Item - 2018.EY31.4

Tracking Status

EY31.4 - Final Report - High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Area Character Study

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Amended
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park

City Council Decision

City Council on June 26, 27, 28 and 29, 2018, adopted the following:

 

1.  City Council adopt Official Plan Amendment 419 substantially in accordance with the Draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 3 to the report (May 22, 2018) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, as amended by Parts a and b below:

 

a.  adding additional wording after "15 metres" in Sections 5.2 High Park Apartment Neighbourhood mid-rise building: Building Form B: Building Base and 5.3 High Park Apartment Neighbourhood tall building: Building Base so they now read:

 

 5.2 High Park Apartment Neighbourhood mid-rise building:

  

Building Form B: Building Base

Minimum separation distance of a building wall(s) from the primary elevation(s) of an existing or new building(s)

 

 

15 metres; the portion(s) of a building enclosing underground parking access and/or site servicing functions may be considered within this setback subject to the development application review process and without further amendment to this Site and Area Specific Policy 

 

 5.3 High Park Apartment Neighbourhood tall building:

 

Building Base

Minimum separation distance of a building wall(s) from the primary elevation(s) of an existing or new building(s)

 

 

15 metres; the portion(s) of a building enclosing underground parking access and/or site servicing functions may be considered within this setback subject to the development application review process and without further amendment to this Site and Area Specific Policy

 

and 

 

b.  deleting the definition of Net new shadow within Section 9. e), i) and replacing it with the following: 

 

Net new shadow means shadow cast by a proposed development/redevelopment in excess of the shadow already cast by existing and approved developments as well as buildings permitted by the existing zoning by-law.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to Official Plan Amendment 419 as may be required.

 

3.  City Council direct the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District to use Official Plan Amendment 419, High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Site and Area Specific Policy 551 in the evaluation of all new and current development proposals located within its boundaries.

 

4.  City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend and support Official Plan Amendment 419 in its current form, should it be appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal within the statutory timeframe of the Planning Act.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 22, 2018) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District - High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Area Character Study - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-115346.pdf
High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Area Character Study, May 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-116205.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 3, 2018) E-mail from Toby Fletcher (EY.New.EY31.4.1)
(June 3, 2018) E-mail from Maria Portman (EY.New.EY31.4.2)
(June 3, 2018) Letter from Helen Hawkins (EY.New.EY31.4.3)
(June 3, 2018) E-mail from Judy Malone (EY.New.EY31.4.4)
(June 3, 2018) E-mail from M. McLean (EY.New.EY31.4.5)
(June 3, 2018) E-mail from Susan Berry (EY.New.EY31.4.6)
(June 3, 2018) E-mail from Lorrie McIntyre (EY.New.EY31.4.7)
(June 3, 2018) E-mail from Michael Bury (EY.New.EY31.4.8)
(June 3, 2018) E-mail from Marie Ashworth (EY.New.EY31.4.9)
(June 4, 2018) Letter from Richard Waldie (EY.New.EY31.4.10)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Shahrzad Davoudi-Strike (EY.New.EY31.4.11)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Ron Hartwell (EY.New.Ey31.4.12)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from L. Burgess (EY.New.EY31.4.13)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Rose Tavelli (EY.New.EY31.4.14)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Bojan Bogdanovic (EY.New.EY31.4.15)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Peter Shiels (EY.New.EY31.4.16)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Dean Tudor (EY.New.EY31.4.17)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Bob Shantz (EY.New.EY31.4.18)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Jill Arthur (EY.New.EY31.4.19)
(June 4, 2018) Letter from Angela M. M. Knowles (EY.New.EY31.4.20)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Steven McNally (EY.New.EY31.4.21)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Wayne King (EY.New.EY31.4.22)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Robert Sekely (EY.New.EY31.4.23)
(June 5, 2018) Letter from Joyce Madill (EY.New.EY31.4.24)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Mary Tsamis (EY.New.EY31.4.25)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Chris Townsend (EY.New.EY31.4.26)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Elle McLaughlin, President, High Park Community Alliance (EY.New.EY31.4.27)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Susan Berry (EY.New.EY31.4.28)
(June 5, 2018) Letter from Dorothy Foster (EY.New.EY31.4.29)
(June 5, 2018) Letter from Paul Lowes, SGL Planning & Design Inc. (EY.New.EY31.4.30)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/comm/communicationfile-83240.pdf
(June 5, 2018) Letter from Wendy Nott, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited (EY.New.EY31.4.31)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/comm/communicationfile-83243.pdf
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Gayle Duchene (EY.New.EY31.4.32)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Brenda Lee, Alannah and Brian O'Farrell (EY.New.EY31.4.33)
(June 5, 2018) Letter from Leslie Gooding, High Park Natural Environment Committee (EY.New.EY31.4.34)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/comm/communicationfile-83248.pdf
(June 5, 2018) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP (EY.New.EY31.4.35)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/comm/communicationfile-83249.pdf
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Edward Cheung (EY.New.EY31.4.36)
(June 5, 2018) Letter from Jason Park, Devine Park LLP (EY.New.EY31.4.37)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/comm/communicationfile-83256.pdf
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Diana Jardine (EY.New.EY31.4.38)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Anna Banerji (EY.New.Ey31.4.39)
(June 5, 2018) Submission from Lenka Holubec (EY.New.EY31.4.40)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/comm/communicationfile-83276.pdf
(June 5, 2018) Letter from Steve Shaw, Executive Officer, Facility Services, Sustainability and Planning, Toronto District School Board (EY.New.EY31.4.41)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/comm/communicationfile-83289.pdf
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Lorraine Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents' Association and President, Oakview Tenants' Association (EY.New.EY31.4.42)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Donna and Norm Boychuk (EY.New.EY31.4.43)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Jade Armstrong (EY.New.EY31.4.44)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Leslie Gooding (EY.New.EY31.4.45)
(June 6, 2018) Letter from Paula Davies (EY.New.EY31.4.46)

Communications (City Council)

(June 22, 2018) Letter from Dawne Jubb, Senior Legal Council Municipal/Land Use Planning, Toronto District School Board (CC.Supp.EY31.4.47)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/cc/comm/communicationfile-85221.pdf
(June 25, 2018) E-mail from Angie Knowles (CC.Supp.EY31.4.48)
(June 25, 2018) Submission from Lenka Holubec (CC.New.EY31.4.49)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/cc/comm/communicationfile-85166.pdf
(June 25, 2018) Letter from Michael Bissett, Bousfields Inc. (CC.New.EY31.4.50)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/cc/comm/communicationfile-85237.pdf
(June 25, 2018) E-mail from Anne Purvis, Toronto Field Naturalists, Environment Chair (CC.New.EY31.4.51)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/cc/comm/communicationfile-85257.pdf
(June 25, 2018) Letter from Kim Kovar, Aird and Berlis LLP (CC.New.EY31.4.52)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/cc/comm/communicationfile-85324.pdf
(June 26, 2018) Letter from Michael Bissett, Bousfields Inc. (CC.New.EY31.4.53)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/cc/comm/communicationfile-85337.pdf
(June 26, 2018) Letter from John A.R. Dawson, McCarthy Tetrault LLP (CC.New.EY31.4.54)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/cc/comm/communicationfile-85357.pdf

Motions (City Council)

1 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Sarah Doucette (Carried)

That City Council amend Attachment 3, Draft Official Plan Amendment, Section 4. Site and Area Specific Policy No. 551, to the report (May 22, 2018) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District by:

 

1.  deleting the development criterion of "15 metres" for "Minimum separation distance of a building wall(s) from the primary elevation(s) of an existing or new building(s)," within sections 5.2 High Park Apartment Neighbourhood mid-rise building: Building Form B: Building Base and 5.3 High Park Apartment Neighbourhood tall building: Building Base, and inserting new development criteria as follows:

 

 5.2 High Park Apartment Neighbourhood mid-rise building:

 

Building Form B: Building Base

Minimum separation distance of a building wall(s) from the primary elevation(s) of an existing or new building(s)

 

the portion(s) of a building enclosing underground parking access and/or site servicing functions may be considered within this setback subject to the development application review process and without further amendment to this Site and Area Specific Policy 

 

15 metres

 

5.3 High Park Apartment Neighbourhood tall building:

 

Building Base

Minimum separation distance of a building wall(s) from the primary elevation(s) of an existing or new building(s)

 

the portion(s) of a building enclosing underground parking access and/or site servicing functions may be considered within this setback subject to the development application review process and without further amendment to this Site and Area Specific Policy

 

15 metres

 

2.  deleting the definition of Net new shadow within Section 9. e), i): 

 

Definition to be deleted

 

Net new shadow means shadow cast by a proposed development/redevelopment in excess of the shadow already cast by existing and approved developments.

 

and inserting the following new definition:

 

Net new shadow means shadow cast by a proposed development/redevelopment in excess of the shadow already cast by existing and approved developments as well as buildings permitted by the existing zoning by-law.

Vote (Amend Item) Jun-28-2018 9:44 AM

Result: Carried Majority Required - EY31.4 - Doucette - motion 1
Total members that voted Yes: 33 Members that voted Yes are Paul Ainslie, Ana Bail„o, John Campbell, Christin Carmichael Greb, Gary Crawford, Joe Cressy, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Justin J. Di Ciano, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, John Filion, Mark Grimes, Jim Hart, Stephen Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Miganoush Megardichian, Joe Mihevc, Frances Nunziata (Chair), Cesar Palacio, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Neethan Shan, David Shiner, Michael Thompson, John Tory, Lucy Troisi, Jonathan Tsao, Kristyn Wong-Tam
Total members that voted No: 1 Members that voted No are Giorgio Mammoliti
Total members that were Absent: 11 Members that were absent are Maria Augimeri, Jon Burnside, Josh Colle, Paula Fletcher, Michael Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Michelle Holland, Jim Karygiannis, Josh Matlow, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Jaye Robinson

Motion to Adopt Item as Amended (Carried)

Motion to Reconsider Item moved by Councillor Sarah Doucette (Carried)

That in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 27, Council Procedures, City Council reconsider Item EY31.4.


2 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Sarah Doucette (Carried)

That City Council amend Attachment 3, Draft Official Plan Amendment, Section 4. Site and Area Specific Policy No. 551, to the report (May 22, 2018) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District by:

 

1.  amending Sections 5.2 High Park Apartment Neighbourhood mid-rise building: Building Form B: Building Base and 5.3 High Park Apartment Neighbourhood tall building: Building Base, by adding the words "the portion(s) of a building enclosing underground parking access and/or site servicing functions may be considered within this setback subject to the development application review process and without further amendment to this Site and Area Specific Policy" after "15 metres":

 

 5.2 High Park Apartment Neighbourhood mid-rise building:

 

 

Building Form B: Building Base

Minimum separation distance of a building wall(s) from the primary elevation(s) of an existing or new building(s)

 

 

15 metres; the portion(s) of a building enclosing underground parking access and/or site servicing functions may be considered within this setback subject to the development application review process and without further amendment to this Site and Area Specific Policy 

 

 5.3 High Park Apartment Neighbourhood tall building:

 

Building Base

Minimum separation distance of a building wall(s) from the primary elevation(s) of an existing or new building(s)

 

 

15 metres; the portion(s) of a building enclosing underground parking access and/or site servicing functions may be considered within this setback subject to the development application review process and without further amendment to this Site and Area Specific Policy

 

2.  deleting the definition of Net new shadow within Section 9. e), i): 

 

Definition to be deleted

 

Net new shadow means shadow cast by a proposed development/redevelopment in excess of the shadow already cast by existing and approved developments.

 

and inserting the following new definition:

 

Net new shadow means shadow cast by a proposed development/redevelopment in excess of the shadow already cast by existing and approved developments as well as buildings permitted by the existing zoning by-law.


Motion to Adopt Item as Amended (Carried)

EY31.4 - Final Report - High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Area Character Study

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Adopted
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt Official Plan Amendment 419 substantially in accordance with the Draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 3 to the report (May 22, 2018) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to Official Plan Amendment 419 as may be required.

 

3.  City Council direct the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to use Official Plan Amendment 419, High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Site and Area Specific Policy 551 in the evaluation of all new and current development proposals located within its boundaries.

 

4.  City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend and support Official Plan Amendment 419 in its current form, should it be appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") within the statutory timeframe of the Planning Act.

Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council:

 

1.  Requested the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to further consult with the community and stakeholders on Draft High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Area Urban Design Guidelines and report to the next meeting of the Etobicoke York Community Council with finalized Urban Design Guidelines for the High Park Apartment Neighbourhood.

_________ 

 

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 6, 2018, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 22, 2018) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This report presents the outcome of the City initiated High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Area Character Study, and the resulting proposed Official Plan Amendment No. 419 which includes the High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Site and Area Specific Policy No. 551.  This Site and Area Specific Policy provides a localized policy framework to guide change and compatible infill development that respects the existing and planned character of the study area.  These documents augment and implement the policies of the Official Plan, they are consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014),  conform to Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2017), and have regard for matters of provincial interest in Section 2 of the Planning Act.  

 

The High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Area is an established, stable residential apartment neighbourhood that is in close proximity to High Park to the south and is surrounded to the west, north and east by low rise residential designated Neighbourhoods.  The High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Area Character Study was initiated in response to the concern that the two significant intensification applications, made at the same time, and following the approval of another large development application, were at a level of intensification not anticipated for in this neighbourhood.  There was concern that the applications were not in keeping with the character of the area and that this neighbourhood required a more localized policy framework than is currently provided in the City's Official Plan.  The Official Plan has a provision that provides Council the ability to determine, at the earliest point in the process, whether a site and area specific policy needs to be created to deal with significant intensification.

 

The High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Area Character Study involved extensive community consultation and provided an evidence based approach and analysis to identifying the neighbourhood characteristics and attributes that define the High Park Apartment Neighbourhood. The findings of the study enabled staff to identify which character defining attributes required localized policies and guidelines to augment the direction of the City's Official Plan and various Guideline documents.

 

The proposed Official Plan Amendment 419 (OPA 419) and Site and Area Specific Policy 551 (SASP 551) for this area is predicated on this study's findings, guiding principles, results from community consultation, and an iterative policy development process which included a Community Working Group and City staff team. Proposed SASP 551 will guide change and compatible infill development within the High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Area that is sensitive to the character of the neighbourhood.  Area Specific Urban Design Guidelines will be developed through additional consultation to further implement the policies of SASP 551 and provide greater direction for the area.  

 

SASP 551 includes development criteria for three building typologies that have been determined through the study to be characteristic of this area. Staff testing of the SASP development criteria confirms that the infill criteria of the SASP are sensitive to the character of this area, while still allowing for appropriate infill opportunities in accordance with the policies of the Official Plan. 

 

The proposed Official Plan Amendment 419 (OPA 419), Site and Area Specific Policy 551 (SASP 551) is consistent with the Provincial Planning Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2017) and has regard for matters of Provincial Interests in the Planning Act.

 

This report recommends adoption of Official Plan Amendment 419 High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Site and Area Specific Policy 551 amending the Official Plan.

Background Information

(May 22, 2018) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District - High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Area Character Study - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-115346.pdf
High Park Apartment Neighbourhood Area Character Study, May 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-116205.pdf

Communications

(June 3, 2018) E-mail from Toby Fletcher (EY.New.EY31.4.1)
(June 3, 2018) E-mail from Maria Portman (EY.New.EY31.4.2)
(June 3, 2018) Letter from Helen Hawkins (EY.New.EY31.4.3)
(June 3, 2018) E-mail from Judy Malone (EY.New.EY31.4.4)
(June 3, 2018) E-mail from M. McLean (EY.New.EY31.4.5)
(June 3, 2018) E-mail from Susan Berry (EY.New.EY31.4.6)
(June 3, 2018) E-mail from Lorrie McIntyre (EY.New.EY31.4.7)
(June 3, 2018) E-mail from Michael Bury (EY.New.EY31.4.8)
(June 3, 2018) E-mail from Marie Ashworth (EY.New.EY31.4.9)
(June 4, 2018) Letter from Richard Waldie (EY.New.EY31.4.10)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Shahrzad Davoudi-Strike (EY.New.EY31.4.11)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Ron Hartwell (EY.New.Ey31.4.12)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from L. Burgess (EY.New.EY31.4.13)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Rose Tavelli (EY.New.EY31.4.14)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Bojan Bogdanovic (EY.New.EY31.4.15)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Peter Shiels (EY.New.EY31.4.16)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Dean Tudor (EY.New.EY31.4.17)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Bob Shantz (EY.New.EY31.4.18)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Jill Arthur (EY.New.EY31.4.19)
(June 4, 2018) Letter from Angela M. M. Knowles (EY.New.EY31.4.20)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Steven McNally (EY.New.EY31.4.21)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Wayne King (EY.New.EY31.4.22)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Robert Sekely (EY.New.EY31.4.23)
(June 5, 2018) Letter from Joyce Madill (EY.New.EY31.4.24)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Mary Tsamis (EY.New.EY31.4.25)
(June 4, 2018) E-mail from Chris Townsend (EY.New.EY31.4.26)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Elle McLaughlin, President, High Park Community Alliance (EY.New.EY31.4.27)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Susan Berry (EY.New.EY31.4.28)
(June 5, 2018) Letter from Dorothy Foster (EY.New.EY31.4.29)
(June 5, 2018) Letter from Paul Lowes, SGL Planning & Design Inc. (EY.New.EY31.4.30)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/comm/communicationfile-83240.pdf
(June 5, 2018) Letter from Wendy Nott, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited (EY.New.EY31.4.31)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/comm/communicationfile-83243.pdf
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Gayle Duchene (EY.New.EY31.4.32)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Brenda Lee, Alannah and Brian O'Farrell (EY.New.EY31.4.33)
(June 5, 2018) Letter from Leslie Gooding, High Park Natural Environment Committee (EY.New.EY31.4.34)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/comm/communicationfile-83248.pdf
(June 5, 2018) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP (EY.New.EY31.4.35)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/comm/communicationfile-83249.pdf
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Edward Cheung (EY.New.EY31.4.36)
(June 5, 2018) Letter from Jason Park, Devine Park LLP (EY.New.EY31.4.37)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/comm/communicationfile-83256.pdf
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Diana Jardine (EY.New.EY31.4.38)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Anna Banerji (EY.New.Ey31.4.39)
(June 5, 2018) Submission from Lenka Holubec (EY.New.EY31.4.40)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/comm/communicationfile-83276.pdf
(June 5, 2018) Letter from Steve Shaw, Executive Officer, Facility Services, Sustainability and Planning, Toronto District School Board (EY.New.EY31.4.41)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/ey/comm/communicationfile-83289.pdf
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Lorraine Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents' Association and President, Oakview Tenants' Association (EY.New.EY31.4.42)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Donna and Norm Boychuk (EY.New.EY31.4.43)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Jade Armstrong (EY.New.EY31.4.44)
(June 5, 2018) E-mail from Leslie Gooding (EY.New.EY31.4.45)
(June 6, 2018) Letter from Paula Davies (EY.New.EY31.4.46)

Speakers

Barbi Lazarus
Margaret vanDijk, Member, High Park Community Alliance
Mary Korica, Member, High Park Community Alliance
Lenka Holubec
Paul Lowes, SGL Planning & Design Inc.
Elle McLaughlin, President, High Park Community Alliance
Piper Morley, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Viola Varga
Leslie Gooding
Judy Bryant

Motions

1 - Motion to Adopt Item moved by Councillor Sarah Doucette (Carried)

Vote (Adopt Item) Jun-06-2018

Result: Carried Majority Required - EY31.4 - Doucette - Adopt Item
Total members that voted Yes: 8 Members that voted Yes are John Campbell, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, Mark Grimes (Chair), Stephen Holyday, Giorgio Mammoliti, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio
Total members that voted No: 0 Members that voted No are
Total members that were Absent: 3 Members that were absent are Vincent Crisanti, Justin J. Di Ciano, Michael Ford
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council