Item - 2017.EY21.5
Tracking Status
- City Council adopted this item on April 26, 2017 without amendments and without debate.
- This item was considered by Etobicoke York Community Council on April 4, 2017 and was adopted with amendments. It will be considered by City Council on April 26, 2017.
EY21.5 - Preliminary Report - 111 Pacific Avenue, 255 Glenlake Avenue and 66 Oakmount Road- Zoning By-law Amendment Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 13 - Parkdale-High Park
City Council Decision
City Council on April 26, 27 and 28, 2017, adopted the following:
1. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District to undertake an area-based character study for the Apartment Neighbourhoods designated lands located north of Bloor Street West, west of Keele Street, south of Glenlake Avenue and east of Gothic Avenue. This study is anticipated to result in a Site and Area Specific Policy that will identify existing area characteristics, and provide guidance on appropriate infill opportunities and constraints. The study is not to include any lands fronting on Bloor Street West or any lands included in the Bloor West Village Avenue study, which is currently underway.
2. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District to report to the Etobicoke York Community Council on the findings of the area-based character study and anticipated Site and Area Specific Policy no later than the second quarter of 2018, but prior to, or concurrent with, any Recommendation Report on any site-specific applications associated with individual development proposals in the study area.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-102032.pdf
(April 4, 2017) Location Map attached to motion 1 by Councillor Sarah Doucette
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-102632.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/ey/comm/communicationfile-68166.pdf
(April 3, 2017) E-mail from Leslie Gooding (EY.New.EY21.5.2)
(April 3, 2017) E-mail from Teresa Hannigan (EY.New.EY21.5.3)
(April 3, 2017) Letter from John A. R. Dawson, McCarthy Tetrault (EY.New.EY21.5.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/ey/comm/communicationfile-68196.pdf
(April 3, 2017) E-mail from Milan Lazic (EY.New.EY21.5.5)
(April 3, 2017) Letter from Lorraine Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents' Association (EY.New.EY21.5.6)
(April 3, 2017) E-mail from Shoshana Fainsilber (EY.New.EY21.5.7)
(April 4, 2017) Letter from Lenka Holubec (EY.New.EY21.5.8)
(April 4, 2017) E-mail from James and Marlene Baxter (EY.New.EY21.5.9)
EY21.5 - Preliminary Report - 111 Pacific Avenue, 255 Glenlake Avenue and 66 Oakmount Road- Zoning By-law Amendment Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 13 - Parkdale-High Park
Community Council Recommendations
Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to undertake an area-based character study for the Apartment Neighbourhoods designated lands located north of Bloor Street West, west of Keele Street, south of Glenlake Avenue and east of Gothic Avenue. This study is anticipated to result in a Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP) that will identify existing area characteristics, and provide guidance on appropriate infill opportunities and constraints. The study is not to include any lands fronting on Bloor Street West or any lands included in the Bloor West Village Avenue study, which is currently underway.
2. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to report to Etobicoke York Community Council on the findings of the area-based character study and anticipated SASP no later than the second quarter of 2018, but prior to, or concurrent with, any Recommendation Report on any site-specific applications associated with individual development proposals in the study area.
Decision Advice and Other Information
Etobicoke York Community Council:
1. Directed staff to schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 111 Pacific Avenue, 255 Glenlake Avenue and 66 Oakmount Road together with the Ward Councillor.
2. Directed that Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents north of Bloor Street West (inclusive), west of Keele Street (inclusive), south of Humberside Avenue, and east of Clendenan Avenue, as laid out on the map attached to the motion moved by Councillor Sarah Doucette, with the additional cost to be borne by the applicant.
3. Directed that Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations of the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes an infill development of purpose built rental dwelling units comprised of two blocks of 3 storey townhouses, one 33 storey apartment building with a 3 storey base and another apartment building of 29 storeys with an 8 storey base on the lands municipally known as 111 Pacific Avenue, 255 Glenlake Avenue and 66 Oakmount Road.
The lands are currently developed with three rental apartment buildings ranging in height from 12 storeys to 23 storeys. The proposal would add 768 new rental units to the existing 750 rental units for a total of 1,518 dwelling units. The proposed development would maintain all existing on-site rental dwelling units. The proposal also includes 450 m2 of retail floor space, which would result in a total floor area of approximately 113,100 m2.
To accommodate the full build out, a total of 1,022 vehicle parking spaces, 1,028 bicycle parking spaces and 4 loading facilities are proposed, with approximately 1,900 m2 of indoor and 3,235 m2 of outdoor amenity space proposed.
A new 2 storey amenity pavilion would accommodate some of the indoor amenity space and programs.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted applications and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the applications and on the community consultation process as well as recommendations to direct staff to conduct an area-based character study.
A community consultation meeting is recommended to be held in late April or early May, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with a Final Report and related Public Meeting under the Planning Act, targeted for the second quarter of 2018.
This target assumes the findings of the area-based character study have been concluded as outlined in Recommendations 4 and 5 contained in the report (March 17, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, and that the applicant provides all required information in a timely manner.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-102032.pdf
(April 4, 2017) Location Map attached to motion 1 by Councillor Sarah Doucette
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-102632.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/ey/comm/communicationfile-68166.pdf
(April 3, 2017) E-mail from Leslie Gooding (EY.New.EY21.5.2)
(April 3, 2017) E-mail from Teresa Hannigan (EY.New.EY21.5.3)
(April 3, 2017) Letter from John A. R. Dawson, McCarthy Tetrault (EY.New.EY21.5.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/ey/comm/communicationfile-68196.pdf
(April 3, 2017) E-mail from Milan Lazic (EY.New.EY21.5.5)
(April 3, 2017) Letter from Lorraine Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents' Association (EY.New.EY21.5.6)
(April 3, 2017) E-mail from Shoshana Fainsilber (EY.New.EY21.5.7)
(April 4, 2017) Letter from Lenka Holubec (EY.New.EY21.5.8)
(April 4, 2017) E-mail from James and Marlene Baxter (EY.New.EY21.5.9)
Motions
That Etobicoke York Community Council adopt the recommendations contained in the report (March 17, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, with Recommendation 2 amended to read as follows:
2. Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents north of Bloor Street West (inclusive), west of Keele Street (inclusive), south of Humberside Avenue, and east of Clendenan Avenue, as laid out on the attached map, with the additional cost to be borne by the applicant.