Item - 2019.BA3.9
Tracking Status
- This item was considered by Bid Award Panel on December 19, 2018 and was adopted without amendment.
BA3.9 - Award of Request for Proposal No. 9118-18-7179 to LEA Consulting Ltd. for Professional Planning and Engineering Services for Transportation Infrastructure Studies and Projects
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
Panel Decision
The Bid Award Panel adopted the following:
1. Bid Award Panel grant authority to award the contract in accordance with the Contract Details set out in the report (December 12, 2018) from the Chief Purchasing Officer:
Call Number:
Request for Proposal #9118-18-7179
Description:
Professional Planning and Engineering Services for Transportation Infrastructure Studies and Projects. Two (2) year contract duration beginning from contract award date, with optional two (2) year extension.
Recommended Proponent:
LEA Consulting Ltd.
Contract Award Value:
$2,000,000 net of all applicable taxes and charges
$2,260,000 including HST and all applicable charges
$2,035,200 net of HST recoveries
Contract is expected to start in January 2019 and end December 2020, with an optional extension from January 2021 to December 2022.
Option Period 1 (January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022)
$2,000,000 net of all applicable taxes and charges
$2,260,000 including HST and all applicable charges
$2,035,200 net of HST recoveries
The total potential contract award including all option years is $4,520,000 including all applicable taxes and charges and $4,000,000 net of all applicable taxes and charges. The total potential cost to the City including all option years is $4,070,400 net of HST recoveries.
Origin
Summary
Call Issued: August 27, 2018 Call Closed: October 11, 2018
Number of Addenda Issued: 5
Number of Bids: 8
Table 2: Summary of Bids* Received for Request for Proposal No. 9118-18-7179
|
Proponent |
|
Parsons Inc. |
|
LEA Consulting Ltd. |
|
WSP CANADA GROUP LIMITED |
|
*MORRISON HERSHFIELD LIMITED |
|
*AECOM CANADA LTD |
|
*STANTEC CONSULTING LTD. |
|
*HDR Corporation |
|
**WOOD ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE |
* Proposals did not pass minimum technical threshold of 60 points (75 percent out of 80 points) in order for their cost information to be considered. This Request for Proposal used a two-envelope process.
** Non-Compliant Bid
Range of Scores:
Of the three (3) proposals which passed the minimum technical threshold, the highest scoring proposal received 84.22 marks out of a possible 100 while the lowest scoring proposal received 77.57 marks.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ba/bgrd/backgroundfile-122680.pdf
Motions
Moved by Carlyle Khan.