City Council

Meeting No.:
52
Contact:
Marilyn Toft, Manager
Meeting Date:
Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Thursday, June 12, 2014

Friday, June 13, 2014

Phone:
416-392-7032
Start Time:
9:30 AM
E-mail:
clerk@toronto.ca
Location:
Council Chamber, City Hall

The Agenda and related materials for this meeting are enclosed.  The details of the meeting are noted at the top of the Agenda.

 

Members of Council and Staff:  Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended.  The City Clerk’s Office will not provide additional copies.

 

Notice to People Writing to Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.

 

The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

 

The City video records Council, committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be video recording you and City staff may make the video recordings available to the public. If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or call 416-392-7032.

 

Closed Meeting Requirements:  If Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of Council must make a motion to do so and give the reason why Council has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).

 

June 5, 2014


toronto.ca/council

This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at  www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.

 

 

 

Routine Matters - Meeting 52

RM52.1 - Call to Order

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All
Attention
Council has voted to consider the following items at specific times:

On Tuesday, June 10:
  • First item after the lunch break: CD29.11 - Access to City Services for Undocumented Torontonians

  • First items in Closed Session (June 10): CC52.6 - Appointment of a Toronto Integrity Commissioner, and CC52.7 - Appointment of a Toronto Auditor General

  • Third item in Closed Session (June 10): AU15.3 - Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts


  • On Wednesday June 11:
    First item:
    CD29.2 - City Support for the Red Door Shelter

    Second item:
    CC52.4 - Toronto Street Furniture Program - Agreement Modifications Update

    Third item:
    AU15.3 - Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts

    Council will consider the following items together:
  • EY33.13 - Investigation of Impacts Related to ML Ready Mix
  • EY33.14 - 29 Judson Street - Divisional Updates on Actions Taken and Outstanding Issues
  • Summary

    • O Canada
    • Moment of Silence

    • Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act

    Background Information

    Condolence Motion for Constable Douglas James Larche, Constable Fabrice Georges Gevaudan and Constable David Ross of the Codiac RCMP detachment
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70390.pdf
    Condolence Motion for Maya Angelou
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70371.pdf
    Condolence Motion for Douglas Tennyson Day
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70391.pdf
    Condolence Motion for Antonietta Di Giorgio
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70392.pdf
    Condolence Motion for Frank Horgan
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70372.pdf
    Condolence Motion for Patricia McDonagh
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70393.pdf
    Condolence Motion for Lawrence (Larry) Murray Priestman
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70394.pdf
    Condolence Motion for Hartley Steward
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70373.pdf
    Condolence Motion for Carl William Stryg
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70395.pdf
    Condolence Motion for Benson Wong
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70374.pdf
    Condolence Motion for Margaret "Maggie" Knap
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70459.pdf
    Condolence Motion for Jeff Plewman
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70460.pdf
    Condolence Motion for Belinda (Balbinder Kaur) Bains
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70516.pdf

    RM52.2 - Confirmation of Minutes

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Summary

    City Council will confirm the Minutes from the meeting held on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014.

    RM52.3 - Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from City Officials

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Summary

    Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 42 on May 27, 2014

    Submitted by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, Chair

     

    Report of the Audit Committee from Meeting 15 on May 28, 2014

    Submitted by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, Chair

     

    Report of the Board of Health from Meeting 31 on May 28, 2014

    Submitted by Councillor Joe Mihevc, Chair

     

    Report of the Community Development and Recreation Committee from Meeting 29 on May 22, 2014

    Submitted by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, Chair

     

    Report of the Economic Development Committee from Meeting 31 on May 21, 2014

    Submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair

     

    Report of the Government Management Committee from Meeting 30 on May 12, 2014

    Submitted by Councillor David Shiner, Chair

     

    Report of the Licensing and Standards Committee from Meeting 28 on May 26, 2014

    Submitted by Councillor Cesar Palacio, Chair

     

    Report of the Parks and Environment Committee from Meeting 27 on May 20, 2014

    Submitted by Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Chair

     

    Report of the Planning and Growth Management Committee from Meeting 33 on May 29, 2014

    Submitted by Councillor Peter Milczyn, Chair

     

    Report of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee from Meeting 31 on May 14, 2014

    Submitted by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

     

    Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 33 on May 13, 2014

    Submitted by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, Chair

     

    Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 32 on May 13, 2014

    Submitted by Councillor Maria Augimeri, Chair

     

    Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 32 on May 13, 2014

    Submitted by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, Chair

     

    Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 32 on May 13, 2014

    Submitted by Councillor Paula Fletcher, Chair

     

    New Business submitted by the Deputy Mayor and City Officials

    RM52.4 - Petitions

    Consideration Type:
    Information
    Wards:
    All

    Summary

    Members of Council may file petitions.

    RM52.5 - Presentations, Introductions and Announcements

    Consideration Type:
    Presentation
    Wards:
    All

    Summary

    Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.

    RM52.6 - Review of the Order Paper

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Summary

    City Council will review the Order Paper.

    Background Information

    Order Paper June 10, 2014
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70389.pdf
    Order Paper June 11, 2014
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70489.pdf
    Order Paper June 12, 2014
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70524.pdf
    Order Paper June 13, 2014
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70656.pdf

    Administrative Inquiry - Meeting 52

    IA52.1 - Administrative Inquiry regarding the Toronto Transit Commission Pension Fund Society: Preliminary Analysis, OMERS Options

    Consideration Type:
    Information
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    The City Manager has submitted an Answer to this Inquiry (IA52.1a)

    Under Council's Procedures, City Council can receive or refer an Administrative Inquiry, without debate.

    Summary

    Councillor Paul Ainslie has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry:

     

    "I am submitting this administrative inquiry under Municipal Code S27-61 to seek information regarding the status of the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Pension Fund Society (Society): Preliminary Analysis, OMERS Options GM21.9 adopted at Toronto City Council during the May 7, 8, 9 and 10, 2013 meeting.

     

    Recommendation number 3 requested that the Toronto Transit Commission and the Board of Directors of the Toronto Transit Commission Pension Fund Society (working with independent external legal advisors), to conduct a formal legal review of the Pension Fund Society's plan documents to ensure transparency in governance and decision making responsibilities, and to ensure consistency between the Society's Bylaws and other policy documents including the Society's Funding Policy and that this be completed and reported back to the October 15, 2013 Government Management Committee meeting.

     

    As of today, no report to update has been brought back to the Government Management Committee.

     

    City Council Decision:

     

    City Council on May 7, 8, 9 and 10, 2013, adopted the following:

     

    1.         City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission and the Board of Directors of the Toronto Transit Commission Pension Fund Society, working co-operatively with the Ontario Municipal Employees' Retirement System (OMERS), to re-assess the benefits of a possible merger of the Pension Fund Society Plan into the OMERS Plan once the regulations dealing with the mechanics of plan mergers are in place under the Pension Benefits Act, and within a year of the regulations being filed.

     

    2.         City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission and the Board of Directors of the Toronto Transit Commission Pension Fund Society to apply to the Ontario Ministry of Finance and the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (i.e., the Ontario pension Regulators) again requesting an exemption from the statutory obligation to continue past solvency deficit payments to the Fund of the Pension Fund Society Plan given that effective January 1, 2011 the Plan has been a recognized Jointly Sponsored Pension Plan and that any correspondence pertaining to the exemption request be made available to the Government Management Committee.

     

    3.         City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission and the Board of Directors of the Toronto Transit Commission Pension Fund Society (working with independent external legal advisors), to conduct a formal legal review of the Pension Fund Society's plan documents to ensure transparency in governance and decision making responsibilities, and to ensure consistency between the Society's Bylaws and other policy documents including the Society's Funding Policy and that this be completed and reported back to the October 15, 2013 Government Management Committee meeting.

     

    4.         City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission to report back to the Government Management Committee on the outcome of the foregoing recommendations once each is completed and that the Government Management Committee be kept apprised of the status of each recommendation in this report every six months or as circumstances warrant.

     

    5.         City Council authorize the release of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 22, 2013) from the Treasurer if an agreement to merge the Toronto Transit Commission Pension Fund Society Plan with OMERS is approved by the Plan Sponsors (i.e. Toronto Transit Commission and Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113), or the Society authorizes such release and as determined by the City Solicitor, but that it be released on a confidential basis now to the affected parties including the Toronto Transit Commission, the Pension Fund Society and OMERS officials.

     

    6.         City Council request that the Toronto Transit Commission Pension Society Board expedite the recruitment of an external Chief Executive Officer for the Pension Fund Society.

     

    7.         City Council adopt the confidential recommendation, as amended, contained in the letter (April 8, 2013) from the City Clerk and that this recommendation remain confidential in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 as it pertains to the security of the property belonging to the City.

     

    To date City Staff have confirmed that the City of Toronto has not heard back from Toronto Transit Commission on this matter."

    Background Information

    (May 29, 2014) Administrative Inquiry from Councillor Paul Ainslie, Ward 43, Scarborough East, regarding the Toronto Transit Commission Pension Fund Society: Preliminary Analysis, OMERS Options
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-70103.pdf
    (June 3, 2014) Answer to Administrative Inquiry from the City Manager (IA52.1a)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-70332.pdf

    Executive Committee - Meeting 42

    EX42.1 - Reducing Costs for Councillor Constituency and Office Renovations

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

    1.         City Council approve the Protocol for Councillor Constituency and Office Renovations, including a competitive process to reduce costs, as set out in Attachment 1 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager and the City Clerk.

    Origin

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the City Clerk

    Summary

    This report is in response to City Council's request for a report on a new Protocol and Policy to clarify the constituency office renovations process so as to reduce costs for these renovations using competitive bids and to ensure Councillors sign off on all expenses.

     

    Staff have developed a new Protocol and Process as included in Attachment 1. Staff strongly recommend that Councillors do not involve themselves directly in any purchasing transactions to avoid issues of fairness, conflict of interest and Code of Conduct.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the City Clerk on Reducing Costs for Councillor Constituency and Office Renovations
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69453.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) Attachment 1 - Protocol for Councillor Constituency and Office Renovations
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69308.pdf

    Speakers

    Miroslav Glavic

    EX42.2 - Amendment to Legal Fees Section in Constituency Services and Office Budget Policy and Authority to Pay a Legal Invoice

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend the Constituency Services and Office Budget Policy, Legal Fees section to include under Eligible Expense:

     

    -           Legal fees related to complaints or investigations handled by the Lobbyist Registrar, Ombudsman or Auditor General under Part V of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to pay an outstanding 2013 legal invoice in 2014, and direct that it be paid from the Council General Expense Budget.

     

    3.         City Council amend the Constituency Services and Office Budget Policy, Legal Fees section so that all future legal fees are paid out of the Council General Expense Budget.

    Origin

    (May 8, 2014) Report from the City Clerk

    Summary

    This report seeks Council's authority to amend the Legal Fees section in the Constituency Services and Office Budget Policy so that in addition to legal fees related to complaints and investigations by the Integrity Commissioner, legal fees related to complaints or investigations by the Lobbyist Registrar, Ombudsman or the Auditor General are also eligible expenses to be paid out of the Constituency Services and Office Budget.

     

    If Council agrees to the amendment to the Constituency Services and Office Budget Policy, this report also seeks Council's authorization to pay an outstanding 2013 legal invoice on a one-time basis, and further seeks Council's direction on whether this invoice should be paid from the Council General Expense Budget or the Councillor's Constituency Services and Office Budget.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 8, 2014) Report from the City Clerk on Amendment to Legal Fees Section in Constituency Services and Office Budget Policy and Authority to Pay a Legal Invoice
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69301.pdf
    (May 8, 2014) Attachment 1 - Current Constituency Services
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69302.pdf
    (May 8, 2014) Attachment 2 - Proposed Constituency Services
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69303.pdf

    EX42.3 - Strengthening Public Service Governance - A Public Service By-law for Toronto

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    The City Manager has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EX42.3a with recommendations)

    Portions of this Item requires 30 votes as it relates to the Accountability Officers

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.           City Council establish a new Toronto Municipal Code Chapter for the public service reflecting the provisions outlined in sections 4 to 12 of the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager and summarized in Appendix A to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager including adopting updated provisions for: (1) Conflict of Interest in Appendix C to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager, (2) Political Activity in Appendix E to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager, and (3) Disclosure of Wrongdoing and Reprisal Protection in Appendix F to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager as amended by Recommendation 14 below.

     

    2.         City Council, subject to the adoption of Recommendation 1, rescind the Conflict of Interest Policy, Employee Participation in Municipal Election Campaigns Policy, Fraud Prevention Policy and the Whistle Blower Protection Policy previously adopted by City Council and replace with the provisions in Appendices C, E and F to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager as amended by Recommendation 14 below, effective December 31, 2015.

     

    3.         City Council extend the application of the public service provisions summarized in Appendix A to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager to the City Agencies listed in Appendix B to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager including provisions related to: (1) Conflict of Interest in Appendix C to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager and (2) Political Activity in Appendix E to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager and direct the Agency Boards to implement these provisions.

     

    4.         City Council require the City Agencies listed in Appendix B to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager to adopt and implement disclosure of wrongdoing and reprisal protection provisions pursuant to the minimum requirements outlined in section 11F of the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager and summarized in section 8 of Appendix A to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager.

     

    5.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to prepare and introduce in Council any bills required to enact the public service provisions, generally in accordance with the report recommendations and provisions described in sections 4 to 12 of the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager and summarized in Appendices A, C, E and F to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager as amended by Recommendation 14 below.

     

    6.         City Council direct that the by-law changes come into force on December 31, 2015 for the Toronto Public Service and the City Agencies listed in Appendix B to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager.

     

    7.         City Council authorize the City Manager to amend Relationship Frameworks in place for the City Agencies listed in Appendix B to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager to align with the provisions of the Toronto Public Service By-law as required.

     

    8.         City Council amend the Toronto Atmospheric Fund’s Relationship Framework to require the Toronto Atmospheric Fund to adopt and implement conflict of interest and political activity provisions consistent with the City of Toronto, and to adopt and implement disclosure of wrongdoing and reprisal protection provisions meeting the minimum requirements established for City Agencies.

     

    9.         City Council request the Toronto Police Service Board and the Toronto Library Board to review their ethical policies pertaining to conflict of interest, political activity and the disclosure of wrongdoing and reprisal protection, and adopt provisions consistent with the City of Toronto.

     

    10.       City Council, acting as the Shareholder, direct the City Manager to amend existing Shareholder Directions to include, and to ensure all future Shareholder Directions include the following clause:

     

    “Subject to Law, the Corporation shall and shall direct its Subsidiaries to conduct their affairs and govern their operations in accordance with such rules, policies and directives or objectives as directed by City Council from time to time.”

     

    11.       City Council, acting as the Shareholder, direct City Corporations to adopt policies related to conflict of interest, political activity and disclosure of wrongdoing and reprisal protection.

     

    12.       City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 3, Accountability Officers to:

     

    a.         require the Accountability Officers and their staff to comply with the Conflict of Interest provisions in Appendix C to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager;

     

    b.         require the Accountability Officers and their staff to comply with the City’s Political Activity provisions in Appendix E to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager and affirm the right of the Accountability Officers and their staff to vote and attend all-candidates meetings in elections, but restrict the Accountability Officers and their staff from engaging in political activity;

     

    c.         extend reprisal protection pursuant to section 13 of the Disclosure of Wrongdoing and Reprisal Protection provisions in Appendix F to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager as amended by Recommendation 14 below, to the Accountability Officer’s staff; and

     

    d.         establish a mechanism for the investigation and reporting of allegations of wrongdoing for the Accountability Officer’s and their staff pursuant to section 16C of the Disclosure of Wrongdoing and Reprisal Protection provisions in Appendix F to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager as amended by Recommendation 14 below.

     

    13.       City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 140, Lobbying to require City employees involved in the City’s procurement processes to report breaches of the Lobbying By-law to the Lobbyist Registrar for investigation and resolution.

     

    14.       City Council:

     

    a.         delete Appendix F, Section 3 "Responsibilities of the Auditor General", Bullet 3 of the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager and replace it with the following new Bullet 3:

     

    May provide oversight to investigations led by the City Manager or designate.

     

    b.         delete Appendix F, Section 9 "Investigations", second paragraph, first sentence of the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager and replace it with the following two sentences:

     

    The Auditor General’s Office may provide oversight of alleged wrongdoing investigations led by the City Manager or his or her designate. The responsibility to ensure such investigations are appropriately conducted remains with the City Manager, as set out in Section 4, Responsibilities of the City Manager.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Executive Committee requested the City Manager to pursue further consultation with representatives of the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79, and with the City of Toronto Administrative, Professional, Supervisory Association Inc. prior to the City Council meeting of June 10 and 11, 2014, and to report directly to City Council as to any proposed amendments to the Toronto Public Service By-law arising from these consultations.

     

    The City Manager gave a presentation to the Executive Committee on Strengthening Public Service Governance - A Public Service By-law for Toronto.

    Origin

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager

    Summary

    This report responds to City Council’s request to bring forward detailed recommendations to enact a public service by-law for the broader Toronto public service, including most of the City’s Agencies.  Strengthening public service governance through the enactment of a Toronto Public Service By-law is one of twenty-six Strategic Actions for 2013 to 2018 affirmed by City Council to continue to advance the City’s mission, vision and goals articulated in its Strategic Plan.

     

    A public service by-law is important foundation legislation that strengthens the separation between the administrative and political components of Toronto’s government, and advances Toronto’s public service as professional, impartial and ethical.

     

    The Toronto Public Service By-law includes the following key elements:

     

    - Objectives;

    - Public Service Values;

    - Role, Responsibilities and Authorities of the City Manager and Other City Officials to Manage;

    - Human Resources under their authority;

    - Role, Responsibilities and Authorities of City Agencies to Manage Human Resources under their  authority;

    - Human Resource Policy Requirements;

    - Ethical Provisions for Conflict of Interest, Political Activity and Disclosure of Wrongdoing and Reprisal Protection; and

    - The Establishment of Ethics Executives.

     

    It works in concert with the Members Code of Conduct and the Code of Conduct for Local Boards to set out the distinct roles that the public service and elected officials play in the effective functioning of Toronto’s government.  The public service is responsible to serve the Council or Board as a whole and the combined interests of all members as evidenced through their decisions.

     

    As noted by Toronto’s Ombudsman in her 2011 Annual Report, the City already has many elements of public service legislation established through a range of legislation, frameworks, by-laws and policies. This report recommends the consolidation and strengthening of these provisions under an overarching chapter in the Toronto Municipal Code and extends these requirements to City Agencies.

     

    Toronto will be the first Canadian municipal government to enact by-law provisions consistent with public service legislation.  A public service by-law is appropriate for Toronto given the size and complexity of its government.  It will further strengthen the City's capacity to provide good governance within its jurisdiction through a democratically elected, responsible and accountable government.

     

    The City Manager will work closely with the Toronto Public Service and City Agencies to ensure that the provisions of the By-law are implemented by the in-force date of December 31, 2015.  Training, resources and tools will be developed to support the implementation of the by-law provisions and reinforce strong public service ethics.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 12, 2014) Report and Appendices A to F from the City Manager on Strengthening Public Service Governance - A Public Service By-Law for Toronto
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69449.pdf
    (May 27, 2014) Presentatation from the City Manager on Strengthening Public Service Governance - A Public Service By-law for Toronto
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69621.pdf

    Background Information (City Council)

    (June 6, 2014) Supplementary report from the City Manager on Strengthening Public Service Governance - a Public Service By-law for Toronto (EX42.3a)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70336.pdf
    Revised Appendix A - Revised Summary of Key Provisions for Toronto's Public Service By-law
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70362.pdf
    Revised Appendix D - Revised Summary of Permitted and Restricted Political Activity for Some Public Servants
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70340.pdf
    Revised Appendix E - Revised Political Activity Provisions
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70363.pdf
    Revised Appendix F - Revised Disclosure of Wrongdoing and Reprisal Protection Provisions
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70341.pdf

    Speakers

    Richard Majkot
    Tim Maguire, President, Local 79 (Submission Filed)
    Councillor Shelley Carroll
    Councillor Pam McConnell
    Councillor Janet Davis

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 27, 2014) Letter from Richard Majkot, COTAPSA (EX.New.EX42.3.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-47755.pdf
    (May 27, 2014) Submission from Tim Maguire, CUPE Local 79 (EX.New.ex42.3.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-47756.pdf

    EX42.4 - Draw the Line - Toronto Ward Boundary Review Project Work Plan, Civic Engagement and Public Consultation Strategy

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    The City Manager has submitted a supplementary report on this item (EX42.4a for information)

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve Draw the Line: Toronto Ward Boundary Review Project Work Plan, Civic Engagement and Public Consultation Strategy attached as Appendix A to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the use of funds in the amount of $800,050 from the Innovation Reserve Fund, Account XR1713 for 2014 to 2016 to cover the costs for the Toronto Ward Boundary Review.

     

    3.         City Council increase the 2014 approved Operating Budget for the City Manager's Office by $0.368 million gross and $0 net to provide for the third party consultant to undertake 2014 research, civic engagement and public consultation activities for the Toronto Ward Boundary Review. 

    Origin

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager

    Summary

    At its meeting on June 11, 2013, City Council authorized the City Manager to retain a third party consultant to undertake a Ward Boundary Review for Toronto consistent with the Terms of Reference adopted by City Council.

     

    Following a competitive Request for Proposal (RFP) process, at its meeting on March 5, 2014, the Bid Committee authorized the award to conduct an independent, objective analysis and review of the City of Toronto's ward boundaries to the Canadian Urban Institute.

     

    The purpose of this report is to transmit the consultant's work plan, Draw the Line: Toronto Ward Boundary Review Project Work Plan, Civic Engagement and Public Consultation Strategy, for City Council's consideration.  The work plan is consistent with the Terms of Reference adopted by City Council and applies judicially recognized principles, considers leading electoral and public policy research and advice and implements a two-step broad engagement and consultation strategy with the Toronto public, communities, key stakeholders, the Mayor and City Councillors. 

     

    Toronto’s ward boundary review must follow an independent and unbiased process that includes substantial public consultation and complies with principles set out by the courts, including the Supreme Court of Canada, and the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).  

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Draw the Line - Toronto Ward Boundary Review Project Work Plan, Civic Engagement and Public Consultation Strategy
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69433.pdf
    (April 28, 2014) Appendix A - Draw the Line - Toronto Ward Boundary Review Project Work Plan, Civic Engagement and Public Consultation Strategy
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69434.pdf
    (May 27, 2014) Presentation from the Canadian Urban Institute on Project Work Plan, Civic Engagement and Public Consultation Strategy
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69622.pdf

    Background Information (City Council)

    (June 4, 2014) Supplementary report from the City Manager on Draw the Line: Toronto Ward Boundary Review Project Work Plan, Civic Engagement and Public Consultation Strategy - Information on Project Budget Breakdown (EX42.4a)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70335.pdf

    Speakers

    Miroslav Glavic
    Councillor Shelley Carroll
    Councillor Janet Davis
    Councillor Paula Fletcher

    EX42.7 - Authority for Disposition of Rail Spurs by Toronto Port Lands Company in East Bayfront

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
    Attention
    The City Manager has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EX42.7a with recommendations)

    Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council consent to the disposition of two rail spurs known municipally as 15 Freeland Street and 15 Cooper Street on the terms identified in Confidential Attachment 3 to the report from (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager.

      

    2.         City Council direct that a declaration by the City, in its capacity as sole shareholder of Toronto Port Lands Company, be delivered to the Board of Directors of Toronto Port Lands Company directing that, once the Properties have been sold, Toronto Port Lands Company use the net proceeds from the sale of the Project to provide a dividend to the City, in a specific amount to be determined by the Toronto Port Lands Company Board of Directors in consultation with the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

     

    3.         City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 3 to the report from (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager remain confidential under the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it relates to the security of the property of the municipality or local board until the closing of any sale transaction.

     

    4.         Council authorize the public release of the confidential information and recommendations in Confidential Attachment 3 to the report from (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager, following the closing of any sale transaction.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Executive Committee adopted the recommendation contained in the Confidential Attachment to Motion 1 by Councillor Shiner and requested the City Manager to report directly to City Council on this matter.

    Origin

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to seek City Council authority for the City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation formerly operated as TEDCO and now operating as Toronto Port Lands Company ("TPLC") to enter into an option agreement (the "Option Agreement") with the Liquor Control Board of Ontario ("LCBO") through its agent Infrastructure Ontario ("IO"). The Option Agreement would provide for the potential disposition of unused rail spurs as part of a consolidated property bounded by Queen's Quay East to the south, Freeland Street to the west, Lake Shore Boulevard East to the north, and a Loblaws retail store to the east. The two rail spurs are known municipally as 15 Freeland Street and 15 Cooper Street and bisect lands currently owned by the Liquor Control Board of Ontario and shown on Attachment 1.

     

    Infrastructure Ontario, on behalf of the Liquor Control Board of Ontario, has approached Toronto Port Lands Company to combine the Liquor Control Board of Ontario and Toronto Port Lands Company properties as part of a joint request for development proposals. The Liquor Control Board of Ontario/Infrastrucuture Ontario proposal contemplates redevelopment of the combined sites consistent with revitalization activities in the East Bayfront. If the Option Agreement is successful, the sale of the rail spur lands will result in revenue to Toronto Port Lands Company and the City of Toronto.

     

    There is standing direction from City Council to Toronto Port Lands Company to transfer their lands in the East Bayfront to the City for waterfront revitalization. In order to proceed with the proposed Option Agreement, City Council must provide consent for Toronto Port Lands Company to enter into the Option Agreement and exempt these properties from being transferred to the City.

     

    The rail spur lands consist of 0.24 hectares (0.6 acres) and have no active use other than current uses by the Liquor Control Board of Ontario. Toronto Port Lands Company staff have determined that the highest and best use of the rail spur lands, consistent with the objectives of waterfront revitalization, is to combine the lands into a joint sale with the Liquor Control Board of Ontario. The lands are currently under review by the Lower Yonge Precinct Plan which when completed, will outline development and planning objectives for the site and overall area. Redevelopment of the lands would require the submission of planning application(s) to the City Planning Division and presentation to the Waterfront Design Review Panel.

     

    In the event that a purchaser is not found for the development block, the lands will remain in the ownership of Toronto Port Lands Company.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 12, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 and 2 from the City Manager on Authority for Disposition of Rail Spurs by Toronto Port Lands Company in East Bayfront
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69428.pdf
    Confidential Attachment 3

    Background Information (City Council)

    (June 9, 2014) Supplementary report from the City Manager on Authority for Disposition of Rail Spurs by Toronto Port Lands Company in East Bayfront (EX42.7a)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70337.pdf
    Confidential Attachment 1

    EX42.8 - Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Residential Rental Program

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to review and update their Conflict of Interest provisions and address any gaps in their provisions including the inclusion of a perceived conflict of interest in their definition of conflict of interest and provisions respecting special treatment of employees.

     

    2.         City Council request the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to work with the City's Real Estate Services Division to review Toronto and Region Conservation Authority leasing procedures thereby ensuring best practices.

     

    3.         City Council request the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to adopt the operational procedures implemented by the City regarding rental accommodation and City policies and procedures related thereto.

     

    4.         City Council request Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to adopt the City of Toronto Conflict of Interest Policy that would include the avoidance of perceived and or actual conflict of interest.

     

    5.         City Council request the City Manager to report back to the Executive Committee should the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority fail to implement the requests in Recommendations 2, 3, and 4 above.

    Summary

    This report provides an overview of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) Residential Rental Program, including the information on Toronto and Region Conservation Authority rental homes in the City of Toronto, current rental rates, vacancies and marketing strategies.

     

    The report also provides information on Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's structure and funding partners, as well as a review and comparison of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Conflict of Interest provisions with the City's Conflict of Interest provisions.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's (TRCA) Residential Rental Program
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69497.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) Appendix A - Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Code of Conduct
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69498.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) Appendix B - Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Policies for Surplus Authority Land Sales
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69499.pdf

    EX42.9 - Build Toronto - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2013

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council treat that portion of the Council meeting at which this report is considered as the 2013 Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Build Toronto Inc. by:

     

    a.         receiving the Build Toronto Financial Report to the Shareholder, which includes the 2013 Audited Financial Statements,in Attachment 1 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager;

     

    b.         re-appointing Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the Auditor of Build Toronto Inc. for fiscal year 2014, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Build Toronto Inc. to fix the remuneration of such Auditor; and

     

    c.         receiving the report of the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer titled "Build Toronto Inc. - 2013 Audited Financial Statements," in Attachment 2 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager.

     

    2.         City Council forward a copy of the Build Toronto Financial Report to the Shareholder, which includes 2013 Audited Financial Statements in Attachment 1 to the report, (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager to the Audit Committee for information.

     

    3.         City Council receive the information concerning executive compensation disclosed with consent in Attachment 3 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager for information.

     

    4.         City Council receive the information in Confidential Attachment 4 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager and direct that it be kept confidential in its entirety for reasons of personal information about an identified individual.

     

    5.         City Council request the Board of Directors of Build Toronto to submit, through the City Manager, the Board approved Build Toronto Business Plan to the Executive Committee for information.

    Origin

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager

    Summary

    This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) for holding the 2013 Annual General Meeting of the shareholder of Build Toronto Inc. including receipt of the 2013 Audited Financial Statements and appointment of the auditor for 2014. This report also transmits documents from Build Toronto Inc. to City Council disclosing the compensation of executive officers employed by the Corporation in 2013.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Build Toronto - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2013
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69409.pdf
    (May 9, 2014) Attachment 1 - Build Toronto Financial Report to the Shareholder (May 9, 2014)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69410.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) Attachment 2 - Report of the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer titled "Build Toronto Inc. - 2013 Audited Financial Statements"
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69411.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) Attachment 3 - Build Toronto - 2013 Executive Compensation Disclosure and Analysis Disclosed with Consent
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69412.pdf
    Confidential Attachment 4 - Build Toronto - 2013 Executive Compensation Disclosure and Analysis for Former Executive

    Speakers

    Councillor Shelley Carroll
    Councillor Doug Ford

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 23, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton (EX.New.EX42.9.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-47761.pdf

    EX42.10 - Casa Loma Corporation - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2013

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council treat the portion of the Council meeting at which this report is considered as the 2013 Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Casa Loma Corporation by:

     

    a.         receiving the 2013 Audited Financial Statements of Casa Loma Corporation in Attachment 1 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager;

     

    b.         appointing KMPG LLP as the Auditor of Casa Loma Corporation for fiscal year 2014; and

     

    c.         receiving Casa Loma Corporation's 2013 Annual Report in Attachment 2 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager.

     

    2.         City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the Casa Loma Corporation 2013 Audited Annual Financial Statements in Attachment 1 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager to the Audit Committee for information.

     

    3.         City Council receive the information in Confidential Attachment 3 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager and direct that it be kept confidential in its entirety for reasons of personal information about identified individuals.

    Origin

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager

    Summary

    Casa Loma Corporation (the Corporation) was established by City Council in June 2011. On January 14, 2104 the Corporation recently transferred operational management of the Main Castle and Grounds to the Liberty Entertainment Group the winner of a competitive call process completed in 2013.  The Corporation now oversees the management agreement and has focused on the revitalization of the north Casa Loma complex. This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) for the holding of the 2013 Annual General meeting of the shareholder, including receipt of the Audited Financial Statements, transmittal of the 2013 Annual Report, and confirmation of the auditor for 2014. The report also transmits the confidential disclosure of executive compensation paid by the Corporation in 2013.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Casa Loma Corporation - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2013
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69385.pdf
    Attachment 1 - Casa Loma Corporation 2013 Audited Financial Statements
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69406.pdf
    Attachment 2 - Casa Loma Corporation 2013 Annual Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69407.pdf
    Confidential Attachment 3 - 2013 Executive Compensation Disclosure

    EX42.11 - Toronto Port Lands Company - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2013

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council treat that portion of the Council meeting at which this report is considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC) by:

     

    a.         receiving TPLC's annual report titled "City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation, Operating as Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC) 2013 Annual Report: Achievements and Results" in Attachment 1 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager;

     

    b.         appointing Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the Auditor of TPLC for fiscal year 2014, and authorizing the Board of Directors of TPLC to fix the remuneration of such Auditor;

     

    c.         receiving the Board's 2013 audited financial statements, titled "City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation c.o.b. Toronto Port Lands Company Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2013" in Attachment 2 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager.

     

    2.         City Council forward a copy of "City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation c.o.b. Toronto Port Lands Company Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2013" in Attachment 2 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager to the Audit Committee for information.

     

    3.         City Council receive for information the information concerning Toronto Port Lands Company executive compensation disclosure in Attachment 3 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager.

     

    4.         City Council request the City Manager to report to the Executive Committee on appointing a Member of Council to the Board of Directors of the Toronto Port Lands Company starting in the next term of Council.

    Origin

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager

    Summary

    This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation operating under the name of Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC), including receipt of its Annual Report and Audited Annual Financial Statements for 2013, and appointment of the Auditor.

     

    This report also transmits information from Toronto Port Lands Company to City Council disclosing the individual compensation of executive officers employed by the corporation in 2013.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Toronto Port Lands Company - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2013
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69414.pdf
    (April 28, 2014) Attachment 1 - City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation, Operating as Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC) 2013 Annual Report: Achievements and Results
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69436.pdf
    (December 31, 2013) Attachment 2 - City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation c.o.b. Toronto Port Lands Company Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2013
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69416.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) Attachment 3 - Toronto Port Lands Company - Executive Compensation Disclosure
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69417.pdf

    EX42.12 - Lakeshore Arena Corporation - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2013

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council treat the portion of Council meeting at which this report is considered as the 2013 Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Lakeshore Arena Corporation by:

     

    a.         receiving the 2013 Audited Financial Statements of  Lakeshore Arena Corporation in Attachment 1 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager;

     

    b.          appointing Hilborn LLP Chartered Accountants as the Auditor of Lakeshore Arena Corporation for fiscal year 2014; and

     

    c.         receiving Lakeshore Arena Corporation's 2013 Annual Report in Attachment 2 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager.

     

    2.         City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the Lakeshore Arena Corporation 2013 Audited Annual Financial Statements in Attachment 1 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager to the Audit Committee for information.

     

    3.         City Council receive the information in Confidential Attachment 3 to the report (May 12, 2014) from the City Manager concerning executive compensation disclosure and direct that it be kept confidential in its entirety for reasons of personal information about identified individuals.

    Origin

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager

    Summary

    This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) for holding the 2013 Annual General Meeting of the shareholder of Lakeshore Arena Corporation (the Corporation) including receipt of the Audited Financial Statements, transmittal of the 2013 Annual Report and confirmation of appointment of the auditor for 2014.  This report also transmits the confidential disclosure of executive compensation paid by the Corporation in 2013.  Furthermore, this report, as a special shareholder matter, recommends that City Council reappoint the senior City staff on the board and authorize the recruitment of new tenant and citizen members to the board.  

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 12, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Lakeshore Arena Corporation - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2013
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69429.pdf
    (December 31, 2013) Attachment 1 - Lakeshore Arena Corporation 2013 Audited Financial Statements
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69430.pdf
    (May 5, 2014) Attachment 2 - Lakeshore Arena Corporation 2013 Annual Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69431.pdf
    Confidential Attachment 3 - 2013 Executive Compensation Disclosure

    EX42.14 - Dangerous Railway Cargo and Measures to Improve Community Safety

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the City Manager to contact the Union of Quebec Municipalities (UMQ) to determine the feasibility of Toronto joining the Cross-Border Municipal Coalition for Railway Safety and report back to the Executive Committee.

     

    2.         City Council direct the City Manager to request CN and CP Rail Companies to confirm to the City Manager that they will be providing emergency response teams in 2014 in the Toronto area capable of responding to all emergency situations, including ones similar to Lac Mégantic in 2013.

     

    3.         City Council direct the City Manager to request all railway companies transporting dangerous goods through the City of Toronto to provide the Office of Emergency Management and Toronto Fire Services with information demonstrating the state of good repair on track signals and related infrastructure and maintenance in the City of Toronto.

    Origin

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B

    Summary

    This report provides information in response to two motions approved at the City Council meetings of July 16-19, 2013, regarding measures to improve transportation of dangerous cargo by rail. The motions requested information regarding the Railway Safety Act Review from Transport Canada and directed City staff to review its authority to improve public safety and mitigate the risk of transporting dangerous goods by rail.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B on Dangerous Railway Cargo and Measures to Improve Community Safety
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69228.pdf

    Speakers

    Hans Modlich (Submission Filed)
    Sharon Howarth (Submission Filed)
    Gerry Dunn
    Councillor Mary Fragedakis

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 23, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton (EX.New.EX42.14.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-47744.pdf
    (May 26, 2014) E-mail from Patricia Y. Lai and Helen Vassilakos, Safe Rail Communuties (EX.New.EX42.14.2)
    (May 26, 2014) E-mail from Hans Modlich (EX.New.EX42.14.3)
    (May 26, 2014) E-mail from John Darling (EX.New.EX42.14.4)
    (May 26, 2014) E-mail from Allan McCartney (EX.New.EX42.14.5)
    (May 27, 2014) E-mail from Sharon Howarth (EX.New.EX42.14.6)

    EX42.15 - Investment in Affordable Housing Program Extension

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to enter into an administration agreement and/or related agreement(s) with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing or related entity necessary for the receipt and expenditure of funding under the Investment in Affordable Housing Extension program ("IAH") and to undertake appropriate measures as the program proceeds to adjust program parameters, recipients, and year end funding among program components as required to ensure full and effective use of available federal/ provincial funds, on such terms and conditions as are satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with the Director, Affordable Housing Office, and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

     

    2.         City Council approve the funding allocations for the Investment in Affordable Housing program at a rate of 52 percent for operating programs and 48 percent for capital programs and authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to submit the required Program Delivery and Fiscal Plan to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing based on these allocations.

     

    3.         Subject to the adoption of Recommendations 1 and 2 above, City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and/or the Director, Affordable Housing Office, as appropriate, to enter into agreements with the Provincial government, other City divisions, community agencies, private entities and/or individuals to deliver the Investment in Affordable Housing program in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Province's program guidelines and the approved allocations on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration or the Director, Affordable Housing Office and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

     

    4.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to extend the current administration agreement between the City of Toronto, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Ministry of Finance, and Service Ontario, beyond the termination date of December 31, 2017 to deliver the 2014-2019 Affordable Housing Extension program housing allowance program allocation.

     

    5.         City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and Director, Affordable Housing Office, to report to Executive Committee and Council on any further implications relating to the Investment in Affordable Housing program, as required, and to report back on the results of the program.

     

    6.         City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and the Director, Affordable Housing Office as part of the annual budget process to report to Budget Committee annually on program funding allocations, and provide an update on the need to alter funding from the allocations proposed.

     

    7.         City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to report to the Budget Committee with the details of the 2014 funding allocations and the administration cost including the impacts on the approved 2014 Operating Budgets for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and the Affordable Housing Office, once the details have been identified.

    Origin

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and the Director, Affordable Housing Office

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to seek Council's approval to take part in the renewed federal/provincial Investment in Affordable Housing Program 2014-2019 (IAH).  This includes making necessary program funding allocations.

     

    The Investment in Affordable Housing Program 2014-2019 was announced in the 2013 Federal budget. Ontario is poised to finalise a federal/provincial agreement. IAH agreements have already been signed between Ottawa and a number of provinces and Ontario is expected to confirm its participation following the election.

     

    As a result, the City must act quickly to renew its participation in the program. It is anticipated that the City of Toronto's annual allocation under the Investment in Affordable Housing Program will be consistent with the annual funding received between 2011and 2014. However, as the renewal is for five years, the total funding received by the City through the new program will be greater.

     

    The Investment in Affordable Housing Program provides both operating and capital funding.  The operating component can be used for housing allowance/rent supplement programs to make rents more affordable for tenants in existing rental buildings. The three capital components are: home repair funding, new rental housing construction, and home-ownership loan funding.

     

    A total of 52 percent of the funding was allocated to housing allowances and 48 percent to the capital programs when Council approved participation in the previous Investment in Affordable Housing  program. This report recommends allocating the new funding using the same ratio, which is based on the strategic priorities and targets approved by Council in Housing Opportunities Toronto, the City's 10 year housing plan. Five percent of the total program funds are available to the City for administrative costs.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and the Director, Affordable Housing Office on Investment in Affordable Housing Program Extension
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69274.pdf

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 20, 2014) E-mail from Joe Deschenes Smith (EX.Main.EX42.15.1)

    EX42.16 - Implementing Innovative Affordable Housing in the East Bayfront

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

    Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    The Hines/Tridel Transaction

     

    1.         City Council authorize the City to proceed with the development of 80 units of affordable rental housing that will make up the Bayside Non-Profit and, the Director, Affordable Housing Office to execute, on behalf of the City, the Bayside Pilot Project Agreement, the Development Management Agreement and the Construction Contract, substantially on the terms and conditions summarized in Attachments 1, 2 and 3 respectively and Confidential Attachment 5 to the report (May 9, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to issue requests for proposals (RFPs) to obtain the services of a project manager and such other professionals deemed advisable to represent the City in construction related matters, to a maximum cost of $200,000 exclusive of HST and disbursements, from the Development Charges Reserve Fund for Subsidized Housing (XR 2116) and within the proposed capital budget as set out in Recommendation 13 below and execute agreements on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director, Affordable Housing Office and approved by the City Solicitor.

     

    3.         City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to retain the services of Robins Appleby for $100,000, exclusive of HST and disbursements, from the Development Charges Reserve Fund for Subsidized Housing (XR 2116) and within the proposed capital funding as set out in Recommendation 13 below, to assist with the negotiations and drafting of all agreements with Hines and Tridel for the Bayside Non-Profit on such terms and conditions as the Director, Affordable Housing Office deems advisable and as approved by the City Solicitor.

     

    4.         City Council authorize the City, as vendor, to enter into an Agreement of Purchase and Sale (APS) with Hines, or its designate, as purchaser, for the sale of Block 3 (save and except the strata parcel of land designated for the Bayside Non-Profit), substantially in accordance with the terms and conditions contained in EX46.33 adopted by City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, as if Block 3 was a development site for sale, together with such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Deputy City Manager whose responsibilities include Waterfront Revitalization in consultation with the Chief Corporate Officer and in form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

     

    5.         City Council confirm all of the requirements contained in the recommendations of EX46.33 adopted by City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010 with respect to the Agreement of Purchase and Sale (APS) with Hines, with the additional requirement that closing under the Agreement of Purchase and Sale shall be conditional upon the initial strata plan approved under the Bayside Pilot Project Agreement having been registered on title to Block 3 and the Agreement of Purchase and Sale having been amended, if required, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Bayside Pilot Project Agreement, including a transfer to a not for profit corporation, incorporated by it for nominal consideration, such transfer being in the interest of the City.

     

    6.         City Council authorize the City to enter into a new agreement of purchase and sale between the City, as vendor, and Hines for the sale of the strata parcel designated for the Bayside Non-Profit (for the consideration set out in the agreement of purchase and sale) to Hines, at a later date, if required under the Bayside Pilot Project Agreement, on the same terms as set out in Recommendation 5, above.

     

    7.         City Council authorize the City, as transferor or transferee, to enter into such re-conveyances of land for nominal consideration as may be necessary when the final strata plan is registered on title in accordance with the Bayside Pilot Project Agreement, to legally identify the Bayside Non-Profit property and the property developed by Hines for condominiums with commercial and retail areas.

     

    8.         City Council authorize the City to enter into any ancillary agreements, including license, encroachment, easement, cost sharing or other agreements, documents or instruments ("Ancillary Agreements") contemplated under the Bayside Pilot Project Agreement, the Development Management Agreement, the Construction Contract, or the agreement of purchase and sale, on terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Director, Affordable Housing Office or Deputy City Manager whose responsibilities include Waterfront Revitalization in consultation with the Chief Corporate Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

     

    Financial Authorities

     

    9.         City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to submit a request to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing for funding for the City through the Canada-Ontario Investment in Affordable Housing Program – Rental Component 2014-2019 for the Bayside Non-Profit, in the amount of $12,000,000.

     

    10.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to negotiate and  execute, on behalf of the City, the agreements and security required by the Province to obtain the funding set out in Recommendation 9 on such terms and conditions deemed reasonable by the Director, Affordable Housing Office and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

     

    11.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to approve the acceptance of the Federal/Provincial program funding received from the Province, in accordance with the request to be made under Recommendation 9 above.

     

    12.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office in the event that Recommendations 9, 10 and 11 above are unable to be implemented, to provide capital funding of $12,000,000 from the Development Charges Reserve Fund for Subsidized Housing (XR2116), towards the development costs of the Bayside Non-Profit.

     

    13.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to provide capital funding of $7,000,000 from the Development Charges Reserve Fund for Subsidized Housing (XR2116) to be used to complete the development of the Bayside Non-Profit.

     

    14.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to provide capital funding up to $7,000,000 from the Capital Revolving Reserve Fund for Affordable Housing (XR-1058), to be used for the development of the Bayside Non-Profit and to be repaid by Artscape to XR-1058 upon entering into the lease.

     

    15.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to access up to $1,200,000 from the Development Charges Reserve Fund for Subsidized Housing (XR 2116) on a temporary basis during construction to address any cash flow issues that may arise as a result of the timing of advances from the Federal/Provincial program.

     

    The Non-Profit Operator Transaction

     

    16.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to approve Toronto Artscape Inc. as the successful proponent under the Request for Proposals issued to select the operator of the Bayside Non-Profit.

     

    17.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to negotiate and enter into an offer to lease, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director, Affordable Housing Office and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

     

    18.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to direct the contribution, as set out in Recommendation 14 above, payable by Toronto Artscape to be paid to the Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing (XR1058).

     

    19.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to assign the funding and security for the Federal/Provincial program obtained by the City to Toronto Artscape Inc. on terms and conditions deemed reasonable by the Director, Affordable Housing Office and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

     

    20.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to provide Toronto Artscape Inc. with a grant of up to $150,000 from the Development Charges Reserve Fund for Subsidized Housing (XR 2116) for start up costs, being part of the funds in Recommendation 13 above, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director, Affordable Housing Office and approved by the City Solicitor.

     

    21.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to negotiate and enter into a municipal capital facility agreement with Toronto Artscape Inc. on such terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director, Affordable Housing Office and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

     

    22.       City Council authorize the City, as landlord, to enter into a lease with Artscape for the operation of the Bayside Non-Profit, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Attachment 4 to the report (May 9, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor, such grant by way of below market rent being in the interest of the City.

     

    23.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to conduct a reserve fund study on the Bayside Non-Profit and to retain such professionals as are necessary to assess the operating pro forma and the contribution required of Toronto Artscape Inc. all to ensure financial viability of the Bayside Non-Profit.

     

    24.       City Council authorize the Director, Revenue Services to recommend to the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation an exemption from taxation for municipal and school purposes for the Bayside Non-Profit.

     

    25.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to approve the waiving of all development charges and planning fees with respect to the affordable housing units to be located in the Bayside Pilot Project.

     

    26.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to designate the Bayside Non-Profit as social housing for the purpose of allowing all or part of the project relief from normal parking standards.

     

    Delegated and General Authorities

     

    27.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to execute a municipal housing facility agreement, all other documents, security, consents, waivers and Ancillary Agreements with respect to the lease and operation of the Bayside Non-Profit by Toronto Artscape Inc., on behalf of the City.

     

    28.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to execute, on behalf of the City, all funding agreements with the Province, assignments, security or financing documentation required by the City, the Province or Toronto Artscape Inc.'s lenders, when and as required.

     

    29.       City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to make all decisions, including any necessary elections, waivers, approvals, consents and notices, on behalf of the City during the pre and post construction and construction phases of the Bayside Non-Profit in accordance with the project agreements set out in Recommendation 1 above and any other agreements or documentation entered into as a result of those agreements.

     

    30.       City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the lease transaction on behalf of the City, including payment of any necessary expenses, establishing and amending the commencement date of the lease and any other dates to such dates and on such terms and conditions as she may from time to time consider reasonable.

     

    31.       City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the lease for the Bayside Non-Profit including the provision of any consents, approvals, waiver notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

     

    32.       City Council confirm the delegated authorities contained in EX46.33 adopted by City Council at its meeting on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010 with respect to the negotiation, execution and delivery of the Agreement of Purchase and Sale and Ancillary Agreement contemplated under the Agreement of Purchase and Sale.

     

    33.       City Council authorize the Director of the Affordable Housing Office to report back through the future-years' operating budget process or directly to Budget Committee with the cash flow requirements to fund the construction of the 80 units of affordable housing by including the required cash flow in the Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration.

     

    34.       City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the information in Confidential Attachment 5 to the report (May 9, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer upon the completion of the development of the publicly-owned lands in East Bayfront as determined by the Deputy City Manager whose responsibilities include Waterfront Revitalization.

    Origin

    (May 9, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

    Summary

    This report recommends that Council approve the development of a City-owned block of land within the Bayside district of East Bayfront for an innovative pilot project integrating  affordable housing with market residential housing, retail and commercial parking uses. 

     

    The recommendations in this report are time sensitive as the Land Development Agreement approved by Council between Hines and the City requires a decision on the affordable housing component by June 16, 2014. The marketing of the condominium development is also dependent on the decision by Council as this information is required prior to the pre-sale of the condominiums.

     

    In August, 2010 Council granted Hines Canada Management Company ULC ("Hines") a right of first offer to develop two City-owned sites for affordable housing within the Bayside waterfront district. In November 2013, staff was directed to report back to Council on the result of negotiations with Hines and its residential development partner Tridel Corporation ("Tridel") on the feasibility of an affordable housing pilot project on the Bayside site known as R3R4 and now being Block 3 on Plan 66M-2514 ("Block 3").

     

    The Hines/Tridel development proposal for Block 3 includes the development of 80 affordable rental housing units to be owned by the City (the "Bayside Non-Profit") within the same building that will contain market condominium units, retail and parking. To support this development, this report recommends entering into agreements with the developers and Toronto Artscape Inc. (Artscape), the recommended non-profit chosen through a competitive Proposal Call to lease and operate the affordable housing. The report also seeks authority to provide the required City funding to assist the Bayside Non-Profit with the completion of the East Bayfront project. See Design Elevation included as Attachment 8.

     

    Upon Council approval of the Pilot project, the second affordable housing site in Bayside will be the site designated as R6 on the Concept Plan (Attachment 6). In the event that Council does not proceed with the pilot project, then A1 and A2 on the Concept Plan will be the affordable housing sites but would be developed in later phases of the East Bayfront.

     

    The recommendations in this report provide for funding of $26 million for the Bayside Pilot. The City would provide $7,000,000 from the Development Charges Reserve Fund for Subsidized Housing (XR 2116) and up to $7,000,000 in interim funding from the Capital Revolving Reserve Fund for Affordable Housing (XR-1058) which Artscape would then repay when it obtains a mortgage.

     

    Some $12,000,000 would come from the Investment in Affordable Housing program upon the Province signing a cost-sharing agreement with Ottawa. In the event that this does not occur, the $12,000,000 would come from the Development Charges Reserve Fund for Subsidized Housing (XR 2116).

     

    The Bayside initiative provides an innovative opportunity to build and operate 80 permanent affordable rental homes in the same building as the new condominium. This project will set a precedent for integrating a diverse mix of individuals and families into a new waterfront community. It also provides a unique and timely opportunity to lever government investments in affordable housing in partnership with well-established private sector and non-profit partners. As a result of the Proposal Call issued by the Affordable Housing Office, Toronto Artscape Inc. is recommended as the successful non-profit proponent.

     

    This housing initiative fulfills three key City objectives;

     

    ·             Supports the Official Plan goal by mixing housing tenure and affordability in large residential developments;

    ·             Supports the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan and zoning by-law requirement of  20% affordable rental housing, and

    ·             Supports the Housing Opportunities Toronto – An Affordable Action Plan 2010-2020 objective of providing affordable housing on the waterfront.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 9, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Implementing Innovative Affordable Housing in the East Bayfront
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69275.pdf
    Attachments 1-4 and 6-8
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69276.pdf
    Confidential Attachment 5

    EX42.17 - New Transitional Housing for Young Victims of Sexual Exploitation and Human Trafficking

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Communications EX42.17.1 to EX42.17.6 have been submitted on this Item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve up to $0.850 million in financial assistance for the capital repairs of a Toronto Community Housing property to provide transitional housing for young women who are victims of sexual exploitation and human trafficking from the Homeless Initiative Reserve Fund (XR1104).

     

    2.         City Council authorize the City to enter into a funding agreement with Toronto Community Housing or such other associated parties as the City deems appropriate, for the delivery and administration of the capital repair funding being provided from the City's Homeless Initiative Reserve Fund (XR1104), on terms and conditions determined by the Director, Affordable Housing Office, and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

     

    3.         City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to execute the funding agreement and any other agreements or documents required to give effect to the foregoing.

     

    4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to execute any documents required to register security for the capital repair funding and to postpone, confirm the status of, and discharge the security when and if necessary.

     

    5.         City Council approve a one-time increase in the 2014 approved Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration of $0.850 million gross $0 net to provide funding for this initiative.

    Origin

    (May 15, 2014) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee

    Summary

    On October 29, 2013, the Affordable Housing Committee requested staff investigate and report on creating a housing pilot project for young women who are victims of sexual exploitation and human trafficking. This report responds to that request and recommends a course of action.

     

    Over the past six months staff have worked with Toronto Community Housing and identified a vacant TCH building suitable for housing five to six young women who are transitioning from homelessness and are victims of sexual exploitation and human trafficking.

     

    Toronto Community Housing has also identified an established charitable service agency in the area to manage and operate the building upon completion of necessary repairs and renovations.  Due to fire damage, the building's interior requires complete refurbishment, including electrical, plumbing and heating systems.

     

    Toronto Community Housing has estimated capital costs of up to $0.850 million to undertake and complete the building repairs and renovations. Toronto Community Housing has requested the City’s support in providing the necessary capital funds. Upon completion the building will be leased to the service agency that will be responsible for managing and operating the home. There will be no operating subsidy required from the City.

     

    Recognizing the need to protect the safety and security of future residents, the location of the home and name of the service agency are treated as a confidential matter in this report. 

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 15, 2014) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee on New Transitional Housing for Young Victims of Sexual Exploitation and Human Trafficking
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69418.htm
    (April 30, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Director, Affordable Housing Office on New Transitional Housing for Young Victims of Sexual Exploitation and Human Trafficking
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69415.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 5, 2014) E-mail from Ruth Godinho (CC.Supp.EX42.17.1)
    (June 9, 2014) E-mail from Margaret Carabine, Member, St. Vincent de Paul Society (CC.New.EX42.17.2)
    (June 6, 2014) E-mail from Leslie Soares, President, St. Vincent de Paul Society (CC.New.EX42.17.3)
    (June 5, 2014) E-mail from Sagai Joseph (CC.New.EX42.17.4)
    (June 5, 2014) E-mail from Ophelia D'Souza, President of St. Timothy Church, St. Vincent de Paul Society (CC.New.EX42.17.5)
    (June 6, 2014) E-mail from Melvyn Menezes (CC.New.EX42.17.6)

    EX42.18 - Affordable Home Ownership Assistance Program Adjustments

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the Affordable Housing Office to increase the average loan amount from the Council approved funds for the Home Ownership Assistance Program (HOAP) from $15,000 to $25,000 to better reflect the cost to pay the City’s planning and development fees and charges paid by non-profit partners.

     

    2.         City Council approve $2,130,000 in additional financial assistance under the City's Home Ownership Assistance Program in the form of grants by way of forgivable loans from the Development Charges Reserve Fund (2009) for Subsidized Housing (XR2116) for the following not-for-profit affordable home ownership initiatives selected through Request for Proposal No. 9155-13-7046 and approved by Council in 2013 up to the following amounts:

     

    Proponent

    Address

    Number of Units

    Previously      Approved HOAP Funding

    Additional      HOAP Funding

    Total      HOAP Funding

    Habitat for Humanity Toronto Inc.

    Brimley Road between Lawrence Ave. E. & Britwell Ave.

    15

    $225,000

    $150,000

    $375,000

    Habitat for Humanity Toronto Inc.

    357 Birchmount Rd.

    9

    $135,000

    $90,000

    $225,000

    Home Ownership Alternatives Non-Profit Corporation (Greater Toronto Area)

    1340-1360 Danforth Rd.

    171

    $2,565,000

    $1,710,000

    $4,275,000

    Toronto Artscape Inc.

    210 Simcoe Ave.

    4

    $60,000

    $40,000

    $100,000

    Toronto Artscape Inc.

    155-163 Dundas St. E.

    14

    $210,000

    $140,000

    $350,000

    Totals:

    213

    $3,195,000

    $2,130,000

    $5,325,000

     

     

    Origin

    (May 15, 2014) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee

    Summary

    The City of Toronto provides funding under the Home Ownership Assistance Program (HOAP) to eligible non-profit housing providers to reduce the upfront costs of building new affordable ownership homes for Toronto residents.  The funds, delivered through a competitive request for proposals process, help offset City fees and charges and pre-construction costs. The savings are then passed onto the eligible home purchasers in the form of forgivable down payment assistance loans.

     

    Under the City's new Development Charges By-law, on average development charge rates will increase by approximately $10,000 per unit over two years. Planning and building permit fees are also gradually increasing. This report recommends Home Ownership Assistance Program funding be increased by $10,000 per unit to off-set these rising costs.

     

    Home Ownership Assistance Program funding is currently $15,000 per unit and would rise to $25,000. The increase would apply to previously-approved developments that have yet to pay their fees and charges, and to future Council-approved non-profit affordable ownership developments.

     

    When the Home Ownership Assistance Program was established in 2010, Council approved up to $2.0 million annually in funding from the Development Charge Reserve Fund (2009) for Subsidized Housing (XR2116). The increase of $10,000 per unit will be drawn from this annual allocation.   There are no additional funds required to support the recommendations in this report, but there will be fewer loans available due to the higher loan amount.

     

    Since 2010, the Home Ownership Assistance Program has made over $8.425 million available to reduce costs for 690 non-profit affordable home ownership homes for eligible Toronto families and individuals.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 15, 2014) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee on Affordable Home Ownership Assistance Program Adjustments
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69420.htm
    (May 1, 2014) Report and Attachment from the Director, Affordable Housing Office on Affordable Home Ownership Assistance Program Adjustments
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69419.pdf

    EX42.19 - Update on Surplus Toronto District School Board and Toronto Catholic District School Board School Board Properties

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development Finance and Administration, the Chief Executive Officer, Build Toronto, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships, to review and identify city building opportunities, in consultation with the Toronto District School Board and Toronto Lands Corporation, on the Bendale/David and Mary Thomson Toronto District School Board redevelopment site and report back to the Executive Committee at its meeting on August 21, 2014.  The review will include consideration of community partnerships to develop community/recreation facilities and services on the David and Mary Thomson portion of the site.

     

    2.         City Council direct the Director, Affordable Housing Office, the General Manager, Children's Services, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry, and Recreation, the Director, Real Estate Services, and the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships, coordinated by the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, to work together under the School Lands Acquisition Framework to identify and regularly report to City Council on sites where multiple divisional property acquisition interests exist.

     

    3.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to host a public meeting about the proposed community centre at the surplus site adjacent to St. Basil the Great College School at 20 Starview Lane.

     

    4.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Director, Real Estate Services to report to the August 21, 2014 meeting of the Executive Committee if there are recommendations to acquire the St. Basil the Great College School and to amend the approved 2014 Capital Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation to fund the acquisition.

    Origin

    (April 4, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

    Summary

    This report provides information about anticipated impacts of recently surplused Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) school properties. Five TCDSB school properties have recently been offered for sale, four of which are currently operating schools which will be relocated to new facilities and one which is the sale of a portion of land attached to a school property. This report identifies potential impacts on local community access to green space and recreational and other community facilities.

     

    This report also provides information on requested reassessments of City of Toronto interest in two Toronto District School Board (TDSB) school sites: the Vincent Massey site and the Lawrence-Midland Redevelopment site.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 4, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Update on Surplus Toronto District School Board and Toronto Catholic District School Board School Board Properties
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68705.pdf
    (April 4, 2014) Attachment 1 - Location Maps of Surplus Toronto Catholic District School Board and Toronto District School Board sites
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68826.pdf

    EX42.20 - Acquisition of a Portion of 15 Mallow Road for Parkland

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    34 - Don Valley East

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council grant authority to enter into an Offer to Sell agreement with the Toronto District School Board ("TDSB") for the Property at a purchase price of $2,720,000, plus applicable taxes, registration fees and environmental assessments and related work, estimated at $380,000 substantially on the terms outlined in Appendix A to the report (May 9, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A for a total cost of $3,100,000 net of HST recoveries, and on such other terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director, Real Estate Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

     

    2.         City Council amend the approved 2014 Capital Budget of Parks, Forestry and Recreation by the addition of a project "15 Mallow Road - Parkland Acquisition" for $3,100,000 with funding provided from Parkland Acquisition - North York Local (XR2041) until depleted, with the rest coming from the Parkland Acquisition – North District Local Parkland Reserve Fund (XR2206).

     

    3.         City Council authorize severally each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services to execute the Offer to Sell agreement (the "Agreement") and associated agreements and documents under the Agreement on behalf of the City.

     

    4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transaction contemplated in the Agreement and associated agreements and documents under the Agreement on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms as she considers reasonable.

     

    5.          City Council authorize the appropriate City officials be directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

    Origin

    (May 9, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to obtain authority to acquire a 0.501hectares (1.238 acre) portion of the surplus school site at 15 Mallow Road (the "School Site") from the Toronto District School Board ("TDSB") for parkland purposes.  The lands proposed to be acquired by the City are shown on Appendix "B1" attached hereto (the "Property").

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 9, 2014) Report and Appendix A, B and B1 from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A on Acquisition of a portion of 15 Mallow Road for Parkland
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69252.pdf

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 26, 2014) E-mail from Vasilis Papanikolaou submitting a letter of support and 12 signatures (EX.New.EX42.20.1)

    EX42.21 - Information and Technology's Desktop Software Replacement Project - 2014 and 2015 Capital Budget Adjustments and Accelerations

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the acceleration of cash flow funding in Information and Technology's approved 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan, with an increase to the 2014 cash flow of $5.223 million and decrease to the 2015 cash flow of $6.093 million that will result in a total project cost decrease and savings of $0.870 million to Information and Technology's approved 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan and no impact on debt.

    Origin

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

    Summary

    This report requests authority to amend the Information and Technology's (I&T) 2014 Approved Capital Budget and 2015 – 2023 Capital Plan, by accelerating the 2015 Desktop Software project to 2014 to realize cost savings on required software and deployment assistance. This approach will increase the 2014 cash flow funding by $5.223 million and reduce the 2015 planned expenditure by $6.093 million that will result in direct cost savings of $0.870 million.

     

    This request is based on a time-limited proposal from Microsoft Canada that would provide a reduction in Microsoft Office software license costs ($0.870 million) and a value of $0.500 million in professional services credit resulting in a total value to the City of approximately $1.37 million.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Information and Technology's Desktop Software Replacement Project: 2014 and 2015 Capital Budget Adjustments and Accelerations
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69247.pdf

    EX42.22 - Amendment to the 2014 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget for Berczy Park Construction

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend the approved 2014 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget for the capital project known as Berczy Park Construction (CPR117-44-22), in the amount of $4.507 million to a total value of $8.007 million, and to be cash flowed as follows: $1.000 million in 2014 and $3.507 million in 2015, with a net zero impact financed from Section 42, Section 37 and Section 45 funds.

    Origin

    (May 1, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to request Council approval to amend the 2014 Parks, Forestry and Recreation’s Capital Budget and Plan for the construction of Berczy Park.

     

    With the approval of this report, staff will have the funding required to complete construction of Berczy Park and adjacent Scott Street streetscape improvements in 2015 prior to the start of the 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games.  The additional $4.507 million is requested, to be cash flowed in 2014 and 2015.  The additional funding is requested from Ward 28 Section 42 above 5%, Section 37, and Section 45 opportunities.

     

    Through public and stakeholder consultation, it was requested that streetscape improvements to the portion of Scott Street adjacent to the park, between Front Street East and Wellington Street East, also be completed concurrently with Berczy Park.  It is cost and time effective to complete park improvements and streetscape improvements together.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 1, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Amendment to the 2014 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget for Berczy Park Construction
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69091.htm
    (April 9, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Amendment to the 2014 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget for Berczy Park Construction
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69106.pdf

    EX42.23 - Facilities Management and Real Estate 2014 Capital Budget Adjustments and Accelerations / Deferrals

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the reallocation of funds in Facilities Management and Real Estate's approved 2014 Capital Budget in the amount of $0.545 million as illustrated in Schedule A to the report (April 14, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, with zero gross and net impact.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the deferral and acceleration of funds in Facilities Management and Real Estate's approved 2014 Capital Budget and 2015 – 2023 Capital Plan in the amount of $1.200 million as illustrated in Schedule B to the report (April 14, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, with zero gross and net impact.

    Origin

    (May 1, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

    Summary

    This report requests authority to amend the Facilities Management and Real Estate's (FM&RE) 2014 Approved Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan, by reallocating funding within approved budget and plan amounts to better meet program requirements.  The adjustment of funds will have a zero net impact corporately and will better align 2014 and future cash flows with Facilities Management and Real Estate's program requirements and anticipated spending.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 1, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Facilities Management and Real Estate 2014 Capital Budget Adjustments and Accelerations / Deferrals
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69092.htm
    (April 14, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Facilities Management and Real Estate 2014 Capital Budget Adjustments and Accelerations / Deferrals
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69116.pdf
    (April 7, 2014) Schedule A- Budget Adjustments
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69117.pdf
    (April 7, 2014) Schedule B - Deferrals / Accelerations
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69118.pdf

    EX42.24 - Operating Variance Report for the Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2014

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.           City Council approve the budget adjustments detailed in Appendix F to the report (April 14, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, to amend the 2014 Approved Operating Budget between Programs with no impact to the 2014 Approved Net Operating Budget.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Executive Committee requested the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board to report to the Budget Committee explaining why there has been a drop in the number of tickets being issued.

    Origin

    (May 1, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the City of Toronto Operating Variance for the three-month period ended March 31, 2014 as well as year-end projections and to request Council's approval for amendments to the 2014 Approved Operating Budget between Programs to ensure accurate reporting and financial accountability with no increase to the 2014 Approved Net Operating Budget.

     

    For the three-month period ended March 31, 2014, Tax Supported Operations reported a favourable net variance of $53.184 million or 5.7%, as noted in Table 1 below.

     

    (See Table 1 of the Report dated April 14, 2014 from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)

     

    Under-spending was driven largely by salary and benefit savings from vacant positions that were not filled, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration savings in salaries and benefits and higher than planned funding from the Community Homelessness Prevention Initiative, and reduction in caseload for Toronto Employment and Social Services.  In addition, higher than budgeted revenue from permit applications for Toronto Building and the Municipal Land Transfer Tax contributed to the favourable net variance.

     

    Projections indicate that the 2014 year-end position will result in a net unfavourable variance of $1.783 million.  The year-end projection is primarily due to under-achieved net revenue from Court Services ($27.066 million), Toronto Transit Commission conventional service ($5.0 million) and over-expenditures for Tax Deficiencies of ($4.038 million).

     

    Table 2 below summarizes Rate Supported Program net variances:

     

    (See Table 2 of the Report dated April 14, 2014 from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)

     

    The year-to-date unfavourable net variance of $16.841 million was driven by Toronto Water's net over-spending $15.490 million, primarily due to increased utility costs from the extreme winter weather resulting in fluctuations in hydro use.  Rate Supported Programs project a 2014 year-end favourable variance of $9.876 million.

     

    Table 2a below summarizes the vacancy rate for three months ended March 31, 2014 and projections to year-end.

     

    (See Table 2a of the Report dated April 14, 2014 from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)

     

    For year-to-date, the City recorded a vacancy rate of 3.6% after gapping under the approved complement of 52,668. The forecasted year-end vacancy rate after gapping is projected to be 0.3% under the approved complement of 52,668. A more detailed analysis is provided in the 'Approved Complement' section.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 1, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Operating Variance Report for the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2014
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69096.htm
    (April 14, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Operating Variance Report for the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2014
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69123.pdf
    (April 14, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer - Notice of Pending Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69124.pdf

    EX42.25 - Capital Variance Report for the Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2014

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    The Chair, Toronto Public Library Board has submitted a letter on this Item (EX42.25a)

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve in-year budget adjustments to the 2014-2023 Approved Capital Budget and Plan detailed in Appendix 2 to the report (April 14, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, with no incremental impact on debt funding.

     

    2.         City Council approve reduction of $2.923 million in previously approved carry forward funding for Toronto Police Services as detailed in Appendix 3 to the report (April 14, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and that 2014 Approved Capital Budget be adjusted accordingly.

     

    3.         City Council receive for information Appendix 4 to the report (April 14, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, which lists 112 capital projects/sub-projects that have been completed and are to be closed with a total combined project budget saving of $17.410 million, including savings of $10.736 million in debt funding.

     

    4.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

    Origin

    (May 1, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the 2014 Capital Variance Report for the three month period ended March 31, 2014 as well as projected actual expenditures to December 31, 2014.  Furthermore, the report seeks Council’s approval for 2014 in-year budget adjustments and carry-forward funding adjustments to the 2014 Approved Capital Budget.

     

    This report also provides a list of 112 completed capital projects to be closed including the total number and value of projects' under and over expenditures. $380.602 million in projects are ready to be closed and have been completed under budget, with savings of $17.410 million. These savings will be returned to their original funding sources, including a savings of $10.736 million in debt funding.

     

    Capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2014 totalled $256.530 million or 6% of the 2014 Approved Capital Budget of $4.269 billion (see Chart 1). This spending pattern is consistent with prior years as first quarter capital activity is typically more preparatory, with less expenditure actually in the first quarter occurring than in the reminder of the year. As detailed by City Program and Agency in Appendix 1, actual expenditures to year-end are expected to reach $3.415 billion or 80% of the total 2014 Approved Capital Budget; 22 of 32 City Programs and Agencies are projecting spending in excess of 70% by year-end: Tax Supported Programs project a spending rate of 79.7% to year-end; while Rate Supported Programs project year-end spending rate of 81.5%.

     

    (Please see Table 1 of the Report dated April 14, 2014 from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 1, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Capital Variance Report for the Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2014
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69126.htm
    (April 14, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Capital Variance Report for the Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2014
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69101.pdf
    (April 14, 2014) Attachment 1 - 2014 Consolidated Capital Variance Report for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69100.pdf
    (April 14, 2014) Attachment 2 - In-Year Adjustments for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69098.pdf
    (April 14, 2014) Attachment 3 - Carry Forward Funding Adjustments
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69103.pdf
    (April 14, 2014) Attachment 4 - Capital Projects to be Closed
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69099.pdf
    (April 14, 2014) Attachment 5 - Capital Variance Explanation - Programs/Agencies
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69104.pdf
    (April 14, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Capital Variance Report for the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2014 - Notice of Pending Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69102.pdf

    Background Information (City Council)

    (June 9, 2014) Letter from the Chair, Toronto Public Library Board on the Scarborough Civic Centre - Civic Green Project (EX42.25a)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70370.pdf

    EX42.26 - Toronto Water 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan Reallocations and Accelerations / Deferrals

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the reallocation of funds in Toronto Water’s approved 2014 Water Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan in the amount of $13.75 million, from projects that have been completed to those requiring additional funding in the same amount, as presented in Schedule A to the report (April 28, 2014) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, with a zero Budget impact.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the deferral and acceleration of funds in Toronto Water's approved 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan in the amount of $16.525 million as presented in Schedule A to the report (April 28, 2014) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, with a zero Budget impact.

    Origin

    (May 1, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

    Summary

    This report requests City Council’s authority to amend Toronto Water’s Approved 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan by adjusting project cash flows contained within the Budget and Plan, respectively, to better meet program requirements.  The adjustment of project cash flows will have a zero gross overall Capital Budget impact and will better align 2014 and future year cash flows with Toronto Water's capital project delivery schedule and program requirements.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 1, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Toronto Water 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan Reallocations and Accelerations/Deferrals
    (April 28, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Toronto Water on Toronto Water 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan Reallocations and Accelerations/Deferrals
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69128.pdf
    (April 15, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water on Toronto Water Capital Budget Adjustment and Accelerations/Deferrals
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69127.pdf

    EX42.27 - Toronto Public Library - 2014 Capital Budget Adjustment for Maryvale Branch

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve a $60,000 gross, $0 net, increase to the 2014 project cost and cash flow for the Multi-Branch State of Good Repair project (CLB175), funded by a $20,000 landlord contribution and a $40,000 draw from the Library’s Development Charges Reserve Fund, for the renovation of an additional 577 square feet of space at the Maryvale Branch.

    Origin

    (May 1, 2014) Letter from The Budget Committee

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to seek approval for an in-year capital budget adjustment to increase the 2014 Multi-Branch State of Good Repair capital project by $60,000 gross, $0 net, for the renovation of an additional 577 square feet of space at the Maryvale Branch. 

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 1, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Toronto Public Library - 2014 Capital Budget Adjustment for Maryvale Branch
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69093.htm
    (April 15, 2014) Report from the City Librarian on Toronto Public Library - 2014 Capital Budget Adjustment for Maryvale Branch
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69119.pdf
    (March 17, 2014) Attachment 1 - Communication from Councillor Michael Thompson to Michael Foderick, Chair, Toronto Public Library Board, dated March 17, 2014, regarding Maryvale Branch Lease - Amendment and Extension
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69120.pdf

    EX42.28 - Responding to Requests for Vulnerable Sector Screening Checks to Within a Two Week Timeline for Completion - Fees To Be Charged

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Public Notice Given

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council permit the Toronto Police Services Board to increase fees, and establish new fees, as outlined below:

     

    a.         effective September 1, 2014, the fee for vulnerable sector screenings will increase from $50.00 to $65.00 per request for the purposes of employment;

     

    b.         effective September 1, 2014, the fee for vulnerable sector screenings will increase from $15.00 to $20.00 per request for volunteers;

     

    c          effective September 1, 2014, there will be a fee for an expedited service for vulnerable sector screenings within 72 hours at $110.00 per request for the purpose of employment; and

     

    d.         effective September 1, 2014, there will be a fee for an expedited service for vulnerable sector screenings within 72 hours at $65.00 per request for volunteers.

     

    2.         City Council amend the Municipal Code Chapter 441 as appropriate to reflect any approved changes to user fees charged by the Toronto Police Service for:

     

    a.         vulnerable sector screenings for the purposes of employment;

     

    b.         vulnerable sector screenings for volunteers;

     

    c.         an expedited service for vulnerable sector screening for the purpose of employment; and

     

    d.         an expedited service for vulnerable sector screenings for volunteers.

    Origin

    (April 11, 2014) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board

    Summary

     

    The purpose of this report is to request that the Executive Committee approve the Toronto Police Services Board’s recommendation to increase the fees that are currently charged by the Toronto Police Service for vulnerable sector screening checks and to establish new fees for expedited vulnerable sector screening checks performed by the Toronto Police Service.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 11, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board on Responding to Requests for Vulnerable Sector Screening Checks to Within a Two Week Timeline for Completion - Fees To Be Charged
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69249.pdf
    (May 20, 2014) Vulnerable Sector Screening Checks - Fees To Be Charged Public Notice
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69509.pdf

    28a - Supplementary Report - Fees for Vulnerable Sector Police Reference Checks

    Origin
    (May 22, 2014) Report from the City Manager
    Summary

    This supplementary staff report is in response to two reports from the Toronto Police Services Board on the Toronto Police Service's Reference Check Program.  The first report advises the Executive Committee that effective June 1, 2014 the Toronto Police Service will end their long standing practice of not charging the City of Toronto for vulnerable sector police reference checks.  The second report requests that the Executive Committee approve the Board's recommendation to increase the fees that are currently charged by the Toronto Police Service for vulnerable sector police reference checks and to establish new fees for expedited checks performed by the Service.

     

    City Divisions and Agencies require approximately 4,500 vulnerable sector police reference checks per year for new and existing employees and volunteers, with current processing times by the Toronto Police Service of between four and twelve weeks.  The large volume of requests and associated backlog impacted the ability to fill vacant positions in direct service delivery areas.  Reducing the processing time to two weeks would improve the time required to fill those vacancies.

     

    This report recommends that the City enter into a memorandum of understanding between the City and Toronto Police Service for the provision of vulnerable sector police reference checks for successful applicants, current employees and volunteers of City Divisions and Agencies for the same fees as charged to the public. It also recommends that the Toronto Police Services Board delay the implementation of charging fees for vulnerable sector screening checks until September 1, 2014 to allow City Divisions and Agencies and Toronto Police Service time to develop administrative process to track requests and reconcile charges.

     

    City Divisions and Agencies will absorb the additional cost of vulnerable sector police reference checks in 2014.  For 2015, Divisions and Agencies will submit their full year estimates of these additional costs for consideration during the Operating Budget process.

     

    This report also outlines previous decisions related to the Toronto Police Service's Reference Check Program, provides a review of the proposed fees with respect to the City's User Fee Policy and assesses the financial impacts resulting from the changes proposed by the Toronto Police Service Board. 

    Background Information (Committee)
    (May 22, 2014) Supplementary Report from the City Manager on Fees for Vulnerable Sector Police Reference Checks
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69512.pdf
    (May 22, 2014) Appendix A - City of Toronto User Fee Policy
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69513.pdf
    (May 22, 2014) Appendix B - City of Toronto Police Reference Check Policy
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69515.pdf

    EX42.29 - Charging the City of Toronto for Police Reference Check Applications

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize City staff, in consultation with appropriate City Agencies, to enter into a memorandum of understanding between the City and the Toronto Police Service for the provision of vulnerable sector police reference checks for successful applicants, current employees or volunteers of City Divisions and Agencies for the same fees as charged to the public.

     

    2.         City Council direct City Divisions and direct or request City Agencies, as appropriate, to fund the full costs of vulnerable sector police reference checks so that the costs for this service are not borne by applicants, employees or volunteers.

     

    3.         City Council request Toronto Police Services Board to delay the implementation of charging City Divisions and Agencies fees for vulnerable sector screening until September 1, 2014, to allow City Divisions and Agencies and Toronto Police Services time to develop administrative processes to track requests and reconcile charges.

     

    4.         City Council receive the report (April 11, 2014) from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board for information.

    Origin

    (April 11, 2014) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to advise the Executive Committee that effective June 1, 2014, the City of Toronto will be charged for all applications that it submits to the Toronto Police Service – Police Reference Check Program for vulnerable sector screenings.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 11, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Chair, Police Services Board on Charging the City of Toronto for Police Reference Check Applications
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69236.pdf

    29a - Supplementary Report - Fees for Vulnerable Sector Police Reference Checks

    Origin
    (May 22, 2014) Report from the City Manager
    Summary

    This supplementary staff report is in response to two reports from the Toronto Police Services Board on the Toronto Police Service's Reference Check Program. The first report advises the Executive Committee that effective June 1, 2014 the Toronto Police Service will end their long standing practice of not charging the City of Toronto for vulnerable sector police reference checks. The second report requests that the Executive Committee approve the Board's recommendation to increase the fees that are currently charged by the Toronto Police Service for vulnerable sector police reference checks and to establish new fees for expedited checks performed by the Service.

     

    City Divisions and Agencies require approximately 4,500 vulnerable sector police reference checks per year for new and existing employees and volunteers, with current processing times by the Toronto Police Service of between four and twelve weeks. The large volume of requests and associated backlog impacted the ability to fill vacant positions in direct service delivery areas. Reducing the processing time to two weeks would improve the time required to fill those vacancies.

     

    This report recommends that the City enter into a memorandum of understanding between the City and Toronto Police Service for the provision of vulnerable sector police reference checks for successful applicants, current employees and volunteers of City Divisions and Agencies for the same fees as charged to the public. It also recommends that the Toronto Police Services Board delay the implementation of charging fees for vulnerable sector screening checks until September 1, 2014 to allow City Divisions and Agencies and Toronto Police Service time to develop administrative process to track requests and reconcile charges.

     

    City Divisions and Agencies will absorb the additional cost of vulnerable sector police reference checks in 2014. For 2015, Divisions and Agencies will submit their full year estimates of these additional costs for consideration during the Operating Budget process.

    This report also outlines previous decisions related to the Toronto Police Service's Reference Check Program, provides a review of the proposed fees with respect to the City's User Fee Policy and assesses the financial impacts resulting from the changes proposed by the Toronto Police Service Board. 

    Background Information (Committee)
    (May 22, 2014) Supplementary Report from the City Manager on Fees for Vulnerable Sector Police Reference Checks
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69559.pdf
    (May 22, 2014) Appendix A - City of Toronto User Fee Policy
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69573.pdf
    (May 22, 2014) Appendix B - City of Toronto Police Reference Check Policy
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69560.pdf

    EX42.33 - Restoration of Funding for Youth Employment Toronto Program

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EX42.33a for information)

    Committee Recommendations

    The Executive Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the City Manager to write to the Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development to strongly advocate for the restoration of this funding in 2015.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Executive Committee requested the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to report directly to Council on the service impact of the loss of Youth Employment Toronto and other youth employment services no longer funded by Employment and Social Development Canada.

    Origin

    (May 9, 2014) Letter from City Council

    Summary

    The Youth Employment Toronto is a job training program operated by Social Development, Finance and Administration. The program is delivered by six case workers, who work with youth aged 16-29 with physical disabilities, poor literacy, mental health challenges and histories of family conflict. Case workers are connected to dozens of partner agencies and work with clients to develop stabilization plans, pre-employment training, and ultimately steady employment. The program served almost 1,800 youth in 2013, with 255 finding steady employment and an additional 111 returning to school. The program has operated for almost 30 years.

     

    Approximately 85 percent of the program has been funded by a Federal grant from the Ministry of Human Resources and Skills Development, with the City paying for the remainder. The federal portion of funding has not been renewed for 2014, leaving a funding shortfall of approximately $400,000.

     

    With youth unemployment in Toronto a staggering 21.5 percent, action is needed now by the City and all levels of government to tackle the youth jobs crisis. Cutting youth employment programs at this time is not acceptable. While the City should not be forced to fund downloaded programs from higher orders of government, the lack of employment opportunity for youth in Toronto represents an exceptional circumstance which cannot be ignored.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on May 6 and 7, 2014 as MM51.28)

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 9, 2014) Letter from City Council on Restoration of Funding for Youth Employment Toronto Program
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-69260.pdf

    Background Information (City Council)

    (June 3, 2014) Supplementary report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Impact of Lost Employment and Social Development Canada Funding on Youth (EX42.33a)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70134.pdf

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 27, 2014) Submission from Tim Maguire, CUPE Local 79 (EX.New.ex42.33.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-47758.pdf
    (May 26, 2014) E-mail from Clare Nobbs, Supporting Our Youth (EX.New.ex42.33.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-47759.pdf

    Audit Committee - Meeting 15

    AU15.1 - Auditor General's Office - Report on the Results of Applying Specified Auditing Procedures to Financial Information other than Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2013

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Audit Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council receive the letter (April 15, 2014) from Hilborn LLP, for information.

    Origin

    (April 15, 2014) Letter from Hilborn, LLP

    Summary

    Hilborn, LLP, reporting on the Results of Applying Specified Auditing Procedures to Financial Information, other than Financial Statements, for the Year Ended December 31, 2013, for the Auditor General's Office; and advising that they found no exceptions to the adherence to the policies, procedures and delegated authorities as they applied to their test sample of transactions.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 15, 2014) Letter from Hilborn, LLP, regarding the Auditor General's Office - Report on the Results of Applying Specified Auditing Procedures to Financial Information other than Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2013
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-68512.pdf

    AU15.3 - Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts

    Consideration Type:
    Presentation
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    The Auditor General has submitted two supplementary reports on this Item (AU15.3b for information) and (AU15.3c with recommendations)

    The City Clerk has submitted a memorandum on this Item (AU15.3d)

    The City Manager has submitted the public minutes of the June 9th Sony Board meeting (AU15.3e)

    Communication AU15.3.1 and AU15.3.2 (confidential communication made public with redactions on June 11) have been submitted on this Item

    Confidential Attachment 1 on AU15.3c was made public with redactions on June 11, 2014

    Third item on Wednesday June 11, 2014

    Confidential Attachment - This report involves the security of property belonging to the City or one of its agencies and corporations. This report deals with personal matters about an identifiable person.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Audit Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         Given the seriousness of the findings of the Auditor General's Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre, the specific recommendation from the Auditor General to conduct a review of the Sony Centre's Operating Agreement with the City, the enormity of the challenge of addressing the Redevelopment and related issues, the burden this places on a part-time voluntary board, and recognizing that the Theatres Working Group is still underway, City Council take the following actions:

     

    a.         City Council remove all the current members of the Board of Directors of the Hummingbird (Sony) Centre Board of Directors and the Board of Directors of the Hummingbird Centre for the Performing Arts Corporation (Sony Centre), effective immediately.

     

    b.         City Council appoint an interim Board of Directors for the Hummingbird (Sony) Centre, and the Board of Directors of the Hummingbird Centre for the Performing Arts Corporation (Sony Centre) effectively immediately, composed of:

     

    -           Councillor Gary Crawford, as Chair;

    -           Councillor Pam McConnell;

    -           Councillor Shelley Carroll;

    -           the City Manager, or his or her designate;

    -           the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A or her or his designate; and

                -           the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer or his or her designate,

     

    such appointments to be in effect until November 30, 2014 and until successors are appointed.

     

    2.         City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Board of Directors of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts, to conduct a comprehensive review of the Centre's operating agreement following any Council decision on the future of the Centre.

     

    3.         City Council request the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to re-evaluate the role of the City's Facilities Management Division in all future construction projects at the City's agencies and corporations.

     

    4.         City Council request the City Manager to make available a centralized resource containing City of Toronto Act requirements and City policies and procedures that City agencies and corporations are required to follow.

     

    5.         City Council request the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer review transactions reported in the financial statements of the City's agencies and corporations which relate to the capital works program recorded in the City's accounts.

     

    6.         City Council request the City Manager to report to the Audit Committee on proposed changes to its annual review of financial statements of Agencies and Corporations which will identify unusual transactions and the appropriateness of the accounting for these financial transactions.

     

    7.         City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Auditor General, to communicate to boards of City agencies and corporations those reports from the Auditor General that have general applicability, and to include those reports along with relevant City Policies as part of the materials to be made available as outlined in the Action Plan with respect to Recommendation 3 of the Auditor General's Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts.

     

    8.         City Council request the Auditor General to report to the first meeting of the Audit Committee in 2015, on the status of Recommendations 2 and 3 contained in his report (April 24, 2014).

     

    9.         City Council request the City Manager to forward this report to the Boards of Directors of the Toronto Centre for the Arts and the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts for information. 

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Audit Committee:

     

    1.         Requested the Auditor General to report directly to City Council for its meeting on June 10, 2014, on any management practices at the Sony Centre that have been uncovered in any related audits or investigations in which the City has been involved.

     

    2.         Requested the City Manager:

     

    a.         to obtain a copy of the public agenda and background materials for the upcoming Sony Board Meeting on June 9, 2014 and forward the material to all Members of Council; and

     

    b.         to obtain a copy of the public minutes for the Sony Board Meeting of June 9, 2014 for submission to City Council as part of its consideration of this item on June 10, 2014.

     

    The Auditor General made a presentation to the Audit Committee on the Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts.

    Origin

    (May 1, 2014) Letter from the Board of Directors, Hummingbird (Sony) Centre for the Performing Arts

    Summary

    The Board of Directors of the Hummingbird (Sony) Centre for the Performing Arts, on May 1, 2014, considered a report (April 24, 2024) from the Auditor General, headed "Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts". 

     

    The Board endorsed Recommendations for City Council (Recommendations 1, 2, 3, 12 and 14), and directed that the report be forwarded to the Audit Committee.

     

    In addition, the Board adopted the following:

     

    1.         The Board of Directors of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts, in consultation with the City Manager, prepare a long-term strategic plan and a five-year business plan as requested by City Council.  Such plan to include strategies to improve operating results, as well as a funding plan for the capital program.

     

    2.         The Board of Directors of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts, ensure that where a business plan is amended or discontinued, that a replacement plan be prepared and presented for City Council approval.  Such business plan, and any subsequent amendments, be consistent with any Council-approved strategic objectives for the Centre.

     

    3.         The Board of Directors of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts request the Chief Executive Officer to report the total funding received from all sources as well as the total of all costs related to all phases of the redevelopment.

     

    4.         The Board of Directors of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts request the Chief Executive Officer to report on the status of required and optional deferred lifecycle maintenance works identified in previous building condition review reports.  Such report to include:

     

    a.         Explanations for why work originally anticipated was omitted from the redevelopment.

     

    b.         Identification of required and optional lifecycle maintenance works that have been included in the current 10-year Capital Plan.

     

    c.         Estimates of the cost to complete the remaining work.

     

    5.         The Board of Directors of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts request the Chief Executive Officer submit for Board approval a comprehensive procurement policy.  The development of this policy be conducted in consultation with the City Manager.  The procurement policy to include but not be limited to:

     

    a.         Acceptable methods of procurement including appropriate dollar value thresholds for requiring open, competitive procurement.

     

    b.         Circumstances where sole sourcing is allowed and the reporting requirements and authorizations required to approve sole source awards.

     

    c.         Approval authorities required where purchases exceed previously authorized commitment levels.

     

    d.         The level of documentation required to be retained in support of procurement decisions.

     

    6.         The Board of Directors of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts request the Chief Executive Officer to review the administrative controls over the procurement process and ensure that such controls are appropriate.  In addition, an internal quality control process be established to ensure compliance with such controls.

     

    7.         The Board of Directors of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts request the Chief Executive Officer to implement processes to ensure future compliance with the City's Policy on Donations to the City for Community Benefits.

     

    8.         The Board of Directors of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts request the Chief Executive Officer to confirm the appropriate accounting treatment of identified transactions with the Centre's external auditors.

     

    The Board also:

     

    -           Requested the Chair to call a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Hummingbird Centre for the Performing Arts to further consider the report (April 24, 2014) from the Auditor General and possible additional recommendations.

     

    -           Requested that representatives from the City Solicitor, the Chief Corporate Officer, and the City Manager's offices be invited to attend the Special Meeting of the Board to respond to questions, in particular, regarding the proposed Public Plaza.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 1, 2014) Decision Letter from the Board of Directors, Hummingbird (Sony) Centre for the Performing Arts, regarding the Auditor General's Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-69061.pdf
    (April 24, 2014) Report from the Auditor General, headed "Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts"
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-69062.pdf
    (May 28, 2014) Presentation Material submitted by the Auditor General (AU15.3b)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-69656.pdf

    Background Information (City Council)

    (June 2, 2014) Supplementary report from the Auditor General on Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts: Supplemental Information Regarding Donations (AU15.3b)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70355.pdf
    (June 4, 2014) Supplementary report from the Auditor General on Additional Information Pertaining to the Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts (AU15.3c)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70356.pdf
    (June 4, 2014) Confidential attachment 1 to AU15.3c made public with redactions on June 11, 2014
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70515.pdf
    (June 9, 2014) Memorandum from the City Clerk on Item AU15.3 - citizen resignations from the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts (AU15.3d)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70361.pdf
    Attachment to memorandum from City Clerk - letter dated June 5, 2014 from Mr. Ron Forbes
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70338.pdf
    (June 10, 2014) Letter from the City Manager on the Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts (AU15.3e)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70396.pdf
    Attachment to AU15.3e - Minutes of the Sony Board meeting scheduled for June 9, 2014
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70397.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 1, 2014) Letter from Ron Forbes, Chair, Sony Centre for the Performing Arts Board of Directors (CC.Main.AU15.3.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47853.pdf
    (June 9, 2014) Submission from Sony Centre Management - Redacted communication previously submitted as confidential in its entirety (CC.Supp.AU15.3.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47934.pdf

    3a - Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts

    Origin
    (May 23, 2014) Letter from the Board of Directors, Hummingbird (Sony) Centre for the Performing Arts
    Summary

    The Board of Directors of the Hummingbird (Sony) Centre for the Performing Arts, on May 23, 2014, further considered the report (April 24, 2024) from the Auditor General, headed "Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts".

     

    The Board forwarded one Recommendation to the Audit Committee for consideration.

     

    In addition, the Board:

     

    1.         Requested the Chief Executive Officer to submit the report requested in Recommendation 7 of the report (April 24, 2014) from the Auditor General to the Board for its next meeting on June 9, 2014.

     

    2.         Requested the Chief Executive Officer to report to the next meeting of the Board on June 9, 2014, on all expenditures incurred in the $3.4 million Sony Centre Business Plan.

     

    3.         Requested the Auditor General to report to the next meeting of the Board on June 9, 2014, if possible, on any other issues or matters he has identified which were outside of the scope of the redevelopment review of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts.

     

    4.         Requested the developer of the L tower, Mr Alfredo Romano (Castlepoint), to assume, at his own expense, the cost of overseeing the construction of the public plaza, at no cost to the Sony Centre, and that he report back to the Board for its next meeting on June 9, 2014, on three quotes for the reconstruction of the public plaza.

     

    5.         Deferred consideration of Motion 1 by Councillor McConnell until the next meeting of the Board on June 9, 2014:

     

    "It is recommended that:

     

    1.         All Board meeting dates, times, and locations be published on the City's website.

     

    2.         All Board meetings be open and accessible to the public, except portions where closed session is required.

     

    3.         All Board meeting agendas and reports be posted on the City's website one week before the scheduled meeting.

     

    4.         All past Board agendas, reports, and meeting minutes from January 2007 to the present be posted on the City's website."

    Background Information (Committee)
    (May 23, 2014) Decision Letter from the Board of Directors, Hummingbird (Sony) Centre for the Performing Arts, regarding the Auditor General's Review of the Redevelopment of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-69606.pdf

    AU15.4 - Auditor General's Status Report on 2014 Audit Work Plan

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Audit Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council receive for information the Auditor General’s status report (April 29, 2014) on the 2014 Audit Work Plan.

    Origin

    (April 29, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to provide the status of the Auditor General's 2014 Audit Work Plan to the Audit Committee and City Council.  The status of individual audit projects included in 2014 Audit Work Plan is attached as Appendix 1 to this report.

     

    For 2014, there are no scheduled Audit Committee meetings after June 27, 2014.  Consequently all audits completed after June 2014 will be reported in 2015.

     

    The 2014 Audit Work Plan provides a balance of audit work that will result in improving overall City operations by identifying potential risks, strengthening management controls, improving accountability and enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of City services.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 29, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Status Report on 2014 Audit Work Plan
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-69292.pdf

    AU15.6 - Continuous Controls Monitoring Program - 12-Month Review of City Staff Absenteeism, 2013

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Audit Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council receive the report (May 5, 2014) from the Auditor General for information.

    Origin

    (May 5, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

    Summary

    The Auditor General’s Work Plan includes the development of a system of continuous controls monitoring for selected City expenses.  The Continuous Controls Monitoring Program was initiated in 2011.  Initial expenses selected for continuous monitoring were employee overtime and mileage reimbursements.  In 2012, the program was expanded to include standby pay. 

     

    In January 2013, the Auditor General further expanded the program to include staff absences.  Our review includes staff absences resulting from staff sick time, sick time for staff dependents and bereavement.  In July 2013, we presented our first report on staff absenteeism covering the period January 1 to December 31, 2012.  The report is available at:  http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59791.pdf 

     

    The objective of the Continuous Controls Monitoring Program is to provide periodic reports to management which assist in proactively monitoring financial transactions, detecting unusual expenses and identifying areas where internal controls could be strengthened. 

     

    This current report includes the results of our analysis of staff absenteeism due to sickness, sick dependent and bereavement time for over 35,000 City employees during 2013.  The purpose of our analysis is to review absentee trends and costs and provide management with exceptions warranting further review. 

     

    Our analysis indicates that 2013 paid staff absences declined by $8.7 million or nine per cent when compared with 2012.

     

    Staff absences have a direct impact on divisional productivity and staff costs.  Additional staff costs result from staff replacement and overtime costs. 

     

    Staff absentee information is provided to management in the form of exception reports on a periodic basis for comment and follow-up on unusual instances.  A summary of management comments received on the reports for 2013 is provided in the ‘Comments’ section of this report. 

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 5, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Continuous Controls Monitoring Program - 12-Month Review of City Staff Absenteeism, 2013
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-69293.pdf

    AU15.7 - Review of 2015 Pan American/Parapan American Games’ Capital Projects

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Audit Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council receive the report (April 17, 2014) from the Auditor General for information.

    Origin

    (April 17, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

    Summary

    The Auditor General’s 2013 Work Plan included a review of capital projects approved by Council in preparation for the 2015 Pan American/Parapan American Games.

     

    In November 2009 the City of Toronto was selected to host the 2015 Pan American/Parapan American Games.  Council approved funding of $96 million as the City’s contribution for a festival site at Nathan Phillips Square, a new sports centre and upgrades to City-owned assets to be used as training and competitive venues during the 2015 Games.

     

    By the end of December 31, 2013 expenditures of approximately $38.7 million have been recorded for work performed on 10 capital projects.

     

    The objective of this review was to assess the adequacy of management practices and level of due diligence exercised over project deliverables, City contributions and payments.

     

    Based on our review, it is our view that staff are appropriately managing the capital projects for which they are responsible.  Payments made by the City for costs incurred and invoices sent to third parties for reimbursement receive an adequate and appropriate level of management review and approval and are in accordance with third-party funding agreements.

     

    We did identify certain minor administrative issues which need to be addressed.  These issues have not been included in this report.  We have discussed these matters with management who have agreed to make the necessary improvements to practices and procedures.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 17, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Review of 2015 Pan American/Parapan American Games’ Capital Projects
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-69291.pdf

    AU15.9 - Paid Duty Police Officers

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Communication AU15.9.1 has been received on this item

    Committee Recommendations

    The Audit Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Government of Ontario to review the Ontario Highway Traffic Act, 1990 to provide the City of Toronto with accommodation to allow for the direction of traffic to be conducted by a "peace officer" as is legal in the Province of British Columbia.

     

    2.         City Council request the Government of Ontario to replace the term "police officer" with the term "peace officer" in section 134(1) of the Ontario Highway Traffic Act, 1990 – Direction of traffic by police officer.

     

    3.         City Council request the City Manager to engage in discussions with the Province as directed in Item AU10.16 - Toronto Police Service: Response to Recommendation Pertaining to the Vancouver Traffic Authority’s Program as an Alternative to Toronto’s Current Paid Duty System.

    Origin

    (May 28, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22 - St. Paul's

    Summary

    Submitting recommendations regarding paid duty police officers.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 28, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22 - St. Paul's, regarding Paid Duty Police Officers
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-69658.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 12, 2014) E-mail from Miguel avila-velarde (CC.New.AU15.9.1)

    Board of Health - Meeting 31

    HL31.2 - Advancing Active Transportation in Toronto: Findings from Four Demonstration Projects

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Board Recommendations

    The Board of Health recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council, on the basis of community requests received by Toronto Public Health, request the General Manager, Transportation Services to conduct a site assessment of the Black Creek Community Farm across from Hullmar Drive on the east side of Jane Street, and to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on:

     

    a.         traffic interventions to improve road safety and access for road users travelling to the Black Creek Community Farm as cyclists and pedestrians; and

     

    b.         the installation of a traffic signal at Hullmar Drive and Jane Street, for residents accessing the farm from neighbourhood and from the TTC stop on the west side of Jane Street.

     

    2.         City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in collaboration with the Medical Officer of Health, to review the actions identified by the community to provide local improvements for active transportation in the North York Centre and the Cliffside Study Areas and to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on specific actions, including service requests, to address these issues.

    Board Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Board of Health:

     

    1.         Requested the Medical Officer of Health to continue to collaborate with the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on key initiatives intended to improve road safety and encourage walking and cycling, including:

     

    a.         the development of Complete Street Guidelines for the City of Toronto; and

    b.         the review of transportation policies in the Official Plan.

     

    2.         Requested the Medical Officer of Health to collaborate with the Executive Director, Social Development Finance and Administration to encourage consideration of active transportation as an investment priority through the Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020.

     

    3.         Requested the Medical Officer of Health, in collaboration with the General Manager, Transportation Services, to explore ways to coordinate community input to indentify and implement local safety priorities and evaluate the resulting safety-traffic interventions.

     

    4.         Encouraged the provincial government elect to reintroduce Bill 173, Highway Traffic Amendment Act (Keeping Ontario's Roads Safe Act) tabled on March 17, 2014.

     

    5.         Forwarded the report (May 8, 2014) from the Medical Officer of Health to:

     

    a.         The Ontario Ministers of Health and Long-Term Care and Transportation;

    b.         Metrolinx;

    c.         The Canadian Diabetes Association, the Canadian Public Health Association, the Ontario Public Health Association, the Heart and Stroke Foundation, the Ontario Medical Association, the Ontario Public Health Association, the Toronto Cancer Prevention Coalition - Occupational and Environmental Health Working Group, the Urban Public Health Network;

    d.         The Canadian Institute of Planners, the Canadian Urban Institute, the Ontario Professional Planners Institute;

    e.         8-80 Cities, Civic Action, Clean Air Partnership, Cycle Toronto, the Toronto Cycling Think and Do Tank and Toronto Centre for Active Transportation; and

    f.          The Dean of the University of Toronto, Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, and the Dean of York University, Faculty of Physical Education.

    Origin

    (May 8, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health

    Summary

    In June 2013, an update to the Board of Health (BOH) was provided on the development of four Active Transportation Demonstration Projects to explore the feasibility, sustainability and potential impact of implementing recommendations made in the Road to Health report. Toronto Public Health (TPH) in collaboration with community partners engaged four neighbourhoods – Black Creek, Annex, North York and Cliffside – in the identification of community needs and preferences for pedestrian and cycling infrastructure changes and potential barriers to their implementation. This report outlines the findings from these four demonstration projects and highlights opportunities to further support active transportation in Toronto.

     

    While the four neighbourhoods had unique sociodemographic characteristics, built forms and patterns of walking and cycling, several common themes emerged. Recurring community-identified safety concerns and constraints to active transportation included: real and perceived risks related to traffic speed and volumes, limitations in street design and accessibility, and limited network connections. Common challenges to making changes in support of active transportation included: competing interests and priorities, funding and implementing community-identified improvements, and engaging communities in active transportation decision-making. Overall, the findings from community engagement are well-supported by existing health evidence and practice-based examples from other jurisdictions.

     

    Ongoing City of Toronto and provincial policies and plans provide key windows for expanding active transportation infrastructure and improving safety and accessibility for all street users in the city. The Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy could further support the City and communities through investments in locally-driven active transportation initiatives. Moving forward, TPH will continue to work with local partners to ensure that community-identified suggestions for local active transportation improvements are considered, and will continue to collaborate with other City divisions and stakeholders on key policies and plans to advance active transportation in Toronto.

    Background Information (Board)

    (May 8, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health on Advancing Active Transportation in Toronto: Findings from Four Demonstration Projects
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-69321.pdf
    (November 20, 2013) Active Transportation Summit Summary Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-69811.pdf

    Speakers

    Nancy Smith Lea, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation
    Jared Kolb, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto

    Communications (Board)

    (May 27, 2014) Letter from Nancy Smith Lea, Director, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (TCAT), Clean Air Partnership (HL.New.HL31.2.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/comm/communicationfile-47786.pdf

    Community Development and Recreation Committee - Meeting 29

    CD29.1 - Feasibility of 24-Hour Drop-in Service for Women

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to issue a Request for Expression of Interest (REOI) in 2014 to establish community interest in operating up to two 24-hour low-barrier drop-ins for women, one in the east end and one in the west end of the city; and

     

    2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to prepare a report to the August 6, 2014 Budget Committee for their consideration on the results of the REOI, feasibility of the service, and estimated program costs and tax impacts, with a view to have one or two 24-hour low-barrier drop-ins for women established no later than December 2014.

    Origin

    (April 3, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

    Summary

    Due to lack of quorum, this item was not completed at the Committee's meeting on April 17, 2014 (Item CD28.2), and is now brought forward for completion.

     

    This report provides recommendations on the feasibility of establishing a 24-hour drop-in for women, based upon consultations conducted with service users and providers from December to March 2014.

     

    An update report on the need and consultation process for developing a safe overnight space for women was received by Community Development and Recreation Committee on January 21, 2014. Currently, there are very few places for women to go overnight, particularly if they will not go to shelters, or if they need respite for a short period of time.

     

    A majority of those consulted agreed that there is a need for a low-threshold overnight or 24-hour service for women.  A drop-in that is open during the most dangerous times for street-involved women, when other services are closed, will meet basic safety needs and provide identified essential service needs including showers, laundry, provision of healthy food and snacks, counselling and referrals. The recent consultations indicate the service philosophy must incorporate low-barrier, harm reduction, trauma-informed care.

     

    A majority suggest that a 24-hour drop-in will best meet the need for a low-barrier overnight service for women.  While a stand-alone 24-hour drop-in is the most appropriate service model to meet the needs of the most vulnerable street-involved women, enhancing a current drop-in to provide overnight services represents another viable option.

     

    Regardless of the option to be pursued, however, there will be a cost impact to expanding services that will be a challenge to implement if there is a desire or expectation to keep property tax increases at or around the rate of inflation.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 3, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 and 2 from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on the Feasibility of 24-Hour Drop-in Service for Women
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69028.pdf
    (April 2, 2014) Attachment 3 - 24/7 Drop-in Service for Women: Stakeholder Consultations Executive Summary
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69029.pdf

    Speakers

    (April 17, 2014) Tina Haynes, St. Stephens Community House
    (April 17, 2014) Norma Neal, Regent Park Community Health Centre (Submission Filed)
    (April 17, 2014) Cherie Miller, Regent Park Community Health Centre
    (April 17, 2014) Cara Heitmann, Women's Safety Committee for Downtown East Side
    (April 17, 2014) Sushi Rosborough, Street Health
    (April 17, 2014) Liisa Schofield, Ontario Coalition Against Poverty
    (April 17, 2014) Jolene Heida, Social Worker, PROS c/o All Saints Community Centre
    (April 17, 2014) Jean McDonald, Administrative Coordinator, Maggie's - Toronto Sex Worker Action Project
    (April 17, 2014) Monica Forrester, Maggies
    (April 17, 2014) Susan Gapka
    (April 17, 2014) Carol Danis Tina-Marie Painter, Sistering

    Communications (Committee)

    (April 14, 2014) Letter from Dr. Kara Santonkie, Project Director, Toronto Women's City Alliance (CD.Main.CD29.1.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-47045.pdf
    (April 17, 2014) Letter from Wendy Komiotis, Executive Director, METRAC (CD.Main.CD29.1.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-47043.pdf
    (April 16, 2014) E-mail from Eric Cashmore (CD.Main.CD29.1.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-47020.pdf
    (April 16, 2014) Letter from Tina Haynes, c/o Toronto Community Addiction Team (CD.Main.CD29.1.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-47041.pdf
    (April 17, 2014) Letter from Linsey MacPhee, Manager, Toronto Drop in Network (CD.Main.CD29.1.5)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-47042.pdf
    (April 17, 2014) Submission from Norma Neal, Regent Park Community Health Centre (CD.Main.CD29.1.6)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-47044.pdf

    CD29.2 - City Support for the Red Door Shelter

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    30 - Toronto-Danforth
    Attention
    The General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (CD29.2a for information)

    Communications CD29.2.2 and CD29.2.3 have been submitted on this Item.

    First Item on Wednesday June 11

    Committee Recommendations

    The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council support the Red Door Shelter in its efforts should it seek to establish its new home within any development of the property, relocate to a new property on Queen Street East, or undertake to establish a title claim to the property;

     

    2.         City Council direct the City Manager and Deputy City Managers explore all mechanisms, including financial options, which can be used to maintain the continuity of the services provided by the Red Door Shelter on Queen Street East; and

     

    3.         City Council direct the City Manager to assist the Red Door Shelter in finding a temporary location should the redevelopment include the shelter at 875 Queen Street East.

    Origin

    (April 10, 2014) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher

    Summary

    Due to lack of quorum, this item was not considered at the Committee's meeting on April 17, 2014 (Item CD28.11), and is now brought forward for consideration.

     

    The Red Door Shelter has been providing support to families in need of emergency shelter for over 30 years. Due to a real estate deal gone wrong the shelter is now in danger of losing its home. The property has been put into receivership with a mandate to be sold, with no provisions in place to guarantee the shelter is maintained within any new development.

     

    Family shelters provide critical services to women and children fleeing abuse, to refugees in need of assistance, and to families fallen on hard times. The Red Door Shelter is very important to the City of Toronto's family shelter network, and its 106 beds are much needed. Deputy City Manager Brenda Patterson has been very helpful in working with the shelter to provide assistance in trying to resolve this issue, and the City has shown great commitment to this stellar service provider in our community.

     

    On April 7th, over 300 residents gathered at an emergency meeting in support of the Red Door Shelter, voicing full support for keeping the shelter in its home. Many communities fight against shelters in their neighbourhoods, and I am so proud of my community for rallying to keep the shelter in their backyard. Everyone feels the Red Door is an important part of our community and over 16,000 people have signed a petition in support of the shelter.

     

    Former Mayor David Crombie attended the emergency meeting and heard from residents how important this shelter is to them. Mr. Crombie has volunteered his services to work with all parties to come to a positive resolution that keeps the shelter at this site.

     

    The community asked me to express their strong desire for City to continue to assist the Red Door in any way possible, including with financial assistance.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 10, 2014) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 30, Toronto-Danforth on the City Support for the Red Door Shelter
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69066.pdf

    Background Information (City Council)

    (June 3, 2014) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on Red Door Shelter Update (CD29.2a)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70144.pdf

    Speakers

    Bernnitta Hawkins, Executive Director, WoodGreen Red Door Family Shelter
    Councillor Peter Leon

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 21, 2014) Letter from Bernnitta Hawkins, Executive Director, WoodGreen Red Door Family Shelter (CD.New.CD29.2.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-47691.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 8, 2014) E-mail from John Deacon (CC.Supp.CD29.2.2)
    (June 10, 2014) Submission from Maria Villarreal (CC.New.CD29.2.3)
    (June 11, 2014) Petition from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 30 - Toronto-Danforth, containing the names of approximately 10,000 persons, filed during the routine matters portion of the meeting (CC.New)
    (June 11, 2014) Petition from Councillor Shelley Carroll, Ward 33 - Don Valley East, containing the names of approximately 10,000 persons, filed during the routine matters portion of the meeting (CC.New)
    (June 11, 2014) Petition from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Ward 27 - Toronto Centre - Rosedale, containing the names of approximately 10,000 persons, filed during the routine matters portion of the meeting (CC.New)
    (June 11, 2014) Petition from Councillor Peter Leon, Ward 3 - Etobicoke Centre, containing the names of approximately 10,000 persons, filed during the routine matters portion of the meeting (CC.New)
    (June 11, 2014) Petition from Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, Ward 40 - Scarborough Agincourt, containing the names of approximately 10,000 persons, filed during the routine matters portion of the meeting (CC.New)

    CD29.3 - Contract Award - Request for Proposal No. 0513-13-7010 for the Toronto Preschool Speech and Language Program

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council, in accordance with Section 195-15 of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195 (Purchasing By-Law), grant the Medical Officer of Health authority to negotiate and enter into service agreements in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor with the following five proponents being the highest scoring proponents per geographic service area and meeting the requirements of Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 0513-13-7010, for a period of fifteen (15) months from January 1, 2015 to March 31, 2016 with the option to renew for four (4) additional one (1) year periods at the sole discretion of the Medical Officer of Health and subject to 100% Ministry of Children and Youth Services (MCYS) funding, based on the terms in the RFP for the potential costs as stated below.

     

    Geographic Service Area

    Proponent

    Cost

    West

    The George Hull Centre for Children and Families

    $1,107,427.00

    Northwest

    Macaulay Child Development Centre

    $   970,724.00

    Northeast

    Adventure Place

    $1,079,872.15

    East

    Aisling Discoveries Child and Family Centre

    $1,060,000.00

    South

    The Hanen Centre

    $1,145,503.00

     

    2.         City Council grant the Medical Officer of Health authority to negotiate with Ministry of Children and Youth Services to secure additional funds to support transition costs, and to negotiate any necessary modifications to the terms of the service agreements to support the transition, subject to additional Ministry of Children and Youth Services (MCYS) funding.

    Origin

    (April 3, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health and Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

    Summary

    Due to lack of quorum, this item was not considered at the Committee's meeting on April 17, 2014 (Item CD28.3), and is now brought forward for consideration.

     

    The purpose of this report is to obtain authority to enter into agreements with five recommended proponents based on the results of the Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 0513-13-7010, for Toronto Preschool Speech and Language Program service delivery on behalf of Toronto Public Health (TPH).

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 3, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Medical Officer of Health and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division on the Contract Award - Request for Proposal No. 0513-13-7010 for the Toronto Preschool Speech and Language Program
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69050.pdf

    Speakers

    Russ Ford, LAMP Community Health Centre

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 21, 2014) Letter from Russ Ford, Executive Director, LAMP Community Health Centre (CD.New.CD29.3.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-47692.pdf

    CD29.5 - Schools-First Child Care Capital Retrofit - Updates Phase 2 and 3

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council receive the report (May 7, 2014) from the General Manager, Children's Services for information. 

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Community Development and Recreation Committee requested the General Manager, Children's Services to report to the June 25, 2014 meeting of the Community Development and Recreation Committee on progress made on the master lease agreements and identify any new areas of concern and inconsistency which have arisen since the City Council decisions in July 2013, including any issues arising from the updated Early Learning and Care Assessment for Quality Improvement (ELCAQI) and curriculum tools.

    Origin

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Children's Services

    Summary

    This report responds to City Council's request that staff provide a summary of the approved and recommended child care capital allocations, locations, age-groups served and number of spaces under the Schools-First Child Care Capital Retrofit Policy.  As reported to Council in February 2014, funding under the Schools-First Child Care Capital Retrofit Policy is to retrofit licensed child care spaces in schools that are made available as a result of four and five year olds attending Full-Day Kindergarten (FDK).  These spaces are to be retrofitted to create licensed space for younger children.

     

    Children's Services has been working with school boards to increase licensed space for the infant and toddler age groups.  When implemented, this program will create 230 infant spaces and 710 toddler spaces in the TDSB schools. Plans with the TCDSB are still being finalized and will be reported at a later date.

     

    The report also updates Council on discussions with TDSB regarding the creation of a master lease agreement governing before- and after-school programs associated with FDK.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 7, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the General Manager, Children's Services on the Schools-First Child Care Capital Retrofit - Updates Phase 2 and 3
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69245.pdf

    CD29.6 - Authorization to Accept Donations from the Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment (MLSE) Foundation for Various Park and Recreation Projects

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Community Development and Recreation recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council delegate authority to the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to accept donations of up to $600,000 from the Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment (MLSE) Foundation in 2014 and to spend these donated funds to undertake various arena, outdoor rink, sports field and program enhancement projects, in accordance with the “Policy on Donations to the City for Community Benefits”.

     

    2          City Council authorize the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to enter into an agreement with the Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment (MLSE) Foundation to spend the donated funds on mutually identified refurbishment projects on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

    Origin

    (May 2, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to seek approval from City Council to authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to accept donations from the MLSE Foundation in 2014 for various Parks, Forestry and Recreation revitalization projects. Projects will include arena and outdoor artificial ice rink refurbishments, outdoor court refurbishments and other revitalization projects identified by the MLSE Foundation throughout the year subject to the approval of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and in accordance with the “Policy on Donations to the City for Community Benefits".

     

    The goals and objectives of the MLSE Foundation are in keeping with Parks, Forestry and Recreation’s mandate to provide recreation opportunities and enhance and protect Toronto's public green spaces. These objectives are also aligned with strategic goals in the Parks Plan (adopted by City Council on May 7, 2013) and the Recreation Service Plan, (adopted by City Council on November 29, 2012).

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 2, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on the Authorization to Accept Donations from the MLSE Foundation for Various Park and Recreation Projects
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69067.pdf
    (May 2, 2014) Attachment 1 - Letter from MLSE Foundation
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69068.pdf

    CD29.8 - Authority to Dispose of End-of-Life, Surplus Fire Fighting Equipment

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council grant the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services, the authority to declare personal protective equipment utilized by Toronto Fire Services as surplus to present and future divisional and corporate requirements, and to dispose of the personal protective equipment by donation where: the Fire Chief is satisfied the surplus personal protective equipment has no appreciable resale value; the personal protective equipment does not meet the applicable North American standard; the recipient is not governed by North American standards; the recipient undertakes to bear all costs and liabilities associated with the donation, and executes indemnity and waiver agreements with the City, such agreements to be in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor;

     

    2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services to execute indemnity and waiver agreements with the appropriate officials receiving the donated items, on behalf of the City, such agreements to be in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor; and

     

    3.         City Council direct the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services to report annually on donation grants to City Council through the Community Development and Recreation Committee.

    Origin

    (March 31, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services

    Summary

    Due to lack of quorum, this item was not considered at the Committee's meeting on April 17, 2014 (Item CD28.6), and is now brought forward for consideration.

     

    This report seeks City Council approval to authorize the Fire Chief to dispose of, through donation, end-of-life, surplus firefighting equipment, which no longer meets the guidelines applicable to Toronto Fire Services operations. This surplus inventory consists of bunker suits, helmets and fire fighting boots, and has no residual value in North America.

     

    The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Guideline 1851 regulates the lifecycle of the Toronto Fire Services' personal protective equipment, such as bunker suits, helmets and fire fighting boots. Under NFPA Guideline 1851, the Toronto Fire Services like all other fire services which follow NFPA guidelines, are required to retire personal protective equipment from service no more than ten years from the date of manufacture.

     

    The surplus inventory of personal protective equipment has no residual value in North America.  However, the City often receives requests from non-profit groups, agencies or municipal officials in other jurisdictions not subject to NFPA Guideline 1851 for donations of surplus personal protective equipment. Many fire services in developing countries have trained staff, but may have very limited resources to provide personal protective equipment to fire fighters.

     

    The City of Toronto will not be responsible for any costs associated with any donation of used or end-of-life firefighting equipment. Recipients of these donations will be responsible for all costs and liabilities associated with the donation and transporting of the items.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (March 31, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services on the Authority to Dispose of End-of-Life, Surplus Fire Fighting Equipment
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69052.pdf

    Speakers

    Richard Majkot, Executive Director, COTAPSA (Submission Filed)

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 22, 2014) Letter from Mayor of Municipality of Plovdiv and Governor of Plovdiv District, Bulgaria addressed to the Mayor, City Manager and Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services, submitted by Richard Majkot, Executive Director of COTAPSA (CD.New.CD29.8.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-47070.pdf

    CD29.10 - Toronto Newcomer Strategy, 2014 - 2016 Implementation

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council adopt the Integrating Cities Charter, included in Attachment 2 of the report (April 2, 2014) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and direct that Toronto become a signatory of the Charter;

     

    2.         City Council declare the day of the signing ceremony as Newcomer Day in Toronto;

     

    3.         City Council approve the implementation of the new activities outlined in the report (April 2, 2014) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration , including an anti-rumour campaign in Toronto and annual Newcomer Fair;

     

    4.         City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, in consultation with the Newcomer Leadership Table, to continue to monitor the implementation of the Toronto Newcomer Strategy and provide annual progress reports to the Community Development and Recreation Committee;

     

    5.         City Council request the Federal Government to:

    a.         remove from Bill C-24 the amendment that eliminates the inclusion of pre-permanent residency time towards citizenship requirement for immigrants and refugees including Live-in-Caregivers, International Students, as well as those selected through the Provincial Nominee Program, and the Canadian Experience Class;

    b.         amend Bill C-24 and recognize up to four years of pre-permanent residency time to be counted towards the citizenship requirement;

    c.         give full credit (i.e., 1:1) to pre-permanent residency time spent within Canada;

    d.         implement a 3-year transition period for coming into force of Bill C-24;

    e.         delete from Bill C-24 the provision of intention to reside in Canada, the provision of new grounds for citizenship revocation, and the provision of restriction of access to the federal court;

    f.          keep the language knowledge requirement to the current age group in the Citizenship Act (18-54 years old);

    g.         reverse in Bill C-24 the application fee increase; and

    h.         restore citizenship rights in Bill C-24 for second generation Canadians born abroad.

    6.         City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A to engage with the Newcomer Leadership Table, and other stakeholders, to better understand and assess other impacts of the proposed changes to the Canadian Citizenship Act on Torontonians, settlement service providers, City services and other stakeholders; and

     

    7.         City Council adopt the recommendations of the Immigrant Friendly City Project, listed below, and direct the City Manager to report on a plan for the implementation of those recommendation at the February, 2015 meeting of the Community Development and Recreation Committee including the financial implications of the recommendations, as part of the Toronto Newcomer Strategy.

     

    "Recommendations of the Immigrant Friendly City Project:

     

    Recommendation 1: That the City of Toronto adopt a charter committing it to equity in access to service, inclusion in society, and the enjoyment of economic and social benefits by all residents.

     

    Recommendation 2: That the City of Toronto develop and apply meaningful equity evaluation tools to systematically review services and programs to ensure they are accessible to all of Toronto’s residents.

     

    Recommendation 3: That City divisions develop, publish, and widely distribute services plans, describing how they will identify and address barriers to immigrant access to services.

     

    Recommendation 4: That City divisions create systematic, inclusive, and equitable processes for engaging diverse communities in service planning, implementation, and evaluation as well as delivery, and engage them in the basic planning processes and customer service standardization processes for every division and corporations as a whole.

     

    Recommendation 5: That all city divisions develop and publish language plans that address linguistic access issues and assign accountability for delivering on that plan to the general manager of the division, with regular reports being made available to the public and key stakeholders.

     

    Recommendation 6: That the City adopt, as corporate policy, the elimination of language barriers, and create corporate strategies to support divisions in achieving that goal.

     

    Recommendation 7: That the City support partnerships between municipal staff and NGOs, community organizations, and cultural groups as well as to assist municipal staff in their systematic outreach to connect with immigrant communities, inform and include newcomers, and link new Torontonians to the systems and supports they need.

     

    Recommendation 8: That the City use a variety of strategies, such as creating visible “welcome stations,” implementing outreach processes, developing partnerships, and establishing measurable goals and targets for engagement in order to reach, involve, and include immigrants in the full range of city processes.

     

    Recommendation 9: That the City support municipal staff in forging partnerships with NGOs, community organizations, and cultural groups to enhance municipal efforts to facilitate civic engagement and system navigation.

     

    Recommendation 10: That the City provide training to all staff and volunteers who deal directly with the public, integrating equity training, cultural appropriateness, anti-oppression and anti-racism into training for customer service.

     

    Recommendation 11: That the City use its’ systems for tracking, measuring, and monitoring customer service to assess the creation of divisional plans that support access and inclusion for all communities, assess the implementation of those plans, and measurable outcomes, such as the rate of access to City services by immigrants, or the inclusion of immigrants in City processes. That evaluation systems include gathering and assessing disaggregated data in order to understand the specific ways in which race, gender, language, ability, culture, and citizenship status impede access to services and to provide for monitoring and accountability on these aspects of customer service.

     

    Recommendation 12: That the general manager in each division will be accountable for ensuring the development, implementation, measuring, and monitoring of immigrant-friendly divisional policies.

     

    Recommendation 13: That the Toronto Newcomer Office and Office of Equity and Diversity be staffed and mandated to provide guidance, direction, and monitoring to support all divisions in meeting these goals.

     

    Recommendation 14: That Toronto establish active strategies for ensuring that all communities are represented in the bodies that govern our city services. That Toronto create policies for our residents by partnering with organizations like the Maytree Foundation, which facilitate the participation of all communities.

     

    Recommendation 15: That the City review community consultation procedures to ensure that processes designed to gain resident input are as oriented toward the needs and practices of new communities as they are to more established ones.

     

    Recommendation 16: That the City broaden its partnership with the newcomer serving community to include not only settlement organizations and Local Immigration Partnerships, but also faith groups and cultural groups, in order to provide ongoing feedback on newcomer and immigrant issues.

     

    Recommendation 17: That programs that support city staff in partnering with settlement services be facilitated and expanded, and that they be extended to include faith groups and cultural groups interested in sustainable partnership. 

     

    Recommendation 18: That purchasing, employment and financial processes incorporate social procurement policies that identify and facilitate opportunities to leverage municipal purchasing power to facilitate the development of our diverse work force and our multicultural business community.

     

    Recommendation 19: That Toronto look at its business regulation framework to identify ways to accommodate micro-business, promote economic development opportunities for new communities, and provide new entrepreneurs with the information they need to navigate our systems.

     

    Recommendation 20: That Toronto advocate strongly with the federal government on immigration policy and the implementation of immigration laws and practices that protect the wellbeing of Toronto residents.

     

    Recommendation 21: That Toronto actively communicate its advocacy efforts to the communities they are meant to support.

     

    Recommendation 22: That Toronto, as the representative of the nation’s largest community of immigrants, continue to seek as large a place as possible at policy making tables affecting immigration and settlement issues."

    Origin

    (April 2, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

    Summary

    Due to lack of quorum, this item was not considered at the Committee's meeting on April 17, 2014 (Item CD28.9), and is now brought forward for consideration.

     

    Toronto City Council approved the mission, vision and guiding principles of the Toronto Newcomer Strategy, and set policy direction concerning a number of other immigration related issues in 2013. The release of the Strategy has brought the successful integration of newcomers into focus.  Its vision is that "all newcomers reach their full potential to thrive and contribute to their local neighbourhood, community and city, ensuring Toronto’s continued success and prosperity."

     

    This report provides information and progress updates on a number of City Council decisions, including those related to the implementation of the Toronto Newcomer Strategy, Social Development Open Dialogue Sessions, Integrating Cities Charter, municipal franchise, welfare of immigrant children and access to City services for newcomers.

     

    The report highlights major achievements to date, relevant trends and issues, and outlines recommendations for new activities.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 2, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on the Toronto Newcomer Strategy, 2014 - 2016 Implementation
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69053.pdf

    Speakers

    Sean Meagher, Public Interest
    Tim Maguire, President, Cupe Local 79
    Haweiya Egeh , Service Collaboration Coordinator, Toronto South Local Immigration Partnership/WoodGreen Community Services
    Maya Bhullar, Chair, Council of Agencies Serving South Asians (CASSA)
    Councillor Peter Leon
    Councillor Janet Davis

    Communications (Committee)

    (April 1, 2014) Letter from Tim Maguire, President, CUPE Local 79 and Sean Meager, President, Public Interest (CD.Main.CD29.10.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-47071.pdf
    (May 20, 2014) Letter from Alina Chatterjee, Director of Redevelopment, Development and Community Engagement, Scadding Court Community Centre (CD.New.CD29.10.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-47690.pdf
    (May 21, 2014) Letter from Bill Sinclair, Associate Executive Director, St. Stephen's Community House (CD.New.CD29.10.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-47663.pdf
    (May 21, 2014) Letter from Haweiya Egeh, Service Collaboration Coordinator, Toronto South Local Immigration Partnership (CD.New.CD29.10.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-47696.pdf

    CD29.11 - Access to City Services for Undocumented Torontonians

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Will be considered at 2:00 pm on Tuesday June 10

    Committee Recommendations

    The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council direct that immigration/citizenship information only be collected where specifically required by either provincial or federal legislation, policies or agreements and request the City Solicitor to report back to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on whether Council can direct that this information shall not be shared outside the City division, agency or corporation which has collected it, unless through the informed consent of the Toronto resident to whom it concerns;

     

    2.         City Council direct City divisions, agencies and corporations to review their policies and procedures to ensure consistency with Council’s commitment to access to City services for undocumented Torontonians; City Council should also direct City divisions, agencies and corporations granting funds to ensure that grant recipients comply with the City’s position on access to services forum documented Torontonians when collecting participant information as part of their City of Toronto grant;

     

    3.         City Council direct the Executive Director, Human Resources, and Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and other City division, agencies and corporations as required, to implement a compulsory training program to inform, educate and train all appropriate City staff and volunteers regarding access to City services for undocumented Torontonians and determine the costs associated to implement the plan and report any implications through the 2015 budget process;

     

    4.         City Council request the Director, Strategic Communications, and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to implement a Communications Plan including a public education strategy to inform all City staff, community organizations and Torontonians of the City’s commitment to and measures for ensuring access to City services for undocumented Torontonians and determine the costs associated to implement the plan and report any implications through the 2015 budget process;

     

    5.         City Council request that the General Manager of Children’s Services advocate with Ministry of Education officials regarding guidelines for accessing child care fee subsidy for immigrants without full status or full status documents;

     

    6.         City Council request the Provincial government to review the Ontario Works legislation and residency policy with a view to ensuring access to social services for undocumented Torontonians;

     

    7.         City Council request the Provincial and Federal governments reconsider immigration and refugee policies, in order to facilitate access to social assistance, health care and housing for undocumented Torontonians;

     

    8.         City Council direct the Executive Director of Social Development, Finance and Administration to report back in the first update report to the new Council on Undocumented Torontonians on the need and proposed mandate for a City Task force be formed to advocate to the Provincial government to review the Ontario Works legislation and residency policy with a view to ensuring access to social services for undocumented Torontonians;

     

    9.         City Council direct the Executive Director of Social Development, Finance & Administration to evaluate and annually report on City divisions, agencies and corporations on the implementation of Access without Fear policies and procedures, training and communications/public education strategy and include mechanisms to obtain community feedback;

     

    10.       City Council direct the Director of the Equity, Diversity and Human Rights Division to work with the appropriate City officials to ensure that the City's Human Rights and Anti-Harassment/Discrimination Policy includes protections for equal treatment with respect to City services and facilities without discrimination or harassment because of immigration status;

     

    11.       City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to continue exploring the viability of introducing a City of Toronto Municipal Identification Card through conversations with U.S. municipalities who have adopted them;

     

    12.       City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to work with the Chief of Police and review existing policies to ensure Police Services comply with Toronto’s Access without Fear directives, as recommended by the Solidarity City Network; and

     

    13.       City Council forward this report and recommendations to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Association of Municipalities of Ontario and encourage all member municipalities and municipal associations to support and develop “Access without fear” policies in their municipalities to facilitate access to social assistance, healthcare and housing for undocumented residents.

    Origin

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

    Summary

    On February 20, 2013, in considering the report, "Undocumented Workers in Toronto" (CD 18.5), Council reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring that Torontonians without full status or full status documents have access to City services without fear, and requested that City staff improve undocumented Torontonians' access to City services.

     

    In response, an Access to City Services for Undocumented Torontonians Working Group was created with the objective of improving access to City’s service for undocumented Torontonians without fear. Comprised of 21 City divisions, agencies and corporations, the Working Group has identified specific measures required to address the service delivery needs of undocumented Torontonians. Measures include:

     

    1.         clarification of the City services that can be accessed by undocumented Torontonians without fear, those that require proof of identity, and options for the City to limit the collection of immigrant/citizenship information;

     

    2.         a training plan for City staff;

     

    3          clarification of the complaints process related to accessing City services;

     

    4.         a public education campaign to raise awareness about the City's commitment to access without fear;

     

    5.         supports to City-funded agencies to increase the role they play in increasing service access without fear; and

     

    6.         work the City must do with other orders of government. This report provides an update on the implementation and implications of these measures.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 7, 2014) Report and Appendices A-C from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Access to City Services for Undocumented Torontonians
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69193.pdf

    Speakers

    Amy Casipullai, Senior Coordinator, Policy and Communications, OCASI - Ontario Council of Agencies Serving Immigrants
    Loly Rico, Co-Director, FCJ Refugee Centre
    Ayesha Basit, No One Is Illegal-Toronto
    Navjeet Sidhu and Ann De Shalit, Social Planning Toronto
    Tzazna Miranda Leal, Parkdale Community Legal Services
    Sonia Singh, Workers' Action Centre
    Syed Hussan, Coordinator, Migrant Workers Alliance for Change
    Bonita Roman, Social Worker, Immigrant Community Outreach, Law Office of Adela Crossley

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 22, 2014) Submission from Syed Hussan, Coordinator, Migrant Workers Alliance for Change (CD.New.CD29.11.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-47722.pdf

    CD29.12 - Access, Equity and Human Rights Investment Program - 2014 Allocation Recommendations

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the 2014 Access, Equity and Human Rights Investment Program allocations totalling $805,000.00 to 23 organizations as recommended in Appendices A and B of the report (May 7, 2014) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration; and

     

    2.         City Council direct that an amount of $40,000.00 be held for appeals.

    Origin

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

    Summary

    This report recommends funding under the 2014 Access, Equity and Human Rights (AEHR) Investment Program. Of the 80 applications received, 23 are recommended for funding in the amount of $805,000.00 with $40,000.00 held for appeals.

     

    The purpose of the AEHR Program is to provide time-limited funding to community-based organizations and residents to act on human rights, accessibility, equity, discrimination and hate crime concerns in their communities. Funded projects help to achieve a positive race relations and human rights climate and promote community participation by equity-seeking groups.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 7, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Access, Equity and Human Rights Investment Program - 2014 Allocation Recommendations
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69172.pdf
    (May 7, 2014) Appendix B: Access, Equity and Human Rights (AEHR) Investment Program - 2014 Detailed Summary Sheets and Summary of Declined Applicants
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69173.pdf

    CD29.13 - Community Safety Investment Program - 2014 Allocation Recommendations

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the 2014 Community Safety Investment Program allocations totalling $690,000.00 to 19 organizations as recommended in Appendices A and B of the report (May 7, 2013) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration; and

     

    2.         City Council direct that an amount of $35,000.00 be held for appeals.

    Origin

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

    Summary

    This report recommends funding under the 2014 Community Safety Investment (CSI) Program. Of the 84 applications received, 19 are recommended for funding of $690,000.00. An amount of $35,000.00 has been held for appeals.

     

    The Community Safety Investment (CSI) program provides time-limited funding for activities that build community capacity for violence prevention and increase safety for the most vulnerable groups in Toronto. CSI criteria encourage applications from organizations that work actively to build on the strengths of neighbourhoods and communities.

     

    The two primary goals of this funding program are to:

     

    1.          increase access to information, skills and supports that prevent violence and increase safety; and

     

    2.          increase the capacity to address systemic causes of violence.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 7, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on the Community Safety Investment Program - 2014 Allocation Recommendations
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69237.pdf
    (May 7, 2014) Appendix B - Community Safety Investment Program 2014 - Detailed Summary Sheets and Summary of Declined Applicants
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69328.pdf

    CD29.14 - Service Development Investment Program (SDIP) 2014 Allocation Recommendations

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the 2014 Service Development Investment Program allocations totalling $452,400.00 be allocated to 14 organizations as described in Appendices A and B of the report (May 7, 2014) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration.

    Origin

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

    Summary

    This report recommends funding under the 2014 Service Development Investment Program (SDIP). Of the 17 applications received, 14 are recommended for funding in the amount $452,400.00.

     

    SDIP provides multi-year project funding to coalitions and organizations that develop community capacity and build effective partnerships within Neighbourhood Improvement Areas (NIAs)  and across the city. SDIP is a unique funding program, offering opportunities for emerging groups and networks that may be high risk due to lack of a track record and robust infrastructure.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 7, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance & Administration on the Service Development Investment Program (SDIP) 2014 Allocation Recommendations
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69167.pdf
    (May 7, 2014) Appendix B: 2014 Service Development Investment Program Project Summaries and Decline Chart
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69169.pdf

    CD29.15 - Investing in Community Recreation Spaces

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, in consultation with the appropriate staff, to work with the Toronto District School Board (TDSB), the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB), Toronto Office of Partnerships, and the Toronto Sports Council and report back to the August 20, 2014 Community Development and Recreation Committee on:

     

    a.         Expanding the City's shared-use agreement with the TDSB/TCDSB to accept donations to upgrade fields and play spaces;

     

    b.         Identifying corporate and community partners interested in investing in public fields and play spaces; and

     

    c.         A system for prioritizing infrastructure needs in order to maximize any future investments, and that any such investments be consistent with existing service plans (recreation, children services, etc).

     

    2.         City Council forward the requested report to the Toronto School Boards Task Force for review.

    Origin

    (May 21, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Colle, Ward 15 - Eglinton Lawrence

    Summary

    The City has a history of working collaboratively with local School Boards to ensure the sustainability of shared and valued assets such as school pools.  More recently, the Toronto School Boards Task Force agreed to seek opportunities to continue a collaborative partnership regarding other assets that fall under the jurisdiction and ownership of either the City or the Board, in order to maintain and enhance these spaces.

     

    The City and the School Board also have a history of working with the Toronto Sports Council to develop an inventory of shared assets.  This existing partnership and available data can be utilized to identify the community recreation infrastructure that is most in need of investment.

     

    Potential corporate and community partners have indicated that they are willing to work with the City and School Boards to enhance our shared recreation and play spaces. In light of these opportunities to enhance our public recreation spaces, I encourage members of the committee to adopt the following recommendations:

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 21, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Colle on Investing in Community Recreation Spaces
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-69542.pdf

    Economic Development Committee - Meeting 31

    ED31.4 - Design Exchange (DX) Sustainability Strategy and Funding

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Design Exchange (DX), through its Board of Directors and President, to submit a comprehensive strategic and business plan to the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture by July, 2014, describing the sustainability of the organization into the future and the value contribution to Toronto that together would be considered in a grant application.

     

    2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to prepare a business case, based on the information provided in the comprehensive strategic and business plan submitted by the Design Exchange (as requested in Recommendation 1 above), to be included in the 2015 budget submission for City Council, whether to consider providing annual support to the DX up to $200,000, and whether to designate DX as a Major Cultural Organization.

     

    3.         City Council direct that funding in the amount of $100,000 continue to be held by the City in the DX Reserve Fund (XR3205) for capital expenditures or extraordinary maintenance and repairs for the term of the sublease; and

     

    4.         City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to continue to work with the Design Exchange to provide assistance to support the DX to fulfill its Strategic Plan, to review DX's progress and to assist the DX Board in its efforts to secure other sources of funding.

    Origin

    (May 6, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

    Summary

    City Council provides financial support to major cultural organizations that are recognized as essential cultural ambassadors for the City and whose programs have a significant impact on the regional economy by playing a major role in tourism attraction through the development of Toronto as a worldwide cultural destination.  The Design Exchange (DX) is well on its way to being one of the most important cultural institutions in the City of Toronto.

     

    With a revitalized strategic direction and refined mandate, to promote the relevancy and experience of design to as large a number of people as possible, the DX is now exclusively a Design Museum offering exhibits from prestigious cultural institutions across the globe; a new city-wide cultural component with a greater focus on educational experiences for both youth and adults, as well as a rollout of in-house programming that will extend across the country.

     

    The DX is currently undergoing a significant expansion that will strengthen Toronto's reputation on the international cultural map. Located in the historic Toronto Stock Exchange, for the past twenty years the DX has hosted exhibitions, competitions and educational programming dedicated exclusively to the pursuit of design excellence. They have demonstrated sound financial management and are working towards a diverse and growing funding base. The DX has requested $200,000 in financial support from the City, starting in 2015, to help transition from receiving an annual grant of $500,000 from a private developer for the last few decades and which ended in 2014.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 6, 2014) Staff Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Design Exchange (DX) Sustainability Strategy and Funding
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-69121.pdf

    Speakers

    Shauna Levy, President, Design Exchange (Submission Filed)
    Dave Marcus, Chair of the Board, Design Exchange (Submission Filed)

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 21, 2014) Presentation from Shauna Levy and Dave Marcus on Design Exchange - Canada's Design Museum (ED.New.ED31.4.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/comm/communicationfile-47689.pdf

    ED31.5 - "Making Space for Culture" Final Report: Creative Capital Gains (Implementation Action # 10)

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to work with stakeholders to develop action plans to address key issues identified in the report (May 2, 2014) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and report back to Council in late 2015.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Economic Development Committee directed that the "Making Space for Culture" summary for each Ward be shared with that Ward Councillor as a separate document.

     

    Tim Jones, President and CEO, Artscape gave a presentation.

    Origin

    (May 2, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to provide Council with information on the "Making Space for Culture" project and make summary documents available. The project was undertaken to address one of the key recommendations of the Creative Capital Gains report: "that the City ensure a supply of affordable, sustainable, cultural space."

     

    All 44 Wards were mapped and consulted through public meetings and an online survey. Existing community cultural infrastructure was mapped and verified to provide baseline data to prioritize and guide decision-making around future investment in cultural infrastructure.  Phase One of the project, which comprised 20 Wards, was completed in the spring of 2013 and summarized in a report to City Council in December of 2013. Phase Two of the project, comprising 24 of 44 Wards was completed recently. The updated data is available online.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 2, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on "Making Space for Culture" Final Report: Creative Capital Gains (Implementation Action # 10)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-69084.pdf
    Attachment 1 "Making Space for Culture" - Community Consultation Summaries for 44 Wards - updated data to be available online.
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-69273.pdf
    (May 21, 2014) Final Report - Making Space for Culture - Community Consultation Summaries - EDC Presentation
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-69508.pdf

    ED31.6 - 2014 Local Arts Service Organizations (LASOs) Grant Allocation

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the Arts and Culture funding allocations totalling $1,333,410 to six Local Arts Service Organizations (LASOs) as follows:

     

    Organization

    Funding Allocation

    Arts Etobicoke                                   

    $374,805

    Lakeshore Arts                                                    

    $232,430

    Scarborough Arts                          

    $209,000

    UrbanArts Community Arts Council                

    $232,935

    East End Arts

    $110,000

    North York Arts

    $174,240

    Total

    $1,333,410

     

    Origin

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

    Summary

    This report seeks Council approval on the recommended funding allocations for the six non-profit organizations that have applied for municipal support through the Local Arts Service Organizations (LASOs) Program.

     

    The arts are an integral part of a healthy culture, nourishing creativity and providing social and economic benefit. Community arts provide significant value to both communities and artists. The LASOs are community-based arts and cultural organizations that are essential to a vibrant community arts infrastructure for the City and are an important building block for healthy and cohesive communities. As incorporated charitable organizations dedicated to community engagement through the arts, the existing four LASOs have sound financial management systems, governance structures, and solid, sustainable community outreach arts programming, activities and events.  Public funding is necessary as the organizations are not fully self-supporting through private donations and self-generated income.

     

    Two newer LASOs, North York Arts (formed in 2011) and East End Arts (formed in 2013) are emerging as local arts catalysts in their respective geographic areas per Recommendation 2.3 "Establish Local Arts Service Organizations in North York and East York" in the Creative Capital Gains: An Action Plan for Toronto, adopted by Council in 2011. Currently being incubated by the Toronto Arts Foundation, an incorporated (1995) non-profit charitable organization which aims to connect every Toronto neighbourhood with the transformative social economic benefits of the arts, the two new LASOs are part of the 2014 Local Arts Service Organization grant program.

     

    Allocation recommendations presented in this report are based on the review by Cultural Services staff and an external peer advisory panel.  Cultural Services staff manage the program and reviewed the grant applications with due diligence and in compliance with the City of Toronto’s Community Grants Policy adopted by Council at its July 16, 2013 meeting,

     

    A total of $1,333,410 is included in the Economic Development and Culture 2014 Approved Operating Budget to fund the six Local Service Arts Organizations.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on 2014 Local Arts Service Organizations (LASOs) Grant Allocation
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-69081.pdf
    Appendix 1 - Overview of Local Arts Service Organizations (LASOs)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-69082.pdf

    ED31.7 - 2014 Major Cultural Organizations Allocations

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Communication ED31.7.1 has been submitted on this Item

    Committee Recommendations

    The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the allocation of the cultural investment of $7,394,960.00 to the following organizations:

     

    Organization

    Amount

    Art Gallery of Ontario

    $626,750

    Canada's National Ballet School

    $161,000

    Canadian Opera Company

    $1,522,800

    Festival Management Committee

    (Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto)

    $560,000

    George R. Gardiner Museum of Ceramic Art

    $152,220

    National Ballet of Canada

    $1,250,000

    Pride Toronto

    $160,500

    Toronto Artscape Inc.                                  

    $346,690

    Toronto Festival of Arts, Culture and

    Creativity (Luminato)                                  

    $345,000

    Toronto International Film Festival Group    

    $1,050,000

    Toronto Symphony Orchestra                     

    $1,220,000

    TOTAL  

    $7,394,960

     

    2.         City Council direct the balance of the 2014 instalment payments to the Art Gallery of Ontario, Canadian Opera Company, Festival Management Committee, National Ballet of Canada, Toronto Artscape Inc., Toronto International Film Festival Group, and Toronto Symphony Orchestra be made as one payment following the adoption of the recommended allocations by City Council, and that monthly instalments to these organizations resume in January 2015.

    Origin

    (May 21, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

    Summary

    This report recommends that City Council approve funding allocations for eleven not-for-profit organizations that have applied for municipal support through the Major Cultural Organizations Program operated by Cultural Services, Economic Development and Culture. Major Cultural Organizations deliver unique artistic programming that strengthens the richness and diversity of Toronto's cultural sector.  They contribute to Toronto's reputation as a leading cultural capital, drive cultural tourism, demonstrate leadership in community education and outreach, create volunteer opportunities, and they support other community arts and cultural organizations. These organizations have significant cultural, social, and economic impact; help Toronto's culture sector create jobs and wealth; attract visitors; and make Toronto an internationally recognized cultural destination.

     

    The report recommends allocations to: the Art Gallery of Ontario; Canada's National Ballet School; Canadian Opera Company; Festival Management Committee (Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto); George R. Gardiner Museum of Ceramic Art; National Ballet of Canada; Pride Toronto, Toronto Artscape Inc.; Toronto Festival of Arts, Culture and Creativity (Luminato); Toronto International Film Festival Group; and the Toronto Symphony Orchestra for a total of $7,394,960.00.  The total program fund for these allocations is based on the 2014 City Operating Budget approved on January 29, 2014.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 21, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on 2014 Major Cultural Organizations Allocations
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-69080.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 2, 2014) Letter from Knia Singh (George B. Singh) Chair, CARIBANA Arts Group (CC.Main.ED31.7.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47870.pdf

    ED31.8 - Proposed Ossington Avenue Business Improvement Area (BIA) Poll Results

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    19 - Trinity-Spadina
    Attention
    Bill 520 has been submitted on this Item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council designate, based on the poll results respecting the intention to designate Ossington Avenue Business Improvement Area (BIA), the area described by Attachment  No. 1 to the report (May 8, 2014) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as the Ossington Avenue Business Improvement Area (BIA), under Chapter 19 of the Toronto Municipal Code.

     

    2.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to submit a by-law to designate the area described in Attachment No. 1 in this report as the Ossington Avenue Business Improvement Area.

     

    3.         City Council approve those amendments necessary to Schedule "A" of Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, to include the Ossington Avenue Business Improvement Area (BIA).

    Origin

    (May 8, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to recommend that the area shown on Attachment No. 1 be designated as the Ossington Avenue Business Improvement Area (BIA).  This will be the City's seventy-eighth BIA.

     

    In accordance with Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code ("Chapter 19"), the City Clerk conducted a poll to determine if there is sufficient support to designate Ossington Avenue, between Queen Street West and Dundas Street West, as a BIA.

     

    The City received a sufficient number of ballots to validate the poll and the majority of accepted ballots were in favour of establishing a BIA.  Accordingly, it is recommended that City Council pass a by-law to designate the area described by the map in Attachment No. 1 as the Ossington Avenue Business Improvement Area (BIA).  Subject to Council's approval, this will be the City's seventy-eighth BIA.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 8, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Proposed Ossington Avenue Business Improvement Area (BIA) Poll Results
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-69286.pdf

    Government Management Committee - Meeting 30

    GM30.3 - Toronto Police Service Annual Report: Parking Enforcement Unit - 2013 Parking Tag Issuance

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Government Management Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to report to the Government Management Committee on August 11, 2014, on increasing enforcement by the Parking Enforcement Unit of regulations on arterial roads during the rush hours and on all roads with bike lanes; and to also include this information in its Annual Report on the Parking Enforcement Unit.

    Origin

    (April 4, 2014) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to provide the Government Management Committee with the annual report on the Toronto Police Service’s (TPS) Parking Enforcement Unit – 2013 estimated tag issuance.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 4, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board, on Toronto Police Service Annual Report: Parking Enforcement Unit - 2013 Parking Tag Issuance
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-68424.pdf

    GM30.5 - Revisions to Schedule A of the Financial Control By-law

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Bill 523 has been submitted on this Item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Government Management Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 71, Financial Control, as set out in Attachment 2 of the report (April 28, 2014) from the Treasurer.

    Origin

    (April 28, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

    Summary

    This report recommends amendments to Schedule A of the Financial Control By-law (re:  Chapter 71 "Financial Control", Toronto Municipal Code) based on a recent review of the Schedule which was conducted in consultation with City Divisions.  Schedule A identifies purchases where payments can be processed without a Purchase Order or Sole Source Request form as these goods and services can only be obtained from one source (e.g. utilities, TTC tokens, postage, land registry fees, etc.) or are mandated by legislation.

     

    Schedule A was added to the Financial Control Bylaw in 2004 based on a recommendation from the Auditor General requesting that staff "develop a list of sole source goods and services (e.g. TTC tokens, utilities, etc.) that can be processed without completing a sole (single) source request form".  In 2007, Schedule A was revised based on experience gained since its implementation in 2004.  A recent review of the Schedule was completed in 2013/2014, in consultation with City Divisions. This report recommends amendments to Schedule A based on the most recent review.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 28, 2014) Report from the Treasurer on Revisions to Schedule A of the Financial Control By-law
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-68821.pdf
    (April 28, 2014) Attachment 1 - Items Added, or Removed from, Schedule A
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-68822.pdf
    (April 28, 2014) Attachment 2 - Revised Schedule A
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-68823.pdf

    GM30.12 - City of Toronto Consolidated Green Fleet Plan 2014-2018

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Government Management Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council adopt the City of Toronto Consolidated Green Fleet Plan 2014-2018, as outlined in Attachment 1 of the report (April 28, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, in place of all previous Green Fleet Plans.

     

    2.         City Council direct the Director, Fleet Services Division, the Chief of Toronto Fire Services, and the Chief of Emergency Medical Services to implement the following objectives of the Consolidated Plan:

     

    a.         Purchase, lease, or otherwise obtain the most fuel-efficient vehicles where appropriate for City operations, while considering lifecycle cost of the vehicle;

     

    b.         Achieve ISO Certification in the area of Environmental Management (ISO 14000) and Quality Management (ISO 9000) for the Fleet Services Division, and work with other City Fleets to explore the feasibility of their ISO Certification;

     

    c.         Develop selection criteria for alternative fuels;

     

    d.         Enhance operational efficiency and driver education; and

     

    e.         Create one new temporary dedicated Green Fleet Coordinator position in Fleet Services Division for the 2015-2018 period, to be included in Fleet Services' operating budget (subject to Budget Committee approval during the 2015 Budget process), and establish a Green Fleet Team comprised of current staff from each of the participating members of the Fleet Management Steering Committee.

     

    3.         City Council delegate to the Director, Fleet Services Division authority to negotiate and execute, and to amend as and when necessary, any agreements necessary to give effect to the implementation of the Consolidated Plan, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director, Fleet Services Division and the City Solicitor.

     

    4.         City Council direct the Director, Fleet Services Division to:

     

    a.         Coordinate the implementation of the Consolidated Plan, in consultation with other Fleets, track the progress made in achieving the established targets and report back to Government Management Committee in Q2 2016, Q2 2017, Q2 2018 and provide a final report in Q2 2019; and

     

    b.         Continue to fund the incremental costs associated with new green technologies for the Centrally Managed Fleet using the Green Fleet Plan Capital Fund (XQ0003) through to 2018, subject to necessary approvals during the annual budget process.

     

    5.         City Council direct the Chief of Toronto Emergency Medical Services to:

     

    a.         Direct staff to actively participate in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan; and

     

    b.         Examine the feasibility of purchasing smaller more fuel efficient emergency response vehicles.

     

    6.         City Council direct the Chief of Toronto Fire Services to:

     

    a.         Direct staff to actively participate in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan;

     

    b.         Continue testing hybrid and electric vehicles for short distance regular use applications such as by the Fire Prevention Officer and Training Division Officer;

     

    c.         Right-size the type of vehicle used by the 16 District Chiefs;

     

    d.         Assess the feasibility and benefits of implementing a Car-Share program for Fire Prevention Officers in the downtown core by reviewing the outcomes of the pilot program currently being led by Fleet Services Division;

     

    e.         Expand the use of idle reduction technology currently used on aerial apparatus to other fire apparatus wherever possible; and

     

    f.          Analyze reducing the amount of outsourced labour to reduce the amount of travel time for apparatus in for repair.

     

    7.         City Council direct that this Item be forwarded to the Toronto Transit Commission Board and the Toronto Police Service Board with a request that they adopt and implement the Consolidated Green Fleet Plan 2014-2018.

    Origin

    (April 28, 2014) Report from the Director, Fleet Services

    Summary

    The City of Toronto Consolidated Green Fleet Plan 2014-2018 (Consolidated Plan) provides an overview of the City of Toronto’s objectives in addressing environmental impact with strategies that aim to reduce hazardous emissions from City's vehicle and equipment fleet operations.

     

    We are pleased to announce that this plan is the product of cooperation between the five major City Fleets. Three of the five fleets working together under this Consolidated Plan are managed by City of Toronto Divisions: Fleet Services Division (Centrally Managed Fleet), Emergency Medical Services (EMS), and Toronto Fire Services (TFS). Two of the five fleets are managed by City Agencies: Toronto Police Service (TPS) and Toronto Transit Commission (TTC). The Consolidated Plan benefits from the assistance of the Environment and Energy Division (EED), and was reviewed and approved by each of the five City Fleets.

     

    The Consolidated Plan presents objectives, strategies, and measures that balance operational needs, financial considerations, and Council's strategic goal of environmental sustainability. Our goal looking forward through to 2018 is to choose vehicles, equipment, fuels, and practices that consume less fuel and emit less greenhouse gas (GHG) and air pollution, meet the City Fleets' operational requirements, are sustainable, and are economically viable. This new Consolidated Plan sets realistic objectives that will measure our progress toward the established goal, and recommends specific measurable strategies on how we will accomplish these objectives. The Consolidate Plan will continue to reduce GHGs while not creating additional costs.

     

    This report provides the outcomes of both the Green Fleet Plan 2008-2011 for the Centrally Managed Fleet, and the Green Fleet Plan for TTC, Police, Fire and EMS 2008 2011. It also addresses Council's direction June 11-13, 2013, in response to the Auditor General's recommendation, that the Director, Fleet Services Division conduct a review of the City's green fleet vehicles and report to Council on the progress on the City's Green Fleet Plan.

     

    As part of the previous Plans, the five City Fleets have undertaken numerous pilot projects involving new and emerging green vehicle technologies. Some of these technologies have been successful and have been adopted by City Fleets. Other technologies have been unable to adequately reduce emissions in the fleet environment and further investment cannot be justified. The Consolidated Plan builds on the collective experience of City Fleets, and lessons learned from previous plans, to cost-effectively achieve our shared goal.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 28, 2014) Report from the Director, Fleet Services, on City of Toronto Consolidated Green Fleet Plan 2014-2018
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-68884.pdf
    (April 28, 2014) Attachment 1 - City of Toronto Consolidated Green Fleet Plan 2014 - 2018 - Part A
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-68885.pdf
    (May 28, 2014) Attachment 1 - City of Toronto Consolidated Green Fleet Plan 2014 - 2018 - Part B
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69039.pdf

    GM30.14 - Results - REOI 9119-13-5004 for the Design, Construction, Administration and Operational Management of a Multi-Pad Ice Arena to Replace the Don Mills Civitan Arena

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    25 - Don Valley West, 26 - Don Valley West, 34 - Don Valley East
    Attention
    The Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (GM30.14c for information)

    Committee Recommendations

    The Government Management Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council direct the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to communicate formally to the Toronto Lands Corporation and the Toronto District School Board that the City will not pursue ownership of a portion of the Don Mills Middle School site to relocate the Don Mills Arena.

     

    2.         City Council defer the decision on the location of the replacement arena until the next term of Council pending a report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Planner to outline possible options for relocating the arena in the Don Mills Eglinton area, such report to outline the planning objectives of the area and the funding and timing implications related to any placement options in the area.

     

    3.         City Council request the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to establish a working group made up of key community stakeholders to provide feedback to City staff throughout the next stages of the selection process.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Government Management Committee:

     

    1.         Requested the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to review the current ice allocation at the Don Mills Civitan Arena, and based on the outcome of the review, to report directly to the June 10, 2014 City Council meeting on a suitable accommodation plan to be implemented within other facilities in the event the replacement arena is not built before the current Don Mills Civitan Arena is no longer available for use as an ice arena.

    Origin

    (September 30, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to provide information on the results of the Request for Expression of Interest (REOI) No. 9119-13-5004 for the design, construction administration and operational management of a multi-pad ice arena to replace the Don Mills Civitan Arena and to request authority to issue a request for proposals (RFP) to design, build and operate a two pad ice arena located at the City-owned site at the northwest corner of York Mills Rd and the Don Valley Parkway.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (September 30, 2013) Report and Attachment A from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Results - REOI 9119-13-5004 for the Design, Construction, Administration and Operational Management of a Multi-Pad Ice Arena to Replace the Don Mills Civitan Arena
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65625.pdf

    Background Information (City Council)

    (May 26, 2014) Supplementary report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on Don Mills Civitan Arena Ice Usage and Potential 2020 Accommodation Plan (GM30.14c)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70095.pdf

    Speakers

    Dennis Timbrell
    Lesley Lewis, Chief Executive Officer, Ontario Science Centre (Submission Filed)
    Terence West, Don Mills Residents Inc.
    Anne Borrelly, Don Mills Residents Inc.
    Bob Vavaroutsos, Don Mills Residents Inc.
    Peter MacInnis, Secretary, Don Mills Civitan Club
    Jeff Simpson, Don Mills Civitan Club
    Councillor Jaye Robinson
    Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong

    Communications (Committee)

    (December 17, 2013) Submission from Louise Dawson (GM.Main.GM30.14.1)
    (December 17, 2013) Submission from Stan Stevenson (GM.Main.GM30.14.2)
    (December 23, 2013) Petition from the Don Mills community containing approximately 284 signatures (GM.Main.GM30.14.3)
    (December 23, 2013) E-mail from John Cockerill (GM.Main.GM30.14.4)
    (January 5, 2014) Submission from Leslie Burt (GM.Main.GM30.14.5)
    (January 6, 2014) Submission from Jacqui Hemingway (GM.Main.GM30.14.6)
    (January 6, 2014) Submission from Terence West, Don Mills Residents Inc. (GM.Main.GM30.14.7)
    (January 6, 2014) Letter from Councillor Jaye Robinson, Ward 25 - Don Valley West (GM.Main.GM30.14.8)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/comm/communicationfile-44508.pdf
    (May 5, 2014) Letter from Lesley Lewis, Chief Executive Officer, Ontario Science Centre (GM.New.GM30.14.9)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/comm/communicationfile-47118.pdf
    (May 8, 2014) Letter from James H. Harbell, Stikeman Elliot LLP, Barristers and Solicitors (GM.New.GM30.14.10)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/comm/communicationfile-47297.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ward 34 - Don Valley East (GM.New.GM30.14.11)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/comm/communicationfile-47403.pdf

    14a - Results of Public Meeting for Don Mills Middle School and Replacement of the Civitan Arena

    Origin
    (December 19, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation
    Summary

    The purpose of this information report is to provide supplemental information resulting from the public meeting held on December 5th to discuss the selection of a site for the new Don Mills Civitan Arena, including the Toronto District School Board's disposal of the Don Mills Middle School site.

     

    The public meeting was attended by approximately 75 people. The questions, comments and discussions arising appeared to involve three main themes:

    •           Retention of the Don Mills Middle School Field as green space;

    •           Locating the New Civitan Arena at the Don Mills Middle School site; and

    •           Locating the new Civitan Arena at one of the chosen City-owned sites.

    Background Information (Committee)
    (December 19, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, on Results of Public Meeting for Don Mills Middle School and Replacement of the Civitan Arena
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65672.pdf
    (December 19, 2013) Attachments 1, 2 and 3 - Results of Public Meeting for Don Mills Middle School and Replacement of the Civitan Arena
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65673.pdf

    14b - Discussions to Locate the Replacement Don Mills Civitan Arena at Celestica

    Origin
    (April 24, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Foresty and Recreation
    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to provide information about the meetings between City staff and representatives of Celestica regarding the possibility of locating the replacement Civitan Arena on the Celestica site. Government Management Committee directed City staff to meet and report on those meetings.

     

    Celestica representatives have discussed possible concepts showing that a new 2-pad arena could be accommodated on the Celestica Site. Celestica is in the early years of a multi-year planning process where they wish to redesignate their Official Plan land use designation from Employment Areas to a Mixed Use Areas designation.

     

    There is no certainty to the end results of this planning process and City Council on December 16, 2013 determined not to convert these employment lands to Mixed Use Areas as part of the City's Official Plan Review.  The Official Plan review process is still underway as described in this report.

    Background Information (Committee)
    (April 24, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, on Discussions to Locate the Replacement Don Mills Civitan Arena at Celestica
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-68797.pdf

    Licensing and Standards Committee - Meeting 28

    LS28.1 - Amendments to Chapter 27, Council Procedures Delegating Authority to Community Councils under the Street Food Vending Program

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Adoption of this Item requires a vote of two-thirds of Members present

    Bill 545 has been submitted on this Item.

    Public Notice Given

    Committee Recommendations

    The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend Chapter 27, Council Procedures to reflect the delegation of final decision making authority to Community Councils to:

     

    a.         designate areas of the road as Mobile Vending Zones or Restricted Zones in accordance with Chapter 740, Street Vending; and

     

    b.         designate, at the request of the local ward Councillor, a particular street vending location for entrepreneurs introducing new products, or variations of products, as identified by the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture.

    Origin

    (May 9, 2014) Report from the City Clerk

    Summary

    City Council at its April 1, 2 and 3, 2014 meeting approved a new Street Food Vending Program.

     

    The Program includes delegation to Community Councils to designate Mobile Vending Zones or Restricted Zones, and the designation of vending locations for entrepreneurs introducing new products as identified by the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture.

     

    This report submits the companion amendments to Chapter 27, Council Procedures to reflect this delegation to Community Councils. Notice of the amendments has been given.

     

    The Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards was consulted in the preparation of this report.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 9, 2014) Report from the City Clerk on Amendments to Chapter 27, Council Procedures Delegating Authority to Community Councils under the Street Food Vending Program
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-69251.pdf

    LS28.2 - Graffiti Management Plan - StreetARToronto (StART) Partnership Programs 2014 Grant Allocation Recommendations

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the list of grant applications for the StART Partnership program and StART Restoration and Education program, as outlined in Appendix A to the report (May 7, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Licensing and Standards Committee requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to identify and proactively reach out to the Street Art community and to arts groups in the remaining wards across the City that have not received StART funding and in consultation with ward councillors, identify opportunities for new street art grant locations, with the goal of creating equity across all wards.

    Origin

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

    Summary

    StreetARToronto (StART) was launched in 2012 as a public/private partnership program and a central feature of Council's new Graffiti Management Plan, a proactive approach to eliminating graffiti vandalism while supporting street art that adds character and visual interest to city streets. StART is funded yearly as a Community Partnership and Investment Program (CPIP) with a grant of $375,890.00 from the former Graffiti Transformation Program. It is administered by the Public Realm Section in Transportation Services, which also has carriage of coordination and implementation of many parts of the Graffiti Management Plan. StART is part of the City's Clean Toronto Together Campaign, which links citizens with city government to keep Toronto streets clean and free of posters and graffiti vandalism. This report recommends funding for 19 projects delivered by community-based organizations in 2014 under the StART Partnership and StART Restoration and Education (RE-StART) Programs.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 7, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Graffiti Management Plan - StreetARToronto (StART) Partnership Programs 2014 Grant Allocation Recommendations
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-69238.pdf
    (May 26, 2014) Presentation from the Director, Public Realm Section on Transportation Services
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-69589.pdf

    LS28.3 - Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Communications LS28.3.5 and LS28.3.6 have been submitted on this Item

    Public Notice Given

    Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege

    Committee Recommendations

    The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Province of Ontario to consider expanding its licensing requirements to include wildlife control operators.

     

    2.         City Council receive for information the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 28, 2014) from the City Solicitor concerning the legal feasibility of licensing wildlife control operators.

     

    3.         City Council direct that the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 28, 2014) from the City Solicitor remain confidential as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Licensing and Standards Committee requested the Medical Officer of Health to prepare a report on diseases that could be transmitted to residents from urban wildlife in Toronto, such report to be available for use by Councillors and Animal Services staff.

    Origin

    (March 4, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards

    Summary

    At its March 19, 2013 meeting, the Licensing and Standards Committee requested staff to report back on the feasibility of licensing wildlife control operators. Committee expressed concern that without regulation, individuals performing wildlife control activities pose a risk to both consumers (e.g. disease and fraud) and wildlife (e.g. injury and death).

     

    A review of relevant legislation indicates that there are provincial laws in place to protect wild animals and residents of Toronto from unqualified wildlife removal companies. These laws are enforced by the Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (OSPCA) and Ministry of Consumer Services.

     

    Stakeholder consultations and research revealed some concerns with the activities of wildlife control operators, although the issues cannot be generalized to the entire industry.

     

    Accordingly, this report recommends referring the matter to the Province of Ontario for consideration because it is the level of government with direct responsibility for wildlife management and the regulation of wildlife control activities such as hunting and trapping.

     

    Referral to the provincial government is also advisable because a municipal licensing by-law for wildlife control operators could be declared invalid by the courts for conflicting with existing provincial legislation, the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1997 (the "Act").  Although the Act establishes a licensing regime for persons that hunt or trap wildlife, it also provides an exemption to this licensing requirement. The Act allows a person to harass, capture or kill wildlife without a licence where the person reasonably believes that wildlife is damaging or is about to damage that person's property. The Act extends this exemption to persons in the business of removing nuisance wildlife for the same purpose.

     

    Municipal Licensing and Standards through Toronto Animal Services will provide resources on its website to educate the public on what rules govern wildlife control and what factors to consider when hiring a wildlife control operator.

     

    Legal Services was consulted in the preparation of this report.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (March 4, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-68427.pdf

    Speakers

    Robin Howarth, Ontario Fur Managers Federation (OFMF) (Submission Filed)
    Scott Sears, Director 7A, Ontario Fur Managers Federation (OFMF)
    Bill Davies, Vice President, Southern Region, Ontario Fur Managers Federation (OFMF)

    Communications (Committee)

    (March 14, 2014) E-mail from Nicole Therese Corrado (LS.Main.LS28.3.1)
    (March 18, 2014) Memo from Lia Laskaris, Manager, Animal Alliance of Canada, Liz White, Leader, Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada and Barry MacKay, Canadian Representative, Born Free (LS.Main.LS28.3.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/comm/communicationfile-46723.pdf
    (May 23, 2014) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (LS.New.LS28.3.3)
    (May 26, 2014) Submission from Robin Howarth, General Manager, Ontario Fur Managers Federation (LS.New.LS28.3.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/comm/communicationfile-47767.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (March 18, 2014) Submission from Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, Ward 38 Scarborough Centre (CC.Main.LS28.3.5)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47877.pdf
    (June 4, 2014) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (CC.Supp.LS28.3.6)

    3a - Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators

    Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege
    Origin
    (March 28, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor
    Summary

    This report provides legal advice with respect to LS27.2, the Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators.

    Background Information (Committee)
    (March 28, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor on Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-68428.pdf
    Confidential Attachment 1

    3b - Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators - Supplementary Report

    Origin
    (May 9, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards
    Summary

    At its meeting of March 18, 2014, Licensing and Standards Committee deferred consideration of the report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, headed "Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators" to its next meeting, and requested a further report on a motion to license wildlife control operators.

     

    As indicated in the previous report, issues of wildlife management appropriately reside with the Province of Ontario. However, if City Council directs Municipal Licensing and Standards (ML&S) to develop a licensing system for wildlife control operators, staff will need to do further work to develop such a program and report back on amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 545, Licensing, and on the resulting financial implications to ML&S' operating and capital budgets through the 2015 budget process.

     

    This report outlines the steps necessary and preliminary financial estimates to undertake a licensing system for wildlife control operators in the City of Toronto.

    Background Information (Committee)
    (May 9, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators - Supplementary Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-69196.pdf

    LS28.5 - Review of the City's Election Sign By-law

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council recommend that the period for election signs be three weeks before the election date.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Licensing and Standards Committee:

     

    a.         Requested the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to review the City's existing election sign by-law and report to the Licensing and Standards Committee by the August 18, 2014 meeting on any recommended changes, such report to include a comparison of municipal, provincial and federal election sign regulations, on the implications of relaxing the enforcement of such a by-law, providing any examples of signs on fences in residential properties and on the feasibility of removing signs and advising the candidates' campaign offices before they are taken down.

    Origin

    (May 8, 2014) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti

    Summary

    The City's current election sign by-law was adopted in 2000 and has been the subject of some minor amendments since then.

     

    With a provincial election underway, the municipal election in the fall and a federal election expected in 2015, now would be a good time to review the City's existing election sign by-law to make sure it reflects current and best practices in other jurisdictions and to address any issues that have been identified since it was first adopted.

     

    Accordingly, City Council should ask the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards to review the by-law and bring forward recommendations that City Council may consider.

     

    This matter is urgent since City Council should make any changes well in advance of the close of nominations for the 2014 municipal election on September 12, 2014 so that the rules may be communicated to candidates.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 8, 2014) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti on Review of the City's Election Sign By-law
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-69201.pdf

    Speakers

    Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti

    Parks and Environment Committee - Meeting 27

    PE27.1 - Authorization to Enter an Agreement with Evergreen regarding Third-Party Fundraising for Lower Don Trail

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 29 - Toronto-Danforth, 30 - Toronto-Danforth

    Committee Recommendations

    The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to enter into an Agreement with Evergreen to raise third-party funding for capital improvements, temporary art, programming and broader community engagement for the Lower Don Trail, under the proposed title, "The Ribbon Campaign," on terms and conditions satisfactory in form and content to the General Manager and the City Solicitor, including the donor recognition term.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to accept third-party funds raised through Phase 1 of the "The Ribbon Campaign" as described in the Agreement, and to contribute the funds as they become available to Lower Don capital projects in Parks, Forestry and Recreation's Capital Budget and Plan for the purpose of capital improvements to the Lower Don, subject to the budget process.

     

    3          City Council forward a copy of the report (May 1, 2014) from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to the Disability Issues Committee.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The following gave a presentation to the Parks and Environment Committee on the Lower Don Trail - Access, Environment and Art Master Plan:

     

    -           Garth Armour, Manager, Horticulture and Greenhouse Operations, Parks, Forestry and Recreation;

    -           Rob Richardson, Manager, Partnership Development, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; and

    -           Julia Murnaghan, Project Manager, Parks Development and Capital Projects, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

    Origin

    (May 1, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to seek approval from City Council to enter into an Agreement with Evergreen to allow Evergreen to raise third-party funding, split 50-50 between the City and Evergreen for capital improvements, temporary art installations, special events, heritage interpretation, and nature educational programming on the Lower Don Trail, as well as for community engagement and public awareness campaigns that build support for the Lower Don revitalization.

     

    The objective is to partner with Evergreen to further the high-level vision set out in the City's Lower Don Trail Master Plan: Access, Environment and Art, published in September 2013.

     

    This report also seeks for City Council to authorize the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to accept and contribute third-party funds raised through Phase 1 of the Lower Don campaign to Lower Don capital plan accounts, subject to the budget process.

     

    Evergreen is a national non-profit organization that inspires action to green cities. The goals and objectives of Evergreen are in keeping with Parks, Forestry and Recreation’s mandate to provide recreation opportunities and enhance and protect Toronto's public green spaces. They are also in keeping with the Parks Plan, adopted by Council on May 7, 2013; the Recreation Service Plan, adopted Nov. 29, 2012, and the Natural Environment Trail Management Strategy, published June 2013.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 1, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, on Authorization to Enter an Agreement with Evergreen regarding Third-Party Fundraising for Lower Don Trail
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-69000.pdf
    (May 20, 2014) Staff Presentation on Lower Don Trail - Access, Environment and Art Master Plan
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-69492.pdf

    Speakers

    Seana Irvine, Chief Operating Officer, Evergreen
    Cynthia Wilkey, West Don Lands Committee
    Councillor Paula Fletcher
    Councillor Mary Fragedakis

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 14, 2014) Letter from Cynthia Wilkey, Chair, West Don Lands Committee (PE.New.PW27.1.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/comm/communicationfile-47613.pdf
    (May 16, 2014) Submission from Seana Irvine, Chief Operating Officer, Evergreen (PE.New.PE27.1.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/comm/communicationfile-47655.pdf
    (May 20, 2014) Presentation from Seana Irvine, Chief Operating Officer, Evergreen, on Revitalizing the Lower Don: Engagement, Education, Enhancement (PE.New.PE27.1.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/comm/communicationfile-47657.pdf

    PE27.2 - Golf Marketing Incentive

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Bill 512 has been submitted on this Item.

    Public Notice Given

    Committee Recommendations

    The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the introduction of a golf marketing incentive as outlined in Appendix A to the report (April 22, 2014) from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

     

    2.         City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, to add the fee schedule as outlined in Appendix A to the report (April 22, 2014) from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

    Origin

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

    Summary

    This report seeks authority for a golf marketing incentive in response to the 2012 Auditor General's report that recommended integrating standard industry practices into City golf operations, including increased marketing/promotion, responsiveness to golfer expectations, and a flexible fee structure.

     

    Parks, Forestry and Recreation (PFR) is proposing a marketing incentive to improve golf course usage during underutilized periods and to encourage new/repeat participation. The incentive is for adult, 18-hole, weekday rounds, and includes: a 12-round package at the cost of 10-rounds at all five city-owned golf courses; a 2-round coupon at the cost of 1-round for courses with a higher percentage of available tee times; and a 4-round coupon for the cost of 3-rounds for off-peak times.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 22, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, on Golf Marketing Incentive
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-68576.pdf

    PE27.3 - Vehicle Parking in Non-Designated Areas in City Parks - Exemption Criteria

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Communication PE27.3.2 has been submitted on this Item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council direct City staff to end all for-profit use of parks for parking in 2015, and all other uses of parks for parking in 2016

    Origin

    (April 30, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

    Summary

    City Council at its meeting on July 16, 2013, directed the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report back on the feasibility of a criteria-based exemption by permit, from the requirements of Section 27 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 608, Parks to allow temporary permitted parking in areas within parks that are not designated for parking. This report provides a list of criteria to determine possible exemptions as part of the special event permit guidelines.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 30, 2014) Report and Appendix 1 from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, on Vehicle Parking in Non-Designated Areas in City Parks - Exemption Criteria
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-69024.pdf

    Speakers

    Jacqueline Mackey, Chief Financial Officer, Canadian Film Centre

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 20, 2014) Submission from Jacqueline Mackey, Chief Financial Officer, Canadian Film Centre, on a Request for an Exception to a By-law Prohibiting Vehicle Parking in City Parks re the CFC Annual Barbeque (PE.New.PE27.3.1)

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 6, 2014) Letter from Christina Jennings, Chair and Slawko Klymkiw, Chief Executive Officer, Canadian Film Centre (CC.Supp.PE27.3.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47947.pdf

    Planning and Growth Management Committee - Meeting 33

    PG33.2 - Amendments for all Zoning By-laws Group Home Separation and Occupant Numbers

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Bill 532 has been submitted on this Item.

    Public Notice Given

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Committee Recommendations

    The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013; former City of Toronto By-law 438-86; former City of North York By-law 7625; former City of York By-law 1-83; former Borough of East York By-laws 6752 and 1916; former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code; and, former City of Scarborough Zoning By-laws 10076, 12797, 8786, 9350, 9174, 9396, 8978, 9364, 9508, 10048, 9676, 10827, 9089, 9276, 12466, 14402, 12181, 17677, 11883, 9366, 9812, 15907, 10010, 16762, 10717, 12360, 950-2005, 9511, 10327, 9510, substantially in accordance with the draft zoning by-law amendments included in Attachment 1 of the report (December 20, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to each Zoning By-law amendment as may be required.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Planning and Growth Management Committee commenced a statutory public meeting on January 13, 2014 and continued the public meeting on April 10, 2014 and May 29, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

    Origin

    (December 20, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

    Summary

    At the February 28, 2013 meeting of Planning and Growth Management Committee Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning reported on the findings of the report entitled 'Opinion on the Provisions of Group Homes in the City-wide Zoning By-law of the City of Toronto' by Dr. Sandeep Agrawal, a land use planning expert with knowledge of the interaction between planning and human rights issues. Dr. Agrawal was retained to conduct a review and provide advice to City Council on the land use planning and human rights issues related to the definition of "Group Home" and the 250 metre mandatory separation distance between group homes in the then draft, now enacted, City-wide Zoning by-law. The expert found that the definitions and separation distances applicable to group homes were in his opinion not supportable and recommended removing them. Staff was requested to review these findings and prepare their own report providing advice with respect to questions raised by the Committee in light of the findings of the expert.

     

    At the October 22, 2013 meeting of Planning and Growth Management Committee Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning reported that City Planning staff had review the matter further and had additional discussions with several Provincial Ministry representatives to determine whether there is any substantive requirement or planning reason for separating Group Homes and whether there is any basis for requiring a minimum number of occupants in a Group Home. Based upon these discussions and the finding of Dr. Agrawal, City Planning Staff concluded that there is no planning justification to include a separation distances for Group Homes in a zoning by-law. It was also concluded that there is no reason for a zoning by-law to require a minimum number of occupants in a Group Home.

     

    This report responds to that Planning and Growth Management Committee's direction to the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning (PG27.6) to hold a public open house to obtain public input on the proposed changes to Group Homes in the zoning by-law and prepare a final report and draft by-law for the purpose of a statutory public meeting at the January 13, 2014, meeting of the Planning and Growth Management Committee.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (December 20, 2013) Revised Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, on Amendments for all Zoning By-laws Group Home Separation and Occupant Numbers
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69354.pdf
    (December 10, 2013) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Amendments for all Zoning By-laws Group Home Separation and Occupant Numbers
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69355.pdf
    Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69356.pdf
    (January 13, 2014) Presentation on Review of Zoning Regulations Pertaining to Group Homes
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69357.pdf

    Speakers

    (January 13, 2014) Councillor David Shiner
    (January 13, 2014) Councillor Ron Moeser
    (April 10, 2014) Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, CORRA, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto
    (April 10, 2014) Councillor Gord Perks
    (May 29, 2014) Dianne Carter, (representing Chief Commissioner Barbara Hall), Ontario Human Rights Commission
    (May 29, 2014) Eileen Denny, Vice-Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto
    (May 29, 2014) Kenneth Hale, Director of Advocacy and Legal Services , Advocacy Centre for Tenants - Ontario

    Communications (Committee)

    (January 6, 2014) Letter from Garry W. Pruden, CEO, Community Living Toronto (PG.Main.PG33.2.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47615.pdf
    (January 10, 2014) Letter from Kenneth Hale, Director, Advocacy and Legal Services (PG.Main.PG33.2.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47616.pdf
    (January 10, 2014) Letter from Robert G. Keel, Partner, Keel Cottrelle LLP (PG.Main.PG33.2.3)
    (January 12, 2014) E-mail from Don Purvis, Cabbagetown South Residents Association (PG.Main.PG33.2.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47618.pdf
    (January 28, 2014) E-mail from Rob Greenaway (PG.Main.PG33.2.5)
    (January 27, 2014) E-mail from Roberta Freeman (PG.Main.PG33.2.6)
    (April 7, 2014) Letter from Confederation of Resident and Ratepayers Associations in Toronto (CORRA), Executive Team (PG.Main.PG33.2.7)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47619.pdf
    (April 7, 2014) Letter from Confederation of Resident and Ratepayers Associations in Toronto (CORRA), Executive Team (PG.Main.PG33.2.8)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47620.pdf
    (May 23, 2014) Letter from Jeff Forsyth, President and Bryan Gawtrey, Planning Chair, Centennial Community and Recreation Association (PG.New.PG33.2.9)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47765.pdf
    (May 27, 2014) Letter from William H. Roberts, Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayers Association in Toronto (PG.New.PG33.2.10)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47805.pdf

    2a - Amendments for all Zoning By-laws Group Home Separation and Occupant Numbers - Public Consultation Summary

    Origin
    (May 1, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning
    Summary

    This report responds to Planning and Growth Management Committee's direction to the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning (PG30.2) to "conduct further Community consultation" and report back to Planning and Growth Management Committee at its meeting of April 10, 2014. As space in the various districts of the City could not be secured until the first two weeks of April, the matter is being brought back as a continuation of the January 13, 2014 Statutory Public Meeting at the May 29, 2014 meeting of Planning and Growth Management Committee.

     

    A series of four open house meetings on the proposed changes to group home regulations were held between April 7 and April 15, 2014, between the hours of 4:00 pm to 8:30 pm. One open house meeting was held in each district. A copy of the notification of the meetings was provided to each councillor and the advertisement was placed in the Toronto Star newspaper.

     

    Through the course of the four open house meetings a total of 26 members of the public and various organizations attended. Of those, a total of 15 were also associated with 'The Dream Team', Ontario Human Rights Commission, a Group Home advocacy association or a councillor's office.

     

    Those who attended the meeting, while having questions on the topic, expressed no opposition to eliminating the separation distance between group homes or to the removal of the minimum 3 person requirement for a group home.

    Background Information (Committee)
    (May 1, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning Division on Amendments for all Zoning By-laws Group Home Separation and Occupant Numbers - Public Consultation Summary
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69372.pdf

    PG33.4 - Bermondsey O'Connor Employment Area - City-initiated Official Plan Amendment - Final Report

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    31 - Beaches-East York
    Attention
    Bill 534 has been submitted on this Item.

    Public Notice Given

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Committee Recommendations

    The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that: 

     

    1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for lands in the vicinity of the intersection of Bermondsey Road and O'Connor Drive substantially in accordance with the proposed Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 4 to the report (April 23, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the proposed Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

    Origin

    (April 23, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

    Summary

    This report proposes a City-initiated Official Plan Amendment in response to Council's direction on December 16-18, 2013 to review Site and Area Specific Policies 145, 146 and 233 that apply in the Bermondsey O'Connor area, consider the appropriateness of continuing the uses permitted by these policies, and consider removing those uses not consistent with the new Employment Areas designations.

     

    Staff reviewed the three Site and Area Specific Policies, examined the Bermondsey O'Connor area and consulted with the public. Staff recommend that Site and Area Specific Policies 145 and 146 be removed from the Official Plan to delete permissions for institutional and residential uses.  Further, staff recommend that Site and Area Specific Policy 233 be amended to remove permissions for institutional uses and places of worship, and that small and medium scale retail uses only be permitted on lands fronting Bermondsey Road, north of Northline Road and south of Sunrise Avenue.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 23, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Bermondsey O'Connor Employment Area - City-initiated Official Plan Amendment - Final Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69369.pdf
    (April 22, 2014) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69378.pdf

    Speakers

    Patrick Harrington, Aird & Berlis LLP, representing Toronto City Church
    Paul Johnston, Johnston Litavski Limited
    Councillor Janet Davis

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 28, 2014) Letter from Robert A. Dragicevic, Senior Principal, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited representing Surrey Plaza Limited (PG.New.PG33.4.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47804.pdf
    (May 26, 2014) Letter from Paul E. Johnston, Johnston Litavski representing Mondelez Canada Inc. (PG.New.PG33.4.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47793.pdf
    (May 29, 2014) E-mail from Patrick Harrington, Aird and Berlis, representing Toronto City Church (PG.New.PG33.4.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47823.pdf
    (May 29, 2014) Letter from Steven J. O'Melia, Miller Thomson LLP, representing the Scott Mission O'Connor Family Centre (PG.New.PG33.4.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47826.pdf

    PG33.5 - City-wide Zoning Bylaw Amendments that Address Particular Appeals

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Communication PG33.5.4 has been submitted on this Item

    Bill 544 has been submitted on this Item.

    Public Notice Given

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Committee Recommendations

    That Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council enact amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013 substantially in accordance with Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 to the report (May 2, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and 

     

    2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013 as may be required.

    Origin

    (May 2, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

    Summary

    As part of the process of enacting the new City-wide Zoning By-law, a Transition Protocol was established with criteria to determine which properties would be left out of new Zoning By-law. One category in the Protocol refers to sites with complete applications for a zoning by-law amendment. Another involves lands with complete applications for site plan approval. Due to the time required to produce the Zoning By-law Map for the May 7-10, 2013 meeting of City Council, staff were unable to remove sites that had submitted complete applications just prior to the City-wide Zoning By-law enactment on May 9, 2013.

     

    This report proposes amendments to remove lands from Zoning By-law 569- 2013 that had complete applications and met the Transition Protocol criteria, but were not removed prior to Council enactment. In addition, the correction of a number of minor typographical errors and corrections to zoning labels and zoning boundaries is also being recommended through this amending by-law. The amendments proposed will address 12 appeals to By-law 569-2013.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 2, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the City-wide Zoning Bylaw Amendments that Address Particular Appeals
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69377.pdf
    (May 8, 2014) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69349.pdf

    Background Information (City Council)

    Schedule 53 - 255 Ranee Avenue - attached to the motion by Councillor Josh Collee
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70907.pdf

    Speakers

    Eileen Denny, Vice-Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 12, 2014) Letter from Stanislaw and Krystyna Ferus regarding 115 Roncesvalles Avenue (PG.Main.PG33.5.1)
    (May 26, 2014) Letter from Robert G. Doumani, Aird & Berlis LLP regarding 140 Carlton Street (PG.New.PG33.5.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47746.pdf
    (May 28, 2014) Letter from Signe Leisk, Cassels Brock Lawyers representing the Governing Council of the University of Toronto (PG.New.PG33.5.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47792.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 11, 2014) Letter from Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident & Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CC.New.PG33.5.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48018.pdf

    PG33.6 - Final Report on Areas for Proposed Residential Apartment Commercial (RAC) Zone

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PG33.6a with recommendations).

    Communications PG33.6.8 and PG33.6.9 have been submitted on this Item.

    Items PG33.6 and PG33.7 will be considered together

    Bill 557 has been submitted on this Item.

    Public Notice Given

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Committee Recommendations

    The Planning Growth Management Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 by changing some of the Residential Apartment Commercial (RAC) zoning requirements and applying the RAC zone to selected apartment building sites  substantially in accordance with the draft zoning by-law amendments included in Attachment 2 of the report (May 2, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and 

     

    2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft zoning by-law amendments included in Attachment 2 of the report (May 2, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning as may be required.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

     

    1.         Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to review the requirements that limits the location of arts studios to a separate building, in consultation with the Toronto Arts Council, and report directly to City Council.

     

    2          Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report back to the Planning and Growth Management Committee at the earliest opportunity to include 1765-1775 Weston Road in the Residential Apartment Commercial zone.

     

    The Director, Zoning By-law and Environmental Planning, City Planning, gave a presentation to the Planning and Growth Management Committee.

     

    Origin

    (May 2, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

    Summary

    The new Residential Apartment Commercial (RAC) zone will permit a number of small-scale commercial and community uses on apartment building sites, providing opportunities for new ventures which will contribute to the vibrancy and diversity of apartment neighbourhoods.

     

    The new uses may include, for example, small shops, food markets, cafes, learning centres, barbershops, doctor's offices, community centres and places of worship. The RAC zone requires the apartment site to have at least 100 units in order to have these uses and each shop is limited in size. As well, the total maximum amount of floor area devoted to non-residential uses is restricted in order to ensure these uses remain oriented to the local area. In this manner, the RAC zone regulations allow the flexibility for these uses and services to occur, thereby improving the neighbourhood conveniences, while ensuring they remain compatible with the primary residential uses.

     

    This report outlines the results of the public consultation on the final recommended areas for application of the RAC zoning and proposed amendments to the City-wide Zoning By-law pertaining to the RAC zone.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 2, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division on the Final Report on Areas for Proposed Residential Apartment Commercial (RAC) Zone
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69367.pdf
    (May 2, 2014) Draft Amendments from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning Division on the Final Report on Areas for Proposed Residential Apartment Commercial (RAC) Zone
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69500.pdf
    (May 8, 2014) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69379.pdf
    (May 29, 2014) Presentation on Areas for Proposed Residential Apartment Commercial (RAC) Zone - Report on Consulation
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69673.pdf

    Background Information (City Council)

    (June 10, 2014) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division (PG33.6a)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70430.pdf

    Speakers

    Pedro Barata and Graeme Stewart, United Way Toronto/ E.R.A. Architects
    Claire Hopkinson, Director & CEO, Toronto Arts Council
    Daryl Chong, President and CEO, Greater Toronto Apartment Association
    Eileen Denny, Vice-Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto

    Communications (Committee)

    (April 24, 2014) E-mail from David Willis, President, Board of Directors, South Riverdale Community Health Centre (PG.Main.PG33.6.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47624.pdf
    (May 5, 2014) Letter from Wendy Nott, Senior Principal, Walker, Nott, Draglicevic Associates Limited re: 2667-2677 Kipling Avenue (PG.Main.PG33.6.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47625.pdf
    (May 5, 2014) Letter from Wendy Nott, Senior Principal, Walker, Nott, Draglicevic Associates Limited re: 1765-1775 Weston Road (PG.Main.PG33.6.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47626.pdf
    (May 27, 2014) Letter from Daryl Chong, President & CEO, Greater Toronto Apartment Association (PG.New.PG33.6.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47788.pdf
    (May 27, 2014) E-mail from Robert Bathgate (PG.New.PG33.6.5)
    (May 29, 2014) Letter from Pedro Barata, Vice-President, Communications and Public Affairs, United Way Toronto (PG.New.PG33.6.6)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47795.pdf
    (May 29, 2014) Letter from Graeme Stewart, ERA Architects, Centre for Urban Growth and Renewal (PG.New.PG33.6.7)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47821.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 9, 2014) Letter from Robert G. Doumani, Aird and Berlis LLP (CC.New.PG33.6.8)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47940.pdf
    (June 11, 2014) Letter from Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident & Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CC.New.PG33.6.9)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48019.pdf

    PG33.7 - Residential Apartment Commercial (RAC) Zoning: Supporting Implementation

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Communication PG33.7.5 has been submitted on this Item

    Items PG33.6 and PG33.7 wil be considered together

    Committee Recommendations

    The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council direct the Tower Neighbourhood Inter-Divisional Committee to oversee and coordinate the Residential Apartment Commercial pilot implementation process.

     

    2.         City Council direct the Co-Chairs of the Tower Neighbourhood Inter-Divisional Committee to include the United Way of Greater Toronto Centre for Urban Growth and Renewal as members of the Committee.

    Origin

    (May 15, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

    Summary

    This report outlines the process staff will use to encourage the use of the newly available Residential Apartment Commercial zoning to support achieving more complete communities in the 7 pilot areas identified by City Council at its meeting of April 3 and 4, 2013.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 15, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 - 3 from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Residential Apartment Commercial (RAC) Zoning: Supporting Implementation
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69359.pdf

    Speakers

    Pedro Barata and Graeme Stewart, United Way/E.R.A. Architects
    Eileen Denny, Vice-Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 28, 2014) Letter from Mark A. Piels, Dentons Canada LLP representing The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada (PG.New.PG33.7.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47791.pdf
    (May 29, 2014) Letter from Pedro Barata, Vice President, Communications and Public Affairs (PG.New.PG33.7.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47798.pdf
    (May 29, 2014) Letter from Graeme Stewart, ERA Architects, Centre for Urban Growth and Renewal (PG.New.PG33.7.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47822.pdf
    (May 29, 2014) E-mail from G. Hefner (PG.New.PG33.7.4)

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 11, 2014) Letter from Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CC.New.PG33.7.5)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48020.pdf

    PG33.8 - Area-Specific Amendment to Chapter 694, Signs, General, with respect to an existing Third Party Ground Sign at 1675 Lake Shore Boulevard East

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    32 - Beaches-East York
    Attention
    Communication PG33.8.4 has been submitted on this item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that: 

     

    1.         City Council refuse the request to add an area-specific amendment to Schedule B, Signage Master Plans and Area-Specific Amendments, Chapter 694, Signs, General, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code to allow the display of one illuminated third party ground sign containing four sign faces, two of which would each display 5.9 square metres of electronic readograph sign copy and the other two of which would each display 2.1 square metres of static copy, located in the public right-of-way to the north of the premises municipally known as 1675 Lake Shore Boulevard East.

    Origin

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building

    Summary

    This report reviews and recommends refusal of an application for an amendment to the Sign Bylaw, Chapter 694, Signs General of the City of Toronto Municipal Code (Chapter 694) made on behalf of Tuggs Incorporated ("Tuggs") to permit the continued display of a third party ground sign displaying static and electronic readograph sign copy.

     

    The sign is approximately 3.5 metres tall, and has a total sign face area of 16.0 square metres (eight square metres per side). The sign is erected on the public right-of-way and is located approximately three metres north of the northern property line for 1675 Lake Shore Boulevard East.  The sign is proposed to be used primarily to identify the Boardwalk Café. As the sign is located on the public right-of-way adjacent to 1675 Lake Shore Boulevard East, the proposed sign is defined as a third party sign under Chapter 694.

     

    Staff recommend refusal of this application due to the size of the sign, the proportion of sign face area displaying electronic readograph sign copy and the impact that the sign has had, and would continue to have, on nearby properties as well as the visual impact that the sign structure has on Lake Shore Boulevard East.

     

    Staff from Parks, Forestry and Recreation and Legal Services have been consulted in the preparation of this report.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building on Area-Specific Amendment to Chapter 694, Signs, General, with respect to an existing Third Party Ground Sign at 1675 Lake Shore Boulevard East
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69358.pdf
    (May 7, 2014) Attachment 1
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69590.pdf

    Speakers

    Justin Anisman, Student-at-Law, McCague Borlack LLP (Submission Filed)
    George Foulidis, Owner, Tuggs Incorporated
    Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 26, 2014) E-mail from Justin Anisman, Student-at-Law, McCague Borlack LLP (PG.New.PG33.8.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47766.pdf
    (May 27, 2014) E-mail from Bryan Hughes (PG.New.PG33.8.2)
    (May 29, 2014) Submission from Justin Anisman, Student-at-Law, McCague Borlack LLP (PG.New.PG33.8.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47829.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 11, 2014) Letter from Gary M. Caplan, McCague Borlack LLP (CC.New.PG33.8.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48023.pdf

    PG33.9 - 6 Lloyd Avenue - Official Plan Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    11 - York South-Weston

    Committee Recommendations

    The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to submit the Final Report on 6 Lloyd Avenue to Etobicoke York Community Council on August 12, 2014 after the applicant submits all outstanding material required for a complete application.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

     

    1.         Directed staff, provided the applicant submits all outstanding materials required for a complete application, to schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 6 Lloyd Avenue together with the Ward Councillor before the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing issues a decision on Official Plan Amendment 231.

     

    2.         Directed that notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.

     

    3.         Directed that notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations of the Planning Act.

    Origin

    (March 17, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

    Summary

    This application proposes to amend the Official Plan by redesignating the northern two-thirds of the lands from Employment Areas to Mixed Use Areas and creating a new Site and Area Specific Policy over the entire site to permit residential uses and commercial/offices uses at 6 Lloyd Avenue.  The southern one-third of the site is proposed to remain designated Employment Areas.  The submitted application does not include appropriate plans and drawings and other required material for a complete application.

     

    This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Planning and Growth Management Committee's directions on further processing of the application and on the community consultation process.

     

    This report recommends that the Chief Planner schedule a community consultation meeting and submit the Final Report for 6 Lloyd Avenue to Planning and Growth Management Committee after the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing issues a decision on Official Plan Amendment (OPA) 231, subject to the applicant submitting all required information in a timely manner.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (March 17, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 6 Lloyd Avenue - Official Plan Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69155.pdf

    Speakers

    Christopher Tanzola, Overland LLP

    PG33.12 - Relief Line Project Assessment: Finalized Terms of Reference and Public Consultation Plan

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Communications PG33.12.6 and PG33.12.7 have been submitted on this Item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the final Terms of Reference and Public Consultation Plan presented in Appendix A and Appendix B of the report (May 15, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to guide the next phases (Phases 1B to 4) of the Relief Line Project Assessment. With this approval the City and Toronto Transit Commission will jointly proceed with the Relief Line Project Assessment.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Director, Transportation Planning, City Planning, gave a presentation to the Planning and Growth Management Committee.

    Origin

    (May 15, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

    Summary

    This report recommends a final Terms of Reference and Public Consultation Plan for the Relief Line Project Assessment, a study to determine the station locations and route alignment for a new rapid transit line that would connect Downtown Toronto to the Bloor-Danforth Subway (Line 2) east of the Don River. With this approval the City and TTC will jointly proceed with the Relief Line Project Assessment.

     

    This project is required to accommodate current and future ridership demands on the Yonge Line (Line 1), increase capacity and relieve crowding at the Bloor/Yonge interchange station and, provide new transit capacity to relieve overcrowding on the surface transit network.

     

    The Relief Line Project Assessment encompasses the environmental assessment work that must be completed in advance of initiating a Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) for this project. 

     

    At the December 4, 2013 meeting of Planning and Growth Management Committee, staff received authority to commence Phase 1A of this work, to consult with the public on the draft study Terms of Reference and a proposed Public Consultation Plan. This consultation has been completed in coordination with the Metrolinx Yonge Relief Network Study (YRNS) which is underway concurrently to relieve crowding on the Yonge Subway Line through a review of broader regional solutions.

     

    A summary of  public feedback from the March and April 2014 public consultation is presented along with a final Terms of Reference (Appendix A) and Public Consultation Plan (Appendix B).  The report recommends approval of these guiding documents.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 15, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Relief Line Project Assessment: Finalized Terms of Reference and Public Consultation Plan
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69421.pdf
    (May 15, 2014) Appendix A: Terms of Reference
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69423.pdf
    (May 15, 2014) Appendix B: Public Consultation Plan
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69424.pdf
    (May 29, 2014) Presentation on Relief Line Project Assessment
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69733.pdf

    Speakers

    Eileen Denny, Vice-Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto
    Hamish Wilson (Submission Filed)
    Councillor Paula Fletcher

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 20, 2014) Letter from Kara Isert, President, Corktown Residents & Business Association (PG.New.PG33.12.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47762.pdf
    (May 28, 2014) Letter from Grant Humes, Executive Director, Toronto Financial District BIA (PG.New.PG33.12.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47760.pdf
    (May 26, 2014) Letter from Cynthia Wilkey, Chair, West Don Lands Committee (PG.New.PG33.12.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47768.pdf
    (May 28, 2014) E-mail from Sharon Yetman (PG.New.PG33.12.4)
    (May 29, 2014) Letter from Hamish Wilson (PG.New.PG33.12.5)

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 6, 2014) Letter from Hamish Wilson (CC.Supp.PG33.12.6)
    (June 12, 2014) Submission from Councillor Chin Lee, Ward 41 - Scarborough Rouge River - report "Toronto's Suburban Relief Line" by the Economist of Consumer Policy Institute (CC.New.PG33.12.7)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48033.pdf

    PG33.14 - Implementing a Local Appeal Body for Toronto - Public Consultation Comments and Guiding Principles

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    The City Manager has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PG33.14a with recommendations).

    Communication PG33.14.3 has been submitted on this Item

    Committee Recommendations

    The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the establishment of a Local Appeal Body to hear appeals of minor variances and consent applications;

     

    2.         City Council approve the following eight guiding principles for implementing the Local Appeal Body (LAB):

     

    Guiding Principle One - Appointment of LAB Members

    LAB members will be recruited using a fair and impartial recruitment process where the most qualified candidates are appointed by City Council.

     

    Guiding Principle Two - Qualifications of LAB Members

    The members will have reputable adjudicative experience, familiarity with land use planning and planning law, demonstrated ability to make sound, balanced decisions, and will be free of conflicts of interest.

     

    Guiding Principle Three - LAB Member Remuneration

    LAB members will be remunerated at a level that ensures they are able to effectively perform their role and function to achieve fair and balanced hearing decisions.

     

    Guiding Principle Four - Oversight and Accountability of LAB Members

    The LAB will operate as an independent decision making body free from influence by outside parties. It will be subject to the City's Code of Conduct for Members of Adjudicative Boards and will conduct itself in accordance with the Statutory Powers Procedures Act, the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act and the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

     

    Guiding Principle Five - LAB Practices and Procedures

    The LAB will determine its own hearing practices and procedures in accordance with relevant legislation such as the Statutory Powers Procedure Act and the City of Toronto Act.

     

    Guiding Principle Six - LAB Structure and Relationship with the City 

    The LAB will be structured to provide efficient and timely due process with administrative support from the City.

     

    Guiding Principle Seven - Costs of Implementing and Maintaining a LAB

    The City will provide adequate start-up and ongoing operating funding to the LAB to ensure that it functions effectively and independently and in a manner that upholds fair due process for all the parties involved in the hearing.

     

    Guiding Principle Eight - Appeal Filing Fees for the LAB

    In establishing fees for the LAB, Council will be guided by the legislation which governs the tariff of fees for the LAB and the City's User Fee Policy and by the principles of natural justice.

     

    3.         City Council direct that the amount of additional start up costs for 2015, in addition to operating and capital costs for 2015, be considered as part of the 2015 budget process;

     

    4.         City Council direct that the establishment of a Local Appeal Body be co-ordinated and overseen by the City Manager and that the City Manager report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee at the August 7, 2014 meeting, with recommendations for the number and remuneration of LAB members and a proposed fee structure;

     

    5.         City Council request the City Manager, in preparing the report of a recommended fee structure, give consideration to the following:

                i.          a minimum fee for all appeals; and

    ii.         for appeals initiated by Committee of Adjustment applicants, the minimum appeal fee be at least equal to the applicant's Committee of Adjustment fees.

     

    6.         City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Planning Act to provide a clear definition of a minor variance;

     

    7.         City Council request the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to respond to Council's previous requests for Provincial funding assistance in implementing a Local Appeal Body;

     

    8.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee meeting on August 7, 2014 on the resources required for Planning staff to report on every Committee of Adjustment application;

     

    9.         City Council request that the Committee of Adjustment panels provide detailed written or oral reasons explaining their reasons for approval or refusal of applications; and

     

    10.       City Council request the City Solicitor and the Open Meeting Investigator to meet with Committee of Adjustment panel members to advise them on how to conduct meetings and their discussions in an appropriate manner.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Planning and Growth Management Committee requested the City Manager to report directly to City Council confirming availability of start-up funding in 2014 to begin the process for Local Appeal Body so that it is in place to hear all appeals made after June 1, 2015.

    Origin

    (May 6, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

    Summary

    This report summarizes the results of the public consultations on implementing a Local Appeal Body (LAB) for the City of Toronto to hear appeals of minor variance and consent applications.  The report also provides principles, informed by the consultation, to guide LAB implementation in the event Council decides to implement a LAB.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 6, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 - 2 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Implementing a Local Appeal Body for Toronto - Public Consultation Comments and Guiding Principles
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69375.pdf

    Background Information (City Council)

    (June 9, 2014) Supplementary report from the City Manager on Implementing a Local Appeal Body for Toronto - Public Consultations and Guiding Principles (PG33.14a)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70360.pdf

    Speakers

    Danielle Chin, Building Industry and Land Development Association
    Eileen Denny, Vice-Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto
    Michael Coll, Resident

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 28, 2014) E-mail from Patrick Smyth (PG.New.PG33.14.1)
    (May 28, 2014) Letter from Bill Birdsell, President, Ontario Association of Architects (PG.New.PG33.14.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47799.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 8, 2014) Letter from Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CC.New.PG33.14.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48029.pdf

    PG33.15 - Amendments to the City-wide Site Plan Control By-law

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Communications PG33.15.1 to PG33.15.3 have been submitted on this Item

    Bill 533 has been submitted on this Item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         The Draft By-law included as Attachment 1 of the report (May 2, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning be amended by deleting the proposed changes to § 415-45 A (8).

     

    2.         City Council amend Municipal Code, Chapter 415 - Development of Land, Article V, Site Plan Control substantially in accordance with the draft By-law included as Attachment 1 of the report (May 2, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as amended by Recommendation 1.

     

    3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make stylistic and technical changes to the draft By-law as may be required.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Planning and Growth Management Committee requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on:

     

    a.         amendments to the Site Plan Control By-law to require site plan approval on all changes of use on properties along arterial roads for interior alterations of less than 1000 square metres;  and

     

    b.         the enforcement of Site Plan Control and how it can be made more effective.

    Origin

    (May 2, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

    Summary

    This report recommends amendments to the City-wide Site Plan Control By-law (Municipal Code, Chapter 415 - Development of Land, Article V, Site Plan Control). The proposed amendments provide additional clarity for staff and applicants on the application, interpretation and enforcement of the By-law.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 2, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division on Amendments to the City-wide Site Plan Control By-law
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69373.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 2, 2014) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans, Barristers and Solicitors (CC.Main.PG33.15.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47893.pdf
    (June 4, 2014) Letter from Danielle Chin, Senior Planner, Policy and Government Relations, Building Industry and Land Development Association (CC.Supp.PG33.15.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47926.pdf
    (June 5, 2014) Letter from Eileen P.K. Costello, Aird and Berlis LLP (CC.Supp.PG33.15.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47949.pdf

    Public Works and Infrastructure Committee - Meeting 31

    PW31.1 - Confirmation of Levels of Service for Winter Maintenance of Bikeways, Windrow Opening, Sidewalks and Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) Compliance

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council confirm the proposed levels of service beginning in the 2015/16 winter season for winter maintenance of cycling facilities, including priority routes with appropriate signage, at a cost of approximately $650,000 per season (based on the current cycling network) as outlined in Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 to the report (March 17, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

     

    2.         City Council confirm the expansion of the driveway windrow opening program beginning in the 2015/16 winter season at a cost of approximately $50,000 per season to those streets listed in Appendix 3 to the report (March 17, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

     

    3.         City Council confirm the expansion of the sidewalk clearing program beginning in the 2015/16 winter season at a cost of approximately $50,000 per season to those streets listed in Appendix 5 to the report (March 17, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

     

    4.         City Council direct staff to make the necessary changes to Chapter 719 of the Toronto Municipal Code, Snow and Ice Removal, to require adjacent property owners to clear sidewalks of snow and ice to a minimum width of 1.2 metres wherever the City of Toronto has not undertaken to clear the snow and ice.

     

    5.         City Council direct that contra-flow bicycle lanes be given priority status for winter clearing.

     

    6.         City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to advertise snow removal guidelines in local newspapers at the beginning and throughout the winter season, including that where sidewalk snow clearance occurs the level of service for sidewalk snow clearance of 8 cm of snow accumulation in December and March and 5 cm of snow accumulation in January and February and that it is the responsibility of home owners to clear snow from sidewalks that front their properties at any other time.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee requested the General Manager, Transportation Services, to:

     

    1.         Undertake a review of the current criteria for mechanical sidewalk snow clearing to determine if any changes could be made to increase the number of streets receiving this service and report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in the Spring of 2015.

     

    2.         Consult with Councillors and other stakeholder groups for recommendations for additional streets that should be reviewed for inclusion in the mechanical sidewalk snow clearing program.

    Origin

    (March 17, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to provide further information on winter maintenance levels of service following the report provided to Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on November 20, 2013, entitled, "Confirmation of Levels of Service for Roadway and Roadside Winter Maintenance Services".

     

    The report proposes the creation of levels of service for winter maintenance on cycling facilities, the addition of specified streets to the mechanical driveway windrow opening and sidewalk clearing programs, and changes to the Snow and Ice Removal By-law that will enhance winter maintenance for people with disabilities in compliance with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA).

    Background Information (Committee)

    (March 17, 2014) Report and Appendices 1 to 12 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Confirmation of Levels of Service for Winter Maintenance of Bikeways, Windrow Opening, Sidewalks and Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) Compliance
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68450.pdf

    Speakers

    Hamish Wilson (Submission Filed)
    Jared Kolb, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto
    Roger Brook, Board Member, Transport Action Ontario (Submission Filed)
    Mark Earley, Walk Toronto (Submission Filed)
    Michael Black, Walk Toronto
    Judith Kidd, Walk Toronto
    Justin Levine
    Councillor Shelley Carroll
    Councillor Gord Perks

    Communications (Committee)

    (March 25, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 19 - Trinity-Spadina (PW.Main.PW31.1.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-46782.pdf
    (April 8, 2014) Letter from Nancy Smith Lea, Director, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (TCAT) (PW.Main.PW31.1.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-46784.pdf
    (April 8, 2014) Letter from Jared Kolb, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto (PW.Main.PW31.1.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-46785.pdf
    (April 8, 2014) Letter from Michael Black, John Fischer, Judith Kidd, Sean Marshall, Dylan Reid, Walk Toronto (PW.Main.PW31.1.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-46786.pdf
    (April 8, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22 - St. Paul's (PW.Main.PW31.1.5)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-46783.pdf
    (April 9, 2014) Letter from Mark Earley (PW.Main.PW31.1.6)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Antony Hilliard (PW.New.PW31.1.7)
    (May 13, 2014) Submission from Liz Sutherland, Cycle Toronto Ward 18 (PW.New.PW31.1.8)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47519.pdf
    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Nancy Smith Lea, Director, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (TCAT) (PW.New.PW31.1.9)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47527.pdf
    (May 14, 2014) Submission from Mark Early (PW.New.PW31.1.10)
    (May 14, 2014) Submission from Hamish Wilson (PW.New.PW31.1.11)
    (May 14, 2014) Submission from Roger Brook (PW.New.PW31.1.12)
    (May 14, 2014) E-mail from Neil McDermott (PW.New.PW31.1.13)

    1a - Confirmation of Levels of Service for Winter Maintenance of Bikeways, Windrow Opening, Sidewalks and AODA Compliance - Supplementary Report

    Origin
    (April 28, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services
    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to provide supplementary information on winter maintenance levels of service following the report provided to Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on April 9, 2014 entitled, "Confirmation of Levels of Service for Winter Maintenance of Bikeways, Windrow Opening, Sidewalks and AODA Compliance".

     

    The report provides clarification on matters related to sidewalk snow clearing standards and equipment specifications in other jurisdictions, Transportation Services' plan for compliance with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) legislation, a conceptual plan for the expansion of the mechanical sidewalk clearing program, and how desired pavement conditions may be achieved on cycle tracks and priority lanes.

    Background Information (Committee)
    (April 28, 2014) Report and Appendix 1 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Confirmation of Levels of Service for Winter Maintenance of Bikeways, Windrow Opening, Sidewalks and AODA Compliance - Supplementary Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-69023.pdf

    PW31.4 - St. Dennis Drive - Conversion of Traffic Lanes to On-Street Parking and Bicycle Lanes

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    26 - Don Valley West
    Attention
    Bills 487 and 488 have been submitted on this Item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the installation of bicycle lanes on both sides of St. Dennis Drive between Don Mills Road and Linkwood Lane, as described in Appendix 1 attached to the report (April 22, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

     

    2.         City Council amend the on-street parking regulations on St. Dennis Drive between Don Mills Road and Linkwood Lane, as described in Appendix 2 attached to the report (April 22, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

    Origin

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to obtain authority to convert one traffic lane in each direction on St. Dennis Drive to bicycle lanes (on both sides) and on-street parking (on one side), from Don Mills Road to Linkwood Lane.

     

    The need for changes to St. Dennis Drive was identified in a staff report on "City Initiatives for Reducing Pedestrian Collisions and Improving Traffic Safety" that was received by the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in May 2013 (PW23.12). In that report, the intersection of St. Dennis Drive and Deauville Lane was ranked second city-wide in terms of collision rates between pedestrians and motor-vehicles.

     

    Through a community consultation process and in consultation with the Ward Councillor, Transportation staff are recommending a “road diet” to address the pedestrian safety concerns at the intersection of St. Dennis Drive and Deauville Lane. The road diet, which involves re-purposing one lane of traffic in each direction, will also provide additional community benefits, including new on-street parking spaces and buffered bicycle lanes along St. Dennis Drive. The existing traffic volume on St. Dennis Drive can be accommodated in two traffic lanes without a significant impact on transit service or traffic operations.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 22, 2014) Report and Appendices 1 to 4 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on St. Dennis Drive - Conversion of Traffic Lanes to On-Street Parking and Bicycle Lanes
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68947.pdf

    Speakers

    Miroslav Glavic

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 10, 2014) Letter from Geoff Kettel (PW.New.PW31.4.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47385.pdf
    (May 11, 2014) E-mail from Jacob Louie (PW.New.PW31.4.2)
    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Nancy Smith Lea, Director, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation, Clean Air Partnership (PW.New.PW31.4.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47609.pdf
    (May 14, 2014) E-mail from Neil McDermott (PW.New.PW31.4.4)

    PW31.5 - Kingston Road Bicycle Lane - Waterfront Trail Connection

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    36 - Scarborough Southwest
    Attention
    Bills 485 and 486 have been submitted on this Item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the installation of an eastbound bicycle lane on the south side of Kingston Road, from Wood Glen Road to a point 35 metres west of Haig Avenue.

     

    2.         City Council approve amendments to the parking regulations on the south side of Kingston Road, between Wood Glen Road and Haig Avenue, as described in Appendix 1 to the report (April 22, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

    Origin

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

    Summary

    The Waterfront Trail stretches over 1400 kilometres along the shores of Lake Ontario, Lake Erie and Lake St. Clair and the Niagara, Detroit and St. Lawrence Rivers.  It connects 68 communities and over 405 parks and natural areas.  The majority of the Waterfront Trail through the Scarborough area is on quiet residential streets south of Kingston Road.  In a few locations, a continuous Waterfront Trail cannot be maintained due to the geography and/or private property which precludes the provision of an uninterrupted route.  In these areas, Waterfront Trail users must use Kingston Road to connect with the next section of the trail.

     

    One of the goals of the Bikeway Trails Implementation Plan, adopted by Council in 2012, is to close these gaps as opportunities become available to do so.  Such an opportunity presents itself as Kingston Road, between Wood Glen Road and Haig Avenue, will be reconstructed in 2014 as part of the planned capital work by Toronto Water and Transportation Services.  The capital work provides an opportunity to address a 475-metre gap in the Scarborough section of the Waterfront Trail.  The purpose of this report is to obtain authority to install an eastbound bicycle lane on the south side of Kingston Road, between Wood Glen Road and Haig Avenue. The bicycle lane would be installed when the street is restriped following reconstruction later this year.  Some lightly used on-street parking and a left-turn lane would be removed, while the four existing through traffic lanes on Kingston Road (two in each direction) would be maintained.

     

    The proposal for a bicycle lane on the south side of Kingston Road to close this gap for eastbound cyclists using the Waterfront Trail has been developed in consultation with the community and the Ward Councillor.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 22, 2014) Report and Appendices 1 and 2 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Kingston Road Bicycle Lane - Waterfront Trail Connection
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68948.pdf

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Nancy Smith Lea, Director, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (PW.New.PW31.5.1)
    (May 14, 2014) E-mail from Neil McDermott (PW.New.PW31.5.2)

    PW31.6 - Harbord Street and Hoskin Avenue Bicycle Lane Upgrades

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina
    Attention
    Communication PW31.6.21 has been submitted on this Item

    Bills 529, 530 and 531 have been submitted on this Item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the installation of bicycle lanes on both sides of Harbord Street, from Spadina Avenue to Borden Street, and at the intersections of Bathurst Street and Ossington Avenue, as detailed in Appendix 2 – Amendments to Bicycle Lanes and Cycle Tracks Designation, attached to the report (April 22, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

     

    2.         City Council approve amendments to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 886 (Footpaths, Pedestrian Ways, Bicycle Paths, Bicycle Lanes and Cycle Tracks) to delete the bicycle lane designation for Hoskin Avenue, from Queen's Park Crescent West to St. George Street, and for Harbord Street, from St. George Street to Huron Street, and to replace it by designating these same sections as cycle tracks, as detailed in Appendix 2 – Amendments to Bicycle Lanes and Cycle Tracks Designation, attached to the report (April 22, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

     

    3.         City Council approve amendments to the parking, standing and stopping regulations on Harbord Street between Ossington Avenue and St. George Street; on Hoskin Avenue between St. George Street and Queen’s Park Crescent West; and on Brunswick Avenue between Ulster Street and Sussex Avenue, as detailed in Appendix 3 – Traffic and Parking By-law Amendments, attached to the report (April 22, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

     

    4.         City Council direct that the installation of fully separated bicycle lanes be included during the next scheduled reconstruction of Harbord Street.

     

    5.         City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the area Councillors, to investigate options to install physical barriers, where space permits, on the Harbord Street and Hoskin Avenue bicycle lane.

     

    6.         City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the area Councillors, to investigate changes to the traffic signal timing along the Harbord Street and Hoskin Avenue bicycle lane to reflect traffic flow at 30 km/h.

    Origin

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

    Summary

    The Harbord-Hoskin corridor is the second busiest cycling route in the City with two-way cycling volumes ranging from 3,500 to 3,900 bicycles per day. During the peak periods, cyclists often represent about 40 percent of the total vehicular traffic. The existing Harbord-Hoskin bicycle lanes provide important cycling connections between west-end neighbourhoods and key parts of the City's downtown cycling network.

     

    This report presents the results of the comprehensive design and consultation process to develop separated bicycle lanes and makes recommendations to provide a continuous bikeway on Harbord Street/Hoskin Avenue between Ossington Avenue and Queen’s Park Crescent West.

     

    The Harbord-Hoskin bicycle lanes upgrades, if approved by Council, will be implemented in the summer/fall 2014. When the reconstruction of Wellesley Street, from Yonge Street to Queen’s Park Crescent West, is completed in the late fall 2014, there will be continuous bicycle lanes and cycle tracks extending from Ossington Avenue to Parliament Street along the Harbord-Hoskin-Wellesley corridor.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 22, 2014) Report and Appendices 1 to 4 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Harbord Street and Hoskin Avenue Bicycle Lane Upgrades
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68951.pdf

    Speakers

    Jun Nogami (Submission Filed)
    Hamish Wilson
    Janet Hebbes
    Jared Kolb, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Jamie Keating (PW.New.PW31.6.1)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from David Weatherston (PW.New.PW31.6.2)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Mark van Graft (PW.New.PW31.6.3)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Gray Taylor (PW.New.PW31.6.4)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Rebecca Winters (PW.New.PW31.6.5)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Gord Brown (PW.New.PW31.6.6)
    (May 9, 2014) Letter from Ian Flett (PW.New.PW31.6.7)
    (May 10, 2014) E-mail from Herb van den Dool (PW.New.PW31.6.8)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Raj Bharati (PW.New.PW31.6.9)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Alan Heisey (PW.New.PW31.6.10)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Mark Sadoway (PW.New.PW31.6.11)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Laura Boswall (PW.New.PW31.6.12)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Iain Campbell (PW.New.PW31.6.13)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Antony Hilliard (PW.New.PW31.6.14)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from David Simmons (PW.New.PW31.6.15)
    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Nancy Smith Lea, Director, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (PW.New.PW31.6.16)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Jared Kolb, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto (PW.New.PW31.6.17)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Peter Sakuls (PW.New.PW31.6.18)
    (May 14, 2014) E-mail from Neil McDermott (PW.New.PW31.6.19)
    (May 14, 2014) E-mail from Christian Chan, Partner, C2 Urban Planning (PW.New.PW31.6.20)

    Communications (City Council)

    (May 12, 2014) Letter from Hamish Wilson (CC.Main.PW31.6.21)

    PW31.7 - Richmond - Adelaide Cycle Track Planning and Design Study - Pilot Project

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina
    Attention
    Communications PW31.7.201 to PW31.7.203 have been submitted on this Item

    Bills 547, 553, 554 and 555 have been submitted on this Item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the installation of a westbound cycle track on the north side of Richmond Street West, from York Street to Bathurst Street, and an eastbound cycle track on the south side of Adelaide Street West, from Bathurst Street to Simcoe Street, as a pilot project until the completion of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study, as outlined in Appendix 10 - Amendments to Bicycle Lane and Cycle Track Designations, attached to the report (April 22, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

     

    2.         City Council approve the installation of cycle tracks on Simcoe Street, from Front Street West to Queen Street West, as a pilot project until the completion of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study, as outlined in Appendix 10 - Amendments to Bicycle Lane and Cycle Track Designations, attached to the report (April 22, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

     

    3.         City Council approve the installation of bicycle lanes on both sides of Peter Street, from King Street West to Queen Street West, as a pilot project until the completion of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study, as outlined in Appendix 10 - Amendments to Bicycle Lane and Cycle Track Designations, attached to the report (April 22, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

     

    4.         City Council approve the installation of a westbound contra-flow bicycle lane on the north side of Richmond Street West, from Bathurst Street to Niagara Street, and a southbound bicycle lane on the west side of Bathurst Street, from Richmond Street West to Adelaide Street West, as outlined in Appendix 10 - Amendments to Bicycle Lane and Cycle Track Designations, attached to the report (April 22, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

     

    5.         City Council approve the installation of westbound contra-flow bicycle lanes on the north side of Phoebe Street, from Beverley Street to Soho Street, and on the north side of Stephanie Street, from John Street to Beverley Street, as outlined in Appendix 10 - Amendments to Bicycle Lane and Cycle Track Designations, attached to the report (April 22, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

     

    6.         City Council approve amendments to parking, standing and stopping regulations along Richmond Street, Adelaide Street, Simcoe Street and Peter Street, to designate parking/loading spaces as part of the pilot project until the completion of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study, as outlined in Revised Appendix 11 - Amendments to Traffic and Parking By-Laws, attached to the report (April 22, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

     

    7.         City Council approve amendments to parking, standing and stopping regulations along Richmond Street West, from Niagara Street to Bathurst Street, and Bathurst Street, from Richmond Street West to Adelaide Street West, as outlined in Revised Appendix 11 -  Amendments to Traffic and Parking By-Laws, attached to the report (April 22, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

     

    8.         City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to report on the bikeway connections east of Sherbourne Street to connect the Richmond-Adelaide corridor bike lanes to Parliament Street and existing bikeways east of the Don Valley, including, but not limited to, Dundas Street East, Eastern Avenue, and the Lake Shore Boulevard East path when the final report on the Richmond-Adelaide Environmental Assessment Study is submitted to Council in 2015.

    Origin

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

    Summary

    Transportation Services is undertaking the Richmond-Adelaide Bikeway Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Study to evaluate the feasibility of implementing separated bicycle lanes in the Richmond Street - Adelaide Street corridor, between Bathurst Street and Sherbourne Street. The study is also evaluating the feasibility of bikeways on Wellington Street, Peter Street and Simcoe Street.

     

    The first two phases of the EA process have been completed including the development of preliminary preferred alignments for cycle tracks on Richmond Street, Adelaide Street, Peter Street and Simcoe Street. The implementation of these cycling facilities can be achieved within the existing pavement width; however, this will require the re-allocation of road space, which will result in some traffic capacity reductions along these corridors.

     

    Transportation Services is proposing to install a portion of the preliminary preferred alignments as a pilot project as part of the EA Study. The pilot project will provide an opportunity to evaluate and adjust, if necessary, the preliminary preferred alignments. The results of the pilot project will inform the final recommendations of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study.  Transportation Services proposes to install the pilot project in the summer of 2014, and maintain its operation until a City Council decision is made on the recommendations of the Municipal Class EA report which will be submitted to Council in 2015.

     

    This report also recommends permanent bikeway installations that will provide network connections to the pilot project, including contra-flow bicycle lanes on Phoebe Street, Stephanie Street, and Richmond Street West, west of Bathurst Street.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 22, 2014) Report and Appendices 1 to 11 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Richmond - Adelaide Cycle Track Planning and Design Study - Pilot Project
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68952.pdf
    (April 22, 2014) Revised Appendix 11 - Amendments to Traffic and Parking By-laws
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-69313.pdf

    Speakers

    Wayne Scott, Hoof and Cycle
    Evan Weinberg, Toronto Financial District Business Improvement Area
    Miroslav Glavic
    Hamish Wilson
    Jared Kolb, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto
    Justin Levine

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Graham Lavender (PW.New.PW31.7.1)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Flora Wood (PW.New.PW31.7.2)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Tammy Thorne (PW.New.PW31.7.3)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Lyle Jones (PW.New.PW31.7.4)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Tara Christie (PW.New.PW31.7.5)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Zachari Giacomazzo (PW.New.PW31.7.6)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Amy O'Neill (PW.New.PW31.7.7)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Jacqueline Whyte Appleby (PW.New.PW31.7.8)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Erin Pleet (PW.New.PW31.7.9)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Daniel Ross (PW.New.PW31.7.10)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Genet Zinabou (PW.New.PW31.7.11)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Jamie Keating (PW.New.PW31.7.12)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Jo-Ey, Oscar, Jasper and Clayton Partridge (PW.New.PW31.7.13)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Sascha Dho (PW.New.PW31.7.14)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from David Weatherston (PW.New.PW31.7.15)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Katie Jensen (PW.New.PW31.7.16)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Paul Baines (PW.New.PW31.7.17)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Cort Conover (PW.New.PW31.7.18)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Senwung F. Luk (PW.New.PW31.7.19)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Mark van Graft (PW.New.PW31.7.20)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Emma Brooks (PW.New.PW31.7.21)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Jack Coop (PW.New.PW31.7.22)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Willi Powell (PW.New.PW31.7.23)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Luke Murphy (PW.New.PW31.7.24)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Kevin Frank (PW.New.PW31.7.25)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Bartek Ciszkowski (PW.New.PW31.7.26)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Michael Holloway, Captain, Ward 30 Bikes (PW.New.PW31.7.27)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Daniel Hritzkiv (PW.New.PW31.7.28)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from David Reid (PW.New.PW31.7.29)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Ted Mann (PW.New.PW31.7.30)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Rodolfo Novak (PW.New.PW31.7.31)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Helen Armstrong (PW.New.PW31.7.32)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Matthew Gibson (PW.New.PW31.7.33)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Robyn Hughes (PW.New.PW31.7.34)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Adam Duhatschek (PW.New.PW31.7.35)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Barbara Dresner (PW.New.PW31.7.36)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Alex Korobchevsky (PW.New.PW31.7.37)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Ryan Brown (PW.New.PW31.7.38)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Josh Wise (PW.New.PW31.7.39)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Ryan Tollofson (PW.New.PW31.7.40)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Lee Richmond (PW.New.PW31.7.41)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Chriz Miller (PW.New.PW31.7.42)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Dave Ringer (PW.New.PW31.7.43)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Paul Reynolds (PW.New.PW31.7.44)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Chris Berry (PW.New.PW31.7.45)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Mary Jo Pollak (PW.New.PW31.7.46)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Leons Petrazickis (PW.New.PW31.7.47)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Georges Gabereau (PW.New.PW31.7.48)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Laura Jamer (PW.New.PW31.7.49)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Doug Green (PW.New.PW31.7.50)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Michael Polanyi (PW.New.PW31.7.51)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from David Rusak (PW.New.PW31.7.52)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Christine Boyd (PW.New.PW31.7.53)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Matthew Eagar (PW.New.PW31.7.54)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Judith Rae (PW.New.PW31.7.55)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Sue Campbell (PW.New.PW31.7.56)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Tyler Burton (PW.New.PW31.7.57)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Kaye Coholan (PW.New.PW31.7.58)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Anthony MacMahon (PW.New.PW31.7.59)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Shraddha Pai Stein (PW.New.PW31.7.60)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Jeff Harti (PW.New.PW31.7.61)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Dave Ley (PW.New.PW31.7.62)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Linda Dawn Hammond (PW.New.PW31.7.63)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Grace McDonald (PW.New.PW31.7.64)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Brenda Perras (PW.New.PW31.7.65)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Lili Tucker (PW.New.PW31.7.66)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Sheila Miller (PW.New.PW31.7.67)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Marien Gehrels (PW.New.PW31.7.68)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Dr. Samantha Green (PW.New.PW31.7.69)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Gray Taylor (PW.New.PW31.7.70)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Eva Szabo (PW.New.PW31.7.71)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Lisa Pottier (PW.New.PW31.7.72)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Naomi Buck (PW.New.PW31.7.73)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Jonathan Schachter (PW.New.PW31.7.74)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Gabe Sawhney (PW.New.PW31.7.75)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Jessica Moore (PW.New.PW31.7.76)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Blair O'Connor (PW.New.PW31.7.77)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Eddy Abraham (PW.New.PW31.7.78)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Martha Hunter (PW.New.PW31.7.79)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Tereza Coutinho (PW.New.PW31.7.80)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Andy Inkster (PW.New.PW31.7.81)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Amanda Lewis (PW.New.PW31.7.82)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from David Thom (PW.New.PW31.7.83)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Jeff Mooallem (PW.New.PW31.7.84)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Brendan Flattery (PW.New.PW31.7.85)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Paul Tichonczuk (PW.New.PW31.7.86)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Kaleb Honsberger (PW.New.PW31.7.87)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Rebecca Winters (PW.New.PW31.7.88)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Jim Ilkay (PW.New.PW31.7.89)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Franco Cignelli (PW.New.PW31.7.90)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Lisa Price (PW.New.PW31.7.91)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Colin Bradley (PW.New.PW31.7.92)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Ryan Alafriz (PW.New.PW31.7.93)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Mercedes Perez (PW.New.PW31.7.94)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Jorge Chaves (PW.New.PW31.7.95)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Eric Woolston (PW.New.PW31.7.96)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Douglas Yardley (PW.New.PW31.7.97)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Mark Kinach (PW.New.PW31.7.98)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Peter Gorman (PW.New.PW31.7.99)
    (May 8, 2014) Letter from Ian Flett, Eric K. Gillespie Professional Corporation, Barristers & Solicitors (PW.New.PW31.7.100)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47305.pdf
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Katie Sharp (PW.New.PW31.7.101)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Dr. Jonathon Maguire (PW.New.PW31.7.102)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Ann Hatch (PW.New.PW31.7.103)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Christy Garland (PW.New.PW31.7.104)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Dr. Tyler Law (PW.New.PW31.7.105)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Lee Adamson (PW.New.PW31.7.106)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Katherine Burress (PW.New.PW31.7.107)
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Robert Zaichkowski (PW.New.PW31.7.108)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Kevin Lucas (PW.New.PW31.7.109)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Burns Wattie (PW.New.PW31.7.110)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from J. P. Solmes (PW.New.PW31.7.111)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Rachael Glassman (PW.New.PW31.7.112)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Kelley Bryan (PW.New.PW31.7.113)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Annabel Reinis (PW.New.PW31.7.114)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Gillian Deacon (PW.New.PW31.7.115)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Maria Gruending (PW.New.PW31.7.116)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from John Murtaugh (PW.New.PW31.7.117)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Susan Grey (PW.New.PW31.7.118)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Phil Strong (PW.New.PW31.7.119)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Sarah Elton (PW.New.PW31.7.120)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from David Boon (PW.New.PW31.7.121)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Krista Clark (PW.New.PW31.7.122)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Lisa Roosen-Runge (PW.New.PW31.7.123)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Chris Drew, Co-Captain, Ward 27 Cycle Toronto (PW.New.PW31.7.124)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47375.pdf
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Christopher Grouios (PW.New.PW31.7.125)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Tim Warman (PW.New.PW31.7.126)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from John Provart (PW.New.PW31.7.127)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Karen Steward (PW.New.PW31.7.128)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Josh Apostolopoulos (PW.New.PW31.7.129)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Emily Van Halem (PW.New.PW31.7.130)
    (May 10, 2014) E-mail from Cliff Mewdell (PW.New.PW31.7.131)
    (May 10, 2014) E-mail from Dean Davis (PW.New.PW31.7.132)
    (May 10, 2014) E-mail from Herb van den Dool (PW.New.PW31.7.133)
    (May 11, 2014) E-mail from Dennis Wheeler (PW.New.PW31.7.134)
    (May 11, 2014) E-mail from Nalin Sahni (PW.New.PW31.7.135)
    (May 11, 2014) E-mail from Jacob Louie (PW.New.PW31.7.136)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Angela Moore (PW.New.PW31.7.137)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Evalyn Parry (PW.New.PW31.7.138)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Stephanie Belding (PW.New.PW31.7.139)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Sabine LeBel (PW.New.PW31.7.140)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Nicola Joy (PW.New.PW31.7.141)
    (May 12, 2014) Letter from Grant Humes, Executive Director, Toronto Financial District Business Improvement Area (PW.New.PW31.7.142)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47423.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Raj Bharati (PW.New.PW31.7.143)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from William Tink (PW.New.PW31.7.144)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Christopher Jacobs (PW.New.PW31.7.145)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Tom Howell (PW.New.PW31.7.146)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Kyle C. Hyndman (PW.New.PW31.7.147)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Albert Koehl, The Annex Residents Association (PW.New.PW31.7.148)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47412.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Dominic Wong (PW.New.PW31.7.149)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Peter Low (PW.New.PW31.7.150)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Nathaniel Lowbeer-Lewis (PW.New.PW31.7.151)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Kevin Beattie (PW.New.PW31.7.152)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Christopher L. Tyrrell (PW.New.PW31.7.153)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Jonathan Gould (PW.New.PW31.7.154)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Mark Sadoway (PW.New.PW31.7.155)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Sara Hsiao (PW.New.PW31.7.156)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Justin Levine (PW.New.PW31.7.157)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Francisca Duran (PW.New.PW31.7.158)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Vincent de Tourdonnet and Beth Easton (PW.New.PW31.7.159)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Dannie Little (PW.New.PW31.7.160)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Laura Pin (PW.New.PW31.7.161)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Emily Josephs (PW.New.PW31.7.162)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from James Chan (PW.New.PW31.7.163)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Christopher Hoyle (PW.New.PW31.7.164)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Melissa Yule (PW.New.PW31.7.165)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Lindsey Goodchild (PW.New.PW31.7.166)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Tom Worrall (PW.New.PW31.7.167)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Brian Horn (PW.New.PW31.7.168)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Arcady Genkin (PW.New.PW31.7.169)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Iain Campbell (PW.New.PW31.7.170)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Samuel Perry (PW.New.PW31.7.171)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Jim Rootham (PW.New.PW31.7.172)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Andrea McCutcheon (PW.New.PW31.7.173)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Abby Van Den Broek (PW.New.PW31.7.174)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Albert Allen (PW.New.PW31.7.175)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Antony Hilliard, Captain, Ward 19 Cycle Toronto (PW.New.PW31.7.176)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47477.pdf
    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Liz Sutherland, Cycle Toronto Ward 18 (PW.New.PW31.7.177)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47520.pdf
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Jonah Zalken (PW.New.PW31.7.178)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Paul Young (PW.New.PW31.7.179)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Laura Krahn (PW.New.PW31.7.180)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Cadence King (PW.New.PW31.7.181)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Anne Fleming (PW.New.PW31.7.182)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Ivan Neveu (PW.New.PW31.7.183)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Zachary Finkelstein (PW.New.PW31.7.184)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Frederic Fellouse (PW.New.PW31.7.185)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from David Simmons (PW.New.PW31.7.186)
    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Nancy Smith Lea, Director, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (TCAT), Clean Air Partnership (PW.New.PW31.7.187)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47556.pdf
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Will Chan (PW.New.PW31.7.188)
    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Jared Kolb, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto (PW.New.PW31.7.189 )
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47558.pdf
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Gary Hawker (PW.New.PW31.7.190)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Hwan Hong (PW.New.PW31.7.191)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Ashley McGhee (PW.New.PW31.7.192)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Pino Allevato (PW.New.PW31.7.193)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Alice Barton (PW.New.PW31.7.194)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Ryan Day (PW.New.PW31.7.195)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Max Halparin (PW.New.PW31.7.196)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Brenda Heyer (PW.New.PW31.7.197)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Christopher McKinnon (PW.New.PW31.7.198)
    (May 14, 2014) E-mail from Neil McDermott, Captain, Ward Advocacy Group 21, Cycle Toronto (PW.New.PW31.7.199)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47598.pdf
    (May 14, 2014) E-mail from Kristen MacDonald (PW.New.PW31.7.200)

    Communications (City Council)

    (May 11, 2014) Letter from Hamish Wilson (CC.Main.PW31.7.201)
    (May 14, 2014) E-mail from Mike Zhao (CC.Main.PW31.7.202)
    (June 6, 2014) Letter from S. Switzer, Canada Land Corporation (CC.New.PW31.7.203)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47961.pdf

    PW31.8 - Wellington Street West and Simcoe Street Redesign and Two-Way Conversion

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    20 - Trinity-Spadina, 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
    Attention
    Communication PW31.8.6 has been submitted on this Item

    Bills 525 and 556 have been submitted on this Item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council endorse Project 12 (Wellington Street and Simcoe Street Redesign and Two-Way Conversion) of the Downtown Transportation Operations Study implementation plan.

     

    2.         City Council rescind the one-way regulation on Wellington Street West from Blue Jays Way to John Street.

     

    3.         City Council rescind the one-way regulation on Simcoe Street from Front Street West to Wellington Street West.

     

    4.         City Council approve the amendments to traffic and parking regulations outlined in Attachments 3 and 4 attached to the report (April 24, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, entitled "Wellington Street West and Simcoe Street Redesign and Two-way Conversion".

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee:

     

    a.         Referred the following Recommendation 3 in the report (April 24, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, back to the General Manager, Transportation Services, for consultation with local businesses and a report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee at the appropriate time.

     

    "3.        City Council rescind the one-way regulation on Wellington Street West from Simcoe Street to Yonge Street."

     

    b.         Referred the following motion to the General Manager, Transportation Services, for consideration with the 2015 Bikeway report:

     

                  Motion 2 by Councillor Layton:

     

    "City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to convert Wellington Street to a two-way street from University Avenue to Spadina Avenue, with an appropriate approach to the Clarence Square ring road, and include in this proposal a capacity and design for potential bike lanes."

    Origin

    (April 24, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

    Summary

    The report in response to City Council's direction for the  General Manager, Transportation Services to report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on Project 12 (Wellington Street and Simcoe Street Redesign and Two-Way Conversion) of the "Downtown Transportation Operations Study – Final Report" by June 30, 2014.

     

    Specifically, this report will summarize the findings of the feasibility study performed by  Transportation Services on converting Simcoe Street to a two-way street from Front Street West to Queen Street West, and converting Wellington Street West to a two-way street from University Avenue to Spadina Avenue, with an appropriate approach to the Clarence Square ring road, and the potential for bike lanes.

     

    It is expected that implementing the recommendations will improve traffic operations and better manage congestion in the downtown area.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 24, 2014) Report and Attachments 3 and 4 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Wellington Street West and Simcoe Street Redesign and Two-Way Conversion
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68987.pdf
    (April 24, 2014) Attachment 1 - Study Area Map
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68988.pdf
    (April 24, 2014) Attachment 2 - Project 12 Description - Wellington Street West and Simcoe Street Redesign and Two-way Conversion
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68989.pdf

    Speakers

    Evan Weinberg, Financial District BIA
    Janice Solomon, Toronto Entertainment District BIA
    Hamish Wilson

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Grant Humes, Executive Director, Toronto Financial District (PW.New.PW31.8.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47467.pdf
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Antony Hillard, Ward 19 Captain, Cycle Toronto (PW.New.PW31.8.2)
    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20 - Trinity-Spadina (PW.New.PW31.8.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47544.pdf
    (May 14, 2014) Letter from Nancy Smith Lea, Director, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (PW.New.PW31.8.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47601.pdf
    (May 14, 2014) E-mail from Neil McDermott (PW.New.PW31.8.5)

    Communications (City Council)

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Hamish Wilson (CC.Main.PW31.8.6)

    PW31.9 - North York Centre South Service Road - Environmental Assessment Addendum Study

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    23 - Willowdale
    Attention
    Communications PW31.9.2 and PW31.9.3 have been submitted on this Item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to issue a Notice of Completion and to file the Environmental Study Report (ESR) Addendum for the North York Centre South Service Road Environmental Assessment Addendum Study in the public record for a minimum 30 days in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment.

     

    2.         City Council direct Real Estate Services to undertake valuation and necessary steps for the acquisition of required property for construction of the preferred alternative.

    Origin

    (April 15, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

    Summary

    The North York Centre Service Road, which is included in the North York Centre Secondary Plan (2006), essentially forms a ring road around the North York Centre.  It is comprised of Doris Avenue and Beecroft Road, two north-south roads to the east and west of Yonge Street, respectively, and serves several purposes:  it provides access to development within the Centre, serves as a boundary and buffer between new development within the Centre and the adjacent stable existing residential neighbourhoods, and preserves the arterial road function of Yonge Street, to the greatest extent possible.   It is also includes several east-west connecting branches.

     

    This Environmental Assessment Addendum was intended to provide an updated alternative design for the completion of the south-eastern portion of the Service Road south of Sheppard Avenue and east of Yonge Street, first studied in detail in a 1996 Environmental Assessment and modified in a 1998 EA Addendum. The preferred design, referred to as Option 'D', includes the extension of Tradewind Avenue north from Anndale Drive to Sheppard Avenue, and the elimination of the Bonnington Place intersection with Sheppard Avenue (which will be terminated in a cul-de-sac).  The Tradewind Avenue intersection with Sheppard Avenue will be offset approximately 58 metres from the Doris Avenue/Sheppard Avenue intersection.  These two intersections will be operated as a single coordinated intersection.  Option 'D' achieves the objectives of the Service Road and avoids major impacts to properties at 45-47 Sheppard Avenue and the open space at the northeast corner of Doris Avenue and Sheppard Avenue.  The properties along the west side of Bonnington Place that were required for the alignment of this facility identified in the 1998 EA Addendum are also required for the implementation of this preferred design. Access to 45-47 Sheppard Avenue East will be relocated to Anndale Drive, though there is no need to relocate underground parking spaces as there was in the 1998 plan.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 15, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 to 4 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on North York Centre South Service Road - Environmental Assessment Addendum Study
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68949.pdf

    Speakers

    James Christie, Partner, Crown Property Management
    Dennis Rak, Avondale Community Condominium Association

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Paul Nightingale (PW.New.PW31.9.1)

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 6, 2014) E-mail from Angela Sweeney on behalf of Dennis Rak, Chair of the Avondale Community Condominium Association (ACCA) (CC.Supp.PW31.9.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47927.pdf
    (June 9, 2014) Letter from Mark R. Flowers, Davies Howe Partners LLP (CC.New.PW31.9.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47962.pdf

    PW31.10 - Port Union Road - Environmental Assessment Addendum

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    44 - Scarborough East

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to issue a Notice of Completion and to file the Addendum to the Port Union Road Environmental Assessment Study (2004) in the public record for a minimum 30 days in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment.

    Origin

    (April 14, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

    Summary

    An Environmental Assessment study for Port Union Road was undertaken in 2002–2004 and endorsed by City Council, with the Ministry of Environment-mandated public review completed in 2004. The preferred design solution, intended to address traffic delays particularly in the northbound direction, was to be implemented in two phases: the first consisted of intersection modifications to Kingston Road and Port Union Road, while the second was a widening of the road from Lawrence Avenue to Island Road, to be carried out in the future following an additional round of public consultation.  The first phase of the work was carried out in 2005, with the intersection improvements at Kingston Road. The second phase of the works (widening), currently scheduled for 2019 and included in the Ten Year Capital Program, is being advanced to a 2016 construction date.

     

    The Addendum to the 2004 Environmental Assessment has included an updated traffic analysis, an additional public meeting, and modifications to the EA preferred design to reflect current conditions and minimize impacts to property and the community where possible. The revised preferred design adds a second northbound traffic lane as previously recommended, and in total consists of the following principal elements:

     

    -           Two northbound and two southbound travel lanes on Port Union Road from Lawrence Avenue East to Island Road;

    -           Continuous on-road bicycle lanes in both directions;

    -           Continuous sidewalks on both sides (current gaps filled in);

    -           A continuous two-way centre left-turn lane north of Josaly Drive;

    -           A planted median, similar to what exists south of Lawrence Avenue, in the block north of Lawrence Avenue; and

    -           Left-turn lanes added to the Winter Gardens Trail and Conference Boulevard intersections.

     

    The total construction cost is estimated to be approximately $3.8 million, an increase of $1.9 million from what had been allocated in Transportation Services' Capital Works Program following the first-phase intersection improvements made available by the reallocation of funds from other identified projects in the current Capital Works Program.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 14, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 to 4 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Port Union Road - Environmental Assessment Addendum
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68950.pdf

    Speakers

    Councillor Ron Moeser

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Catherine M. Biesma, Land Use Planner, Goodmans LLP (PW.New.PW31.10.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47301.pdf
    (May 14, 2014) E-mail from Neil McDermott, Captain, Ward Advocacy Group 21, Cycle Toronto (PW.New.PW31.10.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47604.pdf

    PW31.11 - School Zone Safety Strategy

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    The General Manager, Transportation Services has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PW31.11a for information)

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council receive the report (April 30, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, for information.

     

    2.         City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to invite a representative of the Toronto Catholic District School Board to the School Zone Safety Working Group.

     

    3.         City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to invite a representative from the CAA South Central Ontario to the School Zone Safety Working Group.

    Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee requested the General Manager, Transportation Services, to:

     

    a.         Revise the Guidelines for Construction Zones in School Areas (Attachment 1) to clarify standards for notification of principals including timing of notifications, standard letters and on site managerial contact information and to provide a copy of the revised guidelines to City Council on June 10, 2014.

     

    b.         Report to a future meeting of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on the possibility of coupling speed limit signs with school zone signs as seems to be done in Montreal.

     

    c.         Report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on a strategy to increase the provision of crossing guards in school zones, such report include locations, number of crossing guards, criteria and process for approving a new location for a crossing guard and any other information that demonstrates the effectiveness of crossing guards.

    Origin

    (April 30, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to respond to a motion by City Council, dated October 8, 2013, to review pedestrian safety in school zones and develop a strategy for improving and promoting pedestrian safety in those areas.  Traffic data suggests that pedestrian safety and overall road safety in the City has stabilized over the last decade.  However, opportunities for improvement still exist, especially when considering the safety of children and the current shift towards promoting walking to school as active and healthier alternatives for commuting.  The City has programs and tools currently in place for addressing safety concerns around school areas which are discussed in this report, and Transportation Services proposes to pursue additional measures to expand the City's current compliment of measures. 

     

    This report discusses a strategy for improving safety around school zones that was developed based on an analysis of school zone related pedestrian collision data, detailed safety reviews conducted at high collision school clusters and current school safety programs and engineering tools.  This report also discusses a literature review of school safety practices in other jurisdictions that was conducted, as well as the formation of a School Zone Safety Working Group.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 30, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 to 3 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on School Zone Safety Strategy
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68984.pdf

    Background Information (City Council)

    (May 30, 2014) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on School Zone Safety Strategy (PW31.11a)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70096.pdf
    Attachment 1 - Guidelines for Work on Streets in the Areas of Schools
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70097.pdf
    Attachment 2 - Detailed In-Service Road Safety Audits of School Collision Clusters
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70099.pdf
    Attachment 3 - School Zone Safety Strategy Next Actions
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70100.pdf

    Speakers

    Nick Lazaris
    Trustee Ann Andrachuk, Ward 2, Toronto Catholic District School Board
    Councillor Anthony Perruzza
    Councillor Gary Crawford
    Councillor Peter Leon
    Councillor Paula Fletcher

    PW31.13 - Amendments to the Water Supply By-law

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Bill 519 has been submitted on this Item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend Municipal Code Chapter 851 - Water Supply substantially in accordance with the draft By-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report (April 24, 2014) from the General Manager, Toronto Water.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary Bills required to implement these recommendations, subject to any necessary refinements, including stylistic, format and organization, as may be identified by the City Solicitor and General Manager, Toronto Water.

    Origin

    (April 24, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water

    Summary

    This report proposes amendments to Chapter 851 (the “Water Supply By-law”) of the Municipal Code to exempt single family dwellings from the requirement to install a water meter chamber where the distance between the streetline and the location where the water meter would be located inside the building or structure is greater than 30 meters. In certain cases, the General Manager, Toronto Water, may determine that this exemption would not apply. These scenarios are described in the proposed bylaw amendment.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 24, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the General Manager, Toronto Water, on Amendments to the Water Supply By-law
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68979.pdf

    PW31.14 - Coordinated Watercourse Management Plan

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council confirm the following principles for watercourse management in Toronto:

     

    a.         Each City Division with infrastructure or facilities potentially affected by erosion in ravines, and stream and river valleys will be responsible for the inspection, assessment, design, construction, maintenance and monitoring of erosion control works necessary to protect their infrastructure;

     

    b.         Design and construction of erosion control works should be carried out in collaboration with other potentially affected Divisions and costs for such work can be shared among Divisions where there are mutual benefits;

     

    c.         Design and construction of new or replacement erosion control works will be consistent with best practices for natural channel design, adaptive management and considerations for climate change;

     

    d.         Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) will assist with the task of receiving and responding to complaints from private property owners concerning erosion which affects loss of property or is a hazard to private structures;

     

    e.         Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) will be responsible for assessing erosion hazard sites affecting private property and designing, constructing and maintaining erosion control works affecting one or more property owners, on a priority basis, in order to protect public safety and to stabilize and limit further damage;

     

    f.          Costs for design, construction and maintenance of such erosion control works will be shared between the benefitting property owners and TRCA (as per TRCA's Private Landowner Contribution Policy); and

     

    g.         Owners of private property will be responsible for the costs of repair of erosion damage on their property and damage attributed to their unpermitted encroachments or their unpermitted alterations to ravine or valley lands.

     

    2.         City Council consider future funding for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Erosion Management Program in conjunction with the upcoming report by the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the General Manager, Toronto Water to the Executive Committee on financing strategies to support Toronto Water's  long term Capital Plan.

     

    3.         City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, to continue to report to City Council, as part of the annual Toronto Water budget submission, the 10 year TRCA/TW coordinated capital plan of erosion improvement works.

     

    4.         City Council request the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), with input from the General Manager of Toronto Water and the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to complete the Class Environmental Assessment (EA) for Black Creek Flood Management and report to Council on preferred measures to further mitigate valley land flooding of the Rockcliffe area in the Black Creek Watershed and a proposed funding mechanism.

     

    5.         City Council request the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, with input from the General Managers of Toronto Water, Transportation Services and Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to report back prior to finalizing the Class EA for the Scarborough Waterfront Access Plan with the costs for erosion control components identified separately from the trail and waterfront access components of the plan.

    Origin

    (April 29, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water

    Summary

    The valleys, streams and shorelines in the City of Toronto are inhabited and surrounded by roads, trails, utilities, bridges, water infrastructure, natural forests and plant communities, and private property. The City of Toronto and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) have worked for decades to preserve and restore the ecological integrity of these important landscapes while protecting new and existing development against the hazards of flooding and erosion.

     

    The storms of August 19, 2005 and July 8, 2013 caused significant damage to public and private property and City infrastructure located in valley lands. The purpose of this report is to advise City Council of the existing programs that are in place to manage watercourse erosion risks and to respond to damage caused by accelerated erosion during intense storms. The report will also respond to Council's request to identify the most vulnerable houses that are within the floodplain of the Black Creek, and to report on the status of the Environmental Assessment for the Scarborough Waterfront Trail and Critical Erosion.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 29, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water, on Coordinated Watercourse Management Plan
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68981.pdf

    PW31.15 - Ashbridges Bay Landform Project - Erosion and Sediment Control Class Environmental Assessment

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    30 - Toronto-Danforth, 32 - Beaches-East York

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water, as a co-proponent with the TRCA, to finalize the Environmental Study Report and issue a Notice of Study Completion for the Ashbridges Bay Erosion and Sediment Control Class EA, which will be placed on the public record for minimum 30 day review period in accordance with the requirements of the Class EA for Remedial Flood and Erosion Control Projects.

     

    2.         Subject to completion of the Class EA process for the Ashbridges Bay Erosion and Sediment Control Class EA study, City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water, to:

     

    a.         proceed to undertake the detailed design of the Ashbridges Bay landform project in 2014 as a joint initiative to be led by the TRCA; and

     

    b.         report back, through the 2015 Capital Budget process, on an implementation plan for the Ashbridges Bay landform project including a construction phasing schedule, costs and revenues, and other implementation details.

     

    3.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water, to negotiate, enter into and execute any agreement(s) as may be necessary to give effect to Recommendation 2, including an agreement with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Toronto Water and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

    Origin

    (April 28, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water

    Summary

    In 2012, City Council authorized a joint initiative between the City and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to undertake an Environmental Assessment study to support the advancement of the Ashbridges Bay landform project, south of the Ashbridges Bay Wastewater Treatment Plant.  The Ashbridges Bay landform will provide for erosion and sediment control in Ashbridges Bay and for the construction of planned City facilities including a combined sewer overflow (CSO) high-rate treatment facility and a stormwater treatment wetland.

     

    The purpose of this report is to report back to Council on the Ashbridges Bay Erosion and Sediment Control Conservation Ontario Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) Study and an estimated implementation schedule and costs for the project.   

     

    The Class EA study has been completed by TRCA and City staff and has identified a preferred alternative consisting of erosion and sediment control structures to be integrated with the lakefill area required for the City's future stormwater and CSO treatment facilities that will form the Ashbridges Bay landform.  The preferred alternative for erosion and sediment control has been selected based on input from a Steering Committee consisting of staff from TRCA, Toronto Water, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, Waterfront Secretariat, and Waterfront Toronto.  Extensive consultation during the Class EA study has included the establishment and meetings with a Community Liaison Committee, two Public Information Centres, and individual meetings with review agencies and stakeholder groups including local boating clubs.

     

    This report recommends the filing of the Environmental Study Report (ESR) for the Class EA study for a mandatory minimum 30-day review period, and the commencement of the next step of the project, which is detailed design of the Ashbridges Bay landform in 2014 as a joint initiative to be led by TRCA.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 28, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Toronto Water, on Ashbridges Bay Landform Project - Erosion and Sediment Control Class Environmental Assessment
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-69016.pdf

    PW31.17 - F.G. Gardiner Expressway Rehabilitation: Engagement of Infrastructure Ontario

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 13 - Parkdale-High Park, 14 - Parkdale-High Park, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 30 - Toronto-Danforth
    Attention
    Communication PW31.17.1 has been submitted on this Item

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         Council authorize the City Manager to retain the advisory services of Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation (IO) for the purposes of preparing a procurement options analysis in support of the implementation of the Strategic Plan for the rehabilitation of the F.G. Gardiner Expressway, at a cost not to exceed $250,000.

     

    2.         City staff be directed to report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee with the analysis of the project delivery models and procurement options for Council consideration and direction.

     

    3.         City Council direct that City staff ensure that any agreement for Infrastructure Ontario services includes:

     

                a.         provisions for requiring full disclosure to the City of their work and information they have acquired to support the work;

     

                b.         compliance with Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and other City policies; and

     

                c.         public consultation.

    Origin

    (May 2, 2014) Report from the City Manager

    Summary

    At the April 1, 2014 meeting, City Council considered the report PW29.1 Strategic Plan for the Rehabilitation of the F. G. Gardiner Expressway; and Contract Award for Tender Call No. 314-2013 F.G. Gardiner Expressway West Deck Replacement. Council approved the accelerated method of construction for the rehabilitation of the "at-grade" and "elevated" sections of the Gardiner Expressway, extending from Highway 427 to the eastern limit at Logan.

     

    This report responds to Council direction to the City Manager to report on the feasibility of engaging Infrastructure Ontario (IO) in the rehabilitation of the Gardiner Expressway. IO is a provincial crown agency that partners with public sector agencies, including municipalities to renew infrastructure across Ontario. IO employs an Alternative Financing and Procurement (AFP) approach to deliver large scale infrastructure projects. Initial discussions with IO suggest that there may be benefits to procuring the rehabilitation of the Gardiner Expressway by way of an AFP rather than the traditional procurement approach.

     

    Staff propose to work with IO in the assessment of the various project delivery models and report on a recommended approach as part of the 2015 Capital Budget in accordance with a previous Council direction.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (May 2, 2014) Report from the City Manager on F.G. Gardiner Expressway Rehabilitation: Engagement of Infrastructure Ontario
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-69059.pdf

    Speakers

    Hamish Wilson

    Communications (City Council)

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Hamish Wilson (CC.Main.PW31.17.1)

    PW31.18 - Temporary Suspension of Trisan Construction

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Communication PW31.18.3 has been submitted on this Item.

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council declares 614128 Ontario Ltd., operating as Trisan Construction, ineligible to bid on or be awarded any City of Toronto construction tender calls for a period of one year, from the date City Council approves this recommendation.

     

    2.         City Council declare that any legal entity that is related to or has the same operating mind as 614128 Ontario Ltd. shall also be ineligible to bid on or be awarded City of Toronto construction tender calls for one year, from the date City Council approves this recommendation, where PMMD (in consultation with Legal Services) determines that such entity was created or its being used for the purpose of evading the City’s decision to suspend 614128 Ontario Ltd.

    Origin

    (April 30, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

    Summary

    This report recommends that City Council declare 614128 Ontario Ltd., operating as Trisan Construction ("Trisan"), ineligible to bid on any City of Toronto tenders for a period of one year. 

     

    This recommendation is based on demonstrated poor performance by Trisan on two recent Basement Flooding Protection Program contracts.  Trisan's actions as the Constructor on these contracts potentially put staff, the public, homeowner properties, and City infrastructure at risk, which was repeatedly documented by Engineering and Construction Services staff, as well as a number of other Agencies having jurisdiction on construction sites.  City Council approval is required in order to suspend a contractor from contract awards for poor performance.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 30, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Temporary Suspension of Trisan Construction
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68962.pdf

    Speakers

    Angelo Santorelli, President, Trisan Construction
    Matthew Santorelli, Vice-President, Trisan Construction
    Councillor Shelley Carroll

    Communications (Committee)

    (May 13, 2014) Submission from Trisan Construction (PW.New.PW31.18.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47468.pdf
    (May 14, 2014) Submission from Krista J. McKenzie, McKenzie Professional Corporation (PW.New.PW31.8.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-47563.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 9, 2014) Letter from Michael Farace and Cory Estrela, Devry Smith Frank LLP, on behalf of 614128 Ontario Limited, operating as Trisan Construction (CC.New.PW31.18.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47963.pdf

    PW31.19 - Contract Awards for Tender Calls 319-2013 and 70-2014 for the Construction of Works Associated with the City's Basement Flooding Protection Program

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    10 - York Centre, 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council award Tender Call 319-2013, Contract 13FS-36WP, to Comer Group Limited in the amount of $1,190,195.00 net of HST ($1,211,142.43 net of HST recoveries), being the third lowest compliant bidder and meeting the specifications in conformance with the Tender requirements.

     

    2.         City Council award Tender Call 70-2014, Contract 14FS-06WP, to Memme Excavation Company Limited in the amount of $7,059,679.00 net of HST ($7,183,929.35 net of HST recoveries), being the second lowest compliant bidder and meeting the specifications in conformance with the Tender requirements.

    Origin

    (April 30, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to advise of the results of Tender Call 319-2013, Contract 13FS-36WP sewer improvements on Sunnycrest Road Easement and Tender Call 70-2014, Contract 14FS-06WP sewer improvements and watermain relocation on Cartwright Avenue, Paul David Street, and Jane Osler Boulevard, and to recommend that City Council bypass the lowest bidder, 614128 Ontario Ltd., operating as Trisan Construction ("Trisan"), and award Contract 13FS-36WP to Comer Group Limited ("Comer") in the amount of $1,190,195.00 net of HST ($1,211,142.43 net of HST recoveries); and award Contract 14FS-06WP to Memme Excavation Company Limited ("Memme") in the amount of  $7,059,679.00 net of HST ($7,183,929.35 net of HST recoveries).

     

    The recommendations are based on demonstrated poor performance by Trisan on recent contracts under the City's Basement Flooding Protection Program, as documented in the companion staff report to the Public Works & Infrastructure Committee titled "Temporary Suspension of Trisan Construction".  In keeping with Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 195, City Council approval is required in order to bypass the lowest, otherwise compliant bid.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 30, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Contract Awards for Tender Calls 319-2013 and 70-2014 for the Construction of Works Associated with the City's Basement Flooding Protection Program
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68961.pdf

    Speakers

    Matthew Santorelli, Vice-President, Trisan Construction
    Angelo Santorelli, President, Trisan Construction

    PW31.20 - Contract Award: Request for Proposal No. 9150-14-3007 for Single Stream Recyclable Materials Processing Contract

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council, in accordance with Section 195-15 of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195 (Purchasing By-Law), grant the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to negotiate and enter into an agreement with Canada Fibers Ltd. for processing services of up to 120,000 tonnes per year of SSRM, commencing on November 15, 2014 for seven (7) years with optional extensions, exercisable at the General Manager’s sole discretion, for up to two, one (1) year extension periods, based on the terms and conditions contained in the RFP, as amended by the addenda and the Proposal submitted by Canada Fibers Ltd., and, any other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, at a total cost not to exceed $167.514 million net of HST recoveries ($164.617 million exclusive of HST). 

    Origin

    (April 30, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to provide the results of the Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 9150-14-3007 and to obtain authority to negotiate and award a contract to the selected proponent, Canada Fibers Ltd., to process up to 120,000 tonnes per year of Single Stream Recyclable Materials (SSRM) for a term of seven (7) years, together with the Solid Waste Management Services (SWMS) General Manager’s sole discretion to extend the term for two, one (1) year extensions.

     

    The RFP complied with the policies of the Purchasing and Materials Management Division.  As indicated in its report, Attachment 1, a Fairness Monitor was engaged to monitor the RFP and attest to the fairness and openness of the procurement process.  Canada Fibres Ltd. had the lowest cost of services and the highest overall score; as a result, SWMS staff recommends that this proponent be awarded the SSRM Processing Contract.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 30, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Contract Award: Request for Proposal No. 9150-14-3007 for Single Stream Recyclable Materials Processing Contract
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68964.pdf
    (April 30, 2014) Attachment 1 - Attestation Report from PPI Consultants Inc.
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68965.pdf

    PW31.21 - Consent to Assignment of Contract 13FS-08WP - Highland Creek Treatment Plant - Biosolids Treatment Upgrades

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    44 - Scarborough East

    Committee Recommendations

    The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council consent the assignment of Contract 13FS-08WP for the Highland Creek Treatment Plant – Biosolids Treatment Upgrades from Bennett Contracting Millgrove Limited to Bennett Mechanical Installations (2001) Limited.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to negotiate and execute a contractual agreement to give effect to Recommendation 1 to the report (April 30, 2014) from Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, on such terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

    Origin

    (April 30, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services

    Summary

    This report seeks to assign existing Contract 13FS-08WP for the Highland Creek Treatment Plant – Biosolids Treatment Upgrades from Bennett Contracting Millgrove Limited to Bennett Mechanical Installations (2001) Limited.  Both companies are affiliates in the Bennett Group of Companies.

    Background Information (Committee)

    (April 30, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, on Consent to Assignment of Contract 13FS-08WP - Highland Creek Treatment Plant - Biosolids Treatment Upgrades
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-68963.pdf

    Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 33

    EY33.1 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 24 Highgate Road

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
    Attention
    Communication EY33.1.3 has been submitted on this Item

    Community Council Recommendations

    Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council grant the request for a permit to remove the privately owned black walnut tree at 24 Highgate Road, having regard that a hazardous situation exists as a result of this tree, on the condition that the owner provide at least five (5) trees as replacement, which can be achieved in a combination of on-site planting and cash-in-lieu of planting.

    Origin

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

    Summary

    This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located in the rear yard of 24 Highgate Road.  The applicant is requesting tree removal due to falling walnuts and concerns associated with potential injury to children.

     

    The subject tree is a twin-stemmed black walnut (Juglans nigra) with the stems measuring 67cm and 80 cm in diameter. The tree is healthy and in good condition. Urban Forestry does not support removal of this tree.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation regarding an Application to Remove a Private Tree - 24 Highgate Road
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68560.pdf

    Speakers

    Andrew Darbyshire (Submission Filed)

    Communications (Community Council)

    (May 12, 2014) Submission from Andrew Darbyshire (EY.New.EY33.1.1)
    (May 13, 2014) Submission from Andrew Darbyshire (EY.New.EY33.1.2)

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 9, 2014) Letter from Andrew, Dianna, Veronica and Jessica Darbyshire (CC.Supp.EY33.1.3)

    EY33.2 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 33 Princess Margaret Boulevard

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    4 - Etobicoke Centre

    Community Council Recommendations

    Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council grant the request for a permit to remove the privately owned honey locust tree at 33 Princess Margaret Boulevard, on the condition that the owner provide three (3) trees as replacement, which can be achieved in a combination of on-site planting and cash-in-lieu of planting.

    Origin

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

    Summary

    This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located in the rear yard of 33 Princess Margaret Boulevard.  The applicant is requesting tree removal due to a family member with allergies related to honey locust trees.

     

    The subject tree is a honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) measuring 49 cm in diameter. The tree is healthy and in good condition. Urban Forestry does not support removal of this tree.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation regarding an Application to Remove a Private Tree - 33 Princess Margaret Boulevard
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68559.pdf

    Speakers

    J. A. (Submission Filed)

    Communications (Community Council)

    (May 12, 2014) Submission from J.A. (EY.New.EY33.2.1)
    (May 13, 2014) Submission from J.A. forwarding a letter (April 20, 2014) from Henry and Lucy DeLange (EY.New.EY33.2.2)

    EY33.13 - Investigation of Impacts Related to ML Ready Mix

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
    Attention
    Communications EY33.13.19 and EY33.13.20 have been submitted on this Item

    Items EY33.13 and EY33.14 will be considered together

    Community Council Recommendations

    Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Medical Officer of Health to retain an outside Air Quality Expert this spring, to immediately commence air quality monitoring at sensitive receptors (residential properties) within 50 metres of the ML Ready Mix operation at 29 Judson Street, in consultation with the local Councillor.  The findings to be reported to the Ministry of the Environment and to City Council as soon as the study is completed.

     

    2.         City Council request the Division Heads of Municipal Licensing and Standards, Economic Development, City Planning, Toronto Building and Public Health, to convene a Working Group, including a representative from the Ministry of the Environment.  The Working Group will meet on a monthly basis to address community concerns relating to ML Ready Mix at 29 Judson Street, and will submit regular progress updates to the Ward Councillor, Deputy City Manager John Livey, the City Solicitor, Toronto Police Services, and the local Member of Provincial Parliament. 

     

    3.         City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to conduct a review of Employment Lands in the West District that may be suitable for a cement batch mixing plant and initiate any required Zoning By-law Amendment to allow the use, provided ML Ready Mix Concrete Inc. provides proof of a binding Agreement of Purchase and Sale of the property and agrees to pay for all required planning, environmental and traffic studies.

     

    4.         City Council request Deputy City Manager John Livey to look into moving the Works Yard on Commissioner Street, or any other City-owned Yard, to another location to allow ML Ready Mix to relocate.

     

    5.         City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to retain a real estate broker to look for suitable relocation sites for the concrete batching operation at 29 Judson Street.

     

    6.         City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to install a video surveillance and recording system on Judson Street to monitor continuously traffic activity on Judson Street west of Royal York Road, so as to prepare a date and time stamped record of traffic movements which could be shared with various enforcement agencies.

     

    7.         City Council request Metrolinx to submit to Etobicoke York Community Council a status update on the easement proposed for this site.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    Etobicoke York Community Council:

     

    1.         Confirmed and endorsed the following actions previously taken, and requested the appropriate City staff to continue to pursue a resolution to the issues related to ML Ready Mix at 29 Judson Street:

     

    a.         Etobicoke York Community Council requested the Acting Director, Business Services, Economic Development and Culture, to identify and pursue, in consultation with the Councillors for Wards 1, 2, 6 and 7, a potential location within Ward 2 and/or Ward 7 which could be utilized for the relocation and consolidation of concrete production facilities.

     

    b.         Etobicoke York Community Council requested the Medical Officer of Health to work with staff from Municipal Licensing and Standards and the Ministry of the Environment, on issues related to 29 and 145 Judson Street.

     

    Etobicoke York Community Council considered the following Items together:

     

    -           EY33.13, headed "Investigation of Impacts Related to ML Ready Mix"; and

     

    -           EY33.14, headed "29 Judson Street - Divisional Updates on Actions Taken and Outstanding Issues".

    Origin

    (March 20, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health

    Summary

    This report provides a summary of the activities undertaken by Toronto Public Health (TPH) with other City Divisions, and the Ministry of the Environment (Ministry) to address community concerns related to the ML Ready Mix located at 29 Judson Street.  Since 2012, in collaboration with other City Divisions and the Ministry, TPH has responded to potential environmental and health impacts associated with the concrete batching activities at the site.  The most commonly reported concerns related to noise, air quality impacts, dust, and vehicular traffic.  Additional concerns raised by the community related to hours of operations, planning and construction, and esthetic issues.  Due to the complexity of regulatory oversight and jurisdiction issues, responses have entailed a multi-divisional and multi-agency approach.  This collaborative approach has addressed many of the concerns related to impacts of dust, noise, and vehicular traffic.  Toronto Public Health is committed to continue this collaborative work with its City and provincial partners to respond to ongoing and future community concerns.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (March 20, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health regarding the Investigation of Impacts Related to ML Ready Mix
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68553.pdf

    Speakers

    Dan Irwin
    Tony Liusi
    David Cortellessa
    Joanne Cortellessa
    Aaron Gilmour, Vice President, Mimico Residents Association
    Sam Piscione
    JoAnne McKeown
    Barbara Mikina
    Pavel Pronin
    Maria Biasiucci
    Donovan Bond
    Renato Silva
    Doug Holyday, MPP, Etobicoke-Lakeshore

    Communications (Community Council)

    (March 31, 2014) Letter from John M. Alati, Davies Howe Partners LLP (EY.Main.EY33.13.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-46910.pdf
    (April 4, 2014) E-mail from Joanne Cortellessa (EY.Main.EY33.13.2)
    (April 3, 2014) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (EY.Main.EY33.13.3)
    (April 4, 2014) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (EY.Main.EY33.13.4)
    (April 5, 2014) Submission from Sam Piscione (EY.Main.EY33.13.5)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Dan Irwin and Lynn Parik (EY.Main.EY33.13.6)
    (April 7, 2014) Letter from John M. Alati, Davies Howe Partners LLP (EY.Main.EY33.13.7)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-46912.pdf
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (EY.New.EY33.13.8)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (EY.New.EY33.13.9)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (EY.New.EY33.13.10)
    (May 8, 2014) Letter from Aaron Gilmour, Vice President, Mimico Residents Association (EY.New.EY33.13.11)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47438.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (EY.New.EY33.13.12)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Raymond Sawdy (EY.New.EY33.13.13)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (EY.New.EY33.13.14)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (EY.New.EY33.13.15)
    (May 13, 2014) Letter from John M. Alati, Davies Howe Partners LLP (EY.New.EY33.13.16)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47475.pdf
    (May 13, 2014) Fax from Frank and Kathy Spudic (EY.New.EY33.13.17)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Ashley Martineau, Davies Howe Partners LLP (EY.New.EY33.13.18)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47524.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (May 16, 2014) E-mail from Denise Robichaud Warren (CC.Main.EY33.13.19)
    (May 15, 2014) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (CC.Main.EY33.13.20)

    EY33.14 - 29 Judson Street - Divisional Updates on Actions Taken and Outstanding Issues

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
    Attention
    Communications EY33.14.12 and EY33.14.13 have been submitted on this Item

    Items EY33.13 and EY33.14 will be considered together

    Community Council Recommendations

    Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Medical Officer of Health to retain an outside Air Quality Expert this spring, to immediately commence air quality monitoring at sensitive receptors (residential properties) within 50 metres of the ML Ready Mix operation at 29 Judson Street, in consultation with the local Councillor. The findings to be reported to the Ministry of the Environment and to City Council as soon as the study is completed.

     

    2.         City Council request the Division Heads of Municipal Licensing and Standards, Economic Development, City Planning, Toronto Building and Public Health, to convene a Working Group, including a representative from the Ministry of the Environment. The Working Group will meet on a monthly basis to address community concerns relating to ML Ready Mix at 29 Judson Street, and will submit regular progress updates to the Ward Councillor, Deputy City Manager John Livey, the City Solicitor, Toronto Police Services, and the local Member of Provincial Parliament.

     

    3.         City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to conduct a review of Employment Lands in the West District that may be suitable for a cement batch mixing plant and initiate any required Zoning By-law Amendment to allow the use, provided ML Ready Mix Concrete Inc. provides proof of a binding Agreement of Purchase and Sale of the property and agrees to pay for all required planning, environmental and traffic studies.

    4.         City Council request Deputy City Manager John Livey to look into moving the Works Yard on Commissioner Street, or any other City-owned Yard, to another location to allow ML Ready Mix to relocate.

     

    5.         City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to retain a real estate broker to look for suitable relocation sites for the concrete batching operation at 29 Judson Street.

     

    6.         City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to install a video surveillance and recording system on Judson Street to monitor continuously traffic activity on Judson Street west of Royal York Road, so as to prepare a date and time stamped record of traffic movements which could be shared with various enforcement agencies.

     

    7.         City Council request Metrolinx to submit to Etobicoke York Community Council a status update on the easement proposed for this site.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    Etobicoke York Community Council:

     

    1.         Confirmed and endorsed the following actions previously taken, and requested the appropriate City staff to continue to pursue a resolution to the issues related to ML Ready Mix at 29 Judson Street:

     

    a.         Etobicoke York Community Council requested the Acting Director, Business Services, Economic Development and Culture, to identify and pursue, in consultation with the Councillors for Wards 1, 2, 6 and 7, a potential location within Ward 2 and/or Ward 7 which could be utilized for the relocation and consolidation of concrete production facilities.

     

    b.         Etobicoke York Community Council requested the Medical Officer of Health to work with staff from Municipal Licensing and Standards and the Ministry of the Environment, on issues related to 29 and 145 Judson Street.

     

    Etobicoke York Community Council considered the following Items together:

     

    -           EY33.13, headed "Investigation of Impacts Related to ML Ready Mix"; and

     

    -           EY33.14, headed "29 Judson Street - Divisional Updates on Actions Taken and Outstanding Issues".

    Origin

    (April 24, 2014) Report from Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, the Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, the Director, Economic Development and Culture, and the Director, Toronto Building

    Summary

    This report responds to Etobicoke York Community Council's request to the General Managers of Municipal Licensing and Standards, Economic Development and Culture, City Planning and Toronto Building Divisions to report on actions taken to date and outstanding issues in addressing community concerns relating to the operations of ML Ready Mix located at 29 Judson Street.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, the Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, the Director, Economic Development and Culture, and the Director, Toronto Building, regarding 29 Judson Street - Divisional Updates on Actions Taken and Outstanding Issues
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-69253.pdf
    (April 24, 2014) Placeholder Report from the Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, regarding 29 Judson Street - Divisional Updates on Actions Taken and Outstanding Issues
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68842.pdf

    Speakers

    Dan Irwin
    Tony Liusi
    David Cortellessa
    Joanne Cortellessa
    Aaron Gilmour
    Sam Piscione
    JoAnne McKeown
    Barbara Mikina
    Pavel Pronin
    Maria Biasiucci
    Donovan Bond
    Renato Silva
    Doug Holyday, MPP, Etobicoke-Lakeshore

    Communications (Community Council)

    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (EY.New.EY33.14.1)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (EY.New.EY33.14.2)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (EY.New.EY33.14.3)
    (May 8, 2014) Letter from Aaron Gilmour, Vice President, Mimico Residents Association (EY.New.EY33.14.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47435.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (EY.New.EY33.14.5)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Raymond Sawdy (EY.New.EY13.14.6)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from John M. Alati, Davies Howe Partners LLP (EY.New.EY33.14.7)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47513.pdf
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Dan Irwin (EY.New.EY33.14.8)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Dan Irwin (EY.New.EY33.14.9)
    (May 13, 2014) Fax from Frank and Kathy Spudic (EY.New.EY33.14.10)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Ashley Martineau, Davies Howe Partners LLP (EY.New.EY33.14.11)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47545.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (May 16, 2014) E-mail from Denise Robichaud Warren (CC.Main.EY33.14.12)
    (May 15, 2014) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (CC.Main.EY33.14.13)

    EY33.17 - Left Turn Prohibition Amendment - Park Lawn Road, at Driveway Access to 515 The Queensway

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
    Attention
    Bill 494 has been submitted on this Item.

    Community Council Recommendations

    Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council rescind the existing “No Left Turn, Anytime” restriction for northbound traffic on Park Lawn Road, approximately 41 metres south of The Queensway, at the driveway access to 515 The Queensway.

     

    2.         City Council approve enacting a “No Left Turn, Monday to Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.” restriction for northbound traffic on Park Lawn Road, approximately 41 metres south of The Queensway, at the driveway access to 515 The Queensway.

    Origin

    (April 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to recommend changing the existing "No Left Turn Anytime" restriction to a “No Left Turn, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday” restriction for northbound traffic on Park Lawn Road at the driveway access to 515 The Queensway.

     

    As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates bus service on Park Lawn Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District, regarding a Left Turn Prohibition Amendment - Park Lawn Road, at Driveway Access to 515 The Queensway
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68714.pdf
    Attachment 1 - Location Map
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68715.pdf

    EY33.18 - U-Turn Prohibition - Humberwood Boulevard between Upper Humber Drive and Topbank Drive

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    2 - Etobicoke North
    Attention
    Bill 493 has been submitted on this Item.

    Community Council Recommendations

    Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the prohibition of northbound U-turns on Humberwood Boulevard between Upper Humber Drive and Topbank Drive.

    Origin

    (April 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to prohibit northbound U-turns on Humberwood Boulevard between Upper Humber Drive and Topbank Drive.

     

    To address safety concerns and congestion in the area of Humberwood Downs Junior Middle School/Holy Child elementary school, it is recommended that northbound U-turns be prohibited on Humberwood Boulevard in front of the schools.

     

    As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates transit service on Humberwood Boulevard, City Council approval of this report is required.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District, regarding a U-Turn Prohibition - Humberwood Boulevard between Upper Humber Drive and Topbank Drive
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68670.pdf
    Attachment 1 - Location Map
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68671.pdf

    EY33.21 - School Speed Zone - 4319 Bloor Street West (St. Clement Catholic School)

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    3 - Etobicoke Centre
    Attention
    Bill 490 has been submitted on this Item.

    Community Council Recommendations

    Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council designate a School Speed Zone on Bloor Street West, between a point approximately 85 metres west of Mill Road and a point approximately 150 metres east of Forestview Road, for a period of 1 year, and the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District, be requested to re-assess at that time.

    Origin

    (April 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is obtain approval for the designation of a School Speed Zone on Bloor Street West in the area of St. Clement Catholic School, 4319 Bloor Street West.

    During the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, the speed limit on this section of Bloor Street West would be reduced from 50 km/h to 40 km/h and motorists would be alerted by flashing beacons on both sides of a sign placed upstream in both directions. This proposal, part of the City-wide school safety improvement strategy, is a pilot project to access the effectiveness of new installations with and without police enforcement.

     

    As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates bus service on this section of Bloor Street West, City Council approval of this report is required.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District, regard a School Speed Zone - 4319 Bloor Street West (St. Clement Catholic School)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68769.pdf
    Attachment 1 - Location Map
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68770.pdf

    EY33.24 - Installation of Traffic Control Signals: St. Clair Avenue West at Symes Road

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    11 - York South-Weston

    Community Council Recommendations

    Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the removal of the pedestrian crossover on St. Clair Avenue West at Symes Road.

     

    2.         City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of St. Clair Avenue West and Symes Road.

    Origin

    (April 1, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to convert the pedestrian crossover (PXO) to traffic control signals at St. Clair Avenue West and Symes Road.

     

    The installation of traffic control signals is justified as the safety audit of the existing pedestrian crossover on St. Clair Avenue West at Symes Road indicated that this location is no longer environmentally suitable for a pedestrian crossover, given the existing operating speed of vehicle traffic on St. Clair Avenue West. Based on the results of the pedestrian crossover audit, staff recommended that the pedestrian crossover be replaced with traffic control signals at this intersection.

     

    As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on St. Clair Avenue West, City Council approval of this report is required. TTC staff has been advised of the proposed signal installation.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 1, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District regarding the Installation of Traffic Control Signals: St. Clair Avenue West at Symes Road
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68767.pdf
    Attachment 1 - Map
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68768.pdf

    EY33.28 - Parking Regulation Amendments - St. Clair Avenue West at McRoberts Avenue

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    17 - Davenport
    Attention
    Bill 496 has been submitted on this Item.

    Community Council Recommendations

    Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council rescind the existing "No Parking Anytime" regulation on the north side of St. Clair Avenue West, between McRoberts Avenue and a point 15 metres further east and a point 9 metres further west.

     

    2.         City Council approve the enactment of a "No Stopping Anytime" regulation on the north side of St. Clair Avenue West, between McRoberts Avenue and a point 15 metres further east and a point 9 metres further west.

    Origin

    (April 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to introduce amendments to the parking

    regulations on St. Clair Avenue West at McRoberts Avenue.

     

    The proposed parking regulation amendments will serve to improve traffic operations within the intersection of St. Clair Avenue West and McRoberts Avenue, by preventing motorists with accessible permits parking on the north side of the road and impeding traffic flow. This recommendation has been discussed with the area Councillor.

     

    Since the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on St. Clair Avenue West, City Council approval of this report is required.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District regarding Parking Regulation Amendments - St. Clair Avenue West at McRoberts Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68776.pdf
    Attachment 1 - Map
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68777.pdf

    EY33.30 - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 4800 Eglinton Avenue, 3730 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2-6 Eva Road

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    3 - Etobicoke Centre, 4 - Etobicoke Centre, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
    Attention
    Bill 526 has been submitted on this Item.

    Community Council Recommendations

    Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 – Fire Routes:

     

                -           4800 Eglinton Avenue

                -           3730 Lake Shore Boulevard West

                -           2-6 Eva Road.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route. 

    Origin

    (April 2, 2014) Report from Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services

    Summary

    To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

     

    Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 2, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, regarding the Designation of Fire Routes at 4800 Eglinton Avenue, 3730 Lake Shore Blvd West, 2-6 Eva Road
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68697.pdf
    Draft By-law to amend Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes, to include 4800 Eglinton Avenue, 3730 Lake Shore Blvd West, 2-6 Eva Road
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-68698.pdf

    EY33.35 - Events of Municipal Significance for Liquor Licensing Purposes

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    2 - Etobicoke North, 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 7 - York West, 12 - York South-Weston, 13 - Parkdale-High Park
    Attention
    Communications EY33.35.11 and EY33.35.12 have been submitted on this Item

    Community Council Recommendations

    Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

     

    A.        City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the following requests, noting that the applicant is required to comply with other applicable by-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way:

     

    1.         The 17th Annual Taste of the Kingsway Festival:

     

                a.         to be held on Bloor Street West, from Prince Edward Drive to Montgomery Road, on:

     

    -           Friday, September 5, 2014 from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

    -           Saturday, September 6, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 

    -           Sunday, September 7, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 

     

                b.         to operate a Beer and Wine Garden on Bloor Street West, east of Montgomery Road; and

     

                c.         for temporary liquor license extensions for various Kingsway BIA member businesses, as listed in the letter (April 11, 2014) from Cathy Beaulieu, Chair, Kingsway BIA, during event hours of the Taste of the Kingsway Festival.

     

     2.        The placement of a tent(s) for the sampling and promotion of wine on event space which will be barricaded and have uniformed security working at all times, as part of the Emery Village Business Improvement Area Wine Festival, to be held on Saturday, September 13, 2014, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Plunkett Road, between Millwick and Satterly Road, and on Satterly Road, between Islington Avenue and Plunkett Road.

     

    3.         The 2014 Bloor West Village Toronto Ukrainian Festival:

     

                a.         to be held on Bloor Street West, from Jane Street to Glendonwynne Road, on:

     

    -           Friday, September 12, 2014 from 5:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.

    -           Saturday, September 13, 2014 from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. 

    -           Sunday, September 14, 2014 from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 

     

                b.         to operate a Beer Garden on the north side of Bloor Street West, between Willard Avenue and Windermere Avenue; and

     

    c.         for liquor license extensions onto City property for the duration of the festival the establishments listed in the letter (May 2, 2014) from Sonia Holiad, Executive Director, Bloor West Village Toronto Ukrainian Festival.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    Etobicoke York Community Council declared, for liquor licensing purposes, the following events to be of municipal significance, and directed that the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario be advised that the Community Council has no objection to them taking place:

     

    1.         The 11th Annual Lakeshore Mardi Gras Festival, to be held at Colonel Samuel Smith Park, from Friday, August 1 to Monday, August 4, 2014.

     

    2.         The 17th Annual Taste of the Kingsway Festival, to be held on Bloor Street West, from Prince Edward Drive to Montgomery Road, on:

     

                 -          Friday, September 5, 2014 from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

                 -          Saturday, September 6, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 

                 -          Sunday, September 7, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 

     

    3.         The Junction Summer Solstice Festival, organized by the Junction Business Improvement Area, to be held on June 21, 2014, from 12:00 noon to midnight, at various businesses in the Junction neighbourhood.

     

    4.         The Junction Music Festival, organized by the Junction Business Improvement Area, to be held on September 20, 2014, from 12:00 noon to midnight, at various businesses in the Junction neighbourhood.

     

    5.         The Art Tour (formerly the Bloor West Village Art Tour) opening event, to be held on May 30, 2014, from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., at Picture It Framed, 3071 Dundas Street West.

     

    6.         Woodbine Entertainment Group, 555 Rexdale Boulevard, for the Hockey Night in Canada's Play On event, on Saturday May 31 and Sunday June 1, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.

     

    7.         The Emery Village Business Improvement Area Wine Festival, to be held on Saturday, September 13, 2014, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Plunkett Road, between Millwick and Satterly Road, and on Satterly Road, between Islington Avenue and Plunkett Road. 

     

    8.         The Annual Festival of Our Lady of Light, to be held by St. Matthew’s Roman Catholic Church at the St. Matthew's School playground, from August 28 to September 1, 2014, from 6:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m.

     

    9.         The Junction Farmers Market Night Market event, on Pacific Avenue North of Dundas Street West, on July 12, 2014, from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. 

     

    10.       The 2014 Bloor West Village Toronto Ukrainian Festival, to be held on Bloor Street West, from Jane Street to Glendonwynne Road, on Friday, September 12, 2014 from 5:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., Saturday, September 13, 2014 from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m., and Sunday, September 14, 2014 from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.

     

    11.       The World Cup Soccer / Canada Day events, at Plaza Latina, 9 Milvan Road, on July 1, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.

    Summary

    Seeking endorsement of various events for liquor licensing purposes.

    Communications (Community Council)

    (April 30, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore, regarding the 11th Annual Lakeshore Mardi Gras Festival - August 1 to 4, 2014. (EY.New.EY33.35.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47015.pdf
    (April 11, 2014) Letter from Cathy Beaulieu, Chair, Kingsway BIA, regarding the 17th Annual Taste of The Kingsway Festival - September 5-7, 2014 (EY.New.EY33.35.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47035.pdf
    (April 30, 2014) E-mail from Kristina Skindelyte, Executive Director, The Junction BIA, regarding The Junction Summer Solstice Festival on June 21, 2014, and The Junction Music Festival on September 20, 2014 (EY.New.EY33.35.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47036.pdf
    (May 1, 2014) E-mail from John Presseault, on behalf of Art Tour, regarding an event on May 30, 2014 (EY.New.EY33.35.4)
    (April 29, 2014) Letter from William Orct, Director, Racing and Gaming Hospitality, Woodbine Entertainment Group, regarding the Hockey Night in Canada's Play On - Hospitality Tent, on May 31 and June 1, 2014 (EY.New.EY33.35.5)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47090.pdf
    (May 8, 2014) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Ward 7 - York West, regarding the Emery Village BIA Wine Festival on September 13, 2014 (EY.New.EY33.35.6)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47283.pdf
    (May 5, 2014) Letter from Rev. Andre Grecki, St. Matthew's Roman Catholic Church, regarding the Annual Festival of Our Lady of Light, August 28 to September 1, 2014 (EY.New.EY33.35.7)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47284.pdf
    (May 7, 2014) Letter from Chris Ganowski, President, Board of Directors, Junction Farmers Market, regarding a Night Market event on July 12, 2014 (EY.New.EY33.35.8)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47216.pdf
    (May 2, 2014) Letter from Sonia Holiad, Executive Director, Bloor West Village Toronto Ukrainian Festival, regarding the event on September 12-14, 2014 (EY.New.EY33.35.9)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47343.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Ward 7 - York West, regarding the World Cup Soccer Canada Day events at Plaza Latina on July 1, 2014 (EY.New.EY33.35.10)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47431.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (May 28, 2014) E-mail from Roger Bu, owner, Axis Gallery and Grill, regarding the Junction Summer Solstice Festival on June 21, 2014 (CC.Main.EY33.35.11)
    (June 11, 2014) Fax from Jack's Management, Jack's Bakery and Pastry regarding a temporary patio extension for World Cup festivities (CC.New.EY33.35.12)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48027.pdf

    EY33.38 - Request for Zoning Review and Community Consultation - 2 to 8 Blue Springs Road

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    12 - York South-Weston

    Community Council Recommendations

    Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to conduct a zoning review of the properties known municipally as 2 to 8 Blue Springs Road in the context of the surrounding residential area.

     

    2.         City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to provide notice within 120m of the subject properties for a Community Consultation meeting to obtain community comments on any proposed zoning by-law amendment and to report back to Etobicoke York Community Council.

     

    3.         Should there be a Zoning By-law Amendment recommended through this review, City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to issue Notice for a Public Meeting under the Planning Act according to the regulations under the Planning Act at the appropriate time. 

    Origin

    (May 8, 2014) Letter from Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, Ward 12, York South-Weston

    Summary

    The properties known municipally known as 2 to 8 Blue Springs Road (the subject properties) are each occupied with long standing semi detached dwelling houses. Blue Springs Road is a residential street in a residential area predominantly characterized by detached houses. The semi detached houses at 2 to 8 Blue Springs Road are the only semi detached houses in the immediate area.  To the rear of the properties at 2 to 8 Blue Springs Road is a two storey mixed commercial and residential development fronting Rustic Road with a number of ground floor local retail shops and service uses and apartment units on the upper level.

     

    The property known municipally as 2 Blue Springs Road at the corner of Rustic Road is currently the subject of a Committee of Adjustment application. The initial proposal to the Committee of Adjustment sought variances to permit a rear two storey addition to the existing semi detached house for a mixed commercial and residential use. The application was deferred for consultation with the Ward Councillor, Planning staff, Transportation Planning staff and concerned area residents. The current proposal eliminates the commercial use and proposes a two storey addition that is reduced in size and is proposed for residential purposes only.

     

    The properties at 2 to 8 Blue Springs Road are designated Neighbourhoods in the Toronto Official Plan. The existing commercial development and the subject properties are zoned C1 General Commercial Zone by former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625.

     

    The C1 zoning permits commercial uses. Semi detached dwelling houses are also permitted subject to the RM5 Multiple Family Fifth Density Zoning provisions in By-law No. 7625.  The new harmonized City of Toronto Zoning By-law No 569-2013 does not apply to the lands because the C1 zoning of the subject lands was incongruous with the Official Plan Neighbourhoods designation.

     

    The existing and planned context of the subject properties is for residential use pursuant to the Official Plan.  Although the existing C1 zoning permits the semi detached houses, it also permits commercial uses which is inconsistent with the existing residential land use character of the street and surrounding area and which could result in commercial uses and their associated impacts extending onto the residential street. This represents a concern for local residents.

     

    It is therefore requested that a zoning review be undertaken for the subject properties in the context of the surrounding residential area and the current Official Plan Neighbourhoods designation, a Community Consultation meeting be held with area residents and the outcome of the review and consultation be reported back to Community Council.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (May 8, 2014) Letter from Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, Ward 12, York South-Weston requesting a Zoning Review and Community Consultation - 2 to 8 Blue Springs Road
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-69250.pdf

    EY33.40 - Business Improvement Area Parking Study

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

    Community Council Recommendations

    Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Toronto Parking Authority, in consultation with the appropriate City Divisions, to undertake assessments of the parking supply and demand in the Longbranch BIA, Lakeshore Village BIA, Mimico Village BIA, and Mimico by the Lake BIA, to identify areas currently experiencing parking shortfalls, and to assess potential locations for the provision of additional parking.

     

    2.         City Council request the Toronto Parking Authority to consult with appropriate City Divisions and the Longbranch BIA, Lakeshore Village BIA, Mimico Village BIA, and Mimico by the Lake BIA, and the local Councillor to ensure any potential changes to parking are in keeping with the Joint BIA Streetscape Master Plan.

    Origin

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore

    Summary

    Requesting assessment of parking supply and demand in Ward 6.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore requesting a Ward 6 BIA Parking Study.
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-69297.pdf

    North York Community Council - Meeting 32

    NY32.10 - Payment-In-Lieu of Parking - 28 Hendon Avenue

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    23 - Willowdale

    Community Council Recommendations

    North York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council exempt the applicant at 28 Hendon Avenue from the former City of North York Zoning By-law parking requirement of 33 parking spaces, subject to $30,000.00 payment-in-lieu of parking, based on the amount that would be charged if the church was 400 square metres instead of 428.26 square metres, providing the applicant signs a Payment-In-Lieu of Parking Agreement with the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

    Origin

    (April 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District

    Summary

    This report seeks City Council's approval to exempt the applicant from the parking requirement specified in the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 to provide 33 parking spaces. Instead of accommodating all of the parking on-site, the applicant has proposed to provide six (6) spaces and requested a Payment-In-Lieu of Parking to the City which amounts to $91,500.00.

     

    The parking exemption is considered appropriate since the 27 space shortfall will not have a significant impact on parking conditions in the area.

     

    Section 40 of the Planning Act grants Council the authority to approve payment-in-lieu of parking. This application has been made pursuant to the City’s Payment-In-Lieu of Parking Policy, adopted in July 2004. City Council approval is required as this matter has not been delegated.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District on Payment-In-Lieu of Parking for 28 Hendon Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-68759.pdf
    Attachment 1 - Context Map
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-68760.pdf
    Attachment 2 - Applicant's Site Plan
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-68761.pdf

    NY32.18 - Final Report - Zoning By-Law Amendment Application - 289 Finch Avenue West

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    23 - Willowdale

    Public Notice Given

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Community Council Recommendations

    North York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 7625, for the lands at 289 Finch Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (April 23, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

     

    3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills in City Council for enactment, City Council require the applicant to obtain Notice of Approval Conditions under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act, and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Planning, North York District, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 13, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.  No one addressed the North York Community Council on May 13, 2014.

    Origin

    (April 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

    Summary

    This application proposes to amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 to convert the ground floor of the existing one-storey dwelling to a commercial use with a dwelling unit in the basement level.

     

    This report reviews and recommends approval of the draft by-law attached to this report.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 23, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-Law Amendment Application for 289 Finch Avenue West
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-68792.pdf

    Communications (Community Council)

    (April 30, 2014) Letter from M.J. Aunger (NY.New.NY32.18.1)

    NY32.19 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment and Subdivision Applications - 151 McNicoll Avenue

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    24 - Willowdale
    Attention
    Communication NY32.19.1 has been submitted on this Item

    Bill 552 has been submitted on this Item.

    Public Notice Given

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Community Council Recommendations

    North York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 7625, for the lands at 151 McNicoll Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (April 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

     

    3.         In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the draft plan of subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment 2 to the report (April 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, subject to:

     

    a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 6 to the report (April 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior final approval and the release of the plan of subdivision for registration; and

     

    b.         any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 13, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

    Origin

    (April 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

    Summary

    This application proposes to amend former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 for the lands at 151 McNicoll Avenue to permit twenty-two single detached dwellings and a public park. A rezoning is required to permit the residential use, the size of some of the proposed lots and to accommodate the proposed dwellings. An application for subdivision has also been submitted to create the new lots and a public road to provide access to the development. This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. This report also advises that the Chief Planner intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 24, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment and Subdivision Applications for 151 McNicoll Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-68865.pdf

    Speakers

    Moiz Behar, on behalf of the applicant

    Communications (City Council)

    (May 14, 2014) Fax from Antonina Dunaeva (CC.Main.NY32.19.1)

    NY32.20 - Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 2360-2378 Yonge Street

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    16 - Eglinton-Lawrence

    Community Council Recommendations

    North York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other staff as appropriate, to oppose the applicant’s appeal respecting Zoning By-law Amendment application  No. 12 168197 NNY 16 OZ at 2360 to 2378 Yonge Street and attend any Ontario Municipal Board hearings in opposition to such appeal, for the reasons discussed in the report (April 23, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, including:

     

    a.         the proposal does not conform to the Official Plan and the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan, including, but not limited to, policies related to built form, public realm, healthy neighbourhoods, heritage resources, Avenues, and Mixed Use Areas;

     

    b.         the proposal does not adequately address Council approved guidelines including the Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards and the Urban Design Guidelines for the Yonge, Duplex, Helendale, Orchard View Planning Study;

     

    c.         the height, scale and density of the development are not consistent with the existing and planned context;

     

    d.         the height and massing of the proposed building would have negative impacts on the public realm and abutting and nearby properties;

     

    e.         the proposal represents overdevelopment of the site; and

     

    f.          the proposal would adversely impact the future development on the Yonge Street Avenue.

     

    2.         City Council authorize City staff to continue discussions with the applicant on a revised proposal which addresses the issues set out in the report (April 23, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

     

    3.         In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct staff to request that the Board withhold any order to approve a Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands until such time as the City and the owner have presented a draft by-law to the Board that secures community benefits through a Section 37 Agreement.

     

    4.         In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct staff to request that the Board withhold any order to approve a Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands until such time as a site plan agreement has been entered into between the City and the owner and any preconditions to site plan approval are fulfilled including addressing servicing issues as outlined in the memo from the Manager, Development Engineering, North York District dated November 19, 2013.

     

    5.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to advise the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) that the zoning by-law should not be approved without the provision of such services, facilities or matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as may be considered appropriate by the Chief Planner in consultation with the applicant and the Ward Councillor.

     

    6.         City Council not accept the Avenue Segment Study submitted for the application for 2360 to 2378 Yonge Street as the proposal would change the character of Yonge Street adversely impacting the form, scale and intensity of reurbanization along this Avenue, contrary to the Official Plan.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Committee Members present asked that the vote on the Committee Recommendations to City Council be recorded as unanimous.

    Origin

    (April 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

    Summary

    This application proposes a 28-storey mixed-use building (89.6 metres excluding mechanicals) with 234 dwelling units and 2,695 square metres of commercial floor space at 2360 to 2378 Yonge Street. The building design includes a 6-storey base building with a 22-storey tower above. A total of 147 parking spaces are proposed in five levels of below grade parking. The residential gross floor area proposed for the building is 18,042 m², resulting in a proposed density of 12.6 times the area of the lot.  The applicant has appealed the application to the Ontario Municipal Board due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the prescribed time period under the Planning Act.  A prehearing conference was held on October 25, 2013.  A second prehearing conference was held on March 17, 2014. A further prehearing conference is scheduled for July 17 and 18, 2014 and a full hearing has been scheduled for November 12 to November 26, 2014.

     

    This report seeks Council’s direction to oppose the proposed development at the Ontario Municipal Board. The application proposes a tall building along an Avenue where mid-rise buildings are appropriate. The application is contrary to the Official Plan and Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan.  The height, scale and density of the development are not consistent with the existing and planned context. The height and massing of the proposed building would have unacceptable impacts on the public realm and abutting and nearby properties.  The proposal represents overdevelopment of the site and does not adequately address the Council approved Mid-rise Performance Standards and the Yonge, Duplex, Helendale and Orchard View Urban Design Guidelines prepared in association with the Planning Study for this block. Its approval would negatively impact the future development along the Yonge Street Avenue.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 23, 2014) Request for Direction Report and Attachments 1-11 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 2360-2378 Yonge Street
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-68833.pdf

    Speakers

    C. Ann King, Chair, Community Liaison Committee, Stanley Knowles Housing Cooperative
    Frank Peters, President, Avenue Road Eglinton Community Association (ARECA)
    Thomas V. Cohen, Chair, Eglinton Park Residents' Association

    Communications (Community Council)

    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP (NY.New.NY32.20.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-47418.pdf

    NY32.21 - Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application and Rental Demolition Application under Municipal Code 667 - 31, 33, 35 and 37 Helendale Avenue

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    16 - Eglinton-Lawrence

    Community Council Recommendations

    North York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other staff as appropriate, to oppose the applicant’s appeal respecting Zoning By-law Amendment application  No. 12 141927 NNY 16 OZ for  31, 33, 35 and 37 Helendale Avenue and attend any Ontario Municipal Board hearings in opposition to such appeal, for the reasons discussed in the report (April 23, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, including:

     

    a.         the proposal does not conform to the Official Plan and the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan, including, but not limited to,  policies related to built form, public realm, healthy neighbourhoods, heritage resources and Apartment Neighbourhoods;

     

    b.         the proposal does not adequately address Council approved guidelines including the Tall Building Design Guidelines and the Urban Design Guidelines for the Yonge, Duplex, Helendale, Orchard View Planning Study;

     

    c.         the proposal represents over-development of the site; and

     

    d.         an agreement has not been reached between City staff and the applicant with respect to the demolition and replacement of the rental housing.

     

    2.         City Council authorize City staff to continue discussions with the applicant on a revised proposal which addresses the issues set out in the report (April 23, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

               

    3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor, in the event that the proposal is approved in whole or in part by the Ontario Municipal Board, to advise the Board that the development application should not be approved without the approval by City Council of rental demolition and full replacement of the 19 existing rental dwelling units to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and that the City Solicitor advise the Board that City Council approval under Chapter 667 pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act is required for the rental demolition and replacement of the rental housing.

     

    4.         In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct staff to request that the Board withhold any order to approve a Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands until such time as the City and the owner have presented a draft by-law to the Board that provides for securing the rental housing matters as outlined in Recommendation 3 of the report (April 23, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and a Section 37 Agreement incorporating these matters has been executed.

     

    5.         In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct staff to request that the Board withhold any order to approve a Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands until such time as a site plan agreement has been entered into between the City and the owner and any preconditions to site plan approval are fulfilled including addressing parking spaces and access, loading and servicing issues as outlined in the memo from the Manager, Development Engineering, North York District dated December 10, 2013.

     

    6.         In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct staff to request that the Board withhold any order to approve a Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands until such time as the City and the owner have presented a draft by-law to the Board that secures community benefits through a Section 37 Agreement.

     

    7.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to advise the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) that the zoning by-law should not be approved without the provision of such services, facilities or matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as may be considered appropriate by the Chief Planner in consultation with the applicant and the Ward Councillor.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Committee Members present asked that the vote on the Committee Recommendations to City Council be recorded as unanimous.

    Origin

    (April 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

    Summary

    This application proposes a 24-storey apartment building (74.15 metres excluding mechanicals) with 242 dwelling units at 31 to 37 Helendale Avenue. The building design includes a 5-storey base building with a 19-storey tower above. A total of 145 parking spaces are proposed in four levels of below grade parking. The residential gross floor area proposed for the building is 16,594 m², resulting in a proposed density of 10.2 times the area of the lot.  The applicant has appealed the application to the Ontario Municipal Board due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the prescribed time period under the Planning Act.  A prehearing conference was held on March 17, 2014.  A further prehearing conference is scheduled for July 17 and 18, 2014 and a full hearing has been scheduled for November 12 to November 26, 2014. 

     

    The site currently contains 19 residential rental units of affordable and mid-range rents in three 3-storey apartment buildings and a single detached house.  The details of the replacement strategy are currently being discussed with the applicant. A Rental Housing Demolition application was also submitted under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act to demolish the 19 residential rental units on the site pursuant to Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code. The City's decision on the Rental Demolition application is not subject to appeal by the applicant to the Ontario Municipal Board. 

     

    This report seeks Council’s direction to oppose the proposed development at the Ontario Municipal Board.  The application proposes a tall building that is out of scale with its existing and planned context, and creates an unacceptable transition to an area of lower intensity, contrary to the Official Plan.  The height and massing of the building would have negative impacts on the public realm and abutting and nearby properties. The proposal represents overdevelopment of the site and does not adequately address the Council approved Tall Building Design Guidelines and the Yonge, Duplex, Helendale and Orchard View Urban Design Guidelines prepared in association with the Planning Study for this block.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 23, 2014) Request for Direction Report and Attachments 1-10 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment Application and Rental Demolition Application under Municipal Code 667 for 31, 33, 35 and 37 Helendale Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-68832.pdf

    NY32.23 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    8 - York West, 33 - Don Valley East

    Community Council Recommendations

    North York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection, for liquor licensing purposes, to the following requests, noting that applicants are required to comply with other applicable by-laws and obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way:

     

    a.         A temporary liquor licence extension from the Canadian Tennis Association and Marigolds and Onions, for the proposed extended outdoor fenced-in area that surrounds the licensed areas for the Rogers Cup being held at the Rexall Centre, 1 Shoreham Drive from Saturday, August 2, 2013 to Monday, August 11, 2013 from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. daily.

     

    b.         A temporary liquor licence extension for an Annual Corporate Event, to be held on Wednesday, June 18, 2014 between 11:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m. at the Town Hall Green, in an area directly across the Event Pavilion at the Black Creek Pioneer Village, 1000 Murray Ross Parkway.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    North York Community Council, for liquor licensing purposes, declared the following to be an event of municipal significance, and directed that the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario be advised that the Community Council has no objection to it taking place:

     

    1.         Festival of Festivals: A Celebration of Greece, an outdoor event, at the Armenian Community Centre, 50 Hallcrown Place, from Thursday, July 3 to Tuesday, July 8, 2014, from 4:00 to 11:00 p.m. daily.

    Summary

    Seeking endorsement of events for Municipal Significance for liquor licensing purposes.

    Communications (Community Council)

    (May 8, 2014) Memo from Councillor Carroll, requesting that, for liquor licensing purposes, North York Community Council declare the Festival of Festivals: A Celebration of Greece to be held from July 3 to July 8, 2014 at the Armenian Community Centre, 50 Hallcrown Place from 4:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. daily, to be an event of municipal significance and advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to it taking place. (NY.New.NY32.23.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-47368.pdf
    (May 9, 2014) Letter from Al Salomon, President, Marigolds & Onions, requesting a temporary liquor licence extension for the Rogers Cup to be held on Saturday August 2, to Monday August 11, 2014. (NY.New.NY32.23.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-47378.pdf
    (April 28, 2014) Letter from Gina Humilde, Event Coordinator, Black Creek Pioneer Village, requesting an extension to their existing Liquor Licence for an Annual Corporate Event, to be held at the Town Hall Green, Black Creek Pioneer Village, 1000 Murray Ross Parkway, on June 18, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. (NY.New.NY32.23.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-47432.pdf

    NY32.26 - Request for Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board - 154 Deloraine Avenue

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    16 - Eglinton-Lawrence

    Community Council Recommendations

    North York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision in regard to 154 Deloraine Avenue.

     

    Origin

    (May 13, 2014) Memo from Councillor Stintz

    Summary

    On February 19, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment Refused an application to construct a new two-storey detached dwelling with an integral garage. The existing dwelling would be demolished. 

     

    A staff report was submitted recommending reductions in the proposed building height, exterior main wall height and proposed finished first floor height, and increases in the proposed east side yard setback and proposed front yard soft landscaping of 49.35% to better fit the neighbourhood character.  In addition, the approval should be subject to the driveway maintaining a 2% positive slope as per drawings submitted to the Committee of Adjustment.

     

    On February 27, 2014 the Applicant appealed the Committee’s Refusal decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. A hearing has been scheduled for July 4, 2014.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (May 13, 2014) Memo from Councillor Stintz on Request for Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 154 Deloraine Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69279.pdf
    Attachment 1 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Application for 154 Deloraine Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69280.pdf
    Attachment 2 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Minor Variance Application - 154 Deloraine Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69289.pdf

    Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 32

    SC32.2 - Assumption of Services - Midland Avenue and McNicoll Avenue, Kreadar Enterprises Limited

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    41 - Scarborough-Rouge River

    Community Council Recommendations

    Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council assume the services installed at Midland Avenue and McNicoll Avenue and that the City formally assume the road within the development.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the Legal Services Division to release the portion of the performance guarantee held with respect to this development.

     

    3.         City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highways and municipal services within the development.

     

    4.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the Owner.

     

    5.         City Council authorize the City Clerk and Treasurer to sign any release or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto.

     

    6.         City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within this development at Midland Avenue and McNicoll Avenue to Toronto Hydro.

    Origin

    (April 10, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor

    Summary

    This report requests Council’s authority for the City to assume the services with respect to the development at Midland Avenue and McNicoll Avenue.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 10, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the City Solicitor - Assumption of Services - Midland Avenue and McNicoll Avenue, Kreadar Enterprises Limited
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68692.pdf

    SC32.3 - Assumption of Services - Extension of Scarbell Drive - Cal-Scarbell Developments Inc. - Consent Agreement

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    44 - Scarborough East

    Community Council Recommendations

    Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council assume the services installed on the extension of Scarbell Drive and that the City formally assume the road.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the Legal Services Division to release the portion of the performance guarantee held with respect to this development.

     

    3.         City Council authorize the City Clerk and Treasurer to sign any release or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto.

     

    4.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the Owner.

     

    5.         City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within the extension of Scarbell Drive to Toronto Hydro.

    Origin

    (April 15, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor

    Summary

    This report requests Council’s authority for the City to assume the services with respect to the development on the extension of Scarbell Drive.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 15, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the City Solicitor - Assumption of Services - Extension of Scarbell Drive - Cal-Scarbell Developments Inc. - Consent Agreement
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68587.pdf

    SC32.6 - Speed Zone - St. Clair Avenue East from Birchmount Road to Herron Avenue

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    35 - Scarborough Southwest
    Attention
    Bill 513 has been submitted on this Item.

    Community Council Recommendations

    Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council rescind the maximum rate of speed limit regulation, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (April 22, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

     

    2.         City Council enact the maximum rate of speed limit regulation, as identified in Appendix 2 of the report (April 22, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

    Origin

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

    Summary

    This staff report discusses the feasibility of installing a 50 km/h speed zone on St. Clair Avenue East from Birchmount Road to Herron Avenue.  A 50 kilometre per hour (km/h) speed limit is technically justified on this portion of St. Clair Avenue East.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 22, 2014) Report and Appendix 1-2 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Speed Zone - St. Clair Avenue East from Birchmount Road to Herron Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68774.pdf
    Location Plan - St. Clair Avenue East from Birchmount Road to Herron Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68775.pdf

    SC32.9 - Left-Turn Prohibition - St. Clair Avenue East at Gidley Road

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    36 - Scarborough Southwest
    Attention
    Bill 495 has been submitted on this Item.

    Community Council Recommendations

    Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council enact the left-turn prohibition, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (April 22, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

    Origin

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

    Summary

    This staff report discusses the feasibility of installing a westbound left-turn prohibition at the subject location due to concerns about conflicts between westbound through traffic on St. Clair Avenue East and vehicles turning left into Gidley Road during rush hour periods. This conflict is caused by the left-turn storage lane for eastbound left-turns at Jeanette Street being too short to accommodate both east and westbound left-turn movements between the two intersections.

     

    It is recommended that a Westbound Left-turn Prohibition on St. Clair Avenue East at Gidley Road be enacted for the two peak periods of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 22, 2014) Report and Appendix 1 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Left-Turn Prohibition - St. Clair Avenue East at Gidley Road
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68785.pdf
    Location Plan - St. Clair Avenue East at Gidley Road
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68786.pdf

    SC32.10 - Left Turn Review - Lilian Drive at Lawrence Avenue East

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    37 - Scarborough Centre

    Community Council Recommendations

    Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council receive the report (April 22, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District, for information.

    Origin

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to review the safety of making a southbound left turn at the intersection of Lilian Drive and Lawrence Avenue East.  The review revealed that a southbound left turn prohibition is not justified.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Left Turn Review - Lilian Drive at Lawrence Avenue East
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68788.pdf
    Location Plan - Lilian Drive at Lawrence Avenue East
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68789.pdf

    SC32.12 - Pedestrian Crossing Protection - Bellamy Road North and Eastpark Boulevard

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    38 - Scarborough Centre

    Community Council Recommendations

    Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council not approve the installation of Traffic Control Signals at the intersection of Bellamy Road North and Eastpark Boulevard.

    Origin

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

    Summary

    Traffic studies reveal that all warrants for pedestrian crossing protection, specifically, traffic control signals, pedestrian crossover or a pedestrian refuge island are not warranted at this location at this time.  As a result, Traffic Control Signals should not be installed.  In addition, neither a pedestrian crossover nor refuge island are feasible.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Pedestrian Crossing Protection - Bellamy Road North and Eastpark Boulevard
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68648.pdf
    Location Plan - Bellamy Road North and Eastpark Boulevard
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68649.pdf

    SC32.20 - McCowan Precinct Plan Study - Final Report

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    38 - Scarborough Centre
    Attention
    Communication SC32.20.6 has been submitted on this Item

    Bill 535 has been submitted on this Item.

    Public Notice Given

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Community Council Recommendations

    Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend the proposed OPA 242, and the proposed McCowan Precinct Urban Design Guidelines, attached as Attachments 2 and 3 respectively to the report (May 2, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, as follows:

     

    a.         Amend the second point under Section 4.2.b. of the Urban Design Guidelines to read as follows:

     

                "where appropriate, buildings containing retail uses will be designed to allow for their activities to 'spill out' with the provision of wider setback areas."

     

    b.         Amend the first point under Section 4.4.b. of the Urban Design Guidelines to read as follows:

     

                "where appropriate, buildings along the McCowan Road frontage will contain animated uses and architectural features which support pedestrian activity."

     

    c.         Amend the seventh point under Section 4.1 of OPA 242, and the third point under Section 4.2.b. of the Urban Design Guidelines to read as follows:

     

                "retail uses will be located at grade within residential, employment and public use buildings where appropriate, to provide interest and animation to public streets and spaces. Retail uses may be provided in additional locations provided that there are prominent, at-grade, street related entrances."

     

    d.         Amend the fifth point under Section 4.1 (Built Form and Scale) of the Urban Design Guidelines to read as follows:

     

    "All buildings will be designed and located so as to not create adverse shadows and wind on adjacent public spaces, streets, parks or open spaces, including East Highland Creek and the School/Park site, having regard for the varied nature of such areas. Shadows and wind impacts affecting neighbouring properties and buildings should be minimized."

     

    2.         City Council amend the Official Plan, substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 2 (as amended) to the report dated May 2, 2014 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

     

    3.         City Council adopt "The McCowan Precinct Urban Design Guidelines", including the "McCowan Conceptual Master Plan" attached as Attachments 3 (as amended) to 4B to the report dated May 2, 2014 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

     

    4.         City Council direct staff to use the "McCowan Precinct Urban Design Guidelines, including the McCowan Conceptual Master Plan" in the evaluation of all new and current development proposals and public initiatives.

     

    5.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning to undertake, in consultation with the General Manager Transportation Services and other City Divisions, a Scarborough Centre Transportation Master Plan Study to examine the existing and planned transportation network within the Scarborough Centre and surrounding area.

     

    6.         City Council direct City Planning, in consultation with other City Divisions, as appropriate, to report further to City Council, if necessary, regarding any changes/refinement to the McCowan Precinct Urban Design Guidelines (including the Conceptual Master Plan) following completion of the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed Bloor Danforth (No. 2 Line) Subway Extension and completion of the Scarborough Centre Transportation Master Plan Study.

     

    7.         City Council request Parks, Forestry and Recreation, together with other City Divisions as appropriate, to initiate the steps necessary, including proposing changes to Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division's 10 year Capital Plan, to develop a public park on the City's portion of lands at 705 Progress Avenue and to undertake discussions with the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) with the objective of optimizing shared-use of recreation amenities on the site.

     

    8.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Scarborough Community Council requested the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, to consider the comments made at the meeting of the Scarborough Community Council on May 13, 2014 and report directly to City Council on any further amendments if necessary.

     

    The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 13, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

    Origin

    (May 2, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

    Summary

    In September, 2011, City Planning (Scarborough District) began a study of an area within the Scarborough Centre, identified as the McCowan Precinct.  The purpose of this Study is to develop a "Precinct Plan" (Neighbourhood Plan) for the McCowan Precinct (see Attachment No. 1) that would further articulate the policies of the Toronto Official Plan (including the Scarborough Centre Secondary Plan) and develop a framework to guide future growth and development of the McCowan Precinct, one of four Precincts of the Scarborough Centre.

     

    The McCowan Precinct Plan Study was undertaken with the assistance of area residents, landowners, business owners, Ward 37 & 38 Councillors, City Divisions and interested persons who formed "Working Groups" to assist in the development of the Precinct Plan. The Study has now been completed. 

     

    The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the study components, the consultation process, and the findings and recommendations of the Study, including future analysis/studies to be undertaken in relation to the McCowan Precinct and the surrounding areas.  This report also provides an overview of the implementation plan for the McCowan Precinct Plan Study which includes: i) an Official Plan Amendment (OPA No. 242 – Attachment No. 2 to this report) for Council's consideration that would add Site and Area Specific Policies for the McCowan Precinct to the Official Plan and ii) Urban Design Guidelines (including a Conceptual Master Plan) for the McCowan Precinct (Attachment Nos. 3 to 4B to this report) for Council's consideration.

     

    The City-initiated amendment (OPA No. 242) is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (May 2, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - McCowan Precinct Plan Study - Final Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69042.pdf
    Scarborough Centre - McCowan Precinct - Urban Design Guidelines
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69043.pdf
    Notice of Public Meeting - McCowan Precinct Plan Study
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68693.pdf
    (April 25, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - McCowan Precinct Plan Study - Final Report - Notice of Pending Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68804.pdf

    Speakers

    Greg Miklas, Invar Building Corporation
    Cyndi Rottenberg-Walker, Urban Strategies Inc.
    Guy D'Onofrio, Vice President of Development Planning & Governmental Relations, The Goldman Group

    Communications (Community Council)

    (May 2, 2014) Letter from Lorne Ross, on behalf of Glen Andrew Community Association, Midland Park Community Association, Condo Boards of 68 Corporate Drive and Omni Drive (SC.New.SC32.20.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-47173.pdf
    (May 9, 2014) Letter from Cyndi Rottenberg-Walker, Partner, Urban Strategies Inc. (SC.New.SC32.20.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-47352.pdf
    (May 9, 2014) Letter from Lorne Ross correcting his letter dated May 2, 2014 (SC.New.SC32.20.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-47392.pdf
    (May 11, 2014) Letter from Robert A. Dragicevic, Senior Principal, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited (SC.New.SC32.20.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-47463.pdf
    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Bryan Bowen, regionalArchitects (SC.New.SC32.20.5)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-47529.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (May 26, 2014) Letter from Guy D'Onofrio, Vice-President and Mike Mestyan, Director of Planning, The Goldman Group (CC.New.SC32.20.6)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48014.pdf

    SC32.21 - 1251 Bridletowne Circle - City Initiated Zoning Amendment - Final Report

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    40 - Scarborough Agincourt
    Attention
    Communications SC32.21.8 and SC32.21.9 have been submitted on this Item.

    Public Notice Given

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Community Council Recommendations

    Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 12466, as amended, for the lands at 1251 Bridletowne Circle substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to report dated April 30, 2014, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

     

    2.         City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 1251 Bridletowne Circle substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report dated April 30, 2014, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

     

    3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

     

    4.         A further community meeting be held at the Site Plan stage when the building concept is further developed.

     

    5.         City Council authorize staff to continue discussions with the Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee regarding the City’s acquisition of the Escheated Lands and that staff report back with recommendations.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 13, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

    Origin

    (April 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

    Summary

    City Council on July 11, 12 and 13, 2012 directed staff to review and consider a City- Initiated rezoning of the northerly portion of 1251 Bridletowne Circle (surplus Toronto District School Board site that the City purchased), in order to permit the development of  a (multi-service) community hub and if deemed supportable by City Planning staff that a Public Notice be given and a Final Planning report be prepared on the City initiated rezoning.

     

    The proposed multi-service community hub with ancillary retail uses is consistent with the Neighbourhood Areas policies of the Official Plan.  The proposed development responds to a community infrastructure need identified in the Finch Warden Revitalization Study.

     

    The proposed zoning by-law would permit a community centre, public medical clinic uses, community service uses and uses ancillary to the principal uses. 

     

    Appropriate performance standards including restrictions on gross floor area, building placement, massing, height and parking are also reflected in the proposed zoning by-law. 

     

    This report reviews and recommends approval of the City-Initiated rezoning to permit a multi service community hub and uses ancillary to the principal uses.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 30, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-8 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 1251 Bridletowne Circle - City Initiated Zoning Amendment - Final Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69174.pdf
    Notice of Public Meeting - 1251 Bridletowne Circle
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68696.pdf
    (April 24, 2014) Report from Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 1251 Bridletowne Circle - City Initiated Zoning Amendment - Final Report - Notice of Pending Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68695.pdf

    Communications (Community Council)

    (May 9, 2014) Letter from Janice Hayes, Executive Director, YouthLink (SC.New.SC32.21.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-47350.pdf
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Evaline Xavier, Legal Worker, Family Law Service Centre - Toronto North (SC.New.SC32.21.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-47351.pdf
    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Lai Chu, Sandra Hinchliff and Patrick Sherman, on behalf of the Community of Steeles L'Amoureux (SC.New.SC32.21.3)
    (May 12, 2014) Letter from Debra Shime, Vice President, Community Impact, United Way Toronto (SC.New.SC32.21.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-47399.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Patricia Sinclair, Founding Member - Stand Up Bridletowne (SC.New.SC32.21.5)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-47400.pdf
    (May 9, 2014) Letter from Lee Soda, Executive Director, Agincourt Community Services Association (SC.New.SC32.21.6)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-47442.pdf
    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Medhat Mahdy, President and CEO, YMCA of Greater Toronto (SC.New.SC32.21.7)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-47459.pdf

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 6, 2014) E-mail from Rick Grant and Johny Sarker on behalf of the Lord Sydenham Court Community and submitting a petition (CC.Supp.SC32.21.8)
    (June 5, 2014) Letter from Rick Grant and Johny Sarker on behalf of the Lord Syndenham Court Community and submitting a petition (CC.New.SC32.21.9)

    SC32.22 - 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East - Deferral of Section 37 Funds

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    41 - Scarborough-Rouge River

    Community Council Recommendations

    Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to prepare a section 37 agreement for execution by the new owner of 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East and the City, to secure the planned expansion of the Milliken Park Community Recreation Centre on the following terms:

     

    The owner agrees to pay the remaining balance of $1,620,000.00, as indexed from January 1, 2008, with payments to be made in installments tied to building permit issuance, but ensuring total payment to the City no later than two years from the date of execution of the section 37 agreement.  If the actual cost of the expansion is less than $1,800,000.00, as indexed, the surplus funds will be refunded to the owner.  All other provisions in the Zoning By-law including the relocation, restoration and reuse of the historical buildings and the requirement for public art will continue to apply and will be part of the Section 37 agreement, notwithstanding any division of the subject lands into two or more parcels. Such agreement to be registered on title and be applicable to all the lands notwithstanding any future sale or partial land division.

    Origin

    (May 6, 2014) Letter from Councillor Chin Lee

    Summary

    Section 37 Funds regarding 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (May 6, 2014) Letter from Councillor Lee re 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East - Deferral of Section 37 Funds
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69285.pdf

    SC32.24 - Events of Municipal Significance for Liquor Licensing Purposes

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION

    Community Council Recommendations

    Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council, for liquor licensing purposes, advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission that it has no objection to the granting of permits for the  following events at the Royal Canadian Legion Oakridge Branch 73, at 2 Robinson Avenue:

     

    i.          Canada Day Community Barbecue to be held on Tuesday, July 1, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m.

     

    ii.         Civic Holiday Community Barbecue to be held on Monday, August 4, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m.

     

    iii.        Warriors Day Community Barbecue to be held on Saturday, August 16, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m.

     

    iv.        Labour Day Community Barbecue to be held on Monday, September 1, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m.

     

    noting that applicants are required to comply with other applicable by-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    Scarborough Community Council:

     

    1.         Endorsed the following events and declared them to be events of municipal and/or community significance:

     

    i.          Canada Day Community Barbecue to be held on Tuesday, July 1, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m.

     

    ii.         Civic Holiday Community Barbecue to be held on Monday, August 4, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m.

     

    iii.        Warriors Day Community Barbecue to be held on Saturday, August 16, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m.

     

    iv.        Labour Day Community Barbecue to be held on Monday, September 1, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m.

    Origin

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Berardinetti, Ward 35 - Scarborough Southwest

    Summary

    Seeking endorsement of events of municipal significance for liquor licence purposes.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Berardinetti - Request for temporary licence extension from the Royal Canadian Legion, Oakridge Branch 73, together with a letter dated April 12, 2014 from Bill Davidson, Branch President
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69332.pdf

    Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 32

    TE32.1 - Permanent Closure of the Public Lane Extending Westerly from Perth Avenue, at the Rear of 1439 Bloor Street West

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    18 - Davenport
    Attention
    Bill 522 has been submitted on this Item.

    Public Notice Given

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the permanent closure of the public lane extending westerly from Perth Avenue, at the rear of 1439 Bloor Street West, designated as Part 2 on Reference Plan 66R-27335 and shown as Part 1 on Sketch No. PS-2011-001 (the "Lane"), attached to the report dated April 10, 2014, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

     

    2.         City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report, dated April 10, 2014, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Toronto and East York Community Council held a public meeting on May 13, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City's website. No one appeared before the Community Council.

    Origin

    (April 10, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

    Summary

    Transportation Services recommends that the public lane extending westerly from Perth Avenue, at the rear of 1439 Bloor Street West, be permanently closed.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 10, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Permanent Closure of the Public Lane Extending Westerly from Perth Avenue, at the Rear of 1439 Bloor Street West
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68528.pdf
    Appendix A - Permanent Closure of the Public Lane Extending Westerly from Perth Avenue, at the Rear of 1439 Bloor Street West
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68906.pdf

    TE32.2 - Permanent Closure of the Westerly Portion of the Public Lane Abutting 343 to 355 King Street West and 119 Blue Jays Way

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    20 - Trinity-Spadina
    Attention
    Bill 521 has been submitted on this Item.

    Public Notice Given

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the permanent closure of the portion of the public lane designated as Part 1 on Registered Plan 66R-26134 and shown as Part 1 on the attached Sketch No. PS-2010-054 (the "Existing Lane") upon conveyance to the City and dedication of a new public lane outlet to Mercer Street, designated as Part 1 on Registered Plan 66R-26135 and shown as Part 2 on the attached Sketch No. PS-2010-054 (the "New Lane"), attached to the report (April 16, 2014) from the Director of Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

     

    2.         City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report (April 16, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Toronto and East York Community Council held a public meeting on May 13, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City's website. No one appeared before the Community Council.

    Origin

    (April 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

    Summary

    Transportation Services recommends that the westerly portion of the public lane abutting 343 to 355 King Street West and 119 Blue Jays Way, be permanently closed.  The portion of the lane to be closed will be replaced with a new public lane outlet to Mercer Street. 

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Permanent Closure of the Westerly Portion of the Public Lane Abutting 343 to 355 King Street West and 119 Blue Jays Way
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68539.pdf
    Sketch No. PS-2010-054 - Permanent Closure of the Westerly Portion of the Public Lane Abutting 343 to 355 King Street West and 119 Blue Jays Way
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68540.pdf
    Appendix A - Permanent Closure of the Westerly Portion of the Public Lane Abutting 343 to 355 King Street West and 119 Blue Jays Way
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68541.pdf

    TE32.4 - Final Report - 120 Donlands Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    29 - Toronto-Danforth

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council refuse the application to amend the Zoning By-law for the lands at 120 Donlands Avenue.

     

    2.         City Council refuse the application to amend the Official Plan for the lands at 120 Donlands Avenue.

     

    3.         City Council direct the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to continue discussions with the applicant to achieve a reduction in the overall bulk and mass of the proposed building and to achieve a better transition to the surrounding properties.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on February 25, 2014, and continued the public meeting on April 8, 2014 and May 13, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

    Origin

    (January 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

    Summary

    This application proposes the redevelopment of the property at 120 Donlands Avenue with a four-storey apartment building comprising four townhouse-type units and 15 apartment units.  A total of 14 vehicular parking spaces and 16 bicycle parking spaces will be provided.

     

    This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law because the proposed building is a permitted building type in the Official Plan and it sensitively deploys height and massing on a corner lot which ensures that it fits into the surrounding Neighbourhood.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (January 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 120 Donlands Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment - Final Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68433.pdf

    Speakers

    (April 8, 2014) Bruce Stodart
    (April 8, 2014) Ian Johns, Lower Donlands Ratepayers Association
    (April 8, 2014) Scott Smith
    (April 8, 2014) Emira Galeteaneu
    (April 8, 2014) Demetri Portelli, Director, The Reel Workers Film Company
    (April 8, 2014) Tony Volpentesta, Partner, Bousfields Inc.
    (April 8, 2014) Craig Johnston
    (April 8, 2014) Zainab Manjra
    (May 13, 2014) Janis Clennett
    (May 13, 2014) Amanda Lazarides, Louisville Homes Ltd.
    (May 13, 2014) Peter Harrison
    (May 13, 2014) Emira Galeteaneu

    Communications (Community Council)

    (February 19, 2014) E-mail from Jawairia Makrod (TE.Main.TE32.4.1)
    (February 20, 2014) E-mail from Zainab Manjra (TE.Main.TE32.4.2)
    (February 20, 2014) E-mail from Yasmin and Idris Manjra (TE.Main.TE32.4.3)
    (February 20, 2014) E-mail from Shoail and Anam Manjra (TE.Main.TE32.4.4)
    (February 20, 2014) E-mail from Faizan Gori (TE.Main.TE32.4.5)
    (February 21, 2014) E-mail from Humera Amla addressed to the City Planning Division (TE.Main.TE32.4.6)
    (February 21, 2014) E-mail from Gulam Hussain Amla addressed to the City Planning Division (TE.Main.TE32.4.7)
    (February 24, 2014) E-mail from Mihnea Galeteanu addressed to Councillor Mary Fragedakis (TE.Main.TE32.4.8)
    (February 24, 2014) E-mail from Emira Galeteanu (TE.Main.TE32.4.9)
    (February 24, 2014) E-mail from Adrian Grant Barber and Sara Quattro (TE.Main.TE32.4.10)
    (February 24, 2014) Letter from Craig M. Johnston (TE.Main.TE32.4.11)
    (February 24, 2014) E-mail from Martha McKee addressed to Councillor Mary Fragedakis (TE.Main.TE32.4.12)
    (February 24, 2014) E-mail from Patty Pallisco (TE.Main.TE32.4.13)
    (February 24, 2014) E-mail from Ronald Soong submitting resolutions passed by the Lower Donlands Ratepayers Association (TE.Main.TE32.4.14)
    (February 22, 2014) E-mail from Afzal Manjra (TE.Main.TE32.4.15)
    (April 1, 2014) E-mail from Tom Kennedy and Jun Yang (TE.Main.TE32.4.16)
    (April 2, 2014) E-mail from Martha McKee and Andrew Borkowski (TE.Main.TE32.4.17)
    (April 2, 2014) E-mail from Faizan Gori (TE.Main.TE32.4.18)
    (April 3, 2014) E-mail from Robert Burns and Judith Wilson (TE.Main.TE32.4.19)
    (April 4, 2014) E-mail from Demetri and Laarni Portelli, Members of Lower Donlands Ratepayers Association (TE.Main.TE32.4.20)
    (April 4, 2014) E-mail from Vince Puzzella (TE.Main.TE32.4.21)
    (April 6, 2014) E-mail from Peter Harrison (TE.Main.TE32.4.22)
    (April 6, 2014) E-mail from Ann Harrison (TE.Main.TE32.4.23)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Zainab Manjra (TE.Main.TE32.4.24)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Yoona Merdzik (TE.Main.TE32.4.25)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Nazifa Makrod (TE.Main.TE32.4.26)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Amina Makrod (TE.Main.TE32.4.27)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Zuber Gori (TE.Main.TE32.4.28)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Shoail Manjra (TE.Main.TE32.4.29)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Abrar Desai (TE.Main.TE32.4.30)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Jawairia Makrod (TE.Main.TE32.4.31)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Yasmin Manjra (TE.Main.TE32.4.32)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Farheen Gori (TE.Main.TE32.4.33)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Idris Manjra (TE.Main.TE32.4.34)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Gulam Kasam (TE.Main.TE32.4.35)
    (April 7, 2014) Letter from Craig Johnston (TE.Main.TE32.4.36)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Afzal Manjra (TE.Main.TE32.4.37)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Sabiha Desai (TE.Main.TE32.4.38)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Christos Paschalidis (TE.Main.TE32.4.39)
    (April 7, 2014) E-mail from Michael M. Lofft (TE.Main.TE32.4.40)
    (April 7, 2014) Letter from Ronald Soong (TE.Main.TE32.4.41)
    (April 8, 2014) E-mail from Nadeem Syed (TE.Main.TE32.4.42)
    (April 8, 2014) E-mail from Choudhry Amer (TE.Main.TE32.4.43)
    (April 8, 2014) Submission from Bruce Stodart (TE.Main.TE32.4.44)
    (April 8, 2014) E-mail from Zakariyya Momla (TE.Main.TE32.4.45)
    (April 8, 2014) E-mail from Derek Merdzik (TE.Main.TE32.4.46)
    (April 8, 2014) E-mail from George Raffay (TE.Supp.TE32.4.47)
    (April 8, 2014) E-mail from Samira Vashi (TE.Supp.TE32.4.48)
    (April 9, 2014) E-mail from Paul Monkman (TE.Supp.TE32.4.49)

    4a - Supplementary Report - 120 Donlands Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment

    Origin
    (April 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District
    Summary

    This report provides updated information following Toronto and East York Community Council's decision on April 8, 2014, to direct City Planning staff to hold a working group meeting with local residents, the Ward Councillor, and the applicant.

     

    City Planning staff held two working group meetings on April 25 and 29, 2014.  The participants at the meeting consisted of the Ward Councillor, President of the Lower Donlands Community Association (unincorporated), four residents, the project consultant and the owners of the subject property. Discussions at the meetings were held on a without prejudice basis.

     

    In spite of best efforts at the meetings and a full discussion, the applicant and local residents were unable to reach a consensus as to the appropriate form of development on the site.

    Background Information (Community Council)
    (April 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 120 Donlands Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment - Supplementary Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69160.pdf

    TE32.5 - Final Report - 1183 Dufferin Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Application

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    18 - Davenport
    Attention
    Bills 536 and 537 have been submitted on this Item.

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 1183 Dufferin Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 9 to the report (April 14, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

     

    2.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 1183 Dufferin Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No.10 to the report (April 14, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

     

    3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 13, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

    Origin

    (April 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

    Summary

    This application proposes to convert the existing place of worship building at 1183 Dufferin Street into a residential building containing 14 residential units with 11 parking spaces in a new below-grade parking garage.  A four-storey addition is proposed at the rear of the church building as part of this conversion.

     

    This proposed church conversion does not meet the requirements of the Official Plan's  Neighbourhoods policies with respect to prevailing building type, height, massing and scale.  As such an Official Plan Amendment is required.

     

    This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law. 

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 1183 Dufferin Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68579.pdf

    Communications (Community Council)

    (May 11, 2014) E-mail from Francesco Borromeo (TE.Supp.TE32.5.1)

    TE32.6 - Alterations to a Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1183 Dufferin Street (Dufferin Street Presbyterian Church)

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    18 - Davenport

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the proposed alterations to the existing church building and construction of a new rear addition on the heritage property at 1183 Dufferin Street substantially in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by James Bailey Architect dated March 1, 2012 and Addendum dated March 24, 2014 including the drawings prepared by Torplan Consultants Incorporated dated January 16, 2014, subject to the following conditions:

     

    a.         Prior to the introduction of the necessary Bills in Council for the Zoning By-law Amendment, the owner shall:

     

    i.          Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 1183 Dufferin Street, to be registered on title.

     

    ii.         Provide a Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement dated March 1, 2012 and Addendum dated March 24, 2014 for the property at 1183 Dufferin Street prepared by James Bailey Architect, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

     

    b.         That prior to final Site Plan Approval:

     

    i.          The owner shall provide final site plan drawings including drawings related to the approved conservation plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

     

    ii.         Provide a detailed landscape plan for the subject property.

     

    iii.        Submit a Lighting Plan that describes how the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

     

    iv.        The owner shall complete all heritage related pre-approval conditions contained in a Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan Control.

     

    v.         The related Zoning By-law amendment shall be in full force and effect.

     

    c.         That prior to the issuance of any heritage permit the owner shall:

     

    i.          Provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

     

    ii.         Provide a Letter of Credit, indexed annually, in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the Conservation Plan, Lighting Plan and Landscape Plan.

     

    d.         That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and has maintained an appropriate standard of conservation, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

     

    2.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 1183 Dufferin Street (Dufferin Street Presbyterian Church) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 1183 Dufferin Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 4 to the report (March 25, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

     

    3.         If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

     

    4.         If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

     

    5.         If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

     

    6.         City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 1183 Dufferin Street (Dufferin Street Presbyterian Church).

     

    7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 1183 Dufferin Street (Dufferin Street Presbyterian Church).

    Origin

    (March 25, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

    Summary

    This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations and rear addition to the property located at 1183 Dufferin Street (Dufferin Street Presbyterian Church).  The applicant is proposing to convert an existing place of worship into 14 residential units, with a rear addition and a one level below-grade garage for 11 parking spaces. 

     

    Following the evaluation of the site according to Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation, the report also recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 1183 Dufferin Street (Dufferin Street Presbyterian Church) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value.  While the building was damaged by fire in January 2014, the evaluation determined that the building retains and continues to effectively communicate its cultural heritage values and attributes.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (March 25, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Alterations to a Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1183 Dufferin Street (Dufferin Street Presbyterian Church)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68171.pdf

    Communications (Community Council)

    (May 11, 2014) E-mail from Francesco Borromeo (TE.Supp.TE32.6.1)

    6a - Alterations to a Heritage Property, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1183 Dufferin Street (Dufferin Street Presbyterian Church)

    Origin
    (April 17, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
    Summary

    The Toronto Preservation Board on April 16, 2014, considered a report (March 25, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Alterations to a Heritage Property, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1183 Dufferin Street (Dufferin Street Presbyterian Church).

    Background Information (Community Council)
    (April 17, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Heritage Property, Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1183 Dufferin Street (Dufferin Street Presbyterian Church)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68521.pdf

    TE32.7 - Final Report - 1030 King Street West - Zoning Amendment

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    19 - Trinity-Spadina
    Attention
    Bill 541 has been submitted on this Item.

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend By-law No. 618-2012(OMB), being a by-law to amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 438-86 with respect to lands municipally known as 1030 King Street West, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to the supplementary report (May 6, 2014) from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

     

    2.         Before introducing the necessary Bill to Council for enactment, City Council will require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following:

     

    a.         The owner shall pay to the City of Toronto $100,000.00, indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto for the period from the date of the execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment to the City of Toronto, for bicycle share stations within Ward 19, as may be determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

     

    b.         The owner shall ensure a minimum of 83 of the parking spaces located within the commercial parking garage, are made available at all times for the life of the building, on at least a monthly lease basis, to residents of the dwelling units on site. The owner will ensure that all 83 parking spaces will be available at all times and offered to the residents as exclusive parking at a maximum total amount of $150.00 per month, per parking space, which may be amended annually but only with the written consent from the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which consent may be withheld at the sole discretion of the General Manager if the proposed rate increase does not correspond to annual percentage increases in estimated monthly parking rates within the surrounding area, according to the Toronto Parking Authority. The owner agrees to submit plans indicating the location and details, including, but not limited to, wording and typeface size, of signage communicating to residents of the dwelling units on site that these 83 spaces may be leased, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division. The owner agrees to provide notice to the residents of the opportunity to lease these spaces. The owner may only permit such of the designated spaces that have not been leased to residents to be used by the general public if the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division is satisfied that the Owner has complied with these obligations to provide and offer to lease the spaces to the residents.

     

    3.         City Council require that the Applicant submit plans detailing the location, size, colour and illumination of signage related to the proposed commercial garage for review to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the local Councillor.

     

    4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Zoning By-law amendment as may be required.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, to review and report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council on August 12, 2014 on the realignment of Permit Parking Area 4I and the exclusion of the properties located at 1030 King Street West.

     

    The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 13, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

    Origin

    (April 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

    Summary

    This Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes to adjust the mix of parking spaces in the 14-storey OMB approved residential condominium building at 1030 King Street West.  The proposed Zoning By-law amendment is to convert part of the required resident and visitor parking spaces, required by Zoning By-law No. 618-2012(OMB), to a 147 space commercial garage. The application also proposed a minor map amendment to Zoning By-law No. 618-2012(OMB), to allow for an awning at the King Street West Frontage.

     

    This report recommends approval of a Zoning By-law to permit the use of commercial garage with the provision that the commercial operator will lease spaces within the commercial garage to building occupants at rates commensurate with area Toronto Parking Authority rates.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 1030 King Street West - Zoning Amendment - Final Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68798.pdf

    Speakers

    Michael B. MacGregor
    Craig Hunter, President, Hunter & Associates Ltd.

    Communications (Community Council)

    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Michael B. MacGregor (TE.Supp.TE32.7.1)

    7a - Supplementary Report - 1030 King Street West

    Origin
    (May 6, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District
    Summary

    This report provides additional information and replaces recommendations 1 and 2 in the Final Report found at Item No. TE32.7, dated April 23, 2014, from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, on the proposed Zoning By-law amendment at 1030 King Street West.

     

    This report appends the Draft Zoning By-law and details the conditions related to the 83 spaces within the commercial garage which must be offered for monthly lease to residents of the building for rates corresponding to Toronto Parking Authority monthly rate estimates for the area. 

    Background Information (Community Council)
    (May 6, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 1030 King Street West - Supplementary Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69248.pdf

    TE32.8 - Final Report - 798 and 800 Richmond Street West - Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    19 - Trinity-Spadina

    Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the application for a Section 111 permit to demolish one four-bedroom residential rental unit, Unit 111, at 800 Richmond Street West pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 667, subject to the following conditions:

     

    a.         the owner shall provide and maintain one (1) one-bedroom replacement rental unit and one (1) two-bedroom replacement rental unit at 800 Richmond Street West, and the plans for replacement of the rental units shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, with rents that shall be no higher than mid-range rents for a period of at least ten years from the date of first occupancy of the new units; 

     

    b.         the owner shall upgrade the laundry facilities within two years of the date of this approval by providing at least 16 new washing and drying machines, with the final number of machines and the plans for the improvements to be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and which will be located  on the ground floor of 800 Richmond Street West for the use and enjoyment of residents in the existing rental building;

     

    c.         the owner shall provide a Construction Mitigation and Tenant Communication Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to deal with the construction disruption relating to the changes listed in Recommendation 1.a. and 1.b. respectively;

     

    d.         the owner shall enter into and register one or more Section 111 Agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendation 1.a. and 1.b. above to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and

     

    e.         the owner shall enter into and register, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor agreeing not to transfer or charge those parts of the lands subject to the Section 111 Agreement, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate to assist with securing the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of the lands until such time as the City Solicitor determines that its registration on title is no longer required to secure the provisions of the Section 111 Agreement.

     

    2.         City Council approve the application for a Section 111 permit pursuant to Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code for the previous demolition of twenty-two (22) bachelor rental units (Units 121, 123, 125, 127, 128, 130, 225, 227, 244, 246, 331, 333, 425, 427, 469, 471, 473, 475, 541, 543, 625, and 627) at 798 and 800 Richmond Street West and their replacement with 11 one-bedroom rental apartments  (Units 121, 125, 128, 227, 244, 331, 427, 471, 475, 543, and 627),  the work for which was completed  between 2007 and 2009, subject to the following conditions:

     

    a.         that these 11 units will be maintained as one-bedroom rental units;

     

    b.         the owner shall enter into and register one or more Section 111 Agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendation 2.a. above to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and

     

    c.         the owner shall enter into and register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor agreeing not to transfer or charge those parts of the lands subject to the Section 111 Agreement, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate to assist with securing the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of the lands until such time as the City Solicitor determines that its registration on title is no longer required to secure the provisions of the Section 111 Agreement.

     

    3.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue the Section 111 permit to the applications for demolition for the rental units in  Recommendations 1 and 2 under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the following has occurred:

     

    a.         A Construction Mitigation and Tenant Communication Plan has been submitted and approved to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

     

    b.         The Section 111 Agreement(s) and a Section 118 Restriction, pursuant to the Land Titles Act  required in Recommendations 1 and 2 above have been entered into and registered on title.

     

    c.         The applicant has submitted the plans for the 2 replacement rental units in Recommendation 1.a. and the plans for the laundry facility improvements in Recommendation 1.b. and received the approval of the Chief Planner.

     

    After receiving the Chief Planner's approvals for the plans as required in Recommendation 3.c, the applicant has submitted all the required building permit applications based on the approved plans for the approved alterations to the laundry facilities and the two replacement rental units

     

    4.         City Council refuse the application for a Section 111 permit to demolish the 3 one-bedroom units (# 523, 535, and 635), and to replace them with 6 bachelor rental units.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 13, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

    Origin

    (April 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

    Summary

    The applicant has submitted an application for a Section 111 permit to demolish 4 residential rental units, comprised of 1 four-bedroom and 3 one-bedroom units, in a 525 unit rental apartment building at 798 and 800 Richmond Street West under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code, pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act and to replace them with 6 bachelor units, 2 one-bedroom units and 1 two-bedroom unit.

     

    The applicant has also applied to legalize the previous demolition of 22 bachelor rental units that were replaced with 11 one-bedroom rental units by the former owners of the property during the period between 2007 and 2009.

     

    When there are more than six residential units and any one of them is rental, the demolition of residential rental housing is prohibited under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code unless a Section 111 permit has been issued.

     

    This report recommends the issuance of a Section 111 permit for the demolition of 1 four-bedroom rental unit to be replaced by two rental units, comprising 1 one- bedroom unit and 1 two-bedroom unit, subject to conditions.  It also recommends the issuance of a Section 111 permit for the previous demolition of 22 former bachelor rental units that were replaced by 11 one-bedroom rental units. The report recommends refusal of the application for a Section 111 permit to demolish 3 one-bedroom rental units and to replace them with 6 bachelor rental units.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 798 and 800 Richmond Street West - Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667 - Final Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68578.pdf

    TE32.9 - Final Report - Lands Bounded by Yonge Street, Isabella Street, Gloucester Lane and Gloucester Street - City Initiated Official Plan Amendment

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
    Attention
    Communication TE32.9.3 has been submitted on this Item.

    Bill 524 has been submitted on this Item.

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands bounded by Yonge Street to the west, Isabella Street to the north, Gloucester Lane to the east and Gloucester Street to the south, substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to the report (April 14, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 13, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

    Origin

    (April 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

    Summary

    An Official Plan Amendment is proposed by the City of Toronto to establish a Site and Area Specific Policy for the block bounded by Yonge Street to the west, Isabella Street to the north, Gloucester Lane to the east and Gloucester Street to the south.  The intent of the policy is to limit the block to a maximum of two new tall buildings, with a minimum separation of 25 metres between the face of the tall building towers.  The Draft Official Plan Amendment is in Attachment 1.

     

    A 34-storey building was approved at the south end of the block and an application for a Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a second tower in the block, at the north end, has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.  Given this OMB appeal and lack of consolidation of the balance of the block, a Site and Area Specific Policy is appropriate to ensure that any towers within the block have a separation distance of 25 metres.  That would also result in a maximum of two towers within this block.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Lands Bounded by Yonge Street, Isabella Street, Gloucester Lane and Gloucester Street - City Initiated Official Plan Amendment - Final Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68799.pdf

    Communications (Community Council)

    (May 11, 2014) E-mail from Cindy Weiner and Marci Newton, representing Harvest Enterprises Limited, Glowin Enterprises Limited and M. Weiner Enterprises Limited, owners of 619, 621 and 623 Yonge Street. (TE.Supp.TE32.9.1)
    (May 12, 2014) Letter from Sheldon Switzer, Oberon Development Corporation, owner of the property at 615-617 Yonge Street (TE.Supp.TE32.9.2)

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 4, 2014) Letter from Patrick J. Devine, Dentons Canada LLP (CC.Supp.TE32.9.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47951.pdf

    TE32.10 - Final Report - 1029 and 1075 Queen Street East - Zoning Amendment

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    30 - Toronto-Danforth
    Attention
    Communication TE32.10.3 has been submitted on this Item.

    Bill 540 has been submitted on this Item.

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 1029 and 1075 Queen Street East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (April 3, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

     

    3.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to secure, amongst others, the following matters to her satisfaction in a Site Plan Agreement pursuant to Section 41 of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act:

     

    a.         a lane widening at the rear of the subject property;

     

    b.         an indoor room for the storage of residential and non-residential waste bins associated with the proposed development; and

     

    c.         streetscaping along the Queen Street East and Winnifred Avenue frontages.

     

    4.         City Council require the applicant to create a construction liaison committee for the development at 1029 and 1075 Queen Street East and post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board.

     

    5.         City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto the hoarding board, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

     

    6.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to investigate park acquisition opportunities to expand parkland and to improve parkland space.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Toronto and East York Community Council, under its delegated authority:

     

    1.         Rescinded the existing one-way northbound traffic operation on Winnifred Avenue, between Queen Street East and the public lane first south.

     

    2.         Prohibited parking on the east side of Winnifred Avenue between Queen Street East and the public lane first south.

     

    3.         Requested the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, to examine and report back to Toronto and East York Community Council on June 17, 2014 regarding the realignment of parking area 8D, and the exclusion of the subject site at 1029 and 1075 Queen Street East from the permit parking area.

     

    The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 13, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

    Origin

    (April 3, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

    Summary

    This application proposes a six-storey (19.5 metre) mixed-use building plus mechanical penthouse with 292 square metres of non-residential uses at grade and 48 residential dwelling units above at 1029 and 1075 Queen Street East.  23 parking spaces are proposed at the rear of the site with 20 of the spaces located in a parking stacker system. Access to the parking spaces would be from the laneway to the south (via Winnifred Avenue).

     

    This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 3, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 1029 and 1075 Queen Street East - Zoning Amendment - Final Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68803.pdf

    Speakers

    John Cameron
    Paul Dowsett
    Andrew Ferancik, WND Associates

    Communications (Community Council)

    (April 28, 2014) E-mail from Bill Macheras (TE.Supp.TE32.10.1)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Gwen Shandroski (TE.Supp.TE32.10.2)

    Communications (City Council)

    (May 15, 2014) E-mail from Dara Gellman (CC.Supp.TE32.10.3)

    TE32.11 - Final Report - 1220-1230 Dundas Street East - Zoning Amendment

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    30 - Toronto-Danforth
    Attention
    Bill 528 has been submitted on this Item.

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 1220-1230 Dundas Street East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (April 4, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

     

    3.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to secure, among others, the following matters to her satisfaction in a Site Plan Agreement pursuant to Section 41 of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act:

     

    a.         the planting of seven (7) trees along the north property line, adjacent to Boston Avenue/private lane;

     

    b.         landscaping within the City road allowance along Dundas Street East, provided Urban Forestry, Tree Protection and Plan Review staff (in consultation with Toronto Hydro staff) are satisfied that any utilities within the road allowance will not be affected by the landscaping; and

     

    c.         access to the parking garage for this development will be shared with the adjacent development at 345-349 Carlaw Avenue and have a shared entrance via Carlaw Avenue.

     

    4.         City Council request the General Manager of Transportation Services to include the public realm improvements to the boulevard on the west side of Boston Avenue, south of Dundas Street East in the Neighbourhood Improvement work program for 2015.

     

    5.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to review the Site Plan application for 1220-1230 Dundas Street East in consideration of the Dundas-Carlaw Community Initiative Study.

     

    6.         City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto the hoarding board, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Toronto and East York Community Council requested Transportation Services to examine and report back to Toronto and East York Community Council on June 17, 2014 regarding the realignment of parking area 8C, and the exclusion of the subject site at 1220-1230 Dundas Street East from the permit parking area.

     

    The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 13, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

    Origin

    (April 4, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

    Summary

    This application proposes the construction of an eight-storey (24.6 metre) mixed-use building containing 1,065 square metres of non-residential uses at grade, 83 dwelling units above, and 13 multi-floor townhouse-type units with grade related access at the rear and eastern portion of the site (total 96 dwelling units).  Two levels of below grade parking containing 96 parking spaces are proposed.  The existing one-storey warehouse building would be demolished.

     

    This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 4, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 1220-1230 Dundas Street East - Zoning Amendment - Final Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68800.pdf

    Communications (Community Council)

    (April 4, 2014) Letter from Yan Fat Kwan and Lai-Kuen Kwan (TE.Supp.TE32.11.1)
    (May 4, 2014) Letter from Grant Snider and Sharon Cohen Snider (TE.Supp.TE32.11.2)
    (April 4, 2014) Letter from Sheryl Leong and Neal Leong (TE.Supp.TE32.11.3)
    (April 4, 2014) Letter from Keily Chi Keung Ho and Cathy Tran (TE.Supp.TE32.11.4)
    (May 8, 2014) Letter from Jose Molina and Herb Stover, members of the Board of Directors of Toronto Common Elements Condominium Corporation No. 1631 (TE.Supp.TE32.11.5)

    TE32.12 - Final Report - 43, 49 and 51 Gerrard Street West and 695 Bay Street - Zoning Amendment Application

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
    Attention
    The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE32.12a with recommendations).

    Communications TE32.12.6 to TE32.12.12 have been submitted on this Item

    Bill 551 has been submitted on this Item.

    Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 43, 49, 51 Gerrard Street West and 695 Bay Street, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached to the motion by Councillor Wong-Tam.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

     

    3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

               

    a.         The provision of a financial contribution in the amount of $2,750,000, prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, with the contribution to be used by the City for one or more of the following:

     

    i.          $250,000 to be used for public art on the site at 43 Gerrard Street West, to the satisfaction of  the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning or her designate.

     

    ii.         $450,000 to be used for off-site streetscape improvements on Bay Street, Yonge Street, Gerrard Street West and/or Walton Street to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or her designate.

     

    iii.        $300,000 to be used for capital improvements to Toronto Community Housing properties within Ward 27 to the satisfaction of the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation, or their designate.

     

    iv.        $1,750,000 to be used for new affordable housing or a community recreation centre in Ward 27 to the satisfaction of the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, or her designate, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

     

    v.         Require that the cash amounts identified in Recommendation 3.a.i., ii., iii. and iv. above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of submission of the funds by the Owner to the City.

     

    b.         The provision of a financial contribution in the amount of $250,000 at the submission of a site plan application to be used by the City for the following:

     

    i.          $250,000 to be used for new affordable housing or a community recreation centre in Ward 27 to the satisfaction of the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, or her designate, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

     

    ii.         Require that the cash amounts identified in Recommendation 3.b.i. above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of submission of the funds by the Owner to the City.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to investigate the appropriate floor plate restrictions in the proposed Zoning By-law for inclusion in the Draft Zoning By-law to be submitted to City Council.

     

    The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 13, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

    Origin

    (April 25, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

    Summary

    The applicant proposes to construct a 43-storey mixed-use building with retail at-grade for the location known municipally as 43, 49 and 51 Gerrard Street West and 695 Bay Street.  While the applicant submitted their application in September, 2011, a pause was requested by the applicant until further processing was resumed in 2013.

     

    The applicant has worked closely with City Planning Staff to modify the built form to preserve the view corridor to Old City Hall, reduce shadows on College Park and provide an attractive public realm.  The provision of affordable rental units in the project is a welcome addition and much needed in the City of Toronto.  Overall, Staff are satisfied that objectives of the Official Plan and applicable guidelines are met.  This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. 

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 25, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 43, 49 and 51 Gerrard Street West and 695 Bay Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68873.pdf
    Draft By-law attached to Motion by Councillor Wong-Tam
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69366.pdf

    Background Information (City Council)

    (June 5, 2014) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 43, 49 and 51 Gerrard Street West and 695 Bay Street - Zoning Amendment Application (TE32.12a)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70359.pdf

    Speakers

    Russell Scorgie
    Blair Scorgie
    Craig Hunter, President, Hunter & Associates Ltd.

    Communications (Community Council)

    (May 12, 2014) Letter from Russell Scorgie and Blair Scorgie, representing the residents of MTCC 901 and MTCC 907 located at 44 Gerrard Street West and 711 and 717 Bay Street, known as The Liberties (TE.Supp.TE32.12.1)
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Mark Noskiewicz, Goodmans LLP (TE.Supp.TE32.12.2)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Osama Sendi (TE.Supp.TE32.12.3)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Lorie Shentow (TE.Supp.TE32.12.4)
    (May 13, 2014) Submission from Russell Scorgie (TE.Supp.TE32.12.5)

    Communications (City Council)

    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Carrol Zhou (CC.Main.TE32.12.6)
    (May 21, 2014) E-mail from Russell Scorgie on behalf of the Urban Issues Resident Committee, MTCC 901 and 907 (CC.Main.TE32.12.7)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47879.pdf
    (June 3, 2014) Letter from Russell Scorgie, Architect/Consultant and Blair Scorgie, Urban Planner/Urban Designer on behalf of the Urban Issues Resident Committee, MTCC 901 and 907 (CC.Main.TE32.12.8)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47898.pdf
    (June 9, 2014) E-mail from Esther and Baruch Levy (CC.New.TE32.12.9)
    (June 10, 2014) E-mail from Shayan Rahnama (CC.New.TE32.12.10)
    (June 9, 2014) E-mail from Esther and Baruch Levy (CC.New.TE32.12.11)
    (June 9, 2014) Submission from Russell Scorgie and Blair Scorgie on behalf of the Urban Issues Resident Committee, MTCC 901 and 907 (CC.New.TE32.12.12)

    TE32.13 - Alteration to a Designated Heritage Property Within the East Annex Heritage Conservation District - 50 Boswell Avenue

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    20 - Trinity-Spadina
    Attention
    The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a transmittal on this Item (TE32.13b with recommendations)

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 50 Boswell Avenue as proposed in the plans as provided by E.R.A. Architects Inc., dated May 22, 2012.

     

    2.         Prior to the issuance of any heritage permit, City Council request the owner to provide full building permit drawings, including a description of materials and finishes, substantially in accordance with the approved drawings, to be prepared by the project architect, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

    Origin

    (March 28, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

    Summary

    This report recommends that City Council refuse the proposed alteration to the designated heritage property at 50 Boswell Avenue in the East Annex Heritage Conservation District (EAHCD). The alteration proposes modifications to the designated heritage property that are incompatible with the EAHCD Guidelines.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (March 28, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Alteration to a Designated Heritage Property Within the East Annex Heritage Conservation District - 50 Boswell Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68166.pdf

    Background Information (City Council)

    (May 26, 2014) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property within the East Annex Heritage Conservation District - 50 Boswell Avenue (TE32.13b)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70049.pdf
    Attachment 1 to transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board - letter from Sandra Shaul, Chair, Heritage Committee, Annex Residents Association
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70117.pdf
    Attachment 2 to transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board - letter from Andrew Pruss, Principal, E.R.A. Architects Inc.
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70118.pdf

    Speakers

    Philip Evans, Partner, ERA Architects

    13a - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property within the East Annex Heritage Conservation District - 50 Boswell Avenue

    Origin
    (April 17, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
    Summary

    The Toronto Preservation Board on April 16, 2014, considered the following:

     

    1.         (March 28, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property within the East Annex Heritage Conservation District - 50 Boswell Avenue.

     

    2.         (April 14, 2014) Letter from Sandra Shaul, Chair, Heritage Committee, Annex Residents Association (PB.Supp.PB30.1.1)

     

    3.         (April 14, 2014) Letter from Andrew Pruss, Principal, E.R.A. Architects Inc. (PB.Supp.PB30.1.2)

     

    Andrew Pruss, Principal, E.R.A. Architects Inc., addressed the Toronto Preservation Board.

    Background Information (Community Council)
    (April 17, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property within the East Annex Heritage Conservation District - 50 Boswell Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68543.pdf

    TE32.14 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 111 St. Clair Avenue West

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    22 - St. Paul's

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the proposed alteration of the designated heritage property at 111 St. Clair Avenue West under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act contained within the drawings by Landini Associates, dated October 29th, 2013 and date stamped received January 8, 2014, and drawings by Fiorino Design, dated October 2013 and date stamped received on January 8, 2014, and on file with Heritage Preservation Services, subject to the following conditions:

     

    a.         Prior to site plan approval, the applicant will provide a Conservation Plan and final site plan drawings to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

     

    b.         Prior to the release of any heritage permit for the retail conversion, the applicant will provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures, keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

     

    c.         Prior to the issuance of any heritage permit the owner shall:

     

    i.          Provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

     

    ii.         Provide a Letter of Credit, indexed annually, in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the Conservation Plan.

     

    d.         Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and has maintained an appropriate standard of conservation, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

    Origin

    (March 10, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

    Summary

    This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alteration of 111 St. Clair Avenue West (Imperial Oil Building).  The property at 111 St. Clair Avenue West, which is located on the south side of the street, east of Avenue Road, contains the former headquarters of the Imperial Oil Company (now Imperial Oil Limited) which was designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act on October 4, 2012 (By-law No. 1234-2012).

     

    The property is the subject of a development application that proposes to convert the former office building for use as a residential condominium.  The applicant is also proposing alterations to the building's first floor interior to accommodate retail and residential uses. The building's reasons for designation includes exterior and interior features.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (March 10, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 111 St. Clair Avenue West
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68434.pdf

    14a - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 111 St. Clair Avenue West

    Origin
    (March 31, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
    Summary

    The Toronto Preservation Board on March 26, 2014, considered a report (March 10, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 111 St. Clair Avenue West. 

    Background Information (Community Council)
    (March 31, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 111 St Clair Avenue West
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68435.pdf

    14b - Alterations to a Heritage Property - 111 St Clair Avenue West

    Origin
    (April 17, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
    Summary

    The Toronto Preservation Board on April 16, 2014, considered a report (March 10, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Alterations to a Heritage Property - 111 St. Clair Avenue West.

    Background Information (Community Council)
    (April 17, 2014) Letter Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Heritage Property - 111 St. Clair Avenue West
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68522.pdf

    TE32.15 - Authorization to Study the Distillery District as a Potential Heritage Conservation District

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize that a study be undertaken of the Distillery District as a potential heritage conservation district under Section 40.(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act, as indicated by the boundary with additions on the map in Attachment 1 of the report (March 24, 2014) from the Director of Urban Design.

    Origin

    (March 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

    Summary

    This report recommends that City Council authorize the Gooderham & Worts Distillery District as an area to study for potential designation as a Heritage Conservation District, under Section 40.(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act.

     

    From its peak as the largest distilling operation of its kind in 1875, the Distillery District has evolved into a lively historic precinct centred around cultural, retail and emerging residential uses.  The conservation and adaptive re-use of the existing heritage properties, as well as the addition of several contemporary residential buildings, have for the most part, been in accordance with the original Master Plan and existing planning framework for the area.  In recent years however, there has been considerable pressure for development of a nature and scale that was not previously contemplated for certain parcels.  The cumulative impact of additional development in the area could significantly impact the historic integrity and feel of the District.  Although designated as a National Historic Site, the Distillery District does not have a comprehensive in-force planning framework conducted through a heritage lens.  As a result, City Planning staff feel that undertaking a Heritage Conservation District study for the Distillery District is an important exercise that would provide a more suitable planning framework for the review of future development applications. 

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (March 24, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Authorization to Study the Distillery District as a Potential Heritage Conservation District
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68137.pdf

    Speakers

    Lester Brown, Gooderham & Worts Neighbourhood Association
    Michael Stewart, Goodmans LLP

    Communications (Community Council)

    (April 21, 2014) E-mail from Corinne Bryers (TE.Supp.TE32.15.1)
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Phylis Coles, President, Gooderham & Worts Neighbourhood Association (TE.Supp.TE32.15.2)
    (May 13, 2014) Submission from Lester Brown (TE.Supp.TE32.15.3)

    15a - Authorization to Study the Distillery District as a Potential Heritage Conservation District

    Origin
    (April 17, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
    Summary

    The Toronto Preservation Board on April 16, 2014, considered a report (March 24, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Authorization to Study the Distillery District as a potential Heritage Conservation District.

     

    Michael McClelland, E.R.A. Architects Inc., addressed the Toronto Preservation Board.

    Background Information (Community Council)
    (April 17, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Authorization to Study the Distillery District as a potential Heritage Conservation District
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68544.pdf

    TE32.16 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Hubbard and Wineva Properties

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    32 - Beaches-East York

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 1 Hubbard Boulevard (Hubbard Fourplex) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 1 Hubbard Boulevard (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3A to the report (March 13, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

     

    2.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 11 Hubbard Boulevard (Hubbard Fourplex) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 11 Hubbard Boulevard (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3B to the report (March 13, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

     

    3.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 8 Wineva Avenue (Wineva Fourplex) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 8 Wineva Avenue (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3C to the report (March 13, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

     

    4.         If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

     

    5.         If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designations to the Conservation Review Board.

     

    6.         If the designations are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designations of the properties.

    Origin

    (March 13, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

    Summary

    At its meeting of November 5, 2013, the Toronto Preservation Board adopted the recommendations in a staff report (October 22, 2013) recommending the designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act of 10 City-owned properties on Hubbard Boulevard and Wineva Avenue and the granting of the authority to enter into heritage easement agreements following the sale of the properties in accordance with the heritage policies in the Official Plan.  Following the meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council where the recommendations were adopted, staff determined that three of the properties at 1 and 11 Hubbard and 8 Wineva Avenue were not owned by the City and therefore not subject to the Official Plan policies.

     

    City Council deferred consideration of the staff report (October 22, 2013) at its meeting of December 16-18, 2013 and directed that the Chief Planner and Executive Director report directly to Council on the clarification of the ownership of the properties.  At its meeting of February 13, 2014, City Council stated its intention to designate the Hubbard and Wineva Properties apart from those at 1 and 11 Hubbard Boulevard and 8 Wineva Avenue.  Council referred the designation of the three privately-owned properties back to the Chief Planner for further consideration and report back once staff had an opportunity to discuss the designation process with the current owners

     

    Staff have prepared this report and are forwarding the contents to the owners of the three properties to advise them about the proposed designations and invite them to contact staff to discuss the designation process. 

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (March 13, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Hubbard and Wineva Properties - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68139.pdf

    16a - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Hubbard and Wineva Properties

    Origin
    (April 17, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
    Summary

    The Toronto Preservation Board on April 16, 2014, considered a report (March 13, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Hubbard and Wineva Properties.

     

    Franzi Arana addressed the Toronto Preservation Board.

    Background Information (Community Council)
    (April 17, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Hubbard and Wineva Properties
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68545.pdf

    TE32.43 - Application to Consider - Application by Pattison Outdoor for Five Variances With Respect to a Sign Proposal for One Third Party Ground Sign at 7 Fraser Avenue

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    14 - Parkdale-High Park
    Attention
    The City Solicitor has submitted a letter on this Item (TE32.43a)

    Communication TE32.43.1 has been submitted on this Item

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council refuse the variances with the conditions requested to each of subsections 694-22C, 694-22D, 694-26(4)(a), §694-26(4)(b) and §694-22(4)(d), of Chapter 694 as required to allow the issuance of a permit to erect and display a third party ground sign displaying electronic static sign copy at 7 Fraser Avenue.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the City Solicitor to provide all Members of Council, as soon as possible and prior to the City Council meeting of June 10, 2014, with information pertaining to whether lobbyists are able to lobby Members of Council with respect to a recommendation of the Toronto and East York Community Council, as a quasi judicial body, regarding a sign variance.

     

    The Toronto and East York Community Council adopted the following process for this application to consider a variance under Chapter 694.

     

    1.         The order of the item will be:

     

    a.         Presentation from Speakers

    b.         Questions of Speakers by Councillors

    c.         Presentation from Staff

    d.         Question of Staff

    e.         Debate and Decision

     

    2.         All speakers will have 5 minutes to speak with the applicant being allowed to go first.  If the applicant wants to respond to comments from other speakers at the end of all the presentations he/she can do so but will have a maximum of 3 minutes to provide responding comments.

     

    3.         Members may ask questions of deputants for 5 minutes following their presentations and may have a further round of questioning after everyone has had the opportunity.

    Origin

    (April 23, 2014) Report from the Director and Deputy Chief Building Official, Toronto Building

    Summary

    Pattison Outdoor (the "Applicant") has made an application for five variances from the provisions of Municipal Code Chapter 694, Signs, General, ("Chapter 694"), on specified conditions, as would be required to permit the erection of a specific sign (the "Proposed Sign").

     

    The Proposed Sign is located at 7 Fraser Avenue and is a third-party ground sign, containing two sign faces each using electronic static copy (with a maximum vertical measurement of 14.63 metres and maximum horizontal measurement of 4.27 metres).  The Applicant requests that each of the 5 variances be subject to the following three conditions:

     

    1.         The existing ground sign located on the eastern portion of the premises be removed and its permits revoked, and the proposed sign be located within 1.0 metre of the location of the sign being removed, and the sign replace the existing third party ground sign located on the eastern portion of the premises and is located within 1.0 metre of the current location of the sign it is replacing and all permits associated with the sign it is replacing be revoked;

     

    2.         Prior to the issuance of the sign permit for the sign, the existing third party roof sign and third party ground sign on the western portion of the premises be removed and all permits associated with those signs revoked; and

     

    3.         Each sign face on the proposed sign contains screening sufficient to mitigate the visual impact of the sign copy on all residential land uses within reasonable proximity of the sign.

     

    On February 11, 2104, the Sign Variance Committee heard Item SB26.2 and granted the five variances from Chapter 694 sought for the Proposed Sign, on the requested conditions.  An “Application to Consider” was filed on February 24, 2014 by the Ward Councillor.  As a result, the current variance application is to be heard by the Toronto and East York Community Council for the purpose of making a recommendation to City Council for a final decision.

     

    Under Chapter 694, decisions of the Sign Variance Committee ("SVC") to grant a variance, with or without conditions are only final and binding, if an "Application to Consider" is not filed by the ward councillor within 21 days after the date of the SVC's decision. On February 24, 2014, Councillor Perks filed an Application to Consider; therefore, under Chapter 694, the current application for the variances for the Proposed Sign is a matter to be heard by Toronto and East York Community Council for purposes of making a recommendation to City Council for a final decision.

     

    This report sets out the position of staff relating to the variances being requested.  This report recommends approval of the five variances with conditions, on the basis that the Proposed Sign meets the criteria prescribed in §694-30 of Chapter 694. The report also includes, as attachments, the reports of staff, and all other materials which were submitted to the Sign Variance Committee for the February 11, 2014 meeting.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 23, 2014) Report from the Director and Deputy Chief Building Official, Toronto Building - Application to Consider - Application by Pattison Outdoor for Five Variances with Respect to a Sign Proposal for One Third Party Ground Sign at 7 Fraser Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68850.pdf
    Attachment 1 - Application by Pattison Outdoor for Five Variances with Respect to a Sign Proposal for One Third Party Ground Sign at 7 Fraser Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68851.pdf
    Attachment 2 - Application by Pattison Outdoor for Five Variances with Respect to a Sign Proposal for One Third Party Ground Sign at 7 Fraser Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68852.pdf
    Attachment 3 - Application by Pattison Outdoor for Five Variances with Respect to a Sign Proposal for One Third Party Ground Sign at 7 Fraser Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68853.pdf
    Attachment 4 - Application by Pattison Outdoor for Five Variances with Respect to a Sign Proposal for One Third Party Ground Sign at 7 Fraser Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68854.pdf
    Attachment 5 - Application by Pattison Outdoor for Five Variances with Respect to a Sign Proposal for One Third Party Ground Sign at 7 Fraser Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68855.pdf
    Attachment 6 - Application by Pattison Outdoor for Five Variances with Respect to a Sign Proposal for One Third Party Ground Sign at 7 Fraser Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68856.pdf

    Background Information (City Council)

    (June 6, 2014) Letter from the City Solicitor regarding lobbying (TE32.43a)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70342.pdf

    Speakers

    Patrick Harrington, Aird & Berlis LLP on behalf of Pattison Outdoor
    Sid Catalano, Pattison Outdoor

    Communications (City Council)

    (June 9, 2014) Letter from Patrick J. Harrington, Aird and Berlis LLP (CC.New.TE32.43.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47969.pdf

    TE32.49 - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 812 and 816 Lansdowne Avenue

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    18 - Davenport
    Attention
    Bill 527 has been submitted on this Item.

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes:

     

    -           812 and 816 Lansdowne Avenue.

     

    2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route. 

    Origin

    (April 25, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services

    Summary

    To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

     

    Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 25, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 812 and 816 Lansdowne Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68892.pdf
    Attachment - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 812 and 816 Lansdowne Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68893.pdf

    TE32.55 - Removal of Accessible Parking Space - May 2014 (Non-Delegated)

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    18 - Davenport
    Attention
    Bill 491 has been submitted on this Item.

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the removal of an on-street accessible parking space at the location identified in revised Appendix A attached to the report dated April 22, 2014, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

    Origin

    (April 22, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the removal of an on-street accessible parking space for persons with disabilities.

     

    As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the subject street, City Council approval of this report is required.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 22, 2014) Revised Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Removal of Accessible Parking Space - May 2014 (Non-Delegated)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68651.pdf

    TE32.59 - Parking Amendments - East Liberty Street

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    19 - Trinity-Spadina
    Attention
    Bill 492 has been submitted on this Item.

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council rescind the "No Parking, Anytime" regulation on the south side of East Liberty Street, between a point 72.2 metres west of Lynn Williams Street and a point 15.0 metres east of Lynn Williams Street.

     

    2.         City Council enact a "No Standing, Anytime" regulation on the south side of East Liberty Street, between a point 72.2 metres west of Lynn Williams Street and a point 130 metres west of Pirandello Street.

    Origin

    (April 3, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

    Summary

    Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to remove parking on the south side of East Liberty Street, between a point west of Lynn Williams Street and Pirandello Street.  The presence of parked vehicles on both sides of East Liberty Street is resulting in operational and safety concerns for motorists and pedestrians.  To resolve this issue, staff recommends implementing a "No Standing, Anytime" regulation on the south side where parking is currently permitted.  This regulation will be consistent with the adjacent sections of East Liberty Street.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (April 3, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Parking Amendments - East Liberty Street
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68656.pdf
    Drawing No. 421G-1393 - Parking Amendments - East Liberty Street
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68657.pdf

    TE32.74 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Attention
    Communications TE32.74.37 to TE32.74.61 have been submitted on this Item

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    A.        City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection, for liquor licensing purposes, to the following requests, noting that applicants are required to comply with other applicable By-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way:

     

    1.         Temporary liquor licence/patio extensions for the following establishments during the Cabbagetown Festival of the Arts to be held on September 6, 2014 from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and September 7, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.:

     

    Stout Irish Pub, 221 Carlton Street East

    Hey Lucy Café, 227 Carlton Street

    OMI Restaurant, 241 Carlton Street

    Ginger, 252 Carlton Street

    New Town Restaurant, 413 Parliament Street

    Peter’s Cajun Creole Pizza, 415 Parliament Street

    The Local Gest, 424 Parliament Street

    Wing Machine, 443 Parliament Street

    Young Thailand, 446 Parliament Street

    House On Parliament, 454 Parliament Street

    Johnny G’s, 478 Parliament Street

    The Flying Beaver, 488 Parliament Street

    The Pear Tree, 507 Parliament Street

    KiBo Sushi House, 533 Parliament Street

    Alice’s Place, 554 Parliament Street

    Butter Chicken Factory, 556 Parliament Street

    Merryberry Café & Bistro, 559 Parliament Street

    Pho Viet Phi, 568 Parliament Street

    Tender Trap, 580 Parliament Street

    Red Cranberries, 601 Parliament Street

    Winchester Kitchen & Bar, 51A Winchester Street

    Kingyo Izakaya, 51B Winchester Street

    F’Amelia, 12 Amelia Street

     

    2.         Temporary patio extensions for the following establishments during 2014 Roncesvalles Polish Festival to be held on Saturday, September 13, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and Sunday, September 14, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.:

     

    The Ace, 231 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Ice Queen Restaurant, 28 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Aris Place, 229 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Inter Steer, 357 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Barque Smokehouse, 299 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Kami Sushi, 153 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Butler’s Pantry, 371 Roncesvalles Avenue

    The Local, 396 Roncesvalles Avenue

    By The Slice Gourmet Pizza, 133 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Loons, 416 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Café Polonez, 195 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Pizzeria Defina, 321 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Cardinal Rule, 5 Roncesvalles Avenue

    The Roncy Public, 390 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Chopin Restaurant, 165 Roncesvalles Avenue

    The Rude Boy, 397 Roncesvalles Avenue

    La Cubana, 392 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Sangria, 145 Roncesvalles Avenue

    The Dizzy, 305 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Shalamar, 391 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Domani, 335 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Smock Café, 287 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Era Diner, 367 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Sue’s Thai Food, 414 Roncesvalles Avenue

    The Workshop by Latitude, 331 Roncesvalles Avenue

     Sushi Nomi, 67 Roncesvalles Avenue

    The Friendly Thai, 223 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Sushi on Roncy, 293 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Gabby’s on Roncesvalles, 157 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Thai Chef Cuisine, 233 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Gate 403, 403 Roncesvalles Avenue

    The Westerly, 413 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Hey! Meatball, 89 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Zagloba, 317 Roncesvalles Avenue

    Hopgood’s Foodliner, 325 Roncesvalles Avenue

     

    3.         Temporary liquor licence/patio extension for Zipperz/Cellblock Bars for use of the adjoining parking lot located at 70 Carlton Street, from June 27 to 29, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. each day, as part of the WorldPride 2014 Event.

     

    4.         Temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. on Saturday, July 12, 2014 at the Fringe Club, as part of The Fringe of Toronto Theatre Festival (Event approved in Item TE30.87).

     

    5.         Temporary liquor licence/patio extensions from 12:00 noon to 7:00 p.m. during Pedestrian Sundays (P.S. Kensington) to be held on June 29,  July 27, August 31 and September 28, 2014, for the following establishments:

     

    Graffiti's, 170 Baldwin Street

    Detour Bar, 193 ½ Baldwin Street

    Handlebar, 159 Augusta Avenue

    Pizzaria Via Mercanti, 188 Augusta Avenue

    Star Café, 189 Augusta Avenue

    The Embassy, 223 Augusta Avenue

    Poetry Jazz Bar, 224 Augusta Avenue

    Jumbo Empanadas, 245 Augusta Avenue

    Krepez, 253 Augusta Avenue

    Super Market, 268 Augusta Avenue

    Torito, 276 Augusta Avenue

    El Trompo,  277 Augusta Avenue

    Café Pamenar, 307 Augusta Avenue

    Templeton's, 319 Augusta Avenue

    Tibet Café, 51 Kensington Avenue

    Lola's, 40 Kensington Avenue

    Kensington Lodge, 21 Kensington Avenue

    Last Temptation, 12 Kensington Avenue

     

    6.         Temporary patio extension to a private parking lot for Braz.1.L - Esfiha's House, 501 Yonge Street - 7 Maitland Entrance, for three summer events, "Let's Celebrate Summer and Sports – Braz.1.L 1 Year Anniversary and World Cup" to be held from June 12 to June 23, 2014, "World Pride Happiness" to be held from June 25 to July 1, 2014, and "Let's Celebrate Summer and Sports - Braz.1.L 1 Year Anniversary and World Cup Summer Must Continue" to be held from July 4 to July 13, 2014, at the times outlined in the e-mail from Nelson Moreira.

     

    7.         Temporary patio extension in the parking lot area for the An Sibin Pub, 709 Queen Street East from June 20-22, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., for a Summer Solstice party.

     

    8.         Temporary patio extension for O'Grady's Tap and Grill, 518 Church Street, on the following dates and times during WorldPride 2014:

     

     June 20, 2014 - 6:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.

     June 21, 2014 - 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.

     June 22, 2014 - 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.

     June 27, 2014 - 6:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m.

     June 28, 2014 - 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m.

     June 29, 2014 - 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m.

     

    B.        City Council concur in the action taken by the Toronto and East York Community Council in approving the following events, due to the timing of such events:

     

    1.         Temporary patio extension for M&M Fruit and Grocery at 1251 Dundas Street West, from 12:00 noon to 9:30 p.m., on June 7, 2014, in conjunction with the "Dundas West Fest".

     

    2.         Temporary liquor licence extension to 4:00 a.m. for the Soundtrack of the City event to be held from June 12 to 22, 2014, at Cherry Cola's, 200 Bathurst Street and Velvet Underground, 510 Queen Street West.

     

    3.         Temporary patio extension in the parking lot area for the An Sibin Pub, 709 Queen Street East on June 6 to 8, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. for an "Eats and Beats" event.

     

    C.        City Council approve the following:

     

    1.         Road closure for a portion of Fraser Avenue between King Street and Liberty Street, during the Liberty Village BIA's "Give Me Liberty After Work Party", to be held on Thursday, June 12, 2014 from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

     

    2.         Temporary road closure of the north curb lane of Wellington Street West from John Street to Simcoe Street for load in, event dates and load out, during the World MasterCard Fashion Week to be held from October 20 to 24, 2014, at David Pecaut Square, 55 John Street, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:59 p.m., each day.

     

    3.         Road Closure on Roncesvalles Avenue from Dundas Street West in the north to Harvard Avenue in the south, during the 2014 Roncesvalles Polish Festival to be held on Saturday, September 13, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and on Sunday, September 14, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.

    Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

    The Toronto and East York Community Council, for liquor licensing purposes:

     

    A.        Declared the following to be events of municipal significance:

     

    1.         Liberty Village BIA's "Give Me Liberty After Work Party", with beer garden, to be held on Thursday, June 12, 2014 from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., on Fraser Avenue south of King Street.

     

    2.         The Withrow Funfair to be held on May 24, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m., at Withrow Public School.

     

    3.         The 2014 Delicious Food Show, to be held on Friday, October 17 and Saturday, October 18, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and on Sunday, October 19, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. at the Direct Energy Centre, Exhibition Place.

     

    4.         The Cirque du Soleil, Big Top Show 'KURIOS', to be held from August 27 to October 26, 2014, at the 51 Commissioners Street site in the Port Lands, on the dates and times outlined in the attachment to the letter from Mr. Brennan.

     

    5.         World MasterCard Fashion Week to be held from October 20 to 24, 2014, at David Pecaut Square, 55 John Street, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:59 p.m., each day.

     

    6.         The Cabbagetown Festival of the Arts to be held on September 6, 2014 from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and September 7, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

     

    7.         The 17th Annual GWN Sport Regatta, to be held on Saturday, July 19, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., at Marilyn Bell Park, with beverage tent.

     

    8.         The 20th Annual GWN Dragon Boat Challenge event, to be held at Marilyn Bell Park, with beverage tent on:

     

    Friday, September 5, 2014 from 5:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.

    Saturday, September 6, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m.

    Sunday, September 7, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.

     

    9.         The pre-festival Polka Party to be held on Friday, September 12, 2014, from 8:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., at St. Casimir's Hall, 156 Roncesvalles Avenue, prior to the 9th Annual Roncesvalles Polish Festival to be held on Saturday, September 13, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and Sunday, September 14, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., which was declared an event of municipal significance on February 25, 2014 (Item TE30.87).

     

    10.        CraveTO event to be held on Thursday, June 26, 2014, at Honest Ed's Alley, 581 Bloor Street West, amendment to time of the event changed to 4:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., rather than 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., as originally approved by the Toronto and East York Community Council in Item TE31.72.

     

    11.       One-day music festival event to be held at Artscape Gibraltar Point, 443 Lakeshore Avenue, Toronto Island on June 19, 2014, from 4:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., as part of the North by Northeast Music and Film Festival and Conference.

     

    12.        HangLoose Media pop-up art market event to be held on May 31, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m., at HangLoose Media Studio, 28 Logan Avenue.

     

    13.       The Bellwoods Block Party to be held on the following date at a private dead end lane at 198 Walnut Avenue:

     

    Sunday, June 1, 2014 - 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

     

    14.       The "ideacity" Closing Night Party (ZoomerMedia), to be held on June 20, 2014, from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. at 64 Jefferson Avenue.

     

    15.       The Toronto Blue Jays Cottage in the City Festival, Summer Friday Fan Festivals and Canada Day Festival, to take place on the south west side of the Rogers Centre property, outside of Gates 10 and 11, as well as on Canada Lands, on the following dates and times:

     

    Friday, June 27, 2014 - 4:30 p.m.-7:00 p.m. Cottage in the City

    Saturday, June 28, 2014 - 11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. Cottage in the City

    Sunday, June 29, 2014 - 11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. Cottage in the City

    Tuesday, July 1, 2014 - 11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. Canada Day Festival

    Friday, July 18, 2014 - 4:30 p.m.-7:00 p.m. Summer Friday Fan Festival

    Friday, August 8, 2014 - 4:30 p.m.-7:00 p.m. Summer Friday Fan Festival

    Friday, August 22, 2014 - 4:30 p.m.-7:00 p.m. Summer Friday Fan Festival

    Friday, August 29, 2014 - 4:30pm-7:00 p.m. Summer Friday Fan Festival

     

    16.       Toronto Food Truck Festival to be held on August 2 and 3, 2014, from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m. each day, at Woodbine Park.

     

    17.       The 12th Annual IRIE Music Festival, to be held on August 1, 2014, from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., August 2 and 3, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. and August 4, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., at Nathan Phillips Square.

     

    18.       A series of events to promote the Ossington Avenue neighbourhood at Tiger of Sweden, 56 Ossington Avenue, to be held on the following dates from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. each day:

     

    Saturday, June 7, 2014 - a summer launch party.

    Saturday, June 14, 2014 - a Father’s Day shopping event.

    Saturday, June 21, 2014  - a summer solstice shopping event.

    Saturday, June 28, 2014  - a Canada Day celebration.

     

    19.       Aria Boutique Fashion Shows running during the Taste of Italy Festival to be held from June 13-15, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., at the Aria Boutique Store, 686 College Street.

     

    20.       The Persian Summer Festival at Centre Island to be held on July 4, 2014, from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., July 5, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and July 6, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., at Olympic Island (part of Centre Island).

     

    21.       The No. 9 Eco-Art-Fest, to be held on various dates from June 21, 2014 to September 21, 2014, with the times for Wednesday, Thursday, and Sunday being from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., and on Friday and Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., at Todmorden Mills, as outlined in the e-mail from Mr. Davies.

     

    22.       Pedestrian Sundays (P.S. Kensington) to be held from 12:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. on the following dates:

     

    June 29, 2014

    July 27, 2014

    August 31, 2014

    September 28, 2014.

     

    23.       Three summer events at Braz.1.L – Esfiha's House, 501 Yonge Street: "Let's Celebrate Summer and Sports - Braz.1.L 1-Year Anniversary and World Cup" to be held from June 12 to June 23, 2014, "World Pride Happiness" to be held from June 25 to July 1, 2014, and "Let's Celebrate Summer and Sports - Braz.1.L 1-Year Anniversary and World Cup Summer Must Continue" to be held from July 4 to July 13, 2014, at the times outlined in the e-mail from Nelson Moreira.

     

    24.       Festival Libre 2014 to be held in the Distillery Historic District, 55 Mill Street, on July 2, 3 and 4, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m., and on July 5 and 6, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.

     

    25.       Soundtrack of the City event to be held from June 12 to 22, 2014, from 8:30 p.m. to 4:00 a.m. at Cherry Cola's, 200 Bathurst Street and Velvet Underground, 510 Queen Street West.

     

    26.       4 Storeys Up: Live Art Show, to be held on Wednesday, June 25, 2014, from 7:00 p.m. until 10:00 p.m.,  at The Linden School, on the Rooftop of 10 Rosehill Avenue.

     

    27.       Beer and Cider Festival, to be held on September 19, 2014 from 4:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. and September 20, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., at Sugar Beach, located at Jarvis Street and Queens Quay East.

     

    28.       Amendment to the dates of the Grolsch Open House, to be held during the Toronto International Film Festival to include Thursday, September 4, 2014, from 3:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m.

     

    29.       Riverdale Farm Stewardship Group fundraising event at Riverdale Farm, 201 Winchester Street from 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 19, 2014.

     

    30.       Church of St. Andrew-by-the-Lake Strawberry Social to be held on June 15, 2014, from 12:00 noon to 2:00 p.m., on the lawn beside the Church on Centre Island.

     

    B.        Approved the following events, due to the timing of such events, and advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario accordingly:

     

    1.         Temporary patio extension for M&M Fruit and Grocery at 1251 Dundas Street West, from 12:00 noon to 9:30 p.m., on June 7, 2014, in conjunction with the "Dundas West Fest".

     

    2.         Temporary liquor licence extension to 4:00 a.m. for the Soundtrack of the City event to be held from June 12 to 22, 2014, at Cherry Cola's, 200 Bathurst Street and Velvet Underground, 510 Queen Street West.

     

    3.         Temporary patio extension in the parking lot area for the An Sibin Pub, 709 Queen Street on June 6 to 8, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. for an "Eats and Beats" event.

     

    C.        Deferred consideration of the following request until its next meeting to be held on June 17, 2014, due to concerns with respect to access to the lane:

     

    The Bellwoods Block Party to be held on the following dates at a private dead end lane at 198 Walnut Avenue:

     

    Sunday, July 6, 2014 - 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

    Sunday, August 3, 2014 - 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

    Sunday, September 7, 2014 - 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

    Sunday, September 14, 2014 - 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

    Saturday, October 4, 2014 - 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. (Nuit Blanche night edition)

    Summary

    Seeking endorsement of event for Liquor Licensing Purposes.

    Communications (Community Council)

    (April 12, 2014) E-mail from Lynn Clay, Executive Director, LVBIA, requesting that the Liberty Village BIA's "Give Me Liberty After Work Party", with beer garden, to be held on Thursday, June 12, 2014 from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., on Fraser Avenue south of King Street, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of a road closure for a portion of Fraser Avenue between King Street and Liberty Street. (TE.Main.TE32.74.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-46883.pdf
    (April 14, 2014) Letter from Darryn Crombeen, Co-Chair, Withrow Funfair, requesting that The Withrow Funfair to be held on May 24, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m., at Withrow Public School, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE32.74.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-46880.pdf
    (April 22, 2014) E-mail from Hannah O'Donovan, Operations Coordinator, informa Canada, requesting that the 2014 Delicious Food Show, to be held on Friday, October 17 and Saturday, October 18, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and on Sunday, October 19, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. at the Direct Energy Centre, Exhibition Place, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE32.74.3)
    (April 17, 2014) Letter from Ted Brennan, Site and Venue Development Department, requesting that the Cirque du Soleil, Big Top Show 'KURIOS', to be held from August 27 to October 26, 2014, at 51 Commissioners Street site in the Port Lands, on the dates and times outlined in the attachment to letter from Mr. Brennan, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE32.74.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-46922.pdf
    (April 16, 2014) Letter from Carolyn Quinn, Director, IMG Fashion Events and Properties Canada, requesting that World MasterCard Fashion Week to be held from October 20 to 24, 2014, at David Pecaut Square, 55 John Street, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:59 p.m., each day, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of the temporary closure of the north curb lane of Wellington Street West from John Street to Simcoe Street for load in, event dates and load out. (TE.Main.TE32.72.5)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-46944.pdf
    (April 23, 2014) Letter from Lido Chilelli, Coordinator for the Cabbagetown BIA Team, requesting that The Cabbagetown Festival of the Arts to be held on September 6, 2014 from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and September 7, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., at various locations, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting temporary liquor licence/patio extensions for the establishments listed in the letter from Mr. Chilelli (TE.Main.TE32.74.6)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-46935.pdf
    (April 1, 2014) Letter from Mike Fulton, Director of Operations, Great White North Communications, requesting that the 17th Annual GWN Sport Regatta, to be held on Saturday, July 19, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., at Marilyn Bell Park, with beverage tent, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE32.74.7)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-46936.pdf
    (April 1, 2014) Letter from Mike Fulton, Director of Operations, Great White North Communications, requesting that the 20th Annual GWN Dragon Boat Challenge event, to be held on Friday, September 5, 2014 from 5:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., Saturday, September 6, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m., and on Sunday, September 7, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., at Marilyn Bell Park, with beverage tent, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE32.74.8)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-46952.pdf
    (May 5, 2014) Letter from Keith Denning, Manager, Roncesvalles Village BIA, requesting a letter of non-objection for temporary patio extensions for the establishments listed in the revised letter from Mr. Denning during 2014 Roncesvalles Polish Festival to be held on Saturday, September 13, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and Sunday, September 14, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.. with a pre-festival Polka Party on Friday, September 12, 2014 at St. Casimir's Hall, from 8:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., with road closure. (TE.Main.TE32.74.9)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-46953.pdf
    (April 23, 2014) E-mail from Simona Koicheva, Event and Marketing Coordinator, requesting that the time of the CraveTO event to be held on Thursday, June 26, 2014, at Honest Ed's Alley, 581 Bloor Street West, be changed to 4:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., rather than 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., as originally approved by the Toronto and East York Community Council in Item TE31.72 (TE.Main.TE32.74.10)
    (April 13, 2014) E-mail from Mike Tanner, Director of Operations, NXNE, requesting that a one-day music festival event to be held at Artscape Gibraltar Point, 443 Lakeshore Avenue, Toronto Island on June 19, 2014, from 4:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., as part of the North by Northeast Music and Film Festival and Conference, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE32.74.11)
    (April 24, 2014) Letter from Ariane Klassen, Marketing Coordinator, HangLoose Media, requesting that a pop-up art market event to be held on May 31, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m., at HangLoose Media Studio, 28 Logan Avenue, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE32.74.12)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-46958.pdf
    (April 29, 2014) Letter from Rebecca Caulford, Owner/Designer, Honeybea Designhive, requesting that The Bellwoods Block Party to be held on Sunday, June 1, Sunday, July 6, Sunday, August 3, Sunday, September 7, and Sunday, September 14, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. each day, and on Saturday, October 4, 2014 (Nuit Blanche night edition) from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., at a private dead end lane at 198 Walnut Avenue, be declared events of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE32.74.13)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47028.pdf
    (May 2, 2014) Letter from Richard Robertson, Project Management, Conferences and Shows ideacity (ZoomerMedia), requesting that the "ideacity Closing Night Party, to be held on June 20, 2014, from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. at 64 Jefferson Avenue, in the Liberty Village Area, be declared an event of municipal significance and a temporary liquor license extension for the outdoor space. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.14)
    (May 2, 2014) Letter from Kristy-Leigh Boone, Manager, Special Events Toronto Blue Jays, requesting that The Toronto Blue Jays Cottage in the City Festival, Summer Friday Fan Festivals and Canada Day Festival, to take place on the south west side of the Rogers Centre outside of Gates 10 and 11, as well as on Canada Lands, on the dates and times listed in the letter, be declared events of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.15)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47158.pdf
    (May 2, 2014) Letter from Ben Freeman, Executive Director, The Toronto Food Truck Festival, requesting that the Toronto Food Truck Festival to be held on August 2 and 3, 2014, from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m. each day, at Woodbine Park, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.16)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47159.pdf
    (May 6, 2014) E-mail from Donna McCurvin, requesting that the 12th Annual IRIE Music Festival, to be held on August 1, 2014, from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., August 2 and 3, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. and August 4, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., at Nathan Phillips Square, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.17)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Caitlin MacLachlan, Junior Publicist, rock-it promotions, inc. requesting that a series of events to promote the Ossington Avenue neighbourhood at Tiger of Sweden, 56 Ossington Avenue, to be held from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. each day on June 7, 14, 21 and 28, 2014, as outlined in the e-mail from Ms. MacLachlan, be declared events of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.18)
    (May 1, 2014) Letter from Tammy Beltrami, Aria Boutique, advising that they will be running Fashion Shows during the Taste of Italy Festival to be held from June 13-15, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., at the Aria Boutique Store, 686 College Street and requesting that it be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.19)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47217.pdf
    (May 8, 2014) E-mail from Annemarie Catalano, Event Planner, Jam Productions, requesting that The Persian Centre Island Festival, to be held on July 4, 2014, from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., July 5, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and July 6, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., at Olympic Island (part of Centre Island), be declared an event of municipal significance and requesting a temporary liquor licence for these dates. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.20)
    (May 7, 2014) E-mail from Andrew Davies, Executive Director, No. 9 Contemporary Art & the Environment, requesting that the No. 9 Eco-Art-Fest, to be held on various dates from June 21, 2014 to September 21, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., on Wednesday, Thursday, and Sunday and from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., at Todmorden Mills, as outlined in the e-mail from Mr. Davies, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.21)
    (April 21, 2014) Letter from Michael Simpson, requesting a temporary liquor licence/patio extension for Zipperz/Cellblock Bars for use of the adjoining parking lot located at 70 Carlton Street, from June 27 to 29, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. each day, as part of the WorldPride 2014 Event (TE.Supp.TE32.74.22)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47220.pdf
    (May 8, 2014) Letter from Lucy Eveleigh, General Manager, The Toronto Fringe, requesting approval of a temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. on Saturday, July 12, 2014 at the Fringe Club, as part of The Fringe of Toronto Theatre Festival (approved in Item TE30.87) (TE.Supp.TE32.74.23)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47302.pdf
    (May 9, 2014) E-mail from Nelson Moreira, Braz.1.L - Esfiha's House, 501 Yonge Street - 7 Maitland Entrance, requesting that 3 summer events, "Let's Celebrate Summer and Sports" (two parts) and "Word Pride Happiness", to be held on various dates from June 12 to June 23, 2014, June 25 to July 1, 2014 and July 4 to July 13, 2014, at the times outlined in the e-mail, be declared events of municipal significance; and requesting approval of a patio extension into the private parking lot during these events. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.24)
    (May 9, 2014) Letter from Michael Pesce and Joe Morais, M&M Fruit and Grocery, requesting approval of a temporary patio extension at 1251 Dundas Street West, from 12:00 noon to 9:30 p.m., on June 7, 2014, in conjunction with the "Dundas West Fest" (TE.Supp.TE32.74.25)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47361.pdf
    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan requesting that Pedestrian Sundays (P.S. Kensington) to be held on June 29, July 27, August 31, and September 28, 2014, be declared events of municipal significance; and requesting approval of temporary liquor licence/patio extensions from 12:00 noon to 7:00 p.m. for the establishments listed in the letter from Councillor Vaughan during these events. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.26)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47362.pdf
    (May 9, 2014) Letter from Candace Shaw, Outdoor Events Coordinator, The Distillery Historic District, requesting that the Festival Libre 2014 to be held in the Distillery Historic District, 55 Mill Street, on July 2, 3 and 4, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m., and on July 5 and 6, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance and requesting approval of a temporary liquor licence. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.27)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47363.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) E-mail from Jeannie Reid requesting that Soundtrack of the City to be held on June 12 to 22, 2014, from 8:30 p.m. to 4:00 a.m. at Cherry Cola's, 200 Bathurst Street and Velvet Underground, 510 Queen Street West, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting a temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. for this event. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.28)
    (May 6, 2014) Letter from Eric Tigley, The Linden School, 10 Rosehill Avenue, requesting that 4 Storeys Up: Live Art Show, to be held on Wednesday, June 25, 2014, from 7:00 p.m. until 10:00 p.m., at The Linden School on the Rooftop of 10 Rosehill Avenue, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.29)
    (May 10, 2014) Letter from Scott Rondeau, Drink Inc., requesting that the Beer and Cider Festival, to be held on September 19, 2014 from 4:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. and September 20, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., at Sugar Beach, located at Jarvis Street and Queens Quay East, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.30)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47444.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) Letter from Scott Rondeau, Drink Inc. Events (Formerly Power Juncture Corp), requesting an amendment to the dates of the Grolsch Open House, to be held during the Toronto International Film Festival to include Thursday, September 4, 2014, from 3:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. (Event approved in TE30.87). (TE.Supp.TE32.74.31)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47445.pdf
    (May 12, 2014) Letter from Scott Brockington, c/o An Sibin Pub, requesting a non-objection to a temporary patio extension in the parking lot area for the An Sibin Pub, 709 Queen Street East on June 6 to 8, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. for an "Eats and Beats" event, and on June 20-22, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., for a Summer Solstice party. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.32)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47448.pdf
    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Pam McConnell, on behalf of the Riverdale Farm Stewardship Group, requesting that Riverdale Farm Aid 2014 to be held on Thursday, June 19, 2014 from 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., be declared as an Event of Municipal Significance. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.33)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47478.pdf
    (May 13, 2014) Fax from Dr. Charlotte R. Mudge, Church Warden, Church of St. Andrew-by-the-Lake, requests that the annual Strawberry Social, to be held on June 15, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m., be declared as an Event of Municipal Significance. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.34)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Jimmy Georgoulis, O'Grady's Tap & Grill, requesting on June 20, 2014, from 6:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., June 21, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., June 22, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., June 27, 2014, from 6:00 p.m. to 4 a.m., June 28, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m., June 29, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m., a letter of non-objection for a patio extension. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.35)
    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Michelle McVicar, on behalf of Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation 755, expressing opposition to the proposal of a Patio Extension to Braz.1.L Esfiha's House. (TE.Supp.TE32.74.36)

    Communications (City Council)

    (April 22, 2014) Letter from Erika Campbell, Manager, Events, Toronto Argonauts Football Club Inc., requesting a temporary liquor licence for the pre-game festival/outdoor event at the Rogers Centre Gate 11 area on Saturday, July 5, 2014 from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.; Saturday, July 12, 2014 from 3:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.; Friday, October 10, 2014 from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.; Sunday, November 16, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. and Sunday, November 23, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. (CC.Main.TE32.74.37)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47863.pdf
    (May 21, 2014) Letter from Lido Chilelli, Co-ordinator, Cabbagetown BIA Team, requesting a temporary liquor licence extension during the Cabbagetown Festival of the Arts on September 6, 2014 from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and September 7, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. for various establishments as listed in the letter (CC.Main.TE32.74.38)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47866.pdf
    (May 21, 2014) E-mail from Jeannie Reid, Director, Music City North, requesting that the Hideout be added to the list of establishments participating in the Soundtrack of the City Event to be held from June 12 to 22, 2014 (CC.Main.TE32.74.39)
    (May 22, 2014) Letter from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21, St. Paul's, requesting approval of a temporary liquor licence for "Salsa on St. Clair" from July 19, 2014 from noon to 11:00 p.m. and July 20, 2014 from noon to 9:00 p.m. for various establishments as listed in the letter (CC.Main.TE32.74.40)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47868.pdf
    (May 14, 2014) Letter from Katerina Gourmos, GreekTown on the Danforth BIA, requesting a temporary liquor licence extension for various participants of the 21st Annual Krinos Taste of the Danforth to be held on Danforth Avenue bewteen Broadview Avenue and Jones Avenue on August 8, 2014 from 6:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m., August 9, 2014 from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m. and August 10, 2014 from 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. (CC.Main.TE32.74.41)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47871.pdf
    (May 23, 2014) E-mail from Andrew Gayle, requesting a temporary liquor licence extension on July 12, 2014 from 10:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. and July 13, 2014 from 10:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. for the CBC Soccer Nation World Cup Viewing Party to be held on John Street, from Wellington Street to Front Street (CC.Main.TE42.74.42)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47872.pdf
    (June 2, 2014) E-mail from Mychol Scully, General Manager, Church-Wellesley Village BIA, seeking temporary patio extensions during "The Village Welcomes The World" event from June 20, 2014 to June 22, 2014 and temporary patio extensions on the sidewalk portion only during WorldPride Festivities from June 27, 2014 to June 29, 2014 for various establishments listed in the letter (CC.Main.TE32.74.43)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47851.pdf
    (May 6, 2014) Letter from Paul Brown and Philippe Gauthier, Co-owners, Paul Brown Boxfit, regarding the "Float Like a Butterfly" Beer Garden at 40 Wellesley Street East, during the World Pride 2014 Event from noon to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday, June 28, 2014 and Sunday, June 29, 2014. (CC.Main.TE32.74.44)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47852.pdf
    (June 5, 2014) E-mail from Brock Shepherd, Kensington Brewing Company, regarding a beer garden at 156 and 250 Augusta Avenue during Pedestrian Sunday for the dates specified (CC.New.TE32.74.45)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47974.pdf
    (June 1, 2014) Letter from Robert Salvati, Owner, Vivoli Restaurant, regarding a liquor licence extension for Vivoli's Customer Appreciation Day Festivities on July 5 and August 16, 2014 (CC.New.TE32.74.46)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47975.pdf
    (June 5, 2014) Letter from Dougal Bichan, Festival Director, Bloordale BIA, Big of Bloor Festival regarding patio extensions for the Bloordale BIA Big on Bloor Festival on July 19 and July 20, 2014 (CC.New.TE32.74.47)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47976.pdf
    (June 10, 2014) Letter from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21 St. Pauls, regarding beer gardens and tents during the Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival in July and August 2014. (CC.New.TE32.74.48)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47977.pdf
    (June 6, 2014) E-mail from Larysa Kalyta, Marketing, Sales and Event Manager, Marche Restaurants Canada Limited, regarding events on Marche's patio: Brookfield's BBQ function on June 25, 2014 and CIBC fundraiser on September 10, 2014 (CC.New.TE32.74.49)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47978.pdf
    (June 4, 2014) Letter from Simone Weir, BIS Coordinator, Bloorcourt Business Improvement Area, regarding temporary patio extensions for the 3rd Annual Bloorcourt Arts and Crafts Fair on August 16, 2014 for the restaurants listed in the letter (CC.New.TE32.74.50)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47979.pdf
    (June 6, 2014) E-mail from Stephanie McCracken, Office Administrator, Church-Wellesley Village BIA, regarding patio/liquor extensions during World Pride (CC.New.TE32.74.51)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47980.pdf
    (June 9, 2014) E-mail from Stephanie McCracken, Office Administrator, Church-Wellesley Village BIA, regarding patio/liquor extensions during World Pride (CC.New.TE32.74.52)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47981.pdf
    (May 6, 2014) Letter from Paul Brown and Phillipe Gauthier, Co-Owners, Paul Brown BoxFit, regarding a beer garden during World Pride (CC.New.TE32.74.53)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47982.pdf
    (June 5, 2014) Letter from Jimmy Georgoulis, O'Grady's On Church, regarding a beer garden from June 20 to 22, 2014 (CC.New.TE32.74.54)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47983.pdf
    (June 2, 2014) Letter from Ben Freeman, Director of Development, Pride Toronto, regarding an extension for The Marquis of Granby during World Pride (CC.New.TE32.74.55)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47984.pdf
    (June 9, 2014) E-mail from Candace Shaw, regarding a liquor licence extension for Festival Libre from July 4 to 6, 2014 (CC.New.TE32.74.56)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47985.pdf
    (May 16, 2014) Letter from Robert Sysak, Executive Director, West Queen West BIA, regarding a liquor licence extension during World Pride for various venues listed in the letter (CC.New.TE32.74.57)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-47986.pdf
    (June 10, 2014) Memo from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21, St. Paul's West, regarding additional locations for beer gardens and tents during the Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival as listed in the memo (CC.New.TE32.74.58)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48009.pdf
    (June 10, 2014) E-mail from Patrick Morrison, Corrodinator, P.S. Kensington, regarding patio extensions for a number of establishments on June 29, July 27, August 31 and September 28, 2014 (CC.New.TE32.74.59)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48092.pdf
    (June 2, 2014) Fax from Louis Silva regarding a beer garden for an event at the Santa Cruz Church on June 21 and 22, 2014. (CC.New.TE32.74.60)
    (June 9, 2014) Letter from Frank Kocis, Suresh Doss and Michael Di Caro, Spotlight Toronto, regarding the "PintxosTO: A Celebration of Tapas" on June 17, 2014 (CC.New.TE32.74.61)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48021.pdf

    TE32.75 - Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events up to September 13, 2014

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council grant an exemption to Ontario Farm Fresh Marketing Association, Toronto Outdoor Art Exhibition, Pan Am, Office of Commercial Affairs, Royal Thai Consulate General, Toronto Urban Music Festival, Association of Ecuadorians in Ontario, Canadian-Cuba Friendship Association of Toronto, Pandiero Organization and Consulate General of Mexico to operate a beer garden and to serve wine and hard liquor contingent upon the following conditions:

     

    a.         approval of the A.G.C.O.;

    b.         approval of the Medical Officer of Health;

    c.         compliance with the City of Toronto’s Municipal Alcohol Policy; and

    d.         receipt of all the necessary permits associated with the production of the event i.e., building permit, noise by-law extension permit

     

    2.         City Council grant permission to ANCOP Canada and Blue Knights Ontario IV to solicit donations in support of their organizations.

     

    3.         City Council grant permission to Pan Am and Hiroshima Day Coalition to place objects in the reflecting pool.

     

    4.         City Council grant permission to Pan Am to use special effects pyrotechnics.

     

    5.         City Council require that the various events compensate the City of Toronto through the Facilities Management Division for all the City of Toronto costs associated with the event.

    Origin

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

    Summary

    It is recommended that Toronto and East York Community Council give exemption to City Chase "City Chase Event", ANCOP Canada’s “Walk for the Poor” and Blue Knights Ontario IV’s “Red, White and Blue Knights Toy Drive” request to solicit donations, Hiroshima Day Coalition’s “Hiroshima Day” request to use open flame and place objects in the reflecting pool, Toronto Outdoor Art Exhibition’s “Toronto Outdoor Art Exhibition” request to solicit donations and operate a beer/wine garden, Pan Am’s “One Year Count Down” request to operate a beer/wine garden, use special effects pyrotechnics and place objects in the reflecting pool and Ontario Farm Fresh Marketing Association's City Hall Farmers Market, Office of Commercial Affairs, Royal Thai Consulate General’s “Tastes of Thailand”, Toronto Urban Music Festival’s “IRIE Music Festival”,  Association of Ecuadorians in Ontario "Ecuador Festival", Canadian-Cuba Friendship Association of Toronto’s “Toronto Cuba Friendship Day”, Pandiero Organization’s “Brazilian Day Canada” and Consulate General of Mexico’s “Mexican Independence Day” request to operate a beer/wine garden at their event to be held on Nathan Phillips Square.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (May 7, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer - Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events up to September 13, 2014
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69145.pdf

    TE32.78 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 68 Vermont Avenue

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    20 - Trinity-Spadina

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appear in support of decision A0989/13TEY of the Committee of Adjustment and to retain outside consultants as necessary to support the City's position with respect to the property at 68 Vermont Avenue.

    Origin

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina

    Summary

    An application was submitted to the Committee of Adjustment (Application No. A0989/13TEY) seeking relief from various provisions of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 and City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 in order to construct a third storey addition and a rear three-storey addition to an existing house and construct a rear detached garage. These include variances to the maximum floor space index of 1.0 times the lot area whereas 0.6 times is permitted, the maximum permitted coverage of an ancillary building of 15.56% of the lot area whereas 10% is permitted, and variances under 438-86 for reduced side yard setbacks. The Committee of Adjustment refused the requested minor variances in a decision dated February 19, 2014, concluding the variances did not meet the intent and purpose of either the Official Plan or Zoning By-law. The applicant has appealed that decision to the Ontario Municipal Board and a hearing has been scheduled for July 3, 2014.

     

    The consent and variances as a whole do not respect and reinforce the character of the neighbourhood and raise issues of light and privacy for neighbouring properties. Accordingly, the following recommendation seeks to instruct staff to appear in support of the Committee of Adjustment decisions. Planning has not written a report on the application, so it is also recommended that the City Solicitor be granted authority to retain an outside planning consultant to provide expert evidence before the Board.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 68 Vermont Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69254.pdf

    TE32.82 - Renaming of Cawthra Square Park to Barbara Hall Park

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
    Attention
    Communications TE32.82.2 to TE32.82.9 have been submitted on this Item

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the renaming of Cawthra Square Park to "Barbara Hall Park".

    Origin

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Ward 27, Toronto Centre-Rosedale

    Summary

    Barbara Hall was the 61st Mayor of Toronto.  She served on Toronto City Council from 1985 – 1994 as City Councillor for Ward 7, where she sat as Budget Chief and also led initiatives on homelessness and worked with housing advocates for supportive and affordable housing for AIDS patients.  She was a staunch housing advocate and fought hard for improved policies for co-operative housing and by-laws affecting tenants.

     

    For almost 40 years, Ms. Hall has been a public, visible and committed champion of human rights.  As a community activist in the 1980s, she forged a close relationship with the gay and lesbian community and worked with a group of criminal defence lawyers, founding the Right to Privacy Committee following the devastating Toronto bath house raids in 1981.   As a member of the Toronto Board of Health, she championed funding for programming to residents living with HIV/AIDS and helped to confront fear and misunderstanding of the disease in Toronto.

     

    In 1994 when Ms. Hall was elected as Mayor of Toronto, she became the first big-city mayor to march in a Gay Pride Parade. Her prominent support  for LGBTQ2S people helped set a new standard of acceptance for a community that was once shunned. She was a force of progressive social change in a city that was becoming one of the most diversely composited in the world.

     

    Ms. Hall served as the first chair of The 519 Church Street Community Centre's capital campaign when it began its ambitious expansion plans for new additions.  She was instrumental in rallying the support of prominent donors to ensure The 519's fundraising efforts were successful. The expansion enabled Canada's LGBTQ2S community centre to dramatically expand its services.

     

    Ms. Hall currently sits as the Chief Commissioner of the Ontario Human Rights Commission, a position she has held since 2005.  She recently launched changes to the Code by ensuring that "Gender Identity and Gender Expression" are now prohibitive grounds for discrimination.

     

    With this extensive record and dedication to human rights, notably LGBTQ2S rights in Toronto, I am requesting that Council approve the renaming of Cawthra Square park in Barbara Hall's honour and to ensure that the name change be approved by Council in 2014 to commemorate the 33rd anniversary of the Bath House raids.   Attached to this letter is further background on Ms. Hall's incredible career and accomplishments.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam - Renaming of Cawthra Square Park to Barbara Hall Park
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69294.pdf
    Attachment 1 - Barbara Hall - Mayor of All the People
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69284.pdf

    Communications (Community Council)

    (May 13, 2014) E-mail from Mark Maloney (TE.Supp.TE32.82.1)

    Communications (City Council)

    (May 16, 2014) E-mail from Michel F. Pare (CC.Main.TE32.82.2)
    (May 15, 2014) E-mail from Kevin Keswick (CC.Main.TE32.82.3)
    (May 30, 2014) E-mail from Doug Kerr and Michael Went (CC.Main.TE32.82.4)
    (June 8, 2014) E-mail from Joe Clark (CC.Supp.TE32.82.5)
    (June 7, 2014) Letter from Rev. Dr. Brent Hawkes C.M., Senior Pastor Metropolitan Community Church of Toronto (CC.New.TE32.82.6)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48004.pdf
    (June 3, 2014) Submission from Chris Drew (CC.New.TE32.82.7)
    (June 10, 2014) E-mail from Dennis Findlay (CC.New.TE32.82.8)
    (May 25, 2014) Letter from R.J. Fabian, Co-Chair, CWNA Development Committee (CC.New.TE32.82.9)

    TE32.84 - Renaming Ecology Park after Paul Martel

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    20 - Trinity-Spadina

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve the renaming of "Ecology Park" in the Annex, as "Paul Martel Park".

    Origin

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina

    Summary

    Residents who live in the east Annex area are familiar with community member and dedicated leader Paul Martel.  Mr. Martel has donated hundreds of volunteer hours to the creation of beautiful parks in his community.  It is only fitting to recognize his contributions through the naming of his local park, which he tended to most Saturday mornings with great care.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan - Renaming Ecology Park after Paul Martel
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69305.pdf

    TE32.88 - Urban Design Guidelines for Queen Street East from Leslie Street to Coxwell Avenue

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    30 - Toronto-Danforth, 32 - Beaches-East York

    Community Council Recommendations

    The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York to assess the portion of Queen Street East between Leslie Street and Coxwell Avenue to determine whether either the existing Urban Design Guidelines for Queen Street East between Coxwell Avenue and Neville Park Boulevard or the emerging Urban Design Guidelines for Queen Street in between Jimmie Simpson Park and Leslie Avenue, and associated Official Plan policies, should be extended to apply to the portion of Queen Street East between Leslie Street and Coxwell Avenue, and report back to Toronto and East York Community Council in 2015.

    Origin

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 30, Toronto-Danforth and Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, Ward 32, Beaches-East York

    Summary

    An application has come forward which proposes to construct an 8-storey mixed use building consisting of 110 residential units and 685 square metres of grade-related retail space. The development is located at 1327-1329 Queen Street East on the boundary between Ward 30 and Ward 32.

    Background Information (Community Council)

    (May 13, 2014) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher and Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon - Urban Design Guidelines for Queen Street East from Leslie Street to Coxwell Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69315.pdf

    New Business - Meeting 52

    CC52.1 - Report on an Inquiry into Lobbying about Request for Proposal No. 9118-13-5066

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Origin

    (May 28, 2014) Report from the Lobbyist Registrar

    Recommendations

    The Lobbyist Registrar recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council receive the findings in the attached report.

    Summary

    This is a report on the Lobbyist Registrar’s inquiry into whether the Principal/CEO of Forge Media and Design (the respondent) contravened the Lobbying By-law, § 140-41A by writing to the City Manager and Mayor’s Office about Request for Proposal 9118-13-5066 (the RFP) on October 30, 2013.  The Lobbyist Registrar found that the respondent contravened § 140-41A by writing to the City Manager and Mayor’s Office about the RFP after the RFP was issued and before its award.

     

    The City’s Procurement Processes Policy, section 5.0, restricts all communications about the RFP to the staff contact person named in a procurement document from the time the procurement is issued until its award.  All other communications with public office holders about the procurement during this “blackout period” are prohibited.

     

    The respondent complied with the restrictions on communications about the RFP after receiving advice from Purchasing and Materials Management Division (PMMD).  The respondent co-operated with the inquiry by providing the information requested of him.  This was his first contravention of the Lobbying By-law.  As a result, no sanction is imposed.

     

    The Lobbyist Registrar advises the respondent to comply with the restrictions on communications about procurements and with the Lobbying By-law; and requests that the Principal/CEO attend a training session provided by the Office of the Lobbyist Registrar (OLR).

     

    The Lobbyist Registrar makes this Report to Council as this is a procurement matter and it is in the public interest to do so.

    Background Information

    (May 28, 2014) Covering Report from the Lobbyist Registrar submitting an Inquiry Report on Lobbying about Request for Proposal No. 9118-13-5066 (CC52.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70073.pdf
    (May 28, 2014) Inquiry Report from the Lobbyist Registrar on Lobbying about Request for Proposal No. 9118-13-5066
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70077.pdf

    CC52.2 - Report on an Inquiry into Communications about Request for Proposal No. 0513-13-7010

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Origin

    (May 28, 2014) Report from the Lobbyist Registrar

    Recommendations

    The Lobbyist Registrar recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council receive the findings in the attached report.

    Summary

    This is a report on the Lobbyist Registrar’s inquiry into whether the Executive Director of Lakeshore Area Multi-Services Project Inc. (LAMP) contravened § 140-41A of the Lobbying By-law by contacting a member of Toronto City Council about a procurement process, Request for Proposal No. 0513-13-7010 (the RFP); and by publishing a blog that encouraged readers to contact members of Council on LAMP’s behalf about the RFP.

     

    The Registrar found that LAMP’s Executive Director did not contravene § 140-41A when he published the blog and contacted the member of Council about RFP 0513-13-7010.  The Lobbying By law did not apply to his communications on LAMP’s behalf because LAMP is a not for-profit community services sector organization.  By virtue of § 140-4, LAMP’s members, staff, and officers are not considered to be lobbyists when acting in their official capacity. 

     

    Since the Lobbying By-law did not apply, the Executive Director did not breach the Lobbying By law by communicating with public office holders and publishing a blog about the RFP.  As a result, the Registrar has imposed no sanctions. 

     

    However, the Registrar found that the Executive Director’s communications were subject to the restrictions on communications in the City’s Procurement Processes Policy, section 5.0.  This report is referred to the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management for follow up.

    Background Information

    (May 28, 2014) Covering Report from the Lobbyist Registrar, submitting an Inquiry Report on Communications about Request for Proposal No. 0513-13-7010 (CC52.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70091.pdf
    (May 28, 2014) Inquiry Report from the Lobbyist Registrar on Communications by a Not-for-Profit Community Services Sector Organization with Public Office Holders about Request for Proposal No. 0513-13-7010
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70092.pdf

    CC52.3 - Vacancy in the Office of Councillor, Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    20 - Trinity-Spadina

    Origin

    (June 2, 2014) Report from the City Clerk

    Recommendations

    The City Clerk recommends:

     

    1.         City Council declare the office of Councillor, Ward 20 – Trinity-Spadina to be vacant.

     

    2.         City Council fill the vacancy by appointing a person qualified to hold office in the City of Toronto at a special meeting to be held on Monday, July 7, 2014 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chamber, in accordance with the following:

     

                 a.        The City Clerk shall advertise the vacancy inviting any interested and qualified applicants to seek appointment to City Council.

     

                 b.        Interested persons shall complete a Consent of Nominee and Declaration of Qualification and provide personal identification showing their name and qualifying address within the City of Toronto.

     

                 c.        The deadline for submitting the required forms to the City Clerk shall be Friday, June 20, 2014 at 4:30 p.m.

     

                 d.        The City Clerk shall submit a report with the list of applicants for publication on the agenda of the July 7, 2014 City Council meeting.

     

                 e.        Each applicant shall be provided the opportunity to address City Council for up to 5 minutes.

     

                 f.         The order in which applicants address City Council shall be determined by lot drawn by the City Clerk when City Council begins its debate on the item.

     

                 g.        Members of City Council shall be entitled to ask one question of each candidate.

     

                 h.        City Council shall vote on the appointment by ballot in accordance with the Council Procedures.

               

                 i.         City Council shall enact a by-law confirming the appointment of the successful candidate to the office for the remainder of the term of the present Council.

     

    3.         City Council waive the requirements of the Council Procedures for the City Clerk to canvass Members for their interest in appointments to vacancies on committees and boards, and instead proceed to appoint a Member to fill the vacancy on the Disability Issues Committee at the same meeting at which this report is considered.

    Summary

    Councillor Adam Vaughan has resigned the office of Councillor for Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina.

     

    Council must officially declare the seat vacant, and within 60 days of doing so, fill the vacancy by appointing a person qualified to hold municipal office in the City of Toronto, other than a current Member of City Council.

     

    A by-election is not permitted as the vacancy has occurred after March 31 in an election year.  City Council is not permitted to leave the seat vacant for the balance of the term.

    Background Information

    (June 2, 2014) Report from the City Clerk on Vacancy in the Office of Councillor, Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina (CC52.3)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70102.pdf

    CC52.4 - Toronto Street Furniture Program - Agreement Modifications Update

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    The City Manager has submitted a report on this Item (CC52.4a with recommendations)

    Second Item on Wednesday July 11

    Confidential Attachment - The security of the property belonging to the City or one of its agencies, boards and commisisons

    Origin

    (June 3, 2014) Report from the City Manager

    Recommendations

    The General Manager, Transportation Services recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council adopt the confidential recommendation in Confidential Attachment 1 and authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services and the City Solicitor to amend the Street Furniture Agreement on the terms and conditions previously adopted by Council, subject to the terms and conditions as set out in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

     

    2.         Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential as it contains information which relates to the security of property belonging to the City or one of its agencies, boards and corporations, provided that the confidential recommendations may be released publically upon the execution of an approved amending Agreement incorporating the terms and conditions previously adopted by Council, subject to the terms and conditions as set out in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

    Summary

    The report provides the results of the confidential instructions to staff from City Council on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 regarding recommended amendments to the Toronto Street Furniture Agreement.

    Background Information

    (June 4, 2014) Supplementary report from the City Manager on Toronto Street Furniture Program - Agreement Modifications Update (CC52.4a)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70334.pdf
    Confidential Attachment 1
    (June 3, 2014) Report from the City Manager on the Toronto Street Furniture Program - Agreement Modifications Update - Notice of Pending Report (CC52.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70141.pdf

    CC52.5 - Appointment of the Toronto Ombudsman

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable person and labour relations or employee negotiations

    Origin

    (June 2, 2014) Report from the City Manager

    Recommendations

    The City Manager recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council consider the appointment of the Ombudsman and confidential Attachment 1.

     

    2.         City Council direct the confidential instructions adopted by City Council remain confidential at this time and be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

    Summary

    City Council at its meeting on October 30, 2012 considered the re-appointment of the Toronto Ombudsman for an additional five (5) year non-renewable term.  City Council adopted to extend the term of the Ombudsman to November 16, 2015 on the same terms and conditions.

     

    As specified in the Toronto Ombudsman’s Employment Agreement with the City of Toronto, the City, as the employer, is required to notify the Toronto Ombudsman by November 16, 2014 whether the City intends to re-appoint the Ombudsman for an additional five (5) year non-renewable term.

    Background Information

    (June 2, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Appointment of the Toronto Ombudsman (CC52.5)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70121.pdf
    Confidential Attachment 1

    CC52.6 - Appointment of a Toronto Integrity Commissioner

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Bill 550 has been submitted on this Item.

    Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable person and labour relations or employee negotiations

    Origin

    (June 3, 2014) Report from Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly

    Recommendations

    The Selection Panel recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council appoint as Integrity Commissioner the candidate identified in confidential Attachment 1 to this report effective September 6, 2014 or the date upon which the recommended candidate enters into an employment agreement with the City of Toronto whichever occurs last, for a 5-year non-renewable term ending on September 6, 2019.

     

    2.         The City Manager be authorized to negotiate the standard employment agreement for Accountability Officers with the recommended candidate and to execute any related documents as necessary.

     

    3.         City Council authorize the public release of the name and summary profile of the Integrity Commissioner contained in confidential Attachment 1 upon approval of the appointment of the Integrity Commissioner and at the conclusion of the June 10 and 11, 2014 Council meeting.

    Summary

    I am pleased to transmit the report from the Selection Panel recommending appointment of an Integrity Commissioner as identified in the confidential Attachment.

     

    Toronto’s Integrity Commissioner, Janet Leiper, was appointed by City Council at its meeting on August 5 and 6, 2009 for a non-renewable five-year term.  The Integrity Commissioner's term ends on September 5, 2014.

     

    At its meeting on November 18, 2013, City Council delegated the appointment and chairing (or designating the chair) of the Selection Panel to the Deputy Mayor.  I appointed a Selection Panel that included Councillor Lindsay Luby (chair), Councillor Doucette, Councillor McMahon and Councillor Robinson.  The Integrity Commissioner Selection Panel undertook a comprehensive recruitment process to recommend a preferred candidate to City Council. The Selection Panel was assisted by an independent external search firm.

     

    I want to thank the Selection Panel for their participation in the recruitment process and for their efforts to ensure a successful outcome for this very important position.

    Background Information

    (June 3, 2014) Transmittal from Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly on Appointment of a Toronto Integrity Commissioner (CC52.6)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70106.pdf
    (June 3, 2014) Report from the Chair, Integrity Commissioner Selection Panel on Appointment of a Toronto Integrity Commissioner
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70107.pdf
    Confidential Attachment 1
    Summary Profile of Valerie J. Jepson
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70959.pdf

    CC52.7 - Appointment of a Toronto Auditor General

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Bill 549 has been submitted on this Item.

    Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable person and labour relations or employee negotations

    Origin

    (June 3, 2014) Report from Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly

    Recommendations

    The Selection Panel recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council appoint as Auditor General the candidate identified in confidential Attachment 1 to this report effective December 16, 2014 or the date upon which the recommended candidate enters into an employment agreement with the City of Toronto whichever occurs last, for a 7-year non-renewable term ending on December 16, 2021.

     

    2.         The City Manager be authorized to negotiate the standard employment agreement for Accountability Officers with the recommended candidate and to execute any related documents as necessary.

     

    3.         City Council authorize the public release of the name and summary profile of the Auditor General contained in confidential Attachment 1 upon approval of the appointment of the Auditor General and at the conclusion of the June 10 and 11, 2014 Council meeting.

    Summary

    I am pleased to transmit the report from the Selection Panel recommending appointment of an Auditor General as identified in the confidential Attachment.

     

    Toronto’s Auditor General, Jeffrey Griffiths, was appointed by City Council at its meeting on April 12 and 13, 2011 for an additional non-renewable three-year term.  The Auditor General's term ends on December 16, 2014.

     

    At its meeting on November 18, 2013, City Council delegated the appointment and chairing (or designating the chair) of the Selection Panel to the Deputy Mayor.  I appointed a Selection Panel that included Councillor Lindsay Luby (chair), Councillor Doucette, Councillor McMahon and Councillor Robinson as well as Jim McCarter, the former Auditor General of Ontario.  The Auditor General Selection Panel undertook a comprehensive recruitment process to recommend a preferred candidate to City Council. The Selection Panel was assisted by an independent external search firm.

     

    I want to thank the Panel for their participation in the recruitment process and for their efforts to ensure a successful outcome for this very important position.

    Background Information

    (June 3, 2014) Transmittal from Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly on Appointment of a Toronto Auditor General
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70151.pdf
    (June 2, 2014) Report from the Chair, Auditor General Selection Panel on Appointment of a Toronto Auditor General
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70152.pdf
    Confidential Attachment 1
    Summary Profle of Beverly Romeo-Beehler
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70960.pdf

    CC52.8 - 2013 External Auditor’s Reports for the Integrity Commissioner, Lobbyist Registrar and Ombudsman Offices

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All

    Origin

    (May 22, 2014) Report from Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly

    Summary

    The Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 3 (“Accountability Officers”), requires that the City’s Accountability Officers undergo an annual audit by an external auditor, a practice that began with the Auditor General.  As directed by City Council, the City Manager facilitated the request for proposal process and retained Hilborn LLP to undertake this work.

     

    The external auditors have completed their review.  I am transmitting to City Council the external auditor’s reports for the Integrity Commissioner, Lobbyist Registrar and Ombudsman for the year ended December 31, 2013 for information.

     

    At City Council, the City Manager will be available to answer questions about the request for proposal process and Mr. Blair MacKenzie from Hilborn LLP will be available to answer questions about the audit process.

    Background Information

    (May 22, 2014) Transmittal from Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, forwarding the External Auditor's 2013 Reports for the Office of the Integrity Commissioner, the Lobbyist Registrar and the Ombudsman (CC52.8)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70159.pdf
    (May 20, 2014) External Auditor's Report on the Integrity Commissioner's Office for the year ended December 31, 2013
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70161.pdf
    (May 20, 2014) External Auditor's Report on the Lobbyist Registrar's Office for the year ended December 31, 2013
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70162.pdf
    (May 20, 2014) External Auditor's Report on the Ombudsman's Office for the year ended December 31, 2013
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70163.pdf

    CC52.9 - Prince Edward Viaduct Pier Rehabilitation: Cable Replacement

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 29 - Toronto-Danforth, 30 - Toronto-Danforth

    Origin

    (June 3, 2014) Report from the City Manager

    Recommendations

    The City Manager recommends:

     

    1.         Council confirm approval to proceed with the unbudgeted cable replacement project, estimated at $2,782,000 in conjunction with the City's Prince's Edward Viaduct pier (PEV) rehabilitation.

    Summary

    The purpose of this report is to transmit a report considered by the TTC Board on May 28, 2014, entitled "Prince Edward Viaduct Pier Rehabilitation: Cable Replacement" (Attachment 1 and 2).  In order for the City to complete rehabilitation work on the Prince Edward Viaduct (PEV), replacement of TTC cabling and conduits mounted throughout the length of the bridge, is required prior to the City's contractor commencing work on the PEV.  The replacement of TTC cabling is time sensitive, due to the need for the rehabilitation work on the PEV to be completed prior to the 2015 Pan Am Games.

     

    The TTC Board confirmed approval to proceed with the unbudgeted cable replacement project, estimated at $2,782,000 in conjunction with the City's PEV rehabilitation, and to forward the report for City Council approval.  In order to allow for sufficient funds to accommodate the work, a number of projects have been identified within the TTC's 2014-2023 Capital Budget for deferral.  The cable replacement PEV project will be reflected in the next TTC 2015-2024 capital budget submission.  This report recommends Council approve the staff recommendation to proceed with the necessary cable replacement work.

    Background Information

    (June 3, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Prince Edward Viaduct Pier Rehabilitation: Cable Replacement (CC52.9)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70166.pdf
    (May 29, 2014) Attachment 1 - Letter of transmittal to the City Manager from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, Toronto Transit Commission
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70167.pdf
    (May 28, 2014) Attachment 2 - Toronto Transit Commission Report No. 16, Prince Edward Viaduct Pier Rehabilitaiton: Cable Replacement
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70168.pdf

    Member Motions - Meeting 52

    MM52.1 - "Parking Stall" - Report on Outstanding Council requests on Parking-related matters - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * City Council on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 waived referral of this Motion. City Council subsequently deferred this Motion to the June 10 and 11, 2014 meeting.
    * This Motion is before Council for debate.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to bring forward a report addressing outstanding Council requests on parking-related matters, including Item PW20.9.

     

    2.         City Council request the City Manager to discuss the Operational Guidelines with the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board to establish an operational grace period that aligns with the City's established cancellation policies for alternate-side parking.

     

    3.         City Council request the Treasurer and the General Manager, Transportation Services to improve the City of Toronto website to make clear the cancellation guidelines and ensure that residents are warned prior to completing their electronic payment that the ticket can be cancelled.

    Summary

    Many residents in the older neighbourhoods of Toronto do not have driveways and rely on street permit parking for their vehicles. Over this term, Council has passed a number of motions to simplify the experience for residents parking on their streets and in pay-and-display areas. Some of those motions have resulted in successful programs, such as the weekender and overnight temporary permit.

     

    Unfortunately, other parking reforms have stalled. Council has requested that the Toronto Police Service extend its operational grace period on switchover day for alternate side parking from 9:00 p.m. - 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. - 12:01 p.m., providing residents with an additional 3 hours to complete the changes. While Toronto Police Service's Parking Enforcement has not changed its operation guidlelines to reflect this reasonable policy change, the City has a policy to cancel these tickets upon request.

     

    Upon the City's request, Parking Enforcement honoured a 15-day grace period from April 1-15, 2014 for alternate side parking due to the late thaw this year. It would reason that honouring a 3-hour extension of the grace period for switchover day should not be entangled in red tape.

     

    On December 6, 2012 Council requested a report on establishing a 20-minute grace period for residents to unload their vehicles in front of their homes when no parking is available. Despite the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee requesting the General Manager for Transportation Services to prepare a report at its January 23, 2013 meeting, no report has yet come forward.

     

    Residents should not be continually penalized by a system that makes parking harder than it has to be.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.1)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.1
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70028.pdf

    MM52.2 - Transforming the Child Care Centre Quality Rating System - by Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Community Development and Recreation Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:

     

     1.        City Council request the General Manager, Children Services to review the financial feasibility of adding another day to the Child Care Centre Quality Rating evaluation the City already does and to submit a report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee at the same time the Toronto Child Care Service Plan will be up for review.

    Summary

    During the last five years, children care centres that have a service contract for fee subsidy have been given scores out of 4 for quality in their centres.  These scores then are posted online for parents to decide where they want their children to attend.  The scores are based on a one day evaluation. 

     

    Directors of child care centres in the City, have from the beginning, asked for more time for the evaluation to take place.  Instead of a staff member coming in for a one day evaluation they would like to see a two or three day evaluation to give parents a greater snap shot of how child care centres operate in the City.

     

    The current policy is to go in for one day to monitor the day's activities and then give a score of different criteria out of 4.  A score of 4 is the highest score a child care centre can get in the City of Toronto.  This policy only provides a snap shot of what our child care centres do on a daily basis.  This does not give the full picture and does not do justice to the parents and child care operators in the City of Toronto.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.2)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.2
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70069.pdf

    MM52.3 - Hydro Corridor Lease Agreements - by Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Recommendations

     Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate a licence lease agreement with Hydro One (Ontario Realty Corporation) as an initial measure that can transform the Hydro Corridor lands located north of Dupont Street and the CP Railway, and running from Earlscourt Park to the Annex, into parkland with recreational amenities that are compatible with the land conditions and that this matter be considered during the 2015 Budget Process.

    Summary

    The west-end hydro corridor has the potential to become an iconic landscape in the City of Toronto, as it can provide a continuous green space for local residents.  These subject lands are located north of Dupont Street and the CP Railway, and run from Earlscourt Park to the Annex. Currently, this corridor provides much needed spatial relief to an area that is compact and densely built. It also serves a community that is one of the most park-deprived neighbourhoods in the City of Toronto.  However, only pockets of these subject lands are leased by the City, leaving behind fragmented open spaces with large areas of abandoned landscapes.  This includes: the Wiltshire Avenue Corridor, located between Davenport Road and St. Clair Avenue West; the Geary Avenue Lands, located east of Dovercourt Road to Geary Parkette; and the Geary Avenue Lands, located west of Dovercourt Road.  These open landscapes have a tremendous potential to be re-used as a linear park.  It can provide the community with much needed amenities that will enhance the City's public realm, while providing residents with a safe and accessible place to enjoy the outdoors.

     

    This subject corridor is owned by the Ontario Realty Corporation with Hydro One as the primary user.  The Province has a policy for secondary uses of hydro corridors in place (the Provincial Secondary Land Use Program) and the City already has long-term licences for eight portions of the hydro corridor that are City parks.  These parks are well used by the community and include sports fields, splash pads, allotment gardens and playgrounds.  However, by not leasing the entire corridor, many of these open spaces have been abandoned and left in poor conditions. It also deprives the local community of a continuous physical connection for pedestrians and cyclists.

     

    Given the community's strong support towards the revitalization of these lands, Workshop Architecture, an architectural firm located in Ward 17 Davenport, recently organized an international design competition - Green Line Ideas Competition.  This competition attracted many bold visions and proposals from architects, landscape architects, planners, artists and community members that contributed to an overall vision for the public use of this subject hydro corridor.  Seventy-seven proposals were submitted to this competition from around the world, all of which clearly elaborated the need to revitalize and reclaim these lands for public use as a measure to enhance the City's public realm.

     

    Similar to Toronto's Kay Gardner Beltline Park and New York City's High Line, infrastructure and its respective open spaces must be re-evaluated for future and innovative uses.  It is therefore imperative that the City take the initiative to pursue ways that can enable the community to use these lands in new and enjoyable ways.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.3)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.3
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70089.pdf
    (June 11, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70899.pdf

    MM52.4 - Lead in Drinking Water Mitigation Strategy - by Councillor Janet Davis, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Janet Davis, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Medical Officer of Health, in consultation with General Manager, Toronto Water, to submit a report to the August 18, 2014 meeting of the Board of Health, such report to include:

     

    a.         recent research findings on health impacts of lead in drinking water;

     

    b.         an update on the implementation of Toronto's public education programs on lead in drinking water;

     

    c.         test results and protocols required by the Ministry of Education with respect to lead pipes in schools; and

     

    d.         any recommended improvements to the Lead in Drinking Water Mitigation Strategy from a public health perspective.

     

    2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water, in consultation with the Medical Officer of Health, to submit a report to the August 13, 2014 meeting of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on the implementation of the Lead in Drinking Water Mitigation Strategy, including implementation updates on the Corrosion Control Program, Water Service Replacement Program, and Faucet Filter Program.

     

    3.         City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to submit a report to the August 13, 2014 meeting of Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on the feasibility of developing a Lead Service Replacement Loan program with installments paid through water bills or property taxes based on a model similar to the Home Energy Loan Program (HELP).

     

    4.         City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water to report to the August 13, 2014 meeting of Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on the feasibility and estimated cost of:

     

    a.         restoring the 5,000 "planned" lead service replacements on streets scheduled for  resurfacing and "stand-alone" service replacement in conjunction with the Water Meter Replacement program that were cut in 2011;  and

     

    b.         reducing the service standard of "up to 12 weeks" and increasing the number of  Priority "High-Lead" service replacements.

    Summary

    In 2007, Council approved a strategy to accelerate the replacement of water pipes made of lead that remained in an estimated 65,000 homes built before 1951.  The plan was to replace 11,000 water service connections over a nine year period, starting in 2008.  Of those, 9,000 would be "planned" and replaced on a street-by-street basis as part of the City road and water capital program. Another 1,500 replacements would be "on demand" and replaced on a case-by-case basis, most often because of high-lead test results or broken pipes. 

     

    In January 2011, Council adopted a new Lead in Drinking Water Strategy. The revised Water Service Replacement Program budget was cut from $38.5 million to $17.5 million annually.  The total number of service replacements was reduced by 6,000 (from 11,000 to 5,000 annually).  All replacements that were to be coordinated with water meter installation and non-arterial road resurfacing were eliminated. 

     

    In August 2011, as part of the Lead in Drinking Water Mitigation Strategy, Council also approved a  "Corrosion Control Plan" to introduce "orthophosphate" into drinking water which will, over time, build a protective coating on the inside of all water pipes.  The plan, which was originally estimated for completion in 2013, involves installing new infrastructure at all four water treatment plants at an estimated capital cost of $6 to $8 million, and an annual operating cost of $1.6 million. The Strategy also includes a $50 and $100 Faucet Filter Rebate program to assist eligible residents with the cost of installing an NSF/ANSI-053 certified filter. 

     

    Recent media reports have demonstrated that many areas of the City continue to have high-lead levels in their water. Reports from Toronto Water staff also appear to show that the number of water service replacements has fallen short of our targets, and the Corrosion Control plan is behind schedule.   

     

    Despite the new strategy to implement Corrosion Control, replacing the entire lead pipe, both private and public portions, is the best way to fully eliminate the risk of lead in water.  Full replacement  remains the recommended approach of public health officials across North America and around the world.  Council has a responsibility to oversee and initiate additional measures to encourage the full replacement of lead pipes in Toronto.  In light of the recent public concern about lead pipes, I believe Council should receive a comprehensive update on the status of this program.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.4)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.4
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70071.pdf

    MM52.5 - Proposal to adopt a more environmentally friendly policy for end-of-contract Blackberry devices - by Councillor Chin Lee, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Government Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Chin Lee, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council adopt a policy to permit each Blackberry device user to purchase their end-of-contract Blackberry devices from the City of Toronto at a nominal fee, and that requires device users who purchase their Blackberry device to sign a waiver absolving the City from all liabilities regarding the continued use of the purchased device.

    Summary

    Toronto City Councillors and staff are issued Blackberry devices by the City of Toronto for use for City business.  When these Blackberry devices reach end-of-contract (or end-of-term) and are returned to the City, the current policy is to destroy them for privacy and security reasons due to the unique hardware PIN associated with each Blackberry device.

     

    These Blackberry devices are still useable, therefore the policy to destroy the devices is wasteful and not environmentally-friendly, contributing to society's electronic waste problem.

     

    To reduce this wasteful practice while preserving the privacy of the current user and also anyone communicating with the current user, the current user should be provided with the option to purchase the device by signing a waiver assuming all responsibility for the device and absolving the City of Toronto from all liabilities regarding its continued use.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.5)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.5
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70072.pdf

    MM52.6 - Maintaining the Cleanliness of our Business - by Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Licensing and Standards Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to review the feasibility of adding a condition to business licences to ensure that business operators are held responsible for maintaining the streetscape fronting their business store fronts in a neat and orderly fashion, and clear of all debris, cigarette butts, etc.

     

    2.         City Council request the Multi-divisional Litter Working Group to investigate the feasibility of mandating cigarette dispensers at locations that have a habitual problem, but take no action, as part of the pilot project on cigarette butt receptacles at restaurant, bars, nightclubs and other businesses.

    Summary

    Toronto's commercial strips have become the economic engine of our local neighbourhoods. Our communities work very hard and invest tremendous amounts of time and talent to attract businesses that serve the diverse needs of Toronto, including restaurants, salons, boutiques, cafés, and medical offices.

     

    In order to establish safer and healthier communities throughout the City, it is important that the uses and activities along these commercial strips live in harmony with residents in the surrounding area.

     

    As the Chair of the Licensing and Standards Committee, I have received numerous complaints regarding some establishments that cater to a boisterous clientele which have become an ongoing issue that is deflating Torontonians' sense of community and safety. Unruly behavior, excessive loud noise and litter, are preventing residents from enjoying the peace and tranquility of their homes.

     

    One of the major complaints we receive on a continual basis is the level of litter, especially cigarette butts that plague certain establishments creating a real eyesore on the public sidewalks and precipitating a slippery slope leading to a rundown area.

     

    While most establishments act responsibly and clean up after their patrons, some have taken the approach that what happens outside their business is not their problem and take no action to keep the area clean.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.6)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.6
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70075.pdf
    Photographs of cigarette butts on City streets
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70076.pdf

    MM52.7 - Engineering Infrastructure for New Builds in Established Communities - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Peter Milczyn

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Peter Milczyn, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B to review and to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee for its meeting on August 7, 2014 on the policy and procedures followed in the event of new developments within existing communities, such report to outline measures undertaken to protect existing homes and buildings surrounding the new development from future problems arising from the new construction, including:

     

    a.         grading;

     

    b.         flooding; and

     

    c.         exterior water pooling (etc);

     

    such report to also include recommendations on where amendments are required to ensure the protection of adjacent homeowners.

    Summary

    Many communities across the City of Toronto are experiencing new developments within existing neighbourhoods.  Although the new construction sites are small in nature, they raise many questions to the surrounding homes and buildings directly impacted by possible grade changes.

     

    On occasion, the new development has raised concerns with water drainage and other outdoor flooding issues for adjacent properties after the new development has been completed and has received grading certificates and other planning and engineering approvals granted by the City.

     

    Although the approvals are in place, the grading issues are apparent on site soon after or several months following the completion of the construction.  The original adjacent residents are then placed in a position to advocate to the City on their own having to endure for several months or years damages incurred on their properties due to the new construction.

     

    It would be appropriate for the City of Toronto to review the procedures currently in place to determine if revisions are required to ensure that all precautions are reviewed and undertaken by City staff when addressing engineering infrastructure for new builds in established communities.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.7)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.7
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70093.pdf

    MM52.8 - Requirement to Register with the Lobbyist Registrar`s Office - by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, seconded by Councillor John Parker

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Communications MM52.8.1 to MM52.8.11 have been submitted on this Item.

    Recommendations

    Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, seconded by Councillor John Parker, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Lobbyist Registrar to report back to City Council by the July 8 and 9, 2014 Council meeting, on how to implement the following amendments to the Lobbying Chapter of the Municipal Code:

     

    a.         Non-profit organizations, unions and all community organizations designed to target specific City-wide issues resulting in financial impacts, who are lobbying on issues other than their own funding process, should not be exempt from registering with the Lobbyist Registry; and

     

    b.         All grass roots campaigns, regardless of who started them, should be required to follow the rules of the Lobbyist Registry and should be required to register. 

    Summary

    In 2008, the Lobbyist Registrar recommended that the non-profit community services sector be exempted from registering.

     

    Up until that time, Section 140-4 of the Toronto Municipal Code required non-for-profit community services to register only when they wish to lobby regarding applications for grants, awards or other financial benefits, or when they hired a consultant to lobby for them. 

     

    The exemption however is now being used beyond its original intent. The now overwhelming campaigns led by non-profit organizations that pressure elected officials are hidden from the public as they are not recorded in the Lobbyist Register. Similar campaigns are run by other organizations, including unions, without the need to register.

     

    Given this, there is a serious need to amend the current City of Toronto Lobbying Chapter.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.8)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.8
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70154.pdf

    Communications

    (June 8, 2014) Letter from Timothy Dobson, Chairman, Lakeshore Planning Corp. (MM.Supp.MM52.8.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-47924.pdf
    (June 9, 2014) Letter from David Fleming, Executive Secretary, Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association (MM.New.MM52.8.2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-47970.pdf
    (June 9, 2014) E-mail from David Harrison, Chair, Annex Residents' Association (MM.New.MM52.8.3)
    (June 9, 2014) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Carol Burtin-Fripp, Co-Presidents, Leaside Property Owners Association Incorporated (MM.New.MM52.8.4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-47972.pdf
    (June 9, 2014) E-mail from Ulla Colgrass, York Quay Neighbourhood Association (YQNA) (MM.New.MM52.8.5)
    (June 7, 2014) Letter from Eileen Denny, Confederation of Resident & Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CORRA) (MM.New.MM52.8.6)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-47960.pdf
    (June 9, 2014) E-mail from Sue Dexter, Harbord Village Residents' Association (MM.New.MM52.8.7)
    (June 10, 2014) Letter from Eileen Denny, President Teddington Park Residents Association Inc. (MM.New.MM52.8.8)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-48002.pdf
    (June 10, 2014) Letter from David Layton, President and Garry Pruden, Chief Executive Officer, Community Living Toronto (MM.New.MM52.8.9)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-48012.pdf
    (June 10, 2014) E-mail from Julie Mathien (MM.New.MM52.8.10)
    (June 11, 2014) Letter from Susan McIssac, President and CEO, United Way Toronto (MM.New.MM52.8.11)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-48022.pdf
    (June 10, 2014) Letter from 64 Organizations (duplicate number used) (MM.New.MM52.8.11)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-48245.pdf

    MM52.9 - Authorization for Shelter Staff in the City of Toronto to Conduct "Warrant Checks" as Part of the Admissions Process for Clients When On-Site Staff Deem It Necessary - by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Mike Del Grande

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Community Development and Recreation Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Mike Del Grande, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to amend regulations effective immediately to permit front line on-site shelter staff across the City to undertake "warrant checks" with the Toronto Police Service or other appropriate agencies when they deem it necessary for the security and safety of other clients or shelter staff, such information secured in the "warrant checks" to be used by shelter staff in accordance with applicable protection of privacy regulations as established by the Province of Ontario and the City of Toronto.

    Summary

    Staff in shelters across the City of Toronto has been informed by the City's Shelter, Support and Housing Administration that "warrant checks" previously secured through the Toronto Police Service are no longer permitted to be undertaken by front line staff when admitting new clients to their facilities.  This change removes a tool previously available to front line shelter staff to protect clients and on-site shelter staff from potential clients who have a history of violence.  The prohibition on these types of checks in instances where staff deem it necessary creates a potentially dangerous situation for other shelter clients and a potentially unsafe work environment for shelter staff.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.9)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.9
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70082.pdf

    MM52.10 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to the Toronto District School Board for playing field improvements at Summit Heights Public School - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor John Parker

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Recommendations

    Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor John Parker, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $75,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development of 929-939 Sheppard Avenue West (Source Account: XR3026-3700124) to provide funding to the Toronto District School Board for capital improvements to the playing fields located at Summit Heights Public School, 139 Armour Boulevard.

     

    2.         City Council direct the funds be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the Toronto District School Board has signed a Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the improved facilities drawn up in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

     

    3.         City Council authorize the execution of a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board for the capital improvements to the playing fields at Summit Heights Public School, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

     

    4.         City Council request the Director of Community Planning to participate in the preparation of the Community Access Agreement and request the City Solicitor to draw up the Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and Community Planning staff.

    Summary

    This Motion seeks to support improvements to the playing fields and playground at Summit Heights Public School. The area is park deficient and the grounds surrounding the local school act as both a school yard and community park.

     

    Section 37 funds in the amount of $100,000.00 plus accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 929-939 Sheppard Avenue West for the purposes of park and/or

    community facilities within Ward 10. This Motion proposes to provide a total of $75,000 to the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) towards the cost of improvements to the playing fields at Summit Heights Public School, located in Ward 10 at 139 Armour Boulevard. 

     

    The Community Access Agreement to be signed by the TDSB will contain provisions governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and access to the revitalized grounds at the school. The Community Access Agreement will be executed between the City and the TDSB, drawn up in consultation with the local Councillor.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014, as MM52.10)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.10
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70119.pdf
    (June 11, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70900.pdf

    MM52.11 - Upgrades to the City of Toronto Voting System Technologies - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Government Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the City Clerk to have regard for and include in the scope of election-related projects outlined in the Capital Plan, Council's request to the Province for having the ability to use ranked-ballot elections.

     

    2.         City Council request the City Clerk, when proceeding with any upgrades to the City of Toronto voting system, to include operations to accommodate ranked ballots and instant runoff voting technologies to ensure that any Requests for Proposals (RFP's) for new voting machines are compliant for ranked ballots.

     

    3.         City Council request the City Clerk to ensure that systems/voting machines encompass all necessary certified hardware and software to implement ranked choice voting that allows voters to mark and have ballots recorded according to the specific needs of ranked choice voting methods will have to be implemented to be in place for the 2018 Municipal Elections.

     

    4.         City Council request the City Clerk to report back to City Council to provide an update to ensure that the required technologies and any other provisions are adopted in the Requests for Proposals (RFP's) for new voting machines to ensure they are compliant for ranked ballots.

    Summary

    In June 2013, Council passed a motion by a wide margin (25 to 16) requesting that the provincial government pass legislation permitting the City of Toronto to use ranked ballots and instant runoff voting in municipal elections.  A decision to introduce ranked ballots would promote positive campaigns, encourage a wider discussion on City issues during municipal elections, uphold the principles of majority rule and ‘one person, one vote’, and ensure that voters were confident that their vote reflected how they want the City to move forward.

     

    In the event that the City of Toronto adopts a ranked ballot voting system, the necessary hardware and software must be in place to deliver an election using ranked ballots.  The City Clerk’s Office will need to prepare for and include in the scope of election-related projects outlined in the Capital Plan, Council’s request to the province for having the ability to use ranked-ballot elections.

     

    To have the systems in place for the 2018 Municipal Elections, all necessary certified hardware and software to implement ranked choice voting to allow voters to mark and have their ballots recorded according to the specific needs of ranked choice voting methods will have to be implemented.

     

    The system will be required to: allow voters the ability to give a unique ranking to at least three (3) candidates, be ready to utilize ballots containing ranked choice contests, vote-for-one contests as well as ballot questions on the same ballot card.  The system must also be able to reject ballots that give more than one candidate a first choice ranking.

     

    The voting system should report a contest cast vote record for each contest showing every choice or ranking made by each voter on his/her ballot, and export these records in a common database format, such as a comma delimited text file, that can be tabulated according to the ranked ballot voting method algorithm by the system as well as by independent software that can read such files.

     

    If the voting system lacks the export functionality, it will be able to tabulate the results internally according to the specific needs of ranked choice voting methods.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.11) 

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.11
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70124.pdf
    (June 11, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70901.pdf

    MM52.12 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds, 2242 and 2246 Lake Shore Boulevard West, for Electrical Engineering Services for Future Tree Lighting in the Mimico by the Lake Business Improvement Area - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council increase the approved 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture by $25,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits secured from the development at 2242 and 2246 Lake Shore Boulevard West, (source account: XR3026-3700407), for electrical engineering services for tree lighting in the Mimico by the Lake Business Improvement Area.

    Summary

    The City has a long-standing partnership with the Mimico by the Lake Business Improvement Area (BIA).  The BIA is proposing electrical engineering services for future tree lighting as a streetscape project for 2014.  However, there is currently no funding included in the 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture for this project.

     

    The funds were secured as part of a $50,000 cash contribution in the development at 2242 and 2246 Lake Shore Boulevard West for the purpose of streetscape improvements in Mimico, and have been received by the City.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.12)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.12
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70132.pdf
    (June 11, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70902.pdf

    MM52.13 - Permitting continued access for hikers at the Beare Road Landfill and adjacent Rouge Valley National Park - by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    42 - Scarborough-Rouge River
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Parks and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:

     

     1.        City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to ensure that hikers, and other users of the Rouge Valley National Park, continue to have access to all areas of the Beare Road Landfill site that they currently have access to.

    Summary

    Toronto residents have been hiking on the Bear Road Landfill site since it was formally closed some 30 years ago.

     

    Virtually all park users in the Little Rouge River area of the park cross the 150 acre Beare Road Landfill site in some way. The main Rouge River area to the west is fenced off by the Toronto Zoo and hikers are not allowed to follow the main Rouge River through the zoo property.

     

    The large land area of the former land fill site, the significant wetlands found on the site, the renaturalized areas and the look out at the highest "peak" in Toronto has attracted tens of thousands of hikers over the years and continues to be one of the most popular and accessible hiking spots in the Rouge National Park today. Prime Ministers, Premiers, Cabinet Ministers, and elected officials at all three levels of government – not to mention thousands of hikers and students – have all enjoyed the site and the vast vistas the site provides.

     

    The City and the Federal Government recently decided that the Beare Road Landfill site would not formally be part of the National Park. Since then, many park users are concerned that their access to their traditional hiking trails in this area will be denied.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.13)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.13
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70135.pdf
    (June 11, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70929.pdf

    MM52.14 - Establishing Service Standards for Elevator Repairs - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Licensing and Standards Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Communication MM52.14.1 has been submitted on this Item

    Recommendations

    Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, recommends that:

     

    1.          City Council request the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, as part of the ongoing review of Chapter 629, Property Standards, to review the feasibility of establishing service standards for elevator repairs in buildings and housing that serve vulnerable people or people with disabilities.

     

    2.          City Council request the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to review the Elevating Devices Act as part of the review of establishing service standards for elevator repairs.

     

    3.         City Council request the Province of Ontario to review the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act to establish service standards for elevator repairs in buildings with persons with disabilities.

    Summary

    Residents with disabilities and mobility challenges depend on reliable elevator services within their buildings and also in the buildings that house their medical services.  When an elevator breaks down in a residential building, elderly and disabled residents often become housebound until the elevator can be repaired.  With no timeline standards for an elevator repair, residents are held captive by  their property management or the elevator repair companies.  Furthermore, when elevators break down in the buildings where medical clinics operate, individuals who require these elevators to attend their medical appointments on higher floors, are forced to miss important and necessary medical treatment.

     

    A maximum time limit for elevator repairs should be established within our Property Standards Chapter, so that residents can have a reasonable expectation of when elevator repairs will be completed.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.14) 

     

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.14
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70137.pdf

    Communications

    (June 5, 2014) E-mail from Michelle Giardine (MM.Supp.MM52.14.1)

    MM52.15 - Toronto City Council Recognition of the D-Day Tribute Campaign - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Communication MM52.15.1 has been submitted on this Item

    Recommendations

    Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council recognize the D-Day Tribute Campaign in their work to commemorate our fallen Soldiers during World War II by memorializing them with tribute markers in the grounds of Juno Beach Centre in Normandy France - One for every Canadian who died on D-Day; June 6 1944.

     

    2.         City of Toronto sponsor 22 markers presenting fallen soldiers from "Toronto" that have not yet been sponsored at the cost of $11,000 ($500 x 22 markers) to ensure that all fallen soldiers from Toronto are honoured.

    Summary

    This year we honour the 70th Anniversary of D-Day. No words can express all of our thoughts and gratitude to all the soldiers who lost and risked their lives that day and for their families who shared their loved ones with all Canadians.  Last month the Juno Beach Centre Association organized a memorial project called Canada’s D-Day Tribute Campaign, installing tribute markers in the grounds of the Juno Beach Centre in Normandy, France, one for every Canadian who died on D-Day, June 6, 1944. This act was for all of us to pay further respect to those who paid the highest sacrifice.

     

    The tribute markers made of Canadian maple, stand a metre tall, and are topped with a plaque indicating the soldier’s name, regiment, and hometown as well as the sponsoring individual or organization. The Juno Beach Centre Association also plans to have Quick Response (QR) codes attached to each marker to link directly to a biography of the soldier produced by the Lest We Forget program. All Canadians should at one time in their lives visit June Beach to have a real appreciation for what occurred so many years ago and how the bravery of our soldiers came to win World War II.

     

    Three hundred and fifty-nine Canadians were killed in action on D-Day. Of those killed, one hundred and twenty-seven were from Ontario, and of those fifty were from Toronto, sixty-one from the present day Greater Toronto Area.  Twenty-two markers representing fallen soldiers from "Toronto" have not yet been sponsored and I am requesting that the City of Toronto sponsor these heroes at a cost of $11,000 ($500 x 22 markers) to ensure that all are honoured.

     

    Tribute markers will honour those who called Toronto home.  The City of Toronto will be joining a number of cities who have sponsored markers for their fallen soldiers:

     

    City of Kenora

    City of Markham

    County of Northern Lights, Alberta

    The City of Brighton

    The City of Fernie

    The City of Kelowna

    The City of Orillia

    The City of Calgary

    The City of Barrie

    The City of Welland

    The District of Summerland

    The District of Vanderhoof, British Columbia

    The Municipality of Colchester, Nova Scotia

    The Municipality of Greenstone

    The Municipality of Huron East (Seaforth)

    The Regional Municipality of Shellbrook

    The Town of Digby and the Province of Nova Scotia

    The Town of Fort Erie

    The Town of Fort Qu'Appelle

    The Town of Huntsville

    The Town of Saltcoats

    The Town of Shelburne

    The Town of St. Stephen

    The Township of Springwater

     

    These are in addition to the hundreds of Canadians from coast-to-coast who have committed to honouring our D-Day soldiers.

     

    The City of Toronto's recognition of the Juno Beach Centre Association's work will help to tell their stories again and encourage Toronto residents to visit the site as well as honouring those who were our neighbours.

     

    Further information may be viewed at http://www.junobeach.org, including an opportunity to view soldiers' profiles.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.15)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.15
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70139.pdf
    List of Toronto Men Killed in Action, 6 June 1944 - Unsponsored
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70230.pdf
    (June 11, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70903.pdf

    Communications

    (June 12, 2014) Submission from CBC's Newspaper Article entitled, "Toronto Ignored Requests for D-Day Tribute Donations, Group Says" (MM.New.MM52.15.1)

    MM52.16 - Request for Toronto Hydro comments to be included in City Planning Reports - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to incorporate comments from Toronto Hydro when preparing development application reports for City Council. 

    Summary

    The City of Toronto is experiencing an unprecedented building boom which is stretching the capabilities of our infrastructure and utilities.  One such utility is Toronto Hydro and the experience of frequent brownouts in several rapidly growing areas of the City illustrates that challenges remain in meeting the increased demand.  With almost 60 percent of Hydro's infrastructure requiring rebuilding over the next two decades, their comments are critical to the planning process.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.16)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.16
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70142.pdf

    MM52.17 - Community Notification with Respect to the Declaration of City Land as Surplus and the Disposal of the Land - by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Mike Del Grande

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Government Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Mike Del Grande, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council amend the process by which City land is declared surplus and sold so that:

     

                 a.        notification is required in the form of signage placed on site at the designated property, identical to that which is required for development proposals in terms of signage size and placement;

     

    b.         the signage is placed on the site for a period of no less than 60 days prior to the commencement of the process of declaring any City land as being surplus and is to remain on site until the process is complete, either with the determination that the land is not surplus or the land is declared surplus and sold; and

     

    c.         the signage is also to include a notation that local residents may seek to purchase the land if declared surplus and offered for sale.

    Summary

    The current process of review with respect to the declaration of City land as being surplus and the subsequent sale of this land if confirmed as surplus, does not adequately provide for an acceptable level of public consultation with residents and businesses in the areas surrounding these lands.  A recent example took place in Scarborough where an informal "green space" used by residents of a community for over 60 years was declared surplus and sold.  Residents were not adequately made aware of this until they were notified of a development proposal (three years after the sale) and this has resulted understandably in considerable consternation within the community.  It is imperative that the process be amended to ensure that residents are fully informed throughout the process of the disposal of City land deemed to be surplus.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.17)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.17
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70143.pdf
    (June 11, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70930.pdf

    MM52.18 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds, 1 The Esplanade, and the Release of Section 45 Funds, 33 Bay Street for streetscape improvements to Sherbourne Street - by Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council increase the 2014 approved Capital Budget for City Planning in the Civic Improvement – Places project (CUR054-03) by $177,000 for the purpose of improvements to Sherbourne Street and the Metrolinx bridge lighting to be fully funded by:

     

    a.         $100,000 in secured Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 1 The Esplanade (source account: XR3026- 3700573); and

     

    b.         $77,000 in secured Section 45 community benefits obtained from the development of 33 Bay Street (source account: XR3028-4500080).

    Summary

    Section 37 funds have been secured and received in the development at 1 The Esplanade, in the amount of $100,000.00 plus indexing and accrued interest, for the implementation of the Sherbourne Promenade Plan.   In addition, funds have been secured and received as a condition of approval of a minor variance (Section 45) application for the development at 33 Bay Street, (Committee of Adjustment file A0169/10TEY) in the amount of $77,000.00 plus accrued interest for streetscape improvements to Sherbourne Street between the railway and Queens Quay East.

     

    The City will be reconstructing Sherbourne Street from Lake Shore Boulevard East to Front Street West in 2014 allowing for the opportunity to include streetscape improvement, including street trees and pedestrian lighting.  The beautification and lighting will enhance the attractiveness of this historic area of Toronto.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.18)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.18
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70146.pdf
    (June 11, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70931.pdf

    MM52.19 - Objection to Liquor Licence Application to Remove Conditions - Polson Pier Entertainment Inc. o/a Polson Pier - 11 Polson Street - by Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    30 - Toronto-Danforth
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
    * This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) that the City of Toronto objects to the application to remove or amend conditions attached to the liquor licence for Polson Pier, 11 Polson Street (the “Premises”), as no change of circumstances has occurred at the Premises to warrant their removal or amendment, and that the LAT should issue a Proposal to Refuse the application.

     

    2.         City Council request the LAT to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

     

    3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter.

    Summary

    Polson Pier Entertainment Inc. (“Polson Pier”) is the occupant of an establishment located at 11 Polson Street (the "Premises") operating under the name Polson Pier.  On May 16, 2014, Polson Pier submitted an application to the Licence Appeal Tribunal to remove or amend several conditions that currently are attached to the liquor licence for the Premises. The conditions and proposed replacement conditions are listed in Attachment 1 to this Motion.

     

    From 1996 to 2006, the Premises was occupied by 1132165 Ontario Limited, operating under the name Docks on Cherry (the “Docks”). The Docks contained an indoor licenced area for approximately 3,000 patrons, and an outdoor licenced area for approximately 7,000 patrons. On July 24, 2006, following a twenty-six day hearing held at the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) the liquor licence for the Premises was revoked. The AGCO determined that it was not in the public interest having regards to the needs and wishes of the residents for the Docks to retain its liquor licence. The AGCO based their decision primarily on the evidence of several residents of the Toronto Islands regarding repeated noise impacts from the Docks on their daily lives. The noise originated from both indoor and outdoor music events at the Premises that included concerts and festival events.

     

    On October 25, 2007, Polson Pier applied for a new liquor licence at the Premises. The City and the Toronto Island Noise Committee (TINC) objected to the application. In advance of a hearing at the AGCO Polson Pier, TINC, and the City reached a settlement on conditions that were placed on the licence. These are the conditions that are subject to the current removal application.

     

    The City objects to the application to remove or amend conditions from the liquor licence as a change in circumstances that would warrant their removal has not occurred at the Premises. Of primary concern is the proposed removal or amendment of the conditions restricting outdoor amplified sound, prohibiting outdoor musical events including concerts, and prohibiting sound emanating from the Premises from being audible on either Ward's or Algonquin Islands. These conditions relate directly to the noise impacts that led to the previous revocation of the licence. Polson Pier intends to operate the Premises as an entertainment facility and outdoor concert venue similar to how the Premises operated as the Docks, and the noise impacts on the island residents that led to the current conditions on the licence may return.

     

    A change in circumstance has not occurred to permit the removal or amendment of the conditions currently attached to the liquor licence for the Premises. Therefore, it is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents to have the conditions removed or amended. The Licence Appeal Tribunal should issue a Proposal to Refuse the application.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.19)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.19
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70169.pdf
    Attachment 1 - Conditions to be Removed and Proposed Replacement Conditions
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70196.pdf

    MM52.20 - The 519 Sport and Recreation Project - Request to the Government of Canada to become funding partner - by Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Community Development and Recreation Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

    Communication MM52.20.1 has been submitted on this Item

    Recommendations

    Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request that the Government of Canada become a funding partner to help support the capital development costs of the new Community Sport and Recreation Centre, an initiative of The 519 Church Street Community Centre.

    Summary

    At its December 16, 2013 meeting, City Council authorized staff to develop an overall proposal for the 519 Sport and Recreation Project and enter into negotiations with Infrastructure Ontario to acquire the Wheel and Foundry site in the West Don Lands.

     

    The 519 Church Street Community Centre, with the support of a major philanthropic donor, is proposing to build the first ever Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered and Queer (LGBTQ)-focused sports and recreation centre in Toronto.  This landmark recreation facility will establish an international best practice for LGBTQ engagement in recreation and offer a range of spaces for community activities and athletic programming.  The proposed facility will also meet a service requirement for the West Don Lands community.  The facility will be developed and governed by The 519 Church Street Community Centre, in keeping with their dual mandate of responding to the needs of the local community and communities of common bond.

     

    The 519 Church Street Community Centre will leverage resources from a public sector-private foundation investment to meet this community facility need.  The proposed community centre is estimated to cost $100 million, with one third of those capital costs already guaranteed by a private donor who is working with The 519 Church Street Community Centre on an extensive capital campaign to raise the remaining funds.  One third of the costs will be secured through other private donors, and a combined one third through municipal, provincial and federal government investment.

     

    This Motion requests the Government of Canada to become a funding partner for this project.  The new recreation centre will generate positive economic activity and contribute to Canada's long-term growth and prosperity, acting as a laboratory for research on best practices for developing inclusive sport and recreation programming.  It will provide important community economic development and employment opportunities through training, internship and social enterprise business.  The facility will provide a benefit that extends beyond Toronto, generating investment, tourism, sport hosting opportunities and international admiration.

     

    The project is anticipated to become operational in 2017 subject to final City Council approval and successful Provincial negotiations.  The new facility will be the first of its kind anywhere in the world, providing a welcoming, inclusive space for Torontonians, and particularly LGBTQ people to participate in sports.  It would be a fitting legacy project to recognize Canada’s 150th birthday in 2017, and to celebrate the role of diversity in contributing to Toronto’s strength, and inclusion through sport as an essential element of our shared cultural identity.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.20)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.20
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70171.pdf

    Communications

    (June 8, 2014) E-mail from Joe Clark (MM.Supp.MM52.20.1)

    MM52.21 - Changes to the At-Grade Configuration of the Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit Project - by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson

    Notice of Motion
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has been given.
    * This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Items EX41.2 and PG32.4. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open these Items.
    * If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council approve changes to the Eglinton Connects Planning Study to remove the green trackway; permit emergency vehicles to efficiently enter and exit the trackway when on emergency response calls; and create designated separated bike lanes made possible by the removal of the green trackway and its reconfiguration for use by emergency vehicles.

    Summary

    The recommendations contained in the Eglinton Connnects Planning Study – Final Directions first presented to the Planning and Growth Management Committee and subsequently approved at the Toronto City Council meeting (Item PG32.4 – May 6, 7 and 8, 2014) contains flaws that require changes to the Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit project at grade configuration.  These relate to the best practices for ensuring the efficient and timely movement of emergency vehicles along Eglinton Avenue East and the safety of cyclists along the route.  The "greenway" along the trackway as outlined in the Eglinton Connects Planning Study impedes both of these basic requirements in terms of the configuration of the line at grade.  In its current configuration, it prevents emergency vehicles from entering the trackway which in turn requires them to use vehicle lanes and therefore these vehicles are required to move to the right into bike lanes in order to permit the passage of emergency vehicles.

     

    REQUIRES RE-OPENING

     

    Executive Committee Item EX41.2 headed "Metrolinx Rapid Transit Program - Allocation of the Public Realm Amount" and Planning and Growth Management Committee Item PG32.4 headed "Eglinton Connects Planning Study - Final Directions Report" adopted by City Council on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014, only as they pertain to the green trackway.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.21)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.21
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70081.pdf

    MM52.22 - Request to Adjust Pay Parking Machine Hours on Queen Street West between Spadina Avenue and Simcoe Street - by Councillor Josh Colle, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford

    Motion without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    20 - Trinity-Spadina
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
    * This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item PW27.13. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.
    * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Josh Colle, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York, to adjust the Pay Parking Machine Hours on Queen Street West between Spadina Avenue and Simcoe Street to end at 9:00 p.m.

     

    2.         City Council amend all related by-laws accordingly.

    Summary

    The parking machine hours were recently extended to midnight from 9:00 p.m. Local businesses and the local BIA indicate that these parking changes have had a negative impact on business as a result and have made a formal request to the Office of Ward 20 to revert parking machine hours back to ending at 9:00 p.m.

     

    This section of Queen Street West is the home to some of the City's most historic and important live music venues. Changing the parking machine hours back to ending at 9:00 p.m. is in line with the City's recent steps towards increasing City support for the music industry.

     

    Requires Re-opening:

     

    Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW27.13 – adopted by City Council December 16, 17 and 18, 2013, only as it pertains to Pay Parking Machine Hours on Queen Street West.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.22)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.22
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70366.pdf
    (June 11, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70904.pdf

    MM52.23 - Designation of a Member in the Event of the Absence of the Deputy Mayor - by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, seconded by Councillor John Parker

    Motion without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
    * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

    Recommendations

    Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, seconded by Councillor John Parker, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council designate Councillor Mike Del Grande to assume the role of the Deputy Mayor, including all the powers and duties of the Deputy Mayor, if in the opinion of the City Clerk Deputy Mayor Kelly is absent from the City or is absent due to illness.

    Summary

    City Council should designate another Member of City Council to serve in Deputy Mayor Kelly's place in the event both the Mayor and Deputy Mayor are absent. 

     

    Mayor Rob Ford is absent and Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly has assumed the powers and responsibilities of the Mayor for the duration of the Mayor's absence. 

     

    In the event both Mayor Ford and Deputy Mayor Kelly are absent, there is no provision for another Member to assume the Mayor's powers and duties, other than convening a special meeting of City Council to appoint one. 

     

    City Council should designate another Member of City Council to serve in Deputy Mayor Kelly's place in the event both the Mayor and Deputy Mayor are absent. 

     

    City Council should consider this Motion as soon as possible. Designating another Member to act in the Deputy Mayor's place ensures continuity in the event both the Mayor and Deputy Mayor are absent.

     

    Reasons for designating another Member

     

    If both the Mayor and Deputy Mayor were absent, there would be no one to exercise their powers and duties, including:

     

    ·         Chairing meetings of various committees

    ·         Calling special meetings of City Council and certain committees

    ·         Carrying out duties of the Deputy Mayor in the event of an emergency

    ·         Signing various documents and instruments

    ·         Supervising the work of the staff of the Mayor's Office and the Deputy Mayor's Office

     

    While it is true that City Council could meet to appoint another Member to act as Deputy Mayor should it be necessary, there would be time and effort required to call a special meeting of City Council by petition and there would be a gap in time when no one holds the powers of Mayor or Deputy Mayor.

     

    No title associated with the designation

     

    There is no title associated with this designation. Councillor Del Grande would only be addressed as Deputy Mayor if Deputy Mayor Kelly is absent.

     

    How the powers and duties transfer

     

    Councillor Del Grande would only assume the powers and duties of the Deputy Mayor (and the Mayor during Mayor Ford's absence) if the City Clerk is of the opinion that Deputy Mayor Kelly is absent from the City or is absent due to illness.  The City Clerk will notify Members of City Council and the City Manager should this occur.

     

    When Deputy Mayor Kelly is no longer absent, the powers and duties of the Deputy Mayor would revert to him.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014, as MM52.23)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.23
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70344.pdf

    MM52.24 - Request for Solicitor to defend Committee of Adjustment decision - 331 Walmer Road - by Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor John Filion

    Motion without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    21 - St. Paul's
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
    * This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor John Filion, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing to defend the Committee of Adjustment decision to refuse the requested variances for 331 Walmer Road.

    Summary

    The Committee of Adjustment dealt with an application for 331 Walmer Road to alter the two-storey semi-detached dwelling by constructing a rear one-storey sunroom addition.  The extension would extend the dwelling's depth to 26.82m, a full 9.82m beyond the maximum depth as per the Zoning By-law 569-2013.  The existing property has lawful-nonconforming status under the Planning Act, as the dwelling was in existence prior to the inception of the aforementioned Zoning By-law.

     

    The Committee of Adjustment has refused the application and now the applicant has appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.24)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.24
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70345.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission Application for 331 Walmer Road
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70346.pdf

    MM52.25 - Request for Solicitor to defend Committee of Adjustment decision - 33 Vesta Drive - by Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor John Filion

    Motion without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    21 - St. Paul's
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
    * This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor John Filion, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing to defend the Committee of Adjustment decision to refuse the requested variance for 33 Vesta Drive.

    Summary

    Residents of 33 Vesta Drive have requested to construct a new three-storey dwelling.  The third floor includes a roof deck at the rear, built into the roof-line.  The existing dwelling would be demolished and in its place a new three story structure would be built.  The new dwelling has yet to materialize under application A0140/05TEY.

     

    The applicant has now come back to the Committee of Adjustment with more variances for an even larger home.  The Committee has refused the application which in turn is now before the Ontario Municipal Board.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.25)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.25
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70347.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission application for 33 Vesta Drive
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70348.pdf

    MM52.26 - Review of Liquor Licence - Cake Boys Entertainment Inc. o/a Studio Bar, 824 Dundas Street West, Toronto Licence Number 812879 - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    19 - Trinity-Spadina
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
    * This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) to issue a Notice of Proposal to suspend or revoke the liquor licence for 824 Dundas Street West – Studio Bar (the “Premises”) on the grounds that the past and present conduct of the Licensee affords reasonable grounds that the business will not be operating in accordance with the law, the operation of the business is not in the public interest with regards to the needs and wishes of the residents in which the Premises is located, and the Licensee has breached a condition attached to the licence.

     

    2.         City Council request the AGCO and the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) to provide the City with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to a Notice of Proposal to suspend or revoke the licence for the Premises.

     

    3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the AGCO or the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion.

    Summary

    Cake Boys Entertainment Inc. (the “Licensee”), operating as Studio Bar, 824 Dundas Street West (the “Premises”), was granted a liquor licence by the Alcohol and Gaming Commission (“AGCO”) in March, 2014, subject to the imposition of 8 conditions. These conditions were inserted into a Consent Agreement signed by the Licensee and the City and upon the agreement's execution the City removed its objection to the liquor licence. The conditions were the product of extensive community input with the focus on preventing noise impacts on residential dwellings abutting the rear of the Premises on Euclid Avenue. A primary condition attached to the licence requires the Licensee to ensure that any sound resulting from the indoor operation of the business not be audible beyond the lot line of the property (Sound Condition).

     

    Prior to receiving their liquor licence the Licensee leased out the Premises for private events, and impacts from these events disturbed residents living on Euclid Avenue located to the rear of the Premises. Currently, there are four charges being prosecuted in the courts that stemmed from the private events; three for operating as a public hall keeper without a licence, and one for non-compliance with the City's noise by-law. Even though the events that led to the charges took place roughly a year ago, a trial date has still not been set for these matters.

     

    Since the Premises received their liquor licence, complaints made by neighbouring residents about noise impacts have triggered 13 complaint investigations by Municipal Licensing and Standards (MLS). The complaints pertain to loud music being heard by residents late into the night. Based on evidence provided to MLS by the residents, the City has recently laid three new charges for violating the City's noise by-law for incidents that took place between March 26, 2014 and May 26, 2014. A first appearance date for August 25, 2014 has been scheduled in the courts for one of the three charges.

     

    On April 26, 2014, the Licensee was advised by an MLS inspector that a charge would be forthcoming for operating the Premises as an Entertainment Establishment/Night Club without a licence. The Premises has a business licence to operate as an Eating Establishment, and a condition on the liquor licence requires the Premises to have this type of business licence. An Entertainment Establishment is not a permitted use at the Premises under the City's Zoning By-law.

     

    It is evident from the current ongoing noise impacts felt by nearby residents that the noise by-law charges from last summer, and the recently laid charges, have not been a deterrent in changing the behaviour of the Licensee and management staff at the Premises. The sound levels emanating from the Premises are not being reduced. Therefore, the City is seeking a review of the liquor licence by the AGCO for a suspension or revocation under section 15(1) of the Liquor Licence Act (the "Act") based on the following three grounds:

     

    1.         Section 6(2)(d) of the Act, the past and present conduct of the Licensee and managers of the Premises affords reasonable grounds that the business will continue to disturb residents living to the rear of the establishment, as demonstrated by the recent charges under the City's noise by-law.

     

    2.         Section 6(2)(h) of the Act, the licence is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents in which the premises is located.

     

    3.         The Licensee has breached the Sound Condition attached to the licence by continually producing sound that is disturbing nearby residents.

     

    This matter is considered urgent as the current operation of the Premises continues to impact the neighbouring residents on Euclid Avenue.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.26)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.26
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70365.pdf

    MM52.27 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to the Toronto Catholic District School Board towards playground facilities at St. Edward Catholic School, 1 Botham Road - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

    Motion without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    23 - Willowdale
    Attention
    * Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
    * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
    * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

    Recommendations

    Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $100,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development of 9 and 15 Bales Avenue, and 34 and 44 Avondale Avenue (Source Account: XR3026-3700450) for the purpose of forwarding funds to the Toronto Catholic District School Board for capital improvements to playground facilities located at St. Edward Catholic School, 1 Botham Road.

     

    2.         City Council direct that the $100,000.00 be forwarded to the Toronto Catholic District School Board upon the signing of an Undertaking by the Toronto Catholic District School Board governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

    Summary

    The funds are to be utilized to pay fifty per cent of the cost of a new playground in Ward 23 close to the North York Centre, which would be located on the property of the newly constructed St. Edward Catholic School but would be used by both students and children in the surrounding community.  Section 37 funds in the amount of $291,915.00 plus accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 9 and 15 Bales Avenue, 34 and 44 Avondale Avenue. 

     

    The use of these funds for the purpose described above meets the Section 37 criteria contained in the North York Centre Plan.  It is proposed that $100,000 of the funds be used for the playground with the balance remaining in a City account to be used for purposes to be specified at a later time.

     

    Playground installation is scheduled for completion this summer in order not to disrupt school programming.  It is therefore urgent that the City's share of the funding be confirmed this month. 

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.27)

     

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.27
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70364.pdf
    (June 11, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70905.pdf

    MM52.28 - Revised Project Phasing for Renovation and Expansion of BMO Field - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly

    Motion Without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    19 - Trinity-Spadina
    Attention
    * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
    * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council adopt the following recommendation in the attached report (June 6, 2014) from the City Manager:

     

    "1.        City Council authorize staff to negotiate a project agreement, funding contribution agreement, Toronto Argonaut facility use agreement and amendments to the BMO Field Project Agreement, Management Agreement, Toronto FC Team License and Facility User Agreements substantially on the terms and conditions set out in the amended and restated Letter of Intent ("LOI") attached in Appendix 1 to this report and such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, the General Manager and CEO of Exhibition Place in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor."

    Summary

    Following Council's approval of the original Letter of Intent (LOI) for the renovation and expansion of BMO Field at its meeting in April, it has become clear that, because of the upcoming Provincial election, and other factors, the Provincial and Federal governments are currently unable to provide the requested funding commitments to this project.

     

    Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd. has proposed revised project phasing that would allow the first and second phases of the project to proceed while negotiations continue with the Federal and Provincial governments regarding their potential contributions towards the third phase of the project, which makes the facility suitable for Canadian Football League events.

     

    As the revised phasing plan will hold open the possibility of creating a new home facility for the Toronto Argonauts at BMO Field, and there will be no negative financial impact on the City resulting from the proposed changes in phasing, the City Manager has recommended in the attached staff report that Council approve an amended LOI that incorporates these changes.

     

    This Motion is urgent as MLSE has advised that a contract must be entered into with a general contractor and the structural steel ordered for the project by mid-June if the first phase of construction is to be completed in time to ensure the availability of the stadium for the Pan Am Games in 2015.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.28)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.28
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70431.pdf
    (June 6, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Revised Project Phasing for Renovation and Expansion of BMO Field
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70432.pdf
    Attachment 1 - Draft Amended and Restated Letter of Intent from Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd.
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70433.pdf

    MM52.29 - Review of Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 91 Sheppard Avenue East - by Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor John Parker

    Motion Without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    23 - Willowdale
    Attention
    * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
    * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

    Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board

    Recommendations

    Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor John Parker, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council adopt the following recommendations in the attached report (June 9, 2014) from the City Solicitor:

     

    "1.        City Council adopt the confidential recommendations in Attachment 1; and

     

    2.         City Council authorize the public release of confidential recommendation 1 in Attachment 1 if adopted by Council."

    Summary

    On May 15, 2014, the Ontario Municipal Board released a decision on a Motion regarding the requirement for site plan control on a property located at 91 Sheppard Avenue East.  At issue on the Motion was the Municipal Board's jurisdiction to exempt a proposed development from the requirement for site plan control.

     

    In the past, the determination of whether or not a development application was subject to site plan control was exclusively with the City's Chief Building Official.  Notwithstanding the City's argument at the Board Motion that the Board did not have the authority to determine the applicability of site plan control, the Board in this case has determined that it does have the authority and thereby exempted the development proposal for 91 Sheppard Avenue East from the requirement for site plan control.

     

    This matter is urgent as there is a strict timetable for a legal appeal for an Ontario Municipal Board decision to Divisional Court and it is necessary to give instructions to City staff.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014, as MM52.29)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.29
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70449.pdf
    (June 9, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor on Review of Ontario Municipal Board Decision - 91 Sheppard Avenue East
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70450.pdf
    Confidential Attachment 1

    MM52.30 - Review of Policy Replacement of Sub-Standard Water Services - by Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor John Parker

    Motion Without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
    * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by John Parker, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water to review the operational policy for the emergency replacement of water services with low flow and report back to City Council through the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on the financial and operating impact of including services with measured flows less than 15 litres per minute.

    Summary

    Many residents are experiencing low water pressure but are not entitled to an upgrade unless they pay up to $3000 if not more to have the water service upsized. This is not possible for many residents, particularly seniors. The current minimum flow threshold, for emergency water service replacement of 7 litres per minute is not sufficient. This threshold of 7 litres per minute was a Council decision made in 2007. It is important to revisit this threshold so that we can provide our citizens and tax payers with good quality service.

     

    Currently a Capital Water Service Replacement Program is available for substandard services as part of planned construction projects such as road, sewer and watermain reconstruction, and watermain structural lining.  Substandard services are defined as lead and galvanized steel services or services less than 19 mm in diameter.

     

    This Motion is urgent as more and more residents are complaining about very low water pressure and are unable to pay for upgrades on their own. With more water consumption occurring in the summer, this is something that should be looked into as soon as possible.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014, as MM29.30)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM29.30
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70416.pdf

    MM52.31 - Staff Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board Appeals Hearing for 190, 192 and 194 Neville Park Boulevard - by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, seconded by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio

    Motion Without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    32 - Beaches-East York
    Attention
    * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
    * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, seconded by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City Planning staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing of the appeals from Committee of Adjustment Files A0222/14TEY, A0223/14TEY, A0224/14TEY, A0225/14TEY, B0014/14TEY, and B0024/14TEY for 190, 192 and 194 Neville Park Boulevard, in order to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the applications.

    Summary

    This matter applies to the three properties: a lot at 190 Neville Park Boulevard and a lot at 192 Neville Park Boulevard, each under the same ownership and containing one detached dwelling over both lots; and, a lot at 194 Neville Park Boulevard owned by another party and containing one detached dwelling.  Both owners have applied for severances and variances, which if approved, would permit four detached dwellings, two of which would be new and two of which would be the existing homes with significant alterations.

     

    To permit these four detached dwellings, the two owners have each applied for lot severances and relief from the provisions of the former and new City of Toronto Zoning By-laws to permit:

     

    -     the proposed alterations to the existing dwelling at 192 Neville Park Boulevard, (with a portion of the lot to be severed from 190 Neville Park Boulevard to increase the side yard),

     

    -     the construction of a new residential dwelling on the remainder of 190 Neville Park Boulevard, and

     

    -     the severance of 194 Neville Park Boulevard into two lots, one of which will contain a new residential dwelling and the other will contain the existing home with significant alterations.

     

    Variances were requested for 190 and 192 Neville Park with respect to height, floor space index, size of porch, encroaching stairs, front yard setback, side yard setback, parking space, and integral garage.

     

    Variances were requested for 194 Neville Park with respect to height, first floor above established grade, floor space index, size of porch, roof eaves projection, front yard landscaping, front yard setback, side yard setback, parking space, and height of front porch.

     

    The applications were refused by the Committee of Adjustment on Wednesday May 14, 2014, and have subsequently been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board by the applicants.

     

    The subject properties are located on south side of Queen Street East, west of Victoria Park Avenue in a cul-de-sac at the end of Neville Park Boulevard. They are designated "Neighbourhoods" and "Natural Areas" in the City of Toronto Official Plan,  and are zoned R1Z0.6 (ZZC) Residential in the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 and RD(f6.0; d0.6)(x1322) in the new City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013.

     

    In staff reports dated May 7, 2014 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to the Committee of Adjustment staff, recommended refusal of the severance applications and refusal of certain variances as set out in the reports, including floor space index for the existing and the new structures, side yard setbacks, and front porch encroachment for the existing and the new structures.  Staff also noted that an assessment of the impacts of the Natural Heritage System has not been submitted as required by the Official Plan.  Staff advises that the requested variances do not meet the four tests prescribed in the Planning Act and represent over development that is not in keeping with the physical character of the existing neighbourhood.

     

    This Motion is urgent as the Ontario Municipal Board hearing on this matter may be scheduled before the next City Coucnil meeting.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.31)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.31
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70419.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission Application for 190 Neville Park Boulevard (Part 1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70420.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission Application for 192 Neville Park Boulevard (Parts 2, 3 and 4)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70451.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission Application for 194 Neville Park Boulevard (Part 1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70421.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission Application for 194 Neville Park Boulevard (Part 2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70422.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on Consent for 194 Neville Park Boulevard
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70452.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on Consent for 190 Neville Park Boulevard
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70423.pdf

    MM52.32 - Staff Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 137 Florence Avenue - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

    Motion Without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    23 - Willowdale
    Attention
    * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
    * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

    Recommendations

    Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

     

    1.                  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the approval of the minor variance for 137 Florence Avenue and authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to the Committee of Adjustment's approval of the minor variance with respect to the proposed east side yard setback, the proposed west side yard setback and the proposed main wall height.

    Summary

    On May 28, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment North York Panel considered an application for Minor Variance submitted by Rubinoff Design Group, on behalf of the applicant, to permit the construction of a new two-storey dwelling at 137 Florence Avenue.  The Committee approved all 12 requested variances, including a proposed east side yard setback of 0.61 metres where 1.2 metres is required, a proposed west side yard setback of 0.86 metres where 1.2 metres is required and a proposed main wall height of 7.68 metres where 7.5 metres is permitted.

     

    Side yard setbacks of 0.61 metres and 0.86 metres would be smaller than what has been previously approved for a new two-storey dwelling in this area, specifically on streets west of Botham Road.  It does not fit the current character of the neighbourhood or meet the intent of the zoning by-law. It would also risk setting a precedent for future applications requesting smaller side yard setbacks.

     

    This Motion is urgent as the Ontario Municipal Board hearing on this matter may be scheduled before the next City Coucnil meeting.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.32)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.32
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70418.pdf
    (May 28, 2014) Memorandum from Councillor John Filion regarding 137 Florence Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70453.pdf
    (May 20, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District regarding 137 Florence Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70424.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment North York Panel - Public Hearing Notice on Minor Variance/Permission for 137 Florence Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70454.pdf

    MM52.33 - Contribution of Toronto's Crossing Guards - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

    Motion without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
    * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council recognize the important contribution of Toronto's crossing guards in helping young Torontonians get to and from their schools safely, and express sincere thanks for their role in ensuring children have safe access to learning.

    Summary

    Across Toronto, children are able to safely walk to school due to the hard work and dedication of our terrific crossing guards. Crossing guards help children safely cross to and from school navigating the very-busy streets in our neighbourhoods.

     

    As the end of the school year approaches it is important to acknowledge the important role that crossing guards play in our communities to help our smallest citizens get to and from school safely.

     

    This Motion is urgent as the June meeting is the last opportunity for Council to thank the crossing guards before the end of the school year.


     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.33)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.33
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70425.pdf

    MM52.34 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision Respecting 6 Shamrock Avenue - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

    Motion without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
    Attention
    * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
    * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

     

    1.         That City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the Committee of Adjustment Decisions to refuse the consent and minor variances (B84/13EYK, A609/13EYK and A610/13EYK) for 6 Shamrock Avenue and to retain an independent land use planner if necessary.

    Summary

    The owners of the land municipally known as 6 Shamrock Avenue applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain a consent (Application B84/13EYK) and a number of associated minor variances (Applications A609/13EYK and A610/13EYK) in order to build two new detached dwellings.

     

    On March 4, 2014, the Committee refused the consent and minor variances.

     

    There are concerns that the variances are not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the zoning by-law, and that the proposed lot frontages and areas are out of keeping with the existing physical character of the surrounding neighbourhood.

     

    This Motion is urgent as the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing on this matter may be scheduled before the next City Council meeting.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.34)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.34
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70455.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Consent for 6 Shamrock Avenue
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70467.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission application for 6 Shamrock Avenue (Part 1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70468.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission application for 6 Shamrock Avenue (Part 2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70469.pdf

    MM52.35 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision Respecting 82 Twenty Seventh Street - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

    Motion without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
    Attention
    * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
    * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the Committee of Adjustment Decisions to refuse the consent and minor variances (B85/13EYK, A611/13EYK and A612/13EYK) for 82 Twenty Seventh Street and to retain an independent land use planner if necessary.

    Summary

    The owners of the land municipally known as 82 Twenty Seventh Street applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain a consent (Application B85/13EYK) and a number of associated minor variances (Applications A611/13EYK and A612/13EYK) in order to build two new detached dwellings.

     

    On March 4, 2014, the Committee refused the consent and minor variances.

     

    There are concerns that the variances are not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the zoning by-law, and that the proposed lot frontages and areas are out of keeping with the existing physical character of the surrounding neighbourhood.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.35)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.35
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70456.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Consent for 82 Twenty Seventh Street
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70470.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission application for 82 Twenty Seventh Street (Part 1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70471.pdf
    Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission application for 82 Twenty Seventh Street (Part 2)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70472.pdf

    MM52.36 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds for a Swing Set with an Accessible Swing in Pottery Playground Park - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Jaye Robinson

    Motion without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    22 - St. Paul's
    Attention
    * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
    * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Jaye Robinson, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation by $8,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development from 68 Merton Street, (source account XR3026-3700614) for a new swing set, with an accessible swing, at Pottery Playground Park, with any excess funds to be returned by Parks, Forestry and Recreation to the 68 Merton Street account.

    Summary

     Pottery Playground is a small park in the Davisville Village community abutting Mount Pleasant Cemetery. 

     

    Section 37 funds been secured in the development at 68 Merton Street for local area park improvements. This Motion seeks to direct $8,000 to Parks, Forestry and Recreation for the purchase of a new swing set, including an accessible swing, at Pottery Playground Park.

     

    This Motion is urgent due to the lack of accessible or other children's equipment at the park and the gap between Council meetings this summer.

     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.36)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.36
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70457.pdf
    (June 11, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70906.pdf

    MM52.37 - Direction to Staff to Evaluate Glebe Manor Lawn Bowling Club (196 Manor Road East) for Parkland Acquisition - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Jaye Robinson

    Motion without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    22 - St. Paul's
    Attention
    * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
    * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

    Recommendations

    Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councilor Jaye Robinson, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Director, Real Estate Services to evaluate the acquisition of 196 Manor Road East and report to the August 20, 2014 meeting of the Executive Committee if there are recommendations to acquire 196 Manor Street East and to amend the approved 2014 Capital Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation to fund the acquisition.

    Summary

    The property at 196 Manor Road East has been a green space in the Davisville Village community since 1923 when the Glebe Manor Road Lawn Bowling Club was established. Parks, Forestry and Recreation has deemed the community as deficient in green space and has expressed interest in purchasing the property with existing, dedicated parkland acquisition funds.

     

    This Motion directs Real Estate Services staff to evaluate the fair market value of 196 Manor Road East and directs Parkland Acquisitions staff to begin negotiations with the current owner(s) for the purpose of purchase by the City.

     

    This Motion is urgent as a developer has expressed interest in purchasing the property for the purposes of constructing townhomes. The Board of Directors of the Glebe Manor Lawn Bowling Club has already given direction to sell 196 Manor Road East.
     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10 and 11, 2014 as MM52.37)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.37
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70458.pdf

    MM52.38 - Authorizing the City Clerk to process the anticipated vacancy in Ward 5 - by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, seconded by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti

    Motion without Notice
    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Ward:
    5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
    Attention
    * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
    * This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

    Recommendations

    Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, seconded by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, recommends that:

     

    1.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to seek applications from interested persons for appointment to the office of Councillor for Ward 5 concurrent with the process for Ward 20 as separately authorized by Council.

     

    2.         If City Council is in a position to declare the office of Ward 5 vacant on or before the day of the meeting scheduled to appoint a Ward 20 Councillor, Council consider the candidates and fill the vacancy for Ward 5 at the same meeting using the same rules and process.

    Summary

    Councillor Peter Milczyn was elected to the Legislative Assembly of Ontario in the Ontario General Election on June 12, 2014.  Unless he resigns sooner, Councillor Milczyn remains a Member of Council until the election results appear in the Ontario Gazette sometime later in June or early July.

    Until then City Council cannot declare the Ward 5 seat vacant and take steps to fill the office by appointment.  As with the vacancy in Ward 20, Council will have no option but to appoint a qualified elector to fill the vacancy.

     

    However, if Council waits until July to approve an appointment process, it could take until August to fill the vacancy by appointment.  The August meeting is the last scheduled meeting of the term for City Council and as a result the appointed Councillor would have little opportunity to carry out the legislative duties.

     

    An alternative approach would be for City Council at this meeting to authorize the City Clerk to add the anticipated Ward 5 vacancy to the call for interested persons for the Ward 20 vacancy, and if the sequence of events permits, to consider applicants for the anticipated Ward 5 vacancy at the same meeting it considers the Ward 20 candidates.  In this way Council could fill both vacancies in July.

     

    Should the election results not be confirmed in the Ontario Gazette in time, City Council would not proceed to fill the vacancy until it was possible to do so and the City Clerk would advise on next steps.

     

    City Council should consider this Motion on an urgent basis to ensure that the anticipated vacancy in Ward 5 is filled as soon as possible.


     

    (Submitted to City Council on June 10, 11, 12 and 13,2014 as MM52.38)

    Background Information

    Member Motion MM52.38
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70657.pdf

    Bills and By-laws - Meeting 52

    BL52.1 - Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming Bills

    Consideration Type:
    ACTION
    Wards:
    All
    Attention
    Communication BL52.1.1 has been submitted on this Item.

    The City Clerk has submitted a letter on this Item (BL52.1a) regarding Council Procedures on Bills

    City Council will consider the introduction and enactment of Bills 542 and 543 at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, June 13, 2014.

    Summary

    City Council will introduce and enact general bills and confirming bills.

    Background Information

    (June 19, 2014) Consolidated By-law Index for June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014 City Council meeting
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/bl/bgrd/backgroundfile-70333.htm
    (June 11, 2014) Letter from the City Clerk to City Council regarding Council Procedures on Bills (BL52.1a)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/bl/bgrd/backgroundfile-70485.pdf

    Communications

    (June 9, 2014) Letter from Michael Binetti, Affleck Greene McMurty LLP (BL.New.BL52.1.1)
    https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/bl/comm/communicationfile-48003.pdf
    Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council