solicitor that no Building Permit will be issued until such time as the Owner has entered into the Heritage Easement Agreement and registered the agreement on title; in any case, the Conservation Plan must be accepted and the Heritage Easement Agreement must be entered into and registered no later than December 9, 2022, or such later date as may be agreed by the owner and the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning in writing, failing which this condition will be determined to be unfulfilled;
c. prior to Site Plan approval for the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment for the property located at 95 St. Joseph Street, the subject owner shall:
1. provide final Site Plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Part 1.b.2 above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
2. provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the subject heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
3. provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
4. provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
5. submit a Signage Plan for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
6. provide full documentation of Newman Hall Chapel, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a USB flash drive in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
d. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 95 St. Joseph Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building, as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the related site specific Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments giving rise to the proposed alterations have come into full force and effect and the owner of the subject property shall:
1. have entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City required in Part 1.b.1 above;
2. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Part 1.b.2 above including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
3. provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan; and
e. prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Part 1.d.3 above, the owner shall:
1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation, lighting and interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan, Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
2. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
2. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 95 St. Joseph Street in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in City Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 95 St. Joseph Street.
4. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (July 7, 2022) from the City Solicitor remain confidential as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client and litigation privilege and it relates to ongoing litigation against the City.
Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (July 7, 2022) from the City Solicitor remains confidential in its entirety in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client and litigation privilege and it relates to ongoing litigation against the City.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council considered Items TE34.7 and TE34.15 together.
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-226629.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-228755.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Legal Advice
Communications (Community Council)
(June 27, 2022) Letter from Marilyn Schneider, Rocco Mortelliti, Dara Beard, and 95 Action Group (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/te/comm/communicationfile-153393.pdf
(June 27, 2022) E-mail from Chris Robinson, 95 Action Group (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/te/comm/communicationfile-153785.pdf
(June 28, 2022) Letter from Mark Flowers on behalf of Davies Howe LLP (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/te/comm/communicationfile-153817.pdf
Communications (City Council)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Chris Robinson (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Juan Marcelo Barrancos Clavijo (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Lynn Xu (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Jessica Liu (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Angela Torchia (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Danlei Huang (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Wayne and Lois Hindmarsh (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Carolyn Coté (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from In Kee Kim (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Alex Gao (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Fernando Mini (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Tiankuo Weng (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Maria Mini (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Bing Wu (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Pengfei Guo (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Joanna Chan (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Xinle Cui (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Raymond Chow (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Aaron Davey (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Juxian Wang (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Ealu Li (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Chih Yuan Wang (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Hsuan Hsu (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Huan Wang (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Lidia and Tony Gentilucci (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Lois D. Figg (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Luming Yang (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Nataliia Kasian (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Patricia Pliner (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Pedro Pinzon (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Phillip Robinson (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) Letter from Ross Saturno (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Shicheng Wu and Shan Cheng (CC.Supp)
(July 14, 2022) E-mail from Yong Mi Kim (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Charlotte Snider (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Nael Al Koudsi (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Wendy Yang (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Xiaolong Li, Bruce (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Xin Li (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from LiLy Lee (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Shi Qiu (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Xuejuan Jiang (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Dan Lin (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Ellie Yu (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Xinyi Tang (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Aimee XU (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Carol Wen (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Elsa Lin (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Susie Kim (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Velupiallai Balasubramaniam (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Wing Yun Au (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Winton Au (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Jane Wen (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Stephanie Nicholson (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Anne Joulu (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Steve Lim (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Henry Lubaszka (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Catherine Kim (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from Wei Cao (CC.Supp)
(July 16, 2022) E-mail from Emily Vecchiarelli (CC.Supp)
(July 16, 2022) E-mail from Lily Liu (CC.Supp)
(July 16, 2022) E-mail from Meredyth Daneman (CC.Supp)
(July 16, 2022) E-mail from Tony H C Wong (CC.Supp)
(July 16, 2022) E-mail from Zunwei Du (CC.Supp)
(July 15, 2022) E-mail from David Meneghello (CC.Supp)
(July 16, 2022) E-mail from Qihua Du (CC.Supp)
(July 16, 2022) E-mail from Gang Cheng (CC.Supp)
(July 16, 2022) E-mail from Siyu Fu (CC.Supp)
(July 16, 2022) E-mail from Jing Li (CC.Supp)
(July 16, 2022) E-mail from Rui Zhang (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Fatima Zaidi (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Edward Leung (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Ngoc Bui (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Shuo Xu (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Victoria Yuan (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Eden Zheng (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Kevin Li (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Dr. E Grunfeld (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Deborah MacLellan (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Weigang Huang (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from William Chan (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Dylan Shaul (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from George Lim (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Jun Wei (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Frances M. Dvorchik (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Reiko Hanabusa (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Christine Chan (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Sheila Coleman (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Michael Lo (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Alice Huang (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Lorena Kissoon (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Melanie Yuan (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Adele Kulik (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Catherine Wang (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Chloe Lo (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Christine Ma (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) Letter from Dara Beard, Board President, MTCC 561, Rocco Mortellti, Board President ,TSCC 2538, Marilyn Schneider, Board President, TSCC 2525, and Christ Robinson, 95 Action Group (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/cc/comm/communicationfile-155575.pdf
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from David Wang (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Judy Sheppard and Lenny Beldick (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Karen Wang (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Michael Ewing (CC.Supp)
(July 17, 2022) E-mail from Dr. Ryan Patterson (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Seokhwan Chang (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Chrystina Swetman (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Anne L. (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) Letter from Jerome R. Morse, Morse Shannon LLP (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/cc/comm/communicationfile-155630.pdf
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Lin Mi (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Maddy Ewing (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Mark Robinson (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Myra Tingey (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Rin Su (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Sabrina Robinson (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Susan A'Court (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Timothy Robinson (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Xinhao Huang (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Xinru Qin (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Zhihong(Bill) Weng (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Zhu Xin Zhong (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Hao Ding (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Shari L. Ellis (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Soonhyun Chang (CC.Supp)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from James Lin (CC.New)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Li Chen (CC.New)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Stellar Wang (CC.New)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Heritage Committee and Alexandra Jenkins and Kathy Falconi, Co-Presidents, North Rosedale Residents Association (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/cc/comm/communicationfile-155738.pdf
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Anna Sales (CC.New)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Xiaoli Wu (CC.New)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Yuhui Wang (CC.New)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Carol Westcott (CC.New)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Wende Lam (CC.New)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Yi Du (CC.New)
(July 18, 2022) E-mail from Bryan Wei (CC.New)
(July 19, 2022) E-mail from Daniel Wu (CC.New)
Motions (City Council)
That City Council adopt the following recommendation in the supplementary report (July 7, 2022) from the City Solicitor [TE34.15b]:
1. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client and litigation privilege and relates to ongoing litigation against the City.
That City Council adopt the following recommendations in the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
1. City Council consent to the application to alter the designated property at 95 St. Joseph Street, with conditions, under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the reasons stated in the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and with such alterations substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated October 20, 2021 prepared by CORE Architects Inc. on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated March 10, 2022 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, all subject to and in accordance with an approved Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to the following conditions:
a. That the related site specific Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment have come into full force and effect.
b. That the owner:
1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 95 St. Joseph Street in accordance with the plans and drawings dated October 20, 2021 prepared by CORE Architects Inc., and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared ERA Architects Inc., dated March 10, 2022, and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 95 St. Joseph Street prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated March 10, 2022, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
3. Recommendation b. 1. and 2. above are required to be satisfied prior to the introduction of the bill for any Zoning By-law Amendment related to the property, unless other legal mechanisms are utilized so as to satisfy the City Solicitor that no Building Permit will be issued until such time as the Owner has entered into the Heritage Easement Agreement and registered the agreement on title. In any case, the Conservation Plan must be accepted and the Heritage Easement Agreement must be entered into and registered no later than December 9, 2022, or such later date as may be agreed by the owner and the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning in writing, failing which this condition will be determined to be unfulfilled.
c. That prior to Site Plan approval for the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment for the property located at 95 St. Joseph Street, the subject owner shall:
1. Provide final Site Plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
2. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the subject heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
3. Provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
4. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
5. Submit a Signage Plan for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
6. Provide full documentation of Newman Hall Chapel, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a USB flash drive in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
d. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 95 St. Joseph Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building, as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the related site specific Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments giving rise to the proposed alterations have come into full force and effect and the owner of the subject property shall:
1. Have entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City required in Recommendation 1.b.1.
2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2 including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan.
e. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.d.3, the owner shall:
1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation, lighting and interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan, Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
2. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 95 St. Joseph Street in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 95 St. Joseph Street.
15a - Alterations to a Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 95 St. Joseph Street
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-227598.pdf
TE34.15 - Alterations to a Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 95 St. Joseph Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Without Recs
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council submits the item to Council without recommendation.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Requested the City Solicitor to provide a confidential report directly to City Council setting out the likely outcome of an appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal should this application be refused by the City and appealed by the applicant and include reference to the following matters:
1) refusal of alterations to the heritage building;
2) refusal to grant permission to build residential in an institutional zone;
3) refusal to grant the height and setbacks set out in the report; and
4) planning evidence required to defend a refusal request.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for St. Basil's Seminary (designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act) in connection with the development of the subject property. The development is the subject of an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment application under the Planning Act.
The property contains St. Basil's Seminary, now known as the Cardinal Flahiff Basilian Centre, which is an important example of the work of the great, 20th-century Canadian architect and engineer, Ernest Cormier (1885-1980). Cormier's other notable commissions include the Supreme Court of Canada building in Ottawa. The four-storey seminary complex was completed in 1951 as part of the Basilian Fathers centennial project to expand St. Michael's College. The seminary expresses Cormier's characteristic balance of Modernism with tradition and the St. Basil's Seminary Chapel interior, is especially significant as representative of Cormier's work. The property also contains Newman Hall Chapel, designed in 1913 by Arthur W. Holmes.
The development application proposes a 39-storey, mixed-use tower with a 12-storey podium that incorporates a portion of St. Basil's Seminary and relocates the interior Seminary Chapel. The retained portions of the Seminary are proposed to be restored in the alternative location with minor modifications to support the new interior programming. The Newman Hall Chapel is proposed to be demolished. Overall, the alterations conserve the onsite and adjacent heritage properties and are consistent with the existing heritage policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-226629.pdf
Communications
(June 27, 2022) Letter from Marilyn Schneider, Rocco Mortelliti, Dara Beard, and 95 Action Group (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/te/comm/communicationfile-153393.pdf
(June 27, 2022) E-mail from Chris Robinson, 95 Action Group (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/te/comm/communicationfile-153785.pdf
(June 28, 2022) Letter from Mark Flowers on behalf of Davies Howe LLP (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/te/comm/communicationfile-153817.pdf
Speakers
Mark Flowers, Davies Howe LLP
Dara Beard, MTCC 561 Board
Chris Robinson, 95 Action Group
Stephen Belcourt
Motions
That:
1. The Item be forwarded to City Council without recommendation; and
2. Request the City Solicitor to provide a confidential report directly to City Council setting out the likely outcome of an appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal should this application be refused by the City and appealed by the applicant and include reference to the following matters: 1) refusal of alterations to the heritage building; 2) refusal to grant permission to build residential in an institutional zone; 3) refusal to grant the height and setbacks set out in the report; and 4) planning evidence required to defend a refusal request.
15a - Alterations to a Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 95 St. Joseph Street
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on June 14, 2022, the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB35.4 and forwarded the Item without recommendation.
Summary from the report (May 24, 2022) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for St. Basil's Seminary (designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act) in connection with the development of the subject property. The development is the subject of an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment application under the Planning Act.
The property contains St. Basil's Seminary, now known as the Cardinal Flahiff Basilian Centre, which is an important example of the work of the great, 20th-century Canadian architect and engineer, Ernest Cormier (1885-1980). Cormier's other notable commissions include the Supreme Court of Canada building in Ottawa. The four-storey seminary complex was completed in 1951 as part of the Basilian Fathers centennial project to expand St. Michael's College. The seminary expresses Cormier's characteristic balance of Modernism with tradition and the St. Basil's Seminary Chapel interior, is especially significant as representative of Cormier's work. The property also contains Newman Hall Chapel, designed in 1913 by Arthur W. Holmes.
The development application proposes a 39-storey, mixed-use tower with a 12-storey podium that incorporates a portion of St. Basil's Seminary and relocates the interior Seminary Chapel. The retained portions of the Seminary are proposed to be restored in the alternative location with minor modifications to support the new interior programming. The Newman Hall Chapel is proposed to be demolished. Overall, the alterations conserve the onsite and adjacent heritage properties and are consistent with the existing heritage policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-227598.pdf