City Council

Meeting No.:
24
Contact:
Marilyn Toft, Manager
Meeting Date:
Wednesday, September 30, 2020

Thursday, October 1, 2020

Friday, October 2, 2020

Phone:
416-392-7032
Start Time:
9:30 AM
E-mail:
councilmeeting@toronto.ca
Location:
Video Conference

Meetings of Toronto City Council are being conducted by electronic means. 

 

These measures are necessary to comply with physical distancing requirements and a Provincial Order that limits public gatherings.

 

The meetings of Toronto City Council continue to be conducted publicly and may be viewed live on meeting day at www.toronto.ca/council

 

Notice to people writing to Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees. The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

 

Closed Meeting Requirements: If Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a Member of Council must place a motion to do so and give the reason why Council has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).

 

September 25, 2020.

 

toronto.ca/council

This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.

Routine Matters - Meeting 24

RM24.1 - Call to Order

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All

Summary

- O Canada

- Moment of Silence

- Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act

Background Information

Condolence Motion for Kathryn Anderson
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157316.pdf
Condolence Motion for Ryan Ayukaw
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157317.pdf
Condolence Motion for Salome Bey
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157318.pdf
Condolence Motion for Wilma Chan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157319.pdf
Condolence Motion for Antonio Salvatore Cugliari
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157320.pdf
Condolence Motion for Duncan Blair Gibson
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157321.pdf
Condolence Motion for Lilian Jardine
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157322.pdf
Condolence Motion for Emily McIntosh
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157323.pdf
Condolence Motion for Alexander (Danny) McIntyre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157324.pdf
Condolence Motion for Cathy Sheridan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157325.pdf
Condolence Motion for Right Honourable John Turner
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157326.pdf
Condolence Motion for Mohamed-Aslim Zafis
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157327.pdf

RM24.2 - Confirmation of Minutes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will confirm the Minutes from the regular meeting held on July 28 and 29, 2020.

RM24.3 - Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from the Mayor and City Officials

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

Deterred Items:

 

Infrastructure and Environment Committee Item IE12.4

Scarborough Community Council Item SC12.4

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE14.5

 

Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 16 on September 23, 2020

Submitted by Mayor John Tory, Chair

 

Report of the Board of Health from Meeting 20 on September 21, 2020

Submitted by Councillor Joe Cressy, Chair

 

Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 14 on September 11, 2020

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong

 

Report of the Economic and Community Development Committee from Meeting 15 on September 8, 2020

Submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair

 

Report of the General Government and Licensing Committee from Meeting 15 on September 14, 2020

Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair

 

Report of the Infrastructure and Environment Committee from Meeting 15 on September 17, 2020

Submitted by Councillor James Pasternak, Chair

 

Report of the Planning and Housing Committee from Meeting 16 on September 22, 2020

Submitted by Councillor Ana Bailão, Chair

 

Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 17 on September 9, 2020

Submitted by Councillor Mark Grimes, Chair

 

Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 17 on September 10, 2020

Submitted by Councillor James Pasternak, Chair

 

Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 17 on September 15, 2020

Submitted by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, Chair

  

Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 18 on September 16, 2020

Submitted by Councillor Gord Perks, Chair

 

New Business and Business Previously Requested submitted by the Mayor and City Officials 

RM24.4 - Petitions

Consideration Type:
Information
Wards:
All

Summary

Members of Council may file petitions.

RM24.5 - Presentations, Introductions and Announcements

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All

Summary

Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.

RM24.6 - Review of the Order Paper

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will review the Order Paper.

Background Information

Order Paper September 30, 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157138.pdf
Order Paper October 1, 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157176.pdf
Order Paper October 2, 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157290.pdf

Administrative Inquiries - Meeting 24

IA24.1 - Alternative Parking for 50 Wilson Heights

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted an Answer (IA24.1a).

Under Council's Procedures, City Council can receive or refer an Administrative Inquiry.

Origin

(September 21, 2020) Letter from

Summary

Councillor James Pasternak has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry:

 

"I am submitting this Administrative Inquiry under Municipal Code S27-61 to seek information regarding the status of MM14.9 'Preparing for Housing Now at the 50 Wilson Heights Boulevard Site.'

 

On January 29, 2020 City Council adopted Motion MM14.9 without amendments. The Housing Now site at 50 Wilson Height Boulevard will help address affordable housing market in Ward 6 and Toronto. Consequently, the existing commuter parking lot highly used by Ward 6 residents will be adversely affected. Solutions were to be explored in the above mentioned motion.

 

I am requesting the following information:

 

1. What is the status of these three recommendations adopted in MM14.9?"

Background Information

(September 21, 2020) Administrative Inquiry from Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 6, York Centre on Alternative Parking for 50 Wilson Heights (IA24.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-156996.pdf
(September 28, 2020) Answer from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning (IA24.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-157069.pdf

IA24.2 - Drone Safety in the City of Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards has submitted an Answer (IA24.2a).

Under Council's Procedures, City Council can receive or refer an Administrative Inquiry.

Origin

(September 21, 2020) Letter from Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 6, York Centre

Summary

Councillor James Pasternak has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry:

 

"I am submitting this Administrative Inquiry under Municipal Code S27-61 to seek an update on developing a policy for governing drones in Toronto's outdoor spaces.

 

On May 5, 2015, City Council adopted item EX5.19 titled 'Safety in the Air – Governing Drones in Toronto's Outdoor Spaces.' This Item requested a report back to City Council on a strategy governing the use of drones in the City of Toronto's outdoor spaces.

 

I am requesting the following information:

 

1. An update on the work done to date to address these recommendations."

Background Information

(September 21, 2020) Administrative Inquiry from Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 6, York Centre on Drone Safety in the City of Toronto (IA24.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-156990.pdf
(September 29, 2020) Answer from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards (IA24.2a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-157070.pdf

IA24.3 - CD6.6 TO Prosperity - Interim Poverty Reduction Strategy

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration has submitted an Answer(IA24.3a).

Under Council's Procedures, City Council can receive or refer an Administrative Inquiry.

Origin

(September 21, 2020) Letter from Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 6, York Centre

Summary

Councillor James Pasternak has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry:

 

"I am submitting this Administrative Inquiry under Municipal Code S27-61 to seek an update on a previous motion adopted by Council, CD6.6 entitled 'TO Prosperity – Interim Poverty Reduction Strategy.'

 

In 2015, the Community Development and Recreation Committee adopted an Interim Poverty Reduction strategy. A series of recommendations included in the attached were adopted.

 

I am requesting the following information to be provided:

 

1.  An update on the work done to date to addressed recommendations attached."

Background Information

(September 21, 2020) Administrative Inquiry from Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 6, York Centre on CD6.6 TO Prosperity - Interim Poverty Reduction Strategy (IA24.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-156991.pdf
Attachment 1 - Letter to the Community Development and Recreation Committee from Councillor James Pasternak on Updates to the TO Prosperity - Interim Poverty Reduction Strategy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-156993.pdf
(September 30, 2020) Answer from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration (IA24.3a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-157097.pdf

Deferred Items - Meeting 24

IE12.4 - Mixed Waste Processing Study Update

(Deferred by City Council from June 29, 2020 - 2020.IE12.4)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to consider future work on the development of a mixed waste processing facility, only in conjunction with a thermal treatment process, where the overarching goals are maximizing resource recovery through reduce, reuse, recycle, energy recovery then residual disposal, minimizing the dependence on long term landfill use all while ensuring the financial sustainability of the Solid Waste Management Services program.

 

2. City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee no later than the end of 2023 with a business case, including a triple bottom line analysis (environment, social and financial) and a utility rate impact assessment on the thermal processing of waste with and without mixed waste processing compared to traditional landfilling.

 

3. City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to pursue potentially applicable federal government, provincial government, and non-profit organization funding opportunities to assist in implementing Recommendations 1 and 2 above and to negotiate and enter into all necessary agreements to receive any available funding in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(February 13, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services

Summary

Toronto's Long Term Waste Management Strategy (the Strategy) was adopted by City Council in July of 2016. The Strategy recommendations incorporate strategic system planning to minimize the need for new capital investment. Amongst several other actions to recover resources from the waste stream, the Strategy recommends studying and pilot testing mixed waste processing with organics recovery with a focus on the multi-residential garbage stream (due to lower waste diversion rates from this sector). The purpose of the study and pilot testing as originally outlined in the Strategy was to help inform the development of a business case on whether or not to pursue capital investments in mixed waste processing with organics recovery.

 

This report provides an update on the mixed waste processing with organics recovery study (the Study) work completed to date, preliminary findings and outlines policy and market conditions that have changed since the approval of the Strategy. This report also recommends not advancing a standalone mixed waste processing with organics recovery facility but to broaden the Study approach to include the consideration of thermal processing for materials that cannot be diverted for recycling or organics processing and its impact on long term residual disposal planning.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 13, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services on Mixed Waste Processing Study Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-146477.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Memorandum #1: Executive Summary: Waste Forecasting and Characterization
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-146478.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(March 11, 2020) E-mail from Emily Alfred, Toronto Environmental Alliance (IE.New.IE12.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-101591.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 26, 2020) Letter from William E. Brown (CC.New.IE12.4.2)
(June 26, 2020) Letter from Paul Young, Health Promoter, South Riverdale Community Health Centre (CC.New.IE12.4.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-113889.pdf

SC12.4 - 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1437 Victoria Park Avenue, 14, 18, 19, 22, 23 and 26 Engelhart Crescent and 64 and 68 Harris Park Drive - Official Plan Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report

(Deferred by City Council from July 28, 2020 - 2020.SC12.4) (Deferred by City Council from June 29, 2020 - 2020.SC12.4) (Deferred by City Council from January 29, 2020 - 2020.SC12.4)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
A report on this Item is due from the City Solicitor.

Community Council Recommendations

The Scarborough Community Council submits the item to City Council without recommendations.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Scarborough Community Council directed:

 

1. That the City Solicitor, Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and appropriate City Staff attend a meeting with the local Councillors and the applicant, to discuss a possible resolution in advance of the January 29, 2020 City Council meeting and that the City Solicitor report to City Council at the January 29, 2020 meeting with the outcome of the discussions.

Origin

(December 20, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Toronto Official Plan to add a Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP) for the lands known as the Eglinton Square lands (1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1437 Victoria Park Avenue, 14-26 and 19-23 Engelhart Crescent, and 64-68 Harris Park Drive) to permit a mixed use development.  The SASP would provide for a mixed-use community to develop over time on the lands.  The mixed-use development would include multiple tall buildings with a range of building heights and stacked townhouses with a total of 1,630 residential units and 26,004 m2 of new retail uses proposed to be developed in five (5) blocks.

 

The Official Plan Amendment (OPA) application was submitted on October 4, 2016, and has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), now the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) citing City Council's failure to make a decision within the prescribed time frames set out in the Planning Act.  The appeal was filed on November 10, 2017.

 

A related Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion application (File No. 16 230698 ESC 35 RH) under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act (Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code) was also submitted on October 4, 2016 to allow for the removal of 91 rental units in eight (8) existing apartment buildings, to be replaced elsewhere in the future redevelopment of the site. Review of this application is underway and a decision on this application will be deferred until such time as a decision has been made by the LPAT on the OPA application, and a decision has been made on the Zoning By-law Amendment (17 242390 ESC 35 OZ) application for these lands.

 

On December 16, 2019, the City received a letter from the applicant's solicitor, being a "with prejudice" settlement offer and formal revision to the application ("Resubmission

Letter"). The Resubmission Letter advised that the applicant has amended its application to include all of its lands inclusive of the existing shopping mall, and excepting the block containing existing rental dwelling units (known as Block E in the original application), including a proposed density of 4.9 times the area of its lands. The letter cites that the reason it is amending its application is because the City asked the applicant to resubmit to include all of its holdings. The City, as common in many applications, requests a block context plan to understand how the development proposal fits within the larger context including other sites. This is especially the case in an emerging development area that will be the subject of major redevelopment in the future. City Staff did not request or invite a resubmission to include the shopping mall block, but only to illustrate the development proposal in the larger context that happens to include lands within the same land holdings as the subject lands.

 

The Resubmission Letter was not accompanied by any supporting reports or update letters from the original application, as acknowledged in the Resubmission Letter. City Staff are not in a position to adequately review, circulate and comment on the revised proposal given the timelines and lack of a complete submission package. It is unusual to receive a revised submission requesting additional density from an original submission and therefore the original supporting reports cannot be used to support the revised proposal.

 

Without a circulation and review, City staff cannot support the revisions.  Should the applicant intend to pursue a revision to its application, they should formally resubmit and provide the required documentation for City staff to review and after a reasonable circulation period, City staff will seek further direction. Until that time the City cannot establish a fulsome list of issues in opposition of the revised application at a hearing before the LPAT.  Accordingly, the report largely addresses the original application, however also recommends that the City Solicitor oppose the revised application.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction for the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff and/or external consultants, to attend the LPAT hearing to oppose the application in its current form. City staff have concerns with how the proposed Official Plan Amendment can be supported in the context of the GMSP consultants' reports and recommendations for the broader Golden Mile area and for the subject site.  

 

The GMSP consultants Transportation Master Plan ("TMP"), Community Infrastructure Strategy and the Master Servicing Plan ("MSP") provide comprehensively analyzed information to assist with the direction on how growth can be accommodated within the Golden Mile Area.  These studies will also be used to inform the emerging policy direction in the proposed Golden Mile Secondary Plan, as presented in the report dated December 20, 2019, and being considered at the January 8, 2020 Scarborough Community Council meeting.  The proposed Official Plan Amendment, in its current form, is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS 2014), does not conform with the Growth Plan (2019), and does not conform to the City's Official Plan.

 

This report also recommends that the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff be authorized to continue discussions with the applicant in an effort to address the issues outlined in this report.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 20, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1437 Victoria Park Avenue, 14-26 and 19-23 Engelhart Crescent and 64-68 Harris Park Drive - Official Plan Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-141416.pdf
(December 11, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1437 Victoria Park Avenue, 14-26 and 19-23 Engelhart Crescent and 64-68 Harris Park Drive - Official Plan Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-140997.pdf

TE14.5 - Queen Street West Planning Study - Bathurst Street to Roncesvalles Avenue - Official Plan Amendment - Final Report

(Deferred by City Council from June 29, 2020 - 2020.TE14.5)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
4 - Parkdale - High Park, 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE14.5a with recommendations)

Additional communications TE14.5.25 to TE14.5.32 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands generally fronting Queen Street West between Bathurst Street and Roncesvalles Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment No. 445, at Attachment 4 to the report (February 25, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

 

3. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and other appropriate City Divisions, to initiate a review of the Queen Street West right-of-way located generally between Bathurst Street and Roncesvalles Avenue, including consultation, and develop recommendations to prioritize the safe and efficient movement of pedestrians, cyclists, and transit along the West Queen Street West corridor.

 

4. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to prepare necessary Zoning By-law Amendments to implement Official Plan Amendment 445, having regard for Heritage Conservation District Plans under development, and existing site-specific zoning permissions.

 

5. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend and support the recommended Official Plan Amendment should the Official Plan Amendment be appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on March 12, 2020 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Summary

On November 18, 2013, City Council requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to undertake a planning study of Queen Street West between Bathurst Street and Roncesvalles Avenue. This report summarizes the outcome of the study, recommends amendments to the City’s Official Plan in the form of a Site and Area Specific Policy to guide development and public initiatives in the study area, and requests direction regarding additional implementation measures.

 

The proposed policies are intended to allow opportunities for contextually appropriate growth and change, conserve and enhance historic and culturally significant attributes of Queen Street West, guide public and private investment in public spaces, and encourage sustainable choices in new buildings and additions. The proposed amendments align with the recommendations of the West Queen West Heritage Conservation District Study, and the emerging direction for the West Queen West and Parkdale Main Street Heritage Conservation District Plans, which are under development and will be presented to the Toronto Preservation Board and City Council in Q3 2020. A multiple listing report identifying heritage properties in the study area will be presented to the Toronto Preservation Board and Council in Q2 2020.

 

In addition to the proposed Official Plan Amendment, this report recommends that Transportation Services staff, in consultation with City Planning staff, undertake a review of the Queen Street West Right-of-Way between Bathurst Street and Roncesvalles Avenue and develop recommendations to prioritize the safe and efficient movement of pedestrians, cyclists, and transit along the West Queen West corridor. The report further recommends City Planning staff prepare a Zoning By-law Amendment to implement the proposed policy framework.

Background Information (Community Council)

(February 25, 2020) Revised report and Attachments 1-3 and 5-8 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Queen Street West Planning Study (Bathurst Street to Roncesvalles Avenue) - Official Plan Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-146706.pdf
Attachment 4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-146520.pdf
(February 25, 2020) Report and Attachments 1,5, 6, 7 and 8 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Queen Street West Planning Study - Bathurst Street to Roncesvalles Avenue - Official Plan Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-146519.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary report and Attachment 2 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Queen Street West Planning Study (Bathurst Street to Roncesvalles Avenue) - Official Plan Amendment (TE14.5a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157090.pdf
Attachment 1: Revised Draft Official Plan Amendment No. 445
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157091.pdf

Speakers

Ric Amis, Parkdale Residents Association
Mark Richardson, HousingNowTO.com
Ingrid Beausoleil

Communications (Community Council)

(March 10, 2020) E-mail from Eillen P. K. Costello (TE.Supp.TE14.5.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101450.pdf
(March 10, 2020) E-mail from Eileen P. K. Costello (TE.Supp.TE14.5.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101452.pdf
(March 10, 2020) Letter from Jennifer Horvath (TE.Supp.TE14.5.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101426.pdf
(March 10, 2020) Letter from Louis Tinker (TE.Supp.TE14.5.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101534.pdf
(March 11, 2020) Letter from Leo Longo (TE.Supp.TE14.5.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101592.pdf
(March 11, 2020) Letter from Ric Amis (TE.Supp.TE14.5.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101615.pdf
(March 11, 2020) Letter from Ralph Daley (TE.Supp.TE14.5.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101616.pdf
(March 11, 2020) Letter from David Bronskill (TE.Supp.TE14.5.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101618.pdf
(March 11, 2020) Letter from David Bronskill (TE.Supp.TE14.5.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101619.pdf
(March 11, 2020) E-mail from Eileen P. K. Costello (TE.Supp.TE14.5.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101602.pdf
(March 11, 2020) E-mail from Eileen P. K. Costello (TE.Supp.TE14.5.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101625.pdf
(March 11, 2020) E-mail from Leonard Baranek (TE.Supp.TE14.5.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101626.pdf
(March 11, 2020) E-mail from David Markovic (TE.Supp.TE14.5.13)
(March 12, 2020) E-mail from Fernando Tavares (TE.Supp.TE14.5.14)
(March 12, 2020) E-mail from Matthew Zambri (TE.Supp.TE14.5.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101607.pdf
(March 11, 2020) Letter from Ric Amis, West Side Community Council (TE.Supp.TE14.5.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101630.pdf
(March 12, 2020) E-mail from Emma West, Bousfields (TE.Supp.TE14.5.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101649.pdf
(March 12, 2020) Letter from Eileen Costello (TE.Supp.TE.14.5.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-101658.pdf
(March 12, 2020) E-mail from Djanka Gajdel (TE.New.TE14.5.19)

Communications (City Council)

(April 27, 2020) Letter from Kate Cooper, Bousfields Inc. (CC.Main.TE14.5.20)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-113891.pdf
(May 14, 2020) Letter from Andrew Davidge, Gladki Planning Associates (CC.Main.TE14.5.21)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-113892.pdf
(June 26, 2020) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP on behalf of Skale 1375 QSW Inc. (CC.New.TE14.5.22)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-113893.pdf
(June 26, 2020) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP on behalf of Jameson Plaza Ltd. (CC.New.TE14.5.23)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-113894.pdf
(June 26, 2020) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP on behalf of High Rhodes Inc. (CC.New.TE14.5.24)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-113890.pdf
(March 30, 2020) Letter from Adrienne Van (CC.Main.TE14.5.25)
(July 21, 2020) E-mail from Larry Swern, Rosestone Developments Limited (CC.Main.TE14.5.26)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-118351.pdf
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Eileen P.K. Costello, Aird Berlis on behalf of Silver Hotel Management Inc. (CC.New.TE14.5.27)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120919.pdf
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Eileen P.K. Costello, Aird Berlis on behalf of 835 Queen West Inc. (CC.New.TE14.5.28)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120915.pdf
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Eileen P.K. Costello, Aird Berlis on behalf of Hullmark Developments Inc. (CC.New.TE14.5.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120920.pdf
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Eileen P.K. Costello, Aird Berlis on behalf of Timbertrin (Queen/Bathurst) LP (CC.New.TE14.5.30)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120921.pdf
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Eileen P.K. Costello, Aird Berlis on behalf of Queen and Brock Holdings Inc. (CC.New.TE14.5.31)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120922.pdf
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Djanka Gajdel, West Queen West Business Improvement Area (CC.New.TE14.5.32)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-121047.pdf

Executive Committee - Meeting 16

EX16.1 - Changes to Policing in Toronto - Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications EX16.1.8 to EX16.1.13 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council establish a Confronting Anti-Black Racism Council Advisory Body, in accordance with the Terms of Reference in Attachment 3 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager, for the term ending November 14, 2022 or until their mandate is completed within the 2018 to 2022 term.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager

Summary

Systemic discrimination in our city deeply impacts the life chances and opportunities of Indigenous, Black, and racialized communities, and leads to disparities in health, social, economic and political outcomes. 

 

For many decades, Indigenous, Black and racialized communities have spoken out about their deep mistrust of public institutions – including our police services. Various reports have underscored this mistrust with evidence of systemic discrimination; disproportionate use of force including deadly force, invasive searches, and greater surveillance and street checks.

 

Changes are needed to restore community trust, police accountability and equitable effectiveness to policing and the justice system.

 

At its June 2020 meeting, City Council adopted 36 decisions (CC22.2) related to policing reforms. These decisions covered areas touching on policing, public safety and crisis response. At its meeting on August 18, 2020, the Toronto Police Services Board also adopted 81 decisions on policing reforms, including reforms requested by City Council.

 

Since the adoption of City Council's decisions in CC22.2, there have been actions by the Toronto Police Services Board and the City to advance policing reforms and engage the public. The following are a few of those actions: 

 

- The Toronto Police Services Board held four full-day town hall meetings on July 9, 10, 15 and 16, 2020. These forums were created in response to the thousands of messages that the Board received in the aftermath of the killing of George Floyd and the death of Regis Korchinski-Paquet, and related protests in Toronto and around the world. The public was invited to give deputations and over 250 spoke or submitted written or recorded submissions to the Board.


- The Mayor, on behalf of City Council, requested the province to immediately implement the reforms recommended by Justice Tulloch, to allow City Council to have direct oversight over the Police Services Budget, and to make police conduct and accountability changes.


- The City Manager, as directed by City Council, requested the Province to amend legislation to expand the City of Toronto's Auditor General's jurisdiction to include auditing the Toronto Police Service.

 

- Toronto Police Service posted on its website, its use of force policy, a line-by-line breakdown of the Toronto Police Service's 2020 Budget as well as 5 years of budget summaries.


- To advance City Council decisions on engaging community to support the creation of alternative community response models, staff have established an alternative community safety response accountability table with a first meeting scheduled for early October.


- As per Council's request, staff have drafted Terms of Reference for the implementation of a Confronting Anti-Black Racism Council Advisory Body to assist in further advancing City Council‘s commitment to addressing anti-Black racism in Toronto.


- A dedicated team of City staff, with engagement from community experts, are developing alternative community response models, recommendations for community investments in critical community and social services that better address the root causes of safety and security, and advancing the tracking and reporting of actions taken on City Council's decisions in CC22.2. 
 

This report provides:

 

-An update on the status of City Council's directions on policing reforms from its June 2020 meeting;

 

- Proposed Terms of Reference for establishing a Confronting Anti-Black Racism Council Advisory Body; and


- Next steps including community engagement plans.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager on Changes to Policing in Toronto - Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156438.pdf
Attachment 1: Changes to Policing Decisions - Status Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156439.pdf
Attachment 2: Adopted Recommendations of Toronto Police Services Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156440.pdf
Attachment 3: Confronting Anti-Black Racism Council Advisory Body Terms of Reference
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156441.pdf

Speakers

Albert Venczel (Submission Filed)
Councillor Shelley Carroll

Communications (Committee)

(September 21, 2020) E-mail from Albert Venczel (EX.Supp.EX16.1.1)
(September 21, 2020) E-mail from Anastasia Keita (EX.Supp.EX16.1.2)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Adrienne Law (EX.Supp.EX16.1.3)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Albert Venczel (EX.Supp.EX16.1.4)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Amanda VanDewall (EX.New.EX16.1.5)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Elizabeth Kelly (EX.New.EX16.1.6)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Stephen G. Foote (EX.New.EX16.1.7)

Communications (City Council)

(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Hilary Black (CC.Supp.EX16.1.8)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Devon Pelley (CC.Supp.EX16.1.9)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from William McCulloch (CC.Supp.EX16.1.10)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Melodie Ng (CC.Supp.EX16.1.11)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Beau Levitt (CC.Supp.EX16.1.12)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Leif Vonderlon (CC.Supp.EX16.1.13)

EX16.3 - Responding to the Dundas Street Renaming Petition

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee has submitted a transmittal on this Item (EX16.3a with recommendations)

Communications EX16.3.9 to EX16.3.14 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City Manager to undertake Round 1 of the Dundas Street consultation and communications plan as described in Attachment 1 to the report (September 8, 2020) from the City Manager.
 

2. City Council direct the City Manager to report back to the Executive Committee in the first quarter of 2021 on the consultation findings and recommendations relating to:
 

a. a preferred option for responding to the petition to rename Dundas Street and, by extension, addressing other civic assets with the Dundas name;
 

b. a work plan with estimated costs to implement Recommendation 2.a. above;
 

c. revisions to the City's commemorative policies and programs, including the Property Naming Policy, the Street Naming Policy, and the Public Art and Monuments Donation Policy, and programs relating to civic honours, awards, and tributes; and
 

d. an overall commemorative framework for the City, including guiding principles for naming/renaming and other forms of recognition, developed in consultation with City divisions, agencies, and corporations.
 

3. Subject to the adoption of Recommendation 2.c. above, City Council direct that no new applications to name or rename streets or other civic properties (including parks) or requests to remove City monuments received on or after October 1, 2020 be considered until the review of policies and programs has been completed; this direction to apply to those agencies which are City boards under the City of Toronto Act, while the Board of Health, Police Services Board and Public Library Board are requested to comply with this direction.

Origin

(September 8, 2020) Report from the City Manager

Summary

The City of Toronto is committed to addressing how systematic racism and discrimination are embedded in City assets, commemorative programs, and naming policies.

 

In response to a June 2020 petition calling for Dundas Street to be renamed, Mayor John Tory asked City Manager Chris Murray to form a working group including the City’s Confronting Anti-Black Racism Unit and Indigenous Affairs Office to recommend potential next steps.

 

A decision to rename a major arterial road like Dundas requires careful consideration and an equitable and inclusive public process that considers Black and Indigenous perspectives as well as those of the broader community.

 

The City Manager committed to bringing forward this report to provide a background on the community petition calling for the renaming of Dundas Street, the street's namesake (Scottish MP Henry Dundas), and the street's development since the 1790s.

 

Staff reviewed historical sources, recent media and webinars, materials provided by historical societies, written submissions and letters to the City, and started discussions with over a dozen scholars and subject matter experts. Staff also reviewed 256 recent case studies relating to street and place renamings and monument removals generated world-wide. This information along will additional research will form the basis of the communication and engagement strategies.

 

The question is how the City of Toronto should respond to these findings.

 

This report outlines a process to assess four options:

 

- do nothing
- retain the legal street names with additional interpretation and recognitions
- retain the legal street names but rename those civic assets with Dundas in their name, except TTC facilities
- rename the streets and all other civic assets now carrying the Dundas name.
 

For the renaming option, the report estimates the costs to City divisions and agencies, and potential impacts to businesses, organizations, property owners, and residents with a street address on Dundas as well as any service or directory that maps or shows addresses on Dundas.

 

For the renaming option, the report outlines a community engagement strategy and integrated change management process to address all civic assets with the Dundas name by the end of 2021.

 

The report also outlines a framework to more broadly understand and respond to how systemic racism and discrimination may be embedded in City assets, commemorative programs, and naming policies.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 8, 2020) Report from the City Manager on Responding to the Dundas Street Renaming Petition and Attachment 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156448.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

Transmittal from the Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee (EX16.3a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157023.pdf

Speakers

Anthony Nolan
Bobby Melville, 10th Viscount Melville
Jennifer L. Dundas
Richard Dundas
Andrew Lochhead, Creator Dundas Street Petition

Communications (Committee)

(July 24, 2020) E-mail from Michael Holloway (EX.Supp.EX16.3.1)
(September 18, 2020) E-mail from Anthony Nolan (EX.Supp.EX16.3.2)
(September 18, 2020) E-mail from John De Marco (EX.Supp.EX16.3.3)
(September 19, 2020) Letter from Geoff Kettel, North York Community Preservation Panel (EX.Supp.EX16.3.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/comm/communicationfile-118500.pdf
(September 19, 2020) E-mail from Lisa Bifolchi (EX.Supp.EX16.3.5)
(September 21, 2020) E-mail from Kate Einarson (EX.Supp.EX16.3.6)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Lochhead (EX.Supp.EX16.3.7)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Robert Dundas (EX.New.EX16.3.8)

Communications (City Council)

(September 26, 2020) E-mail from John De Marco (CC.Supp.EX16.3.9)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Lochhead (CC.New.EX16.3.10)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Ellie Chesnutt (CC.New.EX16.3.11)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from The Rt. Hon. Adrienne Clarkson (CC.New.EX16.3.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-121140.pdf
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Audra Williams (CC.New.EX16.3.13)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from R. Popovic (CC.New.EX16.3.14)

EX16.4 - Metrolinx-City of Toronto Master Agreement for the GO Expansion Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 766 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City Manager or designate to finalize negotiations, enter into and execute a Master Agreement with Metrolinx for the Metrolinx GO Expansion Program based on the principles identified in the report (September 9, 2020) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services, and to enter into any such ancillary or related agreements, amendments, and renewals as may be necessary, all on such other terms and conditions as are satisfactory to the City Manager, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and any other relevant official, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 
2. City Council delegate authority to the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services or designate to oversee the management and implementation of the GO Expansion Master Agreement including, without limitation, providing all necessary consents, approving assignments, and enforcement of warranties, but excluding property rights that have been delegated pursuant to Section 213 of the Municipal Code.

 
3. City Council with respect to any Metrolinx transit project under the GO Expansion Program:
 

a. authorize the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services or designate to identify and approve the inclusion of enhancements to City infrastructure in or near work being done for or near the transit project, as well as investigative, planning and design studies considered necessary for City infrastructure and services in the vicinity of the transit projects ("Additional Infrastructure") which Metrolinx's contractor will be asked to construct as part of GO Expansion project procurements, subject to the following conditions:
 

i. the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services or designate, in consultation with the applicable Division Head is of the view that the price provided by Metrolinx, as may be reviewed by an independent reviewer, for the Additional Infrastructure is fair and reasonable; and
 

ii. the funding for the cost of the Additional Infrastructure is or will be available in the year required, within an approved capital budget;
 

b. authorize the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services or designate, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to obtain and pay for estimates and pre-estimates for Additional Infrastructure from Metrolinx and/or Metrolinx's contractor;
 

c. authorize the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services or designate, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to negotiate, enter into and execute Municipal Infrastructure Agreements with Metrolinx for Additional Infrastructure, including any amendments; and
 

d. notwithstanding City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 71, Financial Control, authorize the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to approve budget adjustments, provided that sufficient funds are available, and:
 

i. reallocate funds between capital projects or sub-projects in an amount not more than $3 million; and
 

ii. report any exercise of this delegated authority to the Budget Committee at the first opportunity.

 
4. City Council delegate authority to the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services or designate to negotiate, enter into and execute agreements with Metrolinx and any other party, including amendments and renewals for new utility crossing, level crossings and grade separations, including terms related to cost-sharing for both construction and on-going maintenance.

 

5. City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services or designate to request Metrolinx to provide an update and timelines on the closure of Poplar Road at the rail crossing on the Lakeshore East Line and that the Poplar Road rail crossing be added to the grade separation list for the Lakeshore East Line. 

 
6. City Council consent to the binding dispute resolution process in the Master Agreement described in Attachment 2 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services to deal with disputes involving the allocation of costs between the parties in respect of City infrastructure.
 

7. City Council delegate to City Officials approval authority pertaining to expropriations for transit related purposes where the City is the property owner or has an interest in the property being expropriated, as outlined in Attachment 3 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services and that Appendix A of the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 213, Real Property be amended to reflect this delegation.

 
8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to submit the necessary Bill(s) to amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 213, Real Property, to give effect to City Council's decision.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services

Summary

Metrolinx's GO Expansion Program (formerly known as Regional Express Rail, or RER) is a major transportation infrastructure program that will expand the GO rail transportation network to meet the needs of a growing region. The GO Expansion Program will provide faster and more efficient trains, two-way, all-day service, an expanded Union Station, and 15-minute or better service on core portions of the GO rail network.

 

All seven GO corridors run through the City of Toronto. The corridors currently serve 19 stations within Toronto and converge at Union Station, providing access between various parts of the City and the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) to the downtown core. As such, a significant portion of the infrastructure improvements to facilitate the Program will be made within the City of Toronto, causing impacts during and after construction to residents and businesses within the vicinity of the GO rail corridors. These impacts include work in and around Union Station, the construction of new grade separations (places where the rail network is separated from the road network or other rail lines), modifications or rehabilitation of bridges, relocation and/or replacement of portions of the City's underground infrastructure, and acquisition of City real estate assets. Attachment 1, prepared by Metrolinx, provides more information on the GO Expansion Program, including a full list of current projects in the City of Toronto.

 

A clear understanding and agreement between the City and Metrolinx on authorities, cost-sharing, ownership, and approvals are crucial to the implementation of the Program and to help avoid the potential for disputes and delays. Accordingly, City and Metrolinx staff have been working closely to establish principles on a range of issues in order to develop a GO Expansion Master Agreement. If approved, the GO Expansion Master Agreement between the City of Toronto and Metrolinx will define the roles and responsibilities of each party to guide the implementation of the Program while protecting City infrastructure, assets, and services. This report seeks Council authority to execute the Master Agreement with Metrolinx based on the key principles identified in this report.

 

This report also recommends the delegation of authority pertaining to expropriations for transit-related purposes where the City is the property owner or has an interest in the lands being expropriated. This delegated authority will enable staff to respond to the expropriation proceedings in a timely manner to protect the City's interests.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services on Metrolinx-City of Toronto Master Agreement for the GO Expansion Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156541.pdf
Attachment 1 - Metrolinx update on the GO Expansion Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156542.pdf
Attachment 2 - GO Expansion Master Agreement Dispute Resolution Terms
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156543.pdf
Attachment 3 - Delegation of Authority for Expropriation Matters
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156544.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Shelley Carroll

EX16.5 - Provincial Priority Transit Expansion Projects - Subway Program Status Update Third Quarter 2020

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve temporary staff positions required to support the Subway Program, wholly funded by Metrolinx at a net-zero cost to the City in 2020 and 2021 for the following City Divisions:

 

a. Corporate Real Estate Management: $1,112,103 gross and $0 net and 5 positions (5 positions 2020);

 
b. Engineering and Construction Services: $1,838,944 gross and $0 net and 9 positions (4 positions 2020, 5 positions 2021);

 
c. Legal Services: $1,518,090 gross and $0 net and 5 positions (5 positions 2020);

 
d. Parks, Forestry and Recreation: $930,259 gross and $0 net and 5 positions (4 positions 2020, 1 position 2021);

 
e. Toronto Building: $1,953,580 gross and $0 net and 10 positions (10 positions 2020);

 
f. Toronto Paramedic Services: $229,139 gross and $0 net and 1 position (1 position 2020);

 
g. Toronto Water: $3,837,926 gross and $0 net and 21 positions (5 positions 2020,16 positions 2021); and

 
h. Transportation Services: $2,898,384 gross and $0 net and 14 positions (12 positions 2020, 2 positions 2021).

 
2. City Council authorize the City Manager or designate to execute a Subway Program Resource Agreement between the City and Metrolinx to have Metrolinx fund temporary staff positions in support of the Subway Program for the period from 2020 to 2025 and renewable in subsequent years through agreements with Metrolinx, subject to the following terms:

 

a. funds for 2020 and 2021 will align with those described in Recommendation 1 above; and

 
b. funds for subsequent years will be determined based on annual reviews of resource requirements for the Subway Program.

 
3.  City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services, in consultation with Metrolinx, to report back to the Executive Committee on the public consultation plan and process going forward for the Ontario line, including on matters of noise mitigation.

 

4.  City Council forward the Item to the Toronto Transit Commission Board for its information.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services

Summary

The City and the Province entered into the Ontario-Toronto Transit Partnership in October 2019, as described in EX9.1 Toronto-Ontario Transit Update. The subsequent Ontario-Toronto Transit Partnership Preliminary Agreement, signed in February 2020, established the roles and responsibilities of the Province and the City in implementing major transit initiatives in Toronto.

 

To support the delivery of the Province's Subway Program, Metrolinx requires the City to expedite its reviews and other associated work. To that end and per the Preliminary Agreement, the Province has indicated its intention to reimburse the City for costs incurred in support of advancing its priority transit projects. This report therefore includes recommendations for City Council to approve temporary resources, fully funded by Metrolinx, to support the delivery of the Subway Program.

 

The purpose of this report is to provide a status update on the Province's priority transit projects in Toronto (i.e., Ontario Line, Scarborough Subway Extension, Yonge North Subway Extension, and Eglinton Crosstown West Extension, collectively the "Subway Program").

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services on Provincial Priority Transit Expansion Projects - Subway Program Status Update Third Quarter 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156521.pdf
Attachment 1 - Metrolinx update on Subway Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156522.pdf
Attachment 2 - City submission to Standing Committee on Social Policy re: Bill 171
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156523.pdf

Speakers

Shelley Kline

Communications (Committee)

(September 23, 2020) Letter from Shelley Kline, Lakeshore East Community Advisory Committee (EX.New.EX16.5.1)

EX16.6 - Union Station Enhancement Project, Package 1 - Update on Metrolinx Expropriation and Design and Construction Agreement

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City Manager or designate to execute the Design and Construction Agreement between the City and Metrolinx, based on the major terms outlined in Attachment 2 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and such other terms and conditions as may be satisfactory to the City Manager, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services and the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Manager or designate to execute amendments to the Funding Agreement for Union Station Enhancement, Package 1 to permit the addition of funding for two (2) full-time City staff to perform the scope of services outlined in Attachment 2 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, conditional upon full funding being provided by Metrolinx, and such other terms and conditions as may be satisfactory to the City Manager, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

3. City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services to approve and execute any necessary easements, operating agreements and/or amendments to the existing reciprocal rights agreement between the City and Metrolinx that are required as a result of Metrolinx's expropriation of property at Union Station and construction of Union Station Enhancement Project Package 1, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

4. City Council authorize an amendment to the existing retainer agreement with Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP (Purchase Order number 6025203) for property matters at Union Station in connection with the Union Station Revitalization Project, to include the provision of legal advice and expertise for any necessary easements, operating agreements and/or amendments to the existing reciprocal rights agreement between the City and Metrolinx related to Union Station Enhancement Project Package 1.

 

5. City Council authorize an amendment to the existing retainer agreement with Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP (Purchase Order number 6048193) for property matters in connection with Union Station Enhancement Project Package 1, in the additional amount of up to $35,000 (net of all applicable taxes) to provide legal advice and expertise to complete the proposed sale to Metrolinx of the elevator shafts connecting to Union Station Platform 20/21, and to provide legal services on property matters related to the finalization of the Design and Construction Agreement, increasing the current contract value form $580,000 (net of all applicable taxes) to $615,000 (net of all applicable taxes).

 

6. City Council authorize an amendment to the existing retainer agreement with Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP (Purchase Order number 6049837) for construction matters in connection with Union Station Enhancement Project Package 1, in the additional amount of up to $90,000 (net of all applicable taxes) to provide legal advice and expertise to complete the execution of the Design and Construction Agreement, increasing the current contract value from $530,000 (net of all applicable taxes) to $620,000 (net of all applicable taxes).

 

7. City Council amend the 2020 - 2029 Council Approved Capital Budget and Plan for Corporate Real Estate Management to increase total project cost and cash flow funding by $0.329 million in 2020, $0.514 million in 2021, $0.368 million in 2022, $0.372 million in 2023, and $0.526 million in 2024 for "Union Station Enhancement Project" (CCA913-01), from $1.250 million to $3.359 million, for additional resources for Union Station Enhancement Project Package 1, conditional upon full funding being provided by Metrolinx, with the exception of $0.125 million in 2020, to be funded within the existing Corporate Real Estate Management Council Approved 2020 Capital Budget to cover external legal costs to complete the proposed sale to Metrolinx of the elevator shafts connecting to Platform 20/21 and finalize the Design and Construction Agreement following the expropriation of City-owned lands.

 

8. City Council increase the 2020 Approved Operating Budget and Complement for Corporate Real Estate Management by 2.0 temporary positions and $0.104 million gross, $0 net for necessary project management resources, conditional upon full funding being provided by Metrolinx.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Summary

This report provides an update on the details of Metrolinx's expropriation of City-owned land at Union Station, outlined in Attachment 1, and presents the results of negotiations between City of Toronto ("City") staff and Metrolinx on the necessary agreements for the design and construction of Metrolinx's Union Station Enhancement Project (USEP), Package 1, for a new south concourse.

 

This report also recommends the allocation of additional resources, including two permanent City staff and third party subject matter experts, to allow for further City involvement in Union Station Enhancement Project, Package 1, conditional upon full funding being provided by Metrolinx, with the exception of legal fees required for the proposed sale of two heritage elevator shafts and certain legal services related to finalization of the Design and Construction Agreement with Metrolinx.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on Union Station Enhancement Project, Package 1 - Update on Metrolinx Expropriation and Design and Construction Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156513.pdf
Attachment 1 - USEP Package 1 - Summary of Expropriated Property Interests
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156514.pdf
Attachment 2 - USEP Package 1 - Major Terms of Design and Construction Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156515.pdf
Attachment 3 - USEP Package 1 - Details of Heritage Elevator Shafts
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156516.pdf
Attachment 4 - USEP Package 1 - Layouts and Renderings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156517.pdf

EX16.7 - Federation of Canadian Municipalities 2023 Annual Conference and Trade Show

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the hosting of the 2023 Federation of Canadian Municipalities Conference and Trade Show and City Council direct the City Manager to negotiate and execute any required agreements with the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council authorize the use of the 'Corporate Conference Reserve' for the purposes of hosting the Federation of Canadian Municipalities 2023 Annual Conference and Trade Show.

 

3. City Council direct the City Manager to report back on the costs and the City's required financial contributions for the Federation of Canadian Municipalities 2023 Annual Conference and Trade Show once the format of the conference is known and as part of a future budget process.

 

4. City Council request the Federation of Canadian Municipalities Board of Directors, in consultation with recent host cities, to review the scope and cost of the annual conference to host cities to identify possible expenditure reductions and significant increases to the revenue generation capacity of the conference including through additional sponsorship sales with the goal of reducing any host city's net contribution, in recognition of the impact of the fiscal pressures caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager

Summary

In 2016 the City of Toronto was selected by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities as the host city of the 2020 Federation of Canadian Municipalities Annual Conference and Trade Show. The 2020 event was cancelled on March 25, 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Federation of Canadian Municipalities has offered the City of Toronto the ability to host the conference in 2023, and now requires a City Council resolution to move forward.

 

This report outlines anticipated 2023 host city obligations and related financial implications and seeks authority to enter into agreements with Federation of Canadian Municipalities to host the 2023 conference. The Federation of Canadian Municipalities conference is the largest gathering of municipal officials in Canada providing an opportunity to showcase the City of Toronto as Federation of Canadian Municipalities' largest member.

 

Given the uncertainty surrounding COVID-19 and its impact on traditional in-person conference formats at this point in time the format of the 2023 conference is still not confirmed. Federation of Canadian Municipalities is working on identifying format options ranging from full in-person to fully virtual which would impact the role and responsibilities of the host city, and the related financial and logistical implications.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager on Federation of Canadian Municipalities 2023 Annual Conference and Trade Show
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156529.pdf

EX16.8 - The Impact of COVID-19 on 2022 Election Preparation Activities

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications EX16.8.3 to EX16.8.8 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Clerk to cease any further work on Ranked Ballot Elections for the 2022 Municipal Election, as previously directed in Item GV5.1 on November 26 and 27, 2019.

 

2. City Council request the City Clerk to evaluate alternative voting methods used in other jurisdictions that may provide electors with additional options during a pandemic and to report back to City Council by May 1, 2021 as required.

 

3.  City Council request the City Clerk to provide regular updates to the Executive Committee on the procurement process to acquire new equipment for future elections.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The City Clerk gave a presentation on 2022 Election Preparation Activities: The Impact of COVID-19 and The Ward Structure.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The purpose of this report is to update City Council on the planning and preparation underway in advance of the October 2022 municipal election, particularly as it relates to the unexpected challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on a number of election initiatives.

 

COVID-19 remains an ongoing concern, and health experts believe there may be additional waves of the virus for months or years to come. All aspects of 2022 election planning must shift to accommodate the reality of this global pandemic, which will have significant effects on programs, procedures, and technology. This report focuses on the pandemic's impact on election initiatives that may require Council consideration, including the acquisition of new voting equipment, preparation for Ranked Ballot Elections, and the exploration of alternative methods of voting.

 

The City's current vote counting equipment has reached the end of its life and a competitive procurement process is underway to acquire new equipment for use in the 2022 election. The City Clerk will further report to Council with recommendations resulting from this process. However, the pandemic has introduced new risks that may impact the acquisition of new equipment in time for its use in the 2022 general election and short-term options are therefore also being explored to mitigate these risks, if required.

 

This report also describes how the delays and risks introduced by the pandemic now mean that the pre-conditions required for Council to authorize Ranked Ballot Elections can no longer be fulfilled in accordance with the legislative and regulatory requirements for implementation in the 2022 election. The report therefore recommends that Council request the City Clerk to cease work on fulfilling the pre-conditions required to allow for possible Ranked Ballot Elections in 2022. If Council wishes to implement Ranked Ballots in the 2026 general election, Council can direct the City Clerk to begin fulfilling the legislative pre-conditions immediately following the 2022 election for possible implementation in 2026.

 

The COVID-19 pandemic is likely to have long-term impacts on the ways in which electors feel comfortable voting, and the report describes how the City Clerk is undertaking research into leading practices on safe voting during a pandemic. This includes rethinking the function and operation of voting places during an election and exploring alternative methods of voting that allow electors to cast ballots without having to attend at a voting place. Should alternative methods of voting be pursued, the City Clerk will report back to Council to ensure that any necessary by-laws are passed in time for their implementation in the 2022 general election.

 

Finally, the report notes that there is still uncertainty about the City's future ward structure. The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to hear the City's legal challenge to Bill 5, Better Local Government Act, 2018—which reduced the number of Toronto wards from 47 to 25—but a decision is not expected until mid- to late 2021. Election planning for 2022 must therefore account for both 25 and 47 ward scenarios, adding further complexity to COVID-19 contingency planning.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Clerk on The Impact of COVID-19 on 2022 Election Preparation Activities
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156443.pdf
Presentation from the City Clerk on 2022 Election Preparation Activities: The Impact of COVID-19 and The Ward Structure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156961.pdf

Speakers

Miriam Fine
Jesse Barke
Councillor Shelley Carroll

Communications (Committee)

(September 20, 2020) E-mail from Karen Gomez (EX.Supp.EX16.8.1)
(September 23, 2020) Letter from Glen Foote, Senior Managing Director, Canadian Operations, Election Systems and Software Canada (EX.New.EX16.8.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/comm/communicationfile-118531.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Adam Growe (CC.Supp.EX16.8.3)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Michael Holloway (CC.Supp.EX16.8.4)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Christopher Hoyle (CC.Supp.EX16.8.5)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jeffrey Sauer (CC.New.EX16.8.6)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Scott O'Hara (CC.New.EX16.8.7)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Eileen Denny (CC.New.EX16.8.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-121404.pdf

EX16.9 - Operating Variance Report for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the budget adjustments and any associated complement changes detailed in Appendix D to the report (September 9, 2020) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to amend the Approved 2020 Operating Budget, such adjustments to have no impact on the Approved 2020 Net Operating Budget of the City.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide City Council with the Operating Variance for the six months ended June 30, 2020 as well as projections to year-end. This report also requests City Council's approval for amendments to the 2020 Approved Operating Budget that have no impact on the City's 2020 Approved Net Operating Budget.

 

Since mid-March, the City of Toronto, consistent with other major Canadian and Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) municipalities has been experiencing significant financial impacts, both in the form of added costs and revenue losses as a direct result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

COVID-19 related financial impacts are anticipated to total $1.885 billion by year-end for the City of Toronto, prior to offsets achieved through a series of implemented mitigation strategies that focus on spending and workforce restraints, reducing the year-end shortfall to a projected $1.342 billion. 

 

- These items are expected to collectively generate $542.8 million in total offset by year-end, comprised of $508.7 million in savings from workforce restraints, spending constraints and cost avoidance; $34.1 million in added offsets available from budget variance; and included the elimination of inflationary general salary increases for Non-Union staff, Mayor and Council.


- At its peak in late spring, 9,980 staff had been placed on emergency leave within City programs and approximately 2,000 added staffing impacts were estimated within City agencies.
 

The table below details the anticipated 2020 City-wide COVID-19 related financial impacts, projected offset from mitigations strategies and the resulting financial position that is reflected in the year-end variance projections:

  

Table 1: 2020 Projected COVID-19 Financial Impacts

 

Description

($Millions)

Year-End Projections

Comments

Impacts

Savings / Offset*

Net Impacts

City Tax Supported Programs

1,736.7

(542.8)

1,193.8

Reflected in Table 2

Toronto Parking Authority

96.4

 

96.4

Reflected in Table 3

Toronto Community Housing

51.5

 

51.5

Not Reflected in City Variance Reporting

Total Projected 2020 Year-End Shortfall

1,884.5

(542.8)

1,341.7

Prior to Safe Restart Funding

*Year-to-date savings of $11.6M (TPA) and $0.9M (TCHC) are reflected in impacts and factored in Year-End projections

 

Tax Supported Programs:

The following table summarizes the anticipated year-end COVID-19 financial Impacts, projected offset from mitigations strategies and the resulting financial position of the City's Tax Supported Operations as of June 30, 2020 and the projection at year-end:

 

- Toronto Parking Authority and Toronto Community Housing variance information is not reflected in table below, which details Tax Supported Programs only.
  

Table 2: Tax Supported Operating Variance Summary

 

Variance ($M)

Favourable / (Unfavourable)

2020 6M YTD

2020 Year-End Projection

Budget

Actual

Var

Budget

Actual

Var

Forecast COVID-19 Financial Impacts

4,440.6

6,177.3

(1,736.7)

Implemented Mitigation Strategies reflected in Year-End Projection

N/A

(542.8)

542.8

Tax Supported Operating Variance Summary Including Mitigation Savings

City Operations

1,172.1

1,151.3

20.7

2,450.0

2,621.5

(171.5)

Agencies

1,079.4

1,344.5

(265.0)

2,166.6

2,796.4

(629.8)

Corporate Accounts

(157.6)

(89.9)

(67.7)

(192.1)

178.7

(370.8)

Total Variance

2,093.9

2,405.9

(312.0)

4,424.5

5,596.6

(1,172.1)

Less: Toronto Building*

(6.6)

(6.5)

(0.2)

(16.1)

(37.9)

21.763

Adjusted Variance

2,100.5

2,412.3

(311.8)

4,440.6

5,634.5

(1,193.8)

% of Gross Budget

 

 

-5.7%

 

 

-10.3%

 

Year-to-Date and Year-End Spending Results:

 

As noted in Table 2 above, for the six months ended June 30, 2020 Tax Supported Operations experienced an unfavourable net variance of $311.8 million or 5.7% of planned expenditures. This is mainly driven by COVID-19 related cost and revenue impacts experienced beginning from mid-March onwards. The impact on the year-to-date results are reflected in the following areas:

 

- Toronto Transit Commission - Conventional Service ($272.9 million unfavourable) primarily due to significant loss of ridership revenue from the impact of COVID-19. Ridership losses peaked at 86% below budget in late April and are currently projected to be 55% below budget through the fall. This was partially offset by the implementation of cost containment strategies and matching service capacity to demand.


- Shelter Support and Housing Administration ($11.4 million unfavourable) primarily due to unplanned COVID-19 related expenditures related to new physical distancing measures implemented in the City's shelter system, as well as underachieved revenues in Hostels and the Social Housing Service.


- Court Services ($10.9 million unfavourable) due to underachieved revenues resulting from lower than plan ticket issuance and partial suspension of collection activities due to COVID-19.


For year-end, the City is projecting $1.737 billion in COVID-19 related financial impacts, reduced by $542.8 million from offset generated through $508.7 million in mitigation strategies/cost avoidance and $34.1 million in offsets from budget variance for a net unfavourable variance of $1.194 billion or 10.3% of the 2020 Gross Operating Budget, adjusted for Toronto Building. The unfavourable variance is primarily driven by COVID-19 financial impacts, resulting in increased emergency social support costs such as Shelter, Seniors Services and Long Term Care, as well as lost revenue in City Services such as TTC, Zoo, Exhibition Place, and Corporate revenues such as Municipal Land Transfer Tax and Municipal Accommodation Tax.

 

As noted, the projected year-end pressure resulting from COVID-19 related financial impacts of $1.9 billion has been lessened to $1.194 billion through a series of mitigation strategies and other offsets, these include:

 

- $508.7 million in projected savings generated through mitigation strategies and cost avoidance as detailed below:

 

- Workforce restraints including redeployment of staff to critical and essential service areas; implementing emergency and seasonal / part-time staff layoffs; the implementation of a hiring slowdown; and savings generated from labour negotiations.


- Workforce restraints have resulted in at its peak, 9,980 City staff being placed on emergency leave, some of which have since returned back from leave, along with approximately 2,000 added staffing impacts estimated within City agencies.


- Spending restraints such as matching transit service capacity to demand; reducing discretionary spending; reviewing all services for criticality (prioritize critical, essential and priority services).


- Cost avoidance arising from expenditure management and tracking and forecasting COVID-19 related savings.
 

An additional $34.1 million in offsets are available from budget variance experienced within MLTT revenues from January 1 to March 31 that will be used to reduce COVID-19 related MLTT financial impacts.

 

Based on these initiatives, the City has achieved $293.3 million in offsets within its Tax-Supported programs as of August 30, 2020 and expects to generate a total of $542.8 million in offset by year-end.

 

- It is important to note that the projected savings generated through mitigation strategies and cost avoidance are in part based on the City's experience during the pandemic and may either increase or decrease as the emergency situation betters or worsens, consistent with the rate that recovery and restart initiatives begin across the City.
 

Rate Supported Programs:

Rate Supported Programs reported an unfavourable year-to-date variance of $5.7 million. The unfavourable variance is attributed to lower than budgeted revenue primarily from Toronto Parking Authority. At year-end, an unfavourable projected variance is anticipated to be $88.3 million, again primarily driven by significantly lower revenues from Toronto Parking Authority which is reflected in the City-wide COVID-19 financial impacts that are projected to total $1.342 billion in 2020.

 

Rate Supported Programs are funded entirely by the user fees that are used to pay for the services provided and the infrastructure to deliver them. Solid Waste Management Services and Toronto Water's respective year-end surpluses, if any, must be transferred to the Wastewater and Water Stabilization Reserves and Waste Management Reserve Fund, respectively, to finance capital investments and ongoing capital repairs and maintenance.

 

Table 1: Rate Supported Operating Variance Summary

 

Variance ($M)

Favourable / (Unfavourable)

2020 6M YTD

2020 Year-End Projection

Budget

Actual

Var

Budget

Actual

Var

Solid Waste Management Services

(10.1)

(17.5)

7.4

0.0

0.6

(0.6)

Toronto Parking Authority

(34.4)

(3.1)

(31.3)

(70.1)

26.3

(96.4)

Toronto Water

27.2

8.9

18.2

0.0

(8.6)

8.6

Total Variance

(17.3)

(11.6)

(5.7)

(70.1)

18.2

(88.3)

 

  

Additional COVID-19 Related Impacts:

In addition to COVID-19 impacts to the City's Tax and Rate supported programs that are reflected in City variance report, further impacts have been experienced with the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC).

 

City and TCHC finance staff have been working collaboratively to track and project COVID-19 financial impacts.  The TCHC has experienced $29.7 million in financial impacts as of August 30, 2020 and it is estimated that impacts will total $51.5 million by year-end.

 

In total, it is projected that the City will experience $1.885 billion in COVID-19 financial impacts ($1.737 billion – Tax Supported Programs; $96.4 million – TPA; and $51.5 million – TCHC) prior to savings and offsets that collectively total $542.8 million, reducing the year-end shortfall to a projected $1.342 billion.

  

Safe Restart Agreement:

On July 27, 2020 the Ontario government in partnership with the federal government announced $4 billion in financial support for Ontario's 444 municipalities as part of the Safe Restart Agreement and on August 12, 2020 the City of Toronto was provided with initial phase funding allocations under the agreement totalling $668.6 million as follows:

 

- Municipal Transit Funding Phase 1 - $404.1 million allocated to Toronto proportionately based on ridership.


- Social Services Relief Fund Phase 2 - $118.8 million allocated to Toronto in addition to the $39 million previously received as part of Phase 1 funding.


- Municipal Operating Funding Phase 1 - $145.7 million allocated to Toronto proportionately based on households.
 

$668.6 million in new funding will be applied to projected 2020 year-end funding shortfall of $1.342 billion.

 

- It is estimated that the remaining 2020 funding shortfall for the City following initial Safe Restart funding will be $673.1 million.


- Future phase funding of up to $2.029 billion will be allocated to municipalities by the Province on a needs basis between municipal transit needs ($1.334 billion) and municipal operating needs ($695.0 million).
 

The City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer continue to engage with their Provincial counterparts to obtain funding support as part of future phase allocations under the Safe Restart Program to offset remaining projected deficits resulting from COVID-19 related financial impacts.

 

- The City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer will be reporting to City Council for the meeting of September 30 and October 1, 2020, providing details on experienced and anticipated COVID-19 related financial impacts, results of implemented mitigation strategies and details on the City's $668.6 million Safe Restart funding allocations.


- The City Manager will also be reporting to Council later this year, once the needs based municipal allocations of up to $2.029 billion in future phase Safe Restart funding is confirmed, noting any full or partial offsets to the City's estimated $673.1 million remaining year-end funding shortfall.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on the Operating Variance Report for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 and Appendices A to E
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156562.pdf

EX16.10 - Capital Variance Report for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve in-year budget adjustments to the Approved 2020-2029 Capital Budget and Plan as detailed in Appendix 4 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer that result in no incremental impact on debt financing.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide City Council with the City of Toronto capital spending for the six month period ended June 30, 2020, as well as projected expenditures to December 31, 2020. Furthermore, this report seeks Council's approval for in-year budget adjustments to the 2020 Approved Capital Budget and Plan that have no impact on 2020 approved debt.

 

As illustrated in Table 1 below, City's 2020 capital expenditure was $1.340 billion or 28.9% of the 2020 capital budget of $4.637 billion for the period ended June 30, 2020 and is projecting to expend $3.934 billion or 84.8% by December 31, 2020.

 

Table 1: Capital Variance Summary

 

 

2020 Approved Budget*

Actual Expenditures -

January to June

Projected Expenditures - January to December

 

$M

$M

%

$M

%

City Operations

1,925

501

26.0%

1,580

82.1%

Agencies

1,352

462

34.2%

1,188

87.9%

Tax Supported

3,277

963

29.4%

2,768

84.5%

Rate Supported Programs:

1,361

377

27.7%

1,166

85.7%

TOTAL

4,637

1,340

28.9%

3,934

84.8%

*Note: Includes 2019 carry forward funding and 2020 in-year adjustments

The Capital spending pattern for the first six month typically ranges between 15% and 22% of the total Council Approved Capital Budget, with the 2020 experience of 28.9% comparing favourably to past experience. Total City projected spend of 84.8% by year-end is comprised of a Tax Supported Programs spending rate of 84.5% and a Rate Supported Programs spending rate of 85.7%.

 

Projected underspending by year-end totals $703 million or 15.2% of the 2020 Capital Budget.  Approximately half of the projected year-end variance reflects underspending attributed to COVID-19 impacts.

 

- At the onset of COVID-19, due to the uncertainty of the financial impact and the amount of financial assistance from other levels of government, capital projects funded by Capital from Current (CFC) were slowed to enable potential offsets to COVID-19 financial impacts.

 

- Given the continued uncertainty regarding the allocation that Toronto will receive of future phase Safe Restart Agreement funding, CFC funded capital projects will continued to be slowed to the end of the year.  Impacted capital projects will be reassessed as part of the 2021 budget process.
 

The projected year-end spending rates presented in this report are based on the submissions from each Program and Agency, and as such, the preparation of this report has been based on this information.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Capital Variance Report for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156533.pdf
Appendix 1 - 2020 Capital Variance and Projection Summary for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156534.pdf
Appendix 2 - Capital Projects for Closure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156535.pdf
Appendix 3 - Major Capital Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156576.pdf
Appendix 4 - In-Year Adjustments for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156577.pdf
Appendix 5 - Capital Variance Dashboard by Program and Agency
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156578.pdf

EX16.12 - 2020 Toronto Community Housing Corporation Infrastructure Ontario Mortgage Capex Release

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council consent to the amendment of the terms and conditions to the nine Financing Agreements substantially in the manner described in Attachment 1 to the report (September 9, 2020)  from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer together with such changes thereto or other terms and conditions that are satisfactory to the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

 

2. City Council direct that funding released from the Secured Properties Capex and the 4 percent Capex Reserve be used to satisfy Toronto Community Housing Corporation's capital repair co-investment obligations under its National Housing Co-investment Program Credit Agreement with Canada Mortgage and Housing and to achieve the goals of its Ten Year (2019 – 2028) Capital Financing Plan as it may be amended from time to time.  

 

3. City Council authorize the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer or designate to execute on behalf of the City as shareholder and guarantor:

 

a. City consent to the amended terms and conditions of the Financing Agreements (Amending Agreements) described in Attachment 1 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and

 

b. confirmation that the City acknowledges, ratifies, confirms and agrees that the Guarantees continue in full force and effect and that the City continues to be bound by all of the provisions of the Guarantees notwithstanding the amending terms and conditions on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer or delegate and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

 

4. City Council deem the guarantees to be in the interests of the City.

 

5. City Council authorize the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer or designate to execute and deliver such other notices, consents, authorizations, approvals and agreements or amendments to existing agreements on behalf of the City as service manager, shareholder or guarantor in order to facilitate City Council's decision.

 

6 .City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to:

 

a. provide such Service Manager consents under the Housing Services Act, 2011, as are necessary to authorize any required amendments to the mortgage security provided to Infrastructure Ontario to secure all of the foregoing loans;

 

b. request all necessary third party waivers, consents or other authorizations which the Service Manager is required to seek in connection with the transactions as described in Attachment 1 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and

 

c. provide the necessary notice to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing pursuant to Section 163 of the Housing Services Act, 2011.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report recommends that City Council provide its consent to amend existing financing agreements (FA) between Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation (IO) and Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC), for which the City is guarantor.  The amendments will provide that the capital expenditure (Capex) reserve funds applicable to the specific properties secured under the FAs can be utilized on TCHC’s general portfolio to satisfy TCHC's capital repair co-investment obligations under its National Housing Co-investment (NHCI) Program Credit Agreement with Canada Mortgage and Housing (CMHC) and achieve the goals of its Ten Year (2019 – 2028) Capital Financing Plan.

 

Between 2013 and 2019 TCHC and IO entered into 9 separate FA's providing over $1.1 billion in loans in total to TCHC for the purposes of general debt refinancing and for capital repairs for over 100 of its properties.  The City as the sole shareholder of TCHC guarantees the repayment of all of these loans. 

 

Pursuant to the FAs, a portion of the advance was required to be deposited in a separate fund administered by IO for capital repairs to the properties mortgaged under each specific FA (the "Secured Properties Capex"). In addition, TCHC was required to provide 4% of the gross income from the mortgaged properties into another reserve held by IO for the purpose of funding capital repairs on those properties (the 4% Capex Reserve, together with the Secured Properties Capex, the Capex Amounts).

 

Accordingly, there are limitations on TCHC's ability to access Capex Amounts as they cannot be used for capital repairs on TCHC's general portfolio.  Existing IO FA’s need to be amended to release the funds for capital work on the overall TCHC portfolio instead of only the IO mortgaged properties.

   

The FAs also included an equity withdrawal component which could be used for capital repairs on all of its buildings. TCHC has expended all of such equity withdrawal amounts.  However, there still remains needed capital work to be completed for 2020 and beyond and a funding source is needed to satisfy the TCHC contributions under the NHCI Credit Agreement with CMHC.

 

IO has agreed to release the Capex Amounts and to permit TCHC to apply such funds to its general portfolio state of good repair fund. The amount of the Capex Accounts held by IO in favour of TCHC currently exceeds $137 million.

 

Once the Capex Amounts are released by IO, these funds will be placed in a TCHC segregated account for Capex expenditures on the general portfolio. The released funds will supplement the City’s 10 year funding and be utilized for capital expenditures on the general portfolio.

 

The City and TCHC intend to use these released funds for repairs consistent with the co-investment under the CMHC National Housing Co-investment credit agreement recently executed at the end of 2019.

 

This report has been prepared in consultation with staff from the Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and TCHC.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on 2020 Toronto Community Housing Corporation Infrastructure Ontario Mortgage Capex Release and Attachment 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156520.pdf

EX16.14 - Build Toronto - Annual General Meeting and 2019 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council treat that portion of the City Council meeting at which the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer is considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Build Toronto by:

 

a. receiving the "CreateTO 2019 Annual Report", and the "Build Toronto 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements", forming Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and

 

b. appointing KPMG LLP as the Auditor of Build Toronto for fiscal year 2020, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Build Toronto to fix the remuneration of the Auditor.

 

2. City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the "Build Toronto 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements", forming Attachment 2 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the Audit Committee for information.

 

3. City Council, as Shareholder, direct the Board of Build Toronto Corporation, in consultation with the City of Toronto's Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to bring forward a report on the impacts of COVID-19 on Corporation Operating and Capitals Budgets and operations, detailing any modifications to their programs and initiatives to address COVID-19, to City Council through Executive Committee, by the first quarter of 2021.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report transmits materials submitted by the Board of Directors of Build Toronto to the City. No independent review or analysis has been performed by City staff.

 

This report contains recommendations for the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act, Ontario (OBCA) for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Build Toronto, including receipt of its Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements for 2019 and appointment of the auditor for 2020.

 

In light of the state of emergency that was declared in Ontario in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the deadline to hold annual meetings of shareholders for OBCA corporations was temporarily extended through the addition of Part XIX to the OBCA. With the Ontario declaration of emergency having come to an end on July 24, 2020, the extended meeting deadlines for OBCA incorporated companies that were required to hold annual meetings on or before July 24, 2020 now have until October 22, 2020 to hold their annual meetings.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Build Toronto - Annual General Meeting and 2019 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156504.pdf
Attachment 1 - CreateTO 2019 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156507.pdf
Attachment 2 - Build Toronto 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156481.pdf

EX16.15 - Casa Loma Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2019 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council treat that portion of the City Council meeting at which the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer is considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Casa Loma Corporation by:

 

a. receiving the "Casa Loma Corporation 2019 Annual Report", and the "Casa Loma Corporation 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements", forming Attachment 1 and 2 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and

 

b. appointing Welch LLP Chartered Accountants as the Auditor of Casa Loma Corporation for fiscal year 2020 until close of the next annual general meeting or until a successor is appointed, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Casa Loma Corporation to fix the remuneration of the Auditor.

 

2. City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the "Casa Loma Corporation 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements", forming Attachment 2 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the Audit Committee for information.

 

3. City Council, as Shareholder, direct the Board of Casa Loma Corporation, in consultation with the City of Toronto's Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to bring forward a report on the impacts of COVID-19 on Corporation Operating and Capital Budgets and operations, detailing any modifications to their programs and initiatives to address COVID-19, to City Council through Executive Committee, by the first quarter of 2021.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report transmits materials submitted by the Board of Directors of Casa Loma Corporation to the City. No independent review or analysis has been performed by City staff.

 

This report contains recommendations for the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act, Ontario (OBCA) for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Casa Loma Corporation, including receipt of its Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements for 2019 and appointment of the auditor for 2020.

 

In light of the state of emergency that was declared in Ontario in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the deadline to hold annual meetings of shareholders for OBCA corporations was temporarily extended through the addition of Part XIX to the OBCA. With the Ontario declaration of emergency having come to an end on July 24, 2020, the extended meeting deadlines for OBCA incorporated companies that were required to hold annual meetings on or before July 24, 2020 now have until October 22, 2020 to hold their annual meetings.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Casa Loma Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2019 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156444.pdf
Attachment 1 - Casa Loma Corporation 2019 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156445.pdf
Attachment 2 - Casa Loma Corporation 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156446.pdf

EX16.16 - Lakeshore Arena Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2019 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council treat that portion of the City Council meeting at which the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer is considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Lakeshore Arena Corporation by:

 

a. receiving the "Lakeshore Arena Corporation 2019 Annual Report", and the "Lakeshore Arena Corporation 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements", forming Attachment 1 and 2 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer;

 

b. appointing Welch LLP Chartered Accountants as the Auditor of Lakeshore Arena Corporation for fiscal year 2020, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Lakeshore Arena Corporation to fix the remuneration of the Auditor; and

 

c. receiving the "Lakeshore Arena Corporation Executive Compensation Disclosure 2019", forming Attachment 3 to the report  (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

 

2. City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the "Lakeshore Arena Corporation 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements", forming Attachment 2 to the report  (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the Audit Committee for information.

 

3. City Council, as Shareholder, direct the Board of Lakeshore Arena Corporation, in consultation with the City of Toronto's Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to bring forward a report on the impacts of COVID-19 on Corporation Operating and Capital budgets and operations, detailing any modifications to their programs and initiatives to address COVID-19, to City Council through Executive Committee, by the first quarter of 2021.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report transmits materials submitted by the Board of Directors of Lakeshore Arena Corporation to the City. No independent review or analysis has been performed by City staff.

 

This report contains recommendations for the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act, Ontario (OBCA) for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Lakeshore Arena Corporation, including receipt of its Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements for 2019 and appointment of the auditor for 2020.

 

This report also contains recommendations for receipt at the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of information disclosing the individual compensation of executive officers employed by Lakeshore Arena Corporation in 2019.

 

In light of the state of emergency that was declared in Ontario in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the deadline to hold annual meetings of shareholders for OBCA corporations was temporarily extended through the addition of Part XIX to the OBCA. With the Ontario declaration of emergency having come to an end on July 24, 2020, the extended meeting deadlines for OBCA incorporated companies that were required to hold annual meetings on or before July 24, 2020 now have until October 22, 2020 to hold their annual meetings.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Lakeshore Arena Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2019 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156496.pdf
Attachment 1 - Lakeshore Arena Corporation 2019 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156497.pdf
Attachment 2 - Lakeshore Arena Corporation 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156498.pdf
Attachment 3 - Lakeshore Arena Corporation Executive Compensation Disclosure 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156499.pdf

EX16.17 - Toronto Community Housing Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2019 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council treat the portion of the City Council meeting at which the report (September 9, 2020) report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer is considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Toronto Community Housing Corporation, and:

 

a. receive the Letter to the Shareholder from the Toronto Community Housing Corporation's Chair of the Board of Directors and President and Chief Executive Officer dated June 2, 2020 transmitting the Toronto Community Housing Corporation 2019 Annual Report and additional information, forming Attachment 1 to the report (September 9, 2020) report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer;

 

b. receive Toronto Community Housing Corporation's 2019 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ending December 31, 2019, including the auditor's report dated April 29, 2020, forming Attachment 2 to the report (September 9, 2020) report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer;

 

c. confirm the appointment of KPMG LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the auditor for Toronto Community Housing Corporation for fiscal year 2020  until the close of the next Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder or until a successor is appointed, at the fee provided in the City's agreement with that firm; and

 

d. receive the Toronto Community Housing Corporation's executive compensation disclosure for 2019 included in section 4.1.1 of additional information in Attachment 1 to the report (September 9, 2020) report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

 

2. City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of Toronto Community Housing Corporation's 2019 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, forming Attachment 2 to the report (September 9, 2020) report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the Audit Committee for information.

 

3. City Council, as Shareholder, direct the Board of Toronto Community Housing Corporation, in consultation with the City of Toronto's Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to bring forward a report on the impacts of COVID-19 on Corporation Operating and Capital Budgets and operations, detailing any modifications to their programs and initiatives to address COVID-19, to City Council through Executive Committee, by the first quarter of 2021.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report transmits materials submitted by the Board of Directors of Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) to the City. No independent review or analysis has been performed by City staff.

 

This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act, Ontario (OBCA) to hold an Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC), including receipt of TCHC's 2019 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements and appointment of the auditor for TCHC for 2020.

 

In light of the state of emergency that was declared in Ontario in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the deadline to hold annual meetings of shareholders for OBCA corporations was temporarily extended through the addition of Part XIX to the OBCA. With the Ontario Declaration of Emergency having come to an end on July 24, 2020, the extended meeting deadlines for OBCA incorporated companies that were required to hold annual meetings on or before July 24, 2020 now have until October 22, 2020 to hold their annual meetings.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Toronto Community Housing Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2019 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156524.pdf
Attachment 1 - Letter to the Shareholder dated June 2, 2019, Toronto Community Housing Corporation's 2019 Annual Report and Additional Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156545.pdf
Attachment 2 - Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2019 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, for the period ending December 31, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156546.pdf
Attachment 3 - Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2019-2022 Strategic Plan and 2020 Budget Detailed Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156547.pdf

EX16.18 - Toronto Hydro Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2019 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - The security of property belonging to the City of Toronto or Toronto Hydro Corporation and personal matters about an identifiable person

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council treat the portion of the City Council meeting at which the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer is being considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Toronto Hydro Corporation, and:

 

a. approve the "Resolution of the Sole Shareholder Re-appointing Auditor" in Attachment 1 Appendix A to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in order to re-appoint KPMG LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the auditor for Toronto Hydro Corporation for 2020 until the close of the next annual meeting of the Shareholder, or until a successor is appointed, at such remuneration as may be fixed by the Corporation's Board;

 

b. receive the "Toronto Hydro Corporation 2019 Annual Report," "Toronto Hydro Corporation 2019 Annual Financial Report, and Consolidated Financial Statements," "Toronto Hydro Corporation Annual Information Form 2019," "Toronto Hydro Corporation Environmental Performance Report 2019," "Toronto Hydro Corporation CEO and CFO Certifications of Annual Filings 2019," the "Toronto Hydro Corporation First Quarter Financial Report 2020," and the "Toronto Hydro Corporation Statement of Board Remuneration and Expenses 2019," forming Attachments 2a, 2b, 3, 4, 5, 10, and 11 respectively to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer;

 

c. receive the "Toronto Hydro Corporation Shareholder Report 2019, including Non-Consolidated Financial Statements," "Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited Financial Statements 2019 and 2018," and "Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. Financial Statements 2019 and 2018," forming Confidential Attachments 7, 8 and 9 respectively to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and

 

d. receive the two-part report "Toronto Hydro Corporation Executive Compensation Disclosure 2019" forming Attachment 6a and Confidential Attachment 6b to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

 

2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 7, 8 and 9 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer remain confidential in their entirety due to the security of the property of the City and securities requirements arising from Toronto Hydro Corporation's status as an offering corporation under the Business Corporations Act, (Ontario) R.S.O. 1990, c.B.16, Toronto Hydro Corporation's status as a reporting issuer under the Securities Act, (Ontario) R.S.O. 1990, c.S.5, and the application by the Ontario Securities Commission of National Instrument 51-102.

 

3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 6b to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer remain confidential in its entirety as it deals with personal information about identifiable individuals.

 

4. City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the "Toronto Hydro Corporation Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2019 and 2018", included as part of Attachment 2b to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the Audit Committee for information.

 

5. City Council, as Shareholder, direct the Board of Toronto Hydro Corporation, in consultation with the City of Toronto's Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to bring forward a report on the impacts of COVID-19 on Corporation Operating and Capital Budgets and operations, detailing any modifications to their programs and initiatives to address COVID-19, to City Council through Executive Committee, by the first quarter of 2021.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report transmits materials submitted by the Board of Directors of Toronto Hydro Corporation to the City. No independent review or analysis has been performed by City staff.

 

This report contains recommendations for actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act, (Ontario) R.S.O. 1990, c.B.16 (OBCA) for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Toronto Hydro Corporation including receipt of Toronto Hydro Corporation's audited annual consolidated financial statements for 2019 and appointment of the auditor for Toronto Hydro Corporation for 2020.

 

In light of the state of emergency that was declared in Ontario in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the deadline to hold annual meetings of shareholders for OBCA corporations was temporarily extended through the addition of Part XIX to the OBCA. With the Ontario declaration of emergency having come to an end on July 24, 2020, the extended meeting deadlines for OBCA incorporated companies that were required to hold annual meetings on or before July 24, 2020 now have until October 22, 2020 to hold their annual meetings.

 

 This report also contains recommendations for receipt at the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of information disclosing the individual compensation of executive officers employed by Toronto Hydro Corporation in 2019.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Toronto Hydro Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2019 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156486.pdf
Attachment 1 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Report on the 2019 Annual Shareholder Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156487.pdf
Attachment 1 Appendix A - Resolution of the Shareholder Re-appointing Auditor
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156488.pdf
Attachment 2a - Toronto Hydro Corporation 2019 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156489.pdf
Attachment 2b - Toronto Hydro Corporation 2019 Financial Report and Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156490.pdf
Attachment 3 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Annual Information Form 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156491.pdf
Attachment 4 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Environmental Performance Report 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156492.pdf
Attachment 5 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification of Annual Filings 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156493.pdf
Attachment 6a - Toronto Hydro Corporation Executive Compensation Disclosure 2019 (Part 1, NEOs)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156494.pdf
Confidential Attachment 6b - Toronto Hydro Corporation Executive Compensation Disclosure 2019 (Part 2, All Executives)
Confidential Attachment 7 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Shareholder Report 2019, including Non-Consolidated Financial Statements
Confidential Attachment 8 - Toronto Hydro Electric System Limited Financial Statements 2019 and 2018
Confidential Attachment 9 - Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. Financial Statements 2019 and 2018
Attachment 10 - Toronto Hydro Corporation First Quarter Financial Report 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156539.pdf
Attachment 11 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Statement of Board Remuneration and Expenses 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156540.pdf

EX16.19 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. - Annual General Meeting and 2019 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council, in its capacity as one of the Shareholders of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc.:

 

a. adopt and authorize the City Manager to sign the Resolutions of the Shareholders attached as Attachment 1 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on behalf of the City so that:

 

i. Financial Statements

 

the "Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc.  2019 Annual Report, and the "Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements", including the auditor's report dated March 17, 2020, forming Attachments 2 and 3 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer are received;

 

ii.  Appointment of Auditors

 

Welch LLP are appointed as the Auditor of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. for fiscal year 2020, and until the close of the next annual meeting of the Shareholders or until their successors are duly appointed, and the Board of Directors of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. authorized to fix the remuneration of the Auditor; and

 

iii. Confirmation of Proceedings

 

all by-laws, contracts, acts, proceedings, appointments, elections and payments of any director or officer of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. that were enacted, made, done or taken since the last annual meeting of Shareholders of Toronto Pan Am Sport Centre Inc. are approved, ratified, sanctioned and confirmed; and

 

b. adopt and authorize the City Manager to sign the Resolutions of Shareholders forming Attachment 5 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer:

 

i. ratifying and approving the 2020 Operating and Capital Budgets of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. attached as Schedule A to Attachment 5 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and

 

ii. authorizing any two directors or officers to carry out the provisions of the resolutions passed by the Shareholders of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc.   

 

2. City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements, forming Attachment 3 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the Audit Committee for information.

 

3. City Council, as joint Shareholder, request the Board of Pan Am Sports Centre Inc., in consultation with the City of Toronto's Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to bring forward a report, as appropriate, on the impacts of COVID-19 on Corporation Operating and Capital Budgets and operations, detailing any modifications to their programs and initiatives to address COVID-19, to City Council through Executive Committee, by the first quarter of 2021.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report transmits materials submitted by the Board of Directors of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. (TPASC) to the City.  No independent review or analysis has been performed by City staff.

 

This report contains recommendations for the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act, Ontario (OBCA) for holding the 2020 Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders of TPASC, including receipt of its Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements for 2019, the report of the auditor thereon, and the re-appointment of the auditor for 2020.

 

This report also contains recommendations to approve the 2020 operating and capital budgets of TPASC approved by the TPASC board of directors. Section 5.05(a) of the Unanimous Shareholders’ Agreement of the Corporation as of December 18, 2013 provides that the annual operating and capital budgets shall be considered and approved by the Board and subject to approval by the Shareholders of the Corporation.

 

The City and the Governing Council of The University of Toronto are the two Shareholders of TPASC.  Rather than conducting a Shareholder meeting, the requirements of the OBCA regarding the annual general meeting and the requirements of the Unanimous Shareholders’ Agreement regarding approval of the annual operating and capital budgets are being satisfied by written joint resolutions of the Shareholders, as provided in this report.  

 

The Business Corporations Act, Ontario (OBCA) provides that a resolution in writing signed by all the Shareholders entitled to vote on that resolution at a meeting of the Shareholders is as valid as if it had been passed at a meeting of the Shareholders; and a resolution in writing dealing with all matters required by the OBCA to be dealt with at a meeting of Shareholders, and signed by all the Shareholders entitled to vote at that meeting, satisfies all the requirements of the OBCA relating to that meeting of Shareholders.

 

In light of the state of emergency that was declared in Ontario in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the deadline to hold annual meetings of shareholders for OBCA corporations was temporarily extended through the addition of Part XIX to the OBCA. With the Ontario Declaration of Emergency having come to an end on July 24, 2020, the extended meeting deadlines for OBCA incorporated companies that were required to hold annual meetings on or before July 24, 2020 now have until October 22, 2020 to hold their annual meetings.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. - Annual General Meeting and 2019 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156451.pdf
Attachment 1 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. Resolutions of Shareholders - Financial Statements, Appointment of Auditors, Confirmation of Proceedings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156453.pdf
Attachment 2 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. 2019 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156454.pdf
Attachment 3 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156455.pdf
Attachment 4 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. 2019 Operating Highlights
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156500.pdf
Attachment 5 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. Resolutions of Shareholders - Approval of Budgets
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156501.pdf
Attachment 5 - Schedule A - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc., 2020 Capital and Operating Budgets
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156503.pdf
Attachment 5 - Schedule B - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc., Board Approval of 2020 Capital and Operating Budgets
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156508.pdf

EX16.20 - Toronto Port Lands Company - Annual General Meeting and 2019 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council treat that portion of the City Council meeting at which the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer is considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Toronto Port Lands Company by:

 

a. receiving the "CreateTO 2019 Annual Report", and the "Toronto Port Lands Company 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements", forming Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and

 

b. appointing KPMG LLP as the Auditor of Toronto Port Lands Company for fiscal year 2020 until close of the next annual general meeting, or until a successor is appointed, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Toronto Port Lands Company to fix the remuneration of the Auditor.

 

2. City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the "Toronto Port Lands Company 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements", forming Attachment 2 to the report (September 9, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the Audit Committee for information.

 

3. City Council, as Shareholder, direct the Board of Toronto Port Lands Company, in consultation with the City of Toronto's Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to bring forward a report on the impacts of COVID-19 on Corporation Operating and Capital  Budgets and operations, detailing any modifications to their programs and initiatives to address COVID-19, to City Council through Executive Committee, by the first quarter of 2021.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report transmits materials submitted by the Board of Directors of Toronto Port Lands Company to the City. No independent review or analysis has been performed by City staff.

 

This report contains recommendations for the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act, Ontario (OBCA) for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Toronto Economic Development Corporation (TEDCO), operating as the Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC) including receipt of its Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements for 2019 and appointment of the auditor for 2020.

 

In light of the state of emergency that was declared in Ontario in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the deadline to hold annual meetings of shareholders for OBCA corporations was temporarily extended through the addition of Part XIX to the OBCA. With the Ontario declaration of emergency having come to an end on July 24, 2020, the extended meeting deadlines for OBCA incorporated companies that were required to hold annual meetings on or before July 24, 2020 now have until October 22, 2020 to hold their annual meetings.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Toronto Port Lands Company - Annual General Meeting and 2019 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156510.pdf
Attachment 1 - CreateTO 2019 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156511.pdf
Attachment 2 - Toronto Port Lands Company 2019 Audited Annual Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156512.pdf

EX16.21 - Ratio of Full-time to Part-time Paramedics

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council receive the report (September 8, 2020) from the City Manager and the Chief People Officer for information.

Origin

(September 8, 2020) Report from the City Manager and the Chief People Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to respond to the July 28, 2020, Council request that the City Manager and the Chief People Officer, in consultation with the Medical Officer of Health, report back to City Council on a possible change to the ratio of full-time to part-time Paramedics so that more Paramedics have paid sick days to decrease the likelihood of Paramedics working in other positions that may expose them to greater risk. Toronto Paramedic Services was also consulted for this report.

 

As the COVID-19 pandemic has persisted, the City and Toronto Paramedic Services have continued to implement and maintain initiatives to support the wellness of all Toronto Paramedic Services staff, including part-time Paramedics:

 

Uninterrupted pay for every Toronto Paramedic Services employee on self-isolation due to possible exposure to COVID-19.

 

Part-time Paramedics absent due to COVID-19-related symptoms continue to be compensated for pre-scheduled shifts.

 

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) benefits coverage for all accepted claims regarding illnesses/injuries acquired while working, including COVID-19.

 

Launch of a Staff Support Centre to track COVID-19-related absences and to answer staff enquiries related to the pandemic.

 

Self-screening of all staff for symptoms of illness prior to starting work each shift to increase protection of paramedics and the public.

 

Psychological Health and Wellness Plan for all staff, focused on prevention, reduction of stigma, timely intervention, post-incident support and increasing available resources.

 

In April 2020, the City approved the provision of psychological services for part-time Paramedics provided through the BEACON program offered by the City's benefits provider, Green Shield Canada.
 

It should also be noted that, in Ontario, both full-time and part-time Paramedics are permitted to work for more than one employer. A portion of both full-time and part-time Toronto Paramedic Services Paramedics are known to work for other Paramedic services outside Toronto.

 

In addition, the Ontario government has provided funding for temporary pandemic pay to all active frontline Paramedics, regardless of job classification, in the form of a temporary top-up based on hourly wages as well as monthly lump sum payments. This pay is in recognition of the challenges and heightened risk faced during the COVID-19 outbreak. The goals of this temporary pandemic pay were to provide additional support and relief to frontline workers, encourage staff to continue working and attract prospective employees, and to help maintain safe staffing levels and the operation of critical frontline services.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 8, 2020) Report from the City Manager and the Chief People Officer on Ratio of Full-time to Part-time Paramedics
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156452.pdf

EX16.22 - 2020 Heads and Beds Levy on Institutions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 804 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the levy and collection of amounts for the 2020 taxation year on colleges and universities, public hospitals, and correctional facilities as authorized by Section 285 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and City Council direct that the maximum prescribed amount of $75 be applied per provincially rated hospital bed, full time student, or resident place as prescribed by Ontario Regulation 121/07.

 

2.  City Council forward the Item to the Premier of Ontario and the Ontario Minister of Finance and request the Province to increase the $75.00 levy annually by the rate of inflation.

 

3.  City Council forward the Item to the Association of Municipalities of Ontario and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.

Origin

(September 4, 2020) Report from the Controller

Summary

This report requests Council authority to adopt a by-law to levy amounts for the 2020 taxation year for colleges and universities, public hospitals, and correctional facilities (the "institutions"), estimated at approximately $19.2 million (annual "Heads and Beds" levy).

Background Information (Committee)

(September 4, 2020) Report from the Controller on 2020 Heads and Beds Levy on Institutions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156483.pdf
Attachment 1 - Letter dated June 17, 2020 from the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Municipal Programs and Analytics Branch, regarding the capacity of institutions information to be used for the 2020 payments in lieu levy calculations and Attachment 2 - Summary of Heads and Beds Levy on Institutions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156484.pdf

EX16.23 - 2020 Levy on Railway Roadways and Rights-of-Way and on Power Utility Transmission and Distribution Corridors

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 805 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the levy and collection of taxes for the 2020 taxation year on railway roadways and rights-of-way and on land used as transmission or distribution corridors owned by power utilities, in accordance with subsection 280 (1) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and subsection 257.7 (1) of the Education Act.

 

2. City Council receive Attachment 2, Acreage and Tonnage Taxation Systems, to the report (September 4, 2020) from the Controller for information.

 

3. City Council request the Province of Ontario to explore the impact of national railways converting to a tonnage-based levy system, as opposed to the current rate per acreage system in the Province of Ontario, to determine any benefits to municipalities.

 

4. City Council forward the Item to the Ontario Good Roads Association, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities for their information.

Origin

(September 4, 2020) Report from the Controller

Summary

This report seeks Council authority for the introduction of the by-law necessary to levy and collect taxes for the 2020 taxation year on railway roadways and rights-of-way and on land used as transmission or distribution corridors owned by power utilities, totalling approximately $7.1 million in taxation revenue, of which the municipal share is $6.6 million and the provincial education share is $0.5 million.

 

The 2020 levy total remains unchanged from the 2019 levy total of $7.1 million (with a $6.6 million municipal share and a provincial education share of $0.5 million). In December 2019, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing advised through the 2020 Property Tax Decisions document to municipalities, that for the 2020 tax year, the property tax rates for railway rights-of-way will remain unchanged from 2019 levels, and the 2020 tax rates will be the same as the 2019 rates communicated to municipalities on May 24, 2019 for the 2019 tax year.

 

Attachment 2 to this report also provides information related to the property taxation of railway rights-of-way using acreage and tonnage systems.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 4, 2020) Report from the Controller on 2020 Levy on Railway Roadways and Rights-of-Way and on Power Utility Transmission and Distribution Corridors and Attachments 1 and 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156485.pdf

EX16.24 - Children's Services Capital Budget Adjustment for Child Care Centres Projects at Mount Dennis, St. Barnabas Catholic School, St. Bartholomew Catholic School, and St. Roch

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the 2020 Capital Budget and 2021 – 2023 Capital Plan for Children's Services by increasing the project cost for the TELCCS Mount Dennis Child Care Centre (CCS035-01) by $1.830 million, increasing the project cost from $18.000 million to $19.830 million, funded with cash flows of $2.557 million in 2020; $10.580 million in 2021; $3.410 million in 2022; and $0.202 million in 2023 through the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund (XR1103), to support the consolidation of the Trimbee Early Learning Centre; and to support the addition of 26 child care spaces to the planned Mount Dennis location.

 

2.  City Council amend the 2020 Capital Budget and 2021 – 2022 Capital Plan for Children's Services by increasing the project cost for the St. Barnabas Catholic School Child Care Centre (CCS027-01) by $0.400 million, increasing the project cost from $3.100 million to $3.500 million, funded with cash flows of $0.500 million in 2020; $2.323 million in 2021; $0.500 million in 2022 through the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund (XR1103), required to fund the inflationary impacts on the cost of construction; million.

 

3.  City Council amend the 2020 Capital Budget and 2021 – 2022 Capital Plan for Children's Services by increasing the project cost for the St. Bartholomew Catholic School Child Care Centre (CCS029-01) by $0.800 million, increasing the project cost from $3.000 million to $3.800 million, funded with cash flows of $0.250 million in 2020; $2.750 million in 2021; $0.683 million in 2022; through the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund (XR1103), required to fund the inflationary impacts on the cost of construction.

 

4.  City Council amend the 2020 Capital Budget and 2021-2022 Capital Plan for Children's Services by increasing the project cost for the St. Roch Catholic School Child Care Centre (CCS028-01) by $0.800 million, increasing the project cost from $3.200 million to $4.000 million, funded with cash flows of $0.500 million in 2020; $2.871 million in 2021;and $0.500 million in 2022 through the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund (XR1103), required to fund the inflationary impacts on the cost of construction.

Origin

(September 9, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Children's Services

Summary

This report requests City Council's authority to amend the Approved 2020 Capital Budget and 2021-2029 Capital Plan for Children's Services' by increasing total project costs for four projects by $3.830 million, funded from the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund (XR1103).

 

These amendments are required in order to proceed with the awarding of tenders for the construction of three child care centres, as the tender prices for the Toronto Early Learning & Child Care Services' (TELCCS) Mount Dennis Child Care Centre at 1234 Weston Road in Ward 5, St. Barnabas Catholic School Child Care Centre at 30 Washburn Way in Ward 23, and St. Roch Catholic School Child Care Centre at 174 Duncanwood Drive in Ward 7 are higher than previous cost estimates provided due to the unique nature of the Mount Dennis project, unique site conditions and construction cost inflation for all four projects.  The amendment is also required in order to proceed with the re-tender process for the fourth centre for the construction of St. Bartholomew Catholic School Child Care Centre located at 51 Heather Road in Ward 23, as recently cancelled tender indicated a need to increase project budget.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 9, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Children's Services on Children's Services Capital Budget Adjustment for Child Care Centres Projects at Mount Dennis, St. Barnabas Catholic School, St. Bartholomew Catholic School, and St. Roch
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156482.pdf

EX16.25 - Toronto Youth Jobs Corps 2020-2023 Contract Authority

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to enter into and administer a contract renewal agreement with Employment and Social Development Canada, for the Toronto Youth Jobs Corps program for up to $8,939,959 in Federal subsidy for the period October 5, 2020 to September 29, 2023.
 

2. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to convert one temporary Program Support Analyst position, to a permanent Agency Review Officer, to better meet the program development requirements for the Toronto Youth Job Corps program.

 
3. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to have delegated authority to extend this and future contracts and receive and expend funds as submitted in the application to Employment and Social Development Canada to support the Toronto Youth Job Corps program through the annual budget process.
 

4. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to enter into agreements with other entities, including purchase of service agreements for the delivery of Toronto Youth Job Corp with the successful proponents of the Request for Proposals process, other federal agencies, community organizations, private entities, or individuals, and to spend federal funding in accordance with the federal program requirements and guidelines.

Origin

(September 8, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

This report seeks authority to enter into and administer a contract renewal agreement with Employment and Social Development Canada (formerly referred to as Service Canada), for the City-administered Toronto Youth Job Corps program for the 2020-2023 contract period.

 

The Toronto Youth Job Corps program provides group-based pre-employment support, structured employment training, work experience through job placements and follow up supports for vulnerable youth furthest from labour market. Toronto Youth Job Corps commenced in 1983 and has been reviewed and updated to meet both the changing needs of youth and funding requirements.

For 37 years, the City of Toronto has administered Toronto Youth Job Corp. It is delivered by community agencies selected through an open Request for Proposal. Five agencies have been selected through the 2020 Request for Proposal. This resulting agreement through the Request for Proposals will be valid for five years. 

 

On July 25, 2019, Social Development, Finance and Administration submitted a contract renewal application with an anticipated start date of April 1, 2020, following the completion date of March 27, 2020 for the 2017-2020 contract period. In mid-February 2020, Employment and Social Development Canada extended the current contract until September 25, 2020.  On March 4, 2020, the City received written confirmation from Employment and Social Development Canada for the City's 2020-2023 application, awaiting negotiation of full details.  Social Development, Finance and Administration has proposed to Employment and Social Development Canada a start date of October 5, 2020.  If accepted, this agreement will run from October 5, 2020 – September 29, 2023.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 8, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Toronto Youth Jobs Corps 2020-2023 Contract Authority
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-156442.pdf

Board of Health - Meeting 20

HL20.1 - Response to COVID-19: Reopening and Preparation for a Potential Resurgence

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Mayor's Second Key Matter and first item after the lunch recess on September 30th

The Medical Officer of Health has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (HL20.1a with recommendations)

Communications HL20.1.4 to HL20.1.11 have been submitted on this Item.

Bills 812, 813 and 814 have been submitted on this Item.

Board Recommendations

The Board of Health recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Manager to provide a presentation to the Board of Health in the fall of 2020 on the recommendations from the Toronto Office of Recovery and Rebuild.

 

2.  City Council request the City Manager to work with the Federal and Provincial Governments to ensure the enforcement of existing quarantine rules for visitors to, and residents of, Toronto.

 

3.  City Council request the Federal and Provincial Governments to strictly enforce travel restrictions with regard to COVID-19, including the mandatory 14-day quarantine for visitors and travel by "essential" workers.

 

4.  City Council urge the Federal Government to implement a data system that will quickly transmit information about arriving international travellers to local authorities to support better compliance with the Quarantine Act.

 

5.  City Council urge the Federal Government to expedite, in collaboration with the Province of Ontario and local public health units, the rapid implementation of new testing technologies, such as at-home and saliva-based tests, for the proactive surveillance of COVID-19.

 

6.  City Council urge the Province of Ontario to take all necessary steps to improve the turnaround time for laboratory tests and achieve the timely reporting of positive results to individuals and local public health units.

 

7.  City Council urge the Ontario Ministry of Health to increase testing capacity and develop an enhanced testing strategy aimed at suspected cases, contacts, and high-risk/high-need situations, including workplaces, schools, and neighbourhoods.

 

8.  City Council urge the Ontario Ministry of Health to expedite, in collaboration with the Federal Government and local public health units, the rapid implementation of new testing technologies, such as at-home and saliva-based tests, for the proactive surveillance of COVID-19.

 

9.  City Council urge the Ontario Ministry of Long-Term Care to fund on-site, dedicated infection prevention and control expertise at each long-term care facility and invest in training for existing practitioners to contribute to system-wide improvements related to infection prevention and control.

Board Decision Advice and Other Information

The Board of Health:

 

1.  Requested the Medical Officer of Health to work with the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, and the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services, to explore how to implement strategies such as those identified in the report (September 3, 2020) from the Medical Officer of Health, to address the social determinants of health for the City of Toronto's most vulnerable populations who have been adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

2.  Requested the Medical Officer of Health to continue to support the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in the implementation of the COVID-19 Interim Shelter Recovery Strategy.

 

3.  Requested the Medical Officer of Health, in coordination with Provincial and Regional partners, to consider any additional measures that may be required to maintain a COVID-19 reproduction rate below 1.0, including but not limited to:

 

a.  targeted restrictions and requirements for commercial settings at higher potential risk for transmission;


b.  additional restrictions on social gatherings in private and commercial settings;

 

c.  methods to enhance the use or uptake of personal protective measures;


d.  screening for signs and symptoms at more public locations where people gather;


e.  additional dedicated resources for targeted outreach, inspection, and education; and

 

f.  enhanced promotion of COVID Alert, Canada's exposure notification app, through the various channels available to Toronto Public Health and the City of Toronto.

 

4.  Requested the Medical Officer of Health to continue efforts to scale up Toronto Public Health's COVID-19 resurgence response, including:

 

a.  case and contact management capacity;


b.  support for congregate settings such as schools, child care centres, long-term care facilities, and shelters; and

 

c.  targeted support for marginalized and vulnerable populations and communities disproportionately affected by COVID-19.

 

5.  Requested the Medical Officer of Health to implement a system to publicly share details of workplace outbreaks without compromising individual privacy, similar to existing systems in place for shelters, long-term care facilities, and schools.

 

6.  Requested the Medical Officer of Health to provide a letter of support for intergovernmental funding requests that address the affordable housing and homelessness crisis in Toronto.

 

7.  Urged the Federal Government to implement a data system that will quickly transmit information about arriving international travellers to local enforcement authorities to support better compliance with the Quarantine Act.

 

8.  Urged the Federal Government to expedite, in collaboration with the Province of Ontario and local public health units, the rapid implementation of new testing technologies, such as at-home and saliva-based tests, for the proactive surveillance of COVID-19.

 

9.  Urged the Province of Ontario to take all necessary steps to improve the turnaround time for laboratory tests and achieve the timely reporting of positive results to individuals and local public health units.

 

10.  Urged the Ontario Ministry of Health to increase testing capacity and develop an enhanced testing strategy aimed at suspected cases, contacts, and high-risk/high-need situations, including workplaces, schools, and neighbourhoods.

 

11.  Urged the Ontario Ministry of Health to expedite, in collaboration with the Federal Government and local public health units, the rapid implementation of new testing technologies, such as at-home and saliva-based tests, for the proactive surveillance of COVID-19.

 

12.  Urged the Ontario Ministry of Long-Term Care to fund on-site, dedicated infection prevention and control expertise at each long-term care facility and invest in training for existing practitioners to contribute to system-wide improvements related to infection prevention and control.

 

The Medical Officer of Health gave a presentation on An Update on COVID-19.

Origin

(September 3, 2020) Report from the Medical Officer of Health

Summary

Since January 2020, Toronto Public Health (TPH) and City of Toronto partners have been responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of new COVID-19 cases identified each day had shown a downward trend, but we have now started to observe an increase in the number of cases reported each day.

 

As the City continues to reopen more businesses and services as part of Stage 3 of the Provincial Recovery Framework, Toronto Public Health will continue working with the Province of Ontario to carefully monitor COVID-19 activity in the community and in institutional and congregate settings. Toronto Public Health staff are prepared to respond quickly when additional cases are observed.

 

This report is intended to provide an update on COVID-19 response activities, describe scenarios and planning for future events, including a potential resurgence, and provide recommendations to strengthen the response to the COVID-19 pandemic as we move towards fall 2020.

Background Information (Board)

(September 3, 2020) Report from the Medical Officer of Health on Response to COVID-19: Reopening and Preparation for a Potential Resurgence
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156376.pdf
(September 21, 2020) Presentation from the Medical Officer of Health on An Update on COVID-19
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156696.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 28, 2020) Supplementary report from the Medical Officer of Health on Extending By-laws Necessary for COVID-19 Response (HL20.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157068.pdf

Speakers

Dr. Andrew Morris, Sinai Health - University Health Network Antimicrobial Stewardship Program and University of Toronto
Hamzah Husain, SafeCan Disinfecting and Fogging Solutions
Julien Beillard

Communications (Board)

(September 18, 2020) Letter from Councillor Cynthia Lai (HL.New.HL20.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/hl/comm/communicationfile-118405.pdf
(September 21, 2020) E-mail from Julien Beillard (HL.New.HL20.1.2)
(September 21, 2020) Submission from Dr. Andrew Morris, Sinai Health - University Health Network Antimicrobial Stewardship Program and University of Toronto (HL.New.HL20.1.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/hl/comm/communicationfile-118437.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(August 21, 2020) E-mail from Christine Massey (CC.Main.HL20.1.4)
(September 4, 2020) E-mail from Christine Massey (CC.Main.HL20.1.5)
(September 8, 2020) E-mail from Maria Veronica Gonzalez (CC.Main.HL20.1.6)
(September 9, 2020) E-mail from Maria Veronica Gonzalez (CC.Main.HL20.1.7)
(September 10, 2020) E-mail from Christine Massey (CC.Main.HL20.1.8)
(September 21, 2020) E-mail from Keshav Chandra (CC.Main.HL20.1.9)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Christine Massey (CC.Main.HL20.1.10)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Keshav Chandra (CC.New.HL20.1.11)

HL20.5 - 2020 Ontario Seniors Dental Care Program - Capital Project

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Board Recommendations

The Board of Health recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the Toronto Public Health 2020 Capital Budget for the Ontario Seniors Dental Care Program Capital Project by $2.345 million gross, fully funded by the Ontario Ministry of Health, with cash flows of $2.781 million in 2020 and $0.711 million in 2021.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Medical Officer of Health to enter into Capital Funding Agreements with the following dental clinics for the receipt and expenditure of funding on such terms and conditions that are satisfactory to the Medical Officer of Health and in a form approved by the City Solicitor:

 

a.  Rexdale Community Health Centre, located at 8 Taber Road ($268,000);


b.  TAIBU Community Health Centre, located at 27 Tapscott Road, Unit #1 ($275,000);

 

c.  Toronto Public Health Dental Clinic, located at 2340 Dundas Street West ($320,800);

 

d.  Rexdale Community Health Centre, located at 222 Dixon Road, Suite 301 ($457,100);

 

e.  Black Creek Community Health Centre, located at 1 York Gate Boulevard, Suite 202 ($401,800); and

 

f.  Hong Fook (HF) Connecting Health Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinic, located at 3660 Midland Avenue, Suite 201 ($622,100).

Board Decision Advice and Other Information

The Chair advised the Board of Health that, on the advice of the Medical Officer of Health, Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (September 3, 2020) from the Medical Officer of Health is no longer confidential.  Confidential Attachment 1 has been made public in its entirety and can be accessed under Background Information (Board) below.

Origin

(September 3, 2020) Report from the Medical Officer of Health

Summary

On November 20, 2019 the Government of Ontario launched the Ontario Seniors Dental Care Program (OSDCP). Through this 100 percent Ministry of Health funded program, local public health departments are to ensure the provision of dental treatment to low-income seniors. In Toronto, the OSDCP treatment services are provided to eligible seniors through dental clinics located in Toronto Public Health sites, Community Health Centres and Aboriginal Health Access Centres.

 

On August 31, 2020, the Province of Ontario announced new, one-time capital funding of $25 million to expand access to the Ontario Seniors Dental Care Program. The funding will be used to support infrastructure projects across the province, including building new dental clinics and renovating existing facilities. The Province has indicated that a portion of this funding will be allocated to dental clinics in Toronto.

 

This report recommends increasing Toronto Public Health's 2020 Capital Budget to accept the new provincial funding to expand the Ontario Seniors Dental Care Program in Toronto.

Background Information (Board)

(September 3, 2020) Report from the Medical Officer of Health on 2020 Ontario Seniors Dental Care Program - Capital Project
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156380.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Funding Allocation from the Ministry of Health for Toronto Public Health 2020 Capital Budget and Proposed Locations for the Ontario Seniors Dental Care Program Capital Projects - made public on September 21, 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156381.pdf

Declared Interests (Board)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Kate Mulligan - because she works with the Alliance for Healthier Communities which is the association representing several Community Health Centres receiving this capital funding.
Written Declaration: https://secure.toronto.ca/council/declared-interest-file.do?id=9315

Civic Appointments Committee - Meeting 14

CA14.1 - Toronto Investment Board - Appointment of Public Member

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Toronto Investment Board

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council appoint Colin Lynch to the Toronto Investment Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on January 31, 2024, and until a successor is appointed.

 

2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1 to 4 to the report (September 3, 2020) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Investment Board.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidate's biography:

 

Colin Lynch

 

Colin Lynch is Head of Global Real Estate Investments at TD Greystone Asset Management and oversees the management of real estate assets globally.   He was previously a Senior Engagement Manager with McKinsey & Company and an Investment Banking Analyst at Morgan Stanley.  Colin holds an MBA from Harvard University, a B Com and a BA from Queen’s University. All were received with distinction.  He is a member of the Board of Directors of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto Symphony Orchestra and the Queen’s University Investment Committee.  He was previously Vice Chair of Toronto Community Housing Corporation.  

Origin

(September 3, 2020) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The Civic Appointments Committee will conduct interviews and recommend one public member to City Council for appointment to the Toronto Investment Board.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 3, 2020) Report from the City Clerk on Toronto Investment Board - Appointment of Public Member
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-156303.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Toronto Investment Board (previously distributed with Item CA13.3)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Diversity Information Summary of Current Members of the Toronto Investment Board (previously distributed with Item CA13.3)
Confidential Attachment 3 - Toronto Investment Board Interview Schedule for September 11, 2020
Confidential Attachment 4 - Toronto Investment Board Interview Questions for September 11, 2020

Economic and Community Development Committee - Meeting 15

EC15.4 - Toronto Fire Services Service Delivery Enhancements - Status Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services to report back to City Council through the Economic and Community Development Committee in advance of the commencement of the 2022 budget process with recommended strategies as a result of the Toronto Fire Services Transformation Plan and Commission on Fire Accreditation International related review initiatives to enhance overall service delivery and address emerging and forecasted risks and needs of the growing City.

Origin

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services

Summary

This report responds to the October 2, 2019 City Council request included in EC7.1 "Toronto Fire Services Transformation Plan Update", for the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services to report back to City Council, prior to the 2021 Budget Process, with recommended strategies, initiated both through the Toronto Fire Services Transformation Plan and the Commission on Fire Accreditation International review, with the view to enhance overall service delivery and to address both the emerging, and the forecasted risks and needs of the growing City.

 

A number of initiatives arising from the Toronto Fire Services Transformation Plan are underway, including a comprehensive operational deployment review. Additionally, in March 2019, Toronto Fire Services achieved international Commission on Fire Accreditation International accreditation which included the identification of a number of opportunities for continuous quality improvement. These initiatives will inform the recommendations for service delivery enhancement strategies, particularly opportunities that will enhance staff deployment in an effective and efficient manner.

 

With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, work related to the advancement of the Transformation Plan initiatives and Commission on Fire Accreditation International  recommendations was placed on hold in accordance with the COVID-19 emergency declaration in Toronto.

 

In order for Toronto Fire Services to provide City Council with evidence-based recommendations for future service delivery improvements, along with the most effective means of addressing both current and emerging fire safety risks and trends, additional, ongoing analysis is required. Following the completion of this review, Toronto Fire Services anticipates that recommendations for future service delivery improvements will be provided prior to the 2022 budget process.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services on Status Update on Report for Toronto Fire Services Service Delivery Enhancements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-156047.pdf

EC15.5 - Toronto Fire Services Service Level Enhancements regarding Assessing Fire Safety and Fire Code Compliance - Status Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services to report back to City Council through the Economic and Community Development Committee in advance of the commencement of the 2022 budget process with recommendations for further Inspection and/or Quality Assurance Inspection Review Audit service level enhancements.

Origin

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services

Summary

This report responds to City Council direction related to the Auditor General's 2018 report AU13.11 "Raising the Alarm: Fraud Investigation of a Vendor Providing Life Safety Inspection Services to the City of Toronto."

 

In response to this report, the Audit Committee, at its meeting of July 13, 2018, requested the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, to outline operational and financial implications for options related to the assessment of fire safety and compliance with the Ontario Fire Code in buildings within Toronto. Toronto Fire Services provided three options designed to enhance annual inspection services. At its meeting of July 23, 2018, City Council endorsed Option 1 which included the assignment of 11 Full Time Employees to the Toronto Fire Services Fire Safety Quality Assurance section effective September 1, 2018.

 

City Council further requested the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services to report back to City Council in advance of the 2020 budget process with respect to outcomes and analysis of the enhanced service levels.

 

With the addition of 11 Full Time Employees assigned to the Toronto Fire Services Fire Safety Quality Assurance section, Toronto Fire Services estimated the completion of 80 Quality Assurance Inspection Review Audits in the fourth quarter of 2018 and 325 Quality Assurance Inspection Reviews in 2019 and annually thereafter. Quality Assurance Inspection Review Audits involve a systematic and comprehensive review of all aspects of Ontario Fire Code compliance for a given building, including the associated processes completed by third-party contractors.

 

Toronto Fire Services investigative work on the Auditor General's 2018 report, "Raising the Alarm: Fraud Investigation of a Vendor Providing Life Safety Inspection Services to the City of Toronto," continued after the publishing of the report in the form of follow-up activities that were required to complete the overall inspection review audits. This follow-up activity resulted in unanticipated workloads impacting Toronto Fire Services' total number of originally estimated Quality Assurance Inspection Review Audits for 2019.   

 

Further, with the onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic in March 2020, work related to the advancement of the Quality Assurance Inspection Review Audits was placed on hold in accordance with the COVID-19 emergency declaration in Toronto.

 

The impact of unanticipated circumstances and events in 2019 and 2020 have resulted in Toronto Fire Services having insufficient data to produce the evidence-based outcomes required to adequately analyze and make recommendations on enhanced service levels. Toronto Fire Services will continue to build a comprehensive data set and to analyze the data arising from the current service levels, to determine what, if any, further enhancements would be appropriate. City Council will be provided a complete and thorough analysis of the enhanced service levels and recommendation prior to the 2022 budget process.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services on Status Update on Report for Toronto Fire Services Service Level Enhancements regarding Assessing Fire Safety and Fire Code Compliance
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-156060.pdf

EC15.6 - Trauma-Informed Land-Based Response to COVID-19

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Director, Indigenous Affairs Office, in consultation with relevant City staff and divisions, to engage with Native Child and Family Services of Toronto to explore how the land-based programs in the presentation from Siobhan McCarthy, Director, Holistic Services, Native Child and Family Services of Toronto, and Mark Atanasoff, Director, Quality Assurance and Decolonization, Native Child and Family Services of Toronto, can be incorporated in the City of Toronto's Indigenous place-making strategy.

 

2. City Council request the Director, Indigenous Affairs Office report back to the Economic and Community Development Committee by the second quarter of 2021 on the outcome of Part 1 above.

Origin

(July 7, 2020) Letter from the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee

Summary

At its meeting on July 7, 2020, the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee considered Item AA5.5, Trauma-Informed Land-Based Response to COVID-19.

Background Information (Committee)

(July 7, 2020) Letter from the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee on Trauma-Informed Land-Based Response to COVID-19
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-154854.pdf

General Government and Licensing Committee - Meeting 15

GL15.5 - Procurement of Emergency Goods and Services in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council receive the report (August 18, 2020) from the Chief Procurement Officer for information.

Origin

(August 18, 2020) Report from the Chief Procurement Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise on the emergency non-competitive procurements of goods and services that are over $500,000 in value that were processed by the Purchasing and Materials Management Division on behalf of various divisions relating to the City of Toronto's response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Emergency.  Section 195-7.4B of Chapter 195, Purchasing, requires that any emergency non-competitive over the value of $500,000 must be reported to Council for information.

 

The City entered into 28 emergency non-competitive contracts over the value of $500,000 between March 16 and July 31, 2020. The total value of these emergency non-competitive contracts is 55,155,094.68, net of HST ($56,125,824.35, net of HST recoveries). 

 

To provide a complete picture, Purchasing and Materials Management Division also processed 57 emergency non-competitive contracts $500,000 and less during the same time period.  The total value of these non-competitive contracts is $13,766,718.85, net of HST ($14,009,013.10, net of HST recoveries).

 

As the City continues to support COVID-19 Pandemic Emergency, additional emergency non-competitive procurements may be processed. A follow up report may be submitted in the 1st Quarter 2021 to summarize any further emergency procurements processed that are over $500,000 in value from August 1 to December 31, 2020.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 18, 2020) Report from the Chief Procurement Officer on Procurement of Emergency Goods and Services in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156263.pdf

GL15.6 - Non-Competitive Contract with Altec Industries Limited for Proprietary Original Equipment Manufacturer Parts and Services

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Fleet Services to negotiate and enter into a non-competitive contract with Altec Industries Limited, for the supply of all labour, parts, materials and equipment necessary to perform mechanical and structural safety inspections, repairs and certification for the City's Original Equipment Manufacturer vehicle mounted lifting devices, based on the following terms and conditions:

 

a. the initial term of the contract will be for a period of one (1) year, commencing on November 1, 2020 to October 31, 2021 with the option to renew the contract for four (4) additional separate one (1) year periods, subject to the exercise of each option year being at the sole discretion of the General Manager, Fleet Services and subject to the amounts payable under the contract being available under the current Fleet Services budget approval(s); the amount of this non-competitive contract is $1,910,028 net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($1,943,644 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) for the entire duration of the contract, inclusive of all option years;

 

b. the contract will be based on the condition that Altec Industries Limited continues to be the exclusive distributor for the proprietary Original Equipment Manufacturer parts and specialized services for Altec equipment; and

 

c. on the terms and condition satisfactory to the General Manager, Fleet Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(July 22, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Fleet Services and the Chief Procurement Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council authority for the General Manager, Fleet Services Division to negotiate and enter into a non-competitive contract with Altec Industries Limited, for the supply of all labour, parts, materials and equipment necessary to perform mechanical and structural safety inspections, repairs and certification on proprietary Original Equipment Manufacturer vehicle mounted lifting devices on Altec equipment for the City of Toronto (City).

 

The contract will be for a period of one (1) year commencing on November 1, 2020 to October 31, 2021 with the option to renew the contract for four (4) additional one (1) year periods at the sole discretion of the City, and subject to budget approvals for the total potential contract amount of $1,910,028 net of Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) (or $1,943,644 net of HST recoveries), inclusive of all option years.

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195-Purchasing, where the current request exceeds the Chief Procurement Officer's authority of the cumulative five year commitment for each vendor, under Article 7, Section 7.3 (D) of the Purchasing By-Law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71-Financial Control, Section 71-11A.

Background Information (Committee)

(July 22, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Fleet Services Division and the Chief Procurement Officer on Non-competitive Contract with Altec Industries Limited for Proprietary Original Equipment Manufacturer Parts and Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156245.pdf

GL15.7 - Non-Competitive Contract with B+H Architects for Planning, Design and Conformance Consulting for the George Street Revitalization Project

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to negotiate and enter into a non-competitive Agreement with B+H Architects as Planning, Design and Conformance Consultants for a total cost of $7,505,027, net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($7,637,115, net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) based on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to report back to the Executive Committee and City Council by the first quarter of 2021 on the updated project schedule for the George Street Revitalization Project.

Origin

(August 27, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the Chief Procurement Officer

Summary

On April 24, 2018, City Council authorized the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, to negotiate and enter into a Phase Two Project Agreement with the Planning, Design, and Conformance consultant for the George Street Revitalization Project. The agreement covers the alternative procurement process through the construction phases of the project. The agreement must be on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

After extensive negotiations, staff recommend that the City enter into a non-competitive Agreement with B+H Architects (B+H) in the amount of $7,505,027, net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($7,637,115, net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) to act as Planning, Design, and Conformance consultant for Phase Two of the George Street Revitalization Project. A shared agreement on the scope work, satisfactory to the City's requirements and those of the Alternative Procurement and Financing model, could not be reached with the previous vendor. Additionally, B+H's experience in the development of the updated Project Specific Output Specification template in partnership with Infrastructure Ontario would better place B+H to deliver Phase Two of the George Street Revitalization project. This would also allow B+H to continue and expand upon their current due diligence role of Specification Writer, and present the City a cost avoidance savings of $2,622,789 (net of Harmonized Sales Tax). The savings are calculated based on the difference between the previously approved value of non-competitive Agreement with Montgomery Sisam Architects Inc. per EX33.4, at $10,127,816 (net of Harmonized Sales Tax), and the currently proposed amount of $7,505,027 (net of Harmonized Sales Tax).

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195- Purchasing, where the current request exceeds the Chief Purchasing Official's authority of the cumulative five year commitment for each vendor, under Article 7, Section 195-7.3 (D) of the Purchasing By-Law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of HST allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71- Financial Control, Section 71-11A.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 27, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the Chief Procurement Officer on Non-Competitive Contract with B+H Architects for Planning, Design and Conformance Consulting for the George Street Revitalization Project
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156190.pdf

GL15.8 - Non-Competitive Contract with Darch Fire Incorporated for the Purchase of Two Bronto Model Aerial Devices for Toronto Fire Services

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services to negotiate and execute a non-competitive contract with Darch Fire Incorporated for two specialized aerial devices in the amount of $5,264,158 net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($5,356,807 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), on the terms and conditions satisfactory to the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, which include:

 

a. the supply, delivery, and initial staff training of a 41 metre Bronto Skylift model F135RLX telescopic articulating aerial device in the amount of $2,396,191 net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($2,438,364 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries); and

 

b. the supply, delivery, and training of a 70 metre Bronto Skylift Model F70RPX mounted on a two-person conventional cab truck chassis, including mounted main body, related supplies, staff training equipment, and travel costs incurred in the design and inspection phases of the purchase, in the amount of $2,867,967, net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($2,918,443, net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries).

Origin

(August 25, 2020) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services and the Chief Procurement Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council authority for the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services to negotiate and enter into a non-competitive contract with Darch Fire Incorporated, for the supply and delivery of two aerial devices for a total amount of $5,264,158 net of HST, ($5,356,807 net of HST recoveries). This purchase will assist Toronto Fire Services in ensuring operational readiness to respond to emergency and critical incidents throughout Toronto, specifically with high rise and high angle incidents. 

 

Toronto Fire Services is seeking a non-competitive contract for these apparatus for a number of operational reasons, with the main being matching with existing purchases. Purchasing a model that matches existing ones in service at Toronto Fire Services will significantly reduce training required for staff. Toronto Fire Services already owns three articulating aerial apparatus from this vendor and therefore both operational staff and mechanical staff are trained and familiar with them. Additionally, this brand has a local dealer which means that parts necessary for repairs or replacement are easier to access.

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195, Purchasing, where the current request exceeds the Chief Purchasing Officer's authority of the cumulative five year commitment limit for each vendor under Article 7, Section 195-7.3(D) of the Purchasing By-law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71, Financial Control, Section 71-11a.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 18, 2020) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services and the Chief Procurement Officer on Non-Competitive Contract with Darch Fire Incorporated for the Purchase of Two Bronto Model Aerial Devices for Toronto Fire Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156182.pdf

GL15.9 - Non-Competitive Bridge Contract with Waterford Services Incorporated for Continual Custodial Services

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
21 - Scarborough Centre, 22 - Scarborough - Agincourt, 23 - Scarborough North, 24 - Scarborough - Guildwood, 25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and execute a non-competitive contract with Waterford Services Inc. to provide full custodial services for the period from November 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021, in a total amount of $1,273,042.15 net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($1,295,447.69 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(August 27, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Procurement Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek authority from City Council to approve a non-competitive bridge contract with Waterford Services Inc. for full Custodial services at various Parks and Recreation facilities in the Scarborough District for the period from November 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021 in a total amount of $1,273,042.15 net of HST ($1,295,447.69 net of HST recoveries).

 

The custodial services are critical and ensures our community centres, pools, arenas and parks facilities are clean, tidy, and safe as well as supplies enhanced cleaning during current the COVID-19 Pandemic.

 

The current custodial services Blanket Contract, # 47019674, expires on October 31, 2020.  A new Request for Proposal is scheduled to be issued in September 2020, and expected to have a contract in place by the end of March, 2021. 

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195, Purchasing, where the current request exceeds the Chief Purchasing Officer's authority of the cumulative five year commitment limit for each vendor under Article 7, Section 195-7.3(D) of the Purchasing By-law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71, Financial Control, Section 71-11a.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 27, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Procurement Officer on Non-Competitive Bridge Contract with Waterford Services Incorporated for Continual Custodial Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156215.pdf
Attachment 1 - Cost Centres List
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156187.pdf

GL15.10 - Non-Competitive Contracts with Goodyear Canada Incorporated and Michelin North America (Canada) Incorporated for the Standardization of Tire Purchases Across the City-Wide Fleet

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Fleet Services, the Chief, Toronto Paramedic Services and the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services to standardize tire brands across the City-wide fleet.

 

2. City Council grant authority to the General Manager, Fleet Services, the Chief, Toronto Paramedic Services and the Fire Chief and General Manager,Toronto Fire Services to negotiate and enter into non-competitive agreements with Goodyear Canada Inc. and Michelin North America (Canada) Incorporated for the supply and delivery of tires on the following terms and conditions:

 

a. the initial term of the contract with Goodyear Canada Inc. will be for a period of five (5) years, commencing on November 1, 2020 to October 31, 2025 with the option to renew the contract for one (1) optional renewal term of five (5) years, at the sole discretion of the General Manager, Fleet Services; the amount of this agreement is $11,454,140 net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($11,655,732 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) for the duration of the contract, inclusive of the optional renewal term;

 

b.  the initial term of the contract with Michelin North America (Canada) will be for a period of five (5) years, commencing on November 1, 2020 to October 31, 2025 with the option to renew the contract for one (1) optional renewal term of five (5) years, at the sole discretion of the General Manager, Fleet Services; the amount of this agreement is $5,628,842 net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($5,727,909 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) for the duration of the contract, inclusive of the optional renewal term; and

 

c. on the terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Fleet Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(August 11, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Fleet Services and Chief Procurement Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek authority from City Council to enter into non-competitive, long-term tire purchasing agreements with Goodyear Canada Incorporated and Michelin North America (Canada) Inc. to standardize tire brands across the City's fleet.

 

The contract will be for a period of five (5) years, commencing on November 1, 2020 to October 31, 2025 with the option to renew the contract for one (1) additional five (5) year period at the sole discretion of the City, and subject to budget approvals for the total contract amount of $17,082,981 net of HST ($17,383,641 net of Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) recoveries, inclusive of all optional renewal years.

 

Fleet Services estimates that by adopting a manufacturer-direct service delivery model with Goodyear Canada Incorporated and Michelin North America (Canada) Incorporated savings in the amount of $1,494,920 can be realized over the ten (10) year period.

 

This agreement will also provide considerable efficiency improvements, with anticipated delivery times for in-stock tires expected to improve by eighty-four (84) percent, and delivery times for out of stock tires expected to improve by fifty (50) percent.  These added efficiencies will directly support the reduction of vehicle downtime. 

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195 - Purchasing, where the current request exceeds the Chief Purchasing Official's authority of the cumulative five year commitment for each vendor, under Article 7, Section 195-7.3 (D) of the Purchasing By-Law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of HST allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71- Financial Control, Section 71-11A.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 11, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Fleet Services and the Chief Procurement Officer on Non-Competitive Contracts with Goodyear Canada Incorporated and Michelin North America (Canada) Incorporated for the Standardization of Tire Purchases Across the City-Wide Fleet
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156213.pdf

GL15.13 - Expropriation of Easements to Construct the Fairbank - Silverthorn Storm Trunk Sewer System - Stage 2

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
5 - York South - Weston, 9 - Davenport
Attention
Bill 758 has been submitted on this Item.

Confidential Attachment - This report deals with a proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council, as the Approving Authority under the Expropriations Act, approve the expropriation of the Easements as set out in Appendix A to the report (August 28, 2020) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and as identified on the draft Expropriation Plans displayed in Appendix B to the report (August 28, 2020) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to proceed with the proposed construction of the Fairbank-Silverthorn Storm Trunk Sewer System.

 

2. City Council authorize the City of Toronto, as Expropriating Authority under the Expropriations Act, to take all necessary steps to comply with the Expropriations Act, including but not limited to, the preparation and registration of Expropriation Plans and the service of Notices of Expropriation, Notices of Election and Notices of Possession.

 

3. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, or designate to prepare and serve offers of compensation in accordance with the requirements of the Expropriations Act. 

 

4. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (August 28, 2020) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management once there has been a final determination of all claims for compensation payable to the property owners to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

Origin

(August 28, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Summary

This report seeks approval from City Council as Approving Authority under the Expropriations Act, to expropriate stratified permanent easements (the "Easements") involving portions of the properties municipally known as 441 Blackthorn Avenue, 415 Nairn Avenue, 417 Nairn Avenue, 419 Nairn Avenue, 18 Branstone Road, 20 Branstone Road, 119 Ennerdale Road, 49 Dynevor Road, 65 Dynevor Road and 2226 Dufferin Street. This report also seeks approval for the City, as Expropriating Authority under the Expropriations Act, to serve associated notices and make statutory Offers of Compensation in accordance with the Expropriations Act.

 

The Easements are required to proceed with the proposed construction of the Fairbank-Silverthorn Storm Trunk Sewer System. The Project is part of the City of Toronto's Basement Flooding Protection Program to help reduce the risk of future basement flooding in the Fairbank and Silverthorn communities in Toronto. Construction is anticipated to commence in 2021.

 

This report relates to the second stage of the expropriation process. During the first stage and in accordance with the Expropriations Act, Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate were served on all applicable "registered owners", who had 30 days to request an inquiry into whether the proposed taking is fair, sound, and reasonably necessary.

 

The City did not receive any requests for a hearing of necessity from any of the applicable parties. City Council may now approve the expropriation by this Stage 2 report. If authorized, the Expropriation Plans will be registered and associated notices served. Statutory Offers of Compensation must be served prior to the City taking possession of the expropriated properties.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 28, 2020) Report and Appendices A to C from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on Expropriation of Easements to Construct the Fairbank-Silverthorn Storm Trunk Sewer System - Stage 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156189.pdf
(August 28, 2020) Confidential Attachment 1

GL15.14 - Lease and Contract Extensions for City of Toronto Golf Courses

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and enter into an agreement to extend and amend the Professional Services Agreement with Golf Plus Marketing Incorporated (Contract Number 47020512) respecting the operation and management of the Dentonia Park Golf Course, Don Valley Golf Course, Humber Valley Golf Course, Scarlett Woods Golf Course and the Tam O'Shanter Golf Course for an additional two year term from December 1, 2020 to November 30, 2022, with a further optional year from December 1, 2022 to November 30 2023, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and enter into an agreement to extend and amend the existing food and beverage licence agreement with the Grenadier Group (Contract Number 301630) for all five City run golf courses for an additional two year term from December 1, 2020 to November 30, 2022, with a further optional year from December 1, 2022 to November 30 2023, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.

 

3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and enter into an agreement to extend and amend the existing lease agreement with Centennial Park Golf Center (Contract Number 301347) respecting the lease of Centennial Park Golf Center for an additional two year term from December 1, 2020 to November 30, 2022, with a further optional year from December 1, 2022 to November 30 2023, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.

Origin

(August 27, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Procurement Officer

Summary

Parks, Forestry, and Recreation has seven golf courses under its operational management. Two are leased out fully, and five are operated under a mixed model where golf course assets and turf are maintained by the City, green fees are set by City Council, and ticket sales, golf cart rentals, pro shops, lessons, and food and beverage    operations are contracted out under two separate agreements.

 

Through this model, Parks, Forestry, and Recreation has consistently provided high-quality golf courses for all Torontonians. The courses promote junior, senior, and family golf through affordable fees and program offerings. The quality and maintenance standards of the courses has remained high, and commitments to naturalization and environmental stewardship have been incorporated at the sites where possible. While this model has allowed for outdoor recreational activity for many, there are a number of operational pressures that require thoughtful consideration to ensure the long term success and financial viability of the golf program.

 

In January 2018, agreements for food and beverage operations at the five courses with Grenadier Group, and for the golf course operations and management with Golf Plus Marketing Incorporated, were extended for a two year period, expiring November 30, 2019, with a City option for a further one year extension to November 30, 2020. The longstanding lease of Centennial Golf Park Centre is also set to expire on November 30, 2020. This was done to provide an opportunity for a third party review of golf course operations for consideration of any service delivery changes. Given the current unknown and changing market environment due to the COVID 19 Pandemic, Parks, Forestry, and Recreation is requesting a further extension of the existing contracts until golf course operations have stabilized.

 

This report recommends a two year extension of the existing third party golf operator contracts, and the lease at Centennial Park Golf Centre, as well as a City option for further one year extensions should it be required.

 

These extensions will ensure contracts do not expire without a viable replacement being put in place, and will allow staff time to develop and recommend a comprehensive sourcing strategy for golf operations, including any relevant considerations resulting from a unique 2020 operating season.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 27, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management on Lease and Contract Extensions for City of Toronto Golf Courses
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156214.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(September 11, 2020) E-mail from Christina Hoang (GL.Supp.15.14.1)
(September 11, 2020) Letter from Heather Marshall, Campaigns Director, Toronto Environmental Alliance (GL.Supp.15.14.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/comm/communicationfile-118016.pdf
(September 11, 2020) E-mail from Meghan MacRae (GL.Supp.15.14.3)
(September 11, 2020) E-mail from Diane Roberti (GL.Supp.15.14.4)
(September 11, 2020) E-mail from Linda Saltarelli (GL.Supp.15.14.5)
(September 11, 2020) E-mail from Lou Chaney (GL.Supp.15.14.6)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Emily Visser (GL.Supp.15.14.7)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Megan Kinsman (GL.Supp.15.14.8)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Michael Vickers (GL.Supp.15.14.9)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Karri McCloe (GL.Supp.15.14.10)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Mohammed Shaikh (GL.Supp.15.14.11)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Mara Ziglar (GL.Supp.15.14.12)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Etel Igreda (GL.Supp.15.14.13)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Mackenzie Sousa (GL.Supp.15.14.14)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Koekkoek (GL.Supp.15.14.15)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Carling Lui (GL.Supp.15.14.16)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Megan Kirk (GL.Supp.15.14.17)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Kellianne Bryant (GL.Supp.15.14.18)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Matthew Ravenscroft (GL.Supp.15.14.19)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Peter Bavis (GL.Supp.15.14.20)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Hellen Asproloupos (GL.Supp.15.14.21)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Marina Riddle (GL.Supp.15.14.22)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Deiner (GL.Supp.15.14.23)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Patricia Martin (GL.Supp.15.14.24)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Emily Watson (GL.Supp.15.14.25)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Zoe Downie-Ross (GL.Supp.15.14.26)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Le Ching (GL.Supp.15.14.27)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from James Malekzadeh (GL.Supp.15.14.28)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Lizete Pimentel (GL.Supp.15.14.29)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Maina Beland-Rahm (GL.Supp.15.14.30)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Rebecca Martin (GL.Supp.15.14.31)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Ruvena Buslovich (GL.Supp.15.14.32)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Jaden Chattargoon (GL.Supp.15.14.33)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Chelsea Braun (GL.Supp.15.14.34)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Kaitlin Sylvester (GL.Supp.15.14.35)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Jackie Pirico (GL.Supp.15.14.36)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Emma Ransey (GL.Supp.15.14.37)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Kaitlen McKenny (GL.Supp.15.14.38)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Gabriel Busca (GL.Supp.15.14.39)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Giselle Goncalves (GL.Supp.15.14.40)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Ruiters (GL.Supp.15.14.41)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Beverly Herscovitch (GL.Supp.15.14.42)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Tiffany Jamison-Horne (GL.Supp.15.14.43)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Haley Cohen (GL.Supp.15.14.44)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Carolyn Poutiainen (GL.Supp.15.14.45)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Blair Francey (GL.Supp.15.14.46)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Tennyson Miller (GL.Supp.15.14.47)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Aaron Champion (GL.Supp.15.14.48)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from David Fox (GL.Supp.15.14.49)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Michelle Ryan (GL.Supp.15.14.50)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Alyssa Chrastina (GL.Supp.15.14.51)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Naufal Ejaz (GL.Supp.15.14.52)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Archibald (GL.Supp.15.14.53)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Dancy Mason (GL.Supp.15.14.54)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Emily Skublic (GL.Supp.15.14.55)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Ironside (GL.Supp.15.14.56)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from David Johnson (GL.Supp.15.14.57)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Zack Sandor Kerr (GL.Supp.15.14.58)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Sara Samet (GL.Supp.15.14.59)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Sandra Kang (GL.Supp.15.14.60)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Laura Hoherts (GL.Supp.15.14.61)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Karen Zurek (GL.Supp.15.14.62)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Daniel Fishbayn (GL.Supp.15.14.63)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Myra Khan (GL.Supp.15.14.64)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Diana Perez-Turanskaya (GL.Supp.15.14.65)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Michelle Dang (GL.Supp.15.14.66)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Emily Dial (GL.Supp.15.14.67)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Alison MacDonald (GL.Supp.15.14.68)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Laura Brehaut (GL.Supp.15.14.69)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Amber Valentine (GL.Supp.15.14.70)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Saleena Hak (GL.Supp.15.14.71)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Kirima Isler (GL.Supp.15.14.72)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Christina Quach (GL.Supp.15.14.73)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Tyler Hilkewich (GL.Supp.15.14.74)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Lily Coletti (GL.Supp.15.14.75)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Kyra Jones (GL.Supp.15.14.76)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Sharene Shafie (GL.Supp.15.14.77)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Isabel Klassen-Marshall (GL.Supp.15.14.78)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Keshaani Uthayakumara (GL.Supp.15.14.79)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Anna Lermer (GL.Supp.15.14.80)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Jenna Reich (GL.Supp.15.14.81)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Justine Voutt (GL.Supp.15.14.82)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Sorren Isler (GL.Supp.15.14.83)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Kiley Goyette (GL.Supp.15.14.84)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Giselle De Grandis (GL.Supp.15.14.85)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Derek Vaz (GL.Supp.15.14.86)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Twyla Odd (GL.Supp.15.14.87)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Elyse Lim (GL.Supp.15.14.88)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Gaby Harvey (GL.Supp.15.14.89)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Nelson Tam (GL.Supp.15.14.90)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Amanda VanDewall (GL.Supp.15.14.91)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Kristen VanDewall (GL.Supp.15.14.92)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Chase Valeriote (GL.Supp.15.14.93)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Stephanie Rutherford (GL.Supp.15.14.94)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Lindsay Sangster (GL.Supp.15.14.95)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Hillary Strack-Cheng (GL.Supp.15.14.96)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Arbor Jones (GL.Supp.15.14.97)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Charlotte Stewart-Juby (GL.Supp.15.14.98)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Maria Dawson (GL.Supp.15.14.99)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Neha Joshi (GL.Supp.15.14.100)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Miyako Kurihashi (GL.Supp.15.14.101)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Ewan Cassidy (GL.Supp.15.14.102)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Hannah Sinclair (GL.Supp.15.14.103)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Richard Shapiro (GL.Supp.15.14.104)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Alethea Pezzo (GL.Supp.15.14.105)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Katherine Ward (GL.Supp.15.14.106)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Rebecca Detje (GL.Supp.15.14.107)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Bradley (GL.Supp.15.14.108)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Maggie Hammel (GL.Supp.15.14.109)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Abbie Richards (GL.Supp.15.14.110)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Vina Mohabir (GL.Supp.15.14.111)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Jacinta Pittman (GL.Supp.15.14.112)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Julia Wallace (GL.Supp.15.14.113)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Matt Leiss (GL.Supp.15.14.114)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Matt Schichter (GL.Supp.15.14.115)
(September 13, 2020) Letter from Jessica Bell, MPP University-Rosedale (GL.Supp.15.14.116)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/comm/communicationfile-118181.pdf
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Ryan S (GL.Supp.15.14.117)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Leah Wright (GL.Supp.15.14.118)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Adam Dirks (GL.Supp.15.14.119)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Burcul (GL.Supp.15.14.120)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Brittany Zeer (GL.Supp.15.14.121)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Jesse Gazic (GL.Supp.15.14.122)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Dave Dalrymple (GL.Supp.15.14.123)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Emily Smith (GL.Supp.15.14.124)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Ariel Jones (GL.Supp.15.14.125)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Marla Leal (GL.Supp.15.14.126)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Geron Lee (GL.Supp.15.14.127)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Thomas Dobronyi (GL.Supp.15.14.128)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Darcie Smith (GL.Supp.15.14.129)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Marley Kajan (GL.Supp.15.14.130)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Jess Collins (GL.Supp.15.14.131)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Lee Cameron (GL.Supp.15.14.132)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Linda Naccarato (GL.Supp.15.14.133)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Sally Girdler (GL.Supp.15.14.134)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Kalia Lenaghan (GL.Supp.15.14.135)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Paul M Taylor (GL.Supp.15.14.136)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Savannah Boddy (GL.Supp.15.14.137)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Gwen Moore (GL.Supp.15.14.138)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Carolyne Seward (GL.Supp.15.14.139)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Gabrielle Leith (GL.Supp.15.14.140)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Werhun (GL.Supp.15.14.141)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Alexandra Lambropoulos (GL.Supp.15.14.142)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Cristina Graham-Dwyer (GL.Supp.15.14.143)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Sheldomar Elliott (GL.Supp.15.14.144)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Kaitlin Rizarri (GL.Supp.15.14.145)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Jane Law (GL.Supp.15.14.146)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Madison Maguire (GL.Supp.15.14.147)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Jade Armstrong (GL.Supp.15.14.148)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Mark Zurawinski (GL.Supp.15.14.149)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Jessica (GL.Supp.15.14.150)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Rachel Kelly (GL.Supp.15.14.151)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Saturn Steel-Mendez (GL.Supp.15.14.152)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Weingarten (GL.Supp.15.14.153)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Tara Mabon (GL.Supp.15.14.154)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Kevin Stolz (GL.Supp.15.14.155)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Arran Duguid (GL.Supp.15.14.156)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Emily (GL.Supp.15.14.157)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Mandi Langley (GL.Supp.15.14.158)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Raquel Ronquillo (GL.Supp.15.14.159)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Eric Hooker (GL.Supp.15.14.160)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Allana Fulton (GL.Supp.15.14.161)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Austin Moon (GL.Supp.15.14.162)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Courtney Sickler (GL.Supp.15.14.163)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Petkau (GL.Supp.15.14.164)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Daphne Kiss (GL.Supp.15.14.165)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Mary Hinze (GL.Supp.15.14.166)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Greyson Ike (GL.Supp.15.14.167)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Esqueda (GL.Supp.15.14.168)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Ella Shaffer (GL.Supp.15.14.169)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from MaKenzie Diaz (GL.Supp.15.14.170)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Caylee Brooks (GL.Supp.15.15.171)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Elisa Cantu (GL.Supp.15.15.172)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Rachel Krueger (GL.Supp.15.14.173)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Michael Smith (GL.Supp.15.14.174)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Karen Martinez (GL.Supp.15.14.175)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Jennifer C. Zangre (GL.Supp.15.14.176)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Kelton Hoffmeyer (GL.Supp.15.14.177)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Jonathan Martin (GL.Supp.15.14.178)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Tara Ryan (GL.Supp.15.14.179)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Grace Parmer (GL.Supp.15.14.180)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Peggy Soria (GL.Supp.15.15.181)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Brittany Bolan (GL.Supp.15.14.182)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Mossy Fae (GL.Supp.15.14.183)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Shayna Sayers-Wolfe (GL.Supp.15.14.184)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Zuzanna Jaroszewska (GL.Supp.15.14.185)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Kale Saint Amour (GL.Supp.15.14.186)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Gelaine Trinidad (GL.Supp.15.14.187)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Ellery Rosin (GL.Supp.15.14.188)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Emily Kieffer (GL.Supp.15.14.189)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Rachel Bellone (GL.Supp.15.14.190)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Miriam Issah (GL.Supp.15.14.191)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Leanne Huneault (GL.Supp.15.14.192)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Isabeau Duma-Jaciw (GL.Supp.15.14.193)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Shira Leuchter (GL.Supp.15.14.194)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from David O'Neill (GL.Supp.15.14.195)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Melanie Abreu (GL.Supp.15.14.196)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Ema Walters (GL.Supp.15.14.197)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Wasila Baset (GL.Supp.15.14.198)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Duncan Hood (GL.Supp.15.14.199)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Lydia Stewart (GL.Supp.15.14.200)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Anah Mirza (GL.Supp.15.14.201)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Aathiq Hameed (GL.Supp.15.14.202)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Lana Hafez (GL.Supp.15.14.203)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Ricky Boall (GL.Supp.15.14.204)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Kira Grachev (GL.Supp.15.14.205)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Chelsea Atkins-Macchione (GL.Supp.15.14.206)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Allison Guse (GL.Supp.15.14.207)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Clara Halpern (GL.Supp.15.14.208)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Adam Kreeft (GL.Supp.15.14.209)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Sam Blank (GL.Supp.15.14.210)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Howland (GL.Supp.15.14.211)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Olivia Blank (GL.Supp.15.14.212)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Kaitlyn Martin (GL.Supp.15.14.213)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Katie Story (GL.Supp.15.14.214)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Ellie Gips (GL.Supp.15.14.215)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Kira Grachev (GL.Supp.15.14.216)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Daniel Halpert (GL.Supp.15.14.217)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Cadence Planthara (GL.Supp.15.14.218)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Ashley Senja (GL.Supp.15.14.219)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Megan McGinnis-Dunphy (GL.Supp.15.14.220)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Sidney Astl (GL.Supp.15.14.221)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Isabella Spangher (GL.Supp.15.14.222)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Kennedie Vlogs (GL.Supp.15.14.223)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Abby Scott (GL.Supp.15.14.224)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Lana Kouchnir (GL.Supp.15.14.225)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Emma Wright (GL.Supp.15.14.226)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Wyman (GL.Supp.15.14.227)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Ulysses Lambropoulos (GL.Supp.15.14.228)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Raymond A. Mar (GL.Supp.15.14.229)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Victoria Joy-Warren (GL.Supp.15.14.230)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Clement (GL.Supp.15.14.231)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Rachel Boere (GL.Supp.15.14.232)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Saba Khan (GL.Supp.15.14.233)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Gryphen Colling (GL.Supp.15.14.234)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Ana Lopez (GL.Supp.15.14.235)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Brigid Tierney (GL.Supp.15.14.236)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Josie Eccleston (GL.Supp.15.14.237)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Heather Douglas (GL.Supp.15.14.238)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Meagan McAteer (GL.Supp.15.14.239)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Lays Gee (GL.Supp.15.14.240)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Erin Anderson (GL.Supp.15.14.241)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Caitlin Robson (GL.Supp.15.14.242)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Kate Palumbo, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (GL.Supp.15.14.243)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/comm/communicationfile-118390.pdf
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Lisa Thacker (GL.Supp.15.14.244)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Viney Owl (GL.Supp.15.14.245)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Paul M. Taylor, Executive Director, and Katie Germain, Director of Programs, and Orlando Martin Lopez Gomez, Community Food Growing Manager, FoodShare (GL.Supp.15.14.246)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/comm/communicationfile-118393.pdf
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Tristram Pinney (GL.Supp.15.14.247)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Mat Barkley (GL.Supp.15.14.248)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Iris Verschuren (GL.Supp.15.14.249)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Graham Wright (GL.Supp.15.14.250)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Laurence Butet-Roch (GL.Supp.15.14.251)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Kira Charron (GL.Supp.15.14.252)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Laoutaris (GL.Supp.15.14.253)

Communications (City Council)

(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Tau Hussain (CC.Main.GL15.14.254)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Judy Oduro (CC.Main.GL15.14.255)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Maïna Béland-Rahm (CC.Main.GL15.14.256)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Sharlyn Barahona (CC.Main.GL15.14.257)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Nathaniel Hanula-James (CC.Main.GL15.14.258)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Nicole McReynolds (CC.Main.GL15.14.259)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Darren Cheng (CC.Main.GL15.14.260)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Matt Lemche (CC.Main.GL15.14.261)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Dillon Katrycz (CC.Main.GL15.14.262)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Jing Peng (CC.Main.GL15.14.263)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Mark Woodnutt (CC.Main.GL15.14.264)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from B. Espina (CC.Main.GL15.14.265)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Colleen Filson (CC.Main.GL15.14.266)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Shimona Hirchberg (CC.Main.GL15.14.267)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Annie Bedard (CC.Main.GL15.14.268)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Ellen He (CC.Main.GL15.14.269)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Marianne Roaldi (CC.Main.GL15.14.270)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Chelsea La Vecchia (CC.Main.GL15.14.271)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Mark Savic (CC.Main.GL15.14.272)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Rebecca Arshawsky (CC.Main.GL15.14.273)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Anne Keary (CC.Main.GL15.14.274)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Lauren Wu (CC.Main.GL15.14.275)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Jeremy Schaulin-Rioux (CC.Main.GL15.14.276)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Layah Glassman (CC.Main.GL15.14.277)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Justine G. (CC.Main.GL15.14.278)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Meghan Lamers (CC.Main.GL15.14.279)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Luxmi Shanmuganantha (CC.Main.GL15.14.280)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Charlyn (CC.Main.GL15.14.281)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Adeline Cohen (CC.Main.GL15.14.282)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Ashoka Kanungo (CC.Main.GL15.14.283)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Ainsley Criswell (CC.Main.GL15.14.284)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Jack Henry Comerford (CC.Main.GL15.14.285)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Vanessa Tsotsos (CC.Main.GL15.14.286)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Jett Dunkley (CC.Main.GL15.14.287)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Sydney Smith (CC.Main.GL15.14.288)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Jonathan Lu (CC.Main.GL15.14.289)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Marissa Lusito (CC.Main.GL15.14.290)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Leah Flanagan (CC.Main.GL15.14.291)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Annie Bedard (CC.Main.GL15.14.292)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Vanessa Collins (CC.Main.GL15.14.293)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Lauren Kolyn (CC.Main.GL15.14.294)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Suneet Grewal (CC.Main.GL15.14.295)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Jeny Nussey (CC.Main.GL15.14.296)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Deanna Naccarato (CC.Main.GL15.14.297)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Madison Fitzgerald (CC.Main.GL15.14.298)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Dave Murray (CC.Main.GL15.14.299)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Tollenaar (CC.Main.GL15.14.300)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Anna Shadrova (CC.Main.GL15.14.301)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Nada Elnaiem (CC.Main.GL15.14.302)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Deeb (CC.Main.GL15.14.303)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Tara Costello (CC.Main.GL15.14.304)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Naomi Somerville (CC.Main.GL15.14.305)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Logan Trzeciak (CC.Main.GL15.14.306)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Tea Hadziristic (CC.Main.GL15.14.307)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Daniel Fuller (CC.Main.GL15.14.308)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Niloufar Ameli (CC.Main.GL15.14.309)
(September 16, 2020) E-mail from Kathleen Downie (CC.Main.GL15.14.310)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Emma Tamlin (CC.Main.GL15.14.311)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Heather Marshall (CC.Main.GL15.14.312)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Emily Alfred (CC.Main.GL15.14.313)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Samuel Colman (CC.Main.GL15.14.314)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Samantha Brownell (CC.Main.GL15.14.315)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jacob Heubeck (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Chelsea Andrade (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jolene Cushman (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Dixon (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sydney Hyatt (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from James Kuhns (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Alexandra Bezbor (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Al Tibbles (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Emma Brookfield (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Terry McCrorie (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sheila Caporali (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Rami Schandall (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from David Moffat (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Martin Klein (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Laurie Garbutt (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Ann Dugan (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jennie Montford (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Su Rynard (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Tim Mccaskell (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Shannon Wiggan (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Francis May (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Gerry Lacroix (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Rowena Katigbak (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jo Anna (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Lise Hendlisz (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Or Har-Gil (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Brenda Gallie (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Edgar Davies-Mills (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Amy Coulterman (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Peter Cook (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jenna Bucholtz (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Ryan Brydges (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Zhanina Bregu (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Melissa Bouchard (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Kassie Blythe (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Katie Blundell (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Janna Eggebeen (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Cristina Santiago (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Janice Barton (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Marny Gibson (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Bridget Sokoluk (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Michael Csiki (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Karen Gnat (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jim Purdy (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Angela Leach (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Daniel Lee (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sandra Leuba (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Devorah Lindsay (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Marianne (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Clair Parker (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jocelynn Rodrigues (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Rena Sherring (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Emily Smith (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Siera Snatinsky (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Ann Sulky (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Kathryn Tait (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Tate (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Maryaleen Trafford (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jillian Wakarchuk (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Doug Anderson (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Alan Burt (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Bari Zittell (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Lucy Cant (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Rick Hay (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Peter Morris (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Gail Funston (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Maria Sheppard (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Kathryn Klos (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jay Fisher (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Nabeela Merchant (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Diane Spivak (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Donna Mitchell (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Harold Smith (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Salima Pirani (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Aileen Verdun (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Shelagh Pizey-Allen (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Anne Stadlmair (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Daniela Rodelo (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Maya Tan (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jeanne Graham (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Stephen Park (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Hilda Gowans (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Coleen Clark (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Thomas Worrall (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Wilma Fraser (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Liscio (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Patrick DeRochie (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Catherine Oliver (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Alex Hartman Adams (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from MaryAnn Jansen (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sheryl Gonsalves (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Judith Burgess (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Lindsay Dwarka (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Zunaid Khan (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Gosia Socha (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jordan Darville (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Paul Antze (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Helene St. Jacques (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Ashley Pamenter (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Alexander Kurth (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Ariel Jones (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Leanne Wild (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jordan Ramsay (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Shauna Cook (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Lee-Anne Bigwood (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Irene Shimoda (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Michael Barkley (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Virginia Reimer (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Margaret Procter (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Richard Ruffolo (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Vivian Lin (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jade Armstrong (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Nadeen Rajani (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Madeleine Stinson (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Alyson Merrick (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Courtney Link (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Brynn Clarke (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Klara Kolcze (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Victoria Hoare (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Nathan Vanderkooy (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Alessandra Massa o (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Tharsini Yogaratnam (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Hilary de Veber (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jonathan Robinson (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jocelyn Brown (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Natalie Walker (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Lilian Kapp (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Erin Morris (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Nest Pritchard (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Tara Rousseau (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jason Moore (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Luke Parsons (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Anita Brooks (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from J. Link (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Kim Jarvi (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Debbie Uttama Anderson (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jenn Faught (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Joseph Fernando (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Murray Code (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Mary Kainer (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Kwan (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Zurine Santander (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Helena Betel (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Herng Yi Cheng (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Anneli Andre-Barrett (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Aaron Scholl (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Vasko Kocovski (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Mohamed Mia (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Beth Milner (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Nicholas Jones (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Beatrice D’Angelo (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Darby Leonard (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Anna Belej (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Felicia Morrison (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Diane Devenyi (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Michael Caldwell (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Ariana Michie (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Donna Campbell (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Rosi Berthelot (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Lisa Nave (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sheldon Rose (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Arnold Graaff (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Simone Quenneville (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Jesudasan (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Samantha Stermac (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Willow Cabral (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Geoffrey Smith (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Rebecca Chan (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jack Alvo (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jordan Cojocaru (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Melanie Carrington (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Samantha Goodspeed (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Dominique Russell (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Catherine Gautry (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jarek Piórkowski (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Gwyneth Buck (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Erin Roininen Butler (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ashley El Jachi (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from David Wilson (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Irene Mistro (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Cassie Fawcett (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Laura Rojas (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Megan Anevich (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Adrian Currie (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Julie Hewitt (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Alison Maxwell (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sonya Silva (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Christie Lo (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Allison Weir (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Cierra Johnston (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Hannah Gerry (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sorren Isler (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Aleksandra Levasheva (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lauren Mckay (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Kaitlyn Vleming (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Valérie Bolduc (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Maggie Clark (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lee Berkowitz (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Alexa Hazael (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Allie Lockhart (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sally Rylett (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Mark Zurawinski (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Lauren van Aggelen (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Gitta Postigo (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Tiago Hillerman (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Marguerite Pilger (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Mohsen Kermanshahi (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sheila Zurbrigg (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Shini Ko (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from A. Pope (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Kim McCormack (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Scotia Cox (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Robert Paterson-Watt (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Josh Clavir (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Riley Summers (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Adam Dirks (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Michael Stevens (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Joanne Kaashoek (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Madeleine Godin (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Milatovic (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Jeremy Bonk (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Emma Stainton (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Cheyenne Sundance (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Bradley Fauteux (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Marthinus Goussard (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Michael Polanyi (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Patricia Youn (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Bilski (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Kristy Franks (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Devon Fernandes (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Marjorie Nichol (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Alice Schuda (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Cathy Tafler (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ron Markwell (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Alison Marshall (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Lola Slade (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Antonella Lombardi (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Maegan Harrison (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Tanya Connors (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Leah Shoemaker (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from K. Tobias (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Ena Kenny (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Cassandra Clough (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Samira Kanji (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Godin (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Catharine Tunnacliffe (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Melissa Williams (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Anne Keary (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Raymond Nakano (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sara Arango (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Denise Medina (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Sinead Moore (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Sara Legg (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Melissa Taylor (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Brian MacLean (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Woodrow-Butcher (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Mark Woodnutt (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Lyn Adamson (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Rabea Murtaza (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Leslie Campbell (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Rajean Hoilett (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Cate Prichard (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Sierra Lianga (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kim Finuliar (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Michael Olivier (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Nicola Koyanagi (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Katie McLeod (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jill Glessing (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kathleen Madden (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kristine Kjeldsen (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Deepak Kumar (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Angel Vats (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Joyce McLean (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Suzanne Needs (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Victoria Foote (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Heather Alden (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ken Kessler (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Veronica Van Dam (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Katie Anderson (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Colleen Hill (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lianne Cote (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Mary Boudart (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kris Missud (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Tanya Connors (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Bob Kortright (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Chris Nolan (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jodie Baer (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lorena Balingit (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Barbara Rother (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lindsey Crymble (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kathleen Ko (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Janine Kanters (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Frances Freeman (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lorraine Johnson (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Rebecca Murphy (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Maarika Pinkney (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Angela Elzinga Cheng (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Zora Ignjat (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Eva Hellreich (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Meagan Dellavilla (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Renata Derege (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Borbala Pleasance (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Laura Hammond (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ling Tin (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Marie Sotto (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Dominika Milewska (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Risa Alyson Strauss (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ashley Edwards (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kay Chan (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Carole Larsen (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Emma Harrison (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jenise Aaron (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Laura Bast (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Liliana Furlani (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Katharine Colenbrander (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jade Usackas (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Susan Poizner (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Cleo Mankumah (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Elizabeth Grant (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Harlee Mackenzie (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Saturn SM (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Katie Fullerton (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Laura Innis (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Victoria Jewt (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Brian D. Tam (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Marce Bylinska (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Meghan Perrin (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Peter de Vries (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Tiffanie Lundrigan (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Vicki McGregor (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kirsten Wilson (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Tobi Mcevenue (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Drew Woodley (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Virginie Gysel (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Reg McLean (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sam Province (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Michelle Illiatovitch (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Trigiani (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from W. Walker (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Natalie Butler (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Mona Zaidi (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Mhairi Kubko (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Janay Simpson (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Geoffrey J. P Martin (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Hillary Scott (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Gillian Kranias (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Nasseem Hakimian (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Melanie Cabral (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Scout Swartz (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Isabelle Babici (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Natalie Cito (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Barney Savage (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Matthew Harvey (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Gavin Platt (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Samantha Davies (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Calyssa Erb (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Vaino Poysa (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Rebecca Levere (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Judy Luginbuhl (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Dorothy Holmes (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Carole and Karl Conde and Beveridge (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Shannon Duncan (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Ruth Allen (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Caitlin Gillespie (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Kathryn Payne (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Diane Wells (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Melissa Cusack Striepe (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Michelle Shahoud (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Victoria Ellis (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Marco Bertucci (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Karin Giesbrecht (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Matt Lemche (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kathrin Brunner (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Saad Ali (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ted Mann (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Brian Gettler (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Stewart Arnott (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Cropley (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Allison Meserve (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Paul M (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Fern Mosoff (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Dennis Williams (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Virginia Walsh (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Leon Williams (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Christine Robertson (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Marc Walker (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Bruce Novakowski (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Irene Alatzakis (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Katherine Laundy (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Julie Rouleau (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Karen Ward (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Meghan Trimble (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Gertrude Lung (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Lyubov Lytvyn (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from William Ma (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Clarisse Tatro (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from George Gardiner (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Cynthia Redpath (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Catherine Giannidis (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Yee Lee (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Danny Heap (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Hugh Brewster (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Robin Kortright (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Michael Holloway (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Paul Merriam (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Gordon Pinnell (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Irene Alatzakis (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Cordeiro (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Madelaine Emberson (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Pam Mountain (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Arthur Zimmerman (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Rachelle Chevalier (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Rachel Wang (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Alison Williams (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Fe de Leon (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jane Lennox-King (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Natasha Hickey (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Thomas Dobronyi (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Austra Gulens (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Silvia Wineland (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Harveen Saini (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Yohanna Mehary (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from John MacMillan (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Paula da Costa (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Cassy Hamill (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Luisa Pineros (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Linda Rosengarten (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Kassie Miedema (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jean O'Grady (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Erica Fischer (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Lou Pike (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Vivienne Denton (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Trevelee Goodwin (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jeffrey Aarles (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Joan Malcolmsen (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Ron Shirtliff (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Claire Brown (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Mark Fischer (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Nancy Kennedy (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Agnes Clarke (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Weatherwax (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sierra Curtis (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Rebecca Todd (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lucy Xiang (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Seona Stroz (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from LeeAnne MacGregor (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ilana Guslits (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Steph Braithwaite (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Dafna Godovich (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Bronwynne Dawes (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Gaye-Frances Alexander (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Adelaide Beach (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Don Tu (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Rachel Kim (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sara G. (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Stephanie Braithwaite (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Huynh (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Martine Aldridge (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Prakash Yee (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Linda Stork (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Abaigeal Clark (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Mackenzie Lamontagne (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Cara Chellew (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Tracy Rowan (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Alexandra Palmer (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Maria Ferreira (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Phyllis Brown (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Ted Ho (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Gail Posen (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sandra Glasbeek (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Gow (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Donna Koegl (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jocelyn Rankin (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from James Rolfe (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Dianne Bradley (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from T. Roger Richard (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Marc Bourre (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Darwin McGrath (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Rogers (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Naomi Mitchell (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lydia Moorehead (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Emma Barz (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lindsey Vodarek (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Paula Gallo (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kathryn Ogiltree (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Raymond Mar (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Leah Eyles (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Elsie Nisonen (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Maggie Hammel (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Janet Wilson (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ksenia Bilaniuk (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lindsay Clarke (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Peter Chin (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jill Cairns (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Bev Simpson (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lara Goulding (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lisa Walter (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lina Nasr (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Béatrice Lego (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Eric Stark (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Deanna Di Lello (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Jacqueline Akimoto (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Karen Young (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Caroline de Klerk (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Andreanna Tardelli (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Dean Boulding (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Chizuru Nobe-Ghelani (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Daniel Rotsztain (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Freyja Chapman (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Philip Labine (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from David Livingston-Lowe (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Jonathan Dostrovsky (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Gary Pepperall (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Aparna Menon (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Greg Knittl (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Levitt (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Megan McGinnis-Dunphy (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Robyn Salter (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Mary Alton (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Taylor Davies (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Okami Murphy del Cueto (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Karen Lathe (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Elizabeth Eng (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Rose Scheler (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Stefania Raimondo (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lauren Greenwood (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Arif Jaffer (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Chepesiuk (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Cadence Planthara (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Andre Gill (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Kelsey Sundbo (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Daniel Hoffmann (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kat Tancock (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Marika Viger (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Bree Zorel (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jennifer Goldberg (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Roda Medhat (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Matthew Ravenscroft (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Chantal Stepa (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Judy Land (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jackie Hamilton (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Corinna vanGerwen (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Hannah McCammon (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Christine Li (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Antonio Fernando (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Lexi Jeyarajan (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jill Francis (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from James Whitton (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Caren Crawford (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Rizvana Talreja (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Annie Ungeitis (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from E. Guerrero (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Steven Hanson (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jayne Miles (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Emily Anne Opala (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Elena Potter (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Steven Gold (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Madelin Dawson (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Chelsea Braun (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Tish Carnat (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Miriam Namakanda (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Janet Love (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Catherine Evans (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Corrie Galloway (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Joan Lewis (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Madison Cassidy (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Juliana Vegh (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Don Hildebrand (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kathryn Gray (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Shauna Eve (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Palias (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Anna Shortly (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Patricia Marshall (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Sue Craig (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Gino Reda (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Denna Berg (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Gabriela Rodriguez (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Annick Dufort (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Veronica Sinclaire (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Eve Lee (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Jennifer Ferrari (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Heather Pierce (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Nathaniel Hanula-James (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kate Raycraft (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Irene Alatzakis (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Celia Beketa (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Marian Booy (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Lauren Burkhardt (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Dubeta (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Kayla Ellis (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Michelle Fong (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Gail Fraser (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Robert Griffith (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Sally Hewson (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Martin Howe (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Andie Hunt (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from John Huot (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Natalie Irvine (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Bridget Jaworski (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Tristan O'Rourke (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Ali Hassani (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Denise Martins (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Claire Lacrampe-Couloume (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Mildred Weidhaas (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Marina Matutschovsky (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Michelle Singh (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Marco Mejia (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Curtis (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Allison Suba (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from John Kraan (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Catherine Spidle (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Roberta Benson (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Allyson Amster (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Rizielde Roculan (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Linda Neumayer (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Marissa Canagasuriam (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from V. Gysel (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kelly Dutchak (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ayal Dinner (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Sharon Baird (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Marco Covi (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Alexandra Berceanu (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Benedicte Le Quang (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Elaine Logashov (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sisan Arenyeka (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from James Bailey (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Rachel Chen (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Samantha Adams (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Kelly Crosthwaite (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Angela Lenis (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Allison Vanek (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Alan Levine (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Murray Lumley (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Jill Marzetti (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Shay Pillai (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Hugh Reilly (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Dana Rhijnsburger (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Tollenaar (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Jordan Worona (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Suzanne Long (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from John Paul Morgan (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Alana Galper (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Katherine Verhoeven (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Joelle Westman (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sam Boyer (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Laura Bendea (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Ahmad Amanullah (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ivy Derege-Braga (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Alyssa Albano (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Angel Beyde (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Hunter Blair (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Nikki Pagaling (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Amelia Hartin (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lynne Catt (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Ahmad Amanullah (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from D'Arcy Foster (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Moon Ja Park (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Kadeija Peters (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Lauren Pedersen (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Ruth Perkins (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from W. Mcmorrow (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Beaudin (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Maureen Lynett (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Carolyn Johnson (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Gordon Yanchyshyn (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Edgar Davies-Mills (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kate Van Buskirk (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Caroline Newman (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Krista Maxwell (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Elizabeth Newell (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Stavros Argyropoulos (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ashleigh Blis (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Casey Wigg (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kai Ethier (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Effie Argyropoulos (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Steve De Quintal (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Evan Knopp (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Diseiye Thompson (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Zainab B. (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Stewart (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Laurel Clayton (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Natalie Boustead (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Klarer (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Jess Lyons (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Brandon Ly (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Eva K (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Anya Ettinger (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Julianne Silver (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Karen Weisberg (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Radhika Gupta (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Scott Russell (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Beemsterboer (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Shannon Linde (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Nixon (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Rebecca Catching (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Asha Bruce (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Mao Thao (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Sammie Rogers (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Blake (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Gabriele Franke (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Ryan McCann (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Allison Pedler (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Megan Schmieder (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Jane Hayes (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Floyd Ruskin (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Julia Smith (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Lowell Lo (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Karen Lavut (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Urshila Sriram (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Liz Dobrzanski (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Janet Adamson (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sanjana Sharma (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Dominique Mcgann (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Anne Overgaard (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jim Pearce (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Angelo Diletto (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Donna Blanco (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Becky Caunce (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Kirstyn Motyliwski (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Meredith Potter (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Sophie Smith (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Agi Lukacs (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from David Sky (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Ariella Kohn-Adams (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Anne O’Callaghan (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Rachel Ivey (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Mary Deighan (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Jordan Eady (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Victoria Gabriele (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Joshua Smith (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Eric Ta (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Rana Khan (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Laura Limarzi (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Caroline Taylor (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Aysha Dawood (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Beth Dangerfield (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Louis Fliss (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Zaheer Bhyat (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Graham Lavender (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Stephen Douglas (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Fae Cassidy (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from David Walsh (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Daniel Vandervoort (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Sergio De Lara (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from James Prince (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Peter Welsh (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Meagan Dellavilla (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Marie Roy (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Elizabeth Gilarowski (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Marishka Radwanski (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from John Liss (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Alex Karney (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Scott Beach (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Julie Leach (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Gayman (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Milos Vasic (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Lisa Tate (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Kathryn Purvis (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Joyce Hall (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Julianne Keech (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Angela Bischoff (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Katherine Baird (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Mieko Ise (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Alissa Hamilton (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Gil Broza (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Shane Moffatt (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Katherine Rein (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Sarah De miglio (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Franz Hartmann (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Leigh Williams (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Christine Gebel (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Robert Haskett (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Lucy Falco (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Claire McGee (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Carrie Proctor (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Stephanie D’Souza (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Victoria Ho (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Magdalena Vanderkooy (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Chelsea Atkins-Macchione (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Moises Albanes (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Ikran Ali (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Isabelle Aquino (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Adnaan Bhyat (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Alice Bhyat (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Bourdeau (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Lynn Chambers (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Carol Coiffe (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Robin Cory (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Trudi Deacon (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Reiko Ema (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Val Endicott (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Laëtitia Eyssartel (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Enzo Frati (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Roxanne Futia (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Maiesha Abdelmoula (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Terrence Abrahams (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Ryan Abrams (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Acorn (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Karin Adlhoch (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Valerie Adriaanse (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Flora Aguilar (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jocelynne Aguilar (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Terri Aguilar (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Gaye-Frances Alexander (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Francesca Allodi-Ross (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Niloufar Ameli (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Adrienne Amenta (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Mike Antoniades (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Brianna Aspinall (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Diana Gibbs (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Aneil Gokhale (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Emily Gordon (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Sunday Harrison (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Adam Hasham (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Elissa Hermolin (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Jekums (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Molly Johnson (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Journal (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Corinne Kagan (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Jasmine Kamtirey (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from J. Kim (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Heather Lash (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Finn Lovsted (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Tyrzah Martins (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Christine Avery (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Allan Baker (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sharlyn Barahona (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Vanessa Barnes (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Fran Bazos (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Pat Bello (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Lindsay Bindman (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Luke Bradley (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Elaine Brindley (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Natalie Brown (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Allan Brugel (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Margaret Buchinger (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ben Bull (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Timothy Burlinson (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Alessia Cacciavillani (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Janet McCausland (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Valerie Nelson (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Nathalie Noël (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Emily Paradis (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Marlene Preiss (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Jen Quinlan (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Jennifer Reilly (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from John Ryerson (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Emily Smith (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Eric Souliere (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Annisha Stewart (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Cate Stoker (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Emma Tamlin (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Angela Tawadrous (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Francis Tersigni (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Yordanos Tesfamaraim (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Edward Xie (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Gloria Yip (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Allison Cadwallader (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Dina Catalucci (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lanie Chalmers (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Nina Chorney (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Kathy Chung (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Vicki Clough (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Melissa Coiffe (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Carla Compagnoni (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Nia Contini (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jeremy Cooper (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Christine Costa (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Joe Costa (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Crisp-Foster (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from John Cummings (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Emma Dawkins (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Priyan De Silva (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Monica De Vera (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sara Deris (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Anna Dobie (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Tara Dorey (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kaeli Dragomir (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Oonagh Duncan (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Shane Dunphy (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from John Edwards (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Gail Einarson-McCleery (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jessie Elliot-Brunning (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Ellis Kelly (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Roy England (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Julie Fader (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Kate Fane (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Erica May Farazi (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Deborah Farquharson (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jay Fisher (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Lynn Francis (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Nicki Franek (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Aliyah Fraser (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Susan Fraser (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Erin Freeman (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Amy Furness (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Maxine Gagnon (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Linda Gallant (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Stevie Garnett (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Katie German (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Elena Germani (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kelsey Gilchrist (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kaili Glennon (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ana Gonzalez (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Susan Greer (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Grochalova (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Cathy Gulkin (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Rebecca Hallquist (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Louise Hanly (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Olena Hayina (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Leah Holah (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Soula Homatidis (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Fateha Hossain (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Omar Hussain (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sinead Hutchison (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Taylor Jackson (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Jesudasan (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Lea Jiang (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lara Joannou (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Norman Karlstedt (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Matthew Kelly (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Beth Kettner (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sobia Khan (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jade Khiev (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Laura Kim (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Elise Klesmer (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kristan Klimczak (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jennifer Knoch (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Cat Kollar (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Yevgeniya Kononoff (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Iain Lacourt (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Naila Lalji (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Kien Peng Lim (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Charles Lanktree (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Margaret Law (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jennifer Lebel (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Seung Lee (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sandra Lefrancois (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Meg Leonard (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from John Liss (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Kylah Lohnes (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Ben Lundrigan (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Shantelle Macdonald (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Gina Macedo (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Neal MacInnes (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Meghan MacRae (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Anne Madigan (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Danielle-Rose Maheu (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Abisola Makindipe (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Ellen Manney (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Danielle Marcos (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Beth Martin (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Martyn (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Mike Mattos (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Susan McNeill (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Deniree Mendoza (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Eric Mills (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Carole Milon (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sara Mir (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Angelene Mitchell (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Shah Mohiuddin (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Liz Moore (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jeff Morgan (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Arun Mukherjee (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lucy Mulder (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Ryan Murdock (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jeba Bowers Murphy (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Amy Murphy (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Marilyn Nefsky (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Paul Nesbitt (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Dragos Nica (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Meg O’Mahony (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Penny Petropoulos (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Elysha Phillips (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Jocelyn Pitcher (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Kristin Pouw (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Frank Psrisien (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Emelina Ramos (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Jason Ramsay-Brown (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Danielle Reid (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Mark Riedl (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ange Reynolds (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Ellery Rosin (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Claire Roskey (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from toomas saask (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Anna Sansom (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Michelle Sappong (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Jan Schotte (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Daniel Schwartz (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Ellen Schwartzel (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Carl Schwebel (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Leila Shahoud (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Mercedes Sharpe Zayas (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Rien Shelbi (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Hugh Shewell (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Paul Shortt (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Rachel Small (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Caitlin Smith (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Crispin Smith (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Cindy Stanleigh (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Hayley Stewart (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Martha Stiegman (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Emily Tate (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Neil Taylor (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Charlotte Tenszen (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Tess Thompson (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Don Thomson (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Tiangco (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Erinn Todd (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Townsend (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Alyssa Valente (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Amanda VanDewall (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Maarit Varkel (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Violet Derege (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Dina Waik (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Erica Walker (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kevin Walker (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Caitlin Walter (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Aimin Wang (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Barbara Wehrspann (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Emily Whittome (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Wyatt Whyte (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Elsa Wong (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Dawn Woodward (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Hannelore Yager (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Michelle Ball (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Emily Bingham (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Natalie Boustead (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Alistair Bundy (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Ana Gabriela Buttelli Hentschke (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Bernice Couto (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Julia Creglia (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Laura Dias (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Alexander Drain (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Madeline Embree (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Esther Eng (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jenny Glozman (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Rob Howarth (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Scooter Jay (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Iris Karuna (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Meg Leonard (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Carl Leslie (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Maseeda Majeed (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Anna Mancuso (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Elin Marley (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Felix Mills (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Claudia Moore (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Garrett Morgan (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Pui Yi Ng (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Anne Ngo (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Stefani Pandovski (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Sonali Praharaj (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Ziadh Rab (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Michael Rose (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Lindsay Sanderson (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jeff Sauer (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Stephanie Schmitt (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Brianna Shields (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Ryan Singleton (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Tish Solomon (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Rosalind Sweeney-McCabe (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jess Turchet (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Crissy V. (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Carmen Victor (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Eric Visser (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Samieh Walden (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Kevin Walker (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Holly Williams (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Sophie Wolpert (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Rhonda Wooddisse (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from J. Bosschart (CC.New)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Judy Gilbert (CC.New)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Robert Jacob (CC.New)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Vida Juozaitis (CC.New)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from James Nadolny (CC.New)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Michael Thompson (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Nance Austin (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Annie Bedard (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Bronwyn Cawker (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Annie Clarke (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Madeleine Curry (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Mercedes Dalmeida (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Whitney French (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Isabel Gertler (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Lauren Jones (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Lobo (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Alison Moule (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Tekla Nagel (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Daniel Reynolds (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Lanny Shereck (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Edward Row (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Eric Adams (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Erin Anderson (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Bonnie Bean (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Luana Biamonte (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Sam Braithwaite (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Bright (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Maureen Brown (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Marisa Burton (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Taylor Caldwell (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Lindsay Cameron (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jan Caruana (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Kate Cas (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Ana Cierpich (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jack Comerford (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Cordeiro (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Eric Bolsch (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Cory Gould (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jan Darby (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Serena D'Souza (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from John Elksnitis (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Dennis Findlay (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jacqueline Fleisig (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Erin Foley (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Alex Friedman (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Sorcha Gibson (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Bonita Gionet (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Maedla Glasser (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jesse Gutman (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Laura Hache (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Ranu Hamilton (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Heather Jane (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Tyler Hilkewich (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Raphaël Beaulieu (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Filipe (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jocelyne Mongrain (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Consuelo Orrego (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Catherine Dewdney (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Laura Brehaut (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Fiona Knight (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Rutu Patel (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Erin Pehlivan (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Kathleen Holmes (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Sibi Jeyarajan (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from David Kitai (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Ana Martins (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Alison Moule (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Luc Peters (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Laura Proctor (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Sophi Robertson (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Rochelle Rubinstein (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Hannah Sinclair (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Ariel Slootsky (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Justin and Clara Speer (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Stokes (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Melissa Szopa (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Sumeet Tandon (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Frazer (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Katherine Clegg (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Shayne Taylor (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Randall Terada (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Zora Trocme (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Sydney Truesdale (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Melanie Warren (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Danielle Wiens (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Katherine Wilson (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Wright (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Diana Yoon (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Alexandra Ziolkowski (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from L. J. Robinson (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Frankie Little (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Lindsay Purchase (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Siofan Davies (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Daniella Macri (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Susan Kasurak (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jordan Cojocaru (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Mira Pazek (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from S. Phillips (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Julie Vander Meij (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Shavaun Jamieson (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Basmah Ahmed (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Elizabeth Olin (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Rysia Andrade (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Tina Fushell (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Laura Tanguay (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Vanessa Toye (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Janesse Leung (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Marta Chudolinska (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Heather Buffett (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jade Gardiner (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Kohila Kurunathan (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Carol Schwartz (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jhih-Jia Liou (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Joel Solish (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Ronnie Ali (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Sam Province (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Simone Zucker (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Facciolo (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Carrie Ng (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Ariel Jones (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Kelly Carmichael (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Camille Jodoin-Eng (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Estelle Sun (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Arlin Dixon (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Carmina Ravanera (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from George Turner (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Alvin Rebick (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Emily Kieffer (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Josh Skinner (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Tara Monfaredi (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Stefan Vladusic (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Carolyn Bailey (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from James Malekzadeh (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Sahil Chaini (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Daniela Payne (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Kristina O'Hara (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Riccardo Caimano (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Heather Chapple (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Ross Dickson (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Zachary Manesiotis (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Meraki Being (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Amanda VanDewall (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Emily Beaton (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Harvey-Sanchez (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Tamara Nahal (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Patrick Alain (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Iara Allain (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Aisha Auckbaraullee (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Cassidy Coles (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jeff Culligan (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Dawn Fisher (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Elisabeth Foerster (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Charlotte Griffin (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Denise Hansen (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Oliver Ho (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Zahra Jamal (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Alan Lawrence (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Mitchell LeBlanc (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Joshna Maharaj (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Emily Nixon (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Matthew Lahey (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Joel Slonetsky (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Maggie Campaigne (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Alex Philip (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Alex Rapson (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jenny Reed (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Olivia Selvam (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Warren St. Romain (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Tharsan Veerasingam (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Thomas Cole (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Joe Woolvett (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Alec Sherman (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Tess Degenstein (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Cassandra Pebesma-Zivkovich (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Geoff Goldsmith (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Xenia Taler (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Josephine Liu (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Carolyn Amorin (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Krissan Veerasingam (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Akiwi (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Fizza Khalid (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Daniel Haack (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jenny Lien (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Lindsay Wolfson (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Abira Sathiyanathan (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Marc Green (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Tina Gougoushvili (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jennifer DiMaria (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Amelia Ehrhardt (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Paula Square (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Moon Zong (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Kiki Hastings (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Zoe Fregoli (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Hanno Rein (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Claire Forsyth (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Gans Subramaniam (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Meghan Robbins (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Caitlin Cassie (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Caitlin Hancey (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Juliah Thrift (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Dev Vyas (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Allison Chan (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from N. C. Biswas (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Johanna Catsburg (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Amy Dodington (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Helena Grdadolnik (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Zilla Akl (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Adrianne Yiu (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Michael MacKenzie (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Ranco (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Akcinya Kootchin (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Iman Bundu (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Jenkinson (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Rachel Hill (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Maldonado (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jennifer Nussey (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Nael Meza (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Victoria Rudiak (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jarrod Beaton (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Allison Dubarry (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from May Chook (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Stephanie Pflugfelder (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Leya Choudhury (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Mussarat Ejaz (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Marina Biasutto (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Tess Ng (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Lisa Roosen-Runge (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Tamiris Neves (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Christine Ambre (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Heather Osler (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Christian Hand (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Kate Barton (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Helena Annala (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jason Ramsay-Brown, President and Ellen Schwartzel, incoming President, Toronto Field Naturalists (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-121241.pdf
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Margaret Law (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Anan Lololi (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jenna Zardo (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Holtslander (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from T D (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Tatiana Ferreira (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Sophia Srebot (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Vickery (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Catherine Li-Abrams (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Elizabeth Hum (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Tracy Kett (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Yasir Hameed (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Matt Noble (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Pamela Lapierre (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Katarzyna Monika Janik-Jones (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Jessie Meyer (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Maddy Macnab (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Collie McCutcheon (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Enzo Frati (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Jennifer Berman Diaz (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Ellery Rosin (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Caitlin Feir (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Shoshanah Reiskind (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Erika Christou (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Beier (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Madison Maguire (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Chantelle Gubert (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Camille Borody (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Dylan Reid, Walk Toronto (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-121230.pdf
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Michelle Zhong (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from David Maclean (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Frances Scovil (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Cara Habayeb (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Liz Allemang (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Joshua Richards (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Luke Fox (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Willah Peers (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Angelica Bennett (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Mingjia Chen (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Katherine Kennedy (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Rebecca Russo (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Ivana Simic (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Ktherine Sauer (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Lana Wright (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Abbott (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Alfred-Duggan (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Melwyn Almeida (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Christian Anderson (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Christine Ardagh (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Karen Beattie (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Jocelyne Beaulieu (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Dee Buryk (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Mary Ellen Campbell (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Cheryll Case (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Claire Chackowicz (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Emily Charles-Donelson (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Ansuya Chetty (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Max Christie (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Juliana Coughlin (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Rabeea Fatima (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Gerda Wekerle (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Emily Ash Cutajar (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Alanna Dickinson (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Gina Giron (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Alex Grey (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Kohen Hammond (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Anjali Helferty (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Day Holden (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Pearl Lam (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Judy Land (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Laoutaris (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Lazarovic (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Hai-Dao Le-Nguyen (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Jaclyn MacNeil (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Miriam Maes (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Katherine McGillivray (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Mason McGuire (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Heather McKee (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Mahnoor Muqeem (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Murley-Hauser (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Aimee Normore (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Mayah Obadia (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from L. Osman (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Caitlin Pupillo (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Stephanie Radcliffe (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Amulya Raja (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Jacqueline Reeves (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Maggie Robertson (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Stephen Rockel (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Sabrina Rumel (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Elisabeth Schieck (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Devika Shah (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Maija Sidial (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Sandra Simoes (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Snider (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Molly Stollmeyer (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Rhonda Teitel-Payne (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Sonam Vashisth (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Dila Velazquez (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Vorstermans (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Nancy Ward (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Wilson (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Ronny Yaron (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Mark Flanjak (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Cynthia Wilkey (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Paul Bilodeau (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Eugenia Ochoa (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Joanna Rifkin (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Moraes (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Maya Adachi (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Ritchie Wall (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Alicia Laso (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Matthew Freedlander (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Michael Pettit (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Remy Huberdeau (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Ophelia Lau (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Kristina Block (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Garrett Belk (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Lanadee Lampman (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Nancy Dengler (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Signe Lewis (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Rosalind Franklin (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Carolyn Barber (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Jocelynn Rodrigues (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Haley Higdon (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Marilyn Ropeleski (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Chuck Baker (CC.New)
(October 2, 2020) E-mail from Reanna Niceforo (CC.New)
(October 2, 2020) E-mail from Stephanie Cormier (CC.New)
(October 2, 2020) E-mail from Charles Broughton (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jackie Brown (CC.New)

GL15.15 - Property Sales, Acquisitions, Expropriations and Leases - 2019 Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council receive the report (August 28, 2020) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management for information.

Origin

(August 28, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Summary

This report provides an annual overview of real estate transactions executed by the Corporate Real Estate Management Division on behalf of the City of Toronto through the Delegated Authority Form process from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. Properties that were declared surplus, sold, acquired through negotiations or expropriations, as well as licences and leases, are summarized in this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 28, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on 2019 Final Report on Property Sales, Acquisitions, Expropriations and Leases
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156219.pdf
Appendix A - Declared Surplus List and Appendix B - Properties Authorized for Sale
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156221.pdf

GL15.16 - 123 Queen Street West - Lease Amending & Extension Agreement

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City of Toronto (the "City"), as landlord, to enter into a lease amending and extension agreement (the "Agreement") with BSREP II Hospitality Toronto GP Inc., in its capacity as general partner of BSREP II Hospitality Toronto L.P, as tenant, for the lands located at 123 Queen Street West, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix B and as further set out in the attached Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (August 31, 2020) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and on such other or amended terms and conditions acceptable to the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential in its entirety, until the Agreement or notice of the Agreement is registered on title.

Origin

(August 31, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Summary

BSREP II Hospitality Toronto GP Inc., in its capacity as general partner of BSREP II Hospitality Toronto L.P (the "Tenant"), managed by Brookfield Asset Management, operates the Sheraton Center at 123 Queen Street West (the "Premises") and is planning to invest a minimum of $40 million in renovations and capital improvements to the Premises within the next three (3) years, and has agreed to invest a minimum of $5 million in additional renovations when the market and hospitality industry have recovered from COVID-19 impacts. In respect of the latter investment, the Tenant has agreed to update the City of its investment plans within the next three (3) years.

 

The Tenant has requested that the underlying ground lease with the City of Toronto be amended as set out in this report and extended for 40 years beyond the current expiry of the ground lease on May 31, 2068 (with an extension term commencing June 1, 2068 and ending May 31, 2108) in order to assist in securing capital required to fund such investments. This report requests authority for a lease amending and extension agreement, which will incorporate the major terms and conditions as described in Appendix B and Confidential Attachment 1.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 31, 2020) Report and Appendices A and B from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on 123 Queen Street West - Lease Amending and Extension Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156276.pdf
(September 3, 2020) Confidential Attachment 1

GL15.17 - Below Market Sublease Agreement with Lumenus Community Services for EarlyON Centre Programs - 30 Sheppard Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Willowdale

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize a new sublease agreement with Lumenus Community Services for a term of five (5) years with an option to renew for a further five (5) years for nominal consideration, substantially based on the terms set out in Appendix A to the report (August 28, 2020) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the General Manager, Children's Services, and on such other or amended terms and conditions acceptable to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete all relevant agreements, and all documentation as required, and to deliver any notices, and amend the respective commencement, termination and other dates to such earlier or later date(s), on such terms and conditions, as the City Solicitor, or designate, may from time to time, determine.

 

3. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to execute such documents required to complete the relevant sublease agreements.

Origin

(August 28, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the General Manager, Children's Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council authority to enter into a new sublease agreement with Lumenus Community Services for a five (5) year term for approximately 4,500 square feet area for EarlyON Centre programs, on the fourth floor of the building located at 30 Sheppard Avenue East, for nominal consideration.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 28, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the General Manager, Children's Services on Below Market Sublease Agreement with Lumenus Community Services for EarlyON Centre Programs - 30 Sheppard Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156185.pdf

GL15.18 - Below Market Sublease Agreement with The Neighbourhood Group Community Services for Child Care Centre Programs - 30 Sheppard Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Willowdale

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize a new sublease agreement with The Neighbourhood Group Community Services for a term of five (5) years with an option to renew for a further five (5) years for nominal consideration, substantially based on the terms set out in Appendix A, and on such other or amended terms and conditions acceptable to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete all relevant agreements, and all documentation as required, and to deliver any notices, and amend the respective commencement, termination and other dates to such earlier or later date(s), on such terms and conditions, as the City Solicitor, or its designate, may from time to time, determine.

 

3. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to execute such documents required to complete the relevant sublease agreements.

Origin

(August 28, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the General Manager, Children's Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council authority to enter into a new sublease agreement with The Neighbourhood Group Community Services for a five (5) year term for approximately 6,448 square feet of interior space and approximately 3,197 square feet of outdoor play area for Child Care Centre programs, on the second floor of the building located at 30 Sheppard Avenue East, for nominal consideration.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 28, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the General Manager, Children's Services on Below Market Sublease Agreement with The Neighbourhood Group Community Services for Child Care Centre Programs - 30 Sheppard Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156186.pdf

GL15.19 - City of Toronto Lease at 2900 Warden Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - Scarborough - Agincourt

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City to enter into an offer to sublease (the "Offer") and a sublease to be executed pursuant to the Offer (collectively the "Sublease") with  Bridlewood Mall Management Incorporated (the "Sublandlord"), for approximately 33,000 square feet of space, to a maximum of 34,650 square feet, at 2900 Warden Avenue, Scarborough (the "Premises") for a ten (10) year term (the "Term") commencing on approximately May 1, 2022 and expiring on approximately April 30, 2032, substantially on the major terms and conditions as set out in Appendix A to the report (August 28, 2020) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the General Manager, Children's Services, including such other terms and conditions as may be deemed appropriate by the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, or designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(August 28, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain authority to enter into a new sublease agreement with Bridlewood Mall Management Incorporated, as sublandlord, for approximately 33,000 square feet of space at 2900 Warden Avenue, Suite 225, Scarborough (the "Leased Premises") situated in the Bridlewood Mall, for use by Toronto Employment and Social Services and other City of Toronto Divisions and Agencies that are identified in the planning and design of the Leased Premises. The sublease is for a term of ten (10) years.

 

The Leased Premises will replace Toronto Employment and Social Services's existing leased site at 100 Consilium Place in Scarborough (the "Existing Premises"), which services approximately 2,650 office visits per month, and will result in a reduction of approximately 14,480 square feet in total leased square footage as compared to the existing leased site. This relocation will ensure service continuity for clients in the underserviced north Scarborough area, and presents opportunities for space optimization and service co-location in collaboration with the Toronto Public Library. The Leased Premises may also be used to implement strategic initiatives focused on creating agile, flexible City space that can be used by multiple City Divisions and Agencies, customers and clients as the need and demand for space to deliver services evolve.

 

The rent and other terms and conditions of the sublease agreement reflect current market value according to market research and valuation conducted by Corporate Real Estate Management staff. Staff will also seek to designate the Leased Premises as a municipal capital facility in order to exempt the Leased Premises from realty taxation for municipal and school purposes.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 28, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on City of Toronto Lease at 2900 Warden Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156188.pdf

GL15.20 - Toronto Employment and Social Services Lease at 900 Dufferin Street, Suite 219

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council authorize the City of Toronto (the "City") to enter into a lease (the "Lease") with Dufferin Mall Holdings Incorporated (the "Landlord") or its duly authorized property manager, for approximately 27,894 square feet of space, to a maximum of 28,699 square feet at 900 Dufferin Street, Toronto (the "Premises") for a fifteen (15) year term (the "Term") expected to commence approximately on December 1, 2021 and expire on November 30, 2036, substantially on the major terms and conditions as set out in Appendix A to the report (August 28, 2020) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, including such other terms and conditions as may be deemed appropriate by the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, or designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(August 28, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain authority to enter into a new lease agreement with Dufferin Mall Holdings Incorporated, as landlord, for approximately 27,894 square feet of space at 900 Dufferin Street, Suite 219, Toronto (the "Leased Premises"), for use by Toronto Employment and Social Services for a term of fifteen (15) years.

 

The Leased Premises will replace and consolidate three (3) of Toronto Employment and Social Services' existing leased sites in downtown, which will result in a significant reduction of total leased square footage by approximately 26,000 square feet or 47 percent, as compared to the existing leased sites, which are located at 2340 Dundas Street West, 1900 Dundas Street West, and 55 John Street.

 

The relocations from 2340 Dundas Street West and 1900 Dundas Street West are due to the pending expiry of the leases at these sites. The relocation from 55 John Street is necessitated by the City's strategic acquisition of 229 Richmond Street West and the disposition of 260 Adelaide Street West, requiring Toronto Employment and Social Services and other City Divisions to move to alternative locations to accommodate the anticipated Fire Hall at Metro Hall.

 

The rent and other terms and conditions of the lease agreement reflect current market value according to market research and valuation conducted by Corporate Real Estate Management staff. Staff will also seek to designate the Leased Premises as a municipal capital facility in order to exempt the Leased Premises from realty taxation for municipal and school purposes.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 28, 2020) Report and Appendices A to D from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on Toronto Employment and Social Services Lease at 900 Dufferin Street, Suite 219
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156240.pdf

GL15.21 - Release of City's Property Interest at 131 McCaul Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Confidential Attachment - This report contains (i) information related to potential litigation affecting the City of Toronto (the "City"), (ii) commercial and financial information, supplied in confidence to the City, which, if disclosed, could reasonably be expected to prejudice significantly the competitive position or interfere significantly with the contractual negotiations of an organization; and, (iii) advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City of Toronto to give a release to Tribute (McCaul Street) Limited of any interest the City may have (the "Disputed City Interest") in the lands legally described in Appendix B to the report (August 27, 2020) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the City Solicitor (the "Restricted Lands"), pursuant to a deed from the City to the Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer, registered as Instrument Number 50874EP on September 14, 1944 (the "1944 Deed"), on the terms set out in Appendix C to the report (August 27, 2020) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the City Solicitor, and on such other terms that are acceptable to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in consultation with the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential in its entirety, as it relates to potential litigation against the City; contains commercial and financial information, supplied in confidence to the City, which, if disclosed, could reasonably be expected to prejudice significantly the competitive position or interfere significantly with the contractual negotiations of an organization; and contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Origin

(August 27, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the City Solicitor

Summary

This report seeks City Council authorization to grant a release to Tribute (McCaul Street) Limited (the "Developer") of any interest the City may have in a portion of the lands municipally known as 131 McCaul Street, and legally described in Appendix B (the "Restricted Lands"), pursuant to a deed from the City to the Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer (the "Church").

 

In 1944, a portion of 131 McCaul Street was acquired by the Church from the City. A map showing the general location of the property is provided in Attachment A. The 1944 Deed to the Church provided that the grant of the lands was for so long as they are used for recreational purposes, that they were to be used for such purposes, and that they would vest again in the City in the event that they cease to be used for such purposes.

 

The Church has since entered into a sale agreement with the Developer to sell a larger development parcel, inclusive of these lands, and has requested that the City release any interest it may have in the lands pursuant to the 1944 Deed, while also disputing that the City currently has any enforceable interest. City staff, taking into consideration legal advice from the City Solicitor contained in Confidential Attachment 1, are seeking City Council authorization to grant the release on proposed terms and conditions negotiated with the Developer (Attachment C).

Background Information (Committee)

(August 27, 2020) Report and Attachments A to C from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and City Solicitor on Release of City's Property Interest at 131 McCaul Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156222.pdf
(August 27, 2020) Confidential Attachment 1

GL15.24 - Covid Alert Application Installation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The City Manager has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (GL15.24a with recommendations)

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee submits this item without recommendation.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The General Government and Licensing Committee:

 

1. Directed the City Manager, in consultation with the Medical Officer of Health, to report directly to the September 30, 2020 City Council meeting on the feasibility of installing the Covid Alert app on all City of Toronto managed mobile devices and the necessary steps to maximize the benefit of the software.

Origin

(September 14, 2020) Letter from Councillor Stephen Holyday, Ward 2, Etobicoke Centre

Summary

In July 2020 the Government of Canada released its Covid Alert app for mobile devices. This free software is designed to utilize wireless technology to inform citizens should they come into close proximity of another user of the app who has tested positive for Covid-19, so that they may take appropriate steps to limit the spread of the virus. The software works best when a critical number of users enable the technology, and the more applications installed, the more effective that it is.

 

Since then, media reports have indicated a modest uptake among Canadians despite the wide availability of the free app. While organizations across the country have made enormous efforts to combat the spread of Covid-19 through physical distancing, modified operations, restrictions, sanitization and handwashing, the free application appears to be underutilized. This software is a valuable tool in the fight against Covid-19, gaining strength in numbers. 

 

The City of Toronto manages over 9,000 mobile devices for employees, and potentially thousands more within the span of influence of Council in the broader public sector. Given the negligible cost of deploying this software in an organized manner of across its mobile devices, I am requesting that the City government investigate deploying this software across every device in the mobile fleet. If successful, this could pave the way for other public and private sector organizations to do the same.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 14, 2020) Memo from Deputy Mayor Holyday on the Covid Alert Application Installation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-156596.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary report from the City Manager on COVID Alert APP and City Mobile Devices (GL15.24a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157072.pdf

Infrastructure and Environment Committee - Meeting 15

IE15.2 - Amendment to a Non-Competitive Bridge Contract with Sidan Traffic Control Services Limited for the Provision of Traffic Control Equipment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to negotiate and execute an amendment to non-competitive bridge contract with Sidan Traffic Control Services Limited for the non-exclusive supply, delivery, installation and removal of barricades, Ontario Traffic Manual approved signage/traffic control devices and custom signage for the City's ActiveTO program, in the amount of $160,000.00 net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($162,816.00 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), for the period of October 2, 2020 to December 31, 2020, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(September 2, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services Division and the Chief Procurement Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request authority to amend a non-competitive bridge contract with Sidan Traffic Control Services Limited for the non-exclusive supply, delivery, installation and removal of barricades, OTM approved signage/traffic control devices and custom signage, in the amount of $160,000.00 net of HST ($162,816.00 net of HST recoveries), for the period from October 2, 2020 to December 31, 2020.  The non-competitive bridge contract will support the City's ActiveTO program, which was developed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and allow staff sufficient time to award a new competitive contract. The bridge contract will continue to honour the existing terms, pricing and conditions of the existing competitive contract # 47019435 with Sidan Traffic Control Services Ltd., which expired on July 31, 2020 for the remainder of the calendar year.

 

This report also includes as information, over expenditures not previously reported, that occurred on existing competitive Blanket Contract # 47019435 with Sidan Traffic Control Services Ltd., which amounts to $492,339.25 net of HST ($501,004.42 net of HST recoveries).  In addition, an interim bridge contract was granted from August 1, 2020 to October 1, 2020 to address immediate requirements for $690,000.00, net of HST ($702,144.00 net of HST recoveries), to continue to accommodate the City's ActiveTO program pending further approval.  The current bridge contract honours the existing terms, pricing and conditions of existing competitive Blanket Contract # 47019435.   

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195, Purchasing, where the current request exceeds the Chief Procurement Officer's authority of the cumulative five year commitment limit for each vendor under Article 7, Section 195-7.3(D) of the Purchasing By-law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71, Financial Control, Section 71-11a.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 2, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services Division and Chief Procurement Officer on Amendment to a Non-Competitive Bridge Contract with Sidan Traffic Control Services Limited for the Provision of Traffic Control Equipment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-156337.pdf

IE15.4 - Transition of Toronto's Blue Box Program to Extended Producer Responsibility

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the City of Toronto transitioning from the current Provincially-mandated Blue Box recycling program to the forthcoming Provincially-mandated Extended Producer Responsibility recycling program during the first of the Province's three proposed transition periods and starting such transition on July 1, 2023.

 

2. City Council request the Mayor to provide the Ontario Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks with a copy of this Council resolution and to indicate in such letter that the City of Toronto prefers to transition its recycling program on July 1, 2023.

 

3. City Council request the Province of Ontario to share the draft regulation(s) that will enable a full extended producer responsibility recycling program with City of Toronto staff at least 5 business days in advance of broader public consultations, taking into consideration Toronto's unique features including, without limitations, the highest number of multi-residential buildings, the dense urban centre, and the largest Blue Box Program in Ontario, so that that City can, among other things, effectively mitigate potential adverse impacts to Toronto residents and the City's waste operations as soon as possible.


4. City Council direct the City Manager, Mayor and General Manager of Solid Waste Management, to communicate to the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks City Council's position that:

 

a. any changes to Toronto's blue box program and Extended Producer Responsibility regulations, have clear and measurable goals, targets, outcomes and penalties that ensure producers are accountable for reduction targets and are consistent with the provincial interests stated in the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016, the purposes stated in the Waste Diversion Transition Act, 2016 and the principles of full extended producer responsibility;

 

b. other policy tools and incentives to promote the use of more recycled content in products and packaging should be included, including incentives to reduce and redesign products and packaging;

 

c. Extended Producer Responsibility regulations not allow for recycled content to offset recovery targets and that producers are required to report on sub categories of materials; and

 

d. the eligible sources Include all multi-unit residential dwellings in Ontario during transition, commercial and municipal buildings (including parks and public spaces, schools, and municipally-operated facilities, such as community centres and arenas) and include packaging and packaging like products recovered from the waste stream. 

 

5. City Council request the City Manager, the Mayor and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to communicate to the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks to protect the deposit return system and explore expanding deposit return as a means of increasing recycling rates.

 

6. City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to report back on impacts to user fees and any change in Solid Waste user fee program.

 

7. City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to report back on the impact and proposed management of materials and sources not eligible for transition including costs (i.e. non-residential customer base).

 

8. City Council authorize the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services or designate to negotiate and enter into any new agreements or amending agreements (including but not limited to amending agreements to receive external funding) necessary for the City's continued waste diversion operations until the latter of December 31, 2026 or the transition period end date indicated by the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016 or the Waste Diversion Transition Act, 2016, or any regulations thereunder, on terms satisfactory to the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and each in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor and conditional on approved funding.

 

9. City Council request the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, provide to all Members of Council, communications material to share on potential and proposed changes to the blue box program as a result of proposed Extended Producer Responsibility regulations.

Origin

(September 17, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the transition of Toronto's Blue Bin Recycling Program to extended producer responsibility and seek authority to advise the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks of Toronto's preferred transition date of July 1, 2023. This report also provides an update on the wind-up of the current shared municipal/producer funding model for blue box materials and discusses potential elements of the future Extended Producer Responsibility regulation and Toronto's key policy positions. The report also presents information on potential future-state scenarios and when the financial and operational responsibility of managing blue box materials is fully transitioned to producers.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 17, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services on Transition of Toronto's Blue Box Program to Extended Producer Responsibility
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-156324.pdf
Attachment 1 - Recycling Advisor David Lindsay's Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-156325.pdf
Attachment 2 - Minister's Policy Direction Letter to Stewardship Ontario
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-156326.pdf
Attachment 3 - City of Toronto Recommendations to Inform Extended Producer Responsibility Regulation for Blue Box Materials
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-156327.pdf
Attachment 4 - Letter to Deputy Minister Imbrogno on Toronto's Preferred Transition Date
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-156328.pdf
Attachment 5 - Toronto's Comments on Stewardship Ontario Wind-up Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-156329.pdf

Speakers

Emily J. Alfred, Toronto Environmental Alliance
Councillor Shelley Carroll

IE15.6 - Non-Competitive Bridge Contracts for the Provision of Arboricultural Services in the City of Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and enter into non-competitive bridging contracts with the current Arboricultural Services providers for a period of 6 months, from January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor based on the following details:

 

a. Davey Tree Expert Company of Canada in the amount of $2,374,689, net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($2,416,484, net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries);

 
b. Ontario Line Clearing and Tree Experts in the amount of $3,229,781, net of Harmonized Sales Tax, ($3,286,625, net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries); and

 
c. W.M. Weller Tree Service in the amount of $4,268,973, net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($4,344,107, net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries).

Origin

(August 27, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Procurement Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request authority to establish non-competitive bridging contracts with the current Arboricultural Services providers Davey Tree Expert Company of Canada (Blanket Contract # 47021964), Ontario Line Clearing & Tree Experts (Blanket Contract # 47021967) and W.M. Weller Tree Service (Blanket Contract # 47021966) for the continued non-exclusive supply of all labour, equipment and material necessary to perform Arboricultural Services at various locations for the Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division from January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021. This work is required to mitigate public liability and to maximize the tree canopy potential by ensuring healthier and long-lived trees through a proactive, systematic maintenance regime.

 

The consolidated value of all three (3) bridge contracts for the period of January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021 to the City of Toronto is $9,873,443, net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($10,047,216 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries). Details of the bridging contracts for each vendor are provided in the Financial Impact and Comments sections.

 

A negotiated Request for Proposal for Arboricultural Services (Doc # 2305234907) was issued in March 2020 and closed in May 2020 for a two (2) year term with three (3) additional one (1) year optional renewal periods commencing January 1, 2021. The bid review team, made up of Urban Forestry and Purchasing and Materials Management staff, as well as a Fairness Monitor, was underway with the review and negotiations.

 

At its meeting of July 28 and 29, 2020 City Council considered Infrastructure and Environment Committee Item IE14.8 "Ensuring Value for Money for Tree Maintenance Services – Update and Legal Advice". At that meeting City Council requested a further report from the City Manager to be considered at the next Audit Committee meeting scheduled for October 23, 2020. As a result, negotiations that were underway were put on hold until further notice.

 

Due to this delay, which impacts the award of the 2021 Contract(s), non-competitive bridge contracts are required for the current three (3) vendors from January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021 for the continued supply of all labour, equipment and material to perform arboricultural services. This will ensure continuity of essential arboricultural services including tree pruning and maintenance until such time that the 2021 Contract can be awarded. This work is required to mitigate public liability and maximize the tree canopy potential by ensuring healthier and long-lived trees through a proactive, systematic maintenance regime.

City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195- Purchasing, where the current request exceeds the Chief Purchasing Official's authority of the cumulative five year commitment for each vendor, under Article 7, Section 195-7.3 (D) of the Purchasing By-Law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000, net of Harmonized Sales Tax allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71- Financial Control, Section 71-11A.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 27, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Procurement Officer on Non-Competitive Bridge Contracts for the Provision of Arboricultural Services in the City of Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-156336.pdf

IE15.7 - Update on the School Crossing Guard Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to include the 30 additional new locations in Appendix 5 to the report (September 2, 2020) from the General Manager, Transportation Services in the School Crossing Guard program for the 2020-2021 school year for consideration in the 2021 Operating Budget submission, as amended by Recommendation 2 below.

 

2. City Council amend Appendix 5 to the report (September 2, 2020) from the General Manager, Transportation Services by adding a 31st additional location at 50 Ameer Avenue, St. Margaret Beatrice Catholic School.

 

3. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to undertake a warrant review audit of the original 704 locations to determine whether or not the lunch time school crossing guard coverage is required as well as the anticipated cost-savings.

 

4. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to negotiate, enter into, and execute agreements, as may be required, with the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board to provide funding of $320,000 per year in total to both school boards for the next three (3) years (2021-2023) from the existing Vision Zero 2.0 program budget for the expansion of their existing school travel planning programs, on such terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(September 2, 2020) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The 2019-2020 school year marks the first full year since Transportation Services operated the School Crossing Guard Program completely autonomous from the Toronto Police Service. Through direction from Council, Transportation Services contracted the services to two vendors Carraway Inc. and A.S.P. Incorporated. As anticipated, the measures put in place by Transportation Services through the two contracted vendors resulted in a very high level of service that progressively improved from 98 to 100 percent coverage consistently. The measures included the requirement for emergency backfilling of vacant guards, mobile supervisors patrolling locations to ensure guards were present and the monitoring system that required guards to use cellular apps to digitally check in when arriving and departing the site.

 

Staff are now proposing 30 new locations for the 2020-2021 school year that were deemed warranted using the new warrant process. These new locations originated from legacy requests that came in during the transition of the program from Toronto Police Service to Transportation Services. While there was underspending as earlier in 2020 as a resulted as a result of the COVID-19 shutdown that will offset these expansion costs for 2020, there will still be a requirement to increase the 2021 Operating Budget to include the expansion of the program to include the 30 additional guards.

 

In addition, over the years, there has been a growing problem with respect to student drop-off and pick-up around schools and subsequently, a motion was adopted by City Council in June of 2019 for Transportation Services staff to work with the school boards to develop a road map for a safety plan in this regard. With the re-opening of schools following the COVID-19 shutdown comes an even greater need for overall School Travel Planning development which would include the student drop-off and pick up safety plan.

 

The pandemic has resulted in significant changes in travel habits whereby more parents than usual may elect to walk their children to school in combination with those choosing to drive. To further encourage and facilitate this active transportation and to support safer drop-off and pick-up situations, staff are recommending to provide funding of $320,000 per year in total to both school boards for the next three (3) years (2021-2023) for the expansion of their existing school travel planning programs from the Vision Zero 2.0 Road Safety Plan budget.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 2, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Update on the School Crossing Guard Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-156302.pdf
Attachment 5 - Listing of 30 New School Crossing Guard Locations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-156532.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Shelley Carroll

IE15.8 - Request to Study the Environmental Impact of Two-Stroke Engine Garden Equipment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications IE15.8.44 to IE15.8.70 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that: 

 

1. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Medical Officer of Health, to report back in the first quarter of 2021 on the environmental and associated health impacts of gasoline-powered two-stroke engine leaf blowers and other similarly operated garden equipment, including the feasibility of a year-round ban or a ban from May to September.

Origin

(July 30, 2020) Member Motion from Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak

Summary

City Council on July 28 and 29, 2020, referred Motion MM23.3 to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee.

 

Gasoline-powered leaf blowers and other types of small engine equipment are powered by inefficient two-stroke engines. The process of incomplete fuel combustion generates dangerous hydrocarbon 500 times that of an average automobile and produces toxic aerosol (including carcinogenic particulates) for us to breathe in. These machines have shown to be heavily polluting which can lead to the destruction of our ecosystem.

 

Recently published studies observed a dramatic loss of insect populations across the globe. Just within the past three decades, the number of flying insects had declined by more than 75 percent in sixty of Germany's protected area. Based on available researches, 40 percent of insect species are undergoing major declines around the world. Our local bee populations are facing similar threats.

 

This rapid decline is largely attributed to habitat loss and fragmentation, with gas-powered garden equipment as a major contributing factor due to its heavily polluting nature. It destroys habitats either by harming the soil biology or absorbing small animals and insects through suction. Experts warn that if this trend continues, terrestrial and freshwater ecosystem will collapse with profound consequences on our health and wellbeing.

 

Increasingly, private landscapers are using leaf blowers to remove grass clippings outside the fall season, i.e., from May to September, when no leaves are on the ground. This unnecessary step exposes our neighbourhoods to a greater range of air pollutants and destroys insect populations with adverse impacts on our local ecosystems.

 

Banning or severely restricting gas-operated leaf blowers have been successfully implemented in over 90 cities/municipalities in California and more than 100 other cities in the USA. In Canada, the West End of the City of Vancouver and Beaconsfield have bans to address air and other pollutions. Portland supported a transition to electric operations in 2021 in addition to a ban. Most recently, the findings of the insect population decline have led to a similar proposals in Germany.

 

In the most recent study conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health, breathing in combustion aerosols and fine particulates compromise those with lung disease and significantly raise the risk of death from COVID-19.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 11, 2020) Letter from City Council on a Request to Study the Environmental Impact of Two-Stroke Engine Garden Equipment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-156469.pdf

Speakers

Harold Smith
Monty McDonald
Chris Keating
Cathie Macdonald
Councillor Shelley Carroll

Communications (Committee)

(July 27, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (IE.Main.IE15.8.1)
(July 28, 2020) E-mail from Lyn Anderson (IE.Main.IE15.8.2)
(August 17, 2020) E-mail from Helen Dosani (IE.Main.IE15.8.3)
(September 8, 2020) E-mail from Eleanor Heinz (IE.Main.IE15.8.4)
(September 8, 2020) E-mail from Rick King (IE.Main.IE15.8.5)
(September 8, 2020) E-mail from Thomas Cohen, Chair, Eglinton Park Residents Association (IE.Main.IE15.8.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-117943.pdf
(September 8, 2020) E-mail from Seboua March (IE.Main.IE15.8.7)
(September 8, 2020) E-mail from Mary and Bruce Ferguson (IE.Main.IE15.8.8)
(September 9, 2020) E-mail from Lynette Logue (IE.Main.IE15.8.9)
(September 10, 2020) Letter from Carol Burtin Fripp, Co-Chair, Leaside Residents Association (IE.Supp.IE15.8.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-117984.pdf
(September 10, 2020) Letter from Harold Smith (IE.Supp.IE15.8.11)
(September 11, 2020) Letter from Sheila Dunlop, Secretary, South Armour Heights Residents' Association (SAHRA) (IE.Supp.IE15.8.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-117989.pdf
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Alexandrina Canto Thaler (IE.Supp.IE15.8.13)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Judy Love (IE.Supp.IE15.8.14)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from William Faith (IE.Supp.IE15.8.15)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Catherine Ann Kerwin (IE.Supp.IE15.8.16)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Lillian Mierzwa (IE.Supp.IE15.8.17)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Greg Knittl (IE.Supp.IE15.8.8)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Shoshanna Fainsilber (IE.Supp.IE15.8.19)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Miriam Henriques (IE.Supp.IE15.8.20)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Tom Worrall (IE.Supp.IE15.8.21)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Annabel Reinis (IE.Supp.IE15.8.22)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Anne Butt (IE.Supp.IE15.8.23)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Monty McDonald (IE.Supp.IE15.8.24)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Maureen Kapral (IE.Supp.IE15.8.25)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (IE.Supp.IE15.8.26)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Douglas Smith (IE.Supp.IE15.8.27)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Alex Grenzebach (IE.Supp.IE15.8.28)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Ronald MacFarlane, submitting a letter from Kim Perrotta, Director, Creating Healthy and Sustainable Environments (CHASE (IE.Supp.IE15.8.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-118308.pdf
(September 15, 2020) Letter from Robert Murray, President, Lytton Park Residents Association (IE.Supp.IE15.8.30)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-118309.pdf
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Sally Shaw (IE.Supp.IE15.8.31)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Mary Helen Spence, ABC Residents Association (IE.Supp.IE15.8.32)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-118311.pdf
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Wendy Weaver (IE.Supp.IE15.8.33)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Gabe Hayos, on behalf of Cindy Weiner, President, St. Andrews Ratepayers Association (IE.Supp.IE15.8.34)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-118313.pdf
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Candace Sguinot (IE.Supp.IE15.8.35)
(September 16, 2020) E-mail from Cathie Macdonald, submitting a letter from Cynthia Chrysler, President, Deer Park Residents Association (IE.Supp.IE15.8.36)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-118321.pdf
(September 16, 2020) Letter from Cathie Macdonald, Toronto Noise Coalition (IE.Supp.IE15.8.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-118323.pdf
(September 16, 2020) E-mail from Barb Moore (IE.Supp.IE15.8.38)
(September 16, 2020) E-mail from Pamela Mountain (IE.Supp.IE15.8.39)
(September 16, 2020) E-mail from Lorna McCue (IE.Supp.IE15.8.40)
(September 16, 2020) Letter from Michael Polyanyi, Toronto Environmental Alliance (IE.Supp.IE15.8.41)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-118418.pdf
(September 16, 2020) E-mail from Lyn Adamson (IE.Supp.IE15.8.42)
(September 16, 2020) E-mail from Tomislav Svoboda (IE.Supp.IE15.8.43)

Communications (City Council)

(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Eleanor Heinz (CC.Main.IE15.8.44)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Alexandrina Canto Thaler (CC.Main.IE15.8.45)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from T. Erlich and family (CC.Supp.IE15.8.46)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Stephen Milic (CC.Supp.IE15.8.47)
(September 24, 2020) Letter from Harold Smith, Director, Lytton Park Residents Org. Inc (CC.Supp.IE15.8.48)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120363.pdf
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Judy Love (CC.Supp.IE15.8.49)
(September 24, 2020) Letter from Sheila Dunlop, Secretary, South Armour Heights Residents' Association (CC.Supp.IE15.8.50)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120367.pdf
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Matthew Vienneau (CC.Supp.IE15.8.51)
(September 25, 2020) Letter from William Phillips (CC.Supp.IE15.8.52)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Pamela Mountain (CC.Supp.IE15.8.53)
(September 21, 2020) Letter from Julie Forman-Kay (CC.Supp.IE15.8.54)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Greg Knittl (CC.Supp.IE15.8.55)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Lillian Mierzwa (CC.Supp.IE15.8.56)
(September 27, 2020) Letter from Cathie Macdonald, Member, Toronto Noise Coalition (CC.Supp.IE15.8.57)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120400.pdf
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Catherine Ann Kerwin (CC.Supp.IE15.8.58)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Pauline Walsh (CC.Supp.IE15.8.59)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Tom Worrall (CC.Supp.IE15.8.60)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Barry Applebee (CC.Supp.IE15.8.61)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from David and Wendy Yeates (CC.Supp.IE15.8.62)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Robert Murray, Vice-President, Lytton Park Residents’ Organization (CC.Supp.IE15.8.63)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120410.pdf
(September 25, 2020) Letter from Shari Taylor (CC.Supp.IE15.8.64)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Margot Dawson (CC.Supp.IE15.8.65)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Brenda Bradstreet (CC.Supp.IE15.8.66)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Dr. Susan Friedman (CC.Supp.IE15.8.67)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jill Marzetti (CC.New.IE15.8.68)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Martha Tabmlyn (CC.New.IE15.8.69)
(September 30, 2020) Letter from Lewis E. Kay (CC.New.IE15.8.70)

IE15.9 - Improving Toronto’s Bike Share Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors to direct the Acting President, Toronto Parking Authority to report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee by the end of fourth quarter 2020 on the feasibility of increasing the "overcharge threshold" for Bike Share Toronto from 30 minutes to 45 minutes or more to support longer trips across the growing network, notably in the areas where distances between stations is longer.

 

2. City Council request the Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors to direct the Acting President, Toronto Parking Authority to report back by end of fourth quarter 2020 on a strategy to explore a low-cost, barrier-free option for low-income users, reviewing discounted models such as Mo Go Detroit through its $5 per year program and Hamilton Bike Share with a $1 per month program with the goal of establishing more equitable access to Toronto’s Bike Share system such as through the #Bikes4All program.

 

3. City Council request the Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors to direct the Acting President, Toronto Parking Authority to consider as a strategic plan to align current and future bike share stations along newly installed ActiveTO bike lanes.

Origin

(September 17, 2020) Letter from the Chair, Infrastructure and Environment Committee

Summary

In recent months, our city has faced unprecedented challenges brought forth by the COVID-19 pandemic and economic dislocation. The "new normal" of physical distancing has created an urgency of providing alternative modes of transportation to Torontonians. In a post-COVID world, a robust micro-transit network must be in place for our city. Toronto’s Bike Share program is such an option. However, to make it work for everyone, we must regularly revisit and improve the service it provides. The recommendations below are a step forward to study new ways for improving Bike Share.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 17, 2020) Letter from the Chair, Infrastructure and Environment Committee on Improving Toronto’s Bike Share Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-156331.pdf

Speakers

Kevin Rupasinghe, Cycle Toronto
Councillor Paul Ainslie

Communications (Committee)

(September 10, 2020) E-mail from Gideon Forman, The David Suzuki Foundation (IE.Supp.IE19.9.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-117987.pdf
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Peter Low (IE.Supp.IE15.9.2)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Robert Zaichkowski (IE.Supp.IE15.9.3)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (IE.Supp.IE15.9.4)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Michal Kapral (IE.Supp.IE15.9.5)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Piotr Sepski (IE.Supp.IE15.9.6)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Hafeez Alavi (IE.Supp.IE15.9.7)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Carmen Jones (IE.Supp.IE15.9.8)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Jennifer Kwok (IE.Supp.IE15.9.9)
(September 16, 2020) Letter from Kathleen Mackey, 32 Spokes (IE.Supp.IE15.9.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-118352.pdf
(September 16, 2020) Letter from Michael Longfield, Interim Executive Director, Cycle Toronto (IE.Supp.IE15.9.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-118353.pdf
(September 16, 2020) E-mail from Lee Scott (IE.Supp.IE15.9.12)

IE15.10 - Service Line Warranties

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the General Manager, Toronto Water to report back by first quarter of 2021 on the viability of introducing to Toronto a water and sewer line warranty program for the City of Toronto and its residents.

Origin

(September 17, 2020) Letter from the Chair, Infrastructure and Environment Committee

Summary

Toronto’s residential property owners are responsible for the maintenance of private buried water and sewer lines that run from the public services to the connection of the exterior of the home. When these lines break, leak or clog, the homeowner is often surprised to learn that homeowner’s insurance does not cover the cost of an often expensive repair. Sixty five Ontario municipalities, including Ottawa, Kingston, Peel, Hamilton and Windsor, currently have a Water and Sewer Line and In-Home Plumbing Repair Program. Once such maintenance program has performed 1.3 million repairs in the last three years alone across North America. This is an option and value added the residents of Toronto might be seriously interested in. Such a program triggers no liability for the City of Toronto and only approved contractors can participate.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 17, 2020) Letter from the Chair, Infrastructure and Environment Committee on Service Line Warranties
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-156333.pdf

Speakers

Jeff Olson, General Manager, Service Line Warranties of Canada

Communications (Committee)

(September 11, 2020) E-mail from Jeff Olson, General Manager, Service Line Warranties of Canada (IE.Supp.IE15.10.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-117988.pdf

IE15.11 - Request to get Bike Lanes in Midtown along Yonge Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence
Attention
Communications have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to consider and explore including, as part of either the 2021 update to the cycling network plan, the COVID-19 pandemic cycling network expansion response plan or potentially as part of the YongeTOmorrow process, a temporary protected bikeway along Yonge Street from south of St. Clair Avenue to north of Lawrence Avenue in conjunction with on-street patios, road safety and traffic-calming measures, and other streetscape improvements identified through consultation with local businesses and community groups, following the complete streets approach applied to Danforth Avenue, with implementation by the second quarter of 2021, and iteration and evaluation throughout 2021.

Origin

(September 17, 2020) Memo from Councillor Mike Colle

Summary

The ActiveTO initiative has played a vital role in Toronto’s recovery and rebuild process, providing city residents of all ages and abilities with new, temporary and permanent, bikeways, which allow them to enjoy fresh air, obtain healthy exercise, and safely get around the city.

 

The benefit of these cycling facilities must now be expanded to reach other parts of the city. "Our streets are going to look different in many places in the post-COVID world...we will need more bike infrastructure," said Mayor John Tory when launching the ActiveTO initiative, which is "going to mean more business for shop owners, it’s going to mean that we’re going to take some of the pressure off our transit system and protect the health of the city."

 

Building a resilient city not only means providing clean and safe transportation alternatives during the current pandemic but achieving existing city policies, including the Vision Zero Road Safety Plan, the Cycling Network Plan, TransformTO’s climate mitigation plan through the reduction of short trips travelled by car, as well as the City’s equity and public health initiatives.

 

Given the aforementioned policy goals, the need to accommodate active transportation during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the strong local community support, it is crucial that we prioritize a temporary bikeway along Yonge Street in Midtown, aligned with TTC’s Line 1.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 17, 2020) Memo from Councillor Mike Colle requesting Bike Lanes in Midtown along Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-156607.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(September 16, 2020) Letter from Albert Koehl, Janet Joy Wilson, Mary Ann Neary, Toronto Community Bikeways Coalition (IE.Supp.IE15.11.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ie/comm/communicationfile-118355.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(September 20, 2020) E-mail from John Plumadore, President, Brentwood Towers Tenants' Association (CC.Main.IE15.11.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-119074.pdf
(July 24, 2020) Letter from Board of Directors, ABC Residents Association (CC.Main.IE15.11.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-119075.pdf
(September 20, 2020) Letter from Carol Burtin Fripp, Co-Chair, Leaside Residents Association (CC.Main.IE15.11.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-119096.pdf
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Danny Harvey (CC.Main.IE15.11.5)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Renata Derege (CC.Main.IE15.11.6)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Michael Stroud (CC.Main.IE15.11.7)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Jim Noble (CC.Main.IE15.11.8)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Darcie Clark (CC.Main.IE15.11.9)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Lewis (CC.Main.IE15.11.10)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Alex Speers-Roesch (CC.Main.IE15.11.11)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Caroline Newman (CC.Main.IE15.11.12)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Daniel Di Camillo (CC.Main.IE15.11.13)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from John MacMillan (CC.Main.IE15.11.14)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from James Creeggan (CC.Main.IE15.11.15)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from David Nash (CC.Main.IE15.11.16)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Kenroy Harrison (CC.Main.IE15.11.17)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Lisa Roosen-Runge (CC.Main.IE15.11.18)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Virginia Vuleta (CC.Main.IE15.11.19)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Dr. Karen Ward (CC.Main.IE15.11.20)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Avrum Jacobson (CC.Main.IE15.11.21)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Daniel Amin (CC.Main.IE15.11.22)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Lisa Kennedy (CC.Main.IE15.11.23)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Dave Edwards (CC.Main.IE15.11.24)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ian Robertson (CC.Main.IE15.11.25)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Stewart Adams (CC.Main.IE15.11.26)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from John Carberry (CC.Main.IE15.11.27)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Rachel Fulford (CC.Main.IE15.11.28)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Matthew Richardson (CC.Main.IE15.11.29)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Lindsay Hacker (CC.Main.IE15.11.30)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Angela Zhang (CC.Main.IE15.11.31)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Shelly Nixon (CC.Main.IE15.11.32)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from John Welsman (CC.Main.IE15.11.33)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Prem Vilas Fortran M. Rara (CC.Main.IE15.11.34)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Elizabeth Ewanchuk (CC.Main.IE15.11.35)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Gordon (CC.Main.IE15.11.36)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ted Mann (CC.Main.IE15.11.37)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Gordon Yanchyshyn (CC.Main.IE15.11.38)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Arleigh Crawford (CC.Main.IE15.11.39)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ian Sakinofsky (CC.Main.IE15.11.40)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ivana Marzura (CC.Main.IE15.11.41)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Michelle Baas (CC.Main.IE15.11.42)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ken McCracken (CC.Main.IE15.11.43)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Emad Ghattas (CC.Main.IE15.11.44)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Dianne Nahal (CC.Main.IE15.11.45)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Denis Walsh (CC.Main.IE15.11.46)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Budgey (CC.Main.IE15.11.47)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Jeffrey Sauer (CC.Main.IE15.11.48)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Dave Nichols (CC.Main.IE15.11.49)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ian Worling (CC.Main.IE15.11.50)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Sahil Chaini (CC.Main.IE15.11.51)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ralph Carl Wushke (CC.Main.IE15.11.52)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Scott Beach (CC.Main.IE15.11.53)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Alice Freitas (CC.Main.IE15.11.54)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ilene Hyman (CC.Main.IE15.11.55)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Robert Staples (CC.Main.IE15.11.56)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Bruce Lyne (CC.Main.IE15.11.57)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Mark Zimmerman (CC.Main.IE15.11.58)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Mckinelli (CC.Main.IE15.11.59)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Carlos Gouveia (CC.Main.IE15.11.60)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Lynn Francis and Mark Lecker (CC.Main.IE15.11.61)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Alfred-Duggan (CC.Main.IE15.11.62)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from David Smiley (CC.Main.IE15.11.63)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Sandra Gregson (CC.Main.IE15.11.64)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Howard Henderson (CC.Main.IE15.11.65)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Genevieve Blanshard (CC.Main.IE15.11.66)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Tony Farebrother (CC.Main.IE15.11.67)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Elizabeth Fedorkow (CC.Main.IE15.11.68)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Peter Smiley (CC.Main.IE15.11.69)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Paul Posesorski (CC.Main.IE15.11.70)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Megan Reid (CC.Main.IE15.11.71)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ry Shissler (CC.Main.IE15.11.72)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Evelina Luczko (CC.Main.IE15.11.73)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Pamela Gough (CC.Main.IE15.11.74)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Quinci Best (CC.Main.IE15.11.75)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Marisa Burton (CC.Main.IE15.11.76)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Laura Giraldo (CC.Main.IE15.11.77)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Christian Cajiga (CC.Main.IE15.11.78)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Doug Appeldoorn (CC.Main.IE15.11.79)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Jesse Porter (CC.Main.IE15.11.80)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Dennis Wheeler (CC.Main.IE15.11.81)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Murray Teichman (CC.Main.IE15.11.82)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Michelle Johnson (CC.Main.IE15.11.83)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Swelen Andari (CC.Main.IE15.11.84)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Susan Sheffield (CC.Main.IE15.11.85)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Emily Donaldson (CC.Main.IE15.11.86)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Marjorie Murray (CC.Main.IE15.11.87)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Jack Cunningham (CC.Main.IE15.11.88)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Emma Arenson (CC.Main.IE15.11.89)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Bill Maginas (CC.Main.IE15.11.90)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Alan Harris (CC.Main.IE15.11.91)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Ben Daube (CC.Main.IE15.11.92)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Anissa Hart (CC.Main.IE15.11.93)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Lianne Tile (CC.Main.IE15.11.94)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ken Clowes (CC.Main.IE15.11.95)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from James Portman (CC.Main.IE15.11.96)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Joe Milner (CC.Main.IE15.11.97)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Trevor Campbell (CC.Main.IE15.11.98)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Keara Brown (CC.Main.IE15.11.99)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from B. Isenor (CC.Main.IE15.11.100)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from William Greenberg (CC.Main.IE15.11.101)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Annette Mangaard (CC.Main.IE15.11.102)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Renata Jones (CC.Main.IE15.11.103)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Sharon Zikman (CC.Main.IE15.11.104)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Lorraine Barnaby (CC.Main.IE15.11.105)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Jennifer Hicks (CC.Main.IE15.11.106)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Erica Yudelman (CC.Main.IE15.11.107)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Tracey Macey (CC.Main.IE15.11.108)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Jason Ma (CC.Main.IE15.11.109)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Rick Argles (CC.Main.IE15.11.110)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Grant Carmichael (CC.Main.IE15.11.111)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Micah Dubinsky (CC.Main.IE15.11.112)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Allison Gillies (CC.Main.IE15.11.113)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Carolyn Shaw (CC.Main.IE15.11.114)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Christopher James Mitchell (CC.Main.IE15.11.115)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Chantal Cornu (CC.Main.IE15.11.116)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Grace Alexander (CC.Main.IE15.11.117)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ashley Good (CC.Main.IE15.11.118)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Tara Hargreaves (CC.Main.IE15.11.119)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Tamara Bernstein (CC.Main.IE15.11.120)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Saloomeh Arshi (CC.Main.IE15.11.121)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Sara Ehrhardt (CC.Main.IE15.11.122)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Eric Van Ziffle (CC.Main.IE15.11.123)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Julian Carpenter (CC.Main.IE15.11.124)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from John Campana (CC.Main.IE15.11.125)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Jeffrey Osborne (CC.Main.IE15.11.126)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Jay Fisher (CC.Main.IE15.11.127)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Francesca Allodi-Ross (CC.Main.IE15.11.128)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from James McNeill (CC.Main.IE15.11.129)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Marvin Midwicki (CC.Main.IE15.11.130)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Mauricio Argote-Cortes (CC.Main.IE15.11.131)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Junior Harrison (CC.Main.IE15.11.132)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Cindy Wilson (CC.Main.IE15.11.133)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Willi Powell (CC.Main.IE15.11.134)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Frans Klaassen (CC.Main.IE15.11.135)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Carla Wong (CC.Main.IE15.11.136)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Susan Peers (CC.Main.IE15.11.137)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from David Raponi-Monk (CC.Main.IE15.11.138)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Frans Klaassen (CC.Main.IE15.11.139)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Alan MacKenzie (CC.Main.IE15.11.140)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Melvin Mariampillai (CC.Main.IE15.11.141)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Michael Bellefontaine (CC.Main.IE15.11.142)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from David Keogh (CC.Main.IE15.11.143)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Tom Worrall (CC.Main.IE15.11.144)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Alfio Magnanelli (CC.Main.IE15.11.145)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Dr. Dianne Saxe (CC.Main.IE15.11.146)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Robert Bernecky (CC.Main.IE15.11.147)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Andreas Witz (CC.Main.IE15.11.148)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Curtis (CC.Main.IE15.11.149)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Matthew Gerry (CC.Main.IE15.11.150)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Brendan Hendel-McCarthy (CC.Main.IE15.11.151)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Corey Ramsay (CC.Main.IE15.11.152)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Neale Hunt (CC.Main.IE15.11.153)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Abram Braithwaite (CC.Main.IE15.11.154)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Matt Welke (CC.Main.IE15.11.155)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ross Martin (CC.Main.IE15.11.156)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Christine Loch (CC.Main.IE15.11.157)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Heather Schramm (CC.Main.IE15.11.158)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Chris Jacobs (CC.Main.IE15.11.159)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Jessica Wong (CC.Main.IE15.11.160)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Teresa Labriola (CC.Main.IE15.11.161)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Borys Jerzy Chylinski (CC.Main.IE15.11.162)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Dawn Buie (CC.Main.IE15.11.163)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Jeffrey Levitt (CC.Main.IE15.11.164)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ruben Cordero (CC.Main.IE15.11.165)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Janet Fryer (CC.Main.IE15.11.166)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Patrick Minardi (CC.Main.IE15.11.167)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ralph J. Cowell (CC.Main.IE15.11.168)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Susan Greer (CC.Main.IE15.11.169)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Valerie Sylvester (CC.Main.IE15.11.170)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Kayla Kurin (CC.Main.IE15.11.171)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Alexandre Boisseau (CC.Main.IE15.11.172)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Dan Paraskevopoulos (CC.Main.IE15.11.173)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Grochalova (CC.Main.IE15.11.174)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Meg O’Mahony (CC.Main.IE15.11.175)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Flora Chan (CC.Main.IE15.11.176)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Isabel Prendergast (CC.Main.IE15.11.177)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Dennis Findlay (CC.Main.IE15.11.178)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Scott Head (CC.Main.IE15.11.179)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Elvis Lazaro (CC.Main.IE15.11.180)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Su Rynard (CC.Main.IE15.11.181)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Sorren Isler (CC.Main.IE15.11.182)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Adam Ahmed (CC.Main.IE15.11.183)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Sonia Shields (CC.Main.IE15.11.184)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Arcadia (CC.Main.IE15.11.185)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Basia Stec (CC.Main.IE15.11.186)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Bee Pallomina (CC.Main.IE15.11.187)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from John Barclay (CC.Main.IE15.11.188)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Brynn Ostvik (CC.Main.IE15.11.189)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Gillian Graham (CC.Main.IE15.11.190)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Michelle B. (CC.Main.IE15.11.191)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Clemence Leveau-Vallier (CC.Main.IE15.11.192)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Paula Alcaide Leon (CC.Main.IE15.11.193)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Teresa Chan (CC.Main.IE15.11.194)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Charles Lanktree (CC.Main.IE15.11.195)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from John Thenganatt (CC.Main.IE15.11.196)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Anne Biringer (CC.Main.IE15.11.197)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Joseph Woodworth (CC.Main.IE15.11.198)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Joe Power (CC.Main.IE15.11.199)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Sylvia E. Peacock (CC.Main.IE15.11.200)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Erin Campos (CC.Main.IE15.11.201)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Susan Fraser (CC.Main.IE15.11.202)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Sheldon Hellin (CC.Main.IE15.11.203)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Mark Winter (CC.Main.IE15.11.204)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Jack Carr (CC.Main.IE15.11.205)
(August 9, 2020) Letter from Sheila Dunlop, Secretary, South Armor Heights Residents' Association (CC.Main.IE15.11.206)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-119297.pdf
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Michael Caldwell (CC.Main.IE15.11.207)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from David Bell (CC.Main.IE15.11.208)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Richard Grunberg (CC.Main.IE15.11.209)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Eric Hartman (CC.Main.IE15.11.210)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Tanya Bruce (CC.Main.IE15.11.211)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Alisa Dermawan (CC.Main.IE15.11.212)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Gary T. Burrows (CC.Main.IE15.11.213)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Adrian Currie (CC.Main.IE15.11.214)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Otiena Ellwand (CC.Main.IE15.11.215)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Alec Butler (CC.Main.IE15.11.216)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Maria Zugasti (CC.Main.IE15.11.217)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Bruce Novakowski (CC.Main.IE15.11.218)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Juliet Palmer (CC.Main.IE15.11.219)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Kathie Knight (CC.Main.IE15.11.220)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Dwayne King (CC.Main.IE15.11.221)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Timothy O’Hara (CC.Main.IE15.11.222)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Smadar Carmon (CC.Main.IE15.11.223)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Jack Alvo (CC.Main.IE15.11.224)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Brad Poechman (CC.Main.IE15.11.225)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Maxwell Walls (CC.Main.IE15.11.226)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Riccardo Caimano (CC.Main.IE15.11.227)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Alan Barthel (CC.Main.IE15.11.228)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ray Grenkie (CC.Main.IE15.11.229)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Gregory Trent (CC.Main.IE15.11.230)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Nataliya Murzenko (CC.Main.IE15.11.231)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Morris Manolson (CC.Main.IE15.11.232)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Melana Janzen (CC.Main.IE15.11.233)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Elisabeth Rittinger (CC.Main.IE15.11.234)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ruth Allen (CC.Main.IE15.11.235)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Doug Pritchard (CC.Main.IE15.11.236)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Rebecca Applebaum (CC.Main.IE15.11.237)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Alex Korobchevsky (CC.Main.IE15.11.238)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Nico James-Bock (CC.Main.IE15.11.239)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Patrick Taylor (CC.Main.IE15.11.240)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Catherine Oliver (CC.Main.IE15.11.241)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Christopher Williams (CC.Main.IE15.11.242)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Nick Boldt (CC.Main.IE15.11.243)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Annie Steel (CC.Main.IE15.11.244)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Eli Rawlyk (CC.Main.IE15.11.245)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Sara Winnett (CC.Main.IE15.11.246)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Michael Holloway (CC.Main.IE15.11.247)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ryo Imaizumi (CC.Main.IE15.11.248)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Toks Weah (CC.Main.IE15.11.249)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Mario Palasciano (CC.Main.IE15.11.250)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Jason Milligan (CC.Main.IE15.11.251)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Dan McLennan (CC.Main.IE15.11.252)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Guillermo Verdecchia (CC.Main.IE15.11.253)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Jeff Harti (CC.Main.IE15.11.254)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from John A. King (CC.Main.IE15.11.255)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Kirima Isler (CC.Main.IE15.11.256)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Marcello Mancuso (CC.Main.IE15.11.257)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Kim Hume (CC.Main.IE15.11.258)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Roger Greenwald (CC.Main.IE15.11.259)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Maura Ferguson (CC.Main.IE15.11.260)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Vicki Gagnon (CC.Main.IE15.11.261)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ryan MacIsaac (CC.Main.IE15.11.262)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Charles Pilger (CC.Main.IE15.11.263)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Asli Suna (CC.Main.IE15.11.264)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Gordon Doctorow (CC.Main.IE15.11.265)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Stuart Rogers (CC.Main.IE15.11.266)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Darlene Hebert (CC.Main.IE15.11.267)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Terry Sellwood (CC.Main.IE15.11.268)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Joe Costa (CC.Main.IE15.11.269)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Gina Facchini (CC.Main.IE15.11.270)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Felix Whitton (CC.Main.IE15.11.271)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Bruno Alves (CC.Main.IE15.11.272)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from John Ellis (CC.Main.IE15.11.273)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Sheila Thingvold (CC.Main.IE15.11.274)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Sherri Johnson (CC.Main.IE15.11.275)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Beryl Pilkington (CC.Main.IE15.11.276)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Kris Langille (CC.Main.IE15.11.277)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from N. Wichmann (CC.Main.IE15.11.278)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Laura Alderson (CC.Main.IE15.11.279)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Martin (CC.Main.IE15.11.280)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Bill Ferwerda (CC.Main.IE15.11.281)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Miriam Henriques (CC.Main.IE15.11.282)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from David Machado (CC.Main.IE15.11.283)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Adam Clare (CC.Main.IE15.11.284)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ridout C. (CC.Main.IE15.11.285)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Steen (CC.Main.IE15.11.286)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Hafeez Alavi (CC.Main.IE15.11.287)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Miguel Santos (CC.Main.IE15.11.288)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ling Chiu (CC.Main.IE15.11.289)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Lauren Corindia (CC.Main.IE15.11.290)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Chloe Walls (CC.Main.IE15.11.291)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Wade Potts (CC.Main.IE15.11.292)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Rachael Vuong (CC.Main.IE15.11.293)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Greg Lichti (CC.Main.IE15.11.294)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Helen Ross (CC.Main.IE15.11.295)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Kristina Stockwood (CC.Main.IE15.11.296)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Katherine-Anne Skinner (CC.Main.IE15.11.297)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Joan (CC.Main.IE15.11.298)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Angela Martinez (CC.Main.IE15.11.299)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ted Ho (CC.Main.IE15.11.300)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Ginny Côté (CC.Main.IE15.11.301)
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Tina Faibish (CC.Main.IE15.11.302)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Allison Lewis (CC.Main.IE15.11.303)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Bruce MacKenzie (CC.Main.IE15.11.304)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Cynthia Loch-Drake (CC.Main.IE15.11.305)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Elliot Campbell (CC.Main.IE15.11.306)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Asa Weinstein (CC.Main.IE15.11.307)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Belinda Cole (CC.Main.IE15.11.308)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Tyler Luyben (CC.Main.IE15.11.309)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Consuelo (CC.Main.IE15.11.310)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Oliver Collins (CC.Main.IE15.11.311)
(September 25, 2020) Letter from Mackenzie Keast, Executive Director, Yonge + St. Clair Business Improvement Area (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-119918.pdf
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Kris Langille (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Daly McCarten, Executive Director, Uptown Yonge Business Improvement Area (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-119920.pdf
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Lynn Francis, Mark, Mason and Eliza Lecker (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Sara Winnett (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Vilma Gianfelice (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Ingrid Buday (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from André Martin (CC.Supp)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Nicolai Pogadl (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Vera Kudlac (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Bruce LaZerte (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Rachel Tyndale (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Marilyn Lerner (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Virginia Vuleta (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Jaclyn Law (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Ryan Kerr (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Chaitanya Kalevar (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Wayne Miranda (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Joel Wise (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Anna Marie Hubbard (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Will Robinson (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Michele Wright (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Lauren White (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Kathleen Dowell (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) Letter from Andy Gort, President, South Eglinton Ratepayers' and Residents' Association (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-119977.pdf
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Lisa Spinello (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Norm Di Pasquale, Ward 9 Toronto Catholic District School Board Trustee (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-119979.pdf
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Scott (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Graham Lavendar (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Alan Mackenzie (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Simon Andrews (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Toula Kourgiantakis (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Aidan Girard (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Barb Gormley (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Carol Borg (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Cindy Seeley (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from M. Michelle (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Greg Mulvey (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Jane Graydon (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Maja Japundzic (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Francesca Colussi (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Jan Doherty (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Michael Shulman (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Rossana Marmoria (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Michael de Lint (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Doug Green (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Elizabeth Bacon (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Josiane Frigon (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Joan Gauthier (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Michelle Grant (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Michael Baker (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Elena Basile (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Eddi Bell (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Angela Bischoff (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Bruce Campbell (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Heather Carr Olmstead (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Dennis Findlay (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Daniel Gareau (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Claudia Andrea Gomez Torres (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Shân Gordon (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Cindy Greenlaw (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Bradley Hammond (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Miriam Harris (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Maegan Harrison (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Angie Heydon (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Carmen Jones (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Alex Koranyi (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Pat Martin (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120375.pdf
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Holly Reid (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Marina Schuster (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Nick Shaw (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Steepe (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from John Taranu (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) Letter from David Ticoll, President, Quantum Owners & Residents Association (QUORA) (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120407.pdf
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Larry Webb (CC.Supp)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Cynthia Wilkey (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from M. Arkin (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) Letter from Carla Lutchman, Vice-Chair, Eglinton Park Residents’ Association (EPRA) (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120413.pdf
(July 26, 2020) Letter from Tom Cohen, Chair, Eglinton Park Residents' Association (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120414.pdf
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Ryan Kelln (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Nick Moss Gillespie (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from David Robertson (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Andrew Baranowsku (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Catherine Ann Kerwin (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Patrick DeRochie (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Ryan Lindsay (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Ben Wedge (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Sarah Margolius (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Amy Steele (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Solomon Exmundo (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Agi Lukacs (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Panos Economopoulos (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Arnaud Seigne (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Rachel Robbins (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Maureen Kapral, Vice-President, Lytton Park Residents' Organization Inc. (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120433.pdf
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Christoph Becker (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Krista Maxwell (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Cory Popescu (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Robert Zaichkowski (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Pat Pallotta (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Robert Yu (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from James MacFarlane (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Kaila Mintz (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Samuel Colman (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Lauren McVittie (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Hafeez Alavi (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Grace Alexander (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sharon B (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Nancy Bell (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) Submission from Geri Berholz and Terry O’Sullivan, Co-Chairs, Republic Residents’ Association (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120387.pdf
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Ilona Biro (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Darius Bonds (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Kevin Carmona-Murphy (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Patricia Clooney (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Adrian Currie (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from David Banerjee (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Michael Eisen (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Esteban Flyer (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Chris Gapski (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Daniel Gordon (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jon Herberman (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Lachlan Holmes (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Christopher Hoyle (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Gillian Kranias (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Garry Lam, President, Edithvale Yonge Community Association (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120462.pdf
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Nicholas Lannutti (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Janet Lin (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Murray and Linda Lumley (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Tracey Macey (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from William Magee (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Natasha Mann (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Tania McIntyre (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Lisa Mesbur (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Mieka Moore (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Nazarwal (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jerry Newton (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Marjorie Nichol (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Jeffrey Osborne (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Michael Raby (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Vladimir Raff (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Dan Rishworth, Treasurer, Bedford-Wanless Ratepayers Association (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120498.pdf
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Sabrina (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Mersedeh Safa (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from David Simmons (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Shawn Smith (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Phil Strong (CC.Supp)
(July 20, 2020) Letter from Cynthia Crysler, President, Deer Park Residents Group (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120489.pdf
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Gray Taylor (CC.Supp)
(September 25, 2020) E-mail from Matthew Vienneau (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Joan Walls (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Terry Walsh (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from Teresa Wiens (CC.Supp)
(September 24, 2020) E-mail from A. Paul Williams (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Desmond Wilson (CC.Supp)
(September 23, 2020) E-mail from Peter Y (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Cristian Rojas (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Andrew MacKinnon (CC.Supp)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chairs, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations (FoNTRA) (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120530.pdf
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Rosa Phillip (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jacob Pendergrast (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Michael Black (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Karen Johnston (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Kevin Linger (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from John Rondina (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Michael Longfield, Interim Executive Director, Cycle Toronto (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120936.pdf
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Anette Mageau (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Frank Marra (CC.Supp)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Geoff Kettel and Holly Reid, Co-Chairs, Cycle Don Valley Midtown (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120938.pdf
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Mark Tomblin (CC.New)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Azad Memon (CC.New)

Planning and Housing Committee - Meeting 16

PH16.1 - Technical Amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013 Resulting From the Recent Technical Amendments to York Zoning By-law 1-83 and for Retail Store Permissions in Employment Industrial Office Zones

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bills 768 and 769 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council enact the zoning by-law amendments substantially in accordance with Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (September 3, 2020) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the zoning by-law amendments as may be required.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Housing Committee held a statutory public meeting on September 22, 2020, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(September 3, 2020) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report proposes technical amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013 that are required as a result of the recent technical amendments to York Zoning By-law 1-83 enacted by Council on June 30, 2020 by By-laws 522-2020 and 523-2020. None of these amendments affect the substance of By-law 569-2013.

 

This report also proposes a technical amendment to the Employment Industrial Office (EO) zone, which is required as the result of a drafting error in the Cask Force Zoning By-law (By-law 1198-2019). This amendment deals with the condition for retail store uses in combination with manufacturing uses.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 3, 2020) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Technical Amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013 Resulting From the Recent Technical Amendments to York Zoning By-law 1-83 and for Retail Store Permissions in Employment Industrial Office Zones
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156363.pdf
Attachment 1: Technical Amendment By-law to Zoning By-law 569-2013 resulting from the Technical Amendment By-laws to the former City of York Zoning By-law 1-83, being City of Toronto By-law 522-2020 and 523-2020.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156365.pdf
Attachment 2: Technical Amendment By-law to Zoning By-law 569-2013 resulting from the Cask Force Zoning By-law 1198-2019.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156366.pdf
(August 31, 2020) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156321.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Eileen Denny (PH.New.PH16.1.1)

PH16.2 - Christie's Planning Study - City-Initiated Proposed Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law and Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision for 2150 and 2194 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 23 Park Lawn Road - Status Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Attention
Communication PH16.2.10 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to use the draft Christie’s Secondary Plan, Zoning By-law and Urban Design and Streetscape Guidelines found in Attachments 2-4 to the report (September 4, 2020) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning as the basis for further stakeholder and public consultation.

 

2. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planner, to use the draft Christie’s Secondary Plan, Zoning By-law and Urban Design and Streetscape Guidelines for the basis of further discussion and to guide further review of the development applications submitted by First Capital Realty on the former Mr. Christie lands.

 

3. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to bring forward a recommended Christie’s Secondary Plan, Zoning By-law and Urban Design and Streetscape Guidelines to Council in the first quarter of 2021.

Origin

(September 4, 2020) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report advances a draft Secondary Plan (draft Plan) and draft Zoning By-law (draft By-law), which is the outcome of Phases 1 and 2 of the City-initiated Christie’s Planning Study. The draft Plan establishes a planning framework for future development in the area and sets out the long-term vision for a complete community centred on transit investment, job creation and community services and facilities. The draft Plan and draft By-law have been developed with input from local residents and stakeholders through public consultation conducted jointly with the Park Lawn Lake Shore Transportation Master Plan project. The Study Area boundaries can be found at Attachment 1.

 

This report recommends that the draft Plan be used as the basis for further stakeholder and public consultation to support the development of a recommended Secondary Plan, Zoning By-law and Urban Design and Streetscape Guidelines, to be brought forward to City Council in the first quarter of 2021.

 

This report also provides a status update on the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application as well as a related Draft Plan of Subdivision application, submitted by First Capital Realty for the former Mr. Christie lands at 2150 and 2194 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 23 Park Lawn Road (subject lands). The Draft Plan of Subdivision application has been submitted in conjunction with the other application to establish development blocks and new public streets.

 

Detailed initial comments on the development applications were provided to the applicant in early September. Further revisions and refinement of the development proposal to align with the vision and objectives of the Secondary Plan and draft Zoning By-law are expected to be undertaken in the fall.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 4, 2020) Report and Attachments 1 and 5 to 13 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Christie's Planning Study - City-Initiated Proposed Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law and Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision for 2150 and 2194 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 23 Park Lawn Road - Status Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156396.pdf
Attachment 2: Draft Christie’s Secondary Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156397.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Christie’s Zoning By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156398.pdf
Attachment 4: Draft Urban Design and Streetscape Guidelines
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156399.pdf

Speakers

Jodi Shpigel, First Capital Realty Inc.
Amar Singh, Senior Planner, Toronto Lands Corporation
Mark J. Richardson, HousingNowTO.com

Communications (Committee)

(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Gurinder Gill (PH.New.PH16.2.1)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Thomas Klepl (PH.New.PH16.2.2)
(September 18, 2020) Letter from Jodi Shpigel, First Capital (PH.New.PH16.2.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118502.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Michael Loberto, Toronto Catholic District School Board (PH.New.PH16.2.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118471.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Daryl Sage, Toronto Lands Corperation (PH.New.PH16.2.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118472.pdf
(September 21, 2020) E-mail from Karen Adams (PH.New.PH16.2.6)
(September 21, 2020) Letter from Keddone Dias, LAMP Community Health Centre (PH.New.PH16.2.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118518.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Kate O'Neil, Lakeshore Affordable Housing Action and Advocacy Group (LAHAAG) (PH.New.PH16.2.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118993.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Mark Richardson, HousingNowTO.com (PH.New.PH16.2.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118994.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Kasra Zokaei, Humber Shores Residence Association (CC.Supp.PH16.2.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120704.pdf

PH16.3 - 100 and 180 Steeles Avenue West in the City of Vaughan - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Request for Direction Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council endorse the July 8, 2020 letters from the Director, Community Planning, North York District (Attachments 3 and 4 to the report (September 3, 2020) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning) to the City of Vaughan's Committee of the Whole which identify the concerns with the applications at 100 Steeles Avenue West and 180 Steeles Avenue West, including height and density.

 

2. In the event that the City of Vaughan approves either application at 100 Steeles Avenue West or 180 Steeles Avenue West that is not substantially in conformity with the Council of Vaughan adopted Yonge Steeles Corridor Secondary Plan, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning report back to the Planning and Housing Committee on next steps.

 

3. Should either of the applications at 100 Steeles Avenue West or 180 Steeles Avenue West be appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend and seek party status to support the City's interests.

Origin

(September 3, 2020) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report responds to two separate applications filed in the City of Vaughan to amend the City of Vaughan Official Plan and the City of Vaughan Zoning By-law which have been circulated to the City of Toronto in accordance with the requirements of the Planning Act given their proximity to the City of Toronto. The report identifies the concerns of City Planning staff and makes recommendations on future steps to protect the City's interests concerning the applications. The applications are on the north side of Steeles Avenue West, west of Yonge Street, abutting the City of Toronto. The two applications propose a total of eleven mixed-use buildings with a total of 3845 residential units. The towers range in height from fifty-four to sixteen storeys.

 

The Deputy Manager, Planning and Growth Management for the City of Vaughan has written a report to the City of Vaughan's Committee of the Whole regarding each application outlining some preliminary concerns with the applications including the proposed heights and densities.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 3, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 100 and 180 Steeles Avenue West in the City of Vaughan - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156364.pdf

PH16.4 - Addressing the Committee of Adjustment COVID-19 Related Application Backlog

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications PH16.4.7 to PH16.4.9 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council resolve that, notwithstanding Section 4-2 of the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 4, Adjustment, Committee of, and By-law 1134-2019, all Districts and Panels will be comprised of a majority of previously appointed members of for those hearings, with cross-appointed members representing a minority of those Districts and Panels, until the end of November 14, 2022.

 

2. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report back to the Planning and Housing Committee meeting in the first quarter of 2021 on potential improvements to virtual hearings at the Committee of Adjustment with regards to:


a. expanding notification timelines;


b. ensuring Application Information Centre documents are online for general review in a timely manner before a hearing;


c. ensuring written comments are part of the Committee of Adjustment's review of applications; and


d. ensuring deputants on online meetings are provided sufficient time to address the committee.

Origin

(September 4, 2020) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

As a result of COVID-19 related restrictions, 18 scheduled Committee of Adjustment public hearings, from March 25, 2020 through to May 28, 2020 were cancelled. The backlog resulting from these cancelled hearings was approximately 700 Committee of Adjustment applications. Since that time, Committee of Adjustment operations were substantially adjusted to allow for virtual public hearings, which commenced on June 3, 2020.

 

A backlog remains; however, measures have been taken to substantially reduce it. As per Council's direction, this report describes these measures, including an additional recommendation to continue the cross-appointment of members between districts in order to increase the capacity of the Committee of Adjustment to clear the backlog.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 4, 2020) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Addressing the Committee of Adjustment COVID-19 related Application Backlog
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156405.pdf

Speakers

Danielle Chin, Building Industry and Land Development Association
Geoff Kettel, Federation of North Toronto Residents Assns
Cathie Macdonald, Federation of North Toronto Residents Assns
Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong
Councillor John Filion

Communications (Committee)

(September 18, 2020) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, The Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations (FoNTRA) (PH.New.PH16.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118508.pdf
(September 20, 2020) Letter from Carol Burtin Fripp, Leaside Residents Association (PH.New.PH16.4.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118462.pdf
(September 21, 2020) E-mail from Cindy Weiner, St. Andrew's Ratepayers Association (PH.New.PH16.4.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118463.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Danielle Chin, Building Industry and Land Development Association (PH.New.PH16.4.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118464.pdf
(September 20, 2020) E-mail from David Reid (PH.New.PH16.4.5)
(September 21, 2020) Letter from Councillor John Filion, Ward 18 Willowdale (PH.New.PH16.4.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118522.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(September 28, 2020) Letter from Sheila Dunlop, Secretary, South Armour Heights Residents' Association (CC.Supp.PH16.4.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120424.pdf
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chairs, The Federation of North Toronto Residents' Association (CC.New.PH16.4.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-121042.pdf
(September 30, 2020) Letter from Eileen Denny (CC.New.PH16.4.9)

PH16.5 - Improving Outcomes for Toronto Residents through Implementation of HousingTO 2020-2030

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PH16.5a for information)

The Chief Operating Officer, Development and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat have submitted a supplementary report on this Item. (PH16.5b with recommendations)

The Executive Director, Housing Secretariat has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PH16.5c for information)

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council adopt the HousingTO 2020-2030 Implementation Plan, included as Attachment 1 to the report (September 8, 2020) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, as the accountability framework to monitor the City's progress towards delivering on the actions identified in the HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan over the next ten years.

 

2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to provide annual reports to Council, beginning in 2021, outlining progress against the performance targets outlined in the HousingTO 2020-2030 Implementation Plan, including a summary of investments received from the federal and provincial governments towards delivery of HousingTO, and to propose any recommended changes to the targets based on changing conditions.

 

3. City Council request the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, working with all relevant City Divisions involved in the delivery of housing to include in the first HousingTO 2020-2030 annual report, a framework for creating a housing data strategy, including:

 

a. HousingTO 2020-2030 performance targets and progress to be reported cumulatively, annually and tracked geographically by wards;

 

b. Measures needed to improve reporting of city-wide, site-by-site data for projects contributing to affordable housing performance targets in the HousingTO 2020-2030 Implementation Plan;

 

c. Measures to ensure the City of Toronto has integrated data, across divisions and agencies, for housing and homelessness indicators across the housing continuum;

 

d. Options for hosting these performance targets and key indicators in a public and accessible format, such as  the City’s Open Data portal; and,

 

e. A clear outline of the resources and data-sharing permissions needed to develop and implement a housing data strategy for the City of Toronto.

 

4. City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to report back to the Planning and Housing Committee meeting on December 8, 2020 on the feasibility of expanding the Toronto Rent Bank program and the Eviction Prevention in the Community program to:

 

a. Introduce non-repayable grants to residents who cannot afford a temporary loan; and

 

b. Expand the eligibility criteria of the Toronto Rent Bank and the Eviction Prevention in the Community program to capture more low-income residents and families.

 

5.  City Council request the appropriate staff to provide further information on the $650,000  allocated for three Toronto Community Housing Corporation communities.

 

6. City Council request the appropriate staff to clarify further for the Committee which parts of the Housing Plan can be achieved and if funds required from other levels of government are not realized.

  

7. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the Executive Director, Financial Planning to include the resources required to deliver on the HousingTO 2021 targets as part of the 2021 Capital and Operating Budget submissions.
 

8. City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services to report back to Council, as part of the 2021 Operating Budget Submission on measures being taken to streamline the way housing and homeless services are planned and delivered across City divisions, including measures to ensure clear accountabilities and service improvements for residents.

 
9. City Council direct the Chief Operating Officer, Development and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to develop a pilot affordable housing concierge/prioritization stream as part of the Concept to Keys project, to expedite the approval of affordable housing development projects in the planning approval process, and report back to Council in the third quarter of 2021 on the results of the pilot. 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Housing Committee:

 

1. Requested the Chief Operating Officer, Development and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to report directly to City Council at its September 30 and October 1, 2020 meeting on guidelines for projects to be considered in a pilot affordable housing concierge/prioritizing stream.

 

The Executive Director, Housing Secretariat gave a presentation on Improving Outcomes for Toronto Residents through Implementation of HousingTO 2020-2030.

Origin

(September 8, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat

Summary

In December 2019, through Item Number PH11.5, City Council adopted the HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan ("HousingTO") and the new Toronto Housing Charter as a blueprint to help over 340,000 households achieve and maintain housing stability by 2030. This overarching plan provides a roadmap to guide all City actions, policies and investments in housing and homelessness over the next decade.

 

Recognizing that access to safe, secure, affordable and well-maintained homes is fundamental to improving outcomes for individuals and communities, HousingTO seeks to address the root causes of homelessness and housing instability through strategic opportunities and priority actions across the housing continuum. HousingTO ultimately seeks to end chronic homelessness, address housing inequity and instability, and improve the health and socio-economic outcomes for people and the environment over the next ten years.

 

Signifying the City's leadership on housing issues and solidifying its commitment to improve outcomes for residents by 2030, Toronto is the first city in Canada to adopt a policy to further the progressive realization of the right to adequate housing through HousingTO and the revised Toronto Housing Charter. The establishment of the role or function of Housing Commissioner to oversee implementation of HousingTO and the Toronto Housing Charter will be a key component of implementing the progressive realization of the right to adequate housing in Toronto, as outlined in the HousingTO Plan.

 

Subsequent to adopting HousingTO, in January 2020, through Item Number EC11.5, staff were directed to report to Council in the third quarter of 2020 on steps required to end chronic homelessness and include details on the status of chronic homelessness; existing inter-governmental financial support for ending chronic homelessness; and recommendations on programmatic, staffing and budgetary changes required to end homelessness.

 

This report responds to Council's request and provides a robust HousingTO Implementation Plan for Council's consideration. This Implementation Plan reflects a human rights-based approach to the implementation of HousingTO, and is ultimately geared towards helping those most in need and eliminating chronic homelessness over the next decade. The Implementation Plan also shows the progress made to-date on developing the framework for establishing the Housing Commissioner's role or function, in collaboration with human rights experts and City staff.

 

While the overall strategies and actions in the HousingTO Plan remain relevant despite the current COVID-19 context, the pandemic's resulting socio-economic impacts on residents, the City's ongoing response, and the current municipal financial deficit have changed the context for implementing HousingTO. On the one hand, the pandemic has further emphasized the need for urgent investments in housing and expediting affordable housing delivery and on the other, it has created delays for projects, programs and policies along with significant financial constraints to implement some of the actions. Despite these challenges, the attached Implementation Plan presented for Council's consideration is a balanced approach. The Implementation Plan will help the City and the public to track all of the actions, targets and measures and will be used to monitor progress on the implementation of HousingTO over the next decade. The Implementation Plan also outlines the many actions that have been expedited or that are in progress. Additionally, it acknowledges that some actions have been delayed due to financial constraints, and will be addressed as part of the 2021 budget cycle for consideration and prioritization in light of the challenging financial context.

 

Further, this report highlights the substantial progress made by the City in advancing the targets in HousingTO in 2020. Despite the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March,  the City took several actions, including but not limited to, implementing modular supportive housing which will deliver an initial 100 permanent homes in the fall (plus another 150 homes in spring 2021); launching phase two of the Housing Now Initiative which will activate 6 new City-owned sites for affordable housing (a total of over 4,500 affordable rental housing units on 17 City sites will be developed); and moving 1,500 people from shelters into permanent housing through housing benefits. Including the Housing Now and Modular Housing Initiatives, there are over 65 projects currently in the City's affordable rental development pipeline which will add almost 9,000 new permanent affordable rental homes once completed.

 

While the need to increase affordable housing opportunities for residents in the city was urgent preceding the pandemic, this need has become even more critical for all orders of government due to extensive loss of employment, heightened risks of evictions for households, the need for adequate housing to reduce spread of the virus, and the need to boost the economy. In addition, the pandemic has disproportionately impacted low-income racialized communities, seniors and women, signaling the need to address systemic and structural inequalities as part of our COVID-19 recovery plans.

 

Delivery of HousingTO is expected to cost $23.4 billion over the next ten years and requires an approximate one-third contribution by the three orders of government. To-date, the City has committed almost 65% of its share. It is imperative that the federal and provincial governments also commit towards delivery of this plan particularly as governments prepare for potential future waves of the pandemic and focus efforts to help residents who are struggling with housing insecurity, inadequacy and unaffordability issues. As the pandemic has shown, now more than ever all orders of government need to coordinate resources, increase investments and focus on addressing the housing needs of residents, particularly those who are vulnerable and marginalized.

 

In responding to COVID-19 and laying the foundation for a robust recovery through accelerating investments in HousingTO, there is a strong social and economic case to support increased investments in permanent housing with appropriate supports. Not only does permanent housing improve outcomes of individuals, it also reduces costs to the public sector and increases the resilience of health, housing and homelessness systems. Investments in permanent housing would also create employment opportunities helping to boost the economy at this critical time.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 8, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat on Improving Outcomes for Toronto Residents through Implementation of HousingTO 2020-2030
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156408.pdf
Attachment 1 - HousingTO 2020-2030 Implementation Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156646.pdf
Presentation from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156852.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (PH16.5a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157135.pdf
(September 30, 2020) Supplementary report from the Chief Operating Officer, Development and Executive Director, Housing Secretariat on Concept to Keys Development Review Operational Pilot (PH16.5b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157136.pdf
(September 29, 2020) Supplementary report and Attachment 1 from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat on Implementing the HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan (PH16.5c)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157158.pdf
Attachment 2- What will the HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan Achieve?
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157144.pdf

Speakers

Kira Heineck, Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness
Jonathan Robart, Senior Advisor – Policy, Litigation & Law Reform, Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation
Emily Paradis, Right To Housing in Toronto
Jasmine Rezaee, Director of Advocacy and Communications, YWCA Toronto
Melissa Goldstein
Vashti King, New Toronto RatePayers
Marcia Stone, Toronto ACORN
(September 22, 2020) Sean Meagher, ConveneToronto
Bob Murphy, Weston ACORN

Communications (Committee)

(September 21, 2020) Submission from Vashti King, New Toronto Ratepayers Association (PH.New.PH16.5.1)
(September 21, 2020) Letter from Emily Paradis, Right to Housing Toronto (PH.New.PH16.5.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118465.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from David Reycraft, Dixon Hall Neighbourhood Services (PH.New.PH16.5.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118520.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Jonathan Robart, Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation (PH.New.PH16.5.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118524.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Kira Heineck, Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness (PH.New.PH16.5.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118997.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Melissa Goldstein (PH.New.PH16.5.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-119004.pdf

PH16.8 - Addressing Housing and Homelessness Issues in Toronto through Intergovernmental Partnerships

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Mayor's First Key Matter and first Item of business on September 30th

The Executive Director, Housing Secretariat has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PH16.8a).

Communications have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council endorse the Housing and People Action Plan, in Attachment 1 and the COVID-19 Interim Shelter Recovery Strategy in Attachment 2 to the report (September 8, 2020) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration as the framework for prioritization of the City's Intergovernmental advocacy work on housing and homelessness over the next 24 months, and to complement the City's HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan.

 

2. City Council urgently request that the Federal and Provincial governments support the City's 24-month plan in Attachment 3 to the report (September 8, 2020) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to deliver 3,000 affordable rental and supportive homes comprised of:

 

a.  1,000 permanent modular homes;

 

b. 1,000 new homes through acquisitions, renovations and "shovel ready" projects; and

 

c. 1,000 additional new portable (and flexible) Canada-Ontario Housing Benefits (COHB) to help households secure housing available for rent in Toronto and across the region.

 

3. City Council request the Provincial and Federal Governments to urgently allocate funding for additional mental health care, and a continuum of substance use treatment and overdose prevention supports delivered by health and community partners, as part of an integrated enhanced service model to meet the increasingly complex needs of individuals that are currently experiencing homelessness to help transition them into permanent housing.

 

4. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to report to the October 20, 2020 meeting of the Planning and Housing Committee on a plan shift future capital and operating funding from shelters to create permanent supportive housing and to include the plan as part of the 2021 Capital and Operating Budget submission.

 
5. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, in consultation with the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and CreateTO to develop an affordable housing acquisitions strategy to support the City's COVID-19 Housing and Homelessness Recovery Response Plan, and to report back to the October 20, 2020 meeting of the Planning and Housing Committee with recommendations to activate the strategy to take advantage of the federal Rapid Housing Initiative and ensure that the City is well-positioned to move quickly to acquire properties for people experiencing homelessness.

 

6. City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to consult with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and the Ministry of Finance on opportunities to improve the customer service experience for both applicants and recipients of all Provincially funded and administered housing allowance programs.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Housing Committee:

 

1. Directed the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to report directly to City Council at its meeting of September 30 and October 1, 2020 to outline the process that will give unsolicited inquiries from property owners their due consideration as part of any plan to obtain 1,000 new homes through acquisitions, renovations and "shovel ready" projects for the City's Housing and People Action Plan.

 

The Executive Director, Housing Secretariat gave a presentation on Addressing Housing and Homelessness Issues in Toronto through Intergovernmental Partnerships.

Origin

(September 8, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

In December 2019, City Council adopted the HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan to address housing and homelessness challenges in the City of Toronto. The HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan, which is premised on intergovernmental partnerships, has an ambitious aim to help over 340,000 households through the approval of over 40,000 new affordable rental homes, including 18,000 supportive housing units over the next 10 years. It also proposes a range of actions to increase housing stability for Toronto residents.

 

As part of Council's approval, staff were directed to establish an Intergovernmental Working Group with the federal and provincial governments to develop a six-month action plan to address the urgent issue of homelessness in the City. On February 20, 2020, City Council further directed staff to establish an Inter-divisional Working Group and work with stakeholders to develop a six-month action plan to address homelessness. 

 

Due to the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic in March, the formal working groups were delayed and are now in the process of being established. However, staff have been actively engaged and working with all orders of government, and across City divisions, agencies and corporations to respond to the pandemic and lay the foundation for recovery. These partnership efforts have focused on supporting our most vulnerable and marginalized residents, including a significant expansion of the emergency shelter system to create spaces for physical distancing and isolation and moving clients from the shelter system into permanent housing where possible.

 

This report provides an update on some of the actions taken to date in response to the pandemic. It provides also provides a summary of the Housing and People Action Plan developed by the Mayor's Recovery Task Force as well as the joint Shelter Support and Housing Administration (SSHA)/United Way of Greater Toronto (UWGT) COVID-19 Interim Shelter Recovery Strategy. These reports' recommendations are aligned and support the request for a new tri-government partnership to expedite investments under the National Housing Strategy and other programs to accelerate the actions of the HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan, and support a 24-month plan for the delivery of 3,000 affordable and supportive homes as part of recovery planning. Both documents provide a roadmap for governments to address housing and homelessness challenges now while concurrently taking action to pivot away from emergency measures towards stable permanent housing solutions as part of recovery. The actions in both reports complement and support the goals of the City's HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 8, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on Addressing Housing and Homelessness Issues in Toronto through Intergovernmental Partnerships
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156417.pdf
Attachment 1: Housing and People Plan: Responding to COVID-19 Crisis while Planning for a More Resilient Future
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156418.pdf
Attachment 2: COVID-19 Interim Shelter Recovery Strategy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156419.pdf
Attachment 3: City of Toronto 24-Month Housing Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156597.pdf
Presentation from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156916.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary report from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat on Addressing Housing and Homelessness Issues in Toronto through Intergovernmental Partnerships (PH16.8a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157137.pdf

Speakers

Arthur Lofsky
Sonja Nerad, Toronto Shelter Network
Kira Heineck, Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness
Ian Cooper
Jason Appleby
Tara Speers
Yvonne Robertson
Harmy Mendoza, Woman Abuse Council of Toronto
Vashti King, New Toronto Ratepayers Association
Nathan Doucet, Encampment Support Network
Claude Wittman
Kenneth Hale, Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario
Jonathan Robart, Senior Advisor for Policy, Litigation & Law Reform, Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation (CERA)
Muntasir Chowdhury
Sharon Taylor
Mohamed Hashim, Condominium Residences and Small Businesses in Downtown Toronto
Alykhan Pabani
Frank Cox-O'Connell
Melissa Goldstein
Greg Cook, Outreach Worker, Sanctuary Toronto
Shahrzad Mobasher Fard, Condo Residences and Small Businesses of Downtown Toronto
Simone Schmidt
Tammy McLean

Communications (Committee)

(September 21, 2020) Letter from Shahrzad Mobasher Fard (PH.New.PH16.8.1)
(September 21, 2020) Letter from Kenneth Hale, Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario (PH.New.PH16.8.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118515.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Nico Elliott-Armstrong (PH.New.PH16.8.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118995.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Jonathan Robart, Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation (PH.New.PH16.8.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118523.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Muntasir Chowdhury (PH.New.PH16.8.5)
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Melissa Goldstein (PH.New.PH16.8.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118996.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Kira Heineck, Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness (PH.New.PH16.8.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118526.pdf
(September 22, 2020) E-mail from Nathan Doucet (PH.New.PH16.8.8)
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Simone E. Schmidt (PH.New.PH16.8.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-119007.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Claude Wittman (PH.New.PH16.8.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-119008.pdf
(September 22, 2020) Letter from Greg Cook (PH.New.PH16.8.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-119009.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(September 27, 2020) Letter from Patti Abraham (CC.Supp.PH16.8.12)
(September 26, 2020) E-mail from Jeff Friedman (CC.Supp.PH16.8.13)
(September 26, 2020) Letter from Alex and Elena Meekhoff (CC.Supp.PH16.8.14)
(September 26, 2020) Letter from Gary Lahey (CC.Supp.PH16.8.15)
(September 26, 2020) Letter from Robert and Magda Moore (CC.Supp.PH16.8.16)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from Kevin Chabot (CC.Supp.PH16.8.17)
(September 22, 2020) Submission from Vashti King, New Toronto Ratepayers Association (CC.Supp.PH16.8.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120558.pdf
(September 27, 2020) Letter from Joe Willis (CC.Supp.PH16.8.19)
(September 27, 2020) Letter from Delia Close (CC.Supp.PH16.8.20)
(September 27, 2020) Letter from Brenda Walker (CC.Supp.PH16.8.21)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Ania Biczysko (CC.Supp.PH16.8.22)
(September 27, 2020) E-mail from John Plant (CC.Supp.PH16.8.23)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Cherie Rahkola (CC.Supp.PH16.8.24)
(September 27, 2020) Letter from Arlene Gramada (CC.Supp.PH16.8.25)
(September 27, 2020) Letter from Wojtek Biczysko (CC.Supp.PH16.8.26)
(September 27, 2020) Letter from David Kunda, Lakeshore Lumber Company Incorporated (CC.Supp.PH16.8.27)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120535.pdf
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Richard Piatek (CC.Supp.PH16.8.28)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Tatiana Kushner (CC.Supp.PH16.8.29)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Karen Adams (CC.Supp.PH16.8.30)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Reay Jespersen (CC.Supp.PH16.8.31)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Graeme Martin (CC.Supp.PH16.8.32)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Anthony & Jessica Hajsan (CC.Supp.PH16.8.33)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from New Toronto Ratepayers Association (CC.Supp.PH16.8.34)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-120582.pdf
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Guy McCrum (CC.Supp.PH16.8.35)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Michelle King (CC.Supp.PH16.8.36)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Marta Pozniakowski (CC.Supp.PH16.8.37)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Thomas Crosby (CC.Supp.PH16.8.38)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Debbie and Darryl Gallant (CC.Supp.PH16.8.39)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Stephanie Wilson (CC.Supp.PH16.8.40)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Yashar Khoshand (CC.Supp.PH16.8.41)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Joanna Kajda (CC.Supp.PH16.8.42)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Sylvia (CC.Supp.PH16.8.43)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Simone and Michael Byrne (CC.Supp.PH16.8.44)
(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Denise Stremler (CC.Supp.PH16.8.45)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from William and Barbara Moss (CC.Supp.PH16.8.46)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Trish Buchanan (CC.Supp.PH16.8.47)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Vashti King (CC.Supp.PH16.8.48)
(September 28, 2020) Letter from Kim Dorney (CC.Supp.PH16.8.49)
(September 27, 2020) Letter from Melanie Cramp and Warren Evans (CC.Supp.PH16.8.50)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Wanda Allen (CC.Supp.PH16.8.51)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Leslie Newman (CC.Supp.PH16.8.52)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Steve Baumgartner (CC.Supp.PH16.8.53)
(September 29, 2020) Petition from New Toronto Rate Payers (CC.New.PH16.8.54)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Dan and Anna Rogers (CC.New.PH16.8.55)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Wendy Bertsch (CC.New.PH16.8.56)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Scott (CC.New.PH16.8.57)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Jason Walker (CC.New.PH16.8.58)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Robert Jeffrey (CC.New.PH16.8.59)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Mark and Cindy Kitcher (CC.New.PH16.8.60)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Roman Diakun (CC.New.PH16.8.61)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Charlotte Minard (CC.New.PH16.8.62)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Chloe Macrae (CC.New.PH16.8.63)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jonathan Buccella (CC.New.PH16.8.64)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from George Kushner (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Robert and Magda Moore (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Agnes Stolarczyk (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Sandra Wokulousky (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Wojciech Stolarczyk (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Joe Willis (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Jan Copeman (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Joanne Yano, Chair, Lakeshore Village Resident's Association (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-121008.pdf
(September 30, 2020) Letter from Radenko Marmat (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) Letter from Aleksandra Sucevic (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) Letter from Danielle Parrotta (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Melanie Blochlinger Mullins (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Kel Chan (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Jonathan Robart, Senior Advisor, Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-121060.pdf
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Patty Chippa Findlay (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Laura and Jim Campbell (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Liz Miller (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Richard Ganpat (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Juanita Forde McDermott (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Samuel McDermott (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Feisel Haji (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Alain Coulombe (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Ramzi Boutros (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Sepehr Sepidar (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Ava Aram (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Dorsa Aram (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Evelyn Hubbs (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Robin Riley (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Pierre LeGendre (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Anna Bialas (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Collin Blatcher (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Christoph Buchmann (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Michael Caravaggio (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Judi Cohen (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Lawrence Cohen (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Cheryl Hendy (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Lisa Holland (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Valentina Ivanova (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Thomas Kosciuch (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Anna Kramarska and Pawel Kramarski (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Daniel Matthews (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Kasia Mnich (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Chuck and Lisa Thomas (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from W. R. Thuma and Jane DuBroy (CC.New)
(September 29, 2020) Letter from Merilee Wright (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Maria and Dave Cherevaty (CC.New)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Roger Carmichael (CC.New)

PH16.9 - Creating 303 New Affordable Rental Homes with Support Services for Seniors at 1250 Markham Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
24 - Scarborough - Guildwood
Attention
Bill 764 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council authorize up to 303 affordable rental units to be constructed on the lands known as 1250 Markham Road be eligible for waivers of planning application, building permit and parkland dedication fees, and development charge exemptions.

 

2.  City Council authorize an exemption from taxation for municipal and school purposes for 50 years, for the 303 affordable rental units to be constructed on the lands known as 1250 Markham Road.

 

3.  City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to negotiate and enter into, on behalf of the City, a municipal housing facility agreement (the "Contribution Agreement") with Global Kingdom Ministries for the development of the affordable housing to be constructed on the lands known as 1250 Markham Road, to secure the financial assistance being provided and to set out the terms of the operation of the new affordable rental housing, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

 

4.  City Council authorize City staff to cancel or refund any taxes paid after the effective date of the municipal capital facility agreement.

 

5.  City Council authorize severally each of the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to execute, on behalf of the City, any security or financing documents required by Global Kingdom Ministries to secure construction and conventional financing and subsequent refinancing, including any postponement, tripartite, confirmation of status, discharge or consent documents where and when required during the term of the municipal housing facility agreement, as required by normal business practices, and provided that such documents do not give rise to financial obligations on the part of the City that have not been previously approved by Council.

 

6.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to execute, postpone, confirm the status of, and discharge any City security documents registered as required by normal business practices.

Origin

(August 28, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve Open Door incentives for up to 303 affordable rental homes for seniors to be created at 1250 Markham Road. The project is proposed to be developed by Global Kingdom Ministries Inc. (Global Kingdom Ministries), a 65 year old charitable, federal corporation, affiliated with the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada, which operates a broad range of services for seniors in the Scarborough area.

 

The new affordable rental homes to be developed at 1250 Markham Road will remain affordable for a minimum of 50 years and will be part of a larger mixed-income, mixed-use development. The project has been designed to be energy efficient and will include a significant number of fully accessible units. Global Kingdom Ministries will also partner with various community organizations and health care providers to deliver a combination of housing and clinical and non-clinical support services onsite which promote “aging in place". In addition to the 303 affordable rental homes, 302 market rental homes are proposed to be developed at the site.

 

The Open Door incentives recommended for Council approval will assist the Global Kingdom Ministries in providing affordable housing options to low-and-moderate-income seniors, including women, persons with disabilities and those from equity-seeking groups. Approval of this project will also contribute towards the delivery of the City's HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan which includes targets to increase the supply of affordable, accessible and good quality homes for seniors.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 28, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat on Creating 303 New Affordable Rental Homes with Support Services for Seniors at 1250 Markham Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156407.pdf

PH16.10 - Laneway Suites: Fire Access Requirements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request that the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, in consultation with the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services develop a publicly accessible guide detailing acceptable options along with mitigating measures to achieve compliance with the Ontario Building Code for fire access to Laneway Suites where the travel distance to the building from a fire apparatus on an access route exceeds a travel distance of 45 metres.

 

2. City Council request that the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building request that the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing amend the Ontario Building Code to provide clarity for designers and homeowners by providing a broader range of fire access options to comply with the Ontario Building Code requirements that apply to Laneway Suites.

 

3. City Council request that the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, in consultation with the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services work to facilitate the design and construction of other housing forms, in support of the City's housing strategy by:

 

a. Hiring a Building Code Consultant for technical consulting services to recommend options to achieve compliance with the Ontario Building Code for multi-tenant houses and other forms of additional units in accessory buildings; and,

 

b. Working in partnership with the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and   Standards; the Chief Planner and  Executive Director, City Planning, and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to incorporate the alternative options for compliance into the proposed regulatory framework for Multi-tenant Houses and "Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods".

Origin

(September 8, 2020) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building

Summary

This report responds to direction from the Planning and Housing Committee on July 13, 2020, which requested that the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building in collaboration with the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, explore and develop further opportunities for building designers to achieve compliance with the fire department access requirements for Laneway Suites.

 

Following City Council's decision to allow Laneway Suites across the city in 2019, Toronto Building worked with Toronto Fire Services to develop options and tools to assist homeowners in meeting Building Code requirements for fire access during the building permit stage. While the 2012 Ontario Building Code does not provide specific dimensional requirements for fire department access, Toronto Fire Services requires a level, unobstructed exterior path for firefighters no longer than 45 metres in length, with minimum dimensions of 1.0 metre-wide by 2.1 metres-high.

 

In cases where it is not possible to provide the minimum 1.0 metre-wide path of travel for firefighting access on the subject property, the City developed an option for property owners, where this required width may be shared with a neighbouring property, provided both owners enter into a Limiting Distance Agreement, or through the lane provided the path of travel is not more than 45 metres in length. Despite these additional options, some applicants proposing Laneway Suites still had difficulties meeting the fire access requirements. Following the implementation of these additional options and tools, the City continued to consider alternate approaches to emergency access based on experiences with applications for Laneway Suites and comments from the building industry. A Building Code Commission decision on this matter in 2019 was also helpful in informing the consideration of how to develop additional compliance options for designers and property owners.

 

This report summarizes how Toronto Building, in consultation with Toronto Fire Services, has responded to a new housing option and has developed innovative approaches to support the construction of Laneway Suites.

 

The review of fire department access requirements and the challenges these requirements create was carried out with support from a Building Code Consultant having expertise in fire protection engineering.  The Consultant identified acceptable measures that may allow an increase in the maximum permitted travel distance from a Laneway Suite entry to a fire apparatus on a public street to more than 45 metres. The Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services agree with the approach recommended by the Consultant and are working to share these options in more detail with the public.

 

Toronto Fire Services has also reviewed the current 1.0 metre-wide unobstructed path of travel requirement and is establishing a new standard of 0.9 metres (and allowing for building protrusions such as hydro and gas meters into this required path of travel).  The new requirement of 0.9 metres is the minimum width that will permit firefighters to respond effectively and efficiently to an emergency.  This minimum width is consistent with the typical residential side yard setback required in the Zoning By-law.

 

This review process conducted by City staff illustrates an opportunity for Toronto Building to continue to develop alternative solutions to Building Code challenges in order to support other City strategic objectives, including the provision of a diverse range of housing opportunities.  As a next step, this report recommends that the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building undertake a review of Code-related requirements for multi-tenant houses and other forms of additional units in accessory buildings in order to identify generic alternative solutions that all property owners and designers can use to more easily meet Code requirements. 

 

This report has been written in consultation with the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 8, 2020) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building on Laneway Suites: Fire Access Requirements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156421.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(September 20, 2020) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations (PH.New.PH16.10.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118470.pdf
(September 21, 2020) Letter from Sue Dexter, Harbord Village Residents' Association (PH.New.PH16.10.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/comm/communicationfile-118519.pdf

PH16.13 - 28-30 Langley Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards have submitted a supplementary report on this Item. (PH16.13a for information)

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee submits the item to City Council without recommendations.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Housing Committee:

 

1. Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards report directly to the City Council meeting of September 30  and October 1, 2020 to confirm the existing zoning and the status of the Rooming House Licence at 28-30 Langley Avenue.

Origin

(September 21, 2020) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher

Summary

The property at 28-30 Langley Avenue contains a building that was first occupied in 1898 and converted into a rooming house in the 1950s. It has been operating as a rooming house within the proper zoning since 1985 with approximately 23 units. In the summer of 2018, the property changed ownership and the tenants received N13 eviction notices. At that time the building was home to about 20 low-income tenants.

 

Consequently, tenants in the building reached out to as they had deep concerns about finding comparable affordable accommodation. They decided  to challenge the eviction or 'renoviction'. The tenants who took the matter to the Landlord Tenant Board received the right to return.

 

In January 2020, there was a renewal hearing for the Rooming House License. The hearing is pending as the Rooming House Licencing Commissioner determined that the compliance inspection would have to wait until the building was tenanted. She wrote "the hearing is stayed pending the outcome of the inspections".

 

In September 2020, the current owner wrote the Mayor and members of the Planning and Housing Committee, referencing the HousingTOAction Plan, to suggest the City buy the property – noting:

 

I am writing to you because although we purchased this as an investment and have put significant work into the building, we are looking to potentially sell the property. I understand that the city is in need of properties such as this and I thought that it would be prudent to reach out regarding the matter. This would be a turn key operation with zoning and a license that the city or a non for profit organization could operate instantly. The building is vacant apart from one room. I believe this would fit nicely into the city's proposed fast tracking of 3,000 permanent residences.

 

In their report on Item PH 16.8, the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration advise that they would like to obtain, as part of the City's Housing and People Action Plan, 1,000 new homes through acquisitions, renovations and "shovel ready" projects.

 

I understand that the zoning for this mid-block property would only allow a Rooming House and using the building for a hotel or student hostel. It would be helpful to understand this in the context of the letter from the owner.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 21, 2020) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher on 28-30 Langley Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-156724.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary report from Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning (PH16.13a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157087.pdf

Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 17

EY17.1 - Final Report - 300 - 304 The East Mall - Zoning By-Law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke Centre
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EY17.1a for information)

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 for the lands at 300-304 The East Mall substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (August 24, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.  City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code for the lands at 300-304 The East Mall substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (August 24, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4.  Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, and any other necessary agreements, satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, with such Agreement(s) to be registered on title to the lands at 300-304 The East Mall in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor to secure the following community benefits at the owner's expense:

 

a.  Prior to the earlier of condominium registration or first residential use on site, the owner shall design, construct, finish and convey to the City, in an acceptable environmental condition, for nominal consideration and at no cost to the City, a minimum 5,000 square feet (465 m²) Community Agency Space located on the ground floor of Building 2 adjacent to the public park and subject to the following:

           

i.  The Community Agency Space shall be delivered to the City in accordance with the City's Community Space Tenancy Policy and finished to Base Building Condition, with the terms and specifications to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement, all satisfactory to the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

 

ii.  Prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, the owner shall provide a letter of credit in the amount sufficient to guarantee 120 percent of the estimated cost of the design, construction and conveyance of the Community Agency Space complying with the specifications and requirements of the Section 37 Agreement, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor;

 

iii.  Prior to conveyance of the Community Agency Space to the City, the owner shall provide a one-time cash contribution in the amount of $750,000.00 for future capital improvements to the Community Agency Space;

  

iv.  The cash contribution referred to in Part 4(a)(iii) shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Residential or Non-Residential, as the case may be, Building Construction Price Index for the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Building Construction Price Indexes Table 18-10-0135-01, or its successor, calculated from the date of the Agreement to the date of payment; and

 

v.  Concurrent with or prior to, the conveyance of the Community Agency Space to the City, the owner and the City shall enter into, and register on title to, the appropriate lands an Easement and Cost Sharing Agreement for nominal consideration and at no cost to the City, that is in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor. The Easement and Cost Sharing Agreement shall address and/or provide for the integrated support, use, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and reconstruction of certain shared facilities, and the sharing of costs, in respect thereof, of portions of the subject lands to be owned by the City and the owner as they pertain to the Community Agency Space.

 

b.  The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i.  The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard.

 

ii.  The owner shall provide, at its own expense, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, a minimum area of 750 m² as Privately-Owned Publicly-Accessible Space (POPS) on the west side of the site in front of the lobby entrances to Building 1, with trees, child specific play areas and seating and shall provide to the City for nominal consideration public access easements to and over the POPS for use by members of the general public. Public access easements shall also be provided over the pedestrian walkway along the proposed north-south central private street through the site, which would be accessed from the public sidewalk and street (Bloor Street West). The public access easements are to be conveyed to the City for nominal consideration and are to be free and clear of all physical and title encumbrances, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor. Such easements to be conveyed to the City prior to Site Plan Approval, and with the configuration and design to be determined to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning  in the context of site plan approval. The owner shall operate, maintain and repair the POPS and install and maintain signs, at its own expense, stating that members of the public shall be entitled to use the POPS during the day and night, 365 days of the year. The owner shall have completed the construction of the POPS prior to the first commercial or residential use on Area 1 of the site, as depicted in Diagram 1 to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (August 24, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

iii.  The owner shall obtain all required permit(s) from the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) prior to any construction and for all signs visible to Highway 427. MTO permits can only be applied for once Site Plan Approval is granted.

  

iv.  Through the Site Plan Approval process, the owner shall implement the wind control measures identified in the Pedestrian Wind Study, dated October 8, 2019, prepared by RWDI and any future addendum, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. Any required mitigation measures would be secured through the Site Plan application review process.

 

v.  Prior to Site Plan Approval, the owner shall submit an updated Noise Impact Study/Addendum Letter to be further peer reviewed at the expense of the owner to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. The owner shall construct and maintain any required noise mitigation measures, to be secured through the Site Plan application review process, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

vi.  Through the Site Plan Approval process, the owner shall implement the air quality measures and recommendations identified in the Air Quality Assessment prepared by RWDI, dated September 6, 2019 and any future addendum as well as conduct an Air Quality Assessment that will include dispersion modelling to determine the impacts of transportation emissions on local air quality to the satisfaction of Public Health. The Air Quality Assessment would be peer reviewed by an independent third party selected by the City (at the expense of the owner). Should there be an air quality impact identified in the study, appropriate mitigation measures would be considered and secured through the Site Plan application review process to the satisfaction of Public Health and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

vii.  The owner shall satisfy the requirements of the Toronto District School Board regarding warning clauses and signage with respect to school accommodation issues.

 

viii. The owner shall notify NAV Canada a minimum of 10 days prior to the start of construction.

 

ix.  A minimum of 10% of the dwelling units on the lands must be three-bedroom units and a minimum of 20% of the dwelling units on the lands must be two-bedrooms units.

 

x.  The owner shall be required to undertake the following, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services, at no cost to the City:

 

a.  Prior to Site Plan Approval, the owner shall submit for review and approval, all necessary engineering drawings and documentation associated with the removal of the existing channelized southbound-to-westbound right-turn lane at the northwest corner of the Bloor Street West and The East Mall signalized intersection, and its replacement with an exclusive southbound-to-westbound right-turn lane;

 

b.  Prior to the issuance of any above grade Building Permit, the owner shall construct and pay all costs associated with the removal of the existing channelized southbound-to-westbound right-turn lane at the northwest corner of the Bloor Street West and The East Mall signalized intersection, and its replacement with an exclusive southbound-to-westbound right-turn lane, as per the approved engineering drawings required in the condition above;

 

c.  Prior to Site Plan Approval, the owner shall submit for review and approval, a full-size pavement marking and signing plan (in metric units) modifying the previously-approved pavement markings along Gibbs Road, west of The East Mall, revised to illustrate two separate eastbound lanes approaching the previously-approved signalized intersection of Gibbs Road with The East Mall, such that one lane is designated for right-turn movements and the other lane is designated for left-turn movements;

 

d.  Prior to the issuance of any above grade Building Permit, the owner shall pay for all costs associated with implementing the proposed updated modifications to the previously-approved pavement markings for Gibbs Road, west of The East Mall, as per the approved pavement marking and signing plan required in the condition above;

 

e.  Prior to Site Plan Approval, the owner shall submit for review and approval, through the proponent's retained transportation consultant, revised traffic capacity analyses of the existing signalized intersection at Bloor Street West and The East Mall and the existing signalized intersection at Bloor Street West and The West Mall, based upon the most up-to-date signal timing information available at the time of the analyses, and with recommendations for signal timing adjustments and provision of any additional signal phases to improve the level-of-service at these intersections, as required;

 

f.  Prior to the issuance of any above grade Building Permit, the owner shall pay for all costs associated with implementing any approved signal timing adjustments and provision of any additional signal phases to improve the level-of-service at the existing signalized intersection at Bloor Street West and The East Mall and the existing signalized intersection at Bloor Street West and The West Mall, based upon the traffic capacity analyses required in the condition above;

 

g.  Prior to Site Plan Approval, the owner shall submit for review and approval, through the proponent's retained transportation consultant, a revised traffic capacity analyses for the previously-approved proposed traffic control signals at the intersection of Gibbs Road and The East Mall with recommendations for any signal timing modifications from the previously-approved signal timing plan for that intersection, as required;

 

h.  Prior to the issuance of any above grade Building Permit, the owner shall pay for all costs associated with implementing any approved signal timing adjustments to the previously-approved signal timing plan for the proposed traffic control signals at the intersection of Gibbs Road and The East Mall, based upon the traffic capacity analyses required in the condition above; and

 

xi.  Prior to final Site Plan Approval, the owner to provide a construction management plan, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which addresses construction vehicle routing, temporary parking and communications with neighbouring stakeholders such as the Toronto District School Board, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and thereafter the owner shall implement such strategies and plans.

 

5.  City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation (PFR). The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of installing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, PFR, and the Parks and Recreation component of Development Charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time. The owner is required to submit a design and cost estimate to be approved by the General Manager, PFR, and a letter of credit equal to 120% of the Parks and Recreation Development Charges payable for the development. The design, cost estimate and letter of credit will be required prior to the issuance of any above grade Building Permit.

 

6.  City Council require that the conditions related to the conveyance of the required public parkland dedication having an area of 2,040 m² be satisfied prior to the issuance of any above grade Building Permit for the lands, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the Director, Real Estate Services and the City Solicitor. The subject parkland conveyance is to be free and clear, above and below grade of all physical and title encumbrances and encroachments, including surface and subsurface easements, unless otherwise approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The owner is to pay for the costs of the preparation and registration of all relevant documents. The owner shall provide to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor all legal descriptions and applicable reference plans of survey for the new parkland.

 

7.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to secure matters regarding the required parkland conveyance through a Section 37 Agreement, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor, including:

 

a.  Conveyance of land to the City for public parkland, with a minimum size of 2,040 m² as generally depicted in Schedule/Diagram 2 and 3 of the Draft Zoning By-law Amendments;

 

b.  Securing the design and construction of the new public park to Above Base Park Improvements; and

 

c.  All other conditions such as (but not limited to): Parkland Conveyance; Environmental Assessment; Park Construction and Base Park Improvements; Above Base Park Improvements; and Credit Against Development Charges for Above Base Park Improvements as outlined in the memorandum from Parks, Forestry and Recreation dated February 24, 2020, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.

 

8.  City Council amend Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that the General Manager, Transportation Services, will not accept applications from residents of, visitors to or tradespersons at 300-304 The East Mall, for a permit.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 9, 2020, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend both the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code and  City-wide Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 to permit a multi-building, mixed-use development including a new 2,040 m² public park at the southeast corner of the site, a privately-owned publicly-accessible open space (POPS) on the west side of the site and 465 m² of community agency space on the ground floor of the proposed building adjacent to the new public park at 300-304 The East Mall. The existing office buildings on the site would be demolished.

 

The proposed development consists of one mid-rise mixed-use building on the east side of the site ranging in height from 2-10 storeys with residential units, the proposed community agency space and ground floor retail space and three residential apartment towers on the west side of the site with heights of 21 storeys (67 m), 37 storeys (116 m) and 29 storeys (91 m) above a ­4-storey base building with office space.

 

The total gross floor area of the proposed development is 89,502 m², of which 3,980 m² would be comprised of non-residential uses, including 2,801 m² of office space.

The development would contain 1,023 dwelling units and provide a total of 1,044 vehicle parking spaces predominantly within a connected 3 level below grade parking garage. Also proposed is the creation of a new central north-south private street connecting Bloor Street West and ­Gibbs Road.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District - 300 - 304 The East Mall - Zoning By-Law Amendment Application- Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-156084.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (EY17.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157093.pdf

Speakers

Tom Giancos, Kingsett Capital

EY17.2 - Final Report - 150 Eighth Street - Zoning By-Law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EY17.2a for information)

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code for the lands at 150 Eighth Street substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report.(August 24, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 for the lands at 150 Eighth Street substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (August 24, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to:

 

a.  Complete a peer review process of the submitted Noise Impact Study by a third party peer reviewer retained by the City of Toronto, and paid for by the owner, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

b.  Complete a peer review process of the submitted Land Use Compatibility and Mitigation Report (Air Quality and Odour Study), by a third party peer reviewer retained by the City of Toronto, and paid for by the owner, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

c.  Enter into a Section 37 Agreement satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, and register the Section 37 Agreement on title to the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor securing the matters of legal convenience outlined in Part 5 below.

 

5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following matters as a legal convenience to support the development:

 

a.  Prior to the issuance of any building permit and/or demolition permit for the subject property, the owner shall, at the owner's sole cost, relocate the Cenotaph from its existing location at 150 Eighth Street to Colonel Samuel Smith Park, with final siting and orientation to be determined by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, prior to commencement of the relocation.

 

b.  Prior to the issuance of any building permit and/or demolition permit for the subject property, the owner shall provide a Letter of Credit to the City in the amount of $360,000 to guarantee the safe relocation of the Cenotaph to Colonel Samuel Smith Park and to guarantee against any damages to parks property, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture.  

 

c.  The owner, at its sole expense, is responsible for the structural design of the new Cenotaph foundation, all utility locates, all excavation, construction of the new concrete foundation, and the moving of and installation of the Cenotaph onto its new foundation, all to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture.

 

d.  The owner shall provide documentation from a qualified structural engineer certifying that the design and construction of the Cenotaph foundation in Colonel Samuel Smith Park has been completed as per the owner's structural design, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture.

 

e.  Prior to issuance of Notice of Approval Conditions (NOAC) for the subject property, the owner shall implement the noise control measures and recommendations contained in the Noise Impact Study, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and provide certification from the owner's air quality consultant that all recommended mitigation measures required in the approved Noise Impact Study have been incorporated into the Site Plan and Building Permit drawings.

 

f.  Prior to issuance of Notice of Approval Conditions (NOAC) for the subject property, the owner shall implement the Land Use Compatibility and Mitigation Report (Air Quality and Odour Study) measures and recommendations to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and provide certification from the owner's air quality consultant that all recommended mitigation measures required in the approved Land Use Compatibility and Mitigation Report (Air Quality and Odour Study) have been incorporated into the Site Plan and Building Permit drawings.

 

g.  City Council accept an on-site parkland dedication that is a minimum of 381 m2 in area pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act and Chapter 415, Article III, of the Toronto Municipal Code (the “Statutory Parkland”), to be dedicated to the City, at no cost to the City, free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances and encroachments and in acceptable environmental condition, all to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation (PFR), in addition to the following:

 

i. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the development charges for the design and construction by the owner of Above Base Park Improvements, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.

 

ii. The owner shall convey the Statutory Parkland to the City prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the building on the subject site, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 9, 2020, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 17, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code and City-wide Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 to permit a 6-storey building containing 90 residential units, 94 vehicular parking spaces and a total gross floor area of 9,964 m2 at 150 Eighth Street. The proposed outdoor amenity space would be located on the rooftop level. A 5 metre wide strip of land that spans the length of the north property line (approximately 381 m2) will be conveyed to the City of Toronto as parkland to expand the existing Eighth Street Skate Park. In addition, the existing 7.5 m high granite Cenotaph that commemorates the Canadian soldiers lost during World War I, World War II and the Korean War will be relocated from the subject site to Colonel Samuel Smith Park as part of this development.

 

The proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019). The development is consistent with the policies of the Mixed Use Areas designation of the Official Plan, as well as other relevant policies pertaining to built form, public realm and housing. The proposal respects and reinforces the existing built form context of the surrounding area.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 17, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-Law Amendment Application - Final Report - 150 Eighth Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-155935.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (EY17.2a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157121.pdf

Speakers

Adam Layton, Evans Planning

Communications (Community Council)

(September 4, 2020) Submission from Eleni Mermigas, Planner, Evans Planning Inc. (EY.New.EY17.2.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ey/comm/communicationfile-117858.pdf
(September 8, 2020) E-mail from Geoffrey Skelding (EY.New.EY17.2.2)

EY17.3 - Final Report - 15 Martha Eaton Way - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EY17.3b for information) Communication EY17.3.5 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The City Planning Division recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625,  as amended by Zoning By-law No. 30883, for the lands at 15 Martha Eaton Way substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (August 20, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.  City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 for the lands at 15 Martha Eaton Way substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (August 20, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4.  Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor, such Agreement to be registered on title to the lands at 15 Martha Eaton Way, in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor to secure the following community benefits at the owner's expense:

 

a.  A cash contribution of $350,000.00 to be directed to "The Treasurer, City of Toronto" indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto for the period from the date of the execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, for the following:

 

i.  $220,000.00 for improvements to North Park (located in Ward 5), including but not limited to a playground as well as improved park lighting and landscaping;

 

ii.  $100,000.00 for bicycle share stations, in close proximity to the subject site, as may be determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor; and

 

iii. $30,000.00 towards capital improvements (including a commercial/teaching kitchen) to the Community Action Resource Centre (municipally known as 1652 Keele Street).

 

b. In the event the cash contribution referred to above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of the By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.

 

c. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i. The owner shall continue to provide and maintain the existing 364 rental dwelling units at 15 Martha Eaton Way as rental housing, together with the new and retained associated facilities and amenities of the residential rental property, for a period of at least 20 years commencing from the date the Zoning By-law Amendments come into force and effect, with no applications for demolition or conversion from residential rental use during such 20-year period, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.

 

ii. The owner shall provide tenants of the existing rental dwelling units on the lands with access to all indoor and outdoor amenities, within and adjacent to both the existing and proposed residential rental buildings, at no extra charge and with no pass-through of costs to the tenants, including by way of an application to the Landlord Tenant Board or any successor tribunal with jurisdiction to hear applications made under the legislation governing residential tenancies in Ontario for the purpose of obtaining an increase in residential rent above the applicable guideline. Access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident on the subject lands.

 

iii. The owner shall provide, repair, operate and/or maintain, at its sole expense, improvements to the existing rental housing on the lands at 15 Martha Eaton Way, taking into account feedback obtained through the tenant survey, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. Such improvements shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

 

Prior to the first above-grade building permit:

 

a. Improvements to laundry facilities in the basement level of the existing residential rental building in accordance with the laundry room concept plans issued by Fay Soultanis Design Inc. on March 30, 2020. Any changes to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

b. Improvements to security in the existing residential rental building and on the surrounding residential rental property, including:

           

i. Installation of 66 new security cameras within the stairwells of the existing residential rental building, as illustrated on the architectural plans edited by Justin Hawkings on July 6, 2020. Any changes to the number and/or location of the new security cameras shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

ii. Installation of 42 new outdoor LED lamps in the existing parking lot and along the existing walkway surrounding the existing residential rental building, as illustrated in the outdoor lighting layout plans issued by All Professional Trades Inc. on August 23, 2019. Any changes to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and

 

iii. Improvements to the lobby area of the existing rental apartment building, including new lighting fixtures, new tile flooring and a new television monitor.

 

Prior to the occupancy of any new residential units:

 

c.  A new programmed outdoor amenity area with new outdoor barbeque/cooking facilities and new outdoor seating, as illustrated in the landscape plans issued by STUDIO TLA Landscape Architects on July 5, 2019. Any changes to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief  Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

d.  An active outdoor recreational playground and aquatic splash pad, as illustrated in the landscape plans issued by STUDIO TLA Landscape Architects on July 5, 2019. Any changes to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

e. The costs of the improvements to the existing residential rental building and associated spaces within and outside the building, as described above, shall not be passed on to the tenants of the building in any form, including by way of an application to the Landlord Tenant Board or any successor tribunal with jurisdiction to hear applications made under the legislation governing residential tenancies in Ontario for the purposes of obtaining an increase in residential rent above the applicable guideline.

 

f. The owner shall develop a construction mitigation plan and tenant communications strategy so that all existing tenants would have limited impact from the proposed development on the site.

 

iv.  The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Management Committee, and as updated by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on December 5, 6 and 7, 2017 through the adoption of item PG23.9 of the Planning and Growth Management Committee, and as may be further amended by City Council from time to time.

 

v. The owner, at its own expense, to design and reconstruct a minimum 2.1 m wide sidewalk, and a secondary municipal sidewalk (a minimum 1.8 m wide) along the Trethewey Drive frontage.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 9, 2020, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 20, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the relevant Zoning By-laws (former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625, as amended by Zoning By-law No. 30883, as well as City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013), to permit an 11-storey (38.4 m in height, including mechanical penthouse) residential infill building containing 155 rental dwelling units while retaining the existing 23-storey apartment building containing 364 rental dwelling units. The proposed building would have a total gross floor area of 13,385 m2, and when combined with the existing building's total gross floor area of 39,284 m2, would result in an overall density of 3.46 times the area of the combined lots (52,669 m2). The proposed building would be located adjacent to Trethewey Drive, in an area that currently contains passive outdoor space, an outdoor pool and a small playground.

 

The proposal seeks to utilize the existing three-level underground parking garage, with 14 existing spaces being removed to facilitate the development. A resulting total of 416 below grade resident parking spaces are proposed for the site. An additional 8 surface visitor parking spaces would be added to the existing roadway loop, resulting in a total of 51 surface visitor parking spaces. In addition, 264 bicycle parking spaces would be located within the existing and proposed buildings.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019). The proposed development represents appropriate intensification that is massed to be compatible with the existing Apartment Neighbourhoods properties in the area. The proposal addresses the Official Plan Healthy Neighbourhoods, Built Form, Public Realm and Mixed-Use policies and the City's Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study and Performance Standards.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws subject to conditions before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment. Provided the conditions are fulfilled, staff are of the opinion the proposed development is appropriate in this location.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 20, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District - 15 Martha Eaton Way - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-156093.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (EY17.3b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157122.pdf

Speakers

Michael Bissett, Bousfields
Dineth Rodrigo, Condominium Superintendent, YCC446

Communications (Community Council)

(August 23, 2020) E-mail from Muna Mohamed (EY.Main.EY17.3.1)
(September 3, 2020) E-mail from Dineth Rodrigo (EY.New.EY17.3.2)
(September 8, 2020) E-mail from Debra-Jo Sujka (EY.New.EY17.3.3)
(September 8, 2020) Petition from Dineth Rodrigo containing approximately 99 signatures (EY.New.EY17.3.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ey/comm/communicationfile-117921.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(September 19, 2020) E-mail from Sarbjit Chugh (CC.Main.EY17.3.5)

3a - Supplementary Report - 15 Martha Eaton Way - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Origin
(August 31, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District
Summary

Community Planning staff have submitted a Final Report (dated August 20, 2020) to Etobicoke York Community Council on the proposal to add an 11-storey residential building to the lands at 15 Martha Eaton Way (Item No. EY17.3).

                      

In this report, staff noted the Toronto Green Standard (TGS) requirements for this development application. The TGS is a set of performance measures for green development. Applications for Zoning By-law Amendments, Draft Plans of Subdivision and Site Plan Control are required to meet and demonstrate compliance with Tier 1 of the Toronto Green Standard. Tiers 2, 3 and 4 are voluntary, higher levels of performance with financial incentives.

 

Staff incorrectly noted that the applicant would meet Tier 2 of the TGS when in fact the applicant has committed to meet the Tier 1 requirements. In this case, Tier 1 performance measures would be secured on site plan drawings and through a Site Plan Agreement for this site, should this application be approved.

 

As Recommendation 4(c)(iv) of the staff report required the applicant to meet Tier 2 of the TGS, the proposed revision is necessary to reflect what the applicant has committed to providing.

Background Information (Community Council)
(August 31, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Supplementary Report - 15 Martha Eaton Way
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-156285.pdf

EY17.4 - Final Report - 2996 Weston Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - Humber River - Black Creek
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EY17.4a for information)

Bills 810 and 811 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 for the lands at 2996 Weston Road substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (August 18, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 for the lands at 2996 Weston Road substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (August 18, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 9, 2020, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 18, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 and City-wide Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 to permit five 3-storey detached dwellings on lands municipally known as 2996 Weston Road. Three of the dwellings are proposed to have frontage on George McKenzie Court, while the remaining dwellings would front on Weston Road.  The subject property is partially located on lands that are regulated by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and the Ravine and Natural Features Protection By-law. The existing dwelling would be demolished and a future Committee of Adjustment Consent application would be required to sever the property into five lots to facilitate the proposal.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020), conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019) and complies with the City's Official Plan.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 18, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report - 2996 Weston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-155936.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (EY17.4a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157123.pdf

Speakers

Walter Mazziotta
Sabrina Sgotto, Weston Consulting

EY17.5 - Request for Direction Report - 26 - 38 Burnhamthorpe Road and 45 - 49 Burnhamthorpe Crescent - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EY17.5a for information)

Communication EY17.5.6 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff, to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) hearing to oppose the applicant's appeal respecting the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application for 26 – 38 Burnhamthorpe Road and 45 - 49 Burnhamthorpe Crescent.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to continue discussions with the applicant to address the issues outlined in this report and to report back to City Council on the outcome of discussions, if necessary.

 

3.  In the event the LPAT allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the LPAT to withhold the issuance of any Order(s) on the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment appeal for the subject lands until such time as:

 

a.  The proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments are in a final form satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor;  

 

b.  A Section 37 Agreement satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, has been executed and registered on title to the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, securing community benefits to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and securing the matters of legal convenience outlined in Recommendation 4 below;  

 

c.  The owner has submitted a revised Functional Servicing Report to determine the stormwater runoff, sanitary flow and water supply demand resulting from this development and whether there is adequate capacity in the existing municipal infrastructure to accommodate the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;

 

d.  The owner has entered into the appropriate agreement with the City for the design, construction and provision of financial securities for any improvements to the municipal infrastructure to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements or upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support this development;

 

e.  The owner has provided space within the development for the installation of maintenance access holes and sampling ports on the private side, as close to the property line as possible, for both the storm and sanitary service connections, in accordance with the Sewers By-law Chapter 681;

 

f.  The owner has submitted a completed Hydrological Review Summary and Servicing Report Groundwater to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;

 

g.  The owner has submitted a revised Transportation Impact Study to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services;          

 

h.  The owner has submitted a revised Landscape Plan, all requirements and related approval processes of the City’s Tree By-laws have been completed and all Tree Preservation matters are resolved to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation;

 

i.  The owner has submitted detailed revised sun/shadow studies to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

j.  The owner has submitted a tenant relocation and assistance plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor;

 

k.  The owner has submitted a Rental Housing Demolition Application to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and

 

l.  City Council, or the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning where authorized to do so, has authorized the Rental Housing Demolition Application under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as applicable, to demolish the existing rental dwelling units at 26 - 38 Burnhamthorpe Road and 45 - 49 Burnhamthorpe Crescent.

 

4.  In the event the LPAT allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to enter into an agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act securing the following as a legal convenience to support development:

 

a.  The owner to satisfy the requirements of the Toronto Catholic District School Board regarding warning clauses and signage with respect to school accommodation issues;

 

b.  The owner to satisfy the requirements of the Toronto District School Board regarding warning clauses and signage with respect to school accommodation issues;

 

c.  The owner to enter into a financially secured Development Agreement for the construction of any improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure,  should it be determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support this development; and

 

d.  The owner to provide for a tenant relocation and assistance plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and City Solicitor, per Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

Origin

(August 20, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

The owner of the site at 26 - 38 Burnhamthorpe Road and 45 - 49 Burnhamthorpe Crescent has appealed the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application for these lands to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) citing City Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time period prescribed under the Planning Act. A Case Management Conference is scheduled for September 1, 2020.

 

This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws to permit a five block townhouse development consisting of 123 stacked back-to-back, 3½ storey townhouses (ranging from 12.9 - 13.5 m in height to the top of the mechanical penthouse/rooftop stair enclosure) at 26 - 38 Burnhamthorpe Road and 45 - 49 Burnhamthorpe Crescent (a site comprised of a land assembly of nine separate lots with existing detached dwellings). The proposal would have a gross floor area of 10,184 m², representing an overall density of 1.6 times the area of the lot. The development would have an underground parking garage containing 161 automobile parking spaces and two surface level automobile parking spaces.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction for the City Solicitor and other appropriate City staff to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing to oppose the applications, as currently proposed. The proposed development is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and does not conform with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019), the Official Plan, the Zoning By-laws nor the City's Townhouse and Low-Rise Apartment Guidelines.

 

The proposed assembly of nine separate lots and demolition of existing detached dwellings to accommodate the proposal is inappropriate on lands designated Neighbourhoods, particularly in the interior of the neighbourhood on Burnhamthorpe Crescent. The proposed residential built form of stacked back-to-back townhouses and the level of intensification proposed represents overdevelopment of the site. The proposal in its current form does not conform with the Official Plan policies (particularly the Neighbourhoods development criteria Policies and Built Form Policies) and does not respect or reinforce the existing physical character of the established neighbourhood.

 

The proposed pattern of driveways and blocks; size and configuration of lots; dwelling type; height; density; massing; scale; setbacks and landscaping/open space (among other matters) are not consistent with the low scale context of the area. The proposal would destabilize the character of the established neighbourhood and set a negative precedent for future development in the neighbourhood. As such, staff are of the opinion the proposal in its current form does not represent good planning and is not in the public interest.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 20, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District - Request for Direction Report - 26 - 38 Burnhamthorpe Road and 45 - 49 Burnhamthorpe Crescent - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-156054.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (EY17.5a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157124.pdf

Speakers

Valerie Gibson
Mark P. Kemerer, Partner, Devry Smith Frank LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(August 29, 2020) E-mail from Gail Rutherford (EY.New.EY17.5.1)
(August 30, 2020) E-mail from Oliver Herlin (EY.New.EY17.5.2)
(September 3, 2020) Submission from Charles McLeod (EY.New.EY17.5.3)
(September 3, 2020) Submission from Marc Kemerer, Devry Smith Frank LLP (EY.New.EY17.5.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ey/comm/communicationfile-117857.pdf
(September 8, 2020) Letter from Rita Alldrit, Islington Ratepayers & Residents Association (EY.New.EY17.5.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ey/comm/communicationfile-117896.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(September 9, 2020) Letter from Mark Cullen (CC.Main.EY17.5.6)

EY17.14 - Strategy to Maintain Public Walkways in a State of Good Repair

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
1 - Etobicoke North, 2 - Etobicoke Centre, 3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore, 5 - York South - Weston, 7 - Humber River - Black Creek

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:  

                                                                                                               

1.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to report in Q3, 2021, to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee on a framework for a City-wide strategy for the maintenance of public walkways.

Origin

(August 27, 2020) Report from the Director, Operations & Maintenance, Transportation Services

Summary

This report is to provide information on a City multi-divisional strategy to maintain public walkways, throughout the Etobicoke York area and across Toronto, in a state of good repair, including information on how these walkways are inventoried, inspected, and maintained by the Transportation Services Division.

 

While this report is specific to the Etobicoke York area, a comprehensive city-wide strategy to maintain public walkways in state of good repair would need be conducted for all public walkways across the City. As such, this report recommends that Transportation Services bring forward a report to Q3 2021 Infrastructure and Environment Committee on a framework for a city-wide strategy for the maintenance of public walkways.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 27, 2020) Report from the Director, Operations & Maintenance, Transportation Services - Strategy to Maintain Public Walkways in a State of Good Repair
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-156067.pdf

EY17.15 - Exclusive Right-Turn Lane Designation - North Queen Street at The Queensway

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Attention
Bill 739 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council designate the westerly southbound lane on North Queen Street, between The Queensway and a point 30.5 metres north, for southbound right-turns only.

Origin

(August 12, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates bus service on North Queen Street, City Council approval of this report is required. The TTC has been consulted on this matter.

 

The purpose of this report is to designate the westerly southbound lane on North Queen Street, between The Queensway and a point 30.5 metres north, for southbound right-turns only. It is appropriate to install an exclusive southbound right-turn lane based on the existing lane configuration and our observations.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 12, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services regarding Exclusive Right-Turn Lane Designation - North Queen Street at The Queensway
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-156010.pdf

EY17.16 - Traffic Control Signals - Lake Shore Boulevard West and Silver Moon Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the removal of traffic control signals at Lake Shore Boulevard West and a point 350 metres northeast of Park Lawn Road/Marine Parade Drive (formally a private access).

 

2. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at Lake Shore Boulevard West and Silver Moon Drive, in conjunction with the removal of traffic control signals at Lake Shore Boulevard West and a point 350 metres northeast of Park Lawn Road/Marine Parade Drive.

Origin

(August 10, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates streetcar service on Lake Shore Boulevard West, City Council approval of this report is required. The TTC has been consulted on this matter.

 

As per the Humber Bay Shores (HBS) Precinct Plan, the existing traffic control signals located on Lake Shore Boulevard West at a point 350 metres northeast of Park Lawn Road, at the former driveway access to Kraft Canada, are to be relocated southwest to the intersection of Lake Shore Boulevard West and Silver Moon Drive. Funding for the relocation of the traffic control signals has been secured from the developers of the area condominiums, as per the core infrastructure agreement for the HBS Precinct Plan.

 

Transportation Services can support installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Lake Shore Boulevard West and Silver Moon Drive, in conjunction with the removal of the existing traffic control signals located 350 metres northeast of Park Lawn Road, at the former driveway access to Kraft Canada.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 10, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services regarding Traffic Control Signals - Lake Shore Boulevard West and Silver Moon Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-156011.pdf

EY17.18 - Parking Regulation Amendment - Evans Avenue, west of Alan Avenue, in the vicinity of San Remo Terrace

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Attention
Bill 740 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council prohibit parking at all times on the north side of Evans Avenue, between a point 57 metres west of Alan Avenue and a point 33 metres further west.

Origin

(August 10, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates bus service on Evans Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required. The TTC has been consulted on this matter.

 

The purpose of this report is to prohibit parking at all times on the north side of Evans Avenue, between a point 57 metres west of Alan Avenue and a point 33 metres further west, in area of San Remo Terrace (private road.) This is in response to concerns raised by the property management of the townhome complex at San Remo Terrace, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, regarding vehicles parked on the north side of Evans Avenue for excessive periods, which reduces the sightlines for motorists exiting the complex.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 10, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services regarding a Parking Regulation Amendment - Evans Avenue, west of Alan Avenue, in the vicinity of San Remo Terrace
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-156105.pdf

North York Community Council - Meeting 17

NY17.1 - Further Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 665, 667, 669 and 671 Sheppard Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (NY17.1a for information)

Bills 795 and 796 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council delete Parts 1 and 2 of Item NY7.1, titled "Final Report - Zoning Amendment Application - 665, 667, 669 and 671 Sheppard Avenue West" to remove the draft by-laws and replace them with the following:

 

a. City Council amend Zoning By-law 7625, for the lands at 665, 667, 669 and 671 Sheppard Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment, attached as Attachment 1 to the report (August 19, 2020) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District, with the following Sections contained in Attachment 1, amended to read as follows: 

 

AMENITY SPACE

An Apartment Building or Townhouse must provide amenity space at a minimum rate of 4.0 square metres for each dwelling unit, of which at least 2.0 square metres for each dwelling unit is indoor amenity space. Each block does not require its own amenity space.

 

BICYCLE PARKING

A minimum of 44 long term and 5 short term bicycle parking spaces shall be provided.

 

b. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 665, 667, 669 and 671 Sheppard Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment, attached as Attachment 2 to the report (August 19, 2020) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District, with the second last paragraph contained in Clause 4 in Attachment 2, amended to read as follows:

 

An Apartment Building or Townhouse must provide amenity space at a minimum rate of 4.0 square metres for each dwelling unit, of which at least 2.0 square metres for each dwelling unit is indoor amenity space. Each block does not require its own amenity space.

 

2. City Council authorize staff to bring the draft Zoning By-law 569-2013 Amendment, attached as Attachment 2 to the report (August 19, 2020) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District, to bring it into the final correct form.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 10, 2020 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 19, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

A Zoning By-law Amendment application was previously considered by City Council at its meeting on July 16, 2019 (Item NY 7.1). The application proposed 39 five-storey, stacked, back-to-back townhouses, 7 three-storey townhouses and 1 three-storey semi-detached dwelling for a total of 48 units with 50 underground parking spaces at 665, 667, 669 and 671 Sheppard Avenue West.

 

Some revisions to the proposal have been requested by the applicant including converting the stacked townhouse units to apartment units, adding indoor amenity space, an elevator and correcting some technical errors in the previous by-laws. The permitted height (in metres) and GFA are not proposed to change.

 

Given that the final Bills have not yet been passed by City Council, this report recommends approval of the revised draft Zoning By-law Amendments, as shown as Attachments 1 and 2 to this report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. Public notice has been provided in accordance with the Planning Act.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 19, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 665, 667, 669 and 671 Sheppard Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-155977.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (NY17.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157125.pdf

Speakers

Robyn Stebner, The Biglieri Group

Communications (Community Council)

(August 30, 2020) E-mail from Teresa and Ted Glickman (NY.Supp.NY17.1.1)
(September 9, 2020) E-mail from Douglas C. Bower (NY.New.NY17.1.2)

NY17.2 - Final Report - Zoning By-Law Amendment - 340 St. Clements Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (NY17.2a for information)

Bills 778 and 779 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 438-86 for the lands at 340 St. Clements Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (August 20, 2020) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 340 St. Clements Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (August 20, 2020) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

3. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council requested the Director, Community Planning, North York District, to set up a Working Group, in consultation with Councillor Colle's office, to clarify various aspects of this application and address community concerns.  

_____________

 

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 10, 2020 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 20, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend Zoning By-law Nos. 438-86 and 569-2013 to permit the redevelopment of the subject lands for a 4-storey (12.7 metre high) residential townhouse containing 6 residential units resulting in an overall density (Floor Space Index - FSI) of 1.65 times the lot area. The proposed development would include 6 parking spaces in a covered garage. 

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).  The proposal would result in a compact, low-rise residential development located within the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan Area, in close proximity to transit, making efficient use of land and existing infrastructure, including public services and facilities, parks and open spaces and recreation facilities.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend Zoning By-law Nos. 438-86 and 569-2013.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 20, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-13 from the Acting Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Zoning By-Law Amendment for 340 St. Clements Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-156017.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (NY17.2a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157126.pdf

Speakers

Dominik Matusik, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited
Babak Akbari, President, Balder Corporation
Carolynna Gabriel

Communications (Community Council)

(August 17, 2020) E-mail from Dianne Rubinoff (NY.Main.NY17.2.1)
(August 20, 2020) E-mail from Elizabeth Bell (NY.Main.NY17.2.2)
(September 2, 2020) E-mail from Peter Marra (NY.Supp.NY17.2.3)
(September 4, 2020) E-mail from Elizabeth Bell (NY.Supp.NY17.2.4)
(September 8, 2020) E-mail from Elizabeth Bell (NY.Supp.NY17.2.5)
(September 9, 2020) Letter from Maureen Kapral (NY.New.NY17.2.6)
(September 9, 2020) E-mail from Dan Strumpf (NY.New.NY17.2.7)

NY17.14 - Traffic Control Signals - Eglinton Avenue East and Street A, Wynford Drive and Street A

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Don Valley East

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Eglinton Avenue East and the unnamed private north-south street, first east of Don Mills Road and running north from Eglinton Avenue East.

 

2. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Wynford Drive and the unnamed private north-south street first east of Don Mills Road and running north from Eglinton Avenue East.

Origin

(June 22, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates bus service on Eglinton Avenue East and Wynford Drive, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to install traffic control signals at the intersections of Eglinton Avenue East and Street A, and Wynford Drive and Street A. Street A is currently an unnamed private north-south street, 175 metres east of Don Mills Road within the Crosstown development, located on the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Eglinton Avenue East and Don Mills Road.  The proposed traffic signals are included in the subdivision agreement for the development and Street A will be a public street.  Traffic control signals are justified at these intersections based on the anticipated vehicle and pedestrian volumes resulting from the development.

 

The proposed traffic control signals will provide efficient access to and from within the community for all road users and provide protected crossings for pedestrians.  The cost of the signals will be borne by the property owner.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 22, 2020) Report and Attachment 1 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services, North York District - Traffic Control Signals - Eglinton Avenue East and Street A, Wynford Drive and Street A
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-156040.pdf

NY17.15 - Traffic Control Signals - Don Mills Road and Freshmeadow Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Don Valley North

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at Don Mills Road and Freshmeadow Drive.

Origin

(August 13, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Don Mills Road and Freshmeadow Drive, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to install traffic control signals at Don Mills Road and Freshmeadow Drive. Traffic control signals will provide enhanced safety for TTC buses turning left onto Don Mills Road from Freshmeadow Drive. The installation of traffic control signals is also justified based on pedestrian activity in the vicinity of the intersection, including a seniors building and schools, the approximate 560 metre distance between crossing protection, TTC bus stops at the intersection, a five lane cross section on Don Mills Road, the high traffic volume on Don Mills Road and by installing signals we will likely draw pedestrians to cross at the intersection.

 

While traffic controls signals will enhance safety for TTC buses, motorists and pedestrians crossing at the intersection, this installation will increase delays for motorists on Don Mills Road, as north/south traffic will no longer operate with free flow.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 13, 2020) Report and Attachment 1 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Traffic Control Signals - Don Mills Road and Freshmeadow Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-156041.pdf

NY17.17 - Permanent Closure of the Portion of Eglinton Avenue West abutting the south limit of 2296 Eglinton Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence
Attention
Bill 755 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the permanent closure of the portion of Eglinton Avenue West, abutting the south limit of 2296 Eglinton Avenue West, shown as Part 1 on Sketch No. PS-2019-091 and designated as Part 1 on Reference Plan 66R-30983 (the "Highway"), attached to the report dated August 24, 2020, from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services.

 

2. City Council enact the a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report dated August 24, 2020, from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a public meeting on September 10, 2020, in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.  Notice of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was posted on the Public Notice Page of the City's website in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162. 

Origin

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services

Summary

Transportation Services recommends that the portion of the public highway known as Eglinton Avenue West abutting the south limit of 2296 Eglinton Avenue West be permanently closed.  Once closed, lands are to be sold to the abutting property owner for incorporation into a mixed-use development, as adopted by City Council at its meeting on 29 October 2019.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services - Permanent Closure of the Portion of Eglinton Avenue West abutting the south limit of 2296 Eglinton Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-156021.pdf

NY17.23 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 17 Arlstan Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 17 Arlstan Drive.

Origin

(June 29, 2020) Letter from City Council

Summary

City Council on June 29 and 30, 2020, referred Item NY15.4, headed "Application to Remove a Private Tree - 17 Arlstan Drive", back to North York Community Council for further consideration.

________

 

The report (February 20, 2020) from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation recommends that:

 

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 17 Arlstan Drive.

 

The subject tree is a multi-stemmed Norway maple (Acer plantanoides), measuring 45 cm and 51 cm in diameter. The Private Tree By-law does not support the removal of the tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 29, 2020) Referral from City Council - Item NY15.4 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 17 Arlstan Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-156136.pdf
(February 20, 2020) Report and Attachment from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 17 Arlstan Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-156130.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 26, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (NY.Main.NY17.23.1)

NY17.24 - Application to Remove a City-Owned Tree - 143 Plewes Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre

Community Council Recommendations

 North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council grant the request for a permit to remove the City-owned tree at 143 Plewes Road, with a condition that the owner provide:

 

a. Payment of the appraised value of the tree to be removed ($920.00), and agreeing to have the tree removed at their expense.

 

b. Five (5) replacement trees for each tree being removed which can be achieved in a combination of on-site planting and cash-in-lieu of planting.

Origin

(July 28, 2020) Letter from City Council

Summary

City Council on July 28 and 29, 2020, referred Item NY16.13, headed "Application to Remove a City-Owned Tree - 143 Plewes Road" back to North York Community Council for further consideration.

________

 

The report (May 14, 2020) from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation recommends that:

 

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove a City-owned tree located at 143 Plewes Road.

 

The subject tree is a Freeman maple (Acer x freemanii), measuring 21 cm in diameter. The Tree By-law does not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(July 28, 2020) Referral from City Council - Item NY16.3 - Application to Remove a City-Owned Tree - 143 Plewes Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-156134.pdf
(May 14, 2020) Report and Attachment from the Director, Urban Forestry, Park, Forestry and Recreation - Application to Remove a City-Owned Tree - 143 Plewes Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-156132.pdf

Speakers

(July 15, 2020) Michael Rubino
(September 10, 2020) Michael Rubino

Communications (Community Council)

(July 9, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (NY.Main.NY17.24.1)
(July 13, 2020) E-mail from Michael Rubino (NY.Main.NY17.24.2)
(September 9, 2020) E-mail from Michael Rubino (NY.New.NY17.24.3)

NY17.26 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 34 Whittaker Crescent

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Don Valley North
Attention
Communication NY17.26.9 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately-owned tree located at 34 Whittaker Crescent.   

Origin

(March 12, 2020) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 34 Whittaker Crescent. The application indicates the reasons for removal are to address concerns that the tree is overhanging the dwelling, property, and neighbouring driveway.

 

The subject tree is a Norway spruce (Picea abies), measuring 51 cm in diameter. The Private Tree By-law does not support the removal of the tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(March 12, 2020) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on an Application to Remove a Private Tree - 34 Whittaker Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-152194.pdf

Speakers

Annette Smith

Communications (Community Council)

(July 9, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (NY.Main.NY17.26.1)
(July 9, 2020) E-mail from Lynne Stanleigh (NY.Main.NY17.26.2)
(July 12, 2020) E-mail from David Reid (NY.Main.NY17.26.3)
(July 13, 2020) E-mail from Annette Smith and Family (NY.Main.NY17.26.4)
(August 31, 2020) E-mail from Sharon Johnson, Co-Chair, Environmental Committee, Bayview Village Association (NY.Supp.NY17.26.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/ny/comm/communicationfile-117929.pdf
(September 3, 2020) E-mail from David Reid (NY.Supp.NY17.26.6)
(September 9, 2020) E-mail from Annette Smith (NY.Supp.NY17.26.7)
(September 9, 2020) E-mail from Annette Smith (NY.New.NY17.26.8)

Communications (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Annette Smith (CC.New.NY17.26.9)

Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 17

SC17.1 - 3050 Pharmacy Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - Scarborough - Agincourt
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (SC17.1a for information)

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the City of Scarborough L'Amoreaux Community By-law No. 12466, as amended, for the lands at 3050 Pharmacy Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (August 24, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, for the lands at 3050 Pharmacy Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (August 24, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the daft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the Owner to enter into and register on title, an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following facilities, services and matters at the Owners expense:

 

a. The Owner shall design and construct twenty-four (24) purpose built affordable rental dwelling units in the new 16-storey residential building on the lot. The minimum average unit size of the purpose built affordable rental dwelling units shall be at least 78 square metres. The purpose built affordable rental dwelling units shall be provided in contiguous groups of at least 6 dwelling units. The general configuration and layout of the twenty-four (24) purpose built affordable rental dwelling units in the new 16-storey residential building shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

b. The Owner shall provide and maintain the twenty-four (24) purpose built affordable rental dwelling units as rental dwelling units for a minimum of 20 years, beginning with the date each such unit is first occupied.  No affordable rental dwelling unit shall be registered as a condominium or any other form of ownership such as life lease or co-ownership which provide a right to exclusive possession of a dwelling unit, and no application for conversion for non-rental housing purposes, or application to demolish any affordable rental dwelling unit shall be made for at least 20 years from the date of first occupancy.  Upon the expiration of the 20 year period, the Owner shall continue to provide and maintain the purpose built affordable rental dwelling units as rental dwelling units, unless and until such time as the Owner has applied for and obtained all approvals necessary to do otherwise;

 

c. The Owner shall provide and maintain the twenty-four (24) purpose built affordable rental dwelling units at affordable rents for at least 15 years, beginning with the date that each such unit is first occupied. During the first 15 years of occupancy, increases to initial rents charged to tenants occupying any of the affordable rental dwelling units shall be in accordance with the Residential Tenancies Act and shall not exceed the Provincial rent guideline;

 

d. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, the Owner shall provide a $250,000 cash contribution to be directed to improvements to parks facilities in the vicinity of the development, said financial contribution to be indexed upwardly in accordance with Statistics Canada Residential Building or Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index, as the case may be, for the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area, reported by Statistics Canada in the Building Construction Price Indexes Table 18-10-0135-01, or its successor, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment; and

 

e. In the event the cash contribution referred to in Recommendation 4d. above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of the implementing Zoning By-law Amendment coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purposes are identified in Toronto's Official Plan and will benefit the local community.

 

5. City Council direct that the following matters be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

a. The Owner shall continue to provide and maintain the 252 existing rental dwelling units on the lands at 3050 Pharmacy Avenue as rental housing, together with the new and retained associated facilities and amenities of the existing residential rental property, for a period of at least 20 years commencing from the date that the Zoning By-laws come into force and effect, and with no applications for demolition or conversion from residential rental use during such 20 year period, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor;

 

b. The Owner shall provide tenants of the existing rental dwelling units with access to all indoor and outdoor amenities on the lands, at no extra charge and with no pass-through costs to the tenants, including by way of an application to the Ontario Landlord Tenant Board or to any successor tribunal with jurisdiction to hear applications made under the legislation governing residential tenancies in Ontario for the purpose of obtaining an increase in residential rent above the applicable guideline.  Access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident on the subject site;

 

c. The Owner shall undertake improvements to the existing rental apartment building, taking into account tenant responses to the required Tenant Survey related to programming of amenity space, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division or their designate, including, but not limited to, the matters set out in d. and e. below;

 

d. Prior to the first above-grade building permit for any part of the development the Owner shall:

 

1. Upgrade the laundry room in the existing residential rental building, including accessibility improvements such as including push button automatic doors and a clothes folding table which is universally accessible within the laundry room;

 

2. Provide a minimum of 54 short-term bicycle parking spaces near the rear entrance of the Existing Building; and

 

3. Provide new indoor amenity space of 120 square metres within the existing residential rental building which shall include but not be limited to; a fitness room; communal/multi-purpose space which shall include, a kitchen, tables and chairs, and a washroom, with additional programming to be determined through the site plan application review process and secured in a Site Plan Agreement;    

 

e. Prior to first occupancy of any new residential units in the development the Owner shall:

 

1. Provide new outdoor amenity space, to be shared between residents of the existing and new residential rental building(s), having a minimum size of 856 square metres, including new, replaced and improved outdoor amenity space with programming to be determined through the site plan application review process and secured in a Site Plan Agreement;

 

2. Provide new outdoor amenity space of 606 square metres, and 386 square metres of replaced and improved existing outdoor amenity space, which shall include but not be limited to: outdoor seating; community garden; planting and landscape treatments; and, play structure/equipment with additional programming to be determined through the site plan application review process and secured in a Site Plan Agreement;   

 

3. Provide new outdoor amenity areas, to be shared between residents of the existing and new residential rental buildings, having a minimum size of 856 square meetings, with programming to be determined through the site plan application review process and secured in a Site Plan Agreement;

 

4. Improve the existing waste management facilities for the existing rental building, including indoor storage of garbage, recycling and composting, located at the New Residential Building; and

 

5. Ensure aesthetic and other improvements to the existing buildings garbage and recycling facilities be provided;

 

f. The costs of all improvements to the existing residential rental building and associated spaces, both within and outside the building, as described above, shall not be passed on to tenants of the existing building in any form, including by way of an application to the Ontario Landlord Tenant Board or to any successor tribunal with jurisdiction to hear applications made under the legislation governing residential tenancies in Ontario, for the purpose of obtaining an increase in residential rent above the applicable guideline;

 

g. Prior to Site Plan Approval for the development agrees to develop a Construction Mitigation and Tenant Communication Plan to mitigate the impacts of construction on existing tenants, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

h. Provide a minimum of 50 percent of all new units in the proposed 16-storey residential building as 2-bedroom units; and provide a minimum 17 percent of all new units in the proposed 16-storey residential building as 3-bedroom units; and

 

i. The Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee, and as updated by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on December 5, 6 and 7, 2017, through the adoption of item PG23.9 of the Planning and Growth Committee, and as may be further amended by City Council from time to time.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 15, 2020 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 and former City of Scarborough L'Amoreaux Community By-law No. 12466, as amended, to permit the construction of two additional 16-storey residential rental buildings connected by a five-storey base building at 3050 Pharmacy Avenue. 

 

A total of 303 rental units are proposed, adding to the existing 252 rental units on site, with a total of 565 parking spaces in the combined underground parking garage.  The existing 18-storey residential rental building, having a gross floor area of 26,978 square metres will remain largely unchanged. The additional gross floor area proposed is 55,276 square metres, resulting in an overall floor space index (FSI) of 3.25 times the area of the lot. 

 

Of the 303 rental units proposed, 24 are proposed to be secured at affordable rents for a period of 20 years through a registered agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act.  Furthermore, rental tenure and improvements to the existing building have been agreed upon as an arrangement for the sharing of new amenity spaces between existing and new residents. These matters are recommended to be secured as a legal convenience through the Section 37 Agreement.

 

The proposed development is both consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms and does not conflict with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019). The proposal represents an appropriate type and scale of development in a strategic growth area that provides an acceptable transition of built form to adjacent low and medium scale areas while securing additional affordable rental units as part of a complete community.

 

The proposal conforms to the applicable Official Plan policies for lands designated Apartment Neighbourhoods and complies with the direction provided by the City's Tall Building Guidelines. The additional residential infill on the lands is deployed at an appropriate density and built form as provided for by the development criteria for this land use designation.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-14 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 3050 Pharmacy Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156114.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (SC17.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157127.pdf

Speakers

Rafid Kustou (Submission Filed)
Lindsay Dale-Harris, Bousfields Inc. (Submission Filed)
Cynthia MacDougall, McCarthy Tetrault LLP
Yousri Maassarany

Communications (Community Council)

(August 26, 2020) E-mail from Randall Laychuk (SC.New.SC17.1.1)
(August 27, 2020) E-mail from Elizabeth Baars (SC.Main.SC17.1.2)
(August 31, 2020) E-mail from Mingjian Jiang (SC.Main.SC17.1.3)
(September 8, 2020) E-mail from Rafid Kustou (SC.New.SC17.1.4)
(September 8, 2020) E-mail from Renee Munro (SC.New.SC17.1.5)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Carole Mack (SC.New.SC17.1.6)
(September 13, 2020) E-mail from Yu Ling Xu Ai Min Zhang (SC.New.SC17.1.7)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Residential of 45, 55, 65 Huntingdale Boulevard (SC.New.SC17.1.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/sc/comm/communicationfile-118010.pdf
(September 14, 2020) Submission from Lindsay Dale-Harris, Bousfields Inc. (SC.New.SC17.1.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/sc/comm/communicationfile-118027.pdf
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (SC.New.SC17.1.10)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Li Wang (SC.New.SC17.1.11)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from K and M Brownlee (SC.New.SC17.1.12)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Trudy Miller (SC.New.SC17.1.13)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Mingjian Jiang (SC.New.SC17.1.14)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Roger Xie (SC.New.SC17.1.15)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Varsha Asser (SC.New.SC17.1.16)

SC17.2 - 4620 Finch Avenue East - Zoning Amendment - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Scarborough North
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (SC17.2a for information)

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 12797, as amended, for the lands at 4620 Finch Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report dated August 24, 2020 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, for the lands at 4620 Finch Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 7 to the report dated August 24, 2020 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to:

 

a. Submit a revised Site Servicing and Stormwater Management report which demonstrates the watermain has adequate pressure and flows to meet the domestic water and fire flow demand and that sanitary sewers have adequate capacity up to the trunk with the level of flow as per City Standards for the proposed development, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director of Engineering Construction Services; and

 

b. Submit to the Chief Engineer and Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services and Toronto Water for review and acceptance, a revised Foundation Drainage Report and any associated letters related to groundwater discharge to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 15, 2020 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the development of a student residence building at the rear of an existing private school site at 4620 Finch Avenue East.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019). It conforms with relevant provisions of the Toronto Official Plan.

 

The proposed use is provided for on lands designated Institutional Areas and compatible with the adjacent land uses. The development is appropriately integrated with the existing buildings and fits within the area context. It improves the site condition adjacent to the natural feature to the north of the site resulting in no adverse impacts.  The new building will provide additional amenity to the existing private school by providing student study space, improves site circulation and removes a number of vehicle trips from the area road network by housing students on campus.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-13 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 4620 Finch Avenue East - Zoning Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156042.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (SC17.2a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157128.pdf

Speakers

Bruce Hall, The Planning Partnership

Communications (Community Council)

(September 14, 2020) Letter from Bruce Hall, The Planning Partnership (SC.New.SC17.2.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/sc/comm/communicationfile-118102.pdf

SC17.8 - Pedestrian Crossing Protection Review - Military Trail and Bobmar Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council not authorize the installation of traffic control signals at Military Trail and Bobmar Road.

 

2. City Council not authorize the installation of All-way stop control at Military Trail and Bobmar Road.

 

3. City Council authorize the installation of a pedestrian crossover on Military Trail at Bobmar Road, contingent upon and in conjunction with the installation of sidewalk facility on the southwest side of Military Trail.

Origin

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a bus service on Military Trail, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

This report recommends that City Council authorize the installation of a pedestrian crossover at the intersection of Military Trail and Bobmar Road following the installation of a sidewalk on the southwest side of Military Trail, as a minimum, between at least Bobmar Road and Gladys Road. Currently, as Military Trail is designated as a through highway, this intersection has a stop control facing the southbound approach on Military Trail and Bobmar Road.

 

Although, the technical warrants for the installation of a pedestrian crossover are not currently met, the installation of a pedestrian crossover is recommended contingent upon the installation of a sidewalk designed to allow safe accessible movements of pedestrians and those using assistive devices along both sides of Military Trail. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2020) Report and Attachment 1 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Pedestrian Crossing Protection Review - Military Trail and Bobmar Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156061.pdf

SC17.9 - Authorization for Submission of Minor Variance Application - 8861 Sheppard Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council declare, in accordance with subsection 45(1.4) of the Planning Act, that the submission of a minor variance application for the lands known municipally as 8861 Sheppard Avenue East is permitted prior to the expiry of the second anniversary of the day on which City of Toronto By-law 569-2013 was amended for the lands in order to seek relief to site-specific zoning provisions of City of Toronto By-law 385-2019 including the gross floor area and floor space index requirements.

Origin

(September 15, 2020) Letter from Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, Ward 25, Scarborough-Rouge Park

Summary

At its meeting of January 30 and 31 2019, City Council enacted By-law No. 385-2019 for the lands known municipally as 8861 Sheppard Avenue East amending Zoning By-law 569-2013.  An accompanying by-law (384-2019) was enacted at the same time for the same lands to amend zoning by-laws for the former City of Scarborough.  These amending by-laws came into full force and effect on February 26, 2019 and permit the construction of a two-storey place of worship with ancillary parking, proposed via Zoning By-law Amendment applications first submitted in 2013.

 

In reviewing the implementing Site Plan Approval applications, Toronto Buildings has recently identified a zoning non-compliance issue related to the gross floor area (GFA) and floor space index (FSI) of the proposal.  The problem identified by the Zoning Examiner arises from the fact that GFA is defined different by Zoning By-law 569-2013 and the former City of Scarborough By-laws.  The GFA permitted by the site specific Zoning By-laws enacted in January 2020 are identical (343.4 square meters).  But given the definition of gross floor area in Zoning By-law 569-2013 which counts GFA exempted by the Scarborough By-laws, the permitted GFA in site specific by-law 385-2019 is insufficient to implement the development proposed and considered by City Council.  While a technical error, zoning relief to site specific By-law 385-2019 is required for the development to proceed.  The landowner has requested to pursue this relief via Committee of Adjustment.

 

However, the Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 (Bill 73) which came into final effect on July 1, 2016, amended Sub-sections 45(1.3) and 45(1.4) of the Planning Act to prevent the submission of minor variance applications on properties subject to a privately-initiated zoning by-law amendments within two years of by-law enactment, unless the municipal council has otherwise "declared by resolution that such an application is permitted".  As the site specific amendments were enacted in February 2019, unless City Council resolves that an application is permitted, the landowner would not be able to file for a minor variance application for zoning relief until February 26, 2021, thus further delaying site development. 

 

The proposed development is the same as that which City Council considered and approved at its meeting on January 30, and 31, 2019.  The landowner has been pursuing planning approvals since 2013 and would like to move forward in obtaining its final approval and begin construction.  City Planning staff have reviewed the request and have found the unexpected technical issue appropriately resolved through an application for minor variance.  Thus, City Council's authorization at this time for submission of an application to the Committee of Adjustment for relief to Zoning By-law 385-2019 is warranted.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 15, 2020) Letter from Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, Ward 25, Scarborough-Rouge Park - Authorization for Submission of Minor Variance Application - 8861 Sheppard Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156599.pdf

Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 18

TE18.3 - 64-86 Bathurst Street - Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE18.3b for information)

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 64-86 Bathurst Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (August 5, 2020), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District. 

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 64-86 Bathurst Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (August 5, 2020), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District. 

 

3. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4. City Council approve the application for a Rental Housing Demolition Permit in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code to allow for the demolition of 7 existing rental dwelling units located at 64, 66, and 82 Bathurst Street, subject to the following conditions:

 

a. The owner shall provide and maintain 8 replacement rental dwelling units, comprising 4 two-bedroom units and 4 three-bedroom units, on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each such replacement dwelling unit is first occupied and as generally shown on the plans submitted to the City Planning dated February 6, 2020. Any revision to these plans must be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

b. The owner shall provide and maintain at least 2 two-bedroom and 1 three-bedroom replacement rental dwelling units at affordable rents and at least 2 two-bedroom 1 three-bedroom replacement rental dwelling unit at mid-range rents for a period of at least 10 years, beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied. The 2 remaining three-bedroom replacement rental dwelling units will have unrestricted rents;

 

c. The owner shall provide all 8 replacement rental dwelling units with a balcony or terrace;

 

d. The owner shall provide all 8 replacement rental dwelling units with ensuite laundry and central air conditioning;

 

e. The owner shall provide tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units with access to all indoor and outdoor amenities on the site at no extra charge. Access and use of these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other building resident;

 

f. The owner shall provide tenants of replacement rental dwelling units with access to all bicycle parking, car parking, visitor parking and storage lockers on the same terms and conditions as any other building resident;

 

g. The owner shall provide tenant relocation and assistance to all eligible tenants, including the right to return to a replacement rental dwelling unit, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

h. The owner shall enter into and register on title to the subject site one or more agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in recommendations 4.a. - 4.g. above, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, including a Section 111 Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and a Section 37 Agreement pursuant to the Planning Act.

 

5. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to issue Preliminary Approval for the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code for the demolition of the one existing rental dwelling unit at 82 Bathurst Street after all of the following have occurred:

 

a. the Zoning By-law Amendments have been approved by City Council;

 

b. vacant possession of all existing rental dwelling units at 82 Bathurst Street;

 

c. issuance of excavation and shoring permits for the proposed mixed-use building on the site or excavation permits for the purpose of environmental remediation; and

 

d. the owner shall enter into and register on title to the subject site a Section 111 Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendation 4.a. to g. above, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

  

6. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to issue Preliminary Approval for the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code for the demolition of the 6 existing rental dwelling units at 64 and 66 Bathurst Street after all of the following have occurred:

 

a. the satisfaction or securing of the conditions in Recommendation 4 above;

 

b. the site-specific Zoning By-law Amendments have come into full force and effect;

 

c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, or designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006;

 

d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits for the proposed mixed-use building on the subject site;

 

e. vacant possession of all 6 existing rental dwelling units has been confirmed, in writing, by the owner; and

 

f. the execution and registration of a Section 37 Agreement pursuant to the Planning Act, as a matter legal convenience, to secure Recommendation 4.a. to h. above and any other requirements of the Zoning-Bylaw Amendment.

 

7. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 82 Bathurst Street after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 5 above, and authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 64 and 66 Bathurst Street after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 6 above.

 

8. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act no earlier than the issuance of the excavation and shoring permit for the proposed development, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, has issued the Preliminary Approval for 64 and 66 Bathurst Street referred to in Recommendation 6, which may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-6.2, of the Toronto Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a. The owner shall remove all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;

 

b. The owner shall erect solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;

 

c. The owner erects a mixed-use building on site no later than 3 years from the day demolition of the existing buildings at 64 and 66 Bathurst Street is commenced; and

 

d. Should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in Recommendation 8.c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each rental dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

 

9. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

 

a. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, a cash contribution of $265,000 towards the provision of new rental housing units, to be directed to the Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

b. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, a cash contribution of $265,000 towards the Toronto Community Housing revolving capital fund for repairs to Toronto Community Housing properties in Ward 10, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning , in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

c. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, a cash contribution of $1,060,000 towards community services and facilities in the vicinity of the site, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning , in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

d. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, a cash contribution of $1,060,000 towards streetscape and/or public realm improvements in the vicinity of the site, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning , in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

 

e. All cash contributions referred to in Recommendation 9.a.-d. above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of registration of the Section 37 Agreement to the date the payment is made.

 

f. In the event the cash contributions referred to in Recommendation 9.a.-d. above have not been used for the intended purposes within 3 years of the By-laws coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning , in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in Ward 10.

 

g. Submission, and thereafter implementation, of a construction management plan by the owner of 64-86 Bathurst Street to address such matters as wind, noise, dust and street closures during construction. Such plan to be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning , in consultation with the ward Councillor and shall be completed prior to final Site Plan Approval.

 

h. Submission of a lighting plan indicating the location, height and type of lighting and ground level signage on the proposed building. Such plan to be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and to be completed as part of the Site Plan application.

 

10. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the recommendations above, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement. 

 

11. Prior to the issuance of any above grade building permits, City Council require the owner to submit landscape plans to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Supervisor, Tree Protection and Plan Review, Urban Forestry.

 

12. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council, require the applicant to address comments identified in the Engineering and Construction Services memo to City Planning, dated January 6, 2020.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 16, 2020 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 5, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This zoning amendment application proposes a 17-storey mixed-use building with 2,394 square metres of retail space located on the ground level, 5,100 square metres of office space located on levels two and three, and 21,477 square metres (307 units) of rental residential space on the remaining levels. A total of 349 bicycle parking spaces, four loading spaces and 78 vehicle parking spaces are proposed within a three-level underground garage.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).

 

The Rental Housing Demolition Application under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code (Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act) proposes to demolish seven existing rental dwelling units and provide replacement of all seven rental dwelling units within the proposed building.

 

The proposal represents an appropriate redevelopment of the site with a mix of uses, built form and public realm that are compatible with the surrounding context. Since its initial submission, the proposal has been revised to address the City's comments by reducing the height of the building, mitigating the massing impact along Bathurst Street, and internalizing the loading spaces.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment  Application, Rental Housing Demolition Application under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and Residential Demolition Application under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, to demolish seven rental dwelling units, subject to conditions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 5, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-13 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 64-86 Bathurst Street - Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156080.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (TE18.3b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157129.pdf

Speakers

Michael Foderick, McCarthy Tétrault

3a - 64-86 Bathurst Street - Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Supplementary Report

Origin
(September 9, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District
Summary

This Supplementary Report provides a revision to the recommendations in the Final Report from the Director of Community Planning dated August 5, 2020. Staff recommend approval of the Zoning Amendment and the Rental Housing Demolition applications.

 

This report recommends deleting recommendations 5, 6 and 7 and adding four new recommendations (recommendations 5, 6, 7 and 8). This change allows for the demolition of 82 Bathurst Street prior the demolition of the 6 existing rental dwelling units located at 64 and 66 Bathurst Street.

 

The property at 82 Bathurst Street has predominantly been used as a commercial building, however as part of the review of the rental housing demolition application, one existing rental unit was found in the building. The commercial uses at 82 Bathurst Street require the developer to obtain a record of site condition (RSC) prior to allowing new residential uses on the site. There are currently no tenants in the existing rental unit at 82 Bathurst Street.

 

The new recommendations include separate conditions of Preliminary Approval for the demolition of the one existing rental dwelling unit located at 82 Bathurst Street and for the demolition of the six existing rental dwelling units located at 64 and 66 Bathurst Street.

 

Staff are in support of the demolition of the vacant rental dwelling unit at 82 Bathurst Street prior to demolition of the rental dwelling units located at 64-66 Bathurst Street, as it will facilitate the redevelopment of the subject properties and will benefit the tenants currently residing in the rental dwelling units at 64-66 Bathurst Street. The tenants currently residing at 64 and 66 Bathurst Street will continue to reside in their units, will not be required to vacate prematurely due to the demolition of 82 Bathurst Street, and will benefit from a shorter construction timeline by having the opportunity to return to a replacement rental dwelling unit within the new mixed-use building in a more timely manner. Staff recommend approval of the Zoning Amendment application and the corresponding Rental Housing Demolition application, as provided in the revised recommendations. 

Background Information (Community Council)
(September 9, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 64-86 Bathurst Street - Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition Applications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156565.pdf

TE18.4 - 125 The Esplanade - City Initiated Rezoning, Extension of Temporary Use By-law - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE18.4a for information)

Bill 759 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 125 The Esplanade substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 4 to the report (August 21, 2020), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District. 

 

2.  City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 125 The Esplanade substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 4 to the report (August 21, 2020), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 16, 2020 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 21, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to extend permission for an existing one-storey structure located at 125 The Esplanade for the continued temporary relocation of the North St. Lawrence Market.  The structure is usually used on weekends for a farmer's market and antique market.  The proposed extension will allow the temporary North Market to continue operations up until 2023, by which time the new North Market building at 92 Front Street East, which is currently under construction, is expected to be complete.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).

 

This report reviews and recommends the extension of the Temporary Use Zoning By-law for an additional 3 years.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 21, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 125 The Esplanade - City Initiated Rezoning, Extension of Temporary Use By-law - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156085.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (TE18.4a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157130.pdf

TE18.5 - 117-119 St. George Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE18.5a for information) See also Item TE18.8

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 117-119 St. George Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (August 14, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to:

 

a. Provide a revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report to demonstrate whether the existing municipal infrastructure is adequate to service the proposed development and to determine whether any upgrades may be required to the existing infrastructure to support the proposed development, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and

 

b. Secure the design and provision of financial securities for any improvements to the municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required to support this development.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 16, 2020 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to permit a six-storey addition with an overall height of approximately 33 metres and a gross floor area of approximately 3,767 square metres of new institutional floor area at the southeast portion of the existing Woodsworth College institutional complex, resulting in an overall gross floor area of 6,957 square metres across the site at 117-119 St. George Street.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020), conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019) and conforms with the Official Plan.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. The application proposes a compact built form addition on a site that is appropriate for further intensification, within a built-up area, that would take advantage of existing infrastructure, conserve heritage resources, provide new institutional uses, and contribute to the vitality of the campus and surrounding area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-13 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 117-119 St. George Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156094.pdf
(September 4, 2020) Attachment 6: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to Amend By-law 438-86
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156342.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (TE18.5a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157131.pdf

Speakers

Mike Dror, Bousfields Inc.

TE18.6 - 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE18.6b for information)

Communication TE18.6.4 has been submitted on this Item.

See also Item TE18.9

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 33 Sherbourne Street, 176 and 178 Front Street East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 9 to the report (August 24, 2020), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, for the lands at 33 Sherbourne Street, 176 and 178 Front Street East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 10 to the report (August 24, 2020), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4. Before introducing the Bills for the Zoning By-law Amendments to City Council for enactment, the owner shall complete the following in relation to heritage matters:

 

a. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 33 Sherbourne Street and 178 Front Street East (including 176 Front Street East) in accordance with the plans and drawings September 3, 2019 and revised June 2, 2020 prepared by Giannone Petricone Associates Inc. Architects on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by GBCA Architects dated March 4, 2019 and revised February 21, 2020 and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 4.c. below to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;

 

b. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out  in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 33 Sherbourne Street and 178 Front Street East (including 176 Front Street East) prepared by GBCA Architects dated March 4, 2019 and revised February 21, 2020 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning; and

 

c. Enter into and register on the property at 33 Sherbourne Street and 178 Front Street East (including 176 Front Street East) one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations.

 

5. Before introducing the Bills for the Zoning By-law Amendments to City Council for enactment, the owner shall enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

 

a. The owner shall provide community benefits having a value of $3,500,000 to be allocated to the following:

 

i. A cash contribution of $1,750,000 towards capital improvements in Toronto Community Housing buildings and/or existing affordable housing units within proximity of the subject site in the Ward, in consultation with the Ward Councillor; and

 

ii. A cash contribution of $1,750,000 towards local streetscape, parkland and/or community facilities within proximity of the subject site in the Ward, in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

 

b. The payment amount identified in Recommendation 5.a. above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto Census Metropolitan area, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Building Construction Price Indexes Table: 18-10-0135-01, or its successor, calculated from the date of the Section 37 agreement to the date of payment;

 

c. In the event the cash contributions referred to Recommendation 5.a. has not been used for the intended purposes within three (3) years of the By-laws coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in Ward 13; and

 

d. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i. The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 16, 27, 2009 through the adoption of item PG 32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee, and as updated by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on December 5,6, 7, 2017 thorugh the adoption of item PG 23.9 of the Planning and Growth Committee, and as may be further amended by City Council from time to time;

 

ii. That prior to final site plan approval the owner shall:

 

A. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 4. b. above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning;

 

B. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect;

 

C. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning;

 

D. Provide a detailed landscape plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning;

 

E. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning;

 

F. Submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and

 

G. Enter into necessary agreements and pay all costs associated with the  Front Street East boulevard widening between Sherbourne Street and Princess Street;

  

iii. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property 33 Sherbourne Street and 178 Front Street East (including 176 Front Street East), including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning the owner shall:

 

A. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect;

 

B. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 4. b. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning; and

 

C. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan and Heritage Interpretation Plan; and

 

iv. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 5. d. iii. C. above, the owner shall:

 

A. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning;

 

B. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning; and

 

C. Have received City Council authority to enter into a heritage easement agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 33 Sherbourne Street and 178 Front Street East (including 176 Front Street East) in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

6. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services initiate a study to improve existing pedestrian boulevards on Front Street East between George Street to Parliament Street to be completed and to report back with recommendations to City Council by the third quarter of 2021, with the implementation of the improvements as identified through the study to be paid and constructed by development applications.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 16, 2020 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to permit a 38-storey mixed-use building with an overall height of 129.4 metres and 29,925 square metres of gross floor area consisting of 439 residential units and 1,383 square metres of retail uses. The existing 2-storey buildings at 33 Sherbourne Street and178 Front Street East are proposed to be designated under the Ontario Heritage Act and incorporated as part of the proposal.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-15 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156086.pdf
Attachment 9: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment 438-86
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156603.pdf
Attachment 10: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment 569-2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156620.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (TE18.6b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157132.pdf

Speakers

Adam Brown
Ralph Giannone
Emad Ghattas

Communications (Community Council)

(September 8, 2020) E-mail from N. Davis (TE.Supp.TE18.6.1)
(September 14, 2020) Presentation from Emad Ghattas, GBCA Architects (TE.New.TE18.6.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-118029.pdf
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Emelia Horn (TE.New.TE18.6.3)

Communications (City Council)

(September 18, 2020) E-mail from Marwen Tebib (CC.Main.TE18.6.4)

6a - 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Supplementary Report

Origin
(September 14, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District Ward 13 - Toronto Centre
Summary

The purpose of the report is to revise the recommendations of the Section 37 community benefits package in conjunction with the recommendations to approve the 38-storey mixed use building in the Final Report dated August 24, 2020.

Background Information (Community Council)
(September 14, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156604.pdf

TE18.7 - 90 - 104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street - Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE18.7a with recommendations)

See also Item TE18.10

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council submits the item to City Council without recommendation.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 16, 2020 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 34 storey mixed use

development including commercial uses, an on-site community facility and 364 dwelling units with a total gross floor area of 23,345 square metres at 90-104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street.  The proposed building would have a height of 107.15 metres including the mechanical penthouse. The proposal includes three levels of underground parking.

 

This Rental Housing Demolition Application proposes to demolish an existing residential rental property containing a total of 10 dwelling units (five rental dwelling units and five owner occupied dwelling units) located at 90-104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street. The applicant has not proposed to replace the demolished units within the proposed development, however the owner will be required to provide for tenant relocation assistance as a condition of demolition approval.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with the A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019) and conforms to the City's Official Plan.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. This report also recommends approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Application under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions. The proposed development has been designed in the form of a mixed use development that generally conforms with the guidelines and importantly addresses both on-site heritage resources and shadowing issues.  The provision of both an on-site community facility and a range of dwelling unit types will help address both community service and housing issues. Staff recommend that Council support approval of the zoning by-law amendment application

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-12 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 90 - 104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street - Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156083.pdf
(September 4, 2020) Attachment 5: Draft 438-86 Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156373.pdf
(September 4, 2020) Attachment 6: Draft 569-2013 Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156341.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 28, 2020) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 90-104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street - Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition Applications (TE18.7a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157062.pdf

Speakers

David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(September 16, 2020) E-mail from Ben Martin (TE.New.TE18.7.1)

TE18.8 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - 117 St. George Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale
Attention
See also Item TE18.5

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 117 St George Street (including an entrance address at 119 St George Street) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 117 St George Street (Reasons for Designation) (Attachment 4) attached to the report (August 7, 2020), from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, City Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

2. If there are no objections to the designation, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3. If there are objections to the designation, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designations to the Conservation Review Board.

 

4. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

 

5. City Council authorize the entering into Heritage Easement Agreement(s) under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 117 St George Street in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into Heritage Easement Agreement(s) for the property at 117 St George Street.

 

7. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 117 St George Street in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for alterations to the heritage property on the lands known municipally as 117 St George Street, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by Kongats Architects, dated September 18, 2019, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), dated September 18, 2019, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a. That the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations has been enacted by City Council and has come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

b. That prior to the introduction of the bills for such Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall:

 

1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 117 St George Street, substantially in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by Kongats Architects, dated September 18, 2019, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), dated September 18, 2019, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., subject to and in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 7.b.2 below, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 117 St George Street, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated September 18, 2019, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

c. That prior to final Site Plan approval, for the development contemplated for 117 St George Street, the owner shall:

 

1. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 7.b.2 above, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

2. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.

 

3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance their heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

4. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject properties, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

5. Provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

d. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 117 St George Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning the owner shall:

 

1. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.

 

2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 7.b.2 above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, and approved Interpretation Plan.

 

4. Provide full documentation of the existing heritage property at 117 St George Street, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

e. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 7.d.3 above, the owner shall:

 

1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

Origin

(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

Woodsworth College at 117 St George Street (including the entrance address at 119 St George Street) is located on the east side of St George Street between Bloor Street West and Hoskin Avenue. It contains a collection of one-, two- and three-storey institutional buildings owned by the University of Toronto, including the Alexander McArthur House, Kruger Hall (former Drill Hall), the former Canadian Officers Training Corps ("COTC"), the Margaret Fletcher House, an L-shaped addition (constructed in 1992 by KPMB and Barton Myers Associates Inc.), and the Peter F. Bronfman Courtyard. The property was identified as a "character-defining resource" in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the University of Toronto Secondary Plan.

 

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate 117 St George Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. This report also recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations for the heritage property at 117 St George Street, in connection with a Zoning Bylaw Amendment Application proposing a 6 storey redevelopment of the site that will contain classrooms, student event spaces, a library and office uses and give authority to enter into Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject property.

 

The conservation strategy for the heritage properties entirely retains the Alexander McArthur House, the west elevation of the Canadian Officers Training Corps ("COTC") addition, as well all courtyard facing elevations of the 1992 KPMB and Barton Myers addition, while removing the significantly altered Kruger Hall and the Margaret Fletcher House to accommodate construction of a new academic building. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 7, 2020) Report and Attachment 1-5 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - 117 St George Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156005.pdf

Speakers

Thomas Payne, Principal, Thomas Payne Architect Inc.
Mike Dror
Evan Manning, Project Manager M.Pl., ERA Architects

Communications (Community Council)

(September 8, 2020) E-mail from Thomas Payne, Principal, Thomas Payne Architects Inc. (TE.Supp.TE18.8.1)
(September 9, 2020) Submission from Thomas Payne, Principal, Thomas Payne Architects Inc. (TE.Supp.TE16.8.2)

8a - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - 117 St George Street

Origin
(August 27, 2020) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

Board Reccomendations
The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the Toronto and East York Community  Council that:

 

1. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 117 St George Street (including an entrance address at 119 St George Street) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 117 St George Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 4 to the report (August 7, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


2. If there are no objections to the designation, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.


3. If there are objections to the designation, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designations to the Conservation Review Board.


4. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.


5. City Council authorize the entering into Heritage Easement Agreement(s) under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 117 St George Street in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.


6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into Heritage Easement Agreement(s) for the property at 117 St George Street.


7. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 117 St George Street in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for alterations to the heritage property on the lands known municipally as 117 St George Street, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by Kongats Architects, dated September 18, 2019, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design,  City Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), dated September 18, 2019, prepared  by ERA Architects Inc., and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban  Design, City Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory  to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, and subject to the  following additional conditions:

 

a. That the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations has been enacted by City Council and has come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


b. That prior to the introduction of the bills for such Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall:


1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 117 St George Street, substantially in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by Kongats Architects, dated September 18, 2019, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), dated September 18, 2019, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., subject to and in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 7.b.2. below, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.


2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 117 St George Street, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated September 18, 2019, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


c. That prior to final Site Plan approval, for the development contemplated for 117 St George Street, the owner shall:


1. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 7.b.2. above, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


2. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.


3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance their heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


4. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject properties, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

5. Provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

d. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 117 St George Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the owner shall:


1. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.


2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 7.b.2. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, and approved Interpretation Plan.


4. Provide full documentation of the existing heritage property at 117 St George Street, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


e. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 7.d.3. above, the owner shall:


1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

Decision Advice and Other Information

Loryssa Quattrociocchi, Heritage Assistant Planner, and Dan Dibartolo, Heritage Senior  Planner, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning gave a presentation on -  Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to  Designated Heritage Properties and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - 117 St George Street.

 

Origin
(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City  Planning


Summary
Woodsworth College at 117 St George Street (including the entrance address at 119 St George  Street) is located on the east side of St George Street between Bloor Street West and Hoskin  Avenue. It contains a collection of one-, two- and three-storey institutional buildings owned by  the University of Toronto, including the Alexander McArthur House, Kruger Hall (former  Drill Hall), the former Canadian Officers Training Corps ("COTC"), the Margaret Fletcher  House, an L-shaped addition (constructed in 1992 by KPMB and Barton Myers Associates  Inc.), and the Peter F. Bronfman Courtyard. The property was identified as a "character-defining resource" in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the University of Toronto Secondary  Plan.


This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate 117 St George Street  under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. This report also recommends that City  Council approve the proposed alterations for the heritage property at 117 St George Street, in  connection with a Zoning Bylaw Amendment Application proposing a 6 storey redevelopment  of the site that will contain classrooms, student event spaces, a library and office uses and give  authority to enter into Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject property.


The conservation strategy for the heritage properties entirely retains the Alexander McArthur  House, the west elevation of the Canadian Officers Training Corps ("COTC") addition, as well  all courtyard facing elevations of the 1992 KPMB and Barton Myers addition, while removing  the significantly altered Kruger Hall and the Margaret Fletcher House to accommodate  construction of a new academic building.


Background Information
(August 7, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning,  Urban Design, City Planning - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario  Heritage Act, Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties and Authority to Enter into  Heritage Easement Agreements - 117 St George Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-155614.pdf)

 

(August 26, 2020) Presentation from the Heritage Planner, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario  Heritage Act, Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties and Authority to Enter into  Heritage Easement Agreements - 117 St George Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-156113.pdf)

 

Communications
(August 26, 2020) Submission from Thomas Payne, Thomas Payne Architects
 Inc. (PB.Supp.PB16.9.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/comm/communicationfile-117801.pdf)

 

Speakers

Graeme  Stewart, Principal Planner, ERA Architects Inc.

Background Information (Community Council)
(August 27, 2020) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156278.pdf

TE18.9 - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to Heritage Properties and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
See also Item TE18.6

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council include the properties at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register.

 

2. City Council state its intention to designate the properties at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 4 to the report (August 7, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

3. If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

4. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

5.  If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

 

6.  City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a new mixed use building incorporating the heritage buildings on the lands known municipally in the year 2020 as 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated September 3, 2019 and revised June 2, 2020 prepared by Giannone Petricone Associates Inc. Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning; and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by GBCA Architects dated March 4, 2019 and revised February 21, 2020, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a. That the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations has been enacted by City Council and has come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning;

 

b. That prior to the introduction of the bills for such Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall:

 

1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street in accordance with the plans and drawings September 3, 2019 and revised June 2, 2020 prepared by Giannone Petricone Associates Inc. Architects on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by GBCA Architects dated March 4, 2019 and revised February 21, 2020 and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.b.2. below, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street prepared by GBCA Architects dated March 4, 2019 and revised February 21, 2020 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

3. Enter into and register on the property at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations and securing such matters generally as set forth in these Recommendations.

 

c. That prior to final Site Plan approval for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, for the property located at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street the owner shall:

 

1. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.b.2. above, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

2. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.

 

3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning..

 

4. Provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

5. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

6. Submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

d. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the owner shall:

 

1. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.

 

2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.b.2. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan and Heritage Interpretation Plan.

 

4. Provide full documentation of the existing heritage property, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

e. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 6.d.3. above, the owner shall:

 

1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

7. City Council authorize the entering into of a heritage easement agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into a heritage easement agreement for the property at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street.

Origin

(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve alterations proposed for the heritage properties located at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street in connection with a redevelopment of the subject properties, that Council state its intention to designate the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject properties.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 7, 2020) Report and Attachment 1-6 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to Heritage Properties and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156161.pdf

Speakers

Emad Ghattas, GBCA Architects
Adam Brown

Communications (Community Council)

(September 14, 2020) Presentation from Emad Ghattis, GBCA Architects (TE.New.TE18.9.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-118030.pdf

9a - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to Heritage Properties and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street

Origin
(August 27, 2020) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

Board Recommendations
The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the Toronto and East York Community  Council that:

 

1. City Council include the properties at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register.


2. City Council state its intention to designate the properties at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 4 to the report (August 7, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


3. If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.


4. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.


5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.


6. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a new mixed use building incorporating the heritage buildings on the lands known municipally in the year 2020 as 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated September 3, 2019 and revised June 2, 2020 prepared by Giannone Petricone Associates Inc.  Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City  Planning, and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by GBCA Architects dated  March 4, 2019 and revised February 21, 2020, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage  Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation  Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and  subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a. That the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations has been enacted by City Council and has come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning;


b. That prior to the introduction of the bills for such Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall:


1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street in accordance with the plans and drawings September 3, 2019 and revised June 2, 2020 prepared by Giannone Petricone Associates Inc. Architects on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by GBCA Architects dated March 4, 2019 and revised February 21, 2020 and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.b.2. below, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.


2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street prepared by GBCA Architects dated March 4, 2019 and revised February 21, 2020 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


3. Enter into and register on the property at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations and securing such matters generally as set forth in these Recommendations.


b. That prior to final Site Plan approval for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, for the property located at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street the owner shall:


1. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.b.2. above, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


2. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.


3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the  satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning  and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager,  Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

4. Provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


5. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


6. Submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

c. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the owner shall:


1. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.


2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.b.2. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan and Heritage Interpretation Plan.


4. Provide full documentation of the existing heritage property, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


d. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 6.c.3. above, the owner shall:


1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

7. City Council authorize the entering into of a heritage easement agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.


8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into a heritage easement agreement for the property at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street.

 

Decision Advice and Other Information
Alex Corey, Senior Planner, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning and Paul  Maka, Senior Planner, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning gave a presentation  on - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, Intention to Designate under Part IV,  Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to Heritage Properties and Authority to  Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne  Street.


Origin
(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City

 

Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve alterations proposed for the heritage  properties located at 176-178 Front Street East and 33 Sherbourne Street in connection with a  redevelopment of the subject properties, that Council state its intention to designate the  properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and that Council grant  authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject properties.


Background Information
(August 7, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning,  Urban Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, Intention  to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to Heritage  Properties and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 176-178 Front Street  East and 33 Sherbourne Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-155554.pdf)
(August 26, 2020) Presentation from the Heritage Planner, Heritage Preservation, Urban  Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, Intention to  Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to Heritage  Properties and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 176-178 Front Street  East and 33 Sherbourne Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-156112.pdf)

 

Communications
(August 25, 2020) Submission from Emad Ghattas (PB.Supp.PB16.8.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/comm/communicationfile-117797.pdf)

 

Speakers
Emad Ghattas

Background Information (Community Council)
(August 27, 2020) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156280.pdf

TE18.10 - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to a Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 3 Mutual Street, 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
See also Item TE18.7

Bill 803 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council submits the item to City Council without recommendation.

Origin

(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council include the properties at 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, state its Intention to Designate the properties at 3 Mutual Street, 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, approve the alterations to the heritage properties located within the proposed development site at 90-104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject properties.

 

The proposed development comprises a three-storey podium and 34-storey tower for mixed-use development with residential and commercial space. The proposal entails demolition of 90, 92 and 94 Queen Street East and the partial retention of 3 Mutual Street and 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East. At 3 Mutual Street, the west elevation and north elevation will be retained to a depth of 9.3 metres, with the south return wall partially reconstructed to retain the three dimensional character of the building. The south elevations of 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East will be retained in situ, and the east and west return walls of 98 Queen Street East (the Bigley Building) will be partially reconstructed.

This report recommends that City Council include the properties at 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, state its Intention to Designate the properties at 3 Mutual Street, 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, approve the alterations to the heritage properties located within the proposed development site at 90-104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject properties.

 

The proposed development comprises a three-storey podium and 34-storey tower for mixed-use development with residential and commercial space. The proposal entails demolition of 90, 92 and 94 Queen Street East and the partial retention of 3 Mutual Street and 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East. At 3 Mutual Street, the west elevation and north elevation will be retained to a depth of 9.3 metres, with the south return wall partially reconstructed to retain the three dimensional character of the building. The south elevations of 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East will be retained in situ, and the east and west return walls of 98 Queen Street East (the Bigley Building) will be partially reconstructed.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 7, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-9 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to a Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 3 Mutual Street, 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156097.pdf

10a - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to a Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 3 Mutual Street, 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East

Origin
(August 27, 2020) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

Board Decision
The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the Toronto and East York Community  Council that:

 

1. City Council include the properties at 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register.


2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 98 Queen Street East under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 6 to the report (August 7, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning.


3. City Council state its intention to designate the properties at 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 7 to the report (August 7, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning.


4. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 3 Mutual Street East under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 8 to the report (August 7, 2020) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning.


5. If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.


6. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designations to the Conservation Review Board.


7. If the designations are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize  the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review  Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

 

8. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage properties in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a 34-storey tower on the lands known municipally as 90-104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated February 14, 2020, prepared by IBI Group  Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager,Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated July 23, 2019, with supplemental material December 18, 2019, February 14, 2020 and March 5, 2020 all on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a. That the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations have been enacted by the City Council and have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning.


b. That prior to the introduction of the bills for such Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall:


1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 3 Mutual Street, 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East in accordance with plans and drawings dated February 14, 2020, prepared by IBI Group  Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated July 23, 2019, with supplemental material December 18, 2019, February 14, 2020 and March 5, 2020 and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 8.b.2. below to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated July 23, 2019, with supplemental material December 18, 2019, February 14, 2020 and March 5, 2020 all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning.


3. Enter into and register on the property at 90-104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations.

 

c. That prior to final Site Plan approval for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council for the property located at 90-104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street, the owner shall:


1. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved  Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 8.b.2. above to the satisfaction of the  Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

2. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.


3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning.


4. Submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning.


5. Provide a comprehensive, publically accessible Interpretation Plan that conveys the early development history of the subject properties with a focus on the life and work of Richard Bigley, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

d. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of 90-104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage properties as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning, the owner shall:

 

1. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures, keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 8.b.2. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning.


2. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and approved Interpretation Plan.


3. Provide full documentation of all buildings and structures on 90-104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

e. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 8.d.2. above, the owner shall:

 

1. Provide a letter of substantial completion, prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant, confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and  Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been  maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation,  Urban Design, City Planning.

 

2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

9. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the properties at 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street, in a form and with content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.


10. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the properties at 3 Mutual Street, 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East.

 

Decision Advice and Other Information
Liz McFarland, Heritage Planner and Guy Zimmerman, Heritage Planner, Heritage  Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning gave a presentation on - Inclusion on the City of  Toronto's Heritage Register, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario  Heritage Act, Alterations to a Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage  Easement Agreement - 3 Mutual Street, 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East.


Origin
(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City  Planning


Summary
This report recommends that City Council include the properties at 100, 102 and 104 Queen  Street East on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, state its Intention to Designate the  properties at 3 Mutual Street, 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East under Part IV, Section  29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, approve the alterations to the heritage properties located within  the proposed development site at 90-104 Queen Street East and 3 Mutual Street, and that  Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject properties.


The proposed development comprises a three-storey podium and 34-storey tower for mixed-use  development with residential and commercial space. The proposal entails demolition of 90, 92  and 94 Queen Street East and the partial retention of 3 Mutual Street and 98, 100, 102 and 104  Queen Street East. At 3 Mutual Street, the west elevation and north elevation will be retained  to a depth of 9.3 metres, with the south return wall partially reconstructed to retain the three  dimensional character of the building. The south elevations of 98, 100, 102 and 104 Queen  Street East will be retained in situ, and the east and west return walls of 98 Queen Street East  (the Bigley Building) will be partially reconstructed.


Background Information
(August 7, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-9 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning,  Urban Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, Intention  to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to a Heritage  Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 3 Mutual Street, 98,  100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-155594.pdf)
(August 26, 2020) Presentation from the Heritage Planner, Heritage Preservation, Urban

Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, Intention to  Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Alterations to a Heritage  Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 3 Mutual Street, 98,  100, 102 and 104 Queen Street East
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-156111.pdf)

 

Communications
(August 26, 2020) Submission from Evan Manning, Project Manager, ERA Architects  Inc. (PB.Supp.PB16.7.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/comm/communicationfile-117800.pdf)

 

Speakers
Michael McClelland, Principal, ERA Architects Inc.

Background Information (Community Council)
(August 27, 2020) Letter from the Toronto Preseravation Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156284.pdf

TE18.11 - 1 Front Street West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE18.11a for information)

See also Item TE18.13

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal in support of the revised proposal prepared by architectsAlliance dated April 23, 2020 for the requested Zoning By-law Amendments for the lands municipally known as 1 Front Street West, as described in the report (August 24, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and subject to Recommendations 2 to 8 below.

 

2. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal in support of the application to amend the Official Plan for 1 Front Street West, generally as described in Attachment 8 to the report (August 24, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and subject to technical and stylistic changes by the City Solicitor as required.

 

3. City Council authorize and direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor to prepare the form of Zoning By-law Amendments to Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, and Zoning By-law 569-2013 that reflect and implement the revised proposal and the requirements set out in City Council's decision, including the matters to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement with such modification as may be required to implement the revised proposal as described in the report (August 24, 2020), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

4. City Council authorize City Planning staff to close the city-initiated Zoning By-law Amendment application on the site at 1 Front Street West, file no. 17 125756 STE 28 OZ, after the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal issues the Final Order for the Zoning By-law amendment appeal based on the revised proposal as set out in the report (August 24, 2020), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

5. City Council require the owner to enter into an agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

 

a. That prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for the lands, the owner shall pay to the City a cash contribution of $4,600,000 dollars to be allocated as follows:

 

i. $460,000 for the provision of affordable housing in Ward 10;

 

ii. $460,000 for capital repairs to the existing Toronto Community Housing buildings in Ward 10; and

 

iii. $3,680,000 towards any combination of the following, at the discretion, and to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor:

 

A. Local parkland improvements and/or public realm improvements in Ward 10; and

 

B. Community services and facilities in Ward 10;

 

b. The payment amount identified in Recommendation 5.a. above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto Census Metropolitan area, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Building Construction Price Indexes Table: 18-10-0135-01, or its successor, calculated from the date of the Section 37 agreement to the date of payment; and

 

c. In the event the cash contribution referred to in Recommendation 5.a. above has not been used for the determined purpose within three years of the amending Zoning By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided the purpose is identified in Official Plan Policy 5.1.1 and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.

 

6. City Council also direct that the following be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience as matters required to support development, in consultation with the Ward Councillor:

 

a. The owner shall, as part of a site plan process, submit a Pedestrian Wind Level Study acceptable and satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and securing such mitigation matters through the Site Plan Approval process arising from the accepted studies or reports;

 

b. The owner shall, as part of a site plan process, submit a Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study acceptable and satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and securing such mitigation matters through the Site Plan Approval process arising from the accepted studies or reports;

 

c. A construction management plan with such terms and conditions as may be required prior to Site Plan approval, satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

d. The privately-owned publicly accessible space (POPS) of not be less than 1,000 square metres at the southern portion of the property between Bay Street and Yonge Street, as generally shown on the architectural plans by architectsAlliance dated April 23, 2020 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. Prior to the issuance of Site Plan Approval, the owner shall convey to the City, for nominal consideration, easement(s) along the surface of the lands, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, which shall constitute the POPS and any required public access easements to connect the POPS to adjacent POPS and/or public rights-of-way, where necessary.  The owner shall own, operate, maintain and repair the POPS and install and maintain a sign, at its own expense, stating that members of the public shall be entitled to use the POPS at all times of the day and night, 365 days of the year; and the specific location, configuration and design of the POPS shall be determined in the context of a site plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and secured in a Site Plan Agreement with the City;

 

e. The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 16, 27, 2009 through the adoption of item PG 32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee, and as updated by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on December 5,6, 7, 2017 thorugh the adoption of item PG 23.9 of the Planning and Growth Committee, and as may be further amended by City Council from time to time; and

 

f. The provision of a knock out panel, or panels, for a potential future PATH connection as part of site plan approval.

 

7.  City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request that Local Planning Appeal Ttribunal withhold issuance of its Order until such time as the Local Planning Appeal Ttribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that:

 

a.  The proposed Official Plan Amendment(s) are in a content and form satisfactory to the City Solicitor and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

b.  The proposed Zoning By-law Amendments are in a form satisfactory to the City, including appropriate Section 37 provisions in Recommendations 5 and 6 above, satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor;

 

c.  A Section 37 Agreement satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, has been executed and registered on title to the Site to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, securing the benefits and matters of required to support the development outlined in the Recommendations;

 

d.  The owner has, at its sole expense:

 

i.  Submitted a revised Functional Servicing Report, including confirmation of water and fire flow, sanitary and storm water capacity, Stormwater Management Report and Hydrogeological Report (the "Engineering Reports") to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Water;

 

ii.  Secured the design and the provision of financial securities for any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure and/or new municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Engineering Reports to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements or upgrades and/or new infrastructure are required to support the development; and

 

e. The owner has submitted a revised Arborist Report, Tree Protection and Preservation Plan, and revised conceptual landscape plan addressing the City-owned trees along Front Street in a manner satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the owner addresses such requirements as may be required regarding City-owned trees under Chapter 813 of the Municipal Code;

 

f. The owner has entered into a heritage easement agreement pursuant to section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and such agreement registered on title to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;

 

g. The owner has entered into a Limiting Distance Agreement between the landowners of 1 Front Street West, 141 Bay Street and the City, to be registered on title to the 141 Bay Street property, to the satisfaction to the City Solicitor, that would prevent the erection of a tall building over a portion of the property at 141 Bay Street lot to achieve a minimum of 12.5 metres from the East Tower, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.

 

8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the recommendations above.

Origin

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This revised Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment  proposes two tall buildings of 45 an 49 storeys (156.9 metres and 168.7 metres respectively) on top of the 5-storey heritage designated Dominion Public Building which is proposed to be altered. The proposal contains a total of 89,385.8 square metres of gross area consisting of 36,164.4 square metres of office; 16,283.6 square metres for a hotel; 5,082 square metres of retail; and 31,604.9 square metres of residential resulting in 408 dwelling units. A three level underground garage is proposed to accommodate 195 vehicular parking spaces.

 

The applications for Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments were refused by City Council on May 14, 2019, with directions to use mediation, conciliation or other dispute resolution techniques in the event that the applications are appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT"). The applicant subsequently appealed the decision to the LPAT. The case management conference took place on January 23, 2020 and a teleconference status hearing took place on May 22, 2020. A third case management conference is scheduled for October 5, 2020.

 

The revised proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019), and the City's Official Plan.

 

This report provide details of the revised proposal and seeks Council's support of the revised applications to amend the Official Plan and the Zoning By-laws. This report also provides a recommendation to close the city-initiated Zoning By-law amendment application on the site.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-13 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 1 Front Street West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Request for Directions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156073.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (TE18.11a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157133.pdf

Speakers

Peter Smith
Cynthia MacDougall

Communications (Community Council)

(September 15, 2020) Letter from Cynthia A. MacDougall (TE.New.TE18.11.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-118263.pdf

TE18.12 - 465-471 Richmond Street West and 38 Camden Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE18.12a for information)

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff, to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to oppose the applicant’s appeal respecting the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 465-471 Richmond Street West and 38 Camden Street (File No. 19 182800 STE 10 OZ) in its current form for the reasons set out in the report (August 17, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to seek revisions to the application and continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the issues outlined in the report (August 17, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment application 465-471 Richmond Street West and 38 Camden Street (File No. 19 182800 STE 10 OZ), to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and to report back to City Council on the outcome of discussions, if necessary.

 
3. In the event the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal approves the Zoning By-law Amendment application, in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal withhold its Order(s) approving the application until such time as:

 
a. the Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendments are in a form satisfactory to the City;  

b. the owner has provided for the withdrawal of their appeal of the King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District Plan; 

c. the owner has provided for the withdrawal of their appeal of Official Plan Amendment 486, the King-Spadina Secondary Plan (2020); 

d. the owner has provided a satisfactory and acceptable Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report satisfactory to the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and secured any upgrades and/or improvements as may be necessary to facilitate the proposed development, and confirmation that the amending by-laws do not require any modifications to address the accepted Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineer and Construction Services, and the City Solicitor (where necessary); and 

e. appropriate Section 37 benefits are secured for the redevelopment of the site, and such matters as may be required to support the development are secured in a Section 37 agreement satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and such agreement is executed and registered on title to the lands satisfactory to the City Solicitor. 

 

4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the recommendations above.

Origin

(August 17, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

On January 14, 2020, the applicant filed an appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT), citing Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the prescribed timelines of the Planning Act. The first case management conference was scheduled for May 13, 2020, however, this was postponed due to the Covid-19 Emergency Order. New hearing dates have not been set at this time.

 

The application proposes a 17-storey (51.2 metres including mechanical penthouse) hotel building fronting 465-471 Richmond Street West and a 15-storey (44.25 metres including mechanical penthouse) hotel building fronting 38 Camden Street. The 2 hotel components would be connected by a common, 2-storey base building. The existing significant built heritage resource on the designated heritage property at 38 Camden Street is proposed to be demolished. The applicant has filed a demolition application under the Ontario Heritage Act. 

 

The proposal is not supportable in its current form as it proposes the demolition of the existing significant built heritage resource on the heritage property at 38 Camden Street. In addition, the proposed built form, height and lack of building setbacks and stepbacks from adjacent properties would create negative impacts, such as limiting access to sunlight and sky-view, and would impact adequate privacy, and as such the proposed development, in its current form, does not fit within its existing and planned context.

 

The application is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, does not conform to A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, does not conform to the City’s Official Plan, the Downtown Secondary Plan or the King-Spadina Secondary Plan. Specifically, the proposed development fails to be consistent or conform to policy matters related to heritage conservation, height and built form compatibility with neighbouring properties.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction for the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend at the LPAT and oppose the applicant’s development proposal in its current form. Staff are also seeking direction to continue discussions with the applicant in order to resolve the issues raised in this report.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 17, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-13 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 465-471 Richmond Street West and 38 Camden Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156099.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 29, 2020) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning on Conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe as amended in 2020 (TE18.12a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157134.pdf

TE18.13 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the Union Station Heritage Conservation District Under Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Front Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
See also Item TE18.11

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 1 Front Street West, in accordance with Sections 33 and 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a new mixed used development incorporating the heritage building on the lands known municipally in the year 2020 as 1 Front Street West, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated July 19, 2018 and revised April 13, 2020, prepared by Architects Alliance, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning; and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated July 23, 2018 and revised July 15, 2020, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a. That prior to any Local Planning Appeals Tribunal Order issuing in connection with the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment appeal, the owner shall:

 

1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 1 Front Street West in accordance with the plans and drawings dated July 19, 2018 and revised April 13, 2020, prepared by Architects Alliance, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated July 23, 2018 and revised July 15, 2020, and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2. below, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 1 Front Street West prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated July 23, 2018 and revised July 15, 2020, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

3. Enter into and register on the property at 1 Front Street West one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations and securing such matters generally as set forth in these Recommendations.

 

b. That prior to final Site Plan approval for the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, for the property located at 1 Front Street West the owner shall:

 

1. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2. above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

2. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.

 

3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

4. Provide a detailed landscape plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

5. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

6. Submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

c. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 1 Front Street West, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning the owner shall:

 

1. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.

 

2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan, and Heritage Interpretation Plan.

 

4. Provide full documentation of the existing heritage property, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

d. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in 1.c.3. above, the owner shall:

 

1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

2. City Council authorize the entering into of a heritage easement agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 1 Front Street West in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a heritage easement agreement for the property at 1 Front Street West.

Origin

(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the heritage property located at 1 Front Street West, the Dominion Public Building, in connection with a proposed redevelopment of the subject property and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject property.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 7, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the Union Station Heritage Conservation District Under Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Front Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156162.pdf

Speakers

Peter Smith
Michael McClelland, Principal, ERA Architects Inc.
Cynthia MacDougall

Communications (Community Council)

(September 15, 2020) Letter from Cynthia A. Macdougall (TE.New.TE18.13.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-118262.pdf

13a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the Union Station Heritage Conservation District Under Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Front Street West

Origin
(August 27, 2020) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

Board Recommendation: 

The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the Toronto and East York Community Council that:

 

1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 1 Front Street West, in accordance with Sections 33 and 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a new mixed used development incorporating the heritage building on the lands known municipally in the year 2020 as 1 Front Street West, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated July 19, 2018 and revised April 13, 2020, prepared by Architects Alliance, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated July 23, 2018 and revised July 15, 2020, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning , all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a. That prior to any Local Planning Appeals Tribunal Order issuing in connection with the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment appeal, the owner shall:

 

1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 1 Front Street West in accordance with the plans and drawings dated July 19, 2018 and revised April 13, 2020, prepared by Architects Alliance, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated July 23, 2018 and revised July 15, 2020, and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 1 Front Street West prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated July 23, 2018 and revised July 15, 2020, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


3. Enter into and register on the property at 1 Front Street West one or more
agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the
satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City
Planning, and the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning
with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific
Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations and securing such matters generally as set forth in these Recommendations.

 

b. That prior to final Site Plan approval for the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, for the property located at 1 Front Street West the owner shall:

 

1. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2. above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


2. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.


3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


4. Provide a detailed landscape plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


5. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


6. Submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

c. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 1 Front Street West, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the owner shall:


1. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.


2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning. 

 

3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan, and Heritage Interpretation Plan.


4. Provide full documentation of the existing heritage property, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

d. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in 1.c.3. above, the owner shall:


1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.


2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.

 

2. City Council authorize the entering into of a heritage easement agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 1 Front Street West in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.


3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a heritage easement agreement for the property at 1 Front Street West.

 

Decision Advice and Other Information 

Paul Maka, Senior Planner, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning gave a presentation on - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the Union Station Heritage Conservation District Under Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Front Street West.


Origin
(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning


Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the heritage property located at 1 Front Street West, the Dominion Public Building, in connection with a proposed redevelopment of the subject property and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject property.


Background Information
(August 7, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the Union Station Heritage Conservation District Under Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Front Street West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-155454.pdf)
(August 26, 2020) Presentation from the Heritage Planner, Heritage Preservation, Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the Union Station Heritage Conservation District Under Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Front Street West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-156108.pdf)  

 

Communications
(August 26, 2020) Submission from Alexis Cohen, ERA Architects Inc. (PB.Supp.PB16.3.1) (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/comm/communicationfile-117799.pdf)


Speakers
Art Phillips, Larco
Michael McClelland, ERA Architects Inc.
Alexis Cohen, ERA Architects Inc.
Ori Abara, ERA Architects Inc.
Cynthia MacDougall, McCarthy Tetrault LLP  

Background Information (Community Council)
(August 27, 2020) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156277.pdf

TE18.14 - Demolition of a Property Designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 38 Camden Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council refuse the issuance of a demolition permit for the protected heritage property at 38 Camden Street in accordance with Section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

2. If the owner appeals City Council's decision to refuse the issuance of a demolition permit under Section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the property at 38 Camden Street, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the necessary City staff to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) hearing in opposition to the appeal.

Origin

(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council refuse an application to demolish the significant built heritage resource on the protected heritage property at 38 Camden Street which is designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

Under the Section 34 of the Act, if City Council fails to make a decision on the application within 90 days of issuing a Notice of Receipt the application is deemed to be permitted.

 

The Province of Ontario has extended the March 17, 2020 Declaration of Emergency and made several subsequent Emergency Orders under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 73/20, the statutory timelines for City Council to consider the application to demolish a Part IV designated property are currently suspended, however, the statutory timelines under the Ontario Heritage Act are intended to commence after September 11, 2020, pursuant to Ontario Regulation 106/20 under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, subject to any further amendments.

 

Unless the regulation is otherwise amended, the 90 day notice of the intention to demolish the building on the subject property therefore starts after September 11, 2020 and the applicant must be notified of Council's decision by December 9, 2020.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 7, 2020) Repot and Attachments 1-3 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning - Demolition of a Property Designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 38 Camden Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156158.pdf

14a - Demolition of a Property Designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 38 Camden Street

Origin
(August 27, 2020) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

Board Recommendations

The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the Toronto and East York Community

Council that:

 

1. City Council refuse the issuance of a demolition permit for the protected heritage property at 38 Camden Street in accordance with Section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

2. If the owner appeals City Council's decision to refuse the issuance of a demolition permit

under Section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the property at 38 Camden Street, City

Council authorize the City Solicitor and the necessary City staff to attend the Local Planning

Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) hearing in opposition to the appeal.

 

Origin

(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City

Planning

 

Summary

This report recommends that City Council refuse an application to demolish the significant

built heritage resource on the protected heritage property at 38 Camden Street which is

designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

Under the Section 34 of the Act, if City Council fails to make a decision on the application

within 90 days of issuing a Notice of Receipt the application is deemed to be permitted.

 

The Province of Ontario has extended the March 17, 2020 Declaration of Emergency and made several subsequent Emergency Orders under the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act. Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 73/20, the statutory timelines for City Council to consider the application to demolish a Part IV designated property are currently suspended, however, the statutory timelines under the Ontario Heritage Act are intended to commence after September 11, 2020, pursuant to Ontario Regulation 106/20 under the Emergency

Management and Civil Protection Act, subject to any further amendments.

 

Unless the regulation is otherwise amended, the 90 day notice of the intention to demolish the

building on the subject property therefore starts after September 11, 2020 and the applicant

must be notified of Council's decision by December 9, 2020.

 

Background Information

(August 7, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning,

Urban Design, City Planning - Demolition of a Property Designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 38 Camden Street

(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-155494.pdf)

 

Communications

(August 26, 2020) Letter from Ori Abara, Project Manager, ERA Architects Inc. (PB.Supp.PB16.10.1)

(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/comm/communicationfile-117803.pdf)

Background Information (Community Council)
(August 27, 2020) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156260.pdf

TE18.15 - Amendment of Designating By-law to Correct Legal Description - 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council state its intention to amend Designating By-law 238-2020 dated February 26, 2020 to correct the legal description in accordance with Section 30.1(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act and to reference the complete municipal address, being 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street) in the by-law.

 

2. City Council provide notice of the proposed amendment to Designating By-law 238-2020 to the Owner of 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street) in accordance with Sections 30.1(3) and 30.1(4) of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3. If there are no objections to the amendment in accordance with Section 30.1(6) of the

Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in Council to amend Designating By-law 238-2020.

Origin

(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to amend City of Toronto By-law 238-2020 designating the property at 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act to correct the legal description and reference the complete municipal address, being 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street) in the by-law.

 

By-Law 238-2020 designates the property at 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street), which contains the Kent School, a three-storey institutional building that was commissioned in 1907 by the Toronto Board of Education as the largest public school in Toronto to serve the rapidly growing west end of the City, included an incorrect legal description in Schedule B of the by-law. 

 

The proposed amendment to the by-law would correct the legal description and reference the complete municipal address, being 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street). This will have no impact on the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Designation) in the original report to City Council recommending the property's designation.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning - Amendment of Designating By-law to Correct Legal Description - 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156156.pdf

15a - Amendment of Designating By-law to Correct Legal Description - 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street)

Origin
(August 27, 2020) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

Board Recommendations: 

The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the Toronto and East York Community
Council that:

 

1. City Council state its intention to amend Designating By-law 238-2020 dated February 26,
2020 to correct the legal description in accordance with Section 30.1(3) of the Ontario
Heritage Act and to reference the complete municipal address, being 90 Croatia Street (980
Dufferin Street) in the by-law.


2. City Council provide notice of the proposed amendment to Designating By-law 238-2020 to the Owner of 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street) in accordance with Sections 30.1(3) and 30.1(4) of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3. If there are no objections to the amendment in accordance with Section 30.1(6) of the
Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in Council to amend Designating By-law 238-2020.

 

Origin
(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City
Planning


Summary
This report recommends that City Council state its intention to amend City of Toronto By-law 238-2020 designating the property at 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act to correct the legal description and reference the
complete municipal address, being 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street) in the by-law.


By-Law 238-2020 designates the property at 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street), which
contains the Kent School, a three-storey institutional building that was commissioned in 1907 by the Toronto Board of Education as the largest public school in Toronto to serve the rapidly growing west end of the City, included an incorrect legal description in Schedule B of the bylaw.

 

The proposed amendment to the by-law would correct the legal description and reference the
complete municipal address, being 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street). This will have no
impact on the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Designation) in the original report to
City Council recommending the property's designation.

 

Background Information
(August 7, 2020) Revised Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design,City Planning - Amendment of Designating By-law to Correct Legal Description - 90 Croatia Street (980 Dufferin Street)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-156015.pdf)

(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City
Planning - Amendment of Designating By-law to Correct Legal Description - 90 Croatia Street(980 Dufferin Street)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-155474.pdf)

Background Information (Community Council)
(August 27, 2020) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156279.pdf

TE18.17 - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 661-665 Huron Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council include the property at 661 Huron Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and state its intention to designate the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance.

 

2. City Council include the property at 663-665 Huron Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and state its intention to designate the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance.

 

3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council. 

 

4. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision to designate the property.

Origin

(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council include the properties at 661 and 663-665 Huron Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and state its intention to designate the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for their cultural heritage value.   

 

Located on the east side of Huron Street, south of Dupont Street in The Annex neighbourhood, the properties contain two house-form buildings completed between 1890-1891 that were originally single-family dwellings and now used as multi-unit residential buildings. Both properties have cultural heritage value as fine examples of eclecticism in Late Victorian Era architecture in Toronto, combining elements of Richardsonian Romanesque with the Queen Anne Revival style. Contextually, the properties at 661 and 663-665 Huron Street are historically and visually linked to their setting on the east side of Huron Street between Dupont Street and Bernard Avenue where, along with a number of other grand Late-Victorian-era house-form buildings recognized on the City’s Heritage Register,[1] and adjacent to the Madison Avenue Heritage Conservation District, they recall the late-nineteenth to early-twentieth century period when The Annex neighbourhood emerged as a sought-after residential enclave for many of Toronto's leading citizens.

 

The properties at 661-665 Huron Street are located within the proposed West Annex Phase 2 Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Study Area authorized by City Council on January 31, 2018.  In spring 2020, the property at 661 Huron Street was nominated for cultural heritage evaluation by members of The Annex Residents’ Association and the British Home Children Advocacy & Research Association.

 

Following research and evaluation, it has been determined that the properties at 661 and 663-665 Huron Street meet Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

The Province and the City's policies seek the conservation of cultural heritage resources. Designation supports conservation as it enables City Council to review alterations to the site, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition.

 

On November 22, 2019 a Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition applications were submitted to permit a four-storey apartment building, with 48 residential units, which would require demolition of the existing multi-unit, house-form dwellings. As the application review is ongoing, City staff will have the opportunity share Council's decision with the property owners to inform revisions of these applications.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 7, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 661-665 Huron Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156155.pdf

Speakers

Dan Oatman, British Home Children

Communications (Community Council)

(September 10, 2020) E-mail from Martyn Burke (TE.Supp.TE18.17.1)
(September 9, 2020) E-mail from Kelly Juhasz (TE.Supp.TE18.17.2)
(September 9, 2020) Letter from Kae Elgie, Chair, Architectural Conservancy Ontario, Provincial Board of Directors (TE.Supp.TE18.17.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-117980.pdf
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Kimberley Bailey (TE.New.TE18.17.4)
(September 9, 2020) E-mail from Karen Kaplan (TE.New.TE18.17.5)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Don Oldfield (TE.New.TE18.17.6)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Joanne Clucas Irwin (TE.New.TE18.17.7)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Dean and Mary Jane Chamberlain (TE.New.TE18.17.8)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Eva Gunn (TE.New.TE18.17.9)
(September 12, 2020) E-mail from Lord and Lady Abinger (TE.New.TE18.17.10)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Sharon Leipert (TE.New.TE18.17.11)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Brenda Riley (TE.New.TE18.17.12)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from C Bonnie (Cherryholme) Fowler (TE.New.TE18.17.13)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Olivia Grant (TE.New.TE18.17.14)
(September 14, 2020) Letter from Janice O'Halloran Mersey (TE.New.TE18.17.15)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from June Staughton (TE.New.TE18.17.16)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Janet MacLean (TE.New.TE18.17.17)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Yu Yuen Chua (TE.New.TE18.17.18)
(September 14, 2020) Letter from Matthew Zambri (TE.New.TE18.17.19)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-118161.pdf
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Cornelia J. Baines (TE.New.TE18.17.20)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Catherine Tramsek (TE.New.TE28.17.21)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Kim Roberge (TE.New.TE18.17.22)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Tisha Hepplewhite (TE.New.TE18.17.23)
(September 14, 2020) Letter from Willamina May (TE.New.TE 18.17.24)
(September 14, 2020) E-mail from Glenn Bonnetta (TE.New.TE18.17.25)
(September 14, 2020) Letter from Diane McKinlay (TE.New.TE18.17.26)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Roger and Eric Jackson (TE.New.TE18.17.27)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Lori Oschefski (TE.New.TE18.17.28)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-118214.pdf
(September 15, 2020) Letter from Gregory Taylor (TE.New.TE18.17.29)
(September 15, 2020) Letter from Tarek Al-azbat (TE.New.TE18.17/30)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Wendy Carveth (TE.New.TE18.17.31)
(September 15, 2020) Letter from Tai So (TE.New.SC18.17.32)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Barb Perkins (TE.New.TE18.17.33)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Deborah McDowell (TE.New.SC18.17.34)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Roula Allen (TE.New.TE18.17.35)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Marilyn Avent (TE.New.SC18.17.36)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Dupont by the Castle BIA (TE.New.TE18.17.37)
(September 15, 2020) Letter from Rebecca Boucher (TE.New.TE18.17.38)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Nathan Pye (TE.New.TE18.17.39)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from John May (TE.New.TE18.17.40)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Natasha Gromoff-Kramer (TE.New.TE18.17.41)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Marie May (TE.New.TE18.17.42)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Kathy Flay (TE.New.TE18.17.43)
(September 15, 2020) E-mail from Dawn Sheppard (TE.New.TE18.17.44)
(September 16, 2020) E-mail from Cathy Knudsen (TE.New.TE18.17.45)
(September 16, 2020) Letter from Debra Gordon (TE.New.TE18.17.46)
(September 14, 2020) Letter from Sean Arthur Joyce (TE.New.TE18.17.47)
(September 14, 2020) Letter from Mark Flowers (TE.New.TE18.17.48)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-118402.pdf

17a - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 661-665 Huron Street

Origin
(August 27, 2020) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

Board Recommendations

The Toronto Preservation Board recommends to the Toronto and East York Community
Council that:


1. City Council include the property at 661 Huron Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage
Register and state its intention to designate the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the
Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance.


2. City Council include the property at 663-665 Huron Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and state its intention to designate the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance.


3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act,
City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council.


4. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the
City Clerk to refer the proposed designation to the Conservation Review Board.


5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision to designate the property.


Origin
(August 7, 2020) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City
Planning


Summary
This report recommends that City Council include the properties at 661 and 663-665 Huron
Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and state its intention to designate the
properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for their cultural heritage
value.

 

Located on the east side of Huron Street, south of Dupont Street in The Annex neighbourhood, the properties contain two house-form buildings completed between 1890-1891 that were originally single-family dwellings and now used as multi-unit residential buildings. Both properties have cultural heritage value as fine examples of eclecticism in Late Victorian Era architecture in Toronto, combining elements of Richardsonian Romanesque with the Queen Anne Revival style. Contextually, the properties at 661 and 663-665 Huron Street are historically and visually linked to their setting on the east side of Huron Street between Dupont Street and Bernard Avenue where, along with a number of other grand Late-Victorian-era house-form buildings recognized on the City’s Heritage Register,[1] and adjacent to the Madison Avenue Heritage Conservation District, they recall the late-nineteenth to early twentieth century period when The Annex neighbourhood emerged as a sought-after residential enclave for many of Toronto's leading citizens.


The properties at 661-665 Huron Street are located within the proposed West Annex Phase 2
Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Study Area authorized by City Council on January 31,
2018. In spring 2020, the property at 661 Huron Street was nominated for cultural heritage
evaluation by members of The Annex Residents’ Association and the British Home Children
Advocacy & Research Association.


Following research and evaluation, it has been determined that the properties at 661 and 663-
665 Huron Street meet Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.


The Province and the City's policies seek the conservation of cultural heritage resources.
Designation supports conservation as it enables City Council to review alterations to the site,
enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition.

 

On November 22, 2019 a Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition
applications were submitted to permit a four-storey apartment building, with 48 residential
units, which would require demolition of the existing multi-unit, house-form dwellings. As the application review is ongoing, City staff will have the opportunity share Council's decision with the property owners to inform revisions of these applications.

 

Background Information
(August 7, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning,
Urban Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and
Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 661-665 Huron
Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-155574.pdf)

 

Communications
(August 18, 2020) E-mail from Denise Smith Pope (PB.Supp.PB16.6.1)
(August 18, 2020) E-mail from Beverley Jenson (PB.Supp.PB16.6.2)
(August 18, 2020) E-mail from Frederick John Smith (PB.Supp.PB16.6.3)
(August 18, 2020) E-mail from Tisha (Lobdell) Hepplewhite (PB.Supp.PB16.6.4)
(August 19, 2020) E-mail from Marten van Kerkwijk (PB.Supp.PB16.6.5)
(August 19, 2020) E-mail from Yuen Chua (PB.Supp.PB16.6.6)
(August 19, 2020) E-mail from Tassie Notar (PB.Supp.PB16.6.7)
(August 19, 2020) E-mail from Don Oldfield (PB.Supp.PB16.6.8)
(August 19, 2020) E-mail from Pennyanne Smith-Maj (PB.Supp.PB16.6.9)
(August 19, 2020) E-mail from Esther-Rose Angel (PB.Supp.PB16.6.10)
(August 19, 2020) Letter from Lisa Ouellette (PB.Supp.PB16.6.11)
(August 18, 2020) E-mail from Carol Tiberi (PB.Supp.PB16.6.12)

(August 19, 2020) E-mail from Clara Lalonde (PB.Supp.PB16.6.13)
(August 20, 2020) E-mail from Christine Jarvis (PB.Supp.PB16.6.14)
(August 20, 2020) E-mail from Libbie Mills (PB.Supp.PB16.6.15)
(August 20, 2020) E-mail from Don Oldfield (PB.Supp.PB16.6.16)
(August 21, 2020) E-mail from Dawn Sheppard (PB.Supp.PB16.6.17)
(August 21, 2020) E-mail from Larry McIntosh (PB.Supp.PB16.6.18)
(August 21, 2020) E-mail from Andrea Hunt (PB.Supp.PB16.6.19)
(August 21, 2020) E-mail from Nigel Klemencic-Puglisevich (PB.Supp.PB16.6.20)
(August 22, 2020) E-mail from Bev Johnson (PB.Supp.PB16.6.21)
(August 24, 2020) E-mail from Sheila Dodd (PB.Supp.PB16.6.22)
(August 23, 2020) Letter from Rita Bilerman, Chair and Edward Leman, Co-Chair, The Annex Residents' Association (PB.Supp.PB16.6.23)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/comm/communicationfile-117752.pdf)
(August 23, 2020) E-mail from Catherine Tramsek (PB.Supp.PB16.6.24)
(August 24, 2020) Letter from Brenda Riley (PB.Supp.PB16.6.25)
(August 24, 2020) E-mail from Kenneth Bartlett (PB.Supp.PB16.6.26)
(August 24, 2020) Letter from Gillian Bartlett (PB.Supp.PB16.6.27)
(August 23, 2020) Letter from Lori Oschefski (PB.Supp.PB16.6.28)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/comm/communicationfile-117791.pdf)
(August 25, 2020) E-mail from Janice Mersey (PB.Supp.PB16.6.29)
(August 25, 2020) E-mail from Jeannette Mazzocato (PB.Supp.PB16.6.30)
(August 26, 2020) E-mail from Anne Hanrahan (PB.Supp.PB16.6.31)
(August 26, 2020) Letter from Mark Flowers (PB.Supp.PB16.6.32)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/pb/comm/communicationfile-117798.pdf)
(August 26, 2020) E-mail from Carol Bland (PB.Supp.PB16.6.33)
(August 26, 2020) E-mail from Dorothy Goldin Rosenberg (PB.Supp.PB16.6.34)
(August 27, 2020) E-mail from Stanislav Belonenko (PB.New.PB16.6.35)

Background Information (Community Council)
(August 27, 2020) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156282.pdf

TE18.42 - Exhibition Place Master Plan - Phase 1 Proposals Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
Communication TE18.42.3 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council adopt the Exhibition Place Master Plan Phase 1 Proposals Report, attached as Attachment 1 to the report (August 24, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 
2. City Council direct the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place to advance the next phase of the Master Plan study according to the directions of the Phase 1 Proposals Report, as endorsed by the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place at its meeting of June 24, 2020, and identify next steps and future study phases required to advance and refine the proposed directions in order to complete the Master Plan process in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, including funding mechanisms for recommended technical reports and studies, phasing and implementation strategies, as described in Attachment 3 to the report (August 24, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 
3. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and other City Divisions and agencies as needed, to work with Exhibition Place as needed to advance the Exhibition Place Master Plan, including: design development, funding and implementation strategies for "quick start" initiatives that can be implemented in the short term, as described in the report (August 24, 2020) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the Phase 1 Proposals Report;

 
4. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to:

 

a.  report to the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place, when appropriate, identifying any necessary amendments to the Official Plan that may be required to implement the recommended Master Plan; and

 
b.  undertake public consultation and make recommendations to City Council for any necessary amendments to the Official Plan to implement the recommended Master Plan;

 
5. City Council rely on the findings of the Phase 1 Proposals Report to:

 

a.  inform future conversations with the Province regarding the joint revitalization of Ontario Place and Exhibition Place; and

 
b.  inform future consultation with Metrolinx regarding the Ontario Line.

 

6. City Council direct the City Manager to work with Exhibition Place to explore opportunities for the grounds to contribute to the COVID-19 recovery and rebuild effort, such as ShowLoveTO and ActiveTO.

Origin

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Exhibition Place is one of the City’s great waterfront assets. It has a long history as a unique, multi-functional gathering place for Toronto’s residents, visitors and business communities, home to special events, meetings, exhibitions, conventions, recreation and long-held traditions. A focus of economic activity amid a valuable oasis of open space near the downtown, Exhibition Place nonetheless finds itself disconnected from Lake Ontario, the parks and open space system, and surrounding neighbourhoods.

 

At the request of City Council, and pursuant to the Exhibition Place 2017-2019 Strategic Plan, City Planning staff undertook a Master Plan study for Exhibition Place, launched in June 2019 with its first phase concluding in March 2020.  This report describes the outcomes from the first phase of the Master Plan exercise, including a Proposals Report comprising a recommended Vision, Guiding Principles, emerging strategies and draft Structure Plan to support and enhance the continued success of Exhibition Place.  This report also provides a summary of public and stakeholder engagement activities and feedback received throughout the first phase of the study. City staff appeared before the Board of Governors at regular intervals to present status updates and emerging Master Plan strategies, culminating in the confirmation of the Board’s support for the Phase 1 Proposals report at its meeting of June 24, 2020.

 

The Phase 1 Proposals Report (see Attachment 1) outlines a vision to affirm Exhibition Place as Toronto’s preeminent gathering place, where visitors from near and far can experience spaces for relaxation, entertainment and exhibition. These spaces will be bound together with a cohesive public realm network both within the site and connecting to the surrounding city. In serving as a gathering place, Exhibition Place will embrace and balance its diverse roles as a centre for innovation, inspiration and economic development, a historic place, and a place of entertainment and recreation, and a green destination.

 

The public and stakeholder consultation identified a number of issues that need to be addressed, including:

 

Parking.  Parking emerged as a key focus area through Phase 1 public and stakeholder consultation, particularly from major shows and exhibitors. The existing surface parking lots support activity at Exhibition Place and also provide an opportunity through more flexible use for hardscaped plaza spaces that can accommodate a variety of uses while enhancing the public realm. The adaptability of these spaces would allow Exhibition Place to move nimbly to respond to evolving opportunities.

 
Transit Service.  Transit service to Exhibition Place, to provide a convenient alternative means of travel to the grounds that enhances the visitor experience. Given the barriers posed by the Gardiner Expressway, rail corridor and Lake Shore Boulevard West, transit will be critical to moving greater numbers of people to and from the site, as well as addressing vehicular traffic and climate change. This report promotes leveraging investments in transit service and access, optimization of parking and staging areas, and exploration of alternative transportation technologies to allow for enhanced mobility and public realm improvement opportunities to be realized over the long term.

 
Integration of Ontario Place with the Surrounding Area.  The proposed strategies, as outlined in the attached Proposals Report, will better integrate Exhibition Place with surrounding neighbourhoods, parks and open spaces, and Ontario Place; improve transit accessibility and connectivity to and through the site; conserve and rehabilitate the site's heritage features in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Landscape Assessment; and develop a holistic approach to public realm improvements at Exhibition Place to benefit all visitors from Toronto and beyond. These strategies provide a long-term framework to consider future improvement opportunities, including most recently the revitalization of Ontario Place, as they arise over time. The Provincial government’s announcement seeking proposals to revitalize the adjacent Ontario Place brings an opportunity to position Exhibition Place as part of a dynamic lakefront precinct, with improved connectivity and public realm improvements to maximize the use of the grounds. The development of a Master Plan is intended to provide a framework that articulates physical planning priorities to guide future decision-making.

 

Since the substantive completion of the Phase 1 Proposals Report in March 2020, the world has faced the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and its resulting economic uncertainty. Exhibition Place has seen the cancellation of numerous events at its various venues since mid-March, and staff advise they have proactively initiated discussions with the Toronto Office of Recovery and Rebuild regarding innovative strategies toward reopening the site. In this context, the Master Plan Proposals Report offers a first step toward a physical framework to support economic recovery, guiding the restoration of publicly accessible open spaces, and promoting flexibility and resilience in the use of civic assets. It also proposes a number of “quick start” actions that can be implemented in the short term to enhance mobility and connectivity to Exhibition Place as it begins to restore activity.

 

This report represents the professional advice of City Planning staff following an eight-month study phase that included robust consultation with stakeholders, Exhibition Place staff and the Board of Governors, and the public at large; urban design analysis; planning policy review; and development of preliminary ideas for feedback. As the Exhibition Place Board of Governors advances the Master Plan through future phases, a series of technical and feasibility studies, support from City Divisions and agencies, and further consultation are recommended to test and refine the proposed strategies prior to the completion of a final Master Plan for Exhibition Place.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2020) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Exhibition Place Master Plan - Phase 1 Proposals Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156142.pdf
Attachment 1 - Exhibition Place Phase 1 Proposals Report - Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156168.pdf
Attachment 1 - Exhibition Place Phase 1 Proposals Report - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156169.pdf
Attachment 2 - Exhibition Place Phase 1 Engagement Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156170.pdf

Speakers

Bruce Van Dieten

Communications (Community Council)

(September 14, 2020) Letter from Ric Amis (TE.New.TE18.42.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/comm/communicationfile-118278.pdf
(September 16, 2020) E-mail from Ethan Phillips (TE.New.TE18.42.2)

Communications (City Council)

(September 18, 2020) E-mail from Don Cranston, Chair, and Andrew Stewart, Vice-chair, The Friends of Fort York and Garrison Common (CC.Main.TE18.42.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-119355.pdf

TE18.45 - Construction Staging Area - 1221 King Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park
Attention
Bills 745 and 746 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the closure of the west sidewalk on Dufferin Street, between a point 23 metres south of King Street West and a point 51 metres further south, from October 2, 2020 to April 30, 2022.

 

2. City Council authorize the closure of a 2.1 metre wide portion of the southbound curb lane on Dufferin Street, between a point 23 metres south of King Street West and a point 51 metres further south, from October 2, 2020 to April 30, 2022.

 

3. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Dufferin Street, between King Street West and a point 104 metres south.

 

4. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday, at a rate of $3.00 per hour and for a maximum period of 3 hours, on the west side of Dufferin Street, between King Street West and a point 104 metres south.

 

5. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the west side of Dufferin Street, between King Street West and a point 104 metres south.

 

6. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

 

7 City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.

 

8. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.

 

9. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.

 

10. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

11. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

12. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.

 

13. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

14. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

15. City Council direct that Dufferin Street be returned to pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

Origin

(July 7, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Dufferin Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Lifetime Developments is constructing a 14-storey condominium building with ground floor retail at 1221 King Street West. The site is located on the southwest corner of King Street West and Dufferin Street.

 

Transportation Services is requesting authorization to close the west sidewalk and a

2.1 metre wide portion of the southbound curb lane/parking lane on Dufferin Street for a period of 19 months (i.e. October 2, 2020 to April 30, 2022) to accommodate a construction staging area.

 

Traffic lanes abutting the site will be realigned to maintain one 3.7 metre lane for southbound traffic. Pedestrian operations on the west side of Dufferin Street will be maintained in a covered and protected walkway within the closed portion Dufferin Street.

 

Pedestrian operations on the south side of King Street West, abutting the site, will be maintained on the existing sidewalk in a covered and protected walkway.

 

This closure will result in loss of approximately eight parking machine spaces on the west side of Dufferin Street, abutting and to the south of the site.

Background Information (Community Council)

(July 7, 2020) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Construction Staging Area - 1221 King Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156128.pdf

TE18.50 - Construction Staging Area - 203 Jarvis Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
Bill 791 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the closure of the east sidewalk on Jarvis Street, between Shuter Street and a point 37 metres north, from October 2, 2020 to October 31, 2021.
 

2. City Council authorize the closure of a 2.5 metre wide portion of the northbound curb lane on Jarvis Street, between Shuter Street and a point 37 metres north, from October 2, 2020 to October 31, 2021.
 

3. City Council authorize the closure of a 0.9 metre wide portion of the southbound curb lane on the first laneway east of Jarvis Street, north of Shuter Street, between Shuter Street and a point 35 metres north, from October 2, 2020 to October 31, 2021.

 

4. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the east side of Jarvis Street, between Shuter Street and a point 61 metres north.

 

5. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east Jarvis Street, between Shuter Street and a point 61 metres north.

 

6. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the east side of Jarvis Street, between Shuter Street and a point 61 metres north.

 

7. City Council designate the easterly northbound lane on Jarvis Street, between Shuter Street and a point 30.5 metres south, for northbound right-turns only.

 

8. City Council directed the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

 

9. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.

 

10. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.

 

11. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.

 

12. City Council directed the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

13. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

14. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.

 

15. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

16. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

17. City Council direct that Jarvis Street be returned to pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

 

18. City Council direct the applicant to establish a construction management working group that meets monthly and invite local stakeholders including Transportation Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto Buildings, adjacent neighbours, local resident groups, and local businesses.

Origin

(August 10, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As Jarvis Street is a major arterial road and as the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Jarvis Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Magna Hotels is constructing a 32-storey mixed use building at 203 Jarvis Street. The site is located on the northeast corner of Jarvis Street and Shuter Street. This development will include 179 residential units, 240 hotel suites with four levels of underground parking for approximately 75 cars, and a loading bay. All permanent vehicular access will be from the public laneway located off Shuter Street.

 

Transportation Services is requesting authorization to close the east sidewalk and a portion of the northbound curb lane on Jarvis Street, between Shuter Street and a point 37 metres north, and a portion of the first lane east of Jarvis Street, north of Shuter Street, for a period of 30 months (i.e., October 2, 2020 to March 31, 2023) to accommodate construction staging areas.

 

The construction staging area on Jarvis Street will result in the loss of one northbound traffic lane with the adjacent northbound lane being widened 3.4 metres. The existing bi-directional lane on Jarvis Street will continue to operate southbound at all times except between 3:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m., when it will operate as a second northbound lane.  In order to accommodate the staging area, the northbound curb lane on Jarvis Street south of Shuter Street will be designated as an exclusive right-turn only lane. Pedestrian operations on the east side of Jarvis Street will be maintained in a 1.7 metre wide covered and protected walkway within the closed portion of the existing lane.

 

Pedestrian operations on the north side of Shuter Street, abutting the site, will be maintained in a covered and protected walkway. 


 

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 10, 2020) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Construction Staging Area - 203 Jarvis Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156118.pdf

TE18.51 - Construction Staging Area - TTC Easier Access Program - Donlands Station (Phase 1a and 1b)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth
Attention
Bills 747 and 748 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the closure of the north sidewalk on Strathmore Boulevard, from a point from a point 13 metres west of Donlands Avenue to a point 24 metres further west, from October 2, 2020 to December 31, 2020.

 

2. City Council authorize the closure of a 2 metre wide portion of the westbound curb lane on Strathmore Boulevard, from a point 13 metres west of Donlands Avenue to a point 24 metres further west, from October 2, 2020 to December 31, 2020.

 

3. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the north side Strathmore Boulevard, between Donlands Avenue and a point 45 metres west.

 

4. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Strathmore Boulevard, between Donlands Avenue and a point 45 metres west.

 

5. City Council rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., on the south side of Strathmore Boulevard, between Donlands Avenue and point 52 metres west.

 

6. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the south side of Strathmore Boulevard, between Donlands Avenue and a point 52 metres west.

 

7. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

 

8. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.

 

9. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.

 

10. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.

 

11. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

12. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

13. City Council directe the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.

 

14. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

15. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

16. City Council direct that Strathmore Boulevard be returned to pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

Origin

(August 20, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Strathmore Boulevard, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Donlands Station, located on the southwest corner of Donlands Avenue and Strathmore Boulevard, is being modernized to accommodate one at-grade elevator and one below-grade elevator at the main station. In addition, a second entrance/exit is also being added to the station that will be located on the east side of Dewhurst Boulevard south of Strathmore Boulevard, as part of the TTC's Easier Access Program and Second Exit Program. Construction of the development will be undertaken in several phases. This report deals with matters related to Phase 1a and 1b of the construction only.

 

Transportation Services is requesting authorization to close a portion of the north sidewalk and a 2 metre wide portion of the westbound curb lane on Strathmore Boulevard from a point 13 metres west of Donlands Avenue and a point 24 metres further west, for a period of three months (i.e., October 2, 2020 to December 31, 2020), to accommodate construction staging operations in Phase 1a.

 

During Phase 1b, the sidewalk and lane closure implemented during Phase 1a will be removed and Strathmore Boulevard will be returned its previous lane configuration.  Although no long duration closures are proposed with Phase 1b and the majority of work being completed can be accommodated without encroaching onto the municipal right-of-way, portions on the south sidewalk on Strathmore Boulevard and east sidewalk on Dewhurst Boulevard are proposed to be removed and temporary decking will be used within these areas when construction activities are not taking place.  It is anticipated that this phase of the project will be completed April 2021.    

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 20, 2020) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Construction Staging Area - TTC Easier Access Program - Donlands Station (Phase 1a and 1b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156129.pdf

TE18.54 - Accessible Loading Zone - Jarvis Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
Bill 749 and 750 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council designate an accessible loading zone to operate at all times except from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and from 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the west side of Jarvis Street, between a point 30 metres south of Wellesley Street East and a point 11 metres further south.

 

2.  City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Saturday and from 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday, on the west side of Jarvis Street, between Wellesley Street East and a point 41 metres south.

 

3.  City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Jarvis Street, between Wellesley Street East and a point 41 metres south.

Origin

(August 20, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Jarvis Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is recommending the designation of an on-street accessible loading zone on the west side of Jarvis Street.  The establishment of an accessible loading zone will provide unimpeded curbside access to TTC Wheel-Trans service for residents of 460 Jarvis Street.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 20, 2020) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Accessible Loading Zone - Jarvis Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156100.pdf

TE18.55 - Accessible Loading Zone - Main Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Beaches - East York
Attention
Bill 751 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council designate an accessible loading zone to operate from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Sunday, on the east side of Main Street, between point 149 metres south of Doncaster Avenue and a point 11 metres further south.

Origin

(August 21, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Main Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is recommending the designation of an on-street accessible loading zone on the east side of Main Street. The establishment of an accessible loading zone will provide unimpeded curbside access to TTC Wheel-Trans service for patrons of the Church of the Nazarene at 363 Main Street.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 21, 2020) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Accessible Loading Zone - Main Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156140.pdf

TE18.56 - Accessible Loading Zone - Kingston Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Beaches - East York
Attention
Bill 752 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council designate an accessible loading zone to operate from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the south side of Kingston Road, between point 45 metres east of Waverley Road and a point 11 metres further east.

Origin

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Kingston Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is recommending designation of an on-street accessible loading zone on Kingston Road.  The establishment of an accessible loading zone will provide unimpeded curbside access to TTC Wheel-Trans service for local residents.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2020) Revised Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Accessible Loading Zone - Kingston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156374.pdf
(August 24, 2020) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Accessible Loading Zone - Kingston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156137.pdf

TE18.59 - Parking Amendments - Kingston Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Beaches - East York
Attention
Bill 753 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Kingston Road, between Main Street and a point 60 metres west.

Origin

(August 24, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Kingston Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is recommending that stopping be prohibited at all times on the north side of Kingston Road, between Main Street and a point 60 metres west.  This proposal will address concerns regarding parked vehicles obstructing sightlines for drivers exiting the condominium driveway at 630 Kingston Road.  This proposal will result in the loss of three on-street parking spaces.  

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2020) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Parking Amendments - Kingston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156145.pdf

TE18.62 - Realignment of Permit Parking Area 3D to exclude the development located at 1779 St. Clair Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council approve the amendment to Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate a revised map of permit parking area "3D", as attached in Appendix A of the report (August 13, 2020) from the Manager, Permits and Enforcement, Parking, Transportation Services.

Origin

(August 13, 2020) Report from the Manager, Permits and Enforcement, Parking and Administration Transportation Services

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to prohibit the General Manager from accepting applications from residents of, visitors to, and tradespersons at the development properties municipally known as 1779 St. Clair Avenue West from residential on-street permit parking.  

 

Transportation Services has assessed the realignment of permit parking area 3D and the exclusion of the development property located at 1779 St. Clair Avenue West as requested by Toronto and East York Community Council, Item TE 14.65, on March 12, 2020. Transportation Services is recommending approval of the exclusion as it will not impact negatively on St. Clair Avenue West and neighbouring residents.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 13, 2020) Report and Attachment from the Manager, Permits and Enforcement, Parking and Administration Transportation Services - Realignment of Permit Parking Area 3D to exclude the development located at 1779 St. Clair Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156147.pdf

TE18.65 - Introduction of Overnight On-Street Permit Parking - Streets in Wards 4, 9 and 14 - Non-Delegated

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
4 - Parkdale - High Park, 9 - Davenport, 14 - Toronto - Danforth

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the amendment of Schedule A of City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate the streets listed in attachment A of the report August 20, 2020) from the Manager, Permits and Enforcement, Parking and Administration, an area name basis, within newly created areas, under the operating hours of 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., 7 days a week.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Toronto and East York Community Council requested Transportation staff to provide full details on the roll out of the permit parking changes to the affected Ward Councillors by October 15, 2020.

Origin

(August 20, 2020) Report from the Manager, Permits and Enforcement, Parking, Transportation Services

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to introduce overnight on-street permit parking on the streets listed in attachment A, on an area name basis, under the operating hours of 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., 7 days a week.

 

The implementation of overnight on-street permit parking is a means to accommodate residents long term parking needs without being subject to tagging by Parking Enforcement Officers.

 

A companion report "Introduction of Overnight On-Street Permit Parking – Streets in Ward 4, 9 and 14" outlines streets for locations without TTC Service.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 20, 2020) Report from the Manager, Permits and Enforcement, Parking, Transportation Services on Introduction of Overnight On-Street Permit Parking - Streets in Wards 4, 9 and 14 - Non-Delegated
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156148.pdf

TE18.66 - Proposed Installation of Traffic Control Signals - Dufferin Street and Geary Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Dufferin Street and Geary Avenue.

Origin

(August 21, 2020) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Dufferin Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to install traffic control signals at the intersection of Dufferin Street and Geary Avenue.  This installation will provide enhanced safety for pedestrians, cyclists and motorists at this intersection and it is technically justified.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 21, 2020) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Proposed Installation of Traffic Control Signals - Dufferin Street and Geary Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156103.pdf

TE18.78 - Turn Prohibitions - Bloor Street West and Perth Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport
Attention
September 29, 2020, 3:10 p.m. - This item was inadvertently omitted from the Council agenda and is now before City Council.

Bill 781 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council prohibit eastbound left turns from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Monday to Friday (bicycles excepted) from Bloor Street West to Perth Avenue.

 

2. City Council prohibit westbound right turns from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday (bicycles excepted) from Bloor Street West to Perth Avenue.

Origin

(September 15, 2020) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailão, Ward 9-Davenport

Summary

The Junction Triangle Traffic Management Committee, in conjunction with City staff and my office, have proposed several changes to traffic regulations in the neighbourhood to improve road safety. One of the final proposed measures includes turn prohibitions from Bloor Street West on to Perth Avenue during peak hours. Over the summer months and on several previous occasions, I consulted with the community by way of a letter that detailed the proposed changes. The majority of the responses demonstrated clear support of the turn prohibitions. Therefore, I am presenting this motion to implement these measures.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 15, 2020) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailão, Ward 9-Davenport - Turn Prohibitions - Bloor Street West and Perth Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156625.pdf

TE18.80 - Turn Prohibition - Driveway Access at No. 45 Bay Street (CIBC Square)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
September 29, 2020, 3:10 p.m. - This item was inadvertently omitted from the Council agenda and is now before City Council.

Bill 782 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council prohibit westbound left turns at all times at the driveway access at 45 Bay Street located on the east side of Bay Street, approximately 40 metres north of Lake Shore Boulevard West.

Origin

(September 16, 2020) Letter from Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 10, Spadina-Fort York

Summary

45 Bay is located in downtown Toronto in the city’s Financial District. The development site is bounded by Front Street West to the north, Lake Shore Boulevard West to the south, Bay Street to the west and Yonge Street to the east. The site is located south of Union Station and directly east of the Air Canada Centre, in the City’s South Core.

 

Metrolinx bus terminal is contained within the eastern portion of the development, with direct pedestrian connectivity to Union Station to the east. The bus terminal has access and frontage on Lake Shore Boulevard West. As a condition of the Site Plan Agreement, the developer is required to modify the curb lane on Lake Shore Boulevard West for a partially dedicated bus lane. The developer has also agreed, as a condition of Site Plan Approval to notify City staff, in advance of the anticipated date of first occupancy of the project, to enact bylaws with respect to the proposed westbound left-turn prohibition at the driveway access on Bay Street.

The intent of this prohibition is to improve operations and safety by eliminating left turns onto Bay Street and have motorists exit this location with a right-turn movement.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 16, 2020) Letter from Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 10, Spadina-Fort York - Turn Prohibition - Driveway Access at No. 45 Bay Street (CIBC Square)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156629.pdf

TE18.91 - Implementation of Permit Parking on Sousa Mendes Street, between Ruskin Avenue and Wallace Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommended that:

 

1.  City Council exempt the implementation of Permit Parking on Sousa Mendes Street, between Ruskin Avenue and Wallace Avenue from the requirements of subsection 925-4B of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, until such time as Toronto and East York Community Council considers a request for implementation of Permit Parking at this location.

Origin

(September 16, 2020) Letter from Letter from from Councillor Ana Bailão, Ward 9-Davenport

Summary

My office received a lot of support from residents of Sousa Mendes Street to access legal on-street permit parking. Unfortunately due to the pandemic, we are unable to conduct the polling process.

 

Subsection 925-4B, provides that:

 

Where permit parking is not currently available and where a petition requesting permit parking signed by the residents of a minimum of 25% of the total number of residential premises having a residential address on the street or the flank of the street is submitted to the General Manager, a poll shall be conducted in accordance with Chapter 190, Polling and Notification, to determine if the residents wish to have permit parking on their road or area, as the case may be. In the event of a positive polling result, the General Manager shall report such result to the appropriate community council, which community council under delegated authority, shall be authorized to pass any necessary by-laws to implement permit parking on the road or area. In the event of a negative result, permit parking shall not be extended to the road or area, and no further permit parking poll shall be conducted for a period of two years

 

I am seeking an exemption from the requirements of subsection 925-4B of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking as the residents that did vote, were in favour of implementing the permit parking program.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 16, 2020) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailão, Ward 9-Davenport - Implementation of Permit Parking on Sousa Mendes Street, between Ruskin Avenue and Wallace Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-156638.pdf

New Business and Business Previously Requested - Meeting 24

CC24.1 - Appointment of Interim City Clerk

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 777 has been submitted on this Item.

Origin

(September 21, 2020) Report from Mayor John Tory

Recommendations

Mayor Tory recommends that:

 

1. City Council appoint John D. Elvidge as the Interim City Clerk for the City of Toronto, reporting to Council, with all the powers and duties imposed upon the City Clerk by Chapter 169, City Officials of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, and under Section 137 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and until such time as a new City Clerk has been appointed.


2. City Council authorize the Mayor to chair and appoint a selection panel to carry out the recruitment process for a new City Clerk and to bring forward the final recommended candidate identified through the recruitment process for Council's consideration and decision.


3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills to give effect to these recommendations.

Summary

City Council appointed Ulli Watkiss as City Clerk at its meeting of July 24, 25 and 26, 2001 effective September 4, 2001. As Ms. Watkiss has announced her retirement from the City, the purpose of this report is to recommend to Council the appointment of an Interim City Clerk until such time as a new City Clerk, appointed by City Council, takes office.

Background Information

(September 21, 2020) Report from Mayor John Tory on the appointment of an Interim City Clerk (CC24.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156952.pdf

CC24.2 - COVID-19 Financial Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(September 23, 2020) Report from the City Manager, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Chief People Officer

Recommendations

The City Manager, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Chief People Officer recommend that:

 

1. City Council formally requests $673 million in COVID-19 funding support from Phase 2 of the Provincial Safe Restart Program to offset the City's COVID-19 financial impacts to the City, following offsets generated by the City primarily through cost mitigation strategies.

 

2. City Council direct the City Manager to report to City Council in Fall 2020 on any additional commitments of financial support received from the Federal and Provincial governments to the City; to continue to explore opportunities to achieve greater 2020 budget efficiencies or offsets; and to provide recommendation on any further mitigation options needed to address any remaining 2020 COVID-19 financial impacts.

 

3. City Council direct the City manager and Chief Financial Officer to continue to explore opportunities for budget efficiencies and offsets as part of the 2021 budget process to mitigate anticipated 2021 COVID-19 related financial impacts.

 

4. City Council direct the City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to engage with the Federal and Provincial Governments to obtain funding commitments to fully address remaining COVID-19 related financial impacts anticipated in 2021 to avoid reductions to transit service, service levels across all City operations and programs.

 

5. City Council approve the use of the Operating Variance Report for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 for the City's Phase 2 Safe Restart financial submissions.

 

6. City Council approve and increase to the Children's Services 2020 Operating budget by $47.5 million gross and $0.0 net, funded from the City of Toronto's allocation of Safe Restart Funding for the Child Care and Early Years' Sector.

 

7. City Council authorize the Mayor and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to enter into and execute any agreements, including any amendments and extension of such agreements, with the Province of Ontario for funding under the Municipal Transit Enhanced Cleaning program on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Manager, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

8. City Council grant approval to receive and disburse funds from the provincial Municipal Transit Enhanced Cleaning program.

 

9. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to negotiate, approve and enter into interest free rent deferral agreements with qualifying tenants and licensees, which permit for a rent deferral period that extends through December 31, 2020, including the requirement that such tenant or licensee had a lease or licence with the City of Toronto that was in good standing prior to April 1, 2020, such agreements to be in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Summary

This report provides an update on COVID-19 related financial impacts experienced as of August 30, 2020, projected financial impacts to year-end, results of implemented mitigation strategies, details on the City's allocation of initial Safe Restart Agreement funding and the City's remaining funding requirements for phase two Safe Restart funding.

 

It is estimated that the City will experience $1.885 billion in COVID-19 related financial impacts in 2020.  This report details the work the City has been undertaking to address the expenses, loss of revenue, and the unprecedented financial challenges resulting from the pandemic.

 

Current mitigation strategies and savings/offset are expected to collectively generate $542.8 million in total offset by year-end, comprised of $508.7 million in savings from workforce restraints, spending constraints and cost avoidance, and $34.1 million in added offsets available from budget variance.

 

When considering the COVID-19 related financial impacts, partially reduced by savings/offsets, the City is projecting a 2020 budget shortfall across all City Programs and Agencies of $1.342 billion by year-end prior to the City's allocation of Safe Restart funding.

 

The City has been engaging with their Federal and Provincial counterparts to obtain funding support for municipalities to offset projected deficits resulting from COVID-19 related financial impacts and longer-term commitment to support Toronto into 2021.   

 

On July 27, 2020 the Ontario government in partnership with the federal government announced $4 billion in financial support for Ontario's 444 municipalities as part of the Safe Restart Agreement and on August 12, 2020 the City of Toronto was provided with initial phase funding allocations under the agreement totalling $668.6 million, reducing the City's estimated 2020 shortfall to $673.1 million.

 

The Mayor, City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer continue to engage with their Provincial counterparts to confirm future phase Safe Restart funding that will be allocated to municipalities by the Province on a needs basis.

 

The City is optimistic that further Safe Restart funding is forthcoming but there is still uncertainty about the extent to which it will offset the remaining 2020 budget pressures and likely shortfall for 2021.

 

This report recommends the City Manager report to City Council later this year with an update on further funding received from the Safe Restart Agreement that would offset the remaining 2020 budget pressure and any further mitigation options required to address COVID-19 financial impacts.

Background Information

(September 23, 2020) Report from the City Manager, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Chief People Officer on COVID-19 Financial Update (CC24.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156949.pdf

CC24.3 - Declaring the Office of Councillor, Ward 22 - Scarborough Agincourt Vacant and Deciding the Method to Fill the Vacancy

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication CC24.3.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Origin

(September 24, 2020) Report from the City Clerk

Recommendations

The City Clerk recommends that:

 

1. City Council declare a vacancy in the office of Councillor, Ward 22 - Scarborough Agincourt.

 

2. City Council adopt one of the following options to fill the vacancy:

 

Option A – Appointment

 

A. City Council fill the vacancy by appointing a person qualified to hold office in the City of Toronto at a special meeting to be held on Monday, October 26, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chamber, in accordance with the following:

 

1. The City Clerk shall advertise the vacancy inviting any interested and qualified applicants to seek appointment to City Council;

 

2. Interested persons shall complete a Consent of Nominee and Declaration of Qualification and provide personal identification showing their name and qualifying address within the City of Toronto;

 

3. The deadline for submitting the required forms to the City Clerk shall be Monday, October 19 at 4:30 p.m.;

 

4. The City Clerk shall submit a report with the list of applicants for publication on the agenda of the October 26 City Council meeting;

 

5. Each applicant shall be provided the opportunity to address City Council for up to 5 minutes;

 

6. The order in which applicants address City Council shall be determined by lot drawn by the City Clerk when City Council begins its debate on the item;

 

7. Members of City Council shall be entitled to ask one question of each candidate;

 

8. City Council shall vote on the appointment by ballot in accordance with procedures to be determined by the City Clerk; and

 

9. City Council shall enact a by-law confirming the appointment of the successful candidate to the office for the remainder of the term of the present Council.

 

OR

                             

Option B – By-election

 

B. Require that a by-election be held to fill the vacancy in Ward 22 – Scarborough Agincourt, as outlined in the draft bill in Appendix "A"; and

           

1. Authorize a contribution rebate program for payment of rebates to persons who make contributions to candidates in the by-election as outlined in the draft bill in Appendix "B".

 

2. Direct the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to increase the City Clerk's Office 2020 Operating Budget by $550,000 gross and $0 net to reflect the funds required to conduct the by-election, and to increase the City's 2021 Contribution Rebate budget in Non-Program by $150,000 gross and $0 net through the 2021 Budget Process to administer the contribution rebate program related to a by-election to fill the vacancy in Ward 22, both fully funded from the Election Reserve.

Summary

This report outlines the options for Council to fill the vacancy in Ward 22 – Scarborough Agincourt as a result of Jim Karygiannis' removal from office. The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 together prescribe rules and impose deadlines with respect to filling a vacancy.

 

Council previously declared the office for Councillor, Ward 22 vacant at its June 29, 2020 meeting following a June 24, 2020 decision from the Court of Appeal for Ontario that resulted in the removal of Jim Karygiannis from office. Council deferred making a decision about whether to fill the vacancy through appointment or by-election until the September 30, 2020 meeting. On August 5, 2020 the Court of Appeal granted a stay of the June 24, 2020 decision while Jim Karygiannis sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. As such, Jim Karygiannis was returned to office pending the decision on the application for leave to appeal. The Supreme Court of Canada on September 24, 2020 dismissed the leave to appeal application and consequently the June 24, 2020 decision that resulted in the removal of Jim Karygiannis from office became effective immediately creating a vacancy in Ward 22.

 

City Council may choose to fill the vacancy by appointment or direct the City Clerk to hold a by-election. If Council chooses to fill the vacancy by holding a by-election, Council may also decide whether to authorize a contribution rebate program. 

Background Information

(September 24, 2020) Report from the City Clerk on Declaring the Office of Councillor, Ward 22 - Scarborough Agincourt Vacant and Deciding the Method to Fill the Vacancy and Appendices A and B (CC24.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157017.pdf

Communications

(September 29, 2020) E-mail from Anna Kim, Coordinator, Scarborough Civic Action Network (CC.New.CC24.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-121091.pdf

CC24.4 - CreateTO Board - Appointment of Public Members

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the CreateTO Board.

Origin

(September 14, 2020) Letter from the Nominating Panel - Corporations, transmitted by the City Clerk

Recommendations

The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Nominating Panel - Corporations.

 

The Corporations Nominating Panel recommends that:

 

1. City Council appoint the following public members to the CreateTO Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on October 2, 2024, and until successors are appointed:

 

Marni Dicker

Dennis Fotinos

Sandra Levy

 

2. City Council appoint the following public members to the Boards of Directors of Build Toronto and the Port Lands Company, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on October 2, 2022, and until successors are appointed:

  

Marni Dicker

Dennis Fotinos

Sandra Levy

  

3. City Council appoint the following public members of CreateTO for re-appointment to Build Toronto and the Toronto Port Lands Company, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on December 31, 2021, and until successors are appointed:

 

Ron Carinci
Marcie Zajdeman
 

4. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 4 to the report (September 2, 2020) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the CreateTO Board.

 

Candidates' biographies:

 

Marni Dicker

 

Marni Dicker is Executive Vice President and General Counsel at Live Work Learn Play, and leads their major infrastructure projects and large scale real estate developments across North America. Prior to joining LWLP, Marni was Chief Commercial Officer and General Counsel at Infrastructure Ontario where she led billions of dollars of Provincial procurements and created strategic partnerships with the private sector. Before IO, Marni was Executive Vice President and General Counsel at SNC O&M.

 

Dennis Fotinos

 

Dennis is a performance driven thought leader with notable turnaround management achievements and leadership success in engaging and developing talent to drive strategy and profitable growth. He initiated and led the corporate reorganization that created Enwave and then proceeded to lead the transformation of the company into an industry leader. He also initiated and led the development of Deep Lake Water Cooling and established the commercial strategy that brought the company’s capabilities to market.

 

Sandra Levy

 

Sandra Levy joined First Capital Realty Inc. as Vice President, People and Corporate Affairs in 2015. First Capital Realty is one of Canada's leading real estate owners and developers of urban shopping centres. Ms. Levy was previously a senior executive with Ply Gem Canada and Magna International. Ms. Levy has sat on a number of corporate and volunteer boards. She has over 18 years of experience in legal and human resources roles. She holds an LL.B from Osgoode Hall Law School.

Summary

On September 14, 2020, the Corporations Nominating Panel conducted interviews and recommended three candidates to City Council for appointment to the CreateTO Board.

Background Information

(September 14, 2020) Decision Letter from the Nominating Panel - Corporations (CC24.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156639.pdf
(September 2, 2020) Report from the City Clerk on CreateTO Board - Appointment of Public Members
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156640.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Candidates, Qualifications, and Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information Summary and Applications for Appointment to the CreateTO Board (previously distributed with Item NC6.2)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Diversity Information Summary for Current Public Members of the CreateTO Board (previously distributed with Item NC6.2)
Confidential Attachment 3 - Interview Schedule for the CreateTO Board Interviews on September 14, 2020
Confidential Attachment 4 - Interview Questions for the CreateTO Board Interviews on September 14, 2020

CC24.5 - Addressing Youth Violence through Advance Peace

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(September 15, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Recommendations

The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council receives this report for information.

Summary

This report provides information from City staff review on how the Advance Peace program can support existing City of Toronto efforts that are aimed at violence interruption, intervention and prevention, specifically, the development of TO Wards Peace.  

 

Advance Peace is a non-profit organization based in Richmond, California that aims to reduce the spread of gun violence in urban neighbourhoods in America. The Advance Peace program works to interrupt and prevent gun violence by identifying and providing "transformational opportunities" (e.g. case management services, social service navigation, internship opportunities, etc.) to young men who are most likely to be perpetrators of gun violence.

 

In 2019, Toronto City Council requested Social Development, Finance & Administration Division to develop TO Wards Peace as a strategic community safety intervention. TO Wards Peace is a comprehensive Toronto-made model for violence interruption, intervention and prevention. The model is currently in development and will leverage the lived experiences of credible community members within the city, health and community teams, service agencies, and grassroots groups.

 

Social Development, Finance and Administration's review of the Advance Peace program, including consultations with the Advance Peace organization, provided key learnings of international best practices that can help to inform the development of the TO Wards Peace model.

Background Information

(September 15, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Addressing Youth Violence through Advance Peace (CC24.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156834.pdf

CC24.6 - Further Information on 233 Carlton Street Lease Agreement

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
Communications CC24.6.1 to CC24.6.4 have been submitted on this Item.

Origin

(September 17, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Recommendations

The Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, recommends that:

 

1. City Council receive this report for information.

Summary

As directed by City Council at its meeting on July 28 and 29, 2020, the purpose of this report is to provide further information on the lease agreement at 233 Carlton Street including: 1) information pertaining to how the property first came to the attention of City Officials, 2) potential communications between senior City Officials and the WE Charity which may have impacted decision-making on site location and financial terms, and, 3) information supporting the fair market value of the lease.

 

The City of Toronto (the "Tenant") entered into a Lease Agreement (the "Lease") with 1622774 Ontario Ltd. (the "Landlord"), for the property located at 233 Carlton Street (the "Property"), as a replacement location for the Adelaide Resource Centre for Women, currently located at 67 Adelaide Street East. The Lease was authorized by way of Council-approved real estate delegated authorities in August 2019, and adhered to the established approvals process supported by due diligence, and informed by market research and analysis.

Background Information

(September 17, 2020) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on Further Information: 233 Carlton Street Lease Agreement (CC24.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156835.pdf

Communications

(September 23, 2020) Letter from Gale Moore (CC.Main.CC24.6.1)
(September 26, 2020) Letter from Sean O’Donovan, Acting Chair, Cabbagetown Residents Association (CC.Supp.CC24.6.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-119867.pdf
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Howard Bortenstein, Cabbagetown Coalition (CC.New.CC24.6.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-121189.pdf
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Dee Lewis, President, Winchester Park Residents’ Association (CC.New.CC24.6.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/comm/communicationfile-121396.pdf

CC24.7 - 2600 Don Mills Road - Request for Direction Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Don Valley North

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation

Origin

(September 23, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report (September 23, 2020) from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report (September 23, 2020) from the City Solicitor, if adopted by Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1, to the report (September 23, 2020) from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential, as it contains advice and information which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

On July 27, 2020, City Council adopted recommendations in support of a revised Zoning By-law Amendment and enacted an Official Plan Amendment, through By-law 625-2020, in relation to the redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 2600 Don Mills Road.  In general, the development application proposed to develop the site with a 33-storey infill residential building with a height of 102.35 metres plus mechanical penthouse that would contain 354 residential dwelling units, to the west of the existing 19-storey residential building.  Fifteen, three to four-storey townhouses are proposed fronting onto Don Mills Road.  An additional fifteen three to four-storey stacked townhouse units are proposed at the south of the site, fronting onto a new public street. The existing 19-storey rental apartment building containing 226 units would be retained.

 

The proposed increase in height and density is subject to Section 37 of the Planning Act. City Council directed City Staff to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve the allocation of the Section 37 contribution and directed the City Solicitor to report back to City Council on the outcome of those discussion, if necessary.  City Staff have continued those discussions, and the applicant has made an offer to the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act.

 

The purpose of this report is to request further instructions for the LPAT hearing that is scheduled to commence October 26, 2020.

 

City Planning has been involved in the preparation of this report.

Background Information

(September 23, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor on 2600 Don Mills Road - Request for Direction Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing (CC24.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156917.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Letter from WeirFoulds LLP dated September 4, 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156900.pdf
Public Attachment 2 - Architectural Plans prepared by Quadrangle Architects Limited dated September 4, 2020 for the property municipally known as 2600 Don Mills Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156901.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC24.8 - 2901 Bayview Avenue and 630 Sheppard Avenue East - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Don Valley North

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.

Origin

(September 21, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 from the City Solicitor at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and all the information in Confidential Appendix "A" to Confidential Attachment 1 from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential, as it contains advice and information, which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

The Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications for the subject site have been appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) on the basis that the City failed to make a decision within the prescribed time period set out in the Planning Act.

 

On November 16, 2018, the applicant submitted a revised proposal.  A Request for Directions report dated May 13, 2019 was adopted by North York Community Council and City Council on June 18, 2019 which directed the City Solicitor and staff to continue to oppose the applications at the LPAT.

 

The purpose of this report is to request further instructions for the 15-day LPAT hearing that is scheduled to commence September 21, 2020.

Background Information

(September 21, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor on 2901 Bayview Avenue and 630 Sheppard Avenue East - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment - Request for Directions (CC24.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156920.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Settlement Offer Letter dated September 2, 2020, prepared by McCarthy Tetrault LLP
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156906.pdf
Public Attachment 2 - Architectural Plans and Drawings for the Settlement Offer (Part 1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156907.pdf
Public Attachment 2 - Architectural Plans and Drawings for the Settlement Offer (Part 2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156908.pdf
Public Attachment 2 - Architectural Plans and Drawings for the Settlement Offer (Part 3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156909.pdf
Public Attachment 2 - Architectural Plans and Drawings for the Settlement Offer (Part 4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156910.pdf
Public Attachment 2 - Architectural Plans and Drawings for the Settlement Offer (Part 5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156911.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A

CC24.9 - 39 - 45 Thora Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Applications - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Scarborough Southwest

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.

Origin

(September 23, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.  If the confidential recommendations are adopted by City Council, City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1, but that the remainder of Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek further instructions for the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) hearing on the appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment and site plan application for 39-45 Thora Avenue (the "Subject Site").

 

The four-day LPAT hearing scheduled to commence on September 15, 2020 was adjourned to allow the City Solicitor to seek further instruction from City Council. The LPAT intends to schedule another hearing date in mid-October.

Background Information

(September 23, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor on 39 - 45 Thora Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Applications - Request for Directions (CC24.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156902.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - With Prejudice Letter from Overland LLP dated September 4, 2020, Architectural Drawings prepared by Studio Canoo Architecture dated August 18, 2020, and Landscape Plans dated August 19, 2020 prepared by Thincdesign
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156903.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC24.10 - 64-66 Wellesley Street East, 552-570 Church Street and City-owned Public Lane - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.

Origin

(September 23, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (September 23, 2020) from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (September 23, 2020) from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (September 23, 2020) from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

On or around August 26, 2020, the applicant submitted drawings in support of a further revised proposal on a with prejudice basis.  The purpose of this report is to request further instructions for the newly scheduled LPAT hearing that is scheduled to commence December 3, 2020 to continue on December 4, 7, 8, 11, and 14 to 18, 2020.

 

Six procedural appearances (being prehearings, case management conferences, and status updates) have been held with the LPAT to date on June 28, 2018, October 19, 2018, November 28, 2018, March 15, 2019, February 10, 2020, and August 19, 2020.

Background Information

(September 23, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor on 64-66 Wellesley Street East, 552-570 Church Street and City-owned Public Lane - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Request for Directions (CC24.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156922.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Architectural Plans prepared by Graziani + Corazza Architects Inc., dated August 31, 2020 for the property municipally known as 64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156923.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC24.11 - Development Charges - Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Decision - 2157 Lake Shore Boulevard West (Humber Bay Shores)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City of Toronto and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(September 21, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1, once adopted by City Council. 

 

3.  City Council direct that the remainder of Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential in its entirety, as it relates to litigation involving the City and contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

This report provides information regarding a legal challenge to a decision issued by the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT") on August 7, 2020, in respect of a series of development charge complaints filed by the Humber Bay Shores Landowners Group pursuant to section 20 of the Development Charges Act, 1997.

Background Information

(September 21, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor on Development Charges - Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Decision - 2157 Lake Shore Boulevard West (Humber Bay Shores) (CC24.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156905.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC24.12 - Don Mills Crossing - Request for directions regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Appeal

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Don Valley East

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies or corporations and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(September 18, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  The recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report and Confidential Appendices "A", "B" and "C" be made public at such time as Council adopts the recommendations.  All other information contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential.

Summary

Loblaw Properties Ltd and Damis Properties Limited (the "Appellants") each filed an appeal with the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT") of the Don Mills Crossing Secondary Plan (Official Plan Amendment No. 404).  The purpose of this report is to seek instruction for the LPAT appeals.  The LPAT hearing has been scheduled for November 24th to December 3rd, 2020.

Background Information

(September 18, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor on Don Mills Crossing - Request for directions regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Appeal (CC24.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156931.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on October 13, 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156933.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - made public on October 13, 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157000.pdf
Confidential Appendix C - made public on October 13, 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157001.pdf

CC24.13 - Village of Yorkville - City-Initiated Zoning Amendment for Front Yard Setbacks - Properties Municipally known as 98-164 Cumberland Street, 153-159 Cumberland Street, 70-140 Yorkville Avenue, 63-137 Yorkville Avenue, 25-29 Bellair Street, and 18-26 Bellair Street - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.

Origin

(September 18, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the City Solicitor's Report.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the City Solicitor's Report at the discretion of the City Solicitor if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the City Solicitor's Report is to remain confidential, as it contains advice and information which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

 

4.  City Council authorise the public release of Confidential Attachment 2 to the City Solicitor's Report at the discretion of the City Solicitor in the event City Council adopts the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the City Solicitor's Report.

Summary

City of Toronto By-laws 119-2018 and 120-2018 were adopted by City Council on February 1, 2018 (the "Zoning By-laws").  The Zoning By-laws amended City of Toronto By-law 569-2013, as amended and former City of Toronto By-law 438-86, as amended, to require a minimum front yard setback for properties within the Village of Yorkville (being 98-164 Cumberland Street, 153-159 Cumberland Street, 70-140 Yorkville Avenue, 63-137 Yorkville Avenue, 25-29 Bellair Street, and 18-26 Bellair Street).  The minimum front yard setback for these properties under the Zoning By-laws is 3 metres or, for properties with existing front yard setbacks greater than 3 metres, the average of the existing setback of the front wall containing the principal pedestrian entrance located farthest from the front lot line and 3 metres.

 

The Zoning By-laws were appealed by seven parties to the former Ontario Municipal Board in early 2018.  A 5-day hearing by the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) scheduled to commence on August 31, 2020 was adjourned by the LPAT.

Background Information

(September 18, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor on Village of Yorkville - City-Initiated Zoning Amendment for Front Yard Setbacks - Properties Municipally known as 98-164 Cumberland Street, 153-159 Cumberland Street, 70-140 Yorkville Avenue, 63-137 Yorkville Avenue, 25-29 Bellair Street, and 18-26 Bellair Street - Request for Directions (CC24.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156915.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2 - made public on January 8, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-156936.pdf

CC24.14 - 80-82 Bloor Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies or corporations and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Origin

(September 22, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to this Report from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations  contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A and Confidential Appendix B to the report (September 22, 2020) of the City Solicitor, at the sole discretion of the City Solicitor.

Summary

At its meeting of July 28 and 29, 2020, City Council adopted the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (July 29, 2020) from the City Solicitor, as amended.

 

The City Solicitor requires further instructions.

Background Information

(September 22, 2020) Report from the City Solicitor on 80-82 Bloor Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction (CC24.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157020.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on October 13, 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157003.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - made public on October 13, 2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-157004.pdf

Member Motions - Meeting 24

MM24.1 - 1151 Queen Street East - Technical Amendments to By-law 234-2020 - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Bill 760 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council enact the draft By-law attached to Motion MM24.1 amending By-law 234-2020, site specific amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013, for the lands located at 1151 Queen Street East.

 

2.  City Council determine that the changes contained within the revised By-law is minor, technical in nature, and reflective of the original proposal and plans considered by City Council, and, pursuant to subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further public notice is required in respect of the proposed amendment to the Zoning By-law.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft amending By-law as may be required.

Summary

At its meeting on January 29, 2020, City Council deferred Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE12.7, headed "Final Report – 1151 Queen Street East –Zoning Amendment Application", which recommended amendments to City of Toronto Zoning By-laws 438-86 and 569-2013 in order to permit the redevelopment of 1151 Queen Street East with a 6-storey mixed-use building.  At its meeting on February 26, 2020, City Council adopted as amended, Item TE12.7, headed "Supplementary Report – 1151 Queen Street East – Zoning Amendment Application",by adopting the supplementary report which outlined minor changes required to achieve a geothermal energy system on site. At the same meeting, Council adopted enacted By-laws 233-2020 and 234-2020, which implemented the approved amendments.

 

Technical amendments are required to By-law 234-2020 in order to ensure that building permits can be issued for the development approved by Council. The amendments pertain to additional clarification in By-law 234-2020 in order to specify that floor height dimensions are less than the 4.5 metres required in the current by-law. This discrepancy is due to an interpretation issue regarding measurements made between floor-to-floor (4.5 metres) and floor-to ceiling (4.35 metres). The 15 centimetre difference is considered minor and technical and no changes have been made to the plans approved by Council.

 

This Motion is urgent to ensure the orderly processing of the building permit for a development that has been approved by Council.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156937.pdf
Attachment 1 - Draft Amending By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156985.pdf

MM24.2 - Call Me Maybe: Improving Transparency by Making Staff Directories Available to the Public - by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct that all staff positions in all City Divisions, Agencies, Commissions and Corporations be listed in directories showing name, position, phone number and e-mail address, organized according to the operating structure of each organization. 

 

2.  City Council request Agencies, Boards, Commissions and Corporations to make their staff directories available to the public through each entity's website.

Summary

The City of Toronto is committed to an open and transparent government.  One example of this transparency is on-line public access to City staff directories.  Directories make staff accessible by listing their names, positions and phone numbers.  They also indicate the size of the Divisions as well as their scope of work by organizing the listings according to division, unit, etc.

 

Unfortunately this level of transparency is not consistent within the City's Agencies, Boards and Commissions.  Some list senior leadership positions on their websites, but without contact information.  Some do not list any staff.  Generally it is either very difficult or impossible for a member of the public to contact these public employees, or see how these organizations are sized and structured.

 

This Motion proposes to improve transparency by making it mandatory for Agencies, Boards and Commissions to list the names and titles of staff by division, department and unit (as appropriate) in online directories that are accessible to the public.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156927.pdf

MM24.3 - Community Safety Zones - Rockcliffe Boulevard and Castleton Avenue - Housekeeping Amendment - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Bill 780 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that: 

 

1. City Council rescind the community safety zone designation in effect at all times on Rockcliffe Boulevard, between Alliance Avenue and St. Clair Avenue West.

 

2. City Council designate a community safety zone to be in effect at all times on Rockcliffe Boulevard, between Alliance Avenue and Castleton Avenue/Corbett Avenue.

 

3. City Council designate a community safety zone to be in effect at all times on Castleton Avenue, between Rockcliffe Boulevard/Corbett Avenue and St. Clair Avenue West.

Summary

Rockcliffe Boulevard, between Alliance Avenue and Castleton Avenue/Corbett Avenue, is classified as a collector road and has a regulatory speed limit of 30 km/h. This highway is on the frontage of Rockcliffe Middle School.

 

Castleton Avenue, between Rockcliffe Boulevard/Corbett Avenue and St. Clair Avenue West, is classified as a collector road and has a regulatory speed limit of 40 km/h. This highway is on the frontage of residential properties.

 

Rockcliffe Boulevard was designated as a community safety zone as part of the "Vision Zero Road Safety Plan: Designation of Community Safety Zones around Elementary Schools" (Item PW30.5adopted as amended by City Council on June 26, 27, 28 and 29, 2018).

 

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2018.PW30.5

 

The location of this community safety zone designation was misidentified in the original report/Item. In order to sign and enforce the Community Safety Zone designation, a correction is required.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156938.pdf

MM24.4 - Corner Rounding at 155 St. Clair Avenue West - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Communication MM24.4.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to approve the acquisition of the property shown as Part 1 on the draft reference plan attached as Appendix A to Motion MM24.4, being part of 155 St. Clair Avenue West, in accordance with the delegated authorities set out in Article 2 of City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 213, Real Property, without satisfying General Condition (H) of Appendix B of the chapter.

Summary

Transportation Services has identified a number of corner rounding requirements throughout the City which would serve to enhance public and road safety measures. One such requirement has been identified at the south-west corner of St. Clair Avenue West and Avenue Road in Ward 12. Securing a corner rounding at this location is time-sensitive and would help to address ongoing safety corners with respect to pedestrian traffic and crossings at this intersection.

 

To achieve this objective, the City must acquire a small parcel of land (0.77 square metres) at the corner of St. Clair Avenue West and Avenue Road, shown as Part 1 on the draft plan of reference set out in Appendix A (the "Property"). To be authorized by delegated authority, this transaction must satisfy all General Conditions set out in Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 213, Real Property, Appendix B, including General Condition (H) which states:

 

"Authority to acquire property is conditional upon provision being made to bring the property into compliance with applicable Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (or any successor Ministry) or other requirements such that it will be fit for its intended municipal purpose, except for property acquisitions of 50 square metres or less for transit shelter purposes."

 

City staff have advised that is not feasible to conduct an environmental site assessment on the Property, given its small size. City staff have advised, however, that the potential risk of acquiring the Property without carrying out any environmental due diligence is minimal, again given the small size of the Property, as well as its location being adjacent to existing City-owned property already used as a public highway.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156930.pdf
Appendix A - Draft Reference Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156955.pdf

Communications

(September 28, 2020) E-mail from Brian Tyndale (MM.Supp.MM24.4.1)

MM24.5 - Exploring Indigenous Economic Opportunities in Toronto's Ravines - by Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council direct the Director, Indigenous Affairs Office and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in collaboration with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and various Indigenous organizations and communities, to explore the feasibility of developing economic opportunities for Indigenous businesses that contribute to the goals of Toronto's Ravine Strategy and Indigenous place-making in Toronto's parklands for report back to the Economic and Community Development Committee by the second quarter of 2021.

Summary

Toronto's Ravine Strategy guides the management of the ravines and ensures the protection of these irreplaceable lands is balanced with their use and enjoyment, so that they continue to bring nature to people and healthy ecology and biodiversity to Canada's largest urban centre.

 

There is community and City staff interest in exploring business opportunities for Toronto's Indigenous communities within and throughout the city's vast and diverse ravine system. This could be various initiatives that restore the unique ecosystem through landscape design, seed gathering, plant propagation, plant instillation or ecosystem monitoring.

 

This work must be considered working directly with Indigenous communities and organizations (ex. Toronto Indigenous Business Association, City of Toronto's interim Indigenous Place-Making Circle, Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business, etc.).

 

This innovative and creative partnership could bring the goals and actions of the Ravine Strategy to life, while providing pilot project ideas for the diverse Indigenous business organizations and communities within Toronto.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156934.pdf

MM24.6 - Heritage Plaque to Commemorate Oriole Lodge - by Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor John Filion

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Don Valley North
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor John Filion, recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council increase the Approved 2020 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $2,200 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 125 George Henry Boulevard, 32-80 Forest Manor Road, 85-130 Parkway Forest Drive, and 1751 and 1761 Sheppard Avenue East (Source Account: XR3026-3700706), for the production and installation of a heritage plaque to commemorate the construction of Oriole Lodge at 17 Manorpark Court (Cost Centre: HG0001).

Summary

This Motion seeks authorization to release $2,200 in Section 37 funds to Heritage Toronto for a heritage plaque to commemorate the construction of Oriole Lodge at 17 Manorpark Court.

 

The house at 17 Manorpark Court was originally called Oriole Lodge. It is best known as the home of George Stewart Henry (1871-1958), who was Premier of Ontario from 1930 to 1934.

 

In 1806, Henry's great-grandparents Henry and Jane Mulholland settled in what is today North York and operated a farm near the site of 17 Manorpark Court. The exact date that Oriole Lodge was built is disputed -- dates range from 1824 to 1841. Construction was carried out by Stilwell Willson, who used plank-on-plank construction.

 

In 1898, Henry purchased the property from his grandfather, James Stewart. He enlarged the house from 8 to 15 rooms using balloon frame construction. The house is clad with variegated yellow brick. Date stones in the north and south gables are marked 1840 and 1912. A notable feature is the Tuscan columns on the verandah. Henry lived in the house until his death in 1958. Today, it is a landmark in the residential Henry Farm neighbourhood.

 

The City has secured funds under Section 37 of the Planning Act with the owner of the development at 125 George Henry Boulevard, 32-80 Forest Manor Road, 85-130 Parkway Forest Drive, and 1751 and 1761 Sheppard Avenue East, authorized by site-specific Zoning By-law 342-2015(OMB). The zoning by-law and Section 37 Agreement with the landowner provide that the funds shall be used towards parks improvements. Sufficient funds remain available in the Planning Act Reserve Account to produce and install the heritage plaque at this location. The use of these funds for this purpose complies with the by-law and agreement.

 

As Heritage Toronto is a directly funded City agency and not an "outside party", no undertaking is required to be signed by Heritage Toronto to govern the use of the funds and financial reporting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156939.pdf

MM24.7 - Installation of sidewalks on Coldstream Avenue and South Kingslea Drive - by Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore, 8 - Eglinton - Lawrence
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Communications MM24.7.1 to MM24.7.5 have been submitted on this item.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services not to proceed with the installation of new sidewalks as part of road reconstruction on Coldstream Avenue, between Chicoutimi Avenue and Mona Drive, in Ward 8 Eglinton-Lawrence and on South Kingslea Drive, between Kingslea Court and Ivy Lea Crescent, in Ward 3 Etobicoke-Lakeshore.

Summary

As part of the annual state-of-good-repair program, sidewalks are often added where they were not previously present as part of a road reconstruction project.  Transportation Services has delegated authority to construct sidewalks on local roadways as part of road reconstruction, in accordance with the Missing Sidewalk Installation Policy.  In July 2019, Council directed that sidewalk proposals not otherwise delegated to the General Manager, Transportation Services, or those requested by a Member of Council, be subject to decision by City Council.

 

For the following two local roadway locations programmed for reconstruction, an overwhelming majority of residents living on the street have raised opposition to the installation of a new sidewalk:

  • Coldstream Avenue, between Chicoutimi Avenue and Mona Drive, in Ward 8 Eglinton-Lawrence
  • South Kingslea Drive, between Kingslea Court and Ivy Lea Crescent, in Ward 3 Etobicoke-Lakeshore

 Residents on these streets have expressed strong opposition to the proposed sidewalk installations, voicing concerns such as impacts on mature trees and neighbourhood character.  In light of this feedback from local residents, as well as the fact that these are both low-volume roadways generally used by local traffic, the local Councillors formally request that City Council direct that Transportation Services not proceed with the installation of new sidewalks at these locations.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.7
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156929.pdf

Communications

(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Pamela Gough, Walk Toronto (MM.New.MM24.7.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/comm/communicationfile-121410.pdf
(October 2, 2020) E-mail from Fiona Campbell (MM.New.MM24.7.2)
(October 2, 2020) E-mail from Regina Jokel (MM.New.MM24.7.3)
(October 2, 2020) E-mail from Regina Jokel (MM.New.MM24.7.4)
(October 2, 2020) E-mail from Jennifer Gray (MM.New.MM24.7.5)
(September 30, 2020) Petition from approximately 62 persons to stop the installation of sidewalks on either side of South Kingslea Drive and on the other side streets in the greater Sunnylea area, submitted by Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 3, Etobicoke-Lakeshore, filed during the Routine Matters portion of the meeting (MM.New)

MM24.8 - Release of Section 37 Funds from 5365 Dundas Street West to MABELLEarts for Capital Improvements to Mabelle Parkette - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council increase the Approved 2020 Operating Budget for Non-Program on a one-time basis by $316,384.70 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Funds) community benefits from 5365 Dundas Street West (Source Account: XR3026-3700780) for transfer to MABELLEarts for the purpose of undertaking capital improvements to Mabelle Parkette (Cost Centre: NP2161).

 

2.  City Council direct that the $316,384.70 be forwarded to MABELLEarts, subject to the MABELLEarts signing an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

Summary

This Motion recommends the release of Sections 37 Planning Act funds to MABELLEarts for the purpose of undertaking capital improvements to Mabelle Parkette.

 

The project will completely transform Mabelle Parkette, providing a beautiful outdoor space, an extension of everyone's livingroom. This will include a new Field House, new Living (planted) Walls, textured concrete paths, a new Rain Garden and an additional entry point. Toronto Community Housing would also benefit from the funds by allocation to projects within the Mabelle Community.

 

Funds have been secured from the development at 5365 Dundas Street West as community benefits through Sections 37 of the Planning Act to be used toward capital improvements for community services and facilities in the vicinity of the Lands. The funds identified have been received by the City.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.8
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156943.pdf

MM24.9 - Supporting Taxi Operators from COVID-related Financial hardship - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the General Government and Licensing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie, recommends that: 

 

1. City Council request the City Manager to consider, as part of his upcoming October 2020 COVID-19 Financial report, the reduction of taxicab licensing renewal fees for 2020.
 

2. City Council request the General Government and Licensing Committee, at its November meeting, to consider an amendment to Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire to extend the maximum age of vehicles used as a taxicab, sedan limousine or private transportation company vehicle from seven model years to nine model years, for vehicles of the 2013 model year and onward, and the maximum age of vehicles used as a stretch limousine from eight model years to ten model years, for vehicles of the 2012 model year and onward.

Summary

Toronto’s Taxicab industry has been experiencing economic hardship for over a decade, which has only been accelerated and exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the pandemic, the industry has lost over 90 percent of their business, with approximately 95 percent of the fleet having been parked or without service since the state of emergency began. As Toronto continues its cautious reopening, the Taxicab owners estimate it will take the Taxicab industry an additional 12-18 months to fully recover at full service levels and revenues.

 

For the Taxicab industry to survive, they need immediate financial relief and assistance from the City of Toronto. Despite access to the Canadian Emergency Response Benefit (CERB), many taxi owners have indicated that they will be unable to pay the existing taxi renewal fees, and are concerned about their ability to replace their fleet when they reach the end of their current viability cycle.

 

In keeping these factors in mind, we are requesting that the City Council to consider the following recommendations and provide immediate relief to taxi operators across the City of Toronto.

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM24.9
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156956.pdf

MM24.10 - 1141 Bloor Street West, 980 Dufferin Street and 90 Croatia Street - Parkland Conveyance - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that: 

 

1. City Council approve the acceptance of on-site parkland dedication as previously authorized in Item TE11.7 adopted by City Council on December 17 and 18, 2019 for the lands municipally known as 1141 Bloor Street, 980 Dufferin Street and 90 Croatia Street, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances, and encroachments, with exception of the Garrison Trunk Sewer as previously permitted, in an acceptable environmental condition; the owner may propose the exception of encumbrances of tiebacks and such other encumbrances, if any, where such encumbrances are deemed acceptable by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the City Solicitor; and such encumbrances will be subject to the payment of compensation to the City, in an amount as determined by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.

Summary

City staff have requested that this Motion be approved by City Council in relation to parkland conveyance for the proposed development at 1141 Bloor Street West/980Dufferin Street/90 Croatia Street.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.10
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156960.pdf

MM24.11 - Annual report to City Council by 311 - by Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the General Government and Licensing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the Director, 311 Toronto to submit an annual update report directly to City Council outlining important service issues and trends.

 

2. City Council direct the Director, 311 Toronto to send a quarterly Briefing Note to all City Councillors summarizing quarterly trends and findings from a 311 perspective.

Summary

Since 311 interacts with over 300,000 Toronto residents every year and provides a wide range of vital City Services, it is important that there be an annual presentation by 311 officials to City Council in order to better inform Members of Council and the residents of Toronto about the vital service and operation of this key City link with the people of Toronto.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.11
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156958.pdf

MM24.12 - 96 Spadina Avenue and 379, 383, 385 and 391 Adelaide Street West - Zoning Amendment - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that: 

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 96 Spadina Avenue and 379, 383, 385 and 391 Adelaide Street West in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment in Attachment 1 to Motion MM24.12

 

2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 96 Spadina Avenue and 379, 383, 385 and 391 Adelaide Street West in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment in Attachment 2 to Motion MM24.12.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4. City Council determine that the changes contained within the revised By-laws are minor, technical in nature, and reflective of the original proposal and plans considered by City Council, and pursuant to subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further public notice is required in respect of the proposed amendment to the Zoning By-laws.

Summary

At its meeting of October 29 and 30, 2019, Toronto City Council adopted Item TE9.9, adopting Draft Zoning By-law Amendments to Zoning By-laws 438-86 and 569-2013 for 96 Spadina Avenue and 379, 383, 385 and 391 Adelaide Street West, to permit a development of a 16-storey office building.

 

The adopted Draft Zoning By-laws prescribe a 6.5 metre stepback on the eight floor above the exiting heritage building along Adelaide Street, while the rest of the storeys above cantilever over this stepback. It has come to City Planning's attention that structural issues related to the retention of the heritage building and the proposed building's transfer columns require reducing the eight floor stepback to 5.5 metres. A 5.5 metre stepback meets City Planning's heritage and built form policies, and would provide an acceptable building stepback along the Adelaide Street West frontage.

 

The proposed revision to the Draft By-laws revises Diagram 7 and Map 2 to reflect the eighth floor 5.5 metre stepback along Adelaide Street West. No other changes have been made to the proposal, as approved, and it is therefore the opinion of City Planning and Legal Staff that the required changes are minor and technical in nature. As such, the draft Zoning By-laws should be replaced with the attached draft Zoning By-law amendments.

 

As the proposed change is considered minor and technical in nature, it is appropriate for City Council to deem that no further notice be required pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act. This is an urgent matter since the Zoning By-laws were adopted in October, 2019, and further delay may cause hardship to the applicant.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.12
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156962.pdf
Attachment 1 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to By-law 438-86
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156982.pdf
Attachment 2 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to By-law 569-2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156983.pdf

MM24.13 - 7 Broadmead Avenue - Representation at a Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing - by Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Scarborough Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to a Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing in respect of 7 Broadmead Avenue to oppose the consent to sever in Committee of Adjustment Application B0005/20SC.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to bring resolution of the matter in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Summary

The Applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever the land into two residential lots for detached dwellings. The Committee of Adjustment approved the severance of the land into two lots in 2018, but the conditions were not met within one year and the approval lapsed (File B011/15SC). The Applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Application B0005/20SC) requesting consent to sever the land into two lots in the same configuration previously approved by the Committee of Adjustment. At its hearing on July 23, 2020, the Committee of Adjustment refused the Application (the "Decision"). The Notice of Decision is attached.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.13
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156963.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Scarborough Panel Notice of Decision on Application for Consent for 7 Broadmead Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156980.pdf

MM24.14 - 11 Brooklawn Avenue - Representation at a Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing - by Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Scarborough Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to a Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing in respect of 11 Brooklawn Avenue to oppose the variances in Committee of Adjustment Application A0096/20S.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to bring resolution of the matter in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Summary

The Applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Application A0096/20S, the "Application") to construct a new two-storey detached dwelling. The Application requests variances with respect to lot coverage, building height, floor space index and height of exterior main walls. At its hearing on July 23, 2020, the Committee of Adjustment refused the Application (the "Decision"). The Notice of Decision is attached.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.14
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156944.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Scarborough Panel Notice of Decision on Application for Minor Variance for 11 Brooklawn Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156981.pdf

MM24.15 - Release of Section 37 Funds to Build a LGBTQ2S+ Transitional Home for Friends of Ruby (formerly the Egale Centre/Egale Human Rights Trust) in a Toronto Community Housing Building at 257 Dundas Street East - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie, recommends that: 

 

1. City Council increase Approved 2020 Operating Budget for Non-Program on a one-time basis by $150,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Funds) community benefits from 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 and 4 Dundonald Street, and 7 and 9 Gloucester Street (Source Account XR3026-3700894) for transfer to Friends of Ruby in order help renovate and retrofit the Toronto Community Housing Corporation owned property at 257 Dundas Street to create a 30-bed affordable housing facility for LGBTQ2S homeless youth (Cost Centre NP-2161).

 

2. City Council direct that the $150,000.00 be forwarded to Friends of Ruby, subject to Friends of Ruby signing an undertaking governing the use of the funds for capital improvements and for financial reporting requirements.

Summary

This Motion recommends the release of Sections 37 Planning Act funds to Friends of Ruby (formerly the Egale Centre/Egale Human Rights Trust) for the purpose of undertaking capital improvements to a Toronto Community Housing Corporation owned building at 257 Dundas Street East. The building in its current form will require extensive work to renovate the building and create a 30-bed transitional housing facility for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered, Transsexual, Queer and Two-spirited (LGBTQ2S+) homeless youth. 

 

In July 2015, City Council authorized the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to enter into a purchase of service agreement with Egale Human Rights Trust for the establishment of a new permanent 30-bed transitional and emergency housing program for LGBTQ2S youth in the former Ward 27, now Ward 13.

 

The Ward Councillor has to date supported a contribution of $1 million in Section 37 to the former Egale Centre site at 257 Dundas Street East. Friends of Ruby have formally requested funding support of an additional $150,000 to fund the gap for construction renovations. This funding would help them meet their goal of approximately $15.5 million in total project costs.

 

The 2018 Toronto Street Needs Assessment found that 11 percent of respondents identify as a part of the LGBTQ2S community, with 24 percent of respondents 16 to 24 years of age identifying as LGBTQ2S. Outdoor respondents were also slightly more likely to identify as LGBTQ2S compared to other surveyed groups. Compared to other groups, youth respondents staying in City-administered shelters and respondents staying outdoors were more likely to identify as non-heterosexual. As such, City Council has prioritized enhancing the shelter, transitional, and long term housing supports available in Toronto to LGBTQ2S+ youth.

 

Funds have been secured from the development at 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 and 4 Dundonald Street, and 7 and 9 Gloucester Street as community benefits through Section 37 of the Planning Act towards Toronto Community Housing Corporation for capital improvements and/or community, cultural or recreational space improvements in the local area. The funds identified have been received by the City.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.15
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156945.pdf

MM24.16 - City Solicitor Attendance to the Toronto Local Appeal Body re: Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision (A0130/20EYK) for 241 Maple Leaf Drive - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Motion with Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that: 

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City Staff, to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in respect of 241 Maple Leaf Drive to uphold the Committee of Adjustment’s refusal of Application A0130/20EYK.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached, to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion after consulting with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Summary

The Architect (the "Applicant"), on behalf of the Owner, applied to the Etobicoke-York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment for minor variances respecting the site at 241 Maple Leaf Drive (the "Application"). Application (A0130/20EYK) sought permissions to construct a two-storey rear addition and a one-storey front addition.

 

On July 3, 2020 the Committee of Adjustment issued a Public Hearing Notice for the Application. The virtual hearing began on July 14, but the Committee of Adjustment had to cancel and rescheduled all hearings that day due to technical difficulties with the virtual format. A new Public Hearing Notice was issued on July 31, 2020.

 

Several area residents voiced their objection to the Application and submitted comments on record for the Committee of Adjustment hearing.

 

On August 13, 2020 the Committee of Adjustment refused the Application. The Decision is attached to this Motion.

 

On September 2, 2020 the applicant filed to appeal the Decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body.

 

This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor to oppose the Applicant’s Toronto Local Appeal Body appeal.

 

This Motion is urgent as the Committee of Adjustment's decision has been appealed and the City Solicitor requires instructions to attend the hearing.

 

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.16
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156964.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance for 241 Maple Leaf Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156984.pdf

MM24.17 - Eglinton Avenue West - Little Jamaica - by Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Ana Bailão, recommends that: 

 

1. City Council request the City Manager to report to the Executive Committee as soon as possible on the following urgent actions required to insure immediate help for the survival of small businesses on Eglinton Avenue West that are impacted by 10 years of construction in building the Eglinton Crosstown:

 

a. compensation to small business owners for losses suffered by ten (10) years of Eglinton LRT Crosstown Construction;

 

b. immediate completion of westerly portion from Eglinton West to Black Creek as requested by City Council Motion MM16.8 (February, 2020);

 

c. reform of the Provincial Property Tax Assessment System whereby commercial property is assessed on actual and present use and not on highest and best use speculative; and

  

d. an immediate request for Metrolinx/Crosslinx to eliminate all the surface construction equipment on Eglinton West from public sidewalks and road allowances.

 

2. City Council direct the City Manager, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, along with Anti-Black Racism Unit (CABR) to report back as soon as possible on the immediate actions required to establish the Eglinton West area as a Little Jamaica Heritage and Innovation Heritage Hub that recognizes and promotes the local Black History and culture of the area, including the following:  

 

a. the feasibility of creating an Eglinton West (Dufferin Street to Allen Road) Little Jamaica Heritage and Economic Innovation Hub;

 

b. creation of a framework for a consultation process in consultation with organizations that the General Manager and City Staff recommend be included in the public outreach and consultation process including Metrolinx/Crosslinx, the local Business Improvement Areas, the Black Business Professional Association and the Canadian Jamaican Association; and

 

c. incorporate recognition of outstanding local Eglinton West Black Civil Rights leaders like Charles Roach, Dudley Laws and Jimmy Wisdom at the 3 Crosstown Stations of Fairbank, Oakwood and Eglinton West-Crosstown interchange Station.

Summary

With the construction of the Eglinton Crosstown reaching its final stages, there is an opportunity to invest in the preservation and recognition of the unique heritage of The Eglinton West Community of Little Jamaica and at the same time create an Economic Innovation Hub that would provide support to existing small businesses and offer unique opportunities for new start-ups in the area.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.17
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156946.pdf

MM24.18 - The Bentway Under Gardiner Corridor Plan Proposal - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Communication MM24.18.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that: 

 

1. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Transportation Services, the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships to review The Bentway Conservancy's Under Gardiner Corridor Plan proposal and consider which aspects of the proposal are aligned with City plans, policies and programs and which could be realized through planning and development applications/approvals, rehabilitation/maintenance programs related to City roads, sidewalks and related infrastructure, and capital programs related to public realm improvement.

 

2. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to meet with The Bentway Conservancy in Fall 2020 to develop an updated framework by Spring 2021 for how Gardiner maintenance programs/protocols can be optimized to facilitate the programming of renewed public spaces beneath the Gardiner, including The Bentway.

Summary

The City and its partners continue to advance the strategic goal of removing barriers/making new connections along major transportation infrastructure through projects such as Underpass Park, the Waterfront Business Improvement Area Under Gardiner improvements, the East Gardiner Public Realm Strategy, and the The Bentway.  With ongoing private development and capital works along the Gardiner, there is a need to unite new public-realm projects underneath and adjacent to the corridor, linking Parkdale to the West Don Lands, as well as creating north and south connections.

 

The Bentway Conservancy is developing an Under Gardiner Corridor Plan proposal for a strategic corridor framework for the under-Gardiner that will identify current and proposed projects, identify gaps in information, make recommendations on design cohesion and new programming, and gather disparate knowledge under one complete “umbrella”. The Bentway Conservancy is leading consultations with various public and private stakeholders pursuing new development projects under the Gardiner Expressway, as well as properties with key adjacencies. This Motion asks staff to consider which aspects of the proposal are aligned with City plans, policies and programs, as well as options for implementation.

 

In addition, increased use and programming of under Gardiner spaces requires coordination with operation and maintenance of transportation infrastructure such as scheduling of annual and other repairs. A framework to optimize Gardiner maintenance protocols with The Bentway's programming could be applied to the emerging network of public spaces planned for the Gardiner corridor and other areas.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.18
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156947.pdf

Communications

(September 29, 2020) Letter from Tim Kocur, Executive Director and Oliver Hierlihy, Manager, Operations & Special Projects, Waterfront Business Improvement Area (MM.New.MM24.18.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/comm/communicationfile-120992.pdf

MM24.19 - Research Support for Arts and Cultural Organizations Related to Use of Space - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that: 

 

1. City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, the City Solicitor, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and any other City staff deemed appropriate, to research and report back to the Budget Committee as part of the 2021 Budget process on:

           

a. cultural animation as a component of retail recovery programs run in partnerships with Business Improvement Areas to support neighbourhood economic development; and

 

b. a cost benefit analysis and the legal feasibility of creating new tools such as a rent relief fund or a property tax rebate program to assist arts organizations and cultural enterprises sustain or access affordable spaces.

Summary

The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have heavily impacted both the arts and culture sector and main street retail in Toronto. In response, the City has taken measures such as the expansion of the Creative Co-Location Facilities Property Tax Subclasses to include live music venues to provide property tax relief, the expansion of Digital Main Street and introduction of ShopHere. This has sparked interest in City support from other creative sector stakeholders dealing with the impacts of COVID-19.

 

The City recognizes that COVID-19 has exacerbated longstanding issues in Toronto that challenged the viability of cultural enterprises, including rising property rental costs. Organizations that rely on re public gatherings to generate income, such as live music, performing arts, and comedy venues, have been particularly hard hit. Cultural enterprises such as local, independent bookstores, commercial dance studios, and commercial art galleries have been struggling for years with affordability issues, and have had their viability drastically reduced during the pandemic. At the same time, main street retail properties are seeing a significant increase in vacancies due to the dormancy or failure of main street businesses. Given the critical role that cultural businesses and organizations play in the vitality and liveability of Toronto, the City seeks to ensure that independent, cultural businesses receive targeted support to enable them to survive the pandemic and ultimately contribute to the City's economic and social recovery.

 

In the short-term, in order to stimulate economic and cultural activity on main streets, this Motion proposes that City staff work with Business Improvement Areas to assess the role of retail recovery programs in supporting cultural animation with the potential to provide neighbourhood economic development. The motion proposes research into schemes that encourage landlords to allow temporary use of their vacant properties by artists and cultural organizations through short term leases. The goal is to animate main streets, provide affordable space to artists who currently have little to no income, and assist in social and economic recovery efforts. Other cities such as Seattle, Washington; and London, England, have implemented similar schemes for pop-up spaces and "meanwhile leases" to benefit both landlords and arts and culture groups.

 

In the longer term and given the severity of the impacts of COVID-19, the City seeks to ensure that independent, cultural businesses are able to be sustainable. Affordability and sustainability of cultural space remains a key concern of the sector. Incentives to assist the temporary and long-term use of vacant space may contribute to the cultural sector's resilience. One potential tool could be a property tax rebate program for cultural enterprises. Research to determine the viability and impact of these incentives is required before any implementation.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.19
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156966.pdf

MM24.20 - Reopening Council Decisions 2019.IE7.10 and 2019.MM13.10 to modify the scope and duration of the City's first major wastewater energy transfer project - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Items IE7.10 and MM13.10. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open the Items. If re-opened, the previous Council decisions remain in force unless Council decides otherwise.

Confidential Attachment - Criteria to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the City of Toronto.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that: 

 

1. City Council adopt the recommendations in the report (September 23, 2020) from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, amended to read as follows

 

1. City Council rescind Council Decision 2019.IE7.10 in its entirety.

 

2.  City Council rescind Council Decision 2019.MM13.10 in its entirety.

 

3.  City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services or designate, in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Water, to negotiate, enter into and execute a Wastewater Energy Transfer Agreement with Noventa Toronto Western L.P., and any other agreements necessary to give effect thereto, generally in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the Attachment 1 and Confidential Attachment 2 to the report (September 23, 2020) from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and upon such additional terms and conditions satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

4. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services or designate, to negotiate, enter into, and execute any necessary agreements with Noventa Toronto Western L.P., to permit access to and occupation of the City's public highway impacted by the project, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

5. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to initiate an Official Plan amendment, if the site is assessed and found to be appropriate, to permit a disposal in excess of 21 years for the proposed energy transfer system described in the report (September 23, 2020) from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, within lands designated Parks and Open Space, and to consult with the appropriate city divisions and local councillor including a community consultation process.

 

6. City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services or designate, in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Water, to include a progress update on this project and the status of wastewater energy transfer initiatives to reduce emissions, in the required periodic reporting to Council on TransformTO, and to use such reported information to develop a wastewater energy transfer policy as requested by City Council.

 

7. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 2 remain confidential as it contains a combination of commercial and financial information supplied in confidence to the City, which, if disclosed, could reasonably be expected interfere significantly with the contractual or other negotiations of an organization; financial information that belongs to the City and has monetary value or potential monetary value; and positions, plans, procedures, and criteria to be applied to a negotiation carried on by the City.

Summary

City Council decided in October 2019 to authorize Toronto Water to enter into necessary agreements with Noventa Energy, Inc. ("Noventa") for Noventa to facilitate a pilot for a wastewater energy transfer project at Sunnybrook Hospital and, following the result of the pilot, to determine whether to continue the project for much longer duration.  However, with the following three developments – a change to the pilot site to Toronto Western Hospital (after Council amended its October 2019 decision), a decision among City staff that the Energy and Environment Office should lead this effort, and a new approach that would require a longer term commitment from the City -- City staff realized that new Council authority would be needed.  Given that less than a year has passed since Council's initial authorization, a vote to re-open the matter is first required.

 

If Council votes to re-open the matter, the attached staff report and recommendations provide an overview of the new approach.  The approach could deliver significant greenhouse gas reductions while providing climate resiliency and could allow for discussions about long term City growth opportunities.

 

The attached materials include a term sheet that sets parameters for the legal agreements to which the City will need to commit.  City staff carefully negotiated the term sheet in consultation with Legal Services to ensure significant protection of City infrastructure and property assets with minimal risk exposure.

 

REQUIRES RE-OPENING:


Items 2019.IE7.10 (October 2 and 3, 2019 City Council meeting) and 2019.MM13.10 (December 17 and 18, 2019 City Council meeting) to rescind the decisions.

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM24.20
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156948.pdf
(September 23, 2020) Report from Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services on Proposed Wastewater Energy Transfer Project at Bathurst and Dundas
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156987.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Negotiated Term Sheet for Wastewater Energy Transfer Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156986.pdf
Confidential Attachment 2

MM24.21 - 2-50 Secord Avenue and 48-108 Eastdale Avenue - Development Charge Early Payment Agreement and Redevelopment Credit - by Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Beaches - East York
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, or designate, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to enter into a Development Charges Early Payment Agreement pursuant to Section 27 of the Development Charges Act, 1997, to provide for the early payment of development charges respecting the rental portion of the development at 2-50 Secord Avenue and 48-110 Eastdale Avenue to be calculated and payable based on the date of issuance of the first above grade conditional or non-conditional building permit; the agreement to be in a form satisfactory to the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the City Solicitor, to include any provisions in the agreement, as deemed appropriate, to protect the City's financial interests related to this project.

 

3.    City Council authorize a development charge redevelopment credit in the amount of the development charges to be paid by the Developer pursuant to the Development Charges Early Payment Agreement in respect of the new rental units replacing the 12 existing rental units at 2-50 Secord Avenue, which credit is to be paid to the owner of lands municipally known as 2-50 Secord Avenue and 48-110 Eastdale Avenue, without interest, upon demolition of 12 existing rental dwelling units located at 2-50 Secord Avenue and subject to the owner entering into the Development Charges Early Payment Agreement with the City and complying with the provisions of that agreement, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and the City Solicitor, as set out in Recommendations 1 and 2 above.

 

4.    City Council direct and authorize appropriate City staff to take the necessary action to give effect to City Council's decision.

Summary

This Motion seeks Council authority to enter into a Development Charges Early Payment Agreement pursuant to Section 27 of the Development Charges Act, 1997 for a rental housing development at 2 Secord Avenue and 90 Eastdale Avenue, and a development charge redevelopment credit for existing rental housing units that are being demolished in the final phase of the project to reduce dislocation impacts on tenants.

 

2 Secord Inc. and 90 Eastdale Inc. (collectively, the "Developer") propose to redevelop the site municipally known as 2-50 Secord Avenue and 48-108 Eastdale Avenue by adding a 35-storey residential tower, a 7-storey rental replacement building, constructing a new public park and carrying out other site improvements.

 

On April 24, 2018 City Council authorized a settlement of the appeal of the Developer's planning applications before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal through Item CC39.7. On July 23, 2018 City Council approved the Developer's rental housing demolition application through Item TE34.21.

 

The Developer has been working with City staff and local Ward Councillor to minimize hardship that the proposed redevelopment may cause to existing tenants on the site. As a result, the City requested, and the Developer has agreed, to maintain 12 existing rental units at 2-50 Secord Avenue on site until such time as the new rental replacement building is constructed and the tenants relocate into their new units. At that time the 12 existing rental units will be demolished and a new public park will be constructed in their place.

 

The unintended result of the requested change in the construction/demolition phasing is that the Developer is no longer eligible to receive a development charge redevelopment credit/reduction with respect to the 12 existing rental units under the City’s Development Charges By-law, §415-7(C)(1). This would not have been the case, had the development been allowed to proceed in accordance with the originally proposed phasing, i.e. demolition of the existing rental units followed by construction of the replacement rental units.

 

To the extent that the development charge reduction/credit authorized by the City’s Development Charges By-law, §415-7(C)(1) is premised on the policy that, in the case of residential buildings, development charges are payable only with respect to net new residential units provided on the development site, within certain timeframe restrictions, a credit/reduction would be warranted in this case, if and when the 12 existing rental units at 2-50 Secord Avenue are eventually demolished.

 

In light of the above, this Motion proposes to authorize a development charge credit in for the amount of the units replacing the 12 existing rental units at 2-50 Secord Avenue which will be in the final phase of demolition as outlined in the City Council decision TE34.21 "90 Eastdale Avenue and 2 Secord Avenue - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Final Report". The credit would  be paid to the owner of lands municipally known as 2-50 Secord Avenue and 48-110 Eastdale Avenue, without interest, upon demolition of the 12 existing rental dwelling units located at 2-50 Secord Avenue and subject to the owner entering into an early payment agreement with the City under Section 27 of the Development Charges Act, 1997.

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM24.21
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156974.pdf

MM24.22 - Improving Parking Notice for Road-Related Construction - by Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Michael Ford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Michael Ford, recommends that: 

 

1. City Council request the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, working in consultation with relevant divisions, to explore opportunities to require construction companies to post signed notice of parking changes on affected streets, prior to commencement of approved construction activities.

Summary

While many construction companies send written notices and door-knock prior to beginning road related work, it is possible that individual notices are not received by an affected vehicle owner. As a result, residents are often unaware of the need to move their vehicle before discovering it has been towed from the street.

 

This experience is particularly common in many parts of inner-Toronto where residents often park on-street adjacent to their property. Residents who do not park directly outside of their home are less likely to receive direct notice of upcoming work and the need to temporarily park elsewhere.

 

Given the prevalence of this parking configuration on many of Toronto’s streets, construction contractors could do more to ensure affected residents are informed of temporary and approved use of the roadway. This Motion proposes that contractors retained by the City, when possible, also post notices on-street to inform residents of upcoming work which requires them to move their vehicle. This could reduce inconvenience for residents as well as reducing towing costs and burdensome work of waiving parking tickets.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.22
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-156975.pdf

MM24.23 - Clearing the Path Towards a Safe and Accessible Winter - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to provide an update on the Winter Maintenance Program Review that includes, but is not limited to, a plan on harmonizing sidewalk clearing standards for neighbourhoods in Midtown, East York and the downtown core, equipment procurement, and budget impact assessment to the October 6,  2020 Infrastructure and Environment Committee Meeting.

 

2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to investigate the appropriate equipment required to clear bike lanes and cycle tracks.

 

3. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to develop a comprehensive snow clearing plan for all paved pedestrian and cycling pathways in Toronto's parks.  

Summary

Last winter, City Council called for improved standards for sidewalk snow maintenance due to valid concerns raised by residents that Toronto’s current standards are completely insufficient in the downtown and centre of the City.

 

It is inequitable that residents in the former cities of North York, Scarborough, Etobicoke, and York receive sidewalk snow clearing while the majority of neighbourhoods in Old Toronto and East York do not. This is especially concerning given that the levels of pedestrian traffic are much higher in these areas. Residents of our City’s inner suburban areas also frequently walk through downtown and midtown, and rightfully expect safe and accessible sidewalks too.

 

With the COVID-19 pandemic forcing us all to be outdoors, the City of Toronto must prepare this winter season for an increase in the use of our cycling infrastructure and pedestrian traffic on our City's streets, sidewalks, and park amenities. 

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.23
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157045.pdf

MM24.24 - Friends of University Avenue Proposal to Install Public Art Display in University Avenue Median Park - by Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to collaborate with the Friends of University Avenue to enhance University Avenue's public realm through a public art installation supported by philanthropic donations in alignment with the Year of Public Art, which will serve to recognize the efforts of our health care industry workers and bring comfort to patients and clients of the surrounding hospitals.
 

2. City Council direct City staff to support the Friends of University Avenue by providing production management and partnership support, reviewing potential enhancement options with regard to their financial, technical and operational feasibility and developing, in partnership with the Friends of University Avenue, a strategy to implement a revised proposal.
 

3. City Council authorize the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships, in coordination with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the General Manager, Transportation Services, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and sign a Memorandum of Understanding with the Friends of University Avenue on terms satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

Summary

In 2019, The City of Toronto received an unsolicited proposal from a citizen-led organization called the Friends of University Avenue. The proposal included three phases of enhancements to University Avenue. Phase One would include the implementation of a temporary public art installation, funded through philanthropic contributions at the intersection of University Avenue and Gerrard Street. The proposed public art installation is internally lit and its intent is to illuminate the Avenue as a 'beacon of light and hope'. Phase Two would include enhanced landscaping and year round illumination of existing monuments. Phase Three would include a curated program of rotating public art, commissioned or loaned by Friends of University Avenue.

 

A Steering Committee, composed of the Friends of University Avenue and representatives from City Divisions including City Planning, Economic Development and Culture, Transportation Services, and Parks Forestry and Recreation, has been established to assess the feasibility of implementing this public art installation on University Avenue.

 

City staff support the project in principle and, with City Council support, will continue to collaborate with the Friends of University Avenue with the aim of realizing the temporary public art installation. City staff are working through issues related to the proposed project to ensure that all of the City's requirements are met.

 

Since the previous update, City staff have undertaken a State of Good Repair Assessment showing that significant funds are required to bring the proposed installation sites for phase two up to a point where the work could be installed and operationalized. 

 

This Motion provides a clear signal of support from the City to the Friends of University Avenue while also indicating that more work on feasibility has to be undertaken.  It is the hope of staff that we can embed and collaborate with the Friends of University Avenue team to achieve a viable project, affordable for all parties, that delivers on the original intent of the Friends of University Avenue group to make the hospital precinct more welcoming and honour front-line health care staff.  This will also enable the City to build in the project as a signature initiative under the Year of Public Art.

  

This Motion is urgent as staff need to continue their discussions with Friends of University Avenue to expedite the construction of the improvements and this Motion expands the scope of the work of staff that was previously agreed to.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.24
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157118.pdf

MM24.25 - Protecting Tenants from Above-Guideline Increases During the COVID-19 Pandemic - by Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Ontario Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to protect tenants from burdensome rent increases by restricting Above-Guideline Rent Increases as part of the 2021 rent freeze outlined in Bill 204, the Helping Tenants and Small Businesses Act, 2020.

Summary

The Province’s Bill 204, Helping Tenants and Small Businesses Act, 2020, received First Reading on September 17, 2020. The Bill proposes many benefits to residential and commercial tenants, namely through a proposed rent freeze for 2021 and an extension of the temporary ban on commercial evictions. The Bill has yet to receive the Royal Assent necessary for the associated regulations to be enacted. At this time, the Bill permits some Above-Guideline increases in rent, outlined in Schedule 7 Part VII.1. The wording of this exemption may increase the possibility of landlords using a renovation to initiate an Above-Guideline increase, despite the freeze on rent increases planned for the time ahead.

 

Despite the financial and health hardships many residents have been facing throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, I’ve heard from tenants of an older building in Ward 19, who have received notice of an Above-Guideline Rent Increase proposed to take effect in October. This is the second above-guideline increase tenants have received in the past five years - the first of which resulted in three years of extra increases in addition to the annual guideline amounts. While the age of the building provides exemption from general above-guideline increases to individual rents, this increase has still been possible under the landlord’s repair and renovation projects. Requesting the Province to broaden the scope of Bill 204 is one measure that could help tenants to remain in their homes during these unprecedented times. Restricting Above-Guideline Rent Increases, either by preventing them or capping them in 2021 would provide greater protection to tenants.

 

This Motion is urgent because Bill 204 has already received Second Reading within the Provincial Legislature and a decision on the Bill could be made by the Legislature imminently.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.25
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157119.pdf

MM24.26 - 30 Tippett Road - Development Charges Early Payment Agreement - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailao

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailao, recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to enter into a Development Charges Early Payment Agreement to allow for development charges for the project located at 30 Tippett Road to be calculated, payable and collected as of the date of the issuance of the first conditional building permit, which is the foundation permit in respect of this project; the agreement to be in a form acceptable to the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the City Solicitor, to include any provisions in the agreement, as deemed appropriate, to protect the City's financial interests related to this project.

 

3. City Council direct and authorize the appropriate City staff to take the necessary action to give effect to City Council's decision.

Summary

On December 16, 2019, the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario posted notice that certain changes to the Development Charges Act, 1997 would come into effect on January 1, 2020. These changes included a requirement that development charges for rental housing development be deferred to the date of first occupancy and collected in six equal annual installments over five years, instead of being payable at the time of building permit issuance.

The City is in receipt of a building permit application for a project located 30 Tippett Road. The project proposes to construct a new mixed-use building consisting of two towers and podiums with a shared three level below grade garage. A total of 177 rental housing units are proposed, with 50 units that are affordable rental housing. A standalone shoring and excavation permit (19 115879 BLD 00 BA) was issued on January 30, 2020. City staff have now completed the reviews for the conditional foundation building permit.

The developer wishes to pay the applicable development charges at time of issuance of the first conditional permit for the project, which is the foundation permit (19-156908 FND 00 CP), rather than deferring the payment to occupancy and payment in instalment.

Development charges for the market rental component of the project that is otherwise subject to the mandatory development charges deferral to occupancy totals approximately $600,000 (estimated on the City of Toronto's deferral interest rate of prime plus 1 percent, and cost of Letter of Credit at 1.75 percent, to be confirmed with the City of Toronto's Finance Division).

 

This Motion is urgent due to the proximity of the October City Council meeting to the upcoming Development Charge increases in early November 2020.

 

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.26
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157120.pdf

MM24.27 - 1205 Queen Street West- Liquor Licence Application - Matt's Burgerlab Licence 975413 - by Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the issuance of a liquor licence for Matt's Burgerlab, 1205 Queen Street West is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents unless conditions are placed on the licence and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and City Council direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises.

Summary

An application has been submitted to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for a liquor licence at the premises at 1205 Queen Street West to operate under the name of Matt's Burgerlab. The application is for an indoor area only. This Motion requests that City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

 

This establishment is located in close proximity to residential units. There are concerns that an establishment with a liquor licence can cause noise and disturbance to residents in the area. If conditions are put in place, these concerns may be mitigated. Under no circumstance should the establishment be granted a liquor sales license without conditions attached.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.27
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157148.pdf

MM24.28 - 1605 Queen Street West - Liquor Licence Application - The Parkdale Hall Licence 1041937 - by Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the issuance of a liquor licence for The Parkdale Hall, 1605 Queen Street West is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents unless conditions are placed on the licence and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and City Council direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises.

Summary

An application has been submitted to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for a liquor licence at the premises at 1605 Queen Street West to operate under the name The Parkdale Hall. The application is for an indoor area only. This Motion requests that City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

 

This establishment is located in close proximity to residential units. There are concerns that an establishment with a liquor licence can cause noise and disturbance to residents in the area. If conditions are put in place, these concerns may be mitigated. Under no circumstance should the establishment be granted a liquor sales license without conditions attached.

 

The matter is deemed urgent as the deadline to object has already passed.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.28
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157146.pdf

MM24.29 - 3324 Dundas Street West - Liquor Licence Application - Green Apple Bottle Shop Licence 1012395 - by Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the issuance of a liquor licence for Green Apple Bottle Shop, 3324 Dundas Street West is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents unless conditions are placed on the licence and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and City Council direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises.

Summary

An application has been submitted to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for a liquor licence at the premises at 3324 Dundas Street West to operate under the Green Apple Bottle Shop. The application is for an indoor area only. This Motion requests that City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

 

This establishment is located in close proximity to residential units. There are concerns that an establishment with a liquor licence can cause noise and disturbance to residents in the area. If conditions are put in place, these concerns may be mitigated. Under no circumstance should the establishment be granted a liquor sales license without conditions attached.

 

This matter is considered urgent as the deadline for objections is October 14, 2020.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.29
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157147.pdf

MM24.30 - 425 Jane Street - Liquor Licence Application - Cafe Santorini Licence 1033017 - by Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the issuance of a liquor licence for Cafe Santorini, 425 Jane Street is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents unless conditions are placed on the licence and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and  to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and City Council direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises.

Summary

An application has been submitted to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for a liquor licence at the premises at 425 Jane Street to operate under the name of Cafe Santorini. The application is for an indoor area only. This Motion requests that City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

 

This establishment is located in close proximity to residential units. There are concerns that an establishment with a liquor licence can cause noise and disturbance to residents in the area. If conditions are put in place, these concerns may be mitigated. Under no circumstance should the establishment be granted a liquor sales license without conditions attached.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.30
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157160.pdf

MM24.31 - Lawrence Heights Emergency Safety and Security Response - by Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Communications MM24.31.1 to MM24.31.4 have been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes, recommends that to protect the people of Lawrence Heights:

 

1. City Council request the Toronto Community Housing Corporation in cooperation with the community to examine a possibility of establishing a Community Resource Safety House in order to support local residents, community building and safety enhancing effort.

 

2. City Council request the City Manager to reiterate the requests made by City Council that the Provincial Government return the funding for the building of the new Lawrence Heights Community Centre, which was removed in the 2019 Provincial Budget.

 

3. City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to report on the actions needed to deter the drive-by shootings that are occurring on a regular basis, on implementation of additional safety cameras throughout the area, and on any other measures that can be undertaken immediately to deal with the constant threat of the repeated shootings in the Community.

Summary

The Lawrence Heights Community is facing a never ending challenge in dealing with constant gun violence, usually drive-by shootings, despite the best efforts of members of the community, Toronto Community Housing Corporation, Unison Community Health, Toronto Parks and Recreation Staff, 32 Toronto Police Division, Pathways Programs, LHION Safety Committee, Lawrence Heights Change Makers, Hope and Hustle Heights, Lawrence Heights Parents Association, and all residents of Lawrence Heights.

 

Despite the City of Toronto’s Lawrence Heights Revitalization initiative having completed Phase One, where new mixed housing has been completed, the residents continue to face constant threats to their safety and security, especially safety and security of children in the community.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.31
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157142.pdf

Communications

(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Mohamed Ali-aden (MM.New.MM24.31.1)
(September 30, 2020) Letter from Ali Sheikhomar (MM.New.MM24.31.2)
(September 30, 2020) E-mail from Dejazmatch James (MM.New.MM24.31.3)
(October 1, 2020) Letter from Shelley Zuckerman, Executive Director, North York Community House (MM.New.MM24.31.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/comm/communicationfile-121379.pdf

MM24.32 - Supporting Bill C-8, An Act to Amend the Criminal Code to prohibit Conversion Therapy - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council urgently request the Prime Minister of Canada, the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General, and the Minister of Diversity and Inclusion and Youth to express support for the reintroduction of Bill C-8, An Act to Amend the Criminal Code (Conversion Therapy) as soon as possible in the upcoming session of Parliament, and to encourage the Government of Canada to pass and implement this legislation in an expeditious manner.

Summary

On March 9, 2020, the Government of Canada introduced Bill C-8, An Act to Amend the Criminal Code (Conversion Therapy), which broadly seeks to make forcing a person to undergo conversion therapy services, practices or treatments, and to advertise or profit off those activities, criminal offenses. This Bill should be supported by City Council to protect the life and dignity of all its LGBTQ2S+ residents in Toronto and across Canada.

 

Conversion therapy is defined by Bill C-8 as: 

 

“… a practice, treatment or service designed to change a person’s sexual orientation to heterosexual or gender identity to cisgender, or to repress or reduce non-heterosexual attraction or sexual behaviour. For greater certainty, this definition does not include a practice, treatment or service that relates

 

(a)  to a person’s gender transition; or

(b)  to a person’s exploration of their identity or to its development.”

 

The purpose of “conversion therapy”- sometimes also referred to as “reparative therapy”- is to change a person’s sexual orientation, gender identity, sexual attraction or sexual behaviour to reflect a straight, heterosexual identity that matches the sex assigned at birth. This “therapy” often targets LGBTQ2S+ youth, particularly young men, seeking to coerce individuals into rejecting their own identity, including through the use of emotionally traumatic, physical assault and/or drugs to make individuals associate their LGBTQ2S+ identities with shame and pain.

 

According to the 2019-2020 interim results of the Community-Based Research Centre’s “Sex Now Survey” as many of 47,000 sexual minority men have experienced conversion therapy in Canada. Many Provinces and states have sought to ban the practice, including Ontario in 2015. However, the practice still continues.

 

The Canadian Psychological Association, the Canadian Psychiatric Association and the Canadian Paediatric Society, have all denounced conversion therapy as a practice due to its harmful effects. Further to this, no credible health or medical organization supports conversion therapy. Most health organizations do however recognize that the resulting trauma can lead to participants developing struggles with mental health and addiction, often leading to homelessness and suicide.

 

The proposed federal legislation would define conversion therapy as any service, practice or treatment designed to change a person’s sexual orientation to heterosexual, gender identity to one that matches the sex assigned at birth, or to repress or reduce non–heterosexual sexual attraction or sexual behaviours.

 

Bill C-8 proposes to create five new offences that seek to prohibit: causing a minor to undergo conversion therapy; removing a minor from Canada to undergo conversion therapy abroad; causing a person to undergo conversion therapy against their will; profiting from providing conversion therapy; and advertising an offer to provide conversion therapy.

 

Conversion therapy is a terrible practice that must be stopped in all its forms. City Council should express support to the Government in Canada to see Bill C-8, An Act to Amend the Criminal Code (Conversion Therapy), reintroduced and passed as soon as possible.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.32
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157157.pdf

MM24.33 - Vision Zero Grant - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle

Motion Without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to negotiate, enter into and execute an agreement, with MicroTraffic to participate in the grant program for video near miss analysis on 10 intersections along with high level recommendations to improve safety at those intersections, in the amount of $12,500 of funding from the Transportation Services approved Capital Budget for Vision Zero, and on such terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor. 

Summary

The Council approved Vision Zero 2.0 Road Safety Plan update committed to taking a stronger data driven approach to road safety. In line with that commitment and as a cost saving measure, the City of Toronto applied for a grant offered by Aviva Canada Inc. for safety analysis and diagnostics using video near-miss detection at 10 intersections within the City. The City of Toronto is one of the five major Canadian municipalities that have been chosen as successful grant applicants. Transportation Services staff are seeking authority to enter into an agreement to embark on this safety analysis with the grant partners. As a successful applicant, the City is benefiting from $37,500 of services provided by MicroTraffic paid for by Aviva Canada Inc.

 

The safety analysis would be provided through the grant program, involving cost-sharing between Aviva Canada Inc. and the City of Toronto. Aviva Canada Inc. would fund 75 percent of the costs associated with MicroTraffic’s work ($37,500 ) and the City of Toronto would fund the remaining 25 percent ($12,500).

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.33
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157141.pdf

MM24.34 - Update on the Fair Pass Program - by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Mayor John Tory

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Mayor John Tory, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to report to the November 12, 2020 meeting of the Economic and Community Development Committee with:

 

a. an update on the Fair Pass Program and impacts to service during the COVID-19 pandemic;

 

b. an overview of outstanding Presto Card Policy and technical barriers preventing a full restart of Fair Pass; and

 

c. an update on the planning and implementation of Phase 3 of the Program.

Summary

In the City of Toronto's Poverty Reduction Strategy, Transit Equity is a key pillar, including the goal to “make transit more affordable for low-income residents.” The Fair Pass Program was approved in 2016 and has been expanded to include adult residents receiving benefits from the Ontario Disability Support Program, Ontario Works or in a low-income household in receipt of a Toronto Child Care Fee Subsidy.

 

On March 17, 2020 with the declaration of the COVID-19 emergency, the closure of physical City of Toronto service locations including Toronto Employment and Social Service offices, and redeployment of City staff to critical emergency supports, new applications for the Fair Pass Program, which currently utilizes a paper-based manual process, were paused. Recognizing the importance of the discount for Toronto's vulnerable and marginalized residents, City staff worked to renew the discount for those who had already received the benefit and who remained eligible for it. Further, the City of Toronto is urging Metrolinx to work expeditiously with the City to implement required changes to fare card policies and systems to enable the acceptance of new applications, providing the benefit to more riders.

 

However, recent media accounts of a client who was unable to renew their Fair Pass discount highlights the need to continue to complete implementation of the Program, which is in a pilot phase, to ensure the best client experience for Torontonians living in poverty.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.34
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157143.pdf

MM24.35 - Use of Ward Names to identify City Wards and Build Better Community Connections - by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Manager to require City staff, where possible, to use Ward names only on all public facing documentation and identifiers.

Summary

Historically, it has been the City's practice to use mainly numbers to identify City Wards.  This made sense when the Council was composed of Wards that shared the same name.  A Ward number was a necessary unique identifier.

 

Now, as required by O.Reg. 408/18, the City's 25 Wards each have a unique name that denotes the geographic area that Ward represents.  However, the practice of using Ward numbers has continued.

 

A geographically based Ward identifier is more easily understood than a Ward number as it points to a geographical area.  Residents of the City can better identify the area in which they live by name rather than number.  A ward name also allows the City to build better connections to the communities they serve.

 

The purpose of this Motion is to direct staff, where possible, to use Ward names only on all public facing documentation and identifiers. It is not intended that where IT systems or other automated processes require the continued use of Ward numbers, that those systems or processes be immediately changed.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.35
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157161.pdf

MM24.36 - Supporting Black-Owned and Operated Businesses and Preserving the Cultural Heritage of Eglinton Avenue West's "Little Jamaica"- by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Communications MM24.36.1 to MM24.36.6 have been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Province of Ontario to introduce rent control legislation for commercial units along Eglinton Avenue West to protect Black-owned and operated businesses from unfair or drastic increases to their rent.

 

2. City Council direct the Toronto Office of Recovery and Rebuild to engage with the Mayor's Roundtable on Black Business to develop a tailored and phased approach to help support Black-owned and operated businesses, specifically along Eglinton Avenue West, on their stabilization reopening, recovery and rebuild strategy and to report to Executive Committee by end of the fourth quarter of 2020.

 

3. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to:

 

a. explore measures to provide financial relief, including property taxes, license renewal, late tax payment, deferred tax payment with the deferred amount gradually remitted to the City post-construction, or upon the sale of the property, and other measures as appropriate to stabilize Black-owned and operated businesses along Eglinton Avenue West before the end of the first quarter of 2021;

 

b. explore options to ensure that measures identified to provide financial relief can also be made available directly to business operator tenants as appropriate;

 

c. collaborate with the Mayor's Roundtable on Black Business, BlackUrbanismTO, Reclaim, Rebuild Eglinton Avenue West, Black Futures on Eglinton, York-Eglinton Business Improvement Area, Fairbank Village Business Improvement Area, Eglinton Hill Business Improvement Area and community members to investigate opportunities, including holding a community consultation process, to rebrand the area of Eglinton Avenue West from Marlee Avenue to Keele Street that reflects the Jamaican-Caribbean history before the end of 2021; and

 

d. develop a plan with the Mayor's Roundtable on Black Business, BlackUrbanismTO, Reclaim, Rebuild Eglinton Avenue West, Black Futures on Eglinton, York-Eglinton Business Improvement Area, Fairbank Village Business Improvement Area, Eglinton Hill Business Improvement Area and community members that focuses on bringing back previous, and develop new, culturally-focused events and initiatives that will celebrate the Jamaican and Afro-Caribbean cultural heritage of Eglinton Avenue West before the end of 2021.

 

4. City Council request the Toronto Parking Authority Board to request the Acting President, Toronto Parking Authority to consider developing an enhanced, comprehensive and user-friendly Toronto Parking Authority system on Eglinton Avenue West that incorporates and consolidates Toronto Parking Authority lots into new developments, addresses short, medium and long-term parking issues and develops appropriate fee structures that take into consideration ongoing construction and business client needs and to report to Toronto Parking Authority Board by the end of the fourth quarter of 2020.

 

5. City Council direct the City Manager to request Metrolinx and Crosslinx Transit Solutions to give Black-owned and operated businesses on Eglinton Avenue West first right of refusal for any retail spaces opening in any of the LRT stations located along Eglinton Avenue West from Marlee Avenue to Keele Street.

 

6. City Council request the Province of Ontario to require property owners in the subject area to provide Black-owned and operated businesses with a first right of refusal on retail spaces upon transfer of land.

 

7. City Council direct the City Manager to report back on the status of recommendations listed in MM16.8 to the October 21, 2020 meeting of the Executive Committee.

 

8. City Council direct the City Manager to create a team of dedicated staff from Economic Development and Culture, City Planning, Community Planning, Urban Design, Heritage Planning, Parks Forestry and Recreation, Corporate Real Estate Management, the Confronting Anti-Black Racism Unit, the Indigenous Affairs Office, the Housing Secretariat, the Office of Partnerships, Transportation Services, Transportation Planning and other appropriate key divisions to implement an inter-divisional approach to the work and deliverables directed in the below recommendations.

 

9. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to collaborate with the inter-divisional team to develop a Cultural District Plan, using an equity lens, for the neighbourhood that includes the following, and to report back to the Economic and Community Development Committee with an interim report within six months and final report within one year of the date of this Motion:

 

a. officially recognizes, delineates and designates the neighbourhood as a Jamaican- Caribbean Cultural District;

 

b. highlights the cultural landscape of the neighbourhood through the creation of a high profile cultural district that will enhance business and tourism;

 

c. delineates cultural zones based on local character and the existing or historical business landscape;

 

d. explores private and public sector support and partnerships to develop the cultural zones identified in the Plan;

 

e. identifies and incorporates any heritage properties, legacy businesses, cultural landscapes and potential archaeological resources as important elements of the Cultural District;

 

f. identifies, incorporates and celebrates the rich history and contributions of Jamaican and other immigrants of Afro-Caribbean decent;

 

g. identifies and incorporates the Indigenous history within and near the Cultural District;

 

h. promotes local businesses that are a key part of the cultural heritage landscape including restaurants and juice bars, grocers, barbershops, hair salons and beauty supply shops, fashion retailers, recording studios and music stores, and, civic, creative or art-focused institutions;

 

i. identifies locations to establish new parks through acquisition and transfer of City-owned lands to address the gap in parkland in portions of the Cultural District;

 

j. develops a framework and implementation plan to allow for micro-retail uses, operated by the City within new or existing parkland within the Cultural District;

 

k. develops a Retail Strategy and Implementation Plan that reviews the current state and future of Eglinton Avenue West and potential policies and programs to support Black-owned and operated businesses;

 

l. identifies initiatives to celebrate and commemorate local historical people, events and buildings marking Jamaican-Caribbean presence and contribution;

 

m. identifies quick start actions that can be implemented in the short to medium term;

 

n. considers other City and third party studies and plans existing or on going within the Cultural District; and

 

o. retains a public consultation consultant that has significant experience engaging with African-Canadian, Black and/or Caribbean communities, equity-seeking groups, marginalized and diverse communities, business owners, as well as demonstrated experience of effective virtual and in-person consultations.

 

10. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to develop a  housing strategy plan and analysis for the area of Eglinton Avenue West from Marlee Avenue to Keele Street with a focus on affordable housing and explores other appropriate affordable housing and work-live spaces that could help support efforts to sustain the Jamaican-Caribbean identity.

 

11. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to include Eglinton Avenue West station as part of the Phase 1 Protected Major Transit Station Area Study being conducted and to develop a Housing Strategy so that inclusionary zoning permissions can be achieved within the new Cultural District and to work with Community Planning to incorporate the Protected Major Transit Stations Areas requirements into a new planning framework.

 

12. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to collaborate with the inter-divisional team to conduct a comprehensive planning framework study and plan that will reflect the new Cultural District designation and to report back to the Planning and Housing Committee with an interim report within six months and final report within one year of the date of this Motion:

 

a. land use, built form and massing;

 

b. Protected Major Transit Stations Areas requirements including inclusionary zoning for affordable housing;

 

c. develop a Public Realm, Open Space and Public Art Strategy and Implementation Plan that reflects the uniqueness of each Cultural District zones;

 

d. develop a Laneway Improvement and Animation Strategy and Implementation Plan for the existing laneway system, including Reggae Lane, within the Cultural District and determine an appropriate body to lead and take stewardship of this asset;

 

e. takes into account retail spaces and the built form needs of businesses;

 

f. takes into account the Jamaican-Caribbean heritage and cultural heritage potential of the area, including buildings with important historic cultural value and a potential cultural heritage landscape designation;

 

g. identifies quick start actions that can be implemented in the short to medium term;

 

h. retains a public consultation consultant that has significant experience engaging with equity-seeking groups, marginalized and diverse communities, business owners, as well as demonstrated experience of effective virtual and in-person consultations; and

 

i. considers the directions of this recommendation in the review of all development applications.

 

13. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to develop a Mobility study, in consultation with the Toronto Parking Authority, that:

 

a. supplements work already undertaken by EGLINTONconnects;

 

b. examines the existing and future commercial parking needs and considers consolidating parking;

 

c. loading and access as Eglinton Avenue West is redeveloped;

 

d. re-evaluates existing pedestrian and cycling plans with a focus on reducing automobile dependency; and

 

e. aligns study with principles of the new Cultural District and Retail Strategy Study.

 

14. City Council direct the inter-divisional team and request Provincial Minister of Transportation, Caroline Mulroney to review and implement the recommendations made in BlackUrbanismTO's report titled, "A Black Business Conversation on Planning for the Future of Black Businesses and Residents on Eglinton Avenue West".

 

15. City Council direct the inter-divisional team to continue outreach with the Mayor's Roundtable on Black Business, BlackUrbanismTO, Reclaim, Rebuild, Eglinton Avenue West, Black Futures on Eglinton, and community members to ensure that the foregoing recommendations are informed by their experiences.

Summary

The heart and soul of Eglinton Avenue West, which is colloquially known as "Little Jamaica" or "Eglinton", is home to the highest concentration of Black and Caribbean-owned and operated businesses in Toronto. From the barbershops and hair salons that act as community spaces to the various restaurants that remind many of home, Eglinton Avenue West is an important part of Toronto's Black history.

 

However, many Black-owned and operated businesses have been fighting a battle against the potential loss of the character, identity and roots of their neighbourhood for years. Due to rising rents, construction of the Province's LRT project and now, the COVID-19 pandemic, a growing number of prominent and historic small businesses have been forced to shutter their doors. While these factors have certainly contributed to the challenges Black-owned and operated businesses along Eglinton face, we must not discount the silent yet significant roles of gentrification, Black displacement and cultural erasure. With such pressures mounting, community groups and projects such as BlackUrbanismTO, Reclaim, Rebuild Eglinton Avenue West, and Black Futures on Eglinton have formed to stand with the Black-owned and operated businesses and local residents to call for change.

 

The City of Toronto must develop a sustainability plan to support the retention and growth of Black-owned and operated businesses, while celebrating the identity, and showcasing the resiliency of the Jamaican-Caribbean community.

 

The spirit of this Motion and the initiatives called for in this Motion are currently being advanced by the City of Toronto as a legacy project of the United Nations International Decade for People of African Descent, which has its theme: Recognition, Justice and Development. The City proclaimed its official recognition of the International Decade on March 25, 2019.

 

This Motion is urgent to address the immediate threat to Black-owned and operated businesses due to the pressures exerted by the pandemic and Metrolinx's Eglinton Crosstown construction.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.36
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157145.pdf

Communications

(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Lyba Spring (MM.New.MM24.36.1)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Prophetess Elijah-Marie Reid (MM.New.MM24.36.2)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Alica Hall (MM.New.MM24.36.3)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Bill Worrell (MM.New.MM24.36.4)
(October 1, 2020) E-mail from Bill Worrell, Chair, Oakwood Vaughan Community Organization (MM.New.MM24.36.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/comm/communicationfile-121409.pdf
(October 2, 2020) E-mail from Amanda Horn-Hudecki (MM.New.MM24.36.6)

MM24.37 - Alexandra Park and Atkinson Housing Co-operative Revitalization - 571 Dundas Street West, 91 Augusta Avenue, and 73-75 Augusta Square - Phase 2 - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council adopt the following recommendations in the report (September 30, 2020) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning:

 

1. City Council amend its decision on Item 2018.TE34.10 by:

 

a. amending Part 2 by adding the words “amended by permitting an additional 1,300 square metres of residential gross floor area on Site 1” so that Part 2 now reads:

 

“City Council amend Zoning By-law 1710-2013, as amended, for lands located at the southwest corner of Denison Avenue and Dundas Street West, being Phase 2A within the Alexandra Park and Atkinson Coop Revitalization substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 4 to the report (June 15, 2018) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, amended by permitting an additional 1,300 square metres of residential gross floor area on Site 1.”;

 
b. deleting Part 5.iii in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

 

“amending Section 10.3 of the existing Section 37 Agreement to require that, prior to the issuance of any demolition permit for any existing social housing unit in Phase 2, excluding Phase 2A, the Owner shall provide detailed floor plans for any replacement social housing units and associated common amenity areas to be located on the lands subject to the Demolition Permit where an existing social housing unit is to be demolished, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.”;

 
c. amending Part 5.iv. by deleting the words “registration of a subdivision agreement for any block other than Blocks 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, or 15 to include the lands in Phase 2A” and replacing it with “issuance of the first building permit for the first condominium market building within a phase other than Phase 1 or Phase 2A” so that Part 5.iv. now reads as follows:

 

“amending Section 13.6 of the existing Section 37 Agreement that requires the submission of a public art plan prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the first condominium market building within a phase other than Phase 1 or Phase 2A; and”

 

2. City Council amend its decision on Item 2019.TE7.7 by:

 
a. amending Part 2 by adding the words “permitting an additional 150 square metres of residential gross floor area on the property at 91 Augusta Avenue for outdoor amenity space” so that Part 2 now reads:

 

“City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands located south of Dundas Street West, east of Augusta Avenue, north of Paul Lane Gardens, and west of Cameron Street, being Phase 2 within the Alexandra Park and Atkinson Co-op Revitalization, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 7 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, amended by permitting an additional 150 square metres of residential gross floor area on the property at 91 August Avenue for outdoor amenity space and adding the following:

 

Holding Provision

 

a. lands zoned with the "h" Holding Symbol shall not be used for any purpose other than those lawfully existing on the date of passing of this By-Law until the "h" Holding Symbol has been removed; an amending By-law to remove the "h" Holding Symbol in whole, or in part, shall be enacted by City Council when the following plans and studies have been submitted for the lands from which the "h" Holding symbol is proposed to be removed to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning secured through an agreement or agreements binding on the Owner and successors entered into pursuant to Sections 37, 41 or 51 of the Planning Act, or any combination thereof, as appropriate:

 

i. submission of updated Detailed Context Plans, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

ii. submission of updates to the Construction Mitigation and Safety Plan, and Tenant Communication Strategy, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

iii. provision of a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan, and periodic updates to the Plan, being satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

iv. execution of a subdivision agreement satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning pursuant to Section 51 of the Planning Act;

 

v. periodic Housing Issues report updates relating to each phase of revitalization demonstrating adequate progress in the replacement and/or refurbishment of social housing units to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

vi. submission of a satisfactory Community Service and Facility Implementation Plan, which will include a financial strategy to finance any determined required community service or facility to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and

 

vii. confirmation of funding or financing of transportation infrastructure, servicing infrastructure, parks, and/or community facilities required to support development to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Corporate Finance; and

 

b. prior to the removal of the "h" Holding Symbol, shoring and demolition is permitted within the Alexandra Park and Atkinson Co-op Area.”;

 
b. deleting Part 4.b.x in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

 

“amending Section 10.3 of the existing Section 37 Agreement to require that, prior to the issuance of any demolition permit for any existing social housing unit in Phase 2, excluding Phase 2A, the Owner shall provide detailed floor plans for any replacement social housing units and associated common amenity areas to be located on the lands subject to the Demolition Permit where an existing social housing unit is to be demolished, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.”;

 
c. deleting Part 8.c in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

 

"prior to the issuance of any demolition permit for any existing social housing unit in Phase 2, excluding Phase 2A, the Owner shall provide detailed floor plans for any replacement social housing units and associated common amenity areas to be located on the lands subject to the Demolition Permit where an existing social housing unit is to be demolished, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.”; and

 
3. City Council determine that no further notice is required under Section 34(17) of the Planning Act.

Summary

The Alexandra Park and Atkinson Housing Co-operative Revitalization is a community-led project that will result in refurbishing and rebuilding all of the existing affordable homes, and to provide community benefits including a new community centre, new parkland, investments in social enterprise, and funds for expanded affordable housing on site.

 

Phase One of the Revitalization was approved by City Council in 2012-2013. For Phase Two of the Revitalization, some changes were adopted in 2018-2019, and as a consequence of ongoing work a number of technical amendments to the zoning by-law and the Section 37 legal agreement are required to bring the Phase Two zoning into force.

 

There is no change to the built form or the community benefits approved in 2018-2019.

 

This Motion is urgent to ensure the next phase of the Alexandra Park and Atkinson Housing Co-operative Revitalization can proceed with in-force zoning and can maintain construction timelines, and minimize risk associated with delays to the joint-venture project.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.37
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157177.pdf
(September 30, 2020) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Alexandra Park and Atkinson Housing Co-operative Revitalization - 571 Dundas Street West, 91 Augusta Avenue, and 73-75 Augusta Square - Phase 2 - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157178.pdf

MM24.38 - Drive-by Shootings - by Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Motion Without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to come up with a plan to respond to the  non-stop shootings that are occurring thought the City of Toronto, especially the numerous drive-by shootings that are endangering lives of Toronto on daily basis.

 

2.  City Council request the Provincial Government to take immediate steps to support the Toronto Police Service and all other City efforts in combatting the non-stop shootings in Toronto, including the immediate impounding of vehicles and suspending of licences of drivers where Police have found unlawful handguns.

Summary

In light of a most recent drive-by shooting in our City, where a man was shot and killed at Lawrence Avenue West and Jane Street while with his wife and a one-month old baby, something needs to be done to address an unprecedented number of drive-by shootings in our City.

 

This Motion asks for Toronto Police Service and the Provincial Government to do everything in their power to address a growing number of drive-by shootings in our City.

 

This matter is time sensitive and urgent in light of an unprecedented number of drive-by shootings taking place in our City. 

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.38
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157205.pdf

MM24.39 - Approval to receive Atkinson Foundation Grant for AnchorTO Phase 4 - by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson

Motion Without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to enter into an agreement with the Atkinson Foundation to deliver a fourth phase of AnchorTO and to receive $120,000 in grant funding from the Atkinson Foundation to deliver the initiative.

 
2. City Council increase the 2020 Approved Operating Budget for Social Development, Finance and Administration by $20,000 gross, $0 net, and include the funding of $100,000 gross, $0 net in the 2021 Operating Budget Submission for Social Development, Finance and Administration, with the possible extension of the program to be included in the 2022 Outlook, if required to complete the delivery of the program.

 
3. City Council increase the 2020 Approved Complement for Social Development, Finance and Administration by 1.0 temporary FTE, and include it in the 2021 Operating Budget Submission, to provide dedicated staff support to AnchorTO.

Summary

Embedding the practice of social procurement within Toronto's public sector anchor institutions is a key initiative of the City's Poverty Reduction Strategy. Since 2015, the City of Toronto has convened the AnchorTO Network, a group of 15 public sector institutions collaborating to advance their capacity to purchase from businesses and organizations that make an impact on inclusive economic development in Toronto. Through AnchorTO, Toronto's anchor institutions are able to collaborate, share information, tools, examples, and other resources, accelerating the adoption of social procurement and contributing to the economic recovery of Toronto's communities.

 

AnchorTO is entering the fourth phase of work. In the first phase, a community of practice was established to socialize the concept of social procurement. In the second phase of work, a blueprint framework was established so anchor institutions could better understand how to incorporate social procurement within their legal and operational constraints. The most recently completed third phase of work was focused on moving towards implementation of the Blueprint.

 

The fourth phase of work will include the development of:

 

- social procurement vendor lists, including businesses owned by Black and Indigenous residents;

 

- communications and training material for purchasing professionals; and

 

- connecting anchor programs more intentionally with community-based economic development initiatives.
 

The Atkinson Foundation has agreed to provide the City of Toronto with a grant of $120,000 for one year to manage and provide resources to the Network. This funding will support the development of concrete resources and dedicated staffing support.

 

This Motion authorizes the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration Division to receive the Atkinson Foundation grant.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.39
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157211.pdf

MM24.40 - Completing Requisite Pre-construction Work in Riverdale East Park - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water and Chief Engineer & Executive Director, Engineering & Construction Services to immediately undertake requisite  pre-construction inspections and documentation on nearby homes and buildings prior to any further work being done in Riverdale Park East.

Summary

Toronto Water is installing a tunnel in Riverdale Park East as part of the Don River and Central Waterfront Wet Weather Flow System to stop the flow of combined overflow into the Don River.  This work is being undertaken through Engineering & Construction Services.

 

Residents living across from the park on Broadview Avenue are reporting their houses are shaking and glass windows are cracking. As well, items are falling off of shelves.

 

There was no pre-inspection work carried out on any of these homes.  Thus home owners will not be able to assess the damage to their properties, post-construction.

 

This work must cease until the requisite pre-construction work takes is undertaken. .

 

Reason for Urgency: This work is currently underway and homes may be being damaged.

Background Information

Member Motion MM24.40
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-157286.pdf

Bills and By-laws - Meeting 24

BL24.1 - Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming Bills

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will introduce and enact General Bills and Confirming Bills.


Consolidated Bills Index for September 30 and October 1, 2020 City Council Meeting
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewBillBylaw.do?meeting=2020.CC24

Background Information

Consolidated By-law Index for September 30 and October 1 and 2, 2020 City Council Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2020/bl/bgrd/backgroundfile-157440.htm
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council