Item - 2019.EA6.4
Tracking Status
- This item was considered by Compliance Audit Committee on November 18, 2019 and was adopted with amendments.
EA6.4 - Winta Belay - A Contributor in the 2018 Municipal Election who Appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
Statutory - Municipal Elections Act, SO 1996
Committee Decision
The Compliance Audit Committee:
Has decided not to commence legal proceedings against Winta Belay.
1. The Compliance Audit Committee met on November 18, 2019 to hear Item EA6.4 - Winta Belay - A Contributor in the 2018 Municipal Election who Appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act.
2. Section 88.34(2) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 requires the City Clerk to prepare a report identifying each contributor to a candidate for office on a council who appears to have contravened any of the contribution limits under Section 88.9.
3. Section 88.9(3) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 states that the maximum total contribution that a contributor may make to a candidate for the office of mayor in the City of Toronto is $2,500.
4. Appendix A to the report (October 31, 2019) from the City Clerk identified Winta Belay as a contributor that appeared to have exceeded the $2,500 contribution limit to the election campaign of Saron Gebresellassi. Specifically, Appendix A to the report (October 31, 2019) from the City Clerk identified Winta Belay to have made two contributions of $2,275 each for a total contribution of $4,550 to the election campaign of Saron Gebresellassi.
5. The contributor and the candidate both appeared and provided information to the Committee. It was explained that only one contribution of $2,275 was made but the contribution was erroneously recorded twice.
6. For the reasons stated below, the Compliance Audit Committee has decided not to commence a legal proceeding against contributor Winta Belay for the contravention of Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
There was not a contravention over the contribution limit because the individual made one contribution of $2,275, which is below the contribution limit, not two contributions of $2,275.
The Committee considers that it is the candidate's responsibility to monitor the contribution limits. The candidate was provided with written material by the Clerk outlining the contribution limits. Additionally, the Clerk offered multiple training sessions to candidates.
Decision Advice and Other Information
Joe Filippelli, BDO Canada LLP gave a presentation on Winta Belay - A Contributor who Appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
The Compliance Audit Committee recessed its public session to meet in closed session to deliberate in private on Item EA6.4 - Winta Belay - A Contributor in the 2018 Municipal Election who Appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act and to receive advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Origin
Summary
The City Clerk is sending an external auditor's report to the Compliance Audit Committee for consideration. The auditor completed its review of initial financial statements filed and identified Winta Belay as a contributor who appears to have exceeded the contribution limits in the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 (Municipal Elections Act). Within 30 days of receiving this report, the Compliance Audit Committee is required to decide whether to: (1) commence legal proceedings against the contributor for an apparent contravention; or (2) not to commence legal proceedings against the contributor for an apparent contravention. The Committee must also provide brief written reasons for its decision.
The Municipal Elections Act requires the City Clerk to review all contributions reported in financial statements submitted by candidates and registered third party advertisers in the 2018 municipal election and to prepare a separate report for each contributor who appears to have exceeded any of the contribution limits. The City Clerk retained an external auditor, BDO Canada LLP, through a competitive procurement process, to review all candidates and registered third party advertisers' financial statements and report on each apparent over-contribution.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ea/bgrd/backgroundfile-140175.pdf
(October 31, 2019) Report from the City Clerk on Winta Belay - A Contributor in the 2018 Municipal Election who Appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ea/bgrd/backgroundfile-139733.pdf
Appendix A - BDO Canada LLP Report - Winta Belay - A Contributor who Appears to have Contravened Contribution Limits under Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 and Financial Statement for Candidate Saron Gebresallassi
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ea/bgrd/backgroundfile-139709.pdf
Speakers
Candidate Saron Gebresallassi
Motions
The Compliance Audit Committee:
Has decided not to commence legal proceedings against Winta Belay.
1. The Compliance Audit Committee met on November 18, 2019 to hear Item EA6.4 - Winta Belay.
2. Section 88.34(2) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 requires the City Clerk to prepare a report identifying each contributor to a candidate for office on a council who appears to have contravened any of the contribution limits under Section 88.9.
3. Section 88.9(3) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 states that the maximum total contribution that a contributor may make to a candidate for the office of mayor in the City of Toronto is $2,500.
4. Appendix A to the report (October 31, 2019) from the City Clerk identified Winta Belay as a contributor that appeared to have exceeded the $2,500 contribution limit to the election campaign of Saron Gebresellassi. Specifically, Appendix A to the report (October 31, 2019) from the City Clerk identified Winta Belay to have made two contributions of $2,275 each for a total contribution of $4,550 to the election campaign of Saron Gebresellassi.
5. The contributor and the candidate both appeared and provided information to the Committee. It was explained that only one contribution of $2,275 was made but the contribution was erroneously recorded twice.
6. For the reasons stated below, the Compliance Audit Committee has decided not to commence a legal proceeding against contributor Winta Belay for the contravention of Section 88.9 of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996.
There was not a contravention over the contribution limit because the individual made one contribution of $2,275, which is below the contribution limit, not two contributions of $2,275.
The Committee considers that it is the candidate's responsibility to monitor the contribution limits. The candidate was provided with written material by the Clerk outlining the contribution limits. Additionally, the Clerk offered multiple training sessions to candidates.