Minutes To be Confirmed
Toronto and East York Community Council
- Meeting No.:
- 34
- Contact:
- Cathrine Regan, Committee Administrator
- Meeting Date:
- Wednesday, July 8, 2026
- Thursday, July 9, 2026
- Phone:
- 416-392-7033
- Start Time:
- 9:30 AM
- E-mail:
- teycc@toronto.ca
- Location:
- Committee Room 1, City Hall/Video Conference
- Chair:
- Councillor Chris Moise
TE34.1 - Naming of an existing Public Lane located north of Robinson Street, extending easterly from Palmerston Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the name “De Sa Lane” for an existing public lane located north of Robinson Street, extending easterly from Palmerston Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that the name "De Sa Lane" be approved to identify the existing public lane located north of Robinson Street, extending easterly from Palmerston Avenue.
This naming proposal complies with the City of Toronto Street Naming Policy which can be found at https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/.
This naming proposal is in alignment with the Guiding Principles for Commemoration in the Public Realm.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288297.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288676.pdf
Communications
Motions
TE34.2 - Renaming of Ramsden Park Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the renaming of Ramsden Park Road to "Ramsden Park Lane" as shown as Part 1 in Attachment 1 to the report (May 28, 2026) from the Director, Engineering Support Services, Engineering and Construction Services.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the re-naming of Ramsden Park Road to "Ramsden Park Lane”
This naming proposal complies with the City of Toronto Street Naming Policy which can be found at https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288273.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288274.pdf
Motions
TE34.3 - Naming of a Public Lane west of Yonge Street, north of Macpherson Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the name "Woloch Family Lane" for an existing public lane located west of Yonge Street, north of Macpherson Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that the name "Woloch Family Lane" be approved to identify an existing public lane located west of Yonge Street, north of Macpherson Avenue.
This naming proposal complies with the City of Toronto Street Naming Policy which can be found at https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/.
This naming proposal is in alignment with the Guiding Principles for Commemoration in the Public Realm.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288306.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288307.pdf
Motions
TE34.4 - Naming of an existing Public Lane South of College Street, east of Euclid Avenue, being the north and south segment of the lane
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the name "Palmira Lane" for an existing public lane located south of College Street, east of Euclid Avenue, being the north and south segment of the lane.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that the name "Palmira Lane" be approved to identify the north/south segment of an existing public lane located south of College Street, east of Euclid Avenue.
This naming proposal complies with the City of Toronto Street Naming Policy which can be found at https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/.
This naming proposal is in alignment with the Guiding Principles for Commemoration in the Public Realm.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288315.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288356.pdf
Motions
TE34.5 - Naming of an existing Public Lane located north of Eastern Avenue, between Berkshire Avenue and Rushbrooke Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the name "Valerie Mah Lane" for an existing public lane located north of Eastern Avenue, between Berkshire Avenue and Rushbrooke Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that the name "Valerie Mah Lane" be approved to identify an existing public lane located north of Eastern Avenue, between Berkshire Avenue and Rushbrooke Avenue.
This naming proposal complies with the City of Toronto Street Naming Policy which can be found at https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/.
This naming proposal is in alignment with the Guiding Principles for Commemoration in the Public Realm.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288321.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288322.pdf
Motions
TE34.6 - Naming of a Public Lane located east of Logan Avenue, west of Morse Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the name “Sunday Mews” for the naming of a Public Lane located east of Logan Avenue, west of Morse Street.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that the name "Sunday Mews" be approved to identify the naming of a Public Lane located east of Logan Avenue, west of Morse Street.
This naming proposal complies with the City of Toronto Street Naming Policy which can be found at https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288308.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288309.pdf
Motions
TE34.7 - Naming of an existing Public Lane located south of Queen Street East, between Empire Avenue and Booth Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the name "Sister Gwen Smith Lane" for an existing public lane located south of Queen Street East, between Empire Avenue and Booth Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that the name "Sister Gwen Smith Lane" be approved to identify an existing public lane located south of Queen Street East, between Empire Avenue and Booth Avenue.
This naming proposal complies with the City of Toronto Street Naming Policy which can be found at https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/.
This naming proposal is in alignment with the Guiding Principles for Commemoration in the Public Realm.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288276.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288277.pdf
Motions
TE34.8 - 1730 Bloor Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 1730 Bloor Street West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (June 16, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Bloor Street West |
1730 |
|
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 25 storey mixed-use building at 1730 Bloor Street West. The proposed building includes 200 residential units, retail at grade, and an office space that is located on the ground floor and on a portion of the second floor. The total gross floor area of the proposed building is 14,569 square metres of which 454 square metres is for non-residential uses. The proposed development includes a 0.4 metre right-of-way widening along the Bloor Street West frontage.
The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288374.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288460.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288375.pdf
Communications
(June 12, 2026) E-mail from Jacob Sidon (TE.Main)
(June 17, 2026) E-mail from Chris Lau (TE.Main)
(July 6, 2026) Submission from Charlie Smith and Tyler Grinyer, Bousfields Inc. (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215851.pdf
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Lenka Holubec (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217020.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 3:
Recommendation to be deleted
3. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 1730 Bloor Street West from Permit Parking.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Bloor Street West |
1730 |
|
|
|
TE34.9 - 2273, 2277 and 2279 Bloor Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 2273, 2275 and 2279 Bloor Street West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council require the owner to provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
4. City Council direct that prior to the removal of the proposed holding provisions in the proposed By-law, the applicant be required to enter into a legal agreement and register a Section 118 restriction on title to ensure assumption of the agreement by subsequent owners to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, securing the implementation of the Tenant Assistance Plan required by Recommendation 3 above.
5. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Bloor Street West |
2273, 2277 and 2279 |
|
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 15 storey mixed-use building (including the mechanical penthouse and amenity space at the uppermost storey) at 2273, 2277 and 2279 Bloor Street West. The proposed building includes 60 residential units and retail at grade. The total gross floor area of the proposed building is 5,545 square metres of which 116 square metres is for retail use. The proposed development includes a 0.4 metre right-of-way widening along the Bloor Street West frontage.
The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024), conforms to the City's Official Plan, and represents appropriate intensification that is compatible with the existing and planned context within a Protected Major Transit Station Area (PMTSA).
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288453.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288461.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288454.pdf
Communications
(June 1, 2026) E-mail from Aaron Adams (TE.Supp)
(June 23, 2026) E-mail from Catherine Keenan (TE.Supp)
(June 23, 2026) E-mail from Tom Fijalkowski (TE.Supp)
(June 26, 2026) Letter from Victor Roskey (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Kate Stacey (TE.Supp)
(July 3, 2026) Letter from Victor Roskey (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) Letter from Sarah Doucette (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Ren Tashiro (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Lisa Zaretsky (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Karen Yoshida (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Ernst Hamm (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Michael Younder, Chair, Bloor West Village Residents Association (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217025.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Erin Anderson and Michael Liston (TE.New)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Natalie Vanstone (TE.Supp)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 5:
Recommendation to be deleted
5. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 2271, 2273 and 2279 Bloor Street West from Permit Parking.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Bloor Street West |
2273, 2277 and 2279 |
|
|
|
TE34.10 - 1464 King Street West and 10 to 12 Maynard Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 1464 King Street West and 10 to 12 Maynard Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 1464 King Street West and 10 to 12 Maynard Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 1464 King Street West, 10 to 12 Maynard Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 7 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
4. City Council direct the City Solicitor to withhold the necessary Bills for enactment, until City Council has approved the Rental Housing Demolition Application 26 122478 STE 04 RH under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units at 1464 King Street West and 10 to 12 Maynard Avenue.
5. City Council require the owner to provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the three existing rental dwelling rooms proposed to be demolished to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to be secured in one or more agreements with the City to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
7. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
King Street West |
1464 |
|
|
|
|
Maynard Avenue |
12 |
|
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 13-storey mixed-use building at 1464 King Street West and 10 to 12 Maynard Avenue. The building includes ground-floor retail and daycare uses, and a temple above the ninth floor. There are 80 residential units proposed, of which 19 are rental replacement units. There are also 15 residential units proposed for the use of temple visitors. The proposed total Gross Floor Area (GFA) is 8,015 square metres, including 4,115 square metres of non-residential GFA for temple, daycare and retail uses.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. The proposal is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288449.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment (By-law 569-2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288782.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment (By-law 438-86)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288506.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288450.pdf
Communications
(June 30, 2026) E-mail from Jennifer Taborek (TE.Supp)
(June 30, 2026) E-mail from Mikaeel Ghany (TE.Supp)
(July 2, 2026) Letter from Xiaoqing Chen (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Franklynn Bartol (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Damien Moule, More Neighbours Toronto (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216984.pdf
(July 7, 2026) Submission from Francesco Fiorani, Senior Planner/Project Manager, Brutto Consulting (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215868.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Parth Shah (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Carla Jensen
Parth Shah
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 7:
Recommendation to be deleted
7. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 1464 King Street West and 10 to 12 Maynard Avenue from Permit Parking.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
King Street West |
1464 |
|
|
|
|
Maynard Avenue |
12 |
|
|
|
TE34.11 - 1464 King Street West and 10 to 12 Maynard Avenue - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application File 26 122478 STE 04 RH in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of 19 existing rental dwelling units located at 10 Maynard Avenue, subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain 19 replacement rental dwelling units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement;
b. the replacement rental dwelling units required by Recommendation 1.a. above shall collectively have a total gross floor area of at least 825 square metres and be comprised of 9 studio units, 5 one-bedroom units, 2 two-bedroom units, 2 three-bedroom units and 1 four-bedroom unit, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to City Planning dated May 20, 2026; any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
c. the owner shall, as part of the 19 replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a above, provide at least 9 studio units, 5 one-bedroom units, 2 two-bedroom units, 2 three-bedroom units and 1 four-bedroom unit at affordable rents, as currently defined in the City's Official Plan, all for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit;
d. the owner shall provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the 19 existing rental dwelling units to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
e. the owner shall provide tenants of all 19 replacement rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed 13-storey building at no extra charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
f. the owner shall provide central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit at no extra charge;
g. the owner shall provide and maintain a common laundry room, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to City Planning dated May 20, 2026; any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
h. the owner shall provide and make available for rent at least two vehicle parking spaces to tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units; such parking spaces shall be made available firstly to returning tenants who previously rented a vehicle parking space, and at similar monthly parking charges that such tenants previously paid; and the remaining vehicle parking spaces shall be made available to tenants of the replacement rental units to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
i. the owner shall provide tenants of all replacement rental dwelling units with access to bicycle and visitor parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed development;
j. the replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the proposed development, exclusive of the replacement rental dwelling units, are made available and ready for occupancy, subject to any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
k. the owner shall enter into, and register on title to the lands, an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 1.a. through 1.j. above all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the demolition of the 19 existing rental dwelling units located at 10 Maynard Avenue after all the following have occurred:
a. all conditions in Recommendation 1 above have been fully secured;
b. the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments for Application 24 253913 STE 04 OZ have come into full force and effect;
c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Executive Director, Development Review or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, or as otherwise determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits (conditional or full permit) for the approved development on the site; and
e. the owner has confirmed, in writing, that all existing rental dwelling units and dwelling rooms proposed to be demolished are vacant.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate, has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.
4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 1464 King Street West and 10-12 Maynard Avenue after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 pursuant to section 6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:
a. the owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;
b. the owner erects solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
c. the owner erects the proposed building on the site no later than three (3) years from the date that the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units commences, subject to the timeframe being extended at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
d. should the owner fail to complete the proposed building within the time specified in Recommendation 4.c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, as with municipal property taxes, an amount equal to the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such amount shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the Residential Demolition Permit is issued.
5. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement and any other related agreements.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 19 rental dwelling units located at 10 Maynard Avenue. The 19 rental units are proposed to be replaced as part of the new development on the site. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants of the rental units to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship for tenants of the rental units.
The proposed development on the site at 1464 King Street West and 10 to 12 Maynard Avenue is the subject of a related Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application (24 253913 STE 04 OZ). The application proposes a 13-storey mixed-use building with 80 dwelling units, including 19 replacement rental units, ground-floor retail and daycare uses, and a temple with religious residences. To facilitate the development, a total of 19 rental dwelling units and 3 rental dwelling rooms are proposed to be demolished. An approval report for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.
This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288130.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288131.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215869.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Motions
TE34.12 - 1497 and 1501 Queen Street West and 89 and 91 Beaty Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that::
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 1497 and 1501 Queen Street West and 89 and 91 Beaty Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 1497 and 1501 Queen Street West and 89 and 91 Beaty Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills for enactment, City Council require that City Council has approved the Rental Housing Demolition Application 26 147735 STE 04 RH under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of 50 existing rental dwelling units.
5. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Beaty Avenue |
89 and 91 |
|
|
|
|
Queen Street West |
1497 and 1501 |
|
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to develop a 10 and 7 storey mixed use building with 141 affordable rental units, including 54 rental replacement units, and institutional uses. The development includes 8,341 square metres of gross floor area and retains and reconstructs the historic façade of the existing buildings of 1497 and 1501 Queen Street West.
The proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan including Site and Area Specific Policy 566.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288451.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288759.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288452.pdf
Communications
(June 25, 2026) E-mail from Dana Zamzul (TE.Supp)
(June 25, 2026) E-mail from Nigel Carvalho (TE.Supp)
(June 25, 2026) E-mail from Sojie Tate (TE.Supp)
(June 25, 2026) Letter from Lidia Monaco, Chief Executive Officer, Operation Springboard (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215535.pdf
(June 25, 2026) Letter from Belinda Marchese, Executive Director, Jean Tweed Centre (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216693.pdf
(June 26, 2026) E-mail from Jacqueline Burkhardt (TE.Supp)
(June 28, 2026) E-mail from Bernard King (TE.Supp)
(June 28, 2026) E-mail from Emily Visser (TE.Supp)
(June 28, 2026) E-mail from Clare E.M. Cross (TE.Supp)
(June 28, 2026) E-mail from Sean Ferkul (TE.Supp)
(June 26, 2026) Letter from Keith Hambly, Chief Executive Officer, Fred Victor (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216733.pdf
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Jade Armstrong (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Erick Nyaga (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Christine Campbell (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Marika Thoms (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Gregory Benedetto (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Shannon Hirsch (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Rozita Razavi (TE.Supp)
(June 30, 2026) E-mail from Kathleen Banville (TE.Supp)
(June 30, 2026) E-mail from Joanna Moon (TE.Supp)
(June 30, 2026) E-mail from Laurie Chesley (TE.Supp)
(July 3, 2026) Letter from Stephanie Myers (TE.Supp)
(July 3, 2026) E-mail from Michelle Joseph (TE.Supp)
(July 3, 2026) Letter from Criss Habal, Executive Director, Progress Place (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215696.pdf
(July 3, 2026) Letter from Veronica Snooks and Steve Torreson, Co-Chairs, The Dream Team (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216836.pdf
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Abram Braithwaite (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Heather Spithoff (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Shaun Leggett (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Christian Leggett (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Nathaniel Leggett (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Timothy Martin (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) Letter from Ainsley Chapman, Executive Director, Evangel Hall Mission (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215786.pdf
(July 6, 2026) Letter from Joshua Barndt, Director of Strategy and Portfolio Development, The Neighbourhood Land Trust (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216886.pdf
(July 6, 2026) Letter from Andrea Adams, Executive Director, St. Clare’s Housing (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215850.pdf
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Silvia Samsa (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Adam Pham (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Victor Willis, Lead, Toronto Mental Health and Addictions Supportive Housing Network (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216998.pdf
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Elene Lam (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from William Fitzpatrick (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Anne O’Connell (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Peter Martin, Housing Solutions Manager, Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217028.pdf
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Shannon Spencer, Community Planner, Social Planning Toronto (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215895.pdf
(July 8, 2026) Letter from Evan Theriault, Development and Communications Coordinator, Parkdale Activity-Recreation Centre (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215938.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Bettina Harrison (TE.New)
Speakers
Bea Marie
Andrew Peterson
Victor Willis, The Toronto Supportive Housing Network
Diana Chan McNally
Dan Seljak, Another Glass Box
Debbie King
Peter Martin, Housing Solutions Manager, Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness
Jason Miles
Vanessa Raponi
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 5:
Recommendation to be deleted
5. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 1497 and 1501 Queen Street West and 89 and 91 Beaty Avenue from Permit Parking.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Beaty Avenue |
89 and 91 |
|
|
|
|
Queen Street West |
1497 and 1501 |
|
|
|
Vote (Adopt Item as Amended) Jul-08-2026
| Result: Carried | Majority Required - TE34.12 - Moise - Adopt the Item as amended |
|---|---|
| Total members that voted Yes: 7 | Members that voted Yes are Brad Bradford, Alejandra Bravo, Ausma Malik, Josh Matlow, Chris Moise (Chair), Gord Perks, Dianne Saxe |
| Total members that voted No: 0 | Members that voted No are |
| Total members that were Absent: 1 | Members that were absent are Paula Fletcher |
TE34.13 - 1497-1501 Queen Street West and 89-91 Beaty Avenue - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application 26 147735 STE 04 RH in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of 50 existing rental dwelling units located at 1497-1501 Queen Street West and 91 Beaty Avenue, subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain 54 replacement rental dwelling units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement;
b. the replacement rental dwelling units required by Recommendation 1.a. above shall collectively have a total gross floor area of at least 2,486 square metres and be comprised of 24 studio units and 30 one-bedroom units as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to City Planning dated April 21, 2026; any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
c. the owner shall, as part of the 54 replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above, provide at least 24 studio units and 30 one-bedroom units at affordable rents, as currently defined in the City's Official Plan, all for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit;
d. the owner shall provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the 50 existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
e. the owner shall provide tenants of all 54 replacement rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed 10- and 7-storey mixed use buildings at no extra charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
f. the owner shall provide central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit at no extra charge, consistent with the remainder of the units in the building;
g. the owner shall provide and maintain a common laundry room in the basement and on the eighth floor of the proposed buildings, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to City Planning dated May 22, 2026; any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
h. the owner shall provide tenants of all replacement rental dwelling units with access to bicycle and visitor parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed development;
i. the replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the first phase of the proposed development, exclusive of the replacement rental dwelling units, are made available and ready for occupancy, subject to any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
j. the owner shall enter into, and register on title to the lands, an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 1.a. through 1.i. above all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue phased Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the demolition of the 50 existing rental dwelling units located at 1497-1501 Queen Street West and 91 Beaty Avenue after all the following have occurred:
a. all conditions in Recommendation 1 above have been fully secured;
b. the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments for Application 26 118047 STE 04 OZ have come into full force and effect;
c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Executive Director, Development Review or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, or as otherwise determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits (conditional or full permit) for the approved development on the site; and
e. the owner has confirmed, in writing, that all existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished are vacant.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate, has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.
4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 1497-1501 Queen Street West and 91 Beaty Avenue after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 pursuant to section 6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:
a. the owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;
b. the owner erects solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
c. the owner erects the proposed building on the site no later than three (3) years from the date that the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units commences, subject to the timeframe being extended at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
d. should the owner fail to complete the proposed building within the time specified in Recommendation 4.c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, as with municipal property taxes, an amount equal to the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such amount shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the Residential Demolition Permit is issued.
5. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement and any other related agreements.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 50 rental dwelling units located at 1497-1501 Queen Street West and 89-91 Beaty Avenue. A total of 54 rental units are proposed to be replaced as part of the new development on the site. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
The proposed development on the site at 1497-1501 Queen Street West and 89-91 Beaty Avenue is the subject of a related Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application (26 118047 STE 04 OZ). The proposed development would permit a 10- and 7-storey mixed use building consisting of 141 affordable rental units, including 54 rental replacement units. An approval report for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.
This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288000.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288001.pdf
Communications
(June 24, 2026) Letter from Meagan Knight (TE.Supp)
(June 25, 2026) E-mail from Dana Zamzul (TE.Supp)
(June 25, 2026) E-mail from Nigel Carvalho (TE.Supp)
(June 25, 2026) E-mail from Sojie Tate (TE.Supp)
(June 25, 2026) Letter from Belinda Marchese, Executive Director, Jean Tweed Centre (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216694.pdf
(June 26, 2026) E-mail from Jacqueline Burkhardt (TE.Supp)
(June 28, 2026) E-mail from Sean Ferkul (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Gregory Benedetto (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) Letter from Amber Kellen, Director, Urban Health and Homelessness Services Department, The Neighbourhood Group Community Services (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216747.pdf
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Rozita Razavi (TE.Supp)
(June 30, 2026) Letter from Annalisa Rasmussen (TE.Supp)
(June 30, 2026) E-mail from Joanna Moon (TE.Supp)
(June 30, 2026) Letter from Bryan Douthwright, Advocacy and Outreach Program Manager, Weston King Neighbourhood Centre (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215570.pdf
(June 30, 2026) Letter from Deborah Jules, Drop-In/Food Access Manager, Christie Ossington Neighbourhood Centre (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215572.pdf
(July 2, 2026) Letter from Nicola Holness, Director, Integrated Mental Health, Regent Park Community Health Centre (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216768.pdf
(July 2, 2026) Letter from Nicola Bangham, Executive Director, Breakaway Community Services (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216769.pdf
(July 3, 2026) Letter from Stephanie Myers (TE.Supp)
(July 3, 2026) Letter from Veronica Snooks and Steve Torresan, Co-Chairs, The Dream Team (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216838.pdf
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Heather Spithoff (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Shaun Leggett (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Nathaniel Leggett (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Christian Leggett (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Timothy Martin (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) Letter from Ainsley Chapman, Executive Director, Evangel Hall Mission (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216883.pdf
(July 6, 2026) Letter from Joshua Barndt, Director of Strategy and Portfolio Development, The Neighbourhood Land Trust (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216887.pdf
(July 6, 2026) Letter from Andrea Adams, Executive Director, St. Clare’s Housing (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216926.pdf
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Silvia Samsa (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Elene Lam (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Peter Martin, Housing Solutions Manager, Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217029.pdf
(July 8, 2026) Letter from Evan Theriault, Development and Communications Coordinator, Parkdale Activity-Recreation Centre (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217062.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Bettina Harrison (TE.New)
Motions
TE34.14 - 1497 and 1501 Queen Street West - Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties and Demolition of Heritage Attributes on a Designated Heritage Property under Sections 33 and 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve:
a. the alterations to the designated heritage properties at 1497 Queen Street West (1497A and 1499 Queen Street West) and 1501 Queen Street West (93 Beaty Avenue), in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of, respectively, ten- and seven-storey mixed-use buildings, with such alterations to the designated heritage properties being substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by DTAH Architects Limited, dated May 21, 2026, and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated May 19, 2026, on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with an approved Conservation Plan and drawings satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to conditions as set out below; and
b. the selective demolition of heritage attributes of the designated heritage property at 1501 Queen Street West (93 Beaty Avenue), in accordance with Section 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a seven-storey mixed-use building being substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by DTAH Architects Limited, dated May 21, 2026, and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects, dated May 19, 2026, on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with an approved Conservation Plan and drawings satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to conditions as set out below.
2. City Council direct that its consent to the application to alter the designated heritage properties at 1497 Queen Street West (1497A and 1499 Queen Street West) and 1501 Queen Street West (93 Beaty Avenue), in accordance with Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and its consent to the selective demolition of heritage attributes of the heritage property at 1501 Queen Street West (93 Beaty Avenue), in accordance with Part IV, Section 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act, are also subject to the following conditions:
a. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 1497 Queen Street West (1497A and 1499 Queen Street West) and 1501 Queen Street West (93 Beaty Avenue), including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall:
1. enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 1497 Queen Street West (1497A and 1499 Queen Street West) and 1501 Queen Street West (93 Beaty Avenue), substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated May 21, 2026, prepared by DTAH Architects Limited and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated May 19, 2026, and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.a.2. below, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;
2. provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the property at 1497 Queen Street West (1497A and 1499 Queen Street West) and 1501 Queen Street West (93 Beaty Avenue), prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated May 19, 2026, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
3. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.a.2. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
4. provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
5. provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject properties, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
6. submit a Signage Plan for the subject properties to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
7. provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the heritage property at 1501 Queen Street West (93 Beaty Avenue), satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
8. provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan; and
b. prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 2.a.8. above, the owner shall:
1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the Conservation and Interpretation Plans and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
2. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in City Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the properties at 1497 Queen Street West (1497A and 1499 Queen Street West) and 1501 Queen Street West (93 Beaty Avenue).
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Sections 33 and 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) to alter the Part IV designated heritage properties at 1497 and 1501 Queen Street West, including the selective demolition of heritage attributes of 1501 Queen Street West. This is in connection with an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application for the expansion of the existing Parkdale Activity Recreation Centre (PARC) campus to provide additional affordable housing and community services in a new building constructed behind the partially retained façades of the heritage buildings. This report also seeks approval to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement to ensure the long-term conservation of the heritage properties.
The subject redevelopment site is located on the south side of Queen Street West, at the southeast corner of Queen Street West and Beaty Avenue. It contains two heritage properties at 1497 Queen Street West (1497A and 1499 Queen Street West) and 1501 Queen Street West (93 Beaty Avenue) that are both designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the OHA.
The property at 1497 Queen Street West comprises a three-storey main street commercial block building. Constructed between 1924 and 1926 for James J. Walsh and designed by architect James M. Cowan, the building was initially built as a two-storey brick structure. A third-storey addition, designed by architects Chapman and Oxley, was completed in 1926 for the Lakeside Recreation Club Ltd., later known as Lakeside Bowl, which operated on the property until the late 1970s. In 1980, PARC opened a pilot mental health program in the building as a tenant. PARC acquired ownership of the property in 1991 and added ten units of supportive housing on the third floor in the late 1990s.
The property at 1501 Queen Street West comprises a three-storey apartment building constructed in c.1912 in the Edwardian Classical style as a mirror image of the building at 194 Dowling Avenue. Commissioned by Toronto developer David Lavine and designed by architect Stanley Arnold Palmer Waggett, the pair were historically known as the Parkdale Mansions and form a symmetrical composition at the east and west ends of the block. Since 2020, the apartment building at 1501 Queen Street West has been managed by PARC for affordable supportive housing purposes.
The proposed redevelopment involves the expansion of the existing PARC campus to increase the organization's capacity for affordable housing and community services. The proposal is to construct a new building behind the partially retained façades of the heritage buildings. The new building comprises two massing components with overall heights of seven and ten storeys. The new massing is stepped back approximately 5.3 metres and 2.6 metres along the north elevation, facing Queen Street West, and approximately 2.8 metres at the fourth storey along Beaty Avenue.
The north elevation of 1497 Queen Street West, facing Queen Street West, together with its eastern and western return walls, will be retained in situ. Due to significant structural deficiencies at 1501 Queen Street West, most of the north elevation is proposed to be dismantled and reconstructed using salvaged materials, to the extent possible, with new materials where required. However, the western-most portion of the north elevation and the Beaty Avenue elevation (with part of its the southwest return wall) will be retained in situ, as it does not exhibit the same structural deficiencies identified elsewhere along the façade.
Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed redevelopment conserves the on-site and adjacent heritage properties and is consistent with the applicable policy framework. The heritage impacts of the proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy and design measures.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288241.pdf
Communications
Motions
14a - 1497 and 1501 Queen Street West - Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties and Demolition of Heritage Attributes on a Designated Heritage Property under Sections 33 and 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on July 6, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB46.13 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (June 15, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Sections 33 and 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) to alter the Part IV designated heritage properties at 1497 and 1501 Queen Street West, including the selective demolition of heritage attributes of 1501 Queen Street West. This is in connection with an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application for the expansion of the existing Parkdale Activity Recreation Centre (PARC) campus to provide additional affordable housing and community services in a new building constructed behind the partially retained façades of the heritage buildings. This report also seeks approval to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement to ensure the long-term conservation of the heritage properties.
The subject redevelopment site is located on the south side of Queen Street West, at the southeast corner of Queen Street West and Beaty Avenue. It contains two heritage properties at 1497 Queen Street West (1497A and 1499 Queen Street West) and 1501 Queen Street West (93 Beaty Avenue) that are both designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the OHA.
The property at 1497 Queen Street West comprises a three-storey main street commercial block building. Constructed between 1924 and 1926 for James J. Walsh and designed by architect James M. Cowan, the building was initially built as a two-storey brick structure. A third-storey addition, designed by architects Chapman and Oxley, was completed in 1926 for the Lakeside Recreation Club Ltd., later known as Lakeside Bowl, which operated on the property until the late 1970s. In 1980, PARC opened a pilot mental health program in the building as a tenant. PARC acquired ownership of the property in 1991 and added ten units of supportive housing on the third floor in the late 1990s.
The property at 1501 Queen Street West comprises a three-storey apartment building constructed in c.1912 in the Edwardian Classical style as a mirror image of the building at 194 Dowling Avenue.
Commissioned by Toronto developer David Lavine and designed by architect Stanley Arnold Palmer Waggett, the pair were historically known as the Parkdale Mansions and form a symmetrical composition at the east and west ends of the block. Since 2020, the apartment building at 1501 Queen Street West has been managed by PARC for affordable supportive housing purposes.
The proposed redevelopment involves the expansion of the existing PARC campus to increase the organization's capacity for affordable housing and community services. The proposal is to construct a new building behind the partially retained façades of the heritage buildings. The new building comprises two massing components with overall heights of seven and ten storeys. The new massing is stepped back approximately 5.3 metres and 2.6 metres along the north elevation, facing Queen Street West, and approximately 2.8 metres at the fourth storey along Beaty Avenue.
The north elevation of 1497 Queen Street West, facing Queen Street West, together with its eastern and western return walls, will be retained in situ. Due to significant structural deficiencies at 1501 Queen Street West, most of the north elevation is proposed to be dismantled and reconstructed using salvaged materials, to the extent possible, with new materials where required. However, the western-most portion of the north elevation and the Beaty Avenue elevation (with part of its the southwest return wall) will be retained in situ, as it does not exhibit the same structural deficiencies identified elsewhere along the façade.
Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed redevelopment conserves the on-site and adjacent heritage properties and is consistent with the applicable policy framework. The heritage impacts of the proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy and design measures.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289318.pdf
TE34.15 - 1167 to 1175 Bloor Street West, 34 to 42 Brock Crescent and 90 Croatia Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 34 to 42 Brock Crescent and 90 Croatia Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 1167 to 1175 Bloor Street West and 34 to 42 Brock Crescent substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands municipally known as 90 Croatia Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 14 storey mixed use building with 52 dwelling units and 14 supportive group living units, along with retail and institutional uses, at 1167 to 1175 Bloor Street West, 34 to 42 Brock Crescent and 90 Croatia Street. The applicant, Safehaven Project for Community Living, currently occupies 1173 Bloor Street West. Safehaven is a non-profit organization providing rooming, respite, and transitional care services for children and adults with medical complexities or disabilities.
The proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan for an appropriate use, form and scale of development within a Protected Major Transit Station Area (PMTSA).
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288441.pdf
Attachment 6: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288931.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288442.pdf
Communications
Speakers
Motions
TE34.16 - 1280 to 1286 College Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the land municipally known as 1280 College Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 1280 to 1286 College Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
4. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
College Street |
1280 -1286, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit an 9-storey apartment building with 76 dwelling units at 1280 to1286 College Street.
The proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications are consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement 2024 (PPS 2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan, including Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP) 656 and SASP 657, particularly as it relates to directing growth around transit stations, reurbanizing the City’s Avenues, and providing a diverse range and mix of housing options.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288380.pdf
Attachment 6: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288758.pdf
Revised Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288382.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288381.pdf
Communications
(June 5, 2026) E-mail from Steven Fistell (TE.Main)
(June 4, 2026) Letter from Amandio and Zaida Melo (TE.Main)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Nick Shaw (TE.Supp)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Luis Ledesma (TE.New)
Speakers
Catherine Krug
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 4:
Recommendation to be deleted
4. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking to exclude the development located at 1280 to 1286 College Street from Permit Parking.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
College Street |
1280 -1286, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
TE34.17 - Chinatown Tomorrow Planning Initiative - Final Report
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the West Chinatown Planning Framework, included as Attachment 7 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, and City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to use the West Chinatown Planning Framework as guidance in the evaluation of current and future development applications.
2. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 1-149 Baldwin Street, 1-99 Cameron Street, 60 and 81 Cecil Street, 261-279 College Street, 2-8 and 137-143 D’Arcy Street, 308-519 Dundas Street West, 73 and 77 Grange Avenue, 176 Huron Street, 126-256 McCaul Street, 2 Nassau Street, 3, 5 and 8 Oxford Street, 34 Ross Street, 160-474 Spadina Avenue, 76 and 78 Sullivan Street, 2, 6 and 8 St Andrew Street, 378 and 380 Queen Street West, and 1, 10 and 11 Willison Square substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 8 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 40, 42, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, 96, 98, 100, 102, 104, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 120, 122, 124, 126, 128, 130, 65, 67, 69, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93, 95, 97, 99, 101, 103, 105, 107, 109, 111, 113, 115, 117, 119, 121, 123, 125, 127, 129 and 121 Baldwin Street and 112 Huron Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 9 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendments and Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
5. City Council request the Mayor, as part of the 2027 Budget process, to allocate funding to support the implementation of the Cultural District Program in West Chinatown.
6. City Council request the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in collaboration with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to explore community uses at 161 Baldwin Street.
7. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to approve a Street Event application to facilitate the temporary pedestrianization of Huron Street between Dundas Street West and the first east/west laneway north of Dundas Street West for any number of days between August 1, 2026 and October 31, 2026, inclusive, despite any section of Chapter 743 limiting Street Events to no more than four days, on such terms and conditions as deemed appropriate by the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the City Solicitor.
8. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to include in any Street Event permit issued further to Recommendation 7 above, the following condition:
a. that the applicant be solely responsible for and pay all costs associated with the pedestrianization, including but not limited to the costs or expenses of any costs incurred by the City, acting reasonably, that would not otherwise have been incurred but for the Street Event.
9. City Council delegate authority to the General Manager, Transportation Services, notwithstanding any City of Toronto By-law to the contrary, for the term of any Street Event permit approved under Recommendation 7 above:
a. to regulate traffic and parking as may be required for the purposes of managing traffic movement or to address public safety or the safety of any property to support the Huron Street Pedestrianization; and further direct the City Solicitor, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services, to submit any necessary Bills to amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code traffic and parking Chapters, including their Schedules, directly to the first meeting of Council in 2027, or earlier, if practicable, with such amendments being effective retroactively to the date established by the General Manager, Transportation Services; and
b. to temporarily close to vehicular and pedestrian traffic any highway or portion of a highway, for a period up to and including 90 consecutive days, as required for the purposes of managing traffic movement or to address public safety or the safety of any property during preparation for, and during, the Huron Street Pedestrianization and exempt the General Manager, Transportation Services, in carrying out this delegated authority, from the requirement in section 937-5 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 937, Temporary Closing of Highways, that being the requirement to notify the local Ward Councillor of the pending closure and the requirement to report on the proposed closure if so requested.
10. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, to prohibit parking, stopping or standing, until the end of the day on October 31, 2026, on any highway where the General Manager, Transportation Services has erected temporary signage as required to accommodate the Huron Street Pedestrianization.
11. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to submit directly to City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to reinstate the traffic and parking regulations to what they were immediately prior to the By-law amendments made in Recommendations 9 and 10 above.
12. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the local Councillors’ offices, to explore the feasibility of creating a West Chinatown Community Roundtable to discuss ongoing City-wide and local community projects and initiatives and provide a status update to the Toronto East York Community Council in first quarter of 2027.
13. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to conduct a mobility and road safety plan for West Chinatown.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council adopt the West Chinatown Planning Framework and associated Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments to guide growth, development and community investment in the West Chinatown area.
The West Chinatown Planning Framework is an outcome of the Chinatown Tomorrow Planning Initiative, an interdivisional project that began in 2019. The initiative was informed by extensive public consultation and input of staff across City divisions as well as key stakeholder organizations. The West Chinatown Planning Framework provides direction on enhancing the public realm, supporting small businesses, improving and expanding housing and livability, preserving cultural heritage, and guiding built form. Its objectives will be implemented through future capital investment and development within the area.
The report also recommends amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. The Official Plan Amendment would redesignate the Spadina-Dundas intersection in the Downtown Plan from Mixed-Use Areas 3 - Main Street to Mixed Use Areas 2 - Intermediate and removes Site and Area Specific Policies that are no longer applicable to the area. The Mixed-Use Areas 2 designation more accurately reflects the higher densities anticipated at this key intersection, and through future development, supports the provision of community benefits, affordable housing and public realm improvements.
The Zoning By-law Amendment permits a range of small-scale retail, service and office uses on interior lots within residentially zoned properties along Baldwin Street. These changes would encourage small-scale retailers and entrepreneurs to locate within the neighbourhood while supporting the area's character.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288525.pdf
Attachment 6 - Community Consultation Final Report - Part 1 - English
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288526.pdf
Attachment 6 - Community Consultation Final Report - Part 2 - Chinese - Simplified
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288538.pdf
Attachment 6 - Community Consultation Final Report - Part 3 - Chinese - Traditional
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288539.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft West Chinatown Planning Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288691.pdf
Attachment 9 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment - Baldwin Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288812.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288537.pdf
Communications
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Brenda Joy Lem (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Rick Wong (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Bryan Hong (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Shulan Tien (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Samson Tam (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Lily Ruble (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Helen Lee (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Joseph Banh (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Amy Wang (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Hannia Cheng (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Jessica Pegis (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Simone Pegis (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Gian Pileri (TE.New)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Linda Zhang (TE.New)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Sara Constant (TE.New)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Alex Verman (TE.New)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Nicholas Wong (TE.New)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Phat Le (TE.New)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Sonia Yuan (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Amber Edwards (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Cam Naka (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) Letter from Cheryll Case, Founder and Executive Director, Community in Public (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215902.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Chloe Gordon-Chow (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Izzy Waxman (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Jacob Chan (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Koby Song-Nichols (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Leo Wei (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Lily Hu (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Mike Chong (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Myles Isley Brown (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Zoey Lyu (TE.New)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Kal Nong (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Elysse Wevers Lehman (TE.Supp)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Erica Kim (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Ethan Verderber (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Rayna Xu (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Rodrigo Cervantes (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Rowan Ballanger (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Fateha Hossain (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Kai Wong (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Jhony Li Feng (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Yumi Numata (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Quan Thai (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Albert Fung (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Petrolo (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Kennedy Klak (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Lily Jeon (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Chloe Lorenzo (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Sunta Sem (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Storm Luu (TE.New)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Marc Francoeur (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Angela Wang (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Emily Chan (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Anna Malla (TE.Supp)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Jenny Park (TE.New)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Faye Pang (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) Letter from Samantha Petherbridge (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215979.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Karian Chen (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) Multiple Communications from 29 communications with similar text were received between July 8, 2026 at 9:55 a.m. and July 8, 2026 at 2:22 p.m. (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217150.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Eva Ma (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Melinda Benoit (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Anson Ng (TE.New)
Speakers
Anson Ng
Dan Seljak, Another Glass Box
Gian Pileri
Motions
That:
1. City Council request the Mayor, as part of the 2027 Budget process, to allocate funding to support the implementation of the Cultural District Program in West Chinatown.
2. City Council request the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in collaboration with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to explore community uses at 161 Baldwin Street.
3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to approve a Street Event application to facilitate the temporary pedestrianization of Huron Street between Dundas Street West and the first east/west laneway north of Dundas Street West for any number of days between August 1, 2026 and October 31, 2026, inclusive, despite any section of Chapter 743 limiting Street Events to no more than four days, on such terms and conditions as deemed appropriate by the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the City Solicitor.
4. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to include in any Street Event permit issued further to Recommendation 3, the following condition:
a. that the applicant be solely responsible for and pay all costs associated with the pedestrianization, including but not limited to the costs or expenses of any costs incurred by the City, acting reasonably, that would not otherwise have been incurred but for the Street Event.
5. City Council delegate authority to the General Manager, Transportation Services, notwithstanding any City of Toronto By-law to the contrary, for the term of any Street Event permit approved under Recommendation 3:
a. to regulate traffic and parking as may be required for the purposes of managing traffic movement or to address public safety or the safety of any property to support the Huron Street Pedestrianization; and further direct the City Solicitor, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services, to submit any necessary Bills to amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code traffic and parking Chapters, including their Schedules, directly to the first meeting of Council in 2027, or earlier, if practicable, with such amendments being effective retroactively to the date established by the General Manager, Transportation Services; and
b. to temporarily close to vehicular and pedestrian traffic any highway or portion of a highway, for a period up to and including 90 consecutive days, as required for the purposes of managing traffic movement or to address public safety or the safety of any property during preparation for, and during, the Huron Street Pedestrianization and exempt the General Manager, Transportation Services, in carrying out this delegated authority, from the requirement in section 937-5 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 937, Temporary Closing of Highways, that being the requirement to notify the local Ward Councillor of the pending closure and the requirement to report on the proposed closure if so requested.
6. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, to prohibit parking, stopping or standing, until the end of the day on October 31, 2026, on any highway where the General Manager, Transportation Services has erected temporary signage as required to accommodate the Huron Street Pedestrianization.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to submit directly to City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to reinstate the traffic and parking regulations to what they were immediately prior to the By-law amendments made in Recommendations 5 and 6.
That:
1. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the local Councillors’ offices, to explore the feasibility of creating a West Chinatown Community Roundtable to discuss ongoing City-wide and local community projects and initiatives and provide a status update to Toronto East York Community Council in first quarter of 2027.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to conduct a mobility and road safety plan for West Chinatown.
Vote (Adopt Item as Amended) Jul-08-2026
| Result: Carried | Majority Required - TE34.17 - Moise - Adopt the Item as amended |
|---|---|
| Total members that voted Yes: 7 | Members that voted Yes are Brad Bradford, Alejandra Bravo, Ausma Malik, Josh Matlow, Chris Moise (Chair), Gord Perks, Dianne Saxe |
| Total members that voted No: 0 | Members that voted No are |
| Total members that were Absent: 1 | Members that were absent are Paula Fletcher |
TE34.18 - 181 to 195 Dundas Street West and 63 Centre Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 181 to 195 Dundas Street West and 63 Centre Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 181 to 195 Dundas Street West and 63 Centre Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 7 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 41-storey mixed use building with retail at-grade, non-residential uses on floors 2 to 20, and 135 residential units above.
The Official Plan Amendment is required to permit the proposed development to be visible behind the silhouette at the west side of City Hall’s West Tower, as protected in the City's Official Plan view policies.
The proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications are consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024), conform to the City's Official Plan, and represent appropriate intensification that is compatible with the existing and planned context.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288494.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289187.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288495.pdf
Communications
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Motions
TE34.19 - 701 Fleet Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 701 Fleet Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 12 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands municipally known as 701 Fleet Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 13 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. City Council direct the City Solicitor to withhold the Bill necessary to enact the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 12 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 13 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District until City Council has approved the recommendations of the report to the July 21, 2026 Executive Committee authorizing the City to enter into a long-term lease and community access agreement with Tempo Basketball Club Inc.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a three-storey athletic training facility proposed by the Tempo Basketball Club Inc. (the "Toronto Tempo"), Canada's first team in the Women's National Basketball Association, at 701 Fleet Street. This proposal is located on land that is owned by the City and will be subject to a long-term lease between the City and the Toronto Tempo to develop the training facility as well as new public parkland. The proposed lease provides for public access to the Tempo training facility during the team's off-season and periodically during the WNBA season. The proposed lease will be subject to a separate report from Corporate Real Estate Services and Parks and Recreation, to be brought to the July 21, 2026 Executive Committee meeting.
The proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law are consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conform to the City's Official Plan, representing good planning.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288444.pdf
Attachment 12 - Draft Official Plan Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288532.pdf
Attachment 13 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288881.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288445.pdf
Communications
Speakers
Motions
TE34.20 - 14 Grange Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 14 Grange Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 14 Grange Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Grange Avenue |
14 |
|
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a five-storey building at the front of the lot (16.24 metres in height, not including the stairwell overrun) and a 4.5-storey building at the rear of the lot (17.3 metres) with a central courtyard at 14 Grange Avenue. 22 residential units are proposed for the lot, with no vehicular parking.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288377.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289090.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288378.pdf
Communications
(July 2, 2026) Letter from Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, Chair, Grange Community Association (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215670.pdf
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Eddy Ionescu (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Damien Moule, More Neighbours Toronto (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216986.pdf
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Andrea Danko (TE.Supp)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Yu Jie (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) Submission from Greg Uens, Director of Planning, Batory Planning + Management (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215992.pdf
Speakers
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 4:
Recommendation to be deleted
4. City Council request the General Manager of Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 14 Grange Avenue from Permit Parking.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Grange Avenue |
14 |
|
|
|
TE34.21 - 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 7 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 8 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend or replace the existing agreements related to the dwelling room replacement requirements, affordable housing provisions and the securing of additional affordable housing units, including:
a. the Dwelling Room Replacement and Tenant Relocation and Assistance Agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; and
b. the Municipal Housing Project Facilities Agreement (the “Contribution Agreement”) with the Housing Secretariat to confirm the financial assistance being provided and set out the terms of operation of the affordable housing units, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
5. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review to consider securing the following as part of the site plan agreement:
a. a Transportation Impact Study, in consultation with the community, that includes a traffic mitigation and loading strategy to limit the impacts on the surrounding road network.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This Report recommends approval of an application to amend Official Plan Amendment 731 and Site-Specific Zoning By-law 1166-2025 to permit an increase in height from 31 to 45 storeys (90 to 158.5 metres, excluding mechanical penthouse), changes to the building massing, and an increase from 490 to 684 residential dwelling units, including 545 affordable rental units.
An Official Plan Amendment is required to amend policies within Chapter 7 Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP) 533 to reflect the revised building height.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288412.pdf
Attachment 8 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288508.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288413.pdf
Communications
(July 2, 2026) Letter from Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, Chair, Grange Community Association (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216766.pdf
(July 3, 2026) Letter from Don Young, Board member of Cawthra Mansions Co-operative Inc. and Ward 11 Director for the Federation of South Toronto Residents Associations (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215691.pdf
(July 6, 2026) Letter from Ray Buchnea (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Hongyu Xiao, More Neighbours Toronto (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216982.pdf
(July 6, 2026) Letter from Jackey Chen, Unix Development (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216987.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Brandon Simon, The Planning Partnership
Motions
That:
1. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review to consider securing the following as part of the site plan agreement:
a. a Transportation Impact Study, in consultation with the community, that includes a traffic mitigation and loading strategy to limit the impacts on the surrounding road network.
TE34.22 - 240 McCaul Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 240 McCaul Street in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 240 McCaul Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Revised Attachment 7 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. City Council classify the lands municipally known as 240 McCaul Street which are subject to the Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Application (City File 22 155555 STE 11 OZ) as a Class 4 Noise Area pursuant to Publication NPC-300 (Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks Environmental Noise Guideline - Stationary and Transportation Sources - Approval and Planning).
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of an application by Ronald McDonald House Charities (“RMHC”) Toronto, to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 19-storey building (61.2 metres tall, excluding mechanical penthouse), containing 200 hotel suites for short-term accommodation for families receiving treatment at nearby hospitals.
An Official Plan Amendment is required to redesignate the site from Neighbourhoods to Mixed Use Areas.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288841.pdf
Revised Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289225.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288078.pdf
(June 18, 2026) Report and Attachments 1-6 and 8-14 from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 240 McCaul Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288077.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216765.pdf
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Damien Moule, More Neighbours Toronto (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215867.pdf
(July 7, 2026) Submission from Hailey McWilliam, Bousfields Inc. (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215874.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Motions
TE34.23 - 419-431 College Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Withdrawn
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Decision
Item TE34.23 was withdrawn from the Agenda.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on May 28, 2026 that continued on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 16-storey (53 metres, including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building, containing 203 dwelling units and 1,235 square metres of non-residential gross floor area.
An Official Plan Amendment is required to permit the proposed height and massing on the site.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287578.pdf
Attachment 9 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287579.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287580.pdf
Communications
(May 13, 2026) E-mail from Ryan Phillips (TE.Main)
(May 20, 2026) E-mail from Taira Denise Credgeur (TE.Main)
(May 21, 2026) E-mail from Taylor Berman (TE.Main)
(May 21, 2026) E-mail from Isabelle Schell (TE.Main)
(May 21, 2026) E-mail from Niki Schiafone (TE.Main)
(May 21, 2026) E-mail from Matthew Hatch (TE.Main)
(May 21, 2026) E-mail from Nate Palmer (TE.Main)
(May 21, 2026) E-mail from Patrick Ng (TE.Main)
(May 21, 2026) E-mail from Marsha Cohen (TE.Main)
(May 21, 2026) E-mail from Ophelia Wong (TE.Main)
(May 21, 2026) E-mail from Pauline Mukosiej (TE.Main)
(May 22, 2026) E-mail from Steven Santello (TE.Main)
(May 21, 2026) E-mail from Andrew Stewart (TE.Main)
(May 23, 2026) E-mail from Alex and Tammy Kundakcioglu (TE.Main)
(May 25, 2026) E-mail from Sarah Clinton (TE.Main)
(May 25, 2026) E-mail from Cameron Bryar (TE.Main)
(May 25, 2026) E-mail from Melissa Szopa (TE.Main)
(May 25, 2026) E-mail from Erika Nissen (TE.Main)
(May 25, 2026) E-mail from Matt Salisbury (TE.Main)
(May 25, 2026) E-mail from Pia Scheller (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Emilie-Anne Richards (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Matthew Aguanno (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Luca Di Scipio (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Elliott Gallagher-Doucette (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Liam Horrigan (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Jeremy Large (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Michael Dewar (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Paige Tsigaridas (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Sabrina Gallant (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Paul Macchiusi (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Kyla Kearns (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Victoria Henri (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Emma Davis (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) Letter from Gerrod Harris (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Magnus Berg (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Mackenzie Kundakcioglu (TE.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-212674.pdf
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Vanessa Gladwell (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Michael Adair (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Hassan Bodah (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Natalie Sherman (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Emily Ng (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Isaiah Cook (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Bella Gouveia (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Jade Watts (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Vin Singh (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Manus Hopkins (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Rob Basile (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Ivan Cabus (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Sydney Brasil (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Jonathan Ramoutar (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Matthew Sonne (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from James Chiang (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Vanessa Thomson (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Jaime Jenkins (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Caroline Weber (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Lily Ruble (TE.Main)
(May 26, 2026) E-mail from Megan Klotz (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Claire Ferreira (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Jennifer Turner (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Anthony Michael Stillo (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Finola D'souza (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Veronica Watts (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Tomas Virtucio (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Lucy McCallum (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Denise Simpson (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Nichole Fry (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Lindsey Anderson (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Ben Ramos-Salsberg (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Allie Gregory (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Sean Campbell (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Hayley Baldin (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Ryan Lake (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Janelle Hince (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Lola Landekic (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Connor Watt (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Lexie Jay (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Sam Pedicelli (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Dante Berardi Jr (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Steph Guthrie (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Kim Pollock (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Jesse Grant (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Madeline Chan (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Alison Little (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Hayley Hruska (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Brittny Di Scola (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Laura Chau (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Emily Peria (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Jessica Daly (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Mary Long (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Natasha Roslyn (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Elke Atkinson (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Darryll Magboo (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Michael Ford (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Brittny Di Scola (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Raeden Mixemong (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Jordan Howard (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Kate MacQuarrie (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Joshua Coppola (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Jacob Szabo (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Jaclyn Olano (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Ivana Stojkov (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Jeremy Kay (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Lauren Squires (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Cameron Rogers (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Rob Bezanson (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Elia Potestio (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Edward Masuda (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Sefi Sloman (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Bahacan Ceylan (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Lukia Galperine (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Dorian Shepherd Beal (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Leah MacNeil (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Alex Liimatainen (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Maia Roberts (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Brendan Kennedy (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Kelsey Barnes (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Danielle McGeachy (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Kate Riley (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Lucas Hrynyshyn (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Ladonna Cox (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Jorge Figueroa Alva (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Jesse Gillingham (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Eden Schwinghamer (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Livia Saito (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Patrick Ramrattan (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Connor McCann (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Owen Hurst (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Chelsea Edwards (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Charles Ondrovcik (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Brigette Delaney (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Evan Yeong (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Ethan Stacey (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Alex Friedman (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Jessie Lau (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Hannia Cheng (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Ashton Amodeo (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Alyssa Snow (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Elizabeth Miller (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Allison Chan (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from David Bunn (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Shawn Thomson (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Alaina Galati (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Sabina Naziri (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Roberto DiGiovanni (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Marlowe Sunshine (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Alex McFarland (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Lisa Gelineau (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Daniel Kerr (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Ryan Baksh (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from David Ip-Fung-Chun (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Claudia Mak (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Mac Downey (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Hillary Krofchak (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Jesse-James Gaonac'h (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Christina Lao (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Elyse Catherine Xiao Zhong Turton (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Kristine Kjeldsen (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Danielle Millar (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) Letter from Rayna Slobodian (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Alyson Fortowsky (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Julien Bigras (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Caspian Warren (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Cheryl Myerscough (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Collin Sideris (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Dylan Goonoo (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Barbara Grassiccia (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Tess Johnson Roy (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Steph Venerus (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Antonio Juarez (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Lillie Armstrong (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Ashley Francato (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Chris Scott (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Christopher Francato (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Trevor Evoy (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Kevin and Karen Cauilan (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Lily Bitton (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Emma Mazerall (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Claudia Tavernese (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Andrew Sandness (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Carla Haddad (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Emilie Tondeur (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from John C Martin (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Kristen Endo (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Cameron Adkins (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Carly Prescott (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Brittany Horan (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Julia Issa (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Benjamin Wood (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from George Diamantouros (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Tamara Stiles (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Venusz Olah (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Anna Romero (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Christina Dare (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Derek Vahey (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Marsha Malcolm (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Moncef 'Marc' Mounir (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Clare Connolly (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Kaitlyn Kitchener (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Marta Radic (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Nishtha Shrestha (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Tasia McFarland (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Katrina Thorn (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Michael Marra (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Amanda Dring (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Desiree D"Sa (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Yumiko Tesoro (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Sahara Douglas (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Buckley Fitzpatrick (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Sarah Sharpe (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Karen Moore (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Stephanie Puccinelli (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Oksana Worona (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Casey Rand (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Greg Laraigne (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Joshua Schwartz (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Joy Bernus (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Kolby Chong (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Monique Mathew (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Marissa Simington (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Emyly Oropeza (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Anjelica Rees (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Nadia Ozzorluoglu (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Alexandra DiFlorio (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Justin Retsinas (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Chloe Skowron (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Christina Middleton (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Geivana Martinez (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Elizabeth MacLeod (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Yu Chen Liu (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Eric McCabe (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Lynn Sagar (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Ray Chirwa (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Christina Lao, (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Maggie Miller (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Kate Millet (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Danielle Dehne (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Wyatt Dorion (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Sarah Wendling (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Louis Branchaud (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Julia Louise Pereira (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Joan Mahu (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Jane Van Rooyen (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from David Hughes (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Mizpah Almeria (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Eitan Garazi (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Alynah Slack (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Nicholas Punsammy (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Emma Charlebois (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Maria Giammarco (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Jasmine Oliveira (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Sofia Busto (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Danielle Hughes (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Erin Atkinson (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Savannah Rain Piner (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Ari Wahl (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Nadine Miranda (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Salvatore Vavala (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Tera Hay (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Ryan Mumby (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Cam Adkins (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Miranda Henkel (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Lisa Mesbur (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Olivia Press (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from David Pike (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Veronica Spiljak (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Ruth Hampton (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Signe Lund Mathiesen (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Ryan Manuel Vahey (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Kristin Ferguson (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Trista Pozeg (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Ian Fyffe (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Monika Baird (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Colin Lepper (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Ashley Nicol (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Maddy Van de Broek (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Joshua Brooks (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Monica Caroline Walsh (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Lex Stultz (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Julia Swirsky (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Lynn Abrahams (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Bernadette Rimstad (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Carly Kopstick (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Peter D’Addio Di Battista (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Justin Otto (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Corey Hamat (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Nikki Ashworth (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Mariela Navarrete (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Julia Dorfman (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Caitlin Henry (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Jordan Macpherson (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Olivia Tullett (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Shelby Antoniow (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) Letter from Karina Lemke (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Neal Armstrong (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Mauricio Tobar (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Naomi James (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Matthew Galanti (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Sara Lowrey (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Cameron Balmer (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Maria Cielo Paz Torres Cruz (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Michelle Belliveau (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Josie Valotta (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Michael Friedman (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Adam Petkovic (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Christopher Ringham (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Lance Fernandes (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Lindsay Osso (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Bryan Chang Rincan (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Joseph Giannini (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Laura Hennessey (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) Petition from Jaime Jenkins containing the names of approximately 102 persons (TE.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-212703.pdf
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Hannah Stein (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Tim Dafoe (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Luke Barton-Veljkovic (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Hayden Zahary (TE.Main)
(June 9, 2026) E-mail from Anjali Sachdeva (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Kennedy LaPenna (TE.Main)
(June 4, 2026) E-mail from Julian Nucaro Viteri (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Laura Hennessey (TE.Main)
(June 4, 2026) E-mail from Mila Parthemos (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Michael Wiznuk (TE.Main)
(June 3, 2026) E-mail from Jody Vopni (TE.Main)
(June 2, 2026) E-mail from Aleksandr Potapov (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Mac Downey (TE.Main)
(June 2, 2026) E-mail from Rebecca Williams (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Kathleen MacKenzie (TE.Main)
(June 1, 2026) E-mail from Liam Wilson (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Mike de Sévigné (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Cadence Leeper (TE.Main)
(June 1, 2026) E-mail from Milan Mitrovic (TE.Main)
(May 31, 2026) E-mail from Sunny Evans (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Cassandra Girgis (TE.Main)
(May 31, 2026) E-mail from Jake Goldsbie (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Chelsea Gagne (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Armeen Bhesania (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Mallory Thompson (TE.Main)
(May 31, 2026) E-mail from Agypt Mao (TE.Main)
(May 29, 2026) E-mail from Claire Shenstone Harris (TE.Main)
(May 30, 2026) E-mail from Mackenzie Kundakcioglu (TE.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-213966.pdf
(May 29, 2026) E-mail from Matthew Burpee (TE.Main)
(May 30, 2026) E-mail from Logan Hyde (TE.Main)
(May 29, 2026) E-mail from Leiya Ngo (TE.Main)
(May 29, 2026) E-mail from Stella McCaig (TE.Main)
(May 29, 2026) E-mail from KateLyn Wright (TE.Main)
(May 29, 2026) E-mail from Zeke Mountain (TE.Main)
(May 29, 2026) E-mail from Liam Harris (TE.Main)
(May 29, 2026) Multiple Communications from 43 individuals with similar text were received from May 29, 2026 at 7:49 p.m. to Thursday, June 18, 2026 at 2:41 p.m. (TE.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215493.pdf
(June 15, 2026) E-mail from Monica Builes (TE.Main)
(June 17, 2026) E-mail from Kelly Grimes (TE.Main)
(June 19, 2026) E-mail from Maria Cartagena (TE.Main)
(June 19, 2026) E-mail from Nishanth Bharadwaj (TE.Main)
(June 4, 2026) E-mail from Niko Song (TE.Supp)
(June 25, 2026) E-mail from Alexander J. Stephen (TE.Supp)
(June 25, 2026) E-mail from Krystyna Rodrigues (TE.Supp)
(June 26, 2026) E-mail from Steven Santello (TE.Supp)
(June 28, 2026) E-mail from Jessica Santos (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Olivia Go (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Diana Yoon (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Riley LS (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Melissa Szopa (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Andrew Cichocki (TE.Supp)
(July 1, 2026) E-mail from Venusz Olah (TE.Supp)
(July 2, 2026) E-mail from Pankhuri Kaushik (TE.Supp)
(July 2, 2026) E-mail from Michael Goldberg, Principal, Goldberg Group (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216779.pdf
(July 2, 2026) E-mail from Jaime Redford (TE.Supp)
(July 3, 2026) E-mail from Heather Reilly (TE.Supp)
(June 25, 2026) Multiple Communications from 426 individuals with similar text were received from Thursday, June 25, 2026 at 11:01 a.m. to Monday, July 6, 2026 at 3:03 p.m. (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215694.pdf
(July 3, 2026) Letter from Johanna Oakley, Director, Retail Transactions, Corporate Real Estate, Royal Bank of Canada (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216798.pdf
(July 3, 2026) E-mail from Michael Goldberg, Principal, Goldberg Group (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216799.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) Letter from Samantha Petherbridge (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217115.pdf
Motions
That the Toronto and East York Community Council adopt the following recommendation in the supplementary report (July 6, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District [TE343.23a]:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council withdraw this Item from the agenda.
23a - 419-431 College Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Supplementary Report
Origin
Summary
The applicant has withdrawn the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application for the subject lands. Accordingly, staff recommend that Toronto and East York Community Council withdraw the item TE34.23 from its agenda.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289067.pdf
TE34.24 - 420-444 Yonge Street and 1-23 College Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Without Recs
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council forwards the Item to City Council without recommendation.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This Report recommends approval of an application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a mixed-use development consisting of three towers of 65, 75, and 96-storeys (227, 247, and 320 metres, excluding the mechanical penthouses) above the existing heritage designated building at 420-444 Yonge Street and 1-23 College Street.
The application is proposed in three phases and includes the following:
- A total of 2,342 residential dwelling units, including 216 replacement rental units;
- 6,000 square metres of event space (The Carlu);
- A minimum of 23,500 square-metres of non-residential gross floor area including hotel, commercial, and retail space;
- Conservation of the existing heritage designated 7-storey College Park building and completion of the base building consistent with the original design intent; and
- A 600 square metre on-site parkland dedication to expand the adjacent College Park.
An Official Plan Amendment is required to permit the development within the protected view corridor of City Hall and Old City Hall.
A separate report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, on the proposed alterations to the designated heritage property will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this Report.
A Rental Housing Demolition Report will also be considered by City Council in conjunction with this Report as the proposal includes the demolition of 210 existing rental housing units. A Tenant Assistance Plan is proposed that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287957.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288497.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287958.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216770.pdf
(July 6, 2026) Letter from Cheryll Diego, Director, Public Realm Experience, Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216990.pdf
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Gian Pileri (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) Submission from Taylor MacDonald-Plummer, Urban Strategies Inc. (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215917.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Jeremy Bass
Gian Pileri
Warren Rill
Shafaq Latif
Motions
That the item be forwarded to City Council without recommendation.
TE34.25 - 420-444 Yonge Street and 1-23 College Street - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Without Recs
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council forwards the Item to City Council without recommendation.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 210 rental dwelling units located at 420-444 Yonge Street and 1-23 College Street. The new development on the site is proposed to include 216 replacement rental units located in the first phase of development within a 65-storey building. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
The proposed development on the site at 420-444 Yonge Street and 1-23 College Street is the subject of a related Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application (25 191175 STE 11 OZ). The proposed development would permit 65-, 75- and 96-storey buildings with 2,342 dwelling units, including 216 replacement rental units. The proposal also includes 43,000 square metres of commercial space, 19,373 square metres of hotel space, 5,527 square metres of cultural space, and 600 square metres of new on-site parkland to expand the existing adjacent College Park. An approval report for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.
This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288048.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288009.pdf
Communications
(July 8, 2026) Submission from Taylor MacDonald-Plummer, Urban Strategies Inc. (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217049.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Motions
That the item be forwarded to City Council without recommendation.
TE34.26 - 420-444 Yonge Street and 1-23 College Street (College Park) - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Amend an Existing Heritage Easement Agreement
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Without Recs
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council forwards the Item to City Council without recommendation.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) to alter a designated heritage property at 420-444 Yonge Street and 1-23 College Street known as "College Park" (Ross and Macdonald Building). This report is in connection with the submitted Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application(s) for three mixed use towers of 65, 75 and 96 storeys, proposed above the existing designated College Park building, which will form the base of the towers. The owner also requests that Council grant authority to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement.
The subject property contains a 7-storey building at the southwest corner of College Street and Yonge Street, with a three-storey wing extending south along Yonge Street. It was designated under Part IV of the OHA on November 26, 1975, under City of Toronto By-law 510-75. A Heritage Easement Agreement was registered on the property on November 10, 2011. The property contains the T. Eaton Co. Limited, Eaton’s College Street Store building that was designed by Ross & Macdonald; Sproatt & Rolph, Associates and constructed in 1928-1930. It is designated as being of architectural value as a notable example of Classical Revival style with Art Moderne detailing.
The proposed conservation strategy includes retention of the majority of the seven-storey corner College Park building; full in-situ retention of street-facing elevations (east and north); and partial in-situ retention of the south and west (rear) elevations. The project would restore the interior arcade, the seventh-floor foyer, round room, clipper rooms, and auditorium. Extending along the Yonge Street frontage, there would be a new podium infill above the existing three storey podium. The proposed addition would align with the datums of the existing building and interpret the original designs by Ross & Macdonald.
Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations conserve the onsite and adjacent heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287509.pdf
Communications
(July 8, 2026) Submission from Taylor MacDonald-Plummer, Urban Strategies Inc. (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217050.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Motions
That the item be forwarded to City Council without recommendation.
26a - 420-444 Yonge Street and 1-23 College Street (College Park) - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Amend an Existing Heritage Easement Agreement
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on June 8, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB45.5 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (May 20, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) to alter a designated heritage property at 420-444 Yonge Street and 1-23 College Street known as "College Park" (Ross and Macdonald Building). This report is in connection with the submitted Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application(s) for three mixed use towers of 65, 75 and 96 storeys, proposed above the existing designated College Park building, which will form the base of the towers. The owner also requests that Council grant authority to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement.
The subject property contains a 7-storey building at the southwest corner of College Street and Yonge Street, with a three-storey wing extending south along Yonge Street. It was designated under Part IV of the OHA on November 26, 1975, under City of Toronto By-law 510-75. A Heritage Easement Agreement was registered on the property on November 10, 2011. The property contains the T. Eaton Co. Limited, Eaton’s College Street Store building that was designed by Ross & Macdonald; Sproatt & Rolph, Associates and constructed in 1928-1930. It is designated as being of architectural value as a notable example of Classical Revival style with Art Moderne detailing.
The proposed conservation strategy includes retention of the majority of the seven-storey corner College Park building; full in-situ retention of street-facing elevations (east and north); and partial in-situ retention of the south and west (rear) elevations. The project would restore the interior arcade, the seventh-floor foyer, round room, clipper rooms, and auditorium. Extending along the Yonge Street frontage, there would be a new podium infill above the existing three storey podium. The proposed addition would align with the datums of the existing building and interpret the original designs by Ross & Macdonald.
Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations conserve the onsite and adjacent heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287852.pdf
TE34.27 - 835-839 Yonge Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Without Recs
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council forwards the Item to City Council without recommendation.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law, with a holding provision, to permit a mixed-use building with two tower elements of 49 and 41-storeys in height (162 and 139 metres respectively, excluding mechanical penthouses), containing 922 dwelling units and a minimum 750 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. The proposal includes a 672 square metre Privately-Owned Publicly Accessible Space (POPS) at the north-east corner of Yonge and Church Streets and the retention of the heritage designated façade at 835 Yonge Street.
A separate report from Heritage Planning, regarding the proposed alterations to the designated heritage property will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288896.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288459.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287960.pdf
(June 11, 2026) Report and Attachments 1-4 and 6-8 from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 835-839 Yonge Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
Communications
(June 26, 2026) Letter from Susan Burns, President, Board Of Directors, Arbour Glen Apartments Ltd. (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216724.pdf
(July 6, 2026) Letter from Ian Carmichael and John Caliendo, Co-Chairs, The ABC Residents Association and Alan Baker, President, The Greater Yorkville Residence Association (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216971.pdf
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Hongyu Xiao, More Neighbours Toronto (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216983.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Kamyar Ghavam
Motions
That the item be forwarded to City Council without recommendation.
TE34.28 - 148-158 and 162 Soudan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 148-158 and 162 Soudan Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Revised Attachment 5 to the report (June 17, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council direct the City Solicitor to withhold the necessary Bills for enactment, until City Council has approved the Rental Housing Demolition Application 25 135288 STE 12 RH under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of 17 existing rental dwelling units at 148 and 162 Soudan Avenue to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, securing all rental housing-related matters necessary to implement City Council's decision.
4. City Council approve that in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act, prior to the lifting of the Holding Provision, the owner shall convey to the City the property municipally known as 162 Soudan Avenue as a minimum 173.9 square metre on-site parkland dedication, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor, and:
a. in accordance with Chapter 415, Article III of City of Toronto Municipal Code, the remaining Section 42 parkland dedication requirement not fulfilled through the on-site parkland conveyance shall be satisfied through a cash-in-lieu of parkland payment, in an amount to be determined by the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, with such payment to be made prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, all to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review.
5. City Council approve the acceptance of on-site parkland dedication, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition.
6. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
7. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and the City Solicitor, to work with the applicant to dedicate the Community Benefits Charge and parkland dedication towards neighbourhood parkland expansion or improvements.
8. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review and the General Manager, Transportation Services to review options to mitigate neighbourhood traffic impacts resulting from this application.
9. City Council request the applicant establish a Neighbourhood Liaison Committee including but not limited to the South Eglinton Davisville Residents Association, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Development Review, and to consult the committee developing a Construction Management Plan for the project; as a part of the Construction Management Plan, request the following key priorities be addressed:
a. measures to limit right-of-way occupancy for construction staging;
b. regular cleaning of the streets, sidewalks and adjacent properties for dust and debris; and
c. adequate notice to residents of any major neighbourhood disruptions.
10. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments at 148-158 and 162 Soudan Avenue.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law, with a holding provision, to permit a 53-storey (175.4 metres, excluding mechanical penthouse) residential building, containing 640 dwelling units (including 17 replacement rental units), and a new 173.9 square metre park, at 148-158 and 162 Soudan Avenue.
A Rental Housing Demolition Report will be considered in conjunction with this Report at the July 8-9, 2026, Toronto and East York Community Council meeting. The proposal includes the demolition of 17 rental housing units, to be replaced by a total of 17 rental units as part of the development of the site. A Tenant Assistance Plan is proposed, that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288344.pdf
Revised Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289149.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288345.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
Communications
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from J. Sisopha (TE.New)
Speakers
Tony Gagliese
Adam Brown, Brown Dryer LLP
Motions
That:
1. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and the City Solicitor, to work with the applicant to dedicate the Community Benefits Charge and parkland dedication towards neighbourhood parkland expansion or improvements.
2. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review and the General Manager, Transportation Services to review options to mitigate neighbourhood traffic impacts resulting from this application.
3. City Council request the applicant establish a Neighbourhood Liaison Committee including but not limited to the South Eglinton Davisville Residents Association, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Development Review, and to consult the committee developing a Construction Management Plan for the project; as a part of the Construction Management Plan, request the following key priorities be addressed:
a. measures to limit right-of-way occupancy for construction staging;
b. regular cleaning of the streets, sidewalks and adjacent properties for dust and debris; and
c. adequate notice to residents of any major neighbourhood disruptions;
4. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments at 148-158 and 162 Soudan Avenue.
TE34.29 - 148-158 and 162 Soudan Avenue - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application File 25 135288 STE 12 RH in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of 17 existing rental dwelling units located at 148 and 162 Soudan Avenue, subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain 17 replacement rental dwelling units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement;
b. the replacement rental dwelling units required by Recommendation 1.a. above shall collectively have a total gross floor area of at least 993 square metres and be comprised of 2 studio units, 14 one-bedroom units and 1 two-bedroom unit, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to City Planning dated May 15, 2026; any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
c. the owner shall, as part of the 17 replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above, provide at least 1 studio unit, 6 one-bedroom units and 1 two-bedroom unit at affordable rents, 1 studio unit and 4 one-bedroom units at mid-range (affordable) rents, and 4 one-bedroom units at mid-range (moderate) rents, as currently defined in the City's Official Plan, all for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit;
d. the owner shall provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the 17 existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
e. the owner shall provide tenants of all 17 replacement rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed 53-storey building at no extra charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
f. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry and central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit at no extra charge;
g. the owner shall provide and make available for rent at least four vehicle parking spaces to tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units; such parking spaces shall be made available firstly to returning tenants who previously rented a vehicle parking space, and at similar monthly parking charges that such tenants previously paid; and the remaining vehicle parking spaces shall be made available to tenants of the replacement rental units to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
h. the owner shall provide and make available for rent at least 14 storage lockers to tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units; such storage lockers shall be made available firstly to returning tenants who previously rented a storage locker, and at similar monthly storage charges that such tenants previously paid; and the remaining storage lockers shall be made available to tenants of the replacement rental units to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
i. the owner shall provide tenants of all replacement rental dwelling units with access to bicycle and visitor parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed development;
j. the replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the proposed development, exclusive of the replacement rental dwelling units, are made available and ready for occupancy, subject to any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
k. the owner shall enter into, and register on title to the lands, an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 1.a. through 1.j. above all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the demolition of the 17 existing rental dwelling units located at 148 and 162 Soudan Avenue after all the following have occurred:
a. all conditions in Recommendation 1 above have been fully secured;
b. Zoning By-law Amendment for Application 25 135273 STE 12 OZ has come into full force and effect;
c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Executive Director, Development Review or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, or as otherwise determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits (conditional or full permit) for the approved development on the site; and
e. the owner has confirmed, in writing, that all existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished are vacant.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate, has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.
4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 148, 158 and 162 Soudan Avenue after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 pursuant to section 6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:
a. the owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;
b. the owner erects solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
c. the owner erects the proposed building on the site no later than three (3) years from the date that the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units commences, subject to the timeframe being extended at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
d. should the owner fail to complete the proposed building within the time specified in Recommendation 4.c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, as with municipal property taxes, an amount equal to the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such amount shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the Residential Demolition Permit is issued.
5. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement and any other related agreements.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 17 rental dwelling units located at 148 and 162 Soudan Avenue. The 17 rental units are proposed to be replaced as part of the new development on the site. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
The proposed development on the site at 148-158 and 162 Soudan Avenue is the subject of a related Zoning By-law Amendment application (25 135273 STE 12 OZ). The proposed development would permit a 53-storey residential building with 639 dwelling units, including 17 replacement rental units. An approval report for the Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.
This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288333.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288334.pdf
Communications
Motions
TE34.30 - 1913-1951 Yonge Street, 10-22 Davisville Avenue, and 17-21 Millwood Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended by Zoning By-law 907-2024(OLT) for the lands municipally known as 1913-1951 Yonge Street,10-22 Davisville Avenue and 17-21 Millwood Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council require the owner of the lands at 1913-1951 Yonge Street,10-22 Davisville Avenue and 17-21 Millwood Road, at their sole cost and expense, to enter into, and register on title, an Amending Section 37 Agreement which would amend the Section 37 Agreement registered on title for 1913-1951 Yonge Street, 10-22 Davisville Avenue and 17-21 Millwood Road as Instrument Number AT6642275, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
4. City Council require the owner to provide additional community benefits, at the owner's expense, in addition to those already secured in registered Instrument Number AT6642275, and to be secured through the Zoning By-law Amendment and the required Amending Section 37 Agreement, as follows:
the owner of 1913-1951 Yonge Street,10-22 Davisville Avenue and 17-21 Millwood Road is required:
a. to design and construct an off-site 3.0-metre-wide midblock connection along the west lot line of the adjacent lands owned by the Toronto District School Board located at 43 Millwood Road and 50 Davisville Avenue; the 3.0-metre-wide off-site midblock connection on the Toronto District School Board lands will run north-south connecting Davisville Avenue and Millwood Road, and must be designed and constructed prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit for the lands at 1913-1951 Yonge Street, 10-22 Davisville Avenue and 17-21 Millwood Road, and designed and constructed in conjunction with the 3.0-metre wide north-south midblock connection previously secured on the subject site in Instrument Number AT6642275, and in accordance with Schedule A included in Attachment 5 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District; the owner is required to obtain all the necessary authorizations from the Toronto District School Board and enter into any required agreements regarding access and maintenance, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Executive Director, Development Review; and all design and construction work on the midblock connection shall be to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the General Manager, Parks and Recreation;
b. to make a financial contribution of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000.00) to the City, to be paid by the owner prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the subject site, to be allocated towards public realm improvements in the vicinity of the subject site, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the Ward Councillor:
1. the payment identified in Part 4.b. above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Construction Price Index for the Toronto Census Metropolitan area, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Building Construction Price Indexes Table:18-10-0135-01, or its successor, calculated from the date of the execution of the Amending Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment; and
2. in the event the financial contribution referred to in Part 4.b. above has not been used for the intended purpose set out above within three years of the Zoning By-law Amendment coming into full force and effect, the financial contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose(s) is/are identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the subject site; and
c. prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the subject site, if the Executive Director, Development Review determines that Part 4.a. above cannot be adequately satisfied, then the owner will make a financial contribution of four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000.00) to the City, to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the subject site, to be allocated towards public realm improvements in the vicinity of the subject site, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the Ward Councillor:
1. the payment identified in Part 4.c. above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Construction Price Index for the Toronto Census Metropolitan area, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Building Construction Price Indexes Table:18-10-0135-01, or its successor, calculated from the date of the execution of the Amending Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment; and
2. in the event the financial contribution referred to in Part 4.c. above has not been used for the intended purpose set out above within three years of the Zoning By-law Amendment coming into full force and effect, the financial contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose(s) is/are identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the subject site.
5. City Council require the owner of the lands at 1913-1951 Yonge Street,10-22 Davisville Avenue and 17-21 Millwood Road, to enter into, and register on title, the Amending Section 37 Agreement described above in Parts 3 and 4 above prior to the revised site plan approval for the revised proposal, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor.
6. City Council request the applicant establish a Neighbourhood Liaison Committee including but not limited to the South Eglinton Davisville Residents Association, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Development Review, and to consult the committee developing a Construction Management Plan for the project' as a part of the Construction Management Plan, request the following key priorities be addressed:
a. measures to limit right-of-way occupancy for construction staging;
b. regular cleaning of the streets, sidewalks, and adjacent properties for dust and debris;
c. adequate notice to residents of any major neighbourhood disruptions; and
d. review options to mitigate neighbourhood traffic impacts resulting from this application.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend Zoning By-law 907-2024(OLT) to increase the height and density of a mixed-use development consisting of two towers at 1913-1951 Yonge Street, 10-22 Davisville Avenue, and 17-21 Millwood Road. The proposal increases the northern tower to 48-storeys (158.3 metres) from 38-storeys, and the southern tower to 55-storeys (179.3 metres) from 45-storeys.
Elements of the original approval that are maintained include: 5,783 square metres of commercial retail space; the preservation of the existing heritage building at 1913 Yonge Street; the dedicated space for a grocery store; a Privately-Owned Publicly Accessible Open Space; a north-south publicly-accessible mid-block connection; and off-site parkland dedication. Additional community benefits are proposed.
The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan and Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288851.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288552.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288398.pdf
(June 19, 2026) Report and Attachments 1-4 and 6-8 from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 1913-1951 Yonge Street, 10-22 Davisville Avenue, and 17-21 Millwood Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
Communications
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Motions
That:
1. City Council request the applicant establish a Neighbourhood Liaison Committee including but not limited to the South Eglinton Davisville Residents Association, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Development Review, and to consult the committee developing a Construction Management Plan for the project' as a part of the construction management plan, request the following key priorities be addressed:
a. measures to limit right-of-way occupancy for construction staging;
b. regular cleaning of the streets, sidewalks, and adjacent properties for dust and debris;
c. adequate notice to residents of any major neighbourhood disruptions; and
d. review options to mitigate neighbourhood traffic impacts resulting from this application.
TE34.31 - 2010-2050 Yonge Street and 15 Lola Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 2010-2050 Yonge Street and 15 Lola Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment, which includes a Holding Provision, included as Attachment 5 to the report (June 8, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council approve that in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act prior to the issuance of the First Above Grade Building Permit, the City will accept conveyance of the property municipally known as 24 Manor Road East as off-site parkland dedication, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor.
4. City Council approve the acceptance of an off-site parkland dedication, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition.
5. City Council direct that should the cost of acquiring the land for the off-site dedication, including the purchase price, less reasonable real estate commissions of up to five percent, land transfer tax and typical closing adjustments incurred, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, be less than the value of the parks levy calculated upon the submission of an application for the first above-grade building permit, the difference will be paid as cash in lieu to the City prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the development.
6. City Council request the applicant establish a Neighbourhood Liaison Committee including but not limited to the South Eglinton Davisville Residents Association, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Development Review, and to consult the committee developing a Construction Management Plan for the project; as a part of the Construction Management Plan, request the following key priorities be addressed:
a. measures to limit right-of-way occupancy for construction staging;
b. regular cleaning of the streets, sidewalks and adjacent properties for dust and debris;
c. adequate notice to residents of any major neighbourhood disruptions; and
d. review options to mitigate neighbourhood traffic impacts resulting from this application.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 60.0-metre (15 storeys, excluding mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building at 2010-2050 Yonge Street and 15 Lola Road. The building is proposed to contain 274 dwelling units and 1,453 square metres of ground floor commercial space. The development proposes to include a City-owned public laneway (Ln W Yonge S Lola Rd) that currently provides access to the subject site, as well as to 20 Glebe Road West which is under separate ownership. An off-site parkland dedication is proposed at 24 Manor Road East.
For the development to proceed as proposed, the City-owned public laneway will need to be permanently closed through a separate process led by the City's Transportation Services Division and the laneway lands acquired by the proponent though a subsequent sale and disposition process managed by the City's Corporate Real Estate Management (CREM) division. The applicant will be required to address any and all matters pertaining to the adjacent land's use of the existing public laneway though these subsequent applications.
A Holding provision is recommended for the site which would not be lifted unless City Council passes a by-law to close the public laneway (Ln W Yonge S Lola Rd); the laneway is acquired by the proponent; and all associated requirements have been satisfied.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287832.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288464.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287833.pdf
Communications
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Motions
That:
1. City Council request the applicant establish a Neighbourhood Liaison Committee including but not limited to the South Eglinton Davisville Residents Association, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Development Review, and to consult the committee developing a Construction Management Plan for the project; as a part of the construction management plan, request the following key priorities be addressed:
a. measures to limit right-of-way occupancy for construction staging;
b. regular cleaning of the streets, sidewalks and adjacent properties for dust and debris;
c. adequate notice to residents of any major neighbourhood disruptions; and
d. review options to mitigate neighbourhood traffic impacts resulting from this application.
TE34.32 - 1075 Bay Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 1075 Bay Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 1075 Bay Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 7 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
4. If the owner elects to provide affordable housing as part of the development, City Council require the owner to enter into, and register on title, an amending Section 37 Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as it read the day before the date section 1 of Schedule 17 of the COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act, 2020, came into force securing the following matters of legal convenience to implement the requirements of the recommended Official Plan Amendment, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor as follows:
a. in accordance with draft Official Plan Amendment, included as Attachment 6 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, the owner shall be required to provide a minimum a minimum of 1,815 square metres of non-residential gross floor area or a combination of non-residential uses and/or affordable rental housing; the affordable rental housing shall be provided in accordance with the terms and conditions outlined in Attachment 8 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to submit the necessary Bill(s) to implement City Council's decision, and if affordable housing units are provided as part of this development, the City Solicitor is satisfied that the appropriate legal mechanisms are in place to ensure that no building permit will be issued until such time as the Amending Section 37 Agreement is executed and registered.
6. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Bay Street |
1075 |
|
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Site Specific Zoning By-law 833-2021 to permit a reduction in the non-residential gross floor area from 12,100 square metres to a minimum of 1,815 square metres of non-residential and/or affordable housing gross floor area, and an increase in height from 59 storeys (210.1 metres including mechanical penthouse) to 62 storeys (222 metres including the mechanical penthouse) at 1075 Bay Street. An open space of approximately 265 square metres is proposed at the southeast corner of the site with frontage along Inkerman Street.
An Official Plan Amendment is required to amend the Downtown Plan to permit a reduction to the required non-residential gross floor area to a minimum of 1,815 square metres of non-residential gross floor area or a combination of non-residential uses and/or affordable housing.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288891.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288496.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288379.pdf
(June 19, 2026) Report and Attachments 1-6 and 8-10 from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 1075 Bay Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
Communications
(June 23, 2026) E-mail from Betty Chan (TE.Supp)
(June 23, 2026) E-mail from Annika Keller (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) Letter from Christine Dingemans, President, Marilyn Tait-McClellan, Treasurer, Cathy Carnevali, Secretary and Kathryn Holden, Ex-Officio, Bay Cloverhill Community Association (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215857.pdf
(July 5, 2026) Letter from Benjamin Larson, Elevate Planning and Project Management Inc. (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215865.pdf
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Dawn Obokata, President, The Saint Nicholas Housing Co-operative Inc. (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215966.pdf
Speakers
Benjamin Larson, Elevate Planning and Project Management
Robert W Fisher, St. Nicholas Housing Co-operative
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 6:
Recommendation to be deleted
6. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 1075 Bay Street.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Bay Street |
1075 |
|
|
|
TE34.33 - 137-149 Church Street and 18-20 Dalhousie Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Site Specific Zoning By-law 1246-2022 for the lands municipally known as137-149 Church Street and 18-20 Dalhousie Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Revised Attachment 6 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Church Street |
137-149, inclusive |
Odd |
|
|
|
Dalhousie Street |
18-20, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Site Specific Zoning By-law 1246-2022 to permit an increase in height from 54 storeys (175 metres) to 61 storeys (201.5 metres including mechanical penthouse), and reduce the setback from the south property line to the tower from 10 to 6.5 metres. The existing 3-storey designated heritage building at 147 Church Street will be conserved and integrated into the base building.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288370.pdf
Revised Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning Bylaw Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288949.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288371.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288535.pdf
Communications
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 3:
Recommendation to be deleted
3. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 137-149 Church Street and 18-20 Dalhousie Street.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Church Street |
137-149, inclusive |
Odd |
|
|
|
Dalhousie Street |
18-20, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
TE34.34 - 27 Grosvenor Street and 26 Grenville Street - Zoning By-law Amendment and Amendment to Section 37 Agreement - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Site Specific By-law 1096-2021 for the lands municipally known as 27 Grosvenor and 26 Grenville Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 4 to the report (June 17, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend the Section 37 Agreement dated December 10, 2021 in connection with the development located at 27 Grosvenor and 26 Grenville Street to:
a. reduce the required interior gross floor area for the non-profit childcare centre to 640 square metres; and
b. reduce the required number of on-site parking spaces for the use of the childcare centre to be provided on site from six to three.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to take such actions as are required to implement City Council's decision, including execution and registration of the amended Section 37 Agreement on title to the lands municipally known as 27 Grosvenor and 26 Grenville Street.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
On May 5 and 6, 2021, City Council approved a Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development with two towers, 32 and 46 storeys in height, connected by a shared base building at 27 Grosvenor Street and 26 Grenville Street. As part of the approval, Council directed staff to enter into an agreement under Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure a non-profit childcare centre with a total interior gross floor area of 685 square metres and an exterior gross floor area of 290 square metres located on the first and second floors of the building with a total of six parking spaces required on site.
The proposal has been modified through detailed design since the original approval to locate the childcare centre entirely on the first floor. The new configuration removes requirements for staircases and elevators, creating a more efficient floorplate and allowing for the interior area of the childcare centre to be reduced by 45 metres while increasing capacity from 49 to 62 children.
The revised design also contemplates three pick-up and drop-off spaces for the childcare centre being located in a layby within the public Right-of-Way immediately adjacent to the childcare centre entrance instead of within the underground parking, garage allowing for the required on-site vehicle parking spaces to be reduced.
This report recommends amending the Section 37 terms in Schedule A of site-specific By-law 1096-2021 and the Section 37 Agreement registered on title at 27 Grosvenor Street and 26 Grenville Street to reduce the required interior gross floor area of the childcare centre from 685 square metres to 640 square metres and to reduce the required number of on-site parking spaces reserved for the use of the childcare centre from 6 to 3.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288082.pdf
Attachment 4 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288458.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288083.pdf
Communications
Motions
TE34.35 - 77 Howard Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 77 Howard Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council approve that in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, the owner shall convey to the City, an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 604 square metres, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, and the City Solicitor.
4. City Council approve the acceptance of on-site parkland dedication, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances, and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition; the owner may propose the exception of encumbrances of tiebacks, where such an encumbrance is deemed acceptable by the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the City Solicitor; and such an encumbrance will be subject to the payment of compensation to the City, in an amount as determined by the Executive Director, Development Review and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.
5. City Council accept the owner's offer of an In-kind Contribution (Attachment 9 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District) pursuant to subsection 37(6) of the Planning Act and allow the owner to convey 109 square metres of additional open space as part of the development free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances, encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition, prior to the first above grade building permit, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, and in consultation with the General Manager, Parks and Recreation (the “In-kind Contribution”).
6. City Council attribute a value to the In-kind Contribution, equal to 37 percent of 4 percent of the value of the land for the development permissions granted through the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District (net of any exclusions or exemptions authorized under the Community Benefits Charge By-law), as determined the day before the day the first building permit is issued in respect of the development.
7. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Development Review to enter into an Agreement pursuant to subsection 37(7.1) of the Planning Act (the "In-kind Contribution Agreement") to address the provision of the In-kind Contribution on terms satisfactory to the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the General Manager, Parks and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
8. City Council determine that the execution and registration of the In-kind Contribution Agreement constitute satisfactory arrangements for the provision of the In-kind Contribution for the purpose of Applicable Law as defined in the Building Code.
9. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation
component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
10. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to request the owner to develop a Construction Mitigation and Tenant Communication Plan to mitigate the impacts of construction of the development on tenants of the existing rental apartment building prior to Site Plan Approval, including a Parking Plan that provides at least 1 parking space on-site for each tenant of 77 Howard who had a parking space at the time of the Zoning By-law Amendment application, dated April 25, 2025, and indicates the access to, and location of the parking spaces during and after construction of the new building, all to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review.
11. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to request the owner to undertake, through the Site Plan Control process, improvements to the existing rental apartment building, at its sole expense and at no cost to tenants, at 77 Howard, as follows:
a. accessible door improvements to the lobby;
b. upgrades to the heating control systems, including a new generator;
c. upgrades to the main electrical room and electrical components;
d. a minimum of 16 e-bike parking spaces (with an area of 40 square meters) added to the underground parking garage;
e. a new fob system for residential access to building (for all entrance points, including the underground garage);
f. a new roof;
g. façade improvements including exterior brick replacement; and
h. two new outdoor amenity spaces at-grade and accessible to all current residents of the existing rental dwelling units.
12. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Howard Street |
77 |
|
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law, with a holding provision, to permit a 139.5-metre (41-storey excluding mechanical penthouse) infill mixed-use building with 460 residential units and 420 square metres of non-residential space on the ground floor at 77 Howard Street. The existing 24-storey rental apartment building on the subject site will be retained. A 713 square metre on-site parkland dedication is proposed at the northeast corner of the site.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288890.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288462.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288350.pdf
(June 19, 2026) Report and Attachments 1-4 and 6-9 from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 77 Howard Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
Communications
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Edward B. Charles
Mike Dror, Bousfields Inc.
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 12:
Recommendation to be deleted
12. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 77 Howard Street.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Howard Street |
77 |
|
|
|
TE34.36 - 30-34 and 38-40 Huntley Street, 112-124 Isabella Street, and a Portion of 1 Mount Pleasant Road - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 30-34 and 38-40 Huntley Street and112-124 Isabella Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 30-34 and 38-40 Huntley Street, 112-124 Isabella Street and 1 Mount Pleasant Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 7 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills pertaining to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to City Council for enactment, City Council require approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Application 25 265192 STE 13 RH under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of 32 existing rental dwelling units at 30-34 and 38-40 Huntley Street and 112-124 Isabella Street.
5. City Council request that the owner make reasonable commercial efforts to identify, in consultation with the Executive Director, Development Review, a suitable off-site parkland dedication as a substitution for an on-site parkland dedication that:
a. is accessible to the area where the subject site is located;
b. is a good physical substitute for any on-site parkland dedication;
c. is free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances and encroachments;
d. is in an acceptable environmental condition; and
e. the value of the off-site dedication shall not exceed the estimated value of the on-site dedication that would otherwise be required, which value may include the cost of acquiring the land, land transfer tax, typical closing cost and reasonable real estate commissions of up to five percent, all to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review.
6. Should the Executive Director, Development Review and the owner agree to a property as a substitution for an on-site dedication, City Council accept the off-site parkland dedication, in full or partial fulfilment of the parkland dedication requirements, pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act, with conveyance to the City to occur prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit in accordance with the following:
a.in the event the value of the off-site parkland dedication is less than the value of an on-site parkland dedication, the owner shall provide a cash-in-lieu payment for the shortfall in parkland dedication in accordance with Chapter 415 Article III of the Municipal Code; and
b. in the event the owner is unable to provide a substituted off-site parkland dedication to the City, the owner will be required to satisfy the parkland dedication requirement through a cash-in-lieu of parkland payment prior to the issuance of first above grade building permit in accordance with Chapter 415 Article III of the Municipal Code, all to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor.
7. Should the off-site parkland dedication be accepted by the Executive Director, Development Review, City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
8. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Huntley Street |
30-34, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
|
Huntley Street |
38 and 40 |
|
|
|
|
Isabella Street |
112-124, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of an application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a residential development consisting of two towers 60- and 56-storeys (206 metres and 196 metres, including mechanical penthouse) in height, containing approximately 1,419 dwelling units, including 32 rental replacement units. The development site includes the “air space” above the existing office building at 1 Mount Pleasant Road beginning at a height of 61.4 metres. The proposal includes the demolition of 34 Huntley Street, in-situ conservation of 122-124 Isabella Street, and relocation and conservation of 30-32 and 38-40 Huntley Street.
An Official Plan Amendment is required to redesignate 30-34 and 38-40 Huntley Street and 112-124 Isabella Street from Neighbourhoods to Mixed Use Areas, and to designate the lands as Mixed Use Areas 2 – Intermediate in the Downtown Plan.
A Rental Housing Demolition Report will also be considered by City Council in conjunction with this Report as the proposal includes the demolition of 32 existing rental housing units. A Tenant Assistance Plan is proposed that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288406.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288880.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288407.pdf
Communications
Speakers
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 8
Recommendation to be deleted
8. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 30-34 and 38-40 Huntley Street and 112-124 Isabella Street from Permit Parking.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Huntley Street |
30-34, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
|
Huntley Street |
38 and 40 |
|
|
|
|
Isabella Street |
112-124, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
TE34.37 - 30-34 and 38-40 Huntley Street and 112-124 Isabella Street - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application 25 265192 STE 13 RH in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of 32 existing rental dwelling units located at 30-32 and 38-40 Huntley Street and 120-124 Isabella Street, subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain 32 replacement rental dwelling units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement;
b. the replacement rental dwelling units required by Recommendation 1.a. above shall collectively have a total gross floor area of at least 1,496 square metres and be comprised of 7 studio units, 22 one-bedroom units, 2 two-bedroom units and 1 three-bedroom unit, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to City Planning dated May 20, 2026; any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
c. the owner shall, as part of the 32 replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above, provide at least 7 studio units, 22 one-bedroom units and 2 two-bedroom units at affordable rents, and 1 three-bedroom unit at mid-range (moderate) rents, as currently defined in the City's Official Plan, all for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit;
d. the owner shall provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the 32 existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
e. the owner shall provide tenants of all 32 replacement rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed 60-storey north building at no extra charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
f. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry and central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit at no extra charge;
g. the owner shall provide tenants of all replacement rental dwelling units with access to bicycle and visitor parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed development;
h. the replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the first building to be constructed on the lands, exclusive of the replacement rental dwelling units, are made available and ready for occupancy, subject to any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
i. the owner shall enter into, and register on title to the lands, an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 1.a. through 1.h. above all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the demolition of the 32 existing rental dwelling units located at 30-32 and 38-40 Huntley Street and 120-124 Isabella Street after all the following have occurred:
a. all conditions in Recommendation 1 above have been fully secured;
b. the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments for Application 25 265180 STE 13 OZ have come into full force and effect;
c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Executive Director, Development Review or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, or as otherwise determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits (conditional or full permit) for the approved development on the site; and
e. the owner has confirmed, in writing, that all existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished are vacant.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate, has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.
4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 30-34 and 38-40 Huntley Street and 112-124 Isabella Street after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 pursuant to section 6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:
a. the owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;
b. the owner erects solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
c. the owner erects the proposed building on the site no later than three (3) years from the date that the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units commences, subject to the timeframe being extended at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
d. should the owner fail to complete the proposed building within the time specified in Recommendation 4.c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, as with municipal property taxes, an amount equal to the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such amount shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the Residential Demolition Permit is issued.
5. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement and any other related agreements.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 32 rental dwelling units located at 30-32 and 38-40 Huntley Street and 120-124 Isabella Street. The 32 rental units are proposed to be replaced as part of the new development on the site. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
The proposed development on the site at 30-34 and 38-40 Huntley Street, 112-124 Isabella Street, and a Portion of 1 Mount Pleasant Road is the subject of a related Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application (25 265180 STE 13 OZ). The proposed development would permit two residential buildings, a 56-storey south tower and a 60-storey north tower. The two towers would contain a total of 1,419 dwelling units, including 32 rental replacement units. An approval report for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.
This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288010.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288011.pdf
Communications
Motions
TE34.38 - 30-32 and 38-40 Huntley Street, 122-124 Isabella Street - Alterations to Attributes on Designated Heritage Properties Under Part IV Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage properties at 30-32, 38-40 Huntley Street and 122-124 Isabella Street in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a two-tower residential complex at 56 and 60 storeys respectively. with such alterations to the designated properties substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated April 23, 2026, prepared by Diamond Schmitt Architects and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, and the Heritage Impact Assessment dated April 23, 2026, prepared by ERA Architects and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, and the conditions as set out below.
2. City Council direct that its consent to the application to alter the designated heritage properties at 30-32, 38-40 Huntley Street and 122-124 Isabella Street, in accordance with Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, are subject to the following conditions:
a. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 30-32, 38-40 Huntley Street and 122-124 Isabella Street including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall:
1. provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the properties at 30-32, 38-40 Huntley Street and 122-124 Isabella Street, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
2. execute and register on title a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 30-32, 38-40 Huntley Street and 122-124 Isabella Street substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated April 23, 2026, prepared by Diamond Schmitt Architects, and the Heritage Impact Assessment dated April 23, 2026, prepared by ERA Architects all on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.a.1. above, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including execution and registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;
3. provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance their heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such a plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
4. provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
5. provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
6. submit a Signage Plan for the designated properties retained within the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
7. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.a.1. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
8. provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan for 30-32, 38-40 Huntley Street and 122-124 Isabella Street; and
b. prior to the release of an existing Letter of Credit the owner shall:
1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
2. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in City Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the properties at 30-32, 38-40 Huntley Street and 122-124 Isabella Street.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the designated heritage properties at 30-32 and 38-40 Huntley Street and 122-124 Isabella Street under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with a development on the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.
The property contains three properties designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage: 30-32 Huntley Street; 38-40 Huntley Street; and 122-124 Isabella Street. The property also contains 34 Huntley Street, a property listed on the City of Toronto’s Heritage Register that staff have determined does not meet the criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 of the Ontario Heritage Act and will be demolished as part of the proposal.
On May 25, 2026, Council stated its intention to designate 30-32 Huntley Street, 38 and 40 Huntley Street and 122-124 Isabella Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The proposed development application for the subject site includes the relocation of the two heritage buildings on the development site and the construction of a residential tower. Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations conserve the subject heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework.
Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations conserve the onsite heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The heritage impacts of the proposal are appropriately mitigated by the overall conservation strategy.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288146.pdf
Communications
Motions
38a - 30-32 and 38-40 Huntley Street, 122-124 Isabella Street - Alterations to Attributes on Designated Heritage Properties Under Part IV Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on July 6, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB46.11 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (June 15, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the designated heritage properties at 30-32 and 38-40 Huntley Street and 122-124 Isabella Street under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with a development on the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.
The property contains three properties designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage: 30-32 Huntley Street; 38-40 Huntley Street; and 122-124 Isabella Street. The property also contains 34 Huntley Street, a property listed on the City of Toronto’s Heritage Register that staff have determined does not meet the criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 of the Ontario Heritage Act and will be demolished as part of the proposal.
On May 25, 2026, Council stated its intention to designate 30-32 Huntley Street, 38 and 40 Huntley Street and 122-124 Isabella Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The proposed development application for the subject site includes the relocation of the two heritage buildings on the development site and the construction of a residential tower. Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations conserve the subject heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework.
Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations conserve the onsite heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The heritage impacts of the proposal are appropriately mitigated by the overall conservation strategy.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289317.pdf
TE34.39 - 90 to 94 Isabella Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 90-94 Isabella Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Revised Attachment 6 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bill to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to:
a. provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant for 90, 90A, 92 and 94 Isabella Street to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning substantially in accordance with the approval granted by City Council pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act through Decision Item 2023.TE9.29; and
b. enter into and register on title to the lands a Heritage Easement Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act acceptable and satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and the City Solicitor.
4. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Isabella Street |
90-94, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of an application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 69-storey (220.5 metres, plus 8-metre mechanical penthouse) residential building containing 818 dwelling units at 90-94 Isabella Street, with permissions for small-scale non-residential uses in 94 Isabella Street.
On December 13, 2023, City Council approved a previous application to amend the Zoning By-law for the properties at 90-94 Isabella Street to permit a 69-storey residential building. This application reconfigures the previous approval by reducing the size of the tower floor plate, and reorienting the tower from an east-west direction to a north-south direction. The reorientation of the tower form and redistribution of the massing allows for the removal of the previously approved tower massing over 94 Isabella Street and facilitates the full retention of that heritage building. At the same December 13, 2023 City Council meeting, Council approved alterations to the heritage designated properties at 90-94 Isabella Street and authorized the entry into a Heritage Easement Agreement.
The site contains two properties designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act: 90-92 Isabella Street and 94 Isabella Street. The proposal includes the in situ retention of the front (south) projecting façade of 90-92 Isabella Street, while portions of the east and west return walls are proposed to be dismantled and reconstructed. This reworked proposal facilitates the retention of the heritage building at 94 Isabella Street in its entirety.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288351.pdf
Revised Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289141.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288352.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288467.pdf
Communications
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 4:
Recommendation to be deleted
4. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and report back on the feasibility of amending City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 90-94 Isabella Street from Permit Parking.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Isabella Street |
90-94, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
TE34.40 - 164-168 Isabella Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 164-168 Isabella Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 164 168 Isabella Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (July 7, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. City Council direct the City Solicitor to withhold the necessary Bills for enactment until City Council has approved the Rental Housing Demolition Application 25 210135 STE 13 RH under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of 38 existing rental dwelling units at 164-166 Isabella Street.
5. City Council require the owner to enter into one or more agreements, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to secure the following matters:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain 500 square metres of dwelling room replacement area from 168 Isabella Street as 12 replacement rental studio units on the site, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to City Planning dated May 7, 2026, with any revision to these plans being to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental studio unit is first occupied and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement;
b. the owner shall, as part of the 12 replacement rental studio units in Recommendation 5.a. above, provide at least 12 studio units at dwelling room tier 1 affordable rents as currently defined in the City's Official Plan, all for a period of at least 15 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit;
c. the owner shall provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the 25 rental dwelling rooms proposed to be demolished to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the owner shall provide tenants of all 12 replacement rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed 70-storey building at no extra charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
e. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry and central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit at no extra charge;
f. the owner shall provide tenants of all replacement rental dwelling units with access to bicycle and visitor parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed development; and
g. the replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 5.a. above shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the proposed development, exclusive of the replacement rental dwelling units, are made available and ready for occupancy, subject to any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
6. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Isabella Street |
164-168, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 569-2013 to permit a 70-storey (228.5 metres excluding mechanical penthouse) residential building containing 599 dwelling units (including 50 rental replacement units) for the property at 164-166 and 168 Isabella Street. The two existing heritage buildings will be preserved and moved closer to Isabella Street on the site.
The proposal includes the demolition of 38 existing rental units and 25 rental dwelling rooms to be replaced with 50 rental replacement units, as well as tenant assistance for tenants of the dwelling rooms and rental units proposed for demolition.
The Official Plan Amendment is proposed to redesignate the site from Neighbourhoods to Apartment Neighbourhoods to permit the tall building on the site.
A separate report from Heritage Planning on the proposed conservation of the designated heritage properties at 164-168 Isabella Street will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this report.
A related Rental Housing Demolition application considering the rental housing demolition and replacement matters, including assistance to impacted tenants, will also be considered by City Council in conjunction with this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288337.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288468.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288338.pdf
Communications
Speakers
Jane McFarlane
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 6:
Recommendation to be deleted
6. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 164-168 Isabella Street.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Isabella Street |
164-168, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 2 and adopt instead the following new recommendation contained in the supplementary report (July 7, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District [TE34.40a]:
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 164 168 Isabella Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to this report.
40a - 164-168 Isabella Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Supplementary Report
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that Recommendation 2 in the report from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, titled 164-168 Isabella Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval, dated June 18, 2026 be amended to adopt a revised draft Zoning By-law Amendment for 164-168 Isabella Street that does not include a holding provision ("H").
A revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report has been submitted. Engineering Review staff have reviewed the report and accepted its conclusion and determined that a Holding provision ("H") is no longer required.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289183.pdf
Attachment 1 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289184.pdf
TE34.41 - 164-168 Isabella Street - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application File 25 210135 STE 13 RH in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of 38 existing rental dwelling units located at 164-166 Isabella Street, subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain 38 replacement rental dwelling units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement;
b. the replacement rental dwelling units required by Recommendation 1.a. above shall collectively have a total gross floor area of at least 1,584 square metres and be comprised of 38 studio units, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to City Planning dated June 2, 2026; any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
c. the owner shall, as part of the 38 replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above, provide at least 9 studio units at affordable rents, 17 studio units at mid-range (affordable) rents and 12 studio units at mid-range (moderate) rents, as currently defined in the City's Official Plan, all for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit;
d. the owner shall provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the 38 existing rental dwelling units to be demolished to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
e. the owner shall provide tenants of all 38 replacement rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed 70-storey building at no extra charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
f. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry and central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit at no extra charge;
g. the owner shall provide tenants of all replacement rental dwelling units with access to bicycle and visitor parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed development;
h. the replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the proposed development, exclusive of the replacement rental dwelling units, are made available and ready for occupancy, subject to any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
i. the owner shall enter into, and register on title to the lands, an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 1.a. through 1.h. above all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the demolition of the 38 existing rental dwelling units located at 164-166 Isabella Street after all the following have occurred:
a. all conditions in Recommendation 1 above have been fully secured;
b. the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments for Application 25 210128 STE 13 OZ have come into full force and effect;
c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Executive Director, Development Review or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, or as otherwise determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits (conditional or full permit) for the approved development on the site;
e. the owner has confirmed, in writing, that all existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished are vacant; and
f. the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning is satisfied that the required replacement and tenant assistance associated with the 25 dwellings rooms proposed for demolition as part of Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments for Application 25 210128 STE 13 OZ have been secured through one or more agreements.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate, has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.
4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 164-166 and 168 Isabella Street after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 pursuant to section 6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:
a. the owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;
b. the owner erects solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
c. the owner erects the proposed building on the site no later than three (3) years from the date that the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units commences, subject to the timeframe being extended at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
d. should the owner fail to complete the proposed building within the time specified in Recommendation 4.c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, as with municipal property taxes, an amount equal to the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such amount shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the Residential Demolition Permit is issued.
5. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement and any other related agreements.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish and replace 38 rental dwelling units located at 164-166 Isabella Street. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
The proposed development on the site at 164-168 Isabella Street is the subject of a related Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application (25 210128 STE 13 OZ). The proposed development would permit a 70-storey residential building with 599 dwelling units, including a total of 50 replacement rental units. The 50 replacement rental units consist of 12 studio units to replace the existing 25 rental dwelling rooms at 168 Isabella Street and the 38 rental dwelling units proposed for demolition and replacement in this report. An approval report for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.
This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288317.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288318.pdf
Communications
Motions
TE34.42 - 164-166 Isabella Street and 168 Isabella Street - Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties Under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage properties at 164-166 and 168 Isabella Street in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a 70-storey residential tower with such alterations to the designated properties substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated June 2, 2026, prepared by Studio JCI., and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, and the Heritage Impact Assessment dated September 19, 2025 with revisions March 27, 2026 and June 2, 2026, prepared by GBCA Architects and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, and the conditions as set out below.
2. City Council direct that its consent to the application to alter the designated heritage properties at 164-166 and 168 Isabella Street, in accordance with Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, are subject to the following conditions:
a. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 164-166 and 168 Isabella Street including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall:
1. provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the properties at 164-166 and 168 Isabella Street, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
2. execute and register on title a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 164-166 and 168 Isabella Street, substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated June 2, 2026, prepared by Studio JCI, and the Heritage Impact Assessment dated September 19, 2025 with revisions March 27, 2026, and June 2, 2026, prepared by GBCA Architects all on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.a.1. above, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including execution and registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;
3. provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance their heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such a plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
4. provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
5. provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
6. submit a Signage Plan for the designated properties retained within the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
7. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.a.1. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
8. provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan for 164-166 and 168 Isabella Street; and
b. prior to the release of an existing Letter of Credit the owner shall:
1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
2. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in City Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the properties at 164-166 and 168 Isabella Street.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the designated heritage properties at 164-166 Isabella Street and 168 Isabella Street under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with a proposed development of the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.
The property contains 164-166 and 168 Isabella Street. 164-166 Isabella Street was constructed in 1887 by James Hewlett and the property is a semi-detached residence that appears as a single grand residence. Designed in the late-nineteenth century vernacular interpretation of the Gothic Revival style, the properties feature symmetrically organized gables bays and a steeply pitched and complex roofline. On November 12 and 13, 2025, City Council stated its intention to designate the heritage properties at 164-166 Isabella Street under Part IV of the Ontario Act. On February 4, 2026, City Council passed By-law 87-2026, designating 164-166 Isabella Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.
168 Isabella was constructed in 1892 by Jeremiah Bedford in the Queen Anne style as a single-family residence. On February 4, 1991, City Council passed By-law 1991-0089, designating 168 Isabella Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The proposed development application for the subject site includes the relocation of the heritage buildings on the development site and the construction of a 70-storey residential tower. Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations conserve the subject heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The impacts to the heritage properties are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy associated with the proposal.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288237.pdf
Communications
Motions
42a - 164-166 Isabella Street and 168 Isabella Street - Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties Under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on July 6, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB46.10 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (June 15, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the designated heritage properties at 164-166 Isabella Street and 168 Isabella Street under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with a proposed development of the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.
The property contains 164-166 and 168 Isabella Street. 164-166 Isabella Street was constructed in 1887 by James Hewlett and the property is a semi-detached residence that appears as a single grand residence. Designed in the late-nineteenth century vernacular interpretation of the Gothic Revival style, the properties feature symmetrically organized gables bays and a steeply pitched and complex roofline. On November 12 and 13, 2025, City Council stated its intention to designate the heritage properties at 164-166 Isabella Street under Part IV of the Ontario Act. On February 4, 2026, City Council passed By-law 87-2026, designating 164-166 Isabella Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.
168 Isabella was constructed in 1892 by Jeremiah Bedford in the Queen Anne style as a single-family residence. On February 4, 1991, City Council passed By-law 1991-0089, designating 168 Isabella Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The proposed development application for the subject site includes the relocation of the heritage buildings on the development site and the construction of a 70-storey residential tower. Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations conserve the subject heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The impacts to the heritage properties are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy associated with the proposal.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289295.pdf
TE34.43 - 115 Jarvis Street, Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 115 Jarvis Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Revised Attachment 7 to the report (June 17, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Jarvis Street |
115 |
|
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law, with a holding provision, to permit a 50-storey (164.5 metres including mechanical penthouse) mixed use building, including 596 dwelling units and 226 square metres of non-residential floor space at 115 Jarvis Street.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288150.pdf
Revised Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288882.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288152.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216877.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 3:
Recommendation to be deleted
3. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 115 Jarvis Street.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Jarvis Street |
115 |
|
|
|
TE34.44 - 79, 81, and 93 Ontario Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 79, 81 and 93 Ontario Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Revised Attachment 6 to the report (June 17, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council direct the owner to provide and implement an acceptable Tenant Assistance Plan for eligible tenants of the three existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
4. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Ontario Street |
79, 81 and 93 |
|
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law, with a holding provision, to permit a 16-storey (64 metres), including the mechanical penthouse) building containing 98 dwelling units and 78 square metres of non-residential gross floor area at 79, 81, and 93 Ontario Street.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288074.pdf
Revised Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289174.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288075.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
Communications
Speakers
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 4:
Recommendation to be deleted
4. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 79, 81, and 93 Ontario Street.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Ontario Street |
79, 81 and 93 |
|
|
|
TE34.45 - 64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Revised Attachment 6 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision.
5. City Council accept the Owner's offer of an In-kind Contribution attached as Attachment 10 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District pursuant to subsection 37(6) of the Planning Act and allow the Owner to provide a minimum 184 square metre community space located on the ground and mezzanine floors to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, the Executive Director, Social Development, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the City Solicitor (the “In-kind Contribution”), and in accordance with the following terms:
a. the community agency space shall be delivered to the City in accordance with the City's Community Space Tenancy Policy and finished to a complete "turnkey" state as per the Community Space Term Sheet and its Base Building Conditions, with the terms and specifications to be secured in the In-kind Contribution Agreement.
6. City Council attribute a value to the In-kind Contribution, equal to 100 percent of 4 percent of the value of the land for the development permissions granted through the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Revised Attachment 6 to the revised report (June 29, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District (net of any exclusions or exemptions authorized under the Community Benefits Charge By-law), as determined the day before the day the first building permit is issued in respect of the development.
7. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Development Review to enter into an Agreement pursuant to subsection 37(7.1) of the Planning Act (the "In-kind Contribution Agreement") to address the provision of the In-kind Contribution on terms satisfactory to the Executive Director, Development Review in consultation with the Executive Director, Social Development, Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
8. City Council determine that the execution and registration of the In-kind Contribution Agreement constitute satisfactory arrangements for the provision of the In-kind Contribution for the purpose of Applicable Law as defined in the Building Code.
9. City Council direct the City Solicitor to withhold the necessary Bills for enactment until City Council has approved the Revised Rental Housing Demolition Application 21 235906 13 RH under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of existing rental dwelling units.
10. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Church Street |
552-570, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
|
Wellesley Street East |
64 and 66 |
|
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of an application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, with a holding provision, to permit a 36-storey (122.5 metres including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building, containing 409 dwelling units (including 65 replacement rental units) and 852 square metres of non-residential gross floor area at 64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street.
The application to amend the Official Plan is required to amend Site and Area Specific Policy 382 to permit a tall building in the Wellesley Wood Character Area.
A related Rental Housing Demolition application to permit the demolition and replacement of 65 rental dwelling units on site will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this report. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and financial compensation to lessen hardship.
A separate report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, on the proposed alterations to the designated heritage property at 64 Wellesley Street East will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this report.
The applicant is proposing to acquire a public lane, known as Dapper Lane, that currently bisects the site in order for the proposal to be constructed. Approval of the permanent closure of the lane will be considered by City Council through a separate process at a future date in accordance with the relevant policies and legislation.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288849.pdf
Revised Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288870.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288355.pdf
(June 19, 2026) Report and Attachments 1-5 and 7-10 from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
Communications
(June 12, 2026) Letter from Chris Phibbs (TE.Main)
(June 18, 2026) Letter from Kyle Rae (TE.Main)
(June 19, 2026) E-mail from James Neiman (TE.Main)
(June 27, 2026) E-mail from Les Porter (TE.Supp)
(June 30, 2026) Letter from Connie Langille, President, Church Wellesley Neighbourhood Association (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216791.pdf
(July 3, 2026) Letter from Jaret Sereda, Executive Director, Church Wellesley Village Business Improvement Area (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216878.pdf
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Gian Pileri (TE.Supp)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 10:
Recommendation to be deleted
10. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and report back on the feasibility of amending City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street from Permit Parking.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Church Street |
552-570, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
|
Wellesley Street East |
64 and 66 |
|
|
|
TE34.46 - 64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Amending Report
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend its decision on Item 2023.TE6.23 by deleting Parts 4, 5, 6 and 7, and replacing them with the following new Parts:
4. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application File 21 235906 STE 13 RH in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of 65 existing rental dwelling units at 64-66 Wellesley Street East, subject to the following conditions:
a. the Owner shall provide and maintain 65 replacement rental dwelling units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied; during this period, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, conversion to a non-residential rental purpose, or demolition without replacement of the rental units proposed to be demolished; the replacement rental dwelling units shall collectively contain a total gross floor area of at least 3,093 square metres and be comprised of 50 studio units, 11 one-bedroom units and 4 two-bedroom units, as generally illustrated in the plans prepared by Diamond Schmitt Architects and dated May 6, 2026, with any revisions to these plans being to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
b. as part of the 65 replacement rental dwelling units required in Part 4.a. above, the Owner shall provide and maintain at least 36 studio units, 11 one-bedroom units and 4 two-bedroom units at affordable rents as defined as gross monthly rent inclusive of utilities that is no greater than one times the average City of Toronto rent by unit type, as reported annually by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, and at least 14 studio units at mid-range rents, defined as gross monthly rent inclusive of utilities that exceeds affordable rent but is no greater than one 1.5 times the average City of Toronto rent by unit type, as reported annually by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, all for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit;
c. the Owner shall provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the 65 existing rental units proposed to be demolished that reflects the City’s most current tenant assistance practices as generally outlined in the Item 2025.PH20.2 - Implementation Guidelines for Rental Replacement, adopted by City Council during its meeting on April 23 and 24, 2025 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the Owner shall provide tenants of all 65 replacement rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed development, at no extra charge, and on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the development, without separate entrances or the need to pre-book or pay a fee unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
e. the Owner shall provide ensuite laundry in each replacement rental dwelling unit at no additional cost to tenants;
f. the Owner shall provide central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit at no additional cost to tenants;
g. the Owner shall provide and make available vehicular parking spaces to tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the development;
h. the Owner shall provide tenants of all replacement rental dwelling units with access to bicycle and vehicle parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed development;
i. the replacement rental dwelling units required in Part 4.a. above shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the proposed development, exclusive of the replacement rental units, are made available and ready for occupancy, subject to any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
j. the Owner shall enter into, and register on title to the lands at 64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street, an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Parts 4.a. through 4.i. above, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
5. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the demolition of the 65 rental dwelling units located at 64-66 Wellesley Street East after all the following have occurred:
a. all conditions in Part 4 above have been fully satisfied or secured;
b. the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment for Application 26 119147 STE 13 OZ have come into full force and effect;
c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Executive Director, Development Review or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, or as otherwise authorized by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
d. the Owner has confirmed, in writing, that all existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished are vacant.
6. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Part 5 above.
7. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 64-66 Wellesley Street East after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Part 5 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 pursuant to Section 363-6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:
a. the Owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;
b. the Owner erects solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
c. the Owner erects the proposed mixed-use building on the site no later than three years from the date on which the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units commences, subject to the timeframe being extended to the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
d. should the Owner fail to complete the proposed mixed-use building containing the 65 replacement rental units within the time specified in Part 7.c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, as with municipal property taxes, an amount equal to the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such amount shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the Residential Demolition Permit is issued.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of a revised Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 65 rental dwelling units located at 64-66 Wellesley Street East and 552-570 Church Street.
The demolition of the 65 rental dwelling units was previously approved by City Council at its meeting on July 19 and 20, 2023 (21 235906 STE 13 RH) in conjunction with Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application (21 235897 STE 13 OZ) proposing a 31-storey mixed-use building with 405 dwelling units, including 65 replacement rental units. Since then the applicant has submitted a new Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application (26 119147 STE 13 OZ) to construct a 36-storey mixed-use building with 409 dwelling units, including the 65 replacement rental units.
This report replaces the original recommendations approved by City Council with new recommendations securing updates to the replacement floor plans based on the new development proposal, and an updated Tenant Assistance Plan that is consistent with the City's current practices, while maintaining other required aspects of the previously approved approach to replacing rental housing. These new recommendations are reflected in changes to Parts 4a., 4c. and 4j., 5b., and 5d. below, whereas the remaining recommendations remain unchanged from the July 19 and 20, 2023 Council decision. The new recommendations also include the property at 562 Church Street which was part of the original applications but the address was omitted from the previous report's title and recommendations.
An approval report for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this revised Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288243.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288244.pdf
Communications
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Motions
TE34.47 - 64 Wellesley Street East - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage property at 64 Wellesley Street East under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a new mixed-use building, with such alterations to the designated heritage property being substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Diamond Schmitt Architects Inc., dated February 6, 2026, and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated April 24, 2026, on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with an approved Conservation Plan and drawings satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to conditions as set out below.
2. City Council direct that its consent to the application to alter the designated heritage property at 64 Wellesley Street East, in accordance with Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act are also subject to the following conditions:
a. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 64 Wellesley Street East, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall:
1.amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property 64 Wellesley Street East, substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated February 6, 2026, prepared by Diamond Schmitt Architects Inc., and the Heritage Impact Assessment dated April 24, 2026, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., all on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.a.2. below, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including execution and registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;
2. provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated April 24, 2026, for the property at 64 Wellesley Street East to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
3. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.a.2. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
4. provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
5. provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
6. provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
7. provide full documentation of the existing heritage property, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a flash drive in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
8. provide full documentation of the existing World Pride murals, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a USB flash drive in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map and elevations. to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
b. prior to the release of an existing Letter of Credit the owner shall:
1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
2. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in City Council to amend the Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 64 Wellesley Street East.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter heritage attributes of a designated heritage property at 64 Wellesley Street East in connection with the proposed development of the subject property. The application for Site Plan Control is subject to a Heritage Permit application under the Ontario Heritage Act because a previously approved application related to an approved Zoning By-law Amendment has been revised.
The subject property at 64 Wellesley Street East contains the Wellesley Apartments, a five-storey, multi-unit residential apartment building constructed in 1931. The property is designated under Part IV, Section 29, of the Ontario Heritage Act for its association with the pre-World War II apartment building type, its design as a representative example of the Georgian Revival style, and its role in supporting the context of the Church-Wellesley Village.
On July 19 and 20, 2023, City Council approved recommendations to alter the heritage property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act allow for the construction of a new mixed-use building. Since the previous scheme was approved, the applicant has revised the conservation strategy accompanying the related Site Plan Control application. As a result of the proposed changes to the previous scheme, an amended Heritage Easement Agreement will be required.
Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations continue to conserve the onsite and adjacent heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287498.pdf
Communications
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Motions
47a - 64 Wellesley Street East - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on June 8, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB45.6 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (May 15, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter heritage attributes of a designated heritage property at 64 Wellesley Street East in connection with the proposed development of the subject property. The application for Site Plan Control is subject to a Heritage Permit application under the Ontario Heritage Act because a previously approved application related to an approved Zoning By-law Amendment has been revised.
The subject property at 64 Wellesley Street East contains the Wellesley Apartments, a five-storey, multi-unit residential apartment building constructed in 1931. The property is designated under Part IV, Section 29, of the Ontario Heritage Act for its association with the pre-World War II apartment building type, its design as a representative example of the Georgian Revival style, and its role in supporting the context of the Church-Wellesley Village.
On July 19 and 20, 2023, City Council approved recommendations to alter the heritage property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act allow for the construction of a new mixed-use building. Since the previous scheme was approved, the applicant has revised the conservation strategy accompanying the related Site Plan Control application. As a result of the proposed changes to the previous scheme, an amended Heritage Easement Agreement will be required.
Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations continue to conserve the onsite and adjacent heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287861.pdf
TE34.48 - 237, 249 and 251-253 Victoria Street - Official Plan Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 237, 249 and 251-253 Victoria Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
On September 1, 2022, an application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law (File Number 22 198781 STE 11 OZ) was submitted to permit a 24-storey mixed-use building with 416 square metres of non-residential gross floor area and 256 dwelling units for the property at 237 Victoria Street. This Official Plan Amendment applied only to 237 Victoria Street. On June 19, 2023, the owner appealed the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) due to Council not making a decision within the time frame in the Planning Act.
On March 11, 2026, a new Official Plan Amendment application (File Number 26 127817 STE 13 OZ), which is the subject of this report, was submitted to secure a block plan through a Site and Area Specific Policy for 237 Victoria Street, as well as the properties to the north at 249 and 251-253 Victoria Street. The policy would permit a tower to be located along the north property line of the property at 237 Victoria Street, with a maximum 30-metre height limit for the portions of the properties at 249 and 251-253 Victoria Street within 10 metres of the north property line of 237 Victoria Street. Additionally, the Official Plan Amendment would secure minimum setbacks of 10 metres to a tower from both the south property line of 237 Victoria Street and the midpoint of the laneway along the east side of 237 Victoria Street.
This report recommends approval of this application (File Number 26 127817 STE 13 OZ), to amend the Official Plan which applies to the properties 237-253 Victoria Street.
A separate Request for Direction Report from the City Solicitor related to the appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal for the application submitted in September 2022 for only 237 Victoria Street (File Number 22 198781 STE 11 OZ) is anticipated to be considered by City Council at the same meeting with this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288372.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288373.pdf
Communications
Motions
TE34.49 - 65 Ookwemin Street - Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Without Recs
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council forwards the Item to City Council without recommendation.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit non-residential uses including community, cultural, recreational, sport, entertainment and retail uses, while restricting certain industrial uses at 65 Ookwemin Street. The site has another application that proposes four mixed-use buildings of 45, 32, 31 and 20 storeys before the Ontario Land Tribunal, which is currently under litigation and not yet in-force.
This application will permit low-scale non-residential uses that are intended to activate the site in the interim. No changes in height, density, or built form are proposed as part of the application.
The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan and the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289051.pdf
(June 19, 2026) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 65 Ookwemin Street - Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288410.pdf
Revised Attachment 4 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288769.pdf
Attachment 4 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288457.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288411.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217017.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) Letter from Patrick J. Harrington, Aird and Berlis LLP (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217145.pdf
Motions
That the item be forwarded to City Council without recommendation.
TE34.50 - 34 to 50 Southport Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 34 to 50 Southport Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the revised report (June 26, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend Former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands municipally known as 34 to 50 Southport Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the revised report (June 26, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council delegate approval and signing authority to the Executive Director, Development Review for agreements related to payments-in-lieu of bicycle parking under the draft Zoning By-law Amendment referred to in Recommendation 2 above in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
4. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to use $552, per short-term bicycle parking space reduced, adjusted for inflation, as the basis upon which payments under the draft Zoning By-law Amendment referred to in Recommendation 2 above be calculated.
5. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to use $1103, per long-term bicycle parking space reduced, adjusted for inflation, as the basis upon which payments under the draft Zoning By-law Amendment referred to in Recommendation 2 above be calculated.
6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required and to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision including execution of the Section 37 Agreement as referenced in Recommendation 7 below, and any other necessary agreement(s).
7. City Council require the owner to enter into an amending Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as it read the day before the date section 1 of Schedule 17 of the COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act, 2020, came into force, satisfactory to the Executive Director Development Review and the City Solicitor, to secure the following additional community benefit, in addition to previously secured items:
a. an additional cash contribution in the amount of $475,000.00 dollars (Four Hundred Seventy Five Thousand) be provided towards public art, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for Building “C” on the lands municipally known in 2022 as 34 to 50 Southport Street;
b. the cash contribution in Recommendation 7.a. above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index for the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Building Construction Price Indexes Table 18-10-0135-01 or its successor, calculated from the date of the Agreement to the date of payment; and
c. in the event the cash contribution referred to in Recommendation 7.a. above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the local Councillor, provided that the purpose(s) is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the land.
8. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Southpoint Street |
34-50, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, with a holding provision, to permit a 32-storey building with 397 residential units at 34 to 50 Southport Street. In 2012, a 26 and 29 storey building and 16 townhouse units were approved on the site. The proposed 32-storey building would replace the 16 townhouse units previously approved.
The proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan, including the Swansea Secondary Plan.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288785.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289150.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288409.pdf
(June 19, 2026) Revised Report and Attachments 1-5 and 7-11 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 34 to 50 Southport Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288757.pdf
(June 19, 2026) Report and Attachments 1-5 and 7-11 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 34 to 50 Southport Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288408.pdf
Communications
(June 19, 2026) E-mail from Miomira Neskovic (TE.Main)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from David Chapman and Nancy Hall-Chapman on behalf of seniors at Southport (TE.Main)
(June 22, 2026) E-mail from Barbi Lazarus (TE.Supp)
(June 23, 2026) E-mail from Yuan Zhang (TE.Supp)
(June 26, 2026) E-mail from Juan Ding (TE.Supp)
(June 26, 2026) E-mail from Hector Centeno (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Hillery Bourne (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Sheila MacMillan (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Stacey Stevens (TE.Supp)
(June 30, 2026) E-mail from Anna Chaplynska (TE.Supp)
(June 30, 2026) E-mail from Branislav Rusic (TE.Supp)
(June 30, 2026) E-mail from Violeta Dimitrijevic (TE.Supp)
(July 2, 2026) Letter from Talia Marcheggiani (TE.Supp)
(July 3, 2026) E-mail from Arlene Rogers (TE.Supp)
(July 4, 2026) E-mail from Giovanni and Sharon Marcheggiani (TE.Supp)
(July 4, 2026) E-mail from Gunilla Johansson and Gary Boardman (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Tanya Lukovic (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Johanne McCreath (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Erin Knoll (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Diane Trojan (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Tammy Zamudio (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Snežana Pesic (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Mirjana Dumnic (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Dianne Tessier (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Corinna Kitchen (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Weinman (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Katie Yokom (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Barbara Pandza (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Janet and Pete Broadley (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Lindsay McGarvey (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Sue Hutton (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Diana Rhodes (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Nina Artemenko (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Yuri Minkovski (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Niki Mrvelj (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Marko Pandza (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Nico Kulas (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Diane Zafred (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Robin Sinclair (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Sabrina Battaglin (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Elizabeth Pandza (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Alexandra Trasiewicz (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Megan MacDonald (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) Letter from Elaine Topping (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Luis Anastacio (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) Letter from Taylor Lukas (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Tania Gelling (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Rosa Marchese (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Benjamin Mitchell (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Judy Fong Bates (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Lesley Dowbenka (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Woodrow Pelley (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Lenni Jabour (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) Letter from Sue Hutton (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) Letter from Samantha Seabrook (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Alex Keselman (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Karen Maxwade (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Darryn Marcus (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) Submission from Roy Donaldson (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Kristen Juschkewitsch (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Patrick Fisher (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Christina Moore (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Nataliya Parkhomenko (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Wendy Song (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Lidia Battaglin (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Nataliya Parkhomenko, President, Viara Satchkova, Vice-President, Jessica Confalone, Secretary, Tyler Mokren, Treasurer and Taylor Lukas, Director, York Condominium Corporation No. 118, on behalf of the Board of Directors for Grenadier Gardens, York Condominium Corporation No. 118 (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217005.pdf
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Maria Chuyanov (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Nikolett Karadi Miller (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Janet Griffiths-Maxymiw (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Marydean Morrison (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Pauline Heron (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Dennis Lambert (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Jennifer Zabawa (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Nella Miazga and Maris Jansons (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Mae Maracle (TE.Supp)
(July 8, 2026) Letter from Veronica Wynne, President, Swansea Area Ratepayers Association (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215899.pdf
(July 8, 2026) Letter from Will de la Guardia, More Neighbours Toronto (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217046.pdf
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Nikola Pilipovic (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Doruk and Dijana Babaoglu (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Vera Grujic (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Mike Malton (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Set Shuter (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nemanja Grujic (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Dragana Simon (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from David Ouderkirk (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Karin Suezen (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Mike Malton and Cori Malton (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Kai Hutton Wakely (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Andrea Hazard (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Matt Smallwood (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Danica Krajnak (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Darayus Engineer (TE.New)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Stephen Coomber (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Pat and George Moir (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Maryolga Gonzalez (TE.New)
Speakers
Sue Hutton
Talia Marcheggiani
Sabrina Battaglin
Woodrow Pelley
Mike Dror, Bousfields Inc.
Niki Mrvelj
William Yetman
Tammy Zamudio
Roy Donaldson
Tania Gelling
Dragana Simon
Adam Shalaby
Jennifer Zabawa
Veronica Wynne
Vanessa Raponi
Anna Gorka
Ryan Tawileh
Slobodan Kosovalic
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 8:
Recommendation to be deleted
8. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 34 to 50 Southport Street from Permit Parking.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Southpoint Street |
34-50, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
TE34.51 - 1439 Bloor Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 1439 Bloor Street West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council accept the Owner's offer of an In-kind Contribution attached as Appendix 11 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District pursuant to subsection 37(6) of the Planning Act and allow the Owner to provide six affordable rental housing units to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning (the “In-kind Contribution”) all in accordance with the following terms:
a. the In-kind Contribution shall be comprised of 4 one-bedroom units and 2 two-bedroom units (the "Affordable Rental Housing Units");
b. the average unit size of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be no less than the average sizes of all market units, by unit type, of the proposed development;
c. the minimum unit size of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be no less than the minimum unit size of all the market units, by unit type of the proposed development;
d. the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be provided in contiguous groups of at least six rental dwelling units;
e. the general configuration, location and layout of the Affordable Rental Housing Units in the development shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
f. tenants of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be provided with access to, and use of all indoor and outdoor amenities in the development at no extra charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
g. all Affordable Rental Housing Units will be provided with ensuite laundry facilities and central air condition at no extra charge;
h. tenants of the Affordable Rental Housing Units will be provided with access to permanent and visitor bicycle parking/bicycle lockers in accordance with the Zoning By-law and on the same basis as other units within the development;
i. the initial rent (inclusive of utilities) charged to the first tenants of and upon turnover of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall not exceed Affordable Rents as currently defined in the Official Plan for a minimum of 40 years, beginning with the date each such unit is first occupied (the "Affordability Period"); during the Affordability Period, increases to initial rents charged to tenants occupying any of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be in accordance with the Residential Tenancies Act and shall not exceed the Provincial rent guideline, regardless of whether the Provincial rent guideline applies to the Affordable Rental Housing Units under the Residential Tenancies Act;
j. the Owner shall provide and maintain the Affordable Rental Housing Units as rental dwelling units at the rents identified in Recommendation 3.i. above for the duration of the Affordability Period; the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall not be registered as a condominium or any other form of ownership, such as life lease or co-ownership, which provide a right to exclusive possession of a dwelling unit, and no application for conversion for non-rental housing purposes, or application to demolish any Affordable Rental Housing Unit shall be made for the duration of the Affordability Period; upon the expiration of the Affordability Period, the owner shall continue to provide and maintain the Affordable Rental Housing Units as rental dwelling units, unless and until such time as the Owner has applied for and obtained all approvals necessary to do otherwise;
k. the Owner will use the City's Centralized Affordable Housing Access System to advertise and select tenants for the Affordable Rental Housing Units, provided it is in place, unless otherwise agreed to by the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat; and at least six months in advance of any Affordable Rental Housing Unit being made available for rent, the Owner shall develop and implement an Access Plan which will outline how the Affordable Rental Housing Units will be rented to eligible households in consultation with, and to the satisfaction of, the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat; and
l. the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units of the proposed development are erected on the site are available and ready for occupancy.
4. City Council attribute a value to the In-kind Contribution, equal to 100 percent of four percent of the value of the land for the development permissions comprising 24,422 square metres of gross floor area (net of any exclusions or exemptions authorized under the Community Benefits Charge By-law), as determined the day before the day the first building permit is issued in respect of the development.
5. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Development Review to enter into an Agreement pursuant to subsection 37(7.1) of the Planning Act (the "In-kind Contribution Agreement") to address the provision of the In-kind Contribution on terms satisfactory to the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
6. City Council determine that the execution and registration of the In-kind Contribution Agreement constitute satisfactory arrangements for the provision of the In-kind Contribution for the purpose of Applicable Law as defined in the Building Code.
7. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Bloor Street West |
1439 |
|
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 33-storey apartment building with 377 units, including 6 affordable rental units, and 994 square metres of retail and commercial space at 1439 Bloor Street West.
The Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan. The application has also taken into consideration the City-initiated Bloor Street: St. Helen's Avenue to Perth Avenue Planning Framework.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288399.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288463.pdf
Attachment 11 - CBC In-kind Offer Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288436.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288383.pdf
Communications
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Simon Tran, More Neighbours Toronto (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217045.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Tony De Franco, Lead of Development, Sajecki Planning Inc.
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 7:
Recommendation to be deleted
7. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 1439 Bloor Street West from Permit Parking.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Bloor Street West |
1439 |
|
|
|
TE34.52 - 1875 to 1901 Eglinton Avenue West, 137 Kirknewton Road and 156 Dynevor Road - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 137 Kirknewton Road substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (June 17, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 1875 to 1901 Eglinton Avenue West, 137 Kirknewton Road and 156 Dynevor Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (June 17, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. City Council require the owner to provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
5. City Council direct that prior to the removal of the proposed hold in the draft Zoning By-law for the housing provision, the owner be required to enter into an agreement with the City and register a Section 118 restriction on title to ensure assumption of the agreement by subsequent owners, to secure the implementation of the Tenant Assistance Plan required in Recommendation 4 above, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
6. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Dynevor Road |
156 |
|
|
|
|
Eglinton Avenue West |
1875-1901, inclusive |
Odd |
|
|
|
Kirknewton Road |
137 |
|
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 34-storey mixed-use building with 446 dwelling units at 1875 to 1901 Eglinton Avenue West, 137 Kirknewton Road and 156 Dynevor Road. The proposal has a Gross Floor Area (GFA) of 33,237 square metres that includes 910 square metres of retail and 1914 square metres of amenity space. The development includes a publicly accessible open space of over 100 square metres and a 6 metre public laneway on the south end of the site is being conveyed to the City.
The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024). The proposed development also conforms to the City's Official Plan.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288400.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288770.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288401.pdf
Communications
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 6:
Recommendation to be deleted
6. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 1875 to1901 Eglinton Avenue West, 137 Kirknewton Road and 156 Dynevor Road, from Permit Parking.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Dynevor Road |
156 |
|
|
|
|
Eglinton Avenue West |
1875-1901, inclusive |
Odd |
|
|
|
Kirknewton Road |
137 |
|
|
|
TE34.53 - 215 Lake Shore Boulevard East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 215 Lake Shore Boulevard East substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 8 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended by By-law 674-2019(LPAT) and By-law 623-2025, for the lands municipally known as 215 Lake Shore Boulevard East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 9 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council delegate approval and signing authority to the Executive Director, Development Review for agreements related to payments-in-lieu of bicycle parking under the draft Zoning By-law Amendment referred to in Recommendation 2 above in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
4. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to use $552, per short-term bicycle parking space reduced, adjusted for inflation, as the basis upon which payments under the draft Zoning By-law Amendment referred to in Recommendation 2 above be calculated.
5. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to use $1103, per long-term bicycle parking space reduced, adjusted for inflation, as the basis upon which payments under the draft Zoning By-law Amendment referred to in Recommendation 2 above be calculated.
6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
7. City Council require the Owner to enter into an Amending Agreement pursuant to Section 37.1 of the Planning Act and the repealed and transitioned subsections 37(1) and (3) of the Planning Act to reflect the increase in height and density relative to that permitted in Zoning By-law 674-2019(LPAT), as amended, to implement the requirements of the recommended Zoning By-law Amendment referred to in Recommendation 2 above, in addition to the previously secured items, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor, more particularly:
a. the Owner shall design, construct, finish, provide and maintain on the site the greater of 16,078 square metres of residential gross floor area or 8,434 square metres plus seven percent of the total residential gross floor area for Phase 2 as Affordable Rental Housing units for a minimum 25 year period all in accordance with the following terms:
1. the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall comprise the same unit mix as the proposed market residential units in Phase 2;
2. the average unit size of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be no less than the average unit size of all the market units, by unit type within the entire site;
3. the minimum unit size of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be no less than the minimum unit sizes of all market units, by unit type within the entire site;
4. the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be provided in contiguous groups of at least six rental dwelling units;
5. the general configuration, location and layout of the Affordable Rental Housing Units in the development shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
6. tenants of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be provided with access to, and use of all indoor and outdoor amenities in the development at no extra charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
7. all Affordable Rental Housing Units will be provided with ensuite laundry facilities and central air conditioning at no extra charge;
8. tenants of the Affordable Rental Housing Units will be provided with access to permanent and visitor bicycle parking/bicycle lockers in accordance with the Zoning By-law and on the same basis as other residents within the development;
9. the initial rent (inclusive of utilities) charged to the first tenants of and upon turnover of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall not exceed Affordable Rent as defined in the Official Plan for a minimum 25-year period, beginning with the date each such unit is first occupied (the "Affordability Period"); during the Affordability Period, increases to initial rents charged to tenants occupying any of the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be in accordance with the Residential Tenancies Act and shall not exceed the provincial rent guideline, regardless of whether the provincial rent guideline applies to the Affordable Rental Housing Units under the Residential Tenancies Act;
10. the Owner shall provide and maintain the Affordable Rental Housing Units as rental dwelling units at the rents identified in Recommendation 7.a.9. above for the duration of the Affordability Period; the Affordable Rental Housing Units shall not be registered as a condominium or any other form of ownership, such as life lease or co-ownership, which provide a right to exclusive possession of a dwelling unit, and no application for conversion for non-rental housing purposes, or application to demolish any Affordable Rental Housing Unit shall be made for the duration of the Affordability Period; upon the expiration of the Affordability Period, the Owner shall continue to provide and maintain the Affordable Rental Housing Units as rental dwelling units, unless and until such time as the Owner has applied for and obtained all approvals necessary to do otherwise;
11. the Owner will use the City's Centralized Affordable Housing Access System to advertise and select tenants for the Affordable Rental Housing Units, provided it is in place, unless otherwise agreed to by the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat; and at least six months in advance of any Affordable Rental Housing Unit being made available for rent, the owner shall develop and implement an Access Plan which will outline how the Affordable Rental Housing Units will be rented to eligible households in consultation with, and to the satisfaction of, the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat; and
12. the Affordable Rental Housing Units, made up of at least 8,434 square metres and seven percent of the total residential gross floor area of the first residential building containing market units to be constructed, shall be constructed, delivered and made ready for occupancy prior to the issuance of the first Above Grade Building Permit for any residential building, or portion thereof, without any Affordable Rental Housing Units; the remaining Affordable Rental Housing Units shall be constructed, delivered and made ready for occupancy at a commensurate rate to the market units within the Phase 2 development on the site;
b. the Owner shall design, construct and convey to the City a Community Agency Space (the "Community Space") to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, the Executive Director, Social Development and the City Solicitor in accordance with the following terms:
1. the Community Space shall be a minimum of 468 square metres of gross floor area and located on the ground floor of the 70- and 14-storey building abutting Lake Shore Boulevard East;
2. the Owner shall construct and equip the Community Space to Base Building Condition plus fit-out, including but not limited to fixtures and equipment required for full operation, with the terms and specifications to be secured within the Phase-Specific Section 37 Agreement, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Social Development, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the City Solicitor;
3. the Community Space shall be conveyed to the City prior to condominium registration of the 70- and 14-storey building abutting Lake Shore Boulevard East; and
4. the Community Space shall operated in accordance with the City's Community Space Tenancy Policy; and
c. where required, concurrent with or prior to the conveyance of the Community Space to the City, the Owner and the City shall enter into and register on title to the lands, an Easement and Cost Sharing Agreement at no cost to the City, that is in the form satisfactory to the City Solicitor; the Easement and Cost Sharing Agreement shall address and/or provide for the integrated support, use, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and reconstruction of certain shared facilities, and the sharing of costs in respect thereof, of a portion of the lands to be owned by the City and the Owner as they pertain to the Community Agency Space, all to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, the Executive Director, Social Development, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the City Solicitor.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, to permit a multi-tower, mixed use development on the western half (Phase 2) of 215 Lake Shore Boulevard East. The amendments would modify the existing permissions for a mid-rise development from a Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) decision dated October 23, 2018, to allow for a 70- and 14-storey building abutting Lake Shore Boulevard East, and a 60-storey building abutting Chloe Cooley Street. The proposal includes 1,383 residential dwelling units (including approximately 195 affordable housing units), 347 square metres of retail area, 468 square metres of community agency space, and 2,130 square metres of publicly accessible open space.
The proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, and conforms to the City's Official Plan and Central Waterfront Secondary Plan. The proposal represents appropriate intensification within the existing and planned context and delivers a significant amount of on-site affordable rental housing, community agency space, and publicly accessible open space.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288414.pdf
Attachment 9 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289127.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288415.pdf
Communications
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Anna (Yuehua) Chen (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Janet Leung (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Abigail and Clayton Field (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Fangyi Fu (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from May Wong (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from George Pashos (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Kyungmin Kim (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Rajat Malik (TE.Supp)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Chen Hong (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Tanuj Dhaundiyal (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Fangyi Fu (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Shiraz Casseer (TE.New)
Speakers
Motions
TE34.54 - 500 Dundas Street East - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Without Recs
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council forwards the Item to City Council without recommendation.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 35-storey mixed use building (122.2 metres, including mechanical penthouse), containing 413 dwelling units and a minimum of 200 square metres of non-residential gross floor area at 500 Dundas Street East.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288439.pdf
Revised Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289140.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288440.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
Communications
(June 24, 2026) E-mail from Fran Bolton (TE.Supp)
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Susan Dean (TE.Supp)
(June 26, 2026) Letter from Keith Hambly, Chief Executive Officer, Fred Victor (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215569.pdf
(July 2, 2026) E-mail from Boris Antonic (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Remo Agostino, Chief Development Officer, The Daniels Corporation and Yves Cheung, Chief Development Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216993.pdf
(July 8, 2026) Submission from Clay Janzen, Senior Planner, Goldberg Group (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217060.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Chantal Schmidt (TE.New)
Speakers
Vanessa Guillen
Siddhardha Mohan Sakhamuri
Michael Rosenberg
Clay Janzen
Milad Hoorzad
Miguel Avila Velarde
Mark Richardson, HousingNowTO.com
Aiqun Zhang
Motions
That the item be forwarded to City Council without recommendation.
TE34.55 - 47-65 Huntley Street, 2-18, 24, and 26 Linden Street and 1-11 Selby Street - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application File 21 238874 STE 13 RH in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of 29 existing rental dwelling units located at 47 and 65 Huntley Street, 3 and 11 Selby Street, and 2, 8, 12, and 16 Linden Street subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain at least 29 replacement rental dwelling units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement;
b. the replacement rental dwelling units required by Recommendation 1.a. above shall collectively have a total gross floor area of at least 1,973 square metres and be comprised of 3 studio units, 6 one-bedroom units, 8 two-bedroom units and 12 three-bedroom units, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to City Planning dated May 21, 2026; any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
c. the owner shall, as part of the 29 replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above, provide at least 2 studio units, 3 one-bedroom units and 1 two-bedroom rental dwelling unit at affordable rents, defined as gross monthly rent no greater than one times the average City of Toronto rent by unit type, as reported annually by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation and 1 studio unit, 2 one-bedroom units, 6 two-bedroom units and 10 three-bedroom units at mid-range rents, defined as gross monthly rent that exceeds Affordable Rent but is no greater than 1.5 times the average City of Toronto rent by unit type, all for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit; the rents of the remaining 4 replacement rental dwelling units shall be unrestricted;
d. the owner shall provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the 29 existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
e. the owner shall provide tenants of all 29 replacement rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed 58-storey building at no extra charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
f. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry and central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit at no extra charge;
g. the owner shall provide and make available for rent at least one vehicle parking space to tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units that shall be made available firstly to returning tenants who previously rented a vehicle parking space, and at similar monthly parking charges that such tenants previously paid;
h. the owner shall provide tenants of all replacement rental dwelling units with access to bicycle and visitor parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed development;
i. the replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the first building containing residential uses to be developed on the site, exclusive of the replacement rental dwelling units, are made available and ready for occupancy, subject to any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
j. the owner shall enter into, and register on title to the lands, an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 1.a. through 1.i. above all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the demolition of the 29 existing rental dwelling units located at 47 and 65 Huntley Street, 3 and 11 Selby Street, and 2, 8, 12, and 16 Linden Street after all the following have occurred:
a. all conditions in Recommendation 1 above have been fully secured;
b. the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments for Application 21 227527 STE 13 OZ have come into full force and effect;
c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Executive Director, Development Review or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, or as otherwise determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits (conditional or full permit) for the approved development on the site; and
e. the owner has confirmed, in writing, that all existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished are vacant.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate, has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.
4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65 Huntley Street, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 Selby Street and 2, 8, 12, 16, 18, 24, 26 Linden Street after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 pursuant to section 6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:
a. the owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;
b. the owner erects solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
c. the owner erects the proposed building on the site no later than three years from the date that the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units commences, subject to the timeframe being extended at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
d. should the owner fail to complete the proposed building within the time specified in Recommendation 4.c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, as with municipal property taxes, an amount equal to the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such amount shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the Residential Demolition Permit is issued.
5. City Council recommend that the following matters be secured in the Section 111 Agreement specified in Recommendation 1.j. above:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain 639 square metres of dwelling room replacement area from 53 and 55 Huntley Street and 8 Linden Street as 22 replacement rental studio units on the site, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to City Planning dated May 21, 2026, with any revision to these plans being to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental studio unit is first occupied and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement;
b. the owner shall, as part of the 22 replacement rental studio units in Recommendation 5.a. above, provide at least 14 studio units at dwelling room tier 2 affordable rents and 8 studio units at dwelling room tier 1 mid-range rents as currently defined in the Official Plan, all for a period of at least 15 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit;
c. the owner shall provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the 25 rental dwelling rooms proposed to be demolished to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the owner shall provide tenants of all 22 replacement rental studio units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed 58-storey building at no extra charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
e. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry and central air conditioning in each replacement rental studio unit at no extra charge;
f. the owner shall provide tenants of all replacement rental studio units with access to bicycle and visitor parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed development; and
g. the replacement rental studio units required in Recommendation 5.a. above shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the first building containing residential uses to be developed on the site, exclusive of the replacement rental dwelling units, are made available and ready for occupancy, subject to any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
6. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement and any other related agreements.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish and replace 29 rental dwelling units located at 47 and 65 Huntley Street, 3 and 11 Selby Street and 2, 8, 12, and 16 Linden Street. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
The proposed development on the site at 47-65 Huntley Street, 1-11 Selby Street and 2-18 and 24-26 Linden Street is the subject of a related Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application (21 227527 STE 13 OZ) which was appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT). The OLT issued a written decision on May 1, 2024, approving the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment in principle, with the final Order being withheld until all outstanding matters, including the rental housing matters and necessary agreements with the City, are secured.
The OLT approval in principle permits the development of 2 mixed-use buildings with heights of 58 and 63 storeys (the "East" and "West" Towers) containing a total of 1,411 dwelling units, including 51 replacement rental units. The rental replacement units are proposed to be located in the East Tower which will be constructed as the first phase of a two phase development. The 51 replacement rental units consist of 29 rental units proposed to replace the existing 29 rental dwelling units and 22 rental studio units proposed to replace the existing 25 rental dwelling rooms.
This report recommends securing 22 replacement rental studio units and a Tenant Assistance Plan for the 25 rental dwelling rooms proposed for demolition at 53 and 55 Huntley Street and 8 Linden Street.
This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288455.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288476.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215784.pdf
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Shanay Cunningham (TE.Supp)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Catherine Berthiaume (TE.New)
Motions
TE34.56 - 329 to 337 Queen Street East, 135R to 141R and 139 to 141 Berkeley Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 329-335 Queen Street East and 135R-141R and 139-141 Berkeley Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Revised Attachment 7 to the report (June 18, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council direct the City Solicitor to withhold the necessary Bills for enactment until City Council has approved the Rental Housing Demolition Application 25 258492 STE 13 RH under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of 7 existing rental dwelling units at 329, 335, 337 Queen Street East and 135R-141R, 139 and 141 Berkeley Street to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, securing all rental housing-related matters necessary to implement City Council's decision.
4. City Council approve that, in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act, prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, the owner shall convey to the City, an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 143 square metres, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor:
a. in accordance with Chapter 415, Article III of City of Toronto Municipal Code, the remaining Section 42 parkland dedication requirement not fulfilled through the on-site parkland conveyance shall be satisfied through a cash-in-lieu of parkland payment, in an amount to be determined by the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, with such payment to be made prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, all to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review.
5. City Council approve the acceptance of on-site parkland dedication, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition; the owner may propose the exception of encumbrances of tiebacks, where such an encumbrance is deemed acceptable by the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the City Solicitor; and such an encumbrance will be subject to the payment of compensation to the City, in an amount as determined by the Executive Director, Development Review, and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.
6. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
7. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and other relevant staff, to work with the owner to explore the feasibility of an in-kind community benefit package pursuant to Section 37(6) of the Planning Act, that may include the provision of parkland, and to report back to City Council for further instruction on any offer of in-kind community benefits made by the owner.
8. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Berkeley Street |
135R-141R, inclusive |
Odd |
|
|
|
Berkeley Street |
139 -141,inclusive |
Odd |
|
|
|
Queen Street East |
329-337, inclusive |
Odd |
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law, with a holding provision, to permit a 49-storey (162.7 metres, including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building. The proposal contains 545 dwelling units including seven rental replacement units, approximately 350 square metres of non-residential gross floor area on the ground floor, and a new 143 square metre on-site parkland dedication at 329-337 Queen Street East 135R-141R and 139-141 Berkeley Street.
A Rental Housing Demolition Report will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this report. The proposal includes the demolition of seven rental housing units, all of which will be replaced in the new development of the site. A Tenant Assistance Plan is proposed that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
The applicant is proposing to acquire a portion of the public lane that forms part of the subject site to allow for construction of the proposed development. Approval of the permanent closure of the lane will be considered by City Council through a separate process at a future date in accordance with the relevant policies and legislation.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288364.pdf
Revised Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289098.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288365.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
Communications
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 8:
Recommendation to be deleted
8. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 329-337 Queen Street East, 135R-141R, and 139-141 Berkeley Street.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Berkeley Street |
135R-141R, inclusive |
Odd |
|
|
|
Berkeley Street |
139 -141,inclusive |
Odd |
|
|
|
Queen Street East |
329-337, inclusive |
Odd |
|
|
TE34.57 - 329-337 Queen Street East, 135R-141R and 139-141 Berkeley Street - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application File 25 258492 STE 13 RH in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of seven existing rental dwelling units located at 329, 335 and 337 Queen Street East and 135R and 141 Berkeley Street, subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain seven replacement rental dwelling units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement;
b. the replacement rental dwelling units required by Recommendation 1.a. above shall collectively have a total gross floor area of at least 491 square metres and be comprised of 5 one-bedroom units, 1 two-bedroom unit and 1 three-bedroom unit, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to the City dated April 28, 2026; any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
c. the owner shall, as part of the seven replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above, provide at least 1 one-bedroom unit at affordable rent and 2 one-bedroom units and 1 two-bedroom unit at mid-range (moderate) rents, as currently defined in the City's Official Plan, all for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit; the rents of the remaining three replacement rental dwelling units shall be unrestricted;
d. the owner shall provide a Tenant Assistance Plan for tenants of the seven existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
e. the owner shall provide tenants of all seven replacement rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed 49-storey building at no extra charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
f. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry and central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit at no extra charge;
g. the owner shall provide tenants of all replacement rental dwelling units with access to bicycle and visitor parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed development;
h. the replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the proposed development, exclusive of the replacement rental dwelling units, are made available and ready for occupancy, subject to any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
i. the owner shall enter into, and register on title to the lands, an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 1.a. through 1.h. above all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the demolition of the 7 existing rental dwelling units located at 329, 335 and 337 Queen Street East and 135R and 141 Berkeley Street after all the following have occurred:
a. all conditions in Recommendation 1 above have been fully secured;
b. the Zoning By-law Amendment for Application 25 258479 STE 13 OZ has come into full force and effect;
c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Executive Director, Development Review or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, or as otherwise determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits (conditional or full permit) for the approved development on the site; and
e. the owner has confirmed, in writing, that all existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished are vacant.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate, has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.
4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 329-337 Queen Street East and 135R and 139-141 Berkeley Street after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 pursuant to section 6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:
a. the owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;
b. the owner erects solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
c. the owner erects the proposed building on the site no later than three years from the date that the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units commences, subject to the timeframe being extended at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
d. should the owner fail to complete the proposed building within the time specified in Recommendation 4.c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, as with municipal property taxes, an amount equal to the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such amount shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the Residential Demolition Permit is issued.
5. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement and any other related agreements.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 7 rental dwelling units located at 329-337 Queen Street East, 135R-141R and 139-141 Berkeley Street. The 7 rental units are proposed to be replaced as part of the new development on the site. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
The proposed development on the site at 329-337 Queen Street East, 135R-141R and 139-141 Berkeley Street is the subject of a related Zoning By-law Amendment application (25 258479 STE 13 OZ). The proposed development would permit a 49-storey mixed-use building with 545 dwelling units, including 7 replacement rental units. The proposal includes 350 square metres of non-residential gross floor area and a minimum 143 square metre on-site parkland dedication. An approval report for the Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.
This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288061.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288062.pdf
Communications
Motions
TE34.58 - 238-280 Wellesley Street East and 650 Parliament Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 238-280 Wellesley Street East and 650 Parliament Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council accept the owner's offer of an In-kind Contribution in Attachment 10 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, pursuant to subsection 37(6) of the Planning Act and allow the owner to provide a minimum of 464.5-square-metre community agency space to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, and the Executive Director, Social Development, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the City Solicitor (the “In-kind Contribution”), and in accordance with the following terms:
a. the community agency space shall be delivered to the City in accordance with the City's Community Space Tenancy Policy and finished to a complete "turnkey" state as per the Community Space Term Sheet and its Base Building Conditions, with the terms and specifications to be secured in the In-kind Contribution Agreement.
4. City Council attribute a value to the In-kind Contribution set out in Recommendation 3 above, equal to 75 percent of four percent of the value of the land (net of any exclusions or exemptions authorized under the Community Benefits Charge By-law), as determined the day before the day the first building permit is issued in respect of the development.
5. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Development Review to enter into an Agreement pursuant to subsection 37(7.1) of the Planning Act (the "In-kind Contribution Agreement") to address the provision of the In-kind Contribution identified in Recommendation 3 above to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the Executive Director, Social Development, and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
6. City Council determine that the execution and registration of the In-kind Contribution Agreement constitute satisfactory arrangements for the provision of the In-kind Contribution for the purpose of Applicable Law as defined in the Building Code.
7. City Council approve that in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, the owner shall convey to the City, an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 1,894 square metres, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, and the City Solicitor.
8. City Council approve that, in accordance with Chapter 415, Article III of City of Toronto Municipal Code, the remaining Section 42 parkland dedication requirement not fulfilled through the on-site parkland conveyance shall be satisfied through a cash-in-lieu of parkland payment, in an amount to be determined by the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, with such payment to be made prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, all to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review.
9. City Council approve the acceptance of on-site parkland dedication, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition.
10. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
11. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review, to request the owner to develop a Construction Mitigation and Tenant Communication Plan to mitigate the impacts of construction of the development on tenants of the existing rental apartment buildings prior to Site Plan Approval.
12. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review, to request the owner to undertake, through the Site Plan Control process, improvements to the existing rental apartment buildings, at its sole expense and at no cost to tenants, at 238-240, 260 and 280 Wellesley Street East and 650 Parliament Street, as follows:
a. accessible door improvements to lobby at 650 Parliament Street;
b. laundry room lounge upgrades within 238-240 Wellesley Street East, 260 Wellesley Street East, 280 Wellesley Street East and 650 Parliament Street;
c. new indoor amenity space proposed as a party room within 650 Parliament Street;
d. new ground floor indoor amenity space within the proposed Building B1 with programming to be determined in the future and to be accessible to all current residents of the existing rental dwelling units;
e. new private outdoor amenity spaces for each of the existing buildings at 238-240 Wellesley Street East, 260 Wellesley Street East, 280 Wellesley Street East and 650 Parliament Street;
f. enclosure and consolidation of waste and recycling facilities for the existing buildings at 238-240 Wellesley Street East, 260 Wellesley Street East, 280 Wellesley Street East and 650 Parliament Street;
g. new secured bicycle parking for the existing buildings at 238-240 Wellesley Street East, 260 Wellesley Street East, 280 Wellesley Street East and 650 Parliament Street; and
h. new ground level terraces for ground floor units at 280 Wellesley Street East and 650 Parliament Street.
13. City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Parliament Street |
650 |
Even |
|
|
|
Wellesley Street East |
238-280, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit an infill development consisting of a 58-storey (193.0 metres, including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building, a 9-storey (40.5 metres, including mechanical penthouse) residential building, and a 21-storey (74.0 metres, including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building, containing a total of 1,115 new dwelling units and 3,164.5 square metres of new non-residential space, including 464.5 square metres of community space, at 238-280 Wellesley Street East and 650 Parliament Street. The proposal includes the extension of Rose Avenue as a public street from Wellesley Street East to the south side of 77 Howard Street and a new 1,894 square metre public park.
The existing four rental apartment buildings on the site containing a total of 2,251 rental dwelling units will be maintained.
A related Rental Housing Demolition application has also been submitted as the proposal includes the demolition of 4 rental dwelling units. A decision on the Rental Housing Demolition application is delegated to the Chief Planner or their designate, as fewer than six rental units are proposed to be demolished.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288437.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289126.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288438.pdf
Communications
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Raied Ghanam (TE.Supp)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Mike Dror, Bousfields Inc.
Bahia B. Marks
Walied Khogali Ali
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 13:
Recommendation to be deleted
13. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 238-280 Wellesley Street East and 650 Parliament Street.
and adopt the following new recommendation instead:
City Council amend Schedule D of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to, or tradepersons at the developments listed below:
|
Development Application Street Name |
Development Application Street Number Range |
Odd/Even |
Also Known As |
Permit Location Details |
|
Parliament Street |
650 |
Even |
|
|
|
Wellesley Street East |
238-280, inclusive |
Even |
|
|
TE34.59 - 1450 and 1500 O'Connor Drive Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known as 1450 and 1500 O'Connor Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands municipally known as 1450 and 1500 O'Connor Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 7 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. City Council classify the lands municipally known as 1450 and 1500 O'Connor Drive as a Class 4 Noise Area pursuant to Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks Environmental Noise Guidelines - Stationary and Transportation Sources - Approval and Planning Publication NPC-300, August 2013.
5. City Council forward a copy of the Item to the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks.
6. In accordance with the delegated approval under Section 415-16 of the Toronto Municipal Code, as amended, City Council be advised that the Executive Director, Development Review intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision for 1450 and 1500 O'Connor Drive as generally illustrated in Attachment 11 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to:
a. draft approval conditions as generally listed in Attachment 8 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Toronto and East York District which, except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to final approval and the release of the Plan of Subdivision for registration;
b. resolution of outstanding matters arising from the technical review of the application, as set out in the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to the satisfaction of the City; and
c. any revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any additional modified conditions as the Executive Director, Development Review may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.
7. City Council approve that, in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act, prior to the issuance to the first above grade building permit, the owner shall convey to the City an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 1,155 square metres, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor.
8. City Council approve the acceptance of on-site parkland dedication, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances, and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; the owner may propose the exception of encumbrances of tie-backs, where such an encumbrance is deemed acceptable by the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the City Solicitor; and such an encumbrance will be subject to the payment of compensation to the City, in an amount as determined by the Executive Director, Development Review and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.
9. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 8, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit the construction of three mixed use and one residential building with heights ranging from 14 to 28 storeys. The proposed development includes a new public street, a new public park along O'Connor Drive and two publicly accessible open spaces.
The proposed development would provide 863 residential dwelling units and a total gross floor area (GFA) of approximately 71,500 square metres including a minimum of 2,260 square metres of non-residential space. The non-residential space includes a daycare provided in Building D and retail/commercial uses on the ground floor of Buildings A, B and D. There are 513 vehicle parking spaces proposed in three underground levels and 966 bicycle parking spaces at the ground and mezzanine floors.
This report recommends that City Council classify the lands at 1450 and 1500 O'Connor Drive as a Class 4 Noise Area under NPC-300 noise guidelines administered by the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP). This report also advises that the Executive Director, Development Review, acting under delegated authority, intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision necessary to advance the comprehensive development of the site.
The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan. The Draft Plan of Subdivision application has regard for the criteria in Section 51(24) of the Planning Act.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288446.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288504.pdf
Attachment 8 - Draft Plan of Subdivision Conditions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288509.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288447.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215576.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Phillip Moshonas (TE.New)
Motions
TE34.60 - 324 Cherry Street and 429 and 455 Lake Shore Boulevard East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands municipally known 324 Cherry Street and 429 and 455 Lake Shore Boulevard East substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended by By-law 1174-2010 (OMB), for the lands municipally known as 324 Cherry Street and 429 and 455 Lake Shore Boulevard East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 7 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council delegate approval and signing authority to the Executive Director, Development Review for agreements related to payments-in-lieu of bicycle parking under the draft Zoning By-law Amendment referred to in Recommendation 2 above in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
4. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to use $552, per short-term bicycle parking space reduced, adjusted for inflation, as the basis upon which payments under the draft Zoning By-law Amendment referred to in Recommendation 2 above be calculated.
5. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to use $1103, per long-term bicycle parking space reduced, adjusted for inflation, as the basis upon which payments under the draft Zoning By-law Amendment referred to in Recommendation 2 above be calculated.
6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
7. City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37.1 of the Planning Act and the repealed and transitioned subsections 37(1) and (3) of the Planning Act to reflect the increase in market residential gross floor area, in addition to the previously secured items, to implement the requirements of the recommended Zoning By-law Amendment to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review and the City Solicitor.
8. City Council approve that in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act, the Owner shall convey to the City, an on-site parkland dedication having a minimum size of 2,840 square metres (Block 6) and an on-site parkland dedication having a minimum size of 1,491 square metres (Block 5) to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Development Review, in accordance with the conveyance terms and timing for the park blocks secured as part of the Ontario Land Tribunal Settlement for the associated Draft Plan of Subdivision.
9. Prior to the enactment of Bills, City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review to obtain the joint approval of the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing and the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry pursuant to the Natural Hazards policies of the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, and the Protocol for the Lower Don Special Policy Area as it applies to Priority Projects.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on July 9, 2026 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit the intensification of a previously approved four block Master Plan. The application proposes 14 mixed-use buildings, including ten (10) towers ranging in height from 28-storeys to 53-storeys, with a proposed total gross floor area ("GFA") of 325,000 square metres (9.31 FSI for the net site area). Of this total, approximately 308,750 square metres will be residential GFA, and 16,250 square metres will be designated for non-residential uses.
Full site buildout is planned with a total of 4,969 new dwelling units, community benefits including affordable housing and a childcare centre in the first phase; and an enhanced parks and open spaces network. The application also revises the local street network with the removal of the planned Promenade Road, allowing for an enhanced water’s edge promenade, and re-aligns the private lane on the southwest block.
The Zoning By-law amendment included in this application primarily allots densities and addresses land use mix and development performance standards for the first phase of the Master Plan, four towers on the northwest block. The Draft Zoning By-law amendment schedules also reflect changes consistent with the corresponding Official Plan Amendment removing Promenade Road and re-aligning the private lane on the southwest block, as well as updating performance standards and permitting meanwhile uses site-wide. A revised Draft Plan of Subdivision will be required through a future application at 324 Cherry Street and 429 and 455 Lake Shore Boulevard East to implement these changes to the site layout.
The proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan, including the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288492.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Official Plan Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288523.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289287.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288493.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215663.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Motions
TE34.61 - 120 Eglinton Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Refusal
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council refuse the application for the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment (Application 25 151892 STE 12 OZ) for the lands municipally known as 120 Eglinton Avenue East for the reasons identified in the report (June 11, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. In the event that the application is appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal, City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current applications regarding the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment appeals for the lands at 120 Eglinton Avenue East and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other appropriate City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council’s decision, including requesting any conditions of approval that would be in the City’s interest, in the event an appeal of City Council’s decision is allowed by the Ontario Land Tribunal, in whole or in part.
Origin
Summary
This Report recommends refusal of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 70-storey (219-metre, excluding mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building, with a residential gross floor area of 32,625 square metres, 555 dwelling units, and 187 metres of non-residential gross floor area at 120 Eglinton Avenue East. The application does not propose to replace the existing 5,475 square metres of office space.
An Official Plan Amendment is required because the project does not meet the mandatory 100 per cent replacement of existing office gross floor area on the site, as no office replacement is proposed.
The proposal does not conform with the Official Plan and does not have appropriate regard for policies within the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287914.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217047.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Motions
TE34.62 - 4 Gilead Place - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Application - Decision Report - Refusal
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council refuse the application for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment (Application 26 141014 STE 13 OZ) for the lands municipally known as 4 Gilead Place for the reasons identified in the report (June 12, 2026) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff, to appear before the Ontario Land Tribunal in support of City Council’s decision to refuse the application, in the event that the decision is appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other appropriate City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision, including requesting any conditions of approval that would be in the City's interest, in the event an appeal of City Council's decision is allowed by the Ontario Land Tribunal, in whole or in part.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends refusal of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 20-storey (80.5 metres, including mechanical penthouse) residential building containing 297 residential dwelling units at 4 Gilead Place.
An Official Plan Amendment is required to permit a tall building on the site and to allow for a reduction in the provision of two- and three-bedroom units in the building.
The proposed development does not fit the existing or planned context of the site and surrounding area. The application has not demonstrated that the site can appropriately accommodate the proposed form of development. The proposed building massing, including setbacks and stepbacks, together with the proposed building height, are not acceptable given the site's size, configuration, and location, and do not achieve the intent of the planning framework applicable to the site.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287953.pdf
Communications
(June 29, 2026) E-mail from Elliott Jacobson (TE.Supp)
(June 30, 2026) E-mail from Catherine Bray (TE.Supp)
(June 30, 2026) E-mail from Lorraine Dong and Pawel Terek (TE.Supp)
(July 2, 2026) Letter from Coralina Lemos (TE.Supp)
(July 5, 2026) E-mail from Brianne Simionati and Neil Simons (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Vincent Champenois (TE.Supp)
(July 6, 2026) E-mail from Maurizio Laudisa (TE.Supp)
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Frances Latchford and Kym Bird (TE.Supp)
(July 8, 2026) Letter from Will de la Guardia, More Neighbours Toronto (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215920.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Motions
TE34.63 - 445 to 451 Adelaide Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment - Appeal Report
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment Application appeal for the lands municipally known as 445 to 451 Adelaide Street West and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision, including requesting any conditions of approval that would be in the City's interest, in the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part.
Origin
Summary
On May 2, 2025, a Zoning By-law Amendment application was submitted seeking permission for a 17-storey non-residential building containing 144 hotel suites at 445 to 451 Adelaide Street West. The proposal seeks the complete demolition of the existing four heritage properties on site including 445, 447, 449, and 451 Adelaide Street West.
On May 15, 2026, the applicant appealed the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal ("OLT") due to Council not making a decision on the application within the timeframe prescribed by the Planning Act.
This report recommends that the City Solicitor with the appropriate City Staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve any outstanding issues.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288368.pdf
Communications
Motions
TE34.64 - 262-266 St. George Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Appeal Report
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application appeal for the lands municipally known as 262, 264 and 266 St. George Street and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision, including requesting any conditions of approval that would be in the City's interest, in the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part.
Origin
Summary
On January 9, 2025, an application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law was submitted and deemed complete on June 16, 2025, satisfying the City's minimum application requirements. A revised application reflective of an increase in height and density was submitted to the City on December 19, 2025.
The revised application is for an Official Plan Amendment which proposes to redesignate the lands from Neighbourhoods to Apartment Neighbourhoods, and a Zoning By-law Amendment which proposes an 18-storey (61 metres excluding the mechanical penthouse) residential building, containing 121 residential dwelling units, of which 14 are replacement rental units. The application proposes the demolition of 40 dwelling rooms and three rental dwelling units.
On April 24, 2026, the applicant appealed the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the time frame stipulated in the Planning Act.
This Report recommends that the City Solicitor with the appropriate City Staff attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing to oppose the application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve any outstanding issues.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287726.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215923.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Motions
TE34.65 - 2345 Yonge Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Appeal Report
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment Application appeal for the lands municipally known as 2345 Yonge Street and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision, including requesting any conditions of approval that would be in the City's interest, in the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal, in whole or in part.
Origin
Summary
On October 1, 2021, an application to amend the Zoning By-law was submitted and deemed complete upon submission, satisfying the City's minimum application requirements. The application proposes two mixed-use towers with heights of 179.5 metres and 173.5 metres (56 and 54 storeys respectively, excluding the mechanical penthouses) upon a 10-storey base building.
On April 9, 2026, the applicant appealed the Zoning By-law Amend Application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (“OLT”) due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the time frame in the Planning Act.
This Report recommends that the City Solicitor with the appropriate City Staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve any outstanding issues.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287693.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215925.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Motions
TE34.66 - 3044 Dundas Street West - Inclusion on the Heritage Register
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council include 3044 Dundas Street West (including entrance addresses at 3046 and 3048 Dundas Street West) on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) attached as Attachment 1 to the report (May 15, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council include 3044 Dundas Street West (including entrance addresses at 3046 and 3048 Dundas Street West) on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register for its cultural heritage value and interest according to the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) found in Attachment 1.
The subject property at 3044 Dundas Street West is located in the Junction area of Toronto at the northwest comer of Dundas Street West and McMurray Avenue. The circa 1908 commercial Main Street type red-brick building is architecturally notable for its Romanesque Revival-style architecture, and ground-level storefronts. The building also contributes contextually to the Dundas streetscape and sense of place reflecting the early development history of the West Toronto Junction area and Dundas Street West adjacent to the railway corridor.
The property recommended for inclusion on the City’s Heritage Register has been researched and evaluated by staff using the criteria prescribed in Ontario Regulation 9/06 and meets one or more of the provincial criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest and is believed to be of cultural heritage value or interest.
The subject property is located within West Toronto Junction Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Study area. City Planning and a project team, led by EVOQ Architecture are currently undertaking the HCD Study. The findings of the HCD Study will be shared at a community consultation on June 17, 2026.
On January 1, 2023, amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (the Act) through the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill 23) came into effect. Under the Act, as amended, a municipal heritage register may include properties that have not been designated but Council believes to be of “cultural heritage value or interest", and that meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining whether they are of cultural heritage value or interest. The Act now also limits listing to a period of two years.
As of January 1, 2023, should a property be subject to an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, properties must be listed on the heritage register prior to Part IV designation and before the occurrence of a prescribed event. A prescribed event is a point of time when the application for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application has been deemed complete and the City Clerk provides notice of that complete application to the public in accordance with the Planning Act.
The listing of non-designated properties on the municipal heritage register under the Act also extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Act should a development or demolition application be submitted.
Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed properties.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287512.pdf
Communications
Motions
66a - 3044 Dundas Street West - Inclusion on the Heritage Register
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on June 8, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB45.4 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (May 15, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council include 3044 Dundas Street West (including entrance addresses at 3046 and 3048 Dundas Street West) on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register for its cultural heritage value and interest according to the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) found in Attachment 1.
The subject property at 3044 Dundas Street West is located in the Junction area of Toronto at the northwest comer of Dundas Street West and McMurray Avenue. The circa 1908 commercial Main Street type red-brick building is architecturally notable for its Romanesque Revival-style architecture, and ground-level storefronts. The building also contributes contextually to the Dundas streetscape and sense of place reflecting the early development history of the West Toronto Junction area and Dundas Street West adjacent to the railway corridor.
The property recommended for inclusion on the City’s Heritage Register has been researched and evaluated by staff using the criteria prescribed in Ontario Regulation 9/06 and meets one or more of the provincial criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest and is believed to be of cultural heritage value or interest.
The subject property is located within West Toronto Junction Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Study area. City Planning and a project team, led by EVOQ Architecture are currently undertaking the HCD Study. The findings of the HCD Study will be shared at a community consultation on June 17, 2026.
On January 1, 2023, amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (the Act) through the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill 23) came into effect. Under the Act, as amended, a municipal heritage register may include properties that have not been designated but Council believes to be of “cultural heritage value or interest", and that meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining whether they are of cultural heritage value or interest. The Act now also limits listing to a period of two years.
As of January 1, 2023, should a property be subject to an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, properties must be listed on the heritage register prior to Part IV designation and before the occurrence of a prescribed event. A prescribed event is a point of time when the application for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application has been deemed complete and the City Clerk provides notice of that complete application to the public in accordance with the Planning Act.
The listing of non-designated properties on the municipal heritage register under the Act also extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Act should a development or demolition application be submitted.
Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed properties.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287860.pdf
TE34.67 - 72 Henry Street, 258 Wallace Avenue, and 80 Ward Street - Inclusion on the Heritage Register
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- 9 - Davenport, 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council include 72 Henry Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) attached as Attachment 1 to the report (June 15, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.
2. City Council include 258 Wallace Avenue on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) attached as Attachment 2 to the report (June 15, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.
3. City Council include 80 Ward Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (June 15, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council include 72 Henry Street, 258 Wallace Avenue, and 80 Ward Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register for their cultural heritage value and interest according to the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) found in Attachments 1, 2, and 3.
The subject property at 72 Henry Street is located on the west side of Henry Street between College Street and Cecil Street in the Kensington-Chinatown neighbourhood. The property contains a 2-1/2-storey detached house-form building constructed between 1886 and 1887. A location map and current photograph of the property are found in Attachment 1.
72 Henry Street is immediately south of the property at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street, which is subject to an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 45-storey (158 metre, excluding mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building, containing 684 residential units (545 affordable rental units) and 1,931 square metres of grade-related retail space. The owner of 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street has recently acquired 72 Henry Street.
Separate Report from the Acting Director, Community Planning, on the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this Report.
The subject property at 258 Wallace Avenue (including entrance address 258A Wallace Avenue) is located on the north side of Wallace Avenue between Campbell Avenue and Ward Street, west of, and immediately adjacent to Metrolinx and the Canadian National Railway corridor, in the Junction-Wallace Emerson neighbourhood. The property contains a 2-storey, red-brick, manufacturing warehouse-type building constructed in 1920. A location map and current photograph of the property are found in Attachment 2.
The subject property at 80 Ward Street is located on the west side of Ward Street between Wallace and Lappin Avenues, east of, and immediately adjacent to the Metrolinx and Canadian National Railway corridor. The property contains a 2-storey, buff-brick, manufacturing and office-type building constructed in 1947. A location map and current photograph of the property are found in Attachment 3.
258 Wallace Street and 80 Ward Street are a part of an Official Plan Amendment Application to redesignate the site from Core Employment Areas to Mixed Use Areas. The application was submitted on May 25, 2026, and for which ERA Architects produced a “Conservation Design Parameters: Wallace & Ward, Toronto” report dated November 22, 2022.
The properties recommended for inclusion on the City’s Heritage Register have been researched and evaluated by staff using the criteria prescribed in Ontario Regulation 9/06 and meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest and are believed to be of cultural heritage value or interest.
On January 1, 2023, amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (the Act) through the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill 23) came into effect. Under the Act, as amended, a municipal heritage register may include properties that have not been designated but Council believes to be of “cultural heritage value or interest", and that meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining whether they are of cultural heritage value or interest. The Act now also limits listing to a period of two years.
As of January 1, 2023, should a property be subject to an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, properties must be listed on the heritage register prior to Part IV designation and before the occurrence of a prescribed event. A prescribed event is a point of time when the application for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application has been deemed complete and the City Clerk provides notice of that complete application to the public in accordance with the Planning Act.
The listing of non-designated properties on the municipal heritage register under the Act also extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Act should a development or demolition application be submitted.
Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed properties.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288148.pdf
Communications
Motions
67a - 72 Henry Street, 258 Wallace Avenue, and 80 Ward Street - Inclusion on the Heritage Register
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on July 6, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB46.8 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (June 15, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council include 72 Henry Street, 258 Wallace Avenue, and 80 Ward Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register for their cultural heritage value and interest according to the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) found in Attachments 1, 2, and 3.
The subject property at 72 Henry Street is located on the west side of Henry Street between College Street and Cecil Street in the Kensington-Chinatown neighbourhood. The property contains a 2-1/2-storey detached house-form building constructed between 1886 and 1887. A location map and current photograph of the property are found in Attachment 1.
72 Henry Street is immediately south of the property at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street, which is subject to an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a 45-storey (158 metre, excluding mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building, containing 684 residential units (545 affordable rental units) and 1,931 square metres of grade-related retail space. The owner of 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street has recently acquired 72 Henry Street.
Separate Report from the Acting Director, Community Planning, on the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this Report.
The subject property at 258 Wallace Avenue (including entrance address 258A Wallace Avenue) is located on the north side of Wallace Avenue between Campbell Avenue and Ward Street, west of, and immediately adjacent to Metrolinx and the Canadian National Railway corridor, in the Junction-Wallace Emerson neighbourhood. The property contains a 2-storey, red-brick, manufacturing warehouse-type building constructed in 1920. A location map and current photograph of the property are found in Attachment 2.
The subject property at 80 Ward Street is located on the west side of Ward Street between Wallace and Lappin Avenues, east of, and immediately adjacent to the Metrolinx and Canadian National Railway corridor. The property contains a 2-storey, buff-brick, manufacturing and office-type building constructed in 1947. A location map and current photograph of the property are found in Attachment 3.
258 Wallace Street and 80 Ward Street are a part of an Official Plan Amendment Application to redesignate the site from Core Employment Areas to Mixed Use Areas. The application was submitted on May 25, 2026, and for which ERA Architects produced a “Conservation Design Parameters: Wallace & Ward, Toronto” report dated November 22, 2022.
The properties recommended for inclusion on the City’s Heritage Register have been researched and evaluated by staff using the criteria prescribed in Ontario Regulation 9/06 and meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest and are believed to be of cultural heritage value or interest.
On January 1, 2023, amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (the Act) through the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill 23) came into effect. Under the Act, as amended, a municipal heritage register may include properties that have not been designated but Council believes to be of “cultural heritage value or interest", and that meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining whether they are of cultural heritage value or interest. The Act now also limits listing to a period of two years.
As of January 1, 2023, should a property be subject to an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, properties must be listed on the heritage register prior to Part IV designation and before the occurrence of a prescribed event. A prescribed event is a point of time when the application for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning
By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application has been deemed complete and the City Clerk provides notice of that complete application to the public in accordance with the Planning Act.
The listing of non-designated properties on the municipal heritage register under the Act also extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Act should a development or demolition application be submitted.
Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed properties.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289234.pdf
TE34.68 - 468-470 Queen Street West- Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act- Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the demolition of the building at 468-470 Queen Street West, which is a non-contributing property in the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District, in accordance with subsections 42(1) 4 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the demolition of the building at 468-470 Queen Street West. This is on a non-contributing property located within the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District. Demolition of the existing building is proposed to facilitate a new public park at the corner of Queen Street West and Augusta Avenue.
Heritage Planning staff support this application which complies with the provisions of the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District Plan.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288238.pdf
Communications
Motions
68a - 468-470 Queen Street West- Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act-Approval
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on July 6, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB46.16 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (June 15, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve the demolition of the building at 468-470 Queen Street West. This is on a non-contributing property located within the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District. Demolition of the existing building is proposed to facilitate a new public park at the corner of Queen Street West and Augusta Avenue.
Heritage Planning staff support this application which complies with the provisions of the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District Plan.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289323.pdf
TE34.69 - 162 Douglas Drive - Application to Demolish a Structure and Erect a New Structure in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the application to demolish the existing detached garage and construct a new 1.5-storey garden suite at 162 Douglas Drive, a property within the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District, in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, subject to the following:
a. City Council approve the replacement structure for 162 Douglas Drive as shown in the plans and drawings submitted by the applicant and prepared by House Lab Inc, dated May 2026, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, and that the new structure be constructed substantially in accordance with the submitted plans.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the application to demolish an existing detached garage and construct a new 1.5-storey garden suite at the rear of the property known as 162 Douglas Drive under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The subject site is a "C-rated" property located in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD).
Heritage Planning staff are of the opinion that the proposal complies with the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan. As such, it is recommended that the application be approved.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287510.pdf
Communications
Motions
69a - 162 Douglas Drive - Application to Demolish a Structure and Erect a New Structure in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on June 8, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB45.8 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (May 15, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve the application to demolish an existing detached garage and construct a new 1.5-storey garden suite at the rear of the property known as 162 Douglas Drive under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The subject site is a "C-rated" property located in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD).
Heritage Planning staff are of the opinion that the proposal complies with the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan. As such, it is recommended that the application be approved.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287881.pdf
TE34.70 - 8 Robert Street- Alterations to a Designated Property under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act- Approval
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 8 Robert Street, in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated April 7, 2026, prepared by Yimby Studio and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and the Heritage Impact Assessment, prepared by GBCA, dated May 29, 2026, on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, subject to the following:
a. the Owner shall:
1. provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 8 Robert Street prepared by GBCA, dated May 29, 2026, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
2. provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the property at 8 Robert Street, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such a Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
3. provide an Interpretation Plan for the property at 8 Robert Street, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
b. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 8 Robert Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual of minor works for the property as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall:
1. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.1. above including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
2. provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan; and
c. prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.b.2. above, the owner shall:
1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve alterations to the heritage property at 8 Robert Street under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act in connection with the construction of a two-storey roof addition (with mechanical penthouse) to allow the conversion of this former chapel building into a four-unit residential building. The alterations include removal of most of the roof, conservation of all four elevations and the solid wood entrance door at the front, restoration of the six original stained-glass windows, and exterior paint removal.
The subject property is located on the west side of Robert Street, north of College Street, and at the southern edge of the Harbord Village Phase II Heritage Conservation District (HVPIIHCD). It contains the one-storey former Christian Workers' Church which was constructed in 1915 and is currently vacant. 8 Robert Street is one of only two contributing non-residential properties in the HVPIIHCD.
The HVPIIHCD Plan notes that the value of this HCD "lies in the large number of original Victorian buildings with the majority of their heritage attributes present or capable of being restored" and it is the "consistency" in the character of the houses that make the area unique. The proposed two-storey roof addition does not to conform with the guidelines in the HVPIIHCD Plan which states that additions should be located at the rear of properties and should be lower than the ridge of the existing roof. Staff are however supportive of the proposed addition which is set back 0.6-1.2 metres behind the front gable to give visual prominence of the front gable from the public realm. The subject property is a non-residential, one-storey church-form building at the southern edge of the HCD and the proposed roof addition would not disrupt the consistent 2.5-3-storey character of the houses that characterise the district. It also meets the general intent of the HVPIIHCD Plan to conserve the heritage fabric of the area.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288145.pdf
Communications
Motions
70a - 8 Robert Street- Alterations to a Designated Property under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act- Approval
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on July 6, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB46.9 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (June 15, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve alterations to the heritage property at 8 Robert Street under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act in connection with the construction of a two-storey roof addition (with mechanical penthouse) to allow the conversion of this former chapel building into a four-unit residential building. The alterations include removal of most of the roof, conservation of all four elevations and the solid wood entrance door at the front, restoration of the six original stained-glass windows, and exterior paint removal.
The subject property is located on the west side of Robert Street, north of College Street, and at the southern edge of the Harbord Village Phase II Heritage Conservation District (HVPIIHCD). It contains the one-storey former Christian Workers' Church which was constructed in 1915 and is currently vacant. 8 Robert Street is one of only two contributing non-residential properties in the HVPIIHCD.
The HVPIIHCD Plan notes that the value of this HCD "lies in the large number of original Victorian buildings with the majority of their heritage attributes present or capable of being restored" and it is the "consistency" in the character of the houses that make the area unique.
The proposed two-storey roof addition does not to conform with the guidelines in the HVPIIHCD Plan which states that additions should be located at the rear of properties and should be lower than the ridge of the existing roof. Staff are however supportive of the proposed addition which is set back 0.6-1.2 metres behind the front gable to give visual prominence of the front gable from the public realm. The subject property is a non-residential, one-storey church-form building at the southern edge of the HCD and the proposed roof addition would not disrupt the consistent 2.5-3-storey character of the houses that characterise the district. It also meets the general intent of the HVPIIHCD Plan to conserve the heritage fabric of the area.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289294.pdf
TE34.71 - 79 Whitehall Road - Application to Demolish a Structure and Erect a New Structure in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the application to demolish the existing detached garage and construct a detached carport at 79 Whitehall Road, a property within the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District, in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, subject to the following:
a. City Council approve the replacement structure for 79 Whitehall Road as shown in the plans and drawings submitted by the applicant and prepared by Christopher Walker Architect, dated April 27, 2026, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, and that the new structure be constructed substantially in accordance with the submitted plans.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the application to demolish an existing detached garage and construct a new detached carport at the rear of the property known as 79 Whitehall Road under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The subject site is a "C-rated" property located in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD).
Heritage Planning staff are of the opinion that the proposal complies with the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan. As such, it is recommended that the application be approved.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287499.pdf
Communications
Motions
71a - 79 Whitehall Road - Application to Demolish a Structure and Erect a New Structure in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on June 8, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB45.7 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (May 15, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve the application to demolish an existing detached garage and construct a new detached carport at the rear of the property known as 79 Whitehall Road under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The subject site is a "C-rated" property located in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD).
Heritage Planning staff are of the opinion that the proposal complies with the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan. As such, it is recommended that the application be approved.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287882.pdf
TE34.72 - Authorization to Study the Yorkville Village Core as a Potential Heritage Conservation District
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize that a study be undertaken of the Yorkville Village Core Area as a potential Heritage Conservation District under Section 40(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act, as indicated by the boundary in Attachment 1 to the report (June 16, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council authorize the study of the Yorkville Village Core area as a potential Heritage Conservation District (HCD) under Section 40(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The proposed Yorkville Village Core HCD Study Area, indicated by the boundary in Attachment 1 of this report, was recommended for study in the Bloor-Yorkville Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment (December 2025) prepared by Common Bond Collective, a heritage consultant. At their April 22, 23, 24, 2026 meeting, City Council directed the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to undertake all necessary steps, including community consultation, to determine whether the Yorkville Village Core, or a part thereof, merits authorization for study as a potential Heritage Conservation District under Section 40(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Following review of the area as directed, staff are of the opinion that the proposed Yorkville Village Core HCD Study Area has a distinctive character that reflects its historical development from a residential area in the 19th century Village of Yorkville to an important locus of cultural expression and innovation in the mid-20th century, into a renowned, vibrant commercial, social, and cultural destination in the City of Toronto today. The proposed study area is characterized by historic house-form buildings from the late-19th-century and early-20th-century that have been adaptively re-used as commercial buildings. The historic house-form buildings are interspersed with mid-20th century developments in the form of Yorkville Complexes and infill developments which generally reinforce the historic residential neighbourhood scale of the area and contribute a network of mid-block pedestrian "laneways" that are an important feature of its village character. The area is further defined by the award-winning Village of Yorkville Park.
Following staff review and a required community consultation public meeting, it has been determined that the proposed Yorkville Village Core HCD Study Area merits authorization for study as a potential Heritage Conservation District.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288242.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215842.pdf
(July 6, 2026) Letter from John Caliendo and Ian Carmichael, Co-Chairs and Mary Helen Spence, Director, The ABC Residents Association, Alan Baker, President and Paul Bedford, Director Community Planning, The Greater Yorkville Residents Association and Linda Brett, Chair, The Bloor East Neighbourhood Association (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216953.pdf
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Gian Pileri (TE.Supp)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Motions
72a - Authorization to Study the Yorkville Village Core as a Potential Heritage Conservation District
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on July 6, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB46.17 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (June 16, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council authorize the study of the Yorkville Village Core area as a potential Heritage Conservation District (HCD) under Section 40(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The proposed Yorkville Village Core HCD Study Area, indicated by the boundary in Attachment 1 of this report, was recommended for study in the Bloor-Yorkville Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment (December 2025) prepared by Common Bond Collective, a heritage consultant. At their April 22, 23, 24, 2026 meeting, City Council directed the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to undertake all necessary steps, including community consultation, to determine whether the Yorkville Village Core, or a part thereof, merits authorization for study as a potential Heritage Conservation District under Section 40(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Following review of the area as directed, staff are of the opinion that the proposed Yorkville Village Core HCD Study Area has a distinctive character that reflects its historical development from a residential area in the 19th century Village of Yorkville to an important locus of cultural expression and innovation in the mid-20th century, into a renowned, vibrant commercial, social, and cultural destination in the City of Toronto today. The proposed study area is characterized by historic house-form buildings from the late-19th-century and early-20th-century that have been adaptively re-used as commercial buildings. The historic house-form buildings are interspersed with mid-20th century developments in the form of Yorkville Complexes and infill developments which generally reinforce the historic residential neighbourhood scale of the area and contribute a network of mid-block pedestrian "laneways" that are an important feature of its village character. The area is further defined by the award-winning Village of Yorkville Park.
Following staff review and a required community consultation public meeting, it has been determined that the proposed Yorkville Village Core HCD Study Area merits authorization for study as a potential Heritage Conservation District.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289324.pdf
TE34.73 - 570, 572, 574,576 Sherbourne Street, and 29 and 37 Linden Street - Alterations to and Demolition of Attributes on Designated Heritage Properties and Removal of a Building Under Part IV, Sections 33 and 34(2) of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage properties at 570, 572, 574, 576 Sherbourne Street and 29 and 37 Linden Street in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a new residential building with such alterations to the designated properties substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated April 15, 2026, prepared by Sweeny & Co. Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, and the Heritage Impact Assessment dated November 15, 2025, with addenda April 7, 2026, and May 20, 2026, prepared by GBCA Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, and the conditions as set out below.
2. City Council approve the removal of the heritage building on the property at 29 Linden Street to allow for its relocation on the development site in accordance with Section 34(2) of the Ontario Heritage Act in connection with the approval of a 61-storey building on the property substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Sweeny & Co. Architects dated April 15, 2026, and the Heritage Impact Assessment, prepared by GBCA Architects dated November 15, 2025, with addenda April 7, 2026, and May 20, 2026, on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to conditions as set out below.
3. City Council direct that its consent to the application to alter the designated heritage properties at 570, 572, 574, 576 Sherbourne Street and 29 and 37 Linden Street, in accordance with Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and remove and relocate 29 Linden Street are subject to the following conditions:
a. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 570, 572, 574, 576 Sherbourne Street and 29 and 37 Linden Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall:
1. provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for the properties at 570, 572, 574, 576 Sherbourne Street and 29 and 37 Linden Street, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
2. execute and register on title a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 570, 572, 574, 576 Sherbourne Street and 29 and 37 Linden Street, substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated April 15, 2026, prepared by Sweeny & Co. Architects, and the Heritage Impact Assessment dated November 15, 2025, with addenda April 7, 2026, and May 20, 2026, prepared by GBCA Architects, all on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 3.a.1. above, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including execution and registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;
3. provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance their heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such a plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
4. provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject properties, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
5. provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
6. submit a Signage Plan for the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
7. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.a.1. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
8. provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan for 570, 572, 574, 576 Sherbourne Street and 29 and 37 Linden Street; and
b. prior to the release of an existing Letter of Credit the owner shall:
1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
2. provide Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in City Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the properties at 570, 572, 574, 576 Sherbourne Street and 29 and 37 Linden Street.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the designated heritage properties at 570, 572, 574, 576 Sherbourne Street, and 29 and 37 Linden Street (formerly 578 Sherbourne Street) and allow for the removal of the heritage building at 29 Linden Street under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act in connection with a proposed development of the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.
On October 9 and 10, 2024, City Council approved recommendations to alter the heritage properties to allow for the construction of a 69-storey residential tower. Since the previous scheme was approved, the applicant has revised the development application to include additional land on Sherbourne Street and additional tower massing; the tower height has been reduced to 61-storeys. A new Heritage Impact Assessment was prepared by GBCA Architects, dated November 15, 2025, with addenda April 7, 2026, and May 20, 2026, that considers the impact of the revised proposal.
Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations conserve the onsite heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The heritage impacts of the proposal are appropriately mitigated by the overall conservation strategy.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288799.pdf
(June 15, 2026) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning on 570, 572, 574,576 Sherbourne Street, and 29 and 37 Linden Street - Alterations to and Demolition of Attributes on Designated Heritage Properties and Removal of a Building Under Part IV, Sections 33 and 34(2) of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288232.pdf
Communications
Motions
73a - 570, 572, 574, & 576 Sherbourne Street and 29 and 37 Linden Street - Alterations to and Demolition of Attributes on Designated Heritage Properties and Removal of a Building Under Part IV, Sections 33 and 34(2) of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on July 6, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB46.15 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (June 23, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the designated heritage properties at 570, 572, 574, 576 Sherbourne Street, and 29 and 37 Linden Street (formerly 578 Sherbourne Street) and allow for the removal of the heritage building at 29 Linden Street under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act in connection with a proposed development of the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.
On October 9 and 10, 2024, City Council approved recommendations to alter the heritage properties to allow for the construction of a 69-storey residential tower. Since the previous scheme was approved, the applicant has revised the development application to include additional land on Sherbourne Street and additional tower massing; the tower height has been reduced to 61-storeys. A new Heritage Impact Assessment was prepared by GBCA Architects, dated November 15, 2025, with addenda April 7, 2026, and May 20, 2026, that considers the impact of the revised proposal.
Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations conserve the onsite heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The heritage impacts of the proposal are appropriately mitigated by the overall conservation strategy.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289322.pdf
TE34.74 - 78 Springhurst Avenue - Residential Demolition Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the application to demolish the existing two-storey residential building at 78 Springhurst Avenue subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall receive approval of a Rental Housing Demolition Permit (26 145180 STE 04 RH) under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of the one existing rental dwelling unit at 78 Springhurst Avenue;
b. construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
c. all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
d. sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629-11;
e. any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill;
f. authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate to issue Preliminary Approval of a future Rental Housing Demolition Permit (26 145180 STE 04 RH), as required in Part 1.a. above, for the demolition of the one existing rental dwelling unit at 78 Springhurst Avenue subject to the following:
1.the owner shall provide and maintain replacement of the rental dwelling unit having a minimum total gross floor area of 151 square metres to replace the one existing rental dwelling unit proposed to be demolished at 78 Springhurst Avenue as part of any future development on any of the lands at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15 and 17 Close Avenue, 74 and 78 Springhurst Avenue, and 74 and 82 Dunn Avenue (the "Lands") for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental unit is first occupied; during such 20-year period, no replacement rental unit shall be registered as a condominium or any other form of ownership housing that provides a right to exclusive possession of a dwelling unit, including life-lease or co-ownership, and no application shall be made to demolish any replacement rental unit or convert any replacement rental unit to a non-residential rental purpose and the location, unit type and unit size of the replacement rental unit shall be determined as part of the application review process for any future planning application for the Lands, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
2. the owner shall provide and maintain the replacement rental dwelling unit required in Part 1.f.1. above at rents that are no higher than one times the average rent for the same bedroom type in the City of Toronto, as reported by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation in its most recent Rental Market Survey, for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of the replacement rental unit, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
3. the owner shall enter into, and register on title to the Lands, an amended Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Parts 1.f.1. and 1.f.2. above, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
g. authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate to issue a future Rental Housing Demolition Permit (26 145180 STE 04 RH), as required in Part 1.a. above and subject to the conditions in Parts 1.f.1. through 1.f.3. above, for the demolition of the one existing rental dwelling unit at 78 Springhurst Avenue after all of the following have occurred:
1. the conditions in Parts 1.f.1 and 1.f.2. above have been secured though the agreement required in Part 1.f.3. above; and
2. the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments for Application 26 143612 STE 04 OZ have come into full force and effect; and
h. authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a permit to demolish the two-storey residential building pursuant to Section 33 of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 6 "Demolition Control" after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Part 1.g. above.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is regarding a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Ch. 363, Article 6 "Demolition Control", the application for the demolition of the existing two storey residential building at 78 Springhurst Avenue (Application No. 26 182029 DEM 00 DM) is being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration to refuse or grant the application, including any conditions, if any, to be attached to the permit applications because a building permit has not been issued for a replacement building.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288184.pdf
Communications
Motions
That the Toronto and East York Community Council:
3. Approve the application to demolish the existing two storey residential building at 78 Springhurst Avenue subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall receive approval of a Rental Housing Demolition Permit (26 145180 STE 04 RH) under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to permit the demolition of the one (1) existing rental dwelling unit at 78 Springhurst Avenue;
b. that construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official;
c. that all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
d. that sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629-11; and
e. that any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill; and
f. authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate to issue Preliminary Approval of a future Rental Housing Demolition Permit (26 145180 STE 04 RH), as required in Recommendation 3.a. above, for the demolition of the one (1) existing rental dwelling unit at 78 Springhurst Avenue subject to the following:
1.the owner shall provide and maintain replacement of the rental dwelling unit having a minimum total gross floor area of 151 square metres to replace the one (1) existing rental dwelling unit proposed to be demolished at 78 Springhurst Avenue as part of any future development on any of the lands at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 17 Close Avenue, 74 and 78 Springhurst Avenue, and 74 and 82 Dunn Avenue (the "Lands") for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental unit is first occupied. During such 20-year period, no replacement rental unit shall be registered as a condominium or any other form of ownership housing that provides a right to exclusive possession of a dwelling unit, including life-lease or co-ownership, and no application shall be made to demolish any replacement rental unit or convert any replacement rental unit to a non-residential rental purpose. The location, unit type, and unit size of the replacement rental unit shall be determined as part of the application review process for any future planning application for the Lands, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
2. the owner shall provide and maintain the replacement rental dwelling unit required in Recommendation (f)(i)). above at rents that are no higher than one (1) times the average rent for the same bedroom type in the City of Toronto, as reported by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation in its most recent Rental Market Survey, for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of the replacement rental unit, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
3. the owner shall enter into, and register on title to the Lands, an amended agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations (f)(i) and (f)(ii). above, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
g. authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate to issue a future Rental Housing Demolition Permit (26 145180 STE 04 RH), as required in Recommendation 3(a) above and subject to the conditions in Recommendations 3(f)(i) through (iii). above, for the demolition of the one (1) existing rental dwelling unit at 78 Springhurst Avenue after all of the following have occurred:
1. the conditions in Recommendations3(f)(i) and 3(f)(ii). above have been secured though the agreement required in Recommendation 3(f)(iii) above; and
2. the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments for application 26 143612 STE 04 OZ have come into full force and effect; and
h. authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a permit to demolish the two-storey residential building pursuant to Section 33 of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 6 "Demolition Control" after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation (g). above.
TE34.75 - 793 Adelaide Street West - Residential Demolition Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the application to demolish the existing single detached house with one residential unit at 793 Adelaide Street West with the following conditions:
a. a construction fence be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
b. all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
c. sod be laid on the site and be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629-11; and
d. any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision.
In accordance with city wide residential demolition control under the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 363, under the authority of Section 33 of the Planning Act, the application for the demolition of the row house containing one dwelling unit at 793 Adelaide Street West (Application No. 25-195472 DEM 00 DM) is being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration to refuse or to grant the application, including any conditions, to be attached to the demolition permit application because a building permit application for a replacement building has not been applied for.
The demolition application is being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council because the building proposed to be demolished contains one residential dwelling unit and there are no replacement building permits to be issued at this time.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288012.pdf
Communications
Motions
That the Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approve the application to demolish the existing single detached house with one residential unit at 793 Adelaide Street West with the following conditions:
a. that a construction fence be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official;
b. that all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
c. that sod be laid on the site and be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629-11; and
d. that any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
TE34.76 - 26 Ossington Avenue - Residential Demolition Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the application to demolish the existing mixed-use building at 26 Ossington Avenue with the following conditions:
a. construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
b. all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
c. sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, Paragraph B and 629-11; and
d. any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is regarding a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 6 "Demolition Control", the application for the demolition of the existing mixed-use building at 26 Ossington Avenue (Application No. 26 110091 DEM 00 DM) is being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration because Toronto Building received a request for demolition of property prior to the issuance of a replacement building permit.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287581.pdf
Communications
(June 4, 2026) E-mail from Niko Song (TE.Supp)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Motions
That the Toronto and East York Community Council:
3. Approve the application to demolish the existing mixed-use building at 26 Ossington Avenue with the following conditions:
a. That construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official;
b. That all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
c. That sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, Paragraph B and 629-11; and
d. That any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
TE34.77 - 83 Dunvegan Road - Residential Demolition Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the application to demolish the existing detached house containing one dwelling unit at 83 Dunvegan Road with the following conditions:
a. construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
b. all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
c. sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629-11; and
d. any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Ch. 363, Article 6 "Demolition Control," the application for the demolition of the existing detached house containing one dwelling unit at 83 Dunvegan Road (Application No. 26 143598 DEM 00 DM) is being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration to refuse or grant the application, including any conditions, if any, to be attached to the permit application because there is no building permit application to replace the residential building.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288063.pdf
Communications
Motions
That the Toronto and East York Community Council:
3. Approve the application to demolish the existing detached house containing one dwelling unit at 83 Dunvegan Road with the following conditions:
a. that construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official;
b. that all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
c. that sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629-11; and
d. that any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
TE34.78 - 59 High Park Boulevard - Application for Fence Exemption
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused to grant an exemption to Chapter 447, Fences, to the property owner of 59 High Park Boulevard for the existing fence described in the Summary section of the report (June 4, 2026) from the Central District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards.
Origin
Summary
The Applicant for 59 High Park Boulevard has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
The Applicant for 59 High Park Boulevard is requesting an exemption for their:
- Existing wood fence to remain
- Rear fence – west lot line fence height of 3.03 metres for a length of 12 metres
- Rear fence – south lot line fence height of 2.78 metres for a length of 15 metres
Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287745.pdf
Communications
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Susan and Silvano Guzzo (TE.Supp)
Speakers
Susan Guzzo
Motions
TE34.79 - 65 Mayfield Avenue - Application for Fence Exemption
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the Item until the January 2027 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.
Origin
Summary
The Applicant for 65 Mayfield Avenue has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
The Applicant for 65 Mayfield Avenue is requesting an exemption for their;
- Existing wood fence to remain
- The fence was measured at each of the 12 panels plus the gate
- Each panel varied in height, ranging from 2.11 metres to 2.51 metres
- Rear fence – eastern lot line fence (panel #2) height of 2.11 metres at a length of 2.5 metres
- Rear fence – eastern lot line fence (panel #7) height of 2.51 metres at a length of 2.5 metres
Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287751.pdf
Communications
(July 7, 2026) Letter from George Zamrij and Mary Zamrij (TE.Supp)
Motions
That consideration of the item be deferred until the January 2027 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council.
TE34.80 - 45 Montye Avenue - Application for Fence Exemption
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Refused to grant an exemption to Chapter 447, Fences, to the property owner of 45 Montye Avenue, for the existing fence described in the Summary section of the report (May 28, 2026) from the Central District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards.
Origin
Summary
The Applicant for 45 Montye Avenue has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in front yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
The Applicant for 45 Montye Avenue is requesting an exemption for their:
- Existing wooden fence
- Front fence – western lot line fence at a height of 2.1 metres and at a length of 2.7 meters
Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in front yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287463.pdf
Motions
TE34.81 - 409 Gilbert Avenue - Application for Fence Exemption
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the Item until the January 2027 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.
Origin
Summary
The Applicant for 409 Gilbert Avenue has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
The Applicant for 409 Gilbert Avenue is requesting an exemption for their:
Existing wooden fence in rear yard to remain:
- Rear fence – Northern lot line 1st fence panel is a height of 3.18 metres at a length of 1.31 metres
- Rear fence – Northern lot line 2nd fence panel is a height of 2.85 metres at a length of 1.31 metres
- Rear Fence - The average height of both fence panel at the Northern property line is 3.01 metres
Proposed wooden fence in front yard:
- Front yard – Northern lot line at 2 metres in height for 1.82 metres in length
Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287246.pdf
Motions
That consideration of the item be deferred until the January 2027 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council.
TE34.82 - 328 Glenholme Avenue - Application for Fence Exemption
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Granted the application for a fence exemption to the property owner of 328 Glenholme Avenue, thereby allowing the existing fence to be maintained as constructed.
2. Directed that at such time when a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences or its successor by-law.
Origin
Summary
The Applicant for 328 Glenholme Avenue has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
The Applicant for 328 Glenholme Avenue is requesting an exemption for their:
- Existing wooden fence in rear yard to remain
- Rear fence – Eastern lot line 1st fence panel is a height of 2.72 metres
- Rear fence – Eastern lot line 2nd fence panel is a height of 2.14 metres
- Rear fence – Eastern lot line 3rd and 4th fence panel are a height of 2.04 metres
- Rear fence – Eastern lot line 5th fence panel is a height of 2.03 metres
- Rear fence – Southern lot line fence panels are a height of 2.03 metres
- Rear fence – Western lot line fence panels is a height of 2.03 metres
Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287752.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council:
a. grant the application for a fence exemption to the property owner of 328 Glenholme Avenue, thereby allowing the existing fence to be maintained as constructed; and
b. direct that at such time when a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences or its successor by-law.
TE34.83 - 133 Robina Avenue - Application for Fence Exemption
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the Item until the January 2027 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.
Origin
Summary
The Applicant for 133 Robina Avenue has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height
The Applicant for 133 Robina Avenue is requesting an exemption for their;
- Existing Wood fence to remain
- Rear fence – southern lot line fence height ranges between 2.29 metres - 2.41 metres at a length of 8.23 metres.
- Rear fence – northern lot line fence height ranges between 2.30 metres - 2.54 metres at a length of 12.5 metres.
- Rear fence – eastern lot line fence height of 2.37 metres at a length of 5.54 metres
Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287500.pdf
Communications
Speakers
Motions
That consideration of the item be deferred until the January 2027 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council.
TE34.84 - 64 Castle Frank Crescent - Application for Fence Exemption
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Granted the application for a fence exemption to the property owner of 64 Castle Frank Crescent, thereby allowing the existing fence to be maintained as constructed.
2. Directed that at such time when a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences or its successor by-law.
Origin
Summary
The Applicant for 64 Castle Frank Crescent has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 meters in height.
The Applicant for 64 Castle Frank Cres is requesting an exemption for their:
- Existing wood fence to remain
- Rear fence – Eastern fence on patio height of 2.66 metres at a length of 3.15 metres
- Rear fence – Eastern lot line fence height of 3.03 metres at a length of 4.5 metres
- Rear fence – Northern lot line fence height of 2.65 metres at a length of 9 metres
- Rear fence – Western lot line fence height of 2.49 metres at a length of 8 metres
- Rear fence – Western lot line fence #2 (Stone Planters) height of 2.78 meters at a length of 25 metres
Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-286698.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216787.pdf
Speakers
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council:
a. grant the application for a fence exemption to the property owner of 64 Castle Frank Crescent, thereby allowing the existing fence to be maintained as constructed; and
b. direct that at such time when a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences or its successor by-law.
TE34.85 - 307 Rushton Road - Application for Fence Exemption
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the Item until the November 25, 2026 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.
Origin
Summary
The Applicant for 307 Rushton Road has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
The Applicant for 307 Rushton Road is requesting an exemption for their:
- Existing wooden fence
- Rear fence – southern lot line fence at a height of 2.3 metres and at a length of 8.0 meters
Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287725.pdf
Communications
(July 7, 2026) Submission from Eric Mezin (TE.Supp)
Motions
That consideration of the item be deferred until the November 25, 2026 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council.
TE34.86 - 367 Spadina Road - Application for Fence Exemption
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Granted the application for a fence exemption to the property owner of 367 Spadina Road, thereby allowing the existing fence to be maintained as constructed.
2. Directed that at such time when a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences or its successor by-law.
Origin
Summary
The Applicant for 367 Spadina Road has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
The Applicant for 367 Spadina Road is requesting an exemption for their:
- Existing wooden fence
- Rear fence – Southern lot line fence at a height of 2.3 metres and at a length of 7.4 meters
- Rear fence – Northern lot line fence at a height of 2.2 metres and at a length of 5.9 meters
Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287748.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council:
a. grant the application for a fence exemption to the property owner of 367 Spadina Road, thereby allowing the existing fence to be maintained as constructed; and
b. direct that at such time when a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences or its successor by-law.
TE34.87 - 4 Wychwood Park - Application for Fence Exemption
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Granted the application for a fence exemption to the property owner of 4 Wychwood Park, thereby allowing the existing fence to be maintained as constructed.
2. Directed that at such time when a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences or its successor by-law.
Origin
Summary
The Applicant for 4 Wychwood Park has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
The Applicant for 4 Wychwood Park is requesting an exemption for their:
- Existing galvanized steel and wooden fence
- Rear fence – southern lot line fence at a height of 3.5 metres and at a length of 38.8 meters
- Entire southern lot line fence exceeds 2.0 metres in height
Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287269.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council:
a. grant the application for a fence exemption to the property owner of 4 Wychwood Park, thereby allowing the existing fence to be maintained as constructed; and
b. direct that at such time when a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences or its successor by-law.
TE34.88 - 511 Church Street - Application for Fence Exemption
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Granted the application for a fence exemption to the property owner of 511 Church Street, thereby allowing the existing fence to be maintained as constructed.
2. Directed that at such time when a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences or its successor by-law.
Origin
Summary
The Applicant for 511 Church Street has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.A(3) No sheet metal or corrugated metal panels shall be used in any fence.
The Applicant for 511 Church Street is requesting an exemption for their:
- Existing fence
- Average height of 2 Meters
- Constructed with corrugated metal panels
- A gate is positioned at the center of the south side, facing the alleyway
Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.A(3).
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287721.pdf
Communications
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council:
a. grant the application for a fence exemption to the property owner of 511 Church Street, thereby allowing the existing fence to be maintained as constructed; and
b. direct that at such time when a replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, Fences or its successor by-law.
TE34.89 - 90A De Grassi Street - Application for Fence Exemption
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred Indefinitely
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the item indefinitely.
Origin
Summary
The Applicant for 90A Degrassi Street has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
The Applicant for 90A Degrassi Street is requesting an exemption for their:
- Existing wooden fence
- Rear fence – northern lot line fence off the deck is at a height of 2.13 metres and at a length of 21.6 meters
- Rear fence –northern lot line fence on the deck at a height of 2.74 metres and at a length of 9.6 meters
- Rear fence – southern lot line fence off the deck at a height of 2.13 meters metres and at a length of 21.6 meters
- Rear fence – southern lot line fence on the deck at a height of 2.74 meters and at a length of 9.6 meters
- Rear fence – West lot line fence is at a height of 2.13 meters and at a length of 1.3 meters
Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287537.pdf
Communications
Motions
TE34.90 - 12 Beech Avenue - Application for Fence Exemption
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the Item until the November 25, 2026 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.
Origin
Summary
The Applicant for 12 Beech Avenue has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:
City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
The Applicant for 12 Beech Avenue is requesting an exemption for their:
- Existing chain link fence to remain in rear yard
- Rear fence – Southern lot line 1st fence section is at an average height of 3.65 metres and length of 3 metres
- Rear fence – Southern lot line 2nd section is at an average height of 4.15 meters and length of 3 metres
Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287753.pdf
Communications
(July 8, 2026) Submission from Iain Cormack (TE.New)
Speakers
Iain Cormack
Motions
That consideration of the item be deferred until the November 25, 2026 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council.
TE34.91 - 366 St. John’s Road - Application to Remove a Private Tree
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the Item until the January 2027 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.
Origin
Summary
This report requests that the Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately-owned tree located on the boundary line between the properties of 366 and 368 St John's Road. The applicant at 366 St. John's Road indicates the reason for requesting removal is concern over the close proximity of the tree to their house as well as lifting of patio pavers and cracking of the foundation at 368 St. John’s Road.
The silver maple tree (Acer saccharinum) measures 100 cm in diameter. The City's Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable. The permit was denied, and the applicant is appealing the decision. The Community Council has delegated authority from the City Council to make a final decision as to whether a permit may be issued when an applicant appeals the City's decision to deny a tree permit.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288478.pdf
Communications
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Nicole Corrado
Motions
That consideration of the item be deferred until the January 2027 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council.
TE34.92 - 63 Albany Avenue - Interim Approach to Address City-Owned Female Ginkgo Trees
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the request for a permit to remove one City-owned tree located at 63 Albany Avenue as part of an interim approach to addressing female ginkgo trees in the City of Toronto, so that the City-owned female ginkgo tree will be removed and replaced by the City of Toronto in the road allowance fronting 63 Albany Avenue to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry.
Origin
Summary
Environment, Climate and Forestry received an application to remove a City-owned female ginkgo tree (Ginkgo biloba) at 63 Albany Avenue due to concerns that the tree drops fruit with a foul odour. The City's Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.
Following recent City Council direction, this report proposes an interim approach for the management of female ginkgo trees and requests that Toronto and East York Community Council approve a permit to remove one City-owned female ginkgo tree located at 63 Albany Avenue on condition that a tree of alternate species be planted as a replacement.
City staff will report back to City Council in early 2027 with recommendations on an approach to the impacts of female ginkgo trees with a focus on community health and safety, as part of the ongoing Tree By-Law Review.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288456.pdf
Communications
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Motions
TE34.93 - 233 Dunvegan Road - Application to Remove a Private Tree
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Not Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council took no action on this Item.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The motion to amend the Item lost and the motion to adopt the recommendation in the staff report lost.
Origin
Summary
This report requests that the Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately-owned tree located at 233 Dunvegan Road. The applicant indicates the reason for requesting the removal of the tree due to concern over large falling nuts.
The black walnut tree (Juglans nigra) measures 85cm in diameter. The City's Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable. The permit was denied, and the applicant is appealing the decision. The Community Council has delegated authority from the City Council to make a final decision as to whether a permit may be issued when an applicant appeals the City's decision to deny a tree permit.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288465.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215680.pdf
(July 5, 2026) Letter from Jack Greenberg, Law Offices of Jack Greenberg (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215731.pdf
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Nicole Corrado
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council approve the request for a permit to remove one privately-owned tree located at 233 Dunvegan Road and require the applicant to provide five replacement trees which can be achieved in a combination of on-site planting and cash-in-lieu of planting to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry.
TE34.94 - 32 Curzon Street - Application to Remove a City Tree
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Denied the request for a permit to remove one City-owned tree located at 32 Curzon Street.
Origin
Summary
This report requests that Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one City-owned tree located at 32 Curzon Street. The applicant indicates the reason for requesting removal of the tree is to accommodate the construction of a new curb and driveway access and that the tree obstructs sightlines.
The sugar maple tree (Acer saccharum) measures 11 cm in diameter. The City's Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable. The permit was denied, and the applicant is appealing the decision. The Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision as to whether a permit may be issued when an applicant appeals the City's decision to deny a tree permit.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287582.pdf
Communications
(May 21, 2026) E-mail from Jeremy Chan, Brown & Beattie Ltd. (TE.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-212761.pdf
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Main)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Heather Parker
Motions
94a - 32 Curzon Street - Application to Remove a City Tree
Origin
Summary
This report provides updated information to Toronto and East York Community Council on a resolution between staff and the applicant concerning changes to the construction design which ensures preservation and protection of the subject tree in the original report.
There is no change to the recommendation in the original report and this information report provides updated drawings and details as per the Ward Councillor’s request.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289521.pdf
TE34.95 - 40 Myrtle Avenue - Application to Remove a Private Tree
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the request for a permit to remove one privately-owned tree located at 40 Myrtle Avenue as part of an interim approach to addressing female ginkgo trees in the City of Toronto, and required the applicant to plant a new replacement tree at 40 Myrtle Avenue to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry.
Origin
Summary
This report requests that the Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 40 Myrtle Avenue. The applicant indicates the reason for requesting removal of the tree is due to the foul odour and nuisance of the fruit and the poor condition and constrained location of the tree resulting in a potential safety hazard.
The ginkgo tree (Ginkgo biloba) measures 60 cm in diameter. The City's Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable. The permit was denied, and the applicant is appealing the decision. Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision as to whether a permit may be issued when an applicant appeals the City's decision to deny a tree permit.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287583.pdf
Communications
(April 22, 2026) E-mail from James Chiu and Debby Law (TE.Main)
(April 23, 2026) E-mail from Shamira Ishmael (TE.Main)
(April 27, 2026) E-mail from Alan Page (TE.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-212766.pdf
(April 30, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Main)
(May 27, 2026) E-mail from Alan Page (TE.Main)
(May 28, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Main)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Motions
That Toronto and East York Community Council adopt the following recommendation in the supplementary report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Urban Forestry, Environment, Climate and Forestry (TE34.95a):
1. Toronto and East York Community Council approve the request for a permit to remove one privately-owned tree located at 40 Myrtle Avenue as part of an interim approach to addressing female ginkgo trees in the city of Toronto, and require the applicant to plant a new replacement tree at 40 Myrtle Avenue to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Environment, Climate, and Forestry.
95a - 40 Myrtle Avenue - Interim Approach to Address a Privately-Owned Female Ginkgo Tree - Supplementary Report
Origin
Summary
Environment, Climate and Forestry received an application to remove one privately-owned female ginkgo tree (Ginkgo biloba) at 40 Myrtle Avenue due to concerns that the tree drops fruit with a foul odour. The City's Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable. An appeal was submitted to Toronto and East York Community Council on April 30, 2026 and has been deferred to the July 8 and 9, 2026 meeting.
On May 20 and 21, 2026, City Council directed the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry to provide recommendations on the impacts of City-owned female ginkgo trees with a focus on community health and safety, as part of the ongoing Tree By-Law Review and to report back in 2027.
Following recent City Council direction, this supplementary report proposes an interim approach for the management of female ginkgo trees and requests that Toronto and East York Community Council approve a permit to remove one privately-owned female ginkgo tree located at 40 Myrtle Avenue on condition that a tree of alternate species be planted as a replacement.
City staff will report back to Council in early 2027 with recommendations on an approach to the impacts of female ginkgo trees with a focus on community health and safety, as part of the ongoing Tree By-Law Review.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288448.pdf
TE34.96 - 54 Gormley Avenue - Application to Remove a City Owned Tree
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Re-opened Item TE32.20.
2. Deleted its decision on Item TE32.20 and adopted the following recommendation in the report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Environment, Climate and Forestry attached as Attachment 1 to the letter (June 19, 2026) from Councillor Josh Matlow:
a. Approve the request for a permit to remove one City-owned tree located at 54 Gormley Avenue as part of an interim approach to addressing female ginkgo trees in the City of Toronto, so that the City-owned female ginkgo tree will be removed and replaced by the City of Toronto in the road allowance fronting 54 Gormley Avenue to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Environment, Climate and Forestry.
Origin
Summary
As part of the ongoing Tree By-Law Review, City Council has requested that Environment, Climate and Forestry provide recommendations specific to City-owned female gingko trees. The fruit produced by female ginkgo trees emits a noxious smell and toxic residue which inhibits residents from conducting proper maintenance.
While staff’s review is underway, this motion allows the residents of 54 Gormley to replace their existing female ginkgo tree with a less hazardous tree.
I respectfully request your support for my motion to re-open item TE23.20, delete the previous decision and adopt the recommendations from Environment, Climate and Forestry staff permitting the removal of the tree.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288511.pdf
Attachment 1 - Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Environment, Climate and Forestry on Interim Approach to Address City-Owned Female Ginko Trees- 54 Gormley Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288512.pdf
Communications
(July 8, 2026) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.New)
Speakers
Motions
TE34.97 - Changes to Business Improvement Area Boards of Management
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Wards:
- 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 13 - Toronto Centre, 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Appointed, in accordance with the City's Public Appointments Policy, the following nominees to the Business Improvement Area Boards of Management set out below, at pleasure of Toronto and East York Community Council, and for a term expiring at the end of the term of Council or as soon thereafter as successors are appointed:
- Kensington Market:
Maskalyk, James
Rumble-Payne, Chandler
Zimmerman, Allen
- Leslieville:
Lue Chee Kong, Andre
Lim Ah Ken, Dennis
- West Queen West:
Chaussin, Nicolas
- Yonge and St. Clair:
Cascante, Isabel
2. Removed the following directors from the Business Improvement Area Boards of Management set out below:
- Cabbagetown:
Lynch, Gail
- Dupont by the Castle:
Campbell, DJenne
- Kensington Market:
Kennedy, Nikki
Krulicki, Jason
Ozery, Alon
- Leslieville:
El Asfahani, Marawan
- Queen Street West:
Amlani, Shamez
Origin
Summary
Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to appoint and remove directors from the boards of Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) that fall within its geographic boundaries.
The purpose of this report is to make changes to the Cabbagetown, Dupont by the Castle, Kensington Market, Leslieville, Queen Street West, West Queen West and Yonge and St. Clair Business Improvement Area Boards of Management, in accordance with the requirement of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288076.pdf
Motions
TE34.98 - Fort York Integrated Operations and Heritage Stewardship Study
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report back with findings and recommendations for next steps from the Fort York Integrated Operations and Heritage Stewardship Study to the Toronto and East York Community Council in the second quarter of 2027.
Origin
Summary
Fort York National Historic Site (FYNHS) is a nationally significant cultural heritage asset and one of Toronto's most important archaeological sites, serving as a key destination for public programming, learning, and community use. Today, the site is owned and operated by the City of Toronto, one of 10 historic sites promoted under the moniker of Toronto History Museums.
As the surrounding area continues to intensify and evolve, the site faces increasing pressure to balance public programming and learning activations, community needs, heritage conservation, archaeological protection, public access and engagement and revenue-generating activities.
This report describes plans for an Integrated Operations and Heritage Stewardship Study for Fort York. The study will establish a comprehensive and coordinated approach to managing the site, with particular attention to compatible uses, operational requirements, community engagement, and long-term financial sustainability, while ensuring the protection of its cultural, archaeological, and commemorative integrity.
Work on the study will commence following the decommission of the FIFA Men's World Cup 2026 Fan Festival (which vacates the site at the end of July) and aims to conclude in early Q1 2027. The study will include analysis of current site conditions, substantive community engagement with the surrounding Fort York neighbourhood, engagement with Indigenous communities and key stakeholders, review of best practices, and the development of strategic options and recommendations to guide future programming, partnerships, and investment decisions.
The study will support the City’s broader objectives related to reconciliation, cultural vitality, heritage conservation, and access to public space, and will provide a clear, evidence-based foundation for the long-term stewardship and sustainable operation of Fort York.
Stephen Burgess Architects (SBA) has been retained through the heritage architect roster to lead the study as they have completed work at Fort York over two decades. Their depth of experience will enable the firm to build on an established understanding of the site’s heritage attributes, operational context, and stakeholder relationships, while ensuring a well-informed and contextually appropriate approach to the study.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288599.pdf
Communications
Motions
That:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report back with findings and recommendations for next steps from the Fort York Integrated Operations and Heritage Stewardship Study to the Toronto and East York Community Council in the second quarter of 2027.
TE34.99 - Renaming Close-Springhurst Parkette in Honour of Diane Rajaram
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Adopted the renaming of Close-Springhurst Parkette at 70 Close Avenue to “Diane Rajaram Parkette”.
Origin
Summary
City Council adopted the Commemorative Framework at its July 2022 meeting. The Framework provides guidance to the public, Elected Officials, and City staff regarding the commemorative naming and renaming of streets and City properties, and the consideration of proposals for new and existing commemorative monuments.
This report considers an application to rename Close-Springhurst Parkette, located at 70 Close Avenue, to “Diane Rajaram Parkette”.
Parks and Recreation, in collaboration with the Economic Development and Culture and Strategic Partnerships, reviewed the application. The review concluded that the naming proposal satisfies the criteria of the Property Naming Policy and aligns with the Guiding Principles for Commemoration.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288070.pdf
Communications
Motions
TE34.100 - Naming New Park at 95 St. Patrick Street - Asini-Aadisookaan-aki / Stone Spirit Park
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Adopted the naming of “Asini-Aadisookaan-aki / Stone Spirit Park” for the new park at 95 St. Patrick Street.
Origin
Summary
City Council adopted the Commemorative Framework at its July 2022 meeting. The Framework provides guidance to the public, Elected Officials, and City staff regarding the commemorative naming and renaming of streets and City properties, and the consideration of proposals for new and existing commemorative monuments.
The application to name the new park located at 95 St. Patrick Street (St. Patrick Street, south of Dundas Street), in Ward 10, Spadina-Fort York, contributes to Indigenous placekeeping in Toronto’s downtown core through the proposed bilingual name “Asini-Aadisookaan-aki / Stone Spirit Park”.
The park was previously referred to as new park at 234 Simcoe Street, because it is associated with the development project at 234 Simcoe Street. However, the new park now has an official address on St. Patrick Street.
Parks and Recreation, in collaboration with the Economic Development and Culture Division and Strategic Partnerships, reviewed the application. The review concluded that the naming proposal satisfies the criteria of the Property Naming Policy and aligns with the Guiding Principles for Commemoration.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288069.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-216684.pdf
Motions
TE34.101 - 1526 Davenport Road - Encroachment Appeal - Various Encroachments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the General Manager, Transportation Services to enter into an encroachment agreement with the property owner of 1526 Davenport Road to permit the continued maintenance of the existing wooden privacy fence and wooden shed located on the Greenlaw Avenue flankage, located within the public right-of-way, subject to but not limited to the following conditions:
a. the property owner will indemnify the City of Toronto from and against all actions, suits, claims or demands and from all loss, costs, damages and expenses that may result from such permission granted;
b. the property owner will maintain the encroachment at their own expense in good repair and a condition satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services and will not make any additions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the agreement;
c. the property owner will accept such additional or amended conditions as the City Solicitor, or the General Manager, Transportation Services may deem necessary in the interest of the City;
d. the property owner will remove the encroachment upon receiving written notice from Transportation Services to do so;
e. the property owner will enter into an encroachment agreement with the City of Toronto, at the applicant's expense, and assume all liability and damages related to the encroachment;
f. the property owner shall agree that the City and/or utility companies may remove the encroachment at any time in order to install or maintain services or infrastructure within the affected public right-of-way, with no obligation to replace it;
g. no spikes or pointed tops are permitted on the encroachment; and
h. the property owner will remove the asphalt paving, with the exception of a 1.5 metre-wide walkway, and restore the remaining area to soft landscaping, such as sod, groundcover, or planting beds.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The purpose of this report is for Toronto and East York Community Council to consider an appeal from the property owner of 1526 Davenport Road regarding their encroachment application. The encroachment consists of an existing wooden privacy fence and a wooden shed, which do not comply with City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use of.
The property owner is seeking authorization from Toronto and East York Community Council to allow the continued maintenance of the encroachment within the public right-of-way at 1526 Davenport Road. Transportation Services recommends that authority be granted, subject to the conditions set out in this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288341.pdf
Motions
TE34.102 - 12 Hickson Street - Encroachment Appeal
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the General Manager, Transportation Services to enter into an encroachment agreement with the property owner of 12 Hickson Street permitting the basement entrance and catch basin, subject but not limited to, the following conditions:
a. indemnify the City from and against all actions, suits, claims or demands and from all loss, costs, damages and expenses that may result from such permission granted;
b. maintain the encroachment at their own expense in good repair and a condition satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services and will not make any additions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the agreement;
c. accept such additional or amended conditions as the City Solicitor or the General Manager, Transportation Services may deem necessary in the interest of the City;
d. remove the encroachment upon receiving written notice from the General Manager, Transportation Services to do so;
e. the property owner will enter into the agreement with the City of Toronto, at the applicant's expense, and assume all liability and damages related to the encroachment;
f. the property owner shall agree that the City and/or utility companies may remove the encroachment at any time in order to install or maintain services or infrastructure within the affected public right-of-way, with no obligation to replace it; and
g. no spikes or pointed tops are permitted on the encroachment.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The purpose of this report is for Toronto and East York Community Council to consider an appeal from the property owner of 12 Hickson Street regarding a proposed encroachment within the public right-of-way. The proposal includes the reconstruction of a basement entrance and the installation of a catch basin within the public right-of-way. These elements do not comply with certain provisions of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use of.
The property owner is requesting that Toronto and East York Community Council grant authorization for the construction and maintenance of the encroachment within the public right-of-way at 12 Hickson Street. Transportation Services recommends that this authority be granted, subject to the conditions set out in this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288342.pdf
Motions
TE34.103 - 353, 355 and 357 College Street - Encroachment Appeal
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the City to enter into an encroachment agreement with the property owner of 353, 355 and 357 College Street permitting a sanitary control maintenance hole, stormwater control maintenance hole and groundwater sampling port, subject but not limited to, the following conditions:
a. indemnify the City from and against all actions, suits, claims or demands and from all loss, costs, damages and expenses that may result from such permission granted;
b. maintain the encroachment at their own expense in good repair and a condition satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services and will not make any additions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the agreement;
c. accept such additional or amended conditions as the City Solicitor or the General Manager, Transportation Services may deem necessary in the interest of the City;
d. remove the encroachment upon receiving written notice from the General Manager, Transportation Services to do so;
e. the property owner will enter into an encroachment agreement with the City of Toronto, at the applicant's expense, and assume all liability and damages related to the encroachment; and
f. the property owner shall agree that the City and/or utility companies may remove the encroachment at any time to install or maintain services or infrastructure within the affected public right of way with no obligation to replace them.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The purpose of this report is to provide Toronto and East York Community Council with an opportunity to consider an appeal submitted by the owner of 353, 355, and 357 College Street regarding a proposed encroachment within the public right-of-way on College Street. The proposed encroachment would consist of a privately constructed sanitary control maintenance hole, a stormwater control maintenance hole, and a groundwater sampling port. These elements do not comply with certain provisions of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use of.
Transportation Services has reviewed the application and determined that the proposed encroachment will not adversely affect pedestrian movement, vehicular traffic, or the City's ability to access and maintain the public right-of-way. Accordingly, Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council authorize the proposed encroachment at 353, 355, and 357 College Street, subject to the conditions set out in this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288340.pdf
Motions
TE34.104 - Initial Findings Report: Transit Priority Measures to Support the 505 Dundas 6-Minute Network
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in collaboration with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, to investigate the feasibility and options for expanding Transit Priority Measures for the 505 Dundas streetcar outside of the currently implemented Transit Priority Measures, to further reduce travel times and improve reliability of the Dundas streetcar for transit riders; such investigation to include further analysis of the 505 Dundas streetcar performance and development of an engagement plan to support future Transit Priority Measures.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in collaboration with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, to report back with recommendations on Part 1 above in the first quarter of 2027.
Origin
Summary
In December 2025, Transportation Services recommended permanent parking and traffic amendments to Dundas Street East and West to enhance transit service as part of 2025.TE27.51 Transit Priority Measures to Support the 505 Dundas 6-Minute Network. The transit priority measures (TPMs) implemented included expanding ‘No Stopping’ coverage of the AM and PM peak periods on weekdays, as well as new and expanded left-turn restrictions.
These changes were in support of 6-minute headways on the 505 Dundas streetcar route from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. daily, which began on November 15, 2026. The goal of the TPMs is to help improve the speed and reliability of the 505 Dundas route and minimize the risk of increased bunching and gapping associated with moving to a more frequent headway.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288607.pdf
Communications
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Michael Martin (TE.Supp)
(July 8, 2026) Letter from Samantha Petherbridge (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217118.pdf
Motions
That:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in collaboration with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, to investigate the feasibility and options for expanding Transit Priority Measures for the 505 Dundas streetcar outside of the currently implemented Transit Priority Measures, to further reduce travel times and improve reliability of the Dundas streetcar for transit riders; such investigation to include further analysis of the 505 Dundas streetcar performance and development of an engagement plan to support future Transit Priority Measures.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in collaboration with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, to report back with recommendations on Part 1 above in the first quarter of 2027.
TE34.105 - Transit Priority Measures to Support Transit Diversions During Construction on King Street West
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize amendments to parking and traffic regulations as set out in Attachment 1 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services, to take effect from November 1, 2026, until regular Toronto Transit Commission streetcar service has resumed along King Street West.
2. City Council delegate, despite any City of Toronto By-law to the contrary, to the General Manager, Transportation Services, from October 1, 2026, to June 2, 2027, inclusive, for the purposes of implementing and then addressing any operational and/or safety issues that may arise in relation to the project identified above, the authority to implement changes and submit directly to City Council any necessary Bills for by-law amendments to the schedules to City of Toronto Code Chapters on the streets and within the parameters as identified in Attachment 2 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services.
3. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, in consultation with the Chief Congestion Officer and Executive Director, Strategic Capital Coordination Office, to report to Toronto and East York Community Council in the first quarter of 2027 with a status update on transit priority and traffic mitigation measures associated with the watermain replacement and TTC streetcar track work along King Street to ensure reliability and travel times are maintained to the extent feasible, as well as an update on communications and public/stakeholder engagement activities.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to consult with the local Councillors and report directly to the July 29, 30 and 31, 2026 meeting of City Council with an interim communications and engagement plan related to the watermain replacement and TTC streetcar track work on King Street, including engagement activities to take place before construction begins in Fall 2026.
Origin
Summary
Transportation Services is requesting approval, on behalf of the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC), to install temporary transit priority measures (TPMs) associated with the transit diversion for multiple construction events occurring concurrently on King Street West between Close Avenue and Spadina Avenue. The transit diversion discussed in this report covers the period from November 1, 2026, until approximately May 1, 2027. The ongoing construction, which includes watermain and streetcar track work, will require streetcar operations to be suspended. The 504 King streetcar will be diverted onto Queen Street West, between Roncesvalles Avenue and Spadina Avenue. To maintain coverage on King Street West, a 504 King replacement bus will operate, and the 503 Kingston Rd replacement bus will also be extended further west to Dufferin. The construction during this transit diversion includes track repairs and watermain replacement on multiple segments of King Street West, including: between Close Avenue and Dufferin Street, between Shaw Street and Bathurst Street, and between Portland Street and Spadina Avenue.
The recommended temporary TPMs in this report will improve the speed and reliability of impacted TTC routes during the three construction events occurring on King Street West between Close Avenue and Spadina Avenue. The TPMs include changes to curbside regulations, including new and extended ‘No Stopping’ restrictions and new and extended left-turn prohibitions. The proposed changes will benefit the 60,000 customers travelling each day on 504 King, as well as the 30,000 daily customers on 501 Queen (based on Fall 2025 ridership).
To support streetcar and general traffic operations along the diverted transit routes, this report recommends the following temporary measures to be implemented on the following road segments:
- New/Extended ‘No Stopping’ from 7 a.m. to 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. to 7 p.m., Mon. to Fri.:
- Queen Street West from Roncesvalles Avenue to Shaw Street, north side
- New/Extended ‘No Stopping’ from 7 a.m. to 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. to 7 p.m., Mon. to Sun.:
- Queen Street West from Roncesvalles Avenue to Shaw Street, south side
- Queen Street West from Shaw Street to Spadina Avenue, both sides
- New/Extended Left-turn Prohibitions from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Mon. to Sat. or 2 p.m. to 7 p.m., Mon. to Fri. at various intersections along Queen Street West from Roncesvalles Avenue to Spadina Avenue.
The proposed changes to curbside restrictions and turn restrictions are provided in detail in Table 4 and Table 5.
As TTC operates transit service on Queen Street West, City Council approval of this report is required.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288576.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council request the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to consult with the local Councillors and report directly to the July 29, 30 and 31, 2026 meeting of City Council with an interim communications and engagement plan related to the watermain replacement and TTC streetcar track work on King Street, including engagement activities to take place before construction begins in Fall 2026.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, in consultation with the Chief Congestion Officer and Executive Director, Strategic Capital Coordination Office, to report to Toronto and East York Community Council in the first quarter of 2027 with a status update on transit priority and traffic mitigation measures associated with the watermain replacement and TTC streetcar track work along King Street to ensure reliability and travel times are maintained to the extent feasible, as well as an update on communications and public/stakeholder engagement activities.
TE34.106 - Metrolinx Ontario Line - Long-Term Temporary Road Closures, Temporary Delegation of Authority and Update on Liberty New Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
Ontario Line Gerrard Station:
Carlaw Avenue:
1. City Council authorize the temporary closure of the east sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on Carlaw Avenue, between Gerrard Street East and a point approximately 115 metres north, from August 1, 2026 to December 31, 2030, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Gerrard Station.
2. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday; 1:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Sunday, at a rate of $3:25 per hour and for a maximum of three (3) hours, on the east side of Carlaw Avenue (near 369 Carlaw Avenue), between Gerrard Street East and a point approximately 15 metres south, from August 1, 2026 to December 31, 2030, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Gerrard Station.
3. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east side of Carlaw Avenue (near 369 Carlaw Avenue), between Gerrard Street East and a point approximately 15 metres south, from August 1, 2026 to December 31, 2030, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Gerrard Station.
4. City Council prohibit stopping at all times, except for TTC buses, on the east side of Carlaw Avenue (near 369 Carlaw Avenue), between Gerrard Street East and a point approximately 15 metres south, from August 1, 2026 to December 31, 2030, inclusive, to accommodate the temporary relocation of TTC bus stop (#4856) associated with construction of the Ontario Line Gerrard Station.
Gerrard Street East:
5. City Council authorize the temporary closure of the westbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on Gerrard Street East, between Carlaw Avenue and a point approximately 100 metres east, from August 1, 2026 to December 31, 2030, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Gerrard Station.
6. City Council authorize the temporary closure of the north sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on Gerrard Street East, between Carlaw Avenue and a point approximately 100 metres east, from August 1, 2026 to December 31, 2030, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Gerrard Station.
7. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday; 1:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Sunday, at a rate of $3.25 per hour and for a maximum of three (3) hours, on the south side of Gerrard Street East, between Carlaw Avenue and a point approximately 50 metres west, from August 1, 2026 to December 31, 2030, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Gerrard Station.
8. City Council rescind the existing one (1) hour maximum parking regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturday, on the south side of Gerrard Street East, between Carlaw Avenue and a point 100 metres east, from August 1, 2026 to December 31, 2030, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Gerrard Station.
9. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday except public holidays, on the north side of Gerrard Street East, between Carlaw Avenue and a point 100 metres east, from August 1, 2026 to December 31, 2030, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Gerrard Station.
10. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday except public holidays, on the south side of Gerrard Street East, between Carlaw Avenue and a point 100 metres east, from August 1, 2026 to December 31, 2030, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Gerrard Station.
11. City Council prohibit stopping on both sides of Gerrard Street East, between a point approximately 50 metres west of Carlaw Avenue and a point approximately 100 metres east of Carlaw Avenue, from August 1, 2026 to December 31, 2030, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Gerrard Station.
Leslieville Station:
Queen Street East:
12. City Council approve the temporary closure of the north sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on Queen Street East, between De Grassi Street and a point approximately 45 metres east, from August 1, 2026 to December 31, 2028, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
13. City Council approve the temporary closure of the north sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on Queen Street East, between De Grassi Street and a point approximately 45 metres east, for up to 25 days from June 1, 2029 to August 31, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
14. City Council approve the temporary closure of the westbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on Queen Street East, between De Grassi Street and a point approximately 45 metres east, from August 1, 2026 to December 31, 2028, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
15. City Council approve the temporary closure of the westbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on Queen Street East, between De Grassi Street and a point approximately 45 metres east, for up to 25 days from June 1, 2029 to August 31, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
16. City Council approve the temporary closure of the eastbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on Queen Street East, between Strange Street and McGee Street, from July 1, 2027 to November 30, 2027, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
17. City Council approve the temporary closure of the eastbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on Queen Street East, between Strange Street and McGee Street, for up to 25 days from June 1, 2029 to August 31, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
18. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays on the north side of Queen Street, between Boulton Avenue and De Grassi Street from August 1, 2026 to August 31, 2029, inclusive to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
19. City Council prohibit stopping on both sides of Queen Street East, between De Grassi Street and McGee Street, from August 1, 2026 to August 31, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
De Grassi Street:
20. City Council approve the temporary closure of a 2.5-metre-wide portion of the northbound lane to vehicular traffic on De Grassi Street, between Queen Street East and a point approximately 85 metres north, from August 1, 2026 to August 31, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
21. City Council rescind the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday on the odd (east) side of De Grassi Street, between Queen Street East and a point approximately 85 metres north, and require the provision of replacement overnight parking spaces as a condition of permit, from August 1, 2026 to August 31, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
22. City Council approve the temporary closure of the east sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on De Grassi Street, between Queen Street East and a point approximately 85 metres north, from August 1, 2026 to August 31, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
23. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect daily on the west side of De Grassi Street, between Queen Street East and a point approximately 85 metres north, from August 1, 2026 to August 31, 2029, inclusive to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
24. City Council prohibit stopping on both sides of De Grassi Street, between Queen Street East and a point approximately 85 metres north, from August 1, 2026 to August 31, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
Strange Street:
25. City Council approve the temporary closure of the east sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on Strange Street, between Queen Street East and a point approximately 80 metres south, from August 1, 2026 to August 31, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
26. City Council continue to rescind the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. daily on the odd (east) side of Strange Street, between Queen Street East and the south end of Strange Street, from December 31, 2026 to August 31, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
27. City Council continue to prohibit stopping at all times on the east side of Strange Street, between Queen Street East and the south end of Strange Street, from December 31, 2026 to August 31, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
28. City Council continue to designate on-street accessible parking spaces on the west side of Strange Street, between a point approximately 23 metres south of Queen Street East and a point approximately 12 metres further south, from December 31, 2026 to August 31, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the Ontario Line Leslieville Station.
Temporary Delegation of Authority:
29. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 937, Temporary Closing of Highways, to delegate to the General Manager, Transportation Services, until December 31, 2030, inclusive, the authority to temporarily close highways or portions of highways to pedestrian and vehicular traffic for a period of up to and including 365 consecutive days but ending no later than December 31, 2030, inclusive, with the exception of those highways listed in Section 937-4 of Chapter 937, Temporary Closing of Highways, as required for the purpose of the construction of the Ontario Line Gerrard Station and Leslieville Station and City Council exempt the General Manager, Transportation Services, in carrying out this delegated authority from Section 937-5 of Chapter 937, Temporary Closing of Highways, that being the requirement to notify the local Ward Councillor of the pending closure and the requirements to report on the proposed closure if so requested by the local Ward Councillor.
General:
30. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, in issuing any requisite permits to include additional permit terms and conditions as the General Manager, Transportation Services deems necessary and appropriate.
31. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bills to give effect to City Council’s decision and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make any necessary clarifications, refinements, minor modifications, technical amendments, or by-law amendments that may be identified by the City Solicitor or the General Manager, Transportation Services in order to give effect to Recommendations 1 to 29 above, inclusive, above.
32. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to submit directly to City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code and/or Chapters, and any Schedules to the Chapters, to reinstate the traffic and parking regulations to what they were immediately prior to the by-law amendments (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) and remove the delegated authority in Recommendation 29 above made in connection with the report (June 19, 2026) from the Interim Deputy General Manager, Transportation Services.
33. City Council request the Executive Director, Transit Expansion to report to City Council on the fulfillment of the list of conditions that were required in order to create the “Gertrude Gate” and the current status of the permit.
34. City Council request the Executive Director, Transit Expansion to report to City Council on all aspects of the siting of a new fan and second exit on Car Parks 17 and the one exiting on Gough, including:
a. actual Metrolinx technical requirements and specifications for these for the new Ontario Line Pape Station;
b. a list of properties other than Green P lots that were considered for the second, second exit for the new Pape Station; and
c. impact of loss of parking for local business and for the new proposed Transit Oriented Community at the corner of Pape and Danforth.
35. City Council request the Director, Engineering Support Services, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report to the January 2027 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council with a recommendation to change the name of Strange Street to Riverside Street.
Origin
Summary
This report provides an overview of Metrolinx’s planned construction activities for the Gerrard Station and Leslieville Station, two future elevated stations along the joint Ontario Line and Lakeshore East GO rail corridor.
The report outlines the key construction stages, anticipated timelines, and associated temporary lane and sidewalk closures, pedestrian and cycling impacts, transit adjustments, and on-street parking amendments required to safely facilitate these works between 2026 and 2030.
Although certain temporary lane closures and associated traffic and parking by-law amendments required for Leslieville Station would otherwise fall within the approval authority of Toronto and East York Community Council, the proposed traffic management measures form part of a single integrated construction staging and traffic management strategy extending across interconnected station construction sites and adjacent roadways. Accordingly, City Council approval for the temporary road closures and traffic and parking by-law amendments is recommended to ensure coordinated consideration of the overall transportation impacts and associated mitigation measures.
In addition, this report recommends that the General Manager, Transportation Services be granted delegated authority until December 31, 2030 to implement long-term temporary road closures and associated traffic modifications required for the construction of Gerrard Station and Leslieville Station. This authority would allow flexibility to respond to refinements in construction staging and scheduling that may arise during construction, without the need for subsequent reports to Council.
Finally, this report provides an update in response to City Council Item TE31.73 regarding ongoing work with Metrolinx to advance the design and delivery of Liberty New Street.
Approval of the recommendations in this report will enable Metrolinx to proceed with critical transit infrastructure construction while ensuring that impacts to the transportation network, local communities, and road users are effectively managed through coordinated traffic control, access management, and construction mitigation measures.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288482.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-217167.pdf
Motions
That:
1. City Council request the Executive Director, Transit Expansion to report to City Council on the fulfillment of the list of conditions that were required in order to create the “Gertrude Gate” and the current status of the permit.
2. City Council request the Executive Director, Transit Expansion to report to City Council on all aspects of the siting of a new fan and second exit on Car Parks 17 and the one exiting on Gough, including:
a. actual Metrolinx technical requirements and specifications for these for the new Ontario Line Pape Station;
b. a list of properties other than Green P lots that were considered for the second, second exit for the new Pape Station; and
c. impact of loss of parking for local business and for the new proposed Transit Oriented Community at the corner of Pape and Danforth.
3. City Council request the Director, Engineering Support Services, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report to the January, 2027 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council with a recommendation to change the name of Strange Street to Riverside Street.
TE34.107 - Metrolinx East Harbour Transit Hub - Temporary Closure of Sunlight Park Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the temporary closure of the eastbound lanes to vehicular traffic on Sunlight Park Road, between Broadview Avenue and Eastern Avenue, from August 1, 2026 to June 30, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the East Harbour Transit Hub.
2. Approved the temporary closure of the south sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on Sunlight Park Road, between Broadview Avenue and Eastern Avenue, from August 1, 2026 to June 30, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the East Harbour Transit Hub.
3. Approved the temporary closure of the east sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on Broadview Avenue, between Eastern Avenue and Sunlight Park Road, from August 1, 2026 to June 30, 2029, inclusive, to facilitate construction of the East Harbour Transit Hub.
4. Directed the General Manager, Transportation Services, to include the following as a condition of permits for the long-term road and sidewalk closures detailed in Parts 1 to 3 above:
a. pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly or frequently as required, to remove construction debris and maintain safe conditions for all road users;
b. install appropriate signage to ensure safety of pedestrians, cyclists and motorists at all times;
c. provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public;
d. Sunlight Park Road and adjacent impacted sidewalks be reopened and restored to their pre-construction condition or better, upon completion of the East Harbour Transit Hub construction works; and
e. post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the construction hoarding, prominently displayed and legible from a minimum of 20 metres on all elevations facing the public realm.
5. Authorized the General Manager, Transportation Services, in issuing any requisite permit to include additional permit terms and conditions as the General Manager, Transportation Services deems necessary and appropriate.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Metrolinx is constructing the East Harbour Transit Hub (EHTH), a major regional transit interchange station to be located within the Lakeshore East rail corridor, immediately east of the Don Valley Parkway and south of Eastern Avenue. To facilitate construction of the EHTH, Community Council approval is required for the temporary closure of:
- Sunlight Park Road, between Broadview Avenue and Eastern Avenue;
- The south sidewalk on Sunlight Park Road, between Broadview Avenue and Eastern Avenue; and
- The east sidewalk on Broadview Avenue, between Eastern Avenue and Sunlight Park Road.
The proposed temporary road and sidewalk closures are required to accommodate construction staging and laydown activities associated with the EHTH project and are requested from August 1, 2026 to June 30, 2029, inclusive.
Transportation Services staff have reviewed the request and are satisfied that the proposed temporary closures are necessary to support construction of the EHTH and can be accommodated while maintaining pedestrian connectivity, emergency access, and the safe operation of the surrounding road network.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287951.pdf
Motions
TE34.108 - Noble Street (1266 Queen Street West) - Construction Staging Area
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the closure of the east sidewalk and the northbound traffic lane on Noble Street, between Queen Street West and a point 85 metres north, from December 1, 2026 to November 30, 2028, inclusive.
2. City Council designate Noble Street, between Queen Street West and Strickland Avenue, as one-way for northbound to westbound traffic only.
3. City Council authorize a compulsory stop control for westbound traffic at the intersection of Noble Street and Strickland Avenue.
4. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the west side of Noble Street, between Queen Street West and a point 50 metres north.
5. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect 10:00 p.m. of one day to 3:00 p.m. of the next following day Tuesday to Thursday; 10:00 p.m. Friday to 9:00 a.m. Saturday; 7:00 p.m. Saturday. to 3:00 p.m. Monday on the west side of Noble Street, between a point 50 metres north of Queen Street West and a point 16.5 metres further north.
6. City Council rescind the existing maximum 10 minutes parking regulation in effect 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Saturday, on the west side of Noble Street, between a point 50 metres north of Queen Street West and a point 16.5 metres further north.
7. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the west side of Noble Street, between a point 66.5 metres north of Queen Street West and the east/west leg of Noble Street.
8. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the east side of Noble Street, between Queen Street West and a point 85 metres north.
9. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on both sides of Noble Street, between Queen Street West and a point 85 metres north.
10. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Queen Street West, between Noble Street and a point 15 metres east.
11. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Queen Street West, between Noble Street and a point 32 metres east.
12. City Council direct the applicant to sweep the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
13. City Council direct the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected and unobstructed walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices, for the entire duration of the construction staging area to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and ensure it is compliant with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
14. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
15. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
16. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to maintain all sightlines to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
17. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
18. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
19. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
20. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
21. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
22. City Council direct the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance and construction activities to municipal infrastructure within the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
23. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to submit directly to the City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to City Council's decision (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) referred in Recommendations 2 to 11 above, once the project is complete.
24. City Council direct the applicant to provide monthly community meetings, to discuss any concerns raised by the community.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Queen Street West, City Council approval of this report is required.
SG Constructors is building a 27-storey residential condominium building at 1266 Queen St West. The site is located on the northeast corner of Queen Street West and Noble Street.
In order to facilitate construction staging operations for the development, Transportation Services is requesting authorization to implement the following temporary measures:
- Closure of the east sidewalk / boulevard and the northbound traffic lane on the east side of Noble Street, between Queen Street West and a point 85 metres north;
- Conversion of Noble Street from a two-way operation to a one-way traffic operation (northbound to westbound), between Queen Street West and Strickland Avenue;
- Installation of a stop control for westbound traffic on Noble Street and Strickland Avenue;
- Prohibit stopping at all times on both sides of Noble Street, between Queen Street West and a point 85 metres north;
- Prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Queen Street West in the vicinity of the work zone.
The above temporary measures are required for a period of 24 months, from December 1, 2026 to November 30, 2028. During this period, pedestrian access on the east side of Noble Street adjacent to the site will be restricted. Pedestrians will be directed to use the sidewalk on the other side of Noble Street, with crossing opportunities provided at the stop-controlled intersections of Queen Street West and Noble Street, and Noble Street and Strickland Avenue.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288424.pdf
Motions
TE34.109 - 72 Perth Avenue - Construction Staging Area
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the closure of the west sidewalk on Perth Avenue, between a point 71 metres south of Bloor Street West and a point 55 metres further south, from January 1, 2027 to April 30, 2028, inclusive.
2. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the west side of Perth Avenue, between a point 44 metres south of Bloor Street West and a point 92 metres further south.
3. Prohibited stopping at all times on the west side of Perth Avenue, between a point 44 metres south of Bloor Street West and a point 92 metres further south.
4. Directed the applicant to sweep the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
5. Directed the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected and unobstructed walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices, for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and ensure it is compliant with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
6. Directed the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
7. Directed the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
8. Directed the applicant to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to maintain all sightlines to ensure that pedestrians', cyclists' and motorists' safety is considered at all times.
9. Directed the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
10. Directed the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
11. Directed the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
12. Directed the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
13. Directed the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance and construction activities to municipal infrastructure within the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
14. Authorized the appropriate City officials to submit directly to Toronto and East York Community Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to Toronto and East York Community Council direction, and to reinstate the traffic and parking regulations referred in Parts 2 to 9 above, to what they were immediately prior to the date of the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services once the project is complete
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Skygrid Construction Inc. is constructing an 18-storey residential building at 72 Perth Avenue. The site is located on the west side Perth Avenue, approximately 85 metres south of Bloor Street West.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to close the west sidewalk on Perth Avenue for a period of 16 months, from January 1, 2027, to April 30, 2028, in order to facilitate construction staging operations. Pedestrian access along the west side of Perth Avenue, adjacent to the site, will be restricted. Pedestrians will be redirected to the sidewalk on the east side of Perth Avenue.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288387.pdf
Motions
TE34.110 - 355 Adelaide Street West - Construction Staging Area
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the closure the eastbound curb lane on the south side of Adelaide Street West, between Charlotte Street and a point 50 metres west, from January 1, 2027 to January 1, 2028, inclusive.
2. City Council rescind the existing standing prohibition in effect 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. Friday, through Monday on the south side of Adelaide Street West, between Charlotte Street and a point 50 metres west.
3. City Council rescind the existing commercial loading zone, in effect 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on the south side of Adelaide Street West, between a point 54 metres east of Spadina Avenue and a point 28.5 metres west of Charlotte Street.
4. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of Adelaide Street West, between a point 28.5 metres west of Charlotte Street and a point 21.5 metres further west.
5. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the south side of Adelaide Street West, between Charlotte Street and a point 50 metres west.
6. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Oxley Street, between a point 30.5 metres east of Spadina Avenue and a point 31 metres west of Charlotte Street.
7. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Oxley Street, between a point 30.5 metres east of Spadina Avenue and a point 31 metres west of Charlotte Street.
8. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of Oxley Street, between Charlotte Street and a point 30.5 metres east of Spadina Avenue.
9. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on south sides of Oxley Street, between Charlotte Street and a point 30.5 metres east of Spadina Avenue.
10. City Council direct the applicant to sweep the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
11. City Council direct the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected and unobstructed walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices, for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and ensure it is compliant with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
12. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
13. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
14. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to maintain all sightlines to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
15. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
16. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
17. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
18. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
19. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
20. City Council direct the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City Engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance and construction activities to municipal infrastructure within the vicinity of the construction staging area and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
21. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to submit directly to the City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to City Council’s Decision on Recommendations 1 to 9 above (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion), once the project is complete.
22. City Council direct the applicant to provide monthly community meetings, to discuss any concerns raised by the community.
23. City Council direct that the occupation permit for construction staging on the Adelaide Street West and Charlotte Street be conditional, subject to there being no conflicts with Metrolinx transit project construction.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Adelaide Street West and on Charlotte Street, City Council approval of this report is required.
The Hi-Rise Group is constructing a 58-storey condominium building at 355 Adelaide Street West. The site is located on the southwest corner of Adelaide Street West and Charlotte Street.
Transportation Services is seeking authorization to temporarily close the eastbound curb lane on the south side of Adelaide Street West for a period of 24 months, from January 1, 2027 to December 31, 2028. The temporary closure of the eastbound curb lane is required to facilitate construction staging operations associated with the below grade and above grade phases of the development. During the closure period, pedestrians on the south side of Adelaide Street West abutting the site will be maintained in the existing sidewalk within a 2.1 metre wide covered and protected walkway.
Two traffic lanes will be maintained at all times around the proposed construction staging area on Adelaide Street West. There are no lane closures required on Charlotte Street.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288390.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council amend Recommendation 1 by deleting the date "December 31, 2028" and inserting the date "January 1, 2028" so that it now reads:
1. City Council authorize the closure the eastbound curb lane on the south side of Adelaide Street West, between Charlotte Street and a point 50 metres west, from January 1, 2027 to January 1, 2028, inclusive.
TE34.111 - 35-47 Camden Street - Construction Staging Area
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the closure of the south sidewalk and a 2.3 metre wide portion of the westbound curb lane on Camden Street, between a point 29 metres east of Brant Street and a point 35 metres further east, and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the westbound curb lane, from August 1, 2026 to January 1, 2030, inclusive.
2. Rescinded the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday.; 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday, at a rate of $4.50 per hour for maximum period of 3 hours maximum, on the north side of Camden Street, between Brant Street and a point 130 metres east.
3. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect at all times from 12:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. on the even (north) side of Camden Street, from Brant Street and a point 130 metres east.
4. Prohibited stopping at all times on the north side of Camden Street, between Brant Street and a point 130 metres east.
5. Rescinded the existing passenger loading zone regulation on the east side of Brant Street, between a point 15 metres north of Camden Street and a point 9 metres south of Camden Street.
6. Rescinded the existing no standing anytime regulation on the east side of Brant Street, between a point 15 metres north of Camden Street and a point 9 metres south of Camden Street.
7. Prohibited stopping at all times on the east side of Brant Street, between a point 15 metres north of Camden Street and a point 9 metres south of Camden Street.
8. Directed the applicant to sweep the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
9. Directed the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected and unobstructed walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices, for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and ensure it is compliant with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
10. Directed the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
11. Directed the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
12. Directed the applicant to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to maintain all sightlines to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
13. Directed the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
14. Directed the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
15. Directed the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
16. Directed the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
17. Directed the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
18. Directed the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance and construction activities to municipal infrastructure within the vicinity of the construction staging area and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
19. Directed that Camden Street and Brant Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) when the project is complete.
20. Directed the applicant to provide monthly community meetings, to discuss any concerns raised by the community.
21. Directed that the occupation permit for construction staging on Camden Street be conditional, subject to there being no conflicts with Metrolinx transit project construction.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
47 Camden Inc. is constructing a 17-storey condominium building at 35-47 Camden Street. The site is located on the south side of Camden Street, approximately 40 metres east of Brant Street.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to temporarily close the south sidewalk and a 2.3 metre wide portion of the westbound curb lane on the south side of Camden Street for a period of 41 months, from July 6, 2026 to December 6, 2029, in order to facilitate construction staging operations for the development. Pedestrians on the south sidewalk will be redirected to a 2.1 metre wide covered and protected walkway located within the closed portion of the south curb lane.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287584.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council amend Recommendation 1 by deleting the dates "July 6, 2026 to December 6, 2029" and inserting the dates "August 1, 2026 to January 1, 2030" so that it now reads:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council authorize the closure of the south sidewalk and a 2.3 metre wide portion of the westbound curb lane on Camden Street, between a point 29 metres east of Brant Street and a point 35 metres further east, and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the westbound curb lane, from August 1, 2026 to January 1, 2030, inclusive.
TE34.112 - 128 Peter Street - Construction Staging Area
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the closure of the west sidewalk, the southbound bicycle lane, a 1.5 metre wide portion of the southbound lane, and the northbound left-turn lane on Peter Street, between Richmond Street West and a point 40 metres south and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the bicycle and vehicular lanes lanes, from August 1, 2026 to August 1, 2027 inclusive.
2. City Council authorize the closure of south sidewalk, and the westbound curb lane, on Richmond Street West, between Peter Street and a point 50 metres west and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the westbound curb lane, from August 1, 2026 to August 1, 2027 inclusive.
3. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 6:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., Monday to Saturday.; 1:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., Sunday from November 1 to March 31, inclusive, at a rate of $7.00 per hour for maximum period of 6 hours maximum, on the west side of Peter Street, between Richmond Street West and a point 70 metres south.
4. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday from November 1 to March 31, inclusive, at a rate of $7.00 per hour for maximum period of 3 hours maximum, on the west side of Peter Street, between Richmond Street West and a point 70 metres south.
5. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect at all times on the west side of Peter Street, between Richmond Street West and a point 30.5 metres south.
6. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the west side of Peter Street, between Richmond Street West and a point 70 metres south.
7. City Council direct the applicant to sweep the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
8. City Council direct the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected and unobstructed walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices, for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and ensure it is compliant with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
9. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
10. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
11. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to maintain all sightlines to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
12. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
13. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
14. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
15. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
16. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
17. City Council direct the applicant, in consultation with Transportation Services, to maintain any bicycle lanes, and install appropriate signage to inform drivers and cyclists of any changes to the cycling lanes.
18. City Council direct the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City Engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance and construction activities to municipal infrastructure within the vicinity of the construction staging area and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
19. City Council direct that Peter Street and Richmond Street West be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) when the project is complete.
20. City Council direct the applicant to provide monthly community meetings, to discuss any concerns raised by the community.
21. City Council direct that the occupation permit for construction staging on Peter Street, and on Richmond Street West be conditional, subject to there being no conflicts with Metrolinx transit project construction.
Origin
Summary
As Richmond Street West is classified as a major arterial street, City Council approval of this report is required.
Kingdom Development Inc is constructing a 41-storey rental apartment building at 128 Peter Street. The site is located on the west side Widmer Street, between Adelaide Street West and Richmond Street West.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to close the west sidewalk, the southbound bicycle lane, a 1.5 metre wide portion of the southbound lane, and the northbound left-turn lane on Peter Street, between Richmond Street West and a point 40 metres south. During the proposed closures, pedestrians will be redirected to a temporary 2.1 metre wide covered and protected walkway located within the closed portion of the bicycle lane and southbound traffic lane. The bicycle lanes on both sides of Peter Street will be maintained.
Additionally, authorization is being requested to close the south sidewalk, and the westbound curb lane on Richmond Street West, between Peter Street and a point 50 metres west. Throughout the closures duration, pedestrians will be redirected to a temporary 2.1 metre wide covered and protected walkway located within the closed portion of the westbound curb lane.
The requested closures are required for a period of 41 months, from August 1, 2026 to December 31, 2029 to facilitate construction staging activities for the development.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287585.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council amend Recommendations 1 and 2 by deleting the date "December 31, 2029" and inserting the date "August 1, 2027" so that they now read:
1. City Council authorize the closure of the west sidewalk, the southbound bicycle lane, a 1.5 metre wide portion of the southbound lane, and the northbound left-turn lane on Peter Street, between Richmond Street West and a point 40 metres south and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the bicycle and vehicular lanes lanes, from August 1, 2026 to August 1, 2027 inclusive.
2. City Council authorize the closure of south sidewalk, and the westbound curb lane, on Richmond Street West, between Peter Street and a point 50 metres west and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the westbound curb lane, from August 1, 2026 to August 1, 2027 inclusive.
TE34.113 - Richmond Street West (471 Richmond Street West and 38 Camden Street) - Construction Staging Area
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the closure of the south sidewalk and the south side westbound lane on Richmond Street West, between a point 40 metres east of Brant Street and a point 40 metres further east, and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the westbound curb lane, from August 1, 2026 to August 1, 2027, inclusive.
2. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays on the south side of Richmond Street West, between a point 30 metres east of Brant Street and a point 65 metres further east.
3. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of Richmond Street West, between a point 37 metres east of Brant Street and a point 17 metres further east.
4. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the south side of Richmond Street West, between a point 30 metres east of Brant Street and a point 65 metres further east.
5. City Council direct the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected and unobstructed walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices, for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and ensure it is compliant with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
6. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
7. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
8. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to maintain all sightlines to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
9. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
10. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
11. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
12. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
13. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
14. City Council direct the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance and construction activities to municipal infrastructure within the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
15. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to submit directly to the City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to City Council’s decision, and to reinstate traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) referred in Recommendations 1 to 6 above, once the project is complete.
16. City Council direct the applicant to provide monthly community meetings, to discuss any concerns raised by the community.
17. City Council direct that the occupation permit for construction staging on Richmond Street West and on Camden Street be conditional, subject to there being no conflicts with Metrolinx transit project construction.
Origin
Summary
As Richmond Street West is classified as a major arterial street, City Council approval of this report is required.
Chamberlain Construction Services Limited is constructing a 15 and 19-storeys hotel buildings at 471 Richmond Street West and 38 Camden Street. The development site will have frontage on both Richmond Street West and Camden Street.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to close the sidewalk and westbound curb lane on the south side Richmond Street West, for a period of 33 months, from August 1, 2026 to April 30, 2029, to facilitate construction staging operations. Pedestrian movements on the south side of Richmond Street West, adjacent to the site, will be maintained in a 2.1 metre wide covered and protected walkway located within the closed portion of the westbound lane.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288391.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council amend Recommendation 1 by deleting the date "April 30, 2029" and inserting the date "August 1, 2027" so that it now reads:
1. City Council authorize the closure of the south sidewalk and the south side westbound lane on Richmond Street West, between a point 40 metres east of Brant Street and a point 40 metres further east, and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the westbound curb lane, from August 1, 2026 to August 1, 2027, inclusive.
TE34.114 - 1 Bloor Street West (Yonge Street at Bloor Street West) - Construction Staging Area Time Extension
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the continuation of the closure of the 3 metre wide portion of the southbound curb lane on Yonge Street, between Bloor Street West and a point 66 metres south, from January 1, 2027, to June 30, 2028, inclusive.
2. City Council direct the applicant to continue posting a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
3. City Council direct the applicant to continue providing and installing public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
4. City Council direct the applicant to continue sweeping the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
5. City Council direct the applicant to continue ensuring that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
6. City Council direct the applicant to continue consulting and communicating all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
7. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
8. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
9. City Council direct the applicant to continue installing appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
10. City Council direct the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City Engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance, and construction activities to municipal infrastructure within the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
11. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to submit directly to City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to City Council direction, and to reinstate the traffic and parking regulations to what they were immediately prior to the date of the report on November 25 and 26, 2020 (Item 2020.TE20.29) and the report on November 26 and 27, 2019 (Item 2019.TE10.27) from the Director, Transportation Services once the project is complete.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Yonge Street, City Council approval of this report is required.
One Bloor West Toronto Group (The One) Inc. on behalf of FAAN Advisors Group Inc. is constructing an 85-storey residential tower at 1 Bloor Street West. The site is located on the southwest corner of Yonge Street and Bloor Street West.
City Council, at its meeting on July 23 and 24, 2025, City Council approved a time extension of the construction staging area on Yonge Street for the period from August 1, 2025 to December 31, 2026. While the applicant sought an extension from August 1, 2025 until June 30, 2028, the Council instead authorized a reduced period, concluding
on December 31, 2026.
The developer is now requesting an extension of the duration of the construction staging area on Yonge Street, to allow for the project to be completed.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to extend the duration of the construction staging area on Yonge Street for an additional 18 months, from January 1, 2027, to June 30, 2028.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288420.pdf
Motions
TE34.115 - 350 Davenport Road - Construction Staging Area
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the closure of the east sidewalk, the northbound bicycle lane, the curbside parking lane, and the northbound traffic lane on Davenport Road, between a point 50 metres south of Dupont Street to a point 58 metres further south, from August 1, 2026 to August 1, 2028, inclusive.
2. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday; 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday, at a rate of $4.50 per hour and for a maximum period of 3 hours, on the east/north side of Davenport Road from a point 50 metres south of Dupont Street and a point 58 metres further south.
3. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the east side of Davenport Road from a point 50 metres south of Dupont Street and a point 58 metres further south.
4. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash or sweep (weather permitting) the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
5. City Council direct the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected, unobstructed, and fully Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act compliant walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit.
6. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
7. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
8. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
9. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
10. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
11. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
12. City Council direct the applicant, in consultation with Transportation Services, to maintain any bicycle lanes, and install appropriate signage to inform drivers and cyclists of any changes to the cycling lanes.
13. City Council direct the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance and construction activities to municipal infrastructure within the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
14. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to submit directly to the City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to City Council’s decision, and to reinstate traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) referred in Recommendations 1 to 3 above, once the project is complete
15. City Council direct the applicant to provide monthly community meetings, to discuss any concerns raised by the community.
16. City Council direct that Davenport Road be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.
17. City Council direct the applicant to provide a protected bicycle lane for the portion of the northbound bicycle lane on Davenport Road, between a point 50 metres south of Dupont Street and a point 58 metres further south, that has been shifted west to accommodate the applicant’s project, and maintain the protected bicycle lane within the closed portions of the parking lane and the northbound traffic lane.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Davenport Road, City Council approval of this report is required.
Citi-Core Construction Management Ltd, is constructing an eight-storey residential building at 350 Davenport Road. The site is located on the east side of Davenport Road, at a point approximately 80 metres south of Dupont Street.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to close the east sidewalk, the northbound bicycle lane, the curbside parking lane, and the northbound traffic lane on, Davenport Road, for a period of 24 months, from August 1, 2026 to August 1, 2028, in order to facilitate construction staging operations. During the closure period, a temporary pedestrian walkway and a temporary northbound bicycle lane will be provided within the closed portions of the parking lane and the northbound traffic lane.
The proposed construction staging area will require a temporary removal of eight parking machine spaces on the east side of Davenport Road. The applicant will be responsible for paying the lost revenue for the eight parking spaces.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288479.pdf
Communications
Motions
That:
1. City Council direct the applicant to provide a protected bicycle lane for the portion of the northbound bicycle lane on Davenport Road, between a point 50 metres south of Dupont Street and a point 58 metres further south, that has been shifted west to accommodate the applicant’s project, and maintain the protected bicycle lane within the closed portions of the parking lane and the northbound traffic lane.
TE34.116 - 44 Price Street - Construction Staging Area
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the closure of the north boulevard allowance and north sidewalk on Price Street, between a point 48 metres east of Scrivener Square and a point 12.5 metres further east, from May 29, 2026, to October 31, 2027, inclusive.
2. Rescinded the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday, at a rate of $4.50 per hour and for a maximum of three hours, on the north side of Price Street, between a point 135 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 12.5 metres further east.
3. Prohibited stopping at all times on the north side of Price Street, between a point 135 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 12.5 metres further east.
4. Directed the applicant to pressure wash or sweep (weather permitting) the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
5. Directed the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
6. Directed the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
7. Directed the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large-scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
8. Directed the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
9. Authorized the appropriate City officials to submit directly to Toronto and East York Community Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to Toronto and East York Community Council's direction, and to reinstate the traffic and parking regulations to what they were immediately prior to the date of this revised report (May 21, 2026) from the Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services once the project is complete.
10. Directed that Price Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) when the project is complete.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Toronto Lawn and Tennis Club Limited is redeveloping the facility at 44 Price Street. The site is located on the north side of Price Street, between Scrivener Square and the east limit of Price Street.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to temporarily close a portion of the north boulevard allowance and the north sidewalk on Price Street, between a point 48 metres east of Scrivener Square and a point 12.5 metres further east for a period of 18 months, from May 29, 2026 to October 31, 2027, in order to facilitate the redevelopment. Pedestrians will be redirected from the north side to the south side of the road.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287586.pdf
(May 11, 2026) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services on 44 Price Street - Construction Staging Area
Motions
TE34.117 - Centre Avenue and Edward Street (481 University Avenue) - Construction Staging Area Time Extension
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the continuation of the closure of the south sidewalk and a 5.2 metre wide portion of the eastbound parking lane and adjacent eastbound lane on Edward Street, between University Avenue and Centre Avenue, from October 1, 2026 to December 31, 2028, inclusive.
2. Authorized the continuation of the closure of the west sidewalk and a 3.3 metre wide portion of the southbound parking lane and adjacent southbound lane on Centre Avenue, between Dundas Street West and Edward Street, from October 1, 2026 to December 31, 2028, inclusive.
3. Continued to authorize the all-way stop control at the intersection of Edward Street and Centre Avenue.
4. Continued to rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday, at a rate of $7.00 per hour and for a maximum period of 3 hours, on the south side of Edward Street, between University Avenue and Centre Avenue.
5. Continued to rescind the existing designated commercial loading zone in effect 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday, the south side of Edward Street, between a point 35 metres east of University Avenue and a point 8.5 metres further east.
6. Continued to prohibit stopping at all times on the south side of Edward Street, between University Avenue and Centre Avenue.
7. Continued to rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday, at a rate of $7.00 per hour and for a maximum period of 3 hours, on both sides of Centre Avenue, between Dundas Street West and Edward Street.
8. Continued to rescind the existing designated commercial loading zone in effect at all times on the west side of Centre Avenue, between a point 32.7 metres north of Dundas Street West and a point 9.2 metres further north.
9. Continued to rescind the existing standing prohibition in effect at all times on the east side of Centre Avenue, between Dundas Street West and a point 18 metres north.
10. Continued to rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday, on both sides of Centre Avenue, between Dundas Street West and Edward Street.
11. Continued to prohibit stopping at all times on both sides of Centre Avenue, between Dundas Street West and Edward Street.
12. Directed the applicant to continue providing and installing public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
13. Directed the applicant to continue to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City Engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance and construction activities to municipal infrastructure within the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work; more specifically: i. Transportation Services major road rehabilitation, on-street bikeway construction and local geometric safety improvements works, and Toronto Water watermain replacement work planned on University Avenue from August 2026 to July 2027; ii. Toronto Water watermain replacement work planned on Edward Street from August 2027 to May 2028; and iii. Toronto Water watermain replacement work planned on Centre Avenue from August 2027 to May 2028.
14. Authorized the appropriate City officials to submit directly to the Toronto and East York Community Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to Toronto and East York Community Council’s decision, and to reinstate traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) referred in Parts 1 to 11 above, once the project is complete.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Davpart Incorporated is constructing a 54-storey condominium building at 481 University Avenue, 481 University Avenue, 210 Dundas Street West, 70 Centre Avenue and 137 Edward Street. The site encompasses the entire block bounded by University Avenue, Dundas Street West, Centre Avenue, and Edward Street.
By way of background, Toronto and East York Community Council, at its meeting on November 10, 2020, authorized the subject construction staging area on Edward Street and on Centre Avenue, from November 12, 2020, to September 30, 2026. The developer is now requesting an extension of the duration of the construction staging area on Edward Street and on Centre Avenue, as the site has experienced construction delays due to the projects extraordinary heritage preservation requirements that extended the project schedule by more than 24 months.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to extend the duration of the construction staging area on Edward Street and on Centre Avenue for an additional 27 months, from October 1, 2026, to December 31, 2028 to allow for the construction of the development to be completed.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288417.pdf
Motions
TE34.118 - 29-39 Pleasant Boulevard - Construction Staging Area
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the closure of the south sidewalk and a 3.2 metre wide portion of the eastbound curb parking lane on Pleasant Boulevard, between a point 78.5 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 77.5 metres further east, and provision of a temporary 2.1 metre wide pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of Pleasant Boulevard, from July 10, 2026 to March 31, 2028, inclusive.
2. Authorized the closure of a 1.0 metre wide portion of the north-south laneway, abutting the west side of the site, from July 10, 2026 to March 31, 2028, inclusive.
3. Authorized the full closure to all road users of the east-west laneway, abutting the south side of the site, from July 10, 2026 to March 31, 2028, inclusive.
4. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of Pleasant Boulevard, between a point 78.5 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 19 metres further east.
5. Rescinded the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the south side of Pleasant Boulevard, between a point 78.5 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 19 metres further east.
6. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times, Monday to Saturday, on the south side of Pleasant Boulevard, between a point 97.5 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 22.5 metres further east.
7. Rescinded the existing on-street accessible loading zone in effect at all times on the south side of Pleasant Boulevard, between a point 120 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 21 metres further east.
8. Rescinded the existing standing prohibition in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, on the south side of Pleasant Boulevard, between a point 141 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 15 metres further east.
9. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect from 9:00 a.m. of one day to 7:00 a.m. of the next following day, Monday to Friday, on the south side of Pleasant Boulevard, between a point 141 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 15 metres further east.
10. Prohibited stopping at all times on the south side of Pleasant Boulevard, between a point 78.5 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 77.5 metres further east.
11. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Pleasant Boulevard, between a point 78.5 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 77.5 metres further east.
12. Prohibited stopping at all times on the north side of Pleasant Boulevard, between a point 78.5 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 77.5 metres further east.
13. Directed the applicant to pressure wash or sweep (weather permitting) the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
14. Directed the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected and unobstructed walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices, for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and ensure it is compliant with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
15. Directed the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
16. Directed the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business iImprovement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
17. Directed the applicant to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to install converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
18. Directed the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
19. Directed the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large-scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
20. Directed the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
21. Directed the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
22. Directed the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
23. Directed the applicant to provide monthly community meetings, to discuss any concerns raised by the community.
24. Directed the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City Engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance and construction activities to municipal infrastructure with the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
25. Authorized the appropriate City officials to submit directly to the Toronto and East York Community Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to Toronto and East York Community Council’s decision, and to reinstate traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) referred in Parts 4 to 12 above, once the project is complete.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Pleasant Condos LP is constructing a 50-storey condominium with ground floor retail at 29-39 Pleasant Boulevard. The site is located on the south side of Pleasant Boulevard, east of Yonge Street.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to temporarily close a portion of the eastbound lane and the south sidewalk on Pleasant Boulevard. Additionally, portion of the rear north-south laneway and full closures to all road users of a portion of the east-west laneway for a period of 21 months, from July 10, 2026, to March 31, 2028, in order to enable construction staging operations for the development.
Pedestrians on the south side of Pleasant Boulevard will be redirected into a 2.1 metre wide covered and protected walkway within the closed portion of the eastbound curb lane.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288443.pdf
Motions
TE34.119 - 65-87 Raglan Avenue - Construction Staging Area Time Extension
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the continuation of the closure of the east sidewalk and a 4.5 metre wide portion of the northbound curb lane on Raglan Avenue, between a point 56.5 metres south of Maplewood Avenue and a point 67 metres further south, from December 1, 2026 to December 31, 2027 inclusive.
2. Continued to rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect from the 1st day of each month to the 15th day of each month, April 1 to November 30 inclusive, on the west side of Raglan Avenue, between a point 47 metres south of Maplewood Avenue and a point 83 metres further south.
3. Continued to rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking in effect from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday from the 16th day to the last day of each month, from April 1 to November 30 inclusive, on the west side of Raglan Avenue, between a point 47 metres south of Maplewood Avenue and a point 83 metres further south.
4. Continued to rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking in effect from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday from December 1 of one year to March 31 of the next following year inclusive, on the west side of Raglan Avenue, between a point 47 metres south of Maplewood Avenue and a point 83 metres further south.
5. Continued to rescind the existing permit parking regulation in effect at all times, except no parking from 7:00 p.m. 1st day to 7:00 p.m. on the 16th day of each month, inclusive, April 1 to December 1, inclusive, from 12:00 midnight to 6:00 a.m. on the even side of Raglan Avenue, between a point 47 metres south of Maplewood Avenue and a point 83 metres further south.
6. Continued to rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times, December 1 to March 31, inclusive, on the east side of Raglan Avenue, between a point 47 metres south of Maplewood Avenue and a point 83 metres further south.
7. Continued to rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times, from the 16th day of each month to the last day of each month, April. 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the east side of Raglan Avenue, between a point 47 metres south of Maplewood Avenue and a point 83 metres further south.
8. Continued to rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking in effect from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday from the 1st day to the 15th day of each month, from Apr. 1 to Nov. 30, inclusive, on the east side of Raglan Avenue, between a point 47 metres south of Maplewood Avenue and a point 83 metres further south.
9. Continued to rescind the existing permit parking regulation in effect at all times, except no parking from 7:00 p.m. on the 16th day of each month to 7:00 p.m. on the 1st day of each month, inclusive, April 1 to December 1, inclusive and no parking anytime from 7:00 p.m. December 1 of one year to 7:00 p.m. April 1 of the next following year, inclusive, from 12:00 midnight to 6:00 a.m. on the odd side of Raglan Avenue, between a point 47 metres south of Maplewood Avenue and a point 83 metres further south.
10. Continued to prohibit stopping at all times on both sides of Raglan Avenue, between a point 47 metres south of Maplewood Avenue and a point 83 metres further south.
11. Continued to authorize a temporary Level 2, Type B -Pedestrian Crossover on Raglan Avenue, at a point 185 metres south of Maplewood Avenue to be in-operation from December 1, 2026, to December 31, 2027, which the issuance of the construction staging permit must be conditional on the Pedestrian Crossover being operational.
12. Directed the applicant to continue posting a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
13. Directed the applicant to continue providing and installing public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
14. Directed the applicant to continue to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City Engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance, and construction activities to municipal infrastructure within the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
15. Authorized the appropriate City officials to submit directly to the Toronto and East York Community Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to Toronto and East York Community Council’s decision, and to reinstate traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) referred in Parts 1 to 11 above, once the project is completed.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Raglan Building Group Inc is constructing a 28-storey residential condominium building at 65-85 Raglan Avenue. The site is located on the east side of Raglan Avenue, between St. Clair Avenue West and Maplewood Avenue.
Toronto and East York Community Council, at its meeting on June 11, 2024, approved the subject construction staging area on Raglan Avenue, from September 1, 2024 to November 30, 2026. The developer is requesting an extension for the construction staging area on Raglan Avenue due to project delays, including challenges with materials and additional unexpected work encountered during construction.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to extend the duration of the construction staging area on Raglan Avenue for an additional 13 months, from December 1, 2026, to December 31, 2027, to allow for the construction of the development to be completed.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288384.pdf
Motions
TE34.120 - 100 Bond Street - Construction Staging Area
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the closure of a 6 metre wide portion of the west sidewalk and west boulevard allowance on Bond Street, between Dundas Street East and a point 64.5 metres north, from July 10, 2026, to August 31, 2027, inclusive.
2. Authorized the closure of Victoria Street Lane, between Dundas Street East and a point 53 metres north from July 10, 2026 to August 31, 2030 inclusive.
3. Rescinded the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday at a rate of $7.00 per hour and for a maximum of 3 hours, on the east side of Bond Street, between Dundas Street East and a point 11 metres north.
4. Rescinded the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday at a rate of $7.00 per hour and for a maximum of 3 hours, on the east side of Bond Street, between a point 44.8 metres north of Dundas Street East and a point 34.7 metres further north.
5. Rescinded the existing stopping prohibition in effect at all times on the east side of Bond Street, between a point 20 metres north of Dundas Street East and a point 31 metres further north.
6. Prohibited stopping at all times on the east side of Bond Street, between Dundas Street East and a point 79.5 metres further north.
7. Rescinded the existing one-way eastbound traffic only on Lane first south of Gould Street, between Victoria Street Lane and Bond Street.
8. Directed the applicant to pressure wash or sweep (weather permitting) the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
9. Directed the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected and unobstructed walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices, for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and ensure it is compliant with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act .
10. Directed the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
11. Directed the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
12. Directed the applicant to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to install converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
13. Directed the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
14. Directed the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
15. Directed the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
16. Directed the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
17. Directed the applicant to include a minimum of 75 percent of advertisement surface area on the construction hoarding to be allocated to artwork with adequate spotlighting at their sole cost; design is to be reviewed and approved by the local Ward Councillor.
18. Directed the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City Engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance, and construction activities to municipal infrastructure with the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
19. Directed the applicant to establish a Construction Management Working Group that meets monthly and invite local stakeholders including Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto Buildings, adjacent neighbours, local resident groups, local Business Improvement Areas and local school administration.
20. Authorized the appropriate City officials to submit directly to the Toronto and East York Community Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to Toronto and East York Community Council’s decision, and to reinstate traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) referred in Parts 3 to 7 above, once the project is complete.
21. Directed that the occupation permit for construction staging on Victoria Street Lane, on Bond Street, and on Dundas Street East be conditional, subject to there being no conflicts with Metrolinx transit project construction.
22. Authorized the temporary installation of a Pedestrian Crossover Level 2 Type B on Bond Street, at a point approximately 97 metres north of Dundas Street East, to be in operation from July 10, 2026, to August 31, 2030, which the issuance of the construction staging permit must be conditional on the Pedestrian Crossover being operational.
23. Directed the General Manager, Transportation Services to temporarily install a Pedestrian Crossover Level 2 Type B on Bond Street, at a point approximately 97 metres north of Dundas Street East, to be in operation until August 31, 2030 or completion of the 100 Bond Street Project, whichever comes first, on the following conditions:
a. a deposit will be required to be submitted to "The Treasurer, City of Toronto", in advance of the permit being issued; the deposit is required to cover costs incurred by the City, in the event the contractor does not provide a service that it must, as stipulated in the permit agreement conditions below; and upon completion of the construction project and return to normal operation, the unused portion of the deposit will be returned to the contractor;
b. the contractor will be responsible for the installation, maintenance and removal of the Pedestrian Crossover by one of the electrical contractors pre-approved by the City's Traffic Systems Construction and Maintenance Unit; maintenance levels specified by the City's Traffic Systems Construction and Maintenance Unit must be followed, to be in accordance with those followed by the City's Electrical Maintenance Contractor for the maintenance of the City's other Pedestrian Crossovers; and
c. the contractor must provide to Transportation Services a seven day/24 hour contact name, phone number and email address, for the City's dispatchers to forward operational malfunction/complaints to; if the City's dispatcher is not able to reach the contact by phone to provide details of a malfunction/complaint, then the City's Electrical Maintenance Contractor will be dispatched to investigate and complete repairs and the City's dispatcher will send an email to document the malfunction call and their inability to reach the contact; and the response and repair costs will be deducted from the deposit provided to the City.
24. Directed the applicant to mitigate light pollution by installing a shield/barrier on any lighting standards in close proximity to adjacent residential properties, such as cranes.
25. Directed the applicant email monthly construction progress reports to the local Councillor, local residents’ association and Business Improvement Area Board of Management.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Podium Development Corp. is constructing a 21-storey purpose-built student residential building at 100 Bond Street. The site is located on the northwest corner of Dundas Street East and Bond Street.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to temporarily close the west boulevard and west sidewalk on Bond Street, as well as a portion of a public laneway (Victoria Street Lane), for a period of 50 months, from July 10, 2026, to August 31, 2030, to facilitate construction staging operations for the project.
The closure of the Victoria Street Lane will restrict vehicular traffic. As a result, the east-west laneway, between Victoria Street Lane and Bond Street will be temporarily converted from a one-way eastbound operation to a two-way traffic operation to maintain local access.
Due to the high density of the surrounding university, residential buildings, and businesses, a temporary pedestrian crossover will be installed on Bond Street to enhance pedestrian safety and facilitate safe crossings.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288480.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council amend Recommendation 1 by deleting the date "August 31, 2030" and inserting the date "August 31, 2027" so that it now reads:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council authorize the closure of a 6 metre wide portion of the west sidewalk and west boulevard allowance on Bond Street, between Dundas Street East and a point 64.5 metres north, from July 10, 2026, to August 31, 2027, inclusive.
2. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 17:
Recommendation to be deleted:
17. Toronto and East York Community Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
and adopt instead the following new Recommendation 17:
17. Toronto and East York Community Council direct the applicant to include a minimum of 75 percent of advertisement surface area on the construction hoarding to be allocated to artwork with adequate spotlighting at their sole cost; design is to be reviewed and approved by the local Ward Councillor.
3. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 19:
Recommendation to be deleted:
19. Toronto and East York Community Council direct the applicant to provide monthly community meetings, to discuss any concerns raised by the community.
and adopt instead the following new Recommendation 19:
19. Toronto and East York Community Council direct the applicant to establish a Construction Management Working Group that meets monthly and invite local stakeholders including Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto Buildings, adjacent neighbours, local resident groups, local Business Improvement Areas and local school administration.
3. Toronto and East York Community Council adopt the following new recommendations:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council direct the applicant to mitigate light pollution by installing a shield/barrier on any lighting standards in close proximity to adjacent residential properties, such as cranes.
2. Toronto and East York Community Council direct the applicant email monthly construction progress reports to the local Councillor, local residents’ association and Business Improvement Area Board of Management.
TE34.121 - 325 Gerrard Street East - Construction Staging Area
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the closure of the east sidewalk and a 1.9 metre wide portion of the east side southbound curb lane on Dreamers Way, between Gerrard Street East and a point 82.5 metres south, from July 10, 2026, to September 30, 2027, inclusive.
2. City Council rescind the existing standing prohibition at all times on the east side of Dreamers Way, between Gerrard Street East and a point 82.5 metres south.
3. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on both sides of Dreamers Way, between Gerrard Street East and a point 82.5 metres south.
4. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the south side of Gerrard Street East, between a point 84 metres east of Dreamers Way and a point 18.5 metres further east.
5. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the south side of Gerrard Street East, between a point 84 metres east of Dreamers Way and a point 18.5 metres further east.
6. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash or sweep (weather permitting) the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
7. City Council direct the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected and unobstructed walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices, for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and ensure it is compliant with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
8. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
9. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
10. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to install converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
11. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
12. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large-scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
13. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
14. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
15. City Council direct the applicant to include a minimum of 75 percent of advertisement surface area on the construction hoarding to be allocated to artwork with adequate spotlighting at their sole cost; design is to be reviewed and approved by the local Ward Councillor.
16. City Council direct the applicant to establish a Construction Management Working Group that meets monthly and invite local stakeholders including Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto Buildings, adjacent neighbours, local resident groups, local Business Improvement Areas and local school administration.
17. City Council direct the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City Engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance, and construction activities to municipal infrastructure with the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work; more specifically, Transportation Services on-street bikeway pavement markings (2026), major road resurfacing (2028-2029), local geometric safety improvements (2028-2029), Toronto Water watermain replacement and sewer rehabilitation (2029), and Toronto Transit Commission electrical work (2027) and track replacement (2029).
18. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to submit directly to the City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to City Council’s decision, and to reinstate traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) referred in Recommendations 2, 3, 4 and 5 above, once the project is complete.
19. City Council direct the applicant to mitigate light pollution by installing a shield/barrier on any lighting standards in close proximity to adjacent residential properties, such as cranes.
20. City Council direct the applicant email monthly construction progress reports to the local Councillor, local residents’ association and Business Improvement Area Board of Management.
Origin
Summary
As Gerrard Street East is classified as a minor arterial street, City Council approval of this report is required.
Deltera Inc. is constructing a 26-storey mixed use building at 325 Gerrard Street East. The site is located on the southeast corner of Gerrard Street East and Dreamers Way.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to temporarily close a portion of the east side southbound curb lane and the east sidewalk on Dreamers Way for a period of 39 months, from July 10, 2026 to September 30, 2029, in order to facilitate construction staging operations for the development.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288477.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council amend Recommendation 1 by deleting the date "September 30, 2029" and inserting the date "September 30, 2027" so that it now reads:
1. City Council authorize the closure of the east sidewalk and a 1.9 metre wide portion of the east side southbound curb lane on Dreamers Way, between Gerrard Street East and a point 82.5 metres south, from July 10, 2026, to September 30, 2027, inclusive.
2. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 15:
Recommendation to be deleted:
15. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
and adopt instead the following new Recommendation 15:
15. City Council direct the applicant to include a minimum of 75 percent of advertisement surface area on the construction hoarding to be allocated to artwork with adequate spotlighting at their sole cost; design is to be reviewed and approved by the local Ward Councillor.
3. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 16:
Recommendation to be deleted:
16. City Council direct the applicant to provide monthly community meetings, to discuss any concerns raised by the community
and adopt instead the following new Recommendation 16:
16. City Council direct the applicant to establish a Construction Management Working Group that meets monthly and invite local stakeholders including Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto Buildings, adjacent neighbours, local resident groups, local Business Improvement Areas and local school administration.
4. Toronto and East York Community Council adopt the following new recommendations:
1. City Council direct the applicant to mitigate light pollution by installing a shield/barrier on any lighting standards in close proximity to adjacent residential properties, such as cranes.
2. City Council direct the applicant email monthly construction progress reports to the local Councillor, local residents’ association and Business Improvement Area Board of Management.
TE34.122 - Grosvenor Street and Grenville Street (Phase 1) - Construction Staging Area
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the closure of the south sidewalk and a 1.3 metre wide portion of the eastbound curb lane on Grosvenor Street, between a point 47 metres east of Bay Street and a point 50 metres further east, and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the eastbound curb lane, from December 1, 2026 to March 31, 2028, inclusive.
2. Authorized the closure of the north sidewalk and a 2.2 metre wide potion of the westbound curb lane on Grenville Street, between a point 63 metres east of Bay Street and a point 45 metres further east, and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the westbound curb lane, from September 1, 2026 to March 31, 2028, inclusive.
3. Authorized the closure of a 4.6 metre wide portion of the St. Vincent Laneway (east side), between Grosvenor Street and a point 50 metres south, from September 1, 2026 to March 31, 2028, inclusive.
4. Rescinded the existing standing prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of Grosvenor Street, between a point 35 metres east of Bay Street and a point 65 metres further east.
5. Prohibited stopping at all times on the south side of Grosvenor Street, between a point 35 metres east of Bay Street and a point 65 metres further east.
6. Rescinded the existing parking machine regulation in effect 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday.; 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday., at a rate of $7.00 dollars per hour for maximum period of 3 hours maximum, on the north side of Grenville Street, between a point 32 metres east of Bay Street and a point 83 metres further east.
7. Prohibited stopping at all times on the north side of Grenville Street, between a point 32 metres east of Bay Street and a point 83 metres further east.
8. Directed the applicant to sweep the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
9. Directed the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected and unobstructed walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices, for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and ensure it is compliant with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
10. Directed the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
11. Directed the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
12. Directed the applicant to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to maintain all sightlines to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
13. Directed the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
14. Directed the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
15. Directed the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
16. Directed the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
17. Directed the applicant to include a minimum of 75 percent of advertisement surface area on the construction hoarding to be allocated to artwork with adequate spotlighting at their sole cost; design is to be reviewed and approved by the local Ward Councillor.
18. Directed the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance and construction activities to municipal infrastructure within the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
19. Authorized the appropriate City officials to submit directly to the Toronto and East York Community Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to Toronto and East York Community Council’s decision, and to reinstate traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) referred in Parts 1 to 7 above, once the project is completed.
20. Directed the applicant to provide monthly community meetings, to discuss any concerns raised by the community.
21. Directed the applicant to mitigate light pollution by installing a shield/barrier on any lighting standards in close proximity to adjacent residential properties, such as cranes.
22. Directed the applicant to email monthly construction progress reports to the local Councillor, local residents’ association and Business Improvement Area Board of Management.
23. Directed the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
24. Directed the applicant to, in consultation with Transportation Services, install sharrow markings onto the roadway and display appropriate signage on the hoarding board to inform motorists and cyclist to safely share the road.
25. Directed the applicant to establish a construction Management Working Group that meets monthly and invite local stakeholders including Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto Buildings, adjacent neighbours, local resident groups, local Business Improvement Areas and local school administration.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Deltera Contracting Inc. is undertaking the constructing of two residential towers, 41 and 33 storeys high at the properties municipally known as 27 Grosvenor Street and 26 Grenville Street. The site is located on the east side St. Vincent Lane, between Grenville Street and Grosvenor Street.
To facilitate construction staging operations associated with the demolition and below grade works (Phase 1) of the project, Transportation Services is requesting Council authorization for the following temporary closures:
- Partial closure of the south sidewalk and 1.3 metre wide portion of the eastbound curb lane on Grosvenor Street;
- Closure of the north sidewalk and a 2.2 metre wide portion of the westbound curb lane on Grenville Street; and
- Closure of vehicular access on St. Vincent Lane, between Grosvenor Street and a point 40 metres south.
The proposed construction staging area will result in the loss of seven parking machine spaces on the north side of Grenville Street. The applicant will be required to compensate the City for the lost revenue associated with the pay parking spaces.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288385.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council delete Recommendation 17:
Recommendation to be deleted:
17. Toronto and East York Community Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
and adopt instead the following new Recommendation 17:
17. Toronto and East York Community Council direct the applicant to include a minimum of 75 percent of advertisement surface area on the construction hoarding to be allocated to artwork with adequate spotlighting at their sole cost; design is to be reviewed and approved by the local Ward Councillor.
2. Toronto and East York Community Council adopt the following new recommendations:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council direct the applicant to mitigate light pollution by installing a shield/barrier on any lighting standards in close proximity to adjacent residential properties, such as cranes.
2. Toronto and East York Community Council direct the applicant to email monthly construction progress reports to the local Councillor, local residents’ association and Business Improvement Area Board of Management.
3. Toronto and East York Community Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
4. Toronto and East York Community Council direct the applicant to, in consultation with Transportation Services, install sharrow markings onto the roadway and display appropriate signage on the hoarding board to inform motorists and cyclist to safely share the road.
5. Toronto and East York Community Council direct the applicant to establish a construction Management Working Group that meets monthly and invite local stakeholders including Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto Buildings, adjacent neighbours, local resident groups, local Business Improvement Areas and local school administration.
TE34.123 - 1134 Queen Street East - Construction Staging Area Time Extension
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the continuation of the closure of the north sidewalk and a 2.2-metre-wide portion of the westbound curb lane on Queen Street East, between a point 17 metres west of Bertmount Avenue and Coady Avenue, and a provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the westbound curb lane, from October 1, 2026 to March 31, 2027, inclusive.
2. City Council direct the applicant to continue to pressure wash or sweep (weather permitting) the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
3. City Council direct the applicant to continue to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected and unobstructed walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices, for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and ensure it is compliant with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
4. City Council direct the applicant to continue to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
5. City Council direct the applicant to continue to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
6. City Council direct the applicant to continue to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to install converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
7. City Council direct the applicant to continue to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
8. City Council direct the applicant to continue to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large-scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
9. City Council direct the applicant to continue to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
10. City Council direct the applicant to continue to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
11. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to submit directly to the City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to City Council’s decision, and to reinstate traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) referred in Item 2025.TE24.44, once the project is complete.
12. City Council direct the applicant to continue to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City Engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance and construction activities to municipal infrastructure with the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work; more specifically, TTC track replacement work planned on Queen Street East in 2027.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Queen Street East, City Council approval of this report is required.
Elcium Construction Management Corp. has undertaken the construction of a 3-storey condominium with ground floor retail at 1134 Queen Street East. The site is located on the north side of Queen Street East, between Bertmount Avenue and Coady Avenue.
City Council, at its meeting on July 23 and 24, 2025, adopted Item TE24.44, and in doing so, authorized the temporary closure of the north sidewalk and a portion of the westbound curb lane on Queen Street East, from July 1, 2025 to September 30, 2026.
The developer has requested a time extension of the duration of the construction staging area on Queen Street East as a result of delays caused by the issuance of a building permit and approval from Toronto Water for the building's service connections. The initial start date in 2025 did not materialize and could only start site work in March 2026.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to extend the duration of the construction staging area on Queen Street East an additional six months, from October 1, 2026 to March 31, 2027, to allow for the construction of the development to be completed.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288469.pdf
Motions
TE34.124 - 955 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Temporary Left Turn Prohibitions
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council prohibit northbound left turns at all times at the temporary construction access located on the south side of Lake Shore Boulevard West, at a point 158 metres west of Remembrance Drive (west intersection)/New Brunswick Way, from August 1, 2026, to August 1, 2029.
2. City Council prohibit westbound left turns at all times at the temporary construction access located on the south side of Lake Shore Boulevard West, at a point 158 metres west of Remembrance Drive (west intersection)/New Brunswick Way, from August 1, 2026, to August 1, 2029.
3. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to submit directly to the City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to City Council’s decision, and to reinstate traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) referred in Recommendations 1 and 2 above, once the project is complete.
Origin
Summary
As Lake Shore Boulevard West is classified as a major arterial street, City Council approval of this report is required.
Ontario Science Partners (OSP), on behalf of Infrastructure Ontario, is the construction manager for the development of the new Ontario Science Centre, municipally known as 955 Lake Shore Boulevard West. The property is located on the south side of Lake Shore Boulevard West, between Ontario Drive and Remembrance Drive.
Access to the site is provided from Remembrance Drive, as well as a temporary construction access located approximately 158 metres west of Remembrance Drive. The temporary construction access is a critical component needed to advance the timely construction and delivery of the new Ontario Science Centre facility. To maintain safe and efficient traffic operations on Lake Shore Boulevard West, the temporary construction access will be designated as a right-in, right-out turns only.
In view of the above, Transportations Services is requesting authorization to prohibit northbound left, and westbound left turns at all times at the temporary construction access located on the south side of Lake Shore Boulevard West at a point 158 metres west of Remembrance Drive, for a period of 36 months, from August 1, 2026, to August 1, 2029. The proposed turn prohibitions are expected to support safe and efficient traffic operations throughout the duration of the project.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288531.pdf
Motions
TE34.125 - Armadale Avenue and Mayfield Avenue - All-Way Stop Control
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized all-way compulsory stop control at the intersection of Armadale Avenue and Mayfield Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to install all-way stop control at the intersection of Armadale Avenue and Mayfield Avenue. Based on the assessment undertaken, the installation of all-way stop control is recommended and should enhance safety for all road users.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288540.pdf
Motions
TE34.126 - All-Way Stop Control and Parking Amendments - Robinson Street and Manning Avenue (east intersection)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized all-way compulsory stop control at the intersection of Robinson Street and Manning Avenue.
2. Rescinded the existing school bus loading zone in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., daily, on the north side of Robinson Street, between Manning Avenue (west intersection) and a point 61.6 metres east.
3. Designated a school bus loading zone to be in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the north side of Robinson Street, between Manning Avenue (west intersection) and a point 27 metres east.
4. Designated a school bus loading zone to be in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the north side of Robinson Street, between a point 43.5 metres east of Manning Avenue (west intersection) and a point 10.5 metres further east.
5. Prohibited entry for westbound traffic at any time, buses excepted, at Robinson Street bus loop access at a point 27 metres east of the Manning Avenue (west intersection).
6. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, except no parking 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. from a point 42.7 metres west of Manning Avenue to a point 36.3 metres east of Manning Avenue; and 1 hour parking 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday from Manning Avenue to Palmerston Avenue and no parking anytime from a point 36 metres west of Manning Avenue to a point 5.5 metres further west, on the odd (south) side of Robinson Street from Palmerston Avenue to Bellwoods Avenue.
7. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, except no parking anytime from a point 43 metres south of Robinson Street to a point 5.5 metres further south on the even (west) side of Manning Avenue from Queen Street West to Dundas Street West.
8. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, on the odd (south) side of Robinson Street from Palmerston Avenue to Bellwoods Avenue.
9. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, on the even (west) side of Manning Avenue from Queen Street West to Dundas Street West.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to install all-way stop control at the intersection of Robinson Street and Manning Avenue (east intersection). Based on the assessment undertaken, the installation of all-way stop control is recommended and should enhance safety for all road users, including students attending the adjacent Charles G. Fraser Junior Public School.
The installation of all-way stop control will require amendments to a school bus loading in the vicinity of the intersection. These amendments are necessary to ensure the pedestrian crossing area and approach are kept clear of parked vehicles.
During the investigation, Transportation Services discovered discrepancies between the by-lawed parking regulations and the posted signage on Robinson Street and Manning Avenue. Recommendations 6 to 9 will resolve these inconsistencies.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288502.pdf
Motions
TE34.127 - Dufferin Street and Florence Street - Traffic Control Signals
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Dufferin Street and Florence Street.
2. Subject to approval of Part 1 above and in conjunction with the installation of traffic control signals at Dufferin Street and Florence Street, City Council authorize removal of the pedestrian crossover on Dufferin Street, immediately south of Florence Street.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Dufferin Street, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to install traffic control signals at the intersection of Dufferin Street and Florence Street. The traffic control signals will replace the existing pedestrian crossover on Dufferin Street, south of Florence Street, and provide enhanced safety for all road users, particularly pedestrians and cyclists, and is justified based on the assessment undertaken.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288481.pdf
Communications
(July 2, 2026) E-mail from Duane Brown (TE.Supp)
Motions
TE34.128 - Avenue Road and Edmund Avenue/Private Access - Traffic Control Signal Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the existing installation of the traffic control signals at Avenue Road and Edmund Avenue to be in effect at Avenue Road and Edmund Avenue/Private Access.
2. Subject to approval of and in conjunction with the installation of traffic control signals at Avenue Road and Edmund Avenue/Private Access:
a. City Council prohibit northbound right turns at all times at the intersection of Avenue Road and Edmund Avenue/Private Access;
b. City Council prohibit eastbound through movements at all times at the intersection of Edmund Avenue/Private Access;
c. City Council prohibit southbound left turns at all times at the intersection of Avenue Road and Edmund Avenue/Private Access; and
d. City Council prohibit westbound through movements at all times at the intersection of Edmund Avenue/Private Access and Avenue Road.
3. City Council rescind the existing prohibited pedestrian crossing on Avenue Road, between the north curb line of Edmund Avenue and a point 30.5 metres south of the south street line of Edmund Avenue.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Avenue Road, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to amend the operation of the existing traffic control signals at the intersection of Avenue Road and Edmund Avenue. The amendments will address the following:
- the inclusion of a private access from De La Salle College on the east side of the intersection into the existing traffic control signals
- the prohibition of movements at Avenue Road and Edmund Avenue necessary to re-enforce a one-way westbound operation of the private access noted above
- the prohibition of westbound straight through movements from the private access to address concerns associated with traffic infiltration into the adjacent community
- the addition of a new east-west pedestrian crossing on the south leg of the intersection, which will require a rescission of the existing pedestrian crossing prohibition.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288435.pdf
Motions
TE34.129 - 629, 633 and 675 Eastern Avenue - Traffic Control Signals and Traffic Regulations
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Eastern Avenue and Caroline Avenue/Private Access.
2. Authorized the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Lake Shore Boulevard East and Private Access approximately 435 metres west of Leslie Street.
3. Prohibited southbound through movements at all times (bicycles excepted) at the intersection of Eastern Avenue and Caroline Avenue/Private Access.
4. Prohibited southbound right turns on a red signal at all times (bicycles excepted) at the intersection of Eastern Avenue and Caroline Avenue/Private Access.
5. Prohibited eastbound right turns on a red signal at all times (bicycles excepted) at the intersection of Eastern Avenue and Caroline Avenue/Private Access.
6. Prohibited northbound right turns on a red signal at all times (bicycles excepted) at the intersection of Eastern Avenue and Caroline Avenue/Private Access.
7. Prohibited southbound right turns on a red signal at all times (bicycles excepted) at the intersection of Lake Shore Boulevard East and Private Access approximately 435 metres west of Leslie Street.
8. Prohibited westbound right turns on a red signal at all times (bicycles excepted) at the intersection of Lake Shore Boulevard East and Private Access approximately 435 metres west of Leslie Street.
9. Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Executive Director, Development Review, to review and report back to the November 25, 2026 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council on the status of the proposed private street and associated directions in Item 2015.TE11.4.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The properties located at 629, 633, and 675 Eastern Avenue, bounded by Eastern Avenue to the north and Lake Shore Boulevard East to the south, are planned to be redeveloped as a mixed-use development that includes the construction of a new north-south private road connecting Eastern Avenue and Lake Shore Boulevard East. This new private road will be aligned with Caroline Avenue, an existing north-south local road located north of Eastern Avenue. As conditions of development approval, transportation infrastructure improvements are required to safely accommodate the additional vehicular, pedestrian, and cycling activity generated by the development and to provide appropriate access to and from the site.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to install traffic control signals at the two new intersections of the proposed private road with Eastern Avenue/Caroline Avenue and with Lake Shore Boulevard East. Transportation Services is also requesting approval to prohibit right turns on a red signal at both intersections and southbound through movements at the intersection of Eastern Avenue/Caroline Avenue and the proposed private road. Based on the transportation assessments undertaken in support of the development application, the proposed traffic control signals and associated traffic regulations will improve safety, accessibility and connectivity for all road users.
These changes will address the requirements of the site plan agreement for the 629, 633, and 675 Eastern Avenue development and all costs will be the responsibility of the developer.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288507.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Executive Director, Development Review, to review and report back to the November 25, 2026 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council on the status of the proposed private street and associated directions in Item 2015.TE11.4.
TE34.130 - Elizabeth Street and Elm Street - Traffic Control Signals
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Elm Street and Elizabeth Street.
2. City Council rescind the existing all-way compulsory stop control at the intersection of Elm Street and Elizabeth Street.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Elm Street, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to install traffic control signals at the intersection of Elm Street and Elizabeth Street. The traffic control signals will provide enhanced safety for all road users and is justified based on the assessment undertaken.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288484.pdf
Communications
Motions
TE34.131 - Accessible Parking Spaces - July 2026 (Delegated)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Wards:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 14 - Toronto - Danforth, 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation and removal of on-street accessible parking spaces at the locations identified in Attachment 1 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services.
2. Amended parking regulations required in Chapter 903 as generally described in Attachment 2 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is requesting approval for the installation and removal of on-street accessible parking spaces for persons with disabilities.
During the investigation, Transportation Services discovered conflicting by-laws and parking signage on Windermere Avenue. Recommendation 2 will rectify these inconsistencies.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288499.pdf
Motions
TE34.132 - Pay-and-Display Parking - Various Streets - July 2026 (Delegated)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the amendments to parking regulations required to establish new on-street paid parking on Defries Street and Mark Street, as set out in Attachments 2 and 3, to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Broccolini is constructing a 34-storey residential condominium building at 83-97 River Street and 2-4 Labatt Avenue. The site is located at the north-east corner of River Street and Labatt Avenue. As a result, four pay and display parking spaces have been temporarily removed on River Street to accommodate construction. This construction is anticipated to continue until 2029.
Toronto Parking Authority (TPA) has worked with Transportation Services to identify new on-street paid parking opportunities in Ward 13 to replace these lost spaces. These new spaces will support the local community and area businesses by encouraging a regular turnover in the on-street parking supply.
Through this review, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Toronto Parking Authority (TPA), the developer, and Ward Councillor, is requesting approval for the installation of on-street paid parking on Defries Street and Mark Street in Ward 13. The proposed paid parking will replace the existing one-hour unpaid parking restrictions currently in effect and will help offset the temporary paid parking loss on River Street. The proposed changes will not impact on the flow of traffic and will encourage parking turnover.
Defries Street and Mark Street are also currently licensed for on-street permit parking. Both on-street permit parking and paid parking can co-exist. Where signs for both programs co-exist, a valid permit holder will not be required to pay for parking.
While this report seeks Community Council approval for the installation of on-street paid parking on Defries Street and Mark Street in Ward 13, this is an ongoing initiative. Transportation Services and TPA will continue to review and report on potential new on-street paid parking opportunities throughout the City of Toronto.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288536.pdf
Motions
TE34.133 - Various Developments to be Excluded from Permit Parking in the Toronto and East York Community Council Area
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Wards:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 11 - University - Rosedale, 13 - Toronto Centre, 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the amendment to Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate a revised map of the Permit Parking Areas as shown in Attachment 1 to the report (June 8, 2026) from the Acting Director, Street Permits, Transportation Services, excluding the developments listed in Attachment 1 to the report (June 8, 2026) from the Acting Director, Street Permits, Transportation Services.
2. Amended City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services, will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to or tradespersons at the developments listed in Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (June 8, 2026) from the Acting Director, Street Permits, Transportation Services.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The purpose of this report is to respond to City Council's direction to review and report back on the feasibility of excluding the development addresses listed in Attachments 1 and 2 from the on-street overnight permit parking program.
Transportation Services has determined the proposed realignment of permit parking areas and exclusions are feasible and has no objections to excluding the developments listed in Attachment 1 and Attachment 2. Should City Council approve these realignments and exclusions, residents and visitors associated with the addresses listed in Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 would no longer be eligible to participate in the on-street overnight permit parking program.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287839.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288677.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council amend Recommendation 2 so that it now reads as follows:
2. Toronto and East York Community Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services, will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to or tradespersons at the developments listed in Attachments 1 and 2 of the report dated June 8, 2026, from the Director, Street Permits, Transportation Services
TE34.134 - Various Developments to be Excluded from Permit Parking in the Toronto and East York Community Council Area - Non-Delegated
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 13 - Toronto Centre, 14 - Toronto - Danforth, 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the amendment to Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate a revised map of the Permit Parking Areas as shown in Attachment 1 to the report (June 8, 2026) from the Acting Director, Street Permits, Transportation Services, excluding the developments listed in Attachment 1 to the report (June 8, 2026) from the Acting Director, Street Permits, Transportation Services.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services, will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to or tradespersons at the developments listed in Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (June 8, 2026) from the Acting Director, Street Permits, Transportation Services.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates transit service on the streets listed in Attachment 1 and Attachment 2, City Council approval of this report is required.
The purpose of this report is to respond to City Council's direction to review and report back on the feasibility of excluding the development addresses listed in Attachments 1 and 2 from the on-street overnight permit parking program.
Transportation Services has determined the proposed realignment of permit parking areas and exclusions are feasible and has no objections to excluding the developments listed in Attachment 1 and Attachment 2. Should City Council approve these realignments and exclusions, residents and visitors associated with the addresses listed in Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 would no longer be eligible to participate in the on-street overnight permit parking program.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287834.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288678.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council amend Recommendation 2 so that it now reads as follows:
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, such that, despite anything in the chapter to the contrary, the General Manager, Transportation Services, will not accept applications for a permit from residents of, visitors to or tradespersons at the developments listed in Attachments 1 and 2 of the report dated June 8, 2026, from the Director, Street Permits, Transportation Services.
TE34.135 - Mercer Street - Streetscape Improvements and Parking By-law Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the amendments to the Traffic and Parking By-laws for Mercer Street between Blue Jays Way and John Street as described in Attachment 2 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Deputy General Manager, Transportation Services.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to request Community Council approval of amendments to on-street parking and passenger loading regulations along the south side of Mercer Street between Blue Jays Way and John Street, to facilitate proposed streetscape improvements.
This section of Mercer Street is scheduled for road reconstruction and streetscape improvements in 2026. The project includes curb extensions, on-street parking laybys and passenger loading zones. The proposed streetscape improvements will provide an enhanced pedestrian environment and a safer roadway for all users.
The proposed amendments would reduce the existing 13 on-street paid parking spaces in this section of Mercer Street to nine (9) spaces. The existing passenger loading zones in front of Nobu Hotel and Residence, and Le Germain Hotel will remain.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288486.pdf
Motions
TE34.136 - Oriole Parkway - Parking By-law Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council exempt the implementation of permit parking on Oriole Parkway between Anderson Avenue to College View Avenue, from the requirements of subsection 925-4B of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking.
2. Subject to the approval of Recommendation 1, City Council approve amendments to the Traffic and Parking By-laws for Oriole Parkway between Eglinton Avenue West and Chaplin Crescent, as generally described in Attachment 3 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Acting Deputy General Manager, Transportation Services.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Oriole Parkway, City Council approval of this report is required.
Oriole Parkway, extending between Eglinton Avenue West and Chaplin Crescent, currently has road resurfacing and streetscape improvements work underway that commenced in 2025 and will be completed in 2026. The project includes replacement of the existing concrete centre median with a sodded median with raised curb, concrete apron, and trees, as well as replacement of existing paver islands with curb extensions at intersections.
The proposed on-street parking by-law amendments on Oriole Parkway between Eglinton Avenue West and Chaplin Cresent contained within this report are required to facilitate these streetscape improvements. There would be elimination of three (3) existing paid on-street parking spaces on Oriole Parkway between Eglinton Avenue West and College View Avenue, and a net gain of two (2) permit parking spaces.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288522.pdf
Motions
TE34.137 - Farquhars Lane - Parking Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Designated a Commercial Loading Zone to be in affect at all times on the west side of Farquhars Lane between a point 65 metres north of The Esplanade and a point 45 metres further north.
2. Prohibited stopping at all times in the following locations:
a. on the west side of Farquhars Lane between The Esplanade and a point 65 metres north;
b. on the west side of Farquhars Lane between a point 110 metres north of The Esplanade and Front Street East; and
c. on the east side of Farquhars Lane between The Esplanade and Front Street East.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has received complaints about illegal parking in Farquhars Lane, which impedes orderly movement of pedestrians and motor vehicles in the laneway. In consultation with the Old Town Business Improvement Association, Transportation Services is recommending installation of a Commercial Loading Zone in Farquhars Lane and that "No Stopping" prohibitions be added on both sides elsewhere in the laneway, between The Esplanade and Front Street.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288422.pdf
Motions
TE34.138 - Sumach Street - Parking Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Prohibited standing at all times on the west side of Sumach Street, between Dundas Street East and a point 20 metres south.
2. Amended the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. daily on the even (west) side of Sumach Street, from Shuter Street to Dundas Street East, to be in effect from Shuter Street to a point 20 metres south of Dundas Street East.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is recommending that existing corner parking prohibition on the west side of Sumach Street, south of Dundas Street East, be changed to a standing prohibition. The proposed amendment will further deter parking on this section of Sumach Street which will improve unobstructed two-way traffic flow and provide a safer environment for all road users.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288428.pdf
Motions
TE34.139 - Logan Avenue - Parking Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Amended the existing maximum 10-minute parking regulation in effect from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Logan Avenue, between a point 50 metres south of Danforth Avenue and point 38.2 metres further south, to be in effect from between a point 50 metres south of Danforth Avenue and a point 27 metres further south.
2. Designated a school bus loading zone to be in effect from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Logan Avenue, between a point 77 metres south of Danforth Avenue East and point 11.2 metres further south.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is recommending the designation of a school bus loading zone on the west side of Logan Avenue fronting Frankland Community School, located south of Danforth Avenue. The proposed amendment will accommodate pick-up and drop-off activities for students arriving at the school by bus and will require the school's existing short-term parking area be shorted by approximately two spaces.
These recommendations are being made in consultation with the Frankland Community School representatives and the Councillor’s office.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288427.pdf
Motions
TE34.140 - Donlands Avenue - Parking Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council prohibit standing at all times on the west side of Donlands Avenue, between Aldwych Avenue and a point 18 metres north.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Donlands Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services is recommending that existing corner parking prohibition on the west side of Donlands Avenue, north of Aldwych Avenue, be changed to a standing prohibition. The proposed amendment will further deter parking at this location, will improve sightlines for drivers making turning from Aldwych Avenue, and support accessible student pick-up and drop-off by maintaining a clear curb space.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288425.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/comm/communicationfile-215878.pdf
Motions
TE34.141 - Temporary Adjustments to Traffic and Parking Regulations for the 2026 Canadian National Exhibition (Delegated)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the temporary traffic and parking regulations on streets in the vicinity of Exhibition Place that are impacted during the Canadian National Exhibition, identified in Attachment 1 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services; the temporary traffic and parking regulations will override all existing regulations (except with locations as set out in Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 903, Parking for Persons with Disabilities, Schedule II, Designated On-Street Parking for Permit Holders) for the duration of this event (August 21, 2026 to September 7, 2026).
Origin
Summary
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The purpose of this report is to seek Toronto and East York Community Council's authority to enact temporary traffic and parking amendments required to help the local community with their parking needs, and enhance traffic operations and pedestrian safety by minimizing traffic infiltration on local roads during the 2026 Canadian National Exhibition (CNE), which takes place from August 21 to September 7, 2026, inclusive.
Drawing on lessons learned from previous CNE events, as well as input from The Exhibition Place, the local councillor, local residents, the event organizer, and Transportation Services staff, a set of traffic mitigation strategies was developed to minimize the impacts of increased event-related traffic on the surrounding community. These strategies are intended to manage traffic infiltration into local neighbourhood streets, reduce circulation by non-local vehicles, and prioritize parking access for residents. The proposed approach reflects established practices used in prior years and is designed to support safe and efficient movement while limiting disruption to the local area.
To implement these measures, Transportation Services is recommending a series of temporary by-law amendments, as outlined in Attachments 1 and 2. A companion report, "Temporary Adjustments to Traffic and Parking Regulations for 2026 Canadian National Exhibition (Non-Delegated)", outlining the required temporary traffic and parking amendments for locations with TTC service was submitted to Toronto East York Community Council for consideration in parallel with this report.
Further details on broader traffic and congestion management strategies which would include traffic management support by traffic agents and traffic signal timing adjustments to be implemented during the event are also provided in this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288489.pdf
Motions
TE34.142 - Temporary Adjustments to Traffic and Parking Regulations for 2026 Canadian National Exhibition (Non-Delegated)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the temporary traffic and parking regulations on streets in the vicinity of Exhibition Place that are impacted during the Canadian National Exhibition, identified in Attachment 1 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services; the temporary traffic and parking regulations will override all existing regulations for the duration of this event (August 21, 2026 to September 7, 2026).
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates transit service on Dufferin Street and Springhurst Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.
The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's authority to enact temporary traffic and parking amendments required to help the local community with their parking needs, and enhance traffic operations and pedestrian safety by minimizing traffic infiltration on local roads during the 2026 Canadian National Exhibition (CNE), which will take place from August 21 to September 7, 2026, inclusive.
Drawing on lessons learned from previous CNE events, as well as input from The Exhibition Place, the local councillors, local residents, the event organizer, and Transportation Services staff, a set of traffic mitigation strategies was developed to minimize the impacts of increased event-related traffic on the surrounding community. These strategies are intended to manage traffic infiltration into local neighbourhood streets, reduce circulation by non-local vehicles, and prioritize access for residents. The proposed approach reflects established practices used in prior years and is designed to support safe and efficient movement while limiting disruption to the local area.
To implement these measures, Transportation Services is recommending a series of temporary by-law amendments, as outlined in Attachments 1 and 2. A companion report, "Temporary Adjustments to Traffic and Parking Regulations for 2026 Canadian National Exhibition (Delegated)", outlining the required temporary traffic and parking amendments for locations without TTC service was submitted to Toronto East York Community Council for consideration in parallel with this report.
Further details on broader traffic and congestion management strategies which would include traffic management support by traffic agents and traffic signal timing adjustments to be implemented during the event are also provided in this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288487.pdf
Motions
TE34.143 - Temporary Adjustments to Traffic and Parking Regulations for 2026 Distillery Winter Village (Delegated)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Wards:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the temporary traffic and parking regulations on streets in the vicinity of Distillery District that are impacted during the Distillery Winter Village, identified in Attachment 1 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services; the temporary traffic and parking regulations will override all existing regulations for the duration of this event (November 12, 2026 to January 3, 2027).
2. Directed the Director, Permits and Enforcement, Transportation Services to communicate these temporary parking and traffic regulations outlined in Part 1 above to residents through a targeted information campaign throughout the duration of the Distillery Winter Village.
Origin
Summary
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The purpose of this report is to seek Toronto and East York Community Council's authority to enact temporary traffic and parking amendments to enhance traffic operations for patrons accessing the event, to help the local community with their parking needs, and to enhance pedestrian safety by minimizing traffic infiltration on local roads during the 2026 Distillery Winter Village event, which will take place from November 12, 2026 to January 3, 2027, inclusive.
Drawing on lessons learned from previous Distillery Winter Village events, as well as input from the event organizer and their consultant, the local councillor, local residents, and Transportation Services staff, the event organizer and their consultant submitted a traffic management plan to minimize impacts of increased event-related traffic on the surrounding community. Strategies in the traffic management plan are intended to manage traffic infiltration into local neighbourhood streets, reduce circulation by non-local vehicles, and prioritize access for residents. The proposed approach reflects established practices used in prior years and is designed to support safe and efficient movement while limiting disruption to the local area.
To implement these measures, Transportation Services is recommending a series of temporary by-law amendments, as outlined in Attachments 1 and 2. A companion report, "Temporary Adjustments to Traffic and Parking Regulations for 2026 Distillery Winter Village (Non-Delegated)", outlining the required temporary traffic and parking amendments for locations with TTC service was submitted to Community and City Council for consideration in parallel with this report.
Further details on broader traffic and congestion management strategies to be implemented by Transportation Services are also provided in this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288474.pdf
Motions
TE34.144 - Temporary Adjustments to Traffic and Parking Regulations for 2026 Distillery Winter Village (Non-Delegated)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the temporary traffic and parking regulations on streets in the vicinity of Distillery District that are impacted during the Distillery Winter Village, identified in Attachment 1 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services; the temporary traffic and parking regulations will override all existing regulations for the duration of this event (November 12, 2026 to January 3, 2027); and with Attachment 1 to the report (June 19, 2026) from Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services amended by deleting the following entry in the table titled “Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking - Schedule XIV: No Stopping”:
|
Mill Street |
South |
A point 101 metres east of Parliament Street and Trinity Street |
Anytime from and including Thu. Nov. 12, 2026 to and including Sun. Jan. 3, 2027 |
2. City Council delegate authority to the General Manager, Transportation Services, notwithstanding any City of Toronto By-law to the contrary, for the term of the Distillery Winter Village event (November 12, 2026 to January 3, 2027) to regulate traffic and parking as may be required for the purposes of managing traffic movement or to address public safety of any property to support the Distillery Winter Village event; and further, direct the City Solicitor, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services, to submit any necessary Bills to amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code traffic and parking Chapters, including their Schedules, directly to the first meeting of City Council in 2027, or earlier, if practicable, with such amendments being effective retroactively to the date established by the General Manager, Transportation Services.
3. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking to prohibit parking, stopping or standing until the end of the day on January 3, 2027, on any highway where the General Manager, Transportation Services has erected temporary signage as required to accommodate the Distillery Winter Village event.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to submit directly to City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to reinstate the traffic and parking regulations to what they were immediately prior to the By-law amendments made in Recommendation 2 above.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates transit service on Parliament Street, Mill Street and Front Street East, City Council approval of this report is required.
The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's authority to enact temporary traffic and parking amendments to enhance traffic operations for patrons accessing the event, to help the local community with their parking needs, and to enhance pedestrian safety by minimizing traffic infiltration on local roads during the 2026 Distillery Winter Village event, which will take place from November 12, 2026 to January 3, 2027, inclusive.
Drawing on lessons learned from previous Distillery Winter Village events, as well as input from the event organizer and their consultant, the local councillor, local residents, and Transportation Services staff, the event organizer and their consultant submitted a traffic management plan to minimize impacts of increased event-related traffic on the surrounding community. Strategies in the traffic management plan are intended to manage traffic infiltration into local neighbourhood streets, reduce circulation by non-local vehicles, and prioritize access for residents. The proposed approach reflects established practices used in prior years and is designed to support safe and efficient movement while limiting disruption to the local area.
To implement these measures, Transportation Services is recommending a series of temporary by-law amendments, as outlined in Attachments 1 and 2. A companion report, "Temporary Adjustments to Traffic and Parking Regulations for 2026 Distillery Winter Village (Delegated)", outlining the required temporary traffic and parking amendments for locations without TTC service was submitted to Toronto East York Community Council for consideration in parallel with this report.
Further details on broader traffic and congestion management strategies to be implemented by Transportation Services are also provided in this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288472.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council recommend that:
City Council amend Attachment 1 to the report (June 19, 2026) from Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services by deleting the following entry in the table titled “Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking - Schedule XIV: No Stopping”:
|
Mill Street |
South |
A point 101 metres east of Parliament Street and Trinity Street |
Anytime from and including Thu. Nov. 12, 2026 to and including Sun. Jan. 3, 2027 |
That:
1. City Council delegate authority to the General Manager, Transportation Services, notwithstanding any City of Toronto By-law to the contrary, for the term of the Distillery Winter Village event (November 12, 2026 to January 3, 2027) to regulate traffic and parking as may be required for the purposes of managing traffic movement or to address public safety of any property to support the Distillery Winter Village event; and further, direct the City Solicitor, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services, to submit any necessary Bills to amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code traffic and parking Chapters, including their Schedules, directly to the first meeting of City Council in 2027, or earlier, if practicable, with such amendments being effective retroactively to the date established by the General Manager, Transportation Services.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking to prohibit parking, stopping or standing until the end of the day on January 3, 2027, on any highway where the General Manager, Transportation Services has erected temporary signage as required to accommodate the Distillery Winter Village event.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to submit directly to City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to reinstate the traffic and parking regulations to what they were immediately prior to the By-law amendments made in Recommendation 1 above.
TE34.145 - Cooper Street, Downes Street, and John M Tinsley Street - Traffic Regulations and Parking Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the existing stopping prohibition in effect at all times on the east side of Cooper Street, between Queens Quay East and Lake Shore Boulevard East.
2. Rescinded the existing designated passenger loading zone in effect from 6:00 a.m. to midnight from July 1, 2015, to July 28, 2015, inclusive (Games Client Vehicles only) on both sides of Cooper Street, between Queens Quay East and a point 60 metres north.
3. Rescinded the existing standing prohibition in effect at all times on the west side of Cooper Street, between a point 51.3 metres north of Queens Quay East and a point 29.6 metres further north.
4. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:00 a.m. to 11:59 p.m., daily, except no standing anytime from a point 51.3 metres north of Queens Quay East to a point 29.6 metres further north, on the even (west) side of Cooper Street from Queens Quay East to Lake Shore Boulevard East.
5. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:00 a.m. to 11:59 p.m., daily, on the even (west) side of Cooper Street from Queens Quay East to Lake Shore Boulevard East.
6. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, on the odd (east) side of Cooper Street from Queens Quay East to Downes Street.
7. Authorized parking for a maximum period of one-hour from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., daily, on the east side of Cooper Street, between a point 15 metres north of Queens Quay East and a point 55 metres further north.
8. Prohibited stopping to be in effect at all times on the east side of Cooper Street, between Downes Street a point 28 metres south.
9. Prohibited standing to be in effect at all times on the east side of Cooper Street, between a point 15 metres north of Downes Street and a point 20 metres further north.
10. Authorized parking for a maximum period of one-hour from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., daily, on the east side of Cooper Street, between a point 35 metres north of Downes Street and a point 51.5 metres further north.
11. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, on the odd (east) side of Cooper Street, between Downes Street and Lake Shore Boulevard East.
12. Prohibited stopping to be in effect at all times on the north side of Downes Street, between Cooper Street and John M Tinsley Street.
13. Prohibited stopping to be in effect at all times on the south side of Downes Street, between Cooper Street and a point 15 metres east.
14. Prohibited stopping to be in effect at all times on the south side of Downes Street, between John M Tinsley Street and a point 15 metres west.
15. Designated a passenger loading zone to be in effect at all times on the south side Downes Street, between a point 15 metres east of Cooper Street and a point 15 metres west of John M Tinsley Street.
16. Authorized a compulsory stop control for eastbound traffic on Downes Street at John M Tinsley Street.
17. Authorized a compulsory stop control for westbound traffic on Downes Street at Cooper Street.
18. Designated a speed limit of 30 kilometres per hour on Downes Street, between Cooper Street and John M Tinsley Street.
19. Prohibited stopping to be in effect at all times on both sides of John M Tinsley Street, between Queens Quay East and Lake Shore Boulevard East.
20. Designated a speed limit of 30 kilometres per hour on John M Tinsley Street, between Queens Quay East and Lake Shore Boulevard East.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
55 Lake Shore Boulevard East is a two-phase development proposal on the lands of the former Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) headquarters and adjacent surface parking lots. The overall site lands are bounded by Lake Shore Boulevard East to the north, Queens Quay East to the south, and Freeland Street to the west. The proposal includes three mixed-used development blocks and a public park block. In addition, the development includes the creation of a new north-south public right-of-way (John M Tinsley Street) along the eastern edge of the site lands, and a new east-west public right-of-way (Downes Street), which bisects the site approximately 85 metres south of Lake Shore Boulevard East.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to amend appropriate parking regulations on Cooper Street and establish new traffic and parking regulations on Downes Street and John M Tinsley Street, which have recently opened as part of Phase 1 of the development site lands. Cooper Street is an existing public right-of-way, while Downes Street and John M. Tinsley Street have been recently conveyed to the City of Toronto.
The proposed parking amendments on Cooper Street will increase the number of overnight permit parking spaces for nearby residents, provide an area for pick-up and drop-offs, and short-term parking for visitors and delivery vehicles. The proposed parking amendments on the south side of Downes Street will facilitate passenger pick-up and drop-offs, while providing unobstructed two-way traffic flow and improved sightlines. The proposed parking amendments on John M Tinsley Street will provide unobstructed two-way traffic flow and clear sightlines.
Finally, appropriate stop controls and speed limits will be enacted on these streets to ensure the safe and efficient flow of traffic.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288505.pdf
Motions
TE34.146 - 227 Gerrard Street East - Proposed Traffic and Parking Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Amended the existing one-way southbound traffic designation on Ontario Street, between Gerrard Street East and Dundas Street East, to operate between a point 60 metres south of Gerrard Street East and Dundas Street East.
2. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition on the east side of Ontario Street, between Gerrard Street East and a point 143 metres south.
3. Prohibited stopping on the east side of Ontario Street, between Gerrard Street East and a point 69 metres south.
4. Prohibited parking on the east side of Ontario Street, between a point 69 metres south of Gerrard Street East and a point 74 metres further south.
5. Rescinded the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Ontario Street, between Dundas Street East and Gerrard Street East.
6. Authorized parking for a maximum period of one hour from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Ontario Street, between Dundas Street East and a point 69 metres south of Gerrard Street East.
7. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, on the even (west) side of Ontario Street, from Dundas Street East to Gerrard Street East.
8. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, on the even (west) side of Ontario Street, from Dundas Street East to a point 69 metres south of Gerrard Street East.
9. Prohibited stopping on the west side of Ontario Street, between Gerrard Street East and a point 69 metres south.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The development site at 227 Gerrard Street East is bounded by Gerrard Street East to the north, Ontario Street to the east, Hagan Lane to the south, and Seaton Street to the west. The development consists of a seven-storey mixed-use building having a residential gross floor area of 8,960 square metres, and a non-residential gross floor area of 1,002 square metres. This development will take access to/from via an existing lane on the west side of Ontario Street, south of Gerrard Street East.
Transportation Services is requesting approval to convert a portion of Ontario Street, south of Gerrard Street East, from a one-way southbound operation to a two-way operation. The two-way portion of Ontario Street will accommodate traffic destined to/from this development, reducing development-generated traffic using this street. Parking amendments will also need to be approved in order to accommodate unobstructed two-way traffic flow on this section of roadway.
These changes will address the requirements of the site plan agreement for the 227 Gerrard Street East development, and all costs will be the responsibility of the developer.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288524.pdf
Motions
TE34.147 - Pedestrian Crosswalks on Winona Drive between Holland Park Avenue and Glenhurst Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Wards:
- 9 - Davenport, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Received the report (June 17, 2026) from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services for information.
Origin
Summary
On May 28, 2026, Toronto and East York Community Council directed Transportation Services to review options to install safe pedestrian crosswalks on Winona Drive, between Holland Park Avenue and Glenhurst Avenue, and to report back with recommendations to the July 8, 2026 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.
The purpose of this report is to summarize the findings of the review and outline locations where new pedestrian crosswalk markings may be installed.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288092.pdf
Motions
TE34.148 - Castle Frank Road and South Drive - Pedestrian Crossing Protection
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the Item until the January 2027 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
In response to the direction from Toronto and East York Community Council, Transportation Services has reviewed pedestrian safety concerns along Castle Frank Road and on South Drive with a focus on the feasibility of adding pedestrian crossovers (PXO's) at 36 Castle Frank Road and two locations on South Drive.
Based on the assessment undertaken, Transportation Services does not recommend the installation of a pedestrian crossover (PXO's) on Castle Frank Road as the technical warrant criteria was not met and the road geometry would be unsuitable. The requested PXO locations on South Drive are also not recommended but are being reported separately as a non-delegated item.
Transportation Services also evaluated improvements to the existing all-way stop control at the intersection of Elm Avenue and Castle Frank Road/Nanton Avenue. Staff is recommending pavement marking improvements to improve sightlines and stop compliance on all approaches.
The companion report, "Pedestrian Crossing Protection - Castle Frank Road and South Drive (Non-Delegated)", dated June 19, 2026, outlines the required non-delegated traffic amendments for the two requested PXO locations at South Drive and Craigleigh Gardens, and South Drive and Milkman’s Lane access point. These two locations have TTC service and as such, cannot be considered with the delegated items on Castle Frank Road.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288429.pdf
Motions
That consideration of the item be deferred until the January 2027 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council.
TE34.149 - Castle Frank Road and South Drive (Non-Delegated) - Pedestrian Crossing Protection
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the Item until the January 2027 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.
Origin
Summary
As Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on South Drive, City Council approval of this report is required.
In response to the direction from Toronto and East York Community Council, Transportation Services has reviewed pedestrian safety concerns along Castle Frank Road and on South Drive with a focus on the feasibility of adding pedestrian crossovers (PXO's) on at one location on Castle Frank Road and on South Drive the following two locations:
- Craigleigh Gardens
- Milkman’s Lane access point
Based on the assessments undertaken, Transportation Services does not recommend the installation of pedestrian crossovers (PXO's) on South Drive as the technical warrant criteria was not met and the road geometry would be unsuitable. The requested PXO location on Castle Frank Road is also not recommended but is being reported separately as a delegated item.
The companion report, "Pedestrian Crossing Protection - Castle Frank Road and South Drive (Delegated)", dated June 19, 2026, outlines the required delegated traffic amendments for the locations at 36 Castle Frank Road and at the intersection of Elm Avenue and Castle Frank Road/Nanton Avenue. These two locations do not have TTC service and as such, cannot be considered with the non-delegated items on South Drive.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288431.pdf
Motions
That consideration of the item be deferred until the January 2027 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council.
TE34.150 - College Street and Manning Avenue - Pedestrian Crossing Protection
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at College Street and Manning Avenue.
2. Subject to approval of Part 1 above and in conjunction with the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of College Street and Manning Avenue, City Council prohibit crossings on College Street, between the west curb line of Manning Avenue and a point 30.5 metres east of the east curb line of Manning Avenue.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on College Street, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services has reviewed the need for pedestrian crossing protection at College Street and Manning Avenue. Based on the assessment undertaken, Transportation Services is recommending the installation of traffic control signals at College Street and Manning Avenue. The traffic control signals will provide enhanced safety for vulnerable road users.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288433.pdf
Motions
TE34.151 - Eglinton Avenue East and Lillian Street - Pedestrian Crossing Protection
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Eglinton Avenue East and Lillian Street.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Eglinton Avenue East, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services has reviewed the need for pedestrian crossing protection at Eglinton Avenue East and Lillian Street. Based on the assessment undertaken, Transportation Services is recommending the installation of traffic control signals at Eglinton Avenue East and Lillian Street. The traffic control signals will provide enhanced safety for vulnerable road users.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288483.pdf
Motions
TE34.152 - Traffic Calming (Speed Humps) - Various Streets in Ward 4
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of speed humps on the streets set out in Attachment 1 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is recommending the installation of speed humps on the five streets in Ward 4 listed below. Staff's assessment indicates the criteria as set out in the updated Traffic Calming Policy has been satisfied for all streets. Therefore, speed humps should be installed on the streets recommended in this report.
- Armadale Avenue, between Colbeck Street and Ardagh Street
- Beresford Avenue, between Annette Street and Dundas Street West
- Beresford Avenue, between Colbeck Street and Ardagh Street
- Pacific Avenue, between Humberside Avenue and Dundas Street West
- Parkway Avenue, between Grenadier Road and Dundas Street West
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288485.pdf
Motions
TE34.153 - St. John's Road - Additional Speed Humps
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (six additional speed humps) on St. John’s Road, between Jane Street and Beresford Avenue, generally as shown on Attachments 2 and 3 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is recommending the installation of six additional speed humps on St. John's Road, between Jane Street and Beresford Avenue. Two speed humps were originally approved on this street in 2003, but an updated assessment has been requested, due to ongoing concerns with motorists travelling at a high rate of speed.
Staff's assessment indicates the criteria as set out in the updated Traffic Calming Policy has not been satisfied based on numerical warrant. However, lower warrant minimums may be applied within areas designated as Community Safety Zones to enhance the safety of vulnerable road users. Therefore, six additional speed humps should be installed on St. John's Road.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288500.pdf
Motions
TE34.154 - Appointments to the Board of Management of the Waterfront Neighbourhood Centre
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Appointed the following individuals to the Waterfront Neighbourhood Centre Board, at pleasure of Council, for the term of office ending July 8, 2030, and until successors are appointed:
- Tina Szeto
- Claudia Huerta
- Devyaani Bhardwaj
Origin
Summary
The Board confirms that each of these nominees is qualified to serve under the provisions of the City of Toronto's Public Appointments Policy and the Relationship Framework for Community Centre Boards of Management. On behalf of the Board, I respectfully request that the City take the necessary steps to appoint these nominated candidates.
The Board would also like to confirm that the following member, who was previously appointed by the Community Council, has now completed their term:
- Carole Therriault, term ended effective June 23, 2026.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288066.pdf
Motions
TE34.155 - Appointment of a Public Member to the William H. (Bill) Bolton Arena Board
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual who is being considered for appointment to the William H. Bolton Arena Board.
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Appointed Ashley Winberg to the William H. (Bill) Bolton Arena Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending October 23, 2029, and until a successor is appointed.
2. Directed that Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (June 19, 2026) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals.
Origin
Summary
City Council has authorized the City Clerk to shortlist, interview, and recommend candidates to the Toronto and East York Community Council for appointment to the William H. Bolton Arena Board. This report recommends the appointment of one public member to the William H. Bolton Arena Board.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288548.pdf
Attachment 1 - Recommended Candidate and Biography for the William H. Bolton Arena Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288549.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Application, Qualifications, and Confidential Diversity Information for the Recommended Candidate for Appointment to the William H. Bolton Arena Board
Confidential Attachment 2 - List of All Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for the William H. Bolton Arena Board
Motions
TE34.156 - Appointment of Public Members to the Moss Park Arena Board
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Moss Park Arena Board.
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Appointed Pui See Ho to the Moss Park Arena Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on April 2, 2030, and until a successor is appointed.
2. Directed that Confidential Attachments 1a and 1b to the report (June 19, 2026) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Moss Park Arena.
Origin
Summary
City Council has authorized the City Clerk to shortlist, interview and recommend candidates to Community Councils for appointment to the Moss Park Arena Board. This report recommends one candidate for appointment to the board.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288544.pdf
Attachment 1 - Recommended Candidate and Biography for the Moss Park Arena Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288545.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1a - List of Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information, and Applications for Appointment to the Moss Park Arena Board
Confidential Attachment 1b - List of Ineligible Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information, and Applications for Appointment to the Moss Park Arena Board
Motions
TE34.157 - Appointment of Community Members to the Applegrove Community Complex Board of Management
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Appointed Kathryn Edgett-Emirzian to the Applegrove Community Complex Board, at pleasure of Council, for the term of office ending June 30, 2027, and until a successor is appointed.
2. Appointed the following individuals to the Applegrove Community Complex Board, at the pleasure of Council, for the term of office ending June 30, 2028, and until successors are appointed:
- Jean Lim O-Brien
- Kirstin Vanderpark
- Pat Jordan
- Lesley Nilsson
Origin
Summary
The Board further confirms that each of these nominees is qualified to serve under the provisions of the City of Toronto's Public Appointments Policy and the Relationship Framework for Community Centre Boards of Management. On behalf of the Board, I respectfully request that the City take the necessary steps to appoint these nominated candidates.
The following public member's term is coming to an end:
- Brian Wood, term ending June 30, 2026 and until a successor is appointed.
The following public member is resigning with one year remaining in their term:
- Juanita Morris, term ending June 30, 2027 and until a successor is appointed.
On behalf of the Board of Management, I respectfully request the City take the necessary steps to implement the above requested appointments. Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287995.pdf
Motions
TE34.158 - Appointment of Community Members to the Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre Board of Management
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Appointed the following individuals to the Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending June 30, 2027, and until successors are appointed:
- Bilaal Bana
- Rizwan Desai
- Julia Porter
2. Re-appointed the following members to the Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre Board, at pleasure of Council, for the term of office ending June 30, 2028, and until successors are appointed:
- Farhan Chaudhary
- Claire Lukka
- Dalreen Fobler
- Mubarak Baker
- Lauren Lee
Origin
Summary
The Board confirms that each of these nominees is qualified to serve under the provisions of the City of Toronto's Public Appointments Policy and the Relationship Framework for Community Centre Boards of Management. On behalf of the Board, I respectfully request that the City take the necessary steps to appoint these nominated candidates.
These appointments are a result of the following public members' desire to end their term early:
- Abas Barra, term ending June 30, 2027 and until a successor is appointed.
- Courtney Fitton, term ending June 30, 2027 and until a successor is appointed.
- Rob Mackinnon, term ending June 30, 2027 and until a successor is appointed.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288520.pdf
Motions
TE34.159 - Appointment to the Community Centre 55 Board of Management
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Appointed the following individuals to the Community Centre 55 Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending June 30, 2030 and until successors are appointed:
- Pauline Grant
- Patrick Sweeney
Origin
Summary
The Board confirms that these nominees are qualified to serve under the provisions of the City of Toronto's Public Appointments Policy and the Relationship Framework for Community Centre Boards of Management.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter. On behalf of the Board, I respectfully request that the City take the necessary steps to appoint these nominated candidates.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289108.pdf
(June 18, 2026) Letter from the Executive Director, Community Centre 55 on Appointment to The Community Centre 55 Board of Management
Motions
TE34.160 - Improving Pedestrian Safety on Crescent Road - Delegated
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Directed the General Manager, Transportation Services to install sidewalk bollards on Crescent Road in the location shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (May 11, 2026) from Councillor Dianne Saxe.
2. Reduced the speed limit from 40 kilometres per hour to 30 kilometres per hour on Crescent Road, between Yonge Street and South Drive (east intersection).
Origin
Summary
Way finding apps have considerably increased cut-through traffic through formerly quiet residential areas in Ward 11. Residents have expressed serious safety concerns about cut-through motorists frequently driving onto the sidewalk on Crescent Road between Cluny Drive and South Drive, to circumvent TTC buses, trucks and parked cars. This is especially dangerous when children are walking to and from school, but poses a safety risk for all vulnerable street users.
Recent site visits by Transportation staff have confirmed this safety concern and also noted operational delays that stopped vehicles are causing for the Rosedale 82 bus. Unobstructed two-way traffic flow is negatively impacted by the narrow road width combined with on-street standing/parking, delivery and construction vehicles plus TTC operations.
However, removing these obstructions may encourage speeding, which is also a serious threat to the safety of vulnerable road users, and which can no longer be controlled with speed cameras. To avoid speeding, those living on this residential street have requested that the parking restrictions be combined with a reduced speed limit and speed cushions that accommodate TTC buses. Speed cushions would require additional parking restrictions.
I am thefore bringing two motions, a non-delegated motion to amend the parking regulations on this section of Crescent Road to address the safety concerns, and a delegated motion for related matters. Under the delegated motion:
- Sidewalk bollards would help prevent motorized vehicles from mounting the sidewalk in the area where such intrusions most frequently occur.
- The speed limit would be reduced to 30 km/ hour.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287588.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management on Crescent Road - Road Safety - Delegated
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287589.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing 421T-1176
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287590.pdf
Motions
TE34.161 - Improving Pedestrian Safety on Crescent Road - Non-Delegated
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council rescind the existing standing prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Crescent Road, between Yonge Street and a point 20 metres east.
2. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Crescent Road, between a point 20 metres east of Yonge Street and South Drive.
3. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of Crescent Road, between Cluny Drive and a point 45.7 metres east.
4. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, on the south side of Crescent Road, between a point 45.7 metres east of Cluny Drive and Rosedale Road.
5. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the south side of Crescent Road, between a point 45.7 metres east of Cluny Drive and South Drive (west intersection).
6. City Council prohibit standing to be in effect at all times on the north side of Crescent Road, between Yonge Street and South Drive (west intersection).
7. City Council prohibit standing to be in effect at all times on the south side of Crescent Road, between Cluny Drive and a point 68 metres east.
8. City Council prohibit stopping to be in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Sunday, on the south side of Crescent Road, between a point 68 metres east of Cluny Drive and South Drive (west intersection).
9. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to conduct a traffic calming review on Crescent Road, between Yonge Street and South Drive, and report back to Toronto and East York Community Council in first quarter of 2027.
Origin
Summary
Way finding apps have considerably increased cut-through traffic through formerly quiet residential areas in Ward 11. Residents have expressed serious safety concerns about cut-through motorists frequently driving onto the sidewalk on Crescent Road between Cluny Drive and South Drive, to circumvent TTC buses, trucks and parked cars. This is especially dangerous when children are walking to and from school, but poses a safety risk for all vulnerable street users.
Recent site visits by Transportation staff have confirmed this safety concern and also noted operational delays that stopped vehicles are causing for the Rosedale 82 bus. Unobstructed two-way traffic flow is negatively impacted by the narrow road width combined with on-street standing/parking, delivery and construction vehicles plus TTC operations.
I am thefore bringing two motions, a non-delegated motion to amend the parking regulations on this section of Crescent Road to address the safety concerns, and a delegated motion for related matters. Under the non-delegated motion:
- All curbside activity on the south side will be prohibited during the proposed No Stopping hours of operation 8am-6pm, M-Sun. This includes parking, loading/unloading of passengers and/or goods for all (residents, guests, trades etc.).
- To accommodate residents, curbside activities will be permitted outside the prohibited times, i.e. before 8 am and after 6 pm, as recorded traffic volumes during these time periods are lower.
- Under the No Standing Anytime regulation proposed on the north side of the street, loading/unloading of passengers is permitted only. Parking or loading/unloading of goods is prohibited under this regulation.
This parking proposal would maximize road width improving site lines, transit operations, and unobstructed two-way traffic flow during the prohibited times.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287591.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management on Crescent Road - Road Safety - Non-Delegated
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287592.pdf
Motions
TE34.162 - Euclid Avenue direction change
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Amended the existing one-way northbound designation on Euclid Avenue, between Ulster Street and Bloor Street West, to be in effect between Harbord Street and Bloor Street West.
2. Designated Euclid Avenue, between Ulster Street and Harbord Street, as a one-way for southbound traffic only.
Origin
Summary
Euclid Street is a residential street that runs one-way northbound from Queen Street to north of Bloor Street, three blocks west of Bathurst Street. It is the closest continuous northbound street west of Bathurst Street, and has been overwhelmed with cut through traffic, including chronic illegal use by heavy trucks. The police have not been able to devote enforcement resources to deter illegal truck use of this street, or to breaches of the left turn restrictions at Bloor and at Harbord. Euclid street residents have therefore overwhelmingly requested that the block between Ulster and Harbord become one way southbound.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288800.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management on Euclid Avenue, between Ulster Street and Harbord Street - Traffic Amendments (Delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288801.pdf
(June 16, 2026) Letter from Councillor Dianne Saxe on Euclid Avenue direction change
Communications
(July 7, 2026) E-mail from Paul Macchiusi (TE.Supp)
Motions
TE34.163 - Re-open Items TE27.50, Roxborough Street West (Phase 2) - Construction Staging Area - Amendments and TE33.70, Improving Pedestrian Safety on Roxborough Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Re-opened TE27.50, Roxborough Street West (Phase 2) - Construction Staging Area as it pertains to Part 1.
2. Amended Part 1 of its decision on TE27.50 by deleting the date “June 30, 2026” and inserting the date “December 31, 2026” so that it now reads:
1. Authorized the closure of the south sidewalk and a 3.6 metre wide portion of the eastbound curb lane on Roxborough Street West, between Yonge Street and a point 35 metres west, from December 1, 2025 to December 31, 2026, inclusive.
3. Re-opened TE33.70, Improving Pedestrian Safety on Roxborough Road.
4. Amended its decision on TE33.70 by deleting “100 metres” and inserting “40 metres” so that it now reads:
23. Direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to install a temporary pedestrian crossover 40 metres west of Paul Hahn Lane to ensure that pedestrians can safely cross Roxborough Street West in order to walk to Yonge Street on the sole remaining (north side) sidewalk, until the south sidewalk on Roxborough Street West on the block west of Yonge Street is reopened to pedestrians.
Origin
Summary
By 2026.TE33.70, Toronto and East York Community Council amended a construction staging area (2025.TE27.50) for the construction of the new multi-unit residential building at 1 Roxborough Street West. That motion required Transportation Services to install a temporary pedestrian crossover 100m west of Paul Hahn Lane for the duration of the construction road occupancy, to ensure that pedestrians on the south side of the road have a safe access to the sole remaining (north side) sidewalk.
Transportation Services has since advised that it is safer and more feasible to construct the pedestrian crossover 40m west of Paul Hahn Lane. Also, the current staging permit expires before the next TEYCC meeting.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288798.pdf
(June 19, 2026) Letter from Councillor Dianne Saxe on Re-open TE27.50, Roxborough Street West (Phase 2) - Construction Staging Area - Amendments to Parts 1 and 23
Motions
TE34.164 - Shaftesbury Avenue - Parking Amendment
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect from 9:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday, on the north side of Shaftesbury Avenue, between Summerhill Avenue and a point 91.4 metres east of Yonge Street.
Origin
Summary
Parking signs were removed from Shaftesbury Avenue years ago to facilitate a TTC “Easier Access” project to add elevators to the Summerhill subway station. Residents have been pressing for restoration of the original signs ever since the TTC relinquished the road and sidewalk space it had occupied for so long. Transportation Services has advised that they cannot restore the original signs until a by-law conflict is resolved by this motion.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287848.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management on Shaftesbury Avenue - Parking Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-287849.pdf
Motions
TE34.165 - Naming of an Existing Public Lane Located West of Vaughan Road, North of Ellsworth Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the name "Aren Levy Lane" for an existing public lane located west of Vaughan Road, north of Ellsworth Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that the name "Aren Levy Lane" be approved to identify an existing public lane located west of Vaughan Road, north of Ellsworth Avenue.
This naming proposal complies with the City of Toronto Street Naming Policy which can be found at https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/.
This naming proposal is in alignment with the Guiding Principles for Commemoration in the Public Realm.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288944.pdf
(June 29, 2026) Letter from City Council referring MM42.48 - Referral of Urgent Laneway Naming to the Toronto and East York Community Council: Public Lane South of St. Clair Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288946.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288945.pdf
Motions
TE34.166 - 1113-1125 Dundas Street West - Construction Staging Area
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the closure of the south sidewalk and 1.8 metre wide portion of the eastbound curb lane on Dundas Street West, between a point 44 metres east of Ossington Avenue to a point 39 metres further east and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed lane, from September 1, 2026, to September 1, 2028.
2. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.; Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday.; 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday at a rate of $4.50 per hour and for a maximum period of 3 hours, on the south side of Dundas Street West between a point 44 metres east of Ossington Avenue and a point 39 metres further east.
3. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the south side of Dundas Street West between a point 44 metres east of Ossington Avenue and a point 39 metres further east.
4. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.; Monday to Friday at a rate of $4.50 per hour and for a maximum period of 2.5 hours, on the south side of Dundas Street West between a point 44 metres east of Ossington Avenue and a point 39 metres further east.
5. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the south side of Dundas Street West between a point 44 metres east of Ossington Avenue and a point 39 metres further east.
6. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash or sweep (weather permitting) the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
7. City Council direct the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected, unobstructed and fully Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act compliant walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit.
8. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
9. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
10. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
11. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
12. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
13. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
14. City Council direct the applicant to provide monthly community meetings, to discuss any concerns raised by the community.
15. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to submit directly to City Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to City Council's decision, and to reinstate traffic and parking regulations (except with parking rates and hours of operation being consistent to the rates and hours of operation at the time of completion) referred in Recommendations 1 to 6 above, once the project is complete.
16. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Development Office, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO, to:
a. explore measures to reduce the overall duration of these proposed occupancies; and
b. engage the local Councillor’s office at the 12-month mark following the commencement of these proposed occupancies to assess whether adjustments can be made to allow the curb lane to be re-instated as active traffic lane and or vehicle parking, as utilized prior to approval of this application, should public safety and construction staging requirements permit.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, to propose where feasible, operational measures to minimize impacts to the 505 Dundas streetcar service arising from the proposed laneway closure, and report directly to the July 29, 30 and 31, 2026 meeting of City Council.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Dundas Street West, City Council approval of this report is required.
Pomerleau, is constructing a 10-storey affordable housing building. The site is located on the south side of Dundas Street West, east of Ossington Avenue.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to close the south sidewalk and a portion of the eastbound curb lane on Dundas Street West, between a point 44 metres east of Ossington Avenue and a point 39 metres further east, for a period of 24 months, from September 1, 2026 to September 1, 2028, in order to facilitate construction staging operations. During the closure period, pedestrians will be accommodated within a temporary covered and protected walkway located in the closed portion of the eastbound curb lane.
The proposed construction staging area will require a temporary removal of five parking machine spaces on the south side of Dundas Street West. The applicant will be responsible for paying the lost revenue for the five parking spaces.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288990.pdf
Motions
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, to propose where feasible, operational measures to minimize impacts to the 505 Dundas streetcar service arising from the proposed laneway closure, and report directly to the July 29, 30 and 31, 2026 meeting of City Council.
2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Development Office, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO, to:
a. explore measures to reduce the overall duration of these proposed occupancies; and
b. engage the local Councillor’s office at the 12-month mark following the commencement of these proposed occupancies to assess whether adjustments can be made to allow the curb lane to be re-instated as active traffic lane and or vehicle parking, as utilized prior to approval of this application, should public safety and construction staging requirements permit.
TE34.167 - Accessible Loading Zone Mavety Street south of Dundas Street West
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Designated an on-street accessible parking space to be in effect at all times on the east side of Mavety Street, between a point 30 metres south of Dundas Street West and a point 5.5 metres further south.
2. Rescinded the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect at all times, on both sides of Mavety Street, between Annette Street (west intersection) and Dundas Street West.
Origin
Summary
A request for an accessible parking space to accommodate a request on Dundas Street West was reviewed by Transportation Services.
Transportation Services seek approval to install a designated on-street accessible parking space on neighbouring Mavety Street instead of Dundas Street West to avoid the parking restrictions on Dundas Street West.
The installation of the proposed on-street accessible parking space will result in the loss of one pay-and-display parking space on Mavety Street. Transportation Services have determined that this change will have minimal impact on local parking demands. This installation will improve accessibility for neighbouring residents with mobility needs by providing a designated accessible parking space.
Transportation Services also detected inconsistences in the traffic by-law related to the current signed parking regulations along the subject section of Mavety Street. When pay-and-display parking was implemented on Mavety Street, the maximum one-hour parking signs were removed and replaced with pay-and-display parking signage. However, the corresponding maximum one-hour parking by-law was not rescinded, resulting in an inconsistency between the traffic by-law and the current signed parking regulations. These inconsistencies will be resolved with Recommendation 2.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289168.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Memorandum Mavety Street - Accessible Parking Space
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289172.pdf
Motions
TE34.168 - Davenport Village Traffic Safety Plan: Additional Improvements
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Prohibited standing at all times, on the south side of Brandon Avenue, between Foundry Avenue and Lansdowne Avenue.
2. Rescinded the existing standing prohibition in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the south side of Brandon Avenue, between a point 73 metres east of Primrose Avenue and a point 23 metres further east.
3. Amended the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times, car-share vehicles excepted, on the west side of Brandon Avenue, between a point 35 metres east of Lansdowne Avenue and a point 22 metres further east, to be in effect on the south side of Brandon Avenue.
4. Amended the existing designated car-share vehicle parking area for up to four Communauto Inc. vehicles in effect at all times, on the west side of Brandon Avenue, between a point 35 metres east of Lansdowne Avenue and a point 22 metres further east, to be in effect on the south side of Brandon Avenue.
5. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, except no standing from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, from a point 73 metres east of Primrose Avenue to a point 23 metres further east, on the odd (south) side of Brandon Avenue from Dufferin Street to St. Clarens Avenue.
6. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, on the odd (south) side of Brandon Avenue from Dufferin Street to St. Clarens Avenue.
Origin
Summary
In June 2025, Toronto and East York Community Council adopted the Davenport Village Traffic Safety Plan, which approved new traffic safety measures designed to address speeding, heavy cut-through traffic, and other road safety concerns. As implementation of this plan moves forward, residents have raised additional safety concerns regarding unsafe parking and sightline obstructions at intersections in the area.
Transportation Services staff reviewed the feasibility of introducing additional parking restrictions to address community concerns and improve safety. A review determined that there are currently no signed parking regulations on either side of Brandon Avenue, west of Lansdowne Avenue. As a result, parking is limited to three hours unsigned on both sides of the street, narrowing the roadway and reducing visibility for pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers.
To resolve these issues, staff determined that a no-standing prohibition at all times on the south side of Brandon Avenue, west of Lansdowne Avenue, is warranted. This parking restriction would replace the existing unsigned three-hour statutory parking condition on the south side of the street while maintaining parking on the north side for residents and visitors.
The proposed recommendations build on the Davenport Village Traffic Safety Plan by widening sightlines and improving safety for all.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289151.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289152.pdf
Motions
TE34.169 - Improving Pedestrian Safety at Turnberry Avenue and Alentejo Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized all-way compulsory stop control at the intersection of Turnberry Avenue and Alentejo Street.
2. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times, on the north side of Turnberry Avenue, between Union Street and Old Weston Road.
3. Prohibited parking to be in effect at all times, on the north side of Turnberry Avenue, between Old Weston Road and Algarve Crescent.
4. Prohibited standing to be in effect at all times, on the north side of Turnberry Avenue, between Algarve Crescent and a point 80 metres west.
5. Prohibited parking to be in effect at all times, on the north side of Turnberry Avenue, between Benny Stark Street and a point 80 metres west of Algarve Crescent.
Origin
Summary
The intersection of Turnberry Avenue and Alentejo Street is located within a residential neighbourhood home to General Mercer Junior Public School, Turnberry North Park, Turnberry South Park, S.A.D.R.A. Park, and surrounding residential communities. In 2023, traffic calming measures were installed on Turnberry Avenue, west of Old Weston Road, in response to concerns regarding speeding and dangerous driving.
I have heard from area residents that, while the traffic calming measures have helped, the intersection of Turnberry Avenue and Alentejo Street remains dangerously unsafe. To improve safety, I recommend implementing an all-way stop at this intersection and parking restrictions to clear sightlines for drivers. These measures would directly address safety concerns and support safer conditions for all road users accessing the surrounding parks and school.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289243.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management on Improving Pedestrian Safety at Turnberry Avenue and Alentejo Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289244.pdf
Motions
TE34.170 - Improving Permit Parking on Concord Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the existing maximum ten-minute parking regulation in effect from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., and 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east side of Concord Avenue, between a point 132.6 metres north of College Street and a point 23 metres further north.
2. Rescinded the existing maximum ten-minute parking regulation in effect from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., and 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east side of Concord Avenue, between a point 196.6 metres north of College Street and a point 54.8 metres further north.
3. Rescinded the existing school bus loading zone in effect from 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east side of Concord Avenue, between a point 155.6 metres north of College Street and a point 41 metres further north.
4. Authorized parking for a maximum period of ten minutes to be in effect from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., and 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east side of Concord Avenue, between a point 132.6 metres north of College Street and a point 23 metres further north.
5. Authorized parking for a maximum period of ten minutes to be in effect from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., and 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east side of Concord Avenue, between a point 196.6 metres north of College Street and a point 54.8 metres further north.
6. Designated a school bus loading zone to be in effect from 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east side of Concord Avenue, between a point 155.6 metres north of College Street and a point 41 metres further north.
7. Rescinded the stopping prohibition in effect at all times, on the east side of Concord Avenue, between Bloor Street West and a point 44 meters south.
8. Prohibited stopping to be in effect at all times, on the east side of Concord Avenue, between Bloor Street West and a point 57 meters south.
9. Prohibited parking to be in effect at all times, on the west side of Concord Avenue, between the first lane south of Bloor Street West and a point 18 metres further south.
10. Authorized the installation of parking machines on the east side of Concord Avenue, between Bloor Street West and a point 32.4 metres further north, to be in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday, at a rate of $3.25 per hour for a maximum period of three hours.
Origin
Summary
Concord Avenue, between College Street and Dewson Street, is a local street that serves both local residents and the nearby Dewson Street Junior Public School. Residents contacted my office to raise concerns about the lack of available parking during weekday afternoons and evenings, particularly for permit holders returning home from work.
I joined local residents and Transportation Services staff for a site meeting to better understand these concerns and discuss possible solutions. During the meeting, the existing street parking regulations were shown to be inconsistent and confusing about where and when residents can park. Following an additional review, Transportation Services identified parking amendments to resolve these issues, including aligning the school bus loading and short-term parking restrictions with school operating hours.
I recommend authorizing the parking amendments identified by Transportation Services to support residents on Concord Avenue. These measures address the community’s concerns and improve parking availability for residents while continuing to support Dewson Public School’s needs during active school hours.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289105.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Improving Permit Parking on Concord Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289106.pdf
Motions
That in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 27, Council Procedures, Toronto and East York Community Council reconsider Item TE34.170.
That:
1. Toronto and East York Community Council amend Recommendation 10 by deleting the words “one hour” and replacing it with the words “three hours”, so it now reads:
10. Toronto and East York Community Council authorize the installation of parking machines on the east side of Concord Avenue, between Bloor Street West and a point 32.4 metres further north, to be in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday, at a rate of $3.25 per hour for a maximum period of three hours.
TE34.171 - Improving Permit Parking on Conway Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council
1. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:00 midnight to 6:00 a.m., daily, on the odd (south) side of Conway Avenue, from Glenholme Avenue to Oakwood Avenue.
2. Authorized parking by permit only to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., daily, on the even (north) side of Conway Avenue, from Glenholme Avenue to Oakwood Avenue.
3. Rescinded the parking prohibition in effect daily, on the 1st and 3rd Wednesday of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the south side of Conway Avenue, between Glenholme Avenue and a point 30 metres west of Oakwood Avenue.
4. Rescinded the parking prohibition in effect daily, on the 1st and 3rd Wednesday of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the south side of Conway Avenue, between Glenholme Avenue and Oakwood Avenue.
5. Rescinded the parking prohibition in effect daily, except the 1st Wednesday and 3rd Wednesday of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the north side of Conway Avenue, between Glenholme Avenue and Oakwood Avenue.
6. Amended the existing parking prohibition in effect daily, on the south side of Conway Avenue, between a point 30 metres west of Oakwood Avenue and Oakwood Avenue to be in effect between Glenholme Avenue and Oakwood Avenue.
Origin
Summary
Residents on Conway Avenue have contacted my office regarding issues with on-street permit parking regulations. Currently, the existing switchover parking days significantly reduce street parking availability and have created confusion for residents and visitors. I have also heard that the posted parking signage does not match the signage in other sections of the street, resulting in further confusion and inconsistencies in enforcement. Transportation Services staff conducted a site visit and identified several issues with the posted signage.
In response to these issues, my office conducted a neighbourhood survey to request feedback on potential parking amendments. This survey confirmed strong support for removing switchover days and maintaining parking on the north side of Conway Avenue, where there are significantly more on-street parking spaces. These changes will standardize the parking regulations and increase parking availability for residents and visitors.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289136.pdf
Motions
TE34.172 - Improving Permit Parking on Delaware Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. all times, except no parking 16th day to the last day of each month from April 1 to November 30, inclusive; and no parking anytime from a point 147 metres south of Hallam Street to a point 5.5 metres further south, on the odd (east) side of Delaware Avenue from Shanly Street to Hallam Street.
2. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., all times, except no parking first day to the 15th day of each month, from April 1 to November 30, inclusive; and no parking anytime from December 1 of one year to March 31 of the following year, inclusive, on the even (west) side of Delaware Avenue from Shanly Street to Hallam Street.
3. Authorized parking by permit only to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m, all times, except no parking 16th day to the last day of each month from April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the odd (east) side of Delaware Avenue from Shanly Street to Hallam Street.
4. Authorized parking by permit only to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m, all times, except no parking first day to the 15th day of each month from April 1 to November 30, inclusive; and no parking anytime from December1 of one year to March 31 of the next following year, inclusive, on the even (west) side of Delaware Avenue from Shanly Street to Hallam Street.
Origin
Summary
I have heard from residents on Delaware Avenue, between Shanly Street and Hallam Street, who shared that there is a lack of available on-street parking for permit holders. Through conversations with residents, there are clear inconsistencies in the permit parking regulations between this block and the section south of Shanly Street, resulting in unintended parking pressures for local residents.
While permit parking on Delaware Avenue south of Shanly Street is in effect overnight until 10:00 a.m., the shorter and standard permit parking period on the block north of Shanly Street creates an opportunity for drivers to leave their vehicles to avoid the longer parking restriction. As a result, residents on this block have experienced reduced access to on-street permit parking near their homes, which makes it more difficult to find available spaces.
In a survey my office hand-delivered to homes, residents confirmed that parking is a challenge and that changes to the permit parking rules are necessary.
I am recommending that the permit parking regulations on Delaware Avenue, between Shanly Street and Hallam Street, match those already in place on the adjoining block. This parking amendment would create consistency along the neighbourhood, discourage the unfair displacement of visitor vehicles, and improve parking availability for residents with valid permit parking permits.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289095.pdf
Motions
TE34.173 - Improving Traffic Calming Measures on Blackthorn Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Directed the installation of one additional speed hump on Blackthorn Avenue, between Rockwell Avenue and Rowntree Avenue, for traffic calming purposes, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (June 26, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
2. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times, on the west side of Blackthorn Avenue, between a point 76.2 metres north of St. Clair Avenue West and a point 61 metres further north.
3. Rescinded the existing maximum one hour parking regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., Monday to Saturday, on the west side of Blackthorn Avenue, between the first laneway north of St. Clair Avenue West and a point 76.2 metres north of St. Clair Avenue West.
4. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, except no parking anytime from a point 76.2 metres north of St. Clair Avenue West to a point 61 metres further north, on the even (west) side of Blackthorn Avenue from St. Clair Avenue West to Rockwell Avenue.
5. Rescinded the existing on-street accessible parking space in effect at all times, on the west side of Blackthorn Avenue, between a point 42.5 metres north of Rockwell Avenue and a point 5.5 metres further north.
6. Prohibited parking to be in effect at all times, on the west side of Blackthorn Avenue, between a point 37 metres north of St. Clair Avenue West and a point 6.5 metres further north.
7. Authorized parking for a maximum period of one-hour from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., Monday to Saturday, on the west side of Blackthorn Avenue, between a point 43.5 metres north of St. Clair Avenue West and a point 50.5 metres further north.
8. Prohibited parking to be in effect at all times, on the west side of Blackthorn Avenue, between a point 94 metres north of St. Clair Avenue West and a point 80.5 metres further north.
9. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, on the even (west) side of Blackthorn Avenue from St. Clair Avenue West to Rockwell Avenue.
10. Amended the existing on-street accessible parking space in effect at all times on the west side of Blackthorn Avenue, between a point 17 metres south of Rockwell Avenue and a point 5.5 metres further south, to be in effect between a point 10 metres south of Rockwell Avenue and a point 5.5 metres further south.
11. Amended the existing one-way highway on Blackthorn Avenue, between a point 117 metres north of St. Clair Avenue West and Rockwell Avenue, to be in effect between a point 136 metres north of St. Clair Avenue West and Rockwell Avenue.
Origin
Summary
Blackthorn Avenue, between Rogers Road and Rowntree Avenue, is a local residential street operating as an important route for drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians. The area is also home to many families and young children who travel around the neighbourhood. To help address speeding concerns and improve road safety, five speed humps were installed on this section of Blackthorn Avenue in 2000.
Following the installation of improvements through the Silverthorn Cycling Connections Project, this section of Blackthorn Avenue was converted from two-way traffic to one-way southbound traffic. While these changes improved road safety in the area, residents on Blackthorn Avenue have highlighted a gap in the existing traffic-calming measures on this street. The distance between the southernmost speed hump and Rockwell Avenue is approximately 100 metres, creating a segment of roadway that encourages drivers to speed up. This distancing does not meet the City of Toronto’s standard and appears to be an error in the previous design.
In response to these concerns, installing an additional speed hump is recommended. This extension of the existing measures will help reduce speeding and improve safety for all.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289057.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289054.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-675, dated March 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289058.pdf
Motions
TE34.174 - Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Concord Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (12 speed humps) on Concord Avenue, between Bloor Street West and College Street, generally as shown in Attachments 2 and 3 to the letter (July 2, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
Origin
Summary
Concord Avenue, between Bloor Street West and College Street, is located between two major arterial roads and experiences significant volumes of both pedestrian and vehicular traffic. This block serves as a key route for people travelling to nearby destinations while also attracting drivers seeking to bypass potential congestion at surrounding intersections.
Residents have consistently raised concerns about excessive vehicle speeds along this stretch of Concord Avenue and the resulting impacts on neighbourhood safety. Many commnuity members have shared experiences of near-collisions and expressed concerns for the safety of all road users, particularly children travelling to and from Dewson Street Junior Public School.
In response to these concerns, my office conducted a neighbourhood survey to gather community feedback on potential traffic calming measures, and the results confirmed support for the installation of speed humps. These measures will help reduce vehicle speeds, discourage cut-through traffic, and improve safety for all.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289175.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289216.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-638, dated January 2025, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289210.pdf
Attachment 3 - Drawing No. TC-638-1, dated January 2025, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289218.pdf
Attachment 4 - Drawing No. TC-638-2, dated January 2025, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289219.pdf
Motions
TE34.175 - Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Earlscourt Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (one speed hump) on Earlscourt Avenue, between Morrison Avenue and Rogers Road, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (June 26, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
2. Rescinded the existing traffic calming (speed humps) on Earlscourt Avenue, between Ascot Avenue and a point 29.8 metres north of Morrison Avenue.
3. Subject to approval of Recommendation 1 above and in conjunction with the installation of speed humps, reduced the speed limit to 30 kilometres per hour on Earlscourt Avenue, between St. Clair Avenue West and Hope Street.
4. Authorized the amendment of Schedule XLV (Part 1) to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, to remove Earlscourt Avenue between St. Clair Avenue West and Hope Street, from being excluded from the Designated Area such that this portion of highway will then be included within the corresponding designated area in Column 1 in Schedule XLV (Part 1).
Origin
Summary
I have heard from residents on Earlscourt Avenue who have shared concerns regarding speeding drivers travelling through their neighbourhood. This section of Earlscourt Avenue sits just south of Rogers Road and is an important route for residents. Outside this section, Earlscourt Avenue has an existing network of speed humps that has helped improve safety. The gap in this network encourages speeding and dangerous driving. Many residents have shared their experiences involving near accidents and fear that an accident is likely without action.
In a neighbourhood survey, residents on Earlscourt Avenue voted strongly in support of installing speed humps as a traffic-calming measure. This proposed measure will help reduce speeding, combat cut-through traffic, and improve safety.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289059.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289055.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-696, dated May 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289077.pdf
Motions
TE34.176 - Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Ennerdale Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (two speed humps) on Ennerdale Road, between Rochdale Avenue and Chudleigh Road, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 2, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
Origin
Summary
Ennerdale Avenue runs south from Eglinton Avenue West and is a high traffic route connecting residents to many nearby locations. Currently, Ennerdale Avenue benefits from traffic calming measures south to Dynevor Road. I have heard from residents that speeding is a major problem on the stretch between Hatherley Road and Dynevor Road, which lacks the same traffic calming measures.
In response to these issues, a neighbourhood survey conducted by my office confirmed strong support for installing speed humps. These measures will help to reduce speeding and improve safety for all residents.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289133.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289134.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-700, dated May 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289135.pdf
Motions
TE34.177 - Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Gilbert Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (five speed humps) on Gilbert Avenue, between Kitchener Avenue and Eglinton Avenue West, generally as shown in Attachments 2 and 3 to the letter (June 26, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
2. Rescinded the parking prohibition in effect at all times, on the east side of Gilbert Avenue, between a point 11 metres south of Corby Avenue and a point 5.5 metres north thereof.
3. Rescinded the parking prohibition in effect at all times on the east side Gilbert Avenue, between a point 88.5 metres south of Summit Avenue and a point 6 metres north thereof.
4. Rescinded the parking prohibition in effect at all times on the west side of Gilbert Avenue, between a point 173.3 metres south of Rogers Road and Rogers Road.
5. Rescinded the parking prohibition in effect at all times on the west side of Gilbert Avenue, between Norman Avenue and a point 124.9 metres north of Innes Avenue.
6. Rescinded the existing heavy vehicle prohibition in effect at all times on Gilbert Avenue, between a point 173.3 metres south of Rogers Road and Summit Avenue.
7. Rescinded the existing heavy vehicle prohibition in effect at all times on Gilbert Avenue, between Norman Avenue and a point 124.2 metres north of Innes Avenue.
8. Prohibited parking at all times on the west side of Gilbert Avenue, between Norman Avenue and Rogers Road.
9. Prohibited parking at all times on the east side of Gilbert Avenue, between a point 36 metres north of Innes Avenue and a point 10 metres further north.
10. Prohibited heavy vehicles at all times on Gilbert Avenue, between Norman Avenue and Rogers Road.
Origin
Summary
I have heard from residents on Gilbert Avenue, between Kitchener Avenue and Eglinton Avenue West, who have shared concerns about speeding vehicles travelling through this community. Gilbert Avenue extends south from Eglinton Avenue West and often attracts drivers seeking to bypass traffic on busy roads. Residents have shared their experiences with near accidents as they and their children walk down this street.
In a survey my office hand-delivered to homes, residents strongly supported installing speed humps as a traffic calming measure. I also heard directly from residents at their doors, and many confirmed the urgent need for traffic safety measures on this section of Gilbert Avenue. Traffic calming measures are already in place on other sections of Gilbert Avenue, and installing speed humps on the remaining section will complete this network.
These additional measures will help cut down on speeding, reduce cut-through traffic, and improve safety for all.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289080.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289081.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-699, dated May 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289082.pdf
Attachment 3 - Drawing No. TC-699-1, dated May 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289083.pdf
Motions
TE34.178 - Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Greenlaw Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (six speed humps) on Greenlaw Avenue, between Ashburnham Road and St. Clair Avenue West, generally as shown in Attachments 2 and 3 to the letter (June 26, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
Origin
Summary
Greenlaw Avenue extends south from a busy section of St. Clair Avenue West and is an important connection to schools, small businesses, and parks in the area. I have heard from residents who shared that drivers too often speed along Greenlaw Avenue to avoid travelling through nearby major intersections.
This increased vehicle volume has resulted in worsening traffic safety issues for residents, including drivers who speed through stop signs and engage in aggressive driving. As many young children live and walk through this neighbourhood, there is an urgent need for traffic safety improvements to protect them and other residents.
Through a neighbourhood survey hand-delivered to homes by my office, residents voted in strong support of installing speed humps to reduce speeding and improve traffic safety on Greenlaw Avenue.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289088.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289061.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-695, dated May 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289062.pdf
Attachment 3 - Drawing No. TC-695-1, dated May 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289089.pdf
Motions
TE34.179 - Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Kirknewton Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (seven speed humps) on Kirknewton Road, between Dynevor Road and Eglinton Avenue West, generally as shown in Attachments 2 and 3 to the letter (June 26, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
Origin
Summary
Residents on Kirknewton Road have contacted my office to raise concerns regarding excessive vehicle speeds and dangerous driving on their street. Kirknewton Road is a residential street, running south from Eglinton Avenue West, where people walk and cycle to nearby schools, businesses, and parks. Yet speeding drivers continue to impact the safety and livability of the neighbourhood.
In response to these concerns, my office conducted a neighbourhood survey that was hand-delivered to homes. The survey confirmed strong neighbourhood support for installing speed humps as a traffic calming measure to reduce vehicle speeds. Through conversations with residents while door-knocking on Kirknewton Road, I heard directly about ongoing concerns regarding excessive vehicle speeds and further support for traffic calming measures that would make the street safer for all residents. Unfortunately, I witnessed many drivers choosing to speed while I was at doors with residents.
Given clear community support and ongoing traffic safety issues, I recommend installing speed humps on Kirknewton Road to reduce speeding and improve road safety for all.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289073.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Kirknewton Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289074.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-777, dated June 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Kirknewton Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289075.pdf
Attachment 3 - Drawing No. TC-777-1, dated June 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Kirknewton Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289096.pdf
Motions
TE34.180 - Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Margueretta Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (three speed humps) on Margueretta Street, between Dundas Street West and College Street, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 2, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
Origin
Summary
Margueretta Street, between College Street and Dundas Street West, is located between two busy major arterials. This block attracts both heavy pedestrian activity heading towards nearby locations and heavy cut-through traffic attempting to avoid nearby intersections. I have heard from many residents that speeding vehicles are a daily challenge, impacting the safety of all road users. Many residents have shared their experiences of near-accidents and highlighted the urgent need for traffic safety measures.
In response to this issue, my office conducted a neighbourhood survey to hear feedback about ways to improve safety. Residents strongly supported installing speed humps as a traffic calming measure. The installation of speed humps will help to reduce speeding, redirect traffic, and improve safety for residents and their families.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289099.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Margueretta Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289100.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-720, dated May 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Margueretta Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289101.pdf
Motions
TE34.181 - Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Muir Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (four speed humps) on Muir Avenue, between Brock Avenue and Dufferin Street, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (June 26, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
2. Rescinded the parking prohibition in effect from the 16th day to the last day of each month, from April 1 to November 30, inclusive on the north side of Muir Avenue, between Harvie Avenue and Dufferin Street.
3. Prohibited parking to be in effect from the 16th day to the last day of each month, from April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the north side of Muir Avenue, between Brock Avenue and Dufferin Street.
Origin
Summary
Muir Avenue is an important local route located south of Dufferin Mall and runs west from Dufferin Street. I have heard from residents on Muir Avenue who have shared concerns about speeding vehicles and dangerous driving that are impacting safety. Residents have shared their experiences with near accidents and have requested urgent traffic safety improvements.
In a neighbourhood survey my office hand-delivered to homes, residents voted in support of traffic calming measures in response to these issues. Traffic calming measures are already in place on nearby streets, and this additional installation on Muir Avenue will support existing improvements. These measures will help reduce speeding, reduce cut-through traffic, and improve safety for all who are driving, cycling, or walking.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289085.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Muir Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289086.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-719, dated May 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Muir Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289087.pdf
Motions
TE34.182 - Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Pelham Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (three speed humps) on Pelham Avenue, between Osler Street and Uxbridge Avenue, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 2, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
Origin
Summary
In 2018, Toronto and East York Community Council approved speed humps on Pelham Avenue to extend only from Uxbridge Avenue to Laughton Avenue. For many residents on Pelham Avenue, this decision created a gap that left a large section of the street without he appropriate traffic calming measures.
This remaining block of Pelham Avenue is used frequently by young students heading to Charles-Sauriol Elementary School or by families dropping by Pelham Avenue Playground. I have heard directly from residents that drivers are speeding towards the existing speed humps, highlighting the need for urgent measures.
In response to this issue, my office conducted a neighbourhood survey, and residents voted unanimously in support of speed humps. These measures will help to reduce speeding and improve safety for residents travelling throughout the neighbourhood.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289114.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Pelham Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289115.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-701, dated May 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Pelham Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289116.pdf
Motions
TE34.183 - Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Rochdale Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (two speed humps) on Rochdale Avenue, between Harvie Avenue and Ennerdale Road, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (June 26, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
Origin
Summary
Rochdale Avenue, located between Ennerdale Road and Harvie Avenue, sits at the heart of Caledonia-Fairbank and connects residents to several local shops, schools, parks, and public transit. I have heard from many residents that drivers too often speed down Rochdale Avenue, putting them and their families at risk. I’ve also heard from residents who shared their experiences of near misses resulting from dangerous driving. As this neighbourhood continues to grow and welcome new residents, there is an urgent need for traffic calming measures.
In response to these issues, my office shared a neighbourhood survey requesting feedback on traffic safety improvements. Residents along Rochdale Avenue overwhelmingly supported installing speed humps as a proposed traffic calming measure. The addition of speed humps will help reduce speeding and improve traffic safety.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289071.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289092.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-698, dated May 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289072.pdf
Motions
TE34.184 - Parking Amendments on Wade Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Prohibited standing to be in effect at all times on the west side of Wade Avenue, between Paton Road and a point 12 metres south.
2. Prohibited standing to be in effect at all times on the west side of Wade Avenue, between a point 27 metres south of Paton Road and a point 9.5 metres further south.
3. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect from the 16th day of each month to the last day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the north side of Wade Avenue, between Lansdowne Avenue and the west end of Wade Avenue.
4. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect from December 1 of one year to March 31 of the next following year, inclusive, on the south side of Wade Avenue, between Lansdowne Avenue and the west end of Wade Avenue.
5. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect from the 1st day of each month to the 15th day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the south side of Wade Avenue, between Lansdowne Avenue and the west end of Wade Avenue.
6. Rescinded the existing designated taxicab stand for two taxis in effect from 7:00 p.m. of one day to 7:00 a.m. of the next following day, on the north side of Wade Avenue, between a point 25 metres west of Lansdowne Avenue and a point 16 metres further west.
7. Prohibited parking to be in effect from the 16th day of each month to the last day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the north side of Wade Avenue, between a point 62 metres west of Lansdowne Avenue and a point 48 metres further west.
8. Prohibited standing to be in effect at all times, on the south side of Wade Avenue, between Lansdowne Avenue and a point 30.5 metres west.
9. Prohibited parking to be in effect from December 1 of one year to March 31 of the next following year, inclusive, on the south side of Wade Avenue, between a point 30.5 metres west of Lansdowne Avenue and a point 90 metres further west.
10. Prohibited parking to be in effect from the 1st day of each month to the 15th day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the south side of Wade Avenue, between a point 30.5 metres west of Lansdowne Avenue and a point 90 metres further west.
11. Prohibited parking to be in effect at all times on the north side of Wade Avenue, between a point 110 metres west of Lansdowne Avenue and a point 8 metres further west.
12. Prohibited parking to be in effect at all times on the south side of Wade Avenue, between a point 120.5 metres west of Lansdowne Avenue and a point 31.5 metres further west.
13. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Paton Road, between Lansdowne Avenue and Emerson Avenue.
14. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Paton Road, between Lansdowne Avenue and the west end of Paton Road.
15. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., daily, on the even (north) side of Paton Road from Lansdowne Avenue to the Canadian National Railways.
Origin
Summary
I have heard from a business owner on Wade Avenue regarding vehicles routinely parking in front of the business's paid boulevard parking area. These incidents occur too frequently, creating operational challenges and delays for employees, deliveries, and guests. To assess these concerns, Transportation Services conducted a site visit in April 2026.
While the City of Toronto's statutory parking regulations already prohibit parking directly in front of a legal boulevard without signage, Transportation Services determined that additional measures are warranted, given ongoing enforcement challenges. As a result, staff recommend implementing a nso-standing regulation on the west side of Wade Avenue, south of Paton Road, adjacent to the entrance and exit of the business's boulevard parking area.
The proposed parking amendments will discourage vehicles from stopping within the boulevard area and maintain unobstructed access to the parking facility.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289078.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Parking Amendments on Wade Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289079.pdf
Motions
TE34.185 - Re-opening and Amending 2025.TE25.42 - Accessible Parking Spaces
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Re-opened Item TE25.42 titled "Accessible Parking Spaces - September 2025 (Delegated)”.
2. Amended its previous decision on Item 2025.TE25.42 by:
a. deleting the entries in Attachment 1 to the report (September 2, 2025) from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services, only as it pertains to the following locations:
Table 1: On-Street Accessible Parking Spaces to be Installed
Ward 9 Locations
Chudleigh Road, north side, between a point 59 metres east of Harvie Avenue and a point 5.5 meters further east
Morrison Avenue, north side, between a point 21 metres west of Dufferin Street and a point 5.5 metres further west, from the 1st day to the 15th day of each month, from April 1 to November 30, inclusive
Morrison Avenue, south side, between a point 28 metres west of Dufferin Street and a point 5.5 metres further west, from December 1 of one year to March 31 of the next following year, inclusive, and from the 16th day to the last day of each month, from April 1 to November 30, inclusive
b. adopt the following new entries to Attachment 1 to the report (September 2, 2025) from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services only as it pertains to the following locations:
Table 1: On-Street Accessible Parking Spaces to be Installed
Ward 9 Locations
Morrison Avenue, north side, between a point 21.5 metres west of Dufferin Street and a point 5.5 metres further west, from the 1st day to the 15th day of each month, from April 1 to November 30, inclusive
Morrison Avenue, south side, between a point 20 metres west of Dufferin Street and a point 5.5 metres further west, from December 1 of one year to March 31 of the next following year, inclusive, and from the 16th day to the last day of each month, from April 1 to November 30, inclusive
Origin
Summary
At the September 18, 2025 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council, accessible parking spaces were approved on Chudleigh Road and Morrison Avenue. The accessible parking space on Chudleigh Street is not sufficient in length for the original applicant’s vehicle and, therefore, is no longer needed. The location of the accessible parking space on Morrison Avenue will be relocated to better meet the needs of the applicant.
As a year has not passed since the adoption of this item, a motion is required to re-open and rescind the installation of the above accessible parking spaces and approve the installation of the relocated accessible parking space on Morrison Avenue.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289117.pdf
Motions
TE34.186 - Safer Streets for Davenport: Reducing Speed Limits
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the reduction in the speed limit of all roads designated as Collector roads that currently have a speed limit above 40 kilometres per hour down to 30 kilometres per hour within the confines of Ward 9 - Davenport, excluding Collector roads that bound Ward 12 - Toronto-St. Paul’s.
2. Amended City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, generally as outlined in Attachment 1 to the letter (July 2, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
3. Authorized the amendment of Schedule XLV (Part 1) to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, to remove the following streets from being excluded from the Designated Area such that the following portions of highways will then be included within the corresponding designated area in Column 1 in Schedule XLV (Part 1):
a. Auburn Avenue between Via Italia and Dufferin Street;
b. Geary Avenue between Dufferin Street and Dovercourt Road;
c. Hope Street between Nairn Avenue and Dufferin Street;
d. Lansdowne Avenue between Davenport Road and St. Clair Avenue West;
e. Rockwell Avenue between Old Weston Road and Silverthorn Avenue; and
f. Via Italia between Auburn Avenue and St. Clair Avenue West.
4. Reduced the speed limit from 40 kilometres per hour to 30 kilometres per hour on Emerson Avenue, between Bloor Street West and Wallace Avenue.
5. Reduced the speed limit from 40 kilometres per hour to 30 kilometres per hour on Emerson Avenue, between Lappin Avenue and Dupont Street.
Origin
Summary
Improving road safety across Davenport remains one of my top priorities. I often hear from residents and vulnerable road users regarding speeding drivers on several collector roads throughout our neighbourhoods. While these streets are classified as collector roads, they function more like local streets, connecting residents to many nearby schools, parks, and other everyday destinations. These streets and the neighbourhoods that surround them are used by hundreds of pedestrians, and include existing infrastructure designed to support safer travel.
As neighbourhoods in our city continue to grow and more people choose to walk, cycle, and use transit to reach nearby locations, higher vehicle speeds are creating safety risks that affect access to important community spaces. Reducing vehicle speeds on these streets is an important step towards reducing risks in our neighbourhoods and ensuring safety is prioritized.
The City of Toronto's Vision Zero 2.0 Road Safety Plan identifies speed management as one of the most effective ways to reduce the likelihood and severity of collisions. This plan recognizes that lower speed limits are a strong tool for improving safety, especially on streets with schools, parks, and local businesses.
Over the past several years, significant progress has been made to improve road safety across Davenport. These efforts include the installation of new speed humps, the implementation of several neighbourhood traffic safety plans, and investments in pedestrian and cycling connections. Building on this progress, the recommendations below will reduce the posted speed limits on all collector roads that function as neighbourhood streets from 40 km/h down to 30 km/h.
Overall, these measures represent a comprehensive approach to traffic safety that advances the Vision Zero 2.0 objectives and builds on the work of creating a safer Davenport for all.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289137.pdf
Attachment 1 - Amendments to Speed Limits on Collector Roads within Ward 9
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289124.pdf
Attachment 2 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Safer Streets for Davenport: Reducing Speed Limits
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289125.pdf
Motions
TE34.187 - Through Restriction at Bloor Street West and Pauline Avenue/Collegiate Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council prohibit northbound straight through movement at all times, bicycles excepted, at the intersection of Bloor Street West and Pauline Avenue/Collegiate Road.
Origin
Summary
As part of the development at 1141 Bloor Street West, 980 Dufferin Street, and 90 Croatia Street, a new public roadway, Collegiate Road, will be constructed to connect Croatia Street with Bloor Street West at Pauline Avenue. To accommodate this new connection, the existing pedestrian crossover at Bloor Street West will be replaced with a traffic control signal. These changes will create a new route between Bloor Street West and Croatia Street that is expected to be used by hundreds of vehicles travelling to and from Dufferin Mall.
I have heard from residents on Pauline Avenue who are concerned that the opening of Collegiate Road and the installation of traffic control signals will increase traffic infiltration into the surrounding residential neighbourhood. Residents expect drivers travelling northbound on Collegiate Road to use the new signalized intersection to continue through to Pauline Avenue as a shortcut to avoid delays at nearby intersections.
Pauline Avenue is a local residential street and is not intended to function as a through route for neighbourhood traffic. Increased vehicle volumes on the street would negatively affect the safety of local residents, including young students heading over to nearby schools.
To proactively address these concerns before the roadway becomes operational, I am recommending a northbound through restriction at the intersection of Bloor Street West and Pauline Avenue/Collegiate Road. This restriction would be implemented when the new traffic lights are installed and activated. This measure will help prevent cut-through traffic and direct drivers to the road network designed to accommodate higher traffic volumes.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289181.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Through Restriction at Bloor Street West and Pauline Avenue/Collegiate Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289182.pdf
Motions
TE34.188 - Advancing Parking and Traffic Amendments, Speed Reduction and Allowing for Future Speed Humps on Bruyeres Mews
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Prohibited stopping to be in effect at all times, on the north side of Bruyeres Mews, between Ianuzzi Street and a point 15 metres east.
2. Amended the stopping prohibition in effect at all times, on the north side of Bruyeres Mews, between Bathurst Street and a point 15 metres west, to be in effect between Bathurst Street and a point 30.5 metres west.
3. Amended the existing maximum 15-minute parking regulation in effect at all times, on the north side of Bruyeres Mews, between Iannuzzi Street and a point 15 metres west of Bathurst Street, to be in effect between a point 15 metres east of Iannuzzi Street and a point 30.5 metres west of Bathurst Street.
4. Reduced the speed limit from 40 kilometres per hour to 30 kilometres per hour on Bruyeres Mews, between Iannuzzi Street and Bathurst Street.
5. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (two speed humps) on Bruyeres Mews, between Bathurst Street and Grand Magazine Street, generally as shown in Attachment 1 to the letter (June 19, 2026) from the Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik.
Origin
Summary
My office has been working with local residents, the Fort York Neighbourhood Association, and City staff around road safety improvements on Bruyeres Mews.
Transportation Services staff have already begun working with my office to install crosswalk lines and a yellow divider line at the intersection of Ianuzzi Street and Bruyeres Mews.
Resident concerns have focused around vehicles parking in a no standing area on the north side near Bathurst Street, causing congestion and driver frustration, including excessive honking and shouting, as vehicles have limited space to pass. This poses visibility concerns for pedestrians and cyclists. Parking adjustments will improve sightlines at crosswalks and mitigate congestion while still providing some street parking for nearby businesses.
Engineering and Construction Services have determined that Bruyeres Mews has not yet been assumed and/or classified by the City. As a result, physical changes to the road in the form of traffic calming measures (i.e., speed humps), cannot be installed on this road immediately.
However, bylawing two speed humps on Bruyeres Mews this time will greatly expedite their installation by the City once the road is assumed.
My recommendations are aimed at allowing for the future installation of speed humps on Bruyeres Mews, and improving sightlines and congestion on this street for Fort York residents.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289016.pdf
Attachment 1 - Drawing No:TC-705 Bruyeres Mews
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289017.pdf
Attachment 2 - Technical Memorandum Bruyeres Mews - Parking and Traffic Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289018.pdf
Attachment 3 - Technical Memorandum Bruyere - Speed Humps
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289019.pdf
Motions
TE34.189 - Advancing Parking and Traffic Amendments, Speed Reduction and Allowing for Future Speed Humps on Iannuzzi Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Amended the standing prohibition in effect at all times, on the east side of Iannuzzi Street, between Fort York Boulevard and a point 52 metres south, to be in effect, between Fort York Boulevard and a point 63 metres south.
2. Authorized parking for a maximum period of 15 minutes, on the east side of Iannuzzi Street, between a point 63 metres south of Fort York Boulevard and a point 15 metres north of Bruyeres Mews.
3. Amended the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times, on the west side of Iannuzzi Street, between Fleet Street and Bruyeres Mews, to be in effect between Fleet Street and Fort York Boulevard.
4. Amended the existing speed limit of kilometres per hour on Iannuzzi Street, between Fleet Street and Bruyeres Mews to be kilometres per hour on Iannuzzi Street, between Fleet Street and Fort York Boulevard
5. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (two speed humps) on Iannuzzi Street, between Fleet Street and Fort York Boulevard, generally as shown in Attachment 3 to the letter (June 19, 2026) from Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik.
Origin
Summary
My office has been working with local residents, the Fort York Neighbourhood Association, and City staff to prioritize road safety on Iannuzzi Street. These concerns include speeding, as well as vehicles parking on the east side of Iannuzzi Street creating sightline concerns for vehicles exiting from a nearby condo complex.
Engineering and Construction Services have determined that Iannuzzi Street has not yet been assumed and/or classified by the City. As a result, physical changes to the road in the form of traffic calming measures (i.e., speed humps), cannot be installed on these road segments at this time. However, bylawing two speed humps on Iannuzzi at this time will greatly expedite their installation by the City once the road is assumed in future.
My recommendations are aimed at ensuring we address Fort York and Ianuzzi Street residents’ concerns through lowering the speed limit, making parking adjustments to facilitate better visibility and sightlines on this street, and allowing for future speed hump installation.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288787.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Memorandum, Iannuzzi Street - Parking and Traffic Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288788.pdf
Attachment 2 - Technical Memorandum, Iannuzzi Street - Speed Humps
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288789.pdf
Attachment 3 - Speed Hump Locations Plan Drawing No. TC-706 Iannuzzi Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288790.pdf
Motions
TE34.190 - Continuing Commitments to Liberty Village Neighbours by Keeping Metrolinx Exhibition Station Construction off of Strachan Avenue and Neighbourhood Streets
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, in coordination with the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, to request that Metrolinx:
a. re-examine the feasibility, including costs, to pursue alternative haul routes to reduce Ontario Line construction truck traffic on Strachan Avenue and neighbourhood streets; and
b. assess associated traffic conditions, community impacts and mitigation measures to minimize effects on traffic operations in the surrounding neighbourhood.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to provide an update to the soonest possible meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council.
Origin
Summary
My office continues to work with Liberty Village residents and stakeholders around traffic congestion. Traffic remains a major concern for this community, which has only one main East/West Road. I continue to address traffic and transportation issues in this neighbourhood with seriousness through my Liberty Village Traffic Action Plan and the recently approved Liberty for All study.
As we bring much needed new transit infrastructure to this community, this work must be done collaboratively and respectfully. Metrolinx construction at Exhibition Station should not unduly limit Liberty Village’ residents’ and local employees’ ability to navigate their neighbourhood safely and reliably.
My concerns are regarding a new haul route proposed by Metrolinx that would allow unrestricted access through the Strachan Gate, enabling trucks to access the site equally from both the Dufferin and Strachan gates.
This proposal is not aligned with previous agreements between the City and my office, and contrary to previous Council-approved direction in 2024, which emphasized minimizing the use of Strachan Avenue. City staff have advised that this plan would increase truck traffic at the Strachan Avenue and East Liberty Street intersection.
In Fall of 2024, my office successfully advocated alongside local stakeholders to significantly reduce the number of planned dump trucks at key intersections in the neighbourhood for Exhibition Station work.
At that time, Metrolinx committed to neighbours that Strachan Avenue would only be used as a backup route when absolutely necessary, and that the majority of the hauling would take place using the new route that will connect to Dufferin Street.
In advance of a recent Construction Liaison Committee Meeting on Exhibition Station, I shared these concerns with the CEO of Metrolinx and requested they consider alternatives. My office received a response to indicate that this work would be continuing as planned, which is not acceptable.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289237.pdf
Motions
TE34.191 - Dundas Street West - Parking Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 910, Parking Machines and Meters, and Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, generally as outlined in Attachment 1 to the letter (July 6, 2026) from Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik.
Origin
Summary
On behalf of the Scadding Court Community Centre and nearby businesses, I have asked staff to consider amending the parking regulations on Dundas Street West, between Bathurst Street and Denison Avenue to remove the existing peak period parking and stopping restrictions and allow curbside parking on Dundas Street West in the one lay-by area on the south side.
These lay-bys were created as part of civil works completed in 2018 and 2019, however, no parking changes were made at the time until preparations for the FIFA World Cup began. These changes have made it difficult for Scadding Court Community Centre and 707 Market businesses to access deliveries and short term parking.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289169.pdf
Attachment 1 - Amendments to Parking Regulations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289170.pdf
Attachment 2 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management on Dundas Street West - Parking Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289171.pdf
Motions
TE34.192 - Ordnance Street, Between Strachan Avenue and the South End of Ordnance Street - Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (three speed humps) on Ordnance Street, between Strachan Avenue and the south end of Ordnance Street, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 6, 2026) from Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik.
Origin
Summary
My office has been working with City staff and local residents around traffic calming and safety on Ordnance Street. Following a request from a nearby resident, we solicited feedback from residents in local affected condo buildings on Ordnance Street through property management and received over 100 responses to an online survey hosted by my office. A majority of respondents to the survey were in favour of speed humps on their street.
I’m looking forward to advancing these improvements to improve safety at a key intersection in our downtown, and to continue working with residents on improvements in their neighbourhood.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289203.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management on Ordnance Street, Between Strachan Avenue and the South End of Ordnance Street - Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289204.pdf
Attachment 2 - Speed Hump Locations Plan Drawing No. TC-737, Ordnance Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289205.pdf
Motions
TE34.193 - Traffic Calming - Denison Avenue, between Queen Street West and Wolseley Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (one speed hump) on Denison Avenue, between Queen Street West and Wolseley Street, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (June 19, 2026) from Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik.
Origin
Summary
The Queen Street West BIA contacted my office to report concerns about motorists speeding as they exit the neighbourhood onto Queen Street West. In response, my office worked with City staff to assess the feasibility of implementing traffic calming measures, including speed humps, on Denison Avenue between Queen Street West and Wolseley Street. This area experiences significant pedestrian and cyclist activity due to nearby destinations such as St. Stanislaus Kostka Church, TPA Municipal Carpark Lot #106, Randy Padmore Park, local businesses along Queen Street West, and surrounding residential neighbourhoods.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288828.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Memorandum - Denison Avenue - Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288829.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-738 - Denison Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288830.pdf
Motions
TE34.194 - Traffic Calming - Scadding Avenue, between Princess Street and Hahn Place, and Speed Limit Reduction on Scadding Avenue, between Lower Sherbourne Street and Hahn Place
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming ( four speed humps) on Scadding Avenue, between Princess Street and Hahn Place, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (June 19, 2026) from Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik.
2. Amended the speed limit of 30 kilometres per hour on Scadding Avenue, between Lower Sherbourne Street and Hahn Place, to be in effect between Hahn Place and the west end of Scadding Avenue.
Origin
Summary
My office has been working with residents and the St Lawrence Neighbourhood Association around road safety in their neighbourhood. We have heard from local residents that this neighbourhood and the surrounding area experiences a high volume of pedestrian traffic associated with Parliament Square Park, Princess Street Park, David Crombie Park (Playground and Basketball Court). This neighborhood also has a school, daycare, community centre and old age building. Motorists are seen speeding on the subject street, and it is used as a cut through to bypass The Esplanade, between Lower Sherbourne Street and Berkeley Street/ Hahn Place. In a residential area like this one, these are concerns I take seriously.
During the investigation, Transportation Services discovered a discrepancy between the by-lawed traffic regulation and the connecting roadways on Scadding Avenue. Recommendation 2 will resolve this inconsistency.
My recommendations are intended to address ongoing residents' concerns regarding traffic safety on Scadding Avenue between Princess Street and Hahn Place by implementing traffic calming measures, including speed humps and reducing the posted speed limit to 30 kilometers per hour.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288831.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Memorandum - Scadding Avenue - Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288832.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-717 Scadding Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288833.pdf
Motions
TE34.195 - Adding Seating on Streetscapes in Ward 11
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Directed the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Toronto Transit Commission, to report back to the Toronto East York Community Council in the first quarter of 2027 with recommendations on opportunities to provide additional seating along streetscapes in Ward 11, prioritizing locations:
a. along College Street in locations consistent with the Little Italy Streetscape Masterplan;
b. along Baldwin Street between McCaul and Beverley Streets; and
c. along Bathurst Street between Bloor Street and Dupont Street.
Origin
Summary
More than half the residents of Ward 11 do not have private motor vehicles and depend on active transportation and public transit. This includes a high concentration of seniors. The Ward Councillor has worked with the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) to increase the number of benches at subway stations in the Ward and other locations. However, there remains a serious lack of seating along streetscapes in Ward 11, including in areas where local businesses wish to encourage increased pedestrian traffic.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289196.pdf
Motions
TE34.196 - Annex Intersections Safety Study
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Directed the General Manager, Transportation Services, to report back to the first meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council in 2027 with recommendations on pedestrian safety improvements at the intersections of St. George Street at Bernard Avenue and Kendal Avenue at Walmer Road
Origin
Summary
There are two wide, non-standard, offset intersections in the Annex that create chronic dangers for pedestrians: St. George Street at Bernard Avenue, and Kendal Avenue at Walmer Road. Both are heavily used, including by many children on the way to school. The Annex Residents Association has requested a study of opportunities to improve pedestrian safety at these intersections, for example, with pedestrian bump outs or similar mechanisms to right size traffic lane width and to encourage drivers to stop at the intersections.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289236.pdf
Motions
TE34.197 - Chin Radio Building - Loading Zone
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council designate a passenger loading zone to be in effect at all times, except 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the north side of College Street, between a point 53 metres east of Grace Street and a point 13 metres further east.
2. City Council prohibit parking at all times on the north side of College Street, between a point 30.5 metres east of Grace Street and a point 22.5 metres further east.
3. City Council rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturday, on the north side of College Street, between Manning Avenue and a point 30.5 metres east of Grace Street.
Origin
Summary
The CHIN Radio building is located at 622 College Street, east of Grace Street. It provides media, medical and technology offices along with private event workplace terraces. CHIN Radio, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, expressed concern regarding parking fronting the building and the lack of passenger pick-up/drop-off opportunities in this area.
Loading zone signage of unknown provenance was reported to have been present in front of the building until recently. The current parking prohibition signed in front of this building does not meet the building’s requirements. Transportation Services detected inconsistences in the traffic by-law related to the current signed parking regulations along the subject section of College Street.
The Ward Councillor requests that the existing parking regulations fronting this building be changed to deter parking and facilitate a passenger loading zone that will accommodate pick-up/drop-off operation only. The passenger loading zone will operate at all times outside the current weekday peak period times. This passenger loading zone can be used by any motor vehicle undertaking passenger pick-up and drop-off activities. Under this regulation, motorists can legally pick-up/drop-off passengers only. Parking will not be allowed in this area. Staff conducted a site visit in June 2026.
This motion will resolve current bylaw inconsistencies.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289013.pdf
Motions
TE34.198 - Re-appointment of Board Members on the Cecil Community Centre Board of Management
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Appointed, at pleasure of Council, the following nominees to serve on the Cecil Community Centre Board of Management for a two-year term ending June 30, 2028, or until their successors are appointed:
- Laura Mandelbaum
- Ryan Patrick Northfield
- Hadi Damani
- Andrea Wan
Origin
Summary
One current public member, Corals Zheng, has opted not to renew their term upon its expiry. As a result, the Board currently has four vacancies and is actively recruiting to fill them.
The Board confirms that the nominees are qualified to serve under the provisions of the City of Toronto's Public Appointments Policy and the Relationship Framework for Community Centre Boards of Management.
On behalf of the Board of Management, I respectfully request that the Toronto and East York Community Council reappoint Laura Mandelbaum, Ryan Patrick Northfield, Hadi Damani, and Andrea Wan to the Board of Management of Cecil Community Centre for a term of office beginning June 30, 2026, and ending June 30, 2028.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289238.pdf
(July 6, 2026) Letter from Councillor Dianne Saxe on Cecil Community Centre Board of Management
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289222.pdf
Motions
TE34.199 - Mount Pleasant Sidewalk Study
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Directed the General Manager, Transportation Services to report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council in the first quarter of 2027 with recommendations on improving pedestrian safety by installing a sidewalk on the west side of Mount Pleasant Road between Crescent Road and Roxborough Drive.
Origin
Summary
There is no sidewalk on the west side of Mount Pleasant Road between Crescent Road and Roxborough Drive, which creates a dangerous situation for pedestrians wishing to travel north along Mount Pleasant Road from Roxborough Street East to access the park, Yellow Creek or the signalized crossing to the east side of Mount Pleasant Road.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289209.pdf
Motions
TE34.200 - Re-opening 2026.TE31.32 - 666 Spadina Avenue - Encroachment Appeal - Walkway Platform and Bollards
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to enter into an encroachment agreement (the “Agreement”) with the property owner of 664-660 Spadina Avenue (the “Owner”), to permit the construction and maintenance of a walkway platform and bollards within the public right of way fronting 660-664 Spadina Avenue, subject, but not limited to, the following conditions:
a. the Owner shall indemnity the City from and against all actions, suits, claims or demands and from all loss, costs, damages and expenses that may result from such permission granted;
b. the Owner shall maintain the walkway platform and bollards at their own expense in good repair and a condition satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services and will not make any additions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the Agreement;
c. the Owner shall maintain the encroachment at their own expense in good repaid and in a condition satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services and will not make any additions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the Agreement;
d. the Owner shall remove the encroachment upon receiving written notice from the General Manager, Transportation Services to do so;
e. the Owner shall agree that the City and/or utility companies may remove the encroachment at any time in order to install or maintain services or infrastructure within the affected public right of way with no obligation to replace them;
f. the Owner shall obtain all necessary permits for the encroachment from Toronto Building and Municipal Licensing and Standards, if required;
g. the Owner shall pay:
1. an annual licence fee as determined by Corporate Real Estate Management, which shall be adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index (Toronto, all items), and be recalculated every five (5) years; and
2. any applicable property taxes eligible;
h. the Owner shall enter into the Agreement at the Owner’s expense and assume all liability and damages related to the encroachment;
i. the Owner shall amend its site plan application in consultation with City staff to reflect the actual built form of 664-660 Spadina Avenue, and to best facilitate pedestrian travel and winter maintenance within the area affected by its encroachment;
j. that the encroachment be constructed in accordance with the amended site plan; and
k. such other additional or amended conditions as the City Solicitor or the General Manager, Transportation Services may deem necessary in the interest of the City.
2. City Council direct that the authority granted by Council in Recommendation 1 above be conditional upon the Owner obtaining all required clearances from affected City divisions, units, agencies and the Public Utility Coordinating Committee, including signoffs from all public utility companies and satisfying all associated requirements.
3. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to include in any permit issued or agreement entered into further to Recommendation 1 above the following contributions and conditions, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in either the Donations Policy or Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks Use of:
a. that, no later than September 1, 2026, the Owner deliver to Parks and Recreation ten (10) of the durable, colourful Oasis benches that are already installed at 664-660 Spadina Avenue, as shown in the attached photo, to be installed at locations in Ward 11 determined by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation in consultation with the Ward 11 Councillor; and
b. that, no later than October 1, 2026, the Owner obtain all necessary permits and perform asphalt grinding, necessary base repairs and repave Sussex Mews, the laneway just west of Spadina Avenue, from Sussex Avenue to Harbord Street, as specified in the City’s Road Works specifications, and to install there at least three speed bumps, further to Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE1.44, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on February 1, 2 and 3, 2005, all to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council re-opened Item TE31.32 entitled "666 Spadina Avenue - Encroachment Appeal - Walkway Platform and Bollards.”
Origin
Summary
666-660 Spadina Avenue was constructed, in error, with its commercial ground floor and front doors several inches above the sidewalk, without an internal ramp to allow barrier free access from the interior to the sidewalk. This did not comply with its approved site plan or with provincial accessibility requirements.
The developer requested permission to correct its error by encroaching onto the sidewalk, in an area of the city where we already lack adequate sidewalk space for a growing number of pedestrians. The Toronto and East York Community Council rejected this encroachment request on March 13, 2026. As a result, the commercial premises remained vacant and unusable, creating an undesirable dead zone.
Since that time, the Ward Councillor has negotiated a settlement agreement with the developer, and wishes to reopen the matter and authorize a revised encroachment on the terms set out below.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289185.pdf
Attachment 1 - Photo of Bench
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289186.pdf
Motions
That:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to enter into an encroachment agreement (the “Agreement”) with the property owner of 664-660 Spadina Avenue (the “Owner”), to permit the construction and maintenance of a walkway platform and bollards within the public right of way fronting 660-664 Spadina Avenue, subject, but not limited to, the following conditions:
a. the Owner shall indemnity the City from and against all actions, suits, claims or demands and from all loss, costs, damages and expenses that may result from such permission granted;
b. the Owner shall maintain the walkway platform and bollards at their own expense in good repair and a condition satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services and will not make any additions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the Agreement;
c. the Owner shall maintain the encroachment at their own expense in good repaid and in a condition satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services and will not make any additions or modifications to the encroachment beyond what is allowed under the terms of the Agreement;
d. the Owner shall remove the encroachment upon receiving written notice from the General Manager, Transportation Services to do so;
e. the Owner shall agree that the City and/or utility companies may remove the encroachment at any time in order to install or maintain services or infrastructure within the affected public right of way with no obligation to replace them;
f. the Owner shall obtain all necessary permits for the encroachment from Toronto Building and Municipal Licensing and Standards, if required;
g. the Owner shall pay:
1. an annual licence fee as determined by Corporate Real Estate Management, which shall be adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index (Toronto, all items), and be recalculated every five (5) years; and
2. any applicable property taxes eligible;
h. the Owner shall enter into the Agreement at the Owner’s expense and assume all liability and damages related to the encroachment;
i. the Owner shall amend its site plan application in consultation with City staff to reflect the actual built form of 664-660 Spadina Avenue, and to best facilitate pedestrian travel and winter maintenance within the area affected by its encroachment;
j. that the encroachment be constructed in accordance with the amended site plan; and
k. such other additional or amended conditions as the City Solicitor or the General Manager, Transportation Services may deem necessary in the interest of the City.
2. City Council direct that the authority granted by Council in Recommendation 1 above be conditional upon the Owner obtaining all required clearances from affected City divisions, units, agencies and the Public Utility Coordinating Committee, including signoffs from all public utility companies and satisfying all associated requirements.
3. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to include in any permit issued or agreement entered into further to Recommendation 1 above the following contributions and conditions, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in either the Donations Policy or Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks Use of:
a. that, no later than September 1, 2026, the Owner deliver to Parks and Recreation ten (10) of the durable, colourful Oasis benches that are already installed at 664-660 Spadina Avenue, as shown in the attached photo, to be installed at locations in Ward 11 determined by the General Manager, Parks and Recreation in consultation with the Ward 11 Councillor; and
b. that, no later than October 1, 2026, the Owner obtain all necessary permits and perform asphalt grinding, necessary base repairs and repave Sussex Mews, the laneway just west of Spadina Avenue, from Sussex Avenue to Harbord Street, as specified in the City’s Road Works specifications, and to install there at least three speed bumps, further to Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE1.44, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on February 1, 2 and 3, 2005, all to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services.
TE34.201 - Rowanwood Watermain Construction - Temporary Permit Parking on Mathersfield Drive and Chestnut Park
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the parking prohibition in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, on the north side of Mathersfield Drive, between a point 105 metres north and east of Pricefield Road and Mathersfield Drive (easterly north/south leg), until December 31, 2027.
2. Rescinded the parking prohibition in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, on the north side of Chestnut Park, between Roxborough Street East (most westerly intersection) and Thornwood Road, until December 31, 2027.
3. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. daily on the even (north) side of Mathersfield Drive, between Pricefield Road and the Mathersfield Drive east leg, until December 31, 2027.
4. Authorized permit parking on the east side of Mathersfield Drive, between a point 105 metres north and east of Pricefield Road and Mathersfield Drive (easterly north/south leg), from 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, until December 31, 2027.
5. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. daily on the even (north) side of Chestnut Park, between Roxborough Street East and Thornwood Road, until December 31, 2027.
Origin
Summary
The Rowanwood Watermain replacement is a major construction project. Parking restrictions to safely accommodate the construction on Rowanwood Avenue and surrounding streets will temporarily displace residential permit parking. To mitigate the impact on residents with valid street parking permits, Engineering and Construction Services in consultation with Transportation Services recommends permit parking be implemented on a temporary basis on nearby streets, including Mathersfield Drive and Chestnut Park, where existing parking regulations can be adjusted to accommodate displaced permit holders.
At its meeting of May 28, 2026 City Council adopted Item TE33.58 which provided authorization for Toronto and East York Community Council to temporarily implement permit parking on Mathersfield Drive, between Pricefield Road and the Mathersfield Drive east leg and on Chestnut Park, between Roxborough Street East and Thornwood Road, exempt from the petition and polling requirements of subsection 925 of City of Toronto Municipal Code 925, Permit Parking.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289220.pdf
Motions
TE34.202 - Seating at Streetcar Stops in Ward 11
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Directed the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Toronto Transit Commission, to report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council in the first quarter of 2027 with recommendations on opportunities to provide seating at streetcar stops across Ward 11, prioritizing locations where the average daytime wait for the next streetcar is more than six minutes.
Origin
Summary
More than half the residents of Ward 11 do not have private motor vehicles and depend on active transportation and public transit. This includes a high concentration of seniors. The Ward Councillor has worked with the TTC to increase the number of benches at subway stations in the Ward and other locations. However, there is a serious lack of seating where people await streetcar service in Ward 11.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289195.pdf
Motions
TE34.203 - Yonge Streetscape Study
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Decision
The Toronto East York Community Council :
1. Directed the Director, Urban Design, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Transportation Services, to prepare a streetscape vision for Yonge Street between Bloor Street and Summerhill Avenue and report back to the Toronto East York Community Council in the second quarter of 2027.
Origin
Summary
Because of its dense transit connections, Yonge Street is undergoing extreme intensification between Bloor Street and Summerhill, much of it with little parking. These developments assume that most new residents will shop in the neighbourhood by foot. However, the combination of rundown sidewalks, endless construction, and retail displacement/ empty storefronts have make Yonge Street much less attractive and pleasant for pedestrians than it was a few years ago. This area urgently needs a clear vision for an inspiring and attractive Yonge streetscape that can be progressively realized, comparable to the streetscape design prepared for Elm Street, 2025.TE27.30.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289217.pdf
Motions
TE34.204 - Appointments to the Central Eglinton Community Centre Board of Management
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Nominated the following individuals for appointment to the Central Eglinton Community Centre Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending April 26, 2028, and until successors are appointed:
- David Tadeusz Chudak
- Lindsey Tully
2. Re-appointed the following individuals to the Central Eglinton Community Centre Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending April 26, 2028, and until successors are appointed:
- Nancy Haddad-Albina
- Harriet Velazquez
- Celine Devlin
- James Sutcliffe
- Federico Cervantes
Origin
Summary
The Board confirms that each of these nominees is qualified to serve under the provisions of the City of Toronto's Public Appointments Policy and the Relationship Framework for Community Centre Boards of Management.
Please note that the term of the following member has now come to an end:
- Ellen Fisher resigned effective February 26, 2025.
- Violeta Rangel resigned effective February 26, 2026.
On behalf of the Board, I respectfully request that the City take the necessary steps to appoint these nominated and re-elected candidates.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288957.pdf
(June 30, 2026) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow on Central Eglinton Community Centre Board of Management Appointments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288932.pdf
Motions
TE34.205 - Ardmore Road Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (three speed humps) on Ardmore Road, between Spadina Road and Vesta Drive, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 6, 2026) from Councillor Josh Matlow.
Origin
Summary
I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to traffic calming on Ardmore Road, between Spadina Road and Vesta Drive.
Residents of Ardmore Road submitted a petition to my office requesting the installation of speed humps to help reduce speeding, discourage cut-through traffic and improve the safety of their street. Neighbours have reported motorists are increasingly speeding down the street, which is particularly concerning in the morning hours, when children walking to Forest Hill Junior School and Robbins Hebrew Academy.
With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the traffic calming measures they have been organizing for.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289130.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289131.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-747, dated June 2026 from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289132.pdf
Motions
TE34.206 - Atlas Avenue Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (three speed humps) on Atlas Avenue, between Dundurn Crescent and Earlsdale Avenue, generally as shown in Attachments 2 and 3 to the letter (July 6, 2026) from Councillor Josh Matlow.
Origin
Summary
I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to authorize the installation of traffic calming (speed humps) along Atlas Avenue, between Dundurn Crescent and Earlsdale Avenue.
Residents of Atlas Avenue submitted a petition to my office requesting the installation of speed humps to help reduce speeding, discourage cut-through traffic and improve the safety of their street.
Atlas Avenue is one of the few north-south streets in the neighbourhood without speed humps, and is regularly used by commuters and trucks as a means of avoiding traffic calming on neighbouring streets and congestion on Oakwood Avenue.
With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the traffic calming measures they have been organizing for.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289162.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services on Atlas Avenue Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289163.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-772, dated June 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Atlas Avenue Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289164.pdf
Attachment 3 - Drawing No. TC-772-1, dated June 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Atlas Avenue Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289165.pdf
Motions
TE34.207 - Forest Hill Road Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (two speed humps) on Forest Hill Road, between St. Clair Avenue West to Heath Street West, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 6, 2026) from Councillor Josh Matlow.
Origin
Summary
I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to traffic calming along Forest Hill Road, between St. Clair Avenue West to Heath Street West.
Residents of Forest Hill Road submitted a petition to my office requesting the installation of speed humps to help reduce speeding, discourage cut-through traffic and improve the safety of their street. With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the traffic calming measures they have been organizing for.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289176.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289177.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-750, dated June 2026 from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289178.pdf
Motions
TE34.208 - Hillsdale Avenue West Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (two speed humps) on Hillsdale Avenue West, between Lascelles Boulevard and Oriole Parkway, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 6, 2026) from Councillor Josh Matlow.
Origin
Summary
I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to traffic calming along Hillsdale Avenue West, between Lascelles Boulevard and Oriole Parkway.
Residents of Hillsdale Avenue West submitted a petition to my office requesting the installation of speed humps to help reduce speeding, discourage cut-through traffic and improve the safety of their street.
Neighbours have reported that traffic volumes along Hillsdale Avenue West have increased significantly in recent years. This is especially concerning given the increasing number of young families in the community.
With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the traffic calming measures they have been organizing for.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289191.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289192.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-752, dated June 2026 from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289193.pdf
Motions
TE34.209 - Montclair Avenue Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (two speed humps) on Montclair Avenue, between Bathurst Street and Lonsmount Drive, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 6, 2026) from Councillor Josh Matlow.
Origin
Summary
I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to traffic calming along Montclair Avenue, between Bathurst Street and Lonsmount Drive.
Residents of Montclair Avenue submitted a petition to my office requesting the installation of speed humps to help reduce speeding, discourage cut-through traffic and improve the safety of their street.
I have heard many concerns from neighbours regarding excessive speeding on Montclair Avenue, resulting in near missed collisions between cars and pedestrians. These conditions are particularly concerning, as the street is often busy with kids and young families.
With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the traffic calming measures they have been organizing for.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289179.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289180.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-753, dated June 2026 from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289166.pdf
Motions
TE34.210 - Oriole Road Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (two speed humps) on Oriole Road, between Lonsdale Road and Heath Street West, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 6, 2026) from Councillor Josh Matlow.
Origin
Summary
I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to traffic calming along Oriole Road, between Lonsdale Road and Heath Street West.
I have heard many concerns from neighbours regarding excessive speeding on Oriole Road, partially due to motorists using Oriole Road as a means of avoiding Avenue Rd. The street is often busy with kids, elderly community members, and other vulnerable road users. I am recommending the installation of speed humps to help reduce speeding, discourage cut-through traffic and improve safety for residents moving through the neighbourhood.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289188.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services on Oriole Road Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289189.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-728, dated June 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Oriole Road Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289190.pdf
Motions
TE34.211 - Vesta Drive Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (three speed humps) on Vesta Drive, between Eglinton Avenue West and Old Forest Hill Road, generally as shown on Attachment 2 to the letter (June 29, 2026) from Councillor Josh Matlow.
Origin
Summary
I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to traffic calming on Vesta Drive, between Eglinton Avenue West and Old Forest Hill Road.
Residents of Vesta Drive submitted a petition to my office requesting the installation of speed humps to help reduce speeding, discourage cut-through traffic and improve the safety of their street.
Neighbours have reported that high volume of traffic and excessive vehicle speeds create a hazardous environment for residents, especially students walking to and from Forest Hill Collegiate. With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the traffic calming measures they have been organizing for.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288933.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288963.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-746, dated June 2026 from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-288934.pdf
Motions
TE34.212 - Church Street and Wellington Street East - Commercial Loading Zones
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday and from 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday, at a rate of $7.00 per hour and for a maximum period of three hours, on the west side of Church Street, between Front Street East and King Street East, to be in effect between Colborne Street and King Street East.
2. City Council amend the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, at a rate of $7.00 per hour and for a maximum period of two and half hours, on the west side of Church Street, between Front Street East and King Street East, to be in effect between Colborne Street and King Street East.
3. City Council designate a commercial loading zone to be in effect from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., and from 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, and at all times on Saturday and Sunday, on the west side of Church Street, between Colborne Street and a point 29 metres south.
4. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday and from 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday, at a rate of $4.50 per hour and for a maximum period of three hours, on the north side of Wellington Street East, between a point 42.5 metres east of Scott Street and Leader Lane.
5. City Council designate a commercial loading zone to be in effect at all times on the north side of Wellington Street East, between a point 42.5 metres east of Scott Street and Leader Lane.
Origin
Summary
As a result of the loss of parking on Colborne Street and the lack of commercial loading opportunities in this area, the Old Town Toronto Business Improvement Area (BIA), in consultation with the local Councillor and Transportation Services’ staff, requested that commercial loading zones be established at the following locations:
- Church Street, west side, between Colborne Street and a point 29 metres south
- Wellington Street East, north side, between a point 42.5 metres east of Scott Street and Leader Lane
These requests are feasible and will help facilitate loading and unloading operations for businesses in this area. It is noted that a commercial loading zone is a public facility, which may be used by anyone for the purpose of and while engaged in loading or unloading of merchandise and no one has exclusive rights to the loading zone.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289206.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services re: Proposed Commercial Loading Zones - Church Street and Wellington Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289207.pdf
Motions
TE34.213 - Colborne Street Temporary Two Way Road Designation
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the existing one-way westbound traffic operation on Colborne Street, between Scott Street and Leader Lane.
2. Authorized the appropriate City officials to submit directly to the Toronto and East York Community Council at the appropriate time any necessary Bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters to give effect to Toronto and East York Community Council’s decision, and to reinstate traffic and parking regulations referred in Recommendation 1 above, once the project is complete.
Origin
Summary
The City is reconstructing Colborne Street between Leader Lane and Church Street, Colborne Lane and Leader Lane between King Street East and Wellington Street East. The current construction time table puts the totality of the work occurring until January 2027.
To maintain local access and improve traffic flow during construction, staff is recommending that Colborne Street, between Scott Street and Leader Lane, be temporarily converted from a one-way westbound traffic operation to a two-way traffic operation.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289198.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Memorandum from the Director, Congestion and Network Management, Transportation Services re: Colborne Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289199.pdf
Motions
TE34.214 - Leader Lane - Traffic and Parking Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Amended the existing standing prohibition in effect at all times on the west side of Leader Lane, between King Street East and a point 30.5 metres south, to be in effect between King Street East and a point 15 metres south.
2. Amended the existing commercial loading zone in effect at all times on the west side of Leader Lane, between a point 30.5 metres south of King Street East and Colborne Street, to be in effect between a point 15 metres south of King Street East and a point 15 metres south.
3. Designated a Delivery Vehicle Parking Zone to be in effect at all times for a maximum period of 20 minutes, on the west side of Leader Lane, between a point 30 metres south of King Street East and a point 24 metres south.
4. Prohibited standing at all times on the west side of Leader Lane, between a point 54 metres south of King Street East and Colborne Street.
5. Designated Leader Lane, between King Street East and Colborne Street, as one-way for southbound traffic only.
Origin
Summary
The Omni King Edward Hotel (37 King Street East) and King Edward Private Residences (22 Leader Lane) are located adjacent to and have entrances onto Leader Lane, between King Street East and Colborne Street. Leader Lane is a public lane located next to these properties. It is signed to operate as one-way southbound and provides entrances to the hotel and residence on the west side.
The following parking regulations are currently in effect on this section of Leader Lane:
West side
- A Commercial Loading Zone that operates at all times
- The corner parking prohibitions at King Street East and at Colborne Street are signed with a standing prohibition at all times
East Side
- Stopping is prohibited at all times
The Omni King Edward Hotel and King Edward Residences expressed concerns regarding parking on this section of Leader Lane and the lack of short-term delivery opportunities next to the property and in this area.
I requested that the existing parking regulations on this section of Leader Lane be changed to facilitate a 20-minute Delivery Zone that will operate at all times. This Delivery Zone can be used by any motor vehicle undertaking delivery activities. The existing Commercial Loading Zone that generally occupies the entire block length will be shortened to 15 metres in order to accommodate the Delivery Zone. Staff conducted a site visit in June 2026 and confirmed the changes are feasible.
Transportation Services also detected an inconsistency in the traffic by-law related to the current traffic regulations in the subject section of Leader Lane. This inconsistency will be resolved with the approval of Recommendations 5.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289197.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Leader Lane - Traffic and Parking Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289173.pdf
Motions
TE34.215 - Naming 144 Stephenson Avenue Park in Honour of Gene Domagala
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. Notwithstanding the provisions of the City of Toronto Property Naming Policy, City Council approve the naming of a new park located at 144 Stephenson Avenue to Gene Domagala Park.
Origin
Summary
This motion requests City Council approve the naming of a new park located at 144 Stephenson Ave. in honour of Gene Domagala, a longtime Beaches–East York resident whose extraordinary record of community service, volunteerism, and local leadership has had a lasting impact on the city.
Gene Domagala is widely respected and cherished throughout the Beaches–East York community. Over the years, Mr. Domagala’s contributions have been well documented through countless stories shared by residents, community publications and local media. For decades, he has dedicated his time and energy to various community initiatives. His commitment to helping others has earned him a reputation as the unofficial “Mayor of the Beach,” a testimony to the admiration and respect he has earned from residents across generations.
Mr. Domagala’s contributions extend beyond volunteer service. He has played an important role in preserving and sharing the community's history. A passionate local historian, he has led numerous historical walking tours throughout the Beach, Main Street, and Danforth areas, helping residents and visitors gain a deeper appreciation of the rich cultural and historical heritage of Toronto's east end.
Mr. Domagala has also served on numerous local boards and volunteered extensively with local charitable organizations that directly support the community. Naming a park after Mr. Domagala would recognize his commitment to volunteerism and community-building, which has enriched the social fabric of Beaches–East York and the broader City of Toronto.
Community support for this commemorative naming proposal has been demonstrated through both online and in-person petition campaigns. Residents have expressed strong support for recognizing Mr. Domagala’s contributions by naming a public space in his honour.
Naming a park in Gene Domagala’s honour would recognize a lifetime dedicated to community service, celebrate the history and spirit of Beaches–East York, and ensure future generations understand the profound impact one individual can have through kindness and volunteerism.
A property naming application was submitted to Strategic Partnerships, including documentation of community engagement expressing strong support for the naming and a completed consent form.
Parks and Recreation staff have confirmed that costs associated with the production and installation of the new park sign are provided for in the Base Park Improvements, which were secured through the Section 37 Agreement for 276-294 Main Street.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289208.pdf
Motions
TE34.216 - 9 Silver Birch Avenue - Residential Demolition Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Approved the application to demolish the existing detached house at 9 Silver Birch Avenue with the following conditions:
a. construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
b. all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
c. tsod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, Paragraph B and 629 11; and
d. any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is regarding a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter. 363, Article 6 "Demolition Control", the application for the demolition of the existing detached house at 9 Silver Birch Avenue (Application Number 26 169621 DEM 00 DM) is being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration because Toronto Building received a request for demolition of property without a replacement building permit.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289240.pdf
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Councillor Brad Bradford on 9 Silver Birch Avenue - Residential Demolition Application
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289241.pdf
Communications
Motions
That Toronto and East York Community Council:
3. Approve the application to demolish the existing detached house at 9 Silver Birch Avenue with the following conditions:
a. that construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official;
b. that all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
c. that sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, Paragraph B and 629 11; and
d. that any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.
TE34.217 - Reclassify Creek Place Laneway
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to undertake the work required to reclassify Creek Place from a public laneway to a local road, and report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council for any approvals required, including any associated operational, legal or implementation considerations as appropriate, and, pending completion of the reclassification, provide winter maintenance services on Creek Place consistent with the service levels provided to local roads.
Origin
Summary
Residents who live on Creek Place in Ward 19 have faced long-standing challenges related to road servicing and access to their properties. My office has been working with these residents to implement a sustainable solution to these challenges.
Creek Place is currently classified as a laneway, but it demonstrates several unique characteristics. While four properties located at the northern end of the street have rear access from Creek Place while fronting onto Dawes Road, an additional nine properties at the southern end rely on Creek Place as their primary means of access. At its entrance from Donora Drive, the right-of-way is approximately four to six metres wide, which is typical of a laneway, and runs behind the four properties fronting on Dawes Road. Further south, the right-of-way widens to approximately eight metres, consistent with the width of a local road, in the section serving the properties that depend on Creek Place for primary access.
I have worked with Transportation Services staff to develop this motion so that staff can undertake the work necessary to reclassify Creek Place as a local road and to ensure that these residents have access to the maintenance services, including winter services, that they require for their primary point of access.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289306.pdf
Motions
That in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 27, Council Procedures, Toronto and East York Community Council reconsider Item TE34.217.
That:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review the road classification of Creek Place, including consideration of reclassifying the roadway from a public laneway to a local road, and report back to the November 25, 2026 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council on the results of the review and any recommended changes, including any associated operational, legal or implementation considerations as appropriate.
Vote (Amend Item) Jul-08-2026
| Result: Lost | Majority Required - TE34.217 - Perks - Amend Item |
|---|---|
| Total members that voted Yes: 3 | Members that voted Yes are Alejandra Bravo, Paula Fletcher, Gord Perks |
| Total members that voted No: 4 | Members that voted No are Brad Bradford, Josh Matlow, Chris Moise (Chair), Dianne Saxe |
| Total members that were Absent: 1 | Members that were absent are Ausma Malik |
Vote (Adopt Item) Jul-08-2026
| Result: Carried | Majority Required - TE34.217 - Bradford - Adopt the Item |
|---|---|
| Total members that voted Yes: 6 | Members that voted Yes are Brad Bradford, Alejandra Bravo, Josh Matlow, Chris Moise (Chair), Gord Perks, Dianne Saxe |
| Total members that voted No: 0 | Members that voted No are |
| Total members that were Absent: 2 | Members that were absent are Paula Fletcher, Ausma Malik |
TE34.218 - Northline Road - Parking Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the south side of Northline Road, between Cranfield Road and O’Connor Drive.
Origin
Summary
City staff have advised our office that, following a request from Election Services to review the parking regulations on Northline Road to accommodate operational needs for the upcoming municipal election, they identified a discrepancy between the existing parking by-law and the posted parking restrictions. To address the discrepancy and support Election Services' operational needs, staff are recommending amendments to the parking regulations and signage. Once implemented, the standard three-hour maximum parking regulation will apply to this section of Northline Road.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289228.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical memorandum Northline Road - Parking Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289316.pdf
Motions
That in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 27, Council Procedures, Toronto and East York Community Council reconsider Item TE34.218.
TE34.219 - Hutton Avenue - Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (three speed humps) on Hutton Avenue, between O’Connor Drive and Plains Road, generally as shown in Attachment 1 to the letter (July 6, 2026) from Councillor Brad Bradford.
Origin
Summary
Residents have reached out to my office with concerns about pedestrian safety on Hutton Avenue and on surrounding neighbourhood streets. Our office has received a petition from residents in support of the installation of speed humps on Hutton Avenue.
I am requesting that speed humps be installed on Hutton Avenue, between O’Connor Drive and Plains Road.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289280.pdf
Attachment 1 - Drawing TC-788 Hutton Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289283.pdf
Attachment 2 - Technical Memorandum Hutton Avenue - Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289281.pdf
Motions
TE34.220 - Frater Avenue - Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (three speed humps) on Frater Avenue, between Woodmount Avenue and Woodbine Avenue, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 7, 2026) from Councillor Brad Bradford.
Origin
Summary
Residents have reached out to my office with concerns about pedestrian safety on Frater Avenue and on surrounding neighbourhood streets. Our office has received a petition from residents in support of the installation of speed humps on Frater Avenue.
I am requesting that speed humps be installed on Frater Avenue, between Woodmount Avenue and Woodbine Avenue
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289328.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Memorandum Frater Avenue - Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289329.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing TC-758
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289330.pdf
Motions
TE34.221 - Fir Avenue and Fernwood Park Avenue - All-way Compulsory Stop Controls
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized an all-way compulsory stop control at the intersection of Fir Avenue and Fernwood Park Avenue.
Origin
Summary
Residents have indicated that there have been issues between drivers and pedestrians in identifying right of way at this intersection and have requested an all way stop control in order to rectify this problem. Therefore, I request the installation of all-way stop control at the intersection of Fir Avenue and Fernwood Park Avenue.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289344.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Memorandum-Fir Avenue and Fernwood Park Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289345.pdf
Motions
TE34.222 - Aldridge Avenue - Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (three speed humps) on Aldridge Avenue, between Danforth Avenue and Murdock Avenue, generally as shown in Attachment 1 to the letter (July 7, 2026) from Councillor Brad Bradford.
Summary
Residents have reached out to my office with concerns about pedestrian safety on Aldridge Avenue and on surrounding neighbourhood streets. Our office has received a petition from residents in support of the installation of speed humps on Aldridge Avenue.
I am requesting that speed humps be installed on Aldridge Avenue, between Danforth Avenue and Murdock Avenue.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289298.pdf
Attachment 1 - TC-789 Aldridge Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289299.pdf
Attachment 2 - Technical Memorandum Aldridge Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289300.pdf
Motions
TE34.223 - Woodycrest Avenue - Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (three speed humps) on Woodycrest Avenue, between Sammon Avenue and Selkirk Street, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 7, 2026) from Councillor Paula Fletcher.
Origin
Summary
Residents have reached out to me with concerns about speeding on Woodycrest Avenue between Aldwych and Sammon Avenue. The section of Woodycrest Avenue between Sammon Avenue and Mortimer Avenue, as well as the section between Selkirk Street and Danforth Avenue already have speed humps.
Residents are looking to fill in the gap of speed humps on this section, since they have witnessed vehicles speeding up in this section.
This is also a residential area, very close to the disruptive Ontario Line construction.
For the sake of public safety, I am supportive of the installation of speed humps on this street.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289340.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical memorandum Woodycrest Avenue - Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289341.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing TC-681
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289342.pdf
Motions
TE34.224 - Rhodes Avenue - Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (five speed humps) on Rhodes Avenue, between Fairford Avenue and the north end of Rhodes Avenue, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 7, 2026) from Councillor Paula Fletcher.
Origin
Summary
Residents have shared concerns about speeding on Rhodes Avenue, north of Fairford Avenue. This is a residential street, near an elementary school.
Residents submitted a petition with 23 signatures in support of speed humps. In a confidential follow up ballot, there was 65 percent support from households on the affected stretch for the installation of these traffic calming measures.
I am supportive of the installation of speed humps.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289334.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical memorandum Rhodes Ave - Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289335.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing TC-748
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289336.pdf
Motions
TE34.225 - Boulton Avenue -Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (five speed humps) on Boulton Avenue, between First Avenue and Dundas Street East, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 7, 2026) from Councillor Paula Fletcher.
Origin
Summary
Residents have reached out to me with concerns about speeding on Boulton Avenue between First Avenue and Dundas Avenue.
We received a petition from local residents with 53 percent support. In a subsequent confidential ballot, there was 86 percent support from affected households.
For the sake of public safety, I am supportive of the installation of speed humps on this street.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289319.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical memorandum - Boulton Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289320.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing TC-673
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289321.pdf
Motions
TE34.226 - Ben Kerr Lane - Speed Bumps
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of speed bumps on Ben Kerr Lane, between Euston Avenue and the east end of Ben Kerr Lane, as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 7, 2026) from Councillor Paula Fletcher.
Origin
Summary
Residents have reached out to me about speeding in Ben Kerr Lane. This is a busy area, which services residents, businesses and a religious establishment. The western section of the lane already has speed bumps, while the eastern section is without them.
For the sake of public safety, I am supportive of the installation of speed bumps in this laneway.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289235.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Memorandum Ben Kerr Lane - Speed Bumps
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289296.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing TC-739 - Ben Kerr Lane
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289297.pdf
Motions
TE34.227 - Wood Street and Grenville Street - Commercial Loading Zones
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the existing no stopping regulation in effect at all times on the south side of Wood Street between Yonge Street and Church Street.
2. Designated a commercial loading zone to be in effect at all times, on the south side of Wood Street, between a point 146 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 40 metres further east.
3. Prohibited stopping at all times on the south side of Wood Street, between Yonge Street and 146 metres east of Yonge Street and 186 metres further east of Yonge Street to Church Street.
4. Enacted no stopping at all times on the south side of Grenville Street, between Yonge Street and a point 55.5 metres west.
5. Designated a commercial loading zone to be in effect at all times, on the south side of Grenville Street, between a point nine metres west of Yonge Street and a point 25 metres further west.
6. Directed that Grenville Street and Wood Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.
Origin
Summary
Transportation Services has requested temporary commercial loading zones on Wood Street and Grenville Street to accommodate local business during the westbound closure for TTC track replacement on College Street and Carlton Street from Bay Street to Church Street.
The recommendations outlined below to Toronto and East York Community Council are being requested for approval in lieu of a staff report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289367.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services on Wood Street and Grenville Street - Commercial Loading Zones
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289368.pdf
Motions
TE34.228 - Permanently Pedestrianizing Scott Street between Front Street East and Scott Lane
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to consult with the President and Chief Executive Officer, TO Live, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, Old Town Toronto Business Improvement Area, the St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Association, residential buildings and businesses adjacent to Scott Lane, and other City divisions and stakeholders as identified about the permanent closure of Scott Street, between Front Street East and Scott Lane, and to report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council in the first quarter of 2027 with recommendations regarding closing this section of Scott Street permanently.
Origin
Summary
In discussion with TO Live, there is significant interest in pedestrianizing a portion of Scott Street, between Front Street East and Scott Lane (also known as “Reg Taylor Way”) to permit expanded outdoor space for programming and events that support the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts and Meridian Hall.
This motion is to request that staff study the potential for this section of Scott Street to be pedestrianized, with a report back in the new term.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289404.pdf
Motions
TE34.229 - Rushton Road Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (two additional speed humps) on Rushton Road, between Maplewood Avenue and Humewood Gardens, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 7, 2026) from Councillor Josh Matlow.
Origin
Summary
Dear Chair and Members of Toronto and East York Community Council,
I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to authorize the installation of traffic calming (speed humps) along Rushton Road, between Maplewood Avenue and Humewood Gardens.
I have heard from many neighbours along Rushton Road that additional speed humps are required along the block to respond to increased speeds and reckless driving. Residents of Rushton Road have previously demonstrated their strong support for traffic calming along their street. With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the traffic calming measures they have been organizing for.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289337.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289338.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-774, dated June 2026 from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289339.pdf
Motions
TE34.230 - Kendal Avenue and Bridgman Avenue and Macpherson Avenue - All-way Stop Control
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized an all-way compulsory stop control at the intersection of Kendal Avenue and Bridgman Avenue and Macpherson Avenue.
Origin
Summary
I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to authorize an all-way compulsory stop control at the intersection of Kendal Avenue and Bridgman Ave and Macpherson Avenue.
Continuous concerns have been raised by residents regarding the pedestrian safety at the intersection of Kendal Avenue and Bridgman Avenue and Macpherson Avenue, where there are a higher volume of pedestrians crossing east-west at this intersection travelling to/from the Dupont subway station and the George Brown College – Casa Loma Campus without a designated crosswalk across Kendal Avenue. The installation of an all-way stop at this intersection will enable the implementation of this desired east-west crosswalk connection and improve the overall safety at this intersection.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289348.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289349.pdf
Motions
TE34.231 - Everden Road Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (three speed humps) on Everden Road, between Eglinton Avenue West and Gloucester Grove, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 7, 2026) from Councillor Josh Matlow.
Origin
Summary
I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to traffic calming along Everden Road, between Eglinton Avenue West and Gloucester Grove.
Residents of Everden Road submitted a petition to my office requesting the installation of speed humps to help reduce speeding, discourage cut-through traffic and improve the safety of their street. There is a long history of commuters dangerously speeding along Everden Road as a means of bypassing traffic to reach the Allen Road on ramp.
With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the traffic calming measures they have been organizing for.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289325.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289326.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-729, dated June 2026 from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289327.pdf
Motions
TE34.232 - Edmund Avenue Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (three speed humps) on Edmund Avenue, between Avenue Road to Poplar Plains Road, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 7, 2026) from Councillor Josh Matlow.
Origin
Summary
I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to authorize the installation of traffic calming (speed humps) along Edmund Avenue, between Avenue Road and Poplar Plains Road.
Neighbours along Edmund Avenue have submitted a petition to my office demonstrating their support for traffic calming along their street. I have heard concern from the community regarding increased volumes and speed along Edmund Avenue. The street is frequently used as a shortcut to Avenue Road in the morning and evenings, and cars frequently speed to reach the traffic light at the end of the block.
With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the traffic calming measures they have been organizing for.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289303.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289304.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-749, dated June 2026 from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289305.pdf
Motions
TE34.233 - Davisville Avenue Accessible Loading Zone
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the existing stopping prohibition in effect at all times, on the north side of Davisville Avenue, between Yonge Street and a point 231 metres east, to be in effect between Yonge Street and a point 74.6 metres east.
2. City Council prohibit stopping at all times, on the north side of Davisville Avenue, between a point 86.6 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 144.4 metres further east.
3. City Council prohibit standing at all times, on the north side of Davisville Avenue, between a point 74.6 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 12 metres further east.
4. City Council designate an accessible loading zone to be in effect at all times, on the north side of Davisville Avenue, between a point 74.6 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 12 metres further east.
Origin
Summary
I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to designate an accessible loading zone in front of the new aquatic and muti-use community centre on the Davisville Junior Public School and Spectrum Alternative School site.
The accessible loading zone will allow curbside access for accessible vehicles equipped with a side or rear loading ramp (e.g., Wheel-Trans) and permit holders during pick-up/drop-off periods.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289494.pdf
Revised Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management on Davisville Avenue Accessible Loading Zone
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289498.pdf
(July 8, 2026) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow on Davisville Avenue Accessible Loading Zone
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289378.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management on Davisville Avenue Accessible Loading Zone
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289379.pdf
Motions
TE34.234 - Colin Avenue Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (three speed humps) on Colin Avenue, between Eglinton Avenue West and Anderson Avenue, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 7, 2026) from Councillor Josh Matlow.
Origin
Summary
I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to authorize the installation of traffic calming (speed humps) along Colin Avenue, between Eglinton Avenue West and Anderson Avenue.
Residents of Colin Avenue submitted a petition to my office requesting the installation of speed humps to help reduce speeding, discourage cut-through traffic and improve the safety of their street.
With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the traffic calming measures they have been organizing for.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289331.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289332.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-550, dated June 2026 from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289333.pdf
Motions
TE34.235 - Blandford Street Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (two speed humps) on Blandford Street, between Hanson Road to Rogers Road, generally as shown on Attachment 2 to the letter (July 8, 2026) from Councillor Josh Matlow.
Origin
Summary
I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to authorize the installation of traffic calming (speed humps) along Blandford Street, between Hanson Road and Rogers Road.
Residents of Blandford Street submitted a petition to my office requesting the installation of speed humps to help reduce speeding, discourage cut-through traffic and improve the safety of their street. I have heard concern from neighbours regarding excessive speeding on Blandford Street, as cars use the street as a shortcut from Oakwood Ave to Rogers Road.
With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the traffic calming measures they have been organizing for.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289350.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services on Blandford Street Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289351.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-773, dated June 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Blandford Street Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289352.pdf
Motions
TE34.236 - Yorkville Street Closure for the Toronto International Film Festival Celebration
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to approve a Street Event application from Rogers Communications to facilitate the Rogers x TIFF Street Event, proposed to require the closure of Yorkville Avenue from September 8, 2026 to September 14, 2026, inclusive, despite any section of Chapter 743 limiting Street Events to no more than four days, on such terms and conditions as deemed appropriate by the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the City Solicitor.
Origin
Summary
Last year, Rogers Communications sponsored a popular “Red Carpet” celebration of the Toronto International Film Festival on Yorkville Avenue. Staff issued a four day road closure permit. In 2026, Rogers propose to extend and expand the celebration, which requires a road closure of more than four days. The proposal has the strong support of the Bloor Yorkville Business Improvement Area and the GYRA residents association.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289343.pdf
Motions
TE34.237 - Wellington Place Neighbourhood Traffic Study
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to conduct a transportation analysis of the Wellington Place neighbourhood and the recent traffic pattern changes on Portland Street, including impacts on Front Street, Bathurst Street and Spadina Avenue, and report back in the first quarter of 2027.
Origin
Summary
My office has heard from residents and the Wellington Place Neighbourhood Association about the need for a comprehensive analysis of how the many transit and transportation projects in the area are working together to achieve their intended objectives, including improved safety, effective congestion management, and fast, reliable transit service in a clear and transparent manner.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289307.pdf
Communications
(July 9, 2026) E-mail from Christine Ford (TE.New)
(July 9, 2026) E-mail from Dragi Dodevski (TE.New)
Motions
TE34.238 - Queen Street West - Accessible Loading Zone
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council designate an accessible loading zone to be in effect from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the south side of Queen Street West, between a point 33 metres west of Walnut Avenue and a point 11 metres further west.
Origin
Summary
My office has been working with City staff in Transportation Services who received a request from an applicant to install an accessible loading zone on Queen Street West, east of Walnut Avenue, to support Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Wheel-Trans services for a household with limited mobility.
The applicant provided documentation confirming their registration with Wheel-Trans. Transportation Services supports the installation of the accessible loading zone on Queen Street West.
The installation of the proposed accessible loading zone will result in the loss of two pay-and-display parking spaces on Queen Street West during the operating hours of the accessible loading zone. The Toronto Parking Authority (TPA) has been consulted and has no objections to the proposed recommendations and will engage with Transportation Services about future opportunities to add new paid parking in the area.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289277.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Memorandum-Queen Street West-Accessible Loading Zone
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289278.pdf
Motions
TE34.239 - Brunel Court-Parking Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the existing stopping prohibition in effect at all times, on both sides of Brunel Court, between Fort York Boulevard and a point 33 metres further south.
2. Rescinded the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., on the east side of Brunel Court, between a point 33 metres south of Fort York Boulevard and a point 11 metres further south.
3. Rescinded the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., on the east side of Brunel Court, between a point 44 metres south of Fort York Boulevard and a point 56 metres further south.
4. Prohibited stopping to be in effect at all times, on the east side of Brunel Court, between Fort York Boulevard and a point 34 metres south.
5. Prohibited standing to be in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east side of Brunel Court, between a point 34 metres south of Fort York Boulevard and a point 66 metres further south.
6. Rescinded the existing school bus loading zone in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Brunel Court, between a point 33 metres south of Fort York Boulevard and a point 31 metres further south.
7. Prohibited stopping to be in effect at all times, on the west side of Brunel Court, between Fort York Boulevard and a point 37.5 metres south.
8. Designated a passenger loading zone to be in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Brunel Court, between a point 37.5 metres south of Fort York Boulevard and a point 26.5 metres further south.
9. Prohibited standing to be in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Brunel Court, between a point 37.5 metres south of Fort York Boulevard and a point 26.5 metres further south.
10. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times, car-share vehicles excepted, on the east side of Brunel Court, between a point 33 metres south of Fort York Boulevard and a point 11 metres further south.
11. Prohibited stopping to be in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., school buses exempted, on the west side of Brunel Court, between a point 73 metres south of Fort York Boulevard and a point 27 metres further south.
12. Rescinded the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday, at a rate of $4.50 per hour and for a maximum period of 3 hours, on the east side of Brunel Court, between a point 33 metres south of Fort York Boulevard and a point 11 metres further south.
13. Rescinded the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday, at a rate of $4.50 per hour and for a maximum period of 3 hours, on the east side of Brunel Court, between a point 44 metres south of Fort York Boulevard and a point 56 metres further south.
14. Authorized parking machines to be in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday, at a rate of $4.50 per hour and for a maximum period of 3 hours, on the east side of Brunel Court, between a point 34 metres south of Fort York Boulevard and a point 66 metres further south.
15. Amended the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday, at a rate of $4.50 per hour and for a maximum period of 3 hours, on the west side of Brunel Court, between a point 33 metres south of Fort York Boulevard and a point 31 metres further south to be in effect between a point 37.5 metres south of Fort York Boulevard and a point 26.5 metres further south.
Origin
Summary
Over the past two years, my office has been working with City staff to move forward on a number of priorities this community has raised about student safety. These parking amendments proposed will make school pick-up/drop-off safer for everyone.
At my request, and on behalf of Jean Lumb Public School and Bishop Macdonell Catholic Elementary School, staff were asked to consider implementing a passenger loading area on Brunel Court for pick-up/drop-off (PUDO) activities. Both schools have reported that not having a designated passenger loading area had led to parents and guardians parking in the school bus loading zone (SBLZ) and on nearby private property, which obstructs school bus loading activities and motorists entering/exiting their condominium property at 15 Brunel Court.
There are currently two school bus loading zone (SBLZ) areas on the west side of Brunel Court, north and south of the walkway between the two schools and the Canoe Landing building. Staff are proposing converting the northern SBLZ area to a passenger loading zone from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, during school operating times to accommodate parking for PUDO activities for parents, guardians, and visitors. The parking change will provide approximately five parking spaces. The southern SBLZ area, closer to the entrance of the schools will be maintained and both schools have communicated that the length of the SBLZ area is sufficient to meet daily school bus loading activities. Providing a designated passenger loading area near the school may mitigate parents parking in areas obstructing school bus activities and nearby residential access, while still maintaining a SBLZ area to support both schools.
In addition, staff are proposing replacing the existing no stopping area from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, to a standing prohibition, on the east side of Brunel Court. A no standing regulation allows motorists to receive and discharge passengers and will provide an additional PUDO area for parents, guardians, and visitors.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289271.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical Memorandum -Brunel Court - Parking Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289276.pdf
Motions
TE34.240 - Appointments and Re-Appointments to the Scadding Court Community Centre Board of Management
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Re-appointed the following individuals to the Scadding Court Community Centre Board, at pleasure of Council, for the term of office ending June 30, 2030, and until successors are appointed:
- Alex Liang
- Chartreuse Noutelie
- Terrence Liu
- Donna Alleyne
- Alfred Adjetey Sowah
- Coreen Gittens
- Steve Lane
2. Appointed the following individuals to the Scadding Court Community Centre Board, at pleasure of Council, for the term of office ending June 30, 2030, and until successors are appointed:
- Joan Williams
- Sarah Bachinski
- Alcia Aberdeen
- Andy Din
- Imani Abukar
- Kenisha Peters
Summary
The Board confirms that each of these nominees is qualified to serve under the provisions of the City of Toronto's Public Appointments Policy and the Relationship Framework for Community Centre Boards of Management.
These appointments are a result of the following public member's terms coming to an end:
· Doug Lowry, term ending June 30, 2026 and until a successor is appointed.
· Mona Eldardiry, term ending June 30, 2026, and until a successor is appointed.
· Jasjit Sangha, term ending June 30, 2026, and until a successor is appointed.
· Peggy Poon, term ending June 30, 2026, and until a successor is appointed.
· Stephanie Donaldson, resigned effective November 28, 2022.
· Nicholas Austin, resigned effective January 29, 2024.
On behalf of the Board, I respectfully request that the City take the necessary steps to appoint these nominated candidates.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289285.pdf
(July 7, 2026) Letter from Councillor Ausma Malik on Scadding Court Community Centre Board of Management Appointments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289293.pdf
Motions
TE34.241 - St. Clarens Avenue and Shirley Street Parking Plan
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect from 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east side of St. Clarens Avenue, between Shirley Street and a point 76.2 metres north.
2. Rescinded the existing school bus loading zone in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., daily, on the east side of St. Clarens Avenue, between a point 15 metres north of Shirley Street and a point 26 metres further north.
3. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Shirley Street, between St. Clarens Avenue and a point 81.4 metres further east.
4. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Shirley Street, between a point 124.9 metres east of St. Clarens Avenue and Norfolk Street.
5. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the south side of Shirley Street, between St. Clarens Avenue and a point 143 metres east.
6. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, except no parking from 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, from St. Clarens Avenue to a point 143.3 metres further west, on the odd (south) side of Shirley Street from Brock Avenue to Lansdowne Avenue.
7. Amended the existing parking prohibition in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m., and 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, and at all times on Saturday and Sunday, on the north side of Shirley Street, between a point 81.4 metres east of St. Clarens Avenue and a point 43.5 metres further east to be in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the north side of Shirley Street, between a point 81.5 metres east of St. Clarens Avenue and a point 38.5 metres further east.
8. Amended the existing maximum ten-minute parking regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., and 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the north side of Shirley Street, between a point 81.4 metres east of St. Clarens Avenue and a point 43.5 metres further east to be in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., and 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the north side of Shirley Street, between a point 81.5 metres east of St. Clarens Avenue and a point 38.5 metres further east.
9. Prohibited stopping to be in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, school buses excepted, on the east side of St. Clarens Avenue, between a point 15 metres north of Shirley Street and a point 23 metres further north.
10. Designated a school bus loading zone to be in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east side of St. Clarens Avenue, between a point 15 metres north of Shirley Street and a point 23 metres further north.
11. Prohibited parking at all times on the south side of Shirley Street, between St. Clarens Avenue and Norfolk Street.
12. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, on the even (north) side of Shirley Street from Brock Avenue to Lansdowne Avenue.
13. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., daily, on the odd (east) side of St. Clarens Avenue from Hickson Street to a point 37 metres south of Dundas Street West.
14. Reduced the speed limit from 40 kilometres per hour to 30 kilometres per hour on St. Clarens Avenue, between Wyndham Street and the south end of St. Clarens Avenue.
Origin
Summary
Parking availability around Shirley Street Junior Public School has been a major problem for residents living on and around Shirley Street and St. Clarens Avenue. Over the past several months, I have worked closely with residents, City staff, and the Toronto District School Board to develop a comprehensive parking plan. This collaborative approach has focused on striking a balance between parking regulations that better reflect the needs of the local community and those that continue to support school operations.
A review by Transportation Services determined that many parking rules in the area are inconsistent and that revised parking amendments could be implemented without affecting the existing school bus loading zone. These changes include relocating permit parking from the south side of Shirley Street to the north side, removing unnecessary no-parking regulations, and adjusting several school-related restrictions to end at 4:00 p.m., better aligning with the school’s operating hours. In total, these amendments are expected to add approximately thirteen daytime parking spaces and ten additional overnight parking spaces across the two streets.
This parking plan is the result of several discussions between residents and the City. To ensure the proposed changes reflected the community’s priorities, a neighbourhood survey was shared with all impacted residents, and the results confirmed strong support for the recommended improvements.
By better aligning parking regulations with the community’s needs, this plan will improve parking availability for residents and visitors while maintaining safe operations for students attending Shirley Junior Public School.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289346.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289347.pdf
Motions
TE34.242 - Safer Streets for Davenport: Lightbourn-Chandos Traffic Safety Plan
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (six speed humps) on Chandos Avenue, between Dufferin Street and the west end of Chandos Avenue, generally as shown on Attachment 3 to the letter (July 6, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
2. Prohibited parking at all times on the north side of Chandos Avenue, between a point 128 metres west of Dufferin Street and a point 11 metres further west.
3. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, except no parking 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday, from Lightbourn Avenue to a point 61.0 metres west of it; and no parking anytime from a point 128 metres west of Lightbourn Avenue to a point 5.5 metres further west, on the even (north) side of Chandos Avenue from Lightbourn Avenue to the west end of Chandos Avenue.
4. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, on the even (north) side of Chandos Avenue from 109.7 metres west of Dufferin Street to Lightbourn Avenue.
5. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, on the even (north) side of Chandos Avenue from a point 36.6 metres west of Dufferin Street to a point 73.2 metres further west.
6. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, on the even (north) side of Chandos Avenue from Dufferin Street to a point 36.6 metres west of it.
7. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, on the even (north) side of Chandos Avenue from Dufferin Street to the west end of Chandos Avenue.
8. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (four speed humps) on Lightbourn Avenue, between Geary Avenue and Davenport Road, generally as shown on Attachment 4 to the letter (July 6, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
9. Prohibited parking at all times, on the east side of Lightbourn Avenue, between a point 29 metres north of Chandos Avenue and a point 11 metres further north.
10. Prohibited parking at all times, on the south side of Beaver Avenue, between a point 84 metres west of Lightbourn Avenue and a point 11 metres further west.
11. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, except no parking anytime between Beaver Avenue and Davenport Road, on the odd (east) side of Lightbourn Avenue from Geary Avenue to Davenport Road.
12. Authorized permit parking to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., daily, on the odd (east) side of Lightbourn Avenue from Geary Avenue to Davenport Road.
13. Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to review the feasibility of installing a pedestrian crossover or other appropriate pedestrian crossing improvements at Davenport Road and Lightbourn Avenue, and report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council with recommendations to improve safety.
14. Directed the General Manager, Transportation Services to install zebra pavement markings and other intersection safety improvements measures, where warranted and feasible, at intersections on Lightbourn Avenue south of Davenport Road, and report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council.
15. Directed the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to install pedestrian crossing enhancements and pavement markings to improve accessibility and connectivity between Beave Lightbourn Parkette and Chandos Park North, and between Chandos Park North and Chandos Park South, and report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council with a plan.
16. Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to investigate options to improve pedestrian safety at the intersection of Dufferin Street and Davenport Road, including through geometric safety improvements, and report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council.
Origin
Summary
The neighbourhood bounded by Davenport Road to the north, Geary Avenue to the south, Dufferin Street to the east, and Primrose Avenue to the west is a vibrant residential area with a network of parkettes, local shops, and other popular community spaces. The residents who call this neighbourhood home include seniors walking to nearby services, families with young children travelling to schools and playgrounds, and transit users walking over to a bus stop.
I hosted a park pop-up event in Chandos Park last summer to hear directly from residents about their priorities and the issues affecting the area. Residents consistently raised traffic safety concerns on local streets as a major problem. These concerns included speeding vehicles, constant cut-through traffic, unsafe intersections, and a lack of safe pedestrian crossings to travel between parks. The message from the neighbourhood was clear: traffic safety improvements are urgently needed.
Following this meeting, I worked with Transportation Services to develop a comprehensive neighbourhood traffic safety plan to respond to these issues. This plan was designed based on the concerns shared and addresses speeding, unsafe intersections and crosswalks, and cut-through traffic. Residents were invited to review the proposed changes and share their feedback to help design the final plan.
The feedback received through this consultation process confirmed strong community support for traffic safety improvements. Shaped by resident feedback, the final traffic safety plan includes:
- Traffic calming measures on Lightbourn Avenue and Chandos Avenue to reduce speeding and cut-through traffic
- Intersection safety improvements that include curb extensions and painted crosswalks along Lightbourn Avenue to reduce turning speeds and improve safety
- Pedestrian crossings and pavement markings between Beaver Lightbourn Parkette and Chandos Park, and between Chandos Park North and Chandos Park South to improve accessibility
- Investigating the feasibility of a pedestrian crosswalk at Davenport Road and Lightbourn Avenue to make a popular walking route safer
Improving traffic safety across Davenport remains one of my top priorities, and the measures proposed through this plan represent an important step toward addressing the issues impacting this growing community. I am committed to working with residents and Transportation Services to monitor conditions, evaluate the impact of these changes, and identify additional opportunities to improve safety for all road users.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289229.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289230.pdf
Attachment 2 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289231.pdf
Attachment 3 - Drawing No. TC-704, dated May 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289232.pdf
Attachment 4 - Drawing No. TC-703, dated May 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289233.pdf
Motions
TE34.243 - Re-opening and Amending Item TE32.42 - Expanding Parking Availability on Dufferin Park Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Re-opened Item 2026.TE32.42 titled "Expanding Parking Availability on Dufferin Park Avenue”.
2. Deleted Part 3 of its decision on Item 2026.TE32.42 and adopted the following instead:
a. Delete the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Dufferin Park Avenue, between Dufferin Street and the east end.
b. Delete the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of Dufferin Park Avenue, between Dufferin Street and a point 15 metres east.
c. Delete the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of Dufferin Park Avenue, between a point 43 metres east of Dufferin Street and the east end.
d. Prohibit parking at all times on the north side of Dufferin Park Avenue, between Dufferin Street and a point 42 metres east.
e. Prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Dufferin Park Avenue, between a point 42 metres east of Dufferin Street and the east end.
Origin
Summary
At the April meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council, amendments to parking regulations on Dufferin Park Avenue were aimed at improving parking availability for residents, visitors, and Park and Recreation staff. While the adopted parking regulations created additional on-street parking spaces, they also created unintended parking challenges on the north side of Dufferin Park Avenue, particularly for residents with accessible parking permits.
The recommendations below will correct these regulations and continue to support the goal of improving parking availability for this community.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289301.pdf
Motions
TE34.244 - Oakwood Village Streets Plan: Additional Improvements for Davenport
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (two speed humps) on Glenholme Avenue between Conway Avenue and Millerson Avenue, generally as shown in Attachment 3 to the letter (July 2, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
2. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (four speed humps) on Glenhurst Avenue between Appleton Avenue and Winona Drive, generally shown in Attachment 4 to the letter (July 2, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
Origin
Summary
The City of Toronto’s Oakwood Village Streets Plan is an important step towards improving road safety and mobility in this community. Residents have expressed many concerns about traffic safety on many streets in the Oakwood Village area, and the need for improvements. In response to these concerns, I advocated for the development of a comprehensive streets plan and participated alongside many residents in public consultation meetings to discuss potential solutions.
The City’s final plan introduced several important improvements that address concerns regarding speeding, unsafe intersections, and traffic infiltration on local streets. These investments will make our neighbourhood safer and more welcoming for residents, pedestrians, cyclists, and all road users.
While these improvements are a significant step forward, feedback from residents has made it clear that there is still more work to be done. As part of my commitment to ensure road safety is always prioritized, my office shared a neighbourhood survey to gather feedback on additional measures that residents believe are needed. The responses highlighted several traffic calming and road safety improvements that were not included in the final plan but continue to have strong community support.
Given these concerns and support from the community, it is important that we move forward with these additional measures to continue creating a safer Oakwood Village for all.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289288.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services - Traffic Calming on Glenholme Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289289.pdf
Attachment 2 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services - Traffic Calming on Glenhurst Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289290.pdf
Attachment 3 - Drawing No. ATP-SH-152, dated June 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289291.pdf
Attachment 4 - Drawing No. ATP-SH-153, dated June 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289292.pdf
Motions
TE34.245 - Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Northumberland Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (three speed humps) on Northumberland Street, between Westmoreland Avenue and Concord Avenue, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 2, 2026) from Councillor Alejandra Bravo.
Origin
Summary
Northumberland Street, stretching between Ossington Avenue and Westmoreland Avenue, is a high-traffic route connecting residents to many small businesses, schools, and Ossington Station. Despite its importance as a heavily travelled route, Northumberland Street remains one of the few streets in the area without traffic calming measures.
I have heard from residents who shared concerns about speeding along Northumberland Street, highlighting a significant safety issue for pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers. In response to these issues, my office conducted a neighbourhood survey that confirmed strong community support for installing speed humps. Implementing these traffic calming measures will help reduce vehicle speeds and improve road safety for all who use Northumberland Street.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289253.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Northumberland Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289254.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-718, dated May 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Northumberland Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289255.pdf
Motions
TE34.246 - Improving Permit Parking on Old Weston Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect at all times, on the east side of Old Weston Road, between a point 142 metres north of St. Clair Avenue West and a point 256 metres north of St. Clair Avenue West.
2. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east side of Old Weston Road, between St. Clair Avenue West and a point 142 metres north.
3. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east side of Old Weston Road, between Junction Road and Westport Avenue.
4. City Council prohibit standing to be in effect at all times, on the east side of Old Weston Road, between St. Clair Avenue West and a point 81 metres north.
5. City Council prohibit stopping to be in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east side of Old Weston Road, between a point 81 metres north of St. Clair Avenue West and a point 114 metres further north.
6. City Council prohibit stopping at all times, on the east side of Old Weston Road, between a point 195 metres north of St. Clair Avenue West and a point 61 metres further north.
7. City Council prohibit stopping at all times, on the east side of Old Weston Road, between Junction Road and Westport Avenue.
8. City Council authorize parking by permit only to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. daily, on the odd (east) side of Old Weston Road from Davenport Road to St. Clair Avenue West.
9. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times, on both sides of Old Weston Road, between St. Clair Avenue West and a point 55 metres south.
10. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east side of Old Weston Road, between a point 55 metres south of St. Clair Avenue West and Davenport Road.
11. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the west side of Old Weston Road, between a point 55 metres south of St. Clair Avenue West and Davenport Road.
12. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times, on the east side of Old Weston Road, between a point 30.5 metres south of Davenport Road and a point 5.5 metres further south.
13. City Council rescind the existing designated taxicab stand for one taxi in effect at all times, except 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Old Weston Road, north of Townsley Street.
14. City Council prohibit standing to be in effect at all times, on the east side of Old Weston Road, between St. Clair Avenue West and a point 50 metres south.
15. City Council prohibit parking to be in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east side of Old Weston Road, between a point 50 metres south of St. Clair Avenue West and Davenport Road.
16. City Council prohibit parking to be in effect at all times, on the west side of Old Weston Road, between St. Clair Avenue West and a point 57 metres south.
17. City Council prohibit parking to be in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the west side of Old Weston Road, between a point 57 metres south of St. Clair Avenue West and Davenport Road.
Origin
Summary
Old Weston Road serves local residents, businesses, and visitors as an important arterial corridor. However, parking regulations on certain sections of the street do not adequately reflect current neighbourhood needs and have led to ongoing concerns from residents.
Residents on the east side of Old Weston Road, between Davenport Road and St. Clair Avenue West, do not have access to permit parking and contacted my office to request improvements. Many households have limited access to garage parking and rely on curbside parking. Introducing permit parking on this section of the street would help address these concerns, align with surrounding neighbourhood parking regulations, and provide approximately 25 on-street permit parking spaces for local residents.
I have also heard concerns regarding the existing parking and stopping regulations on the east side of Old Weston Road, just south of Ed Clark Gardens. A stopping prohibition is currently in effect at all times along this section, originally implemented in 1999 to support operations at the now-closed Toronto West Flea Market. There is no longer a need for this restriction.
This motion proposes two changes to parking regulations on Old Weston Road to resolve these issues. The directions below enable permit parking on the east side of Old Weston Road, between Davenport Road and St. Clair Avenue West, to better support residents who rely on on-street parking. It would also remove the stopping prohibition south of the park to reflect current resident uses. Together, these changes improves parking availability and aligns regulations with current community needs.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289257.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services on Improving Permit Parking on Old Weston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289258.pdf
Motions
TE34.247 - Improving Permit Parking on Gilbert Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east side of Gilbert Avenue, between Summit Avenue and a point 94.5 metres north.
2. Prohibited parking to be in effect at all times, on the east side of Gilbert Avenue, between Summit Avenue and a point 94.5 metres north.
Origin
Summary
I have heard from residents on Gilbert Avenue about inconsistent parking regulations that are creating traffic flow problems. Currently, parking is allowed on both sides of Gilbert Avenue, north of Summit Avenue. This impedes two-way traffic on a dead-end road and raises potential safety and operational concerns, as parked vehicles limit visibility for pedestrians, cyclists, and oncoming drivers.
A resident-led petition confirmed support for limiting parking to the west side of Gilbert Avenue, between Summit Avenue and Bert Robinson Park.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289265.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289266.pdf
Motions
TE34.248 - Appointment of New Board Members of the Ralph Thornton Community Centre
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Appointed the following individuals, at pleasure of Council, to the Ralph Thornton Community Centre Board of Management for the term of office ending June 30, 2029, or until their successors are appointed:
- Maria Burgos
- Rebecca Curcio
- Caroline McLean
- Deanna Stacey
- Chris Yu
2. Re-appointed Roger Beharry Lall, at pleasure of Council, to the Ralph Thornton Community Centre Board of Management for the term of office ending June 30, 2028, or until their successor is appointed.
Origin
Summary
The Board confirms that the appointment of these individuals complies with the provisions of the City of Toronto’s Public Appointments Policy and the relevant provisions of the Relationship Framework for Board – Operated Community Centres, as well as, in accordance with our bylaws.
The following individuals did not stand for re-election and are no longer on the RTCC Board of Management:
- Ruby Kaliray
- Amanda Munday
- Sarah Reyes
- Heather Simpson
- Gabrielle Totesau
- Ejay Tupe
- Lindsay Williams.
We look forward to the contributions of our new and returning Board members as we continue to serve our community. We also thank our departing Board members for their service to our organization.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289413.pdf
(July 8, 2026) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher on Appointments to the Board of Management of Ralph Thornton Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289414.pdf
Motions
TE34.249 - Dingwall and Carlaw Avenue - Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (four speed humps) on Dingwall Avenue, between Carlaw Avenue and Pape Avenue, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 8, 2026) from Councillor Paula Fletcher.
2. Requested staff maintain Watch Your Speed signs along Dingwall Avenue, between Pape Avenue and Carlaw Avenue, and Carlaw Avenue, between Dingwall Avenue and Riverdale Avenue, until the Ontario Line begins service.
3. Authorized Transportation Services to restore the previous permit parking regulations on the odd (south) and even (north) sides of Dingwall Avenue, from Carlaw Avenue to Pape Avenue.
4. Requested Transportation Services and Toronto Transit Commission to report back to the next Toronto and East York Community Council meeting regarding responsibility for the convex mirrors installed along Dingwall Avenue, between Carlaw Avenue and Pape Avenue.
5. Requested Transportation Services maintain a permanent 20 kilomenters per hour speed limit along Dingwall Avenue, between Pape Avenue and Carlaw Avenue, and Carlaw Avenue, between Dingwall Avenue and Riverdale Avenue, until Ontario Line construction concludes.
Origin
Summary
Residents on Dingwall Avenue, between Pape Avenue and Carlaw Avenue, and Carlaw Avenue, between Dingwall Avenue and Riverdale Avenue, shared significant traffic safety concerns with my office as construction of the Ontario Line has proceeded. They have provided community feedback and completed a confidential ballot showing majority support for the installation of speed humps on Dingwall.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289394.pdf
Attachment 1 - Technical memorandum Dingwall Avenue - Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289431.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing TC-769 Dingwall Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289432.pdf
Motions
TE34.250 - Improving Permit Parking on Rusholme Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. each Thursday, April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the odd (east) side of Rusholme Road, from Dundas Street West to St Annes Road.
2. Rescinded the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. daily, except each Thursday, April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the even (west) side Rusholme Road, from Dundas Street West to St Annes Road.
3. Authorized parking by permit only to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. daily, on the even (west) side of Rusholme Road, from Dundas Street West to St. Annes Road.
4. Amended the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. daily, on the even (west) side of Rusholme Road, from Heydon Park Road to College Street, to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 pm. to 6:00 p.m., daily.
5. Amended the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. daily, on the even (west) side of Rusholme Road, from St. Annes Road to Heydon Park Road, to be in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 pm. to 6:00 p.m., daily.
6. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect each Thursday from April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the west side of Rusholme Road, between Dundas Street West and St. Annes Road.
7. Rescinded the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times except each Thursday from April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the east side of Rusholme Road, between Dundas Street West and St. Annes Road.
8. Prohibited parking to be in effect at all times on the east side of Rusholme Road, between Dundas Street West and St. Annes Road.
9. Authorized parking for a maximum period of two-hours from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., daily, on the west side of Rusholme Road, between College Street and St. Annes Road.
Origin
Summary
Transportation Services has reviewed concerns from local residents on Rusholme Road regarding the lack of parking availability, challenges with overnight permit parking, and confusion around existing parking regulations. The current regulations do not fully reflect local parking needs, especially when residents return from work, and improvements are needed.
A neighbourhood survey delivered to residents by my office confirmed that parking is a challenge and that there is support for the proposed improvements. These changes include extending permit parking hours, reducing visitor parking hours, and removing alternate side parking requirements. This plan will improve parking availability for residents and clear inconsistent parking regulations while maintaining on-street spaces for visitors.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289434.pdf
Motions
TE34.251 - Kippendavie Avenue Parking Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized parking for a maximum period of one hour, on the west side of Kippendavie Avenue, at all times, between a point 131.1 metres south of Queen Street East and Kewbeach Avenue.
Origin
Summary
In response to concerns raised by residents regarding limited parking availability on Kippendavie Avenue, my office has received a petition from community members requesting changes to the current parking regulations. Specifically, residents are asking that parking on the west side of Kippendavie Avenue, between Queen Street and Kewbeach Avenue, be limited to a maximum of one hour. On-street permit parking holders would remain exempt from the one-hour limit.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289449.pdf
Motions
TE34.252 - Ontario Place Construction Management Plan for Pedestrian and Cycling Safety and Traffic Management
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council request the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Gaming to provide a Construction Management Plan for the Ontario Place redevelopment project, including traffic management and pedestrian and cycling safety measures.
2. City Council request the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Gaming convene a Construction Liaison Committee for Ontario Place to provide a forum for information sharing and feedback on the work and access taking place around the site.
Origin
Summary
Due to the Province’s choice to cut short the City’s planning approval process for Ontario Place redevelopment, the usual oversight by the City on development implementation has not been followed. This includes the submission of a Construction Management Plan to the City which is typical of all development approvals.
Any construction at Ontario Place will require access through the Lake Shore Blvd. W. corridor, an area that a City staff review have confirmed experiences heavy traffic, and is close to Exhibition Place which hosts signature events such as the CNE and Toronto Caribbean Festival. It will also require access across the busy Martin Goodman Trail, a major cycling and pedestrian multi-use trail that connects our city, which a City staff report has identified for safety improvements. A Construction Management Plan is required to ensure pedestrian and cycling safety is prioritized, and truck access routes are understood to minimize impacts, and more.
In addition, the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Gaming should convene a Construction Liaison Committee (CLC) for Ontario Place to provide a forum for information sharing and feedback on the work and access around the site. These groups have been successfully convened by Provincial bodies for major projects including current and past works such as the Ontario Line, GO Expansion in the Union Station Rail Corridor, and the Flood Protection Landform in the West Don Lands, among others.
A CLC can provide an opportunity for proactive notice of work, schedules, and changes in access, among other matters. It will also allow for public transparency for any ongoing construction activities taking place at Ontario Place. The Province has engaged a number of stakeholder groups during the redevelopment process that can be considered for inclusion in a CLC, including those representing site users, residents, and businesses.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289497.pdf
Motions
TE34.253 - Re-opening and Amending Item TE29.41 - Accessible Parking Spaces - February 2026 (Delegated)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Re-opened Item TE29.41 titled "Accessible Parking Spaces - February 2026 (Delegated)”.
2. Amended its previous decision on Item TE29.41 by:
a. deleting the following entry in Attachment 1 to the report (February 19, 2026) from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services, only as it pertains to Gladstone Avenue:
Table 1: On-Street Accessible Parking Spaces to be Installed
Gladstone Avenue, west side, between a point 48 metres north of Stonehouse Crescent and a point 5.5 metres further north
b. enacting the following:
designate an accessible loading zone to be in effect from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Gladstone Avenue, between a point 42.5 metres north of Stonehouse Crescent and a point 11 metres further north.
Origin
Summary
At the February 19, 2026, meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council, accessible parking spaces were approved at several locations, including a section of Gladstone Avenue. The original applicant of the accessible space on Gladstone Avenue has contacted my office to share that they instead need an accessible loading zone due to changing health needs. Transportation Services staff confirmed that the resident meets the requirements for an accessible loading zone at this location.
The recommendations below will amend our previous decision and approve the installation of an accessible loading zone for this resident.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289395.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289456.pdf
Motions
TE34.254 - Victor Avenue - Parking Amendments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized additional period of permit parking only on Victor Avenue between Broadview Avenue and Howland Road between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, in addition to the existing permit parking restriction from 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.
Origin
Summary
Residents on Victor Avenue have reached out to my office regarding concerns of non-permit parking on their street. This is a residential street close to a very busy park and businesses.
Residents submitted a petition to my office and in a subsequent confidential ballot, there was 63 percent support for this change.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289428.pdf
Motions
TE34.255 - Indian Grove - Accessible Loading Zone
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Designated an accessible loading zone to be in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, and from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Saturday and Sunday, on the west side of Indian Grove between a point 137 metres south of Glenlake Avenue and a point 11 metres further south.
2. Rescinded the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Indian Grove, between a point opposite Glen Gordon Road and a point 82 metres north of Bloor Street West (west intersection).
3. Rescinded the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Indian Grove, between a point opposite Glen Gordon Road and Glenlake Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services is requesting approval for the installation of a designated on-street accessible loading zone on the west side of Indian Grove, south of Glenlake Avenue. The accessible loading zone will operate from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, and from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Saturday and Sunday. The establishment of this accessible loading zone will provide unimpeded curbside access for the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Wheel-Trans users and permit holders during pick-up/drop-off scenarios in the subject area.
During the investigation, Transportation Services discovered redundant parking by-laws. Recommendations 2 and 3 will rectify these inconsistencies.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289520.pdf
Motions
TE34.256 - Advancing Work on Bremner Boulevard Pedestrian Safety Improvements
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to conduct a comprehensive safety review of Bremner Boulevard and its main intersections, including options to improve street design, signage and the installation of crosswalks and geometric safety improvements.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to engage with local stakeholders including the Toronto Downtown West Business Improvement Area, CN Tower, Ripley’s Aquarium, Rogers Centre, as well as Indigenous stakeholders including the Orange Shirt Society on these options to improve street safety as well as beautify the community.
3. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to report back on Parts 1 and 2 above to the Toronto and East York Community Council at the January 2027 meeting with proposed near-term changes to improve road safety.
Origin
Summary
Bremner Boulevard is a vibrant street in our downtown, home to many destination locations for locals and visitors alike, including the CN Tower, which hosts up to two million visitors annually and celebrates its 50th anniversary this year. My office has heard from community members and local institutional stakeholders on Bremner Boulevard regarding the need for improved pedestrian safety, and have been working with City staff on improvements.
Transportation Services staff have been undergoing an assessment of the area, including collecting traffic counts at key intersections, and exploring options for pedestrian crosswalks in the area.
More work is required from City staff to engage with local stakeholders, including on the ground, and to determine other options to address safety concerns.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289522.pdf
Motions
TE34.257 - Glebeholme Boulevard - Traffic Calming
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Decision
The Toronto and East York Community Council:
1. Authorized the installation of traffic calming (four speed humps) on Glebeholme Boulevard, between Caithness Avenue and Greenwood Avenue, generally as shown in Attachment 2 to the letter (July 9, 2026) from Councillor Paula Fletcher.
Origin
Summary
Residents on Glebeholme Boulevard, between Greenwood Avenue and Caithness Avenue, shared significant traffic safety concerns with my office. They completed a confidential ballot showing majority support for the installation of speed humps on Glebeholme.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289464.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management on Glebeholme Boulevard - Traffic Calming
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289465.pdf
Attachment 2 - Drawing No. TC-759 Glebeholme Boulevard, dated June 2026, from the Director, Enforcement and Street Management, Transportation Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2026/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-289466.pdf
Motions
TE34.258 - Introduction of By-laws
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Wards:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 13 - Toronto Centre, 14 - Toronto - Danforth, 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Decision
July 8, 2026
Confirmatory Bills
Toronto and East York Community Council passed Confirmatory Bill as By-law 778-2026, subject to Section 226.9 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
July 9, 2026
General Bills
Toronto and East York Community Council passed By-laws 779-2026 to 913-2026, subject to Section 226.9 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Confirmatory Bills
Toronto and East York Community Council passed Confirmatory Bill as By-law 914-2026, subject to Section 226.9 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Summary
Toronto and East York Community Council will introduce bills.
Motions
6:18 p.m. - That confirmatory bill to confirm the legislative proceedings of the Toronto and East York Community Council acting under delegated authority at Meeting 34 on July 8, 2026, be declared as a by-law and passed subject to section 226.9 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006:
|
Bill No. |
By-law No. |
Status |
Title and Authority |
|
976 |
778-2026 |
Enacted |
To confirm the proceedings of Toronto and East York Community Council at Meeting 34 held on July 8, 2026, as they relate to decisions made under delegated authority. |
12:04 p.m. - That 829 to 919 and 929 to 972 prepared for the July 8 and 9, 2026, Meeting 34 of the Toronto and East York Community Council, be declared as by-laws and passed subject to section 226.9 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006:
|
Bill No. |
By-law No. |
Status |
Title and Authority |
|
829 |
779-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to streamline permit parking exclusions for new developments
Item TE23.46, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on February 9, 2009; Item TE14.44, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on March 20, 2012; Item TE22.79, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on February 26, 2013; Item TE26.98, as adopted by Toronto East York Community Council on September 10, 2013; Item TE34.158, TE34.161, TE34.163, TE34.164 and TE34.165, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on August 12, 2014; Item TE14.69, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on February 23, 2016; Item TE22.81, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on February 22, 2017; Item TE26.72, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on September 6, 2017; Item TE8.44, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on September 16, 2019; Item TE19.37, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on October 15, 2020; Item TE24.66, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on April 21, 2021; Item TE27.44, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on September 9, 2021; Item TE28.37 and TE28.61, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on October 14, 2021; Item TE32.60 and TE32.72, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on April 21, 2022; Item TE34.131 and TE34.164, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 29 and 30, 2022; Item TE3.31, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on February 23, 2023; Item TE6.60, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 22 and 23, 2023; Item TE7.63, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on September 19, 2023; Item TE11.26, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on February 21, 2024; Item TE15.39, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 10, 2024; Item TE16.32 and TE16.37, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on September 25, 2024; Item TE18.28, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on December 4, 2024. |
|
830 |
780-2026 |
Enacted |
To authorize the naming of a Public Lane Located west of Vaughan Road, north of Ellsworth Avenue, as Aren Levy Lane
Item TE34.165, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
831 |
781-2026 |
Enacted |
To authorize the naming of a Public Lane located north of Robinson Street, extending easterly from Palmerston Avenue, as De Sa Lane
Item TE34.1, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
832 |
782-2026 |
Enacted |
To authorize the renaming of Ramsden Park Road, as Ramsden Park Lane
Item TE34.2, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
833 |
783-2026 |
Enacted |
To authorize the naming of a Public Lane located west of Yonge Street, north of Macpherson Avenue, as Woloch Family Lane
Item TE34.3, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
834 |
784-2026 |
Enacted |
To authorize the naming of a Public Lane located south of College Street, east of Euclid Avenue, being the north and south segment of the lane, as Palmira Lane
Item TE34.4, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
835 |
785-2026 |
Enacted |
To authorize the naming of a Public Lane Located north of Eastern Avenue, between Berkshire Avenue and Rushbrooke Avenue, as Valerie Mah Lane
Item TE34.5, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
836 |
786-2026 |
Enacted |
To authorize the naming of a Public Lane located east of Logan Avenue, west of Morse Street, as Sunday Mews
Item TE34.6, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
837 |
787-2026 |
Enacted |
To authorize the naming of a Public Lane located south of Queen Street East, between Empire Avenue and Booth Avenue, as Sister Gwen Smith Lane
Item TE34.7, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
838 |
788-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Raglan Avenue
Item TE14.30, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 11, 2024 |
|
839 |
789-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Ontario Street
Item TE16.25, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on September 25, 2024 |
|
840 |
790-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Ontario Street
Item TE16.25, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on September 25, 2024 |
|
841 |
791-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Day Avenue
Item TE16.52, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on September 25, 2024 |
|
842 |
792-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Clinton Street
Item TE18.55, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on December 4, 2024 |
|
843 |
793-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Nursewood Road
Item TE17.55, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on October 24, 2024 and Item TE20.51, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on February 20, 2025 |
|
844 |
794-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Peveril Hill South
Item TE21.42, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on April 3, 2025 |
|
845 |
795-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Canniff Street
Item TE22.36, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on May 1, 2025 |
|
846 |
796-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Crawford Street
Item TE22.37, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on May 1, 2025 |
|
847 |
797-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Tracy Street
Item TE22.38, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on May 1, 2025 |
|
848 |
798-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Logan Avenue
Item TE22.48, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on May 1, 2025 |
|
849 |
799-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Charles Street West
Item TE23.44, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 5, 2025 |
|
850 |
800-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Elgin Avenue
Item TE23.45, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 5, 2025 |
|
851 |
801-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Lippincott Street
Item TE23.46, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 5, 2025 |
|
852 |
802-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Montrose Avenue
Item TE23.47, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 5, 2025 |
|
853 |
803-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Rathnelly Avenue
Item TE23.48, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 5, 2025 |
|
854 |
804-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Lippincott Street
Item TE23.52, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 5, 2025 |
|
855 |
805-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Borden Street
Item TE23.60, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 5, 2025 |
|
856 |
806-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Virginia Avenue
Item TE24.56, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8, 2025 |
|
857 |
807-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Foxley Street
Item TE24.67, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8, 2025 |
|
858 |
808-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Turner Road
Item TE25.52, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on September 18, 2025 |
|
859 |
809-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Leroy Avenue
Item TE25.53, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on September 18, 2025 |
|
860 |
810-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Cedarcrest Boulevard
Item TE25.54, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on September 18, 2025 |
|
861 |
811-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 903, Parking for Persons with Disabilities, respecting Mavety Street.
Item TE34.167, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026. |
|
862 |
812-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Elm Avenue
Item TE25.68, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on September 18, 2025 |
|
863 |
813-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Pape Avenue
Item TE25.72, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on September 18, 2025 |
|
864 |
814-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Denvale Road
Item TE26.60, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on October 22, 2025 |
|
865 |
815-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Alhambra Avenue, Glendonwynne Road, Gwynne Avenue, Humberline Avenue, Indian Road Crescent, Montye Avenue and Vernon Street
Item TE27.63, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on November 27, 2025 |
|
866 |
816-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Billings Avenue
Item TE27.64, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on November 27, 2025 |
|
867 |
817-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Cadorna Avenue
Item TE27.65, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on November 27, 2025 |
|
868 |
818-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Boon Avenue
Item TE27.71, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on November 27, 2025 |
|
869 |
819-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Bloem Avenue
Item TE27.72, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on November 27, 2025 |
|
870 |
820-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Morrison Avenue
Item TE27.73, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on November 27, 2025 |
|
871 |
821-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Peterborough Avenue
Item TE27.74, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on November 27, 2025 |
|
872 |
822-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Bloem Avenue
Item TE27.85, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on November 27, 2025 |
|
873 |
823-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Frederick Street
Item TE27.76, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on November 27, 2025 |
|
874 |
824-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Eversfield Road
Item TE27.83, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on November 27, 2025 |
|
875 |
825-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Hatherley Road
Item TE27.84, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on November 27, 2025 |
|
876 |
826-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Sellers Avenue
Item TE27.85, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on November 27, 2025 |
|
877 |
827-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Salem Avenue
Item TE27.87, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on November 27, 2025 |
|
878 |
828-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Northbrook Road
Item TE28.42, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on January 13, 2026 |
|
879 |
829-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Claxton Boulevard
Item TE29.15, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on February 19, 2026 |
|
880 |
830-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Euclid Avenue
Item TE29.50, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on February 19, 2026 |
|
881 |
831-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Walter Street
Item TE29.58, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on February 19, 2026 |
|
882 |
832-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Main Street and Stephenson Avenue
Item TE32.49, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on April 30, 2026 |
|
883 |
833-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Stephenson Avenue
Item TE32.49, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on April 30, 2026 and Item TE33.76 as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on May 28, 2026 |
|
884 |
834-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Portland Street, Stewart Street and Wellington Street West
Item TE33.78, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on May 28, 2026 |
|
885 |
835-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Perth Avenue
Item TE34.109, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
886 |
836-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 910, Parking Machines, Parking Meters and Mobile Only Zones, respecting Camden Street
Item TE34.111, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
887 |
837-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Camden Street
Item TE34.111, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
888 |
838-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Brant Street and Camden Street
Item TE34.111, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
889 |
839-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Price Street
Item TE34.116, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
890 |
840-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 903, Parking for Persons with Disabilities, respecting Pleasant Boulevard
Item TE34.118, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
891 |
841-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Pleasant Boulevard
Item TE34.118, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
892 |
842-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 910, Parking Machines, Parking Meters and Mobile Only Zones, respecting Bond Street
Item TE34.120, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
893 |
843-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Bond Street
Item TE34.120, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
894 |
844-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 910, Parking Machines, Parking Meters and Mobile Only Zones, respecting Grenville Street
Item TE34.122, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
895 |
845-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Grenville Street and Grosvenor Street
Item TE34.122, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
896 |
846-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Armadale Avenue and Mayfield Avenue
Item TE34.125, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
897 |
847-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Manning Avenue and Robinson Street
Item TE34.126, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
898 |
848-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Manning Avenue and Robinson Street
Item TE34.126, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
899 |
849-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 903, Parking for Persons with Disabilities, respecting Chisholm Avenue, Claremont Street, Epsom Avenue, Firstbrooke Road, Indian Road, Kings Park Boulevard, Milverton Boulevard, Oakcrest Avenue, Olive Avenue, Shaw Street, Strathmore Boulevard, Tyrrel Avenue, Wheeler Avenue, Windermere Avenue
Item TE34.131, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
900 |
850-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 910, Parking Machines, Parking Meters and Mobile Only Zones, respecting Defries Street and Mark Street
Item TE34.132, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
901 |
851-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Defries Street and Mark Street
Item TE34.132, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
902 |
852-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 910, Parking Machines, Parking Meters and Mobile Only Zones, respecting Mercer Street
Item TE34.135, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
903 |
853-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Mercer Street
Item TE34.135, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
904 |
854-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Farquhars Lane
Item TE34.137, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
905 |
855-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Sumach Street
Item TE34.138, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
906 |
856-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Sumach Street
Item TE34.138, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
907 |
857-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Logan Avenue
Item TE34.139, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
908 |
858-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Cowan Avenue, Dunn Avenue, Elm Grove Avenue, Fort Rouille Street, Gwynne Avenue, Melbourne Avenue, Spencer Avenue, Temple Avenue, Thorburn Avenue and Tyndall Avenue
Item TE34.141, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
909 |
859-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Temple Avenue, Thorburn Avenue, Tyndall Avenue
Item TE34.141, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
910 |
860-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Aitken Place, Berkeley Street, Douville Court, Hahn Place, Longboat Avenue, Portneuf Court, Princess Street, Sackville Street and Scadding Street
Item TE34.143, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
911 |
861-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Trinity Street
Item TE34.143, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
912 |
862-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Cooper Street
Item TE34.145, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
913 |
863-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Cooper Street, Downes Street and John M Tinsley Street
Item TE34.145, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
914 |
864-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Ontario Street
Item TE34.146, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
915 |
865-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Ontario Street
Item TE34.146, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
916 |
866-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Crescent Road
Item TE34.160, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
917 |
867-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Euclid Avenue
Item TE34.162, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
918 |
868-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Roxborough Street West
Item TE27.50, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on November 27, 2025; Item TE33.70, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on May 28, 2026; and Item TE34.163, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
919 |
869-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Shaftesbury Avenue
Item TE34.164, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
929 |
870-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Mavety Street
Item TE34.167, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
930 |
871-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Brandon Avenue
Item TE34.168, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
931 |
872-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Brandon Avenue
Item TE34.168, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
932 |
873-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Turnberry Avenue
Item TE34.169, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
933 |
874-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 910, Parking Machines, Parking Meters and Mobile Only Zones, respecting Concord Avenue
Item TE34.170, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
934 |
875-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Concord Avenue
Item TE34.170, adopted as amended by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
935 |
876-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Conway Avenue
Item TE34.171, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
936 |
877-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Conway Avenue
Item TE34.171, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
937 |
878-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Delaware Avenue
Item TE34.172, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
938 |
879-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 903, Parking for Persons with Disabilities, respecting Blackthorn Avenue
Item TE34.173, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
939 |
880-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Blackthorn Avenue
Item TE34.173, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
940 |
881-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Dufferin Park Avenue
Item TE32.42, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on April 30, 2026 |
|
941 |
882-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Blackthorn Avenue
Item TE34.173, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
942 |
883-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Gilbert Avenue
Item TE34.177, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
943 |
884-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Muir Avenue
Item TE34.181, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
944 |
885-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Paton Road
Item TE34.184, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
945 |
886-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Paton Road and Wade Avenue
Item TE34.184, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
946 |
887-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 903, Parking for Persons with Disabilities, respecting Chudleigh Road and Morrison Avenue
Item TE25.42, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on September 18, 2025 and Item TE34.185, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
947 |
888-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Auburn Avenue, Emerson Avenue, Geary Avenue, Hallam Street, Hope Street, Lansdowne Avenue, Lappin Avenue, Rockwell Avenue, Symington Avenue and Via Italia
Item TE34.186, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
948 |
889-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Bruyeres Mews
Item TE34.188, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
949 |
890-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Iannuzzi Street
Item TE34.189, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
950 |
891-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Scadding Avenue
Item TE34.194, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
951 |
892-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Colborne Street
Item TE34.213, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
952 |
893-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Leader Lane
Item TE34.214, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
953 |
894-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Chestnut Park and Mathersfield Drive
Item TE34.201, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
954 |
895-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Chestnut Park and Mathersfield Drive
Item TE34.201, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
955 |
896-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 903, Parking for Persons with Disabilities, respecting Trinity Street
Item TE34.143, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
956 |
897-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Northline Road
Item TE34.218, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
957 |
898-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Fernwood Park Avenue and Fir Avenue
Item TE34.221, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
958 |
899-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Ben Kerr Lane
Item TE34.226, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
959 |
900-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Grenville Street and Wood Street
Item TE34.227, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
960 |
901-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Bridgman Avenue, Kendal Avenue and Macpherson Avenue
Item TE34.230, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
961 |
902-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 910, Parking Machines, Parking Meters and Mobile Only Zones, respecting Brunel Court
Item TE34.239, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
962 |
903-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Brunel Court
Item TE34.239, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
963 |
904-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Shirley Street
Item TE34.241, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
964 |
905-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting St. Clarens Avenue and Shirley Street
Item TE34.241, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
965 |
906-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Dufferin Park Avenue
Item TE32.42, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on April 30, 2026 and Item TE34.243, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
966 |
907-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Gilbert Avenue
Item TE34.247, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
967 |
908-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Rusholme Road
Item TE34.250, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
968 |
909-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Rusholme Road
Item TE34.250, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
969 |
910-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 903, Parking for Persons with Disabilities, respecting Indian Grove
Item TE34.255, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
970 |
911-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Indian Grove
Item TE34.255, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
971 |
912-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, respecting Chandos Avenue and Lightbourn Avenue
Item TE34.242, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
|
972 |
913-2026 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Beaver Avenue, Chandos Avenue and Lightbourn Avenue
Item TE34.242, as adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council on July 8 and 9, 2026 |
12:04 p.m. - That confirmatory bill to confirm the legislative proceedings of the Toronto and East York Community Council acting under delegated authority at Meeting 34 on July 8 and 9, 2026, be declared as a by-law and passed subject to section 226.9 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006:
|
Bill No. |
By-law No. |
Status |
Title and Authority |
|
977 |
914-2026 |
Enacted |
To confirm the proceedings of Toronto and East York Community Council at Meeting 34 held on July 8 and 9, 2026, as they relate to decisions made under delegated authority.
(This final confirming By-law confirms the actions taken by Community Council under delegated authority at this meeting, including the enactment of any previous confirming By-laws.) |
Procedural Motions
That the Toronto and East York Community Council confirm the minutes of its meeting held on May 28, 2026.
That the Toronto and East York Community Council set the following rules for this meeting:
1. That, with the exception of the statutory public hearing on Items TE34.8 to TE34.60, speakers who have not pre-registered, be allowed to register to speak until 10:00 a.m. on July 8, 2026, after which no further registration is allowed and the speakers list will be closed.
2. That the length of public presentations be limited to 3 minutes.
3. That questions of speakers by Members of the Toronto and East York Community Council and visiting Members of Council be limited to 3 minutes, with one round of questions per Member.
July 9, 2026 at 11:42 a.m. - That the Toronto and East York Community Council recess for 10 minutes.
Announcements
The Chair and Members gratefully acknowledged that the Toronto and East York Community Council meets on the traditional territory of many nations including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee and the Wendat peoples and is now home to many diverse First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples. The Chair also acknowledged that Toronto is covered by Treaty 13 with the Mississaugas of the Credit.
The Chair further acknowledged that not all people came to these lands as migrants and settlers, and specifically acknowledged those who came here involuntarily, particularly those brought to these lands as a result of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade and Slavery. In support of the City of Toronto's ongoing efforts to confront anti-Black racism, the Chair paid tribute to those ancestors of African, Caribbean and Black origin and descent.
Where the Members of the Toronto and East York Community Council listed in the attendance for this meeting participated remotely, they were counted for quorum as permitted by Section 189(4.2) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and City Council's Procedures.
Chris Moise, Chair, Toronto and East York Community Council
Meeting Sessions
| Session Date | Session Type | Start Time | End Time | Public or Closed Session |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-08 | Morning | 9:40 AM | 12:24 PM | Public |
| 2026-07-08 | Afternoon | 1:39 PM | 6:18 PM | Public |
| 2026-07-09 | Morning | 9:38 AM | 11:42 AM | Public |
| 2026-07-09 | Morning | 11:55 AM | 12:05 PM | Public |
Attendance
| Date and Time | Quorum | Members |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-08 9:40 AM - 12:24 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Brad Bradford, Alejandra Bravo, Paula Fletcher, Ausma Malik, Josh Matlow, Chris Moise (Chair), Gord Perks, Dianne Saxe |
| 2026-07-08 1:39 PM - 6:18 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Brad Bradford, Alejandra Bravo, Paula Fletcher, Ausma Malik, Josh Matlow, Chris Moise (Chair), Gord Perks, Dianne Saxe |
| 2026-07-09 9:38 AM - 11:42 AM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Brad Bradford, Alejandra Bravo, Paula Fletcher, Ausma Malik, Josh Matlow, Chris Moise (Chair), Gord Perks, Dianne Saxe |
| 2026-07-09 11:55 AM - 12:05 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Brad Bradford, Paula Fletcher, Ausma Malik, Josh Matlow, Chris Moise (Chair), Gord Perks, Dianne Saxe Not Present: Alejandra Bravo |