City Council

Meeting No.:
9
Contact:
Marilyn Toft, Manager
Meeting Date:
Tuesday, July 16, 2019

Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Thursday, July 18, 2019

Phone:
416-392-7032
Start Time:
9:30 AM
E-mail:
councilmeeting@toronto.ca
Location:
Council Chamber, City Hall

The Agenda and related materials for this meeting are enclosed.  The details of the meeting are noted at the top of the Agenda.

  

Notice to People Writing to Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.

 

The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

 

The City video records Council, committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be video recording you and City staff may make the video record available to the public. If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or call 416-392-7032.

 

Closed Meeting Requirements:  If Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of Council must make a motion to do so and give the reason why Council has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).

 

July 11, 2019.

 

toronto.ca/council

This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.

Routine Matters - Meeting 9

RM9.1 - Call to Order

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All

Summary

- O Canada

- Moment of Silence

- Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act

Background Information

Condolence Motion for Michael Colgrass
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136046.pdf
Condolence Motion for Bruce Fleury
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136066.pdf
Condolence Motion for John R. Gardner
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136047.pdf
Condolence Motion for Anne Johnston
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136048.pdf
Condolence Motion for Mavis Barbara Knowles-Phillips
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136067.pdf
Condolence Motion for Katharine Mulherin
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136205.pdf
Condolence Motion for Hodan Nalayeh
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136206.pdf
Condolence Motion for Jordon Veira
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136049.pdf

RM9.2 - Confirmation of Minutes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will confirm the Minutes from the regular meeting held on June 18 and 19, 2019.

RM9.3 - Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from City Officials

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 7 on July 4, 2019

Submitted by Mayor John Tory, Chair

 

Report of the Audit Committee from Meeting 3 on June 28, 2019

Submitted by Councillor Stephen Holyday, Chair

 

Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 8 on July 3, 2019

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

 

Report of the Economic and Community Development Committee from Meeting 6 on June 26, 2019

Submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair

 

Report of the General Government and Licensing Committee from Meeting 6 on June 24, 2019

Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair

 

Report of the Infrastructure and Environment Committee from Meeting 6 on June 27, 2019

Submitted by Councillor James Pasternak, Chair

 

Report of the Planning and Housing Committee from Meeting 7 on July 3, 2019

Submitted by Councillor Ana Bailão, Chair

 

Report of the Striking Committee from Meeting 2 on June 10, 2019 - Item ST2.3

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

 

Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 7 on June 25, 2019

Submitted by Councillor Mark Grimes, Chair

 

Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 7 on June 25, 2019

Submitted by Councillor James Pasternak, Chair

 

Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 7 on June 25, 2019

Submitted by Councillor Jim Karygiannis, Chair

 

Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 7 on June 25, 2019

Submitted by Councillor Gord Perks, Chair

 

New Business and Business Previously Requested submitted by City Officials

RM9.4 - Petitions

Consideration Type:
Information
Wards:
All

Summary

Members of Council may file petitions.

RM9.5 - Presentations, Introductions and Announcements

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All

Summary

Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.

RM9.6 - Review of the Order Paper

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will review the Order Paper.

Background Information

Order Paper July 16, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136045.pdf
Order Paper July 17, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136165.pdf
Order Paper July 18, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136166.pdf

Executive Committee - Meeting 7

EX7.1 - Implementing Tenants First - A New Seniors Housing Corporation and Proposed Changes to Toronto Community Housing Corporation's Governance

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Mayor's first Key Matter and first Item of business on Tuesday, July 16th

The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EX7.1a for information)

Confidential Attachment - Security of property belonging to the City or one of its agencies or corporations

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

Creation of New Seniors Housing Corporation

 

1.  City Council approve in principle the establishment under section 148 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of a wholly-owned City services corporation to manage and operate Toronto Community Housing Corporation's 83 seniors-designated buildings, as listed in Attachment 1 to the report (June 21, 2019) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, and City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, to complete a due diligence process to ensure an appropriate understanding of the legal, financial and labour implications and report back with the results of the due diligence process in the first part of 2020.

 

Implementation of the Integrated Service Model

 

2.  City Council, as sole shareholder, direct the Toronto Community Housing Corporation Board of Directors to direct the President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation to implement the integrated service model for seniors as described in Attachment 5 to the report (June 21, 2019) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, beginning with 10 sites selected from the 83 designated seniors-designated buildings in 2020 in partnership with the City and the Toronto Central Local Health Integration Network until such time as the new City services corporation (referenced in Recommendation 1 above) is established.

 

3.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, to oversee the implementation of the integrated service model for seniors beginning with 10 sites selected from the 83 designated seniors buildings in 2020 in partnership with Toronto Community Housing Corporation and the Toronto Central Local Health Integration Network and submit a business case as part of the 2020 budget for any additional resources and funding required.

 

4.  City Council direct the General Manager, Seniors Services and Long-Term Care to develop and report to City Council in 2020 on a new accountability framework and a corresponding implementation plan for the integrated service model.

 

5.  City Council request the Deputy City Manager Community and Social Services, in consultation with the President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation to pilot a modified integrated service model for implementation in the former seniors buildings identified in Attachment 2 to the report (May 2, 2018) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration in Item 2018.EX34.3 starting with 1901 Weston Road and 10 Glen Everest Road and to identify the required resources and timing schedule through the 2020 Budget Process.

 

Creation of a City Housing Corporation Relationship Unit

 

6.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, to design and implement a new accountability framework including the creation of a City Housing Corporation relationship unit reporting to the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, that coordinates the City's relationship with Toronto Community Housing Corporation and the proposed seniors housing corporation.

 

7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to augment internal resources as necessary by retaining external legal services specializing in:

 

a.  the establishment and governance of public service corporations and associated board governance to expedite the process of establishing and forming a wholly-owned City services corporation to manage and operate Toronto Community Housing's 83 seniors designated buildings; and

 

b.  legal, financial and labour implications of the transfer to Toronto Community Housing Corporation's real estate development functions to CreateTO on the City in alignment with the City-wide real estate model.

 

Transition of Toronto Community Housing Corporation's Development Functions to CreateTO

 

8.  City Council approve in principle the transfer of Toronto Community Housing Corporation's real estate development functions to CreateTO and/or the City in alignment with the City-wide real estate model, including infill housing opportunities, the functions related to treatment of property and property related transactions and direct the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO and the Chief Executive Officer and President, Toronto Community Housing Corporation to complete a due diligence process to ensure an appropriate understanding of the legal, financial and labour implications of the transfer and report back by the end of 2019 with a transfer plan including governance.

 

9.  City Council direct that all proposals relating to future revitalizations and redevelopment opportunities of Toronto Community Housing assets, including any demolition and reconstruction of multiple buildings and infill opportunities, be directed to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, for review and recommendation working, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning prior to being recommended to City Council for approval.

 

10.  City Council, as sole shareholder, direct the Toronto Community Housing Corporation Board of Directors to direct the President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation to co-ordinate through the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, who will work in consultation with the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to identify opportunities for new affordable rental housing units on Toronto Community Housing Corporation lands through a program of infill construction.

 

11.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO, to review potential infill projects on Toronto Community Housing Corporation lands on an accelerate basis through the Housing Now approval process.

 

Continue to Transfer Uninhabitable Houses to Non-profit Organizations

 

12.  City Council direct the City Manager to expedite the transfers of Toronto Community Housing Corporation Uninhabitable Houses by adding the houses listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 21, 2019) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services to the list of Uninhabitable Houses approved by Council in 2018.EX34.3.

 

13. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to work with the President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation and the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO to meet with the current long term leaseholder of 45 Canyon, to explore all opportunities and options, including consideration of the transfer of land and/or air rights, to intensify the site with rental housing which will include consideration of providing an element of seniors housing [and/or affordable housing] on the property at 45 Canyon Road and report back to the Executive Committee by the fourth quarter of 2019.

 

14.  City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 21, 2019) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services remain confidential in its entirety as it pertains to the security of the property of the municipality or one of its agencies or corporations.

Origin

(June 21, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services

Summary

Tenants First is implementing a plan in which Toronto Community Housing Corporation focuses on being a social housing landlord, where buildings are in a good state of repair, and tenants are connected to appropriate services. As part of the Tenants First Phase One Implementation Plan, Council tasked Tenants First to review governance, mandate and accountability for Toronto Community Housing Corporation's key business areas. This report recommends changes to the governance of Toronto Community Housing Corporation's business areas to increase its collaboration with the City, while also increasing City oversight of its activities, mitigating legal and financial risk, containing costs, and minimizing disruption to tenants.

 

Specifically, this report recommends City Council approve in principle the creation of a new, City-owned seniors housing corporation whose mandate is to operate 14,000 units in 83 seniors-designated Toronto Community Housing Corporation buildings. This recommendation is subject to the results of a due diligence process. It also recommends that the City and Toronto Community Housing Corporation in partnership with the Toronto Central Local Health Integration Network begin implementation in 2020 of the co-developed integrated service model in 10 seniors-designated buildings to improve services to senior tenants.

 

Toronto Community Housing Corporation will remain a City corporation whose mandate is to operate the 43,000 units in mixed and family buildings. This report provides an overview of the work to clarify the Corporation's core mandate, including six focus areas identified as joint responsibilities of the City and Toronto Community Housing Corporation. This work will be finalized in 2020 and inform the update of the Shareholder Direction.

 

As part of the work to redefine Toronto Community Housing Corporation's core mandate, this report recommends that City Council approve in principle the transfer of Toronto Community Housing Corporation's real estate development functions to CreateTO and/or the City in alignment with the City-wide real estate model. This recommendation is subject to the results of a due diligence process.

 

As a critical step in a new accountability framework, the report recommends City Council approve the creation of a City Housing Corporation relationship unit to better coordinate the City's relationship with Toronto Community Housing Corporation and the future seniors housing corporation. This City-staffed relationship unit will provide strategic oversight of the corporations, support the Seniors Services and Long-Term Care division to provide oversight for the delivery of the integrated service model in seniors housing and support Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to enhance their Service Manager's role under the Housing Services Act.

 

The transformation of Toronto Community Housing Corporation is a long-term process. This report recommends critical steps in transforming the governance, legal structure, mandate, and accountability framework for both seniors housing and the mixed and family portfolios. The recommendations in this report focus Toronto Community Housing Corporation on its core mandate of delivering services to tenants in mixed and family buildings, through creating a separate seniors housing corporation, and consolidating revitalization expertise in CreateTO. Work also continues on the process to transfer the scattered housing portfolio to not-for-profit providers.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 21, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services on Implementing Tenants First - A New Seniors Housing Corporation and Proposed Changes to Toronto Community Housing's Governance
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134973.pdf
Attachment 1 - List of Seniors-mandated Buildings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135434.pdf
Attachment 2 - Summary of Toronto Community Housing Corporation's Current Legal Structure and the City's Accountability Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135435.pdf
Attachment 3 - Update on Tenants First Phase 1 Implementation Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135436.pdf
Attachment 4 - Options for Legal Structures for Toronto Community Housing Corporation and the Seniors Housing Entity
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135437.pdf
Attachment 5 - Summary of the Integrated Service Model
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135438.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Additions to the Uninhabitable House Transfer List

Background Information (City Council)

(July 8, 2019) Supplementary report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Impact of Tenants First Pilots (EX7.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135777.pdf
Attachment 1 - Tenants First: Trialling Innovations in Service Models and Community Development
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135899.pdf

Speakers

Cathy Birch, Responsible Personal Accessibility in Toronto Housing
William Lohman
Anita Dressler
Valentyna Mahoney
Catherine Wilkinson
Marcel Pereira
Michael Rosenberg
John Plumadore, Toronto Seniors Forum
J. MacLeod
Mark Smith
Doris Power
Sam Abebe
Anisa Mohamed
Muhudin Mohiadin
Mary T. Hynes
Miguel Avila-Velarde
Susan Gapka
Councillor Shelley Carroll
Councillor Paula Fletcher
Councillor Joe Cressy

Communications (Committee)

(July 2, 2019) Letter from Catherine Wilkinson (EX.Supp.EX7.1.1)
(July 4, 2019) Letter from Mark Smith (EX.Supp.EX7.1.2)
(July 3, 2019) E-mail from Marcel Pereira, S.I.T. (Save Improved T.C.H.C.) (EX.Supp.EX7.1.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/comm/communicationfile-95868.pdf
(July 3, 2019) Letter from Dave Mitchell, CUPE Local 79 (EX.Supp.EX7.1.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/comm/communicationfile-95897.pdf
(July 2, 2019) Letter from Eddie Mariconda, CUPE Local 416 (EX.Supp.EX7.1.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/comm/communicationfile-95898.pdf
(July 4, 2019) Submission from Anita Dressler (EX.New.EX7.1.6)
(July 4, 2019) Submission from William Lohman (EX.New.EX7.1.7)
(July 4, 2019) E-mail from Cheryl Duggan (EX.New.EX7.1.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/comm/communicationfile-95908.pdf
(July 4, 2019) Submission from Cathy Birch, Responsible Personal Accessibility in Toronto Housing (EX.New.EX7.1.9)
(July 4, 2019) E-mail from Doris Power (EX.New.EX7.1.10)
(July 4, 2019) E-mail from Miguel Avila-Velarde (EX.New.EX7.1.11)

EX7.2 - Protecting the Viability of Street Festivals - Response to Item MM5.17

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services to:

 

a. conduct a survey with the City's Business Improvement Areas, the organizers of major street festivals, staff from the Film and Entertainment Industries Unit of Economic Development and Culture and any other relevant stakeholders regarding issues associated with hosting and managing street festivals and major events across the City and report back on the results; and

 

b. undertake an inventory to identify specifically those factors that have driven an increase in costs associated with evolving pressures including security or any other relevant issues concerning the management of street festivals and other large scale events across the City

 

and report back to the December 11, 2019 meeting of Executive Committee with recommendations based on the issues that are identified in the survey and the inventory.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services

Summary

On March 27, 2019, City Council adopted Motion MM5.17 Protecting the Viability of Street Festivals. The Motion directed the City Manager to meet with the Chief of Police to discuss policing costs and protocols for street festivals and to report to City Council in the second quarter of 2019 on possible solutions and strategies to reduce policing costs for street festivals while ensuring public safety.

 

The Toronto Police Service Transformational Task Force final report, Action Plan: The Way Forward, included two recommendations that focus on a risk-based approach to policing at special events and overhauling paid duty services. The Toronto Police Service have begun to engage the City as they begin to implement these recommendations through on-going discussions lead by the Deputy City Manager of Infrastructure and Development Services. These discussions have identified that similar to the City and external stakeholders, the Toronto Police Service are also experiencing challenges related to security at special events and paid duty services.

 

This report outlines several of the ongoing challenges facing the City, the Toronto Police Service and external stakeholders, such as enhanced security requirements and availability of paid duty officers. It also provides an overview of the continuing collaboration between the City and the Toronto Police Service to address these challenges and find solutions.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services on Response to Member Motion 5.17 - Protecting the Viability of Street Festivals
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134981.pdf

EX7.3 - Crescent Town Pedestrian Bridge Review

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication EX7.3.3 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to implement the recommendations contained in the Internal Audit Report, "Crescent Town Pedestrian Bridge Review" by the end of 2019.
 

2.  City Council direct the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to identify any additional areas where roles and responsibilities overlap, and revise any associated policies and procedures, in order to mitigate against future exposures.

 
3.  City Council direct the Director, Internal Audit, and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to hold a City-sponsored public meeting in Crescent Town in the third quarter of 2019 to:

 

a. share the findings and recommendations of the Crescent Town Bridge Internal Audit Review;


b. provide an update on Toronto Building and Municipal Licensing and Standards' implementation of the Internal Audit recommendations; and


c. request the Toronto District School Board and Bleeman Holdings/Pinedale Properties to provide an update on the replacement plans for the bridge.

 
4.  City Council request the Director, Internal Audit to review any additional documents or information provided by Janet Davis, former Member of Toronto City Council.

Origin

(June 24, 2019) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services

Summary

On November 17, 2018, a privately-owned, publicly-accessible bridge, in the City's Crescent Town neighbourhood, partially collapsed.  Councillors and the public expressed concern that there had been a lack of timely action on the part of the City and property owners in response to complaints, investigations and enforcement related to the bridge, prior to the collapse. 

 

At its meeting of December 4, 2018, City Council adopted a Member's Motion directing the City Manager to examine the circumstances and actions of City staff related to the Crescent Town bridge and identify areas for improving public safety related to privately-owned, publicly-accessible bridges. This report responds to that City Council direction.

 

Attached to this staff report is Internal Audit's review of how the City carried out its responsibilities related to the Crescent Town bridge. The review concluded that a number of factors contributed to the lack of timely action on the part of the City and property owners. The Internal Audit resulted in four recommendations; however, the report did not identify any misconduct. Toronto Building and Municipal Licensing and Standards are in agreement with and supports all of the recommendations resulting from the Internal Audit review. Toronto Building and Municipal Licensing and Standards are moving quickly to implement the Internal Audit recommendations and an implementation plan is outlined in this report. All of the recommendations are either complete or underway with full completion expected by the end of the year, in advance of the Internal Audit timeline. 

 

This report also responds to City Council's direction to consider options for an independent third-party review of the circumstances leading to the collapse of the bridge. Based on research and consideration of risks, costs, potential scope and efficacy, an independent third-party review is not recommended. The Internal Audit review recommendations will strengthen the safety of publicly-accessible, privately-owned bridges. It is not expected that a municipal judicial investigation would provide any further lessons than those which emerged from the Internal Audit review.  Further, research suggests that municipal judicial investigations tend to be costly and time-consuming.

 

This report has been prepared in consultation with the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, City Solicitor, Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards and Director, Internal Audit.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 24, 2019) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services on Crescent Town Pedestrian Bridge Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135012.pdf
Attachment 1 - Internal Audit Report - Crescent Town Pedestrian Bridge Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135431.pdf

Speakers

Janet Davis
Razia Rashed
Councillor Brad Bradford

Communications (Committee)

(July 4, 2019) Letter from Janet Davis (EX.Supp.EX7.3.1)
(July 3, 2019) Letter from Councillor Brad Bradford (EX.Supp.EX7.3.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/comm/communicationfile-95925.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) Letter from Patrick A. Anderson, Partner, Anderson MacKeigan LLP (CC.New.EX7.3.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96168.pdf

EX7.4 - Office Optimization - Office Swing Space at Union Station

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the 2019 - 2028 Approved Capital Budget and Plan for the Facilities, Real Estate, Environment and Energy program by adding a new capital project "Union Station East Wing" with total project cost of $20.0 million and cash flows of $2.5 million in 2019 and $17.5 million in 2020, to be funded by recoverable debt, repayable over 15 years, to complete base building and office fit-up work associated with Union Station East Wing.

 

2.  City Council approve the plan from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, to utilize Union Station East Wing on an interim basis to rationalize spaces leased by the City from third party landlords which expire in 2020 and serve as swing space for office modernization projects.

 

3.  City Council, in accordance with Section 71-11.1C of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 71, Financial Control, grant authority to amend Purchase Order Number 6030175 with NORR Limited, Architects and Engineers and increase the value of the contract by $850,000, net of all taxes and applicable charges, revising the current contract authority from $44,473,000, net of all taxes and applicable charges, up to a maximum value of $45,323,000, net of all taxes and applicable charges, to provide required additional base building architecture and engineering services for the East Wing Project.

Origin

(June 27, 2019) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek approval of the plan to use Union Station East Wing floors 2, 3 and 4 (the "East Wing") as office space for the City and to invest in the base building obligations and fit-up requirements of the facility, allowing for the reduction of City office leases, securing of critical swing space to support future office optimization and modernization, resulting in the realization of operating cost savings.

 

There is approximately 92,000 square feet of space in the East Wing of Union Station. A small portion of the space is currently being used by Union Station operations staff and as a construction site office for various construction projects active at the station, and is otherwise vacant and in need of base building and fit-up investments to support any type of future occupancy. After a third party review of potential use options for the space, and considering the City's priorities of achieving fiscal sustainability, it was determined that utilization of the East Wing as City office space would realize the highest value from the premises. As a result, in the near term, this report recommends utilizing the East Wing as City office space to achieve the following City benefits:

 

- Unlocks value by repurposing underutilized, vacant City-owned space.


- Rationalizes external City leases to reduce overall operating costs and improve fiscal sustainability.


- Secures critical swing space in the downtown core, enabling further cost avoidance during office optimization and modernization projects versus leasing third party space.
 

Corporate Services and CreateTO have identified five (5) locations where the City leases space from third party landlords at a cost to the City of approximately $2.5 million per year. These five (5) leases are scheduled to expire in 2020. By investing $20 million in base building and fit up costs, the City will be able to eliminate these five (5) City leases, consolidating them into Union Station East Wing to generate immediate cost savings and provide a significant return on investment. This will maximize the utility of the premises in the near term, and will be critical in enabling a broader office optimization plan, which will be brought forward to City Council in the third quarter of 2019.  Beyond the initial five (5) leases coming to the end of their term in 2020, there are an additional twenty-five (25) City leases that are coming to the end of their terms over the next (eight) 8 years that will be rationalized, which represents additional opportunity to reduce operating costs associated with the City’s office portfolio on a long-term and sustainable basis

 

On a long-term basis, City staff will continue to explore other options for the East Wing, including considerations brought forward by the current head lessee to utilize the space as retail, attraction and/or other commercial and publicly accessible uses.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 27, 2019) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services on Office Optimization - Office Swing Space
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135514.pdf
(June 26, 2019) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services on Office Optimization - Office Swing Space - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135030.pdf

EX7.5 - Planning Recreation Facilities for the Don Mills Communities

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Don Valley East
Attention
Communications EX7.5.7 and EX7.5.8 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council approve the Preferred Facility community recreation centre that will include a twin-pad arena/multi-sport indoor courts, gymnasium with walking track, an aquatic centre; and community and program space located on the large community park located at 844 Don Mills Road to serve the communities along Don Mills Road, from York Mills Road to Flemingdon Park, as outlined in the attached report, and direct the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and other appropriate City staff to undertake all necessary work to implement Recommendations 2 and 4 below, as well as advancing the design and construction of the project.

 

2.  City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the City Solicitor and other appropriate City staff to implement Recommendation 1 above by:

 

a.  initiating amendments to the existing Section 37 Agreement for the Don Mills Centre, as it pertains to the provisions of the Community Centre at 966 Don Mills Road, and the Don Mills Civitan Arena land exchange agreement;

 

b.  initiating a Zoning By-Law amendment, as it pertains to the provisions of the Community Centre at 966 Don Mills Road, and potential alternative community uses;

 

c.  initiating an Official Plan Amendment, as necessary; and

 

d.  reporting to City Council regarding the final form of the recommended zoning by-law amendment and any official plan amendment.

 

3.  City Council direct CreateTO and Real Estate Services to coordinate with City Planning, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and other appropriate City Divisions, to undertake a review of other public community uses that may be accommodated at 966 Don Mills Road in coordination with the public consultation process reflected in Recommendation 2 above.

 

4.  City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to work with Cadillac Fairview to negotiate the extension of the Don Mills Civitan Arena (at 1030 Don Mills Road) in an effort to minimize disruption while the new arena at 844 Don Mills Road (Celestica) is constructed.

 

5.  City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation to enter into discussions with the owners of 844 Don Mills Road (Celestica) to expedite the transfer of Park Blocks 3A and 3B of the Revised Draft Plan of Proposed Subdivision dated June 27, 2018, and to discuss opportunities to advance the design and construction of the recreation facility.

 

6.  City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report back through the 2020 Budget Process with a preliminary estimate of the full cost of the Preferred Facility and the funding needed beyond the existing approved capital project Don Mills Civitan Arena.

 

7.  City Council direct the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor to take required actions and use available funds to implement the recommendations in the report (June 19, 2019) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

8.  City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to undertake a scan of the broader Don Mills catchment area to determine what public and community needs exist assuming the completion of the recommended community centre at the Celestica site.

 

9.  City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to submit and include the results of the scan in Recommendation 8 above to a thorough public consultation process including but not limited to Don Mills Residents Inc. to obtain input on an appropriate public or community use for the land.

 

10.  City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report back to the Executive Committee on the results of Recommendations 8 and 9 above not later than the third quarter of 2020.

 

11.  City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report back to Executive Committee on the following:

 

a.  including a Community Kitchen to the facilities included in the Preferred Option at the Celestica site; and

 

b.  including coliseum seating for one of the two ice pads at the Celestica site arena.

 

12.  City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission Board to request the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to consider adding a stop at the new Community Recreation Facility on Route 403, upon opening of the centre.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning gave a presentation on Don Mills Community Recreation Facility Planning.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide a recommended approach for planning and building new recreation facilities that will best serve the existing and future communities located along Don Mills Road, specifically the communities located at: Don Mills Road and Lawrence Avenue East, Wynford Drive, and Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East, and Flemingdon Park (Don Mills Corridor).

 

The Don Mills Corridor is anticipated to grow by 25,000 residents, with approximately three quarters of this growth concentrated at the intersection of Eglinton Avenue East and Don Mills Road. This transformation is mainly attributed to the construction of the Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit line as well as the approval of a new mixed-use community on the former Celestica Lands. Growth has intensified since the original approval of the Don Mills Centre (Shops at Don Mills) development in 2011, where 2,050 units were approved for this corridor. Between 2011 and 2018 an additional 12,650 units were approved. In total over 14,000 residential units are planned to date.

 

Along with growth, new city building opportunities have also been secured with the provision of a large 2.26 hectare (5.58 acre) park on the Celestica Lands (844 Don Mills Road). In 2016 City Council approved this site as the new location for a twin-pad arena, replacing the existing single pad Don Mills Civitan Arena at Don Mills Centre. Planning and design for new community recreation centres has also evolved over the past 10 years. With the creation of new facilities such as the Pam McConnell Aquatic Facility, Regent Park Community Recreation Centre, and the York Community Recreation Centre, the City has set new facility design and programming best practices for new recreation centres that will be required to support our growing and changing communities across the city. City staff initiated a recreation planning review to determine how to best serve the current and future communities that will live along the Don Mills Corridor.

 

City staff developed two community recreation facility options that were presented to the public throughout late February to June 2019. The first option was referred to as the "Preferred Facility," and proposes a large fully integrated 11,613 square metre (125,000 square feet) facility at the Celestica Lands, consisting of a twin-pad arena, multi-tank aquatic facility, full-size gymnasium with walking track, multi-purpose and amenity space. The second option, referred to as the "Alternate Proposal," included two smaller facilities: one 2,508 square metre (27,000 square foot) facility at the Don Mills Centre site, consisting of a full-size gym with walking track and multi-purpose and amenity space; and a second 9,290 square metre (100,000 square feet) facility at the Celestica Lands, consisting of a twin-pad arena, multi-tank aquatic facility and a few multi-purpose rooms.

 

Extensive public consultation has been undertaken with more than 525 residents and stakeholders through focused stakeholder meetings, pop-up consultations, on-line feedback forms, and a public open house meeting. There was strong community support for the Preferred Facility; however, some community members had concerns with both the Preferred Facility and the Alternate Proposal as their preference was for the community centre described in a 2010 Section 37 Agreement for the Don Mills Centre.

 

Planning for new recreation facilities requires that the City adapt and change to meet the emerging needs of a growing community. In this area the previous plan for community recreation facilities cannot meet the current and projected requirements of this growing community. With change comes opportunity, as it has in this area, with the approval of a large future park on the former Celestica Lands that can accommodate what will be one of the largest and most integrated recreation facilities in the city. When the City builds new facilities, they must meet today's standards of design and programming excellence, to ensure that we create the best spaces for our current and future residents. Recreation facilities and parks are a generational investment and must be planned and designed accordingly.

 

City staff are recommending the Preferred Facility Option (large, fully integrated recreation centre), as it would achieve:

 

- Co-location of high-quality recreation facilities offering a wide range of seamless programming, serving residents from communities along the Don Mills Road Corridor, including Don Mills Road and Lawrence Avenue East, Don Mills Road and Eglinton Avenue East as well as Flemingdon Park, a Neighbourhood Improvement Area;


- Complementary and enhanced programming opportunities as the facility would be located within a large park;


- Greater capacity to serve residents of all ages and income levels, in an area central to the highest amount of future growth;


- Accessibility and proximity to the Eglinton LRT, Toronto Transit Commission buses, and on-site parking;


- Efficiencies in annual operating costs for a single facility versus two facilities within one kilometre of one another.

 

Further amendments to planning instruments will be required to implement the Preferred Facility. This report was prepared in consultation with City Legal, Real Estate Services and CreateTO.

Background Information (Committee)

(July 4, 2019) Presentation from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Don Mills Community Recreation Facility Planning
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135625.pdf
(June 19, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135017.pdf
Attachment 1 - Summary of Residential Development Applications in the Study Area
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135018.pdf
Attachment 2 - Executive Summary, Don Mills Recreation Facility Planning Public Consultation Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135019.pdf

Speakers

Brian Story, Don Mills Residents Inc.
Ahmed Hussein, The Neighbourhood Organization
Vera Straka, Don Mills Residents Inc. Board
Dorothy Pestell, TSCC 2441 LivLofts Condominium Corporation
Adil Patel, Friends of Flemingdon Park
Larry Steinhauer, Don Mills Residents Inc.
Caroline Schweppe
Wendy Pauling
Vanessa Quinn
Howard Smith
Councillor Shelley Carroll

Communications (Committee)

(July 3, 2019) Letter from Kim Mullin, Wood Bull LLP on behalf of Don Mills Residents Inc. (EX.Supp.EX7.5.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/comm/communicationfile-95865.pdf
(July 3, 2019) E-mail from Nicholas Woodbridge (EX.Supp.EX7.5.2)
(July 3, 2019) Letter from Fahima Fatah, Afghan Women's Organization Refugee and Immigrant Services (EX.Supp.EX7.5.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/comm/communicationfile-95869.pdf
(July 3, 2019) E-mail from Sue England (EX.Supp.EX7.5.4)
(July 3, 2019) Submission from Brian Story, Don Mills Residents Inc. (EX.New.EX7.5.5)
(July 4, 2019) Letter from Lisa Grogan-Green, Go Green Youth Centre (EX.New.EX7.5.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/comm/communicationfile-95928.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 3, 2019) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chairs, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations (CC.Main.EX7.5.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-95985.pdf
(July 16, 2019) E-mail from Sid Catalano (CC.New.EX7.5.8)

EX7.6 - Build Toronto - Annual General Meeting and 2018 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council treat that portion of the City Council meeting at which the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer is considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Build Toronto by:

 

a.  receiving the "Build Toronto 2018 Annual Report", forming Attachment 1 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and

 

b.  appointing PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the Auditor of Build Toronto for fiscal year 2019, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Build Toronto to fix the remuneration of the Auditor.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the Build Toronto 2018 Audited Annual Financial Statements and Audit Results Report, forming Attachment 2 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the Audit Committee for information.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report transmits materials submitted by the Board of Directors of Build Toronto to the City. No independent review or analysis has been performed by City staff.

 

This report contains recommendations for the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act, Ontario for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Build Toronto, including receipt of its Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements for 2018 and appointment of the auditor for 2019.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Build Toronto - Annual General Meeting and 2018 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134767.pdf
Attachment 1 - Build Toronto 2018 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134768.pdf
Attachment 2 - Build Toronto 2018 Audited Annual Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134769.pdf

EX7.7 - Casa Loma Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2018 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council treat that portion of the City Council meeting at which the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer is considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Casa Loma Corporation by:

 

a.  receiving the "Casa Loma Corporation 2018 Annual Report", and the "Casa Loma Corporation 2018 Audited Annual Financial Statements", forming Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and

 

b.  reappointing Welch LLP Chartered Accountants, as the Auditor of Lakeshore Arena Corporation for fiscal year 2019, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Lakeshore Arena Corporation to fix the remuneration of the Auditor.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the "Casa Loma 2018 Audited Annual Financial Statements", forming Attachment 2 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the Audit Committee for information.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report transmits materials submitted by the Board of Directors of Casa Loma Corporation to the City. No independent review or analysis has been performed by City staff.

 

This report contains recommendations for the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act, Ontario for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Casa Loma Corporation, including receipt of its Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements for 2018 and appointment of the auditor for 2019.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Casa Loma Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2018 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134875.pdf
Attachment 1 - Casa Loma Corporation 2018 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134876.pdf
Attachment 2 - Casa Loma Corporation 2018 Audited Annual Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134877.pdf

EX7.8 - Lakeshore Arena Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2018 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council treat that portion of the City Council meeting at which the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer is considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Lakeshore Arena Corporation by:

 

a.  receiving the "Lakeshore Arena Corporation 2018 Annual Report", and the "Lakeshore Arena Corporation 2018 Audited Annual Financial Statements", forming Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and

 

b.  reappointing Welch LLP Chartered Accountants, as the Auditor of Lakeshore Arena Corporation for fiscal year 2019, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Lakeshore Arena Corporation to fix the remuneration of the Auditor; and

 

c.  receiving the "Lakeshore Arena Corporation Executive Compensation Disclosure 2018", forming Attachment 3 to this Report.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the "Lakeshore Arena 2018 Audited Annual Financial Statements", forming Attachment 2 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the Audit Committee for information.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report transmits materials submitted by the Board of Directors of Lakeshore Arena Corporation to the City. No independent review or analysis has been performed by City staff.

 

This report contains recommendations for the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act, Ontario for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Lakeshore Arena Corporation, including receipt of its Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements for 2018 and appointment of the auditor for 2019.

 

This report also contains recommendations for receipt at the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of information disclosing the individual compensation of executive officers employed by Lakeshore Arena Corporation in 2018.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Lakeshore Arena Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2018 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134787.pdf
Attachment 1 - Lakeshore Arena Corporation 2018 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134788.pdf
Attachment 2 - Lakeshore Arena Corporation 2018 Audited Annual Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134789.pdf
Attachment 3 - Lakeshore Arena Corporation Executive Compensation Disclosure 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134790.pdf

EX7.9 - Toronto Community Housing Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council treat the portion of the City Council meeting at which the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer is considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Toronto Community Housing Corporation, and:

 

a.  receive the Letter to the Shareholder from the Toronto Community Housing Corporation's Vice-Chair of the Board of Directors and President and Chief Executive Officer dated April 30, 2019 transmitting the Toronto Community Housing Corporation 2018 Annual Report and additional information, forming Attachment 1 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer;

 

b.  receive Toronto Community Housing Corporation's 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ending December 31, 2018, including the auditor's report dated April 30, 2019, forming Attachment 2 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer;

 

c.  re-appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the auditor for Toronto Community Housing Corporation for fiscal year 2019 at the fee provided in the City's agreement with that firm; and

 

d.  receive the Toronto Community Housing executive compensation disclosure for 2018, included in section 4.1.1 of additional information in Attachment 1 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

 

2.  City Council, as Shareholder, receive Toronto Community Housing Corporation's 2019-2022 Strategic Plan and budget summary forming Attachment 3 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

 

3.  City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of Toronto Community Housing Corporation's 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2018, forming Attachment 2 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the Audit Committee for information.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report transmits materials submitted by the Board of Directors of Toronto Community Housing Corporation to the City. No independent review or analysis has been performed by City staff.

 

This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Ontario Business Corporations Act for holding an Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Toronto Community Housing Corporation, including receipt of Toronto Community Housing Corporation's 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements and appointment of the auditor for Toronto Community Housing Corporation for 2019.

 

This report also recommends that Council receive for information Toronto Community Housing Corporation's 2019-2022 Strategic Plan.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Toronto Community Housing Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134784.pdf
Attachment 1 - Letter to the Shareholder, dated April 30, 2019, Toronto Community Housing Corporation's 2018 Annual Report and Additional Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134829.pdf
Attachment 2 - Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements, for the period ending December 31, 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134830.pdf
Attachment 3 - Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2019-2022 Strategic Plan and 2019 Budget Detailed Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134831.pdf

EX7.10 - Toronto Hydro Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2018 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
First Item after Member Motions.

Confidential Attachment - The security of property belonging to the City of Toronto or Toronto Hydro Corporation and personal matters about an identifiable person

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council treat the portion of the City Council meeting at which the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer is being considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Toronto Hydro Corporation, and:

 

a.  approve the "Resolution of the Sole Shareholder Re-appointing Auditor" in Attachment 1 Appendix A to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in order to re-appoint KPMG LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the auditor for Toronto Hydro Corporation for 2019 until the close of the next annual meeting of the Shareholder, or until a successor is appointed, at such remuneration as may be fixed by the Corporation's Board;

 

b.  receive the "Toronto Hydro Corporation 2018 Annual Report, Financial Report, and Consolidated Financial Statements," the "Toronto Hydro Corporation Annual Information Form 2018," the "Toronto Hydro Corporation Environmental Performance Report 2018," the "Toronto Hydro Corporation Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certifications of Annual Filings 2018," the "Toronto Hydro Corporation First Quarter Financial Report 2019," and the "Toronto Hydro Corporation Statement of Board Remuneration and Expenses 2018," forming Attachments 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, and 11 respectively to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer;

 

c.  receive the "Toronto Hydro Corporation Shareholder Report 2018, including Non-Consolidated Financial Statements," the "Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited Financial Statements 2018 and 2017," and the "Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. Financial Statements 2018 and 2017," forming Confidential Attachments 7, 8 and 9 respectively to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and

 

d.  receive the two-part report "Toronto Hydro Corporation Executive Compensation Disclosure 2018" forming Attachment 6a and Confidential Attachment 6b to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

 

2.  City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 6b to report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer remain confidential in its entirety as it deals with personal information about identifiable individuals.

 

3.  City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 7, 8, and 9 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer remain confidential in their entirety due to the security of the property of the City and securities requirements arising from Toronto Hydro Corporation's status as an offering corporation under the Business Corporations Act, (Ontario) R.S.O. 1990, c.B.16, Toronto Hydro Corporation's status as a reporting issuer under the Securities Act, (Ontario) R.S.O. 1990, c.S.5, and the application by the Ontario Securities Commission of National Instrument 51-102.

 

4.  City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the "Toronto Hydro Corporation Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2018 and 2017", included as part of Attachment 2 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the Audit Committee for information.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report transmits materials submitted by the Board of Directors of Toronto Hydro Corporation to the City. No independent review or analysis has been performed by City staff.

 

This report contains recommendations for actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act, (Ontario) R.S.O. 1990, c.B.16 for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Toronto Hydro Corporation including receipt of Toronto Hydro Corporation's audited annual consolidated financial statements for 2018 and appointment of the auditor for Toronto Hydro Corporation for 2019.

 

This report also contains recommendations for receipt at the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Toronto Hydro Corporation of other reports provided by Toronto Hydro Corporation as required by the Amended and Restated Shareholder Direction Relating to Toronto Hydro Corporation (Shareholder Direction) which, in addition to the Business Corporations Act, (Ontario) R.S.O. 1990, c.B.16 requirements, include:

 

- Toronto Hydro Corporation's annual report, environmental performance report and annual information form;


- Toronto Hydro Corporation's report to the Shareholder, consolidated and non-consolidated financial statements and financial statements for its subsidiary companies. Note that Toronto Hydro Corporation has advised the City that Attachments 7, 8, and 9 are confidential due to: the security of the property of the City, and securities requirements arising from Toronto Hydro Corporation's status as an offering corporation under the Business Corporations Act, (Ontario) R.S.O. 1990, c.B.16, Toronto Hydro Corporation's status as a reporting issuer under the Securities Act (Ontario), R.S.O. 1990, c.S.5, and the application by the Ontario Securities Commission of National Instrument 51-102; and


- Toronto Hydro Corporation's disclosure of executive compensation in two parts, with the part in Attachment 6b being confidential as it includes personal information about identifiable individuals.
 

Toronto Hydro Corporation's Shareholder Direction can be found at https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/8cdc-THC-Shareholder-Direction-Executed-2013-Amended-2017.pdf

 

Subsection 94 (1) of the Business Corporations Act, (Ontario) R.S.O. 1990, c.B.16 requires that the directors of Toronto Hydro Corporation call an annual meeting of its Shareholder by no later than fifteen months after holding the last preceding annual meeting, which was held by City Council at its meeting of July 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 30, 2018.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Toronto Hydro Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2018 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135075.pdf
Attachment 1 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Report on the 2018 Annual Shareholder Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135076.pdf
Attachment 1 Appendix A - Resolution of the Shareholder Re-appointing Auditor
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135077.pdf
Attachment 2 - Toronto Hydro Corporation 2018 Annual Report, Financial Report, and Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135078.pdf
Attachment 3 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Annual Information Form 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135079.pdf
Attachment 4 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Environmental Performance Report 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135080.pdf
Attachment 5 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certification of Annual Filings 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135081.pdf
Attachment 6a - Toronto Hydro Corporation Executive Compensation Disclosure 2018 (Part 1, Named Executive Officers)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135082.pdf
Confidential Attachment 6b - Toronto Hydro Corporation Executive Compensation Disclosure 2018 (Part 2, All Executives)
Confidential Attachment 7 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Shareholder Report 2018, including Non-Consolidated Financial Statements
Confidential Attachment 8 - Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited Financial Statements 2018 and 2017
Confidential Attachment 9 - Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. Financial Statements 2018 and 2017
Attachment 10 - Toronto Hydro Corporation First Quarter Financial Report 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135107.pdf
Attachment 11 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Statement of Board Remuneration and Expenses 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135108.pdf

EX7.11 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. - Annual General Meeting and 2018 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council, in its capacity as one of the Shareholders of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc., (the "Corporation"):

 

a.  adopt and authorize the City Manager to sign the Resolutions of Shareholders attached as Attachment 1 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on behalf of the City so that:

 

1.  Financial Statements

 

City Council receive the audited financial statements of the Corporation for the financial year ended December 31, 2018, including the auditor's report dated March 14, 2019, forming Attachment 4 to this report are received.

 

2.  Appointment of Auditors

 

a.  Welch LLP are reappointed as the auditors of the Corporation until the close of the next annual meeting of the shareholders or until their successors are duly appointed; and

 

b.  the remuneration of the auditors will be fixed by the directors who are hereby authorized to fix that remuneration.

 

3.  Confirmation of Proceedings

 

All by-laws, contracts, acts, proceedings, appointments, elections, and payments of any director or officer of the Corporation that were enacted, made, done, or taken since the last annual meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation are approved, ratified, sanctioned, and confirmed.

 

b.  adopt and authorize the City Manager to sign the Resolution of Shareholders forming Attachment 5 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer:

 

1.  ratifying and approving the Operating and Capital Budgets of the Corporation attached as Schedule A to Attachment 5 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and

 

2.  authorizing any two directors or officers to carry out the provisions of the resolutions passed by the shareholders of the Corporation.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the "Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. 2018 Audited Annual Financial Statements", forming Attachment 4 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the Audit Committee for information.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report transmits materials submitted by the Board of Directors of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. to the City. No independent review or analysis has been performed by City staff.

 

This report contains recommendations for the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act, Ontario for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc., including receipt of its Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements for 2018 and appointment of the auditor for 2019.

 

The purpose of this report is to present two shareholder resolutions for approval by City Council, on behalf of the City in its capacity as one of the two Shareholders of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134809.pdf
Attachment 1 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc., Resolutions of the Shareholders - Financial Statements, Appointment of Auditors, Confirmation of Proceedings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134810.pdf
Attachment 2 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc., 2018 Highlights
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134811.pdf
Attachment 3 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc., 2018 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134812.pdf
Attachment 4 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc., Audited Financial Statements for year ended December 31, 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134827.pdf
Attachment 5 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc., Resolutions of the Shareholders - Approval of Budget, Schedule A and B
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134828.pdf

EX7.12 - Toronto Port Lands Company - Annual General Meeting and 2018 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council treat that portion of the City Council meeting at which the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer is considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Toronto Port Lands Company by:

 

a.  receiving the Toronto Port Lands Company's 2018 Annual Report, forming Attachment 1 to the report  (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and

 

b.  appointing PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the Auditor of Toronto Economic Development Corporation for fiscal year 2019, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Toronto Port Lands Company to fix the remuneration of the Auditor.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the Toronto Port Lands Company's 2018 Audited Annual Financial Statements, forming Attachment 2 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to the Audit Committee for information.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report transmits materials submitted by the Board of Directors of Toronto Port Lands Company to the City. No independent review or analysis has been performed by City staff.

 

This report contains recommendations for the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act, Ontario for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Toronto Economic Development Corporation, operating as the Toronto Port Lands Company, including receipt of its Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements for 2018 and appointment of the auditor for 2019.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Toronto Port Lands Company - Annual General Meeting and 2018 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134780.pdf
Attachment 1 - Toronto Port Lands Company 2018 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134781.pdf
Attachment 2 - Toronto Port Lands Company 2018 Audited Annual Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134761.pdf

EX7.13 - Development Charge Complaint - 1383, 1385, 1389, 1399 and 1403 Military Trail

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park

Statutory - Development Charges Act, SO 1997

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council determine that the Development Charges By-law and Education Development Charges By-Law have been properly applied to the residential development project located at 1383, 1385, 1389, 1399 and 1403 Military Trail.

 

2.  City Council dismiss the complaint filed pursuant to Section 20 of the Development Charges Act, 1997 and Section 257.85 of the Education Act.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee held a statutory public meeting on July 4, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Development Charges Act and the Education Act.

Origin

(June 18, 2019) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report responds to a complaint filed pursuant to Section 20 of the Development Charges Act, 1997 and Section 257.85 of the Education Act relating to a residential development project located at 1383, 1385, 1389, 1399 and 1403 Military Trail.

 

The development project consists of five pre-existing lots with one detached dwelling in each.  In the process of redevelopment, demolition permits were issued for these five lots.  Subsequently, building permit applications for the development were submitted. 

 

The City's 2013 Development Charges By-law was in effect at the time of the permit application. It contains a provision for Development Charge reduction relating to demolished units for up to 36 months after issuance of demolition permit upon submission of a complete building permit application.  At the time of permit application approximately 53 months had elapsed.  The Toronto Catholic District School Board's Education Development Charges By-law also provided demolition offsets for up to 36 months from demolition permit issuance.

 

The complaint seeks to have the demolition reduction apply, noting that i) they experienced delay due to a subsequent sale of the properties followed by redevelopment redesign which required an application for minor variance and ii) revocation of the demolition permit was forestalled at their request twice, and should in their view have reset the clock for the purposes of the 36 month window. 

 

Staff determined that Development Charges By-law was applied properly and no error was made in the calculation of the Development Charges.  This report recommends that the complaint be dismissed.  A decision of Council to dismiss the complaint may be appealed to Local Planning Appeal Tribunal.  This report was prepared in consultation with the Chief Building Official and the City Solicitor.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2019) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Development Charge Complaint - 1383, 1385, 1389, 1399 and 1403 Military Trail
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134962.pdf
Attachment 1 - Complaint letter from Military Trail Development Corporation, dated October 10, 2017
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135003.pdf
(July 3, 2019) Attachment 2 - Executive Committee Orientation - Hearing Procedure - Complaints Under the Development Charges Act and the Education Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135592.pdf

Speakers

Susan Rosenthal, Davies Howe LLP

Communications (Committee)

(July 3, 2019) Letter from Andrew Baker, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP on behalf of the Toronto Catholic District School Board (EX.Supp.EX7.13.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/comm/communicationfile-95899.pdf

EX7.14 - Capital Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2018

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the report (June 18, 2019) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for information.

Origin

(June 18, 2019) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide City Council with the City of Toronto capital performance for the year ended December 31, 2018. Actual capital expenditures for 2018 totalled $3.594 billion or 63.0 percent of 2018 approved Capital Budget of $5.752 billion (see Table 1).

 

For the year-ended December 31, 2018, Tax Supported Programs and Agencies reported capital expenditures of $2.799 billion representing 61.1 percent of their collective 2018 approved Capital Budget of $4.578 billion. Rate Supported Programs reported capital expenditures of $795.4 million, representing 67.7 percent of their collective 2018 approved Capital Budget of $1.174 billion.

 

Table 1: Summary of Capital Spending 

 

2018 Approved Budget

2018 Actual Expenditure

 

        ($M)

         ($M)

       %

City Operations

2,063

1,189

57.6%

Agencies

2,515

1,610

65.2%

Subtotal - Tax Supported

4,578

2,799

61.1%

Rate Supported

1,174

795

67.7%

TOTAL

5,752

3,594

62.5%

*2018 Approved Budget includes $1.656 billion 2017 Carry Forward Funding

 

The report also provides details on the 140 completed capital projects that have a combined budget of $204.9 million that were completed in the fourth quarter of 2018 and are ready to be closed. They have been completed with a total realized underspending of $27.0 million. The permanent underspending which has associated funding of $0.5 million in Federal Subsidy, $2.6 million in Capital from Current, $2.3 million in debt, $4.9 million in reserves/reserve funds, $16.6 million in Recoverable Debt and $0.1 million in other internal/external funds will be returned to their original Council approved funding sources.

 

In 2018, a total of 184 capital projects were completed with a combined capital budget of $366.4 million and an actual combined expenditure of $323.4 million, resulting in a total underspending of $43.0 million returned to the original funding sources.

 

In 2018, 18 of 31 Programs/Agencies have spending rate lower than 70 percent of their total approved Capital Budget. Among them Toronto Transit Commission, Transportation Services, Facilities Management, Real Estate, Environmental and Energy and Waterfront Revitalization Initiative have the highest approved budget and the highest unspent amount and highlighted below:

 

Toronto Transit Commission

 

The 2018 approved Capital Budget for Toronto Transit Commission totals $2.288 billion includes Toronto Transit Commission Base Projects, Toronto York Spadina Subway Extension, Scarborough Subway Extension and Transit Studies for Relief Line and Waterfront Transit. Toronto Transit Commission base projects have a spending rate of 76.5 percent while Toronto York Spadina Subway Extension, Scarborough Subway Extension and Transit Studies have spending rate of 38.0 percent, 63.5 percent and 15.3 percent respectively. The low spending rate for Toronto York Spadina Subway Extension is due to deferral of property settlements, holdback releases, contingencies and claims resolutions, and for Scarborough Subway Extension is due to revised City acquisition plan while Transit Studies are new initiatives supporting future transit expansions as part of the Public Transit Infrastructure Fund program.

 

Transportation Services

 

Transportation Services have a total 2018 Capital Budget of $565.9 million and a year-end spending of $313.9 million or 55.5 percent of its approved capital budget. Most of the $252.0 million year-end under-spending is in capital projects that require third party coordination and/or funding, community consultation, issues with site conditions and/or are development/transit dependent.

 

Facilities Management, Real Estate, Environment and Energy

 

The Facilities Management, Real Estate, Environment and Energy Program has spent $188.2 million or 57.7 percent of the total 2018 approved Capital Budget. Most of the $137.8 million year-end under-spending is due to coordination of legal agreements, insufficient funding, client issues, coordination of building requirements across multiple stakeholders, coordination with other projects and delays in Request for Quotation/Request for Proposal process.

 

Waterfront Revitalization Initiative

 

The Waterfront Revitalization Initiative Program spent $60.3 million or 28.8 percent of total approved Capital Budget. $149.0 million remained unspent primarily due to underspending in the Portland Flood Protection Project and the Cherry Street Stormwater Lakefilling Project caused by site conditions and winter shut-down.

  

Further details on the progress of all approved capital projects for each City Program and Agency can be found in Appendix 4 of this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2019) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Capital Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134850.pdf
Appendix 1 - Capital Variance Summary for the year ended December 31, 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134851.pdf
Appendix 2 - Capital Projects for Closure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134852.pdf
Appendix 3 - Major Capital Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134853.pdf
Appendix 4 - Capital Dashboard for Programs/Agencies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134854.pdf

EX7.15 - Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2018

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the transfer of $8.000 million from the Water (43 percent) and Wastewater (57 percent) Stabilization Reserves to Toronto Water's Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Reserve (XQ1012) to fund future year vehicle purchases.

 

2.  City Council approve the withdrawal from Emergency Human Services Reserve (XQ1111) of $0.077 million to supplement funding in the Emergency Human Services Expense Account to mitigate the deficit position in 2018.

Origin

(June 14, 2019) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the City of Toronto's Operating Variance results for the year ended December 31, 2018 and the disposition of the 2018 year-end operating surplus.

 

As of December 31, 2018 the City experienced a favourable variance of $147.200 million net. The following table summarizes the financial position of the City's Tax Supported Operations at year-end:

 

Table 1: Tax Supported Operating Variance Summary ($ Millions)

Variance ($M)

Favourable / (Unfavourable)

2018 Year-End Results

Budget

Actual

Variance

City Operations

2,254.2

2,166.5

87.7

Agencies

2,015.6

1,990.7

24.8

Corporate Accounts

(94.5)

(129.2)

34.7

Total Variance

4,175.2

4,028.0

147.2

Less: Council Directed/Legislative Requirements

 

(21.4)

Adjusted Variance

 

125.8

% of Gross Budget

 

1.1%

 

In accordance with Council and legislative requirements, a portion of the surplus, $21.434 million net, will be allocated to reserve funds primarily for the following Programs and Agency: Toronto Building, City Planning, and Exhibition Place.

 

As noted in Table 1 above, for the year ended December 31, 2018 Tax Supported Operations experienced a favourable net variance of $147.200 million or 1.3 percent of budgeted gross expenditures. The key factors contributing to the favourable year-end variance are lower than planned salary and benefits from vacant positions, and revenue driven by volume in City Operations, as well as under spending in employee benefits, utility costs, non-labour costs by Toronto Transit Commission. It is important to note lower than budgeted Municipal Land Transfer Tax revenue of $82.403 million net due to lower residential market activity. An overview of the key variance drivers can be found in the "Comments" section of this report as well as in a detailed summary provided in Appendix E.

 

Consistent with the Council approved Surplus Management Policy, at least 75 percent or $94.324 million will be allocated to the Capital Financing Reserve and the remaining $31.441 million will be allocated to underfunded liabilities and/or reserve funds.

 

Rate Supported Programs:

 

Rate Supported Programs reported a favourable year-end variance of $65.414 million. The favourable variance is primarily attributed to both underspending and over achieved revenue in Toronto Water.

 

Table 2: Rate Supported Net Variance Summary ($ Millions)

Variance ($M)

Favourable / (Unfavourable)

2018 Year-End

Budget

Actual

Variance

Solid Waste Management Services

0.0

0.0

0.0

Toronto Parking Authority

(66.5)

(67.0)

0.4

Toronto Water

0.0

(65.0)

65.0

Total Variance

(66.5)

(132.0)

65.4

 

For the year ended December 31, 2018 Tax Supported Operations experienced a favourable variance of $147.200 million net. After meeting Council and legislative requirements, the year-end surplus available for distribution is $125.765 million net. As per City Council's Surplus Management Policy, 75 percent of the 2018 final year-end surplus of $94.324 million will be allocated to the Capital Financing Reserve and the remaining 25 percent or $31.441 million will be allocated to underfunded liabilities and/or reserves/reserve funds.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2019) Report and Appendices A to E from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134900.pdf

EX7.17 - Capital Variance Report for the Four Months Ended April 30, 2019

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve in-year budget adjustments to the 2019-2028 Approved Capital Budget and Plan as detailed in Appendix 4 that result in no incremental impact on debt financing.

 

2.  City Council approve additional 2018 carry forward funding for Toronto Transit Commission and Go Transit as detailed in Appendix 6 to the report (June 13, 2019) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

 

3.  City Council receive for information the list of 30 completed capital projects/sub-projects to be closed as detailed in Appendix 2 to the report (June 13, 2019) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer that results in a total combined project budget an underspending of $4.498 million.

Origin

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide City Council with the City of Toronto capital spending for the four month period ended April 30, 2019, as well as projected actual expenditures to December 31, 2019. Furthermore, this report seeks Council's approval for in-year budget adjustments to the 2019 Approved Capital Budget and additional carry-forward from 2018 that have no impact on approved debt.

 

As illustrated in Table 1 below, 2019 the City's capital expenditure was $748.3 million or 13.1 percent of the 2019 capital budget of $5,793 billion and is projecting to expend $4,589 billion or 79.0 percent by December 31, 2019.

 

Table 1: Capital Variance Summary

 

2019 Approved Budget

Actual Expenditures -

4M YTD

2019 Approved Budget

Projected Expenditures - January to December

 

$M

$M

%

$M

$M

%

City Operations

2,074

212

10.2%

2,074

1,555

75.0%

Agencies

2,593

393

15.5%

2,533

2,056

78.8%

Subtotal - Tax Supported

4,607

605

 13.1%

 4,607

 3,551

 77.1%

Rate Supported

1,126

144

12.7%

1,126

977

86.7%

TOTAL

5,793

748

13.1%

5,733

4,589

79.0%

 

The spending pattern for the first quarter is typically within 10 percent of the total Council Approved Capital Budget. Tax Supported Programs project a spending rate of 77.1 percent while Rate Supported Programs project a spending rate of 86.7 percent by year-end. The projected year-end spending rates presented in this report are based on the submissions from each Program and Agency, and as such, the preparation of this report has been based on this information.

 

The report also details the 46 completed capital projects that have a combined budget of $66.861 million that are ready to be closed. They have been completed under budget, realizing underspending of $6.501 million. The permanent underspending which has associated funding of $0.468 million in capital from current, $0.339 million in debt, $4.114 million in reserves/reserve funds, $0.264 million in Recoverable Debt, $0.115 million in Development Charges and $1.2 million in other Revenue will be returned to their original funding sources.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Capital Variance Report for the Four Months Ended April 30, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134887.pdf
Appendix 1 - 2019 Capital Variance and Projection Summary for the four months ended April 30, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134888.pdf
Appendix 2 - Capital Projects for Closure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134889.pdf
Appendix 3 - Major Capital Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134890.pdf
Appendix 4 - In-Year Adjustments for the four months ended April 30, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134891.pdf
Appendix 5 - Capital Variance Dashboard by Program and Agency
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134892.pdf
Appendix 6 - Additional Carry Forward Funding by Project
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134893.pdf

EX7.18 - Operating Variance Report for the Four Months Ended April 30, 2019

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the budget adjustments and any associated complement changes detailed in Appendix D1, D2 and D3 to the report (June 14, 2019) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to amend the 2019 Approved Operating Budget, such adjustments to have no impact on the 2019 Approved Net Operating Budget of the City.

Origin

(June 14, 2019) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide City Council with the Operating Variance for the four months ended April 30, 2019 as well as projections to year-end. This report also requests City Council's approval for amendments to the 2019 Approved Operating Budget that have no impact on the City's 2019 Approved Net Operating Budget.

 

The following table summarizes the financial position of the City's Tax Supported Operations as of April 30, 2019 and the projection at year-end:

 

Table 1: Tax Supported Operating Variance Summary

Variance ($M)

Favourable / (Unfavourable)

2019 4M YTD

2019 Year-End

Budget

Actual

Var

Budget

Actual

Var

City Operations

716.7

690.3

26.5

2,286.1

2,263.9

22.2

Agencies

696.1

692.0

4.1

2,074.3

2,077.1

(2.7)

Corporate Accounts

192.8

154.6

38.2

(47.4)

(50.2)

2.8

Total Variance

1,605.6

1,536.9

68.7

4,313.0

4,290.7

22.2

Less: Toronto Building*

(3.0)

(6.8)

3.8

(15.9)

(27.8)

11.9

Adjusted Variance

1,608.6

1,543.7

64.9

4,328.9

4,318.5

10.4

% of Gross Budget

 

 

1.8%

 

 

0.1%

* In accordance with the Building Code Act, any surplus from Toronto Building must be contributed to the Building Code Act Service Improvement Reserve Fund.

 

Year-to-Date and Year-End Spending Results:

 

As noted in Table 1 above, for the four months ended April 30, 2019 Tax Supported Operations experienced a favourable net variance of $68.675 million or 4.3 percent of planned expenditures. The key factors contributing to the favourable year-to-date variance are:

 

- Year-to-date under expenditure in City Operations due to lower than planned salary and benefits from vacant positions, partially offset by lower revenue than planned revenue


- Favourable Corporate revenue, primarily from Municipal Land Transfer Tax and Interest/Investment Earnings.

 
For year-end, the City is projecting a net favourable variance of $22.232 million or 0.5 percent of the 2019 Approved Operating Budget.

 

An overview of the key variance drivers can be found in the "Comments" section of this report as well as in a detailed summary provided in Appendix E.

 

Rate Supported Programs:

 

Rate Supported Programs reported a favourable year-to-date variance of $22.510 million. The favourable variance is attributed to gross under expenditures on salary and benefits from vacant positions and earlier than planned receipt of revenue. Consistent with year-to-date results, the favourable year-end projected variance is $20.614 million that is primarily driven by gross under spending in Toronto Water.

 

Table 2: Year-To-Date Rate Supported Operating Variance Summary

Variance ($M)

Favourable / (Unfavourable)

2019 4M YTD

2019 Year-End Projection

Budget

Actual

Var

Budget

Actual

Var

Solid Waste Management Services

(13.3)

(27.4)

14.1

0.0

1.0

(1.0)

Toronto Parking Authority

(19.0)

(19.8)

0.8

(66.5)

(65.0)

(1.6)

Toronto Water

(61.0)

(68.6)

7.6

0.0

(23.2)

23.2

Total Variance

(93.3)

(115.8)

22.5

(66.5)

(87.2)

20.6

 

Rate Supported Programs are funded entirely by the user fees that are used to pay for the services provided and the infrastructure to deliver them. Solid Waste Management Services and Toronto Water's respective year-end surpluses, if any, must be transferred to the Wastewater and Water Stabilization Reserves and Waste Management Reserve Fund, respectively, to finance capital investments and ongoing operations.

 

The recommended budget adjustments in Appendix D1, D2 and D3 are fiscally neutral to the 2019 Approved Net Operating Budget.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 14, 2019) Report and Appendices A to E from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Operating Variance Report for the Four Months Ended April 30, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134910.pdf

EX7.19 - Invest Toronto - Final Wind Up and Dissolution

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council, as shareholder, receive for information the report (June 21, 2019) from the Controller as the final report on the wind up of Invest Toronto Inc. from the appointed liquidator.

Origin

(June 21, 2019) Report from the Controller

Summary

City Council directed staff to wind up Invest Toronto Inc. (Invest Toronto) on July 4, 2017. As a result of the creation of Toronto Global to promote foreign direct investment in Toronto and surrounding region, Invest Toronto was no longer required as a City corporation.

 

The corporation wind up process includes: completing pre-approved transactions, addressing residual employee obligations, settling liabilities, closing accounts, and completing independent financial audits of activity in 2018 and 2019. As part of the process, residual assets in the amount of $4,242 were transferred to the City as shareholder.  The City will retain Invest Toronto corporate records for seven years following the corporation's last fiscal year of activity in accordance with applicable legislation. In addition, City staff are registering Invest Toronto's former website address, slogan and logo to secure their use. As of June 12, 2019, Invest Toronto's assets and liabilities have been settled, as reflected in the audited financial statements (Statements) as at December 31, 2018 and June 12, 2019 attached to this report.

 

The receipt of this report represents the last step for Council as shareholder in the corporation wind up process.  The receipt of this report is required to formally complete the process to dissolve the corporation under the Ontario Business Corporations Act.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 21, 2019) Report from the Controller on Invest Toronto - Final Wind Up and Dissolution
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135051.pdf
Attachment 1 - Audited Financial Statements for Invest Toronto Incorporated for the Year Ended December 31, 2018, and Period Ended June 12, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135378.pdf

EX7.20 - 2019 Levy on Railway Roadways and Rights-of-Way and on Power Utility Transmission and Distribution Corridors

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1130 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the levy and collection of taxes for the 2019 taxation year on railway roadways and rights-of-way and on land used as transmission or distribution corridors owned by power utilities, in accordance with subsection 280 (1) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and subsection 257.7 (1) of the Education Act.

 

2.  City Council receive the Acreage and Tonnage Taxation Systems sections of the report (June 19, 2019) from the Controller for information.

 

3. City Council request the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to include the following information in future annual reports:

 

a. the potential additional income the City of Toronto could receive if the levy was based on a rate per tonnage as opposed to a rate per acreage;

 

b. a review of how the Provinces of Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Quebec tax railway right-of-way properties within their boundaries;

 

c. a summary of what reserves the Cities of Calgary, Regina, Winnipeg and Montreal receive through railway taxation; and

 

d. following consultation with the Railway Association of Canada on what their membership's current practice is in the Canadian Western Provinces in terms of self-reporting their traffic, information on how a similar practice could be adopted in the Province of Ontario if a tonnage-based system similar to the Western Provinces was adopted.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the Controller

Summary

This report seeks Council authority for the introduction of the by-law necessary to levy and collect taxes for the 2019 taxation year on railway roadways and rights-of-way and on land used as transmission or distribution corridors owned by power utilities, totalling approximately $7.1 million in taxation revenue, of which the municipal share is $6.6 million and the provincial education share is $0.5 million.

 

The 2019 levy total remains unchanged from the 2018 levy total of $7.1 million (with a $6.6 million municipal share and a provincial education share of $0.5 million). In May of 2019, the Ministry of Finance announced that, for the 2019 taxation year, the property tax rates for railway rights-of-way will remain unchanged from 2018 levels.

 

This report also provides information related to the property taxation of railway rights-of-way using the acreage and tonnage systems.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) Report and Attachments from the Controller on 2019 Levy on Railway Roadways and Rights-of-Way and on Power Utility Transmission and Distribution Corridors
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135049.pdf

EX7.21 - Fees for Solicitor Services (Limiting Distance Agreements) Provided by the City Solicitor to Outside Parties

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council approve the fee set out in Appendix A to the report (June 18, 2019) from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council amend Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, to add the fee set out in Appendix A to the report (June 18, 2019) from the City Solicitor.

 

3.  City Council direct the revenue collected from the provision of services associated with the fee set out in Appendix A to the report (June 18, 2019) from the City Solicitor be allocated to the Legal Services Division's budget.

Origin

(June 18, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Summary

This report identifies the need to implement a fee for services provided to outside parties by the City Solicitor in relation to limiting distance agreements in order to ensure consistency with the City Council approved user fee policy.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2019) Report and Appendix A from the City Solicitor on Fees for Solicitor Services (Limiting Distance Agreements) Provided by the City Solicitor to Outside Parties
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134965.pdf
(June 26, 2019) Public Notice - Fees for Solicitor Services (Limiting Distance Agreements)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134966.pdf

EX7.22 - Retention Schedule for Accountability Records in the Office of the Integrity Commissioner

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1083 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Municipal Code Chapter 3, Accountability Officers, to establish the Records Retention Schedule detailed in Attachment 1 to the report (June 12, 2019) from the Integrity Commissioner.

 

2.  City Council amend Municipal Code Chapter 3, Accountability Officers by:

 

a.  removing "Subject to Subsection C" from Section 3-7.6B so that it reads "An accountability officer may recommend directly to Council the establishment of a retention schedule for an accountability record"; and

 

b.  deleting Section 3-7.6C.

Origin

(June 12, 2019) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek Council's approval of a retention schedule for certain accountability records of the Office of the Integrity Commissioner in accordance with section 3-7.6B of Municipal Code Chapter 3, Accountability Officers.  

 

The City of Toronto Act, 2006 does not allow for the destruction of records of the City, including records of the Office of the Integrity Commissioner, unless they are destroyed in accordance with a retention schedule.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 12, 2019) Report from the Integrity Commissioner on Approval of Recommended Retention Schedule for Accountability Records in the Office of the Integrity Commissioner
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134666.pdf
Attachment 1 - OIC-0001 - Accountability Records - Integrity Commissioner
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134667.pdf

22a - Amendment to Chapter 3, Accountability Officers - Records Retention - Supplementary Report

Origin
(June 20, 2019) Report from the City Manager
Summary

This is a supplemental report to the Integrity Commissioner's report ("Approval of Recommended Retention Schedule for Accountability Records in the Office of the Integrity Commissioner"), also before City Council at its meeting on July 16, 2019. This report recommends changes to Section 3-7.6 in Chapter 3, Toronto Municipal Code, Accountability Officers to remove the requirement that the City's external auditor approve the retention period for the records in the Accountability Offices.

 

In May 2017, changes to the City of Toronto Act, 2006 came into effect which removed the requirement for approval of retention periods by the City's external auditor. Subsequently, City Council approved amendments to Chapter 217, Toronto Municipal Code, Records Corporate (City) in October 2017 to reflect these legislative changes.

 

As Accountability Officers manage their records independently from the City, a similar amendment is required to Chapter 3.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 20, 2019) Report from the City Manager on Amendment to Chapter 3, Accountability Officers - Records Retention - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135208.pdf

EX7.23 - Children's Services - Amendments to the 2019 Approved Capital Budget and 2019-2021 Cash Flows for Mount Dennis Child Care Centre and St. Barnabas Catholic School Child Care Centre Projects

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize an in-year budget adjustment to the 2019 Capital Budget for Children's Services by increasing the project cost for the Toronto Early Learning and Child Care Services' Mount Dennis Child Care Centre (CCS035-01) by $7.000 million, increasing the project cost from $11.000 million to $18.000 million, funded through the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund (XR1103), required to support the consolidation of the Trimbee Early Learning Centre; to support the addition of 26 child care spaces to the planned Mount Dennis location; and to fund inflationary impacts on the cost of construction.

 
2.  City Council authorize an amendment to the budgeted cash flows for the completion of the Toronto Early Learning and Child Care Services' Mount Dennis Child Care Centre project to reflect the following requirements: 2019 - $2.000 million, 2020 - $10.000 million, and 2021 - $2.991 million.

 
3.  City Council authorize an in-year budget adjustment to the 2019 Capital Budget for Children's Services by increasing the project cost for the St. Barnabas Catholic School Child Care Centre (CCS027-01) by $0.500 million, increasing the project cost from $2.600 million to $3.100 million, funded through the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund (XR1103), required to fund the inflationary impacts on the cost of construction.

 
4.  City Council authorize an amendment to the budgeted cash flows for the completion of the St. Barnabas Catholic School project to reflect the following requirements: 2019 - $1.000 million, and 2020 - $1.923 million.

Origin

(June 17, 2019) Report from the Interim General Manager, Children's Services

Summary

This report requests City Council's authority to amend Children's Services' Approved 2019 Capital Budget and 2020-2028 Capital Plan by increasing total project costs for two projects by $7.500 million, funded from the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund (XR1103).

 

These amendments are required in order to proceed with the tender process for the construction of two child care centres, as scope changes to the Mount Dennis project and third party costing indicates the need to increase the approved project for the Toronto Early Learning and Child Care Services' Mount Dennis Child Care Centre at 1234 Weston Road in Ward 5, and St. Barnabas Catholic School Child Care Centre at 30 Washburn Way in Ward 23.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2019) Report from the Interim General Manager, Children's Services on Children's Services - Amendments to the 2019 Approved Capital Budget and 2019-2021 Cash Flows for Mount Dennis Child Care Centre and St. Barnabas Catholic School Child Care Centre Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134804.pdf

EX7.24 - Emergency Management Program Funding Increase from Ontario Power Generation Incorporated

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication EX7.24.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Director, Office of Emergency Management to negotiate and enter into agreements with Ontario Power Generation Inc. for the provision of, and funding support for the City's provision of emergency management services for nuclear emergency response between the City of Toronto and Ontario Power Generation Inc., as described in this agreement, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director, Office of Emergency Management, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Director, Office of Emergency Management, to accept funding as prescribed for in any agreements negotiated, such funding to be added to the Office of Emergency Management 2019 Operating Budget for as an in-year budget adjustment that:

 

a.  increases expenditures and revenues by $212,500 for a net $0 impact from $225,000 to $437,500; and

 

b.  increases the complement by three (3) additional temporary full-time Full Time Equivalents from 18 to 21 Full Time Equivalents.

 

3.  City Council authorize the Director, Office of Emergency Management to execute and submit on behalf of the City any documents related to the funding support for the City's provision of nuclear emergency management services for nuclear emergency response between the City of Toronto and Ontario Power Generation Inc., required by the agreement between the parties.

Origin

(June 6, 2019) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council authority to enter into a new agreement with Ontario Power Generation Inc. to accept program funding, with respect to a revised nuclear emergency management program. This new agreement would replace existing agreements between the parties. The proposed maximum amount of funding under this new agreement would be $212,500 for the period July 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019, inclusive and $650,000 per calendar year for the period 2020 to 2024 ("primary funding"), plus such additional funding amounts with respect to costs incurred by the City for implementation of specific requirement. The primary funding will offset the addition of three full time, temporary staff who will supplement existing nuclear emergency management work currently being undertaken by the Office of Emergency Management.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 6, 2019) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services on Emergency Management Program Funding Increase from Ontario Power Generation Incorporated
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134660.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from N. Corrado (CC.Supp.EX7.24.1)

EX7.25 - Toronto Public Library - 2019 Capital Budget and 2020-2028 Capital Plan Accelerations/Deferrals (Second Quarter)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council authorize the acceleration and deferral of cash flows within the projects in Toronto Public Library's 2019 Council Approved Capital Budget and future year commitments in the amount of $1.078 million, as included in Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2019) from the City Librarian, with zero gross and debt budget impact.

Origin

(June 17, 2019) Report from the City Librarian

Summary

This report requests City Council's authority to amend the Toronto Public Library 2019 Council Approved Capital Budget and 2020-2028 Capital Plan by adjusting cash flows contained within the 10-Year Capital Plan, respectively, to align forecasted project accelerations and deferrals. The adjustments will have a zero debt impact on the 2019 Capital Budget and 2020-2028 Capital Plan and will align the 2019 Capital Budget to Toronto Public Library's capital project delivery schedule and program requirements.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2019) Report from the City Librarian on Toronto Public Library - 2019 Capital Budget and 2020-2028 Capital Plan Accelerations/Deferrals (Second Quarter)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134825.pdf
Attachment 1 - Accelerations/Deferrals - Toronto Public Library 2019 Capital Budget and 2020-2028 Capital Plan Adjustments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134826.pdf

Speakers

Derek Moran

EX7.26 - Toronto Water 2019 Capital Budget and 2020-2028 Capital Plan Adjustments

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the reallocation of cashflows within Toronto Water's approved 2019 Capital Budget and 2020-2028 Capital Plan in the amount of $8.450 million, for acceleration and deferral of projects, as presented in Schedule A (Part A and B) to the report (June 11, 2019) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, with a zero Budget impact.

 

2.  City Council authorize the reallocation of project costs and cashflows in Toronto Water's approved 2019 Capital Budget and 2020-2028 Capital Plan in the amount of $12.121 million from projects that have been awarded under budget or delayed to those requiring additional funding in the same amount as presented in Schedule A (Part C) to the report (June 11, 2019) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, with a zero Budget impact.

Origin

(June 11, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water

Summary

This report requests City Council's authority to amend Toronto Water's Approved 2019 Capital Budget and 2020-2028 Capital Plan by adjusting project  cash flows contained within the Budget and Plan, respectively, to align forecasted project accelerations and deferrals. Additional reallocations to project cashflows and project costs are requested where recent project bids or estimates exceed the current approved cashflow. These reallocations will allow Toronto Water to continue to deliver projects within its capital plan.  The adjustments will have a zero dollar impact on the 2019 Capital Budget and 2020-2028 Capital Plan and will align the budget and plan with Toronto Water's capital project delivery schedule and program requirements.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water on Toronto Water 2019 Capital Budget and 2020-2028 Capital Plan Adjustments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135042.pdf
Schedule A - Parts A, B and C
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135043.pdf

EX7.27 - Transportation Services 2019 Capital Budget and 2019-2028 Adjustments

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the Transportation Services' approved 2019 Capital Budget by reallocating funding of $1 million between projects, as presented in Attachment 1 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, with a zero budget impact.

 

2.  City Council amend the 2019-2028 approved Capital Budget and Plan for Transportation Services by creating a new Future of King Street project with total project costs of $1.5 million gross and $0 debt, with committed cash flows of $1 million in 2019 and $0.5 million in 2020, fully funded by the Public Realm Reserve Fund.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

This report requests City Council's authority to amend Transportation Services' approved 2019 Capital Budget and 2019-2028 Capital Plan by reallocating cash flows within the 2019 Budget.

 

In addition, the report requests authority to amend Transportation Services' 2019 Capital Budget and 2019-2028 Plan by creating a new Future of King Street capital project with 2019 total project costs of $1.5 million gross and $0 debt with cash flows of $1 million in 2019 and $0.5 million in 2020, fully funded from the Public Realm Reserve Account.

 

These adjustments will align program requirements and project delivery schedules resulting in improved spending rates.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Transportation Services 2019 Capital Budget and 2019-2028 Adjustments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135013.pdf

EX7.28 - Transfer of Reserve Funds to Toronto Live Foundation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committe recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve an in-year budget adjustment to increase the 2019 Council Approved Operating Budget for TO Live by $2.323 million gross and $0 net, fully funded from the Toronto Centre for the Arts Stabilization Reserve Fund ($1.657 million) and the Sony Centre Stabilization Reserve ($0.666 million)  for the purpose of providing a one-time seed grant to the Toronto Live Foundation, conditional upon both the establishment of a Memorandum of Understanding and the execution of a grant agreement, approved by the Board of Directors of TO Live, with terms satisfactory to the City Manager and provided to the City upon completion.

 

2.  City Council direct that the Memorandum of Understanding between the Board of Directors of TO Live and the Toronto Live Foundation required in Recommendation 1 above formally outline the roles and responsibilities, independence, governance, process for determining fundraising priorities, terms of donations, sponsorships and naming rights, and administrative support provided by TO Live to the Toronto Live Foundation.

 

3.  City Council direct that the grant agreement between the Board of Directors of TO Live and the Toronto Live Foundation required in Recommendation 1 above outline transparency and accountability provisions that include the purpose of the grant, reporting timeline and criteria, consistency with City goals and with TO Live mandate under Municipal Code Chapter 23, Civic Theatres, evaluation criteria and process, and information concerning the grant that will be made available to the public.

Origin

(June 13, 2019) Letter from the Board of Directors of TO Live

Summary

This report is to request funds to be transferred from TO Live's reserve funds (Toronto Centre for the Arts Stabilization Reserve Fund and Sony Centre Stabilization Reserve) to the newly incorporated "Toronto Live Foundation" as seed funding.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2019) Letter from the Board of Directors of TO Live on Transfer of Reserve Funds to Toronto Live Foundation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134844.pdf
(May 27, 2019) Report from the President and Chief Executive Office, TO Live on Transfer of Reserve Funds to Toronto Live Foundation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134865.pdf
Attachment 1 - Toronto Live Foundation By-Law No. 2018-1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134866.pdf
Attachment 2 - Toronto Live Foundation Letters Patent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134867.pdf
Attachment 3 - Toronto Live Foundation Business Number
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134868.pdf
Attachment 4 - Notification of Registration for Foundation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-134869.pdf

EX7.30 - Toronto Public Library - E-Content Campaign

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council endorse the Toronto Public Library Board draft resolution outlined in Attachment 1 to the letter (June 19, 2019) from the City Librarian, requesting the City of Toronto to:

 

a.  indicate the City of Toronto's support for Canadian Urban Libraries Council's/Conseil des Bibliothèques Urbaines du Canada's efforts to increase access to ebooks and other econtent for library users in Toronto and across Canada;


b.  call on the Federal government to investigate the barriers faced by libraries in acquiring ebooks and other econtent and the problems that poses for vulnerable demographic groups in Canada; and


c.  ask the Federal government to develop a solution that increases access to ebooks and other econtent across Canada and assists libraries in meeting the cost requirements to acquire e-books and other e-content.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Letter from the City Librarian

Summary

Toronto Public Library is a member of the Canadian Urban Libraries Council/Conseil des Bibliothèques Urbaines du Canada. Members of Canadian Urban Libraries Council/Conseil des Bibliothèques Urbaines du Canada spend approximately $100 million in public funds annually on library acquisitions. Despite that significant expenditure, libraries increasingly struggle to develop their digital collections (ebooks and eaudiobooks) due to prohibitively expensive pricing models. Moreover, some important titles, including Canadian ones, are not made available to Canadian libraries by multinational publishers.

 

Those restrictions and costs make it difficult for libraries to provide important services that contribute to thriving and engaged communities, including vulnerable groups like seniors, low income families, youth and new Canadians.  

 

Canadian Urban Libraries Council/Conseil des Bibliothèques Urbaines du Canada is asking municipal leaders to recognize the important role that libraries play in our communities and to help to advocate for a solution to the barriers that Canadian libraries face in accessing ebooks and other econtent. Accordingly, it is requesting that municipalities formally indicate their support of Canadian Urban Libraries Council's/Conseil des Bibliothèques Urbaines du Canada's campaign to improve Canadian public libraries' access to ebooks and other econtent by passing a resolution and forwarding notice of that resolution to local Federal Members of Parliament and candidates in the October Federal Election.

 

Although libraries are governed provincially, the Federal government is being targeted as it is best placed to provide a comprehensive, Canada-wide solution to the digital access issue.

 

At the June 17, 2019 meeting of the Toronto Public Library Board, the following motion was adopted:

 

1. That the Toronto Public Library Board seeks Toronto City Council's endorsement of a draft resolution outlined in Attachment 1, requesting the City of Toronto to:

 

a. indicate their support for Canadian Urban Libraries Council's/Conseil des Bibliothèques Urbaines du Canada's efforts to increase access to ebooks and other econtent for library users in Toronto and across Canada;


b. call on the Federal government to investigate the barriers faced by libraries in acquiring ebooks and other econtent and the problems that poses for vulnerable demographic groups in Canada; and


c. ask the Federal government to develop a solution that increases access to ebooks and other econtent across Canada and assists libraries in meeting the cost requirements to acquire ebooks and other econtent.

 

I ask for your assistance in obtaining Toronto City Council endorsement of the attached draft resolution. 

 

Your consideration of this request is appreciated.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) Letter from the City Librarian on E-Content Campaign
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135047.pdf
Attachment 1 - Toronto Public Library Board Draft Resoultion
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-135048.pdf

Speakers

Derek Moran

Audit Committee - Meeting 3

AU3.1 - Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 - Agencies and Corporations (Part 1)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive for information, the 2018 Financial Statements and related documents for the following agencies and corporations:

 

- Exhibition Place

- Toronto Parking Authority

- Toronto Public Library

- Toronto Transit Commission

- Toronto Zoo

- Heritage Toronto

- Toronto Atmospheric Fund

- Yonge- Dundas Square.

Summary

The following agencies and corporations have submitted 2018 Financial Statements and related documents to the Audit Committee for consideration:

 

- Exhibition Place

- Toronto Parking Authority

- Toronto Public Library

- Toronto Transit Commission

- Toronto Zoo

1a - Exhibition Place - 2018 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for Exhibition Place for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 13, 2019) Report from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place, submitting 2018 Financial Statements for Exhibition Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134752.pdf
2018 Financial Statements - Exhibition Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134753.pdf
2018 Year-end Report - Exhibition Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134754.pdf

1b - Toronto Parking Authority - 2018 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for the Toronto Parking Authority for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Background Information (Committee)
2018 Financial Statements - Toronto Parking Authority
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134661.pdf
2018 Year-end Report - Toronto Parking Authority
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134663.pdf

1c - Toronto Public Library - 2018 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for the Toronto Public Library for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 14, 2019) Letter from the City Librarian forwarding Financial Statements and Audit Results for the year ended December 31, 2018 - Toronto Public Library Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134727.pdf
2018 Financial Statements - Toronto Public Library
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134721.pdf
2018 Year-end Report - Toronto Public Library
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134722.pdf

1d - Toronto Transit Commission - 2018 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for the Toronto Transit Commission for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 17, 2019) Letter from the Head of Commission Services, Toronto Transit Commission, forwarding Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134818.pdf
2018 Financial Statements - Toronto Transit Commission
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134819.pdf
(June 17, 2019) Letter from the Head of Commission Services, Toronto Transit Commission, forwarding the Year-end Report for the year ended December 31, 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134817.pdf
2018 Year-end Report - Toronto Transit Commission
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134679.pdf

1e - Toronto Zoo - 2018 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for the Toronto Zoo for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Background Information (Committee)
2018 Financial Statements - Toronto Zoo
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134716.pdf
2018 Year-end Report - Toronto Zoo
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134717.pdf

1f - Heritage Toronto - 2018 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for Heritage Toronto for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Background Information (Committee)
Representation Letter (April 23, 2019) from Welch LLP; and 2018 Financial Statements for Heritage Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135411.pdf

1g - Toronto Atmospheric Fund - 2018 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for the Toronto Atmospheric Fund for the year ending December 31, 2018.

Background Information (Committee)
2018 Financial Statements - Toronto Atmospheric Fund
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135412.pdf

1h - Yonge-Dundas Square - 2018 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for Yonge-Dundas Square for the year ending December 31, 2018.

Background Information (Committee)
2018 Financial Statements - Yonge-Dundas Square
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135413.pdf
(March 28, 2019) Representation Letter from Welch LLP
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135414.pdf

AU3.2 - Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2018 Audited Financial Statements - Report No. 1

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council approve the 2018 audited financial statements and management letters of the forty-nine (49) Business Improvement Areas and the 2017 audited financial statements and management letters of the nine (9) Business Improvement Areas attached as Appendices A to BK to the report (June 3, 2019) from the Controller and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture.

 

2.  City Council direct those Business Improvement Areas with outstanding audit issues, to implement the management letter recommendations, and request the Auditor General to provide an update report to the October 25, 2019 meeting of the Audit Committee.

Origin

(June 3, 2019) Report from the Controller and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to present the City of Toronto's (City) Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) audited financial statements and management letters for approval.

 

The report contains the 2018 audited financial statements and management letters for forty-nine (49) entities and the 2017 audited financial statements and management letters for nine (9) entities.  All 2017 audited financial statements have now been presented for approval, with the exception of Historic Queen BIA, which has not presented a budget request for approval since 2009, therefore, does not have any revenues or expenses to report.

 

Audit recommendations, accepted by the respective BIA Boards of Management, are included in the attached management letters.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2019) Report from the Controller and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture - 2018 Audited Financial Statements of Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - Report No. 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135245.pdf
(June 12, 2019) Notice of Pending Report from the Controller - 2018 Audited Financial Statements of Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - Report No. 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134977.pdf
Appendix A: Bloordale Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135068.pdf
Appendix A-1: Bloordale Village Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135069.pdf
Appendix B: Kensington Market Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135070.pdf
Appendix B-1: Kensington Market Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135071.pdf
Appendix C: Korea Town Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135072.pdf
Appendix C-1: Korea Town Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135073.pdf
Appendix D: Liberty Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135074.pdf
Appendix E: Little Italy Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135087.pdf
Appendix F: Ossington Avenue Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135088.pdf
Appendix F-1: Ossington Avenue Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135089.pdf
Appendix G: Queen Street West Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135090.pdf
Appendix G-1: Queen Street West Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135091.pdf
Appendix H: Upper Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135092.pdf
Appendix H-1: Upper Village Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135093.pdf
Appendix I: Wychwood Heights Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135094.pdf
Appendix J: A letter from the auditor, Rafiq Dosani, dated January 10, 2019 stating that there were no significant management letter issues identified for two (2) of the 2017 BIAs audited by him and appended.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135095.pdf
Appendix K: Baby Point Gates Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135096.pdf
Appendix L: Bayview Leaside Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135097.pdf
Appendix M: Bloor Annex Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135098.pdf
Appendix N: Bloor Street Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135099.pdf
Appendix O: Bloor West Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135100.pdf
Appendix P: Bloor Yorkville Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135101.pdf
Appendix Q: Cabbagetown Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135102.pdf
Appendix R: Chinatown Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135103.pdf
Appendix S: Church Wellesley Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135104.pdf
Appendix T: Corso Italia Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135125.pdf
Appendix U: Crossroads of the Danforth Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135126.pdf
Appendix V: Duke Heights Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135127.pdf
Appendix W: Dundas West Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135128.pdf
Appendix X: Eglinton Hill Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135129.pdf
Appendix Y: Fairbank Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135130.pdf
Appendix Z: Financial District Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135109.pdf
Appendix Z-1: Financial District Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135132.pdf
Appendix AA: Forest Hill Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135133.pdf
Appendix AB: Greektown on the Danforth Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135134.pdf
Appendix AC: Harbord Street Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135135.pdf
Appendix AD: Hillcrest Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135136.pdf
Appendix AE: Korea Town Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135137.pdf
Appendix AF: Lakeshore Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135138.pdf
Appendix AF-1: Lakeshore Village Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135139.pdf
Appendix AG: Leslieville Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135141.pdf
Appendix AH: Liberty Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135114.pdf
Appendix AH-1: Liberty Village Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135119.pdf
Appendix AI: Little Portugal Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135120.pdf
Appendix AJ: Mirvish Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135121.pdf
Appendix AK: Mount Dennis Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135122.pdf
Appendix AL: Ossington Avenue Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135123.pdf
Appendix AL-1: Ossington Avenue Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135124.pdf
Appendix AM: Parkdale Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135165.pdf
Appendix AN: Regal Heights Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135166.pdf
Appendix AO: Riverside District Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135167.pdf
Appendix AP: Roncesvalles Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135168.pdf
Appendix AQ: Rosedale Main Street Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135169.pdf
Appendix AR: Sheppard East Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135170.pdf
Appendix AS: ShoptheQueensway.com Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135171.pdf
Appendix AT: St. Clair Gardens Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135172.pdf
Appendix AU: St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135173.pdf
Appendix AV: The Danforth Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135174.pdf
Appendix AW: The Eglinton Way Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135176.pdf
Appendix AX: The Kingsway Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135178.pdf
Appendix AY: The Waterfront Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135179.pdf
Appendix AZ: Toronto Entertainment District Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135181.pdf
Appendix AZ-1: Toronto Entertainment District Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135183.pdf
Appendix BA: Uptown Yonge Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135147.pdf
Appendix BB: Village of Islington Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135148.pdf
Appendix BC: Weston Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135149.pdf
Appendix BD: Wexford Heights Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135150.pdf
Appendix BE: Wilson Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135151.pdf
Appendix BF: Yonge and St. Clair Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135152.pdf
Appendix BG: Yonge Lawrence Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135153.pdf
Appendix BH: A letter from the auditor, Rafiq Dosani, dated March 27, 2019 stating that there were no significant management letter issues identified for eighteen (18) of the 2018 BIAs audited by him and appended.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135154.pdf
Appendix BI: A letter from the auditor, Rafiq Dosani dated May 10, 2019 stating that there were no significant management letter issues identified for fourteen (14) of the 2018 BIAs audited by him and appended.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135155.pdf
Appendix BJ: A letter from the auditor, Rafiq Dosani, dated May 20, 2019 stating that there were no significant management letter issues identified for six (6) of the 2018 BIAs audited by him and appended.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135156.pdf
Appendix BK: A letter from the auditor, Rafiq Dosani, dated May 25, 2019 stating that there were no significant management letter issues identified for six (6) of the 2018 BIAs audited by him and appended
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135157.pdf

AU3.3 - Arenas - 2018 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the 2018 audited financial statements of Arenas attached to the report (June 13, 2019) from the Auditor General.

 

2.  City Council direct those Arenas with outstanding audit issues, to implement the management letter recommendations, and request the Auditor General to provide an update report to the October 25, 2019 meeting of the Audit Committee.

Origin

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the Audit Committee and City Council with the 2018 audited financial statements of Arenas.

 

The 2018 audited financial statements for the eight City Arenas are presented to the Audit Committee after approval by their respective Boards or Committees of Management. The external auditor, Welch LLP, advise that they have provided their comments on internal controls to some organizations by way of a report to the Board.

 

The Independent Auditor’s Report, accompanying financial statements, and internal control letter (where applicable) is attached to this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Auditor General - 2018 Audited Financial Statements - Arenas
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134786.pdf
Attachment 1: Financial Statements - Forest Hill Memorial Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134791.pdf
Attachment 2: Financial Statements and Report to Committee of Management - George Bell Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134792.pdf
Attachment 3: Financial Statements and Report to Board of Management - Leaside Memorial Community Gardens Arena (not available at time of printing)
Attachment 4: Financial Statements - McCormick Playground Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134793.pdf

AU3.4 - Community Centres - 2018 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the 2018 audited financial statements of Community Centres attached to the report (June 13, 2019) from the Auditor General.

Origin

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the Audit Committee and City Council with the 2018 audited financial statements of Community Centres.

 

The 2018 audited financial statements for the 10 Community Centres are presented to Audit Committee after approval by their respective Boards of Management. The external auditor, Welch LLP, advise that they have provided their comments on internal controls to some organizations by way of a report to the Board.

 

Each Community Centre’s Independent Auditor’s Report, accompanying financial statements, and internal control letter (where applicable) is attached to this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Auditor General - 2018 Audited Financial Statements - Community Centres
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134794.pdf
Attachment 1: Financial Statements - Applegrove Community Complex
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134795.pdf
Attachment 2: Financial Statements - Cecil Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134796.pdf
Attachment 3: Financial Statements and Report to the Board of Management - Central Eglinton Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134797.pdf
Attachment 4: Financial Statements and Report to the Board of Management - Community Centre 55
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134798.pdf
Attachment 5: Financial Statements - Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134799.pdf
Attachment 6: Financial Statements - Ralph Thornton Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134800.pdf
Attachment 7: Financial Statements - Scadding Court Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134801.pdf
Attachment 8: Financial Statements - Swansea Town Hall Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134802.pdf
Attachment 9: Financial Statements - Waterfront Neighbourhood Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134803.pdf

AU3.5 - Status of the Financial Statement Audits of the City’s Agencies and Corporations for the Year Ended December 31, 2018

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the report (June 13, 2019) from the Auditor General on the status of the financial statement audits of the City's Agencies and Corporations for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Origin

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the Audit Committee and City Council with the status of financial statement audits of the City’s Agencies and Corporations for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

The majority of the audits of the City’s Agencies and Corporations have been completed and approved by their respective Boards. Any financial statements that are outstanding will be forwarded to Audit Committee as they become available.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Auditor General - Status of the Financial Statement Audits of the City’s Agencies and Corporations for the Year Ended December 31, 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134734.pdf

AU3.6 - Auditor General’s 2019 Status Report on Outstanding Audit Recommendations for City Agencies and Corporations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition of land for municipal or local board purposes

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the report (June 3, 2019) from the Auditor General for information.

 

2.  City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 31, 2019) from the Auditor General remain confidential in its entirety, as it pertains to a proposed or pending acquisition of land by the Toronto Parking Authority Board.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Audit Committee:

 

1.  Requested the Auditor General to provide an update on the outstanding recommendations highlighted in Item AU3.6, to the October 25, 2019 meeting of the Audit Committee.

Origin

(June 3, 2019) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The Auditor General's Office conducts an annual follow-up review to determine the implementation status of recommendations in previously issued audit and investigation reports. This report provides information regarding the implementation status of recommendations issued to City agencies and corporations. The review results are reported to the respective Board of City agencies and corporations and then to City Council through the Audit Committee.

 

Our 2019 follow-up review included 96 outstanding recommendations from the following three City agencies and corporations:

 

- TO Live*
- Toronto Parking Authority
- Toronto Transit Commission
 

*The report to the Board of Directors of TO Live relates to recommendations from an audit of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts.

 

As of December 31, 2017, there were 13 audit reports to agencies and corporations with 96 outstanding recommendations. Among the 96 recommendations, our review verified that 19 recommendations have been fully implemented, 61 recommendations have been partially implemented, and three recommendations are no longer applicable.

  

The Auditor General has decided that the 13 recommendations arising from the 2015 audit of Toronto Parking Authority (TPA) real estate activities will no longer be included in her annual follow up process. Although, the recommendations are still relevant, as a result of the adoption of the City-wide real estate model, TPA no longer carries out real estate transactions on an independent basis. Given the extent of changes being made to the TPA real estate operations, the Auditor General would need to conduct an entirely new audit to be able to have a reasonable basis to form conclusions to confirm that the recommendations have been implemented.

 

Continued efforts to implement all outstanding recommendations will provide additional benefits to City agencies and corporations such as cost savings, additional revenue and enhanced service delivery. The remaining 61 outstanding recommendations will be included in the next year's follow-up review together with the 37 recommendations included in audit reports issued to these agencies and corporations in 2018.

 

Detailed results of our individual follow-up reviews of City agencies and corporations, as presented to their respective Boards, are enclosed as Attachments 1 through 3 and the Confidential Attachment 1. These reports provide further details regarding their respective recommendations and current implementation status.

 

We express our appreciation for the co-operation and assistance we received from the management and staff of City agencies and corporations.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2019) Report from the Auditor General - 2019 Status Report on Outstanding Audit Recommendations for City Agencies and Corporations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134739.pdf
Attachment 1: Toronto Transit Commission - 2019 Results of Follow-up of Previous Audit Recommendations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134740.pdf
Attachment 2: TO Live - 2019 Results of Follow-up of Previous Audit Recommendations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134741.pdf
Attachment 3: Toronto Parking Authority - 2019 Results of Follow-up of Previous Audit Recommendations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134742.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1: Toronto Parking Authority - 2019 Results of Follow-up of Previous Audit Recommendations

AU3.7 - City of Toronto - 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council approve the 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements as attached in Appendix A to the report (June 28, 2019) from the Controller and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

 

2.  City Council request the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Controller to review the way the City's budget documents and consolidated financial statement are prepared, with a view to increasing transparency and the ability of Members, staff and the public to easily understand the City's financial situation.  This review should include current best practices in place nationally and internationally, and enable the financial statements to be an open data item.  Further, request the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to report on this initiative to the Audit Committee, prior to the budget cycle of 2020. 

 

3.  City Council request the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to explore opportunities to make the consolidated financial statement an open data item.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The following City staff gave a presentation to the Audit Committee on this Item:

 

- Andrew Flynn, Controller

- Sandra Califaretti, Director, Accounting Services

Origin

(June 28, 2019) Report from the Controller and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report presents the City of Toronto's (City), Audited Consolidated Financial Statements (Statements) for the year ended December 31, 2018, for approval, to Audit Committee and Council and provides highlights of the City’s financial performance during 2018 and financial condition as of December 31, 2018.

 

The City's financial statements have been prepared by management, who is responsible for ensuring that proper internal controls have been applied to the presentations in each statement.  The City's auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) are responsible for providing an opinion on the fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with Public Sector Accounting Standards (PSAS).  Audit Committee is responsible for approving the statements prior to City Council approval.

 

The Statements are attached as Appendix A.  In addition, Appendix B – 2018 Financial Statement Review, provides information about each statement and explains the City's revenue and expenditure activities and financial position for the audited fiscal year.

 

The City of Toronto 2018 Year End Report to the Audit Committee (Year End Report), Appendix C, includes a draft of the external auditor's opinion on the Statements.  The report contains two internal control recommendations, an unadjusted item for $85 Million which has been included on the Summary of Unadjusted items and the draft Independent Auditor's Report, which includes PwC's unqualified opinion as to the fair presentation of the Statements.  The PwC final audit opinion will be received and dated the day following City Council approval.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 28, 2019) Report from the Controller and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer - 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135263.pdf
Appendix A: 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135286.pdf
Appendix B: 2018 Financial Statement Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135287.pdf
Appendix C: City of Toronto - 2018 Year-end Report - submitted by PricewaterhouseCoopers
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135264.pdf
Updates (as at June 26, 2019) to Appendix C: City of Toronto - 2018 Year-end Report - submitted by PricewaterhouseCoopers
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135515.pdf
(June 12, 2019) Notice of Pending Report from the Controller - 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134978.pdf
(June 28, 2019) Presentation Material submitted by the Controller and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135528.pdf

Speakers

Henrik Bechmann (Submission Filed)

Communications (Committee)

(June 26, 2019) Submission from Henrik Bechmann (AU.New.AU3.7.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/comm/communicationfile-95754.pdf

AU3.8 - Trust Funds - 2018 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the 2018 Consolidated Financial Statements for the City of Toronto Trust Funds as attached in Appendix A to the report (June 12, 2019) from the Controller.

Origin

(June 12, 2019) Report from the Controller

Summary

The City of Toronto (City), its' agencies, and corporations are the beneficiaries of assets from third parties intended to be used for specific purposes.  These assets, held mostly in cash and investments, are administered through the City and two of its' related parties.  Although these trust funds are assets to the City and its consolidated parties, they are not included in the City's Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

This report presents the City's Consolidated Trust Funds Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 and provides highlights of the Trust Funds' 2018 financial performance and financial condition as of December 31, 2018.

 

The Trust Fund Financial Statements are audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC).  The City received an unqualified audit opinion and no internal control recommendations related to the 2018 Trust Fund Financial Statements.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 12, 2019) Report from the Controller - 2018 Audited Trust Funds Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135270.pdf
Appendix A: Consolidated Financial Statements City of Toronto Trust Funds December 31, 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135271.pdf
Appendix B: Trust Funds Account Descriptions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135272.pdf
City of Toronto Trust Funds - 2018 Year-end Report - submitted by PricewaterhouseCoopers
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135273.pdf
(June 12, 2019) Notice of Pending Report from the Controller - 2018 Audited Trust Funds Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134979.pdf

AU3.9 - Sinking Funds - 2018 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council approve the 2018 Sinking Funds Statements as attached in Appendix A to the report (June 10, 2019) from the Controller.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Controller

Summary

The City of Toronto (City) maintains portfolios of sinking funds in order to build up funds used to repay City debt when it matures.  Sinking fund contributions are invested; the investment earnings help reduce the amount of City own-source cash used to repay amounts borrowed.

 

This report presents the City of Toronto's Sinking Funds Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 and provides highlights of the Sinking Funds' 2018 financial performance as of December 31, 2018.

 

The Sinking Fund financial statements are audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC).  The City received an unqualified audit opinion and no internal control recommendations related to the 2018 Sinking Fund financial statements.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Controller - 2018 Audited Sinking Funds Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135240.pdf
Appendix A: Financial Statements - City of Toronto Sinking Funds December 31, 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135241.pdf
City of Toronto Sinking Funds - 2018 Year-end Report - submitted by PricewaterhouseCoopers
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135242.pdf
(June 12, 2019) Notice of Pending Report from the Controller - 2018 Audited Sinking Funds Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134980.pdf

AU3.10 - Auditor General’s 2019 Status Report on Outstanding Audit Recommendations for City Divisions in Infrastructure and Development Services

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Manager to report to the October 25, 2019 meeting of the Audit Committee on a process to track and report on a quarterly basis, progress on management's implementation and target completion date of outstanding audit recommendations, with emphasis on those identified by the Auditor General as items of greatest concern.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Audit Committee:

 

1.  Requested the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, to provide an update to the October 25, 2019 meeting of the Audit Committee on the outstanding recommendations highlighted in Item AU3.10 that relate to Toronto Building, specifically those around building permits and building inspections.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The Auditor General's Office conducts an annual follow-up review to determine the implementation status of recommendations in previously issued audit reports. The results of the review are reported to City Council through the Audit Committee.

 

This report provides information regarding the implementation status of audit recommendations issued to City divisions in Infrastructure and Development Services.  Our 2019 follow-up review included 53 outstanding recommendations from 12 audit reports issued between 2011 and 2017 for the following six City divisions:

 

- City Planning
- Fire Services
- Municipal Licensing & Standards
- Toronto Building
- Toronto Water
- Transportation Services
 

Our review verified that 15 recommendations (28 per cent) have been fully implemented and 37 recommendations (70 per cent) have been partially implemented and one recommendation (2 per cent) is no longer applicable.

 

Continued efforts to implement outstanding recommendations will provide additional benefits to the City such as cost savings, improved controls, and enhanced service delivery. The remaining 37 outstanding recommendations will be included in the next year's follow-up review together with the 21 recommendations included in audit reports issued to City divisions in Infrastructure and Development Services in 2018.

 

Detailed results of our follow-up review together with management comments and action plan are included in Attachments 1 through 3.

 

We express our appreciation for the co-operation and assistance we received from management and staff of City divisions in Infrastructure and Development Services during this year's follow-up review process.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Auditor General - 2019 Status Report on Outstanding Audit Recommendations for City Divisions in Infrastructure and Development Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134757.pdf
Attachment 1: City Divisions in Infrastructure and Development Services - Audit Recommendations Fully Implemented
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134758.pdf
Attachment 2: City Divisions in Infrastructure and Development Services - Audit Recommendations Not Fully Implemented
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134759.pdf
Attachment 3: City Divisions in Infrastructure and Development Services - Audit Recommendations No Longer Applicable
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134760.pdf

AU3.12 - Establishment of the City's Cyber Security Program to Enable Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the City Manager, the Chief Information Officer and the City Clerk to co-ordinate and develop standard incident management procedures including communication protocols to address incidents involving cyber attacks/information breaches. The procedures and protocols should include:

 

a. Guidelines describing the sequence of actions that should take place as soon as staff become aware of a cyber attack/information breach incident.

 

b. Communication protocols detailing key contact names, functions and contact information for staff to receive guidance.

 

c. Reports to be completed by the affected organization, detailing the date of incident, systems affected, information compromised, and other relevant details.

 

d. Communications to the media/public, where required, including privacy protocols.

 

The incident management procedures and communication protocols should be liaised across the City, including agencies and corporations.

 

2.  City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Information Officer, to implement appropriate cyber security training which should be mandatory for all City staff.

Origin

(June 20, 2019) Report from the Chief Information Officer

Summary

This report responds to Audit Committee's request to report on the Information and Technology Division's outstanding audit recommendation wherein the Chief Information Officer was requested to develop a Cyber Security Program that supported ongoing vulnerability assessment and penetration testing using industry standards applied by subject matter experts.

 

The City already has a foundation of cyber security measures in place to protect the City's information technology systems. The Auditor General's recommendations will enhance existing cyber security practices and assist with the detection, prevention and responses to future cyber threats. The City launched its formal Cyber Security Program in 2017 to enhance security capabilities given the increasing complexity in cyber security. The objective of this Program is to identify and mitigate IT-related risks that directly affect the corporate technology environment that City Divisions rely upon when servicing the residents and the public who expect the provision of secure and reliable City services.

 

One component of the Cyber Security Program includes the analysis of resources and funding requirements to develop and implement improvements to vulnerability assessments and penetration testing functions. In addition, the City plans to implement new vulnerability management capabilities as part of a strategy to engage a Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP) and develop partnerships with industry experts.

 

Further to the above recommendation, the Chief Information Officer, in collaboration with the Auditor General's Office, will be issuing a comprehensive Audit Report to Audit Committee for its meeting on October 25, 2019.  This report will provide a comprehensive review of all audit recommendations (including both public and confidential) received to date.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 20, 2019) Report from the Chief Information Officer - Establishment of the City's Cyber Security Program to Enable Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135261.pdf
(June 13, 2019) Notice of Pending Report from the Chief Information Officer - Establishment of the City's Cyber Security Program to Enable Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134654.pdf

12a - Supplementary Report - Establishment of City Wide Cyber Security Breach Incident Management Procedures Required

Origin
(June 19, 2019) Report from the Auditor General
Summary

In our report entitled "Audit of Information Technology Vulnerability and Penetration Testing – Phase 1: External Penetration Testing" we highlighted to the City management that insufficient preparation to manage cyber threats is widely considered as one of the most critical operational risks facing the organizations. The City, as well as its agencies and corporations are not immune from these risks.

 

The Auditor General recently became aware that two small entities within the City were reportedly attacked by ransomware and their systems compromised.[1] In both situations, the incidents were not communicated to the Chief Information Officer because protocols do not exist.  

 

Ransomware is a form of attack where user systems and/or files become non-operable after the attack. The attackers then demand payment for restoring access to the system and/or files. These attacks are not new to Canadian municipalities; recently, two other municipalities were attacked by ransomware, one in Quebec and one in Ontario. One of the municipalities was demanded $65,000 to restore the data; for the other, the ransom details are not public. Cyber security attacks are increasingly becoming more complicated, difficult to detect and costly for compromised organizations.

 

The purpose of this report is to highlight the importance and urgency for the City to have a standard incident management process developed and implemented across City divisions, its agencies and corporations so that the Chief Information Officer can analyze these attacks in an effort to enhance City-wide cyber security. The Auditor General, realizing the emerging risks, in each of her reports on IT vulnerability assessments and IT infrastructure audits issued during 2016 to 2018, recommended that the City:

 

- develop baseline IT security standards to provide guidance across the City to address cyber security threats,

- implement a cyber security program, and

- create an independent role of the Chief Information Security Officer (CISO).

 

In addition, the Auditor General, in her communications with the Information and Technology Division, identified the need to have a centralized process, guidelines and communication protocols available to all organizations within the City to deal with cyber security threats and incidents. Adequate controls must be put in place to maintain confidentiality of sensitive information.

 

The Auditor General's planned follow-up is due in the later half of 2019. An update of the status of the implementation of recommendations will be tabled at future Audit Committee meetings.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 19, 2019) Supplementary Report from the Auditor General - Establishment of City Wide Cyber Security Breach Incident Management Procedures Required
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135368.pdf

AU3.14 - Opening Doors to Stable Housing: An Effective Waiting List and Reduced Vacancy Rates Will Help More People Access Housing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (AU3.14a for information)

Previously scheduled as first Item on Wednesday.

Committee Recommendations

The Auditor General recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to design and implement procedures to ensure compliance with the legislated requirement to review eligibility of applicants on the centralized waiting list for rent-geared-to-income at least once every 24 months after they have been added to the list. Such procedures to ensure:

 

a. applicants are advised of the need to maintain contact with the Access to Housing business unit at least once in every 24-month period to ensure their information is kept up-to-date and to re-affirm continued eligibility for rent-geared-to-income assistance

 

b. all attempts to contact each applicant are sufficiently tracked so that Access to Housing can identify all applications that should be changed to inactive status and subsequently cancelled

 

c. action is taken to make applications inactive and to cancel applications, if there is no response to outreach attempts by City staff in accordance with policies and procedures.

 

2. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to review the applicants on the centralized waiting list for rent-geared-to-income and develop meaningful categories to support the effective management, including accurate reporting of the number of active and eligible applicants.

 

3. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to:

 

a. develop clear guidelines for housing providers on the circumstances under which an offer for rent-geared-to-income housing can be withdrawn and not be considered a refusal. Such guidelines to also clearly indicate how to record the reasons for withdrawals or refusals in the centralized waiting list information system

 

b. implement monitoring procedures to ensure housing providers are not recording refusals of offers as withdrawals such that households can circumvent the Housing Services Act's limit on the number of refusals allowed before the applicant is removed from the centralized waiting list.

 

4. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to recommend to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to consider revising the Housing Services Act, 2011 to be aligned with the Long Term Care Homes Act regarding refusals of pre-selected housing choices and to only accommodate refusals under clearly defined set of exceptional circumstances.

 

5. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to ensure that applicants on the centralized waiting list for rent-geared-to-income understand the importance of choosing only those buildings they are willing to move into and the consequences of such choices.

 

6. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to increase the information made available to enable rent-geared-to-income applicants to make better informed choices about buildings they are willing to move into.

 

7. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to ensure applicants for rent-geared-to-income assistance are required to identify:

 

a. the preferred method(s) of contact that will result in a 48-hour response such as phone, email, or mobile messaging

 

b. an alternate contact person or support organization in Canada designated to respond on their behalf, if necessary.

 

8. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to review additional steps to cost-effectively enhance how Access to Housing communicates with and reminds applicants on the centralized waiting list for rent-geared-to-income to keep their application information accurate and up-to-date.

 

9. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to review and implement technology-based communication methods that allow the Division to more efficiently and cost-effectively:

 

a. serve notice of decisions related to household applications on the centralized waiting list for rent-geared-to-income

 

b. make contact with applicants to confirm their ongoing interest, update their address, phone number, income, housing preferences, and other information.

 

10. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to

 

a. review the City's local priority rules for selecting households from the waiting list for rent-geared-to-income and recommend to City Council any additional priority rules that should be adopted to support selection of households based on an applicant’s level of need; and

 

b. where additional priority rules are established, ensure the waiting list information system supports selection based on these priorities; and, if necessary, develop a process to perform an objective assessment of each applicant's need for rent-geared-to-income assistance in order to determine their priority in being selected from the centralized waiting list.

 

11. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to establish local rules for:

 

a. asset limits for rent-geared-to-income recipients

 

b. total household income limits and prioritize access to rent-geared-to-income assistance based on household income.

 

12. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, in consultation with the City's Medical Officer of Health, to review the types of housing preferences or restrictions for preferred rent-geared-to-income housing units to assess if there is a bona fide need to accommodate and develop local rules to manage such requests.

 

13. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division to consider establishing local rules prioritizing access to rent-geared-to-income assistance for those households that currently do not receive rent-geared-to-income assistance or reside in social housing.

 

14. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to ensure greater integration of services and supports is provided for vulnerable clients in the shelter system as they transition from homelessness to stable housing including confirming that those experiencing homelessness receive appropriate priority status on the centralized waiting list for rent-geared-to-income.

 

15. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to review and, if appropriate, report to City Council through the Planning and Housing Committee on how the City can meet the mandated rent-geared-to-income assistance service level prescribed in the Housing Service Act, 2011. This review should consider how portable housing benefits can be used where vacancies in the physical social housing stock are limited, and determine how much funding would be needed as well as the source of such funds in order to come into compliance.

 

16. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, in collaboration with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation, to ensure that a maximum number of social housing units are being used for housing and to complete a review of all housing units that are used for other purposes; and, establish a process that requires service manager approval prior to the removal of any housing units from service.

 

17. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division to:

 

a. work, in collaboration with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation, to develop an interim process to efficiently and publicly post information on buildings with hard-to-rent vacancies to support applicants in making more informed housing choices

 

b. leverage any existing solutions with City and agency partners to provide support for rent-geared-to-income applicants to access the internet at various city sites such as, emergency shelters, social services offices, local libraries, and community centres.

 

18. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to review and revise the local rules in order to effectively re-house over-housed rent-geared-to-income tenants into a suitable housing unit. In conducting the review, the Division consider:

 

a. evidence available on the number of preferences that will support efficient and timely re-housing of an over-housed household including benchmarking with other jurisdictions

 

b. implications of imposing an over-housed surcharge on households who refuse to be re-housed in a timely manner.

 

19. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to develop system controls to automatically determine the maximum number of bedrooms a rent-geared-to-income applicant is eligible for based on household composition and the City's occupancy standards.

 

20. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, in consultation with the City's Medical Officer of Health, to:

 

a. identify the medical circumstances that would warrant a rent-geared-to-income household to have more bedrooms than specified in the local occupancy standards and update local rules accordingly

 

b. develop and implement a process to review and approve requests for an additional bedroom to accommodate medical conditions, including documentation that should be obtained to support such requests, based on criteria to be included in local rules.

 

21. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation, to consider the feasibility of using TCHC vacant units held for revitalization to meet the demand for emergency shelter as an alternative to hotels or other temporary shelter options.

 

22. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to implement and ensure compliance with procedures to oversee rent-geared-to-income households not selected from the centralized waiting list, including procedures and controls to:

 

a. identify and review all current referral agreements to develop a comprehensive inventory of agency referral agreements and the respective number of housing units to be filled through referral agreements

 

b. ensure all current and future referral agreements are approved by the City

 

c. ensure there is a record of all households that are granted rent-geared-to-income assistance and housed through any alternate arrangement in the centralized waiting list information system.

 

23. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to enforce the regular review of housing providers and ensure they are completed as required in compliance with policies and procedures and to take corrective action to address any problems identified in the course of such reviews.

 

24. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to ensure the internal controls to review rent-geared-to-income housing providers are reviewed and strengthened to address weaknesses identified from the occurrence of fraud.

 

25. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to strengthen internal controls which ensure households on the centralized waiting list and those receiving rent-geared-to-income are eligible.

 

26. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to review how, going forward, the City, as service manager, may be able to centralize and integrate initial and ongoing eligibility reviews and income verification for all housing subsidy programs currently dispersed amongst multiple groups (Access to Housing, other City business units, Toronto Community Housing Corporation, and eventually other housing providers) for greater efficiency and oversight.

 

27. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, in consultation with the City's Chief Information Officer, to ensure:

 

a. that progress is made to select a vendor and develop an implementation plan for the new choice-based system for selecting households to receive rent-geared-to-income assistance

 

b. the new technology includes appropriate system access controls, input and validation controls to prevent data entry errors

 

c. exception monitoring controls are developed, including regular reports to support the detection of errors or irregular activity.

 

28. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division, to collaborate with the General Managers of Employment and Social Services and Children's Services divisions to ensure implementation of the Human Services Integration project achieves service efficiencies in administering these income based subsidy programs. In the short term, this will include one income assessment process and in the longer term this should be expanded to include other common functions. The implementation should include a rationalization of resources.

 

29.  City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to accelerate implementation of recommendations to ensure rules are updated to allow households with greatest need to receive priority, and that over-housed tenant situations are optimized as quickly as possible.

 

30.  City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to report quarterly to City Council, through the Economic and Community Development Committee, on the centralized waiting list for social housing, such report to contain the following details: 

 

- the number of people on the waitlist

- the number of vacant rentable units

- the number of units filled

- the number of refused offers

- the number of withdrawn offers

- any other relevant information.

 

31.  City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, through the implementation of the new Choice Based Model for access to social housing, to expand access to information available through the City's Open Data portal, and report to the Audit Committee by Q4 of 2020, on the status of implementation.  The General Manager be requested to engage Toronto's civic tech community on this project.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The following City staff gave a presentation to the Audit Committee on this Item:

 

- Beverly Romeo-Beehler, Auditor General

- Ina Chan, Assistant Auditor General

- Mary-Anne Bedard, General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Origin

(June 21, 2019) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The Auditor General's Annual Work Plan includes a series of ongoing and upcoming audits along the housing continuum. The focus of this audit is the administration of the City's centralized waiting list for rent-geared-to-income (RGI) assistance. For many people, this list is the gateway to stable housing and access to financial assistance for housing in Toronto.

 

This audit is timely as the City develops its new housing and homelessness action plan for the next 10 years. The findings and recommendations can assist the City in setting its priority actions to more expeditiously open up and fill social housing spaces.

 

Although we recognized the City requires more social housing units to meet the demand for subsidized housing, there is an opportunity to make better use of the existing units.

 

We have made recommendations to break down barriers that keep people from moving along the housing continuum towards stable housing. These are categorized into four areas and highlight that the City needs to:

 

1. Improve the integrity of waiting list data to know exactly who is actively waiting and eligible for RGI housing assistance – so that units can be filled fairly and as quickly as possible

 

2. Review whether the City is properly prioritizing applicants and identify opportunities to better assess and rank applicants' needs for faster access to social housing and RGI assistance

 

3. Make better use of housing units, including units used for other purposes, thereby opening doors for more people to access RGI housing

 

4. Strengthen controls related to administering RGI assistance and increase service integration efforts across income-based programs

 

Our audit provides a total of 28 recommendations for the City, TCHC, and other housing providers to work together to open doors and help more individuals and families to achieve stable housing.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 21, 2019) Report from the Auditor General - Opening Doors to Stable Housing: An Effective Waiting List and Reduced Vacancy Rates Will Help More People Access Housing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135337.pdf
Audit at a Glance - Opening Doors to Stable Housing: An Effective Waiting List and Reduced Vacancy Rates Will Help More People Access Housing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135338.pdf
Attachment 1: Opening Doors to Stable Housing: An Effective Waiting List and Reduced Vacancy Rates Will Help More People Access Housing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135339.pdf
Video Link - Opening Doors to Stable Housing: An Effective Waiting List and Reduced Vacancy Rates Will Help More People Access Housing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135485.pdf
(June 13, 2019) Notice of Pending Report from the Auditor General - Opening Doors to Stable Housing: An Effective Waiting List and Reduced Vacancy Rates Will Help More People Access Housing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134821.pdf
(June 28, 2019) Presentation Material submitted by the Auditor General
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135532.pdf
(June 28, 2019) Presentation Material submitted by Shelter, Support and Housing Administration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135533.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on Update to Presentation Material from Shelter, Support and Housing Administration for AU3.14 (Opening Doors to Stable Housing: An Effective Waiting List and Reduced Vacancy Rates Will Help More People Access Housing) (AU3.14a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136012.pdf
Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Updated Slide Presentation (Slide 4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135990.pdf

Speakers

Mark J. Richardson, HousingNowTO.com (Submission Filed)
Councillor Paula Fletcher

Communications (Committee)

(June 28, 2019) Submission from Mark J. Richardson, HousingNowTO.com (AU.New.AU3.14.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/comm/communicationfile-95787.pdf

AU3.15 - Engineering and Construction Services - Phase Two: Construction Contract Change Management Controls Should Be Strengthened

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to:

 

a.  establish a process and criteria to review and assess liabilities arising from third-party errors and omissions.

 

b.  implement enhancements to the Project Tracking Portal to track the reasons for change orders for analysis and process improvements on an Engineering and Construction Services-wide basis.

 

c.  analyze the root causes for change orders, change order costs, and track recoveries from third parties on account of errors and omissions.

 

d.  ensure that future bridge rehabilitation project tenders are based on recent condition assessments, undertaken within five years of the construction tender preparation.

 

e.  formalize the implementation of the Professional Services Performance Evaluation, recently piloted by Engineering and Construction Services, to include consequences for poor performance up to and including suspension.

 

2.  City Council request the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to:

 

a.  establish specific service standards for the timely approval of change directives and change orders after finalizing the scope of work and pricing.

 

b.  ensure that work only commences after either a change directive or change order is issued which includes a clear and documented agreement on pricing and scope. For time-sensitive changes, staff should obtain appropriate approval via e-mail and expeditiously follow-up with change order documentation.

 

c.  ensure that delegated signing authority limits are enforced and that each signature on a change order is individually dated.

 

d.  establish a formal 'Record of Evaluation and Negotiation' template to internally document the negotiations with contractors over the cost of work and also the assessment of price reasonability.

 

e.  ensure that a change directive is always issued for quantity overruns that are expected to exceed a set threshold as outlined in Engineering and Construction Services's Capital Works Procedures Manual.

 

3.  City Council request the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to:

 

a.  in consultation with Corporate Finance, the Fair Wage Office, Legal Services and Purchasing and Materials Management, establish uniform labour burden rates to be used across all construction contracts.

 

b.  ensure that change work is properly tracked and monitored for unit price, time and material, and lump-sum change orders, and that the payment is made after work has been properly verified.

 

c.  ensure that substantial scope changes are minimized after the contract is awarded. Where it is not possible to avoid such changes, the Client Division should be fully informed of the impact of substantial scope changes on contract costs and timelines.

 

d.  ensure that project documentation on externally managed contracts are always retained within the Engineering and Construction Services Division.

 

e.  measure and monitor change order costs.

 

4.  City Council request the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to:

 

a.  review and update the contract language relating to Specific Condition 32 to remove any ambiguity.

 

b.  at the time of construction contract close-out, calculate the cost of engineering associated with the contract and summarize and review on an annual basis the overall cost of engineering as a percentage of construction costs with a view to evaluating whether the cost of engineering is reasonable.

 

c.  implement edit checks into the Project Tracking Portal to prevent errors and to ensure the accuracy and completeness of important contract information such as tender award date, purchase order date, and substantial completion date. Further, these edit checks should ensure that standard contract naming conventions are used.

 

d.  ensure that production and training data in the Project Tracking Portal are segregated to maintain data integrity.

 

e.  develop and implement a standard procedure for transferring funds from unused tender line items to contingency through the use of change orders.

 

f.  ensure that contingency items such as miscellaneous items, provisional items and various allowances are appropriately tagged in the Project Tracking Portal for tracking, monitoring and analysis of contingency usage.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The following City staff gave a presentation to the Audit Committee on this Item:

 

- Beverly Romeo-Beehler, Auditor General

- Ruchir Patel, Senior Audit Manager, Auditor General's Office

- Michael D'Andrea, Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services

Origin

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

This report presents the results of the Auditor General's audit of the Engineering and Construction Services Division.

 

The objective of the audit was to assess the ECS Division's contract management processes and controls over capital construction work. The audit focused on assessing the effectiveness, efficiency and economy of the management of construction and consulting contracts.

 

Phase one resulted in a report entitled "Phase One: Controls over Substantial Performance and Warranty Inspection Processes Should be Strengthened", which was presented to the Audit Committee on July 13, 2018.

 

https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2018/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-117959.pdf

 

Phase two of this audit, the subject of this report, focuses on change order management.

 

This phase two report highlights areas to improve the management of change orders in ECS contracts. Although change orders can occur on construction contracts, this report highlights the need for staff to comply with ECS guidelines and to improve oversight of change orders to ensure the City receives the best value for money. ECS has good procedural documentation and guidelines to support the change order process. However:

 

1. Staff did not always adhere to these guidelines. Controls over change order   approvals and compliance needs strengthening.

 

2. Documentation was either missing or needs improving for some important areas including price negotiations, liability assessment for errors and omissions, verification of work completed, and change order support.

 

3. There are also opportunities to: (a) minimize design errors and omissions, and (b) where appropriate, pursue recovery for design errors and omissions.

 

Our audit provides a total of four recommendations to improve effectiveness, efficiency, and economy of the construction change management process.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Auditor General - Engineering and Construction Services - Phase Two: Construction Contract Change Management Controls Should Be Strengthened
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134814.pdf
Audit at a Glance - Engineering and Construction Services - Phase Two: Construction Contract Change Management Controls Should Be Strengthened
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134815.pdf
Attachment 1: Engineering and Construction Services - Phase Two: Construction Contract Change Management Controls Should Be Strengthened
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-134816.pdf
(June 28, 2019) Presentation Material submitted by the Auditor General
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135529.pdf
(June 28, 2019) Presentation material submitted by Engineering and Construction Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135530.pdf

AU3.16 - Audit of Interface Invoice Payments - Improving Contract Management and Payment Processes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Chief Purchasing Officer to work with the Controller to:

 

a.  standardize and refine product purchases across divisions

 

b.  capture data to track usage and compare against the goods and services specified in the contract

 

c.  expand data analytics to centrally monitor and analyze expenditures as part of the contract management and payment process

 

d.  develop a reporting process to identify large deviations in goods purchased, from the goods specified in contracts, documenting the reasons for the deviation, and estimating the financial impact.

 

2.  City Council request the Controller to develop a process to verify the accuracy of early payment discounts for both interface and non-interface payment vendors. The ‘discount lost’ report should be updated to identify and include discounts lost on interface payments.

 

3.  City Council request the Controller to automate recording, monitoring and collection of volume rebates. Outstanding amounts of volume rebates should be followed-up on, including those identified during the audit.

 

4.  City Council request the Chief Purchasing Officer to compare the current list of volume rebate vendors with City contracts to identify any vendors offering discounts but which may have been omitted from the existing manually maintained list.

 

5.  City Council request the Chief Purchasing Officer to review and update the procedures related to contract set-up in SAP so the detailed line items are entered in the system in accordance with the contract.

 

6.  City Council request the Chief Purchasing Officer to develop criteria and procedures for limiting the use of ‘miscellaneous category’ in contracts. Any excess expenditures under the miscellaneous category over a specified limit should be reported as exceptions to respective Division Heads.

 

7.  City Council request the Controller to evaluate whether controls can be automated to identify invalid/expired contracts used in interface payment files before they are processed in SAP. If developing such a control is cost-prohibitive, alternate procedures should be developed in coordination with divisions to ensure interface payment files are correctly prepared.

 

8.  City Council request the City Manager to advise Division Heads to ensure compliance with purchasing policies and procedures. Contract spend reports provided by Purchasing and Materials Management Division should be reviewed in a timely manner and contract target values be amended, where required, before additional funds are committed.

 

9.  City Council request the Chief Information Officer to develop policies and procedures to review SAP access for divisions so that they can periodically review whether staff access to systems is appropriate, and make any necessary changes in a timely manner.

 

10.  City Council request the Controller to evaluate the feasibility of establishing a Centralized Contract Management Unit/Centre of Excellence to look after City-wide contracts, where possible. The Unit should be responsible for:

 

a.  performing continuous controls monitoring on contracts, including analyzing divisional purchases, consolidating overall trends, and monitoring contract compliance

 

b.  developing criteria for providing exception reports to divisions on contract compliance, for example, purchase of goods not listed in the contract, and following up with divisions on any potential changes required to contracts

 

c.  developing processes and guidelines for divisions to improve automation and consistency in ordering, receiving and paying for goods and services.

 

11.  City Council request the General Manager, Fleet Services, to take the lead in:

 

a.  developing a periodic review process with the Vendor on competitive pricing of parts that are being supplied to the City. A criteria should be developed to have adequate parts covered under each review. Results of price adjustments should be documented after each review

 

b.  developing a process to approve new parts prices in the system

 

c.  co-ordinating the auto parts price management processes with other City divisions for their review and implementation.

 

12.  City Council request the General Manager, Fleet Services, to develop processes:

 

a.  to reconcile auto parts purchases, returns and prices between the City’s inventory system and the vendor’s billing system on an ongoing basis

 

b.  to resolve reconciliation issues in a timely manner and only those invoices should be paid that reconciles with the City records.

 

13.  City Council request the General Manager, Fleet Services, to review price and quantity variances identified during this audit. Any overpayments and/or outstanding credits identified should be recovered from the vendor. Reasons why these variances occurred should be documented and appropriate controls implemented.

 

14.  City Council request the Director, Real Estate Services, to develop a process for updating properties owned or leased by the City including changes to the ownership in a central database. The database should be used to reconcile addresses with the hydro invoice payment system on a periodic basis, and any hydro services identified as not related to the City should be terminated.

           

15.  City Council request the Director, Environment and Energy Division, to perform a one-time validation of those accounts that do not have a specific service address, with respective divisions and establish a baseline for future validation.

           

16.  City Council request the General Manager, Facilities Management Division to develop:

 

a.  a complete list of all City-owned transformers

 

b.  a process for validating city’s records of transformers with hydro service provider for eligible credits.

 

Further, the transformer list should become part of the Facilities maintenance program.

 

17.  City Council request the General Manager, Facilities Management Division, to develop a process to monitor demand for City-owned transformers in order to ensure  appropriate credits are received when credit thresholds are achieved.

 

18.  City Council request the Director, Environment & Energy Division, to review other utility payments for address reconciliations and to implement similar controls as recommended for hydro service payments.

 

19.  City Council request the Director, Accounting Services, to improve the duplicate payment check criteria and recover the outstanding duplicate and /or incorrect payments identified during the audit.

 

20.  City Council request the City Manager to forward this report to Division Heads and Chief Executive Officers of major City agencies and corporations, and request them to review and consider implementing the recommendations that are relevant to their respective operations, in particular, recommendations relating to purchasing, payment and contract management related areas.

Origin

(June 18, 2019) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The Auditor General's 2018 Audit Work Plan included an audit of interface billing vendors. To save invoice processing costs, the City processes a significant number of invoices (over 30% of total City payments) through the interface bill payment process. This process allows vendors to submit multiple invoices through a consolidated electronic file.

 

The objective of this audit was to evaluate the controls over the vendor interface billing and payment processes.  The audit identified opportunities to leverage data to improve strategic procurement, contract management and payment processes.

 

This report highlights continuous improvement opportunities in three areas:

 

1. Monitoring goods listed in the contract against actual usage – We recommend, where possible, tracking and analyzing usage prior to proceeding with new procurements so that the City receives the most competitive prices and that the integrity of the procurement process is maintained.

 

2. Setting up interface billing processes and contracts properly – The City is missing out on some discounts and volume rebates due to inadequate set-up of various records.  The City lost over $300,000 in early payment discounts and volume rebates on selected vendors during January 2015 to June 2018. The City has an opportunity to improve controls so that it properly captures these discounts.

 

3. Improving contract management practices – Contract management processes for interface billing payments are not efficient. The City can improve its contract management, strategic procurement and payment processes by developing data needs upfront, during the procurement process, and electronically capturing usage information across divisions to better analyze usage against the contracted items and verify payments.

 

The recommendations included in this report relates to control design and are applicable to all types of payment methods, interface and non-interface payments including the new Purchase-to-Pay(P2P) process the City is currently implementing.

 

Implementing the 20 recommendations in this report will support the City in its continuous improvement of controls over the purchase and payment for goods and services, and improve the processing of interface bills. When the City moves to a new system, such as the new Purchase-to-Pay (P2P) solution, the recommendations should be included in the control design.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2019) Report from the Auditor General - Audit of Interface Invoice Payments - Improving Contract Management and Payment Processes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135014.pdf
Audit at a Glance - Audit of Interface Invoice Payments - Improving Contract Management and Payment Processes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135015.pdf
Attachment 1: Audit of Interface Invoice Payments - Improving Contract Management and Payment Processes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-135016.pdf

Civic Appointments Committee - Meeting 8

CA8.1 - Appointment of a Public Member to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee.

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council appoint Shane Rayman to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee, at pleasure of Council, for a term office ending July 16, 2023, and until a successor is appointed.

 

2. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June

24, 2019) from the City Clerk remain confidential as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidate's biography:

 

Shane Rayman

 

Shane Rayman is a partner at Rayman Beitchman LLP who specializes in expropriations law and real property litigation. He has expertise in areas relating to claims for private nuisance arising from noise and environmental disturbance. Shane has served as President of the Ontario Expropriation Association and is a frequent lecturer and author on issues regarding private nuisance, expropriations law, and the interaction between government and private property owners.

Origin

(June 24, 2019) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

At its meeting on December 4, 5, and 13, 2018, City Council amended the Public Appointments process by authorizing the City Clerk to shortlist, interview and recommend candidates to the Civic Appointments Committee for appointment to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee by City Council.

 

This report recommends the appointment of one public member to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) Consultative Committee for a four-year term of office, at pleasure of Council ending July 16, 2023, and until a successor is appointed.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 24, 2019) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of a Public Member to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-135382.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Recommended Candidate, Biography and Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information Summary for Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee

CA8.2 - Appointment of Members to the Heritage Toronto Board of Directors

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable persons being considered for appointment to the Heritage Toronto Board of Directors.

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council appoint the following candidates to the Heritage Toronto Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on July 17, 2023 and until successors are appointed:

 

Lori Davison

Sandy Kedey 

James Lane

Shirin Mandani

Claire Nelischer

Leslie Thompson

 

2.  City Council appoint the following candidates to the Heritage Toronto Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on July 17, 2021 and until successors are appointed:

 

Juliet French

Martin Green

Jeff Junke

 

3.  City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 21, 2019) from the Executive Director, Heritage Toronto remain confidential as it relates to personal information about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Heritage Toronto Board.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidates' biographies:

 

Lori Davison

 

Lori Davison is Vice President, Brand Strategy & Communications at SickKids Foundation where she lead the launch of the Internationally awarded SickKids VS campaign.  Prior to joining SickKids, Lori had roles on the senior management teams of leading advertising agencies Leo Burnett and BBDO.  Lori holds a Master of Arts degree from University of Toronto.   She was named Canada’s 2017 Marketer of the Year by the Canadian Marketing Association and 2018 Marketer of the Year by Strategy Magazine.

 

Juliet French

 

Juliet French has held several administrative positions with the federal government, the most recent being with the Department of Canadian Heritage. A graduate of the University of Toronto (HBA 2000 Art History) Juliet has volunteered and worked with a series of art and cultural organizations in Canada and the US including Stella Jones Gallery, New Orleans; Harbourfront Centre, CARFAC Ontario, Descant Magazine and Lord Cultural Resources.

 

Martin Green

 

Martin Green is a Principal of Foresight Strategic Advisors, a Toronto-based consultancy that advises organizations in highly-regulated sectors on complex challenges. He has had a life-long interest in history and architecture, and is an alumnus of Duke University. Martin has served as an honorary aide-de-camp to the Lieutenant Governor of Ontario, and is a recipient of the Queen Elizabeth II Golden Jubilee Medal and the Ontario Volunteer Service Award. He is married with two children.

 

Jeff Junke

 

Jeff Junke holds an Honours Bachelor of Arts in History and English from the University of Ottawa and a Master of Professional Communication from Ryerson University. He is currently Communications Manager at CivicAction, a non-profit that focuses on various urban issues. Originally from the Niagara Region, Jeff now calls Toronto's Danforth East neighbourhood home and has a strong passion for Toronto's past and how it can shape the city's future.

 

Sandy Kedey

 

Born and raised in Toronto, with 29 years teaching Design thinking and Advertising at OCAD University, Sandy is a tenured Professor in the Faculty of Design, as well as Chair of the Advertising Program, responsible for creating Canada’s only registered university four-year Advertising Design Program. As a practicing professional, she holds over 20 years in both international advertising agencies, awarded in virtually every category of business.

 

James Lane

 

James Lane is a commercial litigation lawyer engaged in private practice as a partner of the Toronto firm of Bersenas Jacobsen Chouest Thomson Blackburn LLP.  He has extensive board experience in the not-for-profit sector with a focus on board governance, including as founder and Board Legal Officer of Medecins sans Frontieres, Canada and Board Chair of the Canadian Centre for Victims of Torture.

 

Shirin Mandani

 

Shirin brings over 20 years of leadership experience in many not-for-profit agencies in Canada and internationally. She has a Masters' degree in Public Policy Administration and Law from York University and a Post degree Diploma in Not-for-Profit Management from University of Western Ontario. Trained in Governance and Leadership from Kellogg Schulich School of Business, she has worked in world renowned agencies along with agencies serving many ethnic and diverse groups in Toronto.

 

Claire Nelischer

 

Claire Nelischer is an urban planner whose work focuses on planning and policy to support a vibrant public realm. She is currently a Project Manager at the Ryerson City Building Institute, where she leads research and public programs on topics related to street design, parks policy, and Toronto's built and cultural heritage. She frequently presents and writes on urban issues. Claire holds a M.Sc. in City and Regional Planning from Pratt Institute and a BAH from Queen’s University.

 

Leslie Thompson

 

Leslie Thompson is an independent corporate board member (15+ years), risk management consultant and visual artist.  She actively promotes the value of heritage in her downtown Toronto community. Her governance and board experience has encompassed public (listed) and not-for-profit corporations, crown agencies, civic and community organizations.

Origin

(June 21, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Heritage Toronto

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend the appointment of public members to the Heritage Toronto Board of Directors.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 21, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Heritage Toronto on Appointment of Members to the Heritage Toronto Board of Directors
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-135352.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Recommended Candidates, Qualifications and Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information Summary to the Heritage Toronto Board

CA8.3 - Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council appoint the following candidates to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board, including one as Chair, at pleasure of Council, for a term office ending July 16, 2023, and until successors are appointed:

 

Laurel Atkinson

Deepak Ramachandran

Parminder Sandhu, as Chair

 

2. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 24, 2019) from the City Clerk remain confidential as it relates to personal information about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidates' biographies:

 

Laurel Atkinson

 

Laurel's first career was as an outdoor educator where she was fortunate to have experienced many remote and unique Canadian rivers and landscapes. She has managed programs for small, community-based environmental non-profits in Toronto and Peterborough. As Program Director at The W. Garfield Weston Foundation, she currently provides strategic grants management to the Foundation's northern-focused grants.

 

Deepak Ramachandran

 

Deepak is a start-up entrepreneur, investor and advisor with a focus on next-generation technology and business models. He is the co-founder and CTO of FundThrough, past Board Chair at Miovision, and past member of the TAF investment committee. He has experience at McKinsey and Bridgewater Associates, as well as broad-based start-up and corporate experience, including finance, software, electronics, and professional services across North America, Europe and Asia.

 

Parminder Sandhu

 

Parminder Sandhu is a seasoned executive focused on delivering results for customers through engaged employees and thoughtful consideration of all stakeholders. He has been involved in over $2B of energy efficiency or climate change programming across North America. He founded and grew Willis Energy Services (ON) to become Canada’s largest program delivery firm which was sold to Clearesult. He is now focused on direct investments primarily on solutions to climate change and sustainability.

Origin

(June 24, 2019) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

At its meeting on December 4, 5, and 13, 2018, City Council amended the Public Appointments process by authorizing the City Clerk to shortlist, interview and recommend candidates to the Civic Appointments Committee for appointment to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board by City Council.

 

This report recommends the appointment of three public members to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund (TAF) Board for a four-year term of office, at pleasure of Council ending July 16, 2023, and until successors are appointed.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 24, 2019) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-135344.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Recommended Candidates, Biographies and Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information Summary for Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board

CA8.4 - Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto Preservation Board

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Toronto Preservation Board

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council appoint the following candidates to the Toronto Preservation Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term office ending July 18, 2023, and until successors are appointed:

  

Robert Allsopp

Geoff Kettel

Barbara McPhail

Loryssa Quattrociocchi

Julia Rady

Sandra Shaul

Kim Storey

 

2. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 21, 2019) from the City Clerk remain confidential as it relates to personal information about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Preservation Board.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidates' biographies:

 

Robert Allsopp

 

Robert has a wide range of involvement in voluntary local community associations and advisory committees and professional design review panels and design competition juries. He is a founding member of Friends of Fort York and current member of Presidents Circle, Architectural Conservancy of Ontario. He has over 50 years of volunteer and professional involvement in Civic issues.

 

Geoff Kettel

 

Geoff Kettel is a community connector and advocate for “making places better”, through active involvement in land use planning, heritage preservation, active transportation, and community development.  He is currently Co-President of the Leaside Property Owners’ Association, Co-Chair of the Federation of North Toronto Residents‘ Associations (FoNTRA),  Chair of the North York Community Preservation Panel, member of the Steering committee of Walk Toronto

 

Barbara McPhail

 

Professionally, I have 37 years of experience in the cultural heritage sector providing heritage expertise in the research, evaluation and designation of heritage property under the OHA; the application of the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties and the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada: and, in the preparation of heritage impact assessments. I am conversant in the City’s heritage issues and local history.

 

Loryssa Quattrociocchi

 

I hold a Master's degree in Art History & Visual Culture from the University of Guelph, with a specialization in architectural history, and I have held appointments at the University of Oxford, the University of Guelph, the Gardiner Museum, and Sir John Soane's Museum, London, UK. I am presently a Heritage Conservation Assistant at Architectural Conservancy Ontario, a Heritage Consultant at Giaimo Architects, and a fourth-year D.Phil. in History student at the University of Oxford.

 

Julia Rady

 

Julia Rady, PhD completed her doctoral training in Canadian History at the University of Toronto in 2017. She parlayed her training into the heritage field and works as a historical consultant for Stevens Burgess Architects Ltd., and has contributed historical content to both Heritage Toronto's plaques program and the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History's Oral History program. 

 

Sandra Shaul

 

Sandra Shaul has served on the Toronto Preservation Board since 2016, recently as vice-chair. From 2003-06 she served on the T&EY Community Preservation Panel, as well as on the board. In recent years, her passion for Toronto’s history and architectural heritage was expressed through her management of the citywide Bicentennial Commemoration of the War of 1812 and Toronto’s Great War Attic. She has been a director of The Annex Residents’ Association responsible for heritage since 2005.

 

Kim Storey

 

Kim Storey, OAA, B.Arch., FRAIC, is an architect and urban designer, whose firm Brown and Storey Architects Inc., is a multidisciplinary firm that has worked with a range of city public spaces, streetscapes, buildings and civic infrastructures, including original research of the Garrison Creek Ravine, Taddle Creek Ravine, Dundas Square, Massey Harris Park, St. George Street, and the West Toronto Railpath.

Origin

(June 21, 2019) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

This report recommends the appointment of 7 public members to the Toronto Preservation Board for a four-year term of office.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 21, 2019) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto Preservation Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-135366.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Recommended Candidates, Qualifications, and Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Toronto Preservation Board

CA8.5 - Appointment of Public Members to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council appoint the following candidates to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board, including one as Chair, at pleasure of Council, for a term office ending July 16, 2023, and until successors are appointed:

 

Michael Fenton, as Chair

Jan Mollenhauer

Jeremy Roach

 

2.  City Council appoint the following the stakeholder representatives to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term office ending July 16, 2023, and until successors are appointed:

 

Robert (Bob) Emond, as the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area representative

Michael Forbes, as the Ryerson University representative

Ian Gemmell, as the McGill-Granby Village Residents' Association representative

Sheila Jennings, as the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area representative

Stefania Paterak, as the Corporation of Massey Hall and Roy Thompson Hall representative

 

3. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 24, 2019) from the City Clerk remain confidential as it relates to personal information about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidates' biographies:

 

Robert (Bob) Emond (Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area representative)

 

Robert Emond is a dynamic, high-performing retail visionary driven to succeed with 40 plus years of comprehensive management and strategic business leadership experience in highly competitive environments with a relentless focus on enhancing the customer experience. He has demonstrated coaching and mentoring skills with a history of effectively motivating peers and associates. He currently oversees a portfolio of retail properties in Toronto including 10 Dundas East in the heart of the city.

  

Michael Fenton, as Chair

 

Mike Fenton is a strategically-focused senior executive with a proven record of building added value brands ,in the private and non-profit sectors. He has held executive roles in the philanthropic industry with national, regional, and international organizations where he has developed expertise in the education, health, social services, advertising/ communications, and government relations sectors. A lifelong Toronto resident, Mike has held various board positions, most recently with George Brown College.

 

Michael Forbes (Ryerson University representative)

 

For over 20 years, Michael Forbes has provided strategic communications and policy advice to major corporate, consumer, and public sector clients. Michael joined Ryerson University in 2011, where he has worked in a number of progressively senior roles. He is currently Group Director, Communications, managing a central team whose primary responsibility is to enhance and protect the reputation of Ryerson University.

 

Ian Gemmell (McGill-Granby Village Residents' Association representative)

 

Ian Gemmell was born in Edinburgh, Scotland, educated at the Edinburgh College of Art, and emigrated to Canada in 1963. He has worked in the architecture and appraisal departments for the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, as the Vice-President of Mortgages for a large trust company, and as the owner of a graphic design company. Ian now works as a real estate agent. He has served as the local resident's association representative on the Yonge-Dundas Square Board since October 2011.

 

Sheila Jennings (Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area representative)

 

Sheila Jennings joined Cadillac Fairview in 2005 and has worked as the General Manager at four of its shopping centres, including Shops at Don Mills – the first urban outdoor shopping village – and, most recently, at its flagship property – the Toronto Eaton Centre. She has interacted with various groups throughout her career, including office and retail clients, developers, and homeowners. Sheila is one of the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area's nominees on the Yonge-Dundas Square Board.

 

Jan Mollenhauer

 

Jan Mollenhauer is a marketing professional with more than 30 years in the advertising and consumer packaged goods industries. She has a diverse business background leading marketing development and managing business units in Canada, the U.S., and globally. A graduate of Queen's University in Economics, Jan also holds the ICD.D designation from the Institute of Corporate Directors. She has volunteered in her local community and with leading Canadian health organizations.

 

Stefania Paterak (Corporation of Massey Hall and Roy Thompson Hall representative)

 

Stefania Paterak has been immersed in the field of arts and culture for many years. She is currently the Programming Manager of Massey Hall and Roy Thomson Hall, two of Canada's premier concert halls. Stefania has an Honours BA in English and History from University College at the University of Toronto and a Certificate in Arts Administration from Humber College. She has served on the Board of Directors for the Canadian Arts Presenting Association.

 

Jeremy Roach

 

Jeremy Roach is a marketing executive who has been involved in national strategies for the past 15 years. With previously held positions within Harbourfront Centre, CTV, Nielsen, and DreamWorks, his professional experience ranges from consumer behaviour to creative management. In his quest to support Toronto's social wellbeing and egalitarianism, he joined the Board of Directors for Homes First Society in 2011. In addition, he is also on a special task force to support regional resilience.

Origin

(June 24, 2019) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

At its meeting on December 4, 5, and 13, 2018, City Council amended the Public Appointments process by authorizing the City Clerk to shortlist, interview and recommend candidates to the Civic Appointments Committee for appointment to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board by City Council.

 

This report recommends the appointment of three public members and five stakeholder representatives to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board for a four-year term of office, at pleasure of Council, ending July 16, 2023, and until successors are appointed.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 24, 2019) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Public Members to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-135369.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Recommended Candidates, Biographies and Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information Summary for Yonge-Dundas Square Board

CA8.6 - Appointment of Members to the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council appoint the following candidates from 18 Indigenous organizations to the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 14, 2022:

 

Kaitlyn Adam Lewis

Andrea Chrisjohn

Larry Frost

Shadrak Gobért

Pamela Hart

Regina Hartwick

Marilyn Hew

Tracey King

Millie Knapp

Ruth Koleszar-Green

Nancy Martin

Blanche Meawassige

Angus D. Palmer

Frances Sanderson

Tanya Senk

Jeffrey Schiffer

Steve Teekens

Bryan Winters

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidates' and their organization's biographies:

 

Kaitlyn Adam Lewis

 

Kaitlyn is Anishinaabe from Couchiching First Nation (Treaty 3.) She currently works for the Native Canadian Centre as a Language Resource Developer and as the Youth Council Coordinator for the Toronto Indigenous Health Advisory Circle.

 

The Toronto Indigenous Youth (TIYC) Collective was formed in 2015 to solve health inadequacies for urban Indigenous youth. Our projects are centered on making traditional knowledge and health resources accessible to Indigenous people living in Toronto. TIYC consists of eight young leaders from diverse Indigenous backgrounds who bring unique individual strengths and interests to this work.

 

Andrea Chrisjohn

 

Andrea is the Board Designate (de facto Executive Director) and a strong leader in the Indigenous community in Toronto. She has been actively engaged in previous terms of the Aboriginal Affairs Committee.

 

Toronto Council Fire Native Cultural Centre is an autonomous, vibrant cultural agency that involves and serves the Indigenous community with confidence for and commitment to their well-being. Their mandate is to provide counselling, material assistance and other direct services to First Nations people as well as to encourage and enhance spiritual and personal growth.

 

Larry Frost

 

Larry Frost is the Executive Director of the Native Canadian Centre of Toronto. As a long-time Indigenous leader in Toronto, he has been actively engaged in previous terms of the Aboriginal Affairs Committee.

 

The Native Canadian Centre of Toronto is a membership-based, charitable organization whose mission is to empower the Indigenous community in Toronto by providing programs that support their spiritual, emotional, physical and mental well-being. 

 

Shadrak Gobért

 

Shadrak (Shak) Gobért has been involved with the Indigenous community for many years here in Toronto, including with the Toronto Indigenous Business Association (TIBA). He currently works for the Ontario Federation of Indigenous Friendship Centres

 

The Toronto Indigenous Business Association (TIBA) is a grassroots organization, which is working to unite Indigenous entrepreneurs in the GTA to network, build our businesses together, and move towards realizing our community's vision of an Indigenous neighbourhood district in the city. TIBA's mission is to develop and unite GTA indigenous businesses and cultural community initiatives for a sustainable future.

 

Pamela Hart

 

Pamela is a member of Chippewas of Georgina Island on Lake Simcoe. She has years of work in the community offering support and advocacy to those facing intergenerational traumas, mental health, addictions, homelessness, violence and more. Currently as the Executive Director of Native Women's Resource Centre of Toronto she continues to try and empower the community through restoration of identity, safe spaces and cultural reconnection.

 

The Native Women’s Resource Centre of Toronto (NWRCT) provides a safe and welcoming environment for all Aboriginal women and their children in the Greater Toronto Area. Their programs fall under six broad categories: Housing, Families, Advocacy, Employment, Education, and Youth. The NWRCT provides individual support, group programming, and cultural initiatives.

 

Regina Hartwick

 

Regina Hartwick is an Anishinaabeg scholar and educator from Ardoch Algonquin First Nation and a specialist in Indigenous Education. As Manager of Humber College's Aboriginal Resource Centre is champion for student equity and inclusion, playing strategic and direct roles to create an inclusive, welcoming place of learning, where students feel a sense of safety, community and belonging.

 

The Aboriginal Resource Centre at Humber College works in partnership with regional Aboriginal communities to ensure Aboriginal students are supported and connected to their learning environment- academically, culturally and socially. It provides support assist Aboriginal students in making the transition and adjustment to the challenges of college life while creating an awareness and appreciation of Aboriginal culture and history in the greater campus community. 

 

Marilyn Hew

 

Marilyn Hew is a Métis woman living in Toronto with roots in Penetanguishene. She is a citizen of the Metis Nation of Ontario and Secretary/Treasurer for the Toronto and York Region Métis Council. She is a retired teacher with the TDSB where she worked beginning in 1975. She continues to support education by occasionally teaching at Middle School and sits on the TDSB's Urban Indigenous Community Advisory Committee representing TYRMC for the MNO.

 

The Toronto and York Region Métis Council (TYRMC) is the elected Métis government within the City of Toronto and the only organization in Toronto specifically representing Métis people.

 

Tracey King

 

Tracey is the Aboriginal Human Resources Lead/Consultant at Ryerson University. Tracey supports Aboriginal recruitment and retention at Ryerson in Human Resources, working with the Office of Aboriginal Initiatives, Ryerson Aboriginal Student Services (RASS) and the Aboriginal Education Council. She is also part of the leadership team in the Office of the Vice-President, Equity and Community Inclusion. 

 

Ryerson University is committed to community engagement, action, inclusion, respect for Aboriginal perspectives, equity, diversity and putting people first. The Office of the Vice President, Equity and Community Inclusion collaborates across campus to make Ryerson a truly inclusive place to learn and work.

 

Millie Knapp

 

Millie Knapp has 25-plus years of work experience in media as a publisher, feature writer, photographer, managing editor, and advertising sales specialist. The cultivation of an international business and community network enriches her work as a panel and advisory board member for Arts and Entertainment programs and social community groups. She has been Executive Director of the Association for Native Development in the Performing and Visual Arts (ANDPVA) since 2012.

 

The ANDPVA is Canada’s oldest Indigenous arts service organization, providing support to Canadian Indigenous artists in Ontario and around the world. ANDPVA's mission is to create, support and develop a self-sufficient community of Indigenous artists who preserve traditional knowledge, advance respective cultural identities and reflect evolving cultural expression. 

 

Ruth Koleszar-Green

 

Ruth is an Assistant Professor in the School of Social Work at York University. She is also the co-chair of the Indigenous Council at York and the Special Advisor to the President on Indigenous Initiatives. She is an urban Indigenous person and a citizen of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy. She is from the Mohawk Nation and a member of the Turtle Clan.

 

York University is a public research university in Toronto. Its Indigenous Council (IC) is well positioned to provide guidance to the University in implementing Indigenous programming and curricula and play a pivotal role in helping to advance the University's reconciliation and Indigeneity agenda.

 

Nancy Martin

 

Nancy was born and raised in Toronto. Her Mohawk roots originate from Six Nations of the Grand River. She has been the Executive Director of Miziwe Biik Aboriginal Employment & Training for the past 25 years.

 

Miziwe Biik Aboriginal Employment and Training was created in 1991 to meet the unique training and employment needs of Aboriginal peoples. Miziwe Biik provides the Greater Toronto Area’s Aboriginal community with training initiatives and employment services. Their mission is to provide services to the Aboriginal peoples in the Greater Toronto Area; to work with employers to secure employment opportunities; to deliver federal and provincial programs; and to promote Aboriginal entrepreneurship and the development of economies. 

 

Blanche Meawassige

 

As Executive Director of Anduhyaun, Blanche provides leadership and support in delivering their mission.

 

Anduhyaun Inc. serves Indigenous women and their children fleeing violence. This includes supporting Indigenous women and children in their efforts to maintain their cultural identity, self-esteem, economic, physical and spiritual well-being. 

 

Angus D. Palmer

 

General Manager of Wigwamen Incorporated since 1998, Angus has overall responsibility for the management of Wigwamen’s 665 unit portfolio. Prior to joining Wigwamen, he worked as a Development Consultant, assisting in the development of 24 different non-profit and co-operative housing projects totaling over 800 units throughout Ontario, and assisting in the management of non-profit housing projects.

 

Wigwamen is one of Ontario's oldest and largest urban Indigenous non-profit housing providers. Wigwamen supports clients from all segments of the housing continuum, including the homeless, through our transitional housing and the poor/working poor through social and affordable housing.

 

Frances Sanderson

 

Raised in East York, currently residing in Scarborough. Frances is the Executive Director, Nishnawbe Homes Inc. She is the previous Co-Chair of the Aboriginal Affairs Committee. Other responsibilities include: Chair, Aboriginal Education Council, George Brown College; Member, Toronto Aboriginal Support Service Council (TASSC); Member, Indigenous Housing and Homelessness Community Advisory Board (CAB); Chair, Aboriginal Consultative Committee, Toronto Police Service.

 

Nishnawbe Homes provides affordable and safe housing to Indigenous people in Toronto.

 

Tanya Senk

 

Tanya Senk is a Metis/Cree/Saulteaux educator/writer/speaker/community leader. She has worked in the field of education and community for over twenty five years. Tanya is currently the Centrally Assigned Principal in Indigenous Education - Urban Indigenous Education Centre and the Principal of Wandering Spirit School, Toronto District School Board.

 

At the TDSB, the Urban Indigenous Education Centre offers a variety of services with the goal of closing the opportunity gap for Indigenous students. This mandate is approached by infusing Indigenous perspectives across the curriculum for all students as well as by providing direct wrap-around supports to enhance the overall achievement of First Nation, Métis and Inuit students throughout the TDSB. 

 

Jeffrey Schiffer

 

Jeffrey Schiffer was born and raised in Coast Salish territory and has Métis and German ancestry. Over the past 15 years Dr. Schiffer has held positions at the Earth Institute at Columbia University, Vancouver Aboriginal Child and Family Services Society, the Justice Institute of British Columbia, and the City of Toronto.  He is currently the Executive Director at Native Child and Family Services of Toronto.

 

Native Child and Family Services of Toronto (NCFST) serves Native families and children in the Toronto area, including First Nations, Métis, Inuit and all those with Aboriginal heritage who choose to be served by NCFST. NCFST strives to provide a life of quality, well-being, caring and healing for children and families in the Toronto Native Community. They do this by creating a service model that is culture based and respects the values of Native people, the extended family and the right to self-determination.

 

Steve Teekens

 

Steve Teekens has been working with the marginalized and homeless sector in Toronto since 1995. Steve is the Executive Director at Na-Me-Res where he has worked since 2008.  He has a degree in Public Administration and Governance from Ryerson University and is working on his Master’s Degree in Public Administration at Queen’s University.

 

In 1985, Native Men's Residence (Na-Me-Res) began offering emergency shelter to Toronto-based Aboriginal men who were without a place to live and has expanded its services to include a nationally-recognized transitional housing program as well as a long-term independent housing initiative. The Na-Me-Res team meets the physical, mental, spiritual, and emotional needs of their clients wherever they are on their journey.

 

Bryan Winters

 

Bryan Winters is a Nunatsiavut beneficiary from Happy Valley - Goose Bay, Labrador. He is now the Executive Director of the Toronto Inuit Association and is currently studying Indigenous Public Administration and Governance through First Nations Technical Institute in Tyendinaga Mohawk Territory and Ryerson University.

 

The Toronto Inuit Association was established in September 2016 to solidify the voice of Inuit in Toronto. TIA's mission is to create a community in Toronto for Inuit from all regions, where they can provide support in language learning, culture awareness, family services, employment and health services to Inuit and their families.

Origin

(June 21, 2019) Report from the City Manager's Office

Summary

The report recommends the appointment of public members to the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 21, 2019) Report from the City Manager's Office on Appointment of Members to the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-135425.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Recommended Organizations and Representatives for Appointment to the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee

CA8.7 - Appointment of a Public Member to the Toronto Police Services Board

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
July 16, 2:18 PM - City Council voted to reconsider the item and subsequently amended the item. Communications CA8.7.1 and CA8.7.2 have been submitted on this Item.

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Toronto Police Services Board

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council appoint Jim Hart to the Toronto Police Services Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending November 14, 2022, and until a successor is appointed.

 

2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1, 2 and 3 to the report (June 21, 2019) from the City Clerk remain confidential their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Police Services Board.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidate's biography:

 

Jim Hart

 

A lifelong resident of Toronto, Jim has resided in Scarborough for over 30 years with his wife Joan. A 31 year career with the City of Toronto spanned 7 divisions. Twenty-five of Jim’s 31 years were at the senior management level, including General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation. Jim was appointed to Toronto City Council in 2017, to replace the late Ron Moeser. As a Councillor, Jim was particularly pleased to be chosen as the Vice-Chair of the Police Services Board in 2018.

Origin

(June 21, 2019) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The Civic Appointments Committee will conduct interviews and recommend one candidate to City Council for appointment to the Toronto Police Services Board.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 21, 2019) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of a Public Member to the Toronto Police Services Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-135371.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Toronto Police Services Board
Confidential Attachment 2 - Toronto Police Services Board Interview Questions for July 3, 2019 (to be circulated under separate cover)
Confidential Attachment 3 - Toronto Police Services Board Interview Schedule for July 3, 2019 (to be circulated under separate cover)

Speakers

Derek Moran

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from N. Corrado (CC.Supp.CA8.7.1)
(July 15, 2019) E-mail from Miguel Avila-Velarde (CC.New.CA8.7.2)

CA8.8 - Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication CA8.8.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council appoint the following candidates to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending July 16, 2023, and until successors are appointed:

 

Ronald Chopowick

Jennifer Drake

Heidi Karst

Maria Kelleher

Basudeb Mukherjee

Connie Tang

Estair Van Wagner

 

2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1, 2 and 3 to the report (June 24, 2019) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidates' biographies:

 

Ronald Chopowick

 

Dr. Ronald Chopowick was an Administrator/Professor at Seneca College for 35 years, and at York University for more than 40 years. He was educated at the University of Toronto, where he obtained undergraduate and graduate degrees in Forestry and a Ph.D. in Plant Biochemistry and Ecology. Ronald is actively involved in his community, and has served on many boards, including the Ontario Trillium Foundation's Toronto Grant Review Team, the Toronto Public Library Board, and, most recently, the TRCA Board.

 

Jennifer Drake

 

Dr. Jennifer Drake is an expert in low impact development, stormwater management and wet weather policy. She completed her PhD at the University of Guelph in 2013 and is currently an Assistant Professor at the University of Toronto.

 

Heidi Karst

 

Over the past 16+ years, Heidi Karst, PhD, has worked across public, private and non-profit sectors in fields ranging from environmental conservation to historical preservation and human rights education to social policy. She has developed and implemented sustainable projects and policies, managed innovative programs, and fostered resilient communities and regional networks in Canada and internationally. She currently works for the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks.

 

Maria Kelleher

 

Maria Kelleher has a Masters Degree in Environmental Engineering from the University of Toronto. She founded Kelleher Environmental, an environmental consulting company in 2002. Maria specializes in waste management, energy efficiency and climate change issues.  With over 30 years of experience in the environmental consulting industry, Maria has worked on a wide range of waste policy, strategy and stewardship as well as energy conservation and climate change projects.

 

Basudeb Mukherjee

 

Basudeb Mukherjee was born in Calcutta, India. He has attended post-secondary institutions in the US and Canada and has a BA (Hons.) and an M.Sc. in eHealth from McMaster University. He has worked in the IT industry for over two decades in various roles. Currently, he owns and operates a training institute in Scarborough, providing post-secondary skills training and teaches at Centennial College.

 

Connie Tang

 

Connie works in research communications in a bilingual research centre committed to driving change in Ontario’s employment and training sector. She specializes in knowledge translation and comes from an education and research background. Connie completed her Master of Science at the University of Toronto, and has worked to demonstrate how research-based activities can inform and support relevant stakeholder communities. She is an active advocate for evidence-informed practices.

 

Estair Van Wagner

 

Estair Van Wagner is an Assistant Professor at Osgoode Hall Law School where she teaches and researches in the areas of property, planning, natural resources, and environmental law. She is co-director of the Environmental Justice and Sustainability Clinic. Professor Van Wagner lives in Toronto with her partner and two young boys who also love nature and spending time outdoors.

Origin

(June 24, 2019) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The Civic Appointments Committee will conduct interviews and recommend seven public members to City Council for appointment to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA).

Background Information (Committee)

(June 24, 2019) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-135374.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of candidates, qualifications, confidential diversity information summary, and applications for appointment to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (previously distributed with Item CA7.6)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Interview questions for July 3, 2019 (to be circulated under separate cover)
Confidential Attachment 3 - Interview schedule for July 3, 2019 (to be circulated under separate cover)

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from N. Corrado (CC.Supp.CA8.8.1)

CA8.9 - Appointment of Members to the Toronto Music Advisory Committee

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Toronto Music Advisory Committee

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Toronto Music Advisory Committee, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 14, 2022:

 

Paul Banwatt

Vivian Barclay

Mary An Blom

Shaun Bowring

Melissa Bubb-Clarke

Hannah Burgé Luviano

Jeff Cohen

Charlotte Cornfield

Kiana “Rookz” Eastmond

Aerin Fogel

Sarah Jarvis, as the Tourism Toronto representative

Tracy Jenkins

Jesse Kumagai

Rob Lanni

Tao-Ming Lau

Julisa Ly

Sofia Mikhaylova

Noah Mintz

Richmond “Tona” Nantwi

John Samuels

Spencer Sutherland, as the Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas representative

Kim Temple

 

2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 2 to the supplementary report (June 26, 2019) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Music Advisory Committee.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidates' biographies:

 

Paul Banwatt

 

Paul Banwatt is the drummer for the rock band The Rural Alberta Advantage and a lawyer at Gilbert's LLP. Paul has been nominated for a Juno, won CBC and Galaxie Rising Stars music awards, made several appearances on the US and Canadian Billboard charts, played the Coachella Music Festival, and been featured in numerous publications such as Spin, NME, Playboy Magazine, and The New York Times.

 

Vivian Barclay

 

Vivian Barclay, - General Manager of Warner Chappell Music Canada Ltd., has worked as a radio programmer and on-air host, in artist management, publicity and promotion and as a programmer for conferences and festivals. A Ryerson University Graduate with a degree, Vivian joined Warner Chappell in 2001, and rose through the ranks with stints in royalties, copyright, song plugging.  Vivian is on the boards of the CMPA, the CMRRA, SOCAN and Phemphat Entertainment Group- (Honey Jam Showcase).

 

Mary An Blom

 

A 21-year veteran of the industry, Mary An Blom is currently the Director of Corporate Strategy & Insights at Sony Music. Her role includes assessing new business ventures, which has allowed her to work with stakeholders in diverse aspects of the Toronto entertainment community.  She also works closely with the executive team on strategic planning, and is known for her ability to distil complex problems and deliver creative and collaborative solutions.  She is a classically trained flutist.

 

Shaun Bowring

 

Shaun Bowring is a musician, business person, entrepreneur, music industry advocate with 30 plus years involvement in the Toronto music scene. Owner and Creator of Transmit Presents promotion company, The Garrison and The Baby G live music venues. Shaun is a board member of Little Portugal BIA as well as the co-founder / Director of Dundas West Fest annual Toronto street festival.

 

Melissa Bubb-Clarke

 

Melissa Bubb-Clarke is the Sr. Dir. of Music Partnerships for MLSE, overseeing Live Nation Canada’s sponsorship portfolio including three award winning programs recognized by the Sponsorship & Marketing Council of Canada and the Canadian Marketing Awards.  Melissa sits on the board for the Unison Benevolent Fund, serves on the Communications Committee for Music Canada Live as well as the Advisory Committee for MusiCounts.  Melissa lives in Toronto with her husband and two children.

 

Hannah Burgé Luviano

 

Hannah Burgé Luviano has made appearances on radio, television, and stage, and in 2015 released her debut record, "Green River Sessions." She has toured the US extensively, and in 2016 traveled to Mexico City to headline the Polanco International Jazz Festival. She is a faculty member at Centennial College in the Music Industry Arts Program.

 

Jeff Cohen

 

Jeff Cohen (JC) is co-owner of iconic Toronto live music venues the Legendary H-Shoe Tavern and Lee's Palace. He also co-owns Toronto based Collective Concerts and The Toronto Urban Roots fest.

 

Charlotte Cornfield

 

Charlotte Cornfield is a critically acclaimed songwriter and multi-instrumentalist from Toronto. She has been touring for over 10 years both under her own name and as a side musician for a huge variety of acts. For the past five years she has been deeply involved in Toronto's music community as music programmer at the internationally renowned venue Burdock Music Hall, artistic director of the Toronto Bicycle Music Festival, and as a member of the Toronto Jazz Festival Advisory Committee.

 

Kiana “Rookz” Eastmond

 

Kiana “Rookz” Eastmond is an award-winning entrepreneur, the founder of Sandbox Studios and the newly appointed Executive Director at Manifesto. She is the definition of a hustler but her wins did not appear overnight. She is humbled by the process and a living testament that if you stick to your dreams, the payoff can be much more than you had originally signed up for.

 

Aerin Fogel

 

Aerin Fogel was born and raised in Toronto's East End. She is the founder and artistic director of Toronto feminist festival and show series Venus Fest, as well as her own music project Queen Of Swords. Aerin has been a part of the music industry for over 15 years, originally as a performer, and now as a producer and curator. She also works in the healing arts in Toronto as a professional astrologer.

 

Sarah Jarvis (Tourism Toronto representative)

 

Sarah Jarvis is the Director of Partnerships at Tourism Toronto. In her role, she is responsible for overseeing broader partnerships with industry stakeholders, Tourism Toronto members and corporate partners that benefit from the region's visitor economy. Sarah, a former musician, has had a long career in the arts and culture sector, working for organizations such as Luminato, the Toronto Symphony Orchestra, Endeavour Marketing and the Canadian Opera Company.

  

Tracy Jenkins

 

Tracy Jenkins is Executive and Co-Artistic Director of Lula Music and Arts Centre, which provides programming for Toronto salsa, jazz and world music venue Lula Lounge. Tracy oversees the educational programming at Lula and works with Co-Artistic Director Jose Ortega to produce the annual Lulaworld festival which has spawned the emerging Lulaworld label.

 

Jesse Kumagai

 

Jesse Kumagai is the VP, Talent for Live Nation Canada and was Director of Programming for The Corporation of Massey Hall & Roy Thomson Hall for more than a decade. In addition to his professional duties, Jesse has been an active volunteer currently serving as the Chair of Music Canada Live and a member of the Unison Benevolent Fund Board.  He is the former Vice-Chair of the Yonge Dundas Square Board of management, a former board member of CAPACOA and the Small World Music Society.

 

Rob Lanni

 

Rob Lanni (with Eric Lawrence) co-founded Coalition Music in the late '80s - a full-service management company.  The current client roster includes artists Our Lady Peace, Simple Plan, Finger Eleven, USS, Justin Nozuka, The Balconies, Andee and Ben Caplan.  In 2010, Coalition Music purchased and renovated a 12,000 square foot building in Scarborough (a former convent) that is home to Canada's Music Incubator (not-for-profit) and TEMPO (Through Education Music Provides Opportunity) charity.

 

Tao-Ming Lau

 

Tao is founder/agent at Blue Crane Agency, a music booking agency seeking to prioritize women, artists of color, and queer and trans musicians in North America and abroad. She is a Polaris Music Prize board director, sits on the TD Toronto Jazz Festival Artistic Advisory Committee, and was chosen as a Rising Star in Toronto Life Magazine's 50 Most Influential Torontonians of 2018. She was previously at touring agency Billions and Universal Music Canada.

 

Julisa Ly

 

Julisa has worked in the radio industry for 12 years and is currently the Music Director at 102.1 The Edge. Growing up, she's been a supporter of the local music scene and continues to do so.

 

Sofia Mikhaylova

 

Since being a journalism student at Ryerson, I have contributed much of my energy as a writer towards writing for numerous local Toronto publications. After university, I began a career in marketing, but continued writing about music in Toronto (and the world) on a freelance basis. In 2016, I went from throwing events for local DJs to creating an independent record label focusing on releasing instrumental electronic music from underrepresented female, trans, and non-binary artists and producers.

 

Noah Mintz

 

Noah Mintz is the owner of and a Senior Mastering Engineer at Lacquer Channel Mastering. Since 1975, Lacquer Channel Mastering has been one of Canada's premier mastering studios. Combining the best of vintage and state-of-the-art technology, Lacquer Channel currently has Canada's only operating record lathe. Previous to Mastering Noah was the singer and guitar player of the influential 90's indie rock band, hHead.

 

Richmond “Tona” Nantwi

 

Not your average master of ceremony or MC, Tona, armed with an in depth understanding of the power and the complexity of words, and a love of Hip hop, has developed his own creative niche through aboriginal and versatile demonstrations in an era where the true art of Hip hop seems to have been lost. Tona reminds the listener of the era where Hip hop was authentic, as he incorporates his own life experiences through rhymes. This appreciation plays a vital role in his most pivotal point.

 

John Samuels

 

Just John is a Musician based in Toronto. Raised in Scarborough he is the founding member of the art organization, Blank Canvas Gallery. Known for his high energy performance, John's vision has always been to be himself; push the boundaries in his art, contrasting styles, blurring genres and presenting fresh production and visual aesthetics. Just John has been trailblazing D.I.Y. culture for years. Inspired by social activism, he became the driving force behind Blank Canvas Gallery.

 

Spencer Sutherland (Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas representative)

 

Spencer has served on TMAC since its inception, and as Co-Chair in 2017/18.  In the industry, he has owned and operated music venues in Toronto for over 10 years, and has produced over 1500 events.  He is well known for his advocacy work, having helped to author the Music Strategy, introduced measures to improve venue sustainability such as the Agent of Change, initiated a new focus on music to improve the Nighttime Economy, and continues to promote the cultural significance of music in Toronto.

 

Kim Temple

 

As Manager of Member & Industry Relations for Canadian Music Publishers Association, Kim advocates for copyright protection and serves its national membership.  She facilitates trade missions, runs international song camps, and fosters cross-sector creative industry collaboration.  As Head of Licensing & Publishing at Six Shooter Records, she runs the creative sync department and manages the label’s publishing roster. Six Shooter’s roster includes Tanya Tagaq and Whitehorse among others.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from City Council

Summary

This report recommends the appointment of 22 individuals to the Toronto Music Advisory Committee at pleasure of Council, for a term ending on November 14, 2019.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) City Council Decision on Appointment of Members to the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-135358.pdf
(June 14, 2019) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Change to the Tourism Toronto Stakeholder Representative on the Toronto Music Advisory Committee (CA8.2a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-135432.pdf
(June 26, 2019) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Appointment of Members to the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council (CA8.9b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-135475.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Recommended Candidates for Appointment to the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council
Confidential Attachment 2 - Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information Summary and Diversity Data for Recommended Candidates for Appointment to the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council

Communications (Committee)

(June 14, 2019) E-mail from Jessie Locke (CA.Main.CA8.9.1)
(June 14, 2019) E-mail from James Beardmore (CA.Main.CA8.9.2)
(June 17, 2019) E-mail from Michael Ranic (CA.Main.CA8.9.3)

Economic and Community Development Committee - Meeting 6

EC6.4 - Children's Services - 2019 Provincial and Federal Budgets

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication EC6.4.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Province to adjust the process regarding school-based child care capital projects that have not received Approval to Proceed (ATP) from the Ministry of Education by:

 

a.  taking into consideration municipal annual budget approval requirements and allowing municipal councils the opportunity to consider and approve any operating and financial impacts associated with these new capital projects; and,

 

b.  extending the deadline of August 30, 2019 to at least October 31, 2019 for service system managers and school boards to jointly confirm priority school-based child care capital projects on a preliminary basis subject to a municipal council's annual budget approval process.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Economic and Community Development Committee:

 

1.  Directed the General Manager, Children's Services to:

 

a.  Report to the September 5, 2019 Economic and Community Development Committee meeting with background and a status update on conversations with the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) regarding EarlyON programs in TDSB facilities.

 

b.  Report to the October 16, 2019 Economic and Community Development Committee meeting with potential service impacts of Provincial funding changes, and an update on any ongoing conversations or additional communications with the Provincial Government.

Origin

(June 20, 2019) Report from Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services

Summary

This report responds to a request arising from City Council's approval of the 2019 Operating Budget for Children's Services, for the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services to report to the Economic and Community Development Committee following the release of the 2019 provincial and federal budgets.

 

This report also provides information on an April 26, 2019 memo from the Ministry of Education to child care and early years service system managers and school boards requesting joint confirmation that school-based child care capital projects proposed since November 2016 can proceed.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 20, 2019) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services on Children's Services - 2019 Provincial and Federal Budgets
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-135207.pdf
(June 11, 2019) Report from the Interim General Manager, Children's Services on Children's Services Report on 2019 Provincial and Federal Budgets - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134418.pdf

Speakers

Carolyn Ferns, Ontario Coalition for Better Child Care

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from Cameron MacLeod (CC.Supp.EC6.4.1)

EC6.5 - Termination of Occupancy Agreements with School Boards

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the General Manager, Children's Services to identify resources to continue funding the occupancy agreements with School Boards from January 1, 2020 until 2020 budget approval, in order to allow the matter to be considered as part of the 2020 Budget Process.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Interim General Manager, Children's Services

Summary

The report responds to a requirement for the General Manager, Children's Services to notify the four participating school boards in August, 2019 of the City's intention to terminate occupancy agreements effective January 1, 2020.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Interim General Manager, Children's Services on Termination of Occupancy Agreements with School Boards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134419.pdf

Speakers

Amy O'Neil, Treetop Children's Centre
Jane Mercer, Toronto Coalition for Better Child Care

Communications (Committee)

(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Bill Sinclair, St. Stephen's Community House (EC.New.6.5.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/comm/communicationfile-95696.pdf

EC6.6 - Appointments to Uptown Yonge Business Improvement Area Board of Management

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 15 - Don Valley West

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council in accordance with the City's Public Appointments Policy, appoint the following nominees to the Business Improvement Area (BIA) Boards of Management set out below at the pleasure of Council, and for a term expiring at the end of the term of Council or as soon thereafter as successors are appointed:

 

            Uptown Yonge:

            Adams, Derrick

            Beattie, Gordon

            Bhalla, Amar

            Cutruzzola, Adriana

            Jubb, David O.

            Kiratzis, Karen

            Mazelow, Alex

            Moretti, Angelo

            Nanoff, Alex

            Trabelsi, Ramzey

            Vargas, Jaime


2.  City Council direct that Schedule A of the Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, be amended by changing the number of directors of the following Boards of Management:

 

            Uptown Yonge                     14

Origin

(February 14, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to appoint directors to the Uptown Yonge Board of Management for the new term of Council and make necessary changes to Schedule A of the Municipal Code, Chapter 19.  Uptown Yonge BIA falls within two Community Council boundaries.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 14, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Appointments to Business Improvement Area Boards of Management
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-131583.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(March 4, 2019) Letter from Councillor Jaye Robinson and Councillor Mike Colle (EC.Main.EC6.6.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/comm/communicationfile-93304.pdf
(April 1, 2019) Letter from Board-elect, Uptown Yonge BIA (EC.Main.EC6.6.2)

6a - Additional Information on Appointments to Business Improvement Area Boards of Management (Uptown Yonge BIA)

Origin
(June 24, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture
Summary

Based on the interviews and information provided to him, the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture has no information that would lead him to question the validity of the Uptown Yonge BIA's most recent Annual General Meeting (AGM) election results or to suggest any alternate course of action different from that recommended in the Report.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 24, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Additional Information on Appointments to Business Improvement Area Boards of Management (Uptown Yonge BIA)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-135336.pdf

EC6.7 - Removal of Director from the Mount Pleasant Village Business Improvement Area Board of Management

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 15 - Don Valley West

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council in accordance with the City's Public Appointments Policy, remove the following director from the Mount Pleasant Village Business Improvement Area (BIA) board of management set out below:

 

            -  Morris, Rick

Origin

(June 3, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to remove one director from the Mount Pleasant Village Business Improvement Area (BIA) Board of Management.  The Mount Pleasant Village BIA falls within two Community Council boundaries.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Appointments to Business Improvement Area Board of Management (Mount Pleasant Village BIA)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134466.pdf

EC6.8 - Strengthening Toronto's Nighttime Economy

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication EC6.8.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Mayor to designate a Member of Council as Toronto's Night Ambassador, to be the voice for Toronto's entertainment-related activities for the 2018 to 2022 term of Council.

 

2.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to:

 

a.  Report to the Economic and Community Development Committee on the key priorities of a nighttime operations working group that consists of invited participation from senior staff in Municipal Licensing and Standards, City Planning, Transportation Services and other relevant City divisions in 2020;

 

b.  Report to the Economic and Community Development Committee on advice from nightlife and creative sector for-profit and not-for-profit enterprises, do-it-yourself event organizers, and equity-seeking groups such as youth, women and LGBTQ2S on best practices to enhance inclusive social culture across Toronto at night in 2020;

 

c.  Pilot an arts event permit to host pop up performances in unconventional spaces working with the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and other appropriate City divisions; and

 

d.  Organize a free annual Toronto Nightlife Industry Town Hall with the private sector and community partners within a year, and annually thereafter, to help set priorities.

 

3.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and other relevant City divisions to work with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to align the review of zoning and business licensing regulations to clarify the requirements for venues regularly presenting live music, and report to the Economic and Community Development Committee and the Planning and Housing Committee, as appropriate, in 2020.

 

4.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to work with the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, other relevant City divisions, Toronto nightlife leaders and residents to:

 

a.  Develop a safer venue industry guide that incorporates safer spaces best practices, information on responsible consumption and safe working environments; and

 

b.  Develop a list of good neighbour principles for late-night businesses based on best practices around the world and adapted for Toronto.

 

5.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to work with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to identify emerging entertainment areas outside the downtown core that can support entertainment uses at night and the future growth of nightlife in Toronto and report to the Planning and Housing Committee on potential opportunities and approaches in 2020.

 

6.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to work with the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with relevant stakeholders, to explore the opportunities for additional transportation options specific to the nighttime economy and report to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in 2020.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The phrase “nighttime economy” describes the social, cultural and economic activities that take place between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m. in the city. A key component of the nighttime economy is nightlife – which refers to entertainment-related activities. Toronto has a safe and lively nightlife that has the potential to grow, and the purpose of this report is to seek the necessary authority to implement the proposed actions of the Toronto Nightlife Action Plan, presented in Attachment 1. If approved, the actions will strengthen Toronto's nightlife over the next three years, using, and in some cases re-aligning, existing City resources.

 

The nighttime economy is the new competitive edge for post-industrial cities. Yet the nighttime economy is often overlooked in municipal economic and infrastructure planning. As a result of market forces and municipal policies, Toronto's nighttime culture is under threat from increasing business costs and regulatory challenges. This is not a unique problem. World-class cities like Amsterdam, New York, Berlin, Paris and Sydney are facing similar challenges and are actively taking steps to plan, protect and create nighttime activities. Their approach is based on the view that a vibrant nightlife attracts young, creative and talented people. Music, fashion, film, literature, visual arts and performing arts all thrive during the nighttime.

 

This report also addresses issues around the do-it-yourself (DIY) pop up music venues challenges (Attachment 2) and findings from an assessment of two hospitality zones in the city conducted by the Responsible Hospitality Institute (RHI) (Attachment 3).

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2019) Report from General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Strengthening Toronto's Nighttime Economy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134446.pdf
Attachment 1 - Toronto Nightlife Action Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134955.pdf
Attachment 2 - DIY Events in Toronto: Understanding Challenges to Access and Space
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134956.pdf
Attachment 3 - Toronto Sociable City at Night: Hospitality Zone Assessment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134957.pdf

Speakers

Tracy Jenkins, Lula Lounge / Lula Music and Arts Centre
Patiente Evbagharu, Youth Toronto
Councillor Paul Ainslie
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Communications (City Council)

(July 16, 2019) Letter from Councillor Brad Bradford, Ward 19, Beaches-East York (CC.New.EC6.8.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96152.pdf

EC6.10 - 2019-20 Funding Allocations for Shelter and Related Services

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication EC6.10.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council approve the recommended 2019 bed capacities and annual funding allocations as set out in Appendix A to the report (June 11, 2019) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, which are in accordance with the 2019 Approved Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration.

 

2.  City Council approve the recommended 2020 bed capacities and annual funding allocations as set out in Appendix A to the report (June 11, 2019) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, subject to approval of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration's 2020 Operating Budget.

 

3.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, or her designate to:

 

a.  enter into agreements with community agencies for the provision of shelter services for up to the annual funding allocation as outlined in Appendix A to the report (June 11, 2019) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, or up to the total approved in the 2019 Operating Budget for SSHA, as may be required, and subject to approval of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration's 2020 Operating Budget;

 

b.  enter into an agreement with the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care to receive $9.214 million annually in 2019 and 2020 for the provision of housing and supports for psychiatric consumer survivors living in Habitat Services contracted boarding or rooming houses, as approved in Shelter, Support and Housing Administration's 2019 Operating Budget and subject to approval of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration's 2020 Operating Budget;

 

c.  enter into an agreement with Mental Health Program Services of Metropolitan Toronto (Habitat Services) and issue payments up to $11.099 million gross and $1.885 million net in 2019 and $11.099 million gross and $2.220 million net in 2020 for the provision of housing and supports for psychiatric consumer survivors living in Habitat Services contracted boarding or rooming houses as outlined in Appendix B to the report (June 11, 2019) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, subject to approval of SSHA's 2020 Operating Budget;

 

d.  enter into an agreement with, and issue payments to the Toronto Hostels Training Centre (THTC) for the administration and provision of training for shelter, drop-in and other agency staff up to a maximum amount of $0.271 million gross and $0.135 million net in 2019 and 2020, as outlined in Appendix B to the report (June 11, 2019) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, subject to approval of SSHA's 2020 Operating Budget.

 

4.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, or her designate to:

 

a.  enter into agreements with Mental Health Program Services of Metropolitan Toronto (Habitat Services) and to issue payments up to $0.490 million gross and net in 2019 and $1.358 million gross and net in 2020 for the provision of housing and supports for psychiatric consumer survivors living in Habitat Services contracted boarding or rooming houses for the George Street Revitalization initiative as outlined in Appendix C to the report (June 11, 2019) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, subject to approval of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration's 2020 Operating Budget; and

 

b.  enter into agreements with community agencies on such terms and conditions as are satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration for the provision of shelter services or housing for George Street Revitalization throughout 2019 and 2020, as shelter or housing sites are identified and as shelter operators are identified through a competitive process.

 

5.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, or her designate, in support of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration's efforts to open 1000 beds, to:

 

a.  enter into agreements with community agencies for the provision of shelter services for up to the annual funding allocation as outlined in Appendix C to the report (June 11, 2019) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, or up to the total approved in the 2019 Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, as may be required, and subject to approval of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration's 2020 Operating Budget; and

 

b.  enter into agreements with community agencies on such terms and conditions as are satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration for the provision of shelter services to open 1000 new beds throughout 2019 and 2020, as shelter sites are identified and as shelter operators are identified through a competitive process.

 

6.  City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services to approve, execute and administer any licence or sublease agreements with a service provider of City owned or leased respite, emergency shelter, or transitional shelter space at less than market value, for a term that corresponds with the applicable operating agreement, and on such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Director, Real Estate Services, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(June 11, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

The City of Toronto's Shelter, Support and Housing Administration division (SSHA) provides funding to 56 shelter sites operated by 32 community not-for-profit agencies through purchase of service contracts. All programs must meet the operating requirements set out in both the Toronto Shelter Standards (TSS) and the purchase of service contracts, and the programs are evaluated using a quality assurance review process.

 

This report provides recommendations on the 2019 and 2020 funding allocations for the purchase of service shelter system and funding levels for other related operating contracts, and requests authority to enter into licence or sub-lease agreements with service providers for provision of shelter and related services.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on 2019-20 Funding Allocations for Shelter and Related Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134574.pdf
Appendices A to C
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134575.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from N. Corrado (CC.Supp.EC6.10.1)

EC6.11 - Amendments to Purchase Orders 6048571, 6045120, 6045121, and 6048213 for Emergency Hotel/Motel Accommodation and Recommendation to Award Request for Proposal No. 6815-18-7217 Short Term Hotel/Motel Accommodations for Shelter Clients

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to negotiate and enter into six (6) agreements with the six (6) successful proponents having met all the requirements set out in Request for Proposal 6815-18-7217 for the Provision of Short Term Accommodations for Shelter Clients through the use of Hotel/motel Services for Operated Shelters, on terms and conditions set out in the Request for Proposal and satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and in a form satisfactory with the City Solicitor, as follows:

 

a.  73719 Newfoundland and Labrador Inc., for an initial term of one year from the date of award in in the amount of $8,600,000 excluding all taxes ($8,751,360 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), with the option to renew for four additional separate one-year periods in the amount of $8,600,000 excluding all taxes ($8,751,360 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), for a total contract value of $43,000,000 excluding all taxes ($43,756,800 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries);

 

b.  Om Tatsat Inc. (New Plaza Motel), for an initial term of one year from the date of award in the amount of $2,700,000 excluding all taxes ($2,747,520 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), with the option to renew for four additional separate one-year periods in the amount of $2,700,000 excluding all taxes ($2,747,520 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), for a total contract value of $13,500,000 excluding all taxes ($13,737,600 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries);

 

c.  InnVest Hotels LP a/o Comfort Inn Pickering, for an initial term of one year from the date of award in the amount of $13,500,000 excluding all taxes ($13,737,600 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), with the option to renew for four additional separate one-year periods in the amount of $13,500,000 excluding all taxes ($13,737,600 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), for a total contract value of $67,500,000 excluding all taxes ($68,688,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries);

 

d.  InnVest Hotels LP a/o Comfort Inn Newmarket, for an initial term of one year from the date of award in the amount of $9,600,000 excluding all taxes ($9,768,960 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), with the option to renew for four additional separate one-year periods in the amount of $9,600,000 excluding all taxes ($9,768,960 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), for a total contract value of $48,000,000 excluding all taxes ($48,844,800 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries);

 

e.  2361173 Ontario Inc. (Sunray Group of Hotels) for an initial term of one year from the date of award in the amount of $53,800,000 excluding all taxes ($54,746,880 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), with the option to renew for four additional separate one-year periods in the amount of $53,800,000 excluding all taxes ($54,746,880 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), for a total contract value of $269,000,000 excluding all taxes ($273,734,400 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries); and

 

f.  2656601 Ontario Inc. (Toronto Plaza Hotel & Conference Centre Toronto Airport), for an initial term of one year from the date of award in the amount of $20,100,000 excluding all taxes ($20,453,760 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), with the option to renew for four additional separate one-year periods in the amount of $20,100,000 excluding all taxes ($20,453,760 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), for a total contract value of $100,500,000 excluding all taxes ($102,268,800 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries).

Origin

(June 11, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and the Chief Purchasing Officer

Summary

This report is to obtain City Council's authority to award Request for Proposal No. 6815-18-7217 for the provision of Short Term Accommodations for shelter clients through the use of hotel/motel services for operated shelters for the period of one (1) year from date of award with the option to renew the contract for an additional four (4) separate one (1) year periods  for a total award of  $541.5 million net of all applicable taxes, $611.9 million including HST and all applicable charges and $551.0 million net of HST recoveries.   Should the option(s) be exercised, then the General Manager of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration will request the Chief Purchasing Officer to process the renewals under the same terms and conditions.

 

Refer to Appendix A for the breakdown of the total value of award for each of the recommended six (6) proponents. 

 

Further, this report advises City Council, pursuant to Chapter 195 of the Toronto Municipal Code (Purchasing By-Law Section 195-7.4), of the related emergency amendments that were processed on four (4) existing non-competitive Purchase Orders.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2019) Report and Appendix A from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and the Chief Purchasing Officer on Amendments to Purchase Orders 6048571, 6045120, 6045121, and 6048213 for Emergency Hotel/Motel Accommodation and Recommendation to Award Request for Proposal No. 6815-18-7217 Short Term Hotel/Motel Accommodations for Shelter Clients
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134583.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Sam Chaise, Christie Refugee Welcome Centre, Anne Woolger, Matthew House Reception Services, Jenn McIntyre, Romero House and Laura Dobrowolski, Silas Hill Home for Refugees (EC.New.EC6.11.1)

EC6.12 - City of Toronto Community Safety and Wellbeing Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication EC6.12.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, to enter into an agreement with the Ministry of the Attorney General to receive funding of up to $150,000.00, and to spend such funding to support the implementation of Justice Centres in the downtown east and north-west areas of Toronto.

Origin

(June 12, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development Finance and Administration

Summary

On March 26, 2019, the Ontario Government's Comprehensive Ontario Police Services Act, 2019, or Bill 68, received royal assent.  Bill 68 amends policing legislation in the province including the Police Services Act which will eventually be replaced by the new Community Safety and Policing Act, 2019. 

 

The Community Safety and Policing Act, 2019 will, when it comes into force, mandate community safety and well-being planning from local municipalities.  Such a requirement already exists under the Police Services Act, but Bill 68 will amend the legislative provisions that apply to the City. Under Bill 68, the City of Toronto will be required to develop and adopt a Community Safety and Well-Being Plan, working in partnership with a multi-sectoral advisory committee. Additional requirements are also outlined in Bill 68 pertaining to conducting consultations, risk analysis, actions to mitigate those risks, monitoring, evaluating, reporting and publishing the plan. Through the Community Safety and Well-Being Plan, the City of Toronto will take a leadership role in defining and addressing priority risks in the community through proactive, integrated strategies that ensure vulnerable populations receive the help they need from the providers best suited to support them.

 

This report outlines the approach the City will use to develop a Community and Safety Well-Being Plan that fulfills the obligations under Bill 68 and support community safety and wellbeing across the city.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 12, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development Finance and Administration on City of Toronto Community Safety and Wellbeing Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134598.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from N. Corrado (CC.Supp.EC6.12.1)

EC6.13 - Toronto Action Plan to Confront Anti-Black Racism - Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the report (June 12, 2019) from the Executive Director, Social Development Finance and Administration for information.

Origin

(June 12, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

In December 2017, City Council unanimously adopted the Toronto Action Plan to Confront Anti-Black Racism, which contained 80 actions and 22 recommendations for City staff to implement to address anti-Black racism in Toronto.

 

Anti-Black racism is a historic, pervasive, and systemic issue in Toronto. Anti-Black racism includes policies and practices embedded in Canadian institutions that reflect and reinforce beliefs, attitudes, prejudice, stereotyping and/or discrimination that is directed at people of African descent and is rooted in their unique history and experience of enslavement and colonization here in Canada.

 

The legacy of anti-Black racism lies in the current social, economic, and political marginalization of Torontonians of African descent. It is experienced as a lack of opportunity, poor health and mental health outcomes, poor education outcomes, higher rates of precarious employment and unemployment, significant poverty, and overrepresentation in the criminal justice, mental health, and child welfare systems.

 

The Toronto Action Plan to Confront Anti-Black Racism is the result of a collaborative effort between the City of Toronto and Torontonians of African descent to take corrective action that addresses anti-Black racism in the most diverse city in the world.

This report is recommended to be received for information and includes:  

 

-  A progress update on key priority areas in Year One (May 2018 to April 2019) of the Action Plan led by the Confronting Anti-Black Racism Unit with further details provided in Appendix A.
-  This report outlines some of the key learnings, challenges and opportunities identified in efforts to address anti-Black racism in Year One. 
-  A report on the Year One work plan compiled by the Partnership and Accountability Circle composed of 12 Toronto residents is attached in Appendix B.
-  Year Two (May 2019 to April 2020) priorities are outlined in Appendix C.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 12, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, of Social Development, Finance and Administration on Update on Toronto Action Plan to Confront Anti-Black Racism
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134609.pdf
Appendix A - Year One Work Plan Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134610.pdf
Appendix B - Partnership And Accountability Circle Report on Year One
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134611.pdf
Appendix C - Year Two Work Plan Priorities
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134612.pdf
Appendix D: Black Population Percentage, City of Toronto 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134613.pdf
Appendix E - Resources List of Major Reports
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134614.pdf

Speakers

Amanuel Melles, Network for the Advancement of Black Communities
Hodan Ahmed Mohamed
Wesley Crichlow, Partnership Accountability Circle
Verlia Stephens, Sherbourne Health
Nathan Baya, Black Creek Community Centre
Paul Dunn, Black Creek Community Health Centre
Keosha Dwyer, Delta Family Resource Centre
Winston W. LaRose, Jane Finch Concerned Citizens Organization
Zakaria Abdulle
Yao Togobo, Centre For Young Black Professionals
Stephanie Lynch, Centre For Young Black Professionals
Jordan Thorne, Centre For Young Black Professionals
Ishon Singh, Centre For Young Black Professionals
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Communications (Committee)

(June 26, 2019) Letter from Nana Yanful, Black Legal Action Centre (BLAC) (EC.New.EC6.13.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/comm/communicationfile-95720.pdf

EC6.15 - Community Benefits Framework

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EC6.15a for information)

Communications EC6.15.5 to EC6.15.9 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the Guiding Principle on Achieving Accountability in Attachment 1 to the report (June 11, 2019) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to read as follows:

 

"3. Achieve Accountability. The City of Toronto's community benefits processes will be consistent, transparent, and accountable to its stakeholders. Community benefits initiatives will establish hard targets, and report on outcomes."

 

2.  City Council adopt the Community Benefits Framework Goal and Principles, and Implementation Plan as set out in Attachment 1 to the report (June 11, 2019) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, as amended by Recommendation 1.

 
3.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, to submit a budget proposal in the 2020 budget process for 1.0 Full Time Equivalent to support the Community Benefits Framework.

 
4.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services, and General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to convene a Community Benefits Advisory Group, with consideration for stakeholder membership categories as set out in Attachment 2 to the report (June 11, 2019) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration. 

 
5.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to report back to Economic and Community Development Committee in the first quarter of 2022 with a status update on the Community Benefits Framework Implementation Plan, and recommendations for Community Benefits Framework future direction.

 

6.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, Chief Purchasing Official, Purchasing and Materials Management Division, General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services, in collaboration with the Community Benefits Coordinator, to provide data required to report annually starting in 2019 and going forward, on City of Toronto community benefits targets and/or achievements on a project by project basis where possible, to be published on a City webpage by year-end 2019, and with consideration for aligning with an open data approach.

  

7.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, through the Community Benefits Coordinator, to support, as resources allow, any community benefits initiatives that may fall outside the focus of the Implementation Plan but are consistent with the guiding principles of the Community Benefits Framework, including private developments on privately-owned land where community groups and developers are both willing to enter into exploratory discussions.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Economic and Community Development Committee:

 

1.  Requested the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to report directly to the July 16 and 17, 2019 City Council meeting to provide additional information on where community benefits hard targets would apply within the proposed community benefits framework.

Origin

(June 11, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

 

Toronto is a prosperous economic engine of the region and country, yet it also suffers from high rates of poverty, growing income inequality, and a rise in precarious work[1]. Youth, immigrants, racialized people and women are particularly disadvantaged, and face significant barriers to opportunity[2]. The Community Benefits Framework responds to these social and economic conditions by utilizing City community benefits levers to create targeted hiring and training opportunities, provide economic opportunities, reduce poverty, and support community priorities among Indigenous peoples and equity-seeking groups in Toronto. 

 

Community benefits processes offer a way for government and other institutions to multiply the impact of their spending. Community benefits can be leveraged by infrastructure projects that are funded through City procurement processes, or incentivized by the City. In this report, community benefits outcomes are focussed on: 1) inclusive workforce development, 2) supply chain diversity, and 3) other community-identified priorities. At this time, it is not recommended that the Community Benefits Framework apply to private developments although, Economic Development and Culture Division has recently recommended a pilot program be implemented, which would further encourage community benefits activities through private development projects that receive grants[3].

 

The community benefits concept has gained significant attention at the City of Toronto. City Divisions, Agencies, and Corporations increasingly seek guidance and subject-matter expertise on how to integrate community benefits into their programs and projects.

 

The Community Benefits Framework sets out a clear goal, guiding principles, and implementation plan, which will build the City of Toronto's capacity to create and implement community benefits opportunities within City programs and projects.

 

To maximize the impact of community benefit initiatives and facilitate simple and efficient implementation, the Community Benefits Framework intends to bring the City's community benefits initiatives under a common umbrella to: 1) achieve better coordination across initiatives, 2) implement consistent approaches, 3) support community engagement, and 4) develop a data tracking system to monitor outcomes.

 

The Community Benefits Framework will not replace the existing administrative role of Divisional programs. Community benefits initiatives will continue to be administered and maintained through respective City Divisions, Agencies, and Corporations.

 

The recommendations in this report support the City of Toronto to maximize the social and economic impacts of community benefits initiatives when it buys, builds, or provides financial incentives for construction or remediation. 

 
[1] United Way Greater Toronto. 2019. Rebalancing the Opportunity Equation. https://unitedwaygt.org/file/2019_OE_fullreport_FINAL.pdf
[2] Ibid.
[3] EC5.13 Improving the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Local Employment Requirement

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2019.EC5.13 

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2019) Report and Attachments 1 to 6 from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Community Benefits Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134595.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 11, 2019) Supplementary report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Community Benefits Framework and Hard Targets (EC6.15a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135947.pdf

Speakers

Nation Cheong, United Way Greater Toronto
Patrick McManus, Ontario Sewer and Watermain Construction Association
Heather Marshall, Toronto Environmental Alliance
Ana Teresa Portillo, Parkdale People’s Economy
Rick Ciccarelli, Mount Dennis Community Association
Rosemarie Powell, Toronto Community Benefits Network
Kumsa Baker, Toronto Community Benefits Network
Ahmed Abdi
Mamadou Bah, Toronto Community Benefits Network
Anthony Tubbs, Liuna Local 183
Mercedes Sharpe Zayas, Parkdale People’s Economy
Erinn Burke, Jane Finch Centre
Ameen Binwalee, Out of the Box Social Enterprise

Communications (Committee)

(June 26, 2019) Letter from Richard M. De Gaetano (EC.New.EC6.15.1)
(June 26, 2019) Letter from Heather Marshall, Toronto Environmental Alliance (EC.New.EC6.15.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/comm/communicationfile-95735.pdf
(June 26, 2019) Submission from Toronto Community Benefits Network - 2018 Annual Report (EC.New.EC6.15.3)
(June 26, 2019) Submission from Erinn Burke (EC.New.EC6.15.4)

Communications (City Council)

(July 12, 2019) Submission from Ushnish Sengupta (CC.Supp.EC6.15.5)
(July 12, 2019) Letter from Mohammed Hashim, Senior Organizer, Toronto and York Region Labour Council (CC.Supp.EC6.15.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96088.pdf
(July 15, 2019) Letter from Debbie Douglas, Executive Director, Ontario Council of Agencies Serving Immigrants (CC.New.EC6.15.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96137.pdf
(July 16, 2019) Letter from Troy Budhu and Tamara Jeremie, Co-Chairs, Economic Opportunities Action Group of Jane Finch TSNS Task Force (CC.New.EC6.15.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96138.pdf
(July 15, 2019) Letter from Rosemarie Powell, Executive Director, Toronto Community Benefits Network (CC.New.EC6.15.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96165.pdf

EC6.16 - Downtown East 2023 Five-Year Action Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
Communications EC6.16.5 to EC6.16.11 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.    City Council amend the Downtown East 5 year Action Plan and Work Plan, outlined as Attachments 3 and 4 to the report (June 12, 2019) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, to include the following actions and deliverables:

 

a. Expand Action 1.0 to include the establishment of a morning and afternoon cleaning schedule for the public realm on the Dundas Street and Victoria Street frontages of the Works at 277 Victoria Street no later than the start of the third quarter 2019, including a plan to address community members’ discarded belongings that may have been forgotten or misplaced.

 

b. In addition to the continuation of outreach services in Action 3.0, the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration review service gaps and identify resource requirements, to be submitted through the 2020 Budget Process, in order to ensure regular outreach is taking place at Ryerson University and in priority hotspots in the Garden District and Moss Park neighbourhoods.

 

c.  The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration work with the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and other applicable Divisions to assess the scale and type of operations taking place at City-funded community agencies as part of Action 2.4, the Sherbourne Corridor Coordinated Plan; and report back in the fourth quarter 2019 with recommendations on programming, funding, collaboration and enforcement actions necessary to maintain a clear and safe pedestrian thoroughfare on both sides of Sherbourne Street and Dundas Street at all times of day.

 

d.  The Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards investigate all vacant buildings in the Downtown East area that they are made aware of to confirm compliance with the applicable municipal bylaws.

 
e.  The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration publish key health indicators bi-annually for the Downtown East catchment area, including City-wide availability of addiction treatment services and rehabilitation spots for those seeking assistance, supportive housing waitlist times, and DTE specific rates of overdoses, the number of individuals sleeping on streets or in shelters who have been successfully housed, sharps collection data, and other relevant statistics.

 

f.  The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration consult with residents in the Moss Park neighbourhood on the need for additional Toronto Police Service Community Officer positions.

 

g.  Expand Action 3.3, Mental Health Capacity Building, to request the Executive Director, Social Development Finance and Administration to work with the Medical Officer of Health, to:

 

1.  Include an exploration of options to convene a mental health and addictions round table with the federal and provincial government, including participation from community partners, that would meet quarterly and provide a focused opportunity to discuss successes and service gaps in communities like the Downtown East which can be addressed through deeper collaboration and program changes.

 

2.  Based on the round table discussions, develop a report detailing the policy changes required for those experiencing mental health or addiction crises to obtain robust supports and housing solutions appropriate to their long-term wellbeing.

 

h.  The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, work with the Medical Officer of Health to review the existing literature to determine the possible health impacts of surviving an overdose including a review of the health and addiction services available to survivors.  This review will include data on overdose reversals estimated through the use of existing paramedic naloxone administration data, data from the existing supervised consumption services on overdose reversals and TPH naloxone distribution data.

 

i.  The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration ensure ongoing consultation with neighbours and resident groups in the Dundas-Sherbourne corridor to identify key health and safety concerns for interdivisional and coordinated responses.

 

j.  As per Action 3.1, Monitoring Toronto Respite Site Standards, the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration continue monthly inspection of respite sites to ensure that they are meeting City standards and providing for the health and safety needs of service users.

 

k.  The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration include resident and business associations' feedback as part of the measures of success for the Action Plan.

 

2.  City Council adopt, as amended by Recommendation 1, the Downtown East 5 year Action Plan and Work Plan, outlined as Attachments 3 and 4 to the report (June 12, 2019) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to include the staffing and resources needed to implement the Work Plan as part of the 2020 Budget Process.

 

3. City Council direct the Executive Director of Social Development, Finance and Administration to submit a new and enhanced 2020 budget proposal to support the implementation of the actions of the Work Plan.

 

4. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to enter into any agreements with third party partners integral to implementing these recommendations, within the resources in the approved operating budget, upon terms satisfactory to them, and in forms and terms satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to support implementation of the Downtown East Action Plan, as required.

 

5.  City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to review the current response to safety and noise concerns in the Sherbourne Corridor and Moss Park areas and identify resource requirements to respond.

 

6. City Council request the Provincial and Federal Government to work with the City to support actions to address the urgent need for enhanced access to supportive housing, rapid mental health crisis supports, and a continuum of substance use treatment and overdose prevention outlined in the Toronto Drug Strategy and collaborate with City staff to advance the outcomes of the Downtown East Action Plan.

Origin

(June 12, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

In its consideration of CD29.5, Closing the Service Gap in the Downtown East Revitalization Area, City Council requested the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to report back to the Economic and Community Development Committee in the second quarter of 2019 on a comprehensive five-year Action Plan to coordinate City services and address long term community needs in the Downtown East area. The Downtown East area is bounded by Bloor Street on the north, Front Street on the south, Bay Street on the west, and the Don Valley Parkway on the east, including an expansion up to 21 Park Rd, north of Bloor due to the respite site at that location. Needs in the area include many issues that require collaboration between sectors and across governments such as supportive housing, crisis intervention, services for all community members including people who are homeless and actions to address safety concerns in the area.

 

This report provides a summary of the outcomes of the enhanced 12-month Action Plan, an 18 month Work Plan for the next phase of the five year Action Plan and a proposed framework for measuring success.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 12, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Downtown East 2023 Five Year Action Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134601.pdf
Attachment 1 - Summary of Key Consultations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134602.pdf
Revised - Attachment 2 - 12 Month Action Plan Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-135442.pdf
Attachment 2 - 12 Month Action Plan Summary
Attachment 3 - Downtown East 2023 Action Plan Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134604.pdf
Attachment 4 - Downtown East Action Plan Work Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134884.pdf

Speakers

Alison Falby, All-Saints Church-Community Centre
Christopher Brosky
Lucas Granger, University of Toronto Students’ Union
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Communications (Committee)

(June 24, 2019) Letter from Jessica Hales, Ontario Coalition Against Poverty (EC.New.EC6.16.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/comm/communicationfile-95686.pdf
(June 25, 2019) Letter from Cathy Crowe (EC.New.6.16.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/comm/communicationfile-95694.pdf
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from John W. Dimon (EC.New.EC6.16.3)
(June 26, 2019) Letter from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam (EC.New.EC6.16.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/comm/communicationfile-95728.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 7, 2019) E-mail from Anna Marie Leonard (CC.Main.EC6.16.5)
(July 11, 2019) Letter from Deborah Brown, Vice President, Administration and Operations, Ryerson University (CC.Supp.EC6.16.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96045.pdf
(July 12, 2019) Letter from Connie Langille, Chair, Church Wellesley Neighbourhood Association (CC.New.EC6.16.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96134.pdf
(July 15, 2019) E-mail from Dee Lewis, President, Winchester Park Residents' Association (CC.New.EC6.16.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96108.pdf
(July 15, 2019) Letter from Andrew Thomson, Chief of Government Relations, University of Toronto (CC.New.EC6.16.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96111.pdf
(July 16, 2019) Letter from Lucas Granger, Vice-President External Affairs, University of Toronto Students' Union, Submitted by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Ward 13, Toronto-Centre (CC.New.EC6.16.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96174.pdf
(July 16, 2019) Letter from Diana McNally, Training and Engagement Co-ordinator, The Toronto Drop-in Network (CC.New.EC6.16.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96151.pdf

EC6.17 - Downtown West Services and Facilities Review Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and in consultation with other divisions as needed, as an interdivisional working group, to implement the workplan referenced in Attachment 1 to the report (June 11, 2019) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration for the coordinated review of current City of Toronto community uses and facilities in the Downtown West area against the current and projected needs and report to the Economic and Community Development Committee with a comprehensive strategy in the second quarter of 2020.

 

2.  City Council request the Executive Director Social Development Finance and Administration to establish a working group composed of lead staff from Alexandra Park Community Centre, Cecil Street Community Centre, Scadding Court Community Centre, University Settlement House, and Yonge Street Mission, to work with the interdivisional working group set out in Recommendation 1, to implement the Downtown West Service Review Workplan.

 

3.  City Council authorize the interdivisional working group to undertake an expedited review of Alexandra Park Community Centre, Cecil Community Centre, Harrison Pool, University Settlement House, and Scadding Court Community Centre, that are identified in this report as the "priority sites" and report back as needed on sites that require capital work, and/or service changes to optimize services.

 

4.  City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to create and administer a migration plan for programs and resources for the programs at Cecil Community Centre to other locations in the catchment in consultation with the local Councillors, stakeholders and the community to accommodate the temporary closure of the facility for required facility upgrades.

Origin

(June 11, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

This report is in response to direction from the Community Development and Recreation Committee to conduct a review of the City of Toronto community facilities, and identified needs in the Downtown West area. Downtown West is an area that is bounded by Bay Street to the east, College Street to the north, Adelaide Ave West to the south, and Bathurst Street to the west. This area has experienced significant growth and demographic change in recent years which is expected to continue through 2041.

 

This report outlines a workplan for a coordinated interdivisional response to several directions from Committees and Council for the area. The intent of this work is to address current and future service needs of the area and optimize the utility of existing community facilities and City-owned assets. This interdivisional workplan establishes a framework to jointly align divisional interests and advance priority projects to enhance the utilization and delivery of community services in the Downtown West.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Downtown West Services and Facilities Review Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134593.pdf

EC6.18 - Implementing the Regent Park Social Development Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
Communications EC6.18.1 and EC6.18.2 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, to include a request in the 2020 budget submission for $0.085 million, 1 Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Community Development Worker to project manage the implementation of the Regent Park Social Development Plan.

 

2.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to review the proposed actions, services and programs in Attachment 1 to the report (June 13, 2019) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and report to the October 16, 2019 Economic and Community Development Committee meeting on priority actions and a strategy to resource these needs in time for consideration for the 2020 budget process.

Origin

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

The Revitalization of Regent Park in 2007 created a unique opportunity to transform Canada's largest social housing community to a mixed-housing community. A Social Development Plan was developed in addition to the Physical Development Plan to ensure social cohesion and social inclusion were prioritized. Ten years later in 2017, community partners recognized the need to update the original 75 recommendations of the Social Development Plan. The Refreshed Regent Park Social Development Plan document was developed through feedback received from consultations and workshops attended by residents, organizations, City divisions, and social service agencies held in 2017 and 2018. 

 

In early 2019 community partners supported by the City of Toronto and Toronto Community Housing Corporation relaunched the Regent Park Social Development Plan Stakeholders Table.  The Stakeholders Table is the primary partnership vehicle for the implementation of the Refreshed Regent Park Social Development Plan. The Stakeholders table began a process to recruit resident and community service partner leaders to identify specific actions for implementation based on the recommendations of the Refreshed Regent Park Social Development Plan. A number of community partners including the Regent Park Neighbourhood Association and The Regent Park Executive Directors Network have asked the City to support the resourcing of the Social Development Plan.

           

This report describes priority actions identified by local partners in Regent Park. The report will also identify the City resources required to support the ongoing coordination of the Social Development Plan through Phase 4 and 5 of the Regent Park Revitalization.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Implementing the Regent Park Social Development Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134594.pdf
Attachment 1 - Regent Park Social Development Plan Actions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134846.pdf

Speakers

Joel Klassen, Yonge Street Mission
Deany Peters
Ismail Afrah
Ina Labuschagne
Walied Khogali
Murwan Khogali
Sam Haque, Wise Media Inc
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from Miguel Avila-Velarde (CC.New.EC6.18.1)
(July 17, 2019) E-mail from Miguel Avila-Velarde (CC.New.EC6.18.2)

EC6.19 - Toronto Grants Policy: Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the Toronto Grants Policy, including the City of Toronto Grant Principles, outlined in Appendix A to the report (June 5, 2019) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration.

Origin

(June 5, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

Council directed staff to update the Toronto Grants Policy (2013) to reflect the City’s responsiveness to Indigenous Peoples and Equity, Diversity and Human Rights. http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2017.CD18.5 . The Toronto Grants Co-ordinating Committee, comprised of staff representatives from all of City of Toronto grant programs, has updated the Policy. The Toronto Grants Co-ordinating Committee also added an appendix to the Policy to reflect how the grant principles of openness, transparency and accountability will be reflected in the application of the Policy to City grant making activities. The Policy was informed by consultation with Indigenous organizations and those serving equity seeking groups. The policy is also supported with an implementation plan that includes staff training.

 

Grants are vital to the City of Toronto's ability to achieve its health, social, economic, environmental and cultural goals for its residents. City grants support a vibrant "for public benefit sector" that is responsive to community needs and builds resident leadership and civic engagement. City grants enable organizations to further leverage other financial and in-kind resources to respond to the needs of Torontonians.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 5, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Toronto Grants Policy: Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134596.pdf
Appendix A - City of Toronto Community Grants Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134597.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 25, 2019) Letter from Lindsay (Swooping Hawk) Kretschmer, Toronto Aboriginal Support Services Council TASSC (EC.New.EC6.19.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/comm/communicationfile-95719.pdf

EC6.20 - Community Services Partnership Renewal

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication EC6.20.3 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the Community Services Partnership framework as described in Appendix A to the report (June 11, 2019) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration .

 

2.  City Council approve the following appeals approach for the full Community Services Partnership funding application:

 

-  Appeals to the recommendations for funding presented to Council will only be accepted and considered in either of the following circumstances:


      -   If there is evidence to suggest that a person involved in the funding recommendation had a conflict of interest at any time during the granting process that has affected the grant recommendation;


       -  If there is evidence to suggest that there was a departure from the approved grant-making process outlined in the grant guidelines.


-  A recommendation to cease funding a particular program or agency will not, in and of itself be a basis for appeals.


-  There will be a process to submit and assess the request to appeal before the appeal is reviewed by an appeals panel. Appeals will be heard by a panel of residents, service users and city staff from divisions other than Social Development, Finance and Administration.
 

3.  City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to re-allocate the 2019-2022 Community Service Partnerships (Community Services Partnership) funds that are not used during the funding year by approved organizations to other Community Service Partnership approved organizations.

 

4.  City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to approve changes to funded programs for already Council approved agencies within each four year Community Services Partnership funding cycle where a demonstrated community need is being addressed.

 

5.  City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to re-allocate, or approve and disburse one-time Capacity Building grants.

 

6. City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to report back annually to the Economic and Community Development Committee on the grants approved through authority provided in recommendations 3, 4 and 5.

 

7. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to receive and allocate money received from other funders in support of capacity building projects approved through authority provided in recommendation 5 and to enter into agreements for the use of these funds.

 

8.  City Council, on a one-time basis, amend the Toronto Grants Policy, to permit the following organizations to submit an eligibility application to the Community Services Partnership no later than July 26, 2019:

 

a.  Scarborough Centre for Healthy Communities.

b.  Christie Ossington Neighbourhood Centre.

c.  New Canadian Community Centre.

d.  Armenian Relief Society, ARS Social.

e.  Canadian Hearing Society.

f.  Mood Disorders Association of Ontario & Toronto.

Origin

(June 11, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

This report describes the Community Services Partnership Renewal process which is only open to currently funded groups at their existing funding levels. Community Services Partnership provides $17.4M in funding to 187 groups across Toronto. The report recommends that Council approve the Community Services Partnership framework (Appendix A) which includes: the long term and short term outcomes that the funding supports agencies to achieve and a focus on serving vulnerable Torontonians. An appeals process is also recommended that outlines two circumstances in which applicants can appeal; where there is evidence of a conflict of interest or where staff have not followed the application process as outlined.

 

The report speaks to two other grant streams: Projects and Events and Capacity Building. The grant call for Projects and Events will focus two critical City priorities: 1) youth gun violence prevention, interruption and intervention; and, 2) actions developed by the community through Social Development Plans and Action Plans in four community revitalization neighbourhoods: Downtown East, Regent Park, Alexandra Park, and Lawrence Heights. With respect to capacity building, the report also notes several capacity building activities slated for 2019 that strengthen organizational capacity, build Black youth leadership and support Indigenous organizations

 

The report recommends that the Executive Director of Social Development Finance and Administration be authorized to make one-time grants in support of a range of capacity building activities and re-allocations within Community Services Partnership to respond to community needs.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Community Services Partnership Renewal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134589.pdf
Appendix A - Community Services Partnership Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134590.pdf
Appendix B - 2019 Community Service Partnership Allocations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134591.pdf
Appendix C - Community Service Partnership Theory of Change
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134592.pdf
Appendix D - Community Service Partnership Eligibility Criteria
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134931.pdf

Speakers

Jeanie Joaquin, Scarborough Centre For Healthy Communities
Julia Gonsalves, Christie Ossington Neighbourhood Centre
Rebecca Chen, New Canadian Community Centre
Councillor Jim Karygiannis

Communications (Committee)

(June 26, 2019) Submission from Jeanie Joaquin (EC.New.EC6.20.1)
(June 26, 2019) Letter from Councillor Jim Karygiannis (EC.New.EC6.20.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/comm/communicationfile-95755.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from N. Corrado (CC.Supp.EC6.20.3)

EC6.21 - Toronto Economic Bulletin

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council receive the report (June 11, 2019) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture for information.

Origin

(June 11, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The attached Toronto Economic Bulletin summarizes the most recent data available for key economic indicators benchmarking the city's economic performance.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Toronto Economic Bulletin
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134422.pdf
Attachment - Toronto Economic Bulletin
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-134423.pdf

EC6.23 - Supporting Three Significant Events in Toronto in 2019

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication EC6.23.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the 2019 Economic Development and Culture Operating Budget by $0.375 million gross, $0 net, fully funded from the Major Special Events Reserve Fund, to provide grants to Elevate, 6 Degrees and the Ontario Economic Summit for their 2019 events in Toronto.

Origin

(June 26, 2019) Letter from Councillor Michael Thompson

Summary

Major events provide multiple benefits to the City of Toronto and its residents.  They help drive tourism, they help brand the city, they produce significant economic spin-off benefits, and they provide shared experiences that help bond people together.  Such events also help address significant issues facing Toronto, through such means as convening experts, producing knowledge and hosting public discussions.

 

The benefits of major events outlined above apply in large measure to a trio of significant public events to be held in Toronto over late 2019.  The Elevate Tech Festival, 6 Degrees and the Ontario Economic Summit will bring residents, visitors and international experts together to, respectively, address scaling Toronto's technology sector, advancing a more inclusive society, and driving sustainable economic growth.  These events will make significant contributions to the understanding of key issues facing Toronto in the areas of social cohesion and shared prosperity.

 

In addition, such events produce a significant economic return for the City of Toronto, with spin-off economic benefits achieved through partnerships with local businesses, venue rentals, staffing, and restaurant and hotel use. The projected combined attendance for these three events in 2019 exceeds 25,000 participants.

 

The City of Toronto has partnered with each event in the past, in varying ways.  Elevate has been a beneficiary of City programs designed to support the development of the local technology sector and its entrepreneurs. A grant of $250,000 from the City of Toronto would support Elevate's 2019 festival and thereby its ongoing leadership in Toronto's fast-growing tech sector to the benefit of firms and workers alike.

 

The 6 Degrees conference, and its organizers, the Institute of Canadian Citizenship, are key partners for the City of Toronto in advancing the concept of the 'diversity dividend'; that there is not only a moral but also an economic imperative to having diversity in organizational governance, management and workforce. In 2017 and 2018, the City of Toronto provided $100,000 in support as a Presenting Partner at 6 Degrees. A grant of $75,000 from the City of Toronto would maintain the significant momentum generated by the past two iterations of the 6 Degrees event and support a broad range of related diversity initiatives.

 

The Ontario Economic Summit, delivered by the Ontario Chamber of Commerce, is re-locating to Toronto from Niagara-on-the-Lake for its 2019 event.  A grant of $50,000 towards the 2019 Ontario Economic Summit will enable the City of Toronto to help shape the agenda for this important forum addressing inclusive economic growth and shared prosperity. 

 

A total investment of $375,000 for these three significant events from the major Special Events Reserve Fund (MSERF) will help advance knowledge generation and public discussion on key issues facing the City of Toronto. A commitment of $375,000 from MSERF in 2019 is manageable from a financial perspective, as the uncommitted balance for MSERF expected at end of 2019 is $1,973,656. Annex A to this letter contains additional details regarding the three events and the benefits that they bring to the City of Toronto. 

 

In view of the significant events taking place in Toronto over late 2019 seeking partnership with the City.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 26, 2019) Letter and Appendix A from Councillor Michael Thompson on Supporting Three Significant Events in Toronto in 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-135469.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from N. Corrado (CC.Supp.EC6.23.1)

General Government and Licensing Committee - Meeting 6

GL6.2 - Annual Update on Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) as it Relates to the City's Employer Contributions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication GL6.2.2 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the report (June 10, 2019) from the Controller for information.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Joe Pennachetti, Director, OMERS Sponsors Corporation, and David Beatty, Director, OMERS Administration Corporation, gave a presentation on OMERS Update to the City of Toronto.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Controller

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the annual summary of the City's employer contributions submitted to OMERS in 2018 and to provide information on the City's total members and contributions relative to the overall OMERS Plan members and contributions.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) Report and Attachments 1, 2, 3, and 4 from the Controller on Annual Update on Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) as it Relates to the City's Employer Contributions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134400.pdf
(June 24, 2019) Presentation from Joe Pennachetti, Director, OMERS Sponsors Corporation, and David Beatty, Director, OMERS Administration Corporation, on OMERS Update to the City of Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-135346.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 21, 2019) Submission from Mike Major, City of Toronto Administrative, Professional, Supervisory Association (COTAPSA) (GL.New.GL6.2.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/comm/communicationfile-95532.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 27, 2019) Letter from Mike Major, President, COTAPSA (CC.Main.GL6.2.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-95987.pdf

GL6.4 - Write-off of Uncollectible Property Taxes from the Tax Roll

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council deem the unpaid property taxes, including interest and penalties which have accrued on those unpaid taxes up to the time of the write-off, levied from 1998 to 2018 as uncollectible on the 88 receivables listed in Attachment 1 to the report (June 10, 2109) from the Controller and direct the Controller to remove these amounts from the tax roll.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Controller

Summary

This report recommends the write-off of property taxes for 88 receivable amounts relating to 27 individual property tax accounts for the taxation years 1998 to 2018. The receivable amounts relate to property tax accounts that are no longer returned on the assessment roll, making collection efforts and recovery of outstanding amounts impossible. The total estimated amount to be written off is $1,856,352, consisting of taxes of $504,026 and interest/penalty of $1,352,326. All reasonable and appropriate collection efforts have been exhausted. It is recommended that the property taxes, interest, and fees that have accumulated over the period 1998 to 2018 be deemed uncollectible and written off. The write-off of these amounts will have no impact on the current year's budget, as these amounts have been previously provided for in the Allowance for Doubtful Tax Receivables Account in prior years.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Controller on Write-off of Uncollectible Property Taxes from the Tax Roll
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134390.pdf
Attachment 1 - Listing of Tax Amounts to be Written off as at May 1, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134391.pdf

GL6.7 - Progress on the Mergers of the City of Toronto Pre-Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) Pension Plans with OMERS

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - The security of property belonging to the City of Toronto

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 10, 2019) from the Controller remain confidential in its entirety, as it pertains to the security of property belonging to the City of Toronto.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Controller

Summary

This report provides an update on the status of the merger of four pre-Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) pension funds with OMERS. The merger process is a technical and regulatory process, with approvals of pensioners and the Financial Services Commission of Ontario, as well as detailed work by City and OMERS staff. The York Fund has successfully merged with OMERS as of January 8, 2019 and it is anticipated that the three other funds will merge in either late 2019 or early 2020. 

 

In addition to pensioners receiving their existing pensions plus OMERS inflationary indexing, members of funds which have surpluses will also receive a share of the surplus, upon the wind-up of their fund. The City will also be receiving a share of surpluses, which will vary depending on fund earnings and other actuarial factors between now and the effective dates, but is anticipated at this time to be between $70 and $90 million.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Controller on Progress on the Mergers of the City of Toronto Pre-Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) Pension Plans with OMERS
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134395.pdf
(June 10, 2019) Confidential Attachment 1 - Mergers of Pre-OMERS Pension Plans with OMERS

GL6.8 - Toronto Civic Employees' Pension Plan - Proposed Merger with the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) Plan - Implementation of OMERS Indexing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1166 has been submitted on this item.

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve an amendment to Schedule A attached to By-law 100-2018 governing the Toronto Civic Employees' Pension Plan (the Plan) to:

 

a.  strike out the existing precondition and formula for conditional annual post retirement adjustments for pensioner benefits in Sections 14B(3a) and 14B(3b) of the Plan and replace it with the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) Plan provision for annual unconditional Consumer Price Index-linked inflation adjustments; and

 

b.  make such other amendments as may be required to facilitate the merger and transfer of assets.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Controller

Summary

This report seeks authority to amend the By-law governing the Toronto Civic Employees' Pension Plan (Civic Plan) to implement the OMERS provision for annual CPI-linked inflation adjustments, immediately prior to the merger of the Civic Plan with the OMERS Plan under the Pension Transfer Agreement (PTA) between OMERS and the City. The PTA requires that the Civic Plan members, following a merger with the OMERS Plan, continue to be entitled to their existing benefits, with the exception that the current formula for conditional annual Post Retirement Adjustments will be replaced by the CPI-linked unconditional inflationary adjustment provided to all OMERS Plan pensioners.

 

The City's experience with the transfer of the York Plan indicates that the Superintendent of Financial Services' (the Superintendent) consent will be conditional upon the indexing amendment to the Plan first being made.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Controller on Toronto Civic Employees' Pension Plan - Proposed Merger with the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) Plan - Implementation of OMERS Indexing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134397.pdf

GL6.10 - Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund - Proposed Merger with the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) Plan - Implementation of OMERS Indexing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1167 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve an amendment to By-law 116-2018, as amended, governing the Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund (the Plan) to:

 

a.  add the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) Plan provision for annual unconditional Consumer Price Index-linked inflation adjustments; and

 

b.  make such other amendments as may be required to facilitate the merger and transfer of assets.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Controller

Summary

This report seeks authority to amend the By-law governing the Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund (Police Plan) to add the OMERS provision for annual CPI-linked inflation adjustments, immediately prior to the merger of the Police Plan with the OMERS Plan under the Pension Transfer Agreement (PTA) between OMERS and the City. The PTA requires that the Police Plan members, following a merger with the OMERS Plan, continue to be entitled to their existing benefits, with the exception that they will become entitled to the CPI-linked unconditional inflationary annual adjustment as is provided to all OMERS Plan pensioners. The Police Plan does not currently contain an indexing provision per se. All historical increases have been ad hoc amendments to the By-law under specified conditions.

 

The City's experience with the transfer of the York Plan indicates that the Superintendent of Financial Services' (the Superintendent) consent will be conditional upon the indexing amendment to the Plan first being made.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Controller on Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund - Proposed Merger with the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) Plan - Implementation of OMERS Indexing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134398.pdf

GL6.11 - The Corporation of the City of York Employee Pension Plan - Surplus Distribution

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve an amendment to Schedule A attached to By-law 1428-2017, as amended, governing The Corporation of the City of York Employee Pension Plan (the Plan) to:

 

a.  amend Section 17.06, Surplus upon Termination, by deleting the words "to the Corporation or any Participating Employer" and replacing it with the words "to the members of the Plan" so that the amended section reads as follows:

 

Subject to terms of participation by Participating Employers, upon discontinuance of the Plan, in whole or in part, any assets of the Fund (or the appropriate portion of the Fund in the case of a partial discontinuance) in excess of those required to discharge all liability for accrued benefits shall be paid to the members of the Plan.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Controller

Summary

This report seeks authority to amend the By-law governing The Corporation of the City of York Employee Pension Plan (York Plan) to provide for surplus distribution to the members of the Plan in accordance with Council's previous decision.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) The Corporation of the City of York Employee Pension Plan - Surplus Distribution
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134399.pdf

GL6.12 - Insurance Claim Trends Against the City of Toronto and Mitigation Measures to Reduce Claims

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Ombudsman to review the City of Toronto's process for public claims for damage due to the escape of water from the City's sewage system, including basement flooding, and to conduct an investigation into this process, if warranted.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The General Government and Licensing Committee:

 

1.  Requested the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to review the City of Toronto's website and communications to ensure that:

 

a.  the process and criteria for making claims are clear; and

 

b.  the percentage of claims that are paid and denied is provided.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to respond to a request made by the General Government and Licensing Committee at its March 5, 2019 meeting that the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, in consultation with the Executive Director, Corporate Finance, the Chief Purchasing Officer, and the City Solicitor, report back to the General Government and Licensing Committee at its meeting on June 24, 2019 with the following information:

 

a.  a breakdown of claim trends against the City of Toronto, the amount of money that has been paid out on claims, and mitigating measures that are being taken by the City to reduce the total number of claims;

 

b.  details regarding aggregate claims, particularly those related to basement flooding; and

 

c.  details regarding aggregate claims, particularly those on other related incidents.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Insurance Claim Trends Against the City of Toronto and Mitigation Measures to Reduce Claims
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134607.pdf

GL6.13 - 2018 Final Report on Property Sales, Acquisitions, Expropriations, and Leases

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council delete number 7 (4086 Sheppard East and part of ramp) in Appendix B to the report (May 30, 2019) from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, and request the Director, Real Estate Services, to report to the General Government and Licensing Committee at its meeting on October 7, 2019 with options for utilizing this property for sale.

 

2.  City Council revise the "Comments" and "Current Status" columns in Appendix A to the report (May 30, 2019) from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services to indicate transit planning activity for the following properties under "Intended Manner of Sale - Transfer to Build Toronto":

 

a.  4200-4400 Eglinton Avenue West; and

 

b.  4452 Eglinton Avenue West.

Origin

(May 30, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services

Summary

This final report provides an annual overview of property sales, purchases, expropriations, and leases transacted by the City of Toronto from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018.

 

Properties that were declared surplus, sold, and acquired through negotiations/expropriations as well as leases are all reviewed in this report. All of these transactions were managed through the delegated authority process.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 30, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services on 2018 Final Report on Property Sales, Acquisitions, Expropriations, and Leases
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-133997.pdf
Appendix A - Declared Surplus List
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-133998.pdf
Appendix B - Properties Authorized for Sale
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-133999.pdf

GL6.14 - Real Estate Acquisitions and Expropriation of Property Interests Near the Christie Subway Station for the Easier Access Phase lll Project

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services, to negotiate and, if unsuccessful, to initiate expropriation proceedings for the Property Interests identified in Appendix A to the report (June 3, 2019) from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services, to serve and publish Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate Land for the Property Interests identified in Appendix A to the report (June 3, 2019) from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, to forward any requests for hearings to the Chief Inquiry Officer, to attend any hearings in order to present the City of Toronto's position, and to report the Chief Inquiry Officer's recommendations to City Council for consideration.

 

3.  City Council request the Director, Real Estate Services, to report to the General Government and Licensing Committee on all transit-related expropriations prior to accepting any offer in relation to the expropriation proceedings, without delaying the acquisition and expropriation process.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The General Government and Licensing Committee considered Items GL6.14 and GL6.15 together.

Origin

(June 3, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services

Summary

As part of the Easier Access Phase III Project (the Project), the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) is proposing to construct two elevators at the Christie Subway Station providing accessibility to and from each of the eastbound and westbound platforms and street level. 

 

This report seeks authority to acquire various property interests in the existing entrance connection to the Christie Station located at 5 Christie Street, as identified in Appendix A and shown approximately in Appendix B (known as the Property Interests) for the purposes of the Project.

 

Negotiations for the acquisition of the Property Interests have been ongoing with various owners, however, in order to protect the Project timeline, this report seeks authority to acquire the Property Interests and, if necessary, initiate expropriation proceedings.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2019) Report and Appendices A and B from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services on Real Estate Acquisitions and Expropriation of Property Interests Near the Christie Subway Station for the Easier Access Phase lll Project
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134327.pdf

GL6.15 - Expropriation of Property Interests Near the Donlands Subway Station for the Easier Access Phase lll and Secondary Exit Projects

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth
Attention
Bill 1121 has been submitted on this Item.

Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition of land by the City of Toronto

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City of Toronto to enter into agreements, an offer to sell or an agreement under the Expropriations Act, with respect to the Property Interests identified in Appendix B to the report (June 3, 2019) from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, on terms and conditions acceptable to the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, or the Director, Real Estate Services, jointly and severally, to execute the agreements in Recommendation 1.

 

3.  City Council, in the event that the City of Toronto is unable to reach an agreement with the owner for the acquisition of the Property Interests identified in Appendix B to the report (June 3, 2019) from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, in Recommendation 1:

 

a.  as approving authority under the Expropriations Act, approve the expropriation of the Property Interests;

 

b.  as expropriating authority under the Expropriations Act, authorize City staff to take all steps necessary to comply with the Expropriations Act, including but not limited to, the preparation and registration of an Expropriation Plan and service of the Notice of Expropriation, the Notice of Election as to a Date for Compensation, and/or the Notice of Possession for the Property, as may be appropriate;

 

c.  authorize City staff to obtain an appraisal report to value the Property Interests, updated to the date of expropriation or, if the owner so elects in accordance with the Expropriations Act, to the date of service of the Notices of Expropriation, and to prepare and serve Offers of Compensation on all registered owners, at the appraised value, all in accordance with the requirements in the Expropriations Act; and

 

d.  authorize the Director, Real Estate Services, and the Manager, Transaction Services, jointly and severally, to sign the Notices of Expropriation, the Notices of Possession, the Offer of Compensation, and any related documents on behalf of the City for the Property Interests.

 

4.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 once there has been a final determination of all claims for compensation for all of the Property Interests identified in Appendix B to the report (June 3, 2019) from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The General Government and Licensing Committee considered Items GL6.14 and GL6.15 together.

Origin

(June 3, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services

Summary

As part of the Easier Access III and Second Exit Projects (the Projects), the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) is proposing to make the Donlands Subway Station accessible by constructing two new elevators and is also improving customer safety and convenience by constructing a new second exit building. 

 

This report seeks approval from City Council, as the approving authority under the Expropriations Act, to expropriate the required fee simple and permanent and temporary easement Property Interests that will enable pedestrian access from two new elevators and a second exit to be constructed at the Donlands Subway Station (the Station). The required properties are shown on the maps attached as Appendix A and on the draft Reference Plans attached as Appendices C, D, and E. 

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2019) Report and Appendices A, B, C, D, and E from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services on Expropriation of Property Interests Near the Donlands Subway Station for the Easier Access Phase lll and Secondary Exit Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134328.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Estimated Value of the Property Interests

GL6.16 - Application for Approval to Expropriate - 39 Commissioners Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services, to initiate expropriation proceedings, if necessary, to acquire the property municipally known as 39 Commissioners Street, legally described in Appendix A and approximately shown in Appendix B to the report (June 10, 2019) from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services, to serve and publish Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate the property municipally known as 39 Commissioners Street, to forward any requests for hearings to the Chief Inquiry Officer, to attend any hearings in order to present the City of Toronto's position, and to report the Chief Inquiry Officer's recommendations to City Council for consideration.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services

Summary

This report seeks authority for the City of Toronto to initiate expropriation proceedings for 39 Commissioners Street in connection with the Port Lands Flood Protection project (PLFP).

 

The PLFP project is a $1.25 billion infrastructure investment by the three levels of government that will provide flood protection to the level of the regulatory storm event (the equivalent of Hurricane Hazel) for the Port Lands and South of Eastern Avenue areas. Led by Waterfront Toronto, but funded by the City, the Province of Ontario, and the Government of Canada, PLFP construction is underway with a targeted completion date in 2024.

 

As part of PLFP, Commissioners Street needs to be raised, reconstructed, and expanded south of its current alignment to accommodate future vehicular, transit, cycling, pedestrian, and servicing infrastructure. The repositioning of Commissioners Street was approved as part of the 2014 Lower Don Lands Environmental Assessment Master Plan Addendum and Environmental Study Report. The approved alignment will require the right-of-way to traverse 39 Commissioners Street, a privately-held property.

 

For the past year, Waterfront Toronto has been in ongoing negotiations for a land exchange/acquisition of 39 Commissioners Street from the existing landowner and their tenant. Negotiations are still ongoing, however, if a resolution is not achieved in the near term, construction timelines for PLFP will be adversely impacted. Waterfront Toronto has accordingly requested that the Waterfront Expropriation Protocol be utilized by submitting a Property Expropriation Request Form and relevant documentation to the City of Toronto.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) Report and Appendices A and B from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services on Application for Approval to Expropriate - 39 Commissioners Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134001.pdf

GL6.17 - Land Exchange with the Toronto District School Board - City Acquisition of 200 Poplar Road in Exchange for Stratified Ownership at 770 Don Mills Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
16 - Don Valley East, 24 - Scarborough - Guildwood

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City of Toronto (the City) to enter into a Land Exchange Agreement with the Toronto District School Board (the TDSB) for the property known as 200 Poplar Road, legally described in Appendix 1 (the TDSB Land), in exchange for approximately 54,000 square feet of stratified fee simple interest in part of 770 Don Mills Road, being Parts 2 and 5 on Plan RS-882, also shown as Part 2 on Sketch Number PS-2005-026 in Appendix 2 (the City Land) to the report (June 10, 2019) from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, substantially on the terms and conditions to be agreed between the parties, as may be approved by the Director, Real Estate Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council approve that the transaction meets the requirement for an exchange of land as outlined in Chapter 4.3 (Parks and Open Space Areas), Policy 8 of the City of Toronto's Official Plan.

 

3.  City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services, to accept the terms of the Land Exchange Agreement on behalf of the City of Toronto.

 

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transaction on behalf of the City of Toronto, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing and other dates to such earlier or later date(s), and on such terms and conditions as they may, from time to time, consider reasonable.

 

5.  City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services

Summary

This report seeks Council authority to enter into a land exchange with the Toronto District School Board (the TDSB) for the exchange of fee simple interest of the property located at 200 Poplar Road, known as Sir Robert L. Borden Business and Technical Institute, in exchange for stratified ownership at the future City of Toronto (the City) mixed-use development site located at 770 Don Mills Road as part of Mayor John Tory's Housing Now Initiative.

 

This proposed transaction will alleviate the TDSB's current student capacity issue in this area by allowing it to construct and take stratified title to a new elementary school in the City's redevelopment site at 770 Don Mills Road, along with creating new open space as the outdoor play area for the students attending the new school. In exchange, the City will obtain the fee simple interest in the TDSB-owned 11.93-acre site, formerly Sir Robert L. Borden Business and Technical Institute, known municipally as 200 Poplar Road, Scarborough, Ontario, M1E 1Z7, which will be used to create a community hub servicing the needs of the local community along with allowing the City to explore city-building opportunities with other City-owned properties nearby.

 

The terms for completing the transaction are considered to be fair, reasonable, and reflective of market value.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) Revised Report and Appendices 1 and 2 from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services on Land Exchange with the Toronto District School Board - City Acquisition of 200 Poplar Road in Exchange for Stratified Ownership at 770 Don Mills Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134343.pdf
(June 10, 2019) Report and Appendices 1 and 2 from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services on Land Exchange with the Toronto District School Board - City Acquisition of 200 Poplar Road in Exchange for Stratified Ownership at 770 Don Mills Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-135325.pdf

GL6.18 - 20 Brunel Court - Leases with the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
Bill 1119 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City of Toronto to enter into Leases with the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board, severally, respecting a portion of the property at 20 Brunel Court, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix A to the report (June 10, 2019) from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and on such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council approve the City of Toronto's proportionate share of 41.9 percent for the Shared Facilities Agreement which includes 5.3 percent to be recovered from the third-party child care operator.

 

3.  City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, or their designate, to administer and manage the Leases, including the provision of any consents, approvals, waivers, notices, and notices of termination, provided that the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters to City Council for its determination and direction.

 

4.  City Council authorize the City of Toronto to enter into a Shared Facilities Agreement with the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix B to the report (June 10, 2019) from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and on such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

5.  City Council authorize the City of Toronto to enter into any Ancillary Agreements and other agreements, documents, notices, or instruments contemplated under or necessary to give effect to the Leases and the Shared Facilities Agreement (Ancillary Agreements) on the terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

6.  City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services, to execute the Leases and Ancillary Agreements relating to the Leases, on behalf of the City of Toronto.

 

7.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to execute the Shared Facilities Agreement and Ancillary Agreements relating to the Shared Facilities Agreement, on behalf of the City of Toronto.

 

8.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, to amend the Shared Facilities Agreement as necessary, from time to time, provided the amendments are not materially inconsistent with the original Shared Facilities Agreement and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

9.  City Council approve the establishment of an obligatory reserve fund account called the Canoe Landing Reserve Fund in Schedule 15 - Third Party Agreements Obligatory Reserve Funds of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 227 (Reserves and Reserve Funds), the purpose of which is to provide funding for minor and major repairs, replacements, and capital improvements for the Canoe Landing Facility and related property as outlined in Appendix C to the report (June 10, 2019) from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

10.  City Council authorize the amendment of the Umbrella Agreement dated October 21, 1994 between the predecessors of the City of Toronto, the Toronto District School Board, and the Toronto Catholic District School Board and the Development Agreement dated May 1, 2014 between the City of Toronto, the Toronto District School Board, and the Toronto Catholic District School Board, such that the requirements in those Agreements to enter into:

 

a.  a ground lease from the City to the School Boards and the City, collectively, as ground lessee;

 

b.  space leases from the ground lessee to each of the City and the School Boards;

 

c.  a Facilities Agreement among the ground lessee parties;

 

d.  a Shared Use Park Agreement between the City and the ground lessee; and

 

e.  any other agreements relating to the Facility, as outlined in the report (June 10, 2019) from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation,

 

are superceded by the Leases and Shared Facilities Agreement authorized by Recommendations 1 and 3 and are of no further force and effect.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek Council authority to enter into agreements with the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board for the leasing and shared use of 20 Brunel Court, in accordance with Item EX38.3, titled Block 31 in the Railway Lands - Development Agreement, Update and Next Steps, adopted by City Council on February 19, 2014.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on 20 Brunel Court - Leases with the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134335.pdf
Appendix A - Major Terms: Leases with the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board - 20 Brunel Court
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134336.pdf
Appendix B - Major Terms: Shared Facilities Agreement Between the City of Toronto, the Toronto District School Board, and the Toronto Catholic District School Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134337.pdf
Appendix C - Canoe Landing Reserve Fund
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134338.pdf

GL6.19 - Community Space Tenancy Lease Agreement and Municipal Capital Facility Designation for Toronto Community & Culture Centre at 1650 Finch Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Don Valley North
Attention
Bill 1084 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City of Toronto to enter into a Community Space Tenancy Lease (the Lease) with Toronto Community & Culture Centre, pursuant to the Community Space Tenancy Policy, as a Community Partner Tenant for the lands and premises located at 1650 Finch Avenue East and known as Zion Church Cultural Centre for a five-year term, substantially on the terms outlined in Appendix A to the report (May 31, 2019) from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, with such revisions as may be acceptable to the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and the Director, Real Estate Services, severally, to execute the Lease and any related documents on behalf of the City of Toronto, as required.

 

3.  City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, or their designate, to administer and manage the Lease, including the provision of any amendments, consents, approvals, waivers, notices, and notices of termination, provided that the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

 

4.  City Council pass a By-law pursuant to Section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to:

 

a.  enter into a Municipal Capital Facility Agreement with Toronto Community & Culture Centre for the property known as 1650 Finch Avenue East, with respect to approximately 2,340 square feet of community space (the Leased Premises) for the purposes of providing a Municipal Capital Facility related to the provision of social and health services; and

 

b.  exempt the Leased Premises from taxation for municipal and school purposes, with the tax exemption to be effective from the latest of: (1) the commencement date of the Lease, (2) the date the Municipal Capital Facility Agreement is entered into, and (3) the date the Tax Exemption By-law is enacted.

 

5.  City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the amended By-law to the Minister of Finance, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, le Conseil scolaire Viamonde, and le Conseil scolaire catholique MonAvenir.

Origin

(May 31, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council authority to enter into a new Community Space Tenancy Lease with Toronto Community & Culture Centre for 2,340 square feet of City-owned space located at 1650 Finch Avenue East in Ward 17 - Don Valley North in the building commonly known as the Zion Church Cultural Centre and to have the premises designated a Municipal Capital Facility.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 31, 2019) Report and Appendices A and B from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Community Space Tenancy Lease Agreement and Municipal Capital Facility Designation for Toronto Community & Culture Centre at 1650 Finch Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134284.pdf

GL6.21 - Award of Request for Proposal Number 9119-19-0162 for the Design, Program Management, and Contract Administration Services for Accessibility Upgrades to City of Toronto Facilities at Various Locations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Facilities Management, to negotiate and enter into an agreement with IBI Group, who was the highest scoring proponent meeting the requirements of Request for Proposal Number 9119-19-0162, for the provision of design, program management, and contract administration services for accessibility upgrades at various City of Toronto locations for a fixed period of 7.5 years ending December 31, 2026 in the amount of $24,120,855 excluding all taxes ($24,545,382 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), based on the terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the Interim General Manager, Facilities Management, and the Chief Purchasing Officer

Summary

The purpose of the report is to advise on the results of the Request for Proposal 9119-19-0162 for the provision of a design, program management and contract administration services and request authority to award and negotiate an agreement with IBI Group in the total amount of $24,120,854.55 net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($24,545,382, net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) for a fixed period of 7.5 years ending December 2026.

 

This procurement is part of a larger initiative to 1) complete accessibility upgrades in accordance with provincial and City requirements at 353 City buildings managed by Facilities Management and Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and 2) complete accessibility audits at a further 11 buildings managed by Shelter, Support and Housing Administration. Through a program approach to procurement and project delivery, Facilities Management expects to deliver all projects before the 2025 deadline for compliance with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, while achieving time efficiencies and cost savings, standardized quality across all projects, and business continuity throughout the program.

 

In addition to the base cost submitted by the proponent, the total estimated contract value includes contingencies and allowances of 15 percent each to account for additional sites that may need to be added or to address unanticipated challenges that may arise during a program of this size, complexity, and duration (7.5 years, including the close out and warranty periods). The total estimated contract value (inclusive of contingencies and allowances) represents approximately 12 percent of the total combined program budgets for accessibility upgrades at Facilities Management and Shelter, Support and Housing Administration facilities ($204.1 million), which is in line with industry benchmarks.

 

In accordance with By-Law 195-8.5-B, City Council approval is required for this award as the term of the proposed contract exceeds five (5) years and the value of award exceeds $20,000,000.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) Report from the Interim General Manager, Facilities Management, and the Chief Purchasing Officer on Award of Request for Proposal Number 9119-19-0162 for the Design, Program Management, and Contract Administration Services for Accessibility Upgrades to City of Toronto Facilities at Various Locations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-135202.pdf
(June 7, 2019) Report from the Interim General Manager, Facilities Management, and the Chief Purchasing Officer on Award of Request for Proposal Number 9119-19-0162 for the Design, Program Management, and Contract Administration Services for Accessibility Upgrades to City of Toronto Facilities at Various Locations - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134204.pdf

GL6.22 - Award of Request for Proposal Number 9119-19-7055 for Property Management Services for Canoe Landing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to execute, on behalf of the City of Toronto, an agreement with Kipling Realty Management Inc., who was the only proponent who met the requirements of Request for Proposal Number 9119-19-7055, to provide property management services for the Canoe Landing Facility, located at 20 Brunel Court, for a fixed term of five years in the amount of $1,948,787.95 net of all taxes ($1,983,086.62 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Attachment 2 to the report (June 13, 2019) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Chief Purchasing Officer and on such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to amend the Property Management Agreement as necessary and to modify the number of staff provided by Kipling Realty Management Inc. to efficiently and effectively manage the Canoe Landing Facility located at 20 Brunel Court.

Origin

(June 13, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Chief Purchasing Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise on the results of the Request for Proposal (RFP) 9119-19-7055 for the provision of property management services for a multi-use hub facility located at 20 Brunel Court and named Canoe Landing which consists of a Parks, Forestry and Recreation (PFR) Community Centre, a Toronto District School Board (TDSB) elementary school, a Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) elementary school, a child care centre, a parking garage, and an outdoor space (collectively the Facility) and to request authority to award and enter into an agreement with the recommended proponent, Kipling Realty Management Inc.

 

The obligations of all parties with respect to the use, maintenance, and repair of all areas of the Facility are set out in the Shared Facilities Agreement and Leases, as outlined in the report, titled 20 Brunel Court - Leases with the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board, from the Acting Director, Real Estate Services, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation (the Leasing Report), that is also being considered at the June 24, 2019 General Government and Licensing Committee meeting.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Chief Purchasing Officer on Award of Request for Proposal Number 9119-19-7055 for Property Management Services for Canoe Landing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134348.pdf
Attachment 1 - Financial Impact Summary of Recommended Contract for the Facility and Related Property (Net of HST Recoveries)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134705.pdf
Attachment 2 - Terms and Conditions of the Property Management Agreement for Canoe Landing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134706.pdf
(June 11, 2019) Attachment 3 - Fairness Monitor Attestation Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134707.pdf

GL6.24 - Delivery of the East Bayfront Community Recreation Centre

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council authorize the City of Toronto to enter into, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to execute on behalf of the City, a Development Management Agreement for the development of an approximately 25,000 square foot community recreation centre (the Recreation Centre) within a mixed-use project containing residential, commercial, and retail components (the Block 4 Project) at 261 Queens Quay East with Aqualuna Bayside Toronto Partnership, a general partnership of 2572942 Ontario Limited and Hines Bayside IV ULC, and with the partnership's nominee, Aqualuna Bayside Toronto Inc., substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Attachment 3 to the report (June 6, 2019) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and on such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City of Toronto to enter into, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to execute on behalf of the City, a Construction Management Contract for the construction of the base/shell of the Recreation Centre and a Construction Management Contract for the construction of the fit-out of the Recreation Centre, both with Deltera Contracting Inc., substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Attachment 4 to the report (June 6, 2019) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and on such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the City Solicitor.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City of Toronto to enter into, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to execute a single contract for an estimated $600,000 from the project budget for full consulting services with Perkins+Will Canada Inc., the architect currently retained by the developer for the design of the Recreation Centre.

 

4.  City Council, conditional upon the execution of acceptable agreements in accordance with Recommendations 1, 2, and 3, authorize the flow of the following funding to Aqualuna Bayside Toronto Partnership, a general partnership of 2572942 Ontario Limited and Hines Bayside IV ULC, or its nominee, and to Deltera Contracting Inc., in accordance with the Development Management Agreement and the Construction Management Agreements, respectively, and to Perkins+Will Canada Inc. to the maximum fee specified in Recommendation 3 for the delivery of the Recreation Centre:

 

a.  up to $15.000 million from the 2019 Council Approved Waterfront Revitalization Initiative Capital Budget and future year commitments from the project "Precinct Implementation Projects," with funding of $1.500 million from Debt and $13.500 million from Development Charges (XR2114); and

 

b.  up to $7.000 million from the 2019 Council Approved Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget and future year commitments for the East Bayfront Community Centre sub-project in the Community Centre project, with funding of $6.300 million from Development Charges (XR2114) and $0.700 million from the South District Parkland Development Reserve Fund (XR2209) projects.

 

5.  City Council authorize the City of Toronto, as Vendor, to enter into an Amending Agreement of Purchase and Sale (Amended APS) with Aqualuna Bayside Toronto Inc., for and on behalf of Aqualuna Bayside Toronto Partnership, as Purchaser, to amend the Agreement of Purchase and Sale of Block 4, on the following terms and conditions and on such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor:

 

a.  the Amended Agreement of Purchase and Sale will not become effective unless and until the City confirms that the City is proceeding with the Recreation Centre, in accordance with the terms of the Development Management Agreement for the base/shell;

 

b.  Waterfront Toronto and the Purchaser shall have entered into an Amending Development Agreement in respect of the development of Block 4 which includes the Recreation Centre;

 

c.  the City will retain freehold ownership of the strata parcel of land designated for the Recreation Centre, as shown on an initial strata plan for closing;

 

d.  the parties will enter into a Shared Facilities Agreement in respect of the shared areas (Shared Areas) of the Block 4 Project and other operational matters in recognition of the integration of the Recreation Centre with the other components of the Block 4 Project, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Attachment 5 to the report (June 6, 2019) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation;

 

e.  the City's share of the Shared Facilities Budget for the operation and maintenance of the Shared Areas and various operational matters in respect of the overall Block 4 Project for the first year of operation of the Recreation Centre are estimated not to exceed $10,000 (the Shared Facilities Budget);

 

f.  on the closing of the Agreement of Purchase and Sale, the Recreation Centre lands will be subject to the Restrictions on Use and the Right of First Opportunity, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Attachment 6 to the report (June 6, 2019) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation;

 

g.  upon the completion of the construction of the Recreation Centre and the registration of the final strata plan for the Block 4 Project, the City, as transferor or transferee, will enter into such reconveyances of land and transfers of easements for nominal consideration, as necessary, to legally describe the lands for the Recreation Centre as City-owned freehold space, together with and subject to appurtenant and servient easement interests; and

 

h.  if the City has not proceeded with the fit-out of the Recreation Centre, in accordance with the terms of the Construction Management Agreement, and the City has failed to commence construction of the fit-out of the Recreation Centre within the two-year period following 50 percent occupancy of the residential condominium, the Purchaser will have the option to purchase the City's freehold strata lands designated for the Recreation Centre, together with the Recreation Centre base/shell as then-existing, for fair market value.

 

6.  City Council authorize the City of Toronto to enter into the Shared Facilities Agreement, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Attachment 5 to the report (June 6, 2019) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and on such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

7.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to approve the Shared Facilities Budget, to negotiate, administer, manage, execute, and deliver on behalf of the City the Shared Facilities Agreement, to designate any person or persons to represent the City on any shared facilities committee or subcommittee formed under the Shared Facilities Agreement, to provide any authorization, direction, or instructions to such designated person(s) in carrying out his/her role(s) as a City representative(s), to carry out all dispute resolution processes, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, or his/her successor/designate(s), is authorized to provide any consents, approvals, waivers, notices, certificates of compliance, status certificates, and other documentation under the Shared Facilities Agreement, provided that the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

 

8.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to make all decisions, including any necessary elections, waivers, approvals, consents, and notices, on behalf of the City during the pre- and post-construction and construction phases of the Recreation Centre, in accordance with the project agreements outlined in Recommendations 1, 2, and 3 and any other agreements or documentation entered into as a result of those agreements.

 

9.  City Council authorize the City of Toronto to enter into, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to execute on behalf of the City, any Ancillary Agreements contemplated under or arising out of the Development Management Agreement, the Construction Management Agreement, the Shared Facilities Agreement, the Amended Agreement of Purchase and Sale, or the construction of the Recreation Centre, in consultation and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(June 6, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests City Council authority to enter into agreements for the delivery of a 25,000 square foot community recreation centre (the Recreation Centre) located within a new mixed-use building in Block 4 on Plan 66M2542 (Block 4) in the East Bayfront Precinct located at 261 Queens Quay East (see Attachment 1). The project is to be delivered by Aqualuna Bayside Toronto Partnership (development manager/developer) and Deltera Contracting Inc. (the constructor). The Aqualuna Bayside Toronto Partnership is between a Hines entity (Hines) and its residential partner, a Tridel entity (Tridel).

 

This report also seeks authority to transfer cash flow funding of up to $22.0 million from the 2019 Council Approved Capital Budgets and future year commitments for Waterfront Revitalization Initiative and Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to the development manager, the constructor, and the architect to design and deliver both the base/shell and fit-out of the Recreation Centre.

 

The major terms for delivery of the Recreation Centre and associated agreements are presented in this report and form part of the approval being sought by Council.

 

Lastly, the report seeks approval for the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to execute the contract with the design architects for the Recreation Centre in order for Parks, Forestry and Recreation to manage the design specification process directly.   

 

This report has been prepared by Parks, Forestry and Recreation, with input from the Waterfront Secretariat, Real Estate Services, Purchasing and Materials Management, Corporate Finance, and in consultation with Legal Services.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 6, 2019) Report and Attachments 1 to 7 from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on Delivery of the East Bayfront Community Recreation Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134353.pdf

GL6.25 - Increase in Penalty Amounts for Stopping and Parking Violations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1145 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the penalty amount from $60 to $100 for the "Stop - Non-School Bus in School Bus Loading Zone" offence in Section 950-400B(10) of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950 (Traffic and Parking), with an implementation date of September 3, 2019.

 

2.  City Council increase the penalty amount from $60 to $100 for the "Stop - Within 9 Metres of School Crossing" offence in Section 950-400B(11) of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950 (Traffic and Parking), with an implementation date of September 3, 2019.

 

3.  City Council increase the penalty amount from $60 to $100 for the "Stop - Signed Highway - During Prohibited (Times/Days)" offence in Section 950-405D of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950 (Traffic and Parking), with an implementation date of September 3, 2019.

 

4.  City Council increase the penalty amount from $60 to $100 for the "Stand Vehicle - Signed Highway During Prohibited (Times/Days)" offence in Section 950-405G of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950 (Traffic and Parking), with an implementation date of September 3, 2019.

 

5.  City Council amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950 (Traffic and Parking) to establish a new offence in Section 950-400B(1.1) for stopping any vehicle on or over a boulevard unless stopping is authorized under any other City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter or By-law and establish an associated penalty amount of $150, with an implementation date of September 3, 2019.

 

6.  City Council amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 610 (Penalties, Administration of) and the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950 (Traffic and Parking), generally as outlined in Attachment 1 to the report (June 10, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

7.  City Council increase the penalty amount from $60 to $100 for the "Stand Vehicle - Passenger Loading Zone - Contrary to Permitted (Times/Days)" offence in Section 950-402A(3) of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950 (Traffic and Parking), with an implementation date of September 3, 2019, and amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 610 (Penalties, Administration of) accordingly.

 

8.  City Council increase the penalty amount from $60 to $100 for the "Stand Vehicle - Passenger Loading Zone - Not Actively Engaged in Loading/Unloading Passengers" offence in Section 950-402A(3) of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950 (Traffic and Parking), with an implementation date of September 3, 2019, and amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 610 (Penalties, Administration of) accordingly.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

This report responds to a request from the General Government and Licensing Committee to review the administrative penalty amounts (penalty amounts) for stopping and parking violations that typically occur near schools, creating localized traffic congestion and safety concerns for parents and students. Parking violation notices issued through the City of Toronto's Administrative Penalty System are meant to promote greater compliance with the City's Parking By-laws.

 

A number of factors may be considered when reviewing penalty amounts for stopping and parking violations. These include comparable violations, the impact of non-compliance, and penalty amounts in other jurisdictions. The penalty amounts discussed in this report are related to the most common stopping and parking violations that take place near schools. The proposed changes are based on existing penalty amounts for comparable violations that similarly address traffic congestion and road safety concerns, particularly for vulnerable road users. All penalty increases are proposed to come into effect at the beginning of the 2019-2020 school year on September 3, 2019.

 

The proposed changes are as follows:

 

-  Increase the penalties from $60 to $100 for violations taking place at any prohibited time of day for the following offences:


-  stopping a motor vehicle in a school bus loading zone; and
-  stopping a motor vehicle within nine metres of a school crossing.


-  Increase the penalties from $60 to $100 for violations taking place outside of rush hour periods for the following offences:


-  stopping a motor vehicle during a prohibited time; and
-  standing a motor vehicle during a prohibited time.


-  Introduce a new offence for stopping a motor vehicle on the boulevard and an associated penalty of $150.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) Report and Attachments 1, 2, and 3 from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Increase in Penalty Amounts for Stopping and Parking Violations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134329.pdf

Speakers

Derek Moran

GL6.30 - Addition to the Records Retention By-law

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Schedule A, Records Retention Schedule, in the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 217, Records, Corporate (City), as outlined in Appendix 1 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the City Clerk.

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

Under Section 201 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, a record of the City may be destroyed if a retention period has been established and the retention period has expired or the record is a copy of the original record. Chapter 217, Records Corporate (City), provides the legislative basis on which the retention periods for City records are authorized and Schedule A indicates the retention period for each records class.

 

The People, Equity and Human Rights Division, as part of their transformation initiative, has requested that an authorized retention for personnel records be added to Schedule A. The bulk of the personnel files held by the City have no authorized retention period. Records dating as far back as 1910 and totalling almost 6,000 boxes continue to be stored at the Records Centre.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 7, 2019) Report from the City Clerk on Addition to the Records Retention By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134280.pdf
Appendix 1 - Revisions to Existing Record Retention Schedule
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134281.pdf

GL6.31 - Review of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
This Item will be the first Item considered after lunch on Thursday July 18, 2019.

The Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (GL6.31a for information).

Communications GL6.31.26 to GL6.31.29 have been submitted on this Item.

Bill 1120 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire, as follows:

 

Accessibility Fund Program

 

1.  Add a provision to create an Accessibility Fund Program that is:

 

a.  funded through regulatory charges on members of the vehicle-for-hire and private transportation company industries that do not provide City-licensed wheelchair accessible service; and

 

b.  disbursed based on service standards and eligibility criteria to City-licensed wheelchair accessible drivers and owners that are not under contract with the Toronto Transit Commission's Wheel-Trans specialized transit service.

 

2.  Add a provision to allow the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards or their designate to establish the funding formulas for the disbursement of funds, the service standards, and the eligibility criteria for the Accessibility Fund Program.

 

3.  Add a provision to state that the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards shall publish the service standards and the eligibility criteria.

 

4. Add a provision to state that accessible vehicle-for-hire drivers must meet the following minimum eligibility requirements for the Accessibility Fund Program:

 

a.  licensed under this chapter;

 

b.  current and valid training endorsement for accessible service; and

 

c.  declare or provide other proof that criteria and service standards, as required by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, have been met.

 

5.  Add a provision to state that accessible vehicle-for-hire owners must meet the following minimum eligibility requirements for the Accessibility Fund Program:

 

a.  licensed under this chapter;

 

b.  vehicle is compliant with the Canadian Standards Association standard for wheelchair accessible vehicles; and

 

c.  declare or provide other proof that criteria and service standards, as required by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, have been met.

 

6.  Add a provision to state that, to be eligible for the Accessibility Fund Program, licensed vehicle-for-hire drivers and owners must provide the following information as part of the application process:

 

a.  business licence number under this chapter;

 

b.  full name;

 

c.  mailing address;

 

d.  contact information such as phone number and e-mail address; and

 

e.  any other information as requested by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.

 

7.  Add a provision that the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards may refuse or cancel funding if the accessible owner or driver does not meet the eligibility criteria or service standards as set out by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, if the funding was granted due to an administrative or technical error, or if the accessible owner or driver has not provided complete or accurate data or information.

 

8.  Add a provision to state that the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards shall provide the accessible owner or driver with written notice that consideration is being given to the refusal or cancellation of their funding application and providing the accessible owner or driver with an opportunity to respond in writing to this notice within 10 days of being notified. Municipal Licensing and Standards will then provide the accessible owner or driver with written notice of its final decision. If an accessible owner or driver's eligibility has been refused or cancelled because the owner or driver was not properly eligible or provided incomplete or inaccurate information, the accessible owner or driver will not be eligible for the Accessibility Fund Program for two years.

 

9.  Add a provision that the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards may recover any funds disbursed in error or if the funds were disbursed based on incomplete or inaccurate information provided by the applicant.

 

10.  Add a provision that requires, as conditions for licence renewal, that the Accessibility Fund Program regulatory charge be paid and that funds disbursed from the Accessibility Fund Program based on incomplete or inaccurate information provided by a funding applicant be repaid.

 

11.  Add a provision to state that the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards has the authority to, at any time, recalibrate the funding formulas or prohibit the disbursement of funds to applicants based on the availability of funding.

 

12.  Add a provision to state that the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards shall collect regulatory charges associated with the Accessibility Fund Program at the same time as licensing fees are collected.

 

Administration, Audit Powers, and Revocation Process of Training Programs

 

13.  Add a provision to allow the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to establish the mandatory components and criteria for the accreditation of training programs for all drivers licensed under this chapter.

 

14.  Add a provision to state that the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards shall publish the mandatory components of training programs, criteria to accredit training programs, and a list of approved training programs.

 

15.  Add a provision that each applicant for the certification of a training program shall provide, at minimum, the following information to the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards:

 

a.  full name of individual or business;

 

b.  mailing address;

 

c.  contact information, including phone number and e-mail address;


d.  the syllabus of the proposed training content; and

 

e.  any other information as requested by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.

 

16.  Add a provision that the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards has the authority to audit approved training programs and request information related to the audit, as required.

 

17.  Add a provision that, pursuant to the audit and investigation process, the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards has the authority to revoke the accreditation of training programs if:

 

a.  Municipal Licensing and Standards has reasonable grounds to believe that the training program no longer meets the requirements for inclusion on the approved list, in accordance with the mandatory components established by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards;

 

b.  Municipal Licensing and Standards has reasonable grounds to believe that the training program is not being delivered or its officers, directors, or employees have not acted in accordance with the intent of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire, or if incomplete or inaccurate information has been provided; or

 

c.  Municipal Licensing and Standards has reasonable grounds to believe that the conduct of the training program or its officers, directors, or employees has resulted, or will result, in a breach of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire, or any other law.

 

18.  Add a provision that vehicle-for-hire or private transportation company drivers who obtained a licence on the basis of their membership in a training program that is then removed from the City’s approved list must provide proof of the successful completion of another approved training program at their licence renewal, if required by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.

 

19.  Add a provision that vehicle-for-hire or private transportation company drivers who do not submit proof of the successful completion of another approved training program at their licence renewal will be deemed to no longer meet the licensing requirements under the By-law and the licence renewal application will be incomplete until proof of training is submitted.

 

Audit and Investigative Authority of Municipal Licensing and Standards

 

20.  Add a provision to allow for Municipal Licensing and Standards to require private transportation companies, limousine brokers, and taxicab brokers to provide records to Municipal Licensing and Standards for the purposes of investigating compliance with this chapter and for researching and undertaking accessibility reviews, transportation planning, and environmental policies or initiatives relevant to the vehicle-for-hire industry and require that records must be produced within 30 days and in a format satisfactory to the Executive Director, Municipal Licencing and Standards.

 

21.  Add a provision to require that taxicab, limousine, and private transportation company records requested by a police officer shall be provided directly to the police officer within 24 hours and records requested by Municipal Licensing and Standards shall be provided within 30 days of the receipt of the request or within 24 hours, if required by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.

 

22.  Add a provision that any licence holder under the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire, is guilty of an offence if they provide incomplete or inaccurate information or business records to a police officer or Municipal Licensing and Standards.

 

Cameras

 

23.  Delete the definition of camera.

 

24.  Authorize the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to establish criteria for and prohibit the use of cameras in licensed vehicles.

 

Collision Reporting

 

25.  Add a provision to state that private transportation companies and limousine and taxicab brokers shall record and provide collision incident information (including type of vehicle, date and time of incident, and location of incident to the nearest intersection) at a frequency that meets the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.

 

Inspection Powers

 

26.  Amend the inspection powers of Municipal Licensing and Standards to confirm that they extend to vehicles-for-hire.

 

Limousine Owners

 

27.  Add a provision that limousine owner licensing fees are waived for accessible limousine owners.

 

28.  Add a provision that accessible service must be provided through vehicles that are in compliance with the standard for accessible vehicles outlined in the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire.

 

29.  Add a provision that if a camera that is capable of recording audio or video footage of the passenger is used in a limousine, then the limousine owner shall ensure that notice stating that passengers are being or may be recorded is provided through notice affixed to the vehicle in a location and manner approved by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.

 

30.  Add a provision that requires limousines to have "Watch for Bike" notices affixed to the vehicle in a location approved by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.

 

31.  Remove the requirement for limousine owners to enter into service agreements to permit them to dispatch their own limousine and/or accept service requests. A limousine owner who dispatches his or her own limousine will not be considered a limousine broker.

 

32.  Remove the minimum fare requirement of $70 per hour for the first two hours, permit limousine owners and brokers to set rates to be charged on a flat or hourly basis, and require that a limousine owner or broker confirm that a passenger has accepted the rate before the vehicle is dispatched by sending written confirmation to the customer and maintaining records for three years.

 

33.  Define a limousine as any accessible, stretch, or sedan limousine in respect of which a limousine owner's licence has been issued or in respect of which a licence is required under this chapter.

 

34.  Define a sedan limousine as a non-metered vehicle that may carry a maximum of seven passengers, excluding the driver, and is approved by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards and that is, or is required to be, licensed under this chapter.

 

35.  Define a stretch limousine as a non-metered vehicle either purpose-built or modified to provide an extended seating area and carry a minimum of seven passengers, excluding the driver, and is approved by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards and that is, or is required to be, licensed under this chapter.

 

36.  Define an accessible limousine as a vehicle which is designed, used, or intended to be used to provide wheelchair accessible service and is approved by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards and that is, or is required to be, licensed under this chapter.

 

37.  Amend the insurance requirements to ensure that each limousine with a seating capacity of more than seven passengers is insured under a policy of automobile insurance as required under the Public Vehicles Act.

 

Limousine Brokers

 

38.  Rename limousine service company to limousine broker throughout the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire.

 

39.  Add a provision that limousine brokers shall only dispatch licensed limousines driven by individuals holding valid vehicle-for-hire driver's licences.

 

40.  Add a provision that limousine brokers must publish business contact information online for the public.

 

41.  Remove the stretch-to-sedan fleet ratio to allow limousine brokers to determine the appropriate type and number of licensed limousines required for their business.

 

42.  Amend the requirements for data recorded in dispatch records to also require the following information in relation to transportation commencing or terminating in Toronto:

 

a.  pick up location and the destination (by reference to the nearest intersection);

 

b.  dates and times (by reference to the nearest minute) the trip started and terminated;

 

c.  length of time (by reference to the nearest minute) elapsing between the passenger's service request and the start of the trip;

 

d.  type of service provided such as request for accessible service;

 

e.  trip status such as completed, driver cancelled, or passenger cancelled;

 

f.  if a trip is cancelled, then the reason for cancellation; and

 

g.  the assigned driver's licence number and unique identification number used by the brokerage (if any).

 

43.  Add a provision that data recorded in dispatch records must be produced within 30 days and in a format that is satisfactory to the Executive Director, Municipal Licencing and Standards and that a limousine broker is required to maintain the records for a minimum of three years.

 

Private Transportation Companies

 

44.  Add a provision that requires private transportation companies to impose a mandatory training program on all drivers affiliated with the private transportation company. The training program must satisfactorily meet the criteria established by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards or their designate.

 

45.  Add a provision that states that all private transportation company drivers must ensure they are using a mounted device, secured to the vehicle, for their phone or other such electronic device when the private transportation company driver is available on the private transportation company software application.

 

46.  Add a provision to state and confirm that drivers who provide accessible service for private transportation companies must be licensed under this chapter and meet all conditions of licensing, including the successful completion of an accessible training program.

 

47.  Add a provision that requires every private transportation company driver to be civil and well-behaved.

 

48.  Add a provision that if a camera that is capable of recording audio or video footage of the passenger is used in a private transportation company vehicle, then the private transportation company and private transportation company driver shall ensure that notice stating that passengers are being or may be recorded is provided through:

 

a.  the software application prior to the passenger accepting the request; and/or


b.  a notice affixed to the vehicle in a location and manner approved by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.

 

49.  Authorize the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to sign the Data Sharing Agreement and Indemnification Agreement for private transportation companies on behalf of the City of Toronto.

 

50.  Add a provision that requires private transportation companies and private transportation company drivers to notify passengers to look for cyclists before exiting a vehicle through:


a.  the software application by sending push notifications at a frequency that is satisfactory to the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards; and


b. "Watch for Bike" notices in the vehicle in a location approved by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.

 

51.  Amend the private transportation company driver requirements so that the private transportation company, when submitting an application for the issuance or renewal of a private transportation company driver's licence on a behalf of an individual, shall also be required to submit information on the fuel type of the vehicle that will be driven by that individual when licensed as a private transportation company driver.

 

52.  Add a provision prohibiting a private transportation company from allowing vehicles that have the same colour scheme that is already in use by a taxicab brokerage and prohibit a private transportation company driver from using such vehicle.

 

53.  Amend the provision that requires all private transportation company drivers to carry and, upon request, produce to Municipal Licensing and Standards their Ontario driver's licence by requiring that private transportation company drivers carry and produce upon request satisfactory government-issued identification.

 

54.  Amend the private transportation company record keeping requirements to ensure all information on time or length of trip is measured by reference to the nearest minute and by adding requirements that private transportation companies keep records of:

 

a.  the starting and ending times for each period that a private transportation company driver was available to provide transportation services through the platform, en route to pick up a passenger after accepting a request, and delivering transportation service to a passenger;

 

b.  wait time of passengers, in accordance with Period 2 in the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire;

 

c.  number of cancelled/rejected trips;


d.  reason for cancelled/rejected trips;

 

e.  volume of private transportation company vehicles available to provide service on the private transportation company platform in any particular hour and with reference to a particular geographic area within which the private transportation company vehicle was available or provided service;

 

f.  pick up and drop-off data for every trip, measured to the nearest 10 metres;

 

g.  aggregate number of vehicles that have completed a trip by hour; and

 

h.  anonymized trip and passenger identification that meets the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.

 

55.  Amend the private transportation company driver requirements:

 

a.  remove the minimum requirement of 18 years of age;

 

b.  increase the year of driving history from one year to three years for new applicants and grandfather existing private transportation company driver's licence holders;

 

c.  require that all new applicants as of June 1, 2020 must provide proof of the successful completion of a mandatory training program that is approved by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards; and

 

d.  require existing private transportation company driver's licence holders to provide proof of the successful completion of a mandatory training program that is approved by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards by their licensing renewal in 2020.

 

56.  Amend the accessible requirements of private transportation companies to confirm that accessible service must be provided through vehicles that are in compliance with the Canadian Standards Association standard for wheelchair accessible vehicles.

 

Taxicab Bill of Rights

 

57.  Amend the Taxicab Bill of Rights to include a section that states that taxicab drivers cannot refuse service to an individual with a mobility or non-mobility disability, where service can be accommodated, and cannot refuse service to an individual being accompanied by a service animal by reason only of the presence of a service animal.

 

Snow Tires

 

58.  Rename snow tires to winter tires and add a definition of winter tires to mean a tire that meets the standards and specifications prescribed for winter tires by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, including tires that are labelled "M" and "S," the minimum requirement for mud and snow/all-season tires.

 

Taxicab Broker

 

59.  Add a provision that any records brokerages are required to collect must be produced within 30 days and in a format satisfactory to the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards and that a taxicab broker is required to maintain all such records for a minimum of three years.

 

60.  Amend the requirements for trip record data to be kept by taxicab brokers to require the collection of the following information:

 

a.  pick up location and the destination (by reference to the nearest intersection);

 

b.  dates and times (by reference to the nearest minute) that each trip started and terminated;

 

c.  length of time (by reference to the nearest minute) elapsing between the passenger's service request and the start of the trip;

 

d.  type of service provided such as request for accessible service;

 

e.  trip status such as completed, driver cancelled, or passenger cancelled;

 

f.  if a trip is cancelled, then the reason for cancellation; and

 

g.  the licence number for each taxicab affiliated with the brokerage that provided the trip.

 

61.  Amend the requirements for brokerages to maintain records to require the collection of the following information:


a.  the vehicle-for-hire driver's licence number, unique identification number used by the brokerage (if any) for each vehicle-for-hire driver, and the driver's first and last name for each driver affiliated with the brokerage; and


b.  the termination date, the driver's first and last name, the licence number, and the termination letter when a driver is no longer affiliated with the brokerage.

 

62.  Add a provision requiring the collection of accessible taxicab trip data for the purposes of the administration of the Accessibility Fund Program to include:

 

a.  plate number, licence number, start date, start time, end date, and end time for each taxicab trip;

 

b.  type of point-of-sale terminal in each taxicab, including whether or not it allows for cordless payment; and


c.  driver's first and last name and licence number for each taxicab trip.

 

Taxicab Owners

 

63.  Add a provision to require that a vehicle be registered with Municipal Licensing and Standards for use as a taxicab as a condition of renewing a taxicab owner licence.

 

64.  Remove the provisions regarding designated agents in order to clarify the role of a taxicab operator and ensure that the only individuals permitted to manage taxicabs on behalf of taxicab owners will be licensed as taxicab operators.

 

65.  Amend the section on required equipment and markings for taxicabs to authorize the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to approve the manner and location of "Watch for Bike" notices.

 

66.  Amend the section on designated custodians for corporations that hold standard taxicab owner licences to require that they designate a director as custodian, instead of an employee or officer.

 

Taxicab Rates and Fares

 

67.  Remove "on request" from the section on flat fares and airport fares and require drivers/owners to offer the flat rate to the airport.

 

68.  Add a provision to prohibit vehicle-for-hire drivers, taxicab owners, and brokers from setting rates higher than the tariff (metered rate) for accessible service requests.

 

Toronto Licensing Tribunal

 

69.  Amend the powers of the Toronto Licensing Tribunal to confirm that it has the power to refuse to issue a licence, as outlined in its mandate.

 

Vehicle-for-Hire Driver

 

70.  Add a provision that states that all drivers must ensure they are using a mounted device, secured to the vehicle, for their phone or other such electronic device while operating their vehicle.

 

71.  Add a provision that all vehicle-for-hire drivers shall carry and, upon request, produce satisfactory government-issued identification to Municipal Licensing and Standards.

 

72.  Remove the section which prohibits a vehicle-for-hire driver from parking on any highway except at a location designated and marked as a taxicab stand by an authorized sign, as this is covered under the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking.

 

73.  Remove the word "first" from the restrictions on taxicabs refusing services in order to confirm that short-fare refusals are not permitted for any prospective passengers.

 

74.  Amend the vehicle-for-hire driver requirements:

 

a.  remove the minimum requirement of 18 years of age;

 

b.  increase the year of driving history from one year to three years for new applicants and grandfather existing vehicle-for-hire driver's licence holders;

 

c.  require that all new applicants as of June 1, 2020 must provide proof of the successful completion of a mandatory training program that is approved by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards; and

 

d.  require existing vehicle-for-hire driver's licence holders to provide proof of the successful completion of a mandatory training program that is approved by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards by their licensing renewal in 2020.

 

75.  Amend the section on civility and oversight of taxicabs and limousines to remove the requirements to be properly dressed, neat and clean in person, and maintain that drivers shall be civil and well-behaved.

 

76.  Amend the data required to be kept in an operator log to include break start date and time, break end date and time, and taxicab type such as non-accessible or accessible.

 

Vehicle Requirements and Inspections

 

77.  Remove the definitions for alternative fuel vehicle, combined fuel consumption rating, exhaust emissions, full useful life emission bin, hybrid vehicle, and low-emission vehicle.

 

78.  Amend the section on replacement vehicles to remove the requirement for replacement taxicab vehicles to be either accessible or alternative fuel, hybrid, or low-emission vehicles.

79.  Amend the section on mechanical inspections to require that all vehicles-for-hire are inspected prior to delivering for-hire service with a new vehicle and, thereafter, once every 12 months.

 

Status Updates

 

2.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to review and provide a status update on the vehicle-for-hire Accessibility Fund Program and work completed to create an environmental incentive program two years after the enactment of this By-law.

 

Collision Reporting Incident Form

 

3.  City Council request the Ontario Ministry of Transportation to review the provincial collision reporting incident form and add taxicab, limousine, and private transportation company vehicles as vehicle types.

 

Fees

 

4.  City Council amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Appendix C - Schedule 12, Municipal Licensing and Standards as follows:

 

1.  Amend the "Service" category to state "Vehicle-for-Hire (VFH) Licensing" instead of "Taxi and Livery Licensing."

 

2.  Add the regulatory charges noted below in Table A - Regulatory Charges for the Accessibility Fund Program, including an annual adjustment based on the Consumer Price Index.

 

Table A - Regulatory Charges for the Accessibility Fund Program

 

Service

Fee Description

Category

Fee Basis

Fee

Annual Adjustment

VFH Licensing

Taxicab Brokerage Reserve Fund - Accessibility Fund

Regulatory Charge

Per Application or Renewal

$250.64

Yes

VFH Licensing

Limousine Brokerage Reserve Fund - Accessibility Fund

Regulatory Charge

Per Application or Renewal

$250.64

Yes

VFH Licensing

Limousine Owner Reserve Fund - Accessibility Fund

Regulatory Charge

Per Application or Renewal

$125.32

Yes

VFH Licensing

Private Transportation Company Reserve Fund - Accessibility Fund

Regulatory Charge

Per Trip

$0.10

Yes

VFH Licensing

Private Transportation Company Driver Reserve Fund - Accessibility Fund

Regulatory Charge

Per Application or Renewal

$7.23

Yes

VFH Licensing

Standard Taxicab Operator Reserve Fund - Accessibility Fund

Regulatory Charge

Per Application or Renewal

$125.32

Yes

VFH Licensing

Non-Accessible Standard Taxicab Owner Reserve Fund - Accessibility Fund

Regulatory Charge

Per Application or Renewal

$125.32

Yes

VFH Licensing

Vehicle-for-Hire Driver Reserve Fund - Accessibility Fund

Regulatory Charge

Per Application or Renewal

$62.66

Yes

 

3.  Remove Reference Number 20 - Re-scheduling an exam or course before it starts and Reference Number 25 - Registration for the Accessible Taxicab Driver Training Course.
 

4.  Amend the fees listed below in Table B - Vehicle-for-Hire Licensing Fees to include an annual adjustment based on the Consumer Price Index.

 

Table B - Vehicle-for-Hire Licensing Fees

 

Service

Fee Description

Category

Fee Basis

Fee

Annual Adjustment

VFH Licensing

Application Fee: Taxicab Operator

Full Cost Recovery

Per Application

$500

Yes

VFH Licensing

Renewal Fee: Taxicab Operator

Full Cost Recovery

Per Application

$300

Yes

VFH Licensing

Application Fee: Private Transportation Company

Full Cost Recovery

Per Application

$20,000

Yes

VFH Licensing

Annual Private Transportation Company Fee Per Driver

Full Cost Recovery

Per Application

$15

Yes

VFH Licensing

Private Transportation Company Fee Per Trip

Full Cost Recovery

Per Trip

$0.30

Yes

VFH Licensing

Application Fee: Vehicle-for-Hire Driver

Full Cost Recovery

Per Application

$130

Yes

VFH Licensing

Renewal Fee: Vehicle-for-Hire Driver

Full Cost Recovery

Per Application

$130

Yes

 

Reserve Fund

 

5.  City Council establish a new Vehicle-for-Hire Reserve Fund as a Corporate Discretionary Reserve Fund to provide funding for initiatives associated with accessibility, transportation planning, or environmental goals relevant to the vehicle-for-hire and private transportation company industries and to minimize the impact of reliance on vehicle-for-hire and private transportation company licensing revenue for Municipal Licensing and Standards' Operating Budget, in accordance with the criteria outlined in Attachment 6 to the report (June 14, 2019) from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, by:

 

1.  Amending the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 227, Reserves and Reserve Funds, by adding the "Vehicle-for-Hire Reserve Fund" to Schedule 7, Corporate Discretionary Reserve Funds, with the criteria outlined in Attachment 6 to the report (June 14, 2019) from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards;

 

2.  Funding the Vehicle-for-Hire Reserve Fund in an initial amount of $6.093 million from an in-year adjustment of the 2019 Operating Budget of Municipal Licensing and Standards and, afterwards, with budgeted allocations from vehicle-for-hire and private transportation company licensing, including regulatory charges on licensees that do not provide wheelchair accessible vehicle-for-hire services. Such that:

 

a.  for 2019, there will be a net zero expenditure and revenue budget adjustment comprised of a contribution to the reserve fund of $6,093,000, offset by an increase in vehicle-for-hire user fees (including private transportation company trip fees) of $6,093,000. The contribution to the new reserve fund would be dependent on sufficient actual user fee revenue being generated; and

 

b.  for 2020 and subsequent years, reserve funding and user fee budgets will be considered as part of the annual budget process and will be structured as outlined in the Financial Impact section of the report (June 14, 2019) from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.

 

3.  Establishing a minimum targeted reserve balance of $5 million; and

 

4.  Establishing Municipal Licensing and Standards as the primary owner of the account.

 

Implementation

 

6.  City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to consider the results of the Transportation Impact Study, as outlined in Attachment 4 to the report (June 14, 2019) from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, as part of the update on the Congestion Management Plan.

 

7.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to make such technical and stylistic amendments to the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire, and the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, as required to give effect to City Council’s decision.

 

8.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to apply to the Ontario Court of Justice for any new set fines or to review and increase, as required, the current set fines.

 

9.  City Council direct that the changes to the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire, come into force on January 1, 2020.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The General Government and Licensing Committee:

 

1.  Requested the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to report directly to City Council at its meeting on July 16 and 17, 2019 on the following:

 

a.  the feasibility and implications of implementing third-party safety training, including options for using accredited training schools, in-class/car training, and other ways to deliver mandated training;

 

b.  opportunities to ensure higher vehicle fuel efficiency standards for vehicles-for-hire, including transitioning to hybrid vehicles or fully-electric vehicles for all vehicles-for-hire;

 

c.  the impact of vehicles-for-hire on traffic congestion and opportunities to mitigate this impact;

 

d.  specific requirements for mobile device holders in vehicles in order to ensure they are mounted securely;

 

e.  requiring stickers cautioning passengers to watch for cyclists when opening doors;

 

f.  the feasibility of continuing the requirement that replacement vehicles for taxicab owners be alternative fuel vehicles, hybrid vehicles, or low-emission vehicles and enacting a new definition for low-emission vehicles to authorize the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to define a low-emission vehicle in accordance with Natural Resources Canada's Fuel Consumption Ratings;

 

g.  the implications and feasibility of requiring private transportation companies, through their software applications or otherwise, to route private transportation company drivers and passengers to pick up and drop off locations where passengers can embark or disembark without the private transportation company vehicle stopping or otherwise obstructing bike lanes, in a manner that is consistent with the existing prohibitions in the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 886 (Footpaths, Pedestrian Ways, Bicycle Paths, Bicycle Lanes and Cycle Tracks) that precludes private transportation company drivers from stopping, standing, parking, loading, or unloading passengers in bike lanes;

 

h.  additional information on the differences between snow, winter, all-season, all-weather, and mud tires and details on industry and insurance standards;

 

i.  requiring private transportation company drivers to notify their personal insurance companies that they are operating their vehicles for private transportation company use and requiring private transportation company drivers to provide proof of insurance to the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards;

 

j.  appropriate wait time standards for accessible private transportation companies and vehicles-for-hire, together with a method of monitoring whether these standards are being achieved and what additional measures might be needed to achieve the standards, and provide this information in an Annual Report to City Council through the General Government and Licensing Committee; and

 

k.  methods to monitor the following:

 

1.  the number of private transportation company vehicles on the City of Toronto's roads during selected time periods; and

 

2.  the percentage of private transportation company vehicles on the City of Toronto's roads with and without passengers during selected time periods.

Origin

(June 14, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards

Summary

This report proposes amendments to the Vehicles-for-Hire By-law (the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire) related to accessibility, public safety, vehicle requirements, and limousines. It also recommends technical amendments to further improve the licensing and enforcement of the vehicle-for-hire industry.

 

The Vehicles-for-Hire By-law came into effect in July 2016 to establish a set of rules and regulations for taxicabs, limousines, and private transportation companies such as Lyft and Uber. The By-law reset and modernized the City of Toronto's approach to regulating for-hire drivers and vehicles. It responded to the public's request for choice in regulated transportation options and provided an opportunity for the City to shift from prescriptive regulation to a risk-based licensing approach. The transition was rooted in the City's regulatory purpose of ensuring public safety and consumer protection and created the opportunity for competition.

 

Since May 2016, staff have focused on implementing the new regulations. The implementation of the new By-law has been a large and complex undertaking that required significant business transformation, including creating digital solutions. In June 2018, the Licensing and Standards Committee considered the Work Plan for the Review of Chapter 546, Vehicles-for-Hire, thereby launching the review of the Vehicles-for-Hire By-law.

 

Staff have since undertaken a review of the By-law and identified proposed changes to address several issues, including driver and vehicle requirements, limousine regulations, and cost to delivering accessible vehicle-for-hire service.

 

This report proposes an accessibility strategy that includes an Accessibility Fund Program and updated By-law requirements. The Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act requires the City to take steps to ensure that equitable vehicle-for-hire service is available to all individuals. The proposed strategy responds to the 2016 City Council direction to establish an accessibility fund to collect regulatory charges from members in the industry that do not provide wheelchair accessible service and disburse these funds to wheelchair accessible taxicab owners and drivers. Staff heard from users of accessible service that the service is not always readily available and that there is sometimes inconsistent quality of service. Accessible service providers told staff that the cost of operating wheelchair accessible vehicles is higher than that of standard taxicabs and that this is due, in part, to the cost of conversion and maintenance. Higher costs, staff heard, limit the financial return that owners and drivers can expect and, as a result, act as a deterrent to having these vehicles on the road full-time. The aim of the proposed accessibility strategy is to address the higher cost of delivering accessible service, increase the availability of accessible service, and improve the consistency and quality of accessible service.

 

In addition to the accessibility strategy, this report recommends changes to enhance public safety, including changes to driver requirements that will contribute to greater driver experience and knowledge, by increasing the minimum years of driving experience from one to three years and introducing mandatory training requirements. Finally, removing outdated limousine restrictions will provide flexibility within the industry and greater consumer choice.

 

The proposed changes to the Vehicles-for-Hire By-law are based on research completed and feedback heard during consultations in 2018 and the beginning of 2019. Internal research included literature reviews, jurisdictional scans, stakeholder consultations, and an analysis of licensing, complaint, and enforcement data. In addition, staff hosted 18 public consultation meetings and two Accessibility Panel meetings.

 

A Transportation Impact Study was also undertaken by Transportation Services with support from the University of Toronto's Transportation Research Institute. Municipal Licensing and Standards (MLS) also procured a consulting firm to complete an Economic Impact Study and a market research firm to complete public opinion research and focus group sessions. The outcome of this work is discussed in this report.

 

This report was prepared in consultation with Legal Services, Economic Development and Culture, Policy, Planning, Finance and Administration, and Transportation Services.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 21, 2019) Revised Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Review of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-135306.pdf
(June 14, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Review of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134401.pdf
Attachment 1 - Jurisdictional Scan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134402.pdf
Attachment 2 - Third-Party Public Opinion Research, Quantitative Online Survey Findings (Phase 1) - Vehicle-for-Hire By-law Review, City of Toronto Resident Survey
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134403.pdf
Revised Attachment 3 - Accessibility Strategy Research and Consultation Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-135293.pdf
Attachment 3 - Accessibility Strategy Research and Consultation Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134425.pdf
Revised Attachment 4 - The Transportation Impacts of Vehicle-for-Hire in the City of Toronto- Executive Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-135307.pdf
Attachment 4 - The Transportation Impacts of Vehicle-for-Hire in the City of Toronto- Executive Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134426.pdf
(May 17, 2019) Attachment 5 - Economic Impact Analysis of Toronto's Taxicab, Limousine, and Private Transportation Companies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134427.pdf
Attachment 6 - Criteria Sheet for Vehicle-for-Hire Reserve Fund
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134428.pdf
(June 17, 2019) Public Notice - Review of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-134429.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 12, 2019) Supplementary report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Review of City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire (GL6.31a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135971.pdf

Speakers

Gail Beck-Souter, Beck Taxi
Kristine Hubbard, Beck Taxi
Cheryl Hawkes
Earla Phillips
Andy Réti, All Taxi Owners and Operators Limited
Nabeel El Khafif, EGO
April Mims, Lyft
Bryan Purcell, Toronto Atmospheric Fund
Steve Keller, Co-op Cabs
Zinnia Batliwalla, March of Dimes Canada
Wendy Murphy, March of Dimes Canada
Pablo L. Godoy, United Food and Commercial Workers Canada
Ejaz Butt, United Food and Commercial Workers Canada
Adam Blinick, Uber
Marty Gray, Uber
Morva Rohani, Uber
Peter Athanasopoulos, Spinal Cord Injury Ontario
Jozsef Takacs
Terry Danylevich
Sam Moini
Behrouz Khamseh
Larry Labovitch, City Taxi
Javid Wali
Allen Matrosov
Joe Ironi, Ontario Limousine Owners Association

Communications (Committee)

(June 17, 2019) E-mail from Norman Pires (GL.Supp.GL6.31.1)
(June 19, 2019) E-mail from Ejaz Butt and Irfan Meer, Toronto Limousine Drivers Association (GL.Supp.GL6.31.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/comm/communicationfile-95428.pdf
(June 19, 2019) Submission from Nabeel El Khafif, EGO (GL.Supp.GL6.31.3)
(June 20, 2019) E-mail from Howard Kaplan (GL.Supp.GL6.31.4)
(June 20, 2019) Letter from Gerry Manley (GL.Supp.GL6.31.5)
(June 20, 2019) E-mail from Christine Leonard (GL.Supp.GL6.31.6)
(June 20, 2019) E-mail from Pablo L. Godoy, United Food and Commercial Workers Canada (GL.Supp.GL6.31.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/comm/communicationfile-95496.pdf
(June 20, 2019) Letter from Tereza Da Silva (GL.Supp.GL6.31.8)
(June 20, 2019) Letter from Bryan Purcell, Toronto Atmospheric Fund (GL.New.GL6.31.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/comm/communicationfile-95525.pdf
(June 20, 2019) E-mail from Amy Jones (GL.New.GL6.31.10)
(June 21, 2019) E-mail from Esther Marietta Nerling (GL.New.6.31.11)
(June 22, 2019) Letter from Andy Réti, All Taxi Owners and Operators Limited (GL.New.GL6.31.12)
(June 23, 2019) E-mail from Imran Chowdhury, TTL Group (GL.New.GL6.31.13)
(June 23, 2019) E-mail from Rita Bijons (GL.New.GL6.31.14)
(June 23, 2019) Letter from Heather Marshall, Toronto Environmental Alliance (GL.New.GL6.31.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/comm/communicationfile-95568.pdf
(June 24, 2019) Letter from Jared Kolb, Cycle Toronto (GL.New.GL6.31.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/comm/communicationfile-95585.pdf
(June 21, 2019) Letter from Pamela Fuselli, Parachute Canada (GL.New.GL6.31.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/comm/communicationfile-95569.pdf
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (GL.New.GL6.31.18)
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Nick Morris, Toronto Limousine Drivers Association (GL.New.GL6.31.19)
(June 24, 2019) Submission from Councillor Jim Karygiannis (GL.New.GL6.31.20)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/comm/communicationfile-95579.pdf
(June 24, 2019) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton (GL.New.GL6.31.21)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/comm/communicationfile-95587.pdf
(June 24, 2019) Letter from David Réti (GL.New.GL6.31.22)
(June 24, 2019) Submission from Kristine Hubbard, Beck Taxi (GL.New.GL6.31.23)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/gl/comm/communicationfile-95592.pdf
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Samuel Bradea (GL.New.GL6.31.24)
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Avtar Sekhon (GL.New.GL6.31.25)

Communications (City Council)

(July 11, 2019) Letter from Andrew Murie, Chief Executive Officer, MADD Canada (CC.Supp.GL6.31.26)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96049.pdf
(July 12, 2019) Letter from Jan De Silva, President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Region Board of Trade (CC.Supp.GL6.31.27)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96090.pdf
(July 15, 2019) Letter from Pamela Fuselli, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer, Vice-President, Knowledge Transfer and Stakeholder Relations, Parachute (CC.Supp.GL6.31.28)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96091.pdf
(July 15, 2019) Letter from Terry Danylevich (CC.New.GL6.31.29)

Infrastructure and Environment Committee - Meeting 6

IE6.1 - Donation from Trans Canada Trail for Riverdale Sloped Path and Upper Highland Creek Trail Projects

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
13 - Toronto Centre, 24 - Scarborough - Guildwood
Attention
Communication IE6.1.1 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to accept a donation of $0.300 million from Trans Canada Trail for City-led capital project work including the Riverdale Sloped Path ($0.100 million) and Upper Highland Creek Trail Improvements ($0.200 million) in compliance with the City's Policy on Donations for Community Benefits.

 

2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to negotiate and sign a donor agreement for the $0.300 million donation from Trans Canada Trail, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

3. City Council authorize amendments to Parks, Forestry and Recreation's 2019 Council-approved Capital Budget and future year commitments for the following sub-projects:

 

a. for the Riverdale Sloped Path (Accessibility - Riverdale and Lower Don Trail) sub-project in the Facility Components project, by increasing the total project cost by $0.100 million from $3.000 million to $3.100 million, and 2020 cash flow from $1.350 million to $1.450 million, with funding from the donation.

 

b. for the Upper Highland Creek Trail sub-project in the Trails and Pathways project, by increasing the total project cost by $0.200 million from $1.400 million to $1.600 million, and 2019 cash flow from $0.024 million to $0.224 million, with funding from the donation.

Origin

(June 11, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek approval from City Council to accept a donation and enter into a donor agreement with Trans Canada Trail, a national charity, for capital work on two trail projects being undertaken by the City in collaboration with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA): the Riverdale Sloped Path connection to the Lower Don Trail, and the Upper Highland Creek Trail improvements. In addition, the report recommends that City Council amend Parks, Forestry and Recreation's 2019 Council-approved Capital Budget and future year commitments to add the donated amount to the two sub-projects, amending the project costs and cash flows.

 

The scope of work includes a new switchback elevated path connecting the Riverdale Footbridge to the Lower Don Trail, and three new trail bridges and associated trail improvements along the Upper Highland Creek in Morningside Park.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on Donation from Trans Canada Trail for Riverdale Sloped Path and Upper Highland Creek Trail Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134696.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from N. Corrado (CC.Supp.IE6.1.1)

IE6.3 - Contract Award: Request for Quotation Number 6033-19-0109 for Waste Transport Services from the City of Toronto Transfer Stations to the Green Lane Landfill and Alternate Landfill Sites

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager of Solid Waste Management Services, to enter into two (2) separate Contracts with two (2) separate vendors for Waste Transport Services as a result of Request for Quotation Number 6033-19-0109 for Waste Transport Services from the City's Transfer Stations to the Green Lane Landfill and Alternate Landfills, for a term of ten (10) years each beginning January 1, 2021 and ending December 31, 2030, all in accordance with all specifications, terms and conditions set out in the solicitation being the lowest bidders meeting specifications as follows:

 

a. Verspeeten Cartage Ltd. for Districts 1 and 3 in the amount of $104,590,034 net of all taxes, $106,430,819 net of HST recoveries and $118,186,739 including all applicable taxes and charges.  All prices include allowances for a Fuel Surcharge and Contingency Transport Services;

 

b. Laidlaw Carriers Bulk GP Inc. for Districts 2 and 4 in the amount of $86,767,244 net of all taxes, $88,294,348 net of HST recoveries and $98,046,986 including all applicable taxes and charges.  All prices include allowances for a Fuel Surcharge and Contingency Transport Services. 

Origin

(May 27, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and the Chief Purchasing Officer

Summary

This report advises on the results of Request for Quotation (RFQ) No. 6033-19-0109 for Waste Transport Services from the City of Toronto’s Transfer Stations to the Green Lane Landfill and Alternate Landfills and requests authority to award two (2) separate Contracts to two (2) separate vendors. Verspeeten Cartage Ltd. is being recommended for an award for Districts 1 and 3 in the amount of $104,590,034 net of all taxes, ($106,430,819 net of HST recoveries) and Laidlaw Carriers Bulk GP Inc. is being recommended for award for Districts 2 and 4 in the amount of $86,767,244 net of all taxes, ($88,294,348 net of HST recoveries) each for a term of ten (10) years beginning January 1, 2021 and ending December 31, 2030.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 27, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and the Chief Purchasing Officer on Contract Award: Request for Quotation Number 6033-19-0109 for Waste Transport Services from the City of Toronto Transfer Stations to the Green Lane Landfill and Alternate Landfill Sites
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134694.pdf

IE6.5 - Extending Successful Energy Retrofitting Programs

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the extension of the Home Energy Loan Program (HELP) and the High-rise Retrofit Improvement Support (Hi-RIS) programs to December 31, 2021 using existing resources in the Local Improvement Charge Energy Works Reserve Fund and any LIC repayments (HELP and Hi-RIS) to support project and programming funding needs, including extension of one temporary project manager for the Hi-RIS program, and one temporary research analyst for the HELP program and direct the Director, Environment and Energy and Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to report back on key Program's outcomes through regular TransformTO reports to Council.

 

2.  City Council authorize terms to maturity of up to 20 years from the current 15 year maximum for qualifying single-family Home Energy Loan Program projects to be consistent with the High-rise Retrofit Improvement Support program terms and aligning with asset lifecycle.

 

3. City Council amend the Residential Retrofit Program By-law (By-law 1105-2017) to expand the category of eligible measures to include energy efficient electric vehicle (EV) chargers and associated works, energy storage technology, and energy efficient resilience measures, as well as allow program participants to include the costs of an energy assessment as eligible project costs.

 

4. City Council authorize the Director, Environment and Energy Division and Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to develop a listing of contractors that have completed projects under the Programs, including a disclaimer that the City does not recommend, endorse or warranty the work of the contractor.

 

5. City Council authorize the Director, Environment and Energy Division and Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to negotiate and enter into all necessary agreements with Toronto Hydro, Enbridge Gas Distribution, Natural Resources Canada, Federation of Canadian Municipalities and other partners, in forms satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to support implementation of the Programs, as required.

 

6. City Council request the Government of Canada (the Minister of Finance and the Minister of Environment and Climate Change) to direct Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CHMC) to provide guarantees for Local Improvement Charge (LIC) financing programs to support broader program participation by property owners with default-insured mortgages as outlined in Recommendation 13.5 of the Final Report of the Expert Panel on Sustainable Finance - Mobilizing Finance for Sustainable Growth.

Origin

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Director Environment and Energy and Executive Director Social Development Finance and Administration

Summary

This report seeks City Council authorization to extend the Residential Energy Retrofit Programs until December 31, 2021 to authorize program enhancements including the expansion of eligible measures funded through the program. An update on program uptake and results is also provided in this report. Staff will report back with a plan for the continuation of the Programs until 2024 through the TransformTO 2021-2024 Implementation Plan in Q4 2019 and subsequently provide regular updates on the Programs through this consolidated process.

           

Launched in 2014, the Residential Energy Retrofit Programs have provided financing to support capital improvements (retrofits) for residential properties with energy efficiency and water conservation benefits. The Programs operate as two streams: the Home Energy Loan Program (HELP) for eligible houses; and the High-rise Retrofit Improvement Support Program (Hi-RIS) for multi-unit residential buildings. To date, almost $14.9 million in financing has been committed to projects with over 202 properties participating in the program, which has resulted in an emissions reduction of over 4,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalents.

 

By enabling energy efficiency, these Programs are also achieving a range of socioeconomic and environmental objectives identified in TransformTO, the Poverty Reduction Strategy and other key City of Toronto objectives including Tower Renewal. Through these programs, property owners have been able to undertake deeper, more comprehensive energy retrofits, thereby significantly reducing emissions while improving the quality of housing and maintaining affordability.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Director Environment and Energy and Executive Director Social Development Finance and Administration on Extending Successful Energy Retrofitting Programs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134697.pdf

Speakers

Hamish Wilson

Communications (Committee)

(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (IE.New.IE6.5.1)
(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (IE.New.IE6.5.2)

IE6.6 - Financial Plan for the City of Toronto's Municipal Drinking Water License Renewal

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommend that:

 

1. City Council approve the Financial Plan, Attachment 1 to the report (June 11, 2019) from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer prepared for the City of Toronto's Municipal Drinking Water System, in accordance with Ontario Regulation 453/07, for submission to the Ontario Ministry of Municipal  Affairs and Housing, in compliance with the requirements of the Municipal Drinking Water License renewal process.

Origin

(June 11, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council approval of a Financial Plan prepared as a condition of the Municipal Drinking Water Licence renewal process under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002. A Municipal Drinking Water Licence is an approval issued by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment for the operation of a municipal drinking water system. The City of Toronto's current Drinking Water Licence expires on February 10, 2020.

 

The Financial Plan for the City of Toronto’s drinking water system has been prepared in accordance with Ontario Regulation 453/07 and must be approved by a resolution of Council for submission to the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing by August 11, 2019.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Financial Plan for the City of Toronto's Municipal Drinking Water License Renewal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134806.pdf
Attachments 1 to 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134807.pdf

IE6.7 - Don River and Central Waterfront Accelerated Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 13 - Toronto Centre, 14 - Toronto - Danforth, 15 - Don Valley West, 16 - Don Valley East, 17 - Don Valley North, 19 - Beaches - East York, 20 - Scarborough Southwest, 21 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
Communications IE6.7.3 and IE6.7.4 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City Manager in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to apply for intergovernmental funding which would support the acceleration of the Don River and Central Waterfront project.

 

2. City Council grant approval to receive the funds, if any, contemplated by Recommendation 1 above.

Origin

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services

Summary

This report, as requested at the April 2, 2019 Infrastructure and Environment Committee, provides an accelerated implementation plan for the Don River and Central Waterfront Project (DR&CW), a key project as part of the City's Wet Weather Flow Master Plan (WWFMP), and potential options for intergovernmental funding under federal and provincial infrastructure programs which, upon application and approval, could assist the City to fund the acceleration of the DR&CW.

 

The DR&CW is the largest combined sewer overflow control project in Canada. The current cost for the DR&CW is $2.5 billion and is planned to be implemented in phases over 25 years with construction completion of all project phases and components projected for 2038. Toronto Water's approved 2019-2028 Capital Budget and Plan allocates $1.022 billion for the DR&CW.

 

The accelerated plan provided in this report would have the DR&CW construction completed by 2030, eight years sooner than the original plan, requiring an estimated $1.051 billion in additional capital funding within the current 10 year capital plan, and an additional $181.8 million beyond the 2019-2028 Toronto Water Capital Plan for a total DR&CW cost of $2.35 billion.

 

Approved by City Council in 2011, the DR&CW is an integrated wet weather flow management system to capture, store, and transport and treat combined sewer overflows (CSOs) and stormwater discharges from all combined sewer outfalls to the Lower Don River, Taylor-Massey Creek and Toronto's Inner Harbour. The preliminary design for the DR&CW was completed in 2015 and construction of the first phase, the Lower Don Tunnel/Coxwell Bypass began in 2018.

 

The accelerated plan proposes engineering design and construction for future project phases and components on the following prioritized basis: 1) Inner Harbour West Tunnel and outfall connections; 2) offline storage tanks; and, 3) Taylor-Massey Creek Tunnel, in order to complete construction of all project components in 2030 at the earliest. An expedited delivery schedule and details are outlined in this report.

 

The key benefit of the accelerated plan is achieving DR&CW water quality improvements in the Don River and central waterfront in approximately 10 years' time. This will be a major step towards delisting Toronto's waterfront as a polluted Area of Concern in the Great Lakes Basin and supports the Canada and Ontario efforts to clean-up the Great Lakes under the Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA) and Toronto Remedial Action Plan (RAP). The DR&CW accelerated plan (DR&CW-AP) would also provide for more effective use of constructed infrastructure and improve sewer capacity to service development in Toronto's downtown and along the central waterfront. In addition, the project's acceleration provides considerable implementation efficiencies for future project phases.

 

At this time, based on an assessment of existing intergovernmental funding programs and eligibility criteria, including completion timelines both at the federal and provincial level, there is limited opportunity to secure intergovernmental funding or financing for the DR&CW. City staff will continue to seek opportunities to secure intergovernmental funds to accelerate of DR&CW.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services on Don River and Central Waterfront Accelerated Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134763.pdf
Attachments 1 and 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134764.pdf
Attachment 3 - Background - Don River and Central Waterfront Project
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134805.pdf

Speakers

Hamish Wilson

Communications (Committee)

(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (IE.New.IE6.7.1)
(June 26, 2019) Submission from Hamish Wilson (IE.New.IE6.7.2)

Communications (City Council)

(July 4, 2019) Letter from Janice Solomon, Executive Director, Toronto Entertainment District Business Improvement Area (CC.Main.IE6.7.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-95988.pdf
(July 12, 2019) Letter from Tim Kocur, Executive Director, The Waterfront Business Improvement Area (CC.Supp.IE6.7.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96065.pdf

IE6.8 - Vision Zero 2.0 - Road Safety Plan Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Mayor's second Key Matter and second Item of business on Tuesday, July 16th

Communications IE6.8.9 to IE6.8.14 have been submitted on this Item.

Bill 1085 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council endorse in principle the Vision Zero 2.0 plan as outlined in the report (June 13, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to report back to the appropriate committee where additional authorities are required in order to implement the Vision Zero 2.0 Plan.

 

2.  City Council designate as Community Safety Zones the secondary school locations set out in Attachment 1 to the report (June 13, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, subject to availability of funding in the 2020 budget.

 

3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to negotiate, enter into, and execute agreements, as may be required, with Vital Strategies to receive funding of $50,000USD for the expansion of the Active and Safe Routes to School Pilot project and the continuation of the City of Toronto's involvement in the Bloomberg Philanthropies' Partnership for Healthy Cities Initiative, on such terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

4. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to negotiate, enter into, and execute agreements, as may be required, with Green Communities Canada to receive funding in the amount of $60,000CAD from the Ontario Active School Travel Fund for the expansion of the Active and Safe Routes to School Pilot project, on such terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

5. City Council reduce the speed limit from 60 km/h to 50 km/h on the following road segments as part of the Speed Management Strategy outlined on page 21 in the report (June 13, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services:

 

a. Albion Road from Todd Brook Drive to Silverstone Drive

 

b. Bathurst Street from Delhi Avenue to Steeles Avenue West

 

c. Birchmount Road from Eglinton Avenue East to Steeles Avenue East

 

d. Brimley Road from Eglinton Avenue East to Progress Avenue

 

e. Brimley Road from Sheppard Avenue East to Steeles Avenue East

 

f. Danforth Road from Brimley Road to McCowan Road

 

g. Don Mills Road from A point 24 metres south of the centre line of the Don Valley Parkway to
Kern Road

 

h. Don Mills Road from Duncan Mills Road to Steeles Avenue East

 

i. Dundas Street West from Dunbloor Road to East Mall Crescent

 

j. Eglinton Avenue East from Brentcliffe Road to Kingston Road

 

k. Eglinton Avenue West from Bicknell Ave / Municipal Dr to 200 m west of Pearen Street

 

l. Ellesmere Road from Morningside Avenue to Victoria Park Avenue

 

m. Finch Avenue East from Bayview Avenue to Victoria Park Avenue

 

n. Finch Avenue East from Birchmount Road to Midland Avenue

 

o. Finch Avenue West from Albion Road to Yonge Street

 

p. Islington Avenue from Prince George Drive/Ridgevalley Crescent to Monogram Place

 

q. Keele Street from Greenbrook Drive to Finch Avenue West

 

r. Lawrence Avenue East from Railside Road (west intersection) to Morningside Ave

 

s. Leslie Street from Eglinton Avenue East to McNicoll Avenue

 

t. Markham Road from Kingston Road to Progress Avenue

 

u. Markham Road from Milner Avenue to Steeles Avenue East

 

v. Martin Grove Road from Eglinton Avenue West to Dixon Road

 

w. Martin Grove Road from Jeffcoat Drive to point 250 metres north of Mercury Road/ Westhumber Boulevard

 

x. McCowan Road from Danforth Road to Progress Avenue

 

y. McCowan Road from Milner Avenue to Steeles Avenue East

 

z. Morningside Avenue (Scarborough) from Kingston Road to Tams Road/ Pan Am Drive

 

aa. Morningside Avenue (Scarborough) from Milner Avenue to McLevin Avenue/ Casebridge Court

 

bb. Sheppard Avenue East from Yonge Street to Meadowvale Road

 

cc. Sheppard Avenue West from Weston Road to Yonge Street

 

dd. St. Clair Avenue East from Danforth Road to Birchmount Road

 

ee. Steeles Avenue East from Yonge Street to Warden Avenue

 

ff. Steeles Avenue West from Fenmar Drive to Jane Street

 

gg. Steeles Avenue West from Keele Street to Yonge Street

 

hh. The Queensway from Ellis Avenue to Kipling Avenue

 

ii. Victoria Park Avenue from O'Connor Drive to York Mills Road

 

jj. Victoria Park Avenue from Consumers Road to Steeles Avenue East

 

kk. Warden Avenue from St Clair Avenue East to Metropolitan Road

 

ll. Warden Avenue from Arkona Drive to Steeles Avenue East

 

6. City Council reduce the speed limit from 70 km/h to 60 km/h on the following road segments as part of the Speed Management Strategy outlined on page 21 of the report (June 13, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services:

 

a. Black Creek Drive (Northbound) from Eglinton Avenue West to Weston Road; and

 

b. Black Creek Drive (Southbound) from A point 200 metres north of Weston Road to Eglinton Avenue West.

 

7. City Council reduce the speed limit from 60 km/h to 50 km/h on the following road segments for Pedestrian Safety Corridors as outlined on page 26 of the report (June 13, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services:

 

a. Eglinton Avenue East from Kennedy Road to Kingston Road

 

b. Kennedy Road from St. Clair Avenue East to Lawrence Avenue East

 

c. Victoria Park Avenue from O'Connor Drive/Eglinton Square to Lawrence Avenue East.

 

8. City Council reduce the speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on the following road segments for Pedestrian Safety Corridors as outlined on page 26 of the report (June 13, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services:

 

a. Bathurst Street from St. Clair Avenue West to Briar Hill Avenue

 

b. Dufferin Street from Geary Avenue to Eglinton Avenue West

 

c. St. Clair Avenue West from Runnymede Road to Dufferin Street

 

d. Victoria Park Avenue from Dawes Road to O'Connor Drive/Eglinton Square

 

e. Yonge Street from Eglinton Avenue East/West to Broadway Avenue

 

9. City Council amend the Zebra Crosswalk Policy outlined in Attachment 17 to the report (June 13, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to include them at stop-controlled intersections that meet the following conditions:

 

a.  located within Pedestrian Safety Corridors,

 

b. located within School Safety Zones,

 

c. located within Senior Safety Zones, and

 

d. at locations where safety is, in the opinion of the General Manager, Transportation Services, an issue.

 

10. City Council:

 

a. adopt the Missing Sidewalk Installation Policy in Attachment 2 to the report (June 13, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services.

 

b. delegate final decision making authority to the General Manager, Transportation Services to add sidewalks to local roads as part of a reconstruction or to accommodate a request for a person with a disability.

 

c. amend Chapter 27, Council Procedures to revoke the legislative delegation to Community Councils in respect of sidewalk proposals as set out in Section 27-18.4B.7.

 

d. direct that sidewalk proposals not otherwise delegated to the General Manager, Transportation Services, by Recommendation 10b. above shall be reported on an annual basis to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee for recommendation to City Council. 

 

11. City Council amend Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, to add motorcycles to the Designated Class of Vehicles permitted in reserved lanes on Bay Street from Front Street West to Bloor Street East.

 

12. City Council request the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario to review and amend road safety related educational programs with a Vision Zero lens related to vulnerable road users including but not limited to mandatory motorcycle training program for M-class Licensing; improved cycling education in schools; enhanced vulnerable road user training requirements for all M and G Class driver education schools including improvements to the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Driver's Handbook, Knowledge and Road Tests. 

 

13. City Council request the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario and Transport Canada to explore mandatory Intelligent Speed Assistance in all new motor vehicles including private vehicles and evaluate other in-vehicle safety technologies.

 

14. City Council request the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario to change the maximum Blood Alcohol Concentration for all licensed motorcycle drivers to 0 percent.

 

15. City Council authorize the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to implement vehicle side guards and to further the current video-based telematics technology to improve road safety by:

 

a. authorizing the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to negotiate, and enter into, and execute any and all agreements and amending agreements necessary, subject to available funding, to implement a fleet safety and accountability program for all new and existing, in-house and contracted out vehicles, which aligns with the principles of Vision Zero and the technologies outlined in the report and Attachment 3 to the report (June 13, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor;

 

b. requesting the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to report back annually, through the budget process, on any fleet related safety and accountability enhancements that have been implemented and integrate fleet safety performance as a key performance indicator moving forward;

 

c. approving funding for the capital acquisition for the safety and accountability enhancement retrofits to existing solid waste vehicles in the amount of $3,850,000 to be budgeted in the amount of $2,530,000 in 2019 and $1,320,000 in 2020 from the Waste Management Reserve Fund (XR1404); and 

 

d. approving funding for annual operating costs associated with monitoring and equipment maintenance to be budgeted in the annual Operating Budget in the amount of $55,200 in the 2019 Operating Budget with an equal offset to the contribution to the Waste Management Reserve Fund (XR1404), and directing that future costs be included in the annual Solid Waste Management Services Budget.

 

16. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review the opportunity for a policy that all TTC stops be provided with a controlled crossing in the immediate vicinity working in consultation with the TTC to ensure that this policy does not reduce the number of TTC stops, and report to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in third quarter of 2019.

 

17. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to plan and design road reconstruction projects using a complete streets approach, including the potential for bicycle lanes, at the outset of all road reconstruction projects, in consultation with local councillors and stakeholders.

 

18.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to report to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee on October 17, 2019 with a recommendation for a motorcyclist lane filter pilot program at a suitable location within the City that meets all road safety rule.

Origin

(June 13, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services

Summary

With a renewed commitment to the safe systems approach, this report presents the City of Toronto's update to the Vision Zero Road Safety Plan ("RSP") (2016) - Vision Zero 2.0.While the 2016 RSP included a larger set of mostly shorter term improvements, Vision Zero 2.0 recommends a set of more extensive, more proactive and more targeted initiatives, informed by data and aimed at eliminating serious injury and fatalities on Toronto's roads.

 

While the number of serious injury collisions have remained relatively steady over the past decade, the number of fatal collisions in the past 5 years has seen a general increase compared to the previous 5 years. The upward trend is most notably seen in pedestrian fatalities.

 

Compared to 2016, the year with a ten-year record high of 78 traffic fatalities, the number of fatalities in the past two years appears to have begun to decline. However, no loss of life as a result of traffic collisions is acceptable in a Vision Zero approach, and addressing road safety continues to be a priority for residents, elected officials and staff.

 

The Vision Zero philosophy is a significant departure from the traditional approach to road safety. This transformative change will take several years to fully establish.

 

As Vision Zero solutions are planned and implemented, there are circumstances when decisions to improve road safety may result in outcomes at odds with other objectives like reducing motor vehicle delay. Vision Zero 2.0 reiterates that human life should be prioritized over all other objectives within all aspects of the transportation system. 

 

Since Council approved the Vision Zero RSP in June 2016 Transportation Services has made progress in a wide range of over 40 countermeasures.

 

Following a safe systems approach, Vision Zero 2.0 continues to draw solutions from the 5Es of engineering, enforcement, education, engagement and evaluation. The plan focuses these solutions on 6 emphasis areas of pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists, school-aged children, older adults and aggressive and distracted driving. Vision Zero 2.0 focuses on a set of the most effective actions including:

 

-  Speed management strategy: Higher speeds contribute to higher risk of serious injuries and fatalities by reducing driver reaction time, increasing the vehicle stopping distance, and inflicting more severe blunt force trauma on victims upon impact. The proposed speed management strategy is comprised of seven integrated speed reduction tools aimed at mitigating risks associated with high speeds. These include revised speed limit setting practices, road design improvements, enhanced police enforcement, proactive deployment of Watch Your Speed signs, speed limit reductions, automated speed enforcement and public education.


-  Road design improvements: Geometric modifications to the design of the road are known to be one of the most effective ways of achieving the intended target speed for the context and improving road user behaviour. There will be a greater focus on this safety countermeasure, including integration of safety improvements as a component of planned road work, implementation of shorter-term interim safety improvements and enhancing road illumination.


-  Proactively addressing high-risk mid-block crossings: Mid-block crossings are the most prevalent type of pedestrian collisions resulting in a killed or serious injury incident and account for over 50 percent of pedestrian fatalities. Wide arterials roads with several lanes of traffic, high travel speeds and long distances between signalized crossing opportunities all contribute to high-risk mid-block crossings. Going forward, recommendations in staff reports on traffic signals will be based upon a new contextual approach to traffic signal assessment and will result in the installation of new signals that may not have been previously warranted.


-  Proactively addressing turning collisions at signalized intersection: Left turn and right collisions at signalized intersections are the second most prevalent type of Killed and Serious Injury collisions involving pedestrians (24 percent) and cyclists (20 percent). Pedestrian head start signals will be proactively implemented at most signalized intersections across the city as a default safety feature. Bicycle head start signals will also be implemented where feasible. Right-turn-on-red prohibitions will be strategically deployed at intersections with known relevant collision patterns.


-  Education and engagement plan: The overarching goals of the education and engagement component of Vision Zero programming are informing and consulting with the public, building support for infrastructure improvements, and instituting a shift in social norms and road user behaviour.
 

In addition to the focus actions listed above, a number of other supporting initiatives are outlined in this report. These include:

 

-  Expansion of the red light camera program;
-  Adding safety features such as side guards to City fleet, particularly large vehicles, starting with the Solid Waste Management Division;
-  Development of District Safety Action Plans;
-  Expansion of partnerships for school travel planning programs;
-  Reviewing signal operations practices with a lens of vulnerable road user safety;
-  Advocacy to the Province for mandatory motorcycle training, improved driver training, changing the maximum Blood Alcohol Concentration for all licensed motorcycle drivers to 0 percent.
 

A key focus of Vision Zero 2.0 will be a renewed emphasis on data-driven decision making and prioritization. Efforts in this area include:

 

-  Using predictive analytics to more effectively prioritize and target our safety measures
-  Incorporating a social justice and equity lens;
-  Implementing performance monitoring and evaluation to measure the impact of our safety programs;
-  Working with partners to acquire better data.
 

It is possible that Toronto will continue to see fluctuations, and at times, increases in year-over-year number of serious injuries and fatalities in the short term until the effects of various Vision Zero initiatives are realized. Experience of other cities and countries that have adopted the Vision Zero approach suggests that meaningful change is only possible after several years of sustained and focused commitment.

 

Transportation Services is committed to implementing these actions, with adequate resources, in order to eliminate all traffic fatalities and serious injuries on Toronto's roads.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services on Vision Zero 2.0 - Road Safety Plan Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134964.pdf
Attachment 1 - Amendments to Community Safety Zones
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134985.pdf
Attachment 2 - Missing Sidewalk Installation Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134986.pdf
Attachment 3 - Solid Waste Management Review of Large Vehicle Safety Technologies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134987.pdf
Attachment 4 - Details of Financial Impacts to Operating and Capital Budget of Solid Waste Management Division
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134988.pdf
Attachment 5 - Decision History Related to Components of Vision Zero Road Safety Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134989.pdf
Attachment 6 - Vision Zero Alignment with municipal, Provincial and Federal Policies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134990.pdf
Attachment 7 - Vision Zero Partners and Partnerships
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134991.pdf
Attachment 8 - Jurisdictional scan of Vision Zero initiatives
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134992.pdf
Attachment 9 - Killed or Serious Injury Collisions Trends by Emphasis Area
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134993.pdf
Attachment 10 - Vision Zero RSP Accomplishments by District
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134994.pdf
Attachment 11 - Killed and Serious Injury Heat Maps and Thematic Maps
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134995.pdf
Attachment 12- Proposed Major Arterial Speed Limit Reductions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134996.pdf
Attachment 13 - Sample Local Road Reduced Speed Limit Area Gateway Signage
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134997.pdf
Attachment 14 - Missing Sidewalks - Recommended Amendment to Procedural Bylaw Chapter 27
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134998.pdf
Attachment 15 - List of Cultural Corridor Safety Reviews
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134999.pdf
Attachment 16 - Vision Zero Campaigns, Education Material and Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-135000.pdf
Attachment 17 - Traffic Control Warrants Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-135001.pdf
Attachment 18 - Scarborough District Safety Action Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-135002.pdf
(June 20, 2019) Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-135238.pdf

Speakers

Nancy Smith Lea, The Centre for Active Transportation (TCAT)
Brenda Thompson
Niko Casuncad, 8 80 Cities
Hamish Wilson
Dylan Reid
Jess Spieker
Kevin Rupasinghe
Jared Kolb

Communications (Committee)

(June 23, 2019) E-mail from Piotr Sepski (IE.New.IE6.8.1)
(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (IE.New.IE6.8.2)
(June 25, 2019) Letter from Carol Burtin Fripp (IE.Supp.IE6.8.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/comm/communicationfile-95745.pdf
(June 26, 2019) E-mail from Daniella Levy-Pinto, Walk Toronto (IE.Supp.IE6.8.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/comm/communicationfile-95748.pdf
(June 26, 2019) E-mail from Arlene Desjardins (IE.New.IE6.8.5)
(June 26, 2019) Submission from Hamish Wilson (IE.New.IE6.8.6)
(June 27, 2019) Letter from Nancy Smith Lea, Director, The Centre for Active Transportation, Clean Air Partnership (IE.New.IE6.8.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/comm/communicationfile-95769.pdf
(June 27, 2019) E-mail from Stephanie Borrelle (IE.New.IE6.8.8)

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (CC.New.IE6.8.9)
(July 15, 2019) Submission from Jessica Spieker, Friends and Families for Safe Streets and Daniella Levy-Pinto, Walk Toronto (CC.New.IE6.8.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96129.pdf
(July 15, 2019) Submission from Hamish Wilson (CC.New.IE6.8.11)
(July 15, 2019) Letter from Raymond Chan, Government Relations, CAA South Central Ontario (CC.New.IE6.8.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96131.pdf
(July 15, 2019) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.New.IE6.8.13)
(July 16, 2019) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (CC.New.IE6.8.14)

IE6.9 - Administrative Penalty System for the Red Light Camera and Future Automated Speed Enforcement Programs - Status Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Province to amend the Highway Traffic Act, develop regulations under the Highway Traffic Act, potentially amend the Provincial Offences Act, and make any requisite amendments to any existing regulations to the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the City of Toronto to use an Administrative Penalty System for offences enforced through the use of an Automated Speed Enforcement system and the Red Light Camera system and to ensure revenue from these offences administered through an Administrative Penalty System be payable to the City of Toronto to recover program costs.

Origin

(June 13, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor and the Director, Court Services

Summary

This report provides a status update on City Council's direction through Public Works and Infrastructure Item PW25.10 to investigate the feasibility of adopting an Administrative Penalty System (APS) for both the Red Light Camera (RLC) and future Automated Speed Enforcement (ASE) programs. An APS is an administrative dispute resolution structure that diverts matters from the provincial court system. The City's first APS was commenced on August 28, 2017 for parking violations.

 

The current provisions of the Highway Traffic Act ("HTA") and the Regulations under that Act, the City of Toronto Act, 2006 ("COTA") and O. Reg. 611/06, Administrative Penalties do not authorize the City to proceed with an APS for ASE offences. In addition, current legislation and regulations do not allow RLC offences to be processed through an APS. This report recommends that City Council request the Province to enact and/or amend legislation and regulations to allow the City to implement an APS for RLC and ASE offences under the HTA with revenues from these offences being made payable to the City of Toronto to recover program costs. Without the enabling statutory and regulatory provisions, staff cannot provide a full feasibility report including program recommendations to City Council. Once those provisions are in place, staff will report back on the feasibility of adopting an APS for the RLC and ASE programs.

 

At its January 31st and February 1st, 2018 meeting, City Council requested the City Manager to expedite the development of the business case for information technology (IT) solutions to advance the development of the APS for consideration in the 2018 budget process. A new APS case management system that provides financial management functionality and can accommodate all existing and future charges under the City's APS is critical to ongoing APS operations. Given the scope and complexity of a new APS case management system, the project has already been presented to the Strategy Portfolio and Review Committee for 2020 IT capital budget approval. Staff are currently developing a business case and will report to City Council through the 2020 budget process if additional capital funding is required to support the project.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor and the Director, Court Services on Administrative Penalty System for the Red Light Camera and Future Automated Speed Enforcement Programs - Status Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134671.pdf

Speakers

Derek Moran

IE6.10 - Automated Speed Enforcement Update and Results of the Request for Proposal 9148-19-0048 for the Provision of Automated Speed Enforcement Services

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Purchasing Officer have submitted a supplementary report on this Item (IE6.10a with recommendations)

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee submits the item to City Council without recommendation.

Origin

(June 26, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Transportation and the Chief Purchasing Officer

Summary

On May 30, 2017, the Province of Ontario passed the Safer School Zones Act, 2017 to facilitate the municipal adoption of Automated Speed Enforcement technology on roads with speed limits under 80 km/h in school and community safety zones.  However, this legislation has not yet been proclaimed as in force, and the associated regulations proposed to be enacted are not yet drafted.  The City cannot implement an automated speed enforcement program until the Province proclaims that this legislation is in force.

 

In January 2018, City Council authorized the General Manager, Transportation Services, to proceed with the development of Automated Speed Enforcement in conjunction with the Province and other partnering municipalities.  Since then, City staff have been working with the Ministry of Transportation, the Ministry of the Attorney General, and other partnering municipalities to jointly develop this program. 

 

The purpose of this report is to:

- provide an update on the results of the Automated Speed Enforcement Study.
- provide an overview of the Automated Speed Enforcement program.
- advise on the financial impact of the program.
- advise on the impact of the program on the provincial offences court system.
- advise on the status of the Request for Proposal 9148-19-0048 for the provision of Automated Speed Enforcement Services in the City of Toronto.
- request authority to hire additional staff necessary to operate the automated speed enforcement program.
- request authority to enter into an agreement with the partnering municipalities for the joint processing centre.
- request authority to enter into agreement(s) with Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario, as represented by the Minister of Transportation, for the access and use of licence plate registration information.
- request authority to conduct an educational campaign, including the use of warning letters.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 26, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Transportation and the Chief Purchasing Officer on Automated Speed Enforcement Update and Results of the Request for Proposal 9148-19-0048 for the Provision of Automated Speed Enforcement Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-135477.pdf
(June 13, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Automated Speed Enforcement Update and Results of the Request for Proposal 9148-19-0048 for the Provision of Automated Speed Enforcement Services - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134689.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 12, 2019) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Purchasing Officer on Automated Speed Enforcement Update and Results of the Request for Proposal 9148-19-0048 for the Provision of Automated Speed Enforcement Services (IE6.10a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135946.pdf
Attachment 1: Fairness Attestation Report - Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 9148-19-0048 for the Supply, Installation, Operation, Maintenance and Decommissioning of Automated Speed Enforcement (ASE) Systems within the City of Toronto and Other Municipalities within Ontario
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136051.pdf

IE6.11 - Cycling Network Plan Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications IE6.11.16 to IE6.11.30 have been submitted on this item..

Items IE6.11 and IE6.12 will be considered together.

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council endorse the Cycling Network Plan as outlined in this report and mapped as the proposed cycling network and near-term cycling implementation program (2019 - 2021) in Attachments 1 and 4 to the report (June 13, 2019) from the General Manger, Transportation Services as the framework for bringing forward cycling infrastructure projects for subsequent Council approval.

 

2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to undertake the feasibility analysis, detailed design, and public consultation required to deliver cycling infrastructure projects contained in the near-term implementation program (2019 - 2021).

 

3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to initiate the near-term studies of the Major City-Wide Cycling Routes as outlined in this report and mapped in Attachment 2 to the report (June 13, 2019) from the General Manger, Transportation Services, and to bring forward the findings of these studies and recommendations regarding future implementation at the appropriate time. 

 

4. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to consider, as part of the annual capital and operating budget process, the capital funding required to implement the near-term cycling implementation program (2019 - 2021) at a rate of $16 million dollars annually, as well as the operating budget required to fund the maintenance costs of newly constructed cycling infrastructure.

 

5. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to target completion of the Danforth Avenue Planning and Complete Streets Study by June 2021.  

 

6. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in the second quarter of 2020, in order to inform the Danforth Avenue Planning and Complete Streets Study, on options for the following cycling infrastructure Study components:

 

a.  Detailed design of a pilot project for eastbound and westbound cycle tracks on Danforth Avenue East from Coxwell Avenue to Dawes Road;
b.  Installation of bike counters to demonstrate trends in daily cycling volumes; and,
c.  Additional consultation with local stakeholders including Councillors, BIAs, and residents’ groups.  

 

7. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to identify any additional capital or operating budget requirements to deliver recommendations 5 and 6 above through the City’s 2020 budget process if required.

 

8.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to report back by the last quarter of 2021, regarding implementation progress of the Cycling Network Plan, including updates on outcomes such as number of km of cycling infrastructure installed, network coverage - the proportion of people in close proximity to the cycling network, and the impact on safety and cycling mode share.

  

9.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, work with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to create a working group of city staff and local stakeholders to assess complete street options for University Avenue in conjunction with the TOCore Great Streets framework and to consider alternative streets to University Avenue for the installation of north south Bike Lanes west of Yonge Street.

 

10.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, consider as part of the planned resurfacing of Harbord Street, an upgrade of the existing bike lane to a cycle track, including appropriate consultation with stakeholders.

 

11. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to initiate planning, design and consultation for an extension of the Bloor Street West cycle tracks from Shaw Street to High Park Avenue, with implementation targeted to take place as early as summer 2020.

 

12.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to consider as part of the Bloor Street East cycle track improvements, the feasibility of establishing a separated bike lane on Bloor Street from Avenue Road to Church street connecting the Bloor cycle track on Bloor Street East and Bloor Street West.

 

13.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to triple the number of bike ring installations on the Danforth Avenue.

 

14.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services take measures to improve pedestrian safety, especially for seniors and to serve seniors' residences along the Danforth.

 

15.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to initiate the detailed design for a pilot project with eastbound and westbound cycle tracks on Danforth Avenue from Coxwell Avenue west to Broadview Avenue which takes loading and unloading issues into account.

 

16.  City Council request the Toronto Police Services to consider siting the Toronto Police Services main bike collision reporting centre at the new police station at Danforth Avenue and Coxwell Avenue.

 

17.  City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to, similar in concept to the warrant process for traffic calming, report on the merits of a warrant system for the installation of cycling infrastructure which includes benchmarks for bike traffic volume and other metrics, reporting back in the first quarter of 2020.

 

18. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to develop a back-end review process for evaluating the success of new cycling infrastructure that measures usage against defined metrics, such as number of cyclists.  

 

19.  City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to develop a pilot project to allow bike traffic on sidewalks, for example where there is a high volume of car traffic and few pedestrians and report back by the fourth quarter of 2020 on the merits of allowing cyclists on designated sidewalks.  

 

20.  City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to perform a count of cyclists using the Flemingdon Park and Thorncliffe Park bike lanes in August, 2020.

Origin

(June 13, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the implementation progress for the City's Cycling Network Plan, establish a priority framework for Major City-Wide Cycling Routes, and share next steps for effective implementation of proposed cycling infrastructure. The Cycling Network Plan, alongside the draft Official Plan cycling policies currently under review, present a strong vision for improving cycling across the city.

 

More people are riding bicycles in Toronto than ever before, especially where new or improved cycling infrastructure has been provided. In some Toronto neighbourhoods, the cycling mode share is now over 20 percent. Demand for safe, connected cycling routes throughout the city is on the rise, and recent polls demonstrate the majority of residents support protected bike lanes.

 

This report provides information requested by City Council as part of a two year review of the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan (2016), including status, changes to project timing, and recommendations for the initiation of major studies. This updated Cycling Network Plan also reflects enhanced analyses and lessons from implementation challenges to date.

 

Moving forward, the Cycling Network Plan will consist of two components: a near-term capital implementation program for cycling infrastructure (currently 2019 to 2021), and an overall proposed network (currently 2022+).

 

The Cycling Network Plan Update maintains the originally established goals of Connect, Grow, and Renew, with newly articulated objectives and measures that correspond to each of the three overarching goals, providing additional clarity and indicators for evaluating success. The Cycling Network Plan Update also helps achieve a key proposed cycling policy objective in the City's Official Plan of bringing all Toronto residents within one kilometre (km) of a designated cycling route, as well as the TransformTO long-term goal that 75 percent of trips under 5 km are walked or cycled by 2050.

 

The review process undertaken for the Update has incorporated the City's Equity Lens Tool and demonstrates a stronger commitment to reducing inequities experienced by Toronto's vulnerable populations. The Update has also strengthened the Plan's focus on safety, with more detailed analyses of collisions, and more connections and initiatives linked to the Vision Zero Road Safety Plan.

 

As part of the work undertaken for the Update, a new map illustrating Toronto's Major City-Wide Cycling Routes has been developed to communicate the significant projects completed, underway, and proposed, which serve as the backbone of the cycling network.

 

From 2016 to 2018, over 100 km of existing cycling routes received upgrades and enhancements to improve safety, and approximately 60 km of new cycling infrastructure was installed:

 

-   15 lane km of cycle tracks
-   18 lane km of bike lanes
-   13 lane km of shared lane pavement markings
-   12 centreline km of multi-use trails
 

Over the next three years (2019 to 2021), over 120 km of new cycling infrastructure is planned, with additional upgrades to existing infrastructure through the Vision Zero Road Safety Plan. Additionally, over 70 km of routes will be studied within the near-term (2019 - 2021) for potential implementation.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Cycling Network Plan Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134913.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map of Proposed Cycling Network by Analysis Scores
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134914.pdf
Attachment 2 - Map of Major City-Wide Cycling Routes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134915.pdf
Attachment 3 - Map and Table of Cycling Infrastructure Completed 2016 - 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134916.pdf
Attachment 4 - Maps of Near-Term Implementation Program 2019 - 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134917.pdf
Attachment 5 - Stakeholder Engagement Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134918.pdf
Attachment 6 - Analysis Methodology and Enhancements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134919.pdf
Attachment 7 - Maps of Cycling Analysis Results by Category
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134920.pdf
Attachment 8 - Project Selection Process Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134921.pdf
Attachment 9 - Routes Removed from Proposed Network
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134922.pdf
Attachment 10 - Project-specific Council Request Responses
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134923.pdf

Speakers

Albert Koehl
Nancy Smith Lea, The Centre for Active Transportation (TCAT)
Claire Nelischer, Ryerson City Building Institute
Gideon Forman, The David Suzuki Foundation
Liza Lukashevsky
Hamish Wilson
Michael Polanyi
Hilda Swirsky , Ontario Nurses for the Environment
Kevin Rupasinghe, Cycle Toronto
Nathan Gomes
Jared Kolb
Councillor Brad Bradford
Councillor Frances Nunziata

Communications (Committee)

(June 24, 2019) Multiple Communications from Multiple Communications from 452 Individuals Supporting Bike Lanes on Danforth Avenue and Bloor Street (IE.New.IE6.11.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/comm/communicationfile-95665.pdf
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Robert J. A. Zaichkowski (IE.New.IE6.11.2)
(June 26, 2019) E-mail from Chantelle Campbell-Sholzberg, Culture Link (IE.New.IE6.11.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/comm/communicationfile-95733.pdf
(June 27, 2019) Letter from Deputy Mayor Ana Bailão, Councillor Mike Layton and Councillor Gord Perks (IE.New.IE6.11.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/comm/communicationfile-95734.pdf
(June 26, 2019) E-mail from Gerry Brown (IE.New.IE6.11.5)
(June 26, 2019) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Holly Reid and Louis Fliss, Cycle Don Valley Midtown (IE.New.IE6.11.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/comm/communicationfile-95753.pdf
(June 26, 2019) Letter from Giselle Cordova, Assistant Curriculum Leader for ESL (IE.New.IE6.11.7)
(June 27, 2019) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (IE.New.IE6.11.8)
(June 26, 2019) Letter from Jared Kolb, Cycle Toronto (IE.New.IE6.11.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/comm/communicationfile-95768.pdf
(June 27, 2019) Submission from Catherine Orion (IE.New.IE6.11.10)
(June 27, 2019) Letter from Councillor Brad Bradford, Beaches-East York, Ward 19 (IE.New.IE6.11.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/comm/communicationfile-95760.pdf
(June 27, 2019) Letter from Albert Koehl, Bells on Bloor (IE.New.IE6.11.12)
(June 27, 2019) Letter from Nancy Lea Smith, Director, The Centre for Active Transportation, Clean Air Partnership (IE.New.IE6.11.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/comm/communicationfile-95773.pdf
(June 27, 2019) E-mail from Niko Casuncad, 8 80 Cities (IE.New.IE6.11.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/comm/communicationfile-95774.pdf
(June 26, 2019) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chairs, Federation of North Toronto Resident's Associations (IE.New.IE6.11.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/comm/communicationfile-95786.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 27, 2019) E-mail from Lucinda Gergley-Garner (CC.Main.IE6.11.16)
(June 28, 2019) E-mail from Colin Mattison (CC.Main.IE6.11.17)
(July 15, 2019) Multiple Communications from 19 Individuals Supporting Bike Lanes on Danforth Avenue and Bloor Street (CC.Main.IE6.11.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96005.pdf
(July 10, 2019) E-mail from Brian Smegal (CC.Supp.IE6.11.19)
(July 11, 2019) E-mail from Murray and Linda Lumley (CC.Supp.IE6.11.20)
(July 15, 2019) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Holly Reid, and Louis Fliss, Cycle Toronto Don Valley Midtown (CC.New.IE6.11.21)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96110.pdf
(July 15, 2019) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.New.IE6.11.22)
(May 21, 2019) Letter from various merchants, groups and representatives of Bloor Street West (Shaw Street to HIgh Park) (CC.New.IE6.11.23)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96112.pdf
(July 15, 2019) Submission from Rebecca Goodwin, Member, Steering Committee, Walk Toronto (CC.New.IE6.11.24)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96114.pdf
(July 5, 2019) Letter from Kathleen Mackey on behalf of 32 Spokes (CC.New.IE6.11.25)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96145.pdf
(July 16, 2019) E-mail from Mary Ann Neary (CC.New.IE6.11.26)
(July 16, 2019) Submission from Morva Rohani, Senior Public Policy Associate, Uber Canada (CC.New.IE6.11.27)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96149.pdf
(July 16, 2019) E-mail from David Edwards (CC.New.IE6.11.28)
(July 16, 2019) E-mail from Chantal Stepa, Market Manager, The Withrow Park Farmers' Market (CC.New.IE6.11.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96175.pdf
(July 16, 2019) Multiple Communications from 7 People from the Toronto-Danforth Community Members, Businesses and Community Groups (CC.New.IE6.11.30)

IE6.12 - Cycling Network Plan: 2019 Cycling Infrastructure Installation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
2 - Etobicoke Centre, 5 - York South - Weston, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 18 - Willowdale, 25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park
Attention
Items IE6.11 and IE6.12 will be considered together.

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council authorize the installation of bicycle lanes on the following sections of roadway, as described in Attachment 2 - Designated Bicycle Lanes, to the report (June 14, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services:

 

a. Argyle Street (from Ossington Avenue to a point 20 metres east)

b. Blue Jays Way (from Navy Wharf Court to King Street West)

c. Vaughan Road (from Northcliffe Boulevard to Oakwood Avenue)

d. Lawrence Avenue East (from Port Union Road to Rouge Hills Drive)

 

2. City Council authorize the installation of cycle tracks on the following sections of roadway, as described in Attachment 3 - Designated Cycle Tracks, to the report (June 14, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services:

 

a. Scarlett Road (from Bernice Crescent to 105 metres south of Edenbridge Drive)

b. Willowdale Avenue (from Empress Avenue to Bishop Avenue)

 

3. City Council authorize the conversion of the bicycle lanes on Conlins Road, from Canmore Boulevard to Sheppard Avenue East, to cycle tracks, as described in Attachment 2 - Designated Bicycle Lanes and Attachment 3 - Designated Cycle Tracks, to the report (June 14, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

4. City Council authorize the amendments to traffic and parking regulations associated with Recommendations 1, 2 and 3, as described in Attachment 4 - Amendments to Traffic and Parking Regulations, to the report (June 14, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

5. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to submit the anticipated report on the conversion of the existing pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Scarlett Road and Eileen Avenue to traffic signals to Etobicoke York Community Council at its meeting on September 16, 2019.

Origin

(June 14, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The Ten Year Cycling Network Plan, adopted by Council in June 2016 seeks to build on the existing network of cycling routes to connect gaps in the current network, grow the network into new parts of the city, and renew existing parts of the network to improve safety.

 

Following the completion of feasibility assessments, design and consultation with area residents, this report seeks Council authority to install the following cycling infrastructure totalling approximately 11.6 lane kilometres proposed in the Cycling Network Plan:

 

- Scarlett Road (cycle track: Wards 2 and 5, 3.1 lane km)
- Blue Jays Way (bicycle lane: Ward 10, 1.1 lane km)
- Vaughan Road (bicycle lane: Ward 12, 550 m) & 550 m of shared lanes
- Willowdale Avenue (cycle track: Ward 18, 2.8 lane km)
- Lawrence Avenue East (bicycle lane: Ward 25, 3.5 lane km)
 

This report also seeks Council authority to make improvements approximately 2.8 lane km of the existing cycling infrastructure on the following streets:

 

- Argyle Street (contra-flow bicycle lane: Ward 10, 20 m) & 180 m of shared lanes
- Conlins Road (cycle track: Ward 25, 2.6 lane km)
 

The changes proposed will improve safety and mobility options for residents by providing improved cycling connections to transit, parks, local schools, event venues, businesses and residences.  No significant impact to traffic operations, TTC, or emergency services is anticipated.

 

Transportation Services proposes to install the above cycling facilities in 2019 and 2020.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 14, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Cycling Network Plan: 2019 Cycling Infrastructure Installation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134711.pdf
Attachment 1: Proposed Cycling Network Installation Location Maps
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134712.pdf
Attachment 2: Designated Bicycle Lanes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134713.pdf
Attachment 3: Designated Cycle Tracks
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134714.pdf
Attachment 4: Amendments to Traffic and Parking Regulations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134715.pdf

Speakers

Hamish Wilson
Glen Levin
Jeff Horodyski, Silverview Community Association
Nathan Gomes
Raj Dharmaraj, Bayview Cummer Neighbourhood Association

Communications (Committee)

(June 20, 2019) E-mail from Leslie MacLeod (IE.New.IE6.12.1)
(June 21, 2019) E-mail from Charles Mangion (IE.New.IE6.12.2)
(June 21, 2019) E-mail from Raymond Kennedy (IE.New.IE6.12.3)
(June 22, 2019) E-mail from Raj Bharati (IE.New.IE6.12.4)
(June 23, 2019) E-mail from Sophia Rasheed (IE.New.IE6.12.5)
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Andrew Akman (IE.New.IE6.12.6)
(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Jessica Presotto (IE.New.IE6.12.7)
(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Dan Green (IE.New.IE6.12.8)
(June 26, 2019) E-mail from Maria Amaral, Glen Levin and Thereza Stephens (IE.New.IE6.12.9)
(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Eleanor Millman (IE.Supp.IE6.12.10)
(June 26, 2019) Letter from Larry Saunders (IE.Supp.IE6.12.11)
(June 26, 2019) E-mail from Adam Pounder (IE.Supp.IE6.12.12)
(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Janet Risovich (IE.New.IE6.12.13)
(June 26, 2019) Letter from Warren Zweig, Sutton's Garden Supplies (IE.Supp.IE6.12.14)
(June 26, 2019) E-mail from Alanna Janssen (IE.Supp.IE6.12.15)
(June 26, 2019) E-mail from Charley Morrison (IE.New.IE6.12.16)
(June 26, 2019) E-mail from Christopher Caputo (IE.New.IE6.12.17)
(June 26, 2019) Letter from Bayview Cummer Neighbourhood Association (IE.New.IE6.12.18)

IE6.13 - GO Expansion Program - Steeles Avenue East Grade Separation and Temporary Diversion Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - Scarborough - Agincourt
Attention
Bill 1159 has been submitted on this item.

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council temporarily close Steeles Avenue East, between Redlea Avenue and Silver Star Boulevard, to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic from September 1, 2019 to August 31, 2021, inclusive, for purposes of the grade separation construction.

 

2. City Council authorize public highway designation for the diversion road, between Redlea Avenue and Silver Star Boulevard, as shown in Attachments 3 to 5 of the report (June 21, 2019) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, from September 1, 2019 to August 31, 2021. The diversion road will be dedicated in name as Steeles Avenue East.

 

3.  City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take all steps necessary to implement the proposed dedication referred to in Recommendation 2, including requesting the City Solicitor to prepare and submit the relevant bills and to pay any costs necessary to register the resultant by-laws, if required.

 

4.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to negotiate, enter into and execute any necessary agreements and documents, and take steps and measures necessary, on behalf of the City, to temporarily exercise the City's authority.

 

5. City Council authorize a 40 km/h speed limit from September 1, 2019 to August 31, 2021, inclusive, on the Steeles Avenue East diversion road, between Redlea Avenue and Silver Star Boulevard.

 

6. City Council prohibit stopping at all times from September 1, 2019 to August 31, 2021 on the north and south sides of the Steeles Avenue East diversion road, between Redlea Avenue and Silver Star Boulevard.

 

7.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, in issuing any requisite permits to include additional permit terms and conditions as the General Manager of Transportation Services deems necessary and appropriate.

Origin

(June 21, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

As part of Metrolinx's GO Expansion Program (formerly known as the Regional Express Rail Program), the existing at-grade railway crossing of the GO Transit Stouffville line at Steeles Avenue East will be replaced by a grade separated railway crossing.

 

In order to facilitate construction of the grade separation structure, Steeles Avenue East, between Redlea Avenue and Silver Star Boulevard, will be closed for a period of up to 24 months. Vehicular traffic on Steeles Avenue East will be temporarily shifted to a diversion road located to the north of the existing roadway and within the current jurisdiction of the City of Markham and York Region. The City of Markham and York Region have provided their consent to temporarily extend the City of Toronto's jurisdiction to the diversion road.

 

This report seeks Council approval to close the existing Steeles Avenue East, between Redlea Avenue and Silver Star Boulevard, for a period of 24 months (September 1, 2019 to August 31, 2021) in order to facilitate construction of the grade separation structure. Additionally, this report seeks Council approval to designate the diversion road as a public highway and implement traffic by-laws for a period of 24 months.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 21, 2019) Report and Attachments 1 to 5 from the General Manager, Transportation Services on GO Expansion Program - Steeles Avenue East Grade Separation and Temporary Diversion Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-135262.pdf
(June 13, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on GO Expansion Program - Steeles Avenue East Grade Separation and Temporary Diversion Road - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-134685.pdf

IE6.14 - Supporting an Increase in Bicycle Parking at Schools

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:


1.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to negotiate, enter into, and execute an agreement with the Toronto District School Board for the provision of funding by the City of Toronto up to $350,000, and the Toronto Catholic District School Board for up to $200,000 for bicycle parking infrastructure, that the agreement be generally in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the March 19, 2018 report EX 32.22, and upon such additional terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(June 27, 2019) Letter from Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 6 York Centre

Summary

This motion recommends that City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to negotiate, enter into, and execute an agreement with each of the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board pursuant to which the City of Toronto would transfer funds to each for the provision of bicycle parking on school properties.

 

The funding will be applied to the installation of bicycle parking at up to 300 schools in Toronto. Cycling to school reduces motor vehicle trips and improves student health and wellbeing. The Toronto District School Board (TDSB) and Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) have set a goal of 7% of trips to school by bike by 2025.

 

The City of Toronto has received funding through the Ontario Municipal Commuter Cycling (OMCC) Fund to provide bicycle parking at Toronto schools under a Transfer Payment Agreement with the Province (OMCC Agreement). The OMCC Agreement requires that OMCC funding may only be used to support up to 80% of eligible costs for eligible projects and that the City is required to provide funding for at least 20% of the eligible costs. The City's matching funds are available within the 2019-2028 Capital Budget & Plan. OMCC funding expires at the end of 2020.

 

Subject to the execution of the required agreement with each of the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board, funding for bicycle parking infrastructure would be provided by the City of Toronto to each school board. A portion (80%) of the funding provided by the City of Toronto to each of the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School board would come from the OMCC Fund in accordance with the terms of the City's Transfer Payment Agreement with the Province. The bicycle racks and other assets purchased through these agreements would be installed on school properties and these assets would be the responsibility of the respective school board. Any agreements would include an indemnity to the City of Toronto.

 

This motion is urgent in order to ensure the necessary agreements can be finalized, and the bicycle parking racks purchased and installed before the OMCC funding expires at the end of 2020.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 27, 2019) Letter from Councillor James Pasternak on Supporting an Increase in Bicycle Parking at Schools
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-135331.pdf

IE6.15 - Enwave Energy Corporation Construction on Wellington Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services in consultation with the City Solicitor to negotiate, enter into and execute an amendment to the existing "Lease of City Decommissioned Underground Pipe System" with Zayo Canada Inc. to remove the portion of City-owned pipe generally located between Wellington Street from Windsor Street to Clarence Square, to include the replacement conduits to the scope of the lease, and such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager Transportation Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor;

 

2.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, in issuing any requisite permits to include additional permit terms and conditions as the General Manager, Transportation Services deems necessary and appropriate;

 

3.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to negotiate, enter into and execute any necessary agreements and documents, and take steps and measures necessary, on behalf of the City to facilitate the removal of a section of the leased pipe by Enwave and the installation of the new conduits;  and

 

4.  City Council delegate standing authority to the General Manager, Transportation Services to amend the "Lease of City Decommissioned Underground Pipe System" with Zayo Group Holdings, Inc., from time to time, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor subject to the following condition:

 

a. any amendment shall not materially impact the potential liability of the City.

Origin

(June 25, 2019) Letter from Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 10, Spadina-Fort York

Summary

Enwave Energy Corporation (Enwave) is undertaking a westerly expansion project of their chilled and hot water system in part to service "The Well" development at the northwest corner of Front Street West and Spadina Avenue. The service route includes Wellington Street West from Windsor Street to Clarence Square. The preferred route for this expansion conflicts with an existing abandoned 750 mm watermain that is owned by the City and is currently leased to Zayo Canada Inc. (Zayo).  At the present time, Zayo has confirmed that it does not have any infrastructure inside the watermain. Enwave is proposing at its sole cost and expense to remove the watermain in this section of roadway in order to install their infrastructure.

 

As part of their project, Enwave will be providing at its sole cost and expense a 2-100mm diameter PVC conduits within their new trench for future use by the City.

 

In order to facilitate this work, City Council authority is required in order to amend the existing Lease of City Decommissioned Pipe System for Telecommunication Purposes, dated September 1, 2012 (the "Lease") with Zayo. 

Background Information (Committee)

(June 25, 2019) Letter from Councillor Joe Cressy on Enwave Energy Corporation Construction on Wellington Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-135491.pdf

Planning and Housing Committee - Meeting 7

PH7.1 - Changing Lanes: The City of Toronto's Review of Laneway Suites - City-wide Expansion of City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications PH7.1.17 and PH7.1.18 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the Official Plan substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment 460 appended as Attachment 4 to the report (June 5, 2019) from The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2. City Council amend the draft Zoning By-law Amendment appended as attachment 5 to the report (June 5, 2019) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, by removing the Asquith-Collier, Ramsden Park, and Yorkville neighbourhoods as delineated in Site and Area Specific Policy 211 of the Official Plan, from the area to which the proposed By-law amendment will apply.

 

3. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment appended as Attachment 5 to this report (June 5, 2019) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and as amended by Recommendation 2 above.

 

4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

5. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to consider permitting laneway suites within the Asquith-Collier, Ramsden Park, and Yorkville neighbourhoods as part of the ongoing review of Site and Area Specific Policy 211.

 

6. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as part of the monitoring report, to review all minor variance applications for laneway suites and include an analysis and discussion of these applications in the laneway suites report originally directed by City Council at its meeting on June 26, 2018 in its decision on Item TE33.3.

 
7. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to consult with the Federation of North Toronto Residents Associations as part of the consultation undertaken for the monitoring report noted in Recommendation 7, above.

 
8. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with appropriate city officials, to initiate a staff training program within all City Districts to ensure consistent city-wide understanding and application of the Laneway Suites Policies and By-law provisions.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Housing Committee held a statutory public meeting on July 3, 2019, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 5, 2019) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

On June 26, 2018, City Council approved Official Plan Amendment 403 and Zoning By-law Amendment 810-2018 to allow laneway suites within the boundaries of the Toronto and East York District as the boundaries existed in 2018. This report recommends extending permissions for Laneway Suites to areas adjacent to public laneways zoned for low-rise residential uses across the City.

 

Laneway suites are considered a type of second unit permitted by the Official Plan.  A laneway suite is a self-contained residential unit, subordinate to a primary dwelling, in which both kitchen and bathroom facilities are provided and located on a lot within an ancillary building, adjacent to a public laneway. Laneway suites provide an additional form of contextually appropriate low-rise housing within the City's neighbourhoods and are part of complete communities. They can provide more opportunities for people to live close to where they work, shop, and play and, can help make the city's urban lanes more green, liveable, and safe. Laneway suites can contribute to increasing the supply of rental housing and provide additional housing options for households at different ages and life stages.

 

On February 12, 2019, Planning and Housing Committee requested that City Planning, in consultation with appropriate staff, undertake a review and consultation on expanding the current policy and regulatory framework for laneway suites city-wide. This report responds to Planning and Housing Committee's request.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 5, 2019) Report and Attachments 1 to 3 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Changing Lanes: The City of Toronto's Review of Laneway Suites - City-wide Expansion of City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135115.pdf
Attachment 4 - Draft Official Plan Amendment No. 460
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135116.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment (By-law No. 569-2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135117.pdf
(June 11, 2019) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135118.pdf

Speakers

Jeremy Schwartz
Kathrin Bohr, ABC Residents Association
Karen Gorsline, ABC Residents Association
Craig Race
Abbad Al Radi
Councillor Joe Cressy

Communications (Committee)

(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Lawrence Lus (PH.New.PH7.1.1)
(June 27, 2019) Letter from Alyssa Rhynold, Land and Right-of-Way Administrator, Trans Northern Pipelines Inc. (PH.New.PH7.1.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95785.pdf
(June 28, 2019) E-mail from Rohan Walters (PH.New.PH7.1.3)
(June 28, 2019) Letter from John Caliendo and Ian Carmichael, Co-Presidents, ABC Residents Association (PH.New.PH7.1.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95809.pdf
(June 28, 2019) Letter from Daniel Brent, Planner, Planning and Policy, Policy Planning, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (PH.New.PH7.1.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95825.pdf
(July 2, 2019) E-mail from Deborah Mesher (PH.New.PH7.1.6)
(July 2, 2019) Letter from Sean Galbraith, Galbraith and Associates (PH.New.PH7.1.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95828.pdf
(July 2, 2019) E-mail from Anton Lodder (PH.New.PH7.1.8)
(July 2, 2019) E-mail from Taras Kulyk (PH.New.PH7.1.9)
(July 2, 2019) E-mail from Brian O'Brian (PH.New.PH7.1.10)
(July 2, 2019) E-mail from Mary Alton (PH.New.PH7.1.11)
(July 2, 2019) E-mail from Daphne Hubble (PH.New.PH7.1.12)
(July 2, 2019) Letter from Brian Kelcey, Toronto Region Board of Trade (PH.New.PH7.1.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95848.pdf
(July 2, 2019) E-mail from Cameron MacLeod (PH.New.PH7.1.14)
(July 2, 2019) Letter from Lanescape founders Andrew Sorbara, Alex Sharpe, and Craig Race (PH.New.PH7.1.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95886.pdf
(July 2, 2019) Letter from Michael Collins, President, Toronto Real Estate Board (PH.New.PH7.1.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95895.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 2, 2019) Letter from Brian Kelcey, Vice President, Public Affairs and Advocacy, Toronto Region Board of Trade (CC.Main.PH7.1.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-95991.pdf
(July 15, 2019) Letter from Christian Chan, Land Use Planner, C2 Planning (CC.New.PH7.1.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96115.pdf

PH7.2 - Cask Force - Zoning By-law Amendments for Breweries and Related Uses

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bills 1182 and 1183 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommend that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment appended as Attachment 1 to the report (June 10, 2019) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 as amended, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment appended as Attachment 2 to the report (June 10, 2019) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and,

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Housing Committee held a statutory public meeting on  July 3, 2019, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

The number of local breweries in Toronto has increased considerably over the last decade to become an important part of the City’s economic and cultural identity. In 2015, City Council requested that staff work with owners and operators of craft breweries to help grow the craft beer sector and make Toronto “the craft beer capital of the world”. In 2017 City Council requested that staff consider amendments to the Zoning By-law permissions for breweries, restaurants, and related uses to help support and grow the craft brewery industry, and that staff hold consultations on these amendments.

 

This report responds to the 2017 request from City Council  and summarizes proposed zoning by-law amendments related to eating establishments, retail stores, and beverage manufacturing uses in the City’s Commercial and Employment Industrial zones. The proposed amendments are based on previous consultation with the City’s Craft Beer Industry, as well as public consultation, and are intended to better reflect the varied and contemporary operating nature of the City’s many local breweries.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Cask Force - Zoning By-law Amendments for Breweries and Related Uses
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135140.pdf
Attachment 1 - Draft By-law Amendment (Amending By-law 569-2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135142.pdf
Attachment 2 - Draft By-law Amendment (Amending By-law 438-86)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135143.pdf
(June 11, 2019) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135144.pdf

PH7.3 - Appeals of City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 - Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PH7.3a with recommendations)

Confidential Attachment - This report is about litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies or corporations and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege This report contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 18, 2019) from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 and Appendix A to Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 18, 2019) from the City Solicitor, if they are adopted by City Council.
  

3.  City Council direct that all other information in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 18, 2019) from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential in its entirety, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Origin

(June 18, 2019) Report from from the City Solicitor

Summary

On March 1, 2018, the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), predecessor of the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) issued its Decision and Order on the Phase 2 Hearing of the appeals of By-law 569-2013 concerning the regulations of the Chapter 10 Residential Zone Category.  The OMB ordered the City to review certain regulations in Chapter 10 mainly relating to height with some specifically for lots with frontages of 12 metres or less.

 

The continuation of the Phase 2 Hearing has been scheduled by the LPAT for October 16-18, 2019 to consider the results of the City's review and the City Solicitor is seeking direction from City Council.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on Appeals of City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 - Request for Direction
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135023.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Appendix A to Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information

Background Information (City Council)

Confidential Appendix A to Confidential Attachment 1 to report (June 18, 2019) from the City Solicitor - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136314.pdf
(July 5, 2019) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor on Appeals of City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 - Request for Direction (PH7.3a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135894.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 to the Supplementary Report from the City Solicitor - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136285.pdf

Speakers

Geoff Kettel, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CORRA)

Communications (Committee)

(June 30, 2019) Letter from Veronica Wynne, President, Swansea Area Ratepayer Association (PH.New.PH7.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95829.pdf
(July 2, 2019) E-mail from Jessica Wilson, President, Ossington Community Association, Representative, West Side Community Council, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident & Ratepayers Associations in Toronto (PH.New.PH7.3.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95831.pdf
(June 30, 2019) Letter from Veronica Wynne, Secretary and Geoff Kettel, Vice-Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (PH.New.PH7.3.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95847.pdf
(July 2, 2019) Letter from Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chair of Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations (PH.New.PH7.3.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95894.pdf

PH7.4 - A New Approvals Framework for Toronto Community Housing Corporation Revitalization Projects

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services has submitted supplementary reports on this Item (PH7.4b with recommendations and PH7.4c for information)

Bills 1132 and 1133 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council amend the Shareholder Direction to require Toronto Community Housing Corporation to work with City divisions and agencies in planning and implementing revitalization projects to ensure that the projects contribute appropriately to city-building objectives by incorporating a range of housing options including net new affordable housing opportunities.

 
2.  City Council, as sole shareholder, direct the Toronto Community Housing Corporation Board of Directors to direct the President and Chief Executive Officer of Toronto Community Housing Corporation to work with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to identify opportunities for new affordable rental housing units on Toronto Community Housing Corporation lands.
 

3.  City Council direct that all Board-approved proposals from Toronto Community Housing Corporation related to revitalizations and redevelopment opportunities, including any demolition and reconstruction of multiple buildings and infill opportunities, be directed to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, for review and recommendation in consultation with the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, the Executive Director, Financial Planning, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the joint CreateTO and City-led Strategic Program Management Committee prior to being recommended to City Council for approval of an Initial Development Proposal (which will include all details outlined on page 9 of the report (July 2, 2019) from the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services).
 

4.  Subject to City Council approval of an Initial Development Proposal as contemplated in recommendation 3 above, Council direct the President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation to undertake a public procurement process to select a development partner and work through the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, who will work in consultation with the joint CreateTO and City-led Strategic Program Management Committee, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to assess all proposals including the proposed business terms, integration of city-building objectives, and site considerations.

 
5.  Prior to undertaking the public procurement process for future revitalizations/redevelopment including infill projects, as contemplated in recommendation 4 above, City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to work with Toronto Community Housing Corporation to:
 

a.  provide key planning principles and guidelines for each site; and

 
b.  support the revitalizations and redevelopment projects by implementing an expedited review process.
 

6.  City Council direct that developer proposals deemed satisfactory by the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, the joint CreateTO and City-led Strategic Program Management Committee (including Toronto Community Housing Corporation), the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning be recommended to Council for approval by way of an Actions Report from the City Manager and Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services seeking consents for revitalization/redevelopment from the Shareholder and Service Manager (including details outlined on page 10 of the report (July 2, 2019) from the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services.

 
7.  City Council direct that the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO, report annually to the Planning and Housing Committee on the status of all active revitalization projects including the status of delivery of affordable housing where applicable.

 
8.  City Council direct that the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the joint CreateTO and City-led Strategic Program Management Committee review the Initial Development Proposal for the revitalization of Firgrove-Grassways  in line with the revised approval framework outlined in this report and if deemed satisfactory, recommend to the Planning and Housing Committee for approval at its September 17, 2019 meeting.
 

9.  City Council direct that the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, the joint CreateTO and City-led Strategic Program Management Committee, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Chief Planner and the Executive Director, City Planning review the developer submission for the Don Summerville revitalization including the proposed business terms, as well as the presently proposed built form, the proposal within the context of the wider community, other City building objectives, and City land holdings and, if recommended to proceed, report to the Planning and Housing Committee for approval at its September 17, 2019 meeting.

 
10.  City Council direct that the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, the joint CreateTO and City-led Strategic Program Management Committee, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and Chief Planner and the Executive Director, City Planning review the Initial Development Proposal for the Lawrence Heights Phase 2 revitalization project in line with the revised approval framework outlined in this report and if deemed satisfactory, recommend to the Planning and Housing Committee for approval at its September 17, 2019 meeting.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Housing Committee:

 

1.  Requested the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, to report directly to City Council at the meeting of July 16 and 17, 2019 on the Don Summerville redevelopment with respect to the following matters:

 

a. reporting the results of discussions between the Housing Secretariat, TCHC and the Developer on providing a mixed income integrated community and buildings within the overall development; on achieving up to 50 additional affordable rental housing units; and on developing the rental housing through a long-term lease arrangement;
 

b. providing a process for the engagement of the non-profit/co-operative housing sector engagement in the provision of the affordable housing component;

 
c. establishing a proposed resident sector target group(s) for the new affordable rental housing;
 

d. setting out an approach to the site development similar to the Housing Now model where the Housing Secretariat and TCHC would jointly lead the project development and approvals;
 

e. providing for a robust and resourced community consultation engagement plan and communications strategy to be developed in consultation with the local Councillors;
 

f. providing for the necessary capacity and resources at the City’s Association of Community Centres (AOCC) to lead and assist in Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) tenant engagement and development in consultation with the Ward Councillor; and,
 

g. outlining how the overall revised development proposal and proposed revisions aligns with the guiding principles as set out in the July 2, 2019 Supplementary Report from the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services.

 

2.  Requested the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services to report directly to City Council on options for social housing providers to act as the developer.

 

3.  Requested the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration in the supplementary report directly to City Council on EC6.15, Community Benefits Framework, to identify immediate opportunities to support employment objectives in a Don Summerville Community Benefits Agreement such as with Toronto Community Benefits Network.

 

The Planning and Housing Committee recessed it's public session and met in closed session to consider to consider a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the City of Toronto; to receive advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege; and, to consider a position, plan, procedure, criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the City of Toronto.

Origin

(April 12, 2019) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services

Summary

Toronto Community Housing Corporation undertakes revitalization projects in communities across Toronto. Revitalization projects aim to address issues relating to long-term maintenance costs associated with aging housing stock, generate funding to renovate and replace social housing stock, and provide opportunities for community development and investment through improved design, additional facilities and services, and community economic development initiatives. As Toronto Community Housing Corporation's sole Shareholder, Service Manager, and as a municipality holding approval authority for planning applications, the City has a number of mechanisms to approve and consent revitalization in Toronto Community Housing Corporation communities. The City also makes contributions to the costs of revitalization. After nearly twenty years of revitalization activities, there is an opportunity to develop a clear and transparent framework for approvals and consents to better align revitalization projects with the objectives of the upcoming Toronto Housing Strategy 2020 – 2030, the City-wide Real Estate Strategy, and the work of Tenants First to review the mandate and funding for Toronto Community Housing Corporation. A new approvals framework is critical for ensuring that the City is able to take opportunities to strategically and cost-effectively achieve city-building objectives through revitalization projects.

 

This report outlines a new approvals framework for revitalization, including a new Initial Development Proposal report to be submitted for Council approval before procurement for a development partner begins. This framework provides Council with critical information regarding the nature and scale of proposed revitalization projects, earlier in the process to enhance Council's oversight and support informed decision-making, as well as creating an opportunity to take a more integrated approach to city-building on Toronto Community Housing Corporation and City lands.

 

The framework adopts a staged approvals process that is currently under development for all major capital projects (for example, see EX4.1 Toronto's Transit Expansion Program - Update and Next Steps). The "stage gate process" identifies the stages of work throughout a capital project's lifecycle and ensures key decisions are made at defined stages of a project. Key features of the stage gate process include aligning City Council's funding decisions with the appropriate level of project design and providing an appropriate level of project oversight to project stakeholders.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 12, 2019) Report and Attachments 1 to 3 from the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services on A New Approvals Framework for Toronto Community Housing Corporation Revitalization Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-133676.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 12, 2019) Supplementary Report from the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services on 1555-1575 Queen Street East (Don Summerville) Revitalization Plan (PH7.4b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135993.pdf
(July 15, 2019) Supplementary Report from the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services on Considerations for Social Housing Providers to Act as Developers (PH7.4c)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135994.pdf

4a - A New Approvals Framework for Toronto Community Housing Corporation Revitalization Projects - Supplementary Report

Origin
(July 2, 2019) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services
Summary

This Supplementary Report to item PH7.4 - A New Approvals Framework for Toronto Community Housing Corporation Revitalization Projects recommends a revised approval process for all future Toronto Community Housing Corporation (or "TCHC") revitalizations and redevelopment opportunities, including any demolition and reconstruction of multiple buildings and infill opportunities.

 

For the purpose of this report, "redevelopment/revitalization" includes any renovation, replacement or development of Toronto Community Housing Corporation buildings that requires Service Manager or Shareholder consent.

 

On April 30, 2019, the Planning and Housing Committee deferred report PH5.5 - A New Approvals Framework for Toronto Community Housing Corporation Revitalization Projects to its July 3, 2019 meeting (now PH7.4) in recognition of the Auditor General's report on TCHC revitalizations. The Committee also requested that the City Manager:

 

a.  review the proposed stage-gating process in Attachment 1 and the proposed consent approval in Attachment 2 to the report (April 12, 2019) from the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, in the context of the evolving mandates of CreateTO and the new Housing Secretariat; and

 
b.  in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation and CreateTO, report on the three revitalization sites in Recommendation 3 of the report (PH5.5) from the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, and provide the full project details, including a plan for net new affordable rental housing.
 

On May 14, 2019, through report AU2.1 - Moving Forward Together: Opportunities to Address Broader City Priorities in Toronto Community Housing Corporation Revitalizations, City Council requested that the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, in consultation with CreateTO, report to the July 3, 2019 meeting of the Planning and Housing Committee on any options for city-building objectives that may be included on revitalizations that have yet to obtain planning approvals.

 

This report responds to the above requests and establishes a revised framework for better integration between the City's Housing Secretariat, TCHC Development Division and CreateTO. It is also aligned with report EX.7.1 - Implementing Tenants First: A New Seniors Housing Corporation and Proposed Changes to Toronto Community Housing's Governance which is being recommended to the Executive Committee for approval on July 4, 2019 and recommends that City Council approve, in principle, the transfer of Toronto Community Housing Corporation's real estate development functions to CreateTO and/or the City in alignment with the City-wide real estate model.

 

Additionally, this report recommends further review of three revitalization projects which are at different stages of the redevelopment process including Don Summerville, Firgrove-Grassways and Lawrence Heights Phase 2, in line with the new approvals framework.

 

Subject to City Council approval of this report, the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat will implement an inter-divisional governance model in partnership with TCHC, CreateTO and City divisions. Similar to the Housing Now Initiative model, this includes liaising with City Councillors, and proactively identifying or resolving issues arising in the pre-development and development stages.

 

The new governance model will also include an annual reporting requirement for TCHC to provide updates on all ongoing revitalization projects, including requests for funding to be considered through the City budgeting process, to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat for review and assessment in coordination with the joint CreateTO City-led Strategic Program Management Committee prior to being presented to Council. The joint CreateTO and City-led Strategic Program Management Committee's role is to formally facilitate conversation and alignment among City programs, including TCHC's revitalization program, to advance city-building efforts.

Background Information (Committee)
(July 2, 2019) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services on A New Approvals Framework for Toronto Community Housing Corporation Revitalization Projects - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135556.pdf

PH7.6 - Activating Federal/Provincial Funding to Increase Housing Options for Toronto Residents

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to enter into a Transfer Payment Agreement and/or related agreement(s) with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing or any other provincial entity necessary for the receipt and expenditure of funding under the Canada-Ontario Community Housing Initiative (COCHI) and the Ontario Priorities Housing Initiative (OPHI) on such terms and conditions as are satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council approve the receipt of Ontario Priorities Housing Initiative and the Canada-Ontario Community Housing Initiative program funds for provision of housing services and initiatives, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Transfer Payment Agreement and any related agreements, directives or program guidelines.

 

3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter Support and Housing Administration in consultation with Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to increase the 2019 approved Operating Budget for Shelter Support and Housing Administration by $11,800,000, $0 net fully funded through the Ontario Priorities Housing Initiative and the Canada-Ontario Community Housing Initiative, with future year requests subject to Council approval through the annual budget process.

 

4. City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to undertake Ontario Priorities Housing Initiative and the Canada-Ontario Community Housing Initiative program administration in accordance with the approved allocations and the Transfer Payment Agreement, including appropriate measures as the program proceeds to adjust program parameter, recipients, and year-end funding among program components as required to ensure full and effective use of available federal/ provincial funds.

 

5. City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to develop Investment and Sustainability Plans, outlining funding priorities, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Transfer Payment Agreement and any related program guidelines, and to submit the plans and any updates to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.

 

6. City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, or the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, as appropriate, to enter into agreements or other suitable arrangements with the provincial government, other City divisions, community agencies, private entities and/or individuals to deliver the Ontario Priorities Housing Initiative and the Canada-Ontario Community Housing Initiative components in accordance with the terms and conditions of the program guidelines on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration or the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

7. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to report to the Planning and Housing Committee in Q1 2020, on activity to date and funding projections on the Ontario Priorities Housing Initiative and the Canada-Ontario Community Housing Initiative.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the General Manager, Shelter Support and Housing Administration

Summary

The City of Toronto is committed to providing affordable, well-maintained and secure housing as a key component of building and sustaining healthy and inclusive communities. The purpose of this report is to seek Council approval for the City of Toronto to participate in two new federal/ provincial housing and homelessness programs: the Canada-Ontario Community Housing Initiative (COCHI) and the Ontario Priorities Housing Initiative (OPHI). The provincial government has allocated a three year total of $159.8 million in federal/ provincial funding to the City of Toronto through the programs. Between 2019 and 2022, these programs will assist in maintaining and increasing housing options for some 9,000 low to moderate income Toronto households.

 

The delegated authorities sought in this report are time-critical as any delay in signing the Transfer Payment Agreement with the Province would miss the provincial deadline in activating these initiatives. This report also seeks Council approval for authority to make funding allocations under the various components of the two programs. The programs will further the City's housing, homelessness and poverty reduction goals, assist the non-profit housing sector and support mixed-income, complete communities, while complementing the City's own housing programs.

 

COCHI is intended to support non-profit community housing providers through both capital and operating funding. Capital funding can be used to support community housing provider's repair or renovate building systems and carry out health and safety repairs. Operating funding can be used for rent supplements or transitional operating funding. The objective of COCHI is to stabilize the supply of community housing through repairs, renovations, operating and rent supports to protect tenant's social housing in projects with expiring operating agreements or mortgages. This report recommends allocating the majority of COCHI funds to the operating components to secure long-term affordability for residents in receipt of rent-geared-to-income (RGI) assistance in social housing projects developed through federal social housing programs.

 

OPHI provides both operating and capital funding. The operating component can be used for housing allowance/rent supplement programs to make rents more affordable for tenants in existing rental buildings and provide support services. The three capital components are: new non-profit rental housing construction, home repair funding and home-ownership loan funding. OPHI is a continuation of the Investment in Affordable Housing Program.

 

This report requests authorization for the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to enter into agreements with the Government of Ontario and other organizations to deliver the initiatives and ensure effective use of available federal/provincial funding. COCHI and OPHI are a part of the bi-lateral agreement signed in April 2018 between the Government of Canada and Government of Ontario under the National Housing Strategy.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) Report from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the General Manager, Shelter Support and Housing Administration on Activating Federal/Provincial Funding to Increase Housing Options for Toronto Residents
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135203.pdf

Speakers

Deric German
Adrian Blackwell, University of Waterloo, Architecture
Maurice Adongo, Street Health
Yogi Acharya, Ontario Coalition Against Poverty
Greg Cook

Communications (Committee)

(July 3, 2019) Submission from Yogi Acharya, Ontario Coalition Against Poverty (PH.New.PH7.6.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95867.pdf

PH7.8 - Charles Hastings Co-operative Inc. - Postponement of Registered Assisted Housing Agreement to the Prospective Lender's Mortgage

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council consent pursuant to subsection 453.1(6) of the City of Toronto Act 2006:

 

a. to the transfer of title from 175 Elm St. Developments Ltd to Charles Hastings Co-operative Inc. pursuant to the option to purchase under the lease between the parties; and

 

b. to Charles Hastings Co-operative Inc. granting a mortgage or charge to First National Financial LP with respect to 175 Elm Street, Toronto to secure repayment of a loan on the terms and conditions described in the report (June 12, 2019) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration.

 

2. City Council direct the City Clerk to provide a certificate, in registerable form, to First National Financial LP pursuant to subsection 453.1(9) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

3.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to execute a Priority, Postponement and Standstill Agreement postponing the rights of the City under the Assisted Housing Agreement to the rights of the mortgagee and providing the City with an opportunity to cure any mortgage defaults or to locate a housing provider acceptable to the lender that will cure such defaults and operate the housing in accordance with the Assisted Housing Agreement, upon such terms and conditions as the General Manager may deem appropriate.

Origin

(June 12, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

This report recommends that City Council provide the necessary consents to enable Charles Hastings Co-operative Inc. (the Co-op) to secure freehold ownership of its property and continue to provide long-term affordable housing at 175 Elm Street, Ward 11.  

 

Council authority is required to postpone the City's interest in a long-term Assisted Housing Agreement that would enable the Co-op to finance the purchase of its currently leased building and land and to perform necessary capital upgrades.

 

If the Co-op is unable to secure financing to purchase the property, the resulting lease costs may require the Co-op to increase rents for residents resulting in the potential loss of affordable housing.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 12, 2019) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on Charles Hastings Co-operative Inc. - Postponement of Registered Assisted Housing Agreement to the Prospective Lender's Mortgage
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135022.pdf

PH7.9 - Emergency Management and Vital Service Disruption Response in Apartment Buildings

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1105 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 354, Apartment Buildings to require building owners/operators under the RentSafeTO program to develop and maintain a vital service disruption plan, satisfactory to the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, and provide the City with a copy of the plan when requested.

 

2. City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 354, Apartment Buildings to authorize the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to set standards and minimum requirements for the vital service disruption plans in consultation with the Office of Emergency Management.

 

3. City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 354, Apartment Buildings to add a provision stating that a building owner/operator who, in the opinion of the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, does not implement their established vital service disruption plan during a time of prolonged vital service disruption is guilty of an offence.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards

Summary

As directed by City Council, this report provides a review of the function and performance of the City of Toronto's emergency response to the incident at 260 Wellesley Street East as it pertains to emergency management interventions for high-rise buildings. It also recommends amendments to Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 354, Apartment Buildings to require building owners/operators to develop and maintain a vital service disruption plan in order to better serve their residents during times of prolonged vital service disruptions.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 19, 2019) Revised - Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Emergency Management and Vital Service Disruption Response in Apartment Buildings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135451.pdf
(June 19, 2019) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Emergency Management and Vital Service Disruption Response in Apartment Buildings
Attachment 1 - Incident Communication
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135187.pdf

Speakers

Maryanna Lewyckyj
Daryl Chong, Greater Toronto Apartment Association

Communications (Committee)

(July 3, 2019) Letter from Daryl Chong, President and Chief Executive Officer, Greater Toronto Apartment Association (PH.New.PH7.9.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95887.pdf
(July 3, 2019) Submission from Maryanna Lewycky, President, Park Vista Tenants’ Association (PH.New.PH7.9.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95888.pdf

PH7.11 - City-wide Heritage Survey Feasibility Study

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication PH7.11.9 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council approve the phased implementation of the Toronto Heritage Survey as outlined in this report, and as summarized in Attachment 2 and Attachment 3 to the report (June 6, 2019) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report back through the City’s 2020 Budget process, on a funding approach that will be required to support the first phase of the Toronto Heritage Survey.

 

3. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report back to City Council in 2021 following the completion of the first phase of the Toronto Heritage Survey work plan, and to make recommendations on future phases of work.

 

4. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to develop a comprehensive public engagement program including potential partnerships, and a communications strategy, to support the Toronto Heritage Survey.

 

5. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to work with the City's four Community Preservation Panels and Heritage Toronto to develop a volunteer program that will support the Toronto Heritage Survey, including the development of a fundraising strategy for community-based initiatives.

 

6. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to prioritize outstanding nominations for the inclusion of properties on the Heritage Register in the first phase of the Toronto Heritage Survey.

 

7. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to collaborate with Architectural Conservancy Ontario Toronto Branch (ACO Toronto), to explore opportunities for information gathering and sharing through extensive online property database, TOBuilt.

 

8. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to work with the Chief Purchasing Officer to explore an Invitation to Partner RFP process to engage with technology companies and/or post-secondary institutions to create the database and mapping tool needed for the City-wide Heritage Survey.

 

9. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to the Planning and Housing Committee in second quarter of 2020 with an update report including: timeline for completion of phase one and the entire City-wide Heritage Survey, a data management plan, results of preliminary field testing, recommended role of volunteers and non-city groups/agencies, and updates or revisions to the scope of the project.

 

10. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to include a review of outstanding Heritage Conservation District study areas, including the Sunshine Valley Heritage Conservation District study area, in phase one of the Toronto Heritage Survey.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The following City Planning Staff gave a presentation on City-Wide Heritage Survey Feasibility Study:

 

- The Program Manager, Policy and Research, Heritage Preservation Services

- The Project Manager, Strategic Initiatives, Policy and Analysis (SIPA)

Origin

(June 6, 2019) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report responds to City Council's request in 2017 for a City-wide Heritage Survey Feasibility Study that would scope and describe the initiative, identify required operating costs and propose necessary resources. It provides the results of the Feasibility Study, makes recommendations for a transformative approach to the identification of heritage resources in the city, and seeks support for the launch of a city-wide heritage survey program to be delivered through a multi-year work plan.

 

This report recommends the initiation of a city-wide heritage survey program - an emerging international best practice - as a building block for good planning. In a development context where increasing demands for heritage evaluation and protection challenge the City's ability to respond quickly and effectively, a standardized and systematic "Toronto Heritage Survey" will result in operational efficiencies, enhance civic leadership and responsiveness to provincial land-use planning and cultural heritage policies, and improve predictability for City staff, property owners and the public. It will support timely and transparent decision-making while engaging Torontonians in the pro-active identification of cultural heritage resources that residents, neighbourhoods and communities value. A Toronto Heritage Survey will also contribute significantly to city-building through the collection and dissemination of comprehensive data about the heritage resources of the city. Importantly, the survey program will engage Indigenous communities and carefully consider Indigenous histories in fulfillment of the City's Statement of Commitment to the Aboriginal Communities of Toronto. Diversity and social equity will be fundamental principles as the survey moves forward.

 

A city-wide heritage survey is an ambitious, multi-year program that will modernize the day to day work of City Planning. This report proposes a phased survey program that, if sufficiently resourced, can efficiently and effectively identify heritage resources throughout the City while providing timely research and base-line data for heritage conservation districts and other area planning studies. A major outcome of the survey will be greater clarity for City Planning, communities and property owners about the location and value of heritage resources.

 

A city-wide heritage survey also has the potential to engage stakeholders, communities and volunteers through their contribution to the survey's understanding of local heritage, which in turn builds stronger communities. Survey data, gathered and made open and accessible through the digital exchange of information, can be used by public and private sectors for a variety of purposes, including informing public policy and decision-making and strengthening a culture of conservation. The Toronto Heritage Survey has the potential to engage Torontonians in ways that could dramatically enrich an understanding of pre- and post-European settlement Toronto. It will also benefit the work of city-builders through pro-active identification. Finally, the survey has the potential to weave together into a coherent whole, the histories and geographies of the amalgamated City.

 

This report provides the results of the City-wide Heritage Survey Feasibility Study conducted by City Planning in 2018-2019, including information on the following areas of interest as identified by Council:

 

-  Sector Scan Analysis
-  Proposed Survey Methodology
-  Data Management
-  Methodology to Prioritize Survey Areas
-  Community Engagement
-  Role of Volunteers
-  Phased Approach to Timing and Costing

Background Information (Committee)

(June 6, 2019) Report and Attachments 1 to 5 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on City-wide Heritage Survey Feasibility Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135182.pdf
Presentation from Heritage Preservation Services on City-Wide Heritage Survey Feasibility Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135591.pdf

Speakers

Alexis Cohen, ERA Architects
Susan Jama
Zhixi Zhuang, Ryerson University, Urban and Social Planning
Catherine Nasmith
Kaitlin Wainwright, Heritage Toronto
Councillor Josh Matlow

Communications (Committee)

(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Susan Stock (PH.New.PH7.11.1)
(July 1, 2019) E-mail from Zhixi Zhuang (PH.New.PH7.11.2)
(June 28, 2019) Letter from Maggie Hutcheson, Block by Block Program Director and Susan Jama, Block by Block Assistant Curator, Toronto Ward Museum (PH.New.PH7.11.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95807.pdf
(June 19, 2019) Letter from F. Leslie Thompson, Chair, Architectural, Conservancy Ontario (PH.New.PH7.11.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95808.pdf
(July 2, 2019) Letter from Michael McClelland, Principal, E.R.A. Architects Inc. (PH.New.PH7.11.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95889.pdf
(July 2, 2019) Letter from Alison Faulknor, Acting Executive Director, National Trust for Canada (PH.New.PH7.11.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95890.pdf
(July 2, 2019) Letter from Caroline Ross, TOBuilt Coordinator, Architectural Conservancy Ontario: Toronto (PH.New.PH7.11.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95891.pdf
(July 3, 2019) Letter from Catherine Nasmith, Catherine Nasmith Architect (PH.New.PH7.11.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/comm/communicationfile-95892.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 12, 2019) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 12, Toronto-St.Paul's (CC.Supp.PH7.11.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96089.pdf

11a - City-wide Heritage Survey Feasibility Study

Origin
(June 20, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on June 20, 2019 considered a report (June 6, 2019) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the City-wide Heritage Survey Feasibility Study.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 20, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on City-wide Heritage Survey Feasibility Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-135354.pdf

Striking Committee - Meeting 2

ST2.3 - Council Member Appointments to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Board of Directors

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee recommends that:

 

1.   City Council appoint the following Members to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Board of Directors for a term starting on the day all fourteen Members have been appointed by City Council, and ending December 31, 2020 and until successors are appointed:

 

Councillor Paul Ainslie

Councillor Shelley Carroll

Councillor Paula Fletcher

Councillor Cynthia Lai

Councillor Mike Layton

Councillor James Pasternak

Councillor Anthony Perruzza

Origin

(May 31, 2019) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend the appointment of Members of Council to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Board of Directors.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 31, 2019) Report from the City Clerk on Council Member Appointments to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Board of Directors
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-133878.pdf
Attachment 1 - Members' preferences for appointment to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Board of Directors
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-133879.pdf

Striking Committee - Meeting 3

ST3.1 - 2020 Schedule of Meetings

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
This Item was removed from the Striking Committee and brought forward to City Council for consideration.

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council approve the 2020 meeting schedule dates in Attachment 1 to the report (July 9, 2019) from the City Clerk and that the published schedule serve as notice for these meetings.

 

2.  City Council request the City Clerk to distribute the approved scheduled to the City's agencies and special purpose bodies with a request that they:

 

a. avoid scheduling meetings, whenever possible, that conflict with the approved schedule; and

 

b. avoid scheduling public meetings, forums, public consultations and large scale meetings on days of cultural or religious significance as noted in the approved schedule.

Origin

(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The purpose of this report is to establish the 2020 meeting schedule for City Council and its committees.

Background Information (Committee)

Striking Committee Recommended 2020 Schedule **Visit Toronto.ca/council to view the 2020 schedule of meetings**
(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Clerk on 2020 Schedule of Meetings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-135705.pdf
Attachment 1 - Recommended 2020 Schedule of Meetings
Attachment 2 - Days of Cultural or Religious Significance
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-135707.pdf

Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 7

EY7.1 - Final Report - 1 Blue Goose Street - Zoning By-Law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the Etobicoke Zoning Code for the lands at 1 Blue Goose Street substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District. 

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.  Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council authorize the appropriate City officials and require the owner to execute and register on title an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor. Such agreement shall be registered on title to the lands in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor in order to secure the following matters:

 

a.  The owner shall provide and maintain at least 18 new secured rental units, comprised of 18 bachelor units within the existing renovated mixed-use building on the site, and as illustrated in the Architectural Plans dated December 12, 2018, for a period of at least 20 years, beginning from the date that each new secured rental unit is first occupied.

 

b.  The owner shall provide and maintain at least 2 bachelor units at affordable rents, for a period of at least 10 years, beginning from the date that each such new affordable rental dwelling unit is first occupied. The remaining 16 bachelor units shall have unrestricted rents.

 

c.  Prior to first occupancy of the 2 affordable bachelor units referenced in Part 3.b. above, the owner shall make every reasonable effort to work in consultation with the City's Shelter Support and Housing Administration staff to select the first tenant for such affordable bachelor units, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Shelter Support and Housing Administration.

 

d.  Prior to Site Plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, the owner shall provide 1:50 scale architectural elevation drawings for representative portions of the buildings with building materials, colours and finishes illustrated and labelled to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning (“Approved Exterior Development Details”).

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council:

 

1. Requested Transportation Services to examine the streets in the immediate vicinity of 1 Blue Goose Street, as part of the Site Plan Control review process, to identify additional on-street parking spaces, in consultation with the local Councillor.

 

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code to permit a residential and commercial development on the lands located at 1 Blue Goose Street. The proposal is to retain and restore the existing heritage mixed-use building on the subject property (the Blue Goose Tavern), add a fourth storey and an east side addition, a new micro-brewery (basement level), a renovated restaurant (ground level), and a total of 18 new rental dwelling units (second to fourth level). Two of the 18 new dwelling units would provide affordable rents. The mixed use building would be approximately 15 m in height to the highest point of the mechanical roof. In addition, the proposal includes a residential infill development consisting of one single detached dwelling unit, 4 semi-detached dwelling units and 7 townhouse dwelling units which would all be 4 storeys and approximately 13.6 m in height.

 

Overall, the proposed development would contain 30 residential dwelling units (2,938 m² of gross floor area) and a total of 526 m² of non-residential gross floor area for a total density of 1.55 times the area of the lot. A total of 33 on site vehicular parking spaces are proposed.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019). The proposal also represents an appropriate and orderly development of the site that conforms to the Official Plan.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 1 Blue Goose Street - Zoning By-Law Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134307.pdf

Speakers

Kate Cooper, Bousfields Inc.

Communications (Community Council)

(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Katherine Zeman (EY.New.EY7.1.1)

EY7.2 - Final Report - 170 The West Mall - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code for the lands at 170 The West Mall substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.  City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 for the lands at 170 The West Mall substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4.  Prior to Site Plan approval, City Council require the owner to enter into a financially secured agreement for the construction of any required improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades are required to support the development based on the revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code and City-wide Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 in order to construct a 1-storey (24 m in height, excluding mechanical) automated frozen goods warehouse distribution building, with a gross floor area of 19,463 m2 on the vacant northern portion of the lands municipally known as 170 The West Mall.  The new building would provide 123 vehicular parking spaces and 30 loading docks.  The existing dry and frozen goods warehouse distribution building on the southern portion of the site would remain.

 

This application has been deemed Gold Star (enhanced service to focus development review and expedite high impact investment/job creation projects within the City). An associated Site Plan Control application under the Planning Act (File Number 18 171371 WET 05 SA) was submitted on June 4, 2018 and is being reviewed concurrently with this Zoning By-law Amendment application.

        

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019) and the City of Toronto Official Plan.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. Staff are of the opinion that the proposed development is appropriate for the lands.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report - 170 The West Mall
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134229.pdf

2a - Supplementary Report - 170 The West Mall - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Origin
(June 21, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District
Summary

A Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd., dated March 29, 2019 was submitted in support of the application. By memo dated May 7, 2019, following a review of this report, Engineering and Construction Services staff requested the applicant make further revisions to determine whether the existing municipal sanitary sewer system has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed development.

 

A report dated June 7, 2019 from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District to Etobicoke York Community Council, recommended the applicant submit a revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report to the satisfaction of Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, prior to the introduction of the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment.

  

Subsequent to the staff report, the applicant met with Engineering and Construction Services staff and provided additional information related to existing and proposed sanitary sewer capacity. Engineering and Construction Services staff are now satisfied with the sanitary sewer analysis.

 

However, there are still some outstanding matters in the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report identified in the memo dated May 7, 2019 that must be addressed. As such, Engineering and Construction Services staff require a revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report be submitted to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to identify any upgrades to municipal infrastructure required to support the development.  Further, Engineering and Construction Services Staff require the applicant to financially secure any required upgrades prior to Site Plan approval, so that such upgrades can be constructed and made operational in coordination with the proposed redevelopment.

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 21, 2019) Supplementary Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Supplementary Report - 170 The West Mall
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-135279.pdf

EY7.4 - Refusal Report - 12, 16 and 20 Cordova Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council refuse the application to amend the Official Plan and the Etobicoke Zoning Code at 12, 16 and 20 Cordova Avenue for the reasons set out in the report (June 21, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with appropriate staff, to appear before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") in support of City Council's decision to refuse the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application, in the event the refusal is appealed to the LPAT.

 

3. City Council direct City staff to continue discussions with the applicant to address issues identified in the report (June 21, 2019 from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

4. City Council defer making a decision on the Rental Housing Demolition application under Municipal Code, Chapter 667 pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to demolish the existing rental dwelling units at 12, 16 and 20 Cordova Avenue.

 

5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, in the event the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application is appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT"), to request the LPAT to withhold its Order should the application be approved in some form, until all of the following have been completed and secured:

 

a. The final form of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

b. City Council, or the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning under delegated authority, has made a decision on the Rental Housing Demolition application, under Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act to demolish the existing rental dwelling units at 12, 16 and 20 Cordova Avenue.

 

c. The owner be required to submit a revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

d. The owner be required to submit a revised Transportation Impact Study to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

e. The owner enter into a financially secured agreement for the construction of any required improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades are required to support the development based on the report in Recommendations 5(c) and (d) above, accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager of Transportation Services.

 

f. Community benefits, rental housing and other matters required to support the development are secured in a Section 37 Agreement executed by the owner and registered on title to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Origin

(June 21, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Official Plan (Etobicoke Centre Secondary Plan) to redesignate the subject lands from Mixed Use Areas B to Mixed Uses Areas A and the Etobicoke Zoning Code to permit the construction of a 27-storey residential apartment building (75.7 m in height, excluding mechanical penthouse) on the lands municipally known as 12, 16 and 20 Cordova Avenue.

 

This report reviews and recommends refusal of the application to amend the Official Plan and the Etobicoke Zoning Code as the proposal would result in an overdevelopment of the site and represents a significant increase in height and density from that currently permitted in the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

 

A Rental Housing Demolition application is required as 12, 16 and 20 Cordova Avenue combined contain six or more residential units, of which at least one is rental. A Rental Housing Demolition application (File No. 19 174970 WET 03 RH ) was submitted on June 20, 2019.  Due to the timing of the application submission, staff have not had an opportunity to review the application at the time of writing this report.

 

The proposed development is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014), as it would establish an inappropriate development precedent for this area, including inadequate building setbacks and overwhelming building massing.

 

The proposal also fails to conform with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019), as it would not provide an appropriate scale of development and lacks appropriate transition of built form to adjacent areas.

 

Further, the proposed development does not achieve the objectives set out in the City's Official Plan. The development does not provide appropriate built form that fits within its context.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 21, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition Application - Refusal Report - 12, 16 and 20 Cordova Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-135280.pdf
(June 6, 2019) Notice of Pending Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Refusal Report - 12, 16 and 20 Cordova Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134235.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 24, 2019) Letter from Daryl Sage, Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Lands Corporation (EY.New.EY7.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/comm/communicationfile-95625.pdf

EY7.5 - Request for Directions Report - 555 The West Mall - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke Centre
Attention
Bill 1129 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff to attend the LPAT hearing for 555 The West Mall in support of the revised proposal outlined in the report (June 21, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.  In the event the LPAT allows the appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment application, in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the LPAT withhold its Order(s) approving the Zoning By-law Amendments until such time as the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the owner provides draft by-laws to the LPAT in a form and content to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, and pending:

 

a.  Confirmation from the City Solicitor that the owner has submitted to the General Manager of Transportation Services for review and acceptance, revised plans clarifying the discrepancy in the parking supply between the proposed underground parking garage plans and the revised site statistics.

 

b.  Confirmation from the City Solicitor that the owner has submitted to the General Manager of Transportation Services for review and acceptance, revised underground parking garage plans illustrating that the typical parking space dimensions and the proposed drive aisle widths comply with the minimum requirements of Zoning By-law No. 569-2013.

 

c.  The revised proposal providing a parking supply and parking space dimensions that comply with the minimum requirements of Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 for "All Other Areas".

 

d. The revised proposal providing a minimum of one Type 'G' loading space with size dimensions that comply with the minimum loading space requirements in Zoning By-law No. 569-2013.

 

e. Confirmation from the City Solicitor that the owner has entered into and registered on title an Agreement under Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following facilities, services and matters at the owners expense:     

 

i.  Prior to the issuance of the first-above grade building permit for the development, the owner shall pay to the City the sum of $550,000 to be used in Ward 2 and allocated towards the following community benefits to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Ward Councillor:

 

-  Streetscaping along The West Mall in the vicinity of the property including streetscape improvements that comply with the Streetscape Manual and/or are to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;   

 

-  Capital upgrades and improvements to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation property at 559 The West Mall;

 

-           Improvements to local parks in the Ward; and

 

-           Improvements to the Etobicoke Olympium Community Centre.

 

ii.  The above required cash contribution in Part 2.e.i. above is to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date the payment is made.

 

iii.  In the event the cash contribution required in Part 2.e.i. above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of the Zoning By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose(s) is/are identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the property.

 

3.  City Council direct that the following matters be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

a.  The owner to provide and maintain the 119 existing rental housing units at 555 The West Mall as rental housing a period of at least 20 years, from the date of the By-law coming into full force and effect, with all associated facilities and building amenity improvements to be secured for the rental housing units, at no extra cost to the existing tenants, and with no applications for demolition or conversion from residential rental use, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.

 

b.  Prior to final Site Plan Approval, to provide a Construction Mitigation Strategy which includes a communication strategy for adjacent property owners and the neighbourhood association and an interim parking plan for existing tenants and tradespeople during the construction period, and a Tenant Communication Plan all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and thereafter the owner shall implement such strategies and plans.

 

c.  The owner to construct and maintain at least 628 m² of ground floor indoor amenity space in the new building at 555 The West Mall to be shared by tenants of both buildings.

 

d. The owner to provide and maintain new indoor amenity space comprised of at least the following: a multi-purpose room to be appropriately furnished and having direct access to a washroom; and a fully outfitted fitness and exercise room. Outdoor amenity space is to be provided that will include at least a children's play area with a minimum of two benches for seating. This indoor and outdoor amenity space is to be provided to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

e.  The owner to make available to tenants of both buildings all ground floor indoor and all outdoor amenity spaces generally as illustrated on the Ground Floor Plan submitted by the applicant in the revised proposal, for the proposed 22-storey building and existing building, without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings.

 

f.  Prior to Site Plan Approval, the owner to submit an updated Noise Feasibility Assessment/Addendum Letter to be further peer reviewed and resolved to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. The owner shall construct and maintain any required noise mitigation measures, to be secured through the Site Plan review process, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

g.  The owner to implement the wind control measures identified in the Pedestrian Wind Study dated October 31, 2018 prepared by RWDI, and the updated Pedestrian Wind Conditions Addendum Letter, dated April 24, 2019 prepared by RWDI to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. Such measures to be secured through the Site Plan review process.

 

h.  The owner to construct and maintain the development in accordance with the Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard.

 

i.  A minimum of 10% of all units shown on the plans for the entire development shall be provided as three-bedroom units.

 

j.  The owner to obtain all required permit(s) from the Ministry of Transportation prior to any construction.

 

k.  The owner to notify NAV Canada a minimum of 10 days prior to the start of construction.

 

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the foregoing. 

 

5. City Council amend Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that the General Manager, Transportation Services shall not accept applications from residents of, visitors to or tradespersons at 555 The West Mall, for a permit.

Origin

(June 21, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

The owner of the site at 555 The West Mall has appealed this Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT"), formerly the Ontario Municipal Board, citing City Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time period prescribed under the Planning Act. The appeal was filed on November 9, 2017 and is considered a "legacy" appeal under the transition regulations of the LPAT Act.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction for the City Solicitor and other appropriate City staff to attend the LPAT in support of a revised proposal (subject to a number of conditions) submitted by the applicant on April 29, 2019. A Pre-Hearing Conference was held at the LPAT on May 6, 2019 in which requests for status in the proceeding and next steps were established. A second Pre-Hearing Conference is scheduled for August 23, 2019 to either consider a settlement or consider a draft procedural order and issues list for a hearing.

 

The original application submitted on November 4, 2016, proposed to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code and City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 to permit a 24-storey (69 m in height, excluding the mechanical penthouse) purpose built rental apartment building with 293 residential dwelling units to the north of an existing 14-storey, 119 unit residential rental apartment building on the site. The proposed development (including the existing building) had a proposed total gross floor area of 34,591 m² and a total Floor Space Index of 4.02 times the area of the lot. The existing and proposed building would be served by a shared 4-level underground parking garage. The existing 14-storey rental apartment building on the site would be retained.

 

The revised proposal modifies the development by reducing the height of the proposed apartment building to 22 storeys (61.4 m in height, excluding the mechanical penthouse), reducing the number of residential dwelling units to 256 and decreasing the total gross floor area (including the existing building on the site) to 30,458 m² for a total Floor Space Index of 3.54 times the area of the lot. Other minor modifications to the built form, site layout and access are also proposed.

 

The revised proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).The proposal is appropriate for the site and is compatible with the surrounding area.

 

The revised proposal conforms to the Apartment Neighbourhoods Official Plan designation as the proposed building represents compatible intensification and would provide new purpose built rental infill housing and improve the existing rental apartment building on the site.

 

This report recommends that City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff, to support the revised proposal at the LPAT, subject to a number of conditions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 21, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions Report - 555 The West Mall
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-135281.pdf
(May 30, 2019) Notice of Pending Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions Report - 555 The West Mall
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-133982.pdf

Speakers

Tony Volpentesta, Bousfeilds Inc.
Mark Chemij, Starlight Investments
Carol Boland-Felice
Paul Christian, President, YCC #26
Cheryl Hill
Gerard McHugh
Elizabeth Duarte
Melvin Clissold
Joseph Mantella
Victoriya Fartushenko

Communications (Community Council)

(June 21, 2019) E-mail from Octavia Pinto (EY.New.EY7.5.1)
(June 24, 2019) Submission from Dr. Janina Kuzmas (EY.New.EY7.5.2)
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Liz Morgan (EY.New.EY7.5.3)

EY7.6 - Final Report - 2217 The Queensway - Application to Lift Holding Provisions (H)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Attention
Bill 1106 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Zoning By-law 409-2013 for the lands at 2217 The Queensway substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (May 30, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Origin

(May 30, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to lift the Holding (H) symbol from the Parcel "1" lands identified in site-specific Zoning By-law 409-2013 (OMB) for the site at 2217 The Queensway.  This amendment would allow for the development of two commercial buildings with a public road traversing between the buildings.

 

The Holding Provisions require that prior to lifting the Holding (H) symbol, the owner must satisfy the following four conditions for the subject lands: (a) confirmation that the lands meet all applicable statutory and regulatory environmental requirements for the development of the uses permitted; (b) confirmation that the owner has entered into a long-term easement agreement, satisfactory to the City, for access to The Queensway across the abutting hydro corridor; (c) confirmation that the owner can provide the required parking for its development by means of: i. a long-term lease, satisfactory to the City, for portions of the hydro corridor, and/or ii. a parking plan for surface and/or underground parking; and (d) the owner has entered into one or more agreements with the City, pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to be registered on title to the lands shown as Parcel "1" on Schedule "A" of Zoning By-law 409-2013 (OMB), securing the matters set out in Section 4 of Zoning By-law 409-2013 (OMB). All four of these conditions have been satisfied.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with A Place to Grow: The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019). This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend site-specific Zoning By-law 409-2013 (OMB) to lift the Holding (H) symbol.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding an Application to Lift Holding Provisions (H) - Final Report - 2217 The Queensway
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134002.pdf

EY7.7 - Final Report - 289 & 291 The Kingsway and 1, 3, 5 & 7 St. Stevens Court - Part Lot Control Exemption Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke Centre

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 289 & 291 The Kingsway and 1, 3, 5 & 7 St. Stevens Court as generally illustrated on Attachment 2 of the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire three years following enactment by City Council.

 

2.  City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

3.  Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or his designate.

 

4.  City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

 

5.  City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or his designate to withhold his consent under paragraph 118(1) 2 of the Land Titles Act until the site specific Zoning By-law for the four new residential apartment buildings approved in principle by the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal in its decision dated April 24, 2018 has come into full force and effect.

 

6.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

 

7.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to release, or partially release, the Section 118 Restriction from title to all or a portion of the lands in her sole discretion after consulting with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application requests exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act to permit the division of land to create 5 residential lots for four proposed residential apartment buildings and 1 existing residential apartment building on the lands located at 289 & 291 The Kingsway and 1, 3, 5 & 7 St. Stevens Court. The exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act would also establish easements for shared access and servicing between the proposed buildings.

 

The proposal complies with the existing Official Plan and Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) approved Zoning By-law. The lifting of Part Lot Control for a period of three years is considered appropriate for the orderly development of these lands.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of Part Lot Control Exemption. In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to convey or mortgage any part of the lands without prior consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or his designate.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 289 & 291 The Kingsway and 1, 3, 5 & 7 St. Stevens Court - Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134310.pdf

EY7.10 - Alterations to a Heritage Property, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Blue Goose Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore

Statutory - Ontario Heritage Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 1 Blue Goose Street in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of 12 dwelling units and modifications to the existing heritage building in conjunction with an application to amend the Zoning By-law with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by Thomas Payne Architect dated October 12 and 15, 2018 and December 12, 2018 and by AA Frias Architect dated December 12 and 17, 2018 and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by GBCA Architects dated December 17, 2018, all on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a. Prior to the introduction of the Bills for such Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall:

 

1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 1 Blue Goose Street substantially in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by Thomas Payne Architect dated October 12 and 15, 2018 and December 12, 2018 and by AA Frias Architect dated December 12 and 17, 2018 and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by GBCA Architects dated December 17, 2018 subject to and in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Part 1.a.2 below, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

2. The owner shall provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 1 Blue Goose Street dated December 17, 2018 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

b. Prior to Final Site Plan approval in connection with the Zoning By-law Amendment for the property at 1 Blue Goose Street the owner shall:

 

1. Provide final site plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2 in the report (May 3, 2019) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning and landscape drawings, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

3. Provide a Signage Plan for the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

c. Prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 1 Blue Goose Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage buildings as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

 

1. Obtain final approval for the necessary by-law amendments required for the alterations to the property at 1 Blue Goose Street, such amendments to have been enacted by City Council and to have come into full force and effect.

 

2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Part 1.a.2 above including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation, Lighting and Interpretation Plans.

 

d. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Part 1.c.3. above, the owner shall:

 

1.  Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work, required heritage lighting work, and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation, Lighting and Interpretation Plans and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 1 Blue Goose Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 1 Blue Goose Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 4 to the report (May 3, 2019) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

 

3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

4. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

 

6. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 1 Blue Goose Street in a form and with content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

 

7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 1 Blue Goose Street.

Origin

(May 3, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council endorse the conservation strategy generally described for the heritage property at 1 Blue Goose Street in connection with the proposed townhouse redevelopment on the property, state its intention to designate 1 Blue Goose Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and give authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 3, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning regarding Alterations to a Heritage Property, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Blue Goose Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-133220.pdf

10a - Toronto Preservation Board Decision Letter - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Blue Goose Street

Origin
(May 29, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on May 29, 2019, recommended to the Etobicoke York Community Council, adoption of the recommendations contained in the report (May 3, 2019) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning regarding Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement – 1 Blue Goose Street.

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 29, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board regarding 1 Blue Goose Street - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-133768.pdf

EY7.11 - Alterations to Two Designated Heritage Properties - 69 Long Branch Avenue and 24 Marina Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore

Statutory - Ontario Heritage Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the alterations to the heritage building at 69 Long Branch Avenue, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for its use as a day care on lands known municipally as 69 Long Branch Avenue, with such alterations substantially in accordance with the plans prepared by C & Partners Architects, dated April 8, 2019 and May 6, 2019, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and subject to the following conditions:

 

a.  That prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the property at 69 Long Branch Avenue, but excluding permits for interior work that will not impact the heritage attributes identified in designation by-law 75-2018, repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the applicant provide the following to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services:

 

1.  Provide full building permit drawings for the interior alterations and a landscape plan consistent with the approved plans prepared by C & Partners Architects, dated April 8, 2019 and May 6, 2019, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

Origin

(May 29, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations at the existing two-storey church, office and rectory buildings at 69 Long Branch Avenue and 24 Marina Avenue. These properties are designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. They served the St. Agnes Church congregation from 1921 to 2005 and have recently been rented to a faith-based community group.

 

The proposal is to convert the existing church and rectory buildings into a day nursery. Alterations required for the new use involve interior changes to the nave, changes to the rear paved entry court and new fencing to enclose the playground.

 

The proposed alterations would have a minimal impact on the heritage character of the existing buildings and the proposed adaptive re-use of the church complex for day nursery purposes is considered to be sensitive and appropriate.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning regarding Alterations to Two Designated Heritage Properties - 69 Long Branch Avenue and 24 Marina Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134020.pdf

11a - Toronto Preservation Board Decision Letter - Alterations to Two Designated Heritage Properties - 69 Long Branch Avenue and 24 Marina Avenue

Origin
(June 20, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on June 20, 2019, recommended to the Etobicoke York Community Council, adoption of the recommendations contained in the report (May 29, 2019) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning regarding Alterations to Two Designated Heritage Properties - 69 Long Branch Avenue and 24 Marina Avenue

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 20, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board regarding 69 Long Branch Avenue and 24 Marina Avenue - Alterations to Two Designated Heritage Properties
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-135327.pdf

EY7.12 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 22 Boxwood Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke Centre
Attention
Communications EY7.12.2 and EY7.12.3 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council grant the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned sugar maple tree located at 22 Boxwood Road, with a condition that the applicant provide five (5) replacement trees, which can be achieved in a combination of on-site planting and cash-in-lieu of planting.

Origin

(May 28, 2019) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at 22 Boxwood Road. The application indicates the reasons for removal are to address concerns associated with falling branches and the tree being too close to the dwelling located on the property.

 

The subject tree is a sugar maple tree (Acer saccharum), measuring 57cm in diameter. The Private Tree By-law does not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2019) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation regarding an Application to Remove a Private Tree - 22 Boxwood Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-133767.pdf

Speakers

Kurt Kumpa (Submission Filed)
Ruth Kumpa

Communications (Community Council)

(June 25, 2019) Submission from Kurt Kumpa (EY.New.EY7.12.1)

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from N. Corrado (CC.Supp.EY7.12.2)
(July 17, 2019) E-mail from Ruth and Kurt Kumpa (CC.New.EC7.12.3)

EY7.14 - Assumption of Services, Registered Plan 66M-2526, 735 & 743 Renforth Drive - 735 Renforth Developments Inc.

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke Centre

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.   City Council assume the services installed at Erinview Terrace and that the City formally assume the road within the Plan of Subdivision.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Legal Services Division to release the portion of the performance guarantee held with respect to this Plan of Subdivision.

 

3.  City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highway and municipal services within the Subdivision at Erinview Terrace.

 

4.  City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office at the expense of the Owner.

 

5.  City Council authorize the City Clerk and Treasurer to sign any release or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto.

 

6.  City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within the Plan of Subdivision at Erinview Terrace to Toronto Hydro.

Origin

(May 29, 2019) Report from the Director, Engineering Review, Engineering and Construction Services

Summary

This report recommends that the municipal services installed under the terms of the Subdivision Agreement between 735 Renforth Developments Inc. and the City of Toronto for Plan 66M-2526, dated September 8, 2014, be assumed by the City.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2019) Report from the Director, Engineering Review, Engineering and Construction Services regarding the Assumption of Services, Registered Plan 66M-2526, 735 & 743 Renforth Drive - 735 Renforth Developments Inc.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-133990.pdf

EY7.16 - Highway Alterations - Highway 27 and Queen's Plate Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
1 - Etobicoke North

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the alterations and modifications at the northwest corner of the intersection of Highway 27 and Queen's Plate Drive, as indicated in Appendix "A", and generally as shown on the attached Drawing EY19-047, dated May 2019.

Origin

(May 27, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting City Council authority to alter the northwest corner of the signalized intersection of Highway 27 and Queen's Plate Drive by removing the southbound (to westbound) right-turn channel.

 

This proposed road alteration will provide for a more pedestrian friendly environment by removing the extra pedestrian crossing from the curb to the channelized island and help reduce the speed of southbound right-turning traffic at the intersection Highway 27 and Queen's Plate Drive

 

Since the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Highway 27 and Queen's Plate Drive, City Council approval of this report is required. TTC staff has been consulted on the matter and has not objected to the proposal.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Highway Alterations - Highway 27 and Queen's Plate Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134134.pdf

EY7.18 - Traffic Control Signals - The East Mall and Capri Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke Centre

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of The East Mall and Capri Road.

Origin

(May 15, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of The East Mall and Capri Road in order to facilitate safe crossings for pedestrians.

 

The installation of a pedestrian crossover (PXO) is justified as the technical criteria have been met; however, a PXO on The East Mall would not be suitable given the failure of the suitability criteria on this minor arterial road. As an alternative, installing traffic control signals at this location would provide a safe and convenient access for pedestrians crossing The East Mall.

 

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates bus service on The East Mall, City Council approval of this report is required. TTC has been advised on the matter.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 15, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services, regarding Traffic Control Signals - The East Mall and Capri Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134022.pdf

EY7.20 - Turn Prohibitions - Church Street at George Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston
Attention
Bill 1088 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council prohibit eastbound right-turns from 8:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, at the intersection of Church Street and George Street.

 

2.  City Council prohibit westbound left-turns from 8:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, at the intersection of Church Street and George Street.

Origin

(May 8, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates bus service on Church Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting City Council approve eastbound right-turn and westbound left-turn prohibitions at the intersection of Church Street and George Street, from 8:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday.

 

George Street connects Church Street and King Street and also serves as an access to both St. John the Evangelist School and HJ Alexander Community School. The prohibitions are intended to provide for more orderly traffic flow to both schools.

 

A companion report entitled "Turn Prohibitions – Fern Avenue at George Street" outlines proposed delegated amendments to traffic regulations at Fern Avenue and George Street that require approval by Etobicoke York Community Council.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 8, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services regarding Turn Prohibitions - Church Street at George Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134148.pdf

EY7.22 - Turn Prohibition - 1345 Martin Grove Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
1 - Etobicoke North
Attention
Bill 1089 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council prohibit southbound left-turn movements at all times on Martin Grove Road at the driveway access to 1345 Martin Grove Road, located approximately 55 metres south of Racine Road.

Origin

(May 14, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to prohibit southbound left-turn movements at all times on Martin Grove Road at the driveway access to 1345 Martin Grove Road, located approximately 55 metres south of Racine Road. The proposed turn prohibition, a requirement of site plan approval for the redevelopment of the property at the southeast corner of the intersection of Martin Grove Road and Racine Road, will help mitigate any interference with southbound traffic within the functional area of the northbound approach of the intersection of Martin Grove Road and Racine Road.

 

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) provides service on Martin Grove Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 14, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services regarding a Turn Prohibition - 1345 Martin Grove Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134162.pdf

EY7.23 - Turn Prohibition Removals - The Pond Road and James Gillies Street/York University Busway

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - Humber River - Black Creek
Attention
Bill 1090 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council rescind the existing westbound right-turn-on-red-signal prohibition in effect at all times at the intersection of The Pond Road and James Gillies Street.

 

2.  City Council rescind the existing eastbound right-turn prohibition in effect at all times at the intersection of The Pond Road and York University Busway.

 

3.  City Council rescind the existing westbound left-turn prohibition in effect at all times at the intersection of The Pond Road and York University Busway.

 

4.  City Council rescind the existing northbound and southbound right-turn-on-red-signal prohibition on effect at all times at the intersection of The Pond Road and York University Busway (Finch Hydro Corridor).

Origin

(May 23, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates bus service on The Pond Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to remove the existing turn prohibitions at the intersection of The Pond Road and James Gillies Street/York University Busway.

 

The deletions of all turn prohibitions at the intersection of The Pond Road and James Gillies Street/York University Busway is a result of the existing closure of York University Busway and future modifications at this intersection.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 23, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services regarding Turn Prohibition Removals - The Pond Road and James Gillies Street/York University Busway
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134047.pdf

EY7.24 - Lane Designation -Trethewey Drive at Jane Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston
Attention
Bill 1091 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council designate the northerly westbound lane on Trethewey Drive, from Jane Street to a point 30.5 metres east for westbound right turns only.

Origin

(May 21, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates bus service on Trethewey Drive and Jane Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to designate the northerly westbound right turn lane on Trethewey Drive at Jane Street for right turns only.

 

It is appropriate to designate an exclusive westbound right turn lane based on the existing lane configuration and field observations.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 21, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services regarding Lane Designation -Trethewey Drive at Jane Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134177.pdf

EY7.25 - Re-opening of the Public Walkway between Acme Crescent and 1735 Kipling Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke Centre

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to re-open the Acme Crescent lane, thereby restoring it to its original and intended function and:

 

- Repair and/or replace the surface, fence and anti-vehicle protections.

 

- Consider adding pedestrian lighting.

 

- In co-operation with adjacent property owners, remove and/or prune all brush, overgrowth, weeds, shrubs

 .

- Establish a schedule to clean and clear litter and report the completion of maintenance activity for the balance of 2019 to the local Councillor.

 

2. City Council request the District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards to investigate and monitor the property standards of the laneway and adjacent properties.

 

3. City Council request Toronto Police Services to monitor the laneway and adjacent properties and report any concerns to the local Councillor. 

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Permits and Enforcement, Transportation Services

Summary

At its June 13, 2017 meeting, Etobicoke York Community Council adopted Item No. EY23.36, to temporarily close the pedestrian walkway between Acme Crescent and 1735 Kipling Avenue. The walkway was subsequently closed to pedestrian traffic through installation of chain link fencing.

 

The current Councillor is considering re-opening the walkway.  Signs were posted on either side of the walkway on May 22, 2019 to solicit comments from area residents and stakeholders regarding its potential re-opening.  As noted on the posted signs, comments must be provided to the Councillor by June 24, 2019.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Permits and Enforcement, Transportation Services - Re-opening of the Public Walkway between Acme Crescent and 1735 Kipling Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134232.pdf

EY7.27 - Parking Machines - Bloor Street West, between Montgomery Road and Brentwood Road North

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Attention
Bills 1092 and 1093 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the installation of parking machines on the north side of Bloor Street West between Montgomery Road and Brentwood Road North, to operate from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday, and from 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Sunday, for a maximum period of three hours at a rate of $3.00 per hour.

 

2.  City Council prohibit standing from 12:01 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., Monday to Saturday, and from 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. on Sunday, on the north side of Bloor Street West between Montgomery Road and Brentwood Road North.

 

3.  City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Bloor Street West, between Montgomery Road and Brentwood Road North.

Origin

(May 7, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of Parking Machines (Pay & Display) and to prohibit standing, from 12:01 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., Monday to Saturday and from 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. on Sunday, on the north side of Bloor Street West between Montgomery Road and Brentwood Road North. The proposed parking machines and standing prohibitions are in response to a request made by the area Councillor for staff to review the feasibility of introducing parking on the aforementioned section of Bloor Street West where standing is currently prohibited at all times. There is a Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) bus stop at this location that only services an overnight bus route, thus the existing standing prohibition is too restrictive.

 

As Bloor Street West is a transit route, this matter requires the approval of City Council. TTC staff have been advised of the issue and have not objected to the recommendations.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 7, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services regarding Parking Machines - Bloor Street West, between Montgomery Road and Brentwood Road North
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134021.pdf

EY7.30 - Parking Regulation Amendment - Ormont Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - Humber River - Black Creek
Attention
Bill 1094 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Ormont Drive, from a point 181 metres west of Weston Road to a point 48 metres further west.

Origin

(April 25, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of approximately seven on-street parking spaces along the front entrance of 700 Ormont Drive.  This proposed parking regulation amendment will provide more convenience and flexibility for clients of 700 Ormont Drive by providing additional parking.

 

Since the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) provides service on Ormont Drive, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 25, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services regarding a Parking Regulation Amendment - Ormont Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134046.pdf

EY7.32 - Request to Study Speed Limit on The Queensway

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to conduct a study of the current speed limits on The Queensway between The West Mall and Riverside Drive.  

Origin

(June 6, 2019) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 3, Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Summary

On Wednesday May 22, 2019, a woman was struck by a vehicle as she attempted to cross The Queensway at a pedestrian crossover immediately east of Milton Street. She activated the pedestrian signal light, pointed, and began to cross the street when a vehicle proceeded through the crosswalk and hit her.

 

According to the City of Toronto’s road classification system, The Queensway is classified as a ‘Major Arterial’ roadway. Within the road section between The West Mall and Riverside Drive, The Queensway has a varying lane cross sections and a varying speed limit between 50 km/h and 60 km/h.

 

A July 2017 Staff Report investigating the safety of the pedestrian crossover at two intersections along The Queensway notes excessive vehicle operating speeds on the street.

 

This motion requests Transportation Services to conduct a study of the appropriateness of current speed limits on The Queensway between The West Mall and Riverside Drive.  

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 6, 2019) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 3, Etobicoke-Lakeshore regarding Speed Limits on The Queensway
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-134019.pdf

EY7.34 - Request to Redesign Traffic Island on Evans Avenue at The East Mall

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District and the Director, Public Realm Section, Transportation Services remove the grass from the island boulevard on Evans Avenue east of The East Mall, and prepare and implement a new design for the island, in consultation with the local Councillor.

Origin

(June 24, 2019) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 3, Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Summary

The island boulevard in the centre of Evans Avenue east of The East Mall, is under the jurisdiction of Transportation Services for maintenance. Currently the island is planted with grass.

 

City staff have advised that the frequency of summer maintenance activities provides for seven visits per year. It takes roughly two weeks to attend to all locations in a service area and there is a one-week gap before undertaking the next round. This means approximately 3-4 weeks between maintenance. The result is overgrown, unsightly grass for many weeks of the year and results in numerous complaints to my office.

 

This motion requests the grass be removed from the island and a new design be prepared and installed as soon as possible.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 24, 2019) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 3, Etobicoke-Lakeshore - Request to Redesign Traffic Island on Evans Avenue at The East Mall
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-135359.pdf

North York Community Council - Meeting 7

NY7.1 - Final Report - Zoning Amendment Application - 665, 667, 669 and 671 Sheppard Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre
Attention
Communication NY7.1.2 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 7625, for the lands at 665, 667, 669 and 671 Sheppard Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (June 18, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 665, 667, 669 and 671 Sheppard Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (June 18, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 18, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes 39 five-storey, (excluding a rooftop terrace access), stacked, back-to-back townhouses, 7 three-storey, (excluding a rooftop terrace access), townhouses and 2 three-storey townhouses for a total of 48 units with 54 underground parking spaces at 665, 667, 669 and 671 Sheppard Avenue West.

 

The redevelopment proposal is in keeping with the Sheppard West/Dublin Secondary Plan, appropriately transitions to the abutting lower density residential uses, and improves the Sheppard Avenue West streetscape.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

 

This report also recommends a holding provision ("H") in the Zoning By-law, due to outstanding sanitary capacity issues, to be lifted at such a time as the sanitary servicing solution is acceptable, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 18, 2019) Report and City of Toronto Data/Drawings (Attachments 1-6) and Applicant Submitted Drawings (Attachments 7-8) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Zoning Amendment Application for 665, 667, 669 and 671 Sheppard Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-135046.pdf
(June 7, 2019) Notice of Pending Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Zoning Amendment Application for 665, 667, 669 and 671 Sheppard Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-134271.pdf

Speakers

Hanita Braun

Communications (Community Council)

(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Sally Clark-Mills (NY.New.NY7.1.1)

Communications (City Council)

(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Judith Starkman (CC.Main.NY7.1.2)

NY7.2 - Final Report - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - 160 Sheppard Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Willowdale

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 160 Sheppard Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 7625 for the lands at 160 Sheppard Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

3. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 by adding the lands at 160 Sheppard Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the applicant to:

 

a. submit a revised Functional Serving Report and Stormwater Management Report to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. No one addressed the North York Community Council on June 25, 2019.

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law at 160 Sheppard Avenue West to permit a three-storey medical office building with a height of 12.3 metres, or 14.0 metres measured to the top of the parapet. The application proposes 500 square metres of commercial gross floor area, including 47 square metres of retail space which equates to a floor space index of 0.95 times the lot area. Vehicular access to the subject site is proposed along the eastern limit of the site via a 6.0 metre wide, two-way driveway. A total of seven parking spaces are proposed on the ground level behind the building. The application also proposes an enclosed terrace accessed through the second floor and an outdoor terrace accessed through the third floor.

 

The Official Plan Amendment proposes to amend the in-force Sheppard Avenue Commercial Area Secondary Plan (SACASP) to permit a height of 14.0 metres, including the parapet. The Zoning By-law Amendment proposes to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 and will bring the site into the City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 to permit the proposed development and to establish appropriate performance standards. The Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments are consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014), conform to and do not conflict with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019), and are consistent with the general intent and purpose of the City's Official Plan.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws to permit a three-storey medical office building with a maximum gross floor area of 500 square metres, resulting in a floor space index of 0.95 times the area of the lot. The proposed development fits within the existing and planned context for Sheppard Avenue West, is in keeping with the objectives of the Council-adopted Sheppard Lansing Secondary Plan to create a mixed-use avenue with a vibrant and attractive streetscape with greening and pedestrian amenity, and appropriately transitions to the abutting lower density residential uses.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 7, 2019) Report and City of Toronto Data/Drawings (Attachments 1-7) and Applicant Submitted Drawings (Attachment 8-10) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications for 160 Sheppard Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-134316.pdf

NY7.3 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 11-19, 25 and 29 Industrial Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 5, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes the development of three new commercial buildings with a total gross floor area of 7,032 square metres at 11-19, 25 and 29 Industrial Street. The westerly two buildings proposed will be one storey in height, and the easterly building will be two storeys in height. A total of 106 vehicular parking spaces are proposed as part of the development. The new development will also share the existing parking located in the existing commercial development at 85-115 Laird Drive. The application is the second phase of the Leaside Village Shopping Centre.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with the A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2019.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the former Leaside Zoning By-law 1916 and City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013. The proposal has been reviewed against the policies of the PPS (2014), the Growth Plan (2019), and the Toronto Official Plan. Staff are of the opinion that the proposal is consistent with the PPS (2014) and does not conflict with the Growth Plan (2019). Furthermore, the proposal conforms with the Toronto Official Plan, particularly as it relates to Site and Area Specific Policy 508. The proposal permits an expansion of an existing retail area onto lands which have been vacant and enhances the streetscape of Industrial Street.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 5, 2019) Report and City of Toronto Data/Drawings (Attachments 1-6) and Applicant Submitted Drawings (Attachments 7a-8f) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 11-19, 25 and 29 Industrial Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-134269.pdf

Speakers

Joshua Butcher, Bousfields Inc.

Communications (Community Council)

(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Geoff Kettel and Carol Burtin Fripp, Co-Presidents, Leaside Property Owners Association Incorporated (NY.New.NY7.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/comm/communicationfile-95688.pdf

NY7.4 - Final Report - Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption Applications - 2962A, 2962B, 2962C, 2966A, and 2966B Bayview Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Willowdale

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium, as generally illustrated on Attachment 2 to the report (June 5, 2019) from Director, Community Planning, North York District, subject to:

 

a. the conditions, as generally listed in Attachment 3 to the report (June 5, 2019) from Director, Community Planning, North York District which, except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to the final approval and the release of the Plan of Condominium for registration;

 

b. any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development; and

 

c. draft plan approval not being issued until the necessary Bill(s) are in full force and effect.

 

2. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 2962A, 2962B, 2962C, 2966A, & 2966B Bayview Avenue as generally illustrated on Attachment 4 to the report (June 5, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

 

3. City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

4. Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the Parcels of Tied Lands (POTLs) without the written consent of the Chief Planner or his/her designate.

 

5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title to the Parcels of Tied Lands (POTLs) at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered.

 

6. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title to the Parcels of Tied Lands (POTLs) lands.

 

7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. No one addressed the North York Community Council on June 25, 2019.

Origin

(June 5, 2019) Report from Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to establish a rear drive aisle as a Common Elements Condominium at 2962A, 2962B, 2962C, 2966A, & 2966B Bayview Avenue. The Common Elements Condominium is required to provide legal pedestrian and vehicular access to five townhouses and to ensure shared ownership and maintenance of the common element rear drive aisle by the Common Elements Condominium corporation.

 

The requested exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act is required to permit the creation of conveyable lots for the five residential townhouses fronting on Bayview Avenue, which will become the Parcels of Tied Land (POTLs) to the Common Elements Condominium.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019). The lifting of Part Lot Control and the creation of the Common Elements Condominium is appropriate for the orderly development of these lands.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption By-law. In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act against each POTL appurtenant to the Common Elements Condominium, whereby the owner agrees not to convey or mortgage any part of the POTLs without prior consent of the Chief Planner or his designate, which may be provided following registration of the Common Elements Condominium.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 5, 2019) Report and City of Toronto Data/Drawings (Attachments 1-6) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption Applications for 2962A, 2962B, 2962C, 2966A, & 2966B Bayview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-134293.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 10, 2019) E-mail from Dennis De Rango, Specialized Services Team Lead, Real Estate Department, Hydro One Networks Inc., submitted by Iwona Lipowski (NY.Main.NY7.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/comm/communicationfile-95226.pdf

Declared Interests (Community Council)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong - owns property in the area
Written Declaration: https://secure.toronto.ca/council/declared-interest-file.do?id=8735

NY7.5 - Final Report - Rental Housing Demolition Application - 2779-2781 Yonge Street and 15-17 and 19-21 Strathgowan Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the application for a Rental Housing Demolition permit in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code to allow for the demolition of 28 existing rental dwelling units located at 2779 Yonge Street and 15-17 and 19-21 Strathgowan Avenue, subject to the following conditions:

 

a. the owner shall provide, secure and maintain not less than 28 replacement rental dwelling units, comprised of at least 14 one-bedroom and 14 two-bedroom units, within the proposed 9-storey mixed-use building on the subject site, for a period of at least 20 years, beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied, and as generally illustrated in the plans provided to the City Planning Division dated May 3, 2019. Any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

b. the owner shall provide, secure and maintain at least 3 one-bedroom and 3 two-bedroom replacement rental dwelling units at affordable rents and 11 one-bedroom and 11 two-bedroom replacement rental dwelling units at mid-range rents, for a period of at least 10 years, beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied;

 

c. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry in each replacement rental dwelling unit, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

d. the owner shall provide tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units with access to all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed 9-storey mix-use building at no extra charge. Access and use of these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any resident of the non-replacement rental dwelling units without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as customary practices for private bookings, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

e. the owner shall provide 14 vehicle parking spaces to tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;       

 

f. the owner shall provide tenant relocation and assistance to all eligible tenants of the existing rental dwelling units, including the right to return to a replacement rental dwelling unit, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

g. the owner shall provide tenant assistance to all past eligible tenants of the existing rental dwelling units, including the right to return to a replacement rental dwelling unit, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division; and

 

h. the owner shall enter into and register on title to the subject site one or more Agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in a, b, c, d, e, f and g above to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division including an agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to issue Preliminary Approval for the Rental Housing Demolition permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code for the demolition of the 28 existing rental dwelling units at 2779 Yonge Street and 15-17 and 19-21 Strathgowan Avenue after all of the following have occurred:

 

a. satisfaction or securing of the conditions in Recommendation 1 above;

 

b. the site-specific Zoning By-law Amendments have come into full force and effect;

 

c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006;

 

d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits for the proposed 9-storey mix-use building on the subject site; and

 

e. the execution and registration of a Section 37 Agreement pursuant to the Planning Act securing Recommendation 1 a, b, c, d, e, f and g and any other requirements of the Zoning-Bylaw Amendment.

 

3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue the Rental Housing Demolition permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, has given preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.

 

4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue the Residential Demolition permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code and Section 33 of the Planning Act no earlier than the issuance of the first building permit for excavation and shoring of the proposed development, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, has given preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition permit under 363-11.1, of the Toronto Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a. the owner remove all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;

 

b. the owner erect solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official;

           

c. the owner erect the mixed-use building on the site no later than 4 years from the day demolition of the existing buildings is commenced; and

 

d. should the owner fail to complete the proposed 9-storey mixed-use building within the time specified in condition c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a Residential Demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

 

5. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 667, under the City of Toronto Act. No one addressed the North York Community Council on June 25, 2019.

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This Rental Housing Demolition application proposes to demolish 28 existing rental dwelling units located within 3 residential rental buildings at 2779 Yonge Street and 15-17 and 19-21 Strathgowan Avenue and replace all demolished units within the proposed 9-storey mixed-use building on the subject site. The commercial building at 2781 Yonge Street would also be demolished.

 

The associated Zoning By-law Amendment application (13 123068 NNY 25 OZ) proposes a 9-storey mixed-use building on the subject site. This application is the subject of a settlement at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT). The LPAT is withholding its order pending written confirmation from the City Solicitor that the Section 37 Agreement has been executed and registered on title, the final form of the Zoning By-law Amendment has been prepared, and the City has issued notice of approval conditions for the site plan application.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Rental Housing Demolition Application for 2779-2781 Yonge Street and 15-17 and 19-21 Strathgowan Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-134318.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Andrew Murphy, Director of Acquisitions and Development, Devron (YS) Ltd. (NY.New.NY7.5.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/comm/communicationfile-95689.pdf

NY7.6 - Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 368-386 Eglinton Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with Planning staff and other appropriate staff to attend the third Local Planning Appeal Tribunal prehearing conference (when it is scheduled) in support of Zoning By-law Amendment Application Number 17 188558 STE 22 OZ, at 368-386 Eglinton Avenue East, and support the conversion of the prehearing conference to a settlement hearing, provided all conditions listed below are satisfied.
 

2. In the event that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to withhold the issuance of any Order(s) until such time as the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that:

 

a. the final form of the Zoning By-law Amendments are to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; 

 

b. all comments from Engineering and Construction Services contained in their February 14, 2019 memorandum are addressed to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and

 

c. the owner enters into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act and the following matters are secured through the agreement  pursuant to policy 5, section 5.1.1 of the City's Official Plan to support development:

 

i. the rental tenure of the existing rental building containing 149 existing rental dwelling units, without application to convert or demolish for at least 20 years commencing from the date of the enactment of the amending by-laws;

 

ii. access for residents of the existing rental building to all indoor and outdoor amenities within the proposed building addition with no cost pass-through to existing residents within the existing rental dwelling units;

 

iii. improvements to the existing rental building, with no cost pass-through to existing residents within the existing rental dwelling units, including:

 

A. programmed outdoor amenity area on the two existing roof-top amenity areas on the existing building, including outdoor furniture, weather protection, barbeques, and renovating the existing washroom located adjacent to the existing eastern roof-top outdoor amenity area;

 

B. establishing a new indoor amenity area within the basement of the existing building of at least 80 square metres, currently occupied by a mechanical/service space;

 

C. locating all garbage, recycling, and composting storage indoors for the new and existing building and locating a hand delivered refuse drop-off area within the existing building;

 

D. introducing secure long-term bike storage within the underground parking garage for residents of the existing and new buildings; and 

 

E. introducing short-term visitor bike parking racks located at the front entrance of the existing building;

 

iv. a construction mitigation and tenant communications plan to lessen adverse impacts on tenants due to the redevelopment proposal, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

v. a tenant assistance plan to lessen impacts imposed upon the tenants of twelve (11) existing rental dwelling units which will be reconfigured to accommodate the enclosure of an existing bedroom window, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and

 

vi. reducing the number of vehicular driveways to and from the site from 4 to 1 and relocating the ramp to the underground parking garage to the rear of the site.

 

3. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to continue to work together with the Toronto District School Board to secure appropriate conditions of approval, including potentially a holding symbol (H), regarding the provision of public school facilities to accommodate students generated from this development.

Origin

(June 6, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

On March 28, 2018, the applicant appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") citing Council's failure to make a decision on the Zoning By-law Amendment applications within the timeframe prescribed by the Planning Act. The first prehearing conference was held on October 16, 2018. A second pre-hearing conference was held on May 14, 2019.  A third pre-hearing conference will be scheduled by the LPAT following an update from all parties including the applicant, the City of Toronto, the Toronto District School Board and the South Eglinton Ratepayers' and Residents' Association on their progress in resolving outstanding issues.

 

This application has been revised and currently proposes a new 11-storey (29.17 metres plus a 5 metre mechanical penthouse) addition to the east end of the existing residential apartment building at 368 Eglinton Avenue East including 76 new residential rental units in addition to the 148 residential rental units in the existing building. A total of 163 parking spaces are proposed for the combined needs of the existing building and the building addition. The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction with respect to the LPAT hearing. This report recommends that Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff, to support the current proposal at the LPAT, subject to conditions.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019) and the City of Toronto Official Plan. It provides improvements to the existing building at 368 Eglinton Avenue East, appropriate transition to the low rise residential Neighbourhoods designated lands to the north, mitigates privacy issues related to the interface with the existing residential building to the east at 398 Eglinton Avenue East, provides new rental housing and secures the new and existing residential rental tenure for a period of 20 years.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 6, 2019) Report and City of Toronto Data/Drawings (Attachments 1-6) and Applicant Submitted Drawings (Attachments 7-11) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 368-386 Eglinton Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-134356.pdf

Speakers

Pitman Patterson, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(June 20, 2019) E-mail from Alejandro Cifuentes submitting letter from Daryl Sage, Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Lands Corporation - recirculated at the City Council meeting. (NY.New.NY7.6.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/comm/communicationfile-95690.pdf
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Mark Williams (NY.New.NY7.6.2)
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Andy Gort, President, South Eglinton Ratepayers' & Residents' Association (SERRA) (NY.New.NY7.6.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/comm/communicationfile-95706.pdf

NY7.7 - Request for Directions - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - 5294-5304 and 5306 Yonge Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Willowdale
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item. (NY7.7a for information)

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation.

Origin

(June 24, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and zoning by-law to permit a thirty-three  storey residential building with retail on the ground floor at 5294-5304 and 5306 Yonge Street. The applicant has appealed the application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act and a hearing has been scheduled to commence on October 28, 2019. On May 31, 2019, the applicant submitted a revised proposal in the form of a "With Prejudice", or public, settlement offer which is the subject of this report.

 

The revised thirty-three storey proposal would have a height of 101.26  metres (excluding the mechanical penthouse) and a gross floor area of 22,188 square metres. The gross floor area would result in a Floor Space Index (a "FSI") of 8.75 times the area of the lot. A total of 109 vehicular parking spaces are proposed underground. An on-site parkland dedication is now proposed in this revised proposal. The changes made by the applicant are discussed in this report, however, despite the modifications, the proposal is still not supportable for the reasons outlined in this report.

 

This report recommends that the City Solicitor, together with City Planning and other appropriate staff, attend the LPAT hearing in opposition to the amended Official Plan and zoning by-law amendment applications. In the opinion of Planning staff, the proposal does not conform with the Growth Plan, is not consistent with the PPS, does not conform to the Official Plan or the North York Centre Secondary Plan, does not constitute good planning and is not in the public interest.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 24, 2019) Report and City of Toronto Data/Drawings (Attachments 1-6) and Applicant Submitted Drawings (Attachments 7-8) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on Official Plan & Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 5294-5304 & 5306 Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-135417.pdf
(June 7, 2019) Notice of Pending Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 5294-5304 and 5306 Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-134322.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 5, 2019) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 5294-5304 and 5306 Yonge Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications (NY7.7a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135718.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 20, 2019) E-mail from Stephen Orlich (NY.New.NY7.7.1)
(June 20, 2019) E-mail from Marina Orlich (NY.New.NY7.7.2)

NY7.8 - Alterations to a Heritage Property, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 50 Eglinton Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council include the property at 50 Eglinton Avenue West on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register.

 

2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 50 Eglinton Avenue West under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 50 Eglinton Avenue West (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 6 to the report (May 8, 2019) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

3. If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

4. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

5. If the designations are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

 

6. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 50 Eglinton Avenue West in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a 32-storey tower on the lands known municipally as 50-60 Eglinton Avenue West, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings (update issued April 19, 2019) prepared by Turner Fleischer Architects and Hariri Pontarini Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and the Heritage Impact Assessment, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., issued February 27, 2019 (with Addendum issued April 12, 2019) and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a. that as a condition of the Section 37 Agreement as approved by the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, the owner shall:

 

1. enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 50  Eglinton Avenue West in accordance with the plans and drawings (update issued April 19, 2019) prepared by Turner Fleischer Architects and Hariri Pontarini Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. issued February 27, 2019 (with Addendum issued April 12, 2019) and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2 below to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;

 

2. provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out  in the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. issued February 27, 2019 (with Addendum issued April 12, 2019) to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; 

 

3. enter into and register on the property at 50 Eglinton Avenue West one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations;

 

b. that prior to final Site Plan approval for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council for the property located at 50-60 Eglinton Avenue West, the owner shall:

 

1. provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2 above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

2. have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect;

 

3. provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager Heritage Preservation Services;

 

4. submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; 

 

5. provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

c. that prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property 50-60 Eglinton Avenue West, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage buildings as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

 

1. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 6.a.2 above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; 

 

2. provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, and approved Interpretation Plan;

 

d. that prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.c.2 above, the owner shall:

 

1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

 

2. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

7. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 50 Eglinton Avenue West in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 50 Eglinton Avenue West

Origin

(May 8, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that Toronto City Council approve the proposed alterations to the heritage property located within the proposed development site at 50-60 Eglinton Avenue West, linked with the proposed redevelopment of the site and per the settlement offer submitted to the City on July 13, 2018, and adopted by Council on July 23, 2018, in conjunction with an appeal to the Local Planning Appeals Tribunal ("LPAT") of the application for Zoning By-law Amendment, that Council include the property at 50 Eglinton Avenue West on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, that Council state its Intention to Designate the property included in the proposed development site (50-60 Eglinton West) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject property.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 8, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning on Alterations to a Heritage Property, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 50 Eglinton Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-134323.pdf

8a - Alterations to a Heritage Property, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 50 Eglinton Avenue West

Origin
(May 29, 2019) Letter from Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on May 29, 2019 considered a report (May 8, 2019) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning regarding Alterations to a Heritage Property, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement – 50 Eglinton Avenue West

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 29, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on Alterations to a Heritage Property, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 50 Eglinton Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-134352.pdf

NY7.21 - Relocation of Pedestrian Crossover - Willowdale Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Willowdale

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the removal of the existing pedestrian crossover from Willowdale Avenue, immediately north of McKee Avenue.

 

2. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Willowdale Avenue at Church Avenue, coincident with the removal of the existing pedestrian crossover at Willowdale Avenue and McKee Avenue.

Origin

(May 17, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates bus service on Willowdale Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval to relocate the existing pedestrian crossover (PXO) from Willowdale Avenue, immediately north of McKee Avenue to Willowdale Avenue, immediately south of Church Avenue.

 

Transportation Services is also recommending that the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection Willowdale Avenue at Church Avenue not be authorized as the technical justification for the installation of traffic control signals is not satisfied.

 

The relocation of pedestrian crossover is based on a number of other factors staff have considered, namely; the pedestrian generators in the area (i.e., school, park and community centre on Church Avenue, west of Willowdale Avenue and high density development on Willowdale Avenue, north of Church Avenue), and the nearby TTC stops. A pedestrian crossover at this location will enhance safety for pedestrians in this area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 17, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services on the Relocation of Pedestrian Crossover on Willowdale Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-134261.pdf

NY7.25 - Assumption of Services - Menkes Antibes Holdings Inc., Plan 66M-2509 - Subdivision File 11 197931 NNY 10 SB - 55 Antibes Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council assume the services installed within Coneflower Crescent and that the City formally assume the road within the Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2509.

 

2. City Council authorize the Director, Engineering Review to release the performance guarantee held with respect to the municipal services in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement.

 

3. City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highway and municipal services within the Registered Subdivision Plan 66M-2509.

 

4. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the Owner.

 

5. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

 

6. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed with Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2509 to Toronto Hydro.

Origin

(May 8, 2019) Report from the Director, Engineering Review, Engineering and Construction Services

Summary

This report requests Council's authority for the City to assume the municipal road and services within Coneflower Crescent, in accordance with the terms of the Subdivision Agreement for Plan 66M-2509, registered on July 19, 2013, between Menkes Antibes Holdings Inc. and the City of Toronto.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 8, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Engineering Review, Engineering and Construction Services on Assumption of Services - Menkes Antibes Holdings Inc. for Plan 66M-2509 - Subdivision File 11 197931 NNY 10 SB - 55 Antibes Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-134136.pdf

NY7.26 - Assumption of Services - Monarch Corporation, Plan 66M-2471 - Subdivision File 04 175091 NNY 33 SB - 2025-2045 Sheppard Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Don Valley North

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council assume the services installed within Herons Hill Way and that the City formally assume the roads within the Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2471.

 

2. City Council authorize the Director, Engineering Review to release the performance guarantee held with respect to the municipal services in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement.

 

3. City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highway and municipal services within the Registered Subdivision Plan 66M-2471.

 

4. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the Owner.

 

5. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

 

6. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed with Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2471 to Toronto Hydro.

Origin

(May 6, 2019) Report from the Director, Engineering Review, Engineering & Construction Services

Summary

This report requests Council's authority for the City to assume the municipal roads and services within Herons Hill Way, in accordance with the terms of the Subdivision Agreement for Plan 66M-2471, registered on December 1, 2009 between Monarch Corporation and the City of Toronto.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 6, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Engineering Review, Engineering & Construction Services on Assumption of Services - Monarch Corporation for Plan 66M-2471 - Subdivision File 04 175091 NNY 33 SB - 2025-2045 Sheppard Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-134137.pdf

NY7.31 - Permanent Public Highway Closures for the Lawrence Heights Revitalization Project - Northeast District - Stage 3 - Portion of Varna Drive and Portion of Cather Crescent; Stage 4 - Portion of Varna Drive and Portion of Cather Crescent; Stage 5 - Portion of Cather Crescent and Tafford Lane

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence
Attention
Bills 1122 and 1123 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the phased permanent closure of portions of the public highways named Varna Drive and Cather Crescent, shown as Parts 1 and 2 respectively on Sketch No. PS-2019-050 (the "Stage 3 Highways"); portions of Varna Drive and Cather Crescent, shown as Parts 1 and 2 respectively on Sketch No. PS-2019-051 (the "Stage 4 Highways") and the portion of Cather Crescent and Trafford Lane, shown as Parts 1 and 2 respectively on Sketch No. PS-2019-049 (the "Stage 5 Highways"), attached to the report (June 6, 2019) from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services.

 

2. City Council enact the by-laws substantially in the form of the draft by-laws attached as Appendices "A" and "B" to the report (June 6, 2019) from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a public meeting in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and notice of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was posted on the Public Notices Page of the City's website in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162.  No one addressed the North York Community Council at its meeting on June 25, 2019.

Origin

(June 6, 2019) Report from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services

Summary

Transportation Services recommends that the portions of Varna Drive and Cather Crescent and all of Trafford Lane be permanently closed for incorporation into the Lawrence Heights Revitalization Project - Northeast District.

 

A new public road network will be constructed to replace the above-noted closed public highways as part of the revitalization project.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 6, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services, on Permanent Public Highway Closures for the Lawrence Heights Revitalization Project - N/E District - Stage 3 - Portion of Varna Drive and Portion of Cather Crescent; Stage 4 - Portion of Varna Drive and Portion of Cather Crescent; and Stage 5 - Portion of Cather Crescent and Trafford Lane
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-134267.pdf

NY7.36 - Application to Remove a City-owned Tree and a Private Tree - 77 Citation Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Don Valley North
Attention
Communication NY7.36.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) City-owned tree located on the road allowance adjacent to 77 Citation Drive.

 

2. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at 77 Citation Drive.

Origin

(May 28, 2019) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) City-owned tree located on the road allowance adjacent to the property located at 77 Citation Drive and that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located on the property at 77 Citation Drive. An applicant on behalf of the property owner is requesting removal to allow for the construction of a new dwelling.

 

The subject trees are a City-owned Colorado spruce (Picea pungens) tree measuring 53 cm in diameter, located on the City-owned road allowance at the front of the property and a privately owned Colorado blue spruce (Picea pungens 'Glauca') tree measuring 38 cm in diameter, located on the property itself. The Tree By-law does not support the removal of these trees as they are healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation for a Application to Remove a City-owned Tree and a Private Tree at 77 Citation Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-134266.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from N. Corrado (CC.Supp.NY7.36.1)

NY7.47 - Request for Interim Directions Report - 25 Fisherville Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (NY7.47a with recommendations)

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council:

 

1. Directed the Director, Community Planning, North York District, to report directly to City Council at its meeting of July 16 and 17, 2019, with an Interim Request for Direction Report regarding the June 21, 2019 resubmission of a re-zoning application for 25 Fisherville Road to the City Planning Division.

Origin

(June 21, 2019) Memo from Councillor James Pasternak

Summary

A re-zoning application was deemed complete by the Director, Community Planning, North York District on September 14, 2018 for 25 Fisherville Road to construct two new 18-storey residential apartment buildings beside an existing 18 storey apartment building on site, which would be maintained in place. Pursuant to the adoption of Item NY3.3 on February 26, 2019, City Council directed staff to continue negotiations with the owner/applicant regarding the proposal and to oppose the application, in what was then its form, in the event of an appeal by the owner/applicant to the LPAT.

 

I understand that on June 21, 2019 the owner/applicant submitted a with prejudice resubmission to staff for their consideration with the caveat that the resubmission was premised on City Council receiving a Final Report from staff with respect to the resubmission prior to the October 2, 2019 City Council meeting.

 

In order for City Council to provide staff with directions regarding a potential appeal of the re-zoning application, as resubmitted, to the LPAT over the summer break, it's necessary for a Request for an Interim Directions Report to be submitted directly to the July 16, 2019, agenda of City Council to address the resubmission.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 21, 2019) Memo from Councillor James Pasternak on a Request for Interim Directions Report for 25 Fisherville Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-135350.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 25 Fisherville Road - Zoning By-law Amendment - Request for Interim Direction (NY7.47a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136005.pdf

NY7.49 - Change to Parking Prohibitions Across Frontage of Sloane Public School - 110 Sloane Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Don Valley East
Attention
Bill 1095 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council prohibit parking from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Sloane Avenue, between a point 38 metres north of Elvaston Drive and a point 224 metres further north.

Origin

(June 25, 2019) Memo from Councillor Minnan-Wong

Summary

Concerns in the community regarding traffic and student safety at Sloane Public School led to a community consultation with Transportation Services. 

 

These recommended changes need to be implemented in time for the start of the new school year in September, 2019.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 25, 2019) Memo from Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong on Change to Parking Prohibitions Across Frontage of Sloane Public School - 110 Sloane Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-135449.pdf

Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 7

SC7.2 - 3850 and 3900 Sheppard Avenue East and 2350-2362 Kennedy Road - Official Plan Amendment - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - Scarborough - Agincourt
Attention
Communication SC7.2.8 has been submitted on this Item.

Bill 1151 has been submitted on this item

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 3850 and 3900 Sheppard Avenue East and 2350-2362 Kennedy Road substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Official Plan to provide for the comprehensive redevelopment of the Agincourt Mall lands located at the northwest intersection of Sheppard Avenue East and Kennedy Road.  The proposal would replace the existing mall with a new mixed-use community consisting of residential, commercial and office uses developed in a variety of mid- and high-rise buildings supported by a new public street network alongside new parks and open spaces.

 

To properly consider this major application, the City undertook a review of the broader context surrounding the Agincourt Mall lands.  The Agincourt Mall Planning Framework Review (AMPFR) was conducted over four phases with the objective of recommending a comprehensive planning and design framework to guide redevelopment of the subject lands through a Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP). 

 

The recommended SASP is the outcome of nearly 2 years of review, analysis and consultation with divisional experts, external agencies, stakeholders and the community.  It will allow for the transformation of the current suburban model of Agincourt Mall to a more compact form with a variety of uses, building types, parks and open spaces that will integrate with the existing and planned context of the surrounding area.  With a maximum gross density of 3.5 and a range of building heights of up to 40 storeys or 137 metres, the SASP is consistent with approved planning frameworks in the Sheppard Avenue East corridor and ensures that adjacent existing and future higher order transit are supported.  The proposed SASP addresses the connectivity challenges in the current environment by providing for a new public street network on the subject lands.  This network will help ensure a full range of mobility options are available and easily accessible by new and existing members of the community, with an emphasis on transit and enhancement of pedestrian and cycling infrastructure.

 

This report recommends the approval of the Official Plan Amendment for the Agincourt Mall lands found as Attachment 1 to this report.  The recommended SASP is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).  It advances a number of Official Plan policy objectives for the subject lands and secures an appropriate level of intensification supported by the necessary physical and community infrastructure that will allow a complete community to emerge.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 7, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 3850 and 3900 Sheppard Avenue East and 2350-2362 Kennedy Road - Official Plan Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-134441.pdf

Speakers

(June 25, 2019) Mary Taylor, President, Greens of Tam O'Shanter Complex
(June 25, 2019) Murray McLeod
(June 25, 2019) Rhoda Potter, President, Agincourt Village Community Association
(June 25, 2019) Lindsay Dale-Harris, Bousfields Inc

Communications (Community Council)

(June 10, 2019) E-mail from Amy and Joseph Foo (SC.Supp.SC7.2.1)
(June 20, 2019) Memo from Sheppard East Village BIA (SC.Supp.SC7.2.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/comm/communicationfile-95505.pdf
(June 20, 2019) E-mail from Catherine Huynh (SC.Supp.SC7.2.3)
(June 23, 2019) E-mail from Chris Chan (SC.Supp.SC7.2.4)
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Rhoda Potter, President, Agincourt Village Community Association (SC.Supp.SC7.2.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/comm/communicationfile-95578.pdf
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Murray McLeod (SC.Supp.SC7.2.6)
(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Richard Domes, Principal Planner, Gagnon Walker Domes Professional Planners (SC.Supp.SC7.2.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/comm/communicationfile-95680.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) Letter from Michael Foderick, McCarthy Tétrault LLP (CC.New.SC7.2.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96148.pdf

SC7.3 - 3453 Victoria Park Avenue and 50-68 Morcambe Gate Zoning By-law Amendment - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - Scarborough - Agincourt

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the Neighbourhood Commercial (NC) and Multiple Family Residential (M) Zone of the L’Amoreaux Community By-law No. 12466, as amended, for the lands at 3453 Victoria Park Avenue and 50-68 Morcambe Gate, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, for the lands at 3453 Victoria Park Avenue and 50-68 Morcambe Gate, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to be registered on title, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, to secure the following matters, services and facilities:

 

a. A cash payment of $400,000 towards the design, construction and cost of a new splash pad to be located adjacent to the Chester Le Community Corner and Child Care Centre.  These payments are to be provided in accordance with the terms of the agreement, or towards other eligible local community benefits as may be determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.  The payment shall be indexed from the date of the execution of the agreement in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto;

 

b. The provision of at least 5% of the total number of residential dwelling units proposed to be constructed on the subject site as new affordable ownership housing units to a non-profit housing provider on the following terms:

 

i. Affordable ownership housing is defined in the City's Official Plan as housing which is priced at or below an amount where the total monthly shelter cost (mortgage principal and interest – based on a 25-year amortization, 10 per cent down payment and the chartered bank administered mortgage rate for a conventional 5-year mortgage as reported by the Bank of Canada at the time of application – plus property taxes calculated on a monthly basis) equals the average City of Toronto rent, by unit type, as reported annually by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation;

 

ii. The unit mix and average unit size of the new affordable ownership housing units will reflect the unit mix and average unit size of the residential dwelling units proposed to be constructed on the remainder of the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

iii. All new affordable ownership housing units will be constructed to a fully-finished condition, to a similar standard as the units in the remainder of the development;

 

iv. Each new affordable ownership housing unit will be provided with at least one vehicle parking space;

 

v. The new affordable ownership housing units will be generally dispersed throughout the building or buildings within which they are to be provided, and occupants of the new affordable ownership housing units will have access to all building facilities and amenities on the same terms and conditions as all the other residents of the development;

 

vi. The owner shall submit, in consultation with the non-profit housing provider, the proposed layouts and locations of the new affordable ownership housing units as part of the application for Site Plan approval, and the final design and location of the new affordable ownership housing units shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, prior to Site Plan approval.

 

c. The Owner shall enter into Agreements of Purchase and Sale ("APS") for the new affordable ownership housing units with the provider and/or the City prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the development phase within which the units are to be provided pursuant to Recommendation 1(a), and the APS will be assignable at no additional cost;

 

d. In the event that an acceptable non-profit housing provider cannot enter into an Agreement of Purchase and Sale for the new affordable ownership housing units, the owner shall provide, prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, an upwardly-indexed cash contribution to the City in the amount of $1,100,000 towards the provision of new affordable housing in Ward 22.

 

5. As a legal convenience, the Owner shall enter into a financially secured Agreement for the construction of all improvements to the municipal infrastructure at no cost to the City to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes amendments to the L’Amoreaux Community Zoning By-law No. 12466, as amended, to permit the construction of a 142 unit townhouse development at 3453 Victoria Park Avenue and 50-68 Morcambe Gate.  The existing 1-storey commercial/retail plaza would be demolished.  The development consists of 4 storey stacked and back-to-back townhouses organized into four blocks with a total gross floor area of approximately 14,000 square metres and an overall density of 1.72 times the area of the lot .  A total of 168 parking spaces are proposed, the majority of which are located underground.

 

The proposed residential infill development use is compatible with its surrounding context. The proposal introduces an appropriate built form to the site with development massed to address Victoria Park Avenue, Morcambe Gate and Chester Le Boulevard.  It also provides step backs and transition in scale and massing to adjacent properties to the north and south.  

 

The site organization and proposed landscaping will provide improved public realm conditions on the adjacent streets and an attractive environment for pedestrian movement within the site.  The proposal also includes an affordable housing component whereby approximately 5% or 7 units will be provided as affordable home ownership through a Construction Agreement with the City's Affordable Housing Office. 

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms and does not conflict with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).  The proposal conforms to the applicable Official Plan policies and complies with the criteria in the City's Townhouse and Low-Rise Apartment Guidelines with a built form that is compatible with the adjacent uses. 

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 7, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-8 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 3453 Victoria Park Avenue and 50-68 Morcambe Gate Zoning By-law Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-134468.pdf

SC7.4 - 2775 Birchmount Road - Zoning By-Law Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - Scarborough - Agincourt
Attention
Communications SC7.4.1 and SC7.4.2 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, for the lands at 2775 Birchmount Road, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2. City Council amend the L’Amoreaux Community By-law 12466, as amended, for the lands at 2775 Birchmount Road, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment(s) as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the L’Amoreaux Community By-law 12466, as amended, to permit development of the subject lands with a restaurant/retail store, a vehicle fuel station and a vehicle washing establishment with an associated drive-through facility.  A gross floor area of approximately 420 square metres is being proposed along with a minimum of 15 surface parking spaces.  

 

The permitted uses on the subject lands which are currently limited to a vehicle service station and a vehicle service shop.  The application proposes to expand the permissions on site to all uses in the Commercial Local (CL) Zone in the City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, and to permit a drive-through facility and a vehicle washing establishment. 

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).  The development of the subject lands with small scale retail, restaurant and service uses (vehicle fuel station, vehicle washing establishment) is appropriate integrating well with the retail uses to the north and is compatible with the surrounding residential community while generally complying with applicable urban design guidelines.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 7, 2019) Revised - Report and Attachments 1-10 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 2775 Birchmount Road - Zoning By-Law Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-134467.pdf
(June 7, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-10 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 2775 Birchmount Road - Zoning By-Law Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135330.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 26, 2019) E-mail from Vahan Georgy (CC.Main.SC7.4.1)
(July 5, 2019) E-mail from Lu Wang (CC.Main.SC7.4.2)

SC7.5 - 6351 Steeles Avenue East - Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Scarborough North
Attention
Bills 1164 and 1165 have been submitted on this item

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 24982, for the lands at 6351 Steeles Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (June 21, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 6351 Steeles Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (June 21, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4. In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision as generally illustrated in Attachment No. 7 to the report (June 21, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, subject to:

 

a. the conditions as generally listed in Attachment No. 7 to the report (June 21, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, which, except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to final approval and the release of the Draft Plan of Subdivision for registration; and

 

b. any such revisions to the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

 

5. Prior to passing of the Bills by City Council, City Council require the owner to carry out a Stage 1 archaeological resource assessment of the lands included in the Zoning By-law Amendment application that have not been previously subject to archaeological assessment and submit this report to the City. Should the Stage 1 archaeological assessment recommend further property assessment (i.e. Stage 2), the applicant shall confirm in writing that current development applications contemplate no alteration of these additional lands, and that no demolition, construction, grading or other soil disturbances shall take place on the subject lands identified by the Stage 1 report as requiring further archaeological assessment.

 

6. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to negotiate in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor with the applicant and/or its design consultants and/or construction contractors as the case may be, to design and construct the segment of Morningside Avenue between Steeles Avenue East and Passmore Avenue, including that:

 

a. the design and construction of the road segment be undertaken such that it would be ultimately integrated into broader street network improvements to be undertaken by the City in the future widening of Steeles Avenue East from Tapscott to Ninth Line and Morningside Avenue from Passmore Avenue to McNicoll Avenue.

 

7. Upon Council approval of funding for the Morningside Ave. Extension capital project, as part of the 2020 Capital Budget process, City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to enter into and execute an agreement, or separate agreements, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor with the applicant and/or its design consultants and/or construction contractors as the case may be, to design and construct the segment of Morningside Avenue between Steeles Avenue East and Passmore Avenue.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 21, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Employment Districts Zoning By-law No. 24982 (Tapscott Employment District East), as amended, for the property at 6351 Steeles Avenue East to permit the construction of a single-storey warehouse and distribution centre having a gross floor area of approximately 152,498 square metres. The resulting FSI is approximately 0.72 times the area of the lot along with 1024 surface parking spaces.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019) and the Greenbelt Plan (2017). The proposed building would generate between 600 and 1200 jobs, intensifying lands that form part of a Provincially Significant Employment Zone and are designated municipally as suitable for employment growth with non-residential uses.

 

Development of the subject lands will necessitate the construction of a segment of the Morningside Avenue Extension between Steeles Avenue East and Passmore Avenue. The extension of Morningside Avenue from its existing terminus at McNiccoll Avenue to Steeles Avenue East is a long standing transportation infrastructure project to improve connectivity in northeast Scarborough. The segment under consideration to be advanced at this time would provide necessary access to the subject lands while helping to integrate the site with employment uses emerging to the west.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law and Draft Plan of Subdivision.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 21, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-10 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 6351 Steeles Avenue East - Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135284.pdf
(June 7, 2019) Notice of Pending Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 6351 Steeles Avenue East - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-134443.pdf

SC7.6 - 1001 Ellesmere Road - Part Lot Control Exemption Applications - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - Scarborough Centre

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 1001 Ellesmere Road Block 1 (Parts 1 to 45) and Block 2 (Parts 1 to 24) on Plan of Subdivision 66M-2555, as generally illustrated on Attachment 2 to the report (June 12, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

 

2. City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

3. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

 

4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

Origin

(June 12, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

The subject applications request exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act to allow the creation of 45 townhouse lots within a future common elements condominium on Block 1 (Parts 1 to 45) under application 18 174528 ESC 37 PL, and 22 standard townhouse lots on Block 2 (Parts 1 to 24) under application 18 174513 ESC 37 PL.  The subject lands are within a registered plan of subdivision that was registered on June 12, 2019 as Plan 66M-2555.

                                      

This report reviews and recommends approval of Part Lot Control Exemption.  The proposals comply with the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, are consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conform to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).  The lifting of the Part Lot Control for a period of two years is considered appropriate for the orderly development of the lands.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 12, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 1001 Ellesmere Road - Part Lot Control Exemption Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-134683.pdf
(June 7, 2019) Notice of Pending Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 1001 Ellesmere Road, Part Lot Control Exemption Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-134161.pdf

SC7.7 - 2787 and 2791 Eglinton Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Status Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Scarborough Southwest

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council directed that:

 

1. Planning Staff bring forward a Final Zoning Amendment report for the revised development proposal substantially in accordance with the architectural plans dated April 4, 2019 and on file with the City, with Bills to a Public Meeting at the September 16, 2019 Scarborough Community Council Meeting. The report shall allow for the following:

 

a. reduced front yard building setback from Eglinton Avenue of 5 metres instead of the 8 to 13 metres;

 

b. the proposed front yard building setback from Danforth Road of 1.4 metres instead of 2.0 metres;

 

c. rear yard main building setback of 7.6 metres instead of a rear yard setback putting the entire building below a 45 degree angular plane from the rear lot line;

 

d. setback of building projections from the rear lot line of 5.08 metres instead of 7.5 metres;

 

e. right-in right-out driveway access and egress to be on Danforth Road  instead of Horton Avenue;

 

f. urban entrances along the Eglinton Avenue East frontage to range from 5.7 to 6.6 metres instead of the 8.0 metres to 14 meters; and

 

g. a Section 37 contribution and allocation will be determined by the Ward Councillor in consultation with City Planning prior to the September 16, 2019 Community Council Meeting, so that the Section 37 agreement can be prepared prior to the Bills being introduced to City Council for enactment at its meeting October 2 and 3, 2019.

 

2. The applicants be requested to submit a full and complete Site Plan submission no later than July 31, 2019.


3. The Site Plan be circulated and Notice of Approval Conditions be brought forward to the September 16, 2019 Scarborough Community Council meeting so that they may be considered along with the Final Zoning Amendment Report.

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This report provides status information and identifies a set of key unresolved issues regarding the application located at 2787- 2791 Eglinton Avenue East.

 

This application proposes amendments to City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, as amended and Eglinton Community Zoning By-law No. 10048, as amended to permit 5 blocks of 4-storey stacked townhouses containing 184 residential units at 2787-2791 Eglinton Avenue East. The proposed development would have a total gross floor area of 15,874 square metres and a Floor Space Index of 1.85 times the lot area. A total of 229 vehicular and 138 bicycle parking spaces; and 1 Type-G loading space would be provided to service the proposed development.

 

Detailed project information on the October 2018 revised submission is found on the City's Application Information Centre at:

https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/application-information-centre/

 

The original application was submitted on April 9, 2018, and City Planning staff brought forward a Request for Interim Directions Report, to Scarborough Community Council on July 7, 2018. Staff outlined why the development was not supportable as it did not demonstrate how it would fit into the planned context and vision for Avenues in accordance with the City's Official Plan.  Planning staff advised that the proposed development was not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and does not conform with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2017).

 

Subsequently, at the July 27, 2018, City Council meeting, City staff were directed to "bring forward a final report to the first Community Council meeting of 2019 considering the proposed townhouse development as reflected on the applicant’s plans dated April 2018 and also considering the City's Townhouse and Low-rise Apartment Guidelines ". It was determined together with the applicant that the extent of changes required were significant and therefore a report could not be brought forward to the first Community Council meeting of 2019. The applicant agreed to continue working with City staff to further revise the proposal to further bring the application in compliance with the City's Townhouse and Low-rise Apartment Guidelines, as directed by Council.

 

To date, the applicant has submitted two revised proposals, however a number of key issues remain unresolved. As such, Planning staff were unable to bring forward a Final Report with the associated draft zoning by-laws due to the level of uncertainty with the proposal.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 2787 and 2791 Eglinton Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Status Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-134158.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 25, 2019) Letter from Councillor Gary Crawford, Ward 20 Scarborough Southwest (SC.Supp.SC7.7.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/comm/communicationfile-95616.pdf

SC7.22 - Turn Prohibitions - East Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park
Attention
Bill 1096 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council prohibit northbound and southbound U-turn movements at all times on East Avenue, between Baronial Court and Golders Green Avenue.

 

2. City Council prohibit eastbound left turns at all times on East Avenue and the private access located 60 metres north of Golders Green Avenue.

Origin

(June 6, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates transit service on East Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services recommends prohibiting U-turns on East Avenue, between Baronial Court and Golders Green Avenue.  Prohibiting U-turns will provide a safer environment for all road users along this section of East Avenue, which is located adjacent to William G. Davis Junior Public School.

 

This report also recommends prohibiting eastbound left turns at the south driveway of William G. Davis Junior Public School.  Prohibiting eastbound left turns will prevent pedestrian and vehicle conflicts, reduce congestion and maintain traffic flow in the area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 6, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-134279.pdf

SC7.23 - U-Turn Prohibition - Brimley Road South

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
Bill 1097 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council prohibit northbound and southbound U-turn movements at all times on Brimley Road South, between Kingston Road and Barkdene Hills.

Origin

(May 31, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Brimley Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

This report recommends a U-turn prohibition on Brimley Road South, between Kingston Road and Barkdene Hills.  Prohibiting U-turns will provide a safer environment for all road users along this section of Brimley Road which is located adjacent to Blessed Cardinal Newman Catholic High school and Brimley Road South is the main access to Bluffers Park and the extensive Marina facilities located on the waterfront immediately to the south.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 31, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - U-Turn Prohibition - Brimley Road South
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-134436.pdf

Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 7

TE7.2 - Permanent Closure of Stratified Portion of Walton Street as Public Highway

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale
Attention
Bill 1116 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council authorize the permanent closure of a stratified portion of Walton Street as public highway designated as Part 1 on the draft Reference Plan prepared by Speight, van Nostrand and Gibson Limited, Job No. 190-0017, attached to the report (June  6, 2019) from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services.

 

2.  City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report (June 6, 2019) from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services, subject to the insertion of the appropriate plan and plan numbers once a Reference Plan has been deposited, conditional upon the City entering into an agreement with the adjacent property owner, wherein the Applicant agrees to purchase the stratified airspace on terms satisfactory to the City.

Origin

(June 6, 2019) Report from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services

Summary

Transportation Services recommends that a stratified portion of the airspace above Walton Street be permanently closed.

 

Once closed the stratified portion will be incorporated into the redevelopment of the Chelsea Hotel at 33 Gerrard Street West.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 6, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services - Permanent Closure of Stratified Portion of Walton Street as Public Highway
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134255.pdf

TE7.3 - 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (June 11, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law  438-86 for the lands at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (June 11, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.        .

 

3. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council shall require the owner to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the City Solicitor and the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services respecting 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by KPMB Architects, dated March 6, 2019, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated March 6, 2019, (the HIA), and a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, to be prepared by a qualified heritage consultant and that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the HIA and provides a detailed description with supporting documentation of the methods for restoration/replacement of the foundations of the retained building elevations at 300 Bloor Street West and 487 Huron Street.

 

5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council will require the owner to provide a revised Functional Servicing Report to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer, Engineering and Construction Services  and such report will determine, whether the municipal water, sanitary and storm sewer systems can support the proposed development and whether upgrades or improvements of the existing municipal infrastructure are required.

 

6. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council shall require the owner to enter into and to register on title an agreement with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, and any other necessary agreements, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services. The community benefits to be provided by the Owner, at its expense and secured through the required Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

a. the matters set forth in Recommendations 7.b.1., 7.b.2., and 7.b.3. in Item TE7.4 ;

 

b. The following community benefits are recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement;

 

i. A financial contribution in the amount of $2,344,000.00, 50 percent of which is payable to the City prior to issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions, and 50 percent payable prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for the development, with such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with Statistics Canada Residential Building or Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index, as the case may be, for the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area, reported by Statistics Canada in the Building Construction Price Indexes Publication 327-0058, or its successor, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment. The funds shall be directed as follows:

 

ii. $2,344,000.00 towards capital improvements for new or existing Toronto Community Housing and/or affordable housing in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and/or playground improvements to Huron Street Junior Public School and to allow public access for a fifteen (15) year period of time.

 

iii. $416,000.00 of benefit value in addition to Recommendation 6.b.ii. towards providing space during the week, for the Annex Seniors Adult Services (SAS) group for accommodation within the Bloor Street United Church building subject to the following conditions:

 

- A minimum of 200 square metres of space

- Available 2 half days per week (8 hours per week total)

- A minimum of a 10 year term

- 50 percent discount over rental rate

- Not to be assignable/transferrable to any other group without the City's consent.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 11, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to alter an existing heritage property (Bloor Street United Church) with the incorporation of a new 29-storey mixed-use building (103.85 metres including mezzanine level and mechanical penthouse) with 70 square metres of retail/commercial space at-grade, 2,209 square metres of place of worship space, 3,994 square metres of office space, and 249 residential units above at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street. A total of 124 parking spaces are proposed in a 5 1/2-level underground garage accessed off of Huron Street.

 

The proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014),

as it provides a density and a mix of land uses which efficiently use land and resources. It is also transit supportive being less than 250 metres from two subway stations. The proposal provides for the conservation of significant built heritage resources.

 

The proposal conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019), as it provides for an appropriate type and scale of development in a strategic growth area that provides an acceptable transition of built form to adjacent areas.

 

The proposed building is to be located and massed to provide a transition through appropriate setbacks and/or stepping down of height toward lower scale Neighbourhoods and the building is also located and massed to adequately limit shadow impacts on adjacent Neighbourhoods and parks. The proposal allows for the integration and conservation of a listed heritage church on the site.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 11, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-13 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street - Zoning By-law Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134883.pdf
(June 10, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report- Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134367.pdf

Speakers

David Harrison, PhD Media
Edward Leman
Kim Kovar, Aird and Berlis
Michael Hilliard, Bloor
Vaughan Miller, KPMB Architects

Communications (Community Council)

(June 9, 2019) E-mail from Mary Lou Dickinson (TE.Supp.TE7.3.1)
(June 24, 2019) Letter from David Harrison (TE.Supp.TE7.3.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/comm/communicationfile-95609.pdf

TE7.4 - Alterations to Heritage Properties at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council state its intention to designate the properties at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Designation) – 300 Bloor Street West (Attachment 3) and the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Designation) - 478 Huron Street (Attachment 4) attached to the report (May 31, 2019) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

2. If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation(s) to the Conservation Review Board.

 

4. If the designations are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation(s) of the properties.

 

5. City Council authorize the entering into Heritage Easement Agreement(s) under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into Heritage Easement Agreement(s) for the properties at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street.

 

7. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage properties at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for alterations to the heritage properties on the lands known municipally as 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by KPMB Architects, dated March 6, 2019, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated March 6, 2019, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning, all subject to and in accordance with Conservation Plan, as referenced in Recommendation 7.b.2 below, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning, and subject to the following additional conditions: 

 

a. That the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations has been enacted by City Council and has come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

b. That prior to the introduction of the bills for such Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall:

 

1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street substantially in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by KPMB Architects, dated March 6, 2019 and with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated March 6, 2019, subject to and in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 7.b.2 below, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning, including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;

 

2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated March 6, 2019, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning, with said Conservation Plan to include a revised design for the primary entrance at the Bloor Street West façade that is compatible and complementary with the character and attributes of the existing south façade at 300 Bloor Street West, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning;

 

3. Enter into and register on the properties at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning, with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations, including amongst other matters, securing the final project specifications, preparation and thereafter the implementation of a Heritage Lighting Plan, a Signage Plan, an Interpretation Plan and requiring a letter of credit to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and approved Interpretation Plan, including provision for upwards indexing, all to the satisfaction of  the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

c. That prior to final Site Plan approval, for the development contemplated for 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street, the owner shall:

 

1. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 7.b.2 above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning;

 

2. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect;

 

3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance their heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning;

 

4. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject properties, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning;

 

5. Provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

d. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning, the owner shall:

 

1. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect;

 

2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 7.b.2 above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning;

 

3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, and approved Interpretation Plan;

 

4. Provide full documentation of the existing heritage property at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron street, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

e. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 7.d.3 above, the owner shall:

 

1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning;

 

2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning.

Origin

(May 31, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations for the heritage properties at 300 Bloor Street and 478 Huron Street, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a 29-storey tower at the project site and also recommends that City Council state its intention to designate 300 Bloor Street and 478 Huron Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and give authority to enter into Heritage Easement Agreement(s) for the properties.


The original application, submitted December 27, 2017, proposed a 38 storey mixed-use building with 249 residential units to the north of the current siting of the tower component, but included alterations to the two heritage properties on the site. 

 

Based on a series of community consultations, six working group meetings and concerns raised by City staff, a revised application was submitted on March 11, 2019 to construct a new 29 storey tower at the site that maintains the church use at the site while introducing commercial, office and residential uses within the new podium and tower elements. Substantive portions of the heritage properties will be retained and incorporated into the new development. Pidgeon House, at 478 Huron Street, to the north of the Bloor United Church at 300 Bloor Street West, would be retained and rehabilitated for continued office use.

 

The conservation strategy will not significantly impact the three dimensional form of the buildings as viewed from the public realm. Should the alterations to the subject property be approved, staff recommend that the property owner be required to enter into Heritage Easement Agreement(s) for the properties at 300 Bloor Street and 478 Huron Street in order to ensure the long-term protection of the heritage properties.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 31, 2019) Report and Attachments 1 - 6 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to Heritage Properties at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134200.pdf

4a - Alterations to Heritage Properties at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street

Origin
(June 20, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations for the heritage properties at 300 Bloor Street and 478 Huron Street, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a 29-storey tower at the project site and also recommends that City Council state its intention to designate 300 Bloor Street and 478 Huron Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and give authority to enter into Heritage Easement Agreement(s) for the properties.

 

The original application, submitted December 27, 2017, proposed a 38 storey mixed-use building with 249 residential units to the north of the current siting of the tower component, but included alterations to the two heritage properties on the site.

 

Based on a series of community consultations, six working group meetings and concerns raised by City staff, a revised application was submitted on March 11, 2019 to construct a new 29 storey tower at the site that maintains the church use at the site while introducing commercial, office and residential uses within the new podium and tower elements. Substantive portions of the heritage properties will be retained and incorporated into the new development. Pidgeon House, at 478 Huron Street, to the north of the Bloor United Church at 300 Bloor Street West, would be retained and rehabilitated for continued office use.

 

The conservation strategy will not significantly impact the three dimensional form of the buildings as viewed from the public realm. Should the alterations to the subject property be approved, staff recommend that the property owner be required to enter into Heritage Easement Agreement(s) for the properties at 300 Bloor Street and 478 Huron Street in order to ensure the long-term protection of the heritage properties.

 

Background Information

 

(May 31, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to Heritage Properties at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements at 300 Bloor Street West and 478 Huron Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-134159.pdf)

 

Communications

 

(June 10, 2019) Letter from Sue Dexter (PB.Supp.PB7.4.1)

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 20, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135335.pdf

TE7.5 - 3385 Dundas Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park
Attention
Bills 1162 and 1163 have been submitted on this item

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend former City of York Zoning By-law 1-83 for the lands at 3385 Dundas Street West substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (June 6, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 3385 Dundas Street West substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (June 6, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following community benefits at the owner's expense. The required Agreement shall be registered on title to the lands at 3385 Dundas Street West in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

a. The owner shall provide and maintain within the proposed mixed-use building on the lot at least 10 affordable rental dwelling units with a combined total gross floor area of at least 743 m2 (8,000 ft2). The affordable rental dwelling units shall be provided in contiguous groups of at least 6 dwelling units.  Any changes to the above conditions shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

b. The owner shall provide and maintain the 10 affordable rental dwelling units as rental dwelling units for at least 20 years, beginning with the date that each such unit is first occupied. No affordable rental dwelling unit shall be registered as a condominium or any other form of ownership such as life lease or co-ownership which provide a right to exclusive possession of a dwelling unit, and no application for conversion for non-rental housing purposes, or application to demolish any affordable rental dwelling unit can be made for at least 20 years from the date of first occupancy. When the 20 year period has expired, the owner shall continue to provide and maintain the affordable rental dwelling units as rental dwelling units, unless and until such time as the owner has applied for and obtained all approvals necessary to do otherwise.

 

c. The owner shall provide and maintain the affordable rental dwelling units with the following unit mix and unit size requirements:

 

i. a minimum of 10 percent of the affordable rental dwelling units shall be three-bedroom units or larger and shall have a minimum floor area of at least 90 m2 (965 ft2); and

 

ii. a minimum of 30 percent of the affordable rental dwelling units, inclusive of the 10 percent three-bedroom units referenced above, shall be two-bedroom units or larger and shall have a minimum floor area of at least 64 m2 (685 ft2).

 

d. The owner shall provide and maintain the affordable rental dwelling units at affordable rents for at least 15 years, beginning with the date that each such unit is first occupied. During the first 15 years of occupancy, increases to rents charged to tenants occupying any of the affordable rental dwelling units shall be in accordance with the Residential Tenancies Act and shall not exceed the Provincial rent guideline until the tenancy ends.

 

e. Prior to first occupancy of the affordable rental dwelling units referenced above, the owner shall work with the City's Shelter Support and Housing Administration staff and make every reasonable effort to select the first tenant for each such affordable rental dwelling unit, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Shelter Support and Housing Administration.

 

5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to enter into a Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development which will include the following:

 

a. The owner shall agree to enter into a Pedestrian Clearway Easement as a NOAC and Site Plan Agreement Condition, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services including the preparation of a draft Reference Plan as required.

 

b. The owner shall agree to the construction of the Pedestrian Clearway Easement, and all the sidewalks along Dundas Street West, Durie Street and Beresford Avenue to be paid for and constructed by the owner to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

c. The owner shall agree to secure a car-share provider as a NOAC and Site Plan Agreement Condition to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

d. The owner shall agree to implement the mitigation measures required for noise abatement under the Class 1 area site criteria as detailed in the HGC Noise Feasibility Study (revised May, 2019).  The final design and applicable clauses would be secured through the Site Plan review process to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

e. The owner shall agree to erect the signs requested by the Toronto Catholic District School Board and Toronto District School Board and include warning clauses as a NOAC and Site Plan Agreement Condition to the satisfaction of Toronto Catholic District School Board and Toronto District School Board staff.

 

6. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to submit a revised Community Facilities and Services Study to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

7. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to submit revised plans illustrating that the minimum parking requirements of the Draft Zoning By-law Amendments are being met.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 6, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend former City of York Zoning By-law 1-83 and City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 to permit a seven-storey (21.5 metres in height excluding mechanical penthouse, and 25 metres including mechanical penthouse), mixed use building containing 131 rental apartment units and 368 m2 of non-residential floor area at 3385 Dundas Street West.  The proposed development would have a Floor Space Index of approximately 3.95 times the area of the lands and would provide 127 vehicular parking spaces.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019). The proposed development represents an appropriate mixed use, mid rise development along this portion of Dundas Street West that would establish a positive precedent for redevelopment of the Avenue.  The proposal complies with the Mixed Use Areas and Avenues policies of the Official Plan and generally complies with the City's Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards and Addendum.  The proposal would also include a minimum of 10 affordable rental apartment units as a Section 37 benefit.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws subject to conditions before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 6, 2019) Report and Attachments 1 - 8 from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District - 3385 Dundas Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134181.pdf

Speakers

Michael Simardone

Communications (Community Council)

(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Samantha and Dennis Cooke (TE.Supp.TE7.5.1)

TE7.6 - 57-77 Wade Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 57-77 Wade Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (June 18, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 57-77 Wade Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (June 18, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

 

3. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.  City Council require the owner to provide a cash payment-in-lieu into the Municipal Parking Fund in lieu of any parking shortfall below the provision of 47 parking spaces on-site.

 

5.  Prior to the introduction of the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to complete a Third-Party Peer Review of the revised Rail Safety Report, prepared by Arup Canada Inc., dated May 1, 2019, to the satisfaction of the City's rail safety consultant, and obtain acceptance of the proposed derailment mitigation measures, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

6. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

 

a. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, the owner shall provide a cash contribution of $350,000 towards the provision of affordable rental housing and parks improvements within Ward 9 in the vicinity of the site, such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto for the period from the date of the execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment;

 

b. The following matters are recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i.  The owner shall provide, at its own expense, 300 square metres of privately-owned, publicly-accessible open space located on the southern portion of the site (refer to the Site Plan in Attachment 7), with the design details of this privately-owned, publicly-accessible open space to be secured through the Site Plan Approval process to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and, prior to Site Plan Approval, the owner shall grant an easement to the City, for nominal consideration and free and clear of title encumbrances, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, for the purpose of the general public's use of this privately-owned, publicly-accessible open space, on terms satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the City Solicitor;

 

ii.  The owner shall provide, at its own expense, a minimum 3.5 metre wide public walkway easement be located along the full extent of the south edge of the site, connecting Wade Avenue to the future Davenport Diamond Greenway Multi-Use Trail, with the design details of this walkway to be secured through the Site Plan Approval process to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director and, prior to Site Plan Approval, the owner shall grant an easement to the City, for nominal consideration and free and clear of title encumbrances, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, for the purpose of pedestrian and cycling use by the general public over this walkway, on terms satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the City Solicitor;

 

iii. The owner shall design and construct the public realm improvements for the public walkway between Wade Avenue and the Davenport Diamond Greenway Multi-Use Trail in accordance with the Davenport Diamond Public Realm Plan;

 

iv. Prior to the issuance of Notice of Approval Conditions for the Site Plan application, the owner shall complete a peer review of the submitted Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study by the City’s peer reviewer, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and provide certification from the noise and vibration consultant that all recommended mitigation measures have been incorporated into the drawings submitted for Site Plan Approval;

 

v. Prior to the issuance of Notice of Approval Conditions for the Site Plan application, the owner shall incorporate all mitigation measures from the rail safety study accepted by the City's peer reviewer into the drawings submitted for site plan approval, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and prior to Site Plan Approval agree that all mitigation measures be constructed and maintained by the owner at its sole cost and expense;

 

vi. Prior to issuance of Notice of Approval Conditions for the Site Plan application, the owner shall provide a Construction Phasing Plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

vii. Prior to the commencement of excavation and shoring work, the owner will submit a Construction Management Plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Chief Building Official, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and thereafter shall implement the plan during the course of construction.  The Construction Management Plan will include the size and location of construction staging areas, dates of significant concrete pouring, lighting details, construction vehicle parking and queuing locations, refuse storage, site security, site supervisor contact information, a communication strategy with the surrounding community, and any other matters requested by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Ward Councillor; and

 

viii. Prior to Site Plan Approval, the owner shall provide a cash payment-in-lieu into the Municipal Parking Fund in lieu of any parking shortfall below the provision of 47 parking spaces on-site.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 18, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application to amend the Zoning By-law proposes a 7-storey (33.2 metres, plus 5 metre mechanical penthouse) office building for the property at 57-77 Wade Avenue.  The proposed development includes a total of 13,123 square metres of gross floor area, with 218 square metres of retail space at the ground level.  A total of 33 vehicle parking spaces and 122 bicycle parking spaces will be provided at-grade.

 

The site is adjacent to the Metrolinx GO Barrie line, and a rail safety report with proposed derailment mitigation measures was submitted in support of the application. A revised version of the report, dated May 2019, is currently under peer review with the City's rail safety consultant.  Upon acceptance of the proposed derailment mitigation measures by the City's third-party peer reviewer, staff will be satisfied that the development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).

 

The proposal diversifies the range of employment options in an established Employment Area, and represents appropriate intensification in an area well-served by existing and planned transit infrastructure. This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law, subject to the recommendations outlined in this report.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 18, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-12 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 57-77 Wade Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134958.pdf
(June 18, 2019) Attachment 5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135340.pdf
(June 18, 2019) Attachment 6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135341.pdf
(June 10, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 57-77 Wade Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134345.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 17, 2019) E-mail from Chris Sartor (TE.Supp.TE7.6.1)

TE7.7 - Alexandra Park and Atkinson Housing Co-operative Revitalization - 571 Dundas Street West, 91 Augusta Avenue, and 73-75 Augusta Square - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion - Phase 2 - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands located south of Dundas Street West, east of Augusta Avenue, north of Paul Lane Gardens, and west of Cameron Street, being Phase 2 within the Alexandra Park and Atkinson Co-op Revitalization, substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment 458 attached as Attachment 6 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands located south of Dundas Street West, east of Augusta Avenue, north of Paul Lane Gardens, and west of Cameron Street, being Phase 2 within the Alexandra Park and Atkinson Co-op Revitalization, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 7 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, amended by adding the following:

 

Holding Provision 

 

a. Lands zoned with the "h" Holding Symbol shall not be used for any purpose other than those lawfully existing on the date of passing of this By-Law until the "h" Holding Symbol has been removed. An amending by-law to remove the "h" Holding Symbol in whole, or in part, shall be enacted by City Council when the following plans and studies have been submitted for the lands from which the "h" Holding symbol is proposed to be removed to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning secured through an agreement or agreements binding on the owner and successors entered into pursuant to Sections 37, 41 or 51 of the Planning Act, or any combination thereof, as appropriate:

 

i. submission of updated Detailed Context Plans, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;


ii. submission of updates to the Construction Mitigation and Safety Plan, and Tenant Communication Strategy, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

iii. provision of a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan, and periodic updates to the Plan, being satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;


iv. execution of a subdivision agreement satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning pursuant to Section 51 of the Planning Act;


v. periodic Housing Issues report updates relating to each phase of revitalization demonstrating adequate progress in the replacement and/or refurbishment of social housing units to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;


vi. submission of a satisfactory Community Service and Facility Implementation Plan, which will include a financial strategy to finance any determined required community service or facility to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and


vii. confirmation of funding or financing of transportation infrastructure, servicing infrastructure, parks, and/or community facilities required to support development to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Corporate Finance.

 
b. Prior to the removal of the "h" Holding Symbol, shoring and demolition is permitted within the Alexandra Park and Atkinson Co-op Area.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and Draft Zoning By-law Amendment, noted in Recommendations 1 and 2 above, as may be required.

 
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills contemplated in Recommendations 1 and 2 above to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner(s) to enter into appropriate Agreement(s) pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act amending the original Section 37 Agreement (Instrument Number AT 3518413) satisfactory to the City Solicitor, together with satisfactory provisions in the amending By-laws, to secure the following, at the owner's expense, in connection with 571 Dundas Street West, 91 Augusta Avenue and 73-75 Augusta Square, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, with such agreement to be registered to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor prior to the bills coming into force:

 

a. The following additional community benefits are recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement:

 

i. A financial contribution of $2,000,000.00 indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto for the period from the date of the execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment, towards the construction and finishing of the replacement community centre location on Block 10 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

ii. In the event the financial contribution referred to in recommendation 4.a.i has not been used for the intended purpose within eight (8) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the financial contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose(s) is/are identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the site.

 

b. The following changes are recommended to the Section 37 Agreement:

 

i. All refurbishment work to retained social housing buildings in Phase 2 will be completed prior to the earlier of, the first residential occupancy of, or the registration of the Draft Plan of Condominium for, the final market building to be constructed within Phase 2;

 

ii. Prior to the issuance of any above grade permit for a building on a Block in Phase 2, the owner will submit an updated wind study. The owner will design and construct any measures that may be required to mitigate the negative impact of any wind conditions;

 

iii. Amend Sections 8.1 and 8.2 to provide for the construction of a new community facility, with a minimum size of 2,000 square metres, to be owned by Toronto Community Housing Corporation and operated by Atkinson Housing Co-op and Alexandra Park Residents Association and located within a new Toronto Community Housing building to be constructed on Block 10 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, Director, Affordable Housing Office, Director, Toronto Community Housing, General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and in consultation with the Ward Councillor. The new facility will:

 

A. Have a minimum gross floor area of 2,000 square metres;

 

B. Be valued at a minimum of $9,000,000.00, including all construction, finishing, fixtures, HVAC systems and equipment to the satisfaction of the Director, Real Estate Services, City of Toronto, of which $5,000,000.00 was required by the original Section 37 Agreement, $2,000,000.00 will be redirected from the overall value of the Public Art Contribution required by the original Section 37 Agreement towards the financing the construction of the community facility, including the outfitting of art studio space accessible to the community, and $2,000,000.00 will be an additional contribution by the owner.

 

C. Be constructed to a commercial standard, ready for occupancy for the intended use, containing all finishing, fixtures and equipment necessary to implement programming of the facility, including HVAC systems;

 

D. Include the construction of two new basketball courts within or adjacent to the facility, one of which may be constructed on Block 11; and,

 

E. Be completed in accordance with the requirements of the Section 37 agreement, prior to the issuance of a demolition permit for the existing community centre at 105 Grange Court.

 

iv. Amend Sections 3.3, 4.2, and 4.4 of the Section 37 Agreement to include the 77 units at 73-75 Augusta Square to be demolished and replaced, so that a total of not less than 410 replacement social housing units, comprising 183 townhouse units and 227 apartment units, all of which are rental housing units and shall have rents geared-to-income, are to be provided and maintained for a period of at least 25 years;

 

v. Amend Section 3.6 of the Section 37 Agreement to clarify the required parkland dedication area.

 

vi. Amend the table in Section 4.11 of the Section 37 Agreement to include the 34 one-bedroom apartment units and the 43 two-bedroom apartment units at 73-75 Augusta Square to be demolished and replaced, so that a total of not less than 410 replacement social housing units, comprising 183 townhouse units and 227 apartment units, are to be provided and maintained;

 

vii. Amend Sections 7.1, 7.3, 7.5, of the Section 37 Agreement to remove references to 73-75 Augusta Square.

 

viii. Amend Sections 8.3 of the Section 37 Agreement to allow part or all of the required Local Enterprise Space to be constructed on Block 10, subject to appropriate conditions including regarding timing of completion.

 

ix. Amend Section 13 of the Section 37 Agreement as necessary to permit the allocation of up to $2,000,000.00 to the community facility noted in 4.b.iii above.

 

x. Amend Section 37 to delete Section 10.3. and replace with the following:  

 

“The owner shall provide detailed floor plans for the replacement social housing units and associated common amenity areas for the social housing units to be demolished in the applicable Site Plan Control application area, the replacement of which may be part of a concurrent or prior phase of redevelopment, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning”

 

c. The following additional matters of convenience are recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i. Prior to the issuance of an above grade permit for development on Sites 4, 6, 8, 9 and 17 the owner will submit an updated wind study and incorporate into the building design and site plan any wind mitigation measures.

 

5. City Council require the owner(s) to enter into appropriate Agreement(s) pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act amending the existing Section 111 Agreement (Instrument Number AT3518416) to address the items in Recommendation 4 above, as required, satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

  
6. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the necessary Section 37 Agreement(s) amending the existing Section 37 Agreement and Section 111 Agreement amending the existing Section 111 Agreement.

 

7. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation (PFR). The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, PFR, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.

 

8. City Council approve the application for a Rental Housing Demolition permit in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 667 to allow the demolition of 77 existing social housing apartment units at 73-75 Augusta Square subject to the following conditions:

 

a. The owner shall provide and maintain not less than four hundred and ten (410) replacement social housing units on the 71 Dundas Street West, 21, 21a, 23, 23a, 91 Augusta Avenue, 73-75 Augusta Square, and 20 Vanauley Street lands for a period of at least 25 years, all of which will have rents-geared-to-income, comprising the following:

 

Replacement Social Housing Units
Unit Type by Number of Bedrooms
Total
1 Bedroom Apartments
48
2 Bedroom Apartments
99
3 Bedroom Apartments
80
3 Bedroom Townhouse
79
4 Bedroom Townhouse
77
5 Bedroom Townhouse
27
Total
410
 

b. The owner shall provide tenant relocation assistance to each eligible tenant, including the right for eligible tenants to return to a replacement social housing unit to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and as further detailed in the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 7 to the report dated June 7, 2019 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District;

 

c. The owner shall provide detailed floor plans for the replacement social housing units and associated common amenity areas for the social housing units to be demolished in the applicable Site Plan Control application area, the replacement of which may be part of a concurrent or prior phase of redevelopment, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and,

 

d. The owner shall to enter into appropriate Agreement(s) pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act amending the existing Section 111 Agreement (Instrument Number AT3518416) to secure the conditions outlined in a., b., and c. above and as detailed in the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 7 to the report dated June 7, 2019 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

9. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue a preliminary approval for the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 for the demolition of the 77 existing social housing units at 73-75 Augusta Square after all of the following have occurred:

 

a. Satisfaction or securing of the conditions in Recommendations 4 and 8 above;

 

b. The Zoning By-law Amendment referred to in Recommendation 2 above has come into full force and effect;

 

10. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Rental Housing Demolition permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has issued the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 9 above for the demolition of the 77 existing social housing units at 73-75 Augusta.

 

11. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act for the demolition of 77 existing social housing units at 73-75 Augusta no earlier than the issuance of the first Building Permit for Phase 2 of the development and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendations 9 and 10 above, which permit may be included in the demolition permit under Chapter 667 and under 363-11.1, of the Municipal Code, on the condition that:

 

a. The owner erect a residential building on site no later than four (4) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and,

 

b. Should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in Recommendation 11.a. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.


12. Before introducing the necessary Bills contemplated in Recommendations 1 and 2 above to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner(s) to submit: 
 

a. revised Functional Servicing, Geotechnical and Stormwater Management Reports, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

On July 13, 2012, City Council approved Official Plan Amendment 189, and on October 8, 2013, City Council approved Zoning By-law Amendments, and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion applications, to guide the Revitalization Plan for the Alexandra Park and Atkinson Housing Co-operative lands located generally between Queen Street West to the south, Spadina Avenue to the east, Dundas Street West to the north and Augusta Avenue to the west.

 

Phase 1 of the Revitalization, comprising a 14-storey residential building, a 15-storey residential building, 66 townhouse units and the refurbishment of the existing apartment building at 20 Vanauley Street, is nearing completion of construction south of the newly constructed Paul Lane Gardens. 

 

Toronto Community Housing and Tridel - the development partnership for both phases of the Revitalization - are proposing a number of changes to the previously approved Revitalization Plan as it applies to Phase 2.

 

Changes to the area noted as Phase 2A, located generally in the north west portion of the Revitalization site, were approved by City Council on July 23, 2018. Phase 2A comprises a 13-storey market building, a 14-storey social housing building and 6 replacement townhouses.

 

The proposed changes to the balance of Phase 2 include: an increase to the size of the on-site public park space; minor changes to the block layout; relocation of the proposed community centre; changes to approved building heights and massing; the demolition and reconstruction of the apartment building at 73-75 Augusta Square; and general increases in floor area for both the market and social housing portions of the development.

 

An application for Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act (Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code) has been submitted to permit the demolition of the 77 social housing units at 73-75 Augusta Square. All 77 existing units will be replaced in the new development and tenant relocation and assistance will be provided so that the known objective of Zero Displacement continues to be achieved.

 

This report recommends approval of proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and the Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Application, subject to conditions. The report also recommends approval of amendments to the Section 37 and Section 111 agreements for the site, as they apply to the area known as Phase 2.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 7, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Alexandra Park and Atkinson Housing Co-operative Revitalization - 571 Dundas Street West, 91 Augusta Avenue, and 73-75 Augusta Square - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion - Phase 2 - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134349.pdf
(June 7, 2019) Attachment 6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134350.pdf
(June 7, 2019) Attachment 7
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134351.pdf

Speakers

Alban Olive
Labib Chowdhury
Cyndi Rottenberg-Walker, Partner, Urban Strategies Inc.
Emily Wall, Senior Associate, Urban Strategies Inc.
Stephen Vassilev, Atkinson Housing Co-operative
Charlene Cottle, Atkinson Housing Co-operative
Javan Courtney, Toronto Community Housing

TE7.8 - 30 Bay Street and 60 Harbour Street - Zoning Amendment - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
Bill 1154 has been submitted on this item

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 30 Bay Street and 60 Harbour Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 4 to the report (June 18, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to:

 

a. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 30 Bay Street prepared by GBCA Architects dated March 29, 2019, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

b. Register an amending Heritage Easement Agreement to update the permitted alterations, Reasons for Identification and Schedule "B" photographs on the existing Heritage Easement Agreement registered on title to the property at 30 Bay Street (formerly known as 60 Harbour Street) as Instrument No. CT918882 on December 15, 1987; and

 

c. Enter into and register on the property at 30 Bay Street one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations, including amongst other matters, securing the preparation and thereafter the implementation of a Heritage Lighting Plan, a Signage Plan, an Interpretation Plan and requiring a Letter of Credit to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and approved Interpretation Plan, including provision for upwards indexing, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

 

a. A cash contribution of $850,000.00, prior to the issuance of the above-grade building permit, to be used towards the provision of affordable housing in Ward 10;

 

b. A cash contribution of $850,000.00, prior to the issuance of the above-grade building permit, to be used towards capital repairs to existing Toronto Community Housing buildings in Ward 10;

 

c. A cash contribution of $6,800,000.00, prior to the issuance of the above-grade building permit, for:


 i. Community Services and Facilities within Ward 10, which may include the Jack Layton Ferry Terminal; and/or

 

ii. Local parkland improvements and/or public realm improvements in Ward 10, which may include improvements to the City owned lands north of 30 Bay Street and Lake Shore Boulevard West pedestrian improvements and/or PATH improvements along the Bay Street corridor; and

 

d. Provide a public art contribution in accordance with the City of Toronto's Percent for Public Art Program.

 

5. The payment amounts referred to in Recommendation 4 above herein to be increased upwards by indexing in accordance with the Non-residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported by Statistics Canada or its successor, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date the payment is made to the City;

 

6. In the event the cash contributions referred to in Recommendation 4 above has not been used for the intended purposes within three (3) years of the By-laws coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in Ward 10.

 

7. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

a. The owner shall provide, at its own expense, an approximate area of 208 m2 of privately-owned publicly-accessible space (POPS) and grant access easements to the City for the purpose of access to and use of the POPS for members of the public. This POPS area is to be located fronting Harbour Street. The POPS easements are to be conveyed to the City for nominal consideration and are to be free and clear of all physical and title encumbrances, other than those acceptable to the City Solicitor. The owner shall own, operate, maintain and repair the POPS;

 

b. The owner shall be required to pay all costs associated with the proposed boulevard extension (road narrowing) along the Bay Street frontage of the property between Lake Shore Boulevard West and Harbour Street, including all public realm improvements;

 

c. The owner shall be responsible for the design, construction, provision and maintenance of above grade PATH connections to the subject property and through the proposed development, including the conveyance at nominal costs to the City of easement(s) for use by the general public;

 

d. The owner shall provide art on construction hoarding, in accordance with the City's START (Street Art Toronto) program; and

 

e. The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee, and as updated by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on December 5, 6 and 7, 2017 through the adoption of item PG23.9 of the Planning and Growth Committee, and as may be further amended by City Council from time to time.

 

f. Prior to the commencement of any excavation and shoring work, the owner will submit a Construction Management and Community Communication Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and thereafter shall implement the plan during the course of construction. The Construction Management and Community Communication Plan will include, but not be limited to, the size and location of construction staging areas, location and function of gates, information on concrete pouring, lighting details, construction vehicle parking and queuing locations, alternate parking arrangements for existing residents for the duration of any affected parking spaces used by existing residents, refuse storage, site security, site supervisor contact information, a communication strategy with the surrounding community and existing tenants, and any other matters requested by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to permit the construction of a 60-storey (281 metre high) office development including an 8 storey podium and 4 levels of underground parking at 30 Bay Street and 60 Harbour Street. The existing heritage building on the property, The Toronto Harbour Commission Building, will be preserved in its entirety and will be connected to the development by a glass atrium at the north side of the building.  The tower portion of the proposed office building will cantilever over a small portion of the heritage building at a height of 52 metres.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with the A Place to Growth Plan (2019).

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. The proposal is consistent with the relevant policies of the Official Plan.  The proposal represents a new Leed Gold office building within the extension of the Financial District to Southcore that is accessible to public transit, improves the public realm and provides for an extension to the PATH system.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 18, 2019) Revised Report and Attachment 1-9 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 30 Bay St and 60 Harbour Street - Zoning Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135006.pdf
(June 10, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-9 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 30 Bay Street and 60 Harbour Street - Zoning Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134368.pdf

TE7.9 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 30 Bay Street formerly 60 Harbour Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
Bill 1127 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage property at 30 Bay Street (formerly known as 60 Harbour Street) in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated March 15, 2019, prepared by Adamson Associates Architects, on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by GBCA Architects dated March 29, 2019, on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a. That prior to the introduction of the bills for such Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall:

 

1. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 30 Bay Street prepared by GBCA Architects dated March 29, 2019, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

2. Register an amending Heritage Easement Agreement to update the permitted alterations, Reasons for Identification and Schedule "B" photographs on the existing Heritage Easement Agreement registered on title to the property at 30 Bay Street (formerly known as 60 Harbour Street) as Instrument No. CT918882 on December 15, 1987;

 

3. Enter into and register on the property at 30 Bay Street one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations, including amongst other matters, securing the preparation and thereafter the implementation of a Heritage Lighting Plan, a Signage Plan, an Interpretation Plan and requiring a Letter of Credit to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and approved Interpretation Plan, including provision for upwards indexing, all to the satisfaction of  the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

b. That Prior to Final Site Plan approval in connection with the Zoning By-law Amendment for the property at 60 Harbour Street the owner shall:

 

1. Provide final site plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.1 above and landscape drawings, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance their heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and thereafter shall implement such Plans to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

c. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 30 Bay Street, including a heritage permit, a building permit or a demolition permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage buildings as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

 

1. Obtain final approval for the necessary by-law amendments required for the alterations to the properties at 30 Bay Street, such amendments to have been enacted by City Council and to have come into effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council as determined by the Director, Urban Design, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.1 above including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan, Landscape Plan, and Interpretation Plan.

 

d. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.c.3. above, the owner shall:

 

1.  Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work, required heritage lighting work, and the required interpretation work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan, Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend the Heritage Easement Agreement registered on title to the property at 30 Bay Street (formerly known as 60 Harbour Street) as Instrument No. CT918882 on December 15, 1987.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bill in Council to amend the Heritage Easement Agreement.

Origin

(April 26, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage property at 30 Bay Street in connection with an application to amend the Zoning By-law by constructing a 60-storey mixed-use office building and to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement.  The proposed development conserves the heritage building in its entirety and in situ.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 26, 2019) Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 30 Bay Street formerly 60 Harbour Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-136113.pdf

9a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 30 Bay Street - Formerly 60 Harbour Street

Origin
(May 29, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage
property at 30 Bay Street in connection with an application to amend the Zoning By-law by
constructing a 60-storey mixed-use office building and to amend the existing Heritage
Easement Agreement. The proposed development conserves the heritage building in its
entirety and in situ.

 

Background Information
(April 26, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 30 Bay Street - formerly 60 Harbour Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-133235.pdf)

 

Speakers
Sharon Vattay, GBCA Architects
Andrew O'Neil, Vice President, Development, Oxford Properties

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 29, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 30 Bay Street - formerly 60 Harbour Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134150.pdf

TE7.10 - 61, 75 and 85 Hanna Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
Bill 1155 has been submitted on this item

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 61, 75 and 85 Hanna Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (June 5, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 5, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The Zoning By-law limits the number of restaurants within the three existing buildings on 61, 75 and 85 Hanna Avenue to 1 per building, and also restricts the maximum gross floor area of each restaurant to 475 square metres. This application proposes to remove the restrictions on the number and size of restaurants on the ground floors of the three buildings located at 61, 75 and 85 Hanna Avenue.  The application does not propose any alterations to the exterior of the three existing buildings.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend Zoning By-law 438-86.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 5, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 61, 75 and 85 Hanna Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134130.pdf

Speakers

Daniel Rende

TE7.11 - 100 Devonshire Place - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 100 Devonshire Place, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (June 5, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to:

 

a. Provide the results of fire hydrant flow testing and a comparison of calculated domestic and fire demand with available flow and pressure from the water system based on results of hydrant tests;

 

b. Provide a revised Functional Servicing Report to clearly indicate that the proposed development will have no negative impact on downstream sanitary sewer capacity and that no downstream sanitary analysis is required, to the satisfaction of Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and

 

c. Pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure identified in the revised Functional Servicing Report, to be submitted for review and acceptance by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required to support this development.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 3, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to add a 14-storey institutional tower at the northern portion of the existing four-storey Goldring Centre for High Performance Sport, which would form the base of the building at 100 Devonshire Place.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. The application proposes a compact built form on a site that is appropriate for further intensification, within a built-up area, that would take advantage of existing infrastructure, provide new institutional uses, and contribute to the vitality of the campus and surrounding neighbourhoods.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 3, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-13 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 100 Devonshire Place - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134311.pdf
(June 3, 2019) REVISED Attachment 6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134879.pdf
(June 3, 2019) Attachment 6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134675.pdf

Speakers

Anne Koven, Mass Timber Institute
Sean Blake, Carpenters District Council of Ontario
Samir Silvestri, Carpenters District Council of Ontario
Joeseph Iannuzzi, Carpenters District Council of Ontario
Signe Leisk, Cassels Brock

Communications (Community Council)

(June 18, 2019) Letter from Bronwyn Krog, President, East Annex Condominiums Association (TE.Supp.TE7.11.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/comm/communicationfile-95405.pdf
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Dennis Wong (TE.Supp.TE7.11.2)
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Sylvia Wong (TE.Supp.TE7.11.3)
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Etta Arbeiter-Jacobs (TE.Supp.TE7.11.4)

TE7.12 - 698 and 700 Spadina Avenue - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the application for a Rental Housing Demolition permit in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code to allow for the demolition of six existing rental dwelling units located at 698 and 700 Spadina Avenue, subject to the following conditions:

 

a. the owner shall provide and maintain not less than six replacement rental dwelling units, comprised of at least six two-bedroom units, of which one two-bedroom unit may be provided as a one-bedroom unit for the duration of an eligible tenant's tenure, provided that it is converted to a two-bedroom unit should the tenant no longer reside in the unit, within the proposed three-storey townhouse building at 54 Sussex Avenue, for a period of at least 20 years, beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied, and as generally illustrated in the plans provided to the City Planning dated May 6, 2019. Any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

b. the owner shall provide and maintain at least four two-bedroom replacement rental dwelling units at affordable rents and two two-bedroom replacement rental dwelling units at mid-range rents, for a period of at least 10 years, beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied;

 

c. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry in each replacement rental dwelling unit at no additional cost to the tenants;

 

d. the owner shall provide central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit;

 

e. the owner shall provide tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units with access to dedicated indoor bicycle parking in the proposed mixed-use building under the same terms and conditions as any resident of the mixed-used building;

 

f. the owner shall provide at least three replacement rental dwelling units with a balcony for private and exclusive access by the unit;

 

g. the owner shall provide tenant relocation and assistance to all eligible tenants of the existing rental dwelling units, including the right to return to a replacement rental dwelling unit, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and

 

h. the owner shall enter into and register on title to the subject site one or more Agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 1. a., b., c., d., e., f. and g. above, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning including an agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to issue Preliminary Approval for the Rental Housing Demolition permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code for the demolition of the six existing rental dwelling units at 698 and 700 Spadina Avenue after all of the following have occurred:

 

a. satisfaction or securing of the conditions in Recommendation 1 above;

 

b. the site-specific Zoning By-law Amendments have come into full force and effect;

 

c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006;

 

d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits for the proposed mixed-use building on the subject site; and

 

e. the execution and registration of a Section 37 Agreement pursuant to the Planning Act securing Recommendations 1. a., b., c., d., e., f. and g. above and any other requirements of the Zoning-Bylaw Amendment.

 

3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue the Rental Housing Demolition permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, has given preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.

 

4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue the Residential Demolition permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code and Section 33 of the Planning Act no earlier than the issuance of the first building permit for excavation and shoring of the proposed development, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, has given preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition permit under 363-11.1, of the Toronto Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a. the owner remove all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;

 

b. the owner erect solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official;

           

c. the owner erect the townhouse building on the site no later than four (4) years from the day demolition of the existing buildings is commenced; and

 

d. should the owner fail to complete the proposed townhouse building within the time specified in Recommendation 4. c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a Residential Demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

 

5. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 27, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This Rental Housing Demolition application proposes to demolish six existing rental dwelling units located within two residential rental buildings at 698 and 700 Spadina Avenue and replace all demolished units within a proposed townhouse building on the subject site.

 

698 and 700 Spadina Avenue are part of a related group of properties at 698-706 Spadina Avenue and 54 Sussex Avenue that are subject to Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications (16 194679 STE 20 OZ and 18 272550 STE 11 SA) for the development of a 23-storey mixed-use building and three-storey townhouses on the subject site. The Zoning By-law Amendment application is the subject of a settlement at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT). The final Tribunal Order is pending until all outstanding matters, including the necessary agreements with the City, are secured.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 698 and 700 Spadina Avenue - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134065.pdf

Speakers

Marc Lizoain
Art Levine
Signe Leisk, Cassels Brock

Communications (Community Council)

(June 20, 2019) E-mail from Art Levine (TE.Supp.TE7.12.1)

TE7.13 - 11-25 Yorkville Avenue and 16-18 Cumberland Street - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands 11-25 Yorkville Avenue and 16-18 Cumberland Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (June 24, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 11-25 Yorkville Avenue and 16-18 Cumberland Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 7 to the report (June 24, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 11-25 Yorkville Avenue and 16-18 Cumberland Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report (June 24, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

4. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, the owner be required to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, and any other necessary agreements, satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, with such Agreement to be registered on title to the lands at 11-25 Yorkville Avenue and 16-18 Cumberland Street in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor to secure the following community benefits at the owner's expense, including:

 

a. A financial contribution in the amount of $7,500,000.00 payable to the City prior to issuance of the first above-grade building permit, with such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with Statistics Canada Residential Building or Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index, as the case may be, for the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area, reported by Statistics Canada in the Building Construction Price Indexes Publication 327-0058, or its successor, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment. The funds shall be directed as follows:

 

i. $2,500,000.00 towards capital improvements for new or existing Toronto Community Housing and/or affordable housing in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

 

ii. $2,500,000.00 towards capital improvements for new or existing cultural and/or community space, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor; and

 

iii. $2,500,000.00 towards local area park or streetscape improvements, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Ward Councillor.

 

b. An additional 149 square metres of on-site parkland dedication above the required on-site parkland contribution pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act;

 

c. The provision of twenty (20) of the eighty-one (81) replacement rental units at reduced rents, comprised of ten (10) bachelor units at rents reduced from mid-range rents to eighty per cent (80%) of affordable rents, and five (5) two-bedroom and five (5) three-bedroom units at rents reduced from mid-range rents to affordable rents, all as defined by the Official Plan, all for a period of 20 years, beginning from the date of first occupancy, and all shall be offered to tenants in accordance with a Tenant Access Plan to ensure the benefit of the affordable units is linked to households in need of affordable housing, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

d. Should the City elect to close the public lanes, generally shown as Laneway A and Laneway B in Attachment 15 to the report (June 24, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, the owner agrees, at its sole expense, to convert and/or construct the portions of the public lane, generally shown as Laneway A and Laneway B in Attachment 15 to the report (June 24, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, for public parkland purposes to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and General Manager, Transportation Services, and this may only occur if and when the north-south public lane along the eastern edge of the Site, is conveyed and assumed by the City to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services;

 

e. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i. The owner shall provide and maintain a Privately-Owned and Publicly-Accessible Space (POPS), with a minimum area of 248 square metres, on the lot with the specific location, configuration and design secured in a Site Plan Agreement with the City to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as amended and as applicable, Section 41 of the Planning Act, as amended;

 

ii. The owner shall provide a minimum of 10 percent family sized units in the development, containing at least three bedrooms;

 

iii. The owner shall enter into a financially secured agreement for the construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades and road improvements are required to support the development, according to the transportation report accepted by the General Manager of Transportation Services and the functional servicing and stormwater management report and/or any other engineering report accepted by, and to the satisfaction of, the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and General Manager, Toronto Water;

 

iv. The owner shall provide space within the development for installation of maintenance access holes and sampling ports on the private side, as close to the property line as possible, for both the storm and sanitary service connections, in accordance with the Sewers By-law Chapter 681-10; and

 

v. The owner shall enter into a maintenance agreement for the 455 square metre parkland dedication and converted lane generally shown as Laneway A and Laneway B in Attachment 15 to the report (June 24, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

6. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, the owner will be required to revise the Functional Servicing Report prepared by WSP Canada Group Ltd., dated March 23, 2018 and re-submit to the City for review and acceptance to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and such report will determine, whether the municipal water, sanitary and storm sewer systems can support the proposed development and whether upgrades or improvements of the existing municipal infrastructure are required.

 

7. City Council accept an on-site parkland dedication pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act having a minimum size of 306 square metres and an on-site parkland dedication in accordance with Section 5.1.1 of the Official Plan and pursuant to section 37 of the Planning Act having a minimum size of 149 square metres for a total combined on-site parkland dedication of 455 square metres (the “Combined Parkland Dedication”), with the location and configuration of the Combined Parkland Dedication to be to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation as generally described in the report (June 24, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

8. The Combined Parkland Dedication will be secured through the Section 37 Agreement, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, including securing the following:

 

a. The owner’s obligations to convey the Combined Parkland Dedication and to design and construct base and above-base park improvements, on terms and conditions set out in the Section 37 Agreement; and

 

b. The Combined Parkland Dedication to be transferred to the City shall be free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances, and encroachments and is to be conveyed to the City prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, pursuant to the park policies set out in Section 3.2.3 of the Official Plan and to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.

 

9. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.

 

10. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code to allow for the demolition of eighty-one (81) existing rental dwelling units located at 11, 17, 19 and 21-25 Yorkville Avenue, subject to the following conditions:

 

a. The owner shall provide and maintain eighty-one (81) replacement rental dwelling units, comprised of seventeen (17) bachelor units, forty-five (45) one-bedroom units, twelve (12) two-bedroom units and seven (7) three-bedroom units, on the subject site for a period of at least twenty (20) years, beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied, and as generally shown on the plans for the rental replacement component by Cecconi Simone dated March 2019 submitted to the City Planning Division with any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

b. The owner shall, as part of the eighty-one (81) replacement rental dwelling units required above, provide:

 

i. Twenty (20) replacement rental dwelling units for a period of at least twenty (20) years, beginning from the date of first occupancy, comprised of at least ten (10) bachelor units at eighty per cent (80%) of affordable rents, and five (5) two-bedroom and five (5) three-bedroom units at affordable rents; and

 

ii. Sixty-one (61) replacement rental dwelling units for a period of at least ten (10) years, beginning from the date of first occupancy, comprised of at least five (5) bachelor replacement rental dwelling units at affordable rents, and two (2) bachelor, forty-five (45) one-bedroom, seven (7) two-bedroom and two (2) three-bedroom replacement rental dwelling units at mid-range rents;

 

c. The owner shall provide tenants of the eighty-one (81) replacement rental dwelling units with access to all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed rental replacement building at no extra charge; access and use of these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other building resident without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as customary practices for private bookings;

 

d. The owner shall provide nineteen (19) replacement rental dwelling units with a balcony or terrace;

 

e. The owner shall provide tenants of the eighty-one (81) replacement rental dwelling units with access to all bicycle parking and visitor parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building;

 

f. The owner shall provide tenant relocation and assistance to all eligible tenants occupying the rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished, including the right to return to a replacement rental dwelling unit, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and

 

g. The owner shall enter into and register on title one or more agreement(s), including a Section 111 Agreement and a Section 37 Agreement, to secure the conditions outlined above, including the matters related to the tenant relocation and assistance plan as detailed in the report (June 24, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, the Construction Mitigation Strategy and Tenant Communication Strategy and any other matters required to satisfy the conditions above, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

11. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue the Preliminary Approval for the application under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code for the demolition of the eighty-one (81) existing rental dwelling units at 11, 17, 19, and 21-25 Yorkville Avenue after all of the following have occurred:

 

a. the conditions in Recommendation 10 above have been fully satisfied;

 

b. The Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments have come into full force and effect;

 

c. The issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006;

 

d. The issuance of excavation and shoring permits for the approved structure on the site; and

 

e. The execution and registration of a Section 37 Agreement pursuant to the Planning Act and/or other required agreements securing Recommendation 10 (a) through (f) and any other prescribed matters.

 

12. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 11 above.

 

13. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a demolition permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act no earlier than the issuance of the first building permit for excavation and shoring of the development, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 11 above, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a. the owner remove all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;

 

b. the owner erect solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;

 

c. the owner erects a residential building on site no later than four and a half (4.5) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and

 

d. should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in condition (C) above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

 

14. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the recommendations above, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement and other related agreements.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 11, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The applications propose to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 62-storey (206 metres plus a 7-metre mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building with 2,467 square metres of retail uses on the ground and second floors and residential uses above at 11-25 Yorkville Avenue, and a 3-storey (13.5 metres) commercial building with 839 square metres of retail at 16-18 Cumberland Street. A total of 674 residential units, 235 vehicle parking spaces and 691 bicycle parking spaces are proposed. An open space comprised of a 455 square metre public park and a 248 square metre Privately-Owned Publically-Accessible Space (POPS) is proposed along the western edge of the property and connects to a stratified park previously secured as part of the development at 27-37 Yorkville Avenue and 26-50 Cumberland Street.

 

A Rental Housing Demolition application proposes to demolish the existing rental residential apartment buildings at 11, 19 and 21-25 Yorkville Avenue. The four existing buildings contain a total of 81 rental dwelling units. All 81 units would be replaced within the lower residential levels of the new 62-storey building on the subject site.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014), conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019), generally conforms with all relevant policies of the Official Plan, and is consistent with the Bloor-Yorkville/North Midtown Urban Design Guidelines and the Yorkville - East of Bay Planning Framework. The proposed development conforms with the development criteria for Mixed Use Areas and Downtown Official Plan policies, includes the second phase of the open space and pedestrian connection between Yorkville Avenue and Cumberland Street known as the Clock Tower Walkway, and fits in with the existing and planned context of the Bloor-Yorkville area.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan, Zoning By-law, and recommends approval of the Rental Housing Demolition, with conditions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 24, 2019) Revised Report and Attachments 1-15 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 11-25 Yorkville Avenue and 16-18 Cumberland Street - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135415.pdf
(June 11, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-16 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 11-25 Yorkville Avenue and 16-18 Cumberland Street - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134586.pdf
(June 10, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 11-25 Yorkville Avenue and 16-18 Cumberland Street - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Final Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134369.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 18, 2019) Letter from Gay Goodfellow (TE.Supp.TE7.13.1)

TE7.14 - 75 Broadway Avenue - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - Toronto - St. Paul's

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the application for a Rental Housing Demolition Permit in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code to allow for the demolition of 20 existing rental dwelling units located at 75 Broadway Avenue, subject to the following conditions:

 

a. the owner shall provide and maintain not less than 20 replacement rental dwelling units, comprised of 20 two-bedroom units, within the proposed residential building addition to the existing rental building, for a period of at least 20 years, beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied, and as generally illustrated in the architectural plans provided to the City Planning dated July 10, 2018, and May 3, 2019. Any revision to these plans with regard to the proposed rental replacement unit location or configuration shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

b. the owner shall provide and maintain not less than 10 two-bedroom replacement rental dwelling units at mid-range rents and no more than 10 two-bedroom replacement rental dwelling units with unrestricted rents, for a period of at least 10 years, beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied;

 

c. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry in each replacement rental dwelling unit;

 

d. the owner shall provide all replacement rental dwelling units with a balcony or terrace;

 

e. the owner shall provide tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units with access to all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed residential building without passing on the cost of said amenities to existing residents. Access and use of these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any resident of the non-replacement rental dwelling units without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as customary practices for private bookings;

 

f. the owner shall make available at least 94 vehicle parking spaces to tenants of the 20 replacement rental dwelling units and 164 retained rental dwelling units; 

 

g. the owner shall make available at least 78 storage lockers to tenants of the 20 replacement rental dwelling units and 164 retained rental dwelling units; 

 

h. the owner shall provide tenant relocation and assistance to all eligible tenants of the existing rental dwelling units to be demolished, including the right to return to a replacement rental dwelling unit, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

i. the owner shall enter into and register on title to the subject site one or more agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in 1.a., b., c., d., e., f., g. and h. above to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, including an agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to issue Preliminary Approval for the Rental Housing Demolition permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code for the demolition of the 20 existing rental dwelling units at 75 Broadway Avenue after all of the following have occurred:

 

a. the satisfaction or securing of the conditions in Recommendation 1 above;

 

b. the site-specific Zoning By-law Amendments have come into full force and effect;

 

c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006;

 

d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits for the proposed residential building on the subject site; and

 

e. the execution and registration of a Section 37 Agreement pursuant to the Planning Act, as a matter legal convenience, to secure Recommendation 1 a., b., c., d., e., f., g. and h. and any other requirements of the Zoning-Bylaw Amendment.

 

3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director to issue the Rental Housing Demolition permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.

 

4. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the recommendations above, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 14, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The Rental Housing Demolition (RH) application proposes to demolish 20 existing  rental dwelling units located in the north west portion of the existing 184-unit rental building at 75 Broadway Avenue. All 20 demolished rental units are to be replaced in a new 38-storey residential building addition to the existing residential building. The associated Zoning By-law Amendment application (17 150315 STE 22 OZ) was the subject of a settlement hearing at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT). The final Board Order is pending until all outstanding matters, including the determination of this Rental Housing Demolition application are resolved.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 14, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 75 Broadway Avenue - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134012.pdf

TE7.15 - 55-61 Charles Street East - Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE7.15a with recommendations)

Bills 1109, 1168 and 1169 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 55-61 Charles Street East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report (June 13, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 55-61 Charles Street East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 9 to the report (June 13, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the City Solicitor, together with satisfactory provisions in the amending By-laws, to secure the following, at the owner's expense, in connection with the development at 55-61 Charles Street East, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the City Solicitor, with such agreement to be registered to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor:

 

a. The following community benefits are recommended to be secured in a Section 37 Agreement:

 

i. The owner of 218 Carlton Street, shall transfer to the City the property at 218 Carlton Street, renovated and furnished at no cost to the City, for use as affordable rental housing units prior to the earlier of December 31, 2021 or registration of a plan of condominium for 55-61 Charles Street East substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Attachment 10 to this report and to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, the value for which shall be $6,400,000.00;

 

ii. Prior to February 12, 2020, the owner shall pay to the City the sum of $200,000.00 to be allocated towards the Capital Revolving Reserve Fund for Affordable Housing (XR1058) for pre-development funding at 218 Carlton Street, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat;

 

iii. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to provide capital funding from the Capital Revolving Reserve Fund for Affordable Housing (XR1058) to a not for profit housing provider, in an amount not to exceed $200,000.00 for pre-development funding, at 218 Carlton Street;

 

iv. City Council approve an increase to the 2019 Approved Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in coordination with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, cost centre FH5795, of $200,000.00 gross, $0 net for affordable housing at 218 Carlton Street, funded from the Capital Revolving Reserve Fund for Affordable Housing (XR1058);

 

v. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, the owner shall pay to the City the sum of $1,470,000.00 to be allocated towards the Capital Revolving Reserve Fund for Affordable Housing (XR1058) for existing and/or new affordable housing that may be owned by Toronto Community Housing within Ward 13, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat;

 

vi. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, the owner shall pay to the City the sum of $1,660,000.00 to be allocated towards local area park or streetscape improvements located within Ward 13 and within the vicinity of the subject lands, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the General Manager, Transportation Services;

 

vii. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, the owner shall pay to the City the sum of $1,670,000.00 to be allocated towards community, cultural, or recreational facilities capital improvements within Ward 13;

 

viii. The cash contributions  outlined in Recommendation a. ii., v., vi. and vii. above are to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Building Construction Price Indexes Publication No. 327-0058, or its successor, and calculated from the date that the Section 37 Agreement is registered on title;

 

ix. In the event the above-noted cash contributions have not been fully used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of the date of the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, the cash contribution may be directed to another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the local Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the subject lands.

 

b. The following matters of convenience are recommended to be secured in a Section 37 Agreement:

 

i. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, a restriction on the property at 620 Church Street will be secured through a Limiting Distance Agreement between the owner of 55-61 Charles Street East, the owner of 620 Church Street, and the City of Toronto, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, which will establish a Limiting Distance Area on the property at 620 Church Street where no new building or structure may be constructed within 25 metres of the building at 55-61 Charles Street East, above a height of 24.5 metres.

 

ii. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, the owner is required to submit a revised Functional Servicing Report satisfactory to the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

iii. The owner shall provide and maintain 140 knock-out panels between units on Levels 9-48 to enable the conversion or combination of two or more units into larger units, and include appropriate provision(s) in any condominium documents to enable any such conversions in the future.

 

iv. The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee, and as updated by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on December 5, 6 and 7, 2017 through the adoption of item PG23.9 of the Planning and Growth Committee, and as may be further amended by City Council from time to time.

 

v. Prior to the issuance of a permit for excavation and shoring work, the owner will submit a Construction Management Plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager of Transportation Services, and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and thereafter will implement the plan during the course of construction. The Construction Management Plan will include the size and location of construction staging areas, dates of significant concrete pouring, lighting details, construction vehicle parking and queuing locations, refuse storage, site security, site supervisor contact information, a communication strategy with the surrounding community, and any other matters requested by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager of Transportation Services, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

5. City Council approve the application for a Rental Housing Demolition permit in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code to allow for the demolition of one hundred (100) existing rental dwelling units located at 55 Charles Street East and 61 Charles Street East, subject to the following conditions:

 

a. The owner shall provide and maintain one-hundred (100) replacement rental dwelling units, comprised of twenty (20) bachelor units, seventy-five (75) one-bedroom units, and five (5) two-bedroom units, on the subject site for a period of at least twenty (20) years, beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied, and as shown on the architectural plans titled 55 Charles Street East, Rental Floor Plans, dated June 6, 2019. Any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

b. The owner shall, as part of the one-hundred (100) replacement rental dwelling units required above, provide at least four (4) one-bedroom replacement rental dwelling units at affordable rents, and twenty (20) bachelor units, seventy-one (71) one-bedroom units, and five (5) two-bedroom units replacement rental dwelling units at mid-range rents, as defined in the City's Official Plan, all for a period of at least ten (10) years, beginning from the date that each replacement dwelling unit is first occupied;

 

c. The owner shall provide tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units with access to all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed rental replacement building at no extra charge.  Access and use of these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other building resident without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as customary practices for private bookings;

 

d. The owner shall provide at least 35 replacement rental dwelling units with a balcony or terrace;

 

e. The owner shall provide tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units with access to all bicycle parking and visitor parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building;

 

f. The owner shall make common storage areas available to tenants, with a combined area of no less than 51 metres, with the final number of lockers to be determined at Site Plan Approval;

 

g. The owner shall make available a clothes laundry room to all tenants, containing at least nine (9) washing machines and seven (7) drying machines;

 

h. The owner shall provide tenant relocation and assistance to all eligible tenants occupying the existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished, including the right to return to a replacement rental dwelling unit, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and

 

i. The owner shall enter into and register on title one or more agreement(s), pursuant to the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in (a) through (h) above to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

6. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue the Preliminary Approval for the application under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code for the demolition of the one-hundred (100) existing rental dwelling units at 55 and 61 Charles Street East after all of the following have occurred:

 

a. The conditions in Recommendation 5 above have been fully satisfied;

 

b. The Zoning By-law Amendment has come into full force and effect;

 

c. The issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006;

 

d. The issuance of excavation and shoring permits for the approved structure on the site; and

 

e. The execution and registration of a Section 37 Agreement pursuant to the Planning Act securing Recommendation 5 (a) through (h) and any other requirements of the Zoning By-law Amendment.

 

7. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 6 above.

 

8. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a demolition permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act no earlier than the issuance of the first building permit for excavation and shoring of the development, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 6 above, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a. The owner remove all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;

 

b. The owner erect solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;

 

c. The owner erects a residential building on site no later than four (4) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and

 

d. Should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in Recommendation 8.c above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

 

9. City Council declare surplus the property municipally known as 218 Carlton Street, effective as of the date the City acquires ownership of 218 Carlton Street, with the intended manner of disposal to be by way of a long term lease to a not for profit affordable rental housing provider for the purposes of operating of affordable rental housing for a period of 50 years.

 

10. City Council authorize all steps necessary to comply with the City’s real estate disposal process, as set out in Chapter 213 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, to be taken.

 

11. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to undertake a competitive process for the selection of a not for profit affordable rental housing provider to operate affordable rental housing within the existing building at 218 Carlton Street for a minimum period of at least 50 years, under a long term lease with the City, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

12. City Council authorize up to 20 affordable rental housing units to be developed on 218 Carlton Street to be exempt from the payment of development charges, building, planning and parkland dedication fees.

 

13. City Council exempt the up to 20 affordable rental homes to be developed at 218 Carlton Street from taxation for municipal and school purposes for the term of 50 years.

 

14. City Council authorize City staff to cancel or refund any taxes paid from the by-law exempting the property from taxation.

 

15. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to negotiate and execute, on behalf of the City, a municipal housing facility agreement (the City's Contribution Agreement), and any other agreements necessary with MOD Developments (Charles) Inc., 2690799 Ontario Inc., or such other related corporation, and a municipal housing facility agreement, and any other agreements necessary with the successful non-profit proponent under the competitive process for an operator, all agreements to secure the financial assistance, being provided and to set out the terms of the development and operation of the new affordable rental homes at 218 Carlton Street on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

16. City Council authorize severally each of the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to execute, on behalf of the City, any security or financing documents required by MOD Developments (Charles) Inc., 2690799 Ontario Inc. or its related corporation, or the successful non-profit proponent under the competitive process for an operator, to secure construction and conventional financing and subsequent refinancing, including any postponement, tripartite agreement, confirmation of status, discharge or consent documents where and when required during the term of the Contribution Agreements, as required by normal business practices, and provided that such documents do not give rise to financial obligations on the part of the City that have not been previously approved by City Council.

 

17. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to provide any consent necessary, pursuant to the Contribution Agreements to assign the Contribution Agreements and to negotiate and enter into any agreements or other documents required to effect such assignment on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

18.  City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to amend Attachment 10 to the report (June 13, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, as follows:

 

Delete paragraph (c) and replace it with the following new paragraph (c):

 

"All closing costs for 218 Carlton Street, including but not limited to land transfer tax and registration fees, related to both the purchase of 218 Carlton Street by the Owner and the acquisition of 218 Carlton Street from the Owner by the City shall be the sole responsibility of the Owner." 

 

19. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the applicant, in consultation with City Planning, Transportation Services, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and any other necessary City officials, to create a working group and to consult with the local community as part of the Site Plan process, including the local residents association and other stakeholders, on the following prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan Approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act: a construction and traffic management plan, landscape and public realm plans, building materials and lighting, and other issues as identified by the Ward Councillor.

 

20. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the recommendations above, including execution of the Section 37 Agreement, Section 111 Agreement, and other related agreements.

 

 

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 13, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes a 48-storey residential building at 55-61 Charles Street East. The building will be 160.5 metres tall, including the mechanical penthouse, and has a total gross floor area of 45,000 square metres. A total of 541 condominium units and 100 rental replacement units are proposed in the building. A total of 155 parking spaces and 642 bicycle parking spaces are proposed within a 4-level underground garage accessed from Macy Dubois Lane. The proposed building would have a density of 19.71 times the area of the lot.

 

The Rental Housing Demolition application proposes to demolish two existing residential rental apartment buildings containing a total of 100 rental dwelling units and provide replacement of all 100 rental dwelling units within the proposed building.

 

As part of the Section 37 contribution, an off-site property at 218 Carlton Street will be purchased, renovated and transferred to the City by the owner for affordable housing purposes. The City will select an experienced non-profit housing agency through a competitive proposal call to operate the affordable rental apartments under a 50 year lease.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws (438-86 and 569-2013). The proposal represents an appropriate redevelopment of the site and presents a built form and public realm that is compatible with the surrounding context. The massing of the building has been revised to provide a better relationship with the public realm and adequate transition to neighbouring properties.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 13, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-15 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 55-61 Charles Street East - Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135146.pdf
Attachment 8 and 9
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135355.pdf
(June 13, 2019) Revised Attachment 10
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135364.pdf
(June 5, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 55-61 Charles Street East - Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Final Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134272.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 8, 2019) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 55-61 Charles Street East - Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications (TE7.15a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135948.pdf

Speakers

Linda Brett, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association (BENA)

TE7.16 - 56 Yonge Street, 21 Melinda Street, 18 to 30 Wellington Street West, 187 to 199 Bay Street and 25 King Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
Communications TE7.16.5 and TE7.16.6 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 56 Yonge Street, 21 Melinda Street, 18 to 30 Wellington Street West, 187 to 199 Bay Street and 25 King Street West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment to be submitted directly to City Council on July 16, 2019.

 

2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, for the lands at 56 Yonge Street, 21 Melinda Street, 18 to 30 Wellington Street West, 187 to 199 Bay Street and 25 King Street West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment to be submitted directly to City Council on July 16, 2019.

 

3. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4. Before introducing the Bills for the Zoning By-law Amendments to City Council for enactment, the owner shall:

 

a) Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street in accordance with the plans and drawings last revised on April 29, 2019, prepared by Adamson Associates Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated December 18, 2017 and revised March 13, 2019, and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 4.b) below, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;

 

b) Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated December 18, 2017 and revised March 13, 2019, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

 

5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

 

a) The owner is to provide community benefits having a value to be determined and be allocated to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor prior to City Council on July 16, 2019;

 

b) The payment amounts referred to in Recommendation 5.a) herein to be increased upwards by indexing in accordance with the Non-residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported by Statistics Canada or its successor, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date the payment is made to the City;

 

c) In the event the cash contributions referred to in Recommendation 5.a) has not been used for the intended purposes within three (3) years of the By-laws coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in Ward 13; and

 

d) The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i. Prior to the earlier of site plan approval or 30 days following the Zoning By-laws coming into full force and effect, the owner shall withdraw their appeal to Official Plan Amendment 352, and Zoning By-laws 1106-2016 and 1107-2016;

 

ii. That the design of the 3-storey pavilion and the 65-storey tower and structural elements as shown on architectural plans by Adamson Associates dated March 13, 2019 be substantially in accordance with the Approved Plans that form site plan approval, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

iii. That the owner is to provide a privately-owned publicly-accessible space (POPS) network as shown on the architectural plans by Adamson Associates dated March 13, 2019 and Landscape Plans by Claude Cormier + Associes dated March 13, 2019, and be secured as part of site plan approval, including hours of operation and programming, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

iv. That the owner pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the accepted Functional Servicing Report, to be submitted for review and acceptance by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required to support the development;

 

v. That the owner implements the mitigation measures identified in the Pedestrian Wind Study dated April 30, 2019 by RWDI, secured as part of site plan approval, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

vi. The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee, and as updated by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on December 5, 6 and 7, 2017 through the adoption of item PG23.9 of the Planning and Growth Committee, and as may be further amended by City Council from time to time;

 

vii. Comply with the City's Tree By-laws, including a tree planting plan, to the satisfaction of the Supervisor, Tree Protection & Plan Review, Urban Forestry, Parks Forestry and Recreation Division;

 

 viii. That prior to final site plan approval the owner shall:

 

A. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 4.b) above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

B. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect;

 

C. Provide a detailed landscape plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

D. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance their heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager Heritage Preservation Services;

 

E. Submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

F. The owner submits an acceptable functional plan illustrating the proposed widening of the northerly boulevard along Wellington Street West between Yonge Street to Bay Street and the associated modifications in the pavement marking and road signs, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services;

 

G. The owner enters into a Municipal Infrastructure Agreement in respect of the northerly boulevard widening along Wellington Street West, as generally shown on the architectural plans by Adamson Associated Dated March 13, 2019, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services;

 

H. The owner to pay all costs associated with the proposed boulevard extension along the Wellington Street West frontage of the building between Yonge Street to Bay Street including pavement marking and signing plans required as a result of the boulevard extension identified in Recommendations 5.d) viii. F. and G.; and

 

I. The owner makes satisfactory arrangements for work on the north-south City-owned public laneway and provide financial security, in an amount to be determined, all to the satisfaction to the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

ix. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

 

A. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect;

 

B. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures identified in the approved Conservation Plan as required in Recommendation 4.b) above including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

 

C. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan Lighting and Interpretation Plan; and

 

x. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 5.d) ix.C. above, the owner shall:

 

A. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

 

B. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

Origin

(June 5, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to permit a 65-storey Class A office building and a 3-storey glass pavilion at the south end of the Commerce Court complex that will add 169,993 square metres of non-residential gross floor area, resulting in a total gross floor area of 361,560 square metres to the complex. The application also includes the retention of the heritage listed 8-storey Hotel Mossop building at 56 Yonge Street. The heritage designated Commerce Court complex will be altered to accommodate the new buildings, which includes the demolition of the existing 6-storey Commerce Court South building and the 13-storey Commerce Court East building.  The façades of the east building will be reconstructed and incorporated into the new office building.  The Commerce Court West and Commerce Court North buildings are being retained.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 20, 2019) Report and Attachments 1 - 14 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 56 Yonge Street, 21 Melinda Street, 18 to 30 Wellington Street West, 187 to 199 Bay Street and 25 King Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135201.pdf
(June 5, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 56 Yonge Street, 21 Melinda Street, 18 to 30 Wellington Street West, 187 to 199 Bay Street and 25 King Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Final - Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134274.pdf

Speakers

George Dark, Urban Strategies Inc.

Communications (Community Council)

(June 21, 2019) Letter from Grant Humes, Executive Director, Toronto Financial District BIA (TE.Supp.TE7.16.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/comm/communicationfile-95545.pdf
(June 21, 2019) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird and Berlis LLP (TE.Supp.TE7.16.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/comm/communicationfile-95530.pdf
(June 24, 2019) Letter from Jane Pepino (TE.Supp.7.16.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/comm/communicationfile-95589.pdf
(June 24, 2019) Letter from David Butler (TE.Supp.TE7.16.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/comm/communicationfile-95624.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2019) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP (CC.New.TE7.16.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96128.pdf
(July 15, 2019) Letter from N. Jane Pepino, Aird & Berlis LLP (CC.New.TE7.16.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96107.pdf

TE7.17 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of a Designating By-Law, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 56 Yonge Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 56 Yonge Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 6 to this report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2. If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

4. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

 

5. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage properties at 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West, and 56 Yonge Street, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a new commercial office building on the lands known municipally in the year 2019 as 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West, and 56 Yonge Street (including the entrance addresses of 21 Melinda Street, 187 Bay Street and, 18-30 Wellington Street West), with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings last revised on April 29, 2019, prepared by Adamson Associates Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated December 18, 2017 and revised March 13, 2019, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a. That prior to the introduction of the bills for such Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall:

 

1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street in accordance with the plans and drawings last revised on April 29, 2019, prepared by Adamson Associates Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated December 18, 2017 and revised March 13, 2019, and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 5.a.2 below, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;

 

2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated December 18, 2017 and revised March 13, 2019, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

3. Enter into and register on the property at 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations.

 

b. That prior to final Site Plan approval for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, for the property located at 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street:

 

1. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 5.a.2 above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

2. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect;

 

3. Provide a detailed landscape plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

4.  Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance their heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager Heritage Preservation Services;

 

5. Submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

c. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

 

1. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect;

 

2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 5.a.2 above including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan Lighting and Interpretation Plan;

 

4. Provide full documentation of the Commerce Court South and Commerce Court East buildings, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

d. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 5.c.3 above, the owner shall:

 

1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

6. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West, and 56 Yonge Street.

Origin

(May 7, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the heritage properties located at 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street in connection with a proposed development of the subject properties, that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject properties and that Council state its intention to designate the property at 56 Yonge Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and state its intention to amend former City of Toronto By-law 539-91 to reflect the proposed alterations.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 7, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of a Designating By-Law, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-133909.pdf

Speakers

Michael McClelland, ERA Architects

17a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of a Designating By-Law, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street

Origin
(May 29, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the heritage properties located at 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street in connection with a proposed development of the subject properties, that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject properties and that Council state its intention to designate the property at 56 Yonge Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and state its intention to amend former City of Toronto By-law 539-91 to reflect the proposed alterations.
 
Background Information
(May 7, 2019) Revised Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of a Designating By-Law, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-133415.pdf)
(May 7, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of a Designating By-Law, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-133245.pdf)

 
Speakers
Michael McClelland, ERA Architects

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 29, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of a Designating By-Law, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 199 Bay Street, 25 King Street West and 56 Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134126.pdf

TE7.18 - 263 Logan Avenue and 15 Busy Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at at 263 Logan Avenue and 15 Busy Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto East York District.

 

2.  City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 263 Logan Avenue and 15 Busy Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6  to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto East York District.  

 

3.  City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4.  The owner is required, as a condition of approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment Application, to pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the accepted Functional Servicing Report, to be submitted for review and acceptance by the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required to support this development.

 

5.  City Council direct the applicant to establish a Construction Liaison Committee made up of local residents to the satisfaction of the local Councillor and that the Committee is to meet at least bi-weekly at the beginning of construction.

 

6. City Council direct the applicant to sweep the construction site daily and nightly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

 

7. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks, laneways and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

 

8.  City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks and all pedestrian walkways have proper lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night during construction.

 

9.  City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local businesses, residents and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications during construction.

 

10.  City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times during construction.

 

11. City Council direct the applicant to post a contact number for the site superintendent on the construction hoarding.

 

12. City Council direct the applicant to create a publicly accessible website with regular construction updates and post the website address on the subject site – 263 Logan Avenue and 15 Busy Street.

 

13. City Council direct the applicant to include a minimum of 50 percent of advertisement surface area on the construction hoarding to be allocated to artwork at their sole cost in collaboration with the STEPS Initiative and to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on June 25, 2019 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes a four-storey, six unit townhouse block that fronts on to 263 Logan Avenue and 15 Busy Street. Each unit will have an integral garage on the first storey, accessed from the rear of the site over a common element drive aisle. The existing commercial parking lot that exists on the site would be reduced and reconfigured.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. The application represents appropriate and desirable infill redevelopment of a surface parking lot and meets the intent of the Official Plan.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 7, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-8 from Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 263 Logan Avenue and 15 Busy Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134031.pdf
(June 7, 2019) Attachment 6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135349.pdf

TE7.19 - Queen-River Secondary Plan - Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council support the proposed changes to the Queen-River Secondary Plan substantially in accordance with the revisions attached as Attachment 3 to the report (June 19, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the proposed changes to the Queen-River Secondary Plan as may be required.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with appropriate staff, to appear before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal in support of City Council’s decision on the proposed changes to the Queen-River Secondary Plan.

Origin

(June 19, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This report proposes changes to the Queen-River Secondary Plan (the "Secondary Plan"), which was approved by City Council on February 10, 2015, as Official Plan Amendment (OPA) 287 and is now under appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT). The Secondary Plan area is bounded by Dundas Street East to the north, River Street to the west, Queen Street East to the south and Bayview Avenue to the east (see Attachment 1). 

 

The Secondary Plan was created to provide an area-specific planning framework for the subject lands that are designated Regeneration Areas on Land Use Map 18 of the Official Plan. The changes proposed by City Planning are largely in response to feedback from the appellants, other parties and the local community. The proposed changes are anticipated to allow the City to settle some or all of the appeals on the Secondary Plan and allow the LPAT to bring some or the entire Plan into effect.  

 

Key changes being proposed include the following:

  • Creation of a new Mixed Use Area ("Mixed Use Area E") on the lands at 83-125 River Street, 1-11 Mark Street, 16-18 Defries Street and 2-10 Labatt Avenue to allow for mid-rise mixed-use development and the potential for one or two towers up to 106 metres (approximately 33 storeys) in height; and
     
  • New affordable housing policy for future developments In Mixed Use Areas 'A', 'D' and 'E'.

The proposed changes to the Secondary Plan are consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conform with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 19, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Queen-River Secondary Plan - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135204.pdf
(June 5, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Queen-River Secondary - Request for Direction - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134346.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Ronwen Guest (TE.Supp.TE7.19.1)

TE7.20 - 230 Oak Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Request for Direction Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council submits the Item to City Council without recommendation.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By Law propose to allow the construction of a new 32-storey residential building with 330 dwelling units at 230 Oak Street and a new child care facility in the existing apartment building at 230 Oak Street. The existing apartment building will be retrofitted on the lower two floors to provide for the new child care facility and provide additional indoor amenity space. The applications were appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) in October 2017.

 

An application for Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion under Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code has been submitted to permit the demolition of 6 existing rental dwelling units on the site. The applicant has proposed to replace all existing rental dwelling units to be demolished within the proposed residential building. A separate staff report to address the Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion application will be brought forward at a later date.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019).

 

The proposed development has been revised since the original submission to adequately address staff concerns with respect to building height, building separation, proximity to the Don Valley top-of-bank on the east side of the property, and pedestrian connections to Gerrard Street East. 

 

This report reviews and recommends that City staff support of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By Law at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, subject to conditions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 10, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-9 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 230 Oak Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134668.pdf
(June 5, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 230 Oak Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134344.pdf

Speakers

Miguel Avila-Velarde

TE7.21 - 440, 444, 450 and 462 Front Street West; 425, 439, 441 and 443 Wellington Street West; 6 - 18 Spadina Avenue and 1 and 19 Draper Street - Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the lands at 440, 444, 450 and 462 Front Street West; 425, 439, 441 and 443 Wellington Street West; 6‑18 Spadina Avenue and 1 and 19 Draper Street (the Subject Lands), to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire four years following enactment by City Council.

 

2. Prior to the introduction of the necessary bill(s) to City Council for enactment of a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law, require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the Subject Lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

3. Prior to the introduction of the necessary bill(s) to City Council for enactment of a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law, require the owner to register on title to the Subject Lands, in a form and with priority to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act, agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the Subject Lands without the prior written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or his designate.

 

4. Prior to the introduction of the necessary bill(s) to City Council for enactment of a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law, require the owner to register against title to the Subject Lands the Draft Plan of Subdivision for the Subject Lands (Application 18 135637 STE 20 SB) as a final approved plan of subdivision, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or his designate.

 

5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 restriction from title to portions of the Subject Lands that become subject to a registered plan of condominium.

 

6. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title to the Subject Lands.

 

7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application has been submitted to facilitate implementation of the approved large-scale mixed-use development on the lands at 440, 444, 450, 462 Front St W; 425, 439, 441 and 443 Wellington St W; 6-8 Spadina Ave and 1 and 19 Draper St, known as The Well (the Subject Lands).  The development includes seven mixed-use buildings with residential, office and retail uses, as well as public parkland and privately-owned publicly-accessible open space (POPS).  Overall, 1,537 dwelling units are proposed, as well as 105,364 square metres of office space and 44,824 square metres of retail space.

 

The applicant requests exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act to permit the creation of seven parcels, consisting of: one commercial and six residential parcels.  The commercial parcel is comprised of the office building, the commercial podium space, the commercial components of the shared underground parking structure and the common open space areas.  The six residential parcels correspond to the six residential buildings above the commercial podium space and the residential components of the shared underground parking structure.

 

The application is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014), conforms to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019) and the City of Toronto’s Official Plan, and advances the implementation of the mixed-use development of the lands as approved by Council in 2017.  The lifting of Part Lot Control is appropriate for the orderly development of these lands.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Part Lot Control Exemption application.  In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the Subject Lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to

 

convey or mortgage any part of the Subject Lands without prior consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or his designate.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 10, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 440, 444, 450 and 462 Front Street West; 425, 439, 441 and 443 Wellington Street West; 6 - 18 Spadina Avenue and 1 and 19 Draper Street - Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134718.pdf
(June 10, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 440, 444, 450 and 462 Front Street West, 425, 439, 441 and 443 Wellington Street, 6 - 18 Spadina Avenue, and 1 and 19 Draper Street - Part Lot Control Application - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134365.pdf

TE7.22 - 65-83 Raglan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Refusal Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - Toronto - St. Paul's

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council refuse the application for the Zoning By-law Amendment at 65-83 Raglan Avenue for the reasons set out in the report (June 7, 2019) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with appropriate staff, to appear before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal in support of City Council's decision to refuse the application, in the event the application is appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other appropriate staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.

 

4. City Council request the City Solicitor to request the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to withhold its order in the event that the project is approved in some form, until the following have been secured:

 

a. the final form of the Zoning By-law Amendments are to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor;

 

b. the owner has revised the Site Servicing and Stage 2 Stormwater Management Report to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;

 

c. community benefits and other matters in support of the development are secured in a Section 37 Agreement executed by the owner and registered on title to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor; and,

 

d. all comments from Engineering and Construction Services contained in their May 29, 2019 memorandum are addressed to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law for the property at 65-83 Raglan Avenue to permit a 33-storey residential building (103.8 metres plus a 4.9-metre mechanical penthouse) containing 347 residential dwelling units. A total of 153 parking spaces are proposed within a 3 level underground garage.

 

This report reviews and recommends refusal of the application to amend the Zoning By-law as it is overdevelopment and it results in a significant density of 11.66 times the area of lot.

 

The proposed development is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2014), as it sets out inappropriate development standards including inadequate setbacks and tower stepbacks.

 

The proposal fails to conform with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2019). It does not provide the appropriate scale of development and transition of built form to adjacent areas.

 

While the proposal is consistent with the policies of Site and Area Specific Policy 38, the proposal fails to conform with the policies of the City of Toronto Official Plan and does not appropriately respond to the Tall Building Design Guidelines.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 7, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-10 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 65-83 Raglan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Refusal Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134324.pdf

Speakers

Patrick Plestid

Communications (Community Council)

(June 12, 2019) E-mail from Lyba Spring (TE.Supp.TE7.22.1)
(June 12, 2019) E-mail from Edward Thomas (TE.Supp.TE7.22.2)
(June 13, 2019) E-mail from Robert Kelly (TE.Supp.TE7.22.3)
(June 14, 2019) E-mail from Jake Ku (TE.Supp.TE7.22.4)
(June 14, 2019) E-mail from Noemi Salamon (TE.Supp.TE7.22.5)
(June 17, 2019) Letter from Mary-Jill Blackman (TE.Supp.TE7.22.6)
(June 20, 2019) E-mail from Colleen Clancy (TE.Supp.TE7.22.7)
(June 21, 2019) E-mail from Peter Finestone (TE.Supp.TE7.22.8)
(June 20, 2019) E-mail from Elena Filipp (TE.Supp.TE7.22.9)
(June 23, 2019) E-mail from Elaine Hsu (TE.Supp.TE7.22.10)
(June 24, 2019) Letter from 100 Vaughan Road Tenants' Association (TE.Supp.TE7.22.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/comm/communicationfile-95591.pdf
(June 25, 2019) E-mail from Robert Cain (TE.Supp.TE7.22.12)

TE7.23 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 2896 Dundas Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage building at 2896 Dundas Street West, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a new entrance to the existing building on lands known municipally as 2896 Dundas Street West, with such alterations substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Culmone and Associates Ltd., dated February 20 and April 26, 2019, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and the letter prepared by Chris Hall of The Ventin Group Ltd. dated April 26, 2019 and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 2896 Dundas Street West, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

 

1. Provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved plans and drawings prepared by Culmone and Associates Ltd., dated February 20 and April 26, 2019, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and the letter prepared by Chris Hall of The Ventin Group Ltd dated April 26, 2019  including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

Origin

(May 7, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed façade alterations at the existing commercial building at 2896 Dundas Street West. This building was constructed in 1911 to the designs of architects Langley and Howard and it was originally known as the Molsons Bank.

 

The proposal involves rear additions to expand the existing building's gross floor area so as to continue commercial uses on the ground floor and create additional dwelling units on the second floor. These alterations involve the conversion of the existing west ground floor window to an entrance door so as to facilitate access to proposed dwelling units on the second floor.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 7, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 2896 Dundas Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-133910.pdf

23a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 2896 Dundas Street West

Origin
(May 29, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed façade alterations at the
existing commercial building at 2896 Dundas Street West. This building was constructed in 1911 to the designs of architects Langley and Howard and it was originally known as the Molsons Bank. The proposal involves rear additions to expand the existing building's gross floor area so as to continue commercial uses on the ground floor and create additional dwelling units on the
second floor. These alterations involve the conversion of the existing west ground floor
window to an entrance door so as to facilitate access to proposed dwelling units on the second
floor.

 

Background Information
(May 7, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation
Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 2896
Dundas Street West
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-133236.pdf)

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 29, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 2896 Dundas Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134149.pdf

TE7.24 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreement at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park
Attention
See also Item CC9.13

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, for the construction of a new 5 storey mixed-use office with at-grade retail uses at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue in conjunction with an appeal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT") and in accordance with the  plans and drawings prepared by Superkul Architects, submitted with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects, Inc., dated May 7, 2019 (the "Revised Plans"), all on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following conditions:

 

a. Prior to issuance of an LPAT Order in connection with the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal for the property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue, the owner shall:

 

1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue substantially in accordance with the Revised Plans subject to and in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;

 

2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 421 Roncesvalles Avenue, prepared by ERA Architects dated May 7, 2019, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

b. Prior to Final Site Plan approval in connection with the property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue, the owner shall:

 

1. Provide final site plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2 to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

2. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

4. Submit a Signage Plan for the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

c. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

 

1. Obtain final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law amendments required for the alterations to the property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue, as described in this report, such Amendments to have come into full force and effect;

 

2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2 above including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan, Landscape Plan, and Interpretation Plan;

 

4. Provide full documentation of the existing heritage property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

d. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.c.3., the owner shall:

 

1.  Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work, required heritage lighting work, and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan, Lighting Plan, and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

 

e. The owner has provided written confirmation to the City Solicitor and the LPAT that it has withdrawn its demolition permit application currently appealed to the LPAT for the heritage property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue, in accordance with Section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act. 

 

2. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 421 Roncesvalles Avenue for the property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue in a form and with content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

3. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue.

 

4.  City Council direct that should the Revised Plans be amended to reflect a lower height than proposed, without any changes to the Revised Plans, the intent of the approval of this alteration application under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act will be maintained.

Origin

(May 29, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations for the heritage property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue, in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the site and in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Superkul Architects, submitted with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects, Inc., dated May 7, 2019 (the "Revised Plans").  The applicant has appealed its Zoning By-law Amendment application and demolition permit application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT"), which has consolidated these two appeals.

 

This report also recommends that City Council give authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property which is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

As part of the Revised Plans, the existing property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue will be conserved and incorporated into the redevelopment. The new development adds three additional stories to the existing heritage property for a total of five stories (plus mechanical penthouse) and incorporates a minimum 3.5 metres step back from Roncesvalles Avenue and a minimum 1 metre step back from Howard Park Avenue. The two street facing facades and the south (side) façade will be retained in situ.  The rear (east) wall will be partially retained (not a heritage attribute) and the rest of the rear (east) wall will be dismantled and partially reconstructed.

 

The conservation strategy will not significantly impact the three dimensional form of the buildings as viewed from the public realm. Should the alterations to the subject property be approved, staff recommend that the property owner be required to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue in order to ensure the long-term protection of the heritage property.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2019) Report and Attachments 1 - 3 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreement at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134026.pdf

24a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreement at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue

Origin
(June 20, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations for the heritage

property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue, in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the

site and in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Superkul Architects, submitted

with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects, Inc., dated May 7, 2019

(the "Revised Plans"). The applicant has appealed its Zoning By-law Amendment application

and demolition permit application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT"), which has

consolidated these two appeals.

 

This report also recommends that City Council give authority to enter into a Heritage Easement

Agreement for the property which is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

As part of the Revised Plans, the existing property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue will be

conserved and incorporated into the redevelopment. The new development adds three

additional stories to the existing heritage property for a total of five stories (plus mechanical

penthouse) and incorporates a minimum 3.5 metres step back from Roncesvalles Avenue and a

minimum 1 metre step back from Howard Park Avenue. The two street facing facades and the

south (side) façade will be retained in situ. The rear (east) wall will be partially retained (not a

heritage attribute) and the rest of the rear (east) wall will be dismantled and partially

reconstructed.

 

The conservation strategy will not significantly impact the three dimensional form of the

buildings as viewed from the public realm. Should the alterations to the subject property be

approved, staff recommend that the property owner be required to enter into a Heritage 

Easement Agreement for the property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue in order to ensure the longterm

protection of the heritage property.

 

Background Information

(May 29, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation

Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property at 421

Roncesvalles Avenue and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreement at 421

Roncesvalles Avenue

(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-133973.pdf)

 

Speakers

Emma Cohlmeyer, ERA Architects

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 20, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135333.pdf

TE7.25 - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register 40-44 and 71-75 Mitchell Avenue and 735-737 and 753-755 Richmond Street West, and Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 40-44 Mitchell Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council include the properties at 71-75 Mitchell Avenue on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 71-75 Mitchell Avenue (Reasons for Inclusion) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (June 12, 2019), from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

2. City Council include the properties at 735-737 Richmond Street West on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 735-737 Richmond Street West (Reasons for Inclusion) attached as Attachment 4 to the report (June 12, 2019), from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

3. City Council include the properties at 753-755 Richmond Street West on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 753-755 Richmond Street West (Reasons for Inclusion) attached as Attachment 5 to the report (June 12, 2019), from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

4. City Council include the properties at 40-44 Mitchell Avenue on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and state its intention to designate the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 40-44 Mitchell Avenue (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 6 to the report (June 12, 2019) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

5. If there are no objections to the designation of the properties at 40-44 Mitchell Avenue, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

6. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

7. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

Origin

(June 12, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council include the properties at 40-44 and 71-75 Mitchell Avenue and 735-737 and 753-755 Richmond Street West on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and state its intention to designate the properties at 40-44 Mitchell Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

The properties at 40-44 and 71-75 Mitchell Avenue and 735-737 and 753-755 Richmond Street West contain four pairs of single-storey semi-detached cottages that were among 16 pairs constructed in 1858 by James Lukin Robinson on three streets southeast of Queen and Niagara streets.  In addition, two pairs of cottages at 703-705 and 719-721 Richmond Street West that are part of this group were listed on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in 2005. 

 

The buildings are known historically as the Robinson Cottages for the man who commissioned them, as well as the Garrison Common Cottages for their location on the former Military Reserve lands east of Garrison Creek (where Mitchell Avenue was known earlier as Garrison Street). With the two pairs of cottages at 703-705 and 719-721 Richmond Street West, which were built at the same time and were listed on the Heritage Register in 2005, they form an important collection and are the last surviving examples of the original group of 16 cottages in the Niagara Street Neighbourhood.

 

Prior to zoning approval in August 2017 for the redevelopment of a pair of semi-detached cottages at 18-22 Mitchell Avenue, area residents nominated them and the four other pairs listed in Recommendations 1-4 for the Heritage Register.  The residents formed a Facebook group "Save the Garrison Common Cottages" in support of the preservation of the remaining cottages:

https://www.facebook.com/Save-The-Garrison-Common-Cottages-1700966533531818/ 

 

The properties at 40-44 Mitchell Avenue are the subject of a Committee of Adjustment application for a minor variance to replace the pair of single-storey semi-detached house form buildings with three 3-storey town houses.

 

Following research and evaluation, it has been determined that properties at 40-44 and 71-75 Mitchell Avenue and 735-737 and 753-755 Richmond Street West meet Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, which the City of Toronto also applies when evaluating properties for its Heritage Register.  With the listed heritage properties at 703-705 and 719-721 Richmond Street, the properties identified in Recommendations 1-4 comprise a rare surviving collection of mid-19th century semi-detached workers' cottages that were built as a group in the former Military Reserve east of Garrison Creek.

 

The inclusion of the properties at 40-44 and 71-75 Mitchell Avenue and 735-737 and 753-755 Richmond Street West on the City’s Heritage Register and the designation of the properties at 40-44 Mitchell Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act would identify all of the property’s cultural heritage values and heritage attributes.

 

Following the inclusion in 2005 of the other extant cottages at 703-705 and 719-721 Richmond Street West on the Heritage Register, additions were made to the rear of the buildings at 705 and 721 Richmond (as shown in the photographs in Attachments 2C and 2D).  The lot sizes allowed for substantial additions that retained the cottages while accommodating the owners' needs.

 

Properties on the Heritage Register will be maintained and conserved in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies.  Designation enables City Council to review applications to the site, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 12, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 40-44 and 71-75 Mitchell Avenue and 735-737 and 753-755 Richmond Street West, and Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29, Ontario Heritage Act - 40-44 Mitchell Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134676.pdf
(June 6, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register 40-44 and 71-75 Mitchell Avenue and 735-737 and 753-755 Richmond Street West, and Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 40-44 Mitchell Avenue - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134142.pdf

Speakers

Kenneth Chestney
Daniel Hall, The Architect Builders Collaborative
Jason Chestney
Ernesto Arduinie, Ridgestone Homes LTD
Andrea Chambers
Dolores Borkowski
Marcus R. Létourneau
Jordana Greenberg
Michael Smith
Sunny Punia

Communications (Community Council)

(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Andrea Chambers (TE.Supp.TE7.25.1)
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Andrea Chambers and Chris Chambers (TE.Supp.TE7.25.2)
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Dolores Borkowski (TE.Supp.TE7.25.3)
(June 24, 2019) Letter from Kenneth Chestney (TE.Supp.TE7.25.4)

25a - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register 40-44 and 71-75 Mitchell Avenue and 735-737 and 753-755 Richmond Street West, and Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 40-44 Mitchell Avenue

Origin
(June 20, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

This report recommends that City Council include the properties at 40-44 and 71-75 Mitchell Avenue and 735-737 and 753-755 Richmond Street West on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and state its intention to designate the properties at 40-44 Mitchell Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

The properties at 40-44 and 71-75 Mitchell Avenue and 735-737 and 753-755 Richmond Street West contain four pairs of single-storey semi-detached cottages that were among 16 pairs constructed in 1858 by James Lukin Robinson on three streets southeast of Queen and Niagara streets. In addition, two pairs of cottages at 703-705 and 719-721 Richmond Street West that are part of this group were listed on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in 2005.

 

The buildings are known historically as the Robinson Cottages for the man who commissioned them, as well as the Garrison Common Cottages for their location on the former Military Reserve lands east of Garrison Creek (where Mitchell Avenue was known earlier as Garrison Street). With the two pairs of cottages at 703-705 and 719-721 Richmond Street West, which were built at the same time and were listed on the Heritage Register in 2005, they form an important collection and are the last surviving examples of the original group of 16 cottages in the Niagara Street Neighbourhood.

 

Prior to zoning approval in August 2017 for the redevelopment of a pair of semi-detached cottages at 18-22 Mitchell Avenue, area residents nominated them and the four other pairs listed in Recommendations 1-4 for the Heritage Register. The residents formed a Facebook group "Save the Garrison Common Cottages" in support of the preservation of the remaining cottages:

https://www.facebook.com/Save-The-Garrison-Common-Cottages-1700966533531818/

 

The properties at 40-44 Mitchell Avenue are the subject of a Committee of Adjustment application for a minor variance to replace the pair of single-storey semi-detached house form buildings with three 3-storey town houses.

 

Following research and evaluation, it has been determined that properties at 40-44 and 71-75 Mitchell Avenue and 735-737 and 753-755 Richmond Street West meet Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, which the City of Toronto also applies when evaluating properties for its Heritage Register. With the listed heritage properties at 703-705 and 719-721 Richmond Street, the properties identified in Recommendations 1-4 comprise a rare surviving collection of mid-19th century semi-detached workers' cottages that were built as a group in the former Military Reserve east of Garrison Creek.

 

The inclusion of the properties at 40-44 and 71-75 Mitchell Avenue and 735-737 and 753-755 Richmond Street West on the City’s Heritage Register and the designation of the properties at 40-44 Mitchell Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act would identify all of the property’s cultural heritage values and heritage attributes.

 

Following the inclusion in 2005 of the other extant cottages at 703-705 and 719-721 Richmond Street West on the Heritage Register, additions were made to the rear of the buildings at 705 and 721 Richmond (as shown in the photographs in Attachments 2C and 2D). The lot sizes allowed for substantial additions that retained the cottages while accommodating the owners' needs.


Properties on the Heritage Register will be maintained and conserved in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Designation enables City Council to review applications to the site, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition.

 

Background Information

 

(June 12, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 40-44 and 71-75 Mitchell Avenue and 735-737 and 753-755 Richmond Street West, and Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29, Ontario Heritage Act - 40-44 Mitchell Avenue

(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-134684.pdf)
(June 6, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register 40-44 and 71-75 Mitchell Avenue and 735-737 and 753-755 Richmond Street West, and Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 40-44 Mitchell Avenue - Notice of Pending Report (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-134155.pdf)

 

Communications


(June 19, 2019) E-mail from Gabriele Guiducci (PB.Supp.PB7.5.1)
(June 19, 2019) E-mail from Andrea Chambers (PB.Supp.PB7.5.2)
(June 19, 2019) E-mail from Dolores Borkowski (PB.Supp.PB7.5.3)
(June 20, 2019) E-mail from Chris Chambers (PB.Supp.PB7.5.4)


Speakers


Kenneth Chestney
Daniel Hall, The Architect Builders Collaborative
Jason Chestney
Chris Uchiyama, Letourneau Heritage Consulting Inc.
Sunny Punia, Punia Group Inc.
Andrea Chambers
Dolores Borkowski
Rajdev Sidhu
Michael Smith

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 20, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135342.pdf

TE7.26 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 2 Strachan Avenue - Automotive Building

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage property at 2 Strachan Avenue (Automotive Building) in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated May 24, 2019, prepared by NORR Architects and Engineers Limited, on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by ERA Architects dated February 28, 2019 and HIA addendum dated May 24, 2019, on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following  conditions:

 

a. That prior to final Site Plan Approval for the property located at 2 Strachan Avenue (Automotive Building) the owner shall:

 

1. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 2 Strachan Avenue (Automotive Building), prepared by ERA Architects dated February 28, 2019, and HIA addendum dated May 24, 2019, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

2. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.1 above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services

 

3. Register an amending Heritage Easement Agreement to update Schedule "B" photographs on the existing Heritage Easement Agreement registered on title for 2 Strachan Avenue (Automotive Building), Instrument No. AT2012487, dated September 12, 2008.

 

b. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 2 Strachan Avenue (Automotive Building), including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

 

1. Amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 2 Strachan Avenue (Automotive Building) in accordance with the plans and drawings dated May 24, 2019, prepared by NORR Architects and Engineers Limited and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.1 above, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services including registration of such amending agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, as required in Recommendation 1.a.3 above.

 

2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.1 above including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

3. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the Automotive Building at 2 Strachan Avenue prepared by ERA Architects, dated February 28, 2019 with HIA addendum dated May 24, 2019, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend the Heritage Easement Agreement registered on title to the Automotive Building property at 2 Strachan Avenue (Automotive Building), Instrument No. AT2012487, dated September 12, 2008.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bill in Council to amend the Heritage Easement Agreement.

Origin

(May 29, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage property at 2 Strachan Avenue (Automotive Building) in connection with a Site Plan Application to construct an enclosed elevated pedestrian walkway over Newfoundland Road connecting the Automotive Building and Hotel X, and that Council grant authority to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2019) Report and Attachments 1 - 7 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 2 Strachan Avenue - Automotive Building
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134029.pdf

26a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 2 Strachan Avenue - Automotive Building

Origin
(June 20, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage property at 2 Strachan Avenue (Automotive Building) in connection with a Site Plan Application to construct an enclosed elevated pedestrian walkway over Newfoundland Road connecting the Automotive Building and Hotel X, and that Council grant authority to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement.

 

Background Information


(May 29, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 2 Strachan Avenue - Automotive Building

(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-133968.pdf)

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 20, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135334.pdf

TE7.29 - Inclusion on the Heritage Register and Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 28 Bracken Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Beaches - East York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that: 

 

1. City Council include the property at 28 Bracken Avenue on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register.

 

2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 28 Bracken Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 28 Bracken Avenue (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (May 22, 2019) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, City Planning.

 

3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council.

 

4. If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision to designate the property.

Origin

(May 22, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Urban Design/Heritage, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 28 Bracken Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and include the property on the City's Heritage Register.

 

Located in Balmy Beach, south of the Kingston Road, between Kingswood Road and Bingham Avenue, the property contains a two-and-a-half storey, Arts and Crafts Movement, Shingle-Style house constructed in 1915-1916 and first owned by Clara and

Arthur G. Hill. 

 

Following research and evaluation, it has been determined that the property meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation under

Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its design, associative and contextual value. 

 

In October, 2018 an application for a minor variance was submitted for consideration by the Committee of Adjustment to demolish the house and garage and replace them with a new house and garage.  In January, 2019 Heritage staff submitted a report to the Committee of Adjustment (CofA) requesting deferral of the application to give staff time to evaluate the property.  The matter will be considered at the CofA hearing on June 25, 2019.

 

Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies.  Designation enables City Council to review alterations to the site, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 22, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Senior Manager, Urban Design/Heritage, City Planning - Inclusion on the Heritage Register and Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 28 Bracken Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-133908.pdf

Speakers

Barbara Myrvold (Submission Filed)
Millie Rowan
Lesley Spencer

Communications (Community Council)

(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Millie Rowan and John Huggins (TE.Supp.TE7.29.1)
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Barbara and Jim Myrvold (TE.Supp.TE7.29.2)

29a - Inclusion on the Heritage Register and Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 28 Bracken Avenue

Origin
(May 29, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 28 Bracken Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and include the property on the City's Heritage Register.

 

Located in Balmy Beach, south of the Kingston Road, between Kingswood Road and Bingham Avenue, the property contains a two-and-a-half storey, Arts and Crafts Movement, Shingle-Style house constructed in 1915-1916 and first owned by Clara and Arthur G. Hill. 

 

Following research and evaluation, it has been determined that the property meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its design, associative and contextual value. 

 

In October, 2018 an application for a minor variance was submitted for consideration by the Committee of Adjustment to demolish the house and garage and replace them with a new house and garage.  In January, 2019 Heritage staff submitted a report to the Committee of Adjustment (CofA) requesting deferral of the application to give staff time to evaluate the property.  The matter will be considered at the CofA hearing on June 25, 2019.

 

Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies.  Designation enables City Council to review alterations to the site, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition.
 
Background Information
(May 22, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-4 from Senior Manager, Urban Design/Heritage, City Planning - Inclusion on the Heritage Register and Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 28 Bracken Avenue
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-133437.pdf)
(May 14, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 28 Bracken Avenue - Notice of Pending Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-133224.pdf)

 
Communications
(May 26, 2019) E-mail from Millie Rowan (PB.Supp.PB6.9.1)
(May 27, 2019) E-mail from Lesley Spencer (PB.Supp.PB6.9.2)
(May 27, 2019) E-mail from Clyde Robinson (PB.Supp.PB6.9.3)
(May 27, 2019) E-mail from Debbie Guyader (PB.Supp.PB6.9.4)
(May 27, 2019) E-mail from Uwe Sehmrau (PB.Supp.PB6.9.5)
(May 27, 2019) E-mail from Susan Turner (PB.Supp.PB6.9.6)
(May 27, 2019) E-mail from Paula Childs (PB.Supp.PB6.9.7)
(May 28, 2019) E-mail from Rob Ptolemy (PB.Supp.PB6.9.8)
(May 28, 2019) E-mail from Mary Mehak (PB.Supp.PB6.9.9)
(May 28, 2019) E-mail from David Myrvold (PB.Supp.PB6.9.10)
(May 28, 2019) E-mail from Yvonne David-Read (PB.Supp.PB6.9.11)
(May 28, 2019) E-mail from John Cameron (PB.Supp.PB6.9.12)
(May 28, 2019) E-mail from Barbara Myrvold (PB.Supp.PB6.9.13)
(May 28, 2019) E-mail from Catherine Roy (PB.Supp.PB6.9.14)
(May 28, 2019) E-mail from Deborah Livingston-Lowe (PB.Supp.PB6.9.15)
(May 28, 2019) E-mail from Millie Rowan (PB.Supp.PB6.9.16)
(May 28, 2019) E-mail from John Higgins (PB.Supp.PB6.9.17)
(May 29, 2019) E-mail from David Livingston-Lowe (PB.Supp.PB6.9.18)
(May 29, 2019) E-mail from Carole Calder (PB.Supp.PB6.9.19)
(May 29, 2019) E-mail from Tony Green (PB.New.PB6.9.20)

 
                       

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 29, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Inclusion on the Heritage Register and Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 28 Bracken Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134153.pdf

TE7.30 - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 2078 and 2086 Danforth Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Beaches - East York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

                    

1. City Council include the properties at 2078 and 2086 Danforth Avenue on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Inclusion), attached as Attachment 3 to the report (June 4, 2019) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning.

Origin

(June 4, 2019) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council include the properties at 2078 and 2086 Danforth Avenue on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register.  Located on the northeast corner of Danforth and Woodbine avenues, the properties contain two adjoining commercial buildings dating to 1925 and 1927 that were commissioned by William A. Summerville, a local politician, realtor, and theatre operator as the commercial components of a complex that included the Prince of Wales Theatre, which was located to the north and east.  The subject properties contribute to the historical development and contextual character of Danforth Avenue as it emerged in the 1920s as one of Toronto's pre-eminent "Main Streets," with Woodbine Avenue among the important cross-streets where commercial structures, including the William A. Summerville Buildings were designed to anchor and highlight this important intersection.

 

The properties were identified for their cultural heritage value in TE34.11, the “Danforth Avenue Planning Study – Coxwell Avenue to Victoria Park Avenue – City-initiated Official Plan Amendment – Final Report,” which was adopted with amendments by City Council at its meeting of July 23, 2018.  The report included Attachment 10: Map of Potential Heritage Properties where, in Block 5 on the north side between Woodbine and Cedarvale avenues, the properties at 2078 and 2086 Danforth Avenue are identified. 

                                              

The properties at 2078 and 2086 Danforth Avenue are the subject of a development application that would result in the demolition of the two 2-storey commercial buildings.

 

The inclusion of the properties at 2078 and 2086 Danforth Avenue on the City’s Heritage Register would identify all of the property’s cultural heritage values and heritage attributes.  Properties on the Heritage Register will be maintained and conserved in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 4, 2019) Report and Attachments 1 - 4 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 2078 and 2086 Danforth Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134140.pdf

30a - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 2078 and 2086 Danforth Avenue

Origin
(June 20, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

This report recommends that City Council include the properties at 2078 and 2086 Danforth Avenue on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register. Located on the northeast corner of Danforth and Woodbine avenues, the properties contain two adjoining commercial buildings dating to 1925 and 1927 that were commissioned by William A. Summerville, a local politician, realtor, and theatre operator as the commercial components of a complex that included the Prince of Wales Theatre, which was located to the north and east. The subject properties contribute to the historical development and contextual character of Danforth Avenue as it emerged in the 1920s as one of Toronto's pre-eminent "Main Streets," with Woodbine Avenue among the important cross-streets where commercial structures, including the William A. Summerville Buildings were designed to anchor and highlight this important intersection.

 

The properties were identified for their cultural heritage value in TE34.11, the “Danforth Avenue Planning Study – Coxwell Avenue to Victoria Park Avenue – City-initiated Official Plan Amendment – Final Report,” which was adopted with amendments by City Council at its meeting of July 23, 2018. The report included Attachment 10: Map of Potential Heritage Properties where, in Block 5 on the north side between Woodbine and Cedarvale avenues, the properties at 2078 and 2086 Danforth Avenue are identified.

 

The properties at 2078 and 2086 Danforth Avenue are the subject of a development application that would result in the demolition of the two 2-storey commercial buildings. The inclusion of the properties at 2078 and 2086 Danforth Avenue on the City’s Heritage Register would identify all of the property’s cultural heritage values and heritage attributes.

 

Properties on the Heritage Register will be maintained and conserved in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies.

 

Background Information

 

(June 4, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation
Services, Urban Design, City Planning - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register -
2078 and 2086 Danforth Avenue (http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-134157.pdf)

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 20, 2019) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135343.pdf

TE7.59 - Danforth Avenue Planning Study - Coxwell Avenue to Victoria Park Avenue - Urban Design Guidelines - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Beaches - East York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council adopt the Urban Design Guidelines attached as Attachment 1 to the report (June 7, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and direct City Planning and other appropriate City staff to use them as a tool in the review of development applications and other initiatives on Danforth Avenue (between Coxwell Avenue and Victoria Park Avenue).

Origin

(June 7, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This report provides an update on the Danforth Avenue Planning Study (Coxwell Avenue to Victoria Park Avenue) and submits the completed Urban Design Guidelines ("Guidelines") that will be used as a tool to help evaluate development applications and other forms of change, including streetscape improvements, within the study area.

 

On July 23, 2018, City Council adopted Item #TE34.22, which included By-law 1136-2018 that implemented Official Plan Amendment #420 (OPA 420). OPA 420 represents the planned policy direction for the future growth of the study area. Included within OPA 420 is a policy direction on how to apply the associated Guidelines when evaluating development applications. OPA 420 is currently under appeal at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT).

 

As part of Council's decision, City Planning staff were directed to complete the Guidelines, post them online for public review, and submit them to a future Council meeting in 2019.

 

This report reviews the Guidelines, in brief, and recommends that Council adopt them for future use by City staff as a tool to evaluate development applications and other forms of change within the study area.

 

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 7, 2019) Report and Attachment from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Danforth Avenue Planning Study - Coxwell Avenue to Victoria Park Avenue - Urban Design Guidelines - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134315.pdf
Attachment 1 - Part 1 of 5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135233.pdf
Attachment 1 - Part 2 of 5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135234.pdf
Attachment 1 - Part 3 of 5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135235.pdf
Attachment 1 - Part 4 of 5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135236.pdf
Attachment 1 - Part 5 of 5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135237.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 24, 2019) Letter from David Bronskill (TE.Supp.TE7.59.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/comm/communicationfile-95600.pdf
(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Nancy Gaughan (TE.Supp.TE7.59.2)

TE7.60 - St. Clair Avenue West and Bathurst Street Area Planning Framework

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Attention
Communications TE7.60.3 to TE7.60.8 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council adopt the St. Clair Avenue West and Bathurst Street area Planning Framework and direct City staff to apply the Planning Framework during the review of current and future development applications.

Origin

(June 18, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This report introduces and recommends a Planning Framework for the St. Clair Avenue West and Bathurst Street area to be used to evaluate current and future development applications. The Planning Framework includes a vision statement, defined character areas, built form objectives, and a public realm network plan.

 

The Planning Framework will apply to a study boundary that extends out from the St. Clair Avenue West and Bathurst Street intersection generally between Vaughan Road and Walmer Road. To the south this generally includes the triangle bounded by Bathurst Street and Vaughan Road and to the north the study area extends to Tichester Road with a portion extending further northwest of Bathurst Street. See Attachment 1 for the study area boundary.

 

The Framework was developed with significant input and feedback from the community and based on a review and analysis by Planning staff. The Framework encourages a sense of place and guides development with a vision of well-designed and appropriately scaled built form, for each defined character area, and a cohesive network of pedestrian features.

 

The Framework is also intended to act as a guide to intensification by detailing built form principles for each character area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 18, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-8 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - St. Clair Avenue West and Bathurst Street Area Planning Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135206.pdf
Attachment 9
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135285.pdf
(June 10, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - St. Clair Avenue West and Bathurst Street Area Planning Framework - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134366.pdf

Speakers

Patrick Plestid
Justin Woodward
Christine Jackson

Communications (Community Council)

(June 24, 2019) E-mail from Janet Patterson (TE.Supp.TE7.60.1)
(June 24, 2019) Letter from 100 Vaughan Road Tenants's Association (TE.Supp.TE7.60.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/comm/communicationfile-95622.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 11, 2019) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP (CC.Supp.TE7.60.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96047.pdf
(July 12, 2019) Letter from Stephen J. Miller, Raglan Building Group (CC.Supp.TE7.60.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96087.pdf
(July 15, 2019) Letter from Jonathan Rodger, Zelinka Priamo Ltd. (CC.Supp.TE7.60.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96099.pdf
(July 15, 2019) E-mail from Rabbi Nechemia Deitsch, and on behalf of the Chabad of Midtown Community (CC.New.TE7.60.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96167.pdf
(July 12, 2019) Letter from Jerrold Wiseblott, 1516665 Ontario Limited (CC.New.TE7.60.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-96170.pdf
(July 16, 2019) Letter from Shane Grosman and Jonathan West (CC.New.TE7.60.8)

TE7.61 - Construction Staging Area - 57 Spadina Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
Bill 1110 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the closure portion of the east sidewalk and a 3.5 metre wide portion of the northbound curb lane on Spadina Avenue, between a point 12 metres north of Clarence Square (north intersection) and a point 62 metres further north. A temporary 1.7 metre pedestrian walkway will be provided within the closed portion of the northbound curb lane, from July 17, 2019 to August 31, 2021.

 

2.  City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the east side of Spadina Avenue, from Clarence Square (north intersection) to a point 50 metres north.

 

3.  City Council rescind the existing Stopping prohibition in effect from 7:30 a.m. to

9:30 am. and 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east side of Spadina Avenue, between Clarence Square (north intersection) and King Street West.

 

4.  City Council rescind the existing  standing prohibition in effect from  6:30 p.m. to 12:00  midnight, Monday to Friday except public holidays and from 12:00 noon to

6:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday and public holidays, on the east side of Spadina Avenue, between Clarence Square (north intersection) and King Street West.

 

5.  City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the east side Spadina Avenue, between Clarence Square (north intersection) and King Street West.

 

6.  City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

7.  City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

8.  City Council direct that Spadina Avenue be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

Origin

(June 6, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Spadina Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Tricon Capital Group Inc. is constructing a 36-storey rental development with four levels of underground parking and a total of 286 units at 57 Spadina Avenue. The site is located on the south-east quadrant of Spadina Avenue and King Street West.

 

In order to enable construction of the above mentioned development, Transportation Services is requesting approval to close the northbound curb lane and a portion of the sidewalk on the east side of Spadina Avenue, between a point 12 metres north of Clarence Square (north intersection) and a point 62 metres north for a period of 26 months.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 6, 2019) Report and 1 Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Construction Staging Area - 57 Spadina Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134197.pdf

TE7.66 - Temporary Adjustments to Traffic and Parking Regulations for 2019 Canadian National Exhibition - Non-Delegated

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park
Attention
Bills 1137 and 1138 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the temporary traffic and parking regulations on streets in the vicinity of Exhibition Place that are impacted during the Canadian National Exhibition, identified in Appendix A attached to the report (June 6, 2019) from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Origin

(June 6, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's authority to enact temporary traffic and parking amendments required to enhance traffic operations and pedestrian safety during the annual Canadian National Exhibition (CNE), which takes place from August 16 to September 2, 2019, inclusive.  As this staff report concerns roadways with regular Toronto Transit Commission service, Council approval is required.

 

A companion report, "Temporary Adjustments to Parking Regulations for 2019 Canadian National Exhibition – Delegated" outlines the required delegated temporary parking amendments for locations without Toronto Transit Commission Service.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 6, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Temporary Adjustments to Traffic and Parking Regulations for 2019 Canadian National Exhibition - Non-Delegated
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134300.pdf

TE7.73 - Payment-In-Lieu of Parking - 211-213 Ossington Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council exempt the applicant at 211-213 Ossington Avenue from the City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 requirement of four retail parking spaces and the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 parking requirement of six parking spaces, subject to a $10,000.00 payment-in-lieu of parking, providing the applicant signs a Payment-In-Lieu of Parking Agreement with the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

Origin

(June 3, 2019) Report from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services

Summary

This report seeks City Council's approval to exempt the applicant from the parking requirement specified in Section 4(4)(b), By-law 438-86 to provide six parking spaces and the parking requirement specified in Chapter 200.5.10.1.(1), By-law 569-2013 to provide four retail parking spaces. The applicant is unable to accommodate the parking on-site and has requested a Payment-In-Lieu of Parking to the City, which amounts to $10,000.00.

 

The parking exemption is considered appropriate since the parking space shortfall will not have a significant impact on parking conditions in the area.

 

Section 40 of the Planning Act grants City Council the authority to approve payment-in-lieu of parking.  This application has been made pursuant to the City's Payment-In-Lieu of Parking Policy, adopted in July 2004. City Council approval is required as this matter has not been delegated.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 3, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services - Payment-In-Lieu of Parking - 211-213 Ossington Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134306.pdf

TE7.75 - Traffic Amendment - Oriole Parkway at Chaplin Crescent

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Attention
Bill 1111 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council exempt buses from the easterly northbound right-turn only lane designation on Oriole Parkway, between Chaplin Crescent and a point 30.5 metres south.

Origin

(June 3, 2019) Report from Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Oriole Parkway, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval to exempt buses from the existing northbound right-turn only lane designation on Oriole Parkway at Chaplin Crescent.  This proposed amendment will address the Toronto Transit Commission's (TTC) request to utilize the existing northbound right-turn only lane to service the proposed accessible northbound nearside bus stop on Oriole Parkway at Chaplin Crescent for the "5 Avenue Road" bus route, and then continue in this lane to merge into the adjacent traffic lane as they travel through the intersection at Chaplin Crescent.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 3, 2019) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Traffic Amendment - Oriole Parkway at Chaplin Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134291.pdf

TE7.76 - Realignment of Permit Parking Area 3J to Exclude the Development Located at 1200 Dundas Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council approve the amendment to Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate a revised map of permit parking area "3J", as attached in Appendix A of the report (May 30, 2019) from the Manager, Permits and Enforcement, Parking, Transportation Services.

Origin

(May 30, 2019) Report from Manager, Permits and Enforcement, Parking, Transportation Services

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to prohibit the General Manager from accepting applications from residents of, visitors to, and tradespersons at the development property municipally known as 1200 Dundas Street West for residential on-street permit parking. 

 

Transportation Services has assessed the realignment of permit parking area 3J and the exclusion of the development property located at 1200 Dundas Street West as requested by Toronto and East York Community Council, Item TE6.56, on May 22, 2019. Transportation Services is recommending approval of the exclusion as it will not impact negatively on Dundas Street West residents.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the Manager, Permits and Enforcement, Parking, Transportation Services - Realignment of Permit Parking Area 3J to Exclude the Development Located at 1200 Dundas Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134268.pdf

TE7.77 - Realignment of Permit Parking Area 5C to Exclude the Development Located at 861 St. Clair Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council approve the amendment to Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate a revised map of permit parking area "5C", as attached in Appendix A of the report (May 30, 2019) from the Manager, Permits and Enforcement, Parking, Transportation Services.

Origin

(May 30, 2019) Report from the Manager, Permits and Enforcement, Parking, Transportation Services

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to prohibit the General Manager from accepting applications from residents of, visitors to, and tradespersons at the development property municipally known as 861 St Clair Avenue West for residential on-street permit parking. 

 

Transportation Services has assessed the realignment of permit parking area 5C and the exclusion of the development property located at 861 St Clair Avenue West as requested by Toronto and East York Community Council, Item TE6.58, on May 22, 2019. Transportation Services is recommending approval of the exclusion as it will not impact negatively on St Clair Avenue West residents.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the Manager, Permits and Enforcement, Parking, Transportation Services - Realignment of Permit Parking Area 5C to Exclude the Development Located at 861 St. Clair Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134248.pdf

TE7.88 - Parking Amendments - Danforth Avenue, between Woodbine Avenue and Moberly Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Beaches - East York
Attention
Bill 1112 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition at all times on the north side of Danforth Avenue, between Woodbine Avenue and a point 61 metres west.

 

2. City Council rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., on the north side of Danforth Avenue, between a point 52 metres east of Woodington Avenue and a point 61 metres west of Woodbine Avenue.   

 

3. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Danforth Avenue, between Woodbine Avenue and a point 30.5 metres west.

 

4. City Council prohibit standing at all times on the north side of Danforth Avenue, between a point 30.5 metres west of Woodbine Avenue and a point 25 metres further west.

Origin

(June 4, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Danforth Avenue between Woodbine Avenue and Moberly Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval to amend the existing parking regulations on the north side of Danforth Avenue, between Woodbine Avenue and Moberly Avenue to prohibit stopping and standing at all times.  The proposed amendment will deter accessible permit holders from parking at this location, and will improve transit operations and vehicle movements by maintaining a clear passage for westbound vehicles on Danforth Avenue, west of Woodbine Avenue.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 4, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Parking Amendments - Danforth Avenue, between Woodbine Avenue and Moberly Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134258.pdf

TE7.89 - Parking Amendments - Kingston Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Beaches - East York
Attention
Bill 1113 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the west and north side of Kingston Road, between a point 126 metres west of Main Street and a point 18 metres further west.

 

2. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays on the west and north side of Kingston Road, between a point 126 metres west of Main Street and a point 18 metres further west.

 

3. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Kingston Road, between a point 126 metres west of Main Street and a point 18 metres further west.

Origin

(June 6, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Kingston Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval to prohibit stopping at all times on the north side Kingston Road, approximately 5.5 metres east and west of the mutual driveway access and egress for 580 and 600 Kingston Road.  The proposed stopping prohibition will prohibit motorists from parking close to the shared driveway access and will address the egress sightline visibility concerns expressed by residents.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 6, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Parking Amendments - Kingston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134263.pdf

TE7.91 - Traffic Control Signals - Yonge Street and Price Street/Marlborough Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals on Yonge Street and Price Street/Marlborough Avenue.

Origin

(May 30, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Yonge Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting that Council not authorize the installation of traffic control signals on Yonge Street and Price Street/Marlborough Avenue as the technical justification for the installation of traffic control signals is not satisfied.  Therefore, the installation of traffic control signals on Yonge Street and Price Street/Marlborough Avenue, is not recommended.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2019) Report and Attachment 1 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Traffic Control Signals - Yonge Street and Price Street/Marlborough Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134289.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 18, 2019) Letter from Robert Lantos (TE.Supp.TE7.91.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/comm/communicationfile-95383.pdf

TE7.93 - Right-Turn-on-Red Prohibition - Queen Street West and Peter Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
Bill 1114 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council prohibit right-turns on a red signal at all times for northbound traffic on Peter Street at Queen Street West.

 

Origin

(June 5, 2019) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Queen Street West and Peter Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting authority from City Council to introduce a right-turn-on-red prohibition for northbound traffic on Peter Street at Queen Street West.

 

This prohibition is recommended to improve safety at the intersection.  This prohibition will increase pedestrian, cyclist and motorist safety, especially for northbound cyclists on Peter Street where a bike box is being installed to accommodate cyclists turning onto Soho Street via Queen Street West.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 5, 2019) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Right-Turn-on-Red Prohibition - Queen Street West and Peter Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134262.pdf

TE7.122 - Endorsement of Toronto International Film Festival Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council endorse the request for 4:00 a.m. extensions to licensed hours for indoor spaces only, for those businesses listed in Revised Attachment 1 to the letter (June 10, 2019) from Councillor Cressy, and advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection, with Revised Attachment 1 amended by deleting the following establishment:

 

- Casa Loma.

 

2. City Council request the City Clerk to notify the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario and the event coordinator for the Toronto International Film Festival, that temporary patio extensions are not endorsed through this decision and that each establishment must apply individually through the City's temporary liquor licence application process. 

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council designated the Toronto International Film Festival taking place from September 5-15, 2019, as an "event of municipal significance" under Chapter 27-18, Delegation to Community Council.

Origin

(June 10, 2019) Report from Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York

Summary

The Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) is requesting consideration by the City of Toronto to be declared, for liquor licensing purposes, as an event of municipal significance and for the City to advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the City has no objection to the event taking place.

 

The City of Toronto, at its meeting of March 27 and 28, 2019, by resolution in Item EX3.7, established criteria for the City Clerk to declare, for liquor licensing purposes, of an event as municipally significant and to advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the City has no objection to the event taking place.

 

The Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) is seeking temporary liquor licences for the establishments listed in Attachment 1.   The City Clerk's delegated authority cannot be exercised for some of these premises as they are requesting extensions that do not meet the criteria for the City Clerk's delegated authority (for example, serving of alcohol outdoors later than 11 pm).

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 10, 2019) Letter from Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York - Endorsement of Toronto International Film Festival Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134416.pdf
(June 10, 2019) Revised Attachment 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135360.pdf
(June 10, 2019) Attachment 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134417.pdf

TE7.123 - Closure of a Portion of Westbound Fleet Street, Between Bathurst Street and Iannuzzi Street to Improve Road Safety and Public Realm

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
Bill 1160 has been submitted on this item

Public Notice Given

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council authorize the permanent closure to vehicular traffic the northerly westbound lane on Fleet Street, between Bathurst Street and Iannuzzi Street, as shown in Attachment 1 - Layout Plan attached to the report (June 17, 2019) from the Director, Project Design and Management, Transportation Services.

 

2. Subject to the approval of Recommendation 1 above, City Council authorize the amendments to traffic regulations set out in Attachment 2 of the report (June 17, 2019) from the Director, Project Design and Management, Transportation Services.

 

3. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect to the recommendations above, including the introduction of any Bills that may be required.

Origin

(June 17, 2019) Report from the Director, Project Design and Management, Transportation Services

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting approval to close to vehicular traffic the northerly westbound lane on Fleet Street, between Bathurst Street and Iannuzzi Street, in order to improve safety and public realm. This change would simplify the intersection for motorists and pedestrians alike by eliminating a redundant right-turn movement at a busy intersection, shorten the north-south pedestrian crossing distance on the west side of Bathurst Street, and accommodate public realm improvements.

 

This project is consistent with the City Council approved Fort York Neighbourhood Public Realm Plan, the Fort York and Railway Lands West Neighbourhoods Class Environmental Assessment Study, the Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Plan Study, the Waterfront Transit Network Plan, and the Vision Zero Road Safety Plan.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 17, 2019) Report and Attachments 1 - 2 from the Director, Project Design and Management, Transportation Services - Closure of a portion of westbound Fleet Street, between Bathurst Street and Iannuzzi Street to Improve Road Safety and Public Realm
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-134832.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 14, 2019) Letter from Tim Kocur (TE.Supp.TE7.123.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/comm/communicationfile-95384.pdf

TE7.124 - Appointment of Public Members to the Moss Park Arena Board

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

2. City Council waive the two-term limit provision of the Public Appointments Policy and appoint the following candidate to the Moss Park Arena Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending June 26, 2023 and until a successor is appointed:

 

· Jo Gladding

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council:

 

1. Appointed the following candidates to the Moss Park Arena Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on June 26, 2023, and until successors are appointed:

 

· Justin Derry

· Daniel Ongaro

· Alexandra Panousis

Origin

(June 17, 2019) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

At its meeting on December 4, 5, and 13, 2018, City Council amended the Public Appointments process to authorize the City Clerk to shortlist, interview and recommend candidates to Community Councils for appointment to the Moss Park Arena Board.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 17, 2019) Report from the City Clerk - Appointment of Public Members to the Moss Park Arena Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135246.pdf
(June 17, 2019) Attachment 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135205.pdf

TE7.125 - Parking Amendments on Vaughan Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Attention
Bill 1115 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council rescind a portion of the existing school bus loading zone in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., daily, on the northeast side of Vaughan Road between a point 15 metres southeast of Alameda Avenue and a point 14 metres further southeast.

Origin

(June 25, 2019) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 12 St. Paul's

Summary

The Oakwood Vaughan Community Organization (OVCO) had reached out to my office to find a solution for sightline concerns identified at the intersection of Vaughan Road and Alameda Avenue. Due to the presence of a school bus loading zone for the Davisville Junior Public School at 529 Vaughan Road, there was an obstruction of sightlines for motorists trying to get from Alameda Avenue onto Vaughan Road.

 

To address the concerns, my office coordinated a site visit with Traffic Operations, OVCO, the School Principal, and Toronto District School Board (TDSB) staff. At the meeting, it was agreed that the best approach to address this is to amend the school loading zone and allow for more space for motorists to see incoming traffic. Both OVCO and the school support the change, with the condition of installing safety railings for students in the portion that would have the loading zone rescinded, to ensure students are protected from live traffic. The safety railings have been installed by Transportation Services on June 19, 2019, meeting the condition provided. Therefore, I would like to proceed with the requested by-law change as specified underneath.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 25, 2019) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 12 St. Paul's - Parking Amendments on Vaughan Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135248.pdf

TE7.126 - Extending the Road Alteration and Parking Amendment Pilot Project - Avenue Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - Toronto - St. Paul's

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:


1. City Council authorize an amendment to the previously approved lane configuration on Avenue Road, between Lynwood Avenue and Balmoral Avenue, adopted by City Council on July 4, 5, 6 and 7, 2017 under Item TE25.88 entitled 'Road Alteration and Parking
Amendment Pilot Project – Avenue Road', generally as shown in the attached Drawing 421G-3393, dated April 2019.

 

2. City Council, contingent upon approval of Recommendation 1 above, authorize the continuation of the Road Alteration and Parking Amendment Pilot Project on Avenue Road, between Lynwood Avenue and Balmoral Avenue, adopted under Item TE25.88 on July 4, 5, 6 and 7, 2017 for an additional period of one year. The commencement of the new one-year trial period will begin upon the installation of the new lane configuration set out in Recommendation 1 under Drawing 421G-3393.

Origin

(June 25, 2019) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 12 St. Paul's

Summary

 City Council on July 4, 5, 6 and 7, 2017 adopted Item TE25.88 entitled 'Road Alteration and Parking Amendment Pilot Project -Avenue Road' and in so doing, approved the alteration of Avenue Road, between Lynwood Avenue and Balmoral Avenue, generally as shown on Drawing No. 421G-2393, dated February 2017. Upon completion of a one-year trial period, Avenue Road is to be returned to its previous conditions.

 

Since the installation of the safety elements of the pilot project, my office has received positive feedback from the school and parents who take their children to Brown Junior Public School, along with advocates for more pedestrian safety on Avenue Road. We have also received constructive feedback as to how these alterations can be enhanced further, so that they can provide for more access and safety for cyclists as well as enhance traffic flow.

 

In response to this feedback, Traffic Operations has developed a new lane configuration that we want to implement for a year and observe how these changes improve the overall effect of the pilot. The right-most lane will be a through/right turn lane, the centre lane will be a through lane and the left-most lane will be a through/left turn lane. The introduction of a through/left-turn lane beginning approximately 37 metres north of Balmoral Avenue generally as shown on Drawing No. 421G3393, date April 2019, will provide a separate storage for southbound left-turning vehicles. The width of the pilot area within the right-most lane has been decreased in order to provide a lane width increase to the centre lane. The increased lane width is intended to provide additional separation between a cyclist and a vehicle who are both travelling in the centre lane alongside the pilot area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 25, 2019) Letter and Attachment 1 from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 12 St. Paul's - Extending the Road Alteration and Parking Amendment Pilot Project -Avenue Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135410.pdf

TE7.129 - Leslie Street and Lake Shore Boulevard - Intersection Safety

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommend:

 

1. City Council direct Transportation Services to implement a "No Right Turn on Red Prohibition" from southbound Leslie Street to westbound Lake Shore Boulevard, in the event that this is not recommended through the Leslieville Traffic Management and Mitigation Study.

Origin

(June 24, 2019) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 14 Toronto-Danforth

Summary

Dear Chair and members of the Toronto and East York Community Council,

 

The intersection of Leslie and Lakeshore is one that has seen a lot of changes over the past few years. From the Leslie Barns construction to the commercial development on the South West Corner, to cars accessing Lakeshore, new traffic challenges have arisen.

 

During the Leslie Barns construction, a right-turn on red prohibition was implemented for cars turning from southbound Leslie to Westbound Lakeshore. Many cyclists and pedestrian felt that this improved safety. Unfortunately after the construction finished the prohibition was removed. The advocacy group Doctors for Safe Cycling has asked that this prohibition be made permanent to improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists on the Martin Goodman Trail and heading towards the Leslie Street Spit. I am happy to support this request.

 

The intersection is currently under review as part of the Leslieville Traffic Study but in the event that study does not make the changes, I want to ensure that this request can be dealt with separately.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 24, 2019) Letter from Councillor Fletcher, Ward 14 Toronto - Danforth - Leslie Street and Lake Shore Boulevard - Intersection Safety
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135409.pdf

TE7.137 - Naming of a Public Laneway, South of Elm, between Bay and Yonge

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale
Attention
The Director, Engineering Support Services, Engineering and Construction Services has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE.7.137a for information)

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council submits the Item to City Council without recommendation.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Director, Engineering Support Services, Engineering and Construction Services to submit a report to the July 16, 2019 meeting of City Council on the feasibility of renaming a public laneway, south of Elm, between Bay and Yonge Streets in honour of Harry Barberian, to "Harry Barberian Lane"

Origin

(June 25, 2019) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 11 University-Rosedale

Summary

In honour of the 60th anniversary of Barberian's Steak House at 7 Elm Street, the owners would like to name the public laneway south of the property for Harry Barberian, the restaurant's founder.

 

Barberian passed away in 2014. He began his career as a short order cook for a circus' railroad dining car, and went on to found the landmark steakhouse in 1959. He played an important role in Toronto's food scene and history, opening multiple restaurants, writing about restaurant science for numerous publications, and acting as a consultant in the food and beverage industry.

 

The current owners of Barberian's are planning on submitting a formal laneway renaming submission to the City as soon as possible, in consultation with the local BIA, to name the laneway "Harry Barberian Lane." However, the 60th anniversary celebration for Barberian's will be occurring in September, before TEYCC has the opportunity to consider their application.

 

The owners are hoping that if their application is approved, a name unveiling ceremony can coincide with the anniversary celebration in September. It would be much appreciated if City Staff can consider their application in the coming weeks, and report back to July 16 City Council on their findings.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 25, 2019) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 11 University-Rosedale - Naming of a Public Laneway, South of Elm, between Bay and Yonge
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-135444.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 9, 2019) Supplementary report from the Director, Engineering Support Services, Engineering and Construction Services on Naming of an Existing Public Lane located west of Yonge Street, extending southerly from Elm Street (TE7.137a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135756.pdf

New Business - Meeting 9

CC9.1 - Report Regarding the Conduct of Former Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(July 9, 2019) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:

 

1. City Council receive this report for information.

Summary

The Integrity Commissioner has jurisdiction to conduct inquiries pursuant to the authorities in the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and Chapter 3 of the Toronto Municipal Code.  Section 4.4(H) of Chapter 3 of the Toronto Municipal Code requires the Integrity Commissioner to report to City Council when a complaint is sustained in whole or in part. 

 

This Report for Action transmits to City Council the Commissioner’s investigation report regarding a complaint made by a member of the public alleging that former Councillor Justin Di Ciano contravened Article VII (Election Campaign Work) of the Code of Conduct. 

 

After an investigation, the Integrity Commissioner has concluded that the former Councillor contravened Articles VI (Use of City Property, Services and Other Resources and VII (Election Campaign Work).  The Commissioner recommends that City Council receive this report for information and impose no penalty or remedial action.

Background Information

(July 9, 2019) Cover report from the Integrity Commissioner on the Conduct of Former Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano (CC9.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135743.pdf
(July 9, 2019) Integrity Commissioner Report Regarding the Conduct of Former Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135744.pdf

CC9.2 - Ombudsman Toronto Enquiry Report: Review of the Toronto Transit Commission's Investigation of a February 18, 2018 Incident Involving Transit Fare Inspectors

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
To be considered after Item EX7.10

Origin

(July 9, 2019) Report from the Ombudsman

Recommendations

The Ombudsman recommends that City Council adopt the report and in so doing, request that the Toronto Transit Commission implement all of the recommendations.

Summary

Pursuant to section 170(2) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 (COTA), Ombudsman Toronto has concluded an Enquiry. The Enquiry consisted of a review of the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Investigation of a February 18, 2018 incident involving Transit Fare Inspectors.

 

We hereby table with City Council for its July 2019 session the Enquiry Report, dated July 9, 2019.

Background Information

(July 9, 2019) Cover report from the Ombudsman on Review of the Toronto Transit Commission's Investigation of a February 18, 2018 Incident Involving Transit Fare Inspectors (CC9.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135716.pdf
(July 9, 2019) Ombudsman Toronto Enquiry Report: Review of the Toronto Transit Commission's Investigation of a February 18, 2018 Incident Involving Transit Fare Inspectors
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135717.pdf
Presentation from the Ombudsman on Enquiry Report: Review of the TTC's Investigation of a February 18, 2018 Incident Involving Transit Fare Inspectors
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136146.pdf

CC9.3 - Appointment of Public Members to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal

Origin

(June 3, 2019) Letter from the Nominating Panel, Administrative Penalty Tribunal, transmitted by the City Clerk.

Recommendations

The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal.

 

The Nominating Panel – Administrative Penalty Tribunal recommends that:  

 

1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal, who will serve as public members for a term of office ending on June 20, 2023, and until successors are appointed:

 

Natasha Bronfman

Ben Drory

Suzanne Graves

Jenny Gumbs

Larry Swartz

Helen Walsh

 

2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1, 2 and 3 to the report (May 27, 2019) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal.
 

Candidates' biographies:

 

Natasha Bronfman

 

Natasha Bronfman is an experienced adjudicator with Ontario’s Consent and Capacity Board and holds a Certificate in Adjudication for Administrative Agencies, Boards and Tribunals and a Certificate in Mental Health Law from Osgoode Hall Law School. She is Secretary to the Board of a children’s charity and also sits on the Board of the Canadian Mental Health Association, Toronto Branch and is Chair of its QA committee. Natasha is also a member of the Downtown Toronto Human Service and Justice Coordinating Committee.

 

Ben Drory

 

An experienced adjudicator and mediator who has conducted many hearings, pre-hearings, mediations, and investigations. Accredited as a Chartered Arbitrator and Chartered Mediator by the ADR Institute of Canada – Canada’s highest ADR designations. Works skillfully in diverse subject matters. Smart, impartial, and efficient, with sound judgment and tact. A director of the ADR Institute of Ontario, and a coach in York University’s Certificate in Dispute Resolution program.  

 

Suzanne Graves

 

Ms. Graves holds a Juris Doctor from Osgoode Hall Law School, a Master of Public Administration from Queen’s University and a Bachelor of Arts from the University of York in the United Kingdom. She is a member of the Law Society of Ontario and practiced law at the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General for over 20 years. Most recently she served as a part-time member of the Social Security Tribunal of Canada. 

 

Jenny Gumbs

 

A graduate of Ryerson University, Jenny has combined an active and successful career with a deep commitment to family and volunteerism. A former diplomat accredited to Canada, she proudly served her community while fulfilling a varied and challenging mandate. She is very actively involved with many community organizations, including Tropicana Community Services, Tarragon Theatre, The Sickle Cell Disease Association of Canada and BBPA.

 

Larry Swartz

 

Larry Swartz is a lawyer and CFA Charterholder with several professional financial designations. His practice includes governance, compliance, insurance, tax, trusts, mergers and acquisitions. He is a winner of the Award of Excellence from the Canadian Corporate Counsel Association Ontario and the Ontario Bar Association. Larry received the Canadian Bar Association National Sections Council Award of Excellence during his term as Chair of the Canadian Bar Association Pensions and Benefits Law Section.

 

Helen Walsh

 

Helen Walsh has over 25 years’ experience in civil litigation and employment law and has advocated before Ontario and Federal Courts and various tribunals. Most recently she was a mediator with the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. She has spoken and written on a variety of topics relating to her areas of practice and teaches and coaches in the area of dispute resolution.  Ms. Walsh holds a B.A. (Hons.) from the University of Toronto and a LL.B and LL.M. (ADR) from Osgoode Hall Law School.

Summary

On June 3, 2019, the Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal conducted interviews and recommended six candidates to City Council for appointment to Administrative Penalty Tribunal.

Background Information

(June 3, 2019) Decision Letter from the Nominating Panel - Administrative Penalty Tribunal (CC9.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135380.pdf
(May 27, 2019) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Public Members to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal (NM2.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135381.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Administrative Penalty Tribunal (previously distributed with item NM1.2)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Interview questions for June 3, 2019 (previously circulated under separate cover)
Confidential Attachment 3 - Interview schedule for June 3, 2019 (previously circulated under separate cover)

CC9.4 - Appointment of Public Members to the Committee of Adjustment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Attention
Bill 1118 has been submitted on this Item.

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Committee of Adjustment

Origin

(July 4, 2019) Letter from the Nominating Panel - Committee of Adjustment, transmitted by the City Clerk

Recommendations

The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Nominating Panel - Committee of Adjustment.

 

The Nominating Panel - Committee of Adjustment recommends that:

 

1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Committee of Adjustment for a term of office ending November 14, 2022 and until successors are appointed:

 

Etobicoke York Panel:

 

Laura Alderson

Danny Bellissimo

Michael Clark

Douglas Colbourne

Stan Kumorek

Michi McCloskey

Neil Palmer

Donald Taylor

 

North York Panel:

 

Nazila Atarodi

Giuseppe Bartolo

Denise Graham

Ron Hunt

Asif A. Khan

Paul Kidd

Thomas Klassen

Isaac Lallouz

Nadini Sankar-Peralta

Allan Smithies

 

Scarborough Panel:

 

Amy Emm

Hena Kabir

Anne McCauley

Gary McKay

Muhammad Saeed

 

Toronto and East York Panel:

 

Zaheer Bhyat

Yim Chan

Aaron Cheng

Larry Clay

Donald Granatstein

Carl Knipfel

Kathleen Larsen

Bruce Mullock

Nancy Oomen

Peter Reed

Nimrod Salamon

Lisa Valentini

 

2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1 to 7 to the report (May 29, 2019) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Committee of Adjustment.

 

Candidates' biographies:

 

Etobicoke York

 

Laura Alderson

 

A long-time community activist, Laura has served on the Boards of UrbanArts, Farmers' Markets Ontario, the Clean Train Coalition (Finalist, Green Toronto Award, 2012) and the Weston Village Residents' Association. An EDCO Award winner for Innovative Marketing Practices for the Film Resource Guide "Lights...Camera...York!", she currently sits on the Artscape Weston Common Steering Committee, is a member of the ABC Residents' Association and a Director of the Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas.

 

Danny Bellissimo

 

Danny Bellissimo's interest in the relationship of people to buildings and open space started in the School of Architecture in Toronto with a focus on sociology and community development. As a Community Improvement Planner for the City of Toronto, he oversaw numerous Neighbourhood Improvement Plans which included community facilities, public square, streetscape, and public art. He also initiated the City's Commercial Facade Improvement Programs in numerous City neighbourhoods.

 

Michael Clark

 

Michael Clark has resided in the City of Toronto for 35 years. He graduated from Osgoode Hall Law School in 1983 and was called to the Ontario Bar in 1985. As an executive and in-house lawyer, Michael has over 25 years of experience in real estate development and property management. He was first appointed to the Committee of Adjustment for the former City of York in 1994 and subsequently served on the Midtown and Toronto/East York panels following amalgamation from 1998 to 2006.

 

Douglas Colbourne

 

Doug Colbourne has extensive experience as an arbitrator and mediator through years of conducting hearings for Municipal, Provincial and federal Governments, Boards, Commissions and Committees. He has extensive experience involving Ontario Provincial Planning Act policies and procedures as well as City requirements. He has a background in the construction and real estate business and as a Certified Professional Accountant.

 

Stan Kumorek

 

A life-long resident of Toronto, Stan is a recently retired manager of real estate and facilities from the Catholic Children's Aid Society of Toronto.  He holds a degree in Urban Planning and Public Administration and is a former Metro Toronto Hydro Commissioner and former board member of the Toronto Parking Authority. He is active in a number of community organizations and boards and is currently a local leader with Scouts Canada.

 

Michi McCloskey

 

Michi McCloskey has a background in urban planning and interdisciplinary design. As a Planner, Michi has worked on complex development and policy projects across Ontario and has assisted with the design and facilitation of numerous community engagement initiatives. Michi has worked in both urban and rural municipal settings, where she has gained valuable insights on community visioning, land use policy, zoning, and real estate acquisition and expropriation processes.

 

Neil Palmer

 

Neil has been active in the planning industry at both the public and private sector since 1990.  He has unique experience in dealing with Committee of Adjustment matters at the Ontario Municipal Board, processing active appeal cases at the Board, ensuring relevant material was before the Board for hearing, representing clients at the Committee of Adjustment while employed at a law firm, representing his employer before Committees of Adjustment for minor variances, severances and easements.

 

Donald Taylor

 

Don retired in 2017 after 43 years in public service.  Hired by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing as a planner in 1974, Don went on to become a Chief Negotiator with the Ministry's Municipal Boundaries Branch.  In this position, Don successfully led major municipal amalgamation projects, including London/Middlesex and South Simcoe County. Don joined the City of Markham in 2005, where he served as Manager, Executive Operations in the office of the Chief Administrative Officer.

 

 

North York

 

Nazila Atarodi

 

Nazila Atarodi is an architectural and urban design professional with over 14 years of Canadian and international experience. Nazila received her Master of Urban Design from the University of Toronto, where she was a recipient of the Gordon Cressy Leadership Award. She also holds a Master of Architecture from Tehran Azad University. Nazila works as a Director of the Architecture and Design Department at C-Living Inc.

 

Giuseppe Bartolo

 

Giuseppe Bartolo holds an undergraduate and master’s degree in urban planning from the University of Waterloo and is a reserve army officer in the Canadian Army.  He has resided in Toronto for the past five years and wants to improve his community through the dedication of time and effort.  He has managed many construction and development projects for the private sector and brings a strong professional background to the role. His desire is to ensure strong community-led and sustainable development in Toronto.

 

Denise Graham

 

Denise Graham is a Registered Professional Planner who retired from the City of Toronto in 2011. She was a Senior Planner in the City Planning Division and holds a Bachelor of Applied Arts (Applied Geography) from Ryerson. She is a Member of the Canadian Institute of Planners and Ontario Professional Planners Institute. Denise continues to serve her community as a member of the Board of Directors of the Fairlawn Neighbourhood Centre and co-coordinates a lunch program for seniors.

 

Ron Hunt

 

Ron Hunt is a University graduate with over 35 years of land development experience. He has had extensive experience with quasi-judicial committees in the areas of municipal appeals to Zoning By-law decisions and the resolution of disputes regarding property-related issues and is an objective and well-reasoned contributor to tribunals.

 

Asif A. Khan

 

Asif Khan is a retired Civil Engineer who was employed for 28 years as a Senior Building Official with the City of Toronto and former City of Scarborough. He has extensive knowledge on By-laws, zoning, planning and other building development issues. Asif has gained community service experience at the Municipal, Provincial and Federal levels including as chair of the Committee of Adjustment, Property Standard, Advisory Council on Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Asif is recipient of Ontario Medal of Good Citizenship.

 

Paul Kidd

 

Paul Kidd has lived in Toronto since 1963 and ran a land surveying business in downtown Toronto until his retirement in 2018. He graduated from the University of Toronto with Bachelor of Science degree with a specialty in Land Surveying and has certification in GIS. He has also been an active neighbourhood volunteer.

 

Thomas Klassen

 

Thomas Klassen earned a MSc in Urban and Regional Planning, University of Toronto. He has worked for the Ontario Ministry of Housing and was member of the Canadian Institute of Planners. He is currently a professor of public policy and administration at York University. He has lived in Toronto for more than 40 years, and currently resides in North York. He has been involved in community organizations for many years, particularly in co-operative housing.

 

Isaac Lallouz

 

Mr. Lallouz is a professional engineer who previously led the Department of Engineers for a national insurance corporation. He has experience conducting committee/commission hearings in the City of Toronto as well as at the provincial level. He has sat on the boards and contributed to fundraising for charity organizations, and is a member of numerous professional organizations including the Professional Engineers of Ontario and the Society of Ontario Adjudicators and Regulators.

 

Nadini Sankar-Peralta

 

Nadini has worked in both federal and provincial governments in senior positions advising and negotiating on policy, programs and government resources. Nadini is also an experienced, multi-lingual accredited mediator in good standing with the ADR Institute of Ontario and the Ontario Association of Family Mediation. She has a Masters Education and volunteers within her community, serving as Vice Chair on the Board of Directors for the a local Community Health Centre and mediating youth justice cases.

 

Allan Smithies

 

Allan Smithies graduated from Sheridan College's Transportation Planning program in 1978, and was employed by the former City of Etobicoke in a number of positions including Transportation Planner and Manager of Transportation Planning. Most recently, Allan served as Manager of Traffic Planning/Right of Way Management for the City of Toronto from 1999 until his retirement in March 2014.

 

 

Scarborough

 

Amy Emm

 

Amy is a MCIP, RPP Senior Planner with over 12 years of private and public sector professional planning and development experience. She provides a full range of planning services working towards the securing of approvals for land development or redevelopment. From the due diligence stages to the final registration of plans, she offers expertise in all applications under the Planning Act.

 

Hena Kabir

 

Hena Kabir is an architectural graduate and a Registered Professional Planner with almost 20 years of professional experience in architectural design, urban planning, urban design and municipal management. She is a strong advocate of citizen participation in city and community building and believes residents should have the opportunity to engage with and contribute towards creating beautiful and livable neighborhoods. Hena is passionate about City building and making neighborhoods safe and attractive to live, work and play in.

 

Anne McCauley

 

Anne McCauley is a professional land use planner with over 40 years of experience of working in the municipal sector.  She has also been involved in numerous advisory committees, associations, and community initiatives.

 

Gary McKay

 

Gary McKay is a lawyer with many years of experience in municipal, planning and land use law.  He has conducted many hearings before Administrative Tribunals throughout Ontario. He holds a B.A. from the University of Toronto, and a law degree from Queen's University in Kingston.

 

Muhammad Saeed

 

Muhammad Saeed has been involved for over fifteen years in project management, group facilitations partnerships and community engagement. He has worked on different positions and has strong skills in proactively managing important and time sensitive projects, developing innovative solutions to critical problems, balancing stakeholder’s expectations and working collaboratively with the team members for achievement of desired goals. He has Master’s in Public Administration.

 

 

Toronto and East York

 

Zaheer Bhyat

 

Zaheer Bhyat has served as a teacher and Administrator with the Toronto District School Board for over 20 years. He entered the University of Toronto and York University where he completed his BA, B.Ed., M.E.S, M.A. and Doctorate degrees. He has also been an entrepreneur, Urban Planner in Alberta, and CIDA in Lesotho. His eclectic background and experiences have afforded him a global perspective. He brings leadership, entrepreneurial and educational skills, and strategic thinking. He currently practices as a mediator.

 

Yim Chan

 

A member of the Ontario Architects Association since 1995, Yim has a portfolio of a large variety of projects, ranging from residential to institutional, health-care, large-scale theme parks and high-rise commercial towers. She has in-depth knowledge of City Planning, construction principles and practices including project management, the Ontario Building Code, and regulatory approval process. She is an active member in the community and has been doing volunteering work for many years.

 

Aaron Cheng

 

Aaron Cheng is an architect and founder of C& Partners Architects Inc. which designs and provides architectural solutions to clients primarily in the healthcare and childcare sectors. Aaron has also been involved in numerous community boards and committees.

 

Larry Clay

 

Larry Clay was Assistant Deputy Minister of the Ontario Growth Secretariat. As Assistant Deputy Minister, Larry oversaw the Places to Grow Act and Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, designed to guide and shape growth across the entire Greater Golden Horseshoe. Prior to joining the Ontario Growth Secretariat, Larry was Director of the Central Municipal Services Office at the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing where he oversaw municipal service delivery, governance issues, and land use planning approvals in the Greater Toronto Area.

 

Donald Granatstein

 

Donald L. Granatstein is an investigator with ADR Chambers Banking Ombudsman, a mediator with ADR Chambers, and practices law full-time. Don has a LLB and BA from University of Toronto, an LL.M. from Osgoode Hall and certificates in Dispute Resolution from Harvard Law, University of Toronto, the LSUC and the University of Windsor. Don has appeared before courts at all levels and before many tribunals.

 

Carl Knipfel

 

Carl is a creative architect, planner and marketing expert with extensive municipal planning experience. He has been involved in the design of housing , education, recreation  and government projects. He has authored municipal urban design guidelines, official plan design policies and worked on the redevelopment of the core areas of many Ontario municipalities. He assisted with initiating design partnerships for OCAD University.

 

Kathleen Larsen

 

Kathleen Larsen moved to Toronto from Vancouver BC in 2017 where she was employed as a Development/Heritage Planner for 27 years. She has an educational background in urban planning and design and a wealth of experience in municipal government planning.  Ms. Larsen is passionate about the planning process and since arriving has enthusiastically familiarized herself with Toronto’s many diverse neighbourhoods, and policy and planning framework.

 

Bruce Mullock

 

Bruce Mullock has served on the City of Toronto Committee of Adjustment since 2015. Formerly, he was appointed to the Borough of East York Planning Board, prior to municipal amalgamation. Bruce holds a B.A. from York University. He advanced through a full-term career in Toronto with Ian Martin Group. There, Bruce worked in close relationship with government and industry clients, providing engineering staffing services. He brings broad governance experience, having served on executive teams and on the boards of industry associations.

 

Nancy Oomen

 

Nancy is an accomplished government and community-relations professional who spent almost two decades with the City of Toronto where she worked with diverse stakeholders to achieve objectives using solid judgement and effective mediation. Nancy has been involved with her local ratepayers' association for about 30 years and she has served several terms as president. She is a highly effective project coordinator and chair of the "Blossom" fundraising event which raises funds for local charities.

 

Peter Reed

 

Peter Reed is an urban planner with more than 15 years experience in the public and private sectors, having worked extensively in Toronto, throughout Ontario, in the United States and overseas.  He most recently directed the Land Use Planning group at Infrastructure Ontario, an agency of the Provincial government, in protecting and enhancing the value of public land and building assets.  Peter now raises his three young children full time in Toronto’s west end.

 

Nimrod Salamon

 

Nimrod Salamon is an urban planner with 30 years of experience who retired from the City of Toronto as a Senior Planner in 2015. He has worked as an urban planner with experience in community planning, development review, policy and Zoning By-law review.

 

Lisa Valentini

 

Lisa Valentini is a lawyer and long-time resident of the City of Toronto. She received her undergraduate and law degrees from Queen's University before articling in Toronto and being called to the bar in 2000. Her professional career has been exclusively with provincial and municipal governments, including significant experience advising municipal councils, departments and committees during her nine years as an in-house lawyer for municipalities in and around the Greater Toronto area.

Summary

On June 4 and 6, and on July 4, 2019, the Nominating Panel - Committee of Adjustment conducted interviews and recommended thirty-five candidates for appointment to the Committee of Adjustment.

Background Information

(July 4, 2019) Decision Letter from the Nominating Panel - Committee of Adjustment (CC9.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135757.pdf
(May 29, 2019) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Public Members to the Committee of Adjustment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135759.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Committee of Adjustment (previously circulated with Item NA1.2)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Interest in Reappointment from Current Members of the Committee of Adjustment (previously circulated with Item NA1.2)
Confidential Attachment 3 - Diversity Information Summary for Current Public Members of the Committee of Adjustment (previously circulated with Item NA1.2)
Confidential Attachment 4 - Interview schedule for June 4 and 6, 2019 (previously circulated under separate cover)
Confidential Attachment 5 - Interview schedule for July 4, 2019 (previously circulated under separate cover)
Confidential Attachment 6 - Interview questions for June 4 and 6, 2019 (previously circulated under separate cover)
Confidential Attachment 7 - Interview questions for July 4, 2019 (previously circulated under separate cover)

CC9.5 - Appointment of Public Members to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board

Origin

(July 9, 2019) Letter from the Corporations Nominating Panel, transmitted by the City Clerk

Recommendations

The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Corporations Nominating Panel.

 

The Corporations Nominating Panel recommends that:  

 

1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending July 16, 2022 and until successors are appointed:

 

Nikki Holland

Stephen Smith

   

2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 4 to the report (June 26, 2019) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board.

 

Candidates' biographies:

 

Nikki Holland

 

Nikki Holland is the President and CEO of Jewish Federations of Canada -UIA, manages two global offices and works with the Federations and Councils across Canada to promote Jewish life and run national programs. She is a seasoned communications and public affairs executive with extensive leadership expertise, having previously worked at the Carpenters Union District Council, Invest Toronto, Insurance Bureau of Canada, and the Provincial Government.  Nikki, a mom, lives and plays in Toronto.

 

Stephen Smith

 

Stephen has made significant contributions to the Board and guided several financial-related situations where his experience as CFO of Cara and Loblaw was invaluable. Stephen's hospitality and retail industry experience and background as a Chartered Accountant provide a solid base for a Board member who can add value to the oversight of the Metro Toronto Convention Centre on behalf of the community.

Summary

The Nominating Panel - Corporations will conduct interviews and recommend two candidates to City Council for appointment to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board.

Background Information

(July 9, 2019) Decision Letter from the Corporations Nominating Panel (CC9.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135778.pdf
(June 26, 2019) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Public Members to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135779.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board (previously circulated with Item NC4.1)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Diversity Data for Current Public Members on the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board (previously circulated with Item NC4.1)
Confidential Attachment 3 - Interview schedule for July 9, 2019 (previously circulated under separate cover)
Confidential Attachment 4 - Interview questions for July 9, 2019 (previously circulated under separate cover)

CC9.6 - Council direction regarding payment of legal fees related to a Code of Conduct Investigation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Clerk

Recommendations

The City Clerk recommends that:  

 

1. City Council adopt one of the following options in response to a request for reimbursement of legal expenses:

 

Option A - pay the current legal fees and any future fees

City Council authorize the payment of legal fees above the $20,000 limit in the amount of $25,269.24, as outlined in the letter (June 27, 2019) from Gardiner Roberts and City Council direct that further invoices related to this matter also be reimbursed.

 

Option B - pay the current legal fees but no future fees

City Council authorize the payment of legal fees above the $20,000 limit in the amount of $25,269.24, as outlined in the letter (June 27, 2019) from Gardiner Roberts and City Council direct that no further invoices related to this matter be reimbursed.

 

Option C - do not pay any legal fees

City Council direct that no further legal costs be covered for the former Councillor related to this matter.

Summary

The City Clerk has received a request from a former Council member to pay legal expenses related a Code of Conduct investigation. Under the Constituency Services and Office Budget Policy, legal fees related to Code of Conduct investigations are eligible expenses. Automatic payment is up to a limit of $20,000. As the submitted request brings the legal fees related to this investigation over the limit, the City Clerk is seeking Council direction on payment of the additional legal fees.

Background Information

(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Clerk on Council direction regarding payment of legal fees related to a Code of Conduct Investigation (CC9.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135721.pdf
Attachment 1 - Letter dated June 27, 2019 from Gardiner Roberts re: Claim for Reimbursement of Legal Fees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135722.pdf

CC9.7 - More Homes, More Choice Act - Budgetary Considerations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(July 8, 2019) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Recommendations

The Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council receive this report for information.

Summary

This report identifies the budgetary considerations related to the implementation of Bill 108, the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019 and the measures staff are taking, both to work with the government to ensure appropriate regulations are adopted, and to communicate to program areas reasonable assumptions for 2020 budget purposes.

Background Information

(July 8, 2019) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on More Homes, More Choice Act - Budgetary Considerations (CC9.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135730.pdf
Attachment 1 - Letter from the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing dated June 7, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135731.pdf

CC9.8 - Minister's Approval of Official Plan Amendments 405 (Yonge-Eglinton) and 406 (Downtown) with Modifications and Staff's Preliminary Assessment of Potential Impacts of Bill 108

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 13 - Toronto Centre, 15 - Don Valley West

Origin

(July 12, 2019) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Recommendations

The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning recommends that:  

 

1. City Council receive this report for information.

Summary

This report summarizes the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing's (the "Minister") modifications of Official Plan Amendments 405 (Yonge-Eglinton) and 406 (Downtown). This report also provides a preliminary assessment of the potential effect of the Decisions and the impact associated with Bill 108 on the Secondary Plans.

 

Official Plan Amendments 405 and 406 ("OPA 405" and "OPA 406")

 

Official Plan Amendments for the Downtown and Yonge-Eglinton areas were submitted to the Minister pursuant to Section 26 of the Planning Act in August 2018. On June 5, 2019, the Minister issued two Notices of Decision (the "Decisions") approving Official Plan Amendment No. 405 (Yonge-Eglinton) and Official Plan Amendment No. 406 (Downtown Plan) with modifications. The Minister's Decisions are final and not subject to appeal. Additionally, in accordance with the Planning Act, the two OPAs cannot be amended for a 2 year period except at the determination of Council. The Official Plan Amendments are now in full force and effect.

 

Each Notice of Decision made a number of modifications to the respective Secondary Plans adopted by City Council. The Minister made 194 modifications to the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan and 224 modifications to the Downtown Plan. Many of the modifications are similar in both plans. The specificity, such as various numeric standards, that had been included in policy directions in both plans to provide certainty and predictability has been generally reduced and replaced with more policy guidance and less prescriptive terminology. Other similar changes to both OPAs included introducing new policies, such as an objective related to "transit optimization", directing transit-supportive development within the vicinity of transit stations.

 

Copies of both the in-force Secondary Plans which incorporate the modifications as well as redline versions which show the modifications are attached to this report as Attachments 1 through 4. 

 

Bill 108

 

Bill 108, which amends 13 pieces of legislation, received Royal Assent on June 6, 2019. It has not yet been proclaimed. A number of the modifications made to both Official Plan Amendments align with provisions in Bill 108, specifically as they relate to the new community benefits charge authority and the removal of an alternative parkland dedication requirement for the development or redevelopment of land for residential purposes.

 

In the absence of the detailed information to be released through Bill 108's implementing regulations, it is difficult to fully assess the implications of Bill 108 on the two Secondary Plans. Detailed analysis that was previously undertaken for the two areas, as well as ongoing work related to the infrastructure implementation strategies for both areas and parkland dedication will inform ongoing discussions with the Province on the regulations.

 

Background Information

(July 12, 2019) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Minister's Approval of Official Plan Amendments 405 (Yonge-Eglinton) and 406 (Downtown) with Modifications and Staff's Preliminary Assessment of Potential Impacts of Bill 108 and Attachment 5 (CC9.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135949.pdf
Attachment 1 - OPA 405 Redline
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135950.pdf
Attachment 2 - Final in-force OPA 405
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135951.pdf
Attachment 3 - OPA 406 Redline
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135952.pdf
Attachment 4 - Final in-force OPA 406
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135953.pdf
(July 8, 2019) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Minister's Approval of Official Plan Amendments 405 (Yonge-Eglinton) and 406 (Downtown) with Modifications and Staff's Preliminary Assessment of the Potential Impacts of Bill 108 - Notice of Pending Report (CC9.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135742.pdf

CC9.9 - 240 Markland Drive - Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke Centre

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City of Toronto and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(July 5, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A, if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Etobicoke Zoning Code to permit the development of two buildings including: a 9-storey residential apartment building fronting Bloor Street West with an integrated 3-storey residential townhouse block at the northwest corner of Broadfield Drive; and a 3-storey residential building at the northeast corner of Markland Drive and Sunplains Crescent.  Combined, these buildings would contain 164 units.  The existing 10-storey, 113 unit apartment building would be retained.

 

The owner appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal

Board, now Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT"), citing City Council's failure to make a decision within the prescribed time frame set out in the Planning Act.

 

At the June 26, 27, and 28, 2018 meeting of City Council, Council provided City Legal staff with direction to oppose the zoning amendment in its current form, but set out modifications to the development (reduction of the overall height of the Bloor building by 1 storey, and introducing terracing to the south end of the Bloor building) that could form the basis of a settlement.

 

The LPAT has held two pre-hearing conferences in this matter, and an 8-day hearing is scheduled to commence September 16, 2019

 

The purpose of this report is to request further instructions for the upcoming LPAT hearing.

Background Information

(July 5, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 240 Markland Drive - Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Request for Direction (CC9.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135727.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A

CC9.10 - 3429 Bloor Street West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(July 5, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1, if adopted by City Council, but that the remainder of the Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

DCMS Realty (Bloor-Islington) Inc. (the "Owner") is the owner of lands known municipally as 3429 Bloor Street West.  On June 27, 2017 the Owner applied for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment with respect to the subject lands in order to permit an 18-storey mixed-use building containing retail uses at-grade, office uses on the 2nd level and a retirement facility above.

 

On November 10, 2017 and January 15, 2018, the applicant filed appeals of the Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment applications, respectively, to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT"), citing Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the prescribed timelines of the Planning Act.  The LPAT has held two pre-hearing conferences in this matter, the first on April 5, 2018 and the second on October 9, 2018.  An 8-day hearing is scheduled to begin on September 3, 2019.

 

On June 17, 2019 the City received "with prejudice" revised plans from the applicant's solicitor on the appealed application.  The purpose of this report is to seek further instruction for the LPAT hearing of the appeals.

Background Information

(July 5, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 3429 Bloor Street West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions (CC9.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135826.pdf
Public Attachment 1- Settlement Offer Letter from Aird & Berlis, dated June 17, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135827.pdf
Public Attachment 2 - Revised With Prejudice Architectural Drawings dated June 14, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135828.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC9.11 - 995-1005 Broadview Avenue and 2 and 4 Mortimer Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation

Origin

(July 5, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege, and Confidential Attachments 2 amd 3 shall remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

Summary

1001 Broadview Avenue Inc. (the "Applicant") is the owner of lands municipally known as 995-1005 Broadview Avenue and 2 & 4 Mortimer Avenue (the "Subject Site").

 

Policy Background

 

The properties at 995-1005 Broadview Avenue are designated Mixed Use Areas in the Official Plan, which permit a broad range of uses and are generally where growth and intensification is targeted.  The properties at 2-4 Mortimer Avenue are designated Neighbourhoods, which are stable low-rise residential areas where physical changes must be sensitive, gradual and "fit" the existing physical character.

 

This site, specifically the properties at 995-1005 Broadview Avenue, fall within Site and Area Specific Policy 509 being Official Plan Amendment 343 ("OPA 343"), which was the result of the Broadview Avenue Planning Study.  City Council adopted OPA 343 on June 7, 2016.  However, OPA 343 was appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT).  On August 15, 2018, the LPAT approved OPA 343 save and except for three site-specific appeals that remain outstanding.  The lands with outstanding site-specific appeals are the following: 995-1005 Broadview Avenue and 2-4 Mortimer Avenue (the Subject Site); 1132 Broadview Avenue; and 954-958 Broadview Avenue and 72 Chester Hill Road.  All three of these site-specific appeals have site-specific development applications under way.

 

OPA 343 guides and manages moderate incremental development on Broadview Avenue, between Danforth Avenue and O'Connor Drive; complements, builds upon, and strengthens the physical character of the area as a whole and within each of its five character areas; conserves and reinforces the area's natural and cultural heritage; and ensures compatibility between existing and future development.

 

OPA 343 provides five character areas for Broadview Avenue, each area defined by its attributes in terms of function, built form and character.  The subject site, for the properties at 995-1005 Broadview Avenue, is within Character Area B, which allows for a maximum height of 5 storeys.  The properties at 2-4 Mortimer Road are not currently within OPA 343.  In addition to OPA 343, City Council also adopted Broadview Avenue Urban Design Guidelines which aid in guiding the implementation of the policies in OPA 343.

 

The Original Site-Specific Application

 

On November 23, 2017, the Applicant submitted an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to the City, proposing to develop a 10-storey (33.2 metres plus a 5.5 metre mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building at the lands municipally known as 995-1005 Broadview Avenue and 2-4 Mortimer Avenue (the "Original Application").  The Original Application proposed a gross floor area ("GFA") of 8,709.5 square metres: 8,260.5 square metres of residential and 449 square metres of retail.  The proposed Floor Space Index (FSI) of the Original Application was 5.66 times the area of the lot.  In order to facilitate this development, the Original Application proposed amendments to the Official Plan, including re-designation of 2-4 Mortimer Avenue from Neighbourhoods to Mixed Use Areas, and an amendment to Site and Area Specific Policy No. 509 (SASP 509) to allow for the construction of a 10-storey building.

 

On March 26, 2018, City Council adopted a refusal report (dated February 2, 2018) from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.  The Applicant appealed its Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") due to Council's decision (the "Appeal").  The Appeal is currently subject to the rules and procedures established by Bill 139.  The Appeal is adjourned pending the result of the Applicant's appeal of the City's Broadview Avenue Planning Study.

 

The Applicant's outstanding appeal of OPA 343 has been scoped to the Subject Site and is considered a legacy appeal before the LPAT assessed against the Planning Act tests prior to the enactment of Bill 139.  The site specific hearing of OPA 343 as it relates to this site is scheduled to be heard by the Tribunal on September 30, 2019 for 5 days.

 

Since the refusal report, 1001 Broadview Avenue Inc. has approached City Planning in an effort to address the concerns raised in the February 2, 2018 refusal report.

Background Information

(July 5, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 995-1005 Broadview Avenue and 2 and 4 Mortimer Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing (CC9.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135831.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2
Confidential Attachment 3

CC9.12 - 2779, 2781 Yonge Street and 15-17, 19-21 Strathgowan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Further Directions Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Appeal

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation

Origin

(July 5, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report, if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

Devron (YS) Ltd. (the "Applicant") is the owners of lands municipally known as 2779, 2781 Yonge Street & 15-17, 19-21 Strathgowan Avenue (the "Subject Site").  The Subject Site is located at the south-east corner of Yonge Street and Strathgowan Avenue.

 

On February 21, 2013, the former owner of the property, 1655584 Ontario Limited, submitted a Zoning By-law Amendment application to the City to permit the development of a 9-storey residential building with ground floor commercial uses (the "Application").  On November 28, 2014, the owner appealed the Application to the Ontario Municipal Board ("OMB") (now the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT")) as OMB/LPAT File No. PL141372.  On February 3, 2016, City Council adopted a settlement of the OMB appeal of the Application as Item CC.12.12.

 

A settlement hearing was held on May 12, 2016, and on June 8, 2016 the OMB issued its decision approving the Application (the "OMB Decision").  In the OMB Decision, the OMB withheld its final order until the City Solicitor has confirmed in writing that a Section 37 agreement has been executed and registered on title, that the City has issued notice of approval conditions for the site plan application, and that the zoning by-law amendments are in a final form to the satisfaction of all the parties.  To date, the final order of the OMB has not been issued as the conditions have yet to be fulfilled.  

 

At some time after the release of the OMB Decision, the Applicant acquired the Subject Site from the previous owner.  On May 3, 2019, following discussion with City staff through the course of the now ongoing site plan approvals process, the Applicant made a resubmission to the City with a revised design for the proposal (the "Revised Design").  This Revised Design includes changes to the proposal and the draft form of the zoning by-law amendments that City Council endorsed as a settlement and that is the subject of the OMB Decision.  The Revised Design was made following consultation and with the input of City Staff, neighbours, and the parties to the OMB appeal.  The Revised Design is public and is described in more detail in the "Comments" section below.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek further instructions from City Council.

 

A related rental housing demolition application has also been submitted in relation to the Application.  There are 28 existing rental dwelling units located on the Subject Property that are proposed to be demolished and replaced within the new development.  The Revised Design maintains the rental replacement as originally proposed.  On June 25, 2019, North York Community Council considered a Final Report regarding the rental housing demolition application for the Subject Property as Item NY7.5, and adopted Staff's recommendations.  Community Council has recommended that City Council approve the application for a rental housing demolition permit subject to the replacement of the 28 existing rental dwelling units and certain other conditions.  City Council will also consider that report at its meeting on July 16 and 17, 2019.   The Final Report regarding the rental housing demolition application should be considered in conjunction with this Solicitor's Report.

 

City Planning has been involved in the preparation of this report.

Background Information

(July 5, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 2779, 2781 Yonge Street and 15-17, 19-21 Strathgowan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Further Directions Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Appeal (CC9.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135749.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Applicant's Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135751.pdf
Public Appendix A to Public Attachment 1 - Architectural Plans
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135752.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC9.13 - Dundas Street West and Roncesvalles Avenue Built Form Study - Official Plan Amendment 421 and 421 Roncesvalles Avenue Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park
Attention
See also Item TE7.24

The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (CC9.13a with recommendations).

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation

Origin

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the Report (July 8, 2019) from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix "A" to the Report (July 8, 2019) from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Report (July 8, 2019) from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice and information, which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

Propeller Developments Inc., the owner of 421 Roncesvalles Avenue ("Propeller"), appealed Council's failure to enact the requested Zoning By-law Amendment (the "Appeal") to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") and Propeller has consolidated its Appeal with Council's refusal to issue a demolition permit for the building on the Subject Property.  The LPAT has scheduled a two-week hearing for these appeals commencing on January 13, 2020.

 

Propeller also appealed Official Plan Amendment 421 ("OPA 421"), the Dundas Street West and Roncesvalles Avenue Built Form Study Official Plan Amendment.  The LPAT has not scheduled a hearing date for Propeller's appeal of OPA 421, and the parties have not at this time informed the LPAT that they are ready to proceed. 

 

On May 8, 2019, Propeller's lawyer provided the City Solicitor with a "with prejudice" settlement offer, Public Attachment 1 and 2 to this Report.

 

The City Solicitor requires further instructions with respect to these appeals.

Background Information

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on Dundas Street West and Roncesvalles Avenue Built Form Study - Official Plan Amendment 421 and 421 Roncesvalles Avenue Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions (CC9.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135806.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Letter from Ritchie, Ketcheson, Hart & Biggart LLP dated May 8, 2019 regarding 421 Roncesvalles Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135809.pdf
Public Attachment 2 - Zoning By-law Amendment Plans and Drawings dated May 7, 2019 prepared by Superkul Architects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135810.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135808.pdf
(July 15, 2019) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor on Dundas Street West and Roncesvalles Avenue Built Form Study - Official Plan Amendment 421 and 421 Roncesvalles Avenue Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions (CC9.13a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135989.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A to Confidential Attachment 1 to the Supplementary Report - made public on July 26,2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136010.pdf
Confidential Appendix B to Confidential Attachment 1 to the Supplementary Report - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136011.pdf

CC9.14 - 2150-2194 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 23 Park Lawn Road - Appeal of Official Plan Amendment 231 - Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies or corporations and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.  If the confidential instructions in Confidential Attachment 1 are adopted, City Council authorize the public release of:

 

a.  the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1, with the remainder of Confidential Attachment 1 and all of Confidential Attachment 2 to remain confidential, as they contain advice subject to solicitor-client privilege; and

 

b.  Confidential Attachment 3.

Summary

FCR (Park Lawn) LP ("FCR") are appellants to Official Plan Amendment No. 231 ("OPA 231") currently at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT"). FCR's appeal is regarding the properties known municipally as 2150-2194 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 23 Park Lawn Road.  City Council adopted OPA 231 policies for the entire city following the Five-Year Official Plan and Municipal Comprehensive Reviews regarding employment lands.  The City Solicitor requires further directions for an upcoming LPAT pre-hearing conference.

Background Information

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 2150-2194 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 23 Park Lawn Road - Appeal of Official Plan Amendment 231 - Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions (CC9.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135797.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2
Confidential Attachment 3 - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135800.pdf

CC9.15 - Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan (East of Royal York Road) Appeal and 25 Audley Street, 23 Buckingham Street, 1, 2 and 10 Audley Street, 8 Newcastle Street, and 29, 31, 59 and 71 Portland Street Site Specific Appeals - Request for Further Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential recommendation(s) in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendation(s) in Confidential Attachment 1, if adopted, with the remainder of Confidential Attachment 1 to remain confidential, and Confidential Attachments 2 and 3 be released only at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

Summary

The owners of various properties within the Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan area have appealed the Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan ("OPA 331") and site specific applications as they relate to the lands east of Royal York Road.  A hearing was held in April 2019 and the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") has rendered a decision allowing various appeals within Blocks D and E of the Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan area.  As a result of that decision, the City Solicitor requires further directions.

Background Information

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan (East of Royal York Road) Appeal and 25 Audley Street, 23 Buckingham Street, 1, 2 and 10 Audley Street, 8 Newcastle Street, and 29, 31, 59 and 71 Portland Street Site Specific Appeals - Request for Further Direction (CC9.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135836.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Block D and E Block Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135837.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2
Confidential Attachment 3

CC9.16 - Murray Road Regeneration and Land Use Study - City Initiated Official Plan Amendment and City Initiated Zoning By-law Amendments - Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Appeal - Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre
Attention
To be considered after Item CC9.29

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.  If the City Solicitor's confidential recommendations are adopted by Council, then City Council authorize the public release of:

 

a.  the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 (with the remainder of Confidential Attachment 1 to remain confidential as it contains information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege), and

 

b.  Appendix 1 (with Appendix 2 to remain confidential)

Summary

At its February 3 and 4, 2016 meeting, City Council enacted By-law 71-2016, an Interim Control By-law that prohibited certain uses on the lands on the west side of Murray Road between Wilson Avenue and Plewes Road (the Murray Road Study Area), and directed staff to review the existing land use permissions and regulations and to determine if new policies and zoning standards were required. Following the study, City Council at its meeting on December 5, 6, 7 and 8, 2017, adopted the Recommendations in the (October 26, 2017) report from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and enacted By-laws 1467-2017, 1468-2017 and 1469-2017, adopting Official Plan Amendment 208 (OPA 208), and Zoning By-law amendments to By-law 569-2013 and former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625. OPA 208 and the two Zoning By-law amendments were appealed to the former Ontario Municipal Board by two appellants, and a two-week hearing is scheduled at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) commencing on August 12, 2019.

 

The City Solicitor seeks direction on this matter no later than the completion of the City Council meeting on July 16 and 17, 2019.

Background Information

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on Murray Road Regeneration and Land Use Study - City Initiated Official Plan Amendment and City Initiated Zoning By-law Amendments - Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Appeal - Request for Direction (CC9.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135841.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix 1 - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135843.pdf
Confidential Appendix 2

CC9.17 - 128, 130 and 132 Gorman Park Road and 795, 797 and 799 Sheppard Avenue West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to this Report from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix "A" to the Report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the Report from the City Solicitor remain confidential as it contains advice, which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

This application proposes a 9-storey residential building containing 85 residential dwelling units, 84 parking spaces and vehicular access from Gorman Park Road at 128, 130 and 132 Gorman Park Road and 795, 797 and 799 Sheppard Avenue West.

 

The applicant has appealed the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT") due to Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. A hearing is not yet scheduled.

Background Information

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 128, 130 and 132 Gorman Park Road and 795, 797 and 799 Sheppard Avenue West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction (CC9.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135786.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135788.pdf

CC9.18 - 55 Erskine Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City of Toronto and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1, paragraphs 1 through 5, inclusive.

 

2.  If paragraphs 1 through 5, inclusive of the confidential recommendation(s) contained in Confidential Attachment 1 are adopted, City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendation(s) contained in Confidential Attachment 1, save and except for paragraph 6, along with Confidential Appendix "A" and Confidential Appendix "B", and that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential.

 

3.  If paragraphs 1 through 5, inclusive of the confidential recommendation(s) contained in Confidential Attachment 1 are not adopted, but paragraph 6 is adopted, City Council authorize the public release of only the confidential recommendation at paragraph 6 of Confidential Attachment 1 and the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix "A" and Confidential Appendix "B" remain confidential.

Summary

The applicant appealed its Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board, now the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "Tribunal"), on November 23, 2017 for City Council's failure to make a decision on the application prior to the lapsing of the statutory time period.  Notwithstanding recent amendments to the Planning Act, the Tribunal will maintain jurisdiction over the appeal according to the rules of the former Ontario Municipal Board.  Further direction from City Council is required on this matter which has been appealed to the Tribunal.

Background Information

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 55 Erskine Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions (CC9.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135846.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135848.pdf
Confidential Appendix B, Part 1 - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135849.pdf
Confidential Appendix B, Part 2 - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136315.pdf

CC9.19 - 2433 Dufferin Street - Zoning Amendment Application and Site Plan Control Application - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies or corporations and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

Rainberry Estates Inc. (the "Applicant") is the owner of the lands municipally known as 2433 Dufferin Street (the "Subject Site").  The Subject Site is currently vacant and located at the northeast corner of Dufferin Street and Hopewell Avenue.  The Applicant originally applied for amendments to the former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83 and the City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 to permit the construction of a 5 storey (18.5 metre high) mixed use building with retail/commercial uses at grade (the "Zoning Application").  The Applicant also submitted a related application for Site Plan approval (the "Site Plan Application").

 

On November 28, 2017, the Applicant appealed the Zoning Application and the Site Plan Application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") due to City Council's failure to make a decision within the prescribed time periods under the Planning Act.  On May 16, 2018, the Applicant submitted a revised proposal for a 9 storey (27 metre high plus mechanicals) mixed use building, to which City Council recommended in July 2018, that the City Solicitor attend the LPAT in opposition and to continue to negotiate with the Applicant.  The LPAT hearing has been scheduled to commence on September 3, 2019.

 

The purpose of this report is to request further instructions for the upcoming LPAT hearing with respect to a without prejudice "public" settlement proposal received from the Applicant on May 28, 2019 following negotiations with Planning staff.

 

City Planning has been involved in the preparation of this report

Background Information

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 2433 Dufferin Street - Zoning Amendment Application and Site Plan Control Application - Request for Directions (CC9.19)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135866.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Without Prejudice "public" Settlement Offer dated May 28, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135867.pdf
Public Appendix A to Public Attachment 1 - Revised Plans dated May 27, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135868.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC9.20 - 579-585 Lawrence Avenue West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation

Origin

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (July 8, 2019) from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (July 8, 2019) from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (July 8, 2019) from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice and information, which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

On August 24, 2017, the City received applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law for 579 - 585 Lawrence Avenue West to permit the construction of 12 freehold townhouses in 2 blocks fronting Lawrence Avenue West.  The total gross floor area of the proposal was 2,885 square metres which resulted in a density of 1.62 times the lot area.  The proposed height of the buildings was 16.06 metres for Block 1 at the eastern end and 15.78 metres for Block 2 at the western end.  Each unit would be provided with one integral parking space at the rear of the unit and two visitor parking spaces would be provided on site to serve the 12 residential units.  Vehicular access was proposed from Lawrence Avenue West with a two-way service driveway.

 

The applicant appealed City Council's neglect or failure to make a decision on its applications for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments (the "Appeal") to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") on March 27, 2018.

 

On May 2, 2019, City Council directed the City Solicitor, along with appropriate staff, to oppose the applications, in their current form, and oppose the Appeal. City Council also directed that staff continue to work with the applicant and seek revisions to the applications and report back to City Council on the outcome of those discussions.

 

The applicant continued discussions with the City and submitted a "with prejudice" settlement offer to the City on July 5, 2019 for consideration by City Council found in Public Attachment 1 and Public Attachment 2 to this Report.

Background Information

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 579-585 Lawrence Avenue West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions (CC9.20)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135723.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Letter from Davies Howe LLP dated July 5, 2019 regarding 579-585 Lawrence Avenue West, Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135905.pdf
Public Attachment 2 - Plans and Drawings: architectural plans dated June 26, 2019 prepared by Varacalli Architect Inc., and landscape plans dated June 26, 2019 prepared by Quinn Design Associates Inc - Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135765.pdf
Public Attachment 2 - Plans and Drawings: architectural plans dated June 26, 2019 prepared by Varacalli Architect Inc., and landscape plans dated June 26, 2019 prepared by Quinn Design Associates Inc. - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135754.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC9.21 - 57 Linelle Street - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Willowdale

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation

Origin

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (July 9, 2019) from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1, Confidential Appendix "A", and Confidential Appendix "B" to the report (July 9, 2019) from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (July 9, 2019) from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice and information, which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

The applicant has appealed the Draft Plan of Subdivision and proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act (the "Appeal").

 

The application proposes an Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment to re-designate the subject lands from “Other Open Spaces” to “Neighbourhoods” to permit 23, three-storey detached dwellings with single integral garages within three residential blocks accessed by the proposed Linelle Street extension.  The proposed gross floor area is 6,624 square metres that would result in a Floor Space Index (FSI) of 1.11 times the lot area.  A Draft Plan of Subdivision application had also been submitted to delineate the public road and new park and to create separate blocks to facilitate the development.

 

On January 30, 2019, City Council directed the City Solicitor, along with appropriate staff, to oppose the applications, in their current form, and oppose the Appeal. City Council also directed that staff continue to work with the applicant and seek revisions to the applications and report back to City Council on the outcome of those discussions.

Background Information

(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 57 Linelle Street - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Request for Directions (CC9.21)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135873.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135875.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135876.pdf

CC9.22 - 3000 Dufferin Street - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Application - Request for Further Direction Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies or corporations and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report, if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

3000 Dufferin Street Limited and Finch-Main Plaza Limited (together the "Applicants") are the owner of the property municipally known as 3000 Dufferin Street (the "Subject Site").  The Subject Site is located at the northwest corner of Dufferin Street and Playfair Avenue.  The Subject Site is currently occupied by an 18 storey rental apartment building containing 287 dwelling units.

 

On July 18, 2017 the Applicants submitted a zoning by-law amendment application, with accompanying draft plan of subdivision application, to permit the development of two additional residential apartment buildings of 16 and 23 storeys and 7 townhouse units on the Subject Site.  The original 18 storey apartment building was proposed to be retained (the "Original Proposal").  The Original Proposal included 613 parking spaces, which includes the existing parking spaces used for the existing apartment building.

 

On November 16, 2018, the Applicants appealed their zoning by-law amendment application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT") for non-decision by City Council.  On January 16, 2019, the Applicants also appealed their draft plan of subdivision application to the LPAT as well.  These appeals are collectively known as LPAT Case No. PL PL171293.

 

On May 27, 2019 and June 20, 2019, the City and the Applicants attended mediation before the LPAT.

 

On July 5, 2019, the Applicant's counsel, Aird Berlis LLP, submitted to the City Solicitor a with prejudice settlement offer (the "Settlement Offer") based on revised architectural plans dated July 2, 2019 and prepared by IBI Group (the "Architectural Plans").  The Settlement Offer is attached to this report as Public Attachment 1, and the Architectural Plans are attached to this report as Public Appendix A to Public Attachment 1.  The Settlement Offer and Architectural Plans are described further in the "Comments" section below.

 

The purpose of this report is to request instructions for the upcoming LPAT hearing, which is scheduled for October 21, 2019 to November 1, 2019.

 

City Planning has been involved in the preparation of this report.

Background Information

(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 3000 Dufferin Street - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Application - Request for Further Direction Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing (CC9.22)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135865.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Settlement Offer dated July 5, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135870.pdf
Public Appendix A to Public Attachment 1 - Architectural Plans dated July 2, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135871.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC9.23 - 193-195 McCaul Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for further Direction Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies or corporations and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and that Confidential Attachments 2-4 remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

Summary

BJL McCaul Inc. (the "Applicant") is the owner of the properties municipally known as 193-195 McCaul Street (the "Subject Property").  In 2017, the Applicant applied for a zoning by-law amendment to City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 in order to facilitate a proposed redevelopment of the Subject Property (the "Application").  The Application included a 19-storey mixed use building with 266 residential units and 597 square metres of retail/service commercial space at grade.  The overall height of the building would be 64 metres, inclusive of the wrapped mechanical penthouse, and the proposed floor space index is 12.15 times the area of the lot.  The Application would require the demolition of the 2-storey former Silverstein's Bakery building on the site.

 

The Applicant appealed the Application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") on December 4, 2017 due to City Council's failure to make a decision.  The appeal is known as LPAT File PL171476.  A seven day hearing of this appeal is scheduled to be heard by the LPAT commencing on September 3, 2019.  The City, the Applicant, Sinai Health System ("Sinai") and a local residents' association attended LPAT led mediation on April 16,  2019 and June 10 and 27, 2019.

 

Sinai is a party to the proceedings before the LPAT and raised issues including matters relating to noise, impacts on Sinai's existing operations and the future redevelopment of the Sinai lands at 40 Murray Street.

 

City Planning has been involved in the preparation of this report.  The City Solicitor is bringing this report for the purpose of requesting instructions for the upcoming LPAT hearing.

Background Information

(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 193-195 McCaul Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for further Direction Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing (CC9.23)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135791.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2
Confidential Attachment 3
Confidential Attachment 4

CC9.24 - 400 - 420 King Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Appeal - Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies or corporations and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client

Origin

(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the Recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  If the confidential instructions in Confidential Attachment 1 are adopted, City Council authorize the public release of:

 

a.  the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1, with the remainder of the Confidential Attachment 1 to remain confidential, as it contains advice subject to solicitor-client privilege; and

 

b.  Confidential Attachments 2 and 3.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek instructions respecting the appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 400-420 King Street West, currently before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT").

 

On June 30, 2017, the City received a Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit the development of a 47-storey mixed-use building with an overall height of 157 metres, inclusive of a 6 metre tall mechanical penthouse (the "Application").  The Application proposed an 11-storey base building containing retail floor space on the first and second levels, and residential uses on the remaining levels.  The Application proposed a total Gross Floor Area of 42,980 square metres, comprised of 39,543 square metres of residential and 3,437 square metres of non-residential space.  The overall Floor Space Index of the application was 16.5.

 

The applicant appealed the Application to the LPAT, citing City Council's failure to make a decision on the Application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek instructions for the appeal of the Application.  The LPAT has not yet scheduled a hearing.

 

This report has been prepared in consultation with City Planning.

Background Information

(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 400 - 420 King Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Appeal - Request for Direction (CC9.24)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135802.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2 - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135804.pdf
Confidential Attachment 3 - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135825.pdf

CC9.25 - Designation of the St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Conservation District under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act - Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies or corporations and advice that is subject to solicitor client privilege

Origin

(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.  If the confidential instructions in Confidential Attachment 1 are adopted, City Council authorize the public release of:

 

a.  the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1, with the remainder of Confidential Attachment 1 to remain confidential, as it contains advice subject to solicitor-client privilege; and

 

b.  Confidential Attachment 2 and 3

Summary

City Council adopted the St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District and St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan (the "St. Lawrence HCD") at its meeting of December 2015. The St. Lawrence HCD was subsequently appealed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT" or "Tribunal").

 

The LPAT has scheduled a 14 day hearing on the merits of the St. Lawrence HCD beginning November 12, 2019. This report requests direction from City Council for the LPAT hearing respecting conversion and forecasting issues.

Background Information

(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on Designation of the St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Conservation District under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act - Request for Direction (CC9.25)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135854.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2 -made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135856.pdf
Confidential Attachment 3 - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135857.pdf

CC9.26 - 504 Wellington Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Further Directions Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation

Origin

(July 15, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report, if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

Uxland Development (West) Inc. (the "Applicant") is the owner of lands municipally known as 504 Wellington Street West (the "Subject Site").  The Subject Site is located on Wellington Street West east of Portland Street.  The Subject Site currently contains a 3 storey office building with 1,591.5 square metres of office gross floor area ("GFA").

 

On December 22, 2016, the Applicant submitted a Zoning By-law Amendment application to the City proposing to amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 and City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 to permit the development of a 15 storey office building including retail and service commercial uses at grade (the "Application").  The Application included one Type C loading space and 12 vehicle parking spaces and

37 bicycle parking spaces.  A total of 7,552 square metres of office GFA and 310 square metres of retail and commercial GFA were proposed.  The office building was proposed to have a total height of 68.8 metres.

 

On October 31, 2017, the Applicant appealed the Application to the Ontario Municipal Board ("OMB") (now known as the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal ("LPAT")) as LPAT File No. PL171178.

 

In April 2019, the Applicant submitted to the City a revised proposal for a 13 storey residential building with a height of 45 metres plus mechanical penthouse (the "Revised Proposal").  The Revised Proposal includes 5,434 square metres of residential gross GFA and includes 22 parking spaces located in 3 levels of underground parking.

 

On July 4, 2019, the Applicant's counsel, Davies Howe LLP, submitted to the City Solicitor a with prejudice settlement offer (the "Settlement Offer").  The Settlement Offer proposed a resolution of the LPAT appeal based on the Revised Proposal, which the Applicant recognizes may require further minor modifications in completing the final form of the zoning by-law amendments based on comments from City staff on the latest submission.  In order to satisfy their office replacement requirement for the existing office uses on the Subject Property, the Settlement Offer proposes that 1,591.5 square metres of replacement office GFA be included in the proposed development at 482-488 Wellington Street West, which is owned by a sister company of the Applicant.  In order to secure the office replacement, the Applicant has agreed to request the LPAT make any final order on the zoning by-law amendment application conditional on the registration of a restrictive covenant in favour of the City and satisfactory to the City Solicitor on title to 482-488 Wellington Street West restricting development of the property unless it includes the required 1,591.5 square metres of office replacement from the Subject Property.  The Settlement Offer also proposes to provide cash-in-lieu payment to satisfy the parkland obligations under Section 42 of the Planning Act.

 

The Revised Proposal is described in further detail in the "Comments" section below.

 

The Settlement Offer also confirms that the Wellington Place Neighbourhood Association (the "WPNA") and the Applicant have reached a settlement on the basis of the Revised Proposal.  In addition to the City and the Applicant, the WPNA are a party to the LPAT appeal for this matter.  The WPNA and the Applicant have entered into minutes of settlement dated April 25, 2019.

 

The Settlement Offer is included as Public Attachment 1 to this report.  The architectural plans showing the Revised Proposal dated April 26, 2019 by RAW Design are included as Public Attachment 2 to this report.

 

An LPAT prehearing conference is currently scheduled for August 1, 2019.  As part of their minutes of settlement, both the Applicant and the WPNA have agreed to consent to the conversion of the prehearing conference into a settlement hearing.

 

The purpose of this report is to request further instructions for the upcoming LPAT hearing.

 

City Planning has been involved in the preparation of this report

Background Information

(July 15, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 504 Wellington Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Further Directions Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing (CC9.26)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136061.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Settlement Offer Letter dated July 4, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136062.pdf
Public Attachment 2 - Architectural Plans dated April 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136063.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
(July 8, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 504 Wellington Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Further Directions Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing - Notice of Pending Report (CC9.26)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135850.pdf

CC9.27 - 135-143 Portland Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation

Origin

(July 15, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1, Confidential Appendix "A", and Confidential Appendix "B", if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

On August 9, 2017, a Zoning By-law Amendment application was submitted for the site at 135-143 Portland Street.  It proposed a 16-storey (52.7 metres, including mechanical penthouse) mixed use building, with approximately 243 square metres of retail space on the ground floor fronting Portland Street, and 9,216 square metres of residential space above (117 units).  The five existing semi-detached and rowhouse buildings on the site would be demolished, other than the façade of 143 Portland Street, which would be retained.

 

The ground floor of the proposed building would be set back approximately 1.5 metres from the west (Portland Street) lot line, which would align with the existing front setback of the dwelling at 143 Portland Street that was proposed to be retained.  This setback would continue up to the seventh floor of the building along Portland Street, above which it would step back slightly at each floor, reaching a maximum setback of approximately 2.5 metres from the Portland Street lot line at the sixteenth floor.  The second through fourth floors would include projecting balconies that extend up to the Portland Street property line to a height of approximately 13.9 metres.  Inset balconies were proposed on all levels above the fourth floor.

 

On the western (front) half of the proposed building, there would be no setbacks from the north and south lot lines.  On the eastern (rear) half of the proposed building, there would be no setbacks from the north and south lot lines up to the ninth floor, above which there would be approximately 1.5 metre setbacks.  There would be a 1.2 metre setback from the eastern lot line along the laneway up to the ninth floor.  Projecting balconies were proposed within this setback area up to the property line.  There would be a 4.5 metre setback at the tenth floor, which is reduced to a 1.5 metre setback for the eleventh through fifteenth floors.

 

Approximately 215 square metres of outdoor amenity space (1.8 square metres per unit) and 143 square metres of indoor amenity space (1.2 square metres per unit) were proposed on the sixteenth storey.

 

Vehicular access to the site would be provided from the laneway along the east side of the building.  Two parking elevators would provide access to 24 parking spaces in two underground levels for residents.  No visitor parking was proposed.  One hundred eighteen bicycle parking spaces would be provided on one underground level, of which 106 would be for residents and 12 would be for visitors, and four spaces would be provided on the ground floor associated with the retail space.

 

On December 7, 2017, the applicant appealed the application to the Ontario Municipal Board (the "OMB"), now continued as the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "LPAT") due to Council's failure to make a decision within the statutory timeframe.

 

The purpose of this report is to request further instructions for the ten-day LPAT hearing that is scheduled to commence October 8, 2019.

 

City Planning has been involved in the preparation of this report.

Background Information

(July 15, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 135-143 Portland Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions Regarding Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing (CC9.27)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135988.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136007.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - made public on July 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136008.pdf
(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 135-143 Portland Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction - Notice of Pending Report (CC9.27)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135789.pdf

CC9.28 - 6020 and 6030 Bathurst Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre
Attention
To be considered after Item AU3.14

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City of Toronto and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(July 15, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends:

 

1.  City Council adopt confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.  If the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 are adopted, City Council authorize the City Solicitor, in her sole discretion, to disclose the contents of Confidential Attachment 1, Confidential Appendix "C", and Confidential Appendix "D" but Confidential Appendix "A" and Confidential Appendix "B" shall remain confidential subject to the owner's consent to release those documents in whole or in part.

Summary

The applicant appealed its Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board, now the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "Tribunal") on March 28, 2018 for City Council's failure to make a decision on the application prior to the lapsing of the statutory time period.  Notwithstanding recent amendments to the Planning Act, the Tribunal will maintain jurisdiction over the appeal according to the rules of the former Ontario Municipal Board.  Further direction from City Council is required on this matter which has been appealed to the Tribunal.

Background Information

(July 15, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 6020 and 6030 Bathurst Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions (CC9.28)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136064.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix B - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix C - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix D - Confidential Information
(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 6020 and 6030 Bathurst Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction - Notice of Pending Report (CC9.28)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135764.pdf

CC9.29 - 6040 Bathurst Street and 5 Fisherville Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre
Attention
To be considered after Item CC9.28

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City of Toronto and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(July 15, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.  If the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 are adopted, City Council authorize the City Solicitor, in her sole discretion, to disclose the contents of Confidential Attachment 1, Confidential Appendix "C", and Confidential Appendix "D" but Confidential Appendix "A" and Confidential Appendix "B" shall remain confidential subject to the owner's consent to release those documents in whole or in part.

Summary

The applicant appealed its Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board, now the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the "Tribunal"), on September 15, 2017 for City Council's failure to make a decision on the application prior to the lapsing of the statutory time period.  Notwithstanding recent amendments to the Planning Act, the Tribunal will maintain jurisdiction over the appeal according to the rules of the former Ontario Municipal Board.  Further direction from City Council is required on this matter which has been appealed to the Tribunal.

Background Information

(July 15, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 6040 Bathurst Street and 5 Fisherville Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction (CC9.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136078.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Report from City Solicitor
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix B - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix C - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix D - Confidential Information
(July 9, 2019) Report from the City Solicitor on 6040 Bathurst Street and 5 Fisherville Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction - Notice of Pending Report (CC9.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135853.pdf

Member Motions - Meeting 9

MM9.1 - Accepting a Donation from Bloordale Baseball League for Refurbishments to Ball Diamond #2 at Millwood Park - by Councillor Stephen Holyday, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Stephen Holyday, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to accept a donation of $73,000 from Bloordale Baseball League for the capital project work relating to the refurbishments to diamond #2 at Millwood Park in compliance with the City's Policy on Donations for Community Benefits.

 
2.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and sign a donor agreement for the $73,000 donation from Bloordale Baseball League, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 
3.  City Council amend the Approved 2019 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget to create a new capital sub-project known as Millwood Park Ball Diamond #2 Refurbishments in the Outdoor Recreation Centre project, with a total project cost and 2019 cash flow of $73,000, funded by the donation.

Summary

Bloordale Baseball League is a not-for-profit organization located in Etobicoke.  The League's mission is to provide the game of baseball to youth in their community with an emphasis on sportsmanship, participation and fun.  Established in 1963, Bloordale Baseball is a baseball program that affords all children and youth to play, regardless of skill level.

 

In 2018, Bloordale Baseball League identified the need for improvements to ball diamond #2 at Millwood Park (Ward 2) and contributed funding to upgrade and expand the infield playing surface of the diamond.  The expanded playing surface has built capacity in the organization by allowing more age groups to play.  Bloordale Baseball League would like to contribute additional funding to complete a full refurbishment of this diamond in 2019.

 

Bloordale Baseball League was recently awarded $63,000 of grant funding through the Jays Care Field of Dreams program from the Toronto Blue Jays - Jays Care Foundation.  The League is contributing another $10,000 from its own budget for this project, for a total donation of $73,000.  Authority is requested to amend the Parks, Forestry and Recreation 2019 Capital Budget to create a new sub-project for Millwood Park in the Outdoor Recreation Centre project, with funding from the donation, to improve the conditions of ball diamond #2 by replacing fencing, increasing fence height by two feet, building larger covered players' bench areas and building protected pitchers' warm up areas.  The work is planned to commence fall 2019.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135708.pdf
(July 16, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136177.pdf

MM9.2 - Release of Section 45(9) Funds from the Development at 4726-4728 Yonge Street to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation Property at 415 Willowdale Avenue for Basketball Court Upgrades - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Willowdale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the Approved 2019 Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on a one-time basis by $31,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 45(9) (Planning Act Reserve Funds) community benefits from 4726-4750 Yonge Street, 9-31 Bogert Avenue, 2-28 Poyntz Avenue and 49 Bogert Avenue (source account: XR3028-4500139) for transfer to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation in order to undertake basketball court upgrades at the Toronto Community Housing Corporation building located at 415 Willowdale Avenue (cost centre: FD5101).  

 
2.  City Council direct that the $31,000.00 be forwarded to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, subject to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation signing an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

Summary

This Motion recommends the release of Sections 45(9) Planning Act funds to Toronto Community Housing Corporation for the purpose of funding capital improvements to the basketball court located at the Toronto Community Housing Corporation property at 415 Willowdale Avenue.

 

415 Willowdale Avenue, also known as the Willowtree community, is a property that provides affordable housing to over 600 people.  The site is undergoing significant renovations funded through the $1.3 billion investment from the Federal Government towards the Toronto Community Housing Corporation repair backlog, however there is currently no funding to improve and upgrade the well-used outdoor basketball courts.  The funds will be used to increase the size of the larger of two on-site courts and upgrade its features to provide a better quality of life for residents, while improving the existing open spaces around the buildings.

 

Funds have been secured from the development on the lands municipally known as 4726-4750 Yonge Street, 9-31 Bogert Avenue, 2-28 Poyntz Avenue and 49 Bogert Avenue as community benefits through Section 45(9) of the Planning Act to be used by the City for appropriate community benefits. 

 

The Toronto Community Housing Corporation will be required to sign an Undertaking that will govern the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements, prior to the funds being released to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation by the City.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135712.pdf
(July 16, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136178.pdf

MM9.3 - 34 Green Valley Road - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to a Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing to oppose the variances requested in Application A0254/19NY respecting 34 Green Valley Road.

 
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal of the decision in Application A0254/19NY respecting 34 Green Valley Road and settle the matter on behalf of the City at the City Solicitor's discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and with the Director of Community Planning, North York District.

Summary

On June 5, 2019, the North York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment (the "Committee") approved an application brought by the owner of 34 Green Valley Road for eleven minor variances, and refused two minor variance pertaining to front yard setback and front stair projection (the "Application"). A copy of the Committee's decision is attached. The Application proposed to demolish the existing structure to construct a new three-storey single detached dwelling.

 

On June 24, 2019, the owner appealed the Committee's decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body.

 

In a report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District dated May 28, 2019, Community Planning Staff recommended the application be refused. A copy of the Planning report is attached. Community Planning Staff opined that the Application did not meet the intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law or Official Plan, identifying specifically the requested building height and length variances.

 

This Motion would give the City Solicitor the authority to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing in opposition to the application. It would also give the City Solicitor authority to settle the matter on behalf of the City in the City Solicitor's discretion after consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Ward Councillor.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135709.pdf
Committee of Adjustment North York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 34 Green Valley Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135710.pdf
(May 28, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on 34 Green Valley Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135711.pdf

MM9.4 - Toronto Municipal Code Building Construction and Demolition Review - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:

 

1.  Toronto City Council direct the Chief Building Officer and Executive Director, Toronto Building to undertake a review of the Vibration Control provisions contained within Chapter 363-3.6 of the Toronto Municipal Code in order to determine whether further updates or amendments are required.

Summary

The City of Toronto has witnessed significant increases in construction activity with a considerable number of these projects being undertaken in established neighbourhoods.  This construction activity may have impact on adjacent properties; in particular, vibrations that emanate from project sites.  It has been some time since a thorough review of the Vibration Control Provisions of the Municipal Code has been undertaken.  It would be prudent that the City carry out a review of these regulations in order to determine whether further updates are required.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135713.pdf

MM9.5 - Amendment to the 2019 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget for Falstaff Park Basketball Court Improvements - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the 2019 Council Approved Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget to create a new capital sub-project known as Falstaff Park Basketball Court Improvements in the Outdoor Recreation Centre project, with a total project cost and 2019 cash flow of $80,000, funded by the donation from Maple Leafs Sports and Entertainment.

Summary

Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment and/or MLSE Foundation is the charitable arm of the Toronto Raptors Basketball Club.  In January 2018, the Raptors and OVO had pledged $1 million over three years to refurbish and refresh local community basketball courts.  For each of the next three years, local community courts will be selected for a capital investment dedicated to supporting programs and sports initiatives for at-risk children and youth.

 

Entering into year two of the initiative, MLSE Foundation committed to completely fund the refurbishment of the Outdoor Basketball Court at Falstaff Community Centre.  Authority is requested to amend the Parks, Forestry and Recreation 2019 Capital Budget to create a new sub-project for Falstaff Park in the Outdoor Recreation Centre project, with funding from the donation for the following scope of work: repaving of the north court, refurbishment of the south court, replacement of all existing basketball poles, backboards and rims/nets for both courts, line painting, logo decal application, and pathway and turf restoration.  The work is planned to commence in early August 2019.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135714.pdf
(July 16, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136179.pdf

MM9.6 - Revisiting the 2017 Memorandum of Understanding signed between the City of Toronto and the District of Jaffna - by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, seconded by Mayor John Tory

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, seconded by Mayor John Tory, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council revive the existing Memorandum of Understanding of March 19, 2017 between the City of Toronto and the District of Jaffna.


2.  City Council resume its commitment to the collaborative advancement of the four main pillars of Good Governance, Education, Library Systems, and Economic Development, as outlined in the 2017 Memorandum of Understanding, and hold another workshop to identify actions for each pillar.


3.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to investigate the potential for an urban planner from the City of Toronto to participate in an exchange exercise with the District of Jaffna; this includes amending the original March 2017 Memorandum of Understanding, as necessary, to include the District of Jaffna as a signatory and reporting back on feasibility and next steps.


4.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to investigate the potential for a Tamil scholar from Sri Lanka to participate in an exchange exercise with Tamil Studies at the University of Toronto at Scarborough and report back on feasibility and next steps.

Summary

In March of 2017, Mayor John Tory and a delegation of 32 business leaders travelled to India and Sri Lanka as part of a mission to promote the media, technology, finance, and education sectors, as well as to reinforce Toronto as a prosperous hub for these areas. The mission, planned with Economic Development and Culture, and spearheaded by former Members of Council, sought to establish stronger partnerships and alliances between Toronto and cities overseas.

 

The implementation of a Memorandum of Understanding signed on March 19, 2017 between the City of Toronto and the District of Jaffna was intended to facilitate new investments and business, educational, and cultural exchanges. The Memorandum of Understanding was meant to bolster activities under four distinct pillars: Good Governance, Education, Library Systems, and Economic Development.

 

Following the return to Toronto, the Toronto-Jaffna Partnership Summit was held on September 30, 2017 in order to discuss an “Implementation Phase” for the Memorandum of Understanding. This Motion seeks to reengage the process and resume this project with clear deliverables. Furthermore, past discussion of an exchange of urban planners between Jaffna and Toronto should be finalized, planned, and eventually executed.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135715.pdf

MM9.7 - 1039 Weston Road - City Solicitor Attendance at the Toronto Local Appeal Body regarding Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision (A0161/19EYK) - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to a Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Decision of the Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel to oppose the approval of the Revised Application for 1039 Weston Road (A0161/19EYK).

 
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the Decision and to retain outside consultants, as necessary.

 
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached, to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion after consulting with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Summary

The Applicant, on behalf of the Applicant and co-owner, applied to the Etobicoke York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment for minor variances respecting the site at 1039 Weston Road (the "Original Application"). The Original Application sought permissions to maintain a double duplex with a secondary suite in the basement.

 

On April 12, 2019, Community Planning for the Etobicoke York District ("Community Planning") wrote a report to the Committee of Adjustment recommending that the Original Application be refused.  On April 25, 2019, the Committee of Adjustment deferred the Original Application in order to allow the Applicant to consult with Community Planning. The Applicant subsequently submitted a revised application wherein the secondary suite in the basement was eliminated, referenced as Committee of Adjustment File A0161/19EYK (the "Revised Application").

 

On June 13, 2019, Community Planning wrote a Revised Staff Report noting that the Revised Application was premature, given that City Planning, at the direction of City Council, is currently undertaking a review of the current planning framework for the Mount Dennis area within which this site is located. The Mount Dennis Planning Framework Study (the "Study") is anticipated to be completed in 2020.

 

The Revised Staff Report requested that, should the Committee of Adjustment approve the Revised Application, the Committee of Adjustment impose a condition that the approval be valid for a period of three (3) years, expiring on June 20, 2022 (the "Condition").

 

On June 20, 2019 the Committee of Adjustment approved the Revised Application without imposing the Condition (the "Decision"). The Decision is attached to this Motion.

 

It is important that the Condition be applied to ensure that the subject site's land use can be considered in relation to the Study's findings and recommendations.

 

This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the Decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body and will authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the application.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.7
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135733.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 1039 Weston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135734.pdf

MM9.8 - 37 Blue Springs Road - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to a Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City Staff, to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in respect of 37 Blue Springs Road to uphold the Committee of Adjustment’s refusal of the Applicant’s proposed development (Committee of Adjustment Applications A0871/17EYK, A0872/17EYK, A0873/17EYK and B0090/17EYK).

 
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.

Summary

On June 6, 2019, the Etobicoke York District Panel Committee of Adjustment refused applications for consent to sever the property municipally known as 37 Blue Springs Road into three undersized lots and with a new detached dwelling with an attached garage proposed for each new lot. The decisions in Applications B0090/17EYK, A0871/17EYK, A0872/17EYK and A0873/17EYK are attached to this Motion. The applicant has appealed the refusal decisions to the Toronto Local Appeal Body.

 

In addition to the consents, the applications require variances to City-wide Zoning By‑law 569‑2013 and North York Zoning By-law 7625, including variances for lot areas, lot coverages, front yard setbacks, rear yard setbacks, side yard setbacks, and dwelling height. Additionally, two of the proposed severed parcels require a variance for permitted height of the first floor above established grade. One of the applications requires a lot frontage variance. Another proposed severed parcel requires a variance from the By-law requirement for the location of vehicle access to a parking space.

 

Community Planning staff do not support the applications. On November 20, 2017, Community Planning for the Etobicoke York District wrote a report to the Committee of Adjustment recommending that the consent and minor variances be refused. On April 2, 2019, Community Planning submitted correspondence to the Committee of Adjustment maintaining their recommendation from the first staff report. Staff recommend refusal of the consents and minor variances because the proposed undersized residential lots and resulting variances would not respect and reinforce the existing physical character and lot configuration of the neighbourhood, would not be in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-laws, and would not conform to the Official Plan.

 

This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor to oppose the applicant’s Toronto Local Appeal Body appeal and to secure the necessary authorization and resources to support the City’s opposition to the appeal.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.8
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135735.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel Notice of Decision on Consent for 37 Blue Springs Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135736.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 37 Blue Springs Road - Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135737.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 37 Blue Springs Road - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135738.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 37 Blue Springs Road - Part 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135739.pdf
(November 20, 2017) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District on 37 Blue Springs Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135740.pdf
Correspondence from Community Planning Staff to the Committee of Adjustment, dated April 2, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135898.pdf

MM9.9 - 2 Gibbs Road - To Permit Applications for Minor Variances - by Councillor Stephen Holyday, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Stephen Holyday, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that:

 

1. City Council, pursuant to Subsection 45(1.4) of the Planning Act, permit applications for minor variances with respect to the property municipally known as 2 Gibbs Road for relief from the Zoning Code and site-specific By-laws in order to amend the associated development standards as they relate to gross floor area.

Summary

Among changes under the Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 (Bill 73) that came into final effect on July 1, 2016, Subsections 45(1.3) and 45(1.4) of the Planning Act, as amended, prevent the submission of minor variance applications on properties subject to a privately initiated Zoning By-law Amendment within two years of the By-law enactment, unless the municipal council has otherwise "declared by resolution that such an application is permitted".

 

In the case of 2 Gibbs Road, site specific By-laws adopted by City Council on February 1, 2018 provide for redevelopment of the site with 1,480 residential units (including 387 rental units) and a total of 1,730 parking spaces within a below and above grade garage. The proposed total gross floor area is 105,600 square metres, of which 6,800 square metres would be composed of non-residential uses. The development would have a Floor Space Index of 3.97 times the lot area. Phase 1 of the development consists of two 10-storey residential rental buildings with retail uses at grade on the eastern portion of the site, a playground area as a privately-owned publicly-accessible open space (POPS), a one way driveway at the eastern property limit, a new central private road accessed from Gibbs Road and one 31-storey residential condominium tower above a 4-storey podium containing eight at-grade residential units on the northwestern portion of the site.

 

Subsequent phases include two residential condominium towers (43 and 37 storeys in height) above a 4-storey podium containing retail and office space and six at-grade residential units with a central garden (POPS) on the western portion of the site.

 

In a letter to the City Planning on June 28, 2019, the applicant noted that they had revised the floor to ceiling heights in the earlier phases and created larger units than anticipated. In the later phases, the applicant desires to revise the floor to ceiling heights and to create larger units. In doing so, the applicant plans to include additional floors within the previously approved height limit, resulting in additional gross floor area beyond that which has been approved. The applicant has also indicated that despite the additional requested floor area, the project will result in fewer residential units overall, and a higher percentage of three bedroom units.

 

Under the Planning Act, as now amended, this land owner will not be able to file for a minor variance application to the Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York District, for zoning relief in this regard until February 2020, thus delaying site redevelopment and further restricting the availability for family housing and causing the owner undue financial hardship.

 

As a result, City Council's authorization for submission of a minor variance application at this time is warranted.  While the minor variance process may be the appropriate process, this resolution is not intended to and does not relay Council’s endorsement of the merits of the application.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.9
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135746.pdf
(June 28, 2019) Letter from the Director, Edilcan Development Corporation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135747.pdf

MM9.10 - Temporary Delegation of Authority During the Summer Recess to Direct Attendance on Appeals of Committee of Adjustment Decisions - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend at hearings on appeals of Committee of Adjustment decisions or to appeal a Committee of Adjustment decision on behalf of the City of Toronto at the request of the Ward Councillor after consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or designate, during the period from the completion of City Council's July 16 and 17, 2019 meeting to the start of City Council's October 2 and 3, 2019 meeting; the delegation shall include the authority to direct appropriate City staff to attend at the hearing and for the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary; the City Solicitor is authorized to take all steps necessary to bring resolution to the matter in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Summary

At the conclusion of the City Council meeting scheduled for July 16 and 17, 2019, City Council will be recessing until its meeting of October 2 and 3, 2019.  During that period it is likely that there will be decisions arising from applications to the Committee of Adjustment which will be matters of concern to the City and would warrant the City's attendance at the Toronto Local Appeal Body either on an appeal by the City itself or on the applicant's appeal to the tribunal.

 

The purpose of this Motion is to delegate temporary authority during this period to the Ward Councillor to instruct the City Solicitor, and appropriate City staff, to attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body on the application, provided the Ward Councillor has first consulted with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or designate.  This would include the authority to direct the City Solicitor to file an appeal of a decision and retain outside experts as necessary.  It also authorizes the City Solicitor to resolve matters in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.10
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135720.pdf

MM9.11 - Request to amend the 2019 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget for the "Ward 3 Park Improvements Project" to Broadacres Park Basketball Court - by Councillor Stephen Holyday, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Stephen Holyday, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the 2019 Council Approved Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget to change the project scope for the Ward 3 Park Improvements sub-project, in the Park Development project to Broadacres Park Basketball Court.

Summary

This Motion seeks authority to amend the project scope for the [former] Ward 3 Park Improvements sub-project in the 2019 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget, changing it to the Broadacres Park Basketball Court. 

 

Broadacres Park is a 5.7 hectare City park that includes a ball diamond, playground and large open green space.  The scope of work for the project includes a new basketball court and related components. There is currently a lack of basketball courts in the area, with the closest basketball court located 6.5 kilometres away.  The addition of a basketball court in the park will increase the provision of recreation opportunities for area residents.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.11
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135719.pdf
(July 16, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136180.pdf

MM9.12 - Reallocation of Section 37 funds by the York-Eglinton Business Improvement Area for the production of a mural at 1669 Eglinton Avenue West - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded Councillor Mike Colle

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the reallocation, by the York-Eglinton Business Improvement Area, of $5,000.00 in Section 37 funds for the production of a mural at 1669 Eglinton Avenue West, subject to the Business Improvement Area signing an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

Summary

Originally started in 1981, the York-Eglinton Business Improvement Area is one of the oldest Business Improvement Areas in the City.  Formerly part of the old City of York, the Business Improvement Area has evolved along with the neighbourhood and currently covers the area on Eglinton Avenue between Marlee Avenue and Dufferin Street, going north to Whitmore Avenue.

 

On July 23, 2018 City Council adopted item MM44.80 entitled “1603 Eglinton Avenue West - Release of Section 37 Funds from the Development for Community Benefit and Public Art Projects”.

 

One of the recommendations adopted by Council provided that the 2018 Approved Operating Budget for Non-Program be increased by $10,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 1603 Eglinton Avenue West for the purpose of forwarding funds to the York-Eglinton Business Improvement Area, for the production of a mural at 1661 Eglinton Avenue West.

 

Subsequent to Council’s approval the $10,000.00 was forwarded to the York-Eglinton Business Improvement Area for the production of a mural at 1661 Eglinton Avenue West.  The mural was completed and $5,000 remained unused.  As per the executed Undertaking, the unused portion was to be returned to the City, but the Business Improvement Area has requested that the remaining funds be utilized to facilitate the production of a mural that will revitalize the streetscape at 1669 Eglinton Avenue West. 

 

This motion seeks Council approval to permit the Business Improvement Area to retain the unused $5,000 and allow it to allocate the funds to the installation of a mural at 1669 Eglinton Avenue West. 

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.12
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135748.pdf

MM9.13 - Supporting Wastewater Energy Transfer in Toronto - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Mayor John Tory

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Mayor John Tory, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, in consultation with the Director, Environment and Energy and the City Solicitor to report back to City Council on October 2 and 3, 2019, through the Infrastructure and Environment Committee with recommendations on how to advance strategic pilot projects for wastewater energy transfer in the fourth quarter of 2019.
 

2.  City Council request that information from these pilot projects be used to develop recommendations for a wastewater energy transfer policy, and that staff report back to Council through the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in the third quarter of 2020.

Summary

The City of Toronto is committed to an ambitious climate change strategy through TransformTO. As part of our commitment to meet the objectives of TransformTO we have established the Green Market Acceleration Program to support the development of new renewable energy technologies.

 

Supporting technology that uses the energy from wastewater is one step the City can take to advance our climate change goals. The United Nations estimates that over 3000 billion litres of waste water are dumped into North American and European sewers every day. That waste water contains thermal energy that can be used to heat and cool buildings across the City. This could have a significant environmental impact, given that heating and cooling buildings contributes almost 30 percent of annual greenhouse gas emissions.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.13
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135766.pdf

MM9.14 - Protecting Seniors Housing in Toronto - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Mayor John Tory

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Mayor John Tory, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to report back to City Council through the Planning and Housing Committee in the fourth quarter of 2019 with recommendations on how to ensure that seniors-specific housing in Toronto is protected in perpetuity.

 
2.  City Council request the Province of Ontario review the Long-Term Care Homes Act (2017) and strengthen regulations around the process through which long-term care facilities and their boards operate to ensure tenants are being better protected and cared for when operations cease.

Summary

On July 3rd, residents at Davenhill Senior Living located at 877 Yonge Street received notice that the Board of Directors had decided that the facility would close by the end of the year. This announcement was made after the building was sold to a numbered company.

 

Several residents have expressed concern about the timing of the notices they received, as well as their ability to find a suitable place to move to, given the limited availability of assisted-living options in Toronto.

 

As the population of our City ages, we need to do everything we can to make sure we protect our existing service providers and expand the number of places that will provide quality and affordable places for seniors to live in dignity.

 

Given the pressure our City faces to constantly commodify its housing supply, we must be taking steps to protect the spaces that will increasingly be at risk of being rezoned due to development pressures. The City must ensure that there are rules that will put the public good of our City’s residents and aging population over the development industry.

 

Additionally, we must ask to have the Province provide better oversight of the operations of these facilities and their boards should they cease their operations.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.14
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135767.pdf

MM9.15 - Protecting the Great Lakes - the proposed Canada-Ontario agreement on Great Lakes Water Quality and Ecosystem Health - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Communications MM9.15.1 and MM9.15.2 have been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Director, Environment and Energy and the General Manager, Toronto Water to report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee on September 9, 2019, regarding the proposed changes to the Canada-Ontario agreement on Great Lakes Water Quality and Ecosystem Health and how it would impact City policy, costs and programs as they relate to water quality, storm water management, ecosystem health, parkland and watercourse management.

 
2.  City Council request the City Manager to prepare any comments on the proposed Canada-Ontario agreement on Great Lakes Water Quality and Ecosystem Health for inclusion on the Environmental Registry of Ontario.

 
3.  City Council direct the City Manager to request the Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks to extend the deadline for the City of Toronto to comment on the Environmental Registry of Ontario regarding the proposed Canada-Ontario agreement on Great Lakes Water Quality and Ecosystem Health beyond September 4, 2019.

Summary

The Great Lakes are the world's largest endowment of freshwater and serve as drinking water to millions of residents in Canada and the United States and Torontonians depend on the Great Lakes for drinking water, transportation, recreation and food. Our quality of life is closely linked with the quality of the Great Lakes water and its ecosystem.

                                                    

The Government of Canada and the Province of Ontario have negotiated changes to the Canada-Ontario agreement on Great Lakes Water Quality and Ecosystem Health which could impact how the City of Toronto uses and protects Lake Ontario.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.15
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135768.pdf

Communications

(July 12, 2019) Letter from Tim Kocur, Executive Director, The Waterfront Business Improvement Area (MM.Supp.MM9.15.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/comm/communicationfile-96048.pdf
(July 15, 2019) E-mail from N. Corrado (MM.Supp.MM9.15.2)

MM9.16 - Representation at a Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing for 20 Sandringham Drive - by Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to a Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor and any other appropriate City staff to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing for 20 Sandringham Drive in opposition to the appeal of the Committee of Adjustment decision.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached, to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion, and in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Summary

On June 5, 2019, the Committee of Adjustment (the "Committee") deferred an application for a minor variance to permit a reduction in the required rear yard setback for the existing dwelling for the property municipally known as 20 Sandringham Drive (Committee file A0246/19NY).  On June 25, 2019, the Applicant appealed the Committee's decision.

 

This property is also the subject of an application for consent to sever the existing lot into two new lots (Committee file B0060/16NY).  The consent application was appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, which is now known as the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal.  The consent application is before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal because it was appealed before the Toronto Local Appeal Body started hearing appeals of consent and minor variance applications.  The appeal was scheduled to be heard September 19, 2017, but has been adjourned indefinitely and has not been re-scheduled.  At its meetings of July 4, 2017 and February 26, 2019, respectively, Council adopted 2017.MM31.38 and 2019.MM3.9, instructing the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing in opposition to the consent appeal, retain outside consultants as necessary, and attempt to negotiate a resolution.

 

Under the provisions of section 115 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, consent and minor variance appeals that are related to existing appeals before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal will also be directed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, rather than the Toronto Local Appeal Body.  Since there is an existing consent appeal before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal for this property, this minor variance appeal will also be directed to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal.

 

This Motion would authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing of the minor variance appeal, to retain outside consultants as necessary, and to negotiate a resolution in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Ward Councillor.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.16
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135755.pdf

MM9.17 - An Inspection and Enforcement Action Plan on Problematic Establishments Serving Alcohol - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the General Government and Licensing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, and the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services to consult with the Toronto Police Service and the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario to develop and implement a cross-jurisdictional action plan to respond, manage and resolve negative community impacts created by problematic establishments serving alcohol, and to report to the General Government and Licensing Committee in the fourth quarter of 2019 on the plan's successes and needed improvements.

Summary

In Toronto-St. Paul's there have been a number of establishments serving alcohol that have impacted the safety and quality of life for local residents. These establishments, which often operate as unlicensed, after hour booze cans, are a hub for criminal activity that create disturbances and invite violence into our neighbourhoods.

 

As a result of the transient nature of the proprietors of these establishments, permanent closure is complex and requires the intervention, inspection and enforcement of the Toronto Police Service, Municipal, Licensing and Standards, the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario, Toronto Building and Toronto Fire Services. While the Toronto Police Service can lay charges under the Liquor Licence Act, Municipal, Licensing and Standards can issue notices of violation under the Toronto Municipal Code. Similarly, the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario has the authority to refuse, revoke or suspend a licence and both Toronto Building and Toronto Fire Services can collaborate to close a premise. 

 

It is imperative that all services work in a coordinated effort that will strengthen their abilities to resolve these enforcement issues.

 

Neighbourhoods in our communities deserve to be safe and vibrant. Anything less is unacceptable to local residents. 

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.17
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135761.pdf

MM9.18 - Connecting the York Beltline Trail and the Kay Gardner Beltline Trail - by Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Communication MM9.18.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to review opportunities to better connect the York Beltline Trail, west of Allen Road with the Kay Gardner Beltline Trail, east of Allen Road, with consideration for the feasibility of an active transportation bridge at this location or through improvements to the existing bridge 50 metres north of the trail on Elm Ridge Drive.

Summary

The purpose of this Motion is to establish a direct connection between the York Beltline Trail and the Kay Gardner Beltline Trail across Allen Road to increase pedestrian and cycling activity for users of the trails. Currently, the two trails end abruptly at Allen Road.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.18
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135758.pdf

Communications

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (MM.New.MM9.18.1)

MM9.19 - East York Hall of Fame - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Toronto Office of Partnerships to work with the East York Hall of Fame Association and identify the feasibility of a public space to be used as the site for the East York Hall of Fame and bring recommendations back to the Economic and Community Development Committee in the first quarter of 2020.

Summary

The East York Hall of Fame held its inaugural awards ceremony on June 14, 2019.  The first inductee was renown Canadian actor/comedian and former co-owner of the Toronto Argonauts Football team, John Candy.  The Association is seeking a public space to display memorabilia from the awards ceremony and dedicate a civic space as the East York Hall of Fame.

 

This Motion seeks authority for staff to work with The East York Hall of Fame Association to pursue options for an East York Hall of Fame.  

 

In the interim, a temporary display will see pictures from this year’s event hung in a meeting room at the East York Community Centre on a temporary basis pending a decision on a permanent public location.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.19
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135760.pdf

MM9.20 - Making Home Renovations Safer - requesting changes to the Ontario Building Code based on the Inquest into the death of Ryan Pearce - by Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to implement changes to the Ontario Building Code that will require all underpinning and bench footing work to be undertaken under the general review of a supervised person, and City Council advise the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing that the City of Toronto is prepared to assist with evaluating the regulatory changes needed to accomplish Recommendation 1 from the Office of the Chief Coroner's Inquest into the death of Ryan Pearce.

Summary

On September 9, 2014, 19 year-old Ryan Pearce died due to an accident while working on home renovations in north Toronto. The project included lowering the basement floor slab and did not require the general review or supervision of a qualified person.

 

In the resulting inquest by the Office of the Chief Coroner, competed May 30, 2018, the first Recommendation was to consider changing the Ontario Building Code to require all underpinning and bench footing work to be undertaken under the general review and supervision of a qualified person.

 

Recommendation 2 was that the City of Toronto inform the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing of their support for Recommendation 1 and its preparedness to support and assist with the regulatory changes.

 

The Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building wrote to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing on February 8, 2019 with his unequivocal support of both Recommendations and requested that the Province move expeditiously on implementing the changes.

 

This Motion would affirm City Council’s support for these important regulatory changes.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.20
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135852.pdf

MM9.21 - Diverting Textiles from Toronto's Waste Stream - by Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Communication MM9.21.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to develop an implementation plan for a City-wide textile waste diversion program, in consultation with potential providers, and report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in the first quarter of 2020.

Summary

The City of Toronto is home to one of the largest municipal waste management systems in North America. The Solid Waste Management Services Division is responsible for collecting, transporting, processing, composting and disposing of municipal sector waste, which includes garbage, Blue Bin recyclables, Green Bin organics, yard waste, oversized and metal items, as well as household hazardous waste and electronic waste. However, the City does not offer a textile waste diversion program.

 

Every year, the average Toronto household throws out about 13 kg/29 lbs of clothing and other textiles. This is problematic given the environmental impact of the resources consumed during production, the chemicals used during the dyeing, printing, and finishing processes, and the time of decomposition in landfills.

 

Currently, textiles cannot be accepted as part of the City's Blue Bin recycling program. When textiles are placed in the blue bin, they can tangle sorting machines, damage equipment, and cause workplace injuries. In 2018, City staff identified textiles as one of the top contaminants of the Blue Bin recycling program, which costs the City millions annually.

 

The City's Long Term Waste Management Strategy included a commitment to create a new textile and clothing recycling program for all residents. This is an important step to further divert waste from landfills and achieve a zero waste future. In 2018, City Council adopted my motion requesting staff to consider implementing a requirement for retailers of textile material to post reuse, recyclability, and waste disposal options at the point of purchase.

 

Other municipalities are participating in pilot initiatives to reduce the amount of textiles in their waste streams. A textile waste diversion program will help to ensure that Toronto remains a safe, clean, and healthy City for future generations.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.21
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135762.pdf

Communications

(July 15, 2019) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (MM.New.MM9.21.1)

MM9.22 - Heritage Evaluation Request for "The Oculus" in South Humber Park - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Communication MM9.22.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, in consultation with the Director, Parks Development and Capital Projects, to evaluate the Oculus Park Pavilion in South Humber Park, Etobicoke for designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act and report to the Toronto Preservation Board and the Etobicoke York Community Council.

Summary

In July 2016, concerned community members became aware that the unique City-owned Modernist Pavilion in South Humber Park, known as the Oculus, was slated for extensive alteration due to safety concerns. Following outreach by the local Councillor, an on-line petition was launched and significant interest was generated.

 

The City’s Heritage Preservation Services Unit worked with staff from Parks, Forestry and Recreation to evaluate the Oculus for its cultural heritage value and condition and to review proposed changes in the light of the findings. Staff hired a heritage consultant to undertake a Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report to inform the decision-making process. The consultant's report provided extensive background research and concluded that the Oculus Pavilion was worthy of designation under Part IV of the Ontario Act. In addition, site rehabilitation and restoration was endorsed.

 

To ensure that the site's cultural heritage values and attributes are conserved, and to guide future work in this location, the Oculus Park Pavilion should be reviewed by City Heritage staff to confirm the consultant's findings and to bring forward recommendations to Council as may be appropriate.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.22
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135763.pdf

Communications

(July 12, 2019) E-mail from Brian Mooney, Chair, Etobicoke York Community Preservation Panel (MM.Supp.MM9.22.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/comm/communicationfile-96051.pdf

MM9.23 - Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area Victoria Street Parklet - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve an exemption from Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks to permit within the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area, parklets in the northbound, east curb lane of Victoria Street, within existing street parking spaces in front of 249 and 251 Victoria Street, between the dates of July 25, 2019 and October 31, 2019, including set-up and take-down.
 

2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to issue a street occupation permit from July 25, 2019 to October 31, 2019 in the northbound, east curb lane of Victoria Street in front of 249 and 251 Victoria Street to facilitate the implementation of parklets and a complimentary greening strategy subject to terms and conditions to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services.

Summary

In July 2019, the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area is proposing a parklet and greening project within the limits of existing street parking spaces along the east side of Victoria Street between Shuter Street and Dundas Street East. Parklets are sidewalk extensions that provide space and amenities for residents and visitors to stop, sit, and rest while taking in the activities of the street. Parklet installation have been implemented with great success in the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area catchment area over the last two years and have enhanced the area's general pedestrian and retail experience.

 

All costs and insurance requirements associated with the parklets are to be borne by the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area and its agents.

 

In July 2019, the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area is proposing a parklet and greening project within the limits of existing street parking spaces along the east side of Victoria Street between Shuter Street and Dundas Street East. Parklets are sidewalk extensions that provide space and amenities for residents and visitors to stop, sit, and rest while taking in the activities of the street. Parklet installation have been implemented with great success in the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area catchment area over the last two years and have enhanced the area's general pedestrian and retail experience.

 

All costs and insurance requirements associated with the parklets are to be borne by the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area and its agents. 

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.23
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135785.pdf

MM9.24 - Training on lock-down procedures for City of Toronto and City Council Members’ staff - by Councillor Brad Bradford. seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the General Government and Licensing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Communication MM9.24.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Director, Corporate Security to make available training opportunities and resource materials on emergency response procedures for all City of Toronto and City Council Members’ staff, including but not limited to:

 
a. simplified, plain-language instructions on lock-down, hold and secure, and shelter-in-place procedures tailored to the specific work environments of staff;


b. conducting annual drills to enhance emergency preparedness;


c. incorporating training into required new employee training packages;


d. information on where and how to receive City of Toronto real-time updates on lock-downs and other emergency situations; and


e. access to City of Toronto resources and opportunities for drills on the procedures and best practices outlined above. 

Summary

On Wednesday July 3rd, City Hall was placed in a hold and secure scenario. Thousands of City staff, members of the public, and Members of Council were in City Hall when the lock-down procedure was initiated due to an incident involving a firearm outside of the building.

 

The lock-down initiation left many confused and unsure on what actions should be taken in a security incident. Many members of our City Hall community took an active role in supporting colleagues and implementing the procedures of the lock-down. Their actions should be commended.

 

While no direct harm was caused in this most recent incident, it provides an opportunity for us all to learn and be informed on the appropriate emergency responses. The recommendation in this Motion asks for staff to communicate and tailor the existing, often detailed protocols and procedures into plain-language so that all members of the City of Toronto community can feel better prepared when emergency situations arise. I hope they will never be required.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.24
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135790.pdf

Communications

(July 12, 2019) Letter from David Mitchell, President, Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 79 (MM.New.MM9.24.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/comm/communicationfile-96106.pdf

MM9.25 - Confirmation of the City's Interest in 155 Falstaff Avenue (formerly Nelson A. Boylen Collegiate Institute) - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council confirm to the Toronto Catholic District School Board the City's interest in constructing a new swimming facility at 155 Falstaff Avenue as part of the construction of the new St. Fidelis Catholic School.

 
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to the Economic and Community Development Committee in the fourth quarter of  2019 on the feasibility of co-locating a future aquatic facility at 155 Falstaff Avenue as part of the construction of the new St. Fidelis Catholic School, including the capital funding sources and timelines that would be required to advance this project.

Summary

For over 20 years, the City of Toronto provided recreational programs, including swim programs, at the former Nelson A. Boylen Collegiate Institute, located at 155 Falstaff Avenue ("the site"). In 2016, the Toronto District School Board declared the site surplus and formally closed the school. As a result, use of the school by the City, including the attached pool, ended in September 2016.

 

The Council approved Facilities and Parks Master Plan identified the need for additional aquatic facilities to address the high demand for aquatic programming. Prior to its closure, this site was well-used by the City, and the community, for recreational programs, including swim programs. The closure of the pool in particular was very disappointing to the community, and the need for this programming to be replaced persists.

 

The Toronto Catholic District School Board has since acquired the site for the relocation of St. Fidelis Catholic School. After a review of options, the Toronto Catholic District School Board has determined that the best way forward is to demolish the existing building, which includes the attached pool building, to construct a new school. A replacement pool is outside of the scope of the Toronto Catholic District School Board's plans, as well as outside of the funding envelope they have been allocated for the new school.

 

A number of meetings have been held between the City and the Toronto Catholic District School Board to discuss the possibility of including a swimming pool in the construction of the new school, and the City's interest in reinstating swim programs at this location. The Toronto Catholic District School Board is advancing design work and wishes to engage the City more formally with respect to this co-development opportunity.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.25
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135796.pdf

MM9.26 - Reviewing North St. James Town for Potential Inclusion as a Neighbourhood Improvement Area - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Communications MM9.26.1 to MM9.26.4 have been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to determine the suitability for the North St. James Town neighbourhood, focusing on the neighbourhood east of Sherbourne Street, to be identified as a Neighbourhood Improvement Area when the next City-wide review to identify Neighbourhood Improvement Areas is complete and report back to the Economic and Community Development Committee in the fourth quarter of 2020 as part of this process.

Summary

Two major incidents in apartment buildings in St. James Town have created a significant push by local community organizations and service providers to have the City re-evaluate the neighbourhood for inclusion as a Neighbourhood Improvement Area when the City updates its Strong Neighbourhood Strategy 2020.

 

In 2014, City Council designated 31 neighbourhoods as Neighbourhood Improvement Areas as part of the Strong Neighbourhood Strategy 2020. As part of that work, staff scored 140 neighbourhoods across the City to create a Neighbourhood Equity Score as well as a benchmark to determine which neighbourhoods would be strengthened through the strategy. The 140 neighbourhoods were determined based on grouping Statistics Canada census tracts together.

 

As outlined in a 2014 staff report, neighbourhoods were scored out 100, with a lower score indicating "unnecessary, unfair and unjust differences faced by neighbourhood residents in five key areas: Economic Opportunities, Social Development, Healthy Lives, Participation in Decision-Making and Physical Surroundings."

 

The 31 neighbourhoods that had a score lower than the benchmark score of 42.89 subsequently were approved as Neighbourhood Improvement Areas.

 

The North St. James Town neighbourhood - bounded by Bloor Street to the North, Jarvis Street to the west, Parliament Street to the east and Wellesley Street East to the south - ranked number 39 amongst the 140 neighbourhoods achieving a score of 47.55. This did not qualify the neighbourhood to be included as a Neighbourhood Improvement Area in 2014.

 

Since 2014, residents and community organizations in St. James Town have reported that their low-income neighbourhood continues to struggle.  The St. James Town neighbourhood is one of the City's most densely populated neighbourhoods, with a high immigrant population, a lower proportion of post-secondary education and a high proportion of residents living in poverty.

 

Two major incidents in apartment buildings over the past year have left over 1,000 residents displaced from their homes, and many more St. James Town tenants feeling vulnerable. Dual incidents at 650 Parliament Street and 260 Wellesley Street East have stretched community resources thin, and have stressed the challenges with communicating with, and providing services to, an area with a high proportion of new immigrant families that collectively speak over a dozen languages.

 

It is notable that North St. James Town may have received a higher score in 2014 because the geographic boundary for the neighbourhood includes a more affluent portion west of Sherbourne Street. This area is not typically associated with "St. James Town" proper, and metrics such as education and income are significantly higher per the 2016 Census compared to the area east of Sherbourne Street. Its influence on how the City evaluated the neighbourhood likely had a positive effect on the North St. James Town neighbourhood's score, and may have resulted in the neighbourhood not being included as a Neighbourhood Improvement Area in 2014.

 

Including North St. James Town as a Neighbourhood Improvement Area would provide targeted investment in this diverse and resilient community to help improve the lives of residents.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.26
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135784.pdf

Communications

(July 12, 2019) Letter from Suze Morrison,MPP, Toronto Centre (MM.Supp.MM9.26.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/comm/communicationfile-96050.pdf
(July 12, 2019) Multiple Communications from Robb Johannes, St. James Town Service Providers' Network (MM.Supp.MM9.26.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/comm/communicationfile-96105.pdf
(July 15, 2019) E-mail from Linda Brett (MM.New.MM9.26.3)
(July 15, 2019) Letter from Norm Di Pasquale, Ward 9 Toronto Catholic District School Board (MM.New.MM9.26.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/comm/communicationfile-96146.pdf
(July 16, 2019) Petition from approximately 842 persons to designate North St. James Town a Neighbourhood Improvement Area, submitted by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Ward 13, Toronto Centre, filed during the Routine Matters portion of the meeting. (MM.New)

MM9.27 - Authority to enter into an Agreement with 1630 Queen Developments Limited and MSI Management Limited to design and construct Streetscape improvements on Queen Street East from Coxwell Avenue to Orchard Park Boulevard - by Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Beaches - East York
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to negotiate, enter into and execute an agreement, or separate agreements, with 1630 Queen Developments Limited and MSI Management Limited and/or their design consultants and/or construction contractors as the case may be, to design and/or construct streetscape improvements on the north side of  Queen Street East from Coxwell Avenue to the westerly property line of 1630 Queen Street East, and from the easterly property line of 1630 Queen Street East, eastward to just west of Orchard Park Boulevard, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, including the following:

 
a. in designing the streetscape improvements any party identified by the General Manager, Transportation Services to be consulted shall be consulted;

 
b. the improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the City's construction standards and with detailed plans approved by the General Manager, Transportation Services;

 
c. all relevant City policies as applicable, including the City’s Fair Wage Policy, the Labour Trades Construction Obligations in the Construction Industry Policy and the Declaration of Compliance with Anti-Harassment/Discrimination Legislation Policy, if applicable, shall be complied with in the design and construction of the streetscape improvements; and

 
d. the negotiated fees and costs for all Agreements to design and construct the streetscape improvements shall be fair and reasonable in the opinion of the General Manager, Transportation Services based on the work involved to implement the improvements and costs for similar work completed in the past.

Summary

This Motion is to permit the City to enter into a contract with the developer of 1630 Queen Street East to coordinate construction for required upgrades to the City's right of way, as part of the sidewalk widening already required under the post-approval Site Plan conditions for the development.

 

Toronto Hydro is upgrading its overhead infrastructure along Queen Street East, east of Coxwell Avenue.  New, taller and wider poles are being installed to rise the wires, to increase capacity and to avoid conflicts with trees and adjacent properties.

 

The north side sidewalks are extremely narrow and the curb lane is very wide (almost 6.0 metres in width).  Transportation Services staff have identified an opportunity to widen the sidewalks to improve the future condition of the evolving main street, but could not widen the sidewalks in order to meet the timelines set by Toronto Hydro. The poles are currently protected through temporary measures.

 

Collaboration with the 1630 Queen Street East project would allow for sidewalk widening to take place as part of the 1630 Queen Street East streetscape project.

 

In order for this opportunity to be realized, City Council authority is required to enter into a two-step design and construction agreement allowing City divisions to provide additional funding to the streetscape contract. Leveraging onsite resources and coordination with the development is expected to expedite completion of the streetscape, reduce disruption, reduce costs and reduce reliance on City resources to administer this work.

 

All agreements will be subject to establishing a fair and reasonable price based on estimated quantities and unit prices for similar work and compliance with City standards and policies, including but not limited to the Fair Wage Policy.

 

The developer has agreed to investigate opportunities to add streetscape amenities along this section subject to funding availability and constructability.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.27
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135801.pdf
(July 16, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136181.pdf

MM9.28 - Authorize approval to accept Federal Funding for the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.   City Council authorize the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in anticipation of a favourable Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship funding grant announcement by the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev Ontario), to enter into and administer a funding agreement with FedDev Ontario for up to $5,000,000 in federal support, via a non-repayable contribution, for the period April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2024.

 

2.   City Council increase the 2019 Approved Operating Budget for Economic Development and Culture and associated service levels by $1,150,000.00 gross and $0 net; future year allocations will be included in future year budget submissions for Economic Development and Culture.

 

3.   City Council delegate authority to the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to seek and receive future funding from the federal government for the  Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship and to receive and expend those funds as specified through the funding agreements accompanying the funding.

 

4.   City Council direct the City Manager, working with the Manager, Indigenous Affairs Office, and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to report back to the Economic and Community Development Committee by second quarter of 2020 on the progress of the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship project.

Summary

Toronto is the most diverse City in the world and home to approximately 70,000 Indigenous persons, making it one of the largest Indigenous urban populations in Canada. Indigenous people’s history can be traced back thousands of years, yet, unlike neighbourhoods such as Chinatown or Little Italy established by newer immigrants and recent Business Improvement Area organizing, there is no formally recognized Indigenous business and cultural area in the City, despite Toronto being a City historically created on treaty and Indigenous land. 

 

In 2012, early discussions about creating an Indigenous business centre and cultural district in Toronto began when the ward Councillor and local Indigenous community members met to explore the viability of the idea. A year later, the Native Women's Resource Centre of Toronto through an enabling grant from Metcalf, hired an Indigenous-owned firm to study the feasibility of creating an Indigenous Business and Cultural District along Dundas Street East in the downtown neighbourhood of the Garden District. Through consultation and interviews with Indigenous leaders and business owners in Toronto, The Aboriginal Economic Development Project report help set the foundation for the work ahead by identifying key areas of importance, including the keen community interest to redesign, revision, and rethink Indigenous business and entrepreneurship within an innovative and contemporary mindset. 

 

That same year in 2013, the ward Councillor worked with City Planning to identify a new development at 200 Dundas Street East as a potential location for the Indigenous business centre and incubator. Over a period of five years, with community support and through extensive Section 37 and community benefits negotiation with the developer, the partial first and second floor of the building’s podium, initially 14,000 square feet and growing to 16,000 and eventually designed to an expansive 20,000 square feet, was secured by the City of Toronto to become an incubator and co-working space dedicated to serving Indigenous entrepreneurs and the local Indigenous community.

 

Construction for the overall development is well underway with the City taking possession of its dedicated space in 2019. Working with local Indigenous leadership towards an opening by early 2021, it is anticipated that the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship will be among the largest incubators dedicated to serving Indigenous entrepreneurs in North America and possibly the world. 

 

The new Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship will enable Indigenous-owned business operators and entrepreneurs to work with the broader community to access Indigenous-led services, technology and talent through virtual and physical co-working locations. It will also serve as an anchor for what could become Canada's first-ever urban Indigenous Business and Cultural District, accelerating the transformation of the Dundas Street East corridor into a world leader for Indigenous innovation and business leadership.

 

The Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship will be a culturally and technology rich environment to support the incubation of start-ups led by Indigenous majority-owned businesses, enhancing economic development by making it a physical hub and meeting place for Indigenous entrepreneurs, industry partners, customers and more. Technology-enabled meeting and convening physical and virtual spaces will serve connections across the Greater Toronto Area and to Indigenous communities in and outside of Toronto, across Canada and around the world.  The Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship will develop wide-ranging training programmes delivered in partnership with universities, colleges and other educational institutions to help Indigenous entrepreneurs scale-up their businesses, and reach local, regional, national and international markets. 

 

The Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship will be an Indigenous-led and operated entity with an initial program offering, which will be expanded over time. In the interim, City staff will work with a Leadership Advisory Circle comprised of local Indigenous leaders and entrepreneurs to develop the business plan, design and construction plans, and governance structure.

 

The Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship is an important initiative to advance  economic opportunity for Indigenous people in the City of Toronto with significant federal funding proposed for the project.

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM9.28
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136030.pdf
(July 16, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136182.pdf

MM9.29 - Improving Pedestrian Safety on Sherbourne Street Between Bloor Street East and Howard Street - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in conjunction and in consultation with the Toronto Transit Commission, adjacent resident associations and other divisions as required, to review pedestrian and traffic safety on Sherbourne Street between Bloor Street East and Howard Street, including reviewing the Sherbourne Street intersection at Selby Street and Howard Street, potential two-way operation on Selby Street and the southbound 75 Sherbourne TTC bus route at Bloor Street East and Sherbourne Street and to report back with changes to improve pedestrian safety to the December 3, 2019 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council.

Summary

The Bloor East Neighbourhood Association and the Upper Jarvis Neighbourhood Association have requested a review of two related issues on Sherbourne Street between Bloor Street East and Howard Street. The first is to review the location of the traffic signals and crosswalks on Sherbourne at Howard Street to potentially move or include hte Selby Street intersection, which they believe will create significant pedestrian improvements. Second, by moving the traffic signal, they want the Toronto Transit Commission to review its southbound 75 Sherbourne route to determine whether a safer location for transit users to queue can be created.

 

Selby Street and Howard Street create a “jog” on Sherbourne Street that has been of concern for residents for many years. There have been discussions about the potential to turn Selby Street into partial two-way operation and to adjust the location of the traffic signals to create an intersection that would improve pedestrian and vehicular movements.

 

An upcoming development at 603-611 Sherboune Street is planning to create a privately-owned, publicly accessible space whose main entrance would roughly align with the north sidewalk on Selby Street. Moving the crosswalk and traffic signal would therefore improve pedestrian access to this future privately-owned, publicly accessible space.

 

In addition, the Bloor East Neighbourhood Association would like to have the existing southbound bus stop for Toronto Transit Commission 75 Sherbourne at Bloor Street East and Sherbourne Street reviewed. The southbound bus stop at Bloor Street East and Sherbourne Street is very close to what is already a busy intersection, creating a crush of pedestrians on what is a narrow sidewalk during rush hour. The  Bloor East Neighbourhood Association would like to explore with Transportation Services and the Toronto Transit Commission whether realigned lights at Sherbourne Street and Selby Street could adjust the southbound stop to improve Toronto Transit Commission operations and improve pedestrian safety.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.29
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135830.pdf

MM9.30 - Bringing Basketball to the Bay by Mitigating Local Recreational Opportunities Lost Due to Construction - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the development, design and construction of a public basketball court on the Ashbridges Bay Park property at a location determined by and suitable to Toronto Water.


2. City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to finalize the design of a basketball court to be located on the Ashbridges Bay Park property. 


3. City Council direct that funds for the work be allocated from the contingency allowances included in the existing Don River and Central Waterfront Contract 1 and/or the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Integrated Pumping Stations Contracts 1 and 2.


4. City Council authorize the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to execute the necessary change orders to implement the project.


5. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to develop a Master Recreation Plan for the park, in consultation with General Manager Toronto Water, the local Ward Councillor, other stakeholders and the local community, to be ready upon completion of the construction activities related to the Don River and Central Waterfront Tunnel system as well as the new Integrated Pumping Station.

Summary

Disruption and public access restriction to more than half the Ashbridges Bay Park area located in Ward 14 due to construction activities related to the Don River and Central Waterfront Tunnel system as well as the new Integrated Pumping Station servicing the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant will significantly impair public enjoyment of the park area for the next ten years.  An existing recreational rugby field has already been relocated to accommodate the construction activity.  This Motion seeks to grant authority and instruct the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to develop and construct an 18 metre by 27 metre temporary basketball court (four min-courts) in accordance with specifications and standards to be provided by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.  The court is to be constructed on the east side of the Ashbridges Bay Park property north of the new rugby field, easily accessible from Coxwell Avenue and will supplement the already existing skate board park at the corner of Lakeshore Boulevard East and Coxwell Avenue.  The basketball court will be constructed as a temporary facilities pending the development of a future Master Plan and further redevelopment of the park once the Toronto Water construction activities are completed in 2030.

 

The preliminary estimate developed by Parks, Forestry and Recreation staff for the proposed court is in the range of $140,000 to $200,000 and can be accommodated within the existing Don and Central Waterfront construction contract or one of the first two construction contracts related to the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Integrated Pumping Station.

 

This Motion will grant authority to Toronto Water, Engineering and Construction Services and Parks, Forestry and Recreation staff to finalize the design and, retain engineering services, seek quotes from one or more contractors, and grant authority to Engineering and Construction Services staff to award the work to contractor(s) best able to construct the works on a timely basis and within the estimated cost developed by Parks, Forestry and Recreation.        

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.30
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135835.pdf
(July 16, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136183.pdf

MM9.31 - Coordinating Construction and Infrastructure Between Yonge Street, King Street East, Church Street and Wellington Street East - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services,  through the Major Capital Infrastructure Coordination Office, to immediately form a monthly working group with membership to include Engineering and Construction Services, Transportation Services, Toronto Hydro, the Toronto Transit Commission, the St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Association, the St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood Business Improvement Area, Carttera Developments Inc., Enbridge Gas, the Ward Councillor and any additional stakeholders as required to facilitate the timely coordination of planned and future infrastructure and development between the area bounded by Yonge Street, King Street East, Church Street and Wellington Street East.

Summary

The St. Lawrence Neighbourhood has seen significant growth, along with necessary investments to replace aging infrastructure. This has made it challenging to coordinate projects, instigated by public and private parties that often need to occupy the same right-of-way.

 

There are currently two active projects and a number of potential future projects within the small geographic area between Yonge Street, King Street East, Church Street and Wellington Street East. These projects require the coordination of multiple City divisions, private development, local stakeholders and residents to ensure timely delivery while creating minimal disruption. Those projects include:

 

a. the coordination of streetscape work on Wellington Street East, as set out in TE20.44, “Road Alterations - Wellington Street East, Church Street, and Front Street Intersection” as approved by City Council in December 13, 2016. This project, strongly advocated for by St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood Business Improvement Area, has involved significant coordination with Toronto Hydro, Enbridge Gas and the Toronto Transit Commission to ensure construction can begin in Summer 2020;

 
b. the coordination of Carttera Private Equities Inc.’s project at 65 King Street East, which requires coordination with the Toronto Transit Commission’s track replacement work on Church Street and planned elevator installations at Yonge Street and Colborne Street to ensure the movement of trucks in and out of the Carttera’s Colborne Street staging area; and

 
c. proposed future streetscape improvements on Colborne Street and other roads, as well as a new potential PATH connection between 65 King Street East and existing PATH connections on Yonge Street.
 

Limited coordination work has already been taking place within existing divisions, developers and agencies to deliver the above work, but a broader remit and membership through this working group will allow for more timely coordination and potentially permit innovative solutions to address stakeholder needs while minimizing the impact on residents, businesses and traffic.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.31
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135845.pdf

MM9.32 - Building the Chinatown Gates - by Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development to initiate a working group composed of staff from Transportation Services, the Toronto Transit Commission and Economic Development and Culture, to work with the Toronto Chinatown Gate Heritage Association on a feasibility and implementation strategy for the Chinatown Gates.


2. City Council direct that any cost implications of the feasibility study for the Chinatown Gates be considered as part of the 2020 budget process.

Summary

Toronto is home to a thriving, vibrant Chinatown in the heart of our downtown core. Every day, residents flock to this area to enjoy the authentic food and culture that this area offers.

 

Chinatown Gates serve as a major tourist attraction for cities worldwide. Serving as a gateway to our community, residents across the City and visitors alike will come to Chinatown to visit, shop and take pictures with the Chinatown Gate.

 

By starting this process with City staff, we may see how we can bring this project to life, in concert with members of the Chinese community who are eager to participate.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.32
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135991.pdf

MM9.33 - 11 Polson Street - Powerhouse Corporation currently operating as Rebel Nightclub/Cabana Pool Bar - Liquor Licence 804501 - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to determine from the Registrar of Alcohol, Cannabis and Racing if the conditions attached to the liquor licence for Maya Corp. at 11 Polson Street are being enforced by the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario, and if any disciplinary action has been brought forward to Maya Corp. for violations of section 46 of Regulation 719, or for a breach of the conditions attached to the liquor licence.
 

2.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to report on the response of the Registrar of Alcohol, Cannabis and Gaming directly to the October 2and 3, 2019 meeting of City Council.

Summary

There is a long history of disturbing noise from the licenced premises at 11 Polson Street (the "Premises") on the residents of Ward's and Algonquin Islands (the "Toronto Islands"):

  •  From 1996 to 2006, the Premises was occupied by Docks on Cherry (the “Docks”).  The Docks contained an indoor licenced area for approximately 3000 patrons, and an outdoor licenced area for approximately 7000 patrons.  
  • On July 24, 2006, following a 26-day hearing held at the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario, the liquor licence for the Premises was revoked. The Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario determined that it was not in the public interest having regards to the needs and wishes of the residents for the Docks to retain its liquor licence.  The Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario based their decision primarily on the evidence of several residents of the Toronto Islands regarding repeated noise impacts from the Docks on their daily lives. The noise originated from both indoor and outdoor music events at the Premises that included concerts and festival events.
  • On October 25, 2007, Polson Entertainment Inc. applied for a new liquor licence at the Premises.  The City and the Toronto Island Noise Committee objected to the application. In advance of a hearing at the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario, Polson Pier, the Toronto Island Noise Committee and the City reached a settlement on conditions that were placed on the licence. 

There were minimal noise impacts between 2007 and 2013.

 

The licence was then transferred to Maya Corp., and starting in late summer 2013 noise impacts from the licenced outdoor area, now named the Cabana Pool Bar, have been felt by the Toronto Island residents.

 

In May 2015, Powerhouse Corporation (Powerhouse), a corporation 75 percent owned by Maya Corp., applied for a brand new liquor licence for the Premises even though the Premises continued to operate under the Maya Corp. licence. The City, the Toronto Island Noise Committee and the York Quay Neighbourhood Association objected to the application and a 17-day hearing occurred throughout 2017 at the Licence Appeal Tribunal. The  Licence Appeal Tribunal directed the then Registrar of Alcohol, Gaming and Racing to issue the new licence, but with an imposed condition that no amplified sound be permitted on the outdoor licenced area.  In the decision, the three-member panel concluded that noise from the Cabana Pool Bar cannot be contained so that it would not disturb the Toronto Island residents. The  Licence Appeal Tribunal decision has been appealed to Divisional Court.

 

Currently, the Premises continues to operate under the Maya Corp. liquor licence that permits amplified sound on the outdoor licenced area between 11:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. daily but prohibits outdoor events and any emission of sound from the outdoor licenced area from being audible on the Toronto Islands.

 

Toronto Island residents continue to be disturbed by noise from the Cabana Pool Bar, and have submitted nine packages of noise logs from the Toronto Island Noise Committee to the Alcohol and Gaming Commissioner of Ontario between July 6, 2014, and June 3, 2018.  As well, there have been two convictions under the City's Noise By-law, and an additional charge pending.  The evidence provided to the Alcohol and Gaming Commissioner of Ontario appears to demonstrate a violation of conditions attached to the licence, and section 46 of Regulation 719, that prohibits noise from a licenced outdoor area "that arises directly or indirectly from entertainment on the premises or from the sale and service of liquor to disturb persons who reside near the premises".

 

Yet, it appears that no disciplinary action has ever been brought forward for this liquor licence by the Alcohol and Gaming Commissioner of Ontario.

 

To determine if any disciplinary action has been brought forward by the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario and to determine if the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario is enforcing the conditions attached to the Maya Corp. liquor licence, City Council should direct the City Solicitor to write to the Registrar of Alcohol, Cannabis and Racing, and to report on the Registrar's response to the October 2 and 3, 2019 meeting of City Council.

 

Urgent consideration is being requested as residents of the Toronto Islands continue to be disturbed by noise from the Cabana Pool Bar.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.33
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136022.pdf

MM9.34 - Request to Investigate the Feasibility of Renaming Woodsy Park located at 80 McMahon Drive and the Renaming of the Adjacent Woodsy Lane, to Ethennonnhawahstihnen’ [et-hen-nonn-ha-wah-stih-nen’] - by Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Don Valley North
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the Manager, Indigenous Affairs Office, to investigate the feasibility of renaming Woodsy Park located at 80 McMahon Drive to Ethennonnhawahstihnen Park and report back to the North York Community Council with a recommendation based on the criteria and process outlined in the Property Naming Policy.

 
2.  City Council waive Section 3.3.5 of the Property Policy which says City properties that have been named or renamed in the previous ten years will not be renamed.

 
3.  City Council direct the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, in consultation the Manager, Indigenous Affairs Office, to investigate the feasibility of renaming Woodsy Park Lane to Ethennonnhawahstihnen Lane and report back to the North York Community Council with a recommendation based on the criteria and process outlined in the Street Naming Policy.

 
4.  City Council express its support for the renaming of "Woodsy Park Lane", extending between Sheppard Avenue East and McMahon Drive, to "Ethennonnhawahstihnen Lane".

Summary

Toronto is one of the most diverse Cities in the world and home to approximately 100,000 First Nations, Metis and Inuit, making it one of the largest Indigenous urban populations in Canada. Indigenous people’s history can be traced back thousands of years, yet, there is very little visibility of these diverse and vibrant Indigenous communities in the City, despite Toronto being a city created on treaty and Indigenous land. The traditional keepers of the land, the Wendat, Haudenosaunee, and Anishinaabe have a relationship of 15,000+ years in the making. Yet, when we walk down our City streets, through our parks, and in our institutions, we are hard-pressed to see that history, culture and relationship reflected.

 

Thoughtfully considering Indigenous naming is a part of the City of Toronto's broader efforts in Indigenous place-making. The Place-Making initiative emerges from ongoing work led by City staff, partner agencies and Indigenous leaders and activists to better reflect the City's commitment to truth and reconciliation in parks and the public realm, and catalyzed in a request from the Parks and Environment Committee to develop an "Indigenous Place-Making Framework".

 

Indigenous place-making has begun to focus on four priorities:

 

1.  expanding and ensuring presentation and commemoration of Indigenous histories and cultures;

 

2.  creating space – physically, and in process and policy – for ceremony, teaching and community;

 

3.  strengthening Indigenous connections with lands and waters, both traditionally and contemporarily used; and

 

4.  building capacity for land-based Indigenous engagement, and for greater cultural competency in staff leadership.

 

These principles distill to four focus areas: places and naming, public art, policy and capacity and consultation. In consultation with the local community, this newly built community represents a unique for the residents of Don Valley North to honour the Wendat Nation and to make a sizeable and spiritual contribution to indigenous place-making in the City of Toronto.

 

Through initial conversations with the Wendat community they have suggested the park and adjacent street be renamed to Ethennonnhawahstihnen’ [et-hen-nonn-ha-wah-stih-nen’], which means ‘where they had a good, beautiful life’.

 

Wendat place names typically reflect the geological features of the landscape or document events that occurred there. A significant Wendat archaeological site, the Moatfield Site, is only 500-800 metres from this park and adjacent street. One of the striking things about this site was the presence of many people who lived over the age of 50, which was not the case at many other sites. The inhabitants lived in good health, there was less violence and warfare compared to other sites.

 

Indigenous place-making looks different depending on the context of its surroundings and community. Each project is shaped uniquely by the communities interacting with it.  As such, the following recommendation is not only an essential component of truth and reconciliation; it is also a necessary one.

 

This Motion is urgent in order to permit work on the feasibility of the renaming to begin prior to the opening of the park.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.34
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136019.pdf

MM9.35 - 2135 Sheppard Avenue East and 299 Yorkland Boulevard - Authority to Amend Section 37 Agreement - by Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Don Valley North
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend the Section 37 Agreement for 2135 Sheppard Avenue East and 299 Yorkland Boulevard to permit an alternative phasing of development which would permit the construction of either of Building A or Building B (including the associated podium), prior to the issuance of an Above-Grade Building Permit for Building C and, where the Owner elects to do so, to require the cash contribution of the outstanding community benefits identified in the Section 37 Agreement not yet provided, prior to the issuance of the first Above-Grade Building Permit for the second Building.

Summary

The approved Zoning By-law 1182-2016 permits a mixed use development in three residential buildings with heights of 26 storeys (Building D), 34 storeys (Building A) and 43 storeys (Building B), as well as a four-storey retail building (Building C) at the southwest corner of Sheppard Avenue East and Consumers Road. Buildings A and B are connected through a five-storey residential podium. The Zoning By-law permits a maximum gross floor area of 83,500 square metres including a maximum gross floor area of 18,750 square metres for non-residential uses and a total of 1,100 dwellings units. A new 2,140 square metre centrally-located park with frontage on Consumers Road and Yorkland Boulevard and a new north-south public street are also proposed as part of the development. In 2017, the applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment to seek variances to the approved Zoning By-law in order to permit, among other things, an increase in the dwelling units from 1,100 to 1,200 units. On March 9, 2018, the Chief Planner approved the draft plan of subdivision application, in accordance with Delegated Approval By-law 229-2000.

 

The City and the Owner, entered into a Section 37 Agreement dated September 28, 2015 (the “Section 37 Agreement”) as a result of increased height and density. The Section 37 Agreement requires the Owner to complete construction of the mixed-use development in phases. The Section 37 agreement stipulates that either of residential Building D or residential Buildings A and B may constitute the first phase of development. Following that first phase of development for either of those buildings, no further above-grade building permits for the remaining residential building(s) are to be issued until an above-grade building permit is issued for the retail building (Building C). The construction of the public street and the conveyance of the park block are to occur prior to the registration of the draft plan of subdivision. The Site and Buildings are shown on the attached extracted zoning by-law map.

 

The Owner has chosen to construct Building D as the first phase of development. The construction of Building D is complete. Construction of the new public street is complete. The park block has been constructed to base park condition and above-base park construction will begin this summer. The Owners have advised that attracting a suitable retail tenant to occupy the retail building has been challenging. The opportunity to build one further residential building on the site in advance of the retail building provides further certainty to support attracting retail tenants. The provision of the Section 37 Community Benefits identified in the Section 37 agreement not previously provided would also be required to be provided in advance of the next above-grade building permit for the second residential building. Such community benefits include a cash contribution of $850,000.00 for capital improvements to the Pleasant View Toronto Public Library branch and the cash contribution of $1,000,000.00 towards streetscape improvements in the Consumers Business Park in the immediate vicinity of the Site.

 

The Owner has proposed that the original Section 37 Agreement be amended by amending the agreement to provide an alternative phasing of development to allow for the construction of one additional residential building (either Building A or B, including associated podium), prior to the construction of the retail building (Building C) and the contribution of the community benefits earlier than stipulated in the Section 37 Agreement. The third and final residential building would be constructed after the construction of Building C. City Staff and the City Solicitor agree with this approach and seek instruction from City Council.

 

This matter is time sensitive as City staff require the appropriate direction from City Council on the processing of a Site Plan Application for the second residential building on the lands, for which City staff have been advised will be submitted prior to the next available City Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.35
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-135992.pdf
Attachment 1 - Schedule C1(142) to Zoning By-law 1182-2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136029.pdf

MM9.36 - Expanding Housing Options in Toronto- Tackling the Missing Middle and the ‘Yellowbelt’ - by Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to the Planning and Housing Committee in the fourth quarter of 2019 on options and a timeline to increase housing options and planning permissions in areas of Toronto designated as Neighbourhoods in Toronto’s Official Plan.

Summary

In decades past, many of Toronto’s neighbourhoods housed more people than they do today. Shrinking family sizes and changing demographics have reduced the population in many neighbourhoods.

 

To allow residents to age in their communities, and to accommodate more people in their underused houses and to provide alternative forms of housing, we must examine the means by which we can expand permissions to construct the so-called ‘Missing Middle’ housing form. The Missing Middle refers to housing forms that range from duplexes to low-rise walk-up apartments many of which can be found in a number of Toronto’s neighbourhoods today.

 

Areas of Toronto designated as Neighbourhoods in the Official Plan, and coloured yellow in the land use plan map, are referred to as the ‘Yellowbelt.’

 

Toronto has made significant strides in the last several years to expand housing options in the City’s neighbourhoods including approving laneway housing and secondary suites. These changes have added the potential for thousands of additional units to be created in neighbourhoods without significant impacts. It is imperative that we continue to look for ways to allow gentle density throughout the City to alleviate the demand for housing and to build a more equitable City.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.36
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136018.pdf

MM9.37 - Restoration and Revitalization of the Ossington Avenue Clock Tower - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the General Manager, Real Estate Services to work with Toronto Fire Services and Toronto City Archives to conduct a thorough search for the clock previously located at Fire Hall No. 9 at 16 Ossington Avenue.

 

2. City Council request the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO, and direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Transportation Services to explore opportunities to revitalize the land at 18 Ossington Avenue as public space, in collaboration with plans to revitalize the space at  16 Ossington Avenue, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

Preserving our City's heritage, and finding creative ways to enhance our public space, are both of critical importance as we continue to build our City and our communities for future generations. In so many of our downtown communities, we continue our work to find creative ways to both preserve the past, while creatively building for the future.

 

Located on the west side of Ossington Avenue, in the first block north of Queen Street, the building at 16 Ossington Avenue was constructed in 1878 as a fire hall. Originally known as Fire Hall No. 9, the City of Toronto commissioned new fire halls in tandem with the expansion of the City, numbering the facilities in order of their appearance. Fire Hall No. 9 was decommissioned in the late 1960s, and it is the oldest intact fire hall in the former City of Toronto. The building is now leased to the University Health Network, and provides critical support for community members, and the City as a whole. Archival photographs of the building depict a clock on top of the hose-drying tower, but it is not known what year the clock was removed.

 

At the same time, the Toronto Parking Authority operates a small Green P parking lot directly adjacent at 18 Ossington Avenue. With significant constraints on available space in this area of the City, and a growing residential and business community along Ossington, finding creative ways to expand and revitalize public space has become an increasing priority for stakeholders across the community.

 

An important neighbourhood landmark, local neighbours, the local Business Improvement Association, and other stakeholders have come together with the goal of restoring the original clock tower at 16 Ossington Avenue, and working together to expand the public realm in the immediate area. Unfortunately, community efforts to locate the original clock have not yet been successful. Working together to ensure we explore all possible avenues to locate the clock, as we continue to move forward to revitalize the space, is critical.

 

This Motion is urgent in order to continue to advance plans for the area revitalization over the summer months.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.37
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136017.pdf

MM9.38 - Interim Housing Assistance Program for Refugee/Asylum Claimants Arriving in Toronto - by Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:

 

City Council adopt the following recommendations in the report (July 12, 2019) from the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the Federal government in order for the City to:

 

a. receive funding to provide services to refugee/asylum claimants as part of the local plan referred to in this report, such agreement to be in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and

 

b. allocate funding in accordance with the agreement and the local plan.

 

2.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, or designate to:

 

a. allocate funds received from the Federal government and enter into agreements with community agencies, hotels or other service providers, in or outside of the City of Toronto, in support of the local plan, such agreements to be on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor;

 

b.  allocate funds received from the Federal government and enter into agreements with other participating municipalities in support of the local plan, such agreements to be on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor; and

 

c. allocate funds received from the Federal government and enter into other agreements as may be necessary to provide services to refugee/asylum claimants in support of the local plan.

Summary

Since 2016, there has been an ongoing and consistent increase in the number of refugee/asylum claimants seeking emergency shelter in Toronto.  This trend surged in 2018 and through 2019 continues to add additional pressure to Toronto’s already strained shelter system. 

 

As part of its ongoing response to this challenge, the City is now proposing to lead a proactive approach with the Federal government and other willing municipalities to increase shelter and housing options to refugee/asylum claimants arriving in Toronto. The details of this plan, described in the accompanying staff report, continue to be developed, and as such, this Motion seeks authority to implement this plan – at no net cost to the City of Toronto – over the summer as further details are finalized.

 

Shelter, Support and Housing Administration staff continue to work with the Federal government and local municipalities to maximize the opportunities for all shelter users, including refugee/asylum claimant families. While the full amount of available funding from the Federal government for this initiative is still being determined, this Motion seeks authority for the City to receive all available funding from the Federal government and to administer this funding – up to the amount provided by the Federal government – to all willing municipalities (including Toronto) for the costs associated with and incurred as a direct result of this approach.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.38
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136020.pdf
(July 12, 2019) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services on Interim Housing Assistance Program for Refugee/Asylum Claimants Arriving in Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136021.pdf

MM9.39 - 1977 Dundas Street West - Liquor Licence Application - Tommys Wine Club - by Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the issuance of a liquor licence for 1977 Dundas Street West operating under the name Tommys Wine Club (the “Premises”) is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 
2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

Tommys Win Bar Inc., (the “Licensee”) has submitted an Application to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for a liquor licence at the premises at 1977 Dundas Street West to operate under the name of Tommys Wine Club (the “Premises”). The Application is for an indoor area with a proposed capacity of approximately 35 patrons. There is no proposed outdoor seating.

 

The Premises directly abuts a low-density residential neighbourhood to the south and the west and is adjacent to Columbus Parkette. There are concerns related to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area. This application for a new liquor licence is not in the public interest, unless the concerns of the residents are addressed. The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

 

This matter is urgent as the Placard deadline for objections is August 1, 2019.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.39
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136027.pdf

MM9.40 - 100 Edward Street - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing to support the Committee of Adjustment's decision in Application A0454/18TEY respecting 70 and 100 Edward Street and 636 Bay Street.
 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal of the decision in application A0454/18TEY respecting 70 and 100 Edward Street and 636 Bay Street and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City in the City Solicitor's discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and with the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

Summary

On April 17, 2019, the Committee of Adjustment refused a minor variance application brought by the owner of 70 and 100 Edward Street and 636 Bay Street to construct a new 19-storey and 22-storey mixed use building with a connected 7-storey base building and five levels of below grade parking (Application A0454/18TEY). Variances from the applicable Zoning By-laws were sought for the building height and penetration of an angular plane, tower setbacks, building setbacks, floor space index and gross floor area, number of dwelling units, amenity space, and location of long-term bicycle parking spaces. The Owner appealed the refusal to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal in order to consolidate the appeal with the previously-appealed Site Plan application.

 

In the report (April 10, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, Community Planning Staff recommended that the application be refused. Planning Staff identified a number of outstanding issues with the proposal which were previously identified through review of the Site Plan application, including building heights which must comply with Official Plan policies 3.1.5.45 and 3.1.1.9 and 10; building heights which demonstrate compliance with the City's helicopter flight path protection policies and regulations; appropriate building massing including tower setbacks and separation distances which provide for adequate light and privacy; building setbacks which provide for a suitable interface with the public realm; and appropriate design of bicycle parking areas. The requested variances do not meet the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and are not a desirable use of the land.

 

This Motion would give the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff authority to attend at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to defend the position set out in the Planning Staff report dated April 10, 2019.

 

This Motion is time sensitive and urgent as the applicant has appealed the Committee's decision to refuse the Application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal and the City Solicitor requires instructions to attend the hearing.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.40
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136052.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 100 Edward Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136076.pdf
(April 10, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 70 and 100 Edward Street and 636 Bay Street Committee of Adjustment Application
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136053.pdf

MM9.41 - 32 Oxton Avenue - Representation at Toronto Local Appeal Body Appeal Hearing - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City staff, to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing in respect of 32 Oxton Avenue to oppose the Committee of Adjustment’s approval of the applicant’s proposed development (Application A0160/19TEY).

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary and at the City Solicitor's discretion.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor’s discretion, and in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Summary

On June 12, 2019, the Toronto and East York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment approved applications related to the property municipally known as 32 Oxton Avenue (the “Subject Property”) for minor variances. The approval decision has been appealed to the Toronto Local Appeal Body.


The applicant proposes to modify an existing townhome. The application requires variances to City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013, including variances for rear yard soft landscaping, maximum building height, maximum height of front and rear exterior walls, maximum building depth for a duplex, maximum floor space index, and the minimum side yard setback for a duplex.

 

The City Solicitor, at the City Solicitor's discretion, may need to retain external planning consultants to provide evidence for the hearing of this appeal.

 

Copies of the Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment is attached.

 

The decision of the Committee of Adjustment to approve the application has been appealed to the Toronto Local Appeal Body by other interested parties. This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor to support the appeal at the Toronto Local Appeal Body and to secure the necessary authorization and resources to support the City’s opposition to the application, including providing for the ability for the City Solicitor to settle the matter.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.41
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136072.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 32 Oxton Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136073.pdf

MM9.42 - Authorization of an Agreement to continue funding the Muslim Youth Fellowship Internship Program in Council Member's Offices for 2020 - by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, seconded by Mayor John Tory

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, seconded by Mayor John Tory, recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City Clerk to enter into an agreement with Urban Alliance on Race Relations to receive funding for up to fifteen Councillor's Aide positions in Council Member Offices.

 

2. City Council direct staff to explore possibilities of expanding the program with the Urban Alliance on Race Relations to youth from other diverse, under-represented communities with the goal of expanding the program as a year-round initiative at City Hall starting Fall 2020 and to report back on progress before the fourth quarter of 2019.

Summary

This Motion seeks City Council's authorization for the City Clerk to enter into an agreement with Urban Alliance on Race Relations in order to receive funding to support up to fifteen part-time positions created in Council Member Offices to support the Muslim Youth Fellowship Internship Program in 2020. Placements in Council Member's Offices are scheduled to start in January 2020.

 

Thirteen Council Member's Offices participated in the Muslim Youth Fellowship in its inaugural year in 2018 as well as thirteen in 2019. This program has proven to be a success for both the Fellows and the City, and should continue in 2020.

 

A number of under-represented communities have approached Urban Alliance on Race Relations to explore the possibility of expanding the program based on the model created by and in full partnership with the Muslim Youth Fellowship.

 

The program is designed to increase participation in civic engagement among Muslim youth. Full funding for the program, will be provided by Urban Alliance on Race Relations unless an agreement for partial support for the program with the City is reached.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.42
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136054.pdf

MM9.43 - Authorization to Release a Portion of Section 37 Contribution to Transportation Services for Capital Improvements to the Sheppard Bridge over Highway 404 - by Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Don Valley North
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the 2019 Approved Capital Budget for Transportation Services, in the amount of $16,000 gross, $0 net, on a one-time basis, for the design cost of the public realm improvements on the Sheppard Bridge over Highway 404; the funds to be transferred to the Ministry of Transportation to undertake the design work; and to be fully funded by Section 37 contribution related to the development at 2025-2045 Sheppard Avenue East. (Source Account XR3026-3700293).
 

2. City Council authorize the inclusion in the 2020 Capital Budget for Transportation Services, upwards in the amount of $234,000, $0 net, on a one-time basis, for the construction cost of the public realm improvements on the Sheppard Bridge over Highway 404; the exact construction cost not having been determined yet; and to be fully funded by Section 37 contribution related to the development at 2025-2045 Sheppard Avenue East. (Source Account XR3026-3700293).

Summary

Authority is being sought to amend the capital Budget of Transportation Services by upwards of $250,000 fully funded by a Section 37 Contribution related to the development application address at 2025-2045 Sheppard Avenue East. (Source Account XR3026-3700293).

 

The Sheppard Bridge over Highway 404 is owned by the Ministry of Transportation and it is scheduled to undergo major rehabilitation work starting in 2020. The section 37 contribution from the 2025-2045 Sheppard Avenue East development will allow for permanent public realm improvements on the North side of the bridge.  The construction will be undertaken by Ministry of Transportation and this approach maximizes cost efficiency and enhances the level of improvements to be undertaken.

 

Reason for Urgency

 

This Motion is urgent due to the inflation of design cost if funding is not secured before August 30, 2019.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.43
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136055.pdf

MM9.44 - Authorization to Release Section 37 (Planning Act) Funds from Various Developments for Capital Improvements to Toronto Community Housing Corporation Properties in Ward 10, Spadina-Fort York - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailao, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the 2019 Approved Operating Budget of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on a one-time basis by $1,994,677.68 gross, $0 net, for transfer to Toronto Community Housing Corporation for capital improvements to various Toronto Community Housing Corporation properties in Ward 10 (Cost Centre: FD5101), fully funded by Section 37 and Section 45(9) (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits from the following developments:

 
a.  500 Lake Shore Boulevard West, secured for capital improvements to affordable housing in former Ward 20, in the amount of $570,175.44 (Source Account: XR3026-3700976);


b.  40, 46, 48, 50, 52 and 60 McCaul Street and 10 Stephanie Street, secured for capital repairs to existing Toronto Community Housing buildings in former Ward 20, in the amount of $101,905.13 (Source Account: XR3026-3700889);


c.  19 Duncan Street, 219-223 Adelaide Street West, secured for capital improvements to existing rental housing units provided by Toronto Community Housing Corporation in former Ward 20, in the amount of $336,141.04 (Source Account: XR3026-3700983);


d.  15-35 Mercer Street, secured for capital fund for repairs to Toronto Community Housing Corporation housing in former Ward 20, in the amount of $583,923.95 (Source Account: XR3026-3700921);


e.  306-322 Richmond Street West, secured for public housing improvements in former Ward 20, in the amount of $40,290.00 (Source Account: XR3028-4500209);


f.  290 Adelaide Street West, secured for capital improvements to Toronto Community Housing Corporation buildings in former Ward 20, in the amount of $50,981.17 (Source Account: XR3028-4500185);


g.  56 Blue Jays Way, secured for capital improvements to social housing in former Ward 20, in the amount of $50,981.17 (Source Account: XR3028-4500184);


h.  219 Queen Street West, secured for capital improvements to affordable housing in former Ward 20, in the amount of $343.75 (Source Account: XR3026-3700662);


i.  576, 578 and 580 Front Street West, 25 and 27 Bathurst Street, 33, 35 and 49 Niagara Street, secured for capital improvements to Toronto Community Housing Corporation properties located in former Ward 20, in the amount of $196,604.48 (Source Account: XR3026- 3700809);


j.  578-580 Front Street West, secured for capital improvements to Toronto Community Housing Corporation properties located in former Ward 20, in the amount of $11,160.93 (Source Account XR3028-4500195); and


k.  602-622 King Street West, 499-505 Adelaide Street West, 1 and 11 Adelaide Place, secured for repairs to Toronto Community Housing Corporation housing in former Ward 20, in the amount of $52,170.62 (Source Account: XR3026-3700806)

 
2.  City Council direct that the $1,994,677.68 be forwarded to Toronto Community Housing Corporation, subject to Toronto Community Housing Corporation signing an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

Summary

Funds have been secured in various developments in Ward 10 as community benefits for affordable housing and capital improvements to affordable, social, and public housing, through Sections 37 and 45 of the Planning Act.

 

These funds will be used by Toronto Community Housing Corporation for capital improvements, including improvements to common areas and enhancements to increase resident's safety and security. The allocations of the requested funds are determined in part through a tenant engagement process that identifies and prioritizes improvements for Toronto Community Housing Corporation buildings in Ward 10. Funding distribution will also be determined in consultation with the local Ward Councillor. Toronto Community Housing Corporation has agreed that these funds sourced as community benefits from Ward 10 developments will not be used for capital improvements that would already have otherwise been included on Toronto Community Housing Corporation's list of Ward 10 capital projects.

 

Toronto Community Housing Corporation will sign an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements prior to the funds being released from the City.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.44
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136070.pdf
(July 17, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136188.pdf

MM9.45 - 16 Kenrae Road - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing to oppose Application B0055/18NY, A0796/18NY and A0797/18NY respecting 16 Kenrae Road.

 
2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal of the decision in Application B0055/18NY, A0796/18NY and A0797/18NY respecting 16 Kenrae Road and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at the City Solicitor's discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and with the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

Summary

On May 23, 2019, the North York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment approved applications brought by the owner of 16 Kenrae Road for a consent to sever land, and for minor variances for each of the newly created lots (the "Application"). A copy of the Committee's decisions regarding the Application are attached. The Application proposed to sever the existing lot and construct semi-detached dwellings on each of the newly created lots.

 

On June 12, 2019, the Leaside Property Owners Association appealed the Committee of Adjustment's decisions to the Toronto Local Appeal Body.

 

In a report (May 14, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, Community Planning Staff recommended the Application be refused. A copy of the Planning report is attached.

 

This Motion would give the City Solicitor the authority to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing in opposition to the Application. It would also give the City Solicitor authority to settle the matter on behalf of the City in the City Solicitor's discretion after consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Ward Councillor.

 

This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the Committee of  Adjustment's decision has been appealed and a hearing date set and the City Solicitor requires instructions to attend the hearing.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.45
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136023.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel Notices of Decisions on application for Minor Variance for 16 Kenrae Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136025.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel Notice of Decision on Consent for 16 Kenrae Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136098.pdf
(May 14, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on 16 Kenrae Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136026.pdf

MM9.46 - Accepting a Donation from Georgia Walsh Memorial Playground Project for Trace Manes Community Centre Playground Improvements - by Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to negotiate and sign a donor agreement for the $916,151.00 donation from Georgia Walsh Memorial Playground Project, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 
2.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to accept donations of $916,151.00 from the community group Georgia Walsh Memorial Playground Project and apply them to the budgeted capital project work relating to playground improvements at Trace Manes Community Centre in compliance with the City's Policy on Donations for Community Benefits.

 
3.  City Council amend the 2019 Approved Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget for the Trace Manes Community Centre Playground Donation sub-project in the Community Centre project by $61,151.00, increasing the total project cost from $1,169,000.00 to $1,230,151.00 and 2019 cash flow from $915,572.00 to $976,723.00, based on a higher amount of donation funds raised since initial project assessment in 2017.

Summary

This Motion seeks authority to negotiate and accept a donation from Georgia Walsh Memorial Playground Project.

 

The Trace Manes project was initiated by a community group interested in raising funds in memory of Georgia Walsh, a 7 year old child who was struck and killed by a vehicle in July 2014 in the Leaside area.  The group raised a total of $916,151.00, through various channels including a charity children's baseball tournament, donation drives, and philanthropic giving, for the purpose of replacing the existing Trace Manes Park playground structures with new equipment and replacing the current wading pool with a splash pad.

 

The current playground at Trace Manes Park is not currently on the Capital list for replacement, however, the main play structure, which was previously used, was installed "temporarily" after the original structure was damaged.  The community group has raised funds for both junior and senior accessible play equipment as well as a rubberized tiled surface – which is one of the City's preferred ground cover for new playgrounds.  The existing wading pool will be converted to an upgraded splash pad with various features and new surfacing. 

 

This matter is time sensitive and urgent as it pertains to funding required for the park project.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.46
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136071.pdf
(July 17, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136189.pdf

MM9.47 - Diverting Coffee Pods from Landfills - by Councillor Michael Ford, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate
Communications MM9.47.1 and MM9.47.2 have been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Michael Ford, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, as part of the City’s approved Waste Diversion Programs Policy (Adapt Policy), to report to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in the fourth quarter of  2019 on a design for a potential pilot project to permit compostable/biodegradable coffee pods to be processed in the City’s Green Bin Program; the pilot project design framework should include:

 

a.  opportunities for partnerships and cost-sharing pilot project costs with industry stakeholders;

b.  a methodology to align the pilot project with Solid Waste Management Services’ Adapt Policy, including Agreements with Material Sponsors, as per the Adapt Policy;

c.  a comprehensive consumer education and information plan; and

d.  a performance monitoring and measurement plan.

Summary

As single use products become an increasingly serious and problematic environmental issue, many businesses are working to innovate and respond to these concerns. These innovations include the recent move to compostable and biodegradable products.

 

Although we are seeing innovation that is working to address excessive waste, the City of Toronto must take a leadership role and keep pace with environmentally friendly options as well as supporting our local businesses. Inaction on this issue will also lead to potentially hundreds of lost jobs in Etobicoke.

 

It is important that the City work with stakeholders to investigate the modernization of programs within the City of Toronto such as the Green Bin Program.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.47
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136095.pdf

Communications

(July 17, 2019) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (MM.New.MM9.47.1)
(July 18, 2019) Letter from Councillor Michael Ford, Ward 1 Etobicoke North (MM.New.MM9.47.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/comm/communicationfile-96225.pdf

MM9.48 - 1032 Queen Street West and 1034 Queen Street West - Review of Liquor Licence - Apt. 200 - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario to issue a Notice of Proposal to suspend or revoke the liquor licence for 1032 Queen Street West and/or 1034 Queen Street West, operating under the name of Apt. 200 (the “Premises”) on the grounds that the past and present conduct of the Licensee affords reasonable grounds that the business will not be operating in accordance with the law, the Licensee is carrying on activities that are in contravention of the Liquor Licence Act or its regulations, and the operation of the business is not in the public interest with regards to the needs and wishes of the residents in which the Premises is located.

 
2. City Council request the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario and the Licence Appeal Tribunal provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion.

Summary

93118602 Quebec Inc., (the “Licensee”) is the holder of a liquor licence from the Alcohol and Gaming Commission for Apt. 200 at the property municipally known as 1032 Queen Street West (the “1032 Queen Premises”) and is known to operate out of 1034 Queen Street West, as outlined in this Motion (collectively, 1032 Queen Street West and 1034 Queen Street West are the “Premises”). The Alcohol and Gaming Commission has confirmed there are currently no conditions on the liquor licence. However, Apt. 200 operates out of 1034 Queen Street West, on the 2nd floor, instead of 1032 Queen Street West. The Director, Bylaw Enforcement has confirmed that the Licensee is operating as Apt. 200 at 1034 Queen Street West, including the sale of liquor on the premises. The Premises has been a continued source of concern for local residents with regard to loud noise, incidents in the community, traffic and public intoxication amongst other issues with the Licensee's operations.

 

The Licencee was issued their licence from the Alcohol and Gaming Commission effective January 23, 2015 and began operations in 2016, however the Premises did not receive a City of Toronto business licence until January 5, 2017. The application process commenced in July 2016, however was delayed due to a Municipal Licensing and Standards licence refusal related to noise violations. A client appeal to the Toronto Licensing Tribunal resulted in the granting of a business licence for an eating/drinking establishment with an 18-month probationary period, concluding July 2018.

 

During the two-year period ending December 2016, Municipal Licensing and Standards charged the business with a series of offences under the noise by-law as well as entertainment establishment/nightclub no licence. On January 25, 2017, a guilty plea was entered for one count of Noise Likely to Disturb.

 

More recent investigations related to noise include two 2017 case files, one of which resulted in a by-law charge that was later withdrawn in November 2018. There was one noise complaint in 2018 with no action and another April 2019 file which was referred to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission as it related to people noise in the vicinity of the business. There is one 2017 conviction related to the commercial waste by-law for failing to keep garbage on premises.

 

Toronto Police Services has had ongoing dealings with the Premises, in particular 1034 Queen Street West. On Monday, July 8, 2019, at approximately 2:30 a.m., Toronto Police Services responded to reports of gun shots in the area of Queen Street West just west of Ossington Avenue and proximate to the Premises. At the scene, police found three people suffering from gunshot wounds and are continuing their investigation. Toronto Police Services have not yet concluded a review of security camera footage, but Toronto Police Services will confirm whether the gunshot activity is linked to the victims as patrons of Apt. 200.

 

On July 10, 2019, a By-law enforcement officer undertook a daytime inspection of the Premises, in particular 1034 Queen Street West, and confirmed, in reviewing the physical layout, licences and licensing requirements related to majority seating and the nightclub/eating establishment ratio. By-law enforcement also spoke to Toronto Police Services regarding the above noted shooting event as part of their investigation. Municipal Licensing and Standards also has conferred with the Alcohol and Gaming Commission and other City divisions as part of their investigation.

 

The Liquor Licence has no conditions attached to it.

 

It is evident from current events and the ongoing impacts felt by nearby residents that the steps taken by the community, Municipal Licensing and Standards and Toronto Police Services have not been a deterrent in changing the behaviour of the Licensee and management staff at the Premises. The City is therefore seeking a review of the liquor licence by the Alcohol and Gaming Commission for a suspension or revocation under section 15(1) of the Liquor Licence Act (the “Act”) based on the following three grounds:

 

1.  Section 6(2)(d) of the Act, the past and present conduct of the Licensee and managers of the Premises affords reasonable grounds that the business will continue to disturb residents living nearby the establishment and community at large.

 
2.  Section 6(2)(f) of the Act, the Licensee is carrying on activities that are in contravention of the Act or the regulations.
 
3.  Section 6(2)(h) of the Act, the licence is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents in which the premises is located.

 

This matter is considered urgent as the operation of the Premises continues to impact residents in the community.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.48
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136024.pdf

MM9.49 - 19 Duncan Street and 219-225 Adelaide Street West - To Permit Application for Minor Variances - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council, pursuant to Subsection 45(1.4) of the Planning Act, permit applications for minor variances with respect to the property municipally known as 19 Duncan Street and 219-225 Adelaide Street West, for relief from By-laws 170-2018 (OMB) and 171-2018 (OMB), in order to vary development standards related to lot line setbacks, building height, outdoor amenity space and parking space rates.

Summary

Among changes under the Smart Growth for our Communities Act, 2015 (Bill 73) that came into final effect on July 1, 2016, Subsections 45(1.3) and 45(1.4) of the Planning Act, as amended, prevent the submission of minor variance applications on properties subject to a privately initiated Zoning By-law Amendment within two years of the By-law enactment, unless the municipal council has otherwise "declared by resolution that such an application is permitted".

 

In the case of 19 Duncan Street, the privately initiated Zoning By-law Amendment (170-2018(OMB) and 171-2018(OMB)), provide for the redevelopment of the site with a 58-storey mixed-use building containing office, hotel and residential uses. The Local Planning Appeal Tribunal issued its order enacting the By-laws on January 22, 2018.

 

The development contains a nine-storey base building with a 49-storey tower on top. The owner proposed to nominally increase the floorplate of the office use on the 10th floor of the building by bumping out the south-facing elevation by 3.8 metres towards the south property line. The residential outdoor amenity space previously proposed in this area is thereby reduced in size, triggering variances to the site-specific By-laws. Additionally, the  bump-out results in variances to the lot line setbacks and building heights as shown on the height maps attached to the By-laws and the increased office gross floor area results in variances to the vehicular parking rates. No variances to the total building gross floor area are required and the overall building height has remained unchanged.

 

Under the Planning Act, as amended, this land owner will not be able to file for a minor variance application to the Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York District, for zoning relief until after January 22, 2020, thus delaying site redevelopment.

 

As a result, City Council's authorization for submission of a minor variance application at this time is required. This resolution is not intended to, and does not, relay Council's endorsement of the merits of the minor variance application.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.49
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136068.pdf

MM9.50 - 90 Eastdale Avenue and 2 Secord Avenue - Implementation of City Council approved Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Settlement - by Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Beaches - East York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Brad Bradford, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailao, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council declare the Eastdale Parkette, shown as Part 1 on Sketch PS-2019-014 as surplus, with intended manner of disposal by land exchange with 2 Secord Inc. and 90 Eastdale Inc.
 

2.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services to enter into a Land Exchange Agreement with 2 Secord Inc. and 90 Eastdale Inc. for the disposal of the Eastdale Parkette, shown as Part 1 on Sketch PS-2019-014 in Appendix B to Motion MM9.50, in exchange for the replacement park lands identified as Part 2 on Sketch PS-2019-014, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix A to Motion MM9.50, and such other terms as may be approved by the Director, Real Estate Services in consultation with the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
 

3.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services to enter into a Lease Agreement to lease back the replacement park lands, identified as Part 2 on Sketch PS-2019-014, to 2 Secord Inc. and 90 Eastdale Inc. for nominal consideration for 46 months, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix A to Motion MM9.50, and on such other terms as may be approved by the Director, Real Estate Services in consultation with the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
 

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to amend the Official Plan Amendment before the Tribunal to accommodate the 46 month delay between the disposal of the existing park and the construction of the park on the Replacement Park lands, by way of a site specific exemption from the Official Plan Policy 4.3.8.

Summary

2 Secord Inc. and 90 Eastdale Inc. ("the Developer") plan to redevelop the rental housing properties at 90 Eastdale Avenue and 2 Secord Avenue by adding new buildings and site improvements. City Council authorized a settlement of the Developer's planning applications before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal, through Item CC39.7 on April 24, 2018. City Council approved the Developer's rental housing demolition application through Item TE34.21 on July 23, 2018.

 

The planning approvals contemplate the exchange of an existing City park at the northeast corner of the block, for a new park at the southeast corner of the development site. The City will dispose of the Eastdale Parkette, shown as Part 1 on Sketch PS-2019-014 (see Appendix B) (the "Eastdale Parkette"), allowing the developer to construct part of a 35-storey tower on the site. A new 7-storey building will also be constructed as part of the development. A replacement park will be constructed on the lands identified as Part 2 Sketch PS-2019-014 in Appendix B to Motion MM9.50 (the "Replacement Park").

 

The existing Eastdale Parkette has limited greenspace utility and park infrastructure. The relocated park will be close to a local school, and adjacent to the Developer's parkland contribution land and a new Publically Accessible Privately Owned Space (POPS easement), to be provided by the Developer pursuant to the conditions of the planning approvals. The net result will be a larger public park area with equal or superior green space and utility.

 

The Replacement Park is currently occupied by 12 rental townhouses, to be demolished pursuant to the terms of the Developer's Rental Housing Demolition approval (approved by Council on July 23, 2018 in TE34.12). The existing residents will have the option of relocating to the new 7-storey residential tower to be constructed by the developer at the same time as the proposed new 35-storey tower located partially on the Eastdale Parkette land.  

 

Because the construction of both new residential towers will take place concurrently, approximately 4 years will elapse from the date of the land exchange until the Developer can relocate the existing residents, demolish the townhomes and complete construction of the Replacement Park. The delay in the construction of the Replacement Park will allow the existing residents to remain in place until the replacement rental housing is constructed, but results in the loss of park space for 4 years. To secure its interest, the City will take ownership of the Replacement Park lands on the date that it transfers title of the Eastdale Parkette, and lease the Replacement Park land back to the Developer on the terms set out in Appendix "A." To mitigate against any risk of the Developer defaulting in its obligations to relocate the tenants, demolish the townhouses and remediate the Replacement Park lands, the City will obtain financial security as set out in Appendix "A" to Motion MM9.50.

 

Official Plan Policy 4.3.8 prohibits the disposal of City-owned parks, but allows exchanges for land of equivalent or larger area and green space utility. Although the Replacement Park will have greater utility, it will not be built out for at minimum 4 years. Therefore, a Site Specific Amendment is required to exempt this property from the application of Official Plan Policy 4.3.8.

 

Both parcels identified on Sketch PS-2019-014 are of equal size and market value, being approximately 1655 square metres in area.

 

This Motion is urgent in order to advance an interim park development and land exchange for a city park.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.50
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136074.pdf
Appendix A - Terms of Land Exchange
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136075.pdf
Appendix B - Sketch PS-2019-014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136097.pdf

MM9.51 - 1211 St. Clair Avenue West - Liquor Licence Application - Kaito Sushi - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the issuance of a liquor licence for 1211 St. Clair Avenue West operating under the name Kaito Sushi (the “Premises”) is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 
2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 
3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Local Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

A sole proprietor has submitted an Application to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for a liquor licence at the premises at 1211 St. Clair Avenue West to operate under the name of Kaito Sushi (the “Premises”). The Application is for an indoor area with a proposed capacity of approximately 30 patrons. There is no proposed outdoor seating.

 

The Premises directly abuts a low-density residential neighbourhood to the south and is adjacent to nearby low-density residential neighbourhoods to the north. The Premises is also located near a large concentration of licensed establishments. There are concerns related to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area. This application for a new liquor licence is not in the public interest, unless the concerns of the residents are addressed. The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

 

This matter is urgent as the Placard deadline for objections was July 11, 2019.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.51
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136028.pdf

MM9.52 - Authorization to Release Section 37 funds from the development at 70 The Esplanade to fund the Production and Installation of a Heritage Plaque to Commemorate the 110th anniversary of Hotel Victoria - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council increase the approved 2019 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $2,200.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 6-18 Church Street and 51-63 Front Street East (70 The Esplanade) (Source Account: XR3026-3700344), for the production and installation of a heritage plaque at 56 Yonge Street to commemorate the 110th anniversary of Hotel Victoria (Cost Centre HG 0001).

Summary

This Motion seeks authorization to release $2,200 in Section 37 funds to Heritage Toronto for a heritage plaque to commemorate the 110th anniversary of the Hotel Victoria, to be installed at its location at 56 Yonge Street.

 

Hotel Victoria opened in 1909 as the Hotel Mossop. It was constructed in the devastating aftermath of the Great Fire of 1904, which destroyed a large swath of Toronto's central business district.

 

In 1906, former hotel clerk Frederick Mossop purchased the site at 56 Yonge Street. Just to the west, more than 100 warehouses and factories destroyed in the fire were beginning to be rebuilt. Protection against fire was becoming increasingly important, and as a result his hotel included a number of unique features designed to make it resistant to flames and other damage.

 

The architect J. P. Hynes designed the eight storey structure, which is clad in pressed red brick with cut stone details. The foundations are especially deep, going right down to the bedrock, and non-combustible materials like slate, iron, and marble were used inside. When it opened the hotel had one of the lowest insurance rates of any hotel in Canada.

 

The 48-room hotel was successful during its early years, but began to struggle during prohibition in Ontario. In 1927, it changed hands and was renamed the Hotel Victoria. Until the Second World War it was a prominent visual landmark on downtown Yonge Street as one of the taller buildings in the neighbourhood. It was renovated several times in the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s and 2000s.

 

High rise development around the Hotel Victoria has dwarfed the original structure but it remains an important part of Yonge Street's architectural heritage. Along with the Gladstone, Drake, and King Edward, it is one of the city's oldest surviving hotels.

 

The City has secured funds under Section 37 of the Planning Act with the owner of the development at 6-18 Church Street and 51-63 Front Street East (70 The Esplanade), authorized by site-specific Zoning By-law 58-2011(OMB). The Zoning By-law and Section 37 Agreement with the landowner provide that the funds shall be used for community benefits, including heritage conservation initiatives in this neighbourhood. Sufficient funds remain available in the Planning Act Reserve Account to produce and install the heritage plaque at this location. The use of these funds for this purpose complies with the by-law and agreement.

 

As Heritage Toronto is a directly funded City agency and not an "outside party", no undertaking is required to be signed by Heritage Toronto to govern the use of the funds and financial reporting.

 

This Motion is urgent as Hotel Victoria's 110th anniversary is August 9, 2019, and Heritage Toronto requires the funding in place to meet its deadline.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.52
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136069.pdf
(July 17, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136190.pdf

MM9.53 - Authorization to Release Section 42 Funding to Support Renovations to the Fieldhouse in Leslie Grove Park, 1158 Queen Street East - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Michael Ford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Michael Ford, recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the 2019 Approved Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget, sub-project CAMP (SGR) ORC Facilities,  account CPR116-48-01, by $0.075 million gross, fully funded by the Section 42 Above Five Percent Cash-in-lieu from 140 Boulton Avenue (Source Account: XR2213-4201082), for the purpose of renovating the Leslie Grove Park Fieldhouse.

Summary

City Council on May 14 and 15, 2019, adopted Member Motion MM 7.11. It requested the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with appropriate City divisions and the local Councillor, to assist in determining the operational needs of The Artists Network, and to identify any suitable and available spaces on or near Queen Street East to house its operations.

 

The Artist Network, a non-profit group, has contributed to cultural life in the community for many years and is being forced out of its most recent home due to gentrification in the neighbourhood.

 

Staff subsequently identified the Fieldhouse in Leslie Grove Park as a suitable location. The Fieldhouse, also known in the past as the Leslie Grove Shack, has washrooms available to the public. Otherwise, it was deemed an underused facility. The building would require minor renovations to make it suitable for the purposes of The Artist Network and its community work. These renovations would include, for example, winterization of washrooms, new locks, new storage closet, and new drywalling, lighting and flooring. The proposed work would be managed by Parks, Forestry and Recreation staff.

 

This Motion proposes to pay for renovation by releasing Section 42 Above Five Percent Cash-in-lieu funds.

  

The work is urgent as the organization is losing its existing space at the end of August.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.53
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136060.pdf
(July 17, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136191.pdf

MM9.54 - 9 Tippett Road Land Conveyance Relief - Site Plan Control Application - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that:

 

City Council adopt the recommendations in the attached report (July 15, 2019) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, amended to read as follows:

 

1. City Council approve, in principle, the conditions set out in Attachment 3 to the report (July 15, 2019) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, for the proposed mixed-use development at 9 Tippett Road, subject to removing all of the conditions related to the transfer of the future road and corner rounding from A – PRE-APPROVAL CONDITIONS, and placing them in B - POST APPROVAL CONDITIONS, and adding the requirement that the conveyance of the future public road and the corner rounding be completed prior to condominium registration, and adding the following two new conditions to A – PRE-APPROVAL CONDITIONS:

 

1.  Provide adequate securities, in the form of a Letter of Credit or certified cheque, to be submitted to the City by the Owner, to cover the estimated future cost of bringing the future 9.25 metre public road and the 6.1 metre corner rounding lands into compliance with the City's policy to remediate contaminated land, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

2. Submit a cost estimate from the Owner’s environmental consultant, which is to be peer reviewed at the Owner’s expense within fifteen (15) days of submission of the cost estimate by the Owner failing which the cost estimate shall be deemed to be acceptable, confirming the cost of remediating the contaminated future road conveyance and corner rounding in order to determine an appropriate amount for the securities required under Condition 1, above.

 

2. City Council delegate back to the Chief Planner or his designate the authority to issue final Site Plan Approval.

 

 

Summary

In 2015, with the support of the City, the Ontario Municipal Board approved By-law 381-2016 to permit the redevelopment of the lands known municipally as 9 Tippett Road (the “Site”). This project will include a minimum of 25 units of affordable housing.

 

As part of the development approval for the Site, the Owner agreed to convey to the City at no cost a 9.25 metre wide portion of a future public road on the south side of the Site, the associated portion of the cul-de-sac, the associated 6.1 metre corner rounding, and any appurtenant rights-of-way in fee simple (the “Conveyances”).  The future public road will not be constructed for some time because additional lands are required from the lands to the south, which are currently owned by the Toronto District School Board.  In the interim, these lands will be landscaped by the Owner and maintained by the future condominium corporation until these lands are needed for the future public road.

 

At its meeting on February 10, 2015, City Council adopted the “Policy for Accepting Potentially Contaminated Lands to be conveyed to the City under the Planning Act, January 2015” (the “Policy”).  Table 1 of the Policy requires conveyances for road widening purposes to occur prior to Final Site Plan Approval.  Only City Council has the authority to amend or provide relief from the provisions of the Policy.

 

City staff are in the process of finalizing the pre-approval conditions for inclusion in the Notice of Approval Conditions for the Site.  In accordance with the Policy, the draft Notice of Approval Conditions would contain a pre-approval condition requiring the Conveyances to occur prior to Final Site Plan Approval.

 

However, the Conveyances cannot occur prior to Final Site Plan Approval because remediation of the lands that are the subject of the Conveyances will not be completed until long after an above grade building permit has issued.  To require remediation of these lands and the Conveyances to occur before site plan approval would result in significant delays to construction and delivery of the 25 affordable housing units.

 

To avoid any delay in construction, and the completion of the 25 affordable housing units, it is appropriate to require the Conveyances as a post approval condition and to occur prior to condominium registration.  There are no impacts to the road network because the future public road cannot be constructed until additional lands are secured by the City from adjacent landowners.

 

This matter is urgent because the Owner is proceeding with construction and requires site plan approval to enable the timely issuance of building permits and delivery of the affordable housing units.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.54
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136090.pdf
(July 15, 2019) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 9 Tippett Road - Site Plan Control Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136093.pdf

MM9.55 - Representation at a Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing for 38 Lorraine Drive - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Willowdale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City staff to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing for 38 Lorraine Drive to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the minor variances requested through Application A0168/19NY.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants, as necessary.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached, to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion, and in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Summary

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Application A0168/19NY) (the "Application") to legalize and maintain a driveway at 38 Lorraine Drive. The Application requests variances with respect to driveway width. In their reports, both Planning and Transportation Services recommended that the application be refused.  At its hearing on May 8, 2019, the Committee of Adjustment refused the Application (the "Decision"). The Notice of Decision, Planning staff report and Transportation memo are attached.

 

The applicant has appealed the Decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body.  This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor, and appropriate City Staff, to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to oppose the proposed consent and minor variances requested in the Application. This Motion will also give the City Solicitor authority to negotiate a settlement of the appeal and retain outside consultants, as necessary.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.55
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136124.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission for 38 Lorraine Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136122.pdf
(April 30, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Representation at a Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing for 38 Lorraine Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136125.pdf
Transportation Memo dated April 26, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136126.pdf

MM9.56 - Authorization to Release Section 45(9) Funds from the Development at 861-863 St. Clair Avenue West to the Toronto District School Board for the Rawlinson Community School Outdoor Area Restoration Project - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:

 

1.  Council approve the release to the Toronto District School Board (NP2161) of $0.155 million of Section 45 funds from the development at 861 St. Clair Avenue West for the Rawlinson Outdoor Area Restoration Project to improve the green space for school and community use, such payment to be made upon the receipt of this Section 45 agreement payment by the City.

 
2.  City Council request City staff from the Management Services Branch of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to participate in the preparation of the Community Access Agreement and City Council request the City Solicitor to draw up the Agreement for a term of 10 years, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and Community Planning staff.
 

3.  City Council authorize the execution of a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board for the outdoor improvements at Rawlinson Community School, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
 

4.  City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the Toronto District School Board has signed a Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the playground facilities satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and prepared in consultation with the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor.

Summary

Section 45(9) Planning Act funds have been secured from the development at 861-863 St. Clair Avenue West to be allocated for local community projects including parks, recreation facilities, and streetscape and open space improvements, to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

This Motion seeks to contribute $155,000 of these Section 45(9) funds, to assist the Rawlinson Community School with their outdoor area restoration project.  This contribution will be added to the $25,000 that the school community has fundraised to date.

 

In the absence of a City playground within a 1.4 kilometre radius, the Rawlinson Community School grounds serve that purpose for the wider community and are heavily used.  The grounds are also in very poor condition and in desperate need of repair.  The Section 37 Implementation Guidelines (section 5.7) approved by Council in 2007 states:

 

"Cash contributions toward the capital improvement of school board playgrounds are eligible Section 37 community benefits where the playground serves as a local park, where the public will continue to have reasonable access for the foreseeable future, and where there is no local City-owned parkland performing a similar function in the same community that could otherwise benefit from the cash contribution."

 

A Community Use Agreement will be executed between the City and the Toronto District

School Board, drawn up in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.56
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136105.pdf
(July 17, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136184.pdf

MM9.57 - 35-53 and 101-113 Valley Woods Road and 1213-1229 York Mills Road - Construction Timing - by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Don Valley East
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize an amendment to the Section 37 Agreement between the City and Alit Don Valley Property Inc., dated August 20, 2013 and Section 111 Agreement dated December 30, 2013 between the City and Alit Don Valley Property Inc., to permit the issuance of a building permit for two of Buildings A, B, or C prior to Building E being ready for occupancy provided that the 140 replacement rental units to be located in Building E (Parcel A) shall be ready and available for residential use and occupancy prior to the issuance of any above-grade building permit for the last building on Parcels A or B, being Building A, B, C, or D.


2.  City Council authorize an amendment to the Section 37 Agreement between the City and Alit Don Valley Property Inc., dated August 20, 2013, to allow the issuance of a conditional above grade structural permit in advance of the required sanitary sewer upgrades being installed and operational, provided that the owner has fulfilled the following conditions:


a.  executed a subdivision agreement;


b.  posted security,  in an amount to be determined by the General Manager, Toronto Water,  to secure the installation of the sanitary sewer upgrade;


c.  completed all necessary approvals for the sanitary sewer upgrade to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Toronto Water; and


d.  commenced construction of the sanitary sewer upgrade.


3.  City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to prepare such amendment agreement as is required and to register the same on title to the subject lands in priority to other interests to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.


4.  City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to take necessary steps to implement recommendations 1, 2 and 3 above, including execution of an amending Section 37 and/or Section 111 Agreement.


5.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any other necessary staff to take the necessary steps to carry out City Council’s decision.

Summary

On July 13, 2012, City Council enacted site-specific By-laws 991-2012 and 992-2012 to permit the development of 1610 residential condominium units and 270 rental replacement units over four phases with built form ranging from 3-storey townhouses to 24-storey apartment buildings, as well as a significant Section 37 contribution. Prior to enactment of the zoning amendment, a Section 37 Agreement was entered into between the owner and the City dated August 20, 2013 and registered on title (AT3504327). An application for rental housing demolition and replacement was approved by City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011, and a Section 111 Agreement between the owner and the City was entered into to secure the rental housing conditions.


The Section 37 and Section 111 Agreement provisions included timing triggers for the owner to complete the Building E (the rental replacement units) on the north part of the site prior to obtaining a building permit for buildings A, B and C on the north site.

 

Building E is currently under construction. The owner has advised that in order to maintain its construction schedule in a timely fashion, it requires the issuance of a building permit for two of Buildings A, B or C on the north site prior to Building E being complete.

 

The Section 37 Agreement also included a requirement that all water mains and sanitary sewers be installed and operational prior to a building permit being issued for the north site. The owner has advised that based on the current anticipated timeline for installation of the sanitary sewer upgrade, there could be significant delay and result in a potential hiatus in construction. This Motion proposes to authorize the necessary amendments to the Section 37 Agreement to allow for the issuance of a conditional above grade structural permit in advance of the installation of the sanitary sewer upgrades. The owner will be required to satisfy certain conditions including commencing construction on the sanitary sewer upgrades prior to the issuance of any above-grade permit including a conditional permit.

 

This Motion recommends that Council authorize an amendment to the Section 37 Agreement and Section 111 Agreement, as applicable, as may be required to permit the adjustment in timing contemplated and directs the City Solicitor to prepare such an amending agreement. Authority for City execution of the amending agreement is also contemplated. Prior to any amending agreement being executed by the City, the owner shall be required to provide an undertaking confirming that it shall not apply for any further above-grade permits beyond a conditional structural permit until the sanitary sewer is installed and operational.

 

This Motion is urgent so that construction can proceed without delay.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.57
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136121.pdf

MM9.58 - Authorization to Release Section 37 and 45(9) Funds from Various Developments for the Construction of New Affordable Housing as part of the Alexandra Park Revitalization - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Michael Ford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Michael Ford, recommends that:

 

1. City Council increase the 2019 Approved Operating Budget of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (FH5795) on a one-time basis by $1,092,909.34 gross, $0 net, for transfer to the Capital Revolving Reserve Fund for Affordable Housing (XR1058), for the purpose of creating new affordable housing and/or home ownership opportunities in Phase 2 of the Alexandra Park Revitalization, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits in the following developments:

 

a. 40, 46, 48, 50, 52 and 60 McCaul Street and 10 Stephanie Street, secured for the provision of new affordable housing in Ward 20 in the amount of $101,905.13 (Source Account: XR3026-3700888);


b. 295 Adelaide Street West and 100 to 104 John Street, secured for the provision of affordable housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $36,584.02 (Source Account: XR3026-3700313);


c. 335, 355 King Street West and 119 Blue Jays Way, secured for the provision of affordable housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $429.71 (Source Account: XR3026-3700748);


d. 324, 326, 328 and 332 Richmond Street West, secured for capital improvements to/or development of new Toronto Community Housing Corporation units in Ward 20, in the amount of $224,622.03 (Source Account: XR3026-3700972);


e. 283 Adelaide Street West, secured for the maintenance of or the provision of new affordable housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $144,881.16 (Source Account: XR3026-3700927).


f. 15-35 Mercer Street, secured for the maintenance of or the provision of new rental housing units as part of the Alexandra Park and Atkinson Housing Co-operative Revitalization, in the amount of $583,923.95 (Source Account: XR3026-3700920);


g. 318 Richmond Street West, to be allocated toward affordable housing in Ward 20, in the amount of $360.98 (Source Account: XR3028-4500189); and


h. 604-618 Richmond Street West, to be allocated for capital improvements to and or the provision of new affordable housing units in Ward 20, in the amount of $202.36 (Source Account: XR3026-3700786).

 
2. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to provide $1,092,909.34 in funding from the Capital Revolving Reserve Fund (XR1058) to Toronto Community Housing Corporation for the purpose of creating new affordable housing and/or home ownership opportunities in Phase 2 of the Alexandra Park Revitalization in Ward 10 fully funded from the Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits, subject to the following conditions:

 

a. the transfer of the designated funds from XR3026 to XR1058; and

 

b. Toronto Community Housing Corporation signing an assignment of the municipal capital facility agreement governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

Summary

Funds have been secured through Sections 37 benefits in various developments in Ward 10 to assist in the provision of affordable housing. This Motion seeks to transfer $1,092,909.34 to Shelter, Support and Housing Administration’s budget in order to create new affordable housing units as part of the ongoing revitalization of Alexandra Park and the Atkinson Housing Co-operative Inc. ("Atkinson Co-op").

 

In 2013, Toronto City Council approved a revitalization plan for the Alexandra Park and Atkinson Housing Co-op. The Plan includes the replacement or refurbishment of the existing residences, the addition of new market residential, the removal of all stacked townhouses and introduction of back-to-back townhouses, a new public park, a new street network, and a new location for the community centre.

 

Phase 1b of the revitalization is now under construction and City Council is considering zoning approval of Phase 2 on this agenda (Item TE7.7), which in addition to continued townhome and apartment replacement and refurbishment, will include: zero displacement of residents, a brand new 1,100 square metre (minimum) community centre, new parks and basketball courts, local social enterprise, bike sharing stations, and more.

 

We are also working hard to implement our Council-approved plan to expand both affordable housing and affordable home ownership in the community, as well as to find opportunities to augment the plan as we move forward. These additional funds will be used to expand the new affordable housing and ownership as part of Phase 2 of the Revitalization.

 

This Motion is urgent in order to permit for the planning and budgeting of next phases of the Alexandra Park Revitalization to proceed without delay.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.58
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136108.pdf
(July 17, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136185.pdf

MM9.59 - Request to Amend the 2019 Capital Budget for Heritage Lighting of the Great Hall at Union Station - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Notice without Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the 2019 Council Approved Capital Budget of Corporate Real Estate Management for the Union Station Revitalization Project by $154,638 gross, $0 net, with $0 debt impact, for the installation of interior lighting for the Great Hall of Union Station (WBS Element: CCA911-08), fully funded by Section 16 funds secured from the development agreement for 15 York Street (Source Account: XR3031).

Summary

Authority is being sought to release Section 16 funds to Corporate Real Estate Management for the installation of heritage lighting for the Great Hall at Union Station.

 

Union Station is a National Historic Site of Canada and is included as one of the subject buildings of the Heritage Lighting Master Plan for Old Town Toronto. As a gateway site to the Old Town, the overall lighting strategy for Union Station has been identified an important component of the revitalization.

 

City Council approved funding in the 2014 Capital Budget and Plan for Facilities Management and Real Estate for heritage lighting of the Great Hall. Real Estate Services later awarded a contract to prepare a design and tender ready documents for the project.

 

The design implements the recommendations of the Heritage Lighting Master Plan for the Old Town to include Union Station as the western anchor of the plan, and create a strong visual identity for the Old Town to assist in enhancement as a neighbourhood and a destination.

 

A final design has been approved, and is ready to be tendered for fabrication and installation. The design recognizes the historic importance of the Great Hall and complements its historic character. After a value engineering process, additional funds are required to complete the project based on updated cost estimates of which $154,638.00 will be achieved through funds from development agreements.

 

This Motion is urgent as the tender for this project is tied to other restoration work in the Great Hall and to maintain the completion schedule for Union Station.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.59
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136119.pdf
Attachment 1 - Great Hall Lighting Design
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136127.pdf
(July 17, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136186.pdf

MM9.60 - Request to Amend the 2019 Parks Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget for the York Street Park project (Ward 10) - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the 2019 Approved Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget for the York Off-ramp Construction sub-project in the amount of $2,000,000.00, increasing the total project cost from $10,000,000 (excluding taxes) to 12,000,000.00 and 2020 cash flow from $3,000,000.00 (excluding taxes) to $5,000,000.00, with funding from the following Section 42 Above five percent Cash-in-lieu for 90 Harbour account $1,188,000 (Source Account: XR2213-4200793), and 120 Harbour $812,000.00 (Source Account: XR2213-4200474) for updated construction estimate.

Summary

In early 2018, Waterfront Toronto in partnership with the City of Toronto Parks Forestry and Recreation launched a design competition for the design of York Street Park. After an extensive public consultation and jury process, Love Park by Claude Cormier et Associés was selected as the winning concept.

 

The modern and simple design includes a central water feature and green perimeter, providing an inviting space for residents, workers, and visitors. The Park is designed to provide vital new recreation space for one of the most intensively used parts of the city, with a dense high-rise neighbourhood, the South Core financial district, and the waterfront tourist zone all in proximity. The project reclaims lands that were previously overshadowed by the since reconfigured York-Bay-Yonge off-ramp.

 

Waterfront Toronto and Parks Forestry and Recreation staff have provided an updated cost estimate on the preferred design and additional funding is required to implement it. This request will increase the 2020 cash flow for the York Street Park project by $2.0 million from Section 42 Above five percent Cash-in-lieu.

 

This Motion is urgent as funding is required to be allocated to maintain tender and construction schedules.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.60
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136096.pdf
(July 17, 2019) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136187.pdf

MM9.61 - Extension of the Term of the Integrity Commissioner - by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the following recommendation in the attached report (July 16, 2019) from the Chair, Integrity Commissioner Selection Panel:

 

1. City Council extend the term of the Integrity Commissioner, on the same terms and conditions, to November 29, 2019 or until the recruitment process for a new Integrity Commissioner is completed, and Council approves the appointment of a new Integrity Commissioner, whichever comes first.

Summary

At its meeting on June 10, 2014, City Council appointed Valerie Jepson as Toronto's Integrity Commissioner for a fixed, non-renewable five-year term. The current Integrity Commissioner's term ends on September 6, 2019.

 

The Integrity Commissioner function is a requirement under the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and reports directly to City Council.

 

A recruitment process for a new Integrity Commissioner is ongoing.

 

The next meeting of City Council is October 2019. The term of the current Integrity Commissioner must be extended to ensure the City is meeting legislative requirements, and to allow for sufficient time to complete the recruitment process, hence the urgency of this motion.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.61
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136120.pdf
(July 16, 2019) Report from the Chair, Integrity Commissioner Selection Panel on Extension of the Term of the Integrity Commissioner
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136123.pdf

MM9.62 - Potential Acquisition of 1240 Bay Street - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the Director, Real Estate Services, and any other appropriate City staff, to investigate and report back on the benefits, costs, and options for the City to acquire the property interest in the property municipally known as 1240 Bay Street.

Summary

The Yorkville neighbourhood has been rapidly densifying over the past decade and opportunities for the City to acquire land are diminishing as properties are purchased and rezoned.

 

1240 Bay Street is located within the Bloor-Yorkville/North Midtown: Planning Framework and Implementation Strategy Report, which was created to address concerns over tall buildings and intensification. It outlines where development should and should not occur, the types of uses and built form that are appropriate, how future development applications will be analyzed, and the future planning approval processes that are required.

 

The City currently owns a building on the site, but lack the property interest. We must take this opportunity to explore all options as it relates to the acquisition of the property for future operational needs.

 

This Motion is time sensitive and urgent as the City is involved in multiple negotiations with developers in the neighbourhood and instruction is necessary to further the City's interests.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.62
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136145.pdf

MM9.63 - 7-15 Ingram Drive - City Solicitor Attendance to the Toronto Local Appeal Body - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision (A00275/19EYK) - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City Staff, to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in respect of 7-15 Ingram Drive to uphold the Committee of Adjustment’s approval with condition of Application A0275/19EYK.

 
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants, as necessary.

 
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached, to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion after consulting with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Summary

The Applicant, on behalf of Bluebird Ingram Storage Corp., applied to the Etobicoke York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment for minor variances respecting the site at 7-15 Ingram Drive. The Application (A0275/19EYK) sought permission to permit a self-storage warehouse on the site.

 

On June 13, 2019, Community Planning for the Etobicoke York District wrote a report to the Committee of Adjustment recommending that, should the Committee of Adjustment approve the Application, the Committee of Adjustment impose a condition that the self-storage warehouse be constructed in accordance with the Site Plan submitted to the Committee of Adjustment, and that any other variances appearing on the plans but not listed in the written decision are not authorized.

 

On June 20, 2019, the Committee of Adjustment approved the Application with the Condition. The decision is attached to this Motion. The Applicant, who was seeking approval without a condition, has appealed the decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body.

 

It is important that the Condition of approval be applied to ensure that Community Planning has the opportunity to review any future expansion plans.

 

This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor to oppose the Applicant’s Toronto Local Appeal Body appeal and to secure the necessary authorization and resources to support the City’s opposition to the appeal.

 

This Motion is urgent as the Committee of Adjustment's decision has been appealed and the City Solicitor requires instructions to attend the hearing.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.63
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136147.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 7-11 Ingram Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136148.pdf
(June 13, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District on 7-15 Ingram Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136149.pdf

MM9.64 - Providing Support to Northern Ontario Communities Evacuations - by Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:

 

1. In respect of the current request to assist in being a "host community", in the event that there is an evacuation due to northern forest fires, and all similar future requests in respect of emergency evacuations, and subject to receiving a commitment that City expenses will be reimbursed, City Council authorize the City Manager, and the Mayor if required, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to:

 

1. negotiate with the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada, and implement, the City's hosting arrangements, if any, including the services and facilities the City may provide as part of such a hosting arrangement;

 
2. enter into and execute all necessary agreements including any amendments with the Province of Ontario, the Government of Canada, and any other required parties, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to provide the hosting arrangement, including funding agreements to secure intergovernmental funding opportunities to recover the City hosting-related costs; and

 
3. receive and allocate any funds obtained for services provided as a result of hosting.

Summary

A letter from the Ontario Deputy Solicitor General, dated July 12, 2019, addressed to the City Manager requested the City of Toronto to act as a "host community" for Northern Ontario residents displaced due to a number of forest fires. The City of Toronto is generally requested to act as a host community annually and has received the request to act as the same seven times in the last five years.

 

This most recent request is a result of emergency evacuations required because of the forest fires in Northwestern Ontario; the scale of which (approximately 16,000 people) is presenting the Province with significant challenges. The Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management and Ministry of the Solicitor General, in partnership with other Provincial Ministries and Government of Canada Departments, coordinates planning for and evacuation of First Nations communities when they are at risk due to fires, floods or other emergencies.

 

In discussions with Solicitor General Sylvia Jones, Mayor Tory has agreed that the City of Toronto would assist in any way possible. We understand that at this time, the province is considering possibly using college dormitories in the City of Toronto to house some evacuees.

 

In order to host evacuees, formal funding and cost recovery agreements between Indigenous Services Canada and the City of Toronto need to be negotiated to: determine and authorize the provision of services, ensure full cost recovery and mitigate other potential liability issues identified by the City; authority is also required for City officials to enter into these agreements.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.64
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136128.pdf

MM9.65 - Request to the Government of Canada to halt the Sale of 200 Queens Quay West and Commit the Site for New Affordable Housing - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Manager to write to the Minister of Public Services and Procurement, with copy to all Members of Parliament representing the City of Toronto, to request that the market sale of 200 Queens Quay West be paused until a requirement is applied to the site ensuring it is used to create new affordable housing.

Summary

200 Queens Quay West is a 1.24-acre (0.5 ha) property owned by Canada Lands Company, which is currently occupied by an eight-storey parking structure with frontage on Lower Simcoe Street.

 

Recently, it has become public that Canada Lands Company has retained TD Cornerstone Commercial Realty to facilitate the marketing and sale of the property for residential redevelopment. In materials posted on the marketing website, the development potential of the property is claimed be "a landmark two-tower development featuring a 55-storey and 45-storey tower above a 10-storey mixed-use podium." The three Waterclub residential towers already stand on the block, immediately abutting 200 Queens Quay West.

 

Downtown Toronto has grown rapidly in recent years, and the population is expected to double to nearly 500,000 residents by 2041. On top of that, there are even more people who work, study, and visit downtown Toronto every day. As downtown grows, it only becomes more important that we work hard to ensure valuable public lands are being utilized to achieve critical community facilities and services such as affordable housing.

 

Canada Lands Company is a Crown Corporation that reports to Parliament through the Minister of Public Services and Procurement Canada, and whose directors are appointed by the Government of Canada. The National Housing Strategy speaks to the importance of surplus federal lands for the creation of new affordable housing, and Canada Lands Company is named as an important partner in that effort. Additionally, the 2017-2018 annual report from Canada Lands Company states that 1,000 new affordable housing units are planned or under construction on properties under its control, and that many collaborative projects are underway with municipalities across Canada to create complete communities. It seems there should be an opportunity for Canada Lands Company to rethink its approach to this property and prioritize the public good.

 

Our City is facing an unprecedented affordable housing crisis. The waiting list for affordable housing has grown to more than 181,000 people. That's over 181,000 people who do not have an affordable place to call home. The list for supportive housing is now years long. On any given night, over 8,000 Torontonians relay on our shelters, emergency respites and overnight drop-ins to find a safe place to spend the night. And as we all know, market rents and housing prices continue to skyrocket.

 

In light of the affordable housing and homelessness crisis, and the ongoing rapid pace of growth downtown, the public lands at 200 Queens Quay West should be used to create new affordable housing. Not simply sold to the highest bidder.

 

This Motion is urgent because Canada Lands Company is already publicly marketing the property for sale.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.65
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136167.pdf

MM9.66 - 619 King Street West - Liquor Licence Application - Goldie - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor license application for 619 King Street West operating under the name Goldie (the “Premises”) is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 
2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 
3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

2573970 Ontario Inc., (the “Licensee”) has submitted an Application to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for the expansion of an existing liquor licence at the premises at 619 King Street West operating under the name of Goldie (the “Premises”) under Application 650183. The Application is for an outdoor area with a proposed capacity of approximately 25 patrons. The Licensee has not yet provided confirmation to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario whether the outdoor area is on private or public property. There is no proposed change to the existing indoor area.  The existing licensed indoor area consists of a main floor of approximately 130 patrons, a second floor dining area is approximately 30 patrons and the second floor lounge is approximately 110 patrons.

 

The Premises is within a mixed-use residential neighbourhood. The Premises is also located near a large concentration of licensed establishments. There are concerns related to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area. This application for an amendment to the existing liquor licence is not in the public interest, unless the concerns of the residents are addressed. The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

 

This matter is urgent as the Placard deadline for objections is July 24, 2019.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.66
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136168.pdf

MM9.67 - Addressing Flooding Issues in the Rockcliffe Area - by Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
5 - York South - Weston, 8 - Eglinton - Lawrence
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
*This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services to investigate flooding issues in the vicinity of Caledonia Road and Bowie Avenue, adjacent to the Canada Goose Plant, and within the Rockcliffe area to identify any possible short and long-term remedies and report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in the fourth quarter of 2019.

Summary

On July 17, 2019 several areas within the City of Toronto were impacted by severe flooding as a result of a sudden and significant amount of rainfall.  In fact, a number of these areas experienced greater than 80 mm of rain, and 3 of the City of Toronto rain gauges identified that the rainfall was representative of a 1 in a 100 year storm event.

 

These specific areas, of Rockcliffe neighbourhood and the Caledonia and Bowie Road area have been suffering repeated impacts for numerous years, and on a more frequent basis than previously experienced.

 

It is important that the City work with residents, businesses and others to identify opportunities to find measures to assist in mitigating these impacts. 

 

Urgency:

 

There is a significant concern that similar types of storm events may occur throughout the summer, as evidence over the past few years (2013 and 2017) where significant storms occurred throughout July and August. It is imperative that City Staff have direction to engage with these affected neighbourhoods in an effort to identify mitigation measures, during the high-risk storm event (summer) season.

Background Information

Member Motion MM9.67
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-136169.pdf

Bills and By-laws - Meeting 9

BL9.1 - Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming Bills

Consideration Type:
ACTION

Summary

City Council will introduce and enact General Bills and Confirming Bills.

 

Consolidated Bills Index for July 16 and 17, 2019 City Council Meeting

 

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewBillBylaw.do?meeting=2019.CC9

Background Information

Consolidated By-law Index for July 16, 17 and 18, 2019 City Council meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/bl/bgrd/backgroundfile-136311.htm
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council