Agenda
City Council
- Meeting No.:
- 19
- Contact:
- Sylwia Przezdziecki, Manager
- Meeting Date:
- Wednesday, June 26, 2024
- Thursday, June 27, 2024
- Phone:
- 416-392-8485
- Start Time:
- 9:30 AM
- E-mail:
- councilmeeting@toronto.ca
- Location:
- Council Chamber, City Hall/Video Conference
This meeting of City Council will be conducted with Members participating in person and remotely and the proceedings of City Council will be conducted publicly.
Notice to people writing to Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006, and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees. The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it - such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address - available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.
Closed Meeting Requirements: If Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a Member of Council must place a motion to do so and give the reason why Council has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).
June 21, 2024
toronto.ca/council
This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.
Routine Matters - Meeting 19
RM19.1 - Call to Order
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
On Wednesday, June 26, 2024:
First Items to be considered:
Mayor's First Key Matter - PH13.7– Renovictions Policy Implementation: Review of Hamilton Renovation Licence and Tenant Relocation By-law and developing a Toronto Renovictions By-law
Second Item to be considered after the Mayor’s First Key Matter:
- EX15.7 – Enabling Toronto Hydro's Sustainable Growth
First Item after lunch recess:
Mayor's Second Key Matter - PH13.8 – Launching the Rental Housing Supply Program
On Thursday, June 27, 2024:
First Items to be considered:
- IE14.3 - Cycling Network Plan Update (2025 - 2027) and IE14.4 - Cycling Network Plan - 2024 Cycling Infrastructure and Missing Sidewalk Installation - Third Quarter Update to be considered together
Items to be considered after Member Motions:
- EX15.4 - A Governance and Operational Review of Sankofa Square (formerly Yonge-Dundas Square
- EX15.2 - Priorities in Transit Expansion and Transit-Oriented Communities Projects
- PH8.5 – City-Initiated Zoning By-law Amendments to Implement Ontario Line - Final Report - Further Consideration of Various Properties
Summary
- O Canada
- Moment of Silence
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247186.pdf
Condolence Motion for George (Joris) Alois Denys
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247200.pdf
Condolence Motion for Phil Nimmons
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247187.pdf
Condolence Motion for the Honourable Jim Peterson
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247240.pdf
Condolence Motion for Jeffery Charles Elon Sinclair
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247250.pdf
Condolence Motion for Emilia Spizzirri
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247188.pdf
Condolence Motion for Donald McNichol Sutherland
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247252.pdf
Condolence Motion for Arturi Vincenzo
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247185.pdf
RM19.2 - Confirmation of Minutes
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Summary
City Council will confirm the Minutes from the regular meeting held on May 22 and 23, 2024.
RM19.3 - Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from the Mayor and City Officials
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Summary
Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 15 on June 18, 2024
Submitted by Mayor Olivia Chow, Chair
Report of the Board of Health from Meeting 13 on May 27, 2024
Submitted by Councillor Chris Moise, Chair
Report of the Economic and Community Development Committee from Meeting 13 on May 29, 2024
Submitted by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, Chair
Report of the General Government Committee from Meeting 13 on May 30, 2024
Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair
Report of the Infrastructure and Environment Committee from Meeting 14 on May 28, 2024
Submitted by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, Chair
Report of the Planning and Housing Committee from Meeting 13 on June 13, 2024
Submitted by Councillor Gord Perks, Chair
Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 14 on June 3, 2024
Submitted by Councillor Stephen Holyday, Chair
Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 14 on June 4, 2024
Submitted by Councillor James Pasternak, Chair
Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 14 on June 12, 2024
Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair
Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 14 on June 11, 2024
Submitted by Councillor Chris Moise, Chair
New Business submitted by the Mayor and City Officials
RM19.4 - Declarations of Interest
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Summary
Members of Council will declare interests under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act.
RM19.5 - Petitions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Summary
Members of Council may file petitions.
RM19.6 - Presentations, Introductions and Announcements
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Summary
Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.
RM19.7 - Review of the Order Paper
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Summary
City Council will review the Order Paper.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247189.pdf
(June 26, 2024) Financial Impact Summary Sheet for Member Motions MM19.1 - MM19.28 from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247208.pdf
(June 26, 2024) Amendments to the Order Paper made on June 26, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247212.pdf
Order Paper June 27, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247258.pdf
(June 27, 2023) Amendments to the Order Paper made on June 27, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247276.pdf
(June 27, 2024) Financial Impact Summary Sheet for Member Motions MM19.29 - MM19.37 from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247271.pdf
(June 27, 2024) Financial Impact Summary Sheet for Member Motions MM19.38 from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247272.pdf
(June 27, 2024) Financial Impact Summary Sheet for Member Motions MM19.39 - MM19.40 from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247307.pdf
Administrative Inquiry - Meeting 19
IA19.1 - The Missing Video Archive of the February 22, 2024 Toronto Transit Commission Board Meeting
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Under Council's Procedures, City Council can receive or refer an Administrative Inquiry.
Origin
Summary
Councillor Chris Moise, Ward 13, Toronto Centre, has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry:
I am submitting this Administrative Inquiry under Municipal Code S27-7.11 for the June 26, 2024 meeting of City Council to seek information on the missing video archive of the Toronto Transit Commission Board Meeting held on Thursday, February 22, 2024.
As a Commissioner, I submitted an Administrative Inquiry to the Toronto Transit Commission Board and received a response at our meeting on April 11, 2024.
In the response from Toronto Transit Commission Staff, they explained:
On the morning of Friday, February 23, Toronto Transit Commission staff became aware that the archived video feed from the February 22, 2024, Toronto Transit Commission Board meeting was unavailable on YouTube. Upon learning that the video was unavailable, our investigation determined that the video stream had not been stopped. Typically, staff ends the stream in the back end of YouTube when the meeting adjourns; in this situation, the feed continued running live for a total run time of 22:18:46 before ending.
Toronto Transit Commission staff contacted YouTube and discovered that there appears to be no archived video.
Typically, the Toronto Transit Commission can secure a backup copy of the video feed from the City’s Broadcast Team; however, they are also unable to restore the video.
I also asked what the role of the City of Toronto’s Broadcast Team in board meetings and why they weren’t able to provide a backup copy. Their response was:
The City of Toronto’s Broadcast Team provides the live webcast of Toronto Transit Commission Board Meetings. This means that they are responsible for sending video from the meeting room to the Toronto Transit Commission's YouTube channel. In addition, the Broadcast Team provides audio-visual support during the meeting through managing microphones and switching video feeds, for example.
The Toronto Transit Commission has received video recordings from the Broadcast Team previously, however, our understanding is that they do not have a video record of the February 22 meeting. We are unclear of the reason why.
I am requesting answers to the following questions:
1. What are the City’s Broadcast Team’s current procedures regarding the recording and archiving of recordings for boards and committees which they provide live webcasting services for?
2. Why does the City’s Broadcast Team not have a video record of the Toronto Transit Commission Board meeting that took place on February 22, 2024?
3. What steps, if any, were taken to recover the recording?
4. What steps are being taken to prevent a future recurrence of this issue?
Furthermore, the Ontario Municipal Act, 2001, states:
“record” means information however recorded or stored, whether in printed form, on film, by electronic means or otherwise, and includes documents, financial statements, minutes, accounts, correspondence, memoranda, plans, maps, drawings, photographs and films;
Section 254 (1) states:
A municipality shall retain and preserve the records of the municipality and its local boards in a secure and accessible manner and, if a local board is a local board of more than one municipality, the affected municipalities are jointly responsible for complying with this subsection. 2001, c. 25, s. 254 (1).
Municipal Code Chapter 219, Records, Corporate (Local Boards), Schedule D, Toronto Transit Commission, Records Retention Schedule states:
GV-005 - Council and Committee Proceedings
Records relating to the meetings, duties, and functions of the City Council, including its standing committee, subcommittees, and taskforces; community councils and their committees
Therefore I am also seeking clarity as to our legal obligations under the Act:
5. Does not having this video record contravene the Municipal Act, 2001, and/or Municipal Code Chapter 219?
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-245801.pdf
(June 24, 2024) Answer from the City Manager Regarding Missing Video Archive of the February 22, 2024 TTC Board Meeting (IA19.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-247114.pdf
IA19.2 - 9-1-1 Call Wait Times
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Under Council's Procedures, City Council can receive or refer an Administrative Inquiry.
Origin
Summary
Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, Ward 25, Scarborough-Rouge Park, has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry:
I am submitting this Administrative Inquiry under Municipal Code S27-7.11 for the June 26, 2024 meeting of City Council.
The Communications Services Unit of the Toronto Police Service operates the call centre where operators answer all emergency 9-1-1 calls, including those for fire and paramedic services, and dispatch police services when needed.
In recent months, some residents have contacted my office to express concern over the wait times they have experienced when calling 9-1-1.
When someone calls 9-1-1 it’s an emergency. The timeliness of the call being answered is critical so that the appropriate emergency response can be dispatched quickly.
I am requesting answers to the following questions:
1. What is the service level standard for answering 9-1-1 calls?
2. Since June 1, 2023
a. What was the monthly average wait time for 9-1-1 calls before being answered?
b. What percentage of 9-1-1 calls answered each month met the service standard?
c. What percentage of days per month was the standard met?
d. What was the longest wait time each month?
3. What factors impact the call centre’s ability to meet the service level standard?
4. What impacts do the answers provided to question 2 have on the ability of emergency services to provide a timely response?
5. Do wait times vary throughout the day? If so, please provide a brief overview of how the wait times generally fluctuate over a 24-hour period.
6. Were new resources allocated to the call centre in the 2024 City of Toronto budget?
7. Are there any planned improvements for the call centre that are anticipated to have a positive impact on wait times, for example, additional resources or new technology?
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-246607.pdf
(June 25, 2024) Answer from the City Manager Regarding 9-1-1 Call Wait Times (IA19.2a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-247153.pdf
Attachment 1: Administrative Inquiry 9-1-1 Wait Times, Briefing Note
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-247157.pdf
IA19.3 - Removal of City Symbols
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Under Council's Procedures, City Council can receive or refer an Administrative Inquiry.
Origin
Summary
Councillor Stephen Holyday, Ward 2, Etobicoke Centre, has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry:
I am submitting this Administrative Inquiry under Municipal Code S27-7.11 for the June 26, 2024 meeting of City Council. On May 26, 2024, and June 2, 2024, journalist Justin Holmes published two Toronto Sun stories outlining a series of activities that happened within the Toronto Public Service that ultimately led to the removal of historical Coats of Arms from public display.
These articles may be found online here:
The articles prompt a number of questions which I would like answered:
What City symbols, including Coats of Arms, flags, monuments and art have been removed?
Who made the decision to remove them?
Why were they removed?
Were they the subject of a complaint, and if so, what was the complaint, when was the
complaint, and where did it come from?
Are there any more symbols, including Coats of Arms, flags, monuments and art expected to be removed? If so, what is under consideration and why?
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-246683.pdf
(June 25, 2024) Answer from the City Manager Regarding Removal of City Symbols (IA19.3a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-247184.pdf
Deferred Items - Meeting 19
EC10.1 - Jane Finch Community Development Plan 2024-2034
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 6 - York Centre, 7 - Humber River - Black Creek
Committee Recommendations
The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request that the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture work with City Planning, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, Toronto Children’s Services, Transportation Services, Toronto Employment and Social Services, Environment and Climate, Housing Secretariat and other relevant City divisions to form an interdivisional team to ensure ongoing collaboration, for the implementation of the Jane Finch Community Development Plan, listed as Appendix A - Jane Finch Community Development Plan Vision & Actions, to the report (February 5, 2024) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture.
2. City Council request that the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and other relevant City divisions, in partnership with community groups, organizations, local businesses, institutions, foundations and other private sector partners, implement and monitor the Jane Finch Community Development Plan, beginning with the following key implementation actions for year one of a 10-year plan:
a. Form a Community Partnership Circle, including a Resident Leadership Circle, that includes residents, businesses, and other community partners to ensure continual engagement, skill development and collaboration for the implementation of the Community Development Plan.
b. Design and implement an Engagement and Communication Strategy working with the members of the Resident Leadership Circle to ensure ongoing resident participation and engagement throughout the implementation of the Community Development Plan.
c. Develop a Community Impact Table in collaboration with foundations, funders, City divisions, business partners and other institutional partners to support the resourcing of actions identified in the Community Development Plan.
3. City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to work with Jane Finch community partners and groups to design and implement a Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for the ongoing monitoring of the Community Development Plan actions and to provide regular reports to the Jane Finch Community.
4. City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report through the 2025 Budget Process on the resources, staff and program operations required to ensure ongoing engagement and capacity-building of residents, with a priority focus on Indigenous, Black and equity-deserving groups and inclusive of grassroots groups, youth groups, community organizations and local businesses in Jane Finch throughout the lifetime of the Jane Finch Community Development Plan.
Origin
Summary
The opening of the Finch West Light Rail Transit line stands to bring intensive and long-term change to the Jane Finch Area. Jane Finch is an area shaped by a history of underinvestment but also a history of community organizing and action responding to community needs. Growing evidence suggests that without focused investments in Reconciliation, equity and systems-wide strategies and supports, neighbourhoods with a history of underinvestment can experience increased levels of disruption and harm as a result of increased development pressure. For new investments to positively impact existing and new Jane Finch residents, holistic supports and policy frameworks must be put in place that reflect the diverse visions of Jane Finch residents, grassroots groups, local organizations, artists, and local businesses. New policies, programs and partnerships must focus where the need is greatest and address the inequities that shape the lives of residents, with priority given to Indigenous, Black, and equity-deserving groups in Jane Finch.
The purpose of this report is to present a proposed Jane Finch Community Development Plan, and to outline the interdivisional and community-led Jane Finch Initiative process that led to the proposed plan. The report also lays out immediate and longer-term next steps to implement the plan.
The Jane Finch Community Development Plan 2024-2034 is a resident-informed plan for the future of the Jane Finch Area led by Social Development, Finance and Administration and Economic Development and Culture. The Community Development Plan is a 25-year plan and commitment to Jane Finch that will be renewed every 10 years with the first 10 years beginning in 2024 and ending in 2034. The Jane Finch Community Development Plan accompanies the Jane Finch Secondary Plan – both aim to ensure that residents, local groups, organizations and businesses are supported as the area changes over time, including with the opening of the Finch West Light Rail Transit. To this end, the Jane Finch Community Development Plan sets out a 10-year community support and resourcing framework.
While the Secondary Plan will provide consistent land use and urban design guidelines for new development, the Community Development Plan is focused on social, economic, and cultural themes. Actions to support Jane Finch communities under these themes will continue to evolve through ongoing partnerships and discussions between multiple parties including the City of Toronto, residents, community organizations and local institutions.
The focus and content of the Community Development Plan are the result of a 2-year partner-led engagement process and intensive collaboration between participating City divisions and the Jane/Finch Centre. Through the engagement process, the Jane Finch Community Development Plan has identified the following eight action areas:
- Access to Space and Mobility
- Food Justice and Sovereignty
- Community Safety and Wellbeing
- Climate Action
- Arts, Culture and Heritage
- Inclusive Employment Opportunities
- Inclusive Entrepreneurship Opportunities
- Anti-Displacement Strategy
The Community Development Plan will advance actions across the eight action areas. The actions will be guided by principles that reflect the City of Toronto's commitments to Indigenous, Black and equity-deserving groups and vulnerable populations through the City's Reconciliation Action Plan, Action Plan to Confront Anti-Black Racism and broader equity-driven strategies, initiatives and programs.
In the process of developing the Jane Finch Community Development Plan, the City has established a strong interdivisional collaboration and community partnership approach to advance both the Jane Finch Community Development Plan and Secondary Plan. The lessons learned through the engagement and development process and through interdivisional collaboration will continue to inform ongoing monitoring and implementation.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-242910.pdf
Appendix A: Jane Finch Community Development Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-242911.pdf
Appendix B: What is a Community Development Plan?
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-242912.pdf
Appendix C: Jane Finch Centre Phase 2 and Phase 3 Engagement Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-242913.pdf
Appendix D: Jane Finch Initiative Indigenous Engagement Summary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-242914.pdf
Speakers
Councillor Anthony Perruzza
IE13.4 - Revised Free-Floating Car-Share Program
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Public Notice Given
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the amendments to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925 Permit Parking, and City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, to allow for an expanded free-floating car-share program outside of permit parking areas / streets, generally as outlined in Attachment 1 to the report (April 18, 2024) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills to give effect to City Council's decision and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make any necessary clarifications, refinements, minor modifications, technical amendments, or by-law amendments as may be identified by the City Solicitor, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services in order to give effect to Recommendation 1 above.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's approval to allow for the expansion of the Free-Floating Car Share Program through several Municipal Code amendments. These changes include exemptions from, the city-wide 3-hour unsigned parking rule, restricted parking prohibitions on highways with maximum permitted limits of one (1) hour or more, and from parking prohibitions, in the former North York, from 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., from December 1 of one year to March 31 of the next following year on highways set out in Schedule IV to City of Toronto Municipal code Chapter 950. In addition, the report also seeks to remove the limits for the number of permits issued to one company (currently set at 1,000 permits on a first-come-first-serve basis) and the total number of permits that can be issued city-wide (currently limited to 2,000).
Given that the primary focus of the existing program is to allow parking in permit parking areas, should City Council approve Municipal Code amendments associated with these exemptions, the Free-Floating Car-Share program will become more accessible to those residents living in neighbourhoods located in the former Scarborough, North York and Etobicoke-York areas of the city, which are outside permit parking areas.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245116.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245117.pdf
Speakers
Kevin Rupasinghe
Communications (Committee)
(May 1, 2024) E-mail from Juzer Kheraluwala (IE.Supp)
(May 2, 2024) E-mail from Debbie Green (IE.Supp)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-179887.pdf
(May 15, 2024) E-mail from Iain Campbell (CC.Supp)
(May 17, 2024) E-mail from Mark Shaw (CC.Supp)
(May 17, 2024) E-mail from Anna Alger (CC.Supp)
(May 17, 2024) E-mail from Paul Genyk-Berezowsky (CC.Supp)
(May 18, 2024) E-mail from Hailey Scott (CC.Supp)
(May 18, 2024) E-mail from Andrew McCallum (CC.Supp)
(May 21, 2024) E-mail from Juzer Kheraluwala (CC.New)
PH8.5 - City-Initiated Zoning By-law Amendments to Implement Ontario Line - Final Report - Further Consideration of Various Properties
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 14 - Toronto - Danforth, 15 - Don Valley West, 16 - Don Valley East
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee forwards the item to City Council without recommendations.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Planning and Housing Committee held a statutory public meeting that began on October 26, 2023 and continued on November 30, 2023, and notice was given in accordance to the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
City Council, at its meeting on November 8 and 9, 2023, referred the draft Zoning By-law Amendments in Attachment 1 to the report (September 13, 2023) from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Executive Director, Transit Expansion Office, as they relate to the following properties, to the Planning and Housing Committee for further consideration at its meeting of November 30, 2023:
891, 885 and 897 Pape Avenue;
1012-1052 Pape Avenue;
240 and 242 First Avenue;
495 and 497 Pape Avenue;
716 Pape Avenue;
676-692 Danforth Avenue;
5-11 Gertrude Place;
1, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13 Lipton Avenue;
855 Gerrard Street East;
15 and 17 Minton Place and 156 and 158 Hopedale Avenue; and
449 Carlaw Avenue.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2023/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-240997.pdf
(September 13, 2023) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and Executive Director, Transit Expansion Division on City-Initiated Zoning By-law Amendments to Implement Ontario Line - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2023/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-241022.pdf
Attachment 1: Draft Amendments to City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2023/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-241023.pdf
Attachment 2: Draft Amendments to former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2023/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-241024.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Amendments to former City of North York By-law 7625
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2023/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-241025.pdf
(October 5, 2023) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2023/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-241026.pdf
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-179883.pdf
NY11.24 - Don Mills Road (The Donway in the north to The Donway in the south) - Community Safety Zone
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 16 - Don Valley East
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council designate a Community Safety Zone in effect at all times, on both sides of Don Mills Road between The Donway West / The Donway East (south intersection) and The Donway West / The Donway East (north intersection).
Origin
Summary
Don Mills Road is a divided arterial road with three lanes of traffic each way from Steeles Avenue in the north to the Don Valley Parkway in the south. I have heard from many concerned residents about speeding on Don Mills Road around the intersection of Lawrence Avenue East. Specifically from the Donway in the north to The Donway in the south. (The Donway is a ring road that circles Don Mills Road). There is a desire to reduce vehicle operating speeds and improve pedestrian safety.
Reasons for implementing a community safety zone in this area include:
- Its proximity to several schools including Norman Ingram and Greenland Public schools, the Overland Learning Centre, Don Mills Middle School and Don Mills Collegiate
- Its close proximity to several seniors' residences including the Revera located on Don Mills Road in the proposed zone, Greenview Living and Thompson House. Many of the condominiums located along Don Mills Road are also inhabited by seniors who need extra time to cross the street;
- The presence of the Shops at Don Mills which is a major retail location that produces increased traffic and pedestrian activity;
- The intersection of several Toronto Transit Commission bus lines at Lawrence Avenue East and Don Mills Road that will be expanded with the arrival of the Crosstown further south;
- The inability of Toronto Police to provide sufficient traffic enforcement as there is not the public space available to safely set up equipment or stop people.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-242873.pdf
TE13.2 - 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (April 19, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (April 19, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. City Council direct that the owner shall provide and maintain 12 replacement rental dwelling rooms on the site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling room is first occupied and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement; the replacement rental dwelling rooms shall collectively have a total gross floor area of at least 400 square metres as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to the City Planning Division dated January 10, 2024; and any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
5. City Council direct that the owner shall, as part of the 12 replacement rental dwelling rooms required in Recommendation 4 above, provide at least four (4) dwelling rooms at affordable tier-one dwelling room rents, three (3) dwelling rooms at mid-affordable tier-two dwelling room rents, and five (5) dwelling rooms at mid-range tier-one dwelling room rents, as currently defined in the City's Official Plan, all for a period of at least 15 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit.
6. City Council direct that the owner shall provide an acceptable Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan for all Eligible Tenants of the 13 existing rental dwelling rooms proposed to be demolished at 76 Henry Street, addressing the right to return to occupy one of the replacement rental dwelling rooms or rental studio unit at similar rents, the provision of rent gap assistance, and other assistance to lessen hardship; the Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan shall be developed in consultation with, and to the satisfaction of, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
7. City Council direct that the owner shall provide an acceptable Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan for tenants of the existing one (1) rental dwelling unit at 193 College Street, addressing financial compensation and other assistance to lessen hardship; the Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
8. City Council direct that the owner shall provide a minimum residential gross floor area of 10,500 square metres towards affordable dwelling units at 100 percent average market rent for the same unit type in the City of Toronto as reported by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation in its most recent annual Rental Market Report, for a minimum of 40 years, currently proposed as 408 affordable dwelling units.
9. City Council authorize the affordable rental units as described in the Table below, to be eligible for waivers of fees for planning application, building permit, parkland dedication and development charges exemptions, unless already paid or exempted by provincial legislation:
Affordable Rental Units |
Estimated Affordability Period |
Estimated Development Charges (1) |
Estimated Building Permit Fee and Charges (2) |
Estimated Total Value of Incentives before Property Taxes (3) |
Estimated Net Present Value of Property Taxes |
408 |
40 years |
$11,007,024 |
$6,507,649 |
$17,514,673
|
$10,165,277
|
10. City Council authorize an exemption from taxation for municipal and school purposes under the terms of the Open Door Affordable Rental Housing Program for the affordable rental units and for the periods of time described in the Table in Recommendation 9 above.
11. City Council authorize the Controller to cancel or refund any taxes paid after the effective date of the exemption from taxation for municipal and school purposes as set out in the applicable Municipal Housing Facility Agreement (the City's Contribution Agreement).
12. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to negotiate and execute, on behalf of the City, a Municipal Housing Facility Agreement (the City's Contribution Agreement), or amendments to existing Contribution Agreements, where applicable, with the appropriate legal entities for the development listed in the Table in Recommendation 9 above, or related entities, to secure the financial assistance and to set out the terms of the development and operation of the new affordable rental housing, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.
13. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, on behalf of the City, to execute any security or financing documents, or any other documents required to facilitate the development, including any documents required by the developers of the development described in the Table in Recommendation 9 above, or their related corporations, to complete pre-development activities, construction and secure conventional financing, where required, including any postponement, confirmation of status, discharge or consent documents where and when required during the term of the Municipal Housing Facility Agreement, as required by normal business practices, and provided that such documents do not give rise to financial obligations on the part of the City that have not been previously approved by City Council.
14. City Council direct the City Solicitor to withhold the necessary Bills for enactment, until the owner has, at its sole cost and expense:
a. entered into a Dwelling Room Replacement and Tenant Relocation Agreement with the owner, pursuant to Policies 3.2.1.11 and 3.2.1.12 of the City’s Official Plan, to secure the owner’s obligation to replace the existing dwelling room gross floor area and provide tenant relocation and assistance to lessen hardship for existing tenants of the 13 existing rental dwelling rooms described in Recommendation 6 above, and of the one (1) existing rental dwelling unit described in Recommendation 7 above, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor;
b. registered on title to the site, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, agreeing not to transfer or charge those parts of the lands, comprising the 12 replacement rental dwelling rooms, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or designate, to assist with securing the Dwelling Room Replacement and Tenant Relocation Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of the lands until such time as the City Solicitor determines that its registration on title is no longer required to secure the provisions of the Dwelling Room Replacement and Tenant Relocation Agreement;
c. entered into one or more agreement(s) with the City, to secure the Affordable Rental Housing Units on the terms set out in Attachment 7 to the report (April 19, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor and registered on title to the site, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, agreeing not to transfer or charge those parts of the lands, comprising the minimum residential gross floor area of 10,500 square metres towards the affordable dwelling units, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or designate, to assist with securing the Affordable Rental Housing Units against future owners and encumbrances of the lands until such time as the City Solicitor determines that its registration on title is no longer required;
d. entered into a Municipal Housing Project Facilities Agreement (the "Contribution Agreement") with Housing Secretariat to ensure the financial assistance being provided and set out the terms of the operation of the Affordable Housing Units, on terms and conditions acceptable to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor;
e. prepared and submitted a revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report for review and acceptance to demonstrate that the storm sewer system and any required improvements to it, has adequate capacity to accommodate the development of the lands to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;
f. where improvements to the storm sewer system are recommended in the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report as accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, the owner has entered into a financially secured agreement with the City to secure the construction of the required improvements;
g. entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street, substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated August 11, 2023, prepared by Icon and ERA Architects, and the Heritage Impact Assessment, dated August 15, 2023, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., all on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; and
h. provided a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment dated August 15, 2023, prepared by ERA Architects Inc. for the properties at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street, subject to modifications to the design proposed in the Heritage Impact Assessment of the barrier-free entrances for the properties at 191-199 College Street to enhance the conservation response to the heritage attributes, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
15. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to secure the following as part of the site plan agreement, as per the applicant’s written commitment in their letter of May 7, 2024:
a. a low-carbon energy strategy that includes at least the following sustainability measures:
i. a highly energy-efficient building envelope;
ii. no on-site combustion of fossil fuels in appliances;
iii. an air and/or ground source heat pump system as the exclusive or, if necessary, primary (> 85 percent) source of heating and cooling for the building;
iv. at least 100 points for energy efficiency in Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s MLI Select Program;
v. ample electrical outlets for bicycle charging in the interior bicycle parking area;
vi. accommodation for future solar photovoltaic system; and
vii. if the applicant is willing, cross-laminated timber construction;
b. delivery access to the building only from the rear laneway, not from Henry Street or College Street;
c. retail spaces suitable for the return of the existing commercial tenants;
d an outdoor, publicly accessible source of drinking water;
e. outdoor public seating, to be located within or adjacent to the public right-of-way for public use, in consultation with Transportation Services; and
f. retaining the existing by-law-protected street trees on College Street and Henry Street, if recommended by Urban Forestry.
16. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 191-199 College Street from Permit Parking.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 7, 2024 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a new 31-storey (96-metre including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building at 191-199 College Street and partially retain the 3-storey semi-detached dwellings at 74 and 76 Henry Street which will contain 12 replacement dwelling rooms. The proposal currently consists of 490 dwelling units and 1,356 square metres of non-residential gross floor area.
This application is part of the Open Door Affordable Rental Housing Program and currently proposes to provide 408 affordable dwelling units (all studio units) or the equivalent of that floor area which amounts to 10,500 square metres.
The properties at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street are designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. The principal elevations of 191-199 College Street, and 74-76 Henry Street will be retained and integrated within the new development.
The Official Plan Amendment redesignates the southern portion of the site from Neighbourhoods to Mixed Use Areas, revises the boundary of Site and Area Policy (SASP) 533 to include 74 and 76 Henry Street, permits the proposed height within Character Area F in SASP 533, provides a minimum residential gross floor area of 10,500 square metres for affordable rental dwelling units for a period of 40 years, and establishes site specific policies for rental dwelling room replacement for a period of 20 years.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-245162.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-245436.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-245180.pdf
Speakers
Brandon Simon, The Planning Partnership
Paul Burke
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-179280.pdf
(May 4, 2024) E-mail from George Traini on behalf of the Baldwin Village Community Association (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-179300.pdf
(May 7, 2024) Letter from Letter from Thaddeus Sherlock, More Neighbours Toronto (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-179399.pdf
(May 7, 2024) Letter from Jackey Chen, Unix Development (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-179441.pdf
TE13.13 - 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street - Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage properties at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street, in accordance with Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a new 31-storey tower on the lands known municipally as 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated August 11, 2023, prepared by Icon Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and the Heritage Impact Assessment, dated August 15, 2023, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., all on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, and all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and subject to the following additional conditions:
a. the related Zoning By-law Amendment permitting the proposed alterations has been enacted by City Council and has come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
b. prior to the introduction of the Bills for such Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall:
1. enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street, substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated August 11, 2023, prepared by Icon and ERA Architects, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and the Heritage Impact Assessment, dated August 15, 2023, prepared by ERA Architects Inc., all on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.2. below, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; and
2. provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment dated August 15, 2023, prepared by ERA Architects Inc for the properties at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street, subject to modifications to the design proposed in the Heritage Impact Assessment of the barrier-free entrances for the properties at 191-199 College Street to enhance the conservation response to the heritage attributes, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
c. prior to Site Plan approval for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment for the properties at located at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street, the subject owner shall:
1. provide final Site Plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plans required in Recommendation 1.b.2. above, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
2. have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect;
3. provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describe how the exterior of the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance their heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such a plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
4. provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject properties, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
5. submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
6. provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject properties, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
d. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building, as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall:
1. have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject properties, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect;
2. have entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City of Toronto required in Recommendation 1.b.1. above, for properties at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street, including registration on title of such Agreement, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;
3. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plans required in Recommendation 1.b.2. above, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
4. provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation, Lighting and Interpretation plans; and
e. prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.d.4. above, the owner shall:
1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation and Interpretation Plans and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
2. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
2. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in City Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the properties at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the heritage properties at 191-199 College Street and 74-76 Henry Street which are designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The subject properties are located on the southwest corner of College and Henry streets and comprise part of a collection of surviving representative examples of late 19th-century semi-detached house form buildings with detailing from the Victorian period. They support and maintain the historical character of College Street and the residential neighbourhood that developed on the south side of the street across from the University of Toronto campus, as well as the transition that occurred as College Street evolved into the present-day commercial thoroughfare.
In May and August 2022, the City received Official Plan Amendment, Site Plan Control and Zoning By-law Amendment applications related to the proposed redevelopment of the subject properties to permit a 31-storey mixed-use building atop a seven-storey podium, containing 492 new rental dwelling units (including 408 new affordable units) and 1,356 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. The proposal includes partial retention and restoration of the subject properties in-situ.
The proposed development is consistent with the existing policy framework and proposes an overall conservation strategy that conserves the heritage resources at the subject development site.
The owner has submitted an application to alter the designated heritage properties under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and this report recommends the application be approved subject to refinements to the alterations of the lower floors.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-244773.pdf
Other Deferred Matter - Meeting 19
DM19.1 - 5051-5061 Yonge Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 18 - Willowdale
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
On December 14, 2020, the City received Zoning By-law and Official Plan Amendment applications for 5051-5061 Yonge Street (the "Site") to permit the construction of a 42 storey (135 metres excluding mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building with non-residential uses on the first 6 storeys, and residential uses above, with a total of 350 units. On October 26, 2022 a revised application was submitted proposing a 39 storey (126 metres excluding mechanical penthouse) mixed use building with non-residential uses on the first two storeys, and residential uses above with a total of 365 units.
The applicant appealed City Council's neglect or failure to make a decision on its application for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments (the "Appeal"), to the Ontario Land Tribunal on January 18, 2023. A ten-day Ontario Land Tribunal hearing was scheduled to commence on May 15, 2024, but was adjourned by the applicant so that further direction could be sought from City Council. This matter is urgent and should not be deferred.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/dm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246177.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information
Executive Committee - Meeting 15
EX15.1 - East Harbour Transit Oriented Communities Proposal: Conclusion of Negotiations and Draft Plan of Subdivision, and Approach to Next Stage
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the City Solicitor, to conclude negotiations and enter into and execute a site-specific Transit Oriented Communities Agreement with the Province of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Infrastructure and the Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation, including provisions relating to the transfer of funding provided by Cadillac Fairview and the Province for the construction of new City infrastructure and coordination of infrastructure projects in the area, based on the terms outlined in Attachment 2 to the report (June 4, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Manager, on condition that the Contribution Agreement between the Province and Cadillac Fairview (the "Owner) is amended as necessary to ensure consistency with the terms of site-specific Transit Oriented Communities Agreement and that the Transit Services/Operating Agreement has been entered into between Metrolinx and Cadillac Fairview, and to enter into any such ancillary or related agreements, amendments, extensions and renewals as may be necessary, on such terms and conditions as are satisfactory to the City Manager, in consultation with the above named City officials, all in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and the City Solicitor, to conclude negotiations and execute Project Delivery Agreements with Waterfront Toronto, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, for the full implementation of the Preferred Design of the Broadview Eastern Flood Protection project Environmental Assessment, including completion of design and construction, subject to City Council budget approvals.
3. City Council authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the General Manager, Children's Services and the City Solicitor, to conclude negotiations, enter into and execute a Development Agreement with Cadillac Fairview and the Province of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Infrastructure and the Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation to secure among other matters two childcare centres and a community recreation centre, based on the terms outlined in Attachment 3 to the report (June 4, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Manager and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
4. City Council authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, to conclude negotiations, enter into and execute an Affordable Housing Agreement with Cadillac Fairview and its related nominees/corporations and the Province of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Infrastructure and the Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation based on the terms outlined in Attachment 4 to the report (June 4, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Manager and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor and to enter into and execute any ancillary and related site-specific affordable housing agreements in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer all in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, but only provided that the aforementioned agreements are able to be registered on title and binding on successor owners, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
5. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the City Solicitor, to execute any security or financing documents as they relate to the Affordable Housing Agreement with Cadillac Fairview and its related nominees/corporations and the Province of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Infrastructure and the Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation and any site-specific affordable housing agreement, or any other documents required to facilitate the affordable housing development and related activities, construction and secure conventional financing, where required, including any postponement, confirmation of status, discharge or consent documents where and when required during the term of the applicable affordable housing agreement, as required by normal business practices, and provided that such documents do not give rise to financial obligations on the part of the City that have not been previously approved by City Council, all in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, but only provided that the aforementioned agreements are able to be registered on title and binding on successor owners, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
6. In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or delegate intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision as generally illustrated in Attachment 6d to the report (June 4, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services subject to:
a. the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 6e to the report (June 4, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services which, except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to final approval and the release of the Plan of Subdivision for registration; and
b. any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.
7. Notwithstanding Chapter 415-28 of the Municipal Code, City Council authorize the conveyance of Phase 2 parkland, being Block 11 on the Draft Plan of Subdivision shown on Attachment 6d to the report (June 4, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services to occur prior to issuance of the final building permit for any building within Phase 2 of the Plan of Subdivision.
8. Notwithstanding Section 415-26B of the Municipal Code, City Council authorize the conveyance of Block 26 on the Draft Plan of Subdivision containing infrastructure to service Block 11 on the Draft Plan of Subdivision, as shown on Attachment 6d to the report (June 4, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.
9. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into a limiting distance agreement, if necessary, with the Owner of the lands to address the relationship between the future development on Block 4 and Block 26 of the Draft Plan of Subdivision as shown on Attachment 6d to the report (June 4, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and determine that the facilitation of appropriate municipal servicing and associated land ownership be due consideration, all to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the City Solicitor.
10. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to accept the conveyance of the East Harbour Flood Protection Landform and Buffer Zone, including the portion of Street East that traverses the East Harbour Flood Protection Landform, on terms acceptable to the General Manager, Transportation Services, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in consultation with the City Solicitor, which may include a restrictive covenant in favour of the Toronto Region Conservation Authority or other form of encumbrance with the purpose of protecting the structural integrity of the flood protection landform.
11. City Council approve development charge credits or exemptions for the proposed development at East Harbour as follows:
a. a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the Owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the Owner for the design and construction of the Above Base Park Improvements as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Parks and the Recreation component of development charges for Phases 2 and 3 respectively, payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time;
b. a Development Charge credit against the Storm Water Management component of the Development Charges applicable to the development, for the design and construction by the Owner of the eligible upsizing of stormwater infrastructure to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the eligible cost to the Owner of the eligible upsizing the stormwater infrastructure and the Storm Water Management component of the development charges payable for the development as approved by the General Manager, Toronto Water, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in accordance with the City’s Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time, to a maximum of $3.3 million;
c. a Development Charge credit against the Sanitary Sewer component of the Development Charges applicable to the development, for the design and construction by the Owner of the eligible upsizing of sanitary infrastructure to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the eligible cost to the Owner of the eligible upsizing the sanitary infrastructure and the Sanitary Sewer component of the development charges payable for the development as approved by the General Manager, Toronto Water in accordance with the City’s Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time, to a maximum of $1.4 million;
d. a Development Charge credit against the Transit Component of the development charge for the design and construction by the Owner of the eligible Toronto Transit Commission base infrastructure within the Broadview Avenue Extension right of way to the satisfaction of the Toronto Transit Commission but only as necessary to address costs incurred by the Owner in excess of $5 million in relation to this work; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the eligible cost to the Owner of constructing the transit base infrastructure within the Broadview Avenue Extension right of way that is above $5 million, as approved by the Toronto Transit Commission and the Transit component of the development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City’s Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time; and
e. a Development Charge exemption for the Community Recreation Centre and the portions of any building containing a Child Care Facility or alternate community use.
12. City Council authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor, to enter into and execute appropriate agreements to secure the development charge credits or exemptions as identified in Recommendations 11.a. to e. above, in appropriate agreements.
13. City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services to negotiate and enter into an agreement between the City and the Owner to reimburse the Owner for the eligible design and construction costs to a value of $10 million for the East Harbour Flood Protection Landform, as approved by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Director, Waterfront Secretariat, and upon acceptance by the City, the reimbursement will be funded through a development charge credit against the East Harbour Port Lands Flood Protection and/or a development charge credit against the Storm Water Management component of the Development Charge payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time and/or through the approved budget for Broadview Eastern Flood Protection.
14. City Council accept deviations from the City’s Policy for Accepting Potentially Contaminated Lands to be Conveyed to the City under the Planning Act (2015) for the East Harbour lands being 21 Don Valley Parkway, 30 Booth Avenue and 375 and 385 Eastern Avenue, as set out below:
a. exempt the conveyance of lands comprising the future widening of the Don Roadway, being Block 13 on the Draft Plan of Subdivision shown on Attachment 6d to the report (June 4, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services, from the Policy for Accepting Potentially Contaminated Lands to be Conveyed to the City under the Planning Act (2015), or as may be amended, and authorize City staff accept the conveyance of such lands in its current physical condition;
b. exempt the conveyance of lands for future parks (Blocks 10, 11 and 26) and the East Harbour Flood Protection Landform (Blocks 15 and 25) as shown on the Draft Plan of Subdivision in Attachment 6d to the report (June 4, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services from the application of Sections 5.1.2, 5.4.3, and 5.4.5 of the Policy for Accepting Potentially Contaminated Lands to be Conveyed to the City under the Planning Act (2015), or as may be amended, and any other sections that may be required to implement the conditions of draft plan approval, and authorize City staff to accept the conveyance of such lands that may be subject to Risk Management Measures that require ongoing monitoring of groundwater by the City and/or vapour mitigation during construction, following conveyance for such lands; and
c. exempt the conveyance of lands for future public roads as shown on the Draft Plan of Subdivision in Attachment 6d to the report (June 4, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services from the application of Sections 5.1.2, 5.4.3, and 5.4.5 of the Policy for Accepting Potentially Contaminated Lands to be Conveyed to the City under the Planning Act (2015), or as may be amended, and any other sections that may be required to implement the conditions of draft plan approval, and authorize City staff to accept the conveyance of such lands that may be subject to Risk Management Measures that require ongoing monitoring of groundwater by the City and/or vapour mitigation during construction, following conveyance for such lands.
15. City Council authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the City Solicitor, to conclude negotiations, enter and execute a Toronto Transit Commission Infrastructure Agreement with the Owner and the Toronto Transit Commission to secure the construction by the Owner of base transit right of way improvements within Broadview Avenue between the rail corridor and Lake Shore Boulevard East on such terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Manager and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
16. If the Committee of Adjustment approves minor variances as described in the Implementing Agreements Section of the report (June 4, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Amended and Restated Section 37 Agreement, pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act (as it read the day before the date Section 1 of Schedule 17 of the COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act, 2020, came into force), to amend the existing Section 37 Agreement registered on title to the lands to implement the Committee’s decision, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
17. City Council request the Toronto Port Lands Company Board of Directors to authorize any agency approvals necessary to enable the delivery and, once completed, the conveyance to the City of Broadview Avenue from the East Harbour lands to Lakeshore Boulevard East on Toronto Port Lands Company lands.
18. City Council direct staff to request that CreateTO, acting on behalf of Toronto Port Lands Company, negotiate and enter into a licence agreement for construction access and laydown with Cadillac Fairview Corporation Limited over portions of Toronto Port Lands Company lands, being described in PIN 21077-0147, located south of the Transit Oriented Community lands, which are necessary to enable delivery of the Transit Oriented Community development and improvements described in the report (June 4, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services.
19. City Council delegate to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management the authority to approve, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services, all necessary transactions required to effect the acquisition, and lease or licence if required, by the City of Toronto from the Toronto Port Lands Company of lands required to effect the extension of Broadview Avenue and such other road allowance extensions, as may be required, from the Transit Oriented Community lands to Lake Shore Boulevard East, at nominal consideration, upon the satisfaction of all requirements imposed upon the Owner in respect of same, and that such authority include the negotiation and execution of all agreements and documents as may be reasonably required to give effect thereto the terms of which shall be consistent with the intent set out herein and the financial parameters determined and approved by City Council.
20. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into a limiting distance agreement, if necessary, with the Owner of the lands, to address the relationship between the 4C Building and the new City-owned Community Recreation Centre only and determine that a commensurate portion of the value of the Community Recreation Centre being constructed by the Owner to be due consideration.
21. City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Development and Growth Services and the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services to engage in discussions with the Province and Cadillac Fairview related to Cadillac Fairview's request for further changes to land use permissions at East Harbour, based on the following initial conditions:
a. the provision of 20 percent of all new housing units as affordable housing for a term of 99 years and depending on the density increase in the area and on the same terms as the affordable housing provided for the first part of the East Harbour Transit Oriented Community;
b. the provision of additional community benefits at a rate of up to 10 percent on the value of new development;
c. a firm commitment to the protection of employment development at East Harbour, the phasing of employment development to coincide with residential development, and a specific approach to develop the film sector at East Harbour; and
d. a commitment to fully integrate the Toronto Port Lands Company owned Keating Lands into the revised East Harbour master plan and to acquire the lands to support important benefits, including an increase in affordable housing and expanding the Community Recreation Centre.
22. City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Development and Growth Services and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report back to City Council on the results of the discussions with the Province and Cadillac Fairview and to seek appropriate negotiating authorities as required.
23. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Executive Committee held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2024 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report presents the outcome of negotiations with the Province and Cadillac Fairview related to the East Harbour Transit Oriented Community (TOC) development. In addition, the report seeks City Council approval to conclude a series of agreements based on the negotiated terms and advises Council of the Chief Planner's intention to issue Draft Plan of Subdivision approval subject to conditions (Draft Plan Conditions). The report also seeks City Council authority to continue discussions with the Province and Cadillac Fairview on an emerging proposal to adjust the current ratio of employment and residential permissions by increasing the amount of mixed use and residential development at East Harbour.
An essential element for the East Harbour TOC development is the East Harbour Transit Hub (the Transit Hub). The Transit Hub is a priority project for the City and the Province. Along with other major infrastructure investments in the area, the Transit Hub will be an economic catalyst creating opportunities for new employment and housing development in the broader area, as well as being essential for the East Harbour TOC development. City Council provided direction in April 2022 confirming City priorities for the East Harbour TOC, including the negotiated community benefits and affordable housing. Based on this direction, City staff have negotiated an overarching approach with the Province and Cadillac Fairview that effectively addresses City interests and requirements at East Harbour.
The East Harbour TOC development is based on terms outlined in a Contribution Agreement between the Province and Cadillac Fairview. The City is not a party to the Contribution Agreement and is restricted in its ability to negotiate given the key terms pre-determined by the Contribution Agreement. The Contribution Agreement establishes several Conditions Precedent (CPs) to be satisfied in order for Cadillac Fairview to release $300 million in cash and in-kind contributions to the City. The majority of the CPs relate to actions to be taken by the City, while certain other CPs relate to actions to be taken by the Provincial government and Metrolinx. Cash contributions will flow through the Province to the City according to the terms of the Contribution Agreement.
In April 2022, following City Council's approval of negotiating direction, the Province issued a Ministerial Zoning Order (MZO) to give effect to the TOC, granting Cadillac Fairview residential development permissions of 302,000 square metres (3.25 million square feet) at East Harbour. With the introduction of residential development at East Harbour, City staff have been guided by an overarching objective to create a liveable, functional mixed-use community, with appropriate supportive community services and facilities, parks and open space, affordable housing, and transportation and servicing infrastructure. Key objectives for City staff have been to ensure City interests are properly reflected in the terms of agreements with the Province and Cadillac Fairview, and to effectively manage financial and other risks to the City. This includes a focus on limiting the impact of the TOC development on the remaining employment lands on the site and in the vicinity as directed by City Council.
As noted above, this report outlines the terms of several key agreements required by the CPs and seeks City Council authority to conclude and execute the agreements:
-A Site-Specific TOC Agreement between the City and the Province to set out the CPs and the manner in which the CF funds will flow to the city, details respecting Provincial and City funding commitments for infrastructure works and governance terms for the delivery of the Broadview Eastern Flood Protection project and the Broadview Avenue extension;
-A Development Agreement between the City, Cadillac Fairview and the Province related to requirements for the delivery of in-kind contributions including a community centre and two childcare centres and other aspects of the TOC development;
-An Affordable Housing Agreement between the City and Cadillac Fairview establishing the key terms for the delivery of 215 affordable housing units for 99 years at East Harbour; and
-Amendments to the existing Section 37 Agreement to reflect changes in the location and timing of the delivery of certain benefits.
The report also outlines conditions related to the Draft Plan of Subdivision and a Pre-Servicing Agreement with Cadillac Fairview. These also relate to CPs identified in the Contribution Agreement.
The New Deal between the City and Province includes terms regarding two key infrastructure projects in East Harbour – the Broadview Avenue Extension north of the rail corridor to Eastern Avenue, and the Broadview Eastern Flood Protection project. The New Deal outlines commitments to funding for the delivery of these City infrastructure projects and provides direction relating to the design approach as well as roles and responsibilities of the City and the Province. This report provides more detail on an updated approach to implementing the Broadview Eastern Flood Protection project.
The outcomes of negotiations described in this report are based on Cadillac Fairview's existing East Harbour master plan. The master plan reflects 926,000 square metres (10 million square feet) of employment development approved by City Council in 2018 and the addition of 302,000 square metres (3.25 million square feet) of residential development approved through the Provincial MZO in 2022.
Cadillac Fairview's previous employment conversion request as part of the recent Municipal Comprehensive Review is being considered by Planning and Housing Committee in June 2024 to coincide with this broader East Harbour TOC report. That report recommends the maintenance of the employment lands at East Harbour, except for the particular sites where the MZO provides for residential development.
While Cadillac Fairview has confirmed their commitment to concluding these negotiations, in late May 2024, Cadillac Fairview informed the Province and the City that with market conditions related to the office development and the costs of financing the East Harbour development, it intends to pursue with the Province further changes to the employment lands to allow more mixed use and residential development.
The City has been clear throughout these TOC negotiations that any future change in the balance of residential and employment permissions on the East Harbour site will require additional affordable housing and other community benefits. This report seeks guidance for City staff discussions with the Province and Cadillac Fairview. City staff will report back to City Council with further information on the Cadillac Fairview proposal as it becomes available and will seek any required City Council direction.
Several initial City conditions are fundamental to this discussion and should be articulated to the Province and Cadillac Fairview as discussions begin. City staff recommend that City Council endorse several key conditions related to any changes to allow more residential development:
-Depending on the proposed density increase, City Council has set a target of 20% of all new housing units as affordable housing on the same 99 year affordability period as the affordable housing provided for the first part of the East Harbour TOC;
-The provision of additional community benefits at a rate of up to 10% on the new development, depending on what the market can bear
-A firm commitment to the protection of employment development, the phasing of employment development to coincide with residential development, and a specific approach to develop the film sector at East Harbour
-A commitment to fully integrate the Keating Lands into the revised East Harbour master plan and to acquire the lands to support important benefits, including an increase in affordable housing and expanding the Community Recreation Centre.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246494.pdf
Attachment 6E - Conditions of Draft Plan of Subdivision
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246496.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246497.pdf
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180731.pdf
EX15.2 - Priorities in Transit Expansion and Transit-Oriented Communities Projects
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and the Deputy City Manager, Development and Growth Services to strengthen internal coordination amongst City Divisions in order to maximize achievement of the priorities outlined in Attachment 2 to the report (June 4, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and the Deputy City Manager, Development and Growth Services in interactions with the Provincial government and its agencies in the delivery of all current and future transit expansion and transit-oriented community projects.
2. City Council request the Province to give the City authority to require community benefits up to a minimum value of 10 percent as part of all Transit Oriented Communities proposals in Toronto, distinct and separate from any affordable housing allocation, and that City staff prioritize essential social infrastructure for complete communities including, but not limited to, childcare facilities, community agency space, libraries and community recreation centres in all negotiations with the Province and its agencies.
3. City Council request that all the new housing in Transit Oriented Communities in Toronto align with Inclusionary Zoning targets with a goal of reaching twenty percent of all units as affordable and City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, to make affordable housing a key priority in all negotiations with the Province and its agencies.
4. City Council inform Metrolinx that the City will not execute any further transactions for City lands until such time that Metrolinx informs the City as to how they will mitigate construction impact to residential tenants and businesses.
5. City Council request Metrolinx to make available to City staff all property needed to support transit expansion projects, including City-owned properties and private properties so that the City can monitor the performance of Metrolinx plans to mitigate the impact of transit construction to residential tenants and businesses.
6. City Council request the Executive Director, Transit Expansion to establish a dedicated position to monitor the outcomes of Metrolinx’s approaches to address the impact for residential tenants and businesses during the construction of transit projects.
7. City Council forward the Item to the Toronto Transit Commission, Waterfront Toronto, the Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Ontario Ministry of Infrastructure, Metrolinx and Infrastructure Ontario.
Origin
Summary
An unprecedented level of transit expansion, housing development and other major infrastructure projects is currently underway in Toronto. Delivery of higher-order transit lines, as well as development, brings numerous benefits, to increase housing supply, reduce congestion, support the City’s environmental goals, and promote a well-connected and accessible city. The advancement of the Province’s transit expansion projects along with its Transit Oriented Communities (TOC) Program, present significant opportunities to advance City priorities and maximize benefits to communities. At the same time, these large-scale and long-term construction projects present challenges that must be carefully managed to mitigate negative impacts on residents and businesses.
The purpose of this report is to:
1. Identify the City priorities that guide and inform negotiations with the Provincial government and its agencies, as well as the relevant policies and levers for implementation;
2. Provide a guide to external partners that outlines the City expectations with the Province, Metrolinx and the public more broadly; and,
3. Assist City staff in reviewing permit, licences and agreements under negotiation to determine if City priorities are being sufficiently addressed, while strengthening internal coordination to maximize City benefits.
The report identifies City priorities in the following areas, as detailed further in Attachment 2:
- Delivering mobility;
- Transit and housing as city building;
- Public realm improvements;
- Roadways, traffic and construction management;
- Parkland, forestry, and recreational facilities;
- Real estate;
- Protecting City infrastructure and assets;
- Community benefits;
- Business and cultural supports; and
- Community engagement.
City Divisions continue to review the Province’s technical designs, plans and requests for permits licences and approvals, in coordination with the local Councillor, as necessary, to identify all opportunities to advance the City’s priorities and to ensure a wholistic and coordinated City-wide approach that maximizes the benefits for the City. To further strengthen coordination processes as well as the engagement with the local Councillor, staff will:
- Ensure all City staff participating in transit expansion and TOC work understand the City priorities identified in Attachment 2, which will help guide and inform all negotiations with the Province and its agencies.
- Establish a monthly Transit and TOC Leaders Roundtable consisting of senior City staff across City Divisions. The purpose of this Roundtable is to review and provide strategic direction on critical, complex or non-routine permits, licenses and other agreements prior to issuance, where permitted under applicable law.
- Enhance their engagement with the local Councillor as part of ongoing work to assess opportunities to deliver on City priorities and identify potential improvements for advancement that reflect local ward priorities.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246367.pdf
Attachment 1 - Relevant Decision History
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246368.pdf
Attachment 2 - Recommended Approaches to Advance City Priorities Through Transit Expansion and Transit-Oriented Communities Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246369.pdf
Speakers
Walied Khogali Ali, Build Ontario Line Differently (BOLD)
Communications (Committee)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Alison Stewart, Cycle Toronto (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180831.pdf
(June 17, 2024) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chairs, The Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations (FoNTRA) (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180880.pdf
(June 18, 2024) Letter from Rosemarie Powell, Executive Director, Toronto Community Benefits Network (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180908.pdf
(June 18, 2024) Letter from Walied Khogali Ali and Liz Driver, Co-Chairs, BOLD Community Coalition (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180886.pdf
EX15.3 - Advancing the Homelessness Services Capital Infrastructure Strategy (HSCIS) and the 2025 Shelter Infrastructure Plan
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend the 2024 Capital Budget and 2025 - 2033 Capital Plan for Toronto Shelter and Support Services to create a new capital project called “Homelessness Services Capital Infrastructure Strategy” with a project cost of $89.5 million, with cash flows commitments of $57.3 million in 2024 and a future commitment of $32.2 million in 2025, fully funded by the City Building Fund, in order to proceed with the due diligence and acquisition of properties.
2. City Council request the Government of Canada to provide $674.5 million in funding over 10 years to support the capital funding needs of Toronto’s Homelessness Services Capital Infrastructure Strategy.
3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Shelter and Support Services, and the Chief Procurement Officer, to extend the use of Request for Supplier Qualifications solicitations Doc3982873048 and Doc3829596667 for Rapid Build Construction and Traditional Build Construction, established for the Rapid Housing Initiative to the Homelessness Services Capital Infrastructure Strategy until such time as updated Request for Supplier Qualifications are issued in 2025, including any amendments to the documents necessary to reflect such changes in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, but excluding the approvals and delegated authorities set out in Part 13 of Item 2021.PH26.4.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Executive Committee directed the General Manager, Toronto Shelter and Support Services to report directly to the June 26, 27 and 28, 2024 meeting of City Council elaborating on the design and program model of the new shelters developed under the Homelessness Services Capital Infrastructure Strategy.
Origin
Summary
This report provides an update on Toronto Shelter and Support Services’ (TSSS) long-term, proactive approach to capital planning through the new Homelessness Services Capital Infrastructure Strategy (HSCIS). This report also seeks funding to increase the total number of new long-term and permanent spaces in the base shelter system by 1,600 spaces between 2024 and 2033. The majority of these new spaces will replace the temporary spaces secured during the COVID-19 pandemic, including hotel sites, and will support recovery and stability of the shelter system. The requested funding will advance securing up to five new shelter sites in 2024 through acquisitions, and additional sites through development on existing City-owned land for the first phase of the HSCIS. The City is in active negotiations with the federal government to secure capital funding for the HSCIS Strategy.
This report also provides an update on other TSSS shelter development projects as part of the 2025 Shelter Infrastructure Plan as required by the Emergency Shelter Development Process (ESDP), approved by City Council in 2017. The Infrastructure Plan provides updates on the Housing and Shelter Infrastructure Development project (HSID, formerly 1,000 beds), the George Street Revitalization (GSR) project, in addition to the new projects as part of the HSCIS that will begin in 2024.
Finally, this report provides an update on the Council-approved COVID-19 Shelter Transition and Relocation Plan, including de-commissioning plans for temporary shelter hotel locations with the largest (more than 200) single adult and chronically homeless populations.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246468.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-247125.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from Garson Hoffman (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from David Lawrence (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from Monique Wertheim (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from K.M. Wertheim (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from Igor Hemon (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from Hyder Butt (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from Donna Phillips (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from Louise Patricio (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from John Liu (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from Leah-Anne Baxter (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from Alex Storcheus and Priscilla Chan (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from Jenn Hilsden (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Dieter Riedel (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Marc Doucet (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Rebecca Gillis (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from Elisha Ballantyne (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Maureen Meikle (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Elisabeth Schwartzman (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from John Davidson (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Barbara Balfour (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Xing Fan (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Belinda Wildenboer (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Tanya Dahonick (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Mariko Pond (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Sarah Enriquez (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Ricardo Gutierrez Velez (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Sam Backlin (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Thierry Vallee (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Judy Hilsden (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Zong Li (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Shirley Rocca (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Terrence Levine (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Donna Phillips (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Therese McGuirk (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Hyder Butt (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Howard Kung (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Sylvie Gakwaya (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Loulou Rails (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Kenneth Chumik (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Yong Zhang (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Susan Land (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Julian Humphreys (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) Letter from Diane Chester (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180817.pdf
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Kevin Strachan (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Judy Dine (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Amelia Meng (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Nicki Skinner (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Judith Doyle (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Nas Yadollahi, President, CUPE Local 79 (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Nicole Jolly (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Ron Lopata (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Robert Carr (EX.New)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Ruairi Twomey (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Mark Klym (EX.New)
(June 17, 2024) Letter from Jill Patrick (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180862.pdf
(June 18, 2024) E-mail from D. Lor (EX.New)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from John Doyle (EX.New)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Alfred Kwan (EX.New)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Linda Yang (EX.New)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Micky (EX.New)
(June 18, 2024) E-mail from Mona Gobran (EX.New)
(June 18, 2024) E-mail from Trish Fabik (EX.New)
(June 18, 2024) E-mail from D. Borkowski (EX.New)
(June 18, 2024) E-mail from Jo-Anne Barnard (EX.New)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181166.pdf
(June 25, 2024) Letter from Diane Chester, Niagara Neighbours for Community Safety (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181167.pdf
EX15.4 - A Governance and Operational Review of Sankofa Square (formerly Yonge-Dundas Square)
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Sankofa Square Board of Management to develop a multi-year strategic and business plan, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the City Manager, that includes:
a. strategies to enhance the activation of Sankofa Square for economic development, tourism and community and commercial programming;
b. enhanced revenue streams to deliver on the mandate and programming of Sankofa Square and the community;
c. a review of permitting, production support policies, and fee structures, including considerations for increasing accessibility by community and not-for-profit organizations;
d. considerations for setting up a foundation to fund the resourcing of the Square's revitalization and enhance access for community and not-for-profit organizations;
e. strategies to enhance the safety and perception of safety of Sankofa Square;
f. rebranding of Yonge-Dundas Square to Sankofa Square;
g. outcomes of community engagement on the revitalization of Sankofa Square;
h. opportunities for partnerships on programming with key stakeholders;
i. a business case and detailed financial implications of implementation of the multi-year strategic plan and business plan; and
j. performance metrics to measure progress on the plans.
2. City Council direct the Sankofa Square Board of Management to report back to City Council through the Executive Committee by the third quarter of 2025 on the results and implementation status of the Board’s multi-year strategic plan and business plan adopted by the Board as set out in Recommendation 1 above, and an update on the partnership/sponsorship opportunities undertaken by the Board.
3. City Council advise the Sankofa Square Board of Management that the City Manager’s governance review requested in Item 2023.MM7.5 is concluded and that it is authorized to pursue appropriate partnership and sponsorship opportunities, subject to the Board-approved partnership policy, multi-year strategic plan and business plan, and consistent with the City’s partnership policies.
4. City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 636, Public Squares, to:
a. replace all references to Yonge-Dundas Square with Sankofa Square;
b. replace all references to Yonge-Dundas Square Board of Management with the Sankofa Square Board of Management; and
c. replace all references to Ryerson University with Toronto Metropolitan University.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to submit Bills directly to City Council for enactment to amend any City of Toronto by-law or Municipal Code Chapter to replace all references to Yonge-Dundas Square with Sankofa Square and to replace all references to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board of Management with the Sankofa Square Board of Management.
6. City Council authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to amend the City’s Relationship Framework with the Yonge-Dundas Square Board of Management and any other substantive or technical changes as may be required to give effect to City Council's decision to reflect the change of the name of Yonge-Dundas Square and the Yonge-Dundas Square Board of Management as set out in Recommendation 4 above, and as may be required by any other City Council decisions in the report (June 4, 2024) from the City Manager and as amended as follows:
a. amend section 1.1, Background, to reflect City Council’s decisions on the renaming of Yonge Dundas Square to Sankofa Square, including the objectives and process that led to the decision;
b. amend section 2.1, Mandate of the Yonge-Dundas Square Board, by deleting paragraph c) “to develop a sponsorship program” and substituting “to develop a 5-year strategic plan”;
c. amend Item 3.1, Matters Requiring Council Approval, by adding “any naming, renaming, or corporate naming” of the Square;
d. amend Article 3.2 – Matters Delegated to the Board as set out below:
i. delete paragraph b) and replace it with “developing a long-term needs assessment with regard to capital maintenance and repairs of the Square”;
ii. amend paragraph d) to add the words “giving consideration to matters of community access, inclusion and affordability” after the words “fees and charges”;
iii. amend paragraph e) to add the words “and developing a strategic plan and updating that plan every 5 years” after the words “every year”; and
iv. add the following new paragraph:
h. establishing performance objectives and conducting an annual performance evaluation of the General Manager.
e. amend Article 5, City Board, to reflect the current composition and membership of the Board and the City’s public appointments policy; and
f. amend Article 8.1.4 to add the words “and provides training to the Board on City of Toronto priorities and policies as required by the City or requested by the Board” after the words “including the Board”.
7. City Council authorize the Sankofa Square Board of Management to amend their rules of procedure to reflect the change of the name to Sankofa Square and Sankofa Square Board of Management as set out in Recommendation 4 above.
8. City Council authorize the City Manager and the Sankofa Square Board of Management or their delegates to take any necessary action to give effect to Recommendations 1 to 7 above.
Origin
Summary
This report responds to City Council's request to conduct a governance and operational review of Sankofa Square[1], including but not limited to considerations such as publicly operating Sankofa Square in the same manner as Nathan Phillips Square (NPS).
The review included a jurisdictional scan and engagement with Board members. Key findings of the review include:
-Sankofa Square has a broader mandate than the City's civic squares which includes economic development and community and commercial objectives.
-Sankofa Square's governance and operations model is similar to other North American squares that have broad mandates.
-Sankofa Square is mandated to be financially self-sufficient while the civic squares are not and therefore Sankofa Square can generate revenues from advertisements, sponsorships and commercial events.
Based on the key findings of the review, it is recommended that Sankofa Square continue its current board of management governance structure. Departing from this structure and operating Sankofa Square in the same manner as NPS could constrain programming, limit its ability to conduct fundraising, generate revenues, and potentially increase the City of Toronto’s net expenditures.
A multi-year strategic plan and business plan is recommended to refresh the Square's objectives. This strategic planning process will help to align the Square's objectives with the post pandemic events market and evolving neighbourhood context and to address the opportunities and challenges identified in this report.
This report also transmits, as directed by City Council, the Sankofa Square Board of Management (Board) report on Yonge-Dundas Square's adoption of the new name of Sankofa Square, as previously adopted by City Council, and includes the Board's implementation and transition plan for the new name (Attachment 1).
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246372.pdf
Attachment 1 - Board report - Renaming to Sankofa Square
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246373.pdf
Speakers
Daniel Tate
Joey Scoleri
Linda Dundas
Sipho Kwaku
Khalidah Bello
Andrew Lochhead
Lindis Collins-Bacchus
David Firang, Ghanaian Association of Ontario
Mary Akuamoah-Boateng, Vice President, Ghanaian-Canadian Association of Ontario
Kemi Jacobs, Executive Director, Delta Family Resource Centre
Joseph Mensah
Camila Collins Araiza, PhD Candidate in History at the University of Toronto
Nina Yaa Frema Aning
Kayla Webber, Partnership and Accountability Circle
Paul Osbourne, Dua Kro Family Services
Rudi Quammie Williams
Dwayne Morgan
Ginelle Skerritt, Adinkrafarm
Julz Ossom
Councillor Chris Moise
Councillor Stephen Holyday
Communications (Committee)
(June 13, 2024) E-mail from Patrick Wright (EX.Supp)
(June 13, 2024) E-mail from Larry Budd (EX.Supp)
(June 13, 2024) E-mail from Bob Liepa (EX.Supp)
(June 13, 2024) E-mail from Nikola Simokovic (EX.Supp)
(June 13, 2024) E-mail from Robert Roy (EX.Supp)
(June 13, 2024) E-mail from Alison Cooper (EX.Supp)
(June 13, 2024) E-mail from Gawdy Cheng (EX.Supp)
(June 13, 2024) E-mail from Judy Yan (EX.Supp)
(June 13, 2024) E-mail from Steven S (EX.Supp)
(June 13, 2024) E-mail from Robert Shortly (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from Stephanie Carne (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from Chris Rees (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from Patrick Gonya (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from Angelina Girardo (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Eitan Strasfield (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Ryan Ross (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Mitch Chevrier (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Videsh Soondar (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Andrew Knave (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) Letter from John De Marco (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Daniel Tovbis (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Rui Torrao (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Marianna Mottola (EX.Supp)
(June 14, 2024) Letter from Councillor Chris Moise (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180799.pdf
(June 17, 2024) Letter from John De Marco (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180809.pdf
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Antonio Tononito JR (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Steven S (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) Letter from Melanie J. Newton, Associate Professor of History and Associate Chair (Graduate), Department of History, University of Toronto (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180854.pdf
(June 17, 2024) Letter from Andrew Lochhead (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180857.pdf
(June 18, 2024) Letter from Linda J Dundas (EX.New)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Daniel Tate (EX.New)
(June 17, 2024) Submission from Emmanuel Duodu, President, Ghanaian-Canadian Association of Ontario (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180878.pdf
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Ross Harvey (EX.New)
(June 18, 2024) Letter from Jennifer Dundas, Chairperson, Henry Dundas Committee of Ontario (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180882.pdf
(June 18, 2024) Submission from Kemi Jacobs, Executive Director, Delta Family Resource Centre (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180906.pdf
(June 18, 2024) E-mail from Carson Lawrance (EX.New)
(June 18, 2024) E-mail from Miguel Avila-Velarde (EX.New)
(June 18, 2024) Petition from Daniel Tate containing the names of approximately 30,000 persons. (EX.New)
Communications (City Council)
(June 21, 2024) E-mail from Jennifer Barrow (CC.Supp)
(June 22, 2024) Letter from John De Marco (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181109.pdf
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Chris Rees (CC.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Bruce LeFevre (CC.New)
(June 27, 2024) E-mail from Lisa Jones (CC.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Andrea Mackenzie (CC.New)
4a - Yonge-Dundas Square Renaming Initiative
Origin
Summary
City Council on May 22 and 23, 2024, referred Administrative Inquiry IA18.1 from Councillor Stephen Holyday, Ward 2, Etobicoke Centre, regarding Yonge-Dundas Square Renaming Initiative and Answer IA18.1a from the City Manager to the Executive Committee for consideration.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246259.pdf
(May 10, 2024) Letter from Councillor Stephen Holyday on Administrative Inquiry - Yonge-Dundas Square Renaming Initiative
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246268.pdf
(May 21, 2024) Letter from the City Manager Regarding Yonge Dundas Square Initiative
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246269.pdf
EX15.5 - Moss Park Arena - Governance and Operational Review
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in collaboration with the City Manager, to develop a transition plan to change the governance and operations of Moss Park Arena from a Board of Management to a City operated arena to come into effect by the end of 2025, and report back to City Council by the fourth quarter of 2024 with the transition plan, including:
a. the financial impacts and resourcing requirements for the transition to the City’s administration;
b. all rights, claims, undertakings, obligations, assets and liabilities of the Board of Management;
c. workforce and employment impacts;
d. any other impacts on the City’s Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division arising from assuming the operations of the Arena; and
e. the implementation timeline.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bills in City Council for dissolution of the Moss Park Arena Board in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and O. Regulation 589/06, Dissolution of and Assumption of Powers of Local Boards, to bring into effect the transition, subject to City Council’s decision in consideration of Recommendation 1 above.
3. City Council direct that, effectively immediately, the Moss Park Arena Board of Management work with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to review opportunities for the Moss Park Arena to enhance equitable community access to the Arena’s programs.
Origin
Summary
This report responds to City Council's direction to the City Manager, in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to assess the impacts of transitioning the governance and operations of Moss Park Arena from a Board of Management to a City-operated arena. This report provides governance considerations as well as financial, operational, staffing and program impacts of such a transition.
Moss Park Arena provides indoor ice sport facilities along with programming including hockey leagues, hockey camps, and instructional programs. It is operated by a Board of Directors, appointed by City Council through the Civic appointments process and follows City policy in terms of how ice is allocated to community user groups.
If directed by City Council to transition Moss Park Arena from a Board of Management to a City-operated arena, a transition plan would need to be developed and implemented. This plan would include, but not be limited to, transitioning current programming to third party user groups, renegotiating ice contracts, a workforce management assessment and Council approval of additional operating funding required, through the budget process.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246423.pdf
Speakers
Councillor Chris Moise
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180675.pdf
(June 14, 2024) E-mail from David Soberman (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Lorraine Bate Boerop (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) Letter from David Reed (EX.Supp)
(June 15, 2024) E-mail from Michael Wayne, Professor of History Emeritus, University of Toronto (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180754.pdf
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Paul Dineen, Chapnick & Associates (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180768.pdf
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Glenna Ford (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Gina Dineen (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Ross Turnbull (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Arlene Woolley (EX.Supp)
(June 16, 2024) E-mail from Lan Power (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Hayley Dineen (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Stephen Milroy (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Robert Dungan (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Ryan Dineen (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Marshall Tully (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Seth Wayne (EX.Supp)
(June 13, 2024) Letter from Councillor Chris Moise (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180841.pdf
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Owen Moorhouse (EX.Supp)
(June 17, 2024) E-mail from Jo Gladding (EX.Supp)
Communications (City Council)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Owen Moorhouse (CC.Supp)
(June 24, 2024) E-mail from Glen Whyte (CC.Supp)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Andy Marcus (CC.Supp)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Michael Wayne (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Karin Fritzlar (CC.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Liz Earley (CC.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Jo Gladding (CC.New)
EX15.7 - Enabling Toronto Hydro's Sustainable Growth
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Confidential Attachment - Contains commercial and financial information of Toronto Hydro Corporation supplied in confidence to the City of Toronto which, if disclosed could reasonably be expected to prejudice Toronto Hydro's competitive position or interfere significantly with the contractual or other negotiations of Toronto Hydro and result in undue loss to Toronto Hydro; in addition, any disclosure could give rise to a breach of law, including applicable securities law.
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 4, 2024) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.
2. City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to the report (June 4, 2024) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, if City Council adopts the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 4, 2024) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and if Confidential Appendix A to the report (June 4, 2024) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer is adopted by City Council and executed by the City Manager.
3. City Council direct that Confidential Appendix B to the report (June 4, 2024) from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer remains confidential as disclosure of this information could reasonably be expected to prejudice Toronto Hydro's competitive position or interfere significantly with the contractual or other negotiations of Toronto Hydro and result in undue loss to Toronto Hydro; in addition, any disclosure could give rise to a breach of law, including applicable securities law.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to seek Council's instructions to enable Toronto Hydro's sustainable growth.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246355.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - made public on June 28, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246357.pdf
Confidential Appendix A - made public on June 28, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246358.pdf
Confidential Appendix B
EX15.8 - City of Toronto Investment Report for the Year 2023
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council receive the report (May 31, 2024) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for information.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to provide the following information:
1. Performance of the Funds for the year 2023
2. General Market Update and Benchmark Performance
3. City of Toronto Investment Policy and Procedures
The City's General Group of Funds (General Fund) hold the working capital and amounts designated for the City's reserves and reserve funds. The General Fund is comprised of two pools of investments: (a) the Short Term Fund (liquidity funds managed internally), and (b) the Long Term Fund (funds not immediately required managed by the Toronto Investment Board). The General Fund had a book return of 4.0 per cent and generated $444 million for the full year 2023.
As a result of the pandemic, the General Fund has held a larger position in the Short Term Fund (STF) to enhance the liquidity and to generally lower the overall risk (risk management). On average, the Short Term Fund, including the short-term investments of the Long Term Fund (LTF), was about 67 per cent of the overall General Fund in 2023 compared to 48 per cent from the pre-pandemic level in 2019. This higher weighting in the Short Term Fund provided significant protection, as well as increased returns as short-term rates moved higher in recent years.
Staff re-assessed the City's liquidity position in late 2023 and advised the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (CFO&T) that excess funds within the Short Term Fund were available for longer term investment. At that time, a plan was set for $2 billion to be transferred from STF to the LTF in four quarterly installments during 2024. The CFO&T maintains the right to halt these transfers if circumstances change and there are higher needs for liquidity.
The City's Sinking Fund portfolio, which holds the investment funds for future debt repayments, had an earned income basis return of 1.2 per cent and generated $29.0 million for the twelve months ending December 31, 2023.
Since January 1, 2018, the City's long-term investments (Long Term Fund and Sinking Fund) have been managed by the Toronto Investment Board (Board) under a Council adopted Investment Policy which is based on the prudent investor standard. Investment portfolios of different asset classes have been progressively phased in to make use of the broader range of investments that have become available. Although, the potential for volatility in total returns over the short-term investment horizon still exist, the overall portfolio risk has been reduced through asset mix diversification. The overall risk-adjusted total returns over the long-term investment horizon are expected to be higher.
The Board currently provides oversight of four external fixed income managers and four external global equity managers that invest the long-term investments. Both fixed income and equity investment classes are fully funded in accordance with the target asset mix in the Investment Policy with 70 per cent allocated to fixed income and 20 per cent to global equities.
As at December 31, 2023, approximately 90 per cent of both the Sinking Fund and the Long Term Fund were managed by external investment managers. The remaining 10 per cent of each fund will be allocated to real assets, which is currently in the contract negotiation phase with the Board's selected investment managers. Adding real assets to the current investment portfolios, which already compose of fixed income and global equity, will enhance the overall portfolios' risk-adjusted investment return and align with the Council-approved policy target asset mix. The Board continues to evaluate opportunities in the real asset category to fulfill the target asset mix.
It is a legislative requirement that the Investment Policy be reviewed annually. Staff have reviewed the Investment Policy and no changes are recommended at this time given that policies have only been in place since 2018 and in that time we have experienced several years of volatility triggered by COVID-19 impacts. The City of Toronto Investment Policy can be reviewed in Attachment 1 of this report.
Although the prudent investor standard has only been in place for five years, and was carefully phased in, the change has been monitored for effectiveness versus the previous prescribed list (prior to 2018). This report also provides a comparison of returns between the previously used prescribed list versus the currently used prudent investor standard. The review shows the current regulation has been beneficial to the Long Term Fund by approximately $260 million over the five years it has been in place.
For the year 2023, all funds managed are compliant with the Investment Policy. KPMG LLP, the City's auditor, will conduct the Investment Policy audit during the second half of 2024.
The Toronto Investment Board has contracted a third-party data provider in order to monitor and report on the high-level Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) attributes of the City's long-term investment portfolio. This investment fund-level ESG reporting process will complement the existing corporate-level ESG performance report. At the end of 2023, the City's long-term investment portfolio's score is in the "Leader" category and is aligned with the selected market benchmark as depicted in the investment policy.
Subsequent to 2022, with a moderation of inflation and other related economic data, it would seem many central banks, such as the Bank of Canada, have now paused any further short-term interest rate increases. Since it would appear the actions of central banks are near a terminal point, with the prospect of lower interest rates in the future, long-term assets have rebounded to provide significantly higher returns in 2023.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246327.pdf
Attachment 1 - City of Toronto Statement of Investment Policy and Procedures
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246328.pdf
Attachment 2 - Background on the Funds
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246329.pdf
Attachment 3 - Record of Transactions in City of Toronto Debentures
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246330.pdf
Attachment 4 - Breakdown of the Portfolios by Sectors and by Credit Ratings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246331.pdf
Attachment 5 - Historical Allocation of Gross Investment Earnings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246332.pdf
EX15.9 - 2024 - 2026 City of Toronto - Toronto Parking Authority Net Income Share Agreement
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the terms of the Net Income Share Agreement between the City and the Toronto Parking Authority for a three (3) year period, effective January 1, 2024, as outlined in Attachment 2 to the report (May 15, 2024) from the President, Toronto Parking Authority and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.
2. City Council authorize appropriate City staff to prepare a Net Income Sharing Agreement between the Toronto Parking Authority and the City of Toronto, in accordance with the terms set out in Attachment 2 to the report (May 15, 2024) from the President, Toronto Parking Authority and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and subject to the approval of the Board of Directors of the Toronto Parking Authority.
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on May 28, 2024, the Board of the Directors of the Toronto Parking Authority considered Item PA9.11 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (May 15, 2024) from the President, Toronto Parking Authority and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, City of Toronto
The purpose of this report is to present the Board of Directors of the Toronto Parking Authority (TPA) with the proposed terms of a new Net Income Share Agreement with the City of Toronto (the "City"). Toronto Parking Authority and the City's Financial Planning Division have collaborated to develop the principles of a new net income sharing agreement that will ensure that Toronto Parking Authority has access to sufficient resources to both fund its Capital Program, and continue to make annual contributions to the City of Toronto that build upon the $1.4 billion, including dividends, property taxes, and rents, that Toronto Parking Authority has contributed to the City since 2002, as outlined in Attachment 1 - Annual Contributions Made by the Toronto Parking Authority to the City of Toronto.
The review of Toronto Parking Authority's financial framework with the City is being carried out in two (2) phases with the first phase intended to arrive at an agreement with the City that will provide Toronto Parking Authority with the needed financial stability in the short-term to execute its 2024 Operating Budget and the 2024 - 2026 segment of the 10-Year Capital Budget and Plan, including the continued capital expansion of Toronto Parking Authority's Bike Share Toronto and Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging programs. The second phase of work, intended to address the long-term sustainability of Toronto Parking Authority will continue, with recommendations expected to be presented to the Board of Directors of the Toronto Parking Authority in Q4 2024.
Under the new framework, the net income sharing formula will be changed to increase the percentage of net income that Toronto Parking Authority retains from its operations from 15 percent to 25 percent which results in the City dividend dropping from 85 percent to 75 percent from the current Agreement. This enhanced income share ratio will provide Toronto Parking Authority with incremental net income over the next three (3) years to address the extensive backlog in state of good repair (SOGR) in Toronto Parking Authority's parking garages. In addition, the City will directly fund the continued capital expansion of Toronto Parking Authority's Bike Share Toronto and Electric Vehicle Charging programs over the term of the Agreement. Table 1 summarizes the proposed terms that are recommended for the new Net Income Share Agreement.
Table 1: Proposed Changes to the City of Toronto - TPA Net Income Share Agreement
|
Current Agreement |
Proposed Agreement |
Term |
2017 - 2019 |
January 1, 2024 - December 31, 2026 |
Income Sharing Formula |
85 percent City / 15 percent Toronto Parking Authority |
75 percent City / 25 percent Toronto Parking Authority |
Minimum Annual Dividend Payment to the City |
$38.0 million |
75 percent of prior year net income |
Progress Payment Frequency |
Monthly |
Quarterly (at fiscal quarter-end or year-end) |
Direct CAPEX Funding |
N/A |
$48.0 million |
The change to the income sharing formula reflects the conditions that were in place prior to the 2017 agreement where a 75/25 income sharing formula was used to support Toronto Parking Authority's capital requirements at a time that pre-dated the extension of Toronto Parking Authority's mandate to include Bike Share Toronto and Electric Vehicle Charging. A reversion to this model is required given the Toronto Parking Authority's relative cash reserve position after the pandemic and current capital program requirements of approximately $186.7 million over three (3) years (2024 - 2026) of Toronto Parking Authority's 10-Year Capital Budget and Plan.
The new Agreement will continue to support annual net income contributions by Toronto Parking Authority to the City, estimated to be at least $91.0 million over the three (3) year term. Contributions will be paid on a quarterly basis, subject to unforeseen circumstances which may result from the interruption of service, any other unplanned occurrence or Council decision, which may have an adverse and material effect on the net income and/or the Toronto Parking Authority's cash reserves.
Subject to the Board's endorsement and approval by City Council, the Net Income Share Agreement will retroactively take effect January 1, 2024, for a three (3) year period ending December 31, 2026.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246283.pdf
(May 15, 2024) Report and Attachments 1 and 2 from the President, Toronto Parking Authority and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, City of Toronto on 2024 - 2026 City of Toronto - Toronto Parking Authority Net Income Share Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246287.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/comm/communicationfile-180146.pdf
(June 17, 2024) Letter from Catherine Wilkinson (EX.Supp)
EX15.10 - Toronto Zoo Revised Records Retention Schedule
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Executive Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the draft By-law as set out in Revised Attachment 2 to the report (May 17, 2024) from the Director, Finance, Technology and Innovation.
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on May 31, 2024, the Board of Management of the Toronto Zoo considered item ZB10.3 and made a recommendation to City Council.
Summary from the Board of Management of the Toronto Zoo:
This report requests approval from the Board of Management of the Toronto Zoo for a revised records retention schedule for records in the custody and control of the Board, requests that the Board forward the schedule to City Council for enactment of the necessary by-law, and requests approval to integrate the Board's records retention schedule in the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 219, Records, Corporate (Local Boards).
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246310.pdf
(May 17, 2024) Report from the Director, Finance, Technology and Innovation on Revised Records Retention Schedule
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246349.pdf
Attachment 1 - Revised Toronto Zoo Records Retention Schedule
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246311.pdf
Revised Attachment 2 - Draft City of Toronto By-Law XX-2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-246312.pdf
Board of Health - Meeting 13
HL13.2 - Service Agreements Awarded and Executed by the Medical Officer of Health for 2024
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Board Recommendations
The Board of Health recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Medical Officer of Health to award, execute and amend, on an ongoing basis, purchase of service agreements for food security initiatives with Working Women Community Centre, within the approved Toronto Public Health budget, in accordance with applicable program and funding guidelines, on such terms and conditions as are satisfactory to the Medical Officer of Health and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to provide information on the purchase of service contracts awarded and executed by the Medical Officer of Health for 2024, according to the delegation of authority by City Council.
This report also requests approval for the Medical Officer of Health to award, execute and amend, on an ongoing basis, purchase of services contracts with Working Women Community Centre to deliver food handler training and certification, food literacy, and employment skills development to low-income community participants, including newcomers and refugees.
Background Information (Board)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-245605.pdf
Attachment 1 - Toronto Public Health - 2024 Service Contracts
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-245606.pdf
HL13.4 - 2024 Student Nutrition Program Service Subsidies
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Board Recommendations
The Board of Health recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Medical Officer of Health to enter into agreements and other suitable arrangements, on behalf of the City of Toronto, for the transfer of funds to the Angel Foundation for Learning ($4,919.3 thousand) and the Toronto Foundation for Student Success ($14,214.9 thousand) for the purpose of administering the 2024 approved municipal funding (totalling $19,134.2 thousand) to eligible student nutrition programs across the City of Toronto on terms satisfactory to the Medical Officer of Health and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Board Decision Advice and Other Information
The Board of Health:
1. Requested the Government of Canada to expand the National School Food Program to provide funding for a universal program which would provide nutritious meals for every school-aged child.
2. Requested the provincial Minister of Children, Community and Social Services to encourage the Government of Ontario to reach an agreement with the federal government as soon as possible so that the National School Food Program can be rolled out in the 2024-2025 school year.
3. Forwarded this report to the federal Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, the federal Minister of Families, Children and Social Development, the federal Minister of Health, the federal Minister of Employment and Social Development Canada, the provincial Minister of Children, Community and Social Services, the provincial Minister of Health, the provincial Minister of Education, the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, le Conseil scolaire Viamonde, le Conseil scolaire catholique MonAvenir, the Toronto Foundation for Student Success, the Angel Foundation for Learning, the Daily Bread Food Bank, and United Way Greater Toronto.
4. Requested the Province of Ontario and Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services to consult with public health units and municipalities on the design, delivery, and local governance of the National School Food Program in Ontario.
Origin
Summary
Student nutrition programs are meal and snack programs offered primarily in school settings. These programs help to ensure that children and youth, especially those at risk for poor nutritional intake, have access to safe and culturally appropriate nutritious food. Research continues to demonstrate that healthy school meals support student mental and physical health, and positively impact food choices. Participating students focus better, achieve academic success, develop greater nutrition knowledge and healthier eating habits. These positive impacts are shown to continue into adulthood resulting in long term positive health behaviours, such as reduced diet-related chronic disease.1,2
Toronto's Student Nutrition Program has two streams: the Public Schools Stream, which includes public schools and some grandfathered independent schools and community sites, and the Independent Schools Stream. Student nutrition programs depend on funding from the City of Toronto (the City), the Government of Ontario, student and parent contributions, community and school board fundraising, and corporate donations. Additional funding and support from the federal and provincial governments is needed to meet student needs and ensure sustainable programs.
This report makes recommendations for the 2024 Student Nutrition Program service subsidy allocations, which includes an 8.5 per cent cost of food inflationary increase of $1,495.9 thousand from the approved 2023 budget. The proposed combined allocations to the Angel Foundation for Learning and the Toronto Foundation for Student Success are for the purpose of administering the 2024 approved municipal funding to eligible student nutrition programs across the City of Toronto and total $19,134.2 thousand which includes $280.1 thousand held in reserve for appeals and Fall applications.
Background Information (Board)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-245607.pdf
Speakers
Jacinta McDonnell, Plant Based Treaty
Communications (Board)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/hl/comm/communicationfile-179833.pdf
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Anita Krajnc, Animal Save Movement (HL.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/hl/comm/communicationfile-179874.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Bernie Fitzpatrick (HL.New)
Economic and Community Development Committee - Meeting 13
EC13.4 - A Plan to Develop the Third Toronto Seniors Strategy
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the approach to community consultation outlined in the report (May 10, 2024) from the General Manager, Seniors Services and Long-Term Care and direct the General Manager, Seniors Services and Long-Term Care to implement the planned consultation approach.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Seniors Services and Long-Term Care to develop the third Toronto Seniors Strategy.
Origin
Summary
This report provides a response to City Council's request for a plan to develop the third Toronto Seniors Strategy.
Toronto’s senior population is growing, with increasing diversity and evolving priorities for aging in place. Building on the first (2013-18) and second (2018-22) Toronto Seniors Strategies, the third Toronto Seniors Strategy will continue to develop and adapt City programs, policies, and strategic initiatives to better support aging in place, particularly for seniors who are Indigenous, Black, and those who belong to equity-deserving groups.
SSLTC has developed a community consultation process to identify the priorities of seniors in Toronto. The multi-modal community consultation plan was developed based on City engagement practices, best practices for engaging with seniors, and principles of equity and accessibility. The consultation methods are informed by leading practices for the engagement of seniors, as identified in the literature. This community consultation process will enhance the City's understanding of the concerns and experiences of seniors in Toronto, with a focus on equity-informed priorities for aging in place. The consultation results will be combined with sociodemographic data and input from key stakeholders to develop the third Toronto Seniors Strategy.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-245670.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(May 28, 2024) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations (FoNTRA) (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/comm/communicationfile-180073.pdf
Communications (City Council)
EC13.5 - Updating the City of Toronto's International Alliance Program
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the updated structure for Toronto's International Alliance Program (IAP) detailed in Attachment 1 to the report (May 14, 2024) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the City Clerk, including definitions for the two main relationship agreement categories of Partnership City and International Project.
2. City Council approve the eligibility criteria and policies for establishing new International Alliance Program Partnership City and International Project agreements detailed, respectively, in Attachment 2 and Attachment 3 to the report (May 14, 2024) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the City Clerk.
3. City Council, authorize the Mayor or their designate, or the City Manager, to execute International Alliance Program Partnership City agreements on behalf of the City, provided that the applicable criteria and policy for establishing a new Partnership Agreement has been followed and the agreement is in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, as detailed in Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (May 14, 2024) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the City Clerk.
4. City Council, authorize the City Manager, Deputy City Managers and Division Heads to execute, on behalf of the City, International Alliance Program International Project agreements with an anticipated project cost not exceeding their respective financial signing authority, provided that the applicable criteria and policy for establishing a new International Project has been followed and the agreement is in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, as detailed in Attachments 1 and 3 to the report (May 14, 2024) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the City Clerk.
5. City Council, authorize the Mayor or their designate to represent the City at ceremonial functions held in conjunction with an International Alliance Program Partnership City or International Project agreement.
6. City Council assign existing Partnership City, Friendship City and Memorandum of Understanding (MOUs) to the updated International Alliance Program relationship agreement categories, as indicated in Table 1, and authorize the City Clerk to advise these cities of their status and, where feasible, amend these agreements to align with updated International Alliance Program requirements or terminate and enter into new agreements with these cities.
7. City Council approve an in-year 2024 Operating Budget transfer of $150,000 gross and net from the Economic Development and Culture division to the City Clerk’s Office, reflecting the expanded corporate role of the City Clerks Office - Strategic Protocol and External Relations unit for the International Alliance Program and related activities.
8. City Council authorize the City Clerk and General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to periodically review and, as needed, report to City Council on any recommended updates to the goals, structure, or associated policies of the International Alliance Program.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Chief of Protocol gave a presentation on the International Alliance Program Review.
Origin
Summary
Toronto’s international activities are guided by an International Policy Framework (IPF) adopted by City Council in 2002. The purpose of the IPF is to position Toronto as a diverse, economically dynamic, creative and caring global urban centre which respects human rights and champions local democratic government.
Toronto has maintained formal bi-lateral relationships with other cities around the world for decades, under the auspices of its International Alliance Program (IAP). Through its city-to-city IAP relationships, Toronto advances several goals of the IPF, including facilitating international business development and investment; exchanging information and best practices; and supporting cultural development, expression and engagement.
The IAP’s goals, structure, resourcing and relationships were last reviewed and updated by City Council in 2005.
This report presents the findings of a review of the IAP, as directed by City Council. Among other elements, this review included a jurisdictional scan of effective practices used by cities engaged in international business development and para-diplomacy, an assessment of how Toronto’s relationships within and alongside the IAP have evolved over time, a survey of organizations which are part of Toronto’s international business development eco-system, and related research.
Drawing on this information and analysis, this report recommends:
- changes to provide a more accountable, flexible and effective structure for the IAP, including the use of two main relationship categories – (i) long-term Partnership City agreements and (ii) short-term International Project agreements; and
- updated eligibility criteria, assessment processes, approval and signing authorities for the establishment of any new IAP relationship agreements, including identification of the financial resources needed to deliver activities associated with the agreement and, as appropriate, consultation with other levels of government as key components of the assessment process.
Finally, as requested by Council, this report advises whether Toronto’s ten existing IAP relationships (including four Partnership City and six Friendship City agreements) and nineteen Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) should be continued, modified or concluded in view of the City’s international engagement objectives and the IAP’s structure and requirements, as proposed to be updated.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-245699.pdf
(May 29, 2024) Presentation from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Chief of Protocol on the International Alliance Program Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-246225.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246828.pdf
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181164.pdf
EC13.6 - Business Improvement Area Technical Boundary Amendments
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 6 - York Centre, 8 - Eglinton - Lawrence, 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 13 - Toronto Centre, 15 - Don Valley West
Committee Recommendations
The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:
1. City Council designate the areas described in Attachment 1 to the report (May 27, 2024) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as the amended Dupont by the Castle, Historic Queen East, Old Town Toronto, St. Clair Gardens, Trinity Bellwoods, Uptown Yonge, Wilson Village, and Yonge and St. Clair Business Improvement Areas under Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor to submit a by-law to designate the areas described in Attachment 1 to the report (May 27, 2024) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as amended Business Improvement Areas in accordance with Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.
3. City Council amend Schedule A of the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, to reflect the amended boundaries of the Dupont by the Castle, Historic Queen East, Old Town Toronto, St. Clair Gardens, Trinity Bellwoods, Uptown Yonge, Wilson Village, and Yonge and St. Clair Business Improvement Areas.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to recommend technical amendments to the boundaries of eight (8) Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) to address properties for which a portion of the lands are included in the Business Improvement Area and a portion excluded, as the result of merging formerly separate properties or subdivision of single properties.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-246187.pdf
(May 14, 2024) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Business Improvement Area Technical Boundary Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-245698.pdf
EC13.8 - The City’s Encampment Approach and Strategy
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the updated City of Toronto Interdivisional Protocol for Encampments in Toronto (IDP) in Attachment 3 to the report (May 14, 2024) from the General Manager, Toronto Shelter and Support Services, and direct City staff to implement the IDP immediately.
2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Shelter and Support Services to make any necessary clarifications, refinements, minor modifications, technical amendments to the City of Toronto Interdivisional Protocol for Encampments in Toronto (IDP) in Attachment 3 to the report (May 10, 2024) from the General Manager, Seniors Services and Long-Term Care.
3. City Council direct the General Manager Toronto Shelter and Support Services to report back on the development of a coordinated, multi-sectoral approach to supporting individuals experiencing homelessness with complex needs, in collaboration with other relevant City Divisions, health care partners and community partners.
4. City Council reiterate its requests to the Government of Canada and Government of Ontario to establish and implement an intergovernmental and cross-departmental strategy for large scale asylum seeker arrivals and the immediate opening of a regional reception centre and interim housing strategy.
5. City Council request the Government of Ontario to fulfill the cost-matching requirement to secure 2024 federal budget funding to address the urgent issue of encampments and unsheltered homelessness.
6. City Council request the Government of Canada and Government of Ontario to provide the City of Toronto with a Canada-Ontario Housing Benefit allocation in 2024/25 of $54 million to enable 300 households to move out of homelessness each month into permanent housing and relieve pressure on the City's emergency shelter system.
7. City Council request the Government of Canada to create a dedicated Housing Benefit for refugees and asylum claimants, funded by immigration ministries allowing for quick access to housing and preventing homelessness for asylum seekers.
8. City Council request the Government of Ontario to develop a regional approach to homelessness in the Greater Toronto Area including ensuring that local governments can provide adequate and accessible shelter space for their residents.
9. City Council request the Government of Ontario to improve the adequacy of social assistance by increasing social assistance rates so that recipients are better able to meet their basic needs, including the cost of living (and housing) in Toronto.
10. City Council reiterate the Board of Health’s request to the Government of Ontario to fund low-barrier crisis stabilization spaces for people with mental health and/or substance use related issues that operate 24 hours per day, seven days per week across the city as part of a full continuum of evidence-based services, treatment and wrap around supports.
11. City Council request the Government of Ontario to provide ongoing and sustainable funding for shelter services to support individuals experiencing homelessness.
12. City Council reiterate its request to the Government of Ontario to expand on its recent commitment to partner with the City of Toronto and create new supportive homes for people experiencing or at risk of homelessness, to meet the City’s HousingTO Action Plan target of creating 18,000 new supportive homes by 2030.
13. City Council urge the Government of Canada to establish a National Encampment Response Plan as recommended in the Federal Housing Advocate's February 2024 final report.
14. City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Shelter and Support Services to report back through the 2025 Budget process on the costs for:
a. Up to three concurrent 24/7 Community Safety Teams for large encampments; and
b. Increasing shelter and respite capacity across the City, including temporary modular and micro-shelter options, required to fully accommodate everyone living in an encampment.
15. City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Shelter and Support Services, to develop and implement key actions to increase access to safe, secure housing and shelter for people who are living outdoors, and respond to the unique housing needs of shelter-seekers, including:
a. Convening a roundtable meeting with refugee-serving organizations and agencies to develop a work plan to build out shelter and housing options for refugee claimants arriving in Toronto that meets their unique shelter and support needs; and,
b. Providing recommendations for a pilot program of enhanced, multi-sectoral case management support for people living outdoors with complex mental and physical health needs, including working in partnership with the Medical Officer of Health, Gerstein Crisis Centre, Family Service Toronto, and other health organizations, hospitals, and community agencies; and reporting back to the Economic and Community Development Committee in the third quarter of 2024.
16. City Council request the Government of Ontario to immediately allocate $54 million to the City of Toronto for the Year 5 administration of the Canada-Ontario Housing Benefit program, to meet demand and continue to support transitions for people living outdoors and in our shelter system to permanent housing.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The General Manager, Toronto Shelter and Support Services gave a presentation on the City's Encampment Approach and Strategy.
Origin
Summary
Toronto is experiencing a housing and homelessness crisis. Communities across Canada continue to see increases in unsheltered homelessness and encampments since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Encampments are a symptom of the housing crisis, shelter demand that exceeds availability, increasing costs of living, inadequate income supports, and other social crises such as the drug toxicity and mental health crisis.
The City believes that permanent, adequate, affordable, and supportive housing is the solution to homelessness and is committed to advancing the progressive realization of the right to adequate housing as set out in the Toronto Housing Charter. Encampments do not meet the human right to housing and are not a long-term solution to homelessness. While the City continues to work towards permanent housing solutions, it is critical that we continue to support people living in encampments, who are among the most vulnerable in our city.
The purpose of this report is to present the City’s strategic approach to encampments that is grounded in a human rights approach while supporting the safety and well-being of people living in encampments and surrounding communities. Key components of this approach include:
a. Expanding the enhanced housing-focused outreach and support mode
b. Exploring new service models for people in encampments
c. Enhancing safety in the shelter system for staff and clients
d. Increasing permanent housing opportunities and shelter system flow
This report also provides an update on the City’s implementation of recommendations in the Ombudsman Toronto’s interim and final reports on encampments and seeks City Council approval of the attached City of Toronto Interdivisional Protocol for Encampments in Toronto, updated based on extensive engagement with people with lived experience of homelessness in encampments, and City and community stakeholders and partners.
From a human rights-based approach, and consistent with what we heard from extensive stakeholder engagement, addressing the urgent issue of encampments requires a multi-divisional and sectoral approach and the commitment of all levels of government, community, and other stakeholders to invest in comprehensive public, social and health-related supports.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-245818.pdf
Attachment 1: Ombudsman Toronto’s Recommendations and City Actions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-245819.pdf
Attachment 2: Third Party Public Engagement Report: City of Toronto Update of the Interdepartmental Service Protocol for Homeless People Camping in Public Spaces (IDP)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-245820.pdf
Attachment 3: City of Toronto Interdivisional Protocol for Encampments in Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-245821.pdf
(May 29, 2024) Presentation from the General Manager, Toronto Shelter and Support Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-246213.pdf
Speakers
Omo Le
Pauline Larsen, Downtown Yonge BIA
Jeff Willmer, A Better Tent City Waterloo Region Inc.
Erik Calhoun
Sheila Penny, Two Steps Home Inc.
Diana Chan McNally, All Saints Toronto
Alexi White, Maytree
Nas Yadollahi, CUPE Local 79
Aimee Carnell, CUPE Local 79
John Van Nostrand, Two-Steps-Home Inc.
Robert Raynor, Two Steps Home
Miguel Avila, Toronto CopWatch
Savhanna Wilson, Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness
Nadine Miller, Pilgrim Feast Tabernacle
Councillor Alex Bierk
Monica Alana, Miracle Arena
Aaron Budd, SvN Architects + Planners
David Walsh, Carrot Common Corp
Paul Bedford
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/comm/communicationfile-179756.pdf
(May 25, 2024) E-mail from David Lawrence (EC.New)
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Manuela Custodio (EC.New)
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Emil Glassbourg (EC.New)
(May 28, 2024) Letter from Pauline Larson, Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area (BIA) on behalf of the 6 Downtown Toronto BIAs (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/comm/communicationfile-180033.pdf
(May 25, 2024) Multiple Communications from 50 Individuals with similar text between May 25, 2024 at 11:20 a.m. to May 29, 2024 at 10:30 a.m. (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/comm/communicationfile-180052.pdf
(May 28, 2024) Letter from Cathy Crowe (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/comm/communicationfile-180070.pdf
(May 28, 2024) E-mail from Kizito Musabimana, Rwandan Canadian Healing Centre on behalf of The African Canadian Collective(ACC)/The Coalition for Canadian people of African Descent (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/comm/communicationfile-180088.pdf
(May 25, 2024) Letter from Diane Chester, Niagara Neighbours for Community Safety (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/comm/communicationfile-180089.pdf
(May 29, 2024) Letter from Alexi White, Director of Systems Change, Maytree (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/comm/communicationfile-180102.pdf
(May 28, 2024) Letter from Pauline Larson, Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area (BIA) (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/comm/communicationfile-180093.pdf
(May 28, 2024) Letter from Diana Chan McNally (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/comm/communicationfile-180103.pdf
(May 29, 2024) Submission from David Walsh (EC.New)
(May 28, 2024) Letter from Ejay Tupe, Director, Mission Canada (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/comm/communicationfile-180104.pdf
(May 29, 2024) Letter from Savhanna Wilson, Acting Executive Director, Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/comm/communicationfile-180115.pdf
(May 29, 2024) E-mail from Leslie Gash, Toronto Shelter Network (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ec/comm/communicationfile-180116.pdf
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-180924.pdf
General Government Committee - Meeting 13
GG13.1 - Largest Property Tax Debtors with Tax Arrears Greater than $500,000 as at December 31, 2023
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Confidential Attachment - The confidential attachment (Attachment 3) to this report identifies three (3) properties owned by individuals with tax arrears in excess of $500,000. The Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act prevents the public disclosure of information that could identify an individual without their consent.
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 3 to the report (May 15, 2024) from the Interim Controller remain confidential in its entirety.
Origin
Summary
This report provides information on property tax accounts with outstanding receivables of $500,000 or more as of December 31, 2023, and reports on the total outstanding tax receivables as at December 31, 2023. The total number of properties with outstanding receivable balances of $500,000 or more is 29, including 26 owned by corporations and 3 owned by individuals as mentioned above. When compared to what was reported as of June 30, 2023, the total number of properties with receivables of $500,000 or more has increased. Further information on prior years can be found in Table 2 of the report.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245811.pdf
Revised Attachment 1 - Properties with Tax Arrears Greater than $500,000 Owned by a Corporation as at December 31, 2023
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-246262.pdf
Attachment 1 - Properties with Tax Arrears Greater than $500,000 Owned by a Corporation as at December 31, 2023
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245812.pdf
Attachment 2 - Summary of Outstanding Tax Receivables as at December 31, 2023 (unaudited) Compared to December 31 Tax Receivables for Years 2019 - 2023
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245813.pdf
Confidential Attachment 3
GG13.2 - 2023 Write-Off of Uncollectible Property Taxes and Accounts Receivable
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council deem the unpaid property taxes levied in all years (including interest and penalties that have accrued on those unpaid taxes up to the time of write-off) on the 182 receivables listed in Attachment 1 to the report (May 1, 2024) from the Interim Controller as uncollectible, and direct the Controller to remove these amounts from the tax assessment roll by writing them off.
2. City Council deem the Provincial Offences Act fines with a total value of $6,051,456 listed in Table 3 and Attachment 3 to the report (May 1, 2024) from the Interim Controller as uncollectible and direct the Controller to remove this amount from the respective account by writing it off.
Origin
Summary
This report provides information on accounts receivable amounts that were written off as uncollectible in 2023 under delegated authority provided to the Controller including property tax amounts owing, outstanding receivables for invoiced services, and Provincial Offences Act fines.
This report recommends that Council deem uncollectible and approve for write-off certain property tax amounts owing on 31 individual property tax accounts, comprising 182 receivable amounts which total $1,950,451 that relate to taxation years 1995 to 2023. Staff are recommending these property tax receivable amounts for write-off as they are no longer returned on the assessment roll, or for which further collection efforts and recovery of outstanding amounts are extremely unlikely to be successful.
Additionally, there are 3 cases of Provincial Offences Act receivables with a total dollar value of $6,051,456 which this report recommends be deemed uncollectible and approved for write-off, as the Controller does not have delegated authority to write off. These offences relate to pre-transfer cases that are associated with corporations that are no longer in operation and for which City Legal has confirmed that they have no recoverable assets.
In 2023, the Controller, in accordance with delegated authority as provided in the City’s Financial Control By-law, has approved the write-off of $1,024,197 in outstanding receivables for various services invoiced by City Divisions where collection is considered doubtful. The Controller has also approved the write-off of 11,296 Provincial Offences Act cases totalling $8,052,086. In all cases, no amounts were recovered since debtors could not be located or were deceased, the business was no longer in operation and / or had no assets, or exhaustive collection efforts proved futile.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245576.pdf
Attachment 1 - Write-off Uncollectible Property Taxes From Tax Assessment Roll
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245577.pdf
Attachment 2 - Divisional Breakdown and Explanation of Amounts Recommended by the Controller to be Written Off
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245578.pdf
Attachment 3 - Provincial Offences Act Fines Deemed Uncollectible Above $500,000
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245579.pdf
Declared Interests (Committee)
Councillor Stephen Holyday - A member of his family is a member of a club listed in the item.
Written Declaration: https://secure.toronto.ca/council/declared-interest-file.do?id=11983
GG13.9 - Amendment to Non-Competitive Blanket Contract 47022513 with Strongco Limited Partnership for Proprietary Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) Parts and Services
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommend that:
1. City Council authorizes the General Manager, Fleet Services Division to amend the Legal Agreement and Blanket Contract Number 47022513 with Strongco LP for the supply and delivery of labour, materials, and equipment necessary to provide overflow warranty and non-warranty Original Equipment Manufacturer authorized parts and services for Volvo, Case, Fassi, National Crane, and any other equipment Strongco LP is the authorized dealer, to extend the target date by one (1) year from November 1, 2024 to October 31, 2025, with the option to renew the contract for four (4) additional (1) one year periods, at the sole discretion of the City, and increase the total target value by $7,457,061 net of Harmonized Sales Tax and all applicable charges, ($7,588,306 net of Harmonized Sales Tax Recoveries), revising the current Blanket Contract value from $7,547,751 to $15,004,812 net of all taxes and charges, based on the following conditions:
a. The agreement will be based on the condition that Strongco LP continues to be the exclusive distributor for the proprietary Original Equipment Manufacturer parts and specialized services for Volvo, Case, Fassi, National Crane, and other equipment; and
b. On other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Fleet Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to seek authority from City Council to amend non-competitive Blanket Contract 47022513 with Strongco Limited Partnership (Strongco LP) to extend the contract validity and date by an additional five (5) year term and increase the contract value by $7,457,061 net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($7,588,306 net of Harmonized Sales Tax Recoveries). The term extension will revise the maximum duration from five (5) years to ten (10) years, where all optional extension years are exhausted. This blanket contract value increase will revise the target value from $7,547,751 to $15,004,812 net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($16,955,438 including all taxes and charges, $15,268,897 net of Harmonized Sales Tax Recoveries).
The contract is for the supply and delivery of labour, materials, and equipment necessary to provide overflow warranty and non-warranty Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) authorized parts and services for Volvo, Case, Fassi, National Crane, and any other equipment for which Strongco LP is an authorized parts and service dealer. The parts and specialized services cannot be obtained through the competitive procurement process as Strongco LP is the only authorized dealer in the Greater Toronto Area.
This fleet equipment is required to ensure the continued delivery of critical services across the City of Toronto, specifically to:
- Support and maintain water infrastructure for Toronto Water operations
- Support haulage operations for Solid Waste Management
- Maintain and develop parks, urban forests, and recreation facilities for Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and
- Build and maintain the transportation network for Transportation Services.
Access to Original Equipment Manufacturer parts and specialized services for warranty/non-warranty repair and maintenance is vital to ensuring that units are safe, reliable, and available when required.
Additionally, completing preventative maintenance services in line with Original Equipment Manufacturer recommended standards and specifications supports Fleet Services’ ongoing work to advance fleet safety and reliability by optimizing fleet performance and equipment health and safety. With properly maintained fleet equipment, a better return on investment can be expected, including longer in-service availability and higher returns yielded from market returns when this equipment is sent to auction at the end of it’s life cycle.
City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195-Purchasing, where the current request exceeds the Chief Procurement Officer's authority of the cumulative five (5) year commitment for each vendor, under Article 7, Section 195-7.3 (D) of the Purchasing By-Law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71-Financial Control, Section 71-11.1.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245798.pdf
GG13.10 - Non-Competitive Contracts with Directrik Inc., and HD Compression Inc., for the Purchase of Proprietary Essential Parts and Services for Maintenance of Process Equipment at Various Wastewater and Water Treatment Plants for Toronto Water
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommend that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water, to enter into a non-competitive contract with Directrik Inc. (Directrik), for the continued supply of proprietary parts required for the maintenance of equipment installed at various City water and wastewater treatment plants, on the following terms and conditions:
a. The initial term of the contract be from the date the contract is issued to December 31, 2024, in the amount of $2,200,000 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($2,238,720 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) and include the option to renew for six (6) additional separate one (1) year periods, at the sole discretion of the City and subject to budget approvals, for the total amount of $16,857,417 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($17,154,107 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries);
b. Directrik continues to be the exclusive distributor of the parts; and,
c. conditional upon such other terms and conditions that are satisfactory to the General Manager, Toronto Water and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water, to enter into a non-competitive contract with HD Compression Inc. (HD Compression), for the supply and delivery of proprietary parts, maintenance services, and bumper-to-bumper warranty for the City's four Ingersoll Rand centrifugal TURBO-AIR at Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant, on the following terms and conditions:
a. The initial term of the contract be from August 01, 2024 to December 31, 2024, in the amount of $44,724 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($45,511 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) and include the option to renew for six (6) additional separate one (1) year periods, at the sole discretion of the City and subject to budget approvals, for the total amount of $901,258 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($917,120 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries);
b. HD Compression continues to be the exclusive distributor of parts, maintenance services, and bumper-to-bumper warranty; and,
c. Conditional upon such other terms and conditions that are satisfactory to the General Manager, Toronto Water and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to request City Council authority to enter into two (2) separate non-competitive contracts with Directrik Inc., and HD Compression Inc., for the supply of proprietary parts, supplies and services. The initial term of Directrik Inc., contract will be from the date of award to December 31, 2024 and the initial term of HD Compression contract will be from August 01, 2024 to December 31, 2024. Both contracts will have the option to extend the agreement for up to six (6) separate one (1) year periods, at the sole discretion of the City and subject to budget approvals, in the total amount of $17,758,674, net of all taxes and charges ($18,071,227 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries).
City Council approval is required in accordance with Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195-Purchasing, where the current request exceeds the Chief Procurement Officer's authority of the cumulative five-year commitment for each supplier under Article 7, Non-competitive or Limited solicitations, Section 195-7.3(D) of the Purchasing By-law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax allowed under staff authority as per Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 71, Financial Control, Section 71-11A.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245726.pdf
GG13.11 - Proposed Settlement of M.J. Dixon Construction Ltd. Claim for Delay and Cost Escalation Compensation - Mount Dennis Net Zero Early Learning and Child Care Centre
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 5 - York South - Weston
Confidential Attachment - This report is about litigation or potential litigation that affects the City of Toronto. The attachment to this report contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions set out in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 15, 2024) from the City Solicitor and Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment, at the discretion of the City Solicitor, but that the remainder of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 15, 2024) from the City Solicitor and Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, remain confidential as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to obtain instructions regarding a proposed settlement of the claim by M.J. Dixon Construction Ltd., against the City of Toronto, for compensation arising out of delay and delay-related cost escalation claims for work associated with the Mount Dennis Net Zero Early Learning and Child Care Centre at 1234 Weston Road.
The Mount Dennis Net Zero Early Learning and Child Care Centre is located in the York South-Weston neighbourhood and represents the City's first net zero energy child care facility, and largest City-owned child care centre in Toronto. Construction of the new facility will result in a 98 space child care center that will serve the ward and future population growth, and advances the City's target of serving 50 percent of children aged zero to six by 2026, as identified in Toronto's 2017 - 2026 Licensed Child Care Growth Strategy.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245804.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
GG13.12 - Acquisition of 21 Private Properties for Public Highway Purposes - Waiving General Conditions (G) and (H) of Appendix B, Delegation of Authorities, Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 213
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 8 - Eglinton - Lawrence, 9 - Davenport, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the exemption from General Conditions (G) and (H) of Appendix B of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 213 (Real Property) for the 21 properties listed in Appendix A to the report (May 15, 2024) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and approve additional compensation for each vendor's legal fees to a maximum of $5,000 inclusive of Harmonized Sales Tax.
2. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 15, 2024) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, remain confidential in its entirety, as it contains information pertaining to a pending acquisition of land and scientific information supplied in confidence to the City.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is in connection with the acquisition of 21 newly constructed sidewalk properties along Eglinton Avenue West to seek City Council authority to (i) exempt from the due diligence and remediation requirements of General Conditions (G) and (H) set out in Appendix B of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 213, Real Property, and (ii) authorize the payment of the vendors' legal costs, to a limit of $5,000 (inclusive of Harmonized Sales Tax) per property. Staff have determined these properties present reduced environmental risk to the City and that the requested authorities will facilitate a timely acquisition process.
The newly constructed sidewalks were installed by Metrolinx as part of its Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit Project. Transportation Services has directed Corporate Real Estate Management to acquire these properties for formal designation as public sidewalks.
Once the requested details are authorized, Corporate Real Estate Management will complete the acquisition of these 21 properties through existing delegated real estate authorities and pursuant to the requirements set out in Municipal Code Chapter 213.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245803.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
GG13.13 - Application for Approval to Expropriate Property Interests near St. Clair West Station for the Fire Ventilation Upgrade Project - Stage 1
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorizes the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to continue negotiations to acquire the property interests set out in Appendix A (the "Property Requirements") to the report (May 15, 2024) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and as illustrated in the draft reference plan set out in Appendix B to the report (May 15, 2024) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and City Council authorize the initiation of expropriation proceedings for the Property Requirements, for the purposes of a permanent fire ventilation storage room and temporary access for construction staging, if the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, deems it necessary or appropriate to proceed in that manner.
2. City Council grants authority to serve and publish the Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate Land for the Property Requirements, to forward to the Ontario Land Tribunal any requests for hearings that are received, to attend the hearing(s) to present the City's position, and to report the Ontario Land Tribunal's recommendations to City Council for its consideration.
Origin
Summary
This report seeks authority to initiate expropriation proceedings for a permanent and temporary easement interest in part of the property municipally known as 396 St. Clair Avenue West, for the purpose of the Toronto Transit Commission's (the "T.T.C.") St. Clair West Station Fire Ventilation Upgrade Project (the "Project").
This is Stage 1 of the expropriation process. Should City Council adopt the recommendations in this report, staff will serve and publish the Notice of Application for Approval to Expropriate Land on each registered owner. Owners, as defined in the Expropriations Act (the "Act"), will have 30 days to request a hearing into whether the City's proposed taking is fair, sound and reasonably necessary.
Staff will report back to City Council with a Stage 2 report, providing details on property values and other costs, and if a hearing is requested, the report of the Ontario Land Tribunal. The proposed expropriation would only be effected after adoption by City Council, as approving authority, of the Stage 2 report, by registration of an expropriation plan(s), which would then be followed by the service of notices as required by the Act.
Before the City could take possession of the expropriated property, offers of compensation based on appraisal reports must be served on each registered owner.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245806.pdf
GG13.14 - Expropriation of Properties for the St. Clair Avenue West Transportation Master Plan - Stage 2
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Confidential Attachment - This report deals with a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the City of Toronto (the "City").
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council, as the approving authority under the Expropriations Act (the “Act’), approve the expropriation of the property interests as set out in Appendix A (and as identified on the draft reference plans attached as Appendix C (the “Property Interests”) to the report (May 15, 2024) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.
2. City Council authorize the City, as the expropriating authority under the Act, to take all necessary steps to comply with the Act, including but not limited to the preparation and registration of Expropriation Plans, and the service of Notices of Expropriation, Notices of Election and Notices of Possession, as may be required.
3. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to prepare, execute and serve offers of compensation based on reports appraising the market value of the Property Interests in accordance with the requirements of the Act.
4. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 once there has been a final determination of the compensation payable to the property owners by arbitration, appeal, or settlement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The General Government Committee recessed its public session to meet in closed session to consider this Item, as it deals with a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the City of Toronto (the "City").
Origin
Summary
On July 14, 2021 and April 14, 2018, City Council authorized the initiation of expropriation proceedings for properties required for constructing Transportation Services’ St. Clair Avenue West Transportation Master Plan, which aims to improve multi-modal transportation network in the area.
This report relates to the second stage of the expropriation process. During the first stage and in accordance with the Expropriations Act, Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate were served on all applicable "registered owners". Registered owners then had 30 days to request an inquiry into whether the proposed taking is fair, sound, and reasonably necessary. Four property owners initially requested inquiries, however, those requests have since been withdrawn. Because of the withdrawal, City Council may now approve the expropriation by this Stage 2 report. If authorized, Expropriation Plans will be registered and associated notices served. Statutory Offers of Compensation must be served prior to the City taking possession of the expropriated properties.
The property requirements are set out in Appendix A and shown on the draft reference plans attached as Appendix C.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245807.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
GG13.15 - Bayview Reservoir and Milliken Mills Reservoir Leases with the City of Markham
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, or their designate, to enter into two 21-year-less-a-day lease agreements with the City of Markham (the "Lease Agreements"), substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix A to the report (May 15, 2024) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and such other and amended terms acceptable to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, or their designate, from time to time, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize that the Director, Transaction Services, Corporate Real Estate Management, or their designate, shall administer and manage the agreements on behalf of the City of Toronto, including the execution and delivery of any consents, amendments, approvals, waivers, and notices, including notices of termination, provided that the Director, Transaction Services, Corporate Real Estate Management may, at any time, refer consideration of any such matters to City Council for its determination and direction.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council authority for the City of Toronto (the "Landlord" or the "City") to enter into two 21-year-less-a-day lease agreements with the City of Markham (the "Tenant" or "Markham") to permit the continued use of surface lands at 8127 Bayview Avenue, Markham, Ontario (the "Bayview Reservoir") and 4375 Fourteenth Avenue, Markham, Ontario (the "Milliken Mills Reservoir") as parkland, a parking lot and operating a metering chamber by the Tenant.
Bayview Reservoir and Milliken Mills Reservoir are owned by the City of Toronto and operated by Toronto Water as treated water reservoirs, serving the middle and eastern portions of Toronto and the York Region.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245794.pdf
GG13.16 - Innovative Partnership to Accelerate Digital Services with Payments
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The General Government Committee recommend that:
1. City Council receive the report (May 17, 2024) from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services for information.
Origin
Summary
In December 2023, City staff provided an update to the General Government Committee on the Phase 1 implementation of the MyToronto Pay platform, a City-branded and customized version of PayIt, which highlighted achievements and opportunities for improvement. Continued progress has been made in enhancing customer experiences and refining the City's digital payments vision since then.
This report provides an overview of the City’s approach for:
- Developing business requirements for digital payment functionalities, which will be informed by:
- Conducting City-wide future visioning activities with key business divisions.
- Gathering customer requirements through a public engagement.
- Researching the approach to digital payments undertaken by other jurisdictions and organizations.
- Conducting a robust, open, and competitive procurement process for the selection of a suitable vendor.
- Extending the current PayIt contract as permitted by the original contract terms to maintain business continuity for the City and its residents using the MyToronto Pay platform.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/gg/bgrd/backgroundfile-245927.pdf
Speakers
Infrastructure and Environment Committee - Meeting 14
IE14.1 - Financial Plan for the City of Toronto's Municipal Drinking Water License Renewal
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommend that:
1. City Council approve the Financial Plan - Attachment 1 to the report (May 8, 2024) from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, prepared for the City of Toronto's Municipal Drinking Water System, in accordance with Ontario Regulation 453/07, for submission to the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, in compliance with the requirements of the Municipal Drinking Water License renewal process.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council approval of a Financial Plan prepared as a condition of the Municipal Drinking Water Licence renewal process under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002. A Municipal Drinking Water Licence, issued by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, approves the operation of a municipal drinking water system. The City of Toronto's current Drinking Water Licence, which was previously approved by City Council in July 2019, expires on January 29, 2025.
The Financial Plan for the City of Toronto’s drinking water system has been prepared in accordance with Ontario Regulation 453/07 and must be approved by a resolution of Council for submission to the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing by July 29, 2024.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245507.pdf
IE14.2 - Pickering Town Line Agreement
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council grant approval to negotiate, enter into and execute an agreement with The Corporation of the City of Pickering for the ongoing maintenance, repair and construction, and the cost-sharing of such maintenance, repair and construction, of the Pickering Town Line road on terms and conditions generally as set out in the report (May 13, 2024) from the General Manager, Transportation Services and on such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager of Transportation Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Origin
Summary
This report requests authority to negotiate, enter into and execute an agreement with The Corporation of the City of Pickering for the ongoing maintenance, repair and construction of the Pickering Town Line road, a jointly shared 2.75 kilometres north-south local road extending between Finch Avenue East and Steeles Avenue East. The agreement identifies cost-sharing and the protocols of co-operation between The Corporation of the City of Pickering and the City of Toronto for the road, generally as further detailed in this report. This new agreement would replace the old agreement between both parties, which old agreement recently expired on January 1, 2023. The work-related terms will generally continue as they were, with the Corporation of the City of Pickering continuing to undertake all works on behalf of both parties. The new agreement is based on generally the same terms of the previous agreement, with the maintenance unit costs updated to reflect the increases due to inflation during the past ten (10) years and the term updated. In addition, a definition of capital improvements is included, provisions surrounding capital improvements are included, and a new provision dealing with design and contract administration fees are included. It is anticipated that the annual cost for the ongoing maintenance of the Pickering Town Line road will be in the range of $3700 to $6200, which will be shared equally by both municipalities.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245630.pdf
IE14.3 - Cycling Network Plan Update (2025 - 2027)
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council endorse, in principle, the bikeway projects contained in the Near-Term Implementation Program (2025 - 2027) as outlined in Attachment 2 to the report (May 13, 2024) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, as the focus of Transportation Services' cycling budget and capital implementation program, including the initiation of feasibility analyses, public consultation, and detailed design.
2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to initiate the near-term studies of the Major City-Wide Cycling Routes as outlined in Attachment 3 to the report (May 13, 2024) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, and to bring forward the findings of these studies and recommendations regarding future implementation at the appropriate time.
3. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, as part of the design, installation, and monitoring of new bikeway projects, to continue to work in consultation with the local Councillors, community representatives, and residents to identify and implement changes to the bikeway projects contained in the Near-Term Implementation Program, before and after installation.
4. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to request, as part of the annual budget process, the capital funding required to implement the Near-Term Cycling Implementation Program (2025 - 2027), as well as the operating budget required to fund the maintenance costs of newly constructed bikeways.
5. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to restore the right-turn on red movement on Bloor Street West between the Humber River and Aberfoyle Road until such time as the traffic signal timing is updated, and monitor for safety concerns and make adjustments, as needed.
6. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to report back to Infrastructure and Environment Committee in the first quarter of 2025, on the feasibility of scale-up the delivery of the Cycling Network Plan to 150 kilometres of new and major upgrade bikeway projects for the 2028 - 2030 Implementation Program, with the report to outline the staff resources and budget that would be needed to do so.
7. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to finalize the Scarborough West Rail Trail study undertaken as part of the 2022 - 2024 Cycling Network Plan Update regarding the feasibility of a multi-use trail along the former GN-GECO rail spur line, update the local Councillor on the outcome of the feasibility study, and work with the local Councillor to update the community on the feasibility study including publishing a summary of the study for the public by the end of the third quarter of 2024.
8. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services work with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry, and Recreation to extend, if feasible, the Copperfield Road cycle path west of Manse Road, through Greyabbey Ravine and south of the rail corridor, to connect to Greyabbey Trail.
Origin
Summary
The Cycling Network Plan, most recently updated and endorsed by Toronto City Council in December 2021, seeks to build on the existing network of cycling routes to Connect gaps in the current network, Grow the network into new parts of the city, and Renew existing parts of the network to improve safety.
This report provides a status update for the 2022 - 2024 Near-Term Implementation Program and seeks City Council endorsement of the 2025 - 2027 Near-Term Implementation Program as a roadmap for the delivery of new and renewed cycling infrastructure in Toronto for the next three years.
The Cycling Network Plan consists of three components:
- a Vision for the Long-Term Cycling Network;
- a Network of Major City-Wide Cycling Routes; and,
- a Three Year Near-Term Implementation Program.
The Plan components, objectives and indicators align with and support other City policies and initiatives including the Official Plan, TransformTO Net Zero Strategy, Vision Zero Road Safety Plan, RapidTO Surface Transit Network Plan, and the Congestion Management Plan.
A successful city requires a transportation system that is safe for people of all ages and abilities. Research and experience across North America have shown that when cities do not provide safe and comfortable alternatives to driving, the majority of residents travel by motor vehicle. In growing cities like Toronto, where hundreds of new developments are being constructed every year, if every new resident added another car on the street network, the traffic congestion across all parts of the city would be unmanageable. Travel mode choice is a crucial aspect of creating healthy, livable cities, and requires investing in new transit, bikeway and pedestrian projects.
In 2021, City Council endorsed the 2022 - 2024 Near-Term Implementation Program which committed to 100 kilometres of new bikeways, and 40 kilometres of renewed bikeways which includes upgrades and enhancements to existing cycling routes.
Transportation Services is on track to deliver 75 kilometres of the 100 kilometres new bikeways committed by the end of 2024. While this value falls below the 2022 - 2024 target, it is expected to surpass the previous accomplishment of 65 kilometres over 2019 - 2021 without the unique parameters of the ActiveTO Cycling Network Expansion as a pandemic response program. There are also approximately 25 kilometres of additional projects that have been approved by City Council and are either underway and extending into 2025, or where construction has not yet started due to conflict coordination with other major road projects, or challenges experienced during detailed design.
Approximately 25 kilometres of the projects completed in 2022 - 2023 and expected to be complete by 2024 are on the network of Major City-Wide Cycling Routes, such as Bloor Street West, Eglinton Avenue, and Sheppard Avenue East. These additions bring the total existing Major City-Wide Cycling Routes to over 230 kilometres, or 46 percent of the 500 kilometres network.
The increase in delivery and the quality of projects have been made possible by previous Council investments in complete streets, including increased funding, additional staff, and a new streamlined by-law reporting process approved as part of the 2021 Cycling Network Plan Update.
Transportation Services is expected to exceed its Council directed goal of 40 kilometres of renewed projects by 8 kilometres, with an anticipated delivery of 48 kilometres of upgrades and enhancements. Investing in improving the safety of existing older bikeways contributes to creating an all ages and abilities bikeway network. These upgrades are important improvements, and for many people who cycle, they feel like new infrastructure and unlock access to more destinations by bike and expand the accessibility of the cycling network.
The City of Toronto has made historic investments in the cycling network over the last three years. In 2023, $30 million was invested in new and renewed bikeways, representing the single largest financial contribution in one year for bikeways. Transportation Services has increased capacity to deliver transformative complete streets projects with enhanced safety and public realm features. Bikeway projects more regularly include permanent materials such as raised cycle tracks and green infrastructure. Additionally, the scope of cycling projects have grown to focus on all modes by implementing improvements for people driving (such as new turn lanes), for pedestrians and people with disabilities (such as new or wider sidewalks, curb extensions and raised crossings), and for transit (such as transit priority measures), thereby taking a complete streets approach with considerations for all road users.
Further, Transportation Services has focused on enhancing intersection design and is in the process of implementing over 20 protected intersections, as well as protected signal phasing and leading bicycle intervals to improve safety at intersections, where most serious and fatal collisions occur.
In November and December of 2023, Transportation Services undertook a public consultation process for the 2025 - 2027 Cycling Network Near-Term Implementation Program. Consultation activities included an online survey (over 9,000 completed responses), an interactive map (over 5,000 comments), three online workshops with interest groups and one public virtual meeting (over 300 participants), as well as four public drop-in or pop-up events (one in each Community Council district, attended by approximately 160 people in total).
Throughout the public consultation, there was a consistent message from people who cycle: progress is not only measured by the quantity of bikeways installed, but also the quality of design and the feeling of safety and comfort, especially at intersections.
“Safety” was the top recommended factor for deciding where to put new bikeways among respondents of all types. For people who cycle, “connectivity” was the next most important factor. From people who do not regularly cycle, their second top factor was “current cycling demand”, and they recommended prioritizing the avoidance of impacts to other modes of travel (vehicle lanes, parking, transit), when determining the location and type of bikeways to be implemented.
The routes recommended for the 2025 - 2027 Near-Term Implementation Program are based on public input, City policies and priorities, and technical requirements. The prioritization framework and data sets used to analyze potential routes were updated to reflect lessons learned through the consultation process, including greater emphasis on safety, connectivity, and equity.
Technical feasibility reviews were undertaken to assess, at a high-level, impacts and deliverability of candidate routes based on the design emphasis areas of all ages and abilities and complete streets, including an assessment of existing motor vehicle volumes. The coordination of capital works, especially sequencing or bundling with other planned major projects, is an important factor that greatly influences the implementation schedule. In addition to taking advantage of road work opportunities, other delivery emphasis areas of this near-term program include expanding and connecting to Major City-Wide Cycling Routes, as well as advancing recommendations from recent and underway Neighbourhood Streets Plans.
Key projects to be delivered in the 2025 - 2027 Near-Term Implementation Program include:
- Etobicoke Greenway and North Etobicoke Hydro Corridor Trails
- Weston Cycling Connections Phases 2 and 3
- Keele Street from Steeles Avenue West to Finch Avenue West
- Lawrence Heights Cycling Connections and upgrade of Marlee Avenue
- Warden Hydro Corridor Trail
- Sandhurst Circle Cycling Connections
- Several sections of Eglinton Avenue, including the EglintonTOday phases, as well as McCowan Road to Kingston Road
- Dupont Street from Dundas Street West to Lansdowne Avenue (major upgrade) and new from Lansdowne Avenue to Davenport Road
- Parkside Drive from Bloor Street West to Lake Shore Boulevard
Transportation Services is proposing that the 2025 - 2027 Near-Term Implementation Program maintains the ambitious target of 100 kilometres of new and major upgrade bikeway projects. Over the past three years, investments have been made in staff resourcing and budget, better preparing the City of Toronto to achieve this commitment.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245671.pdf
Attachment 1 - Completed Bikeways 2022 - 2024 and Status of Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245672.pdf
Attachment 2 - 2025 - 2027 Near-Term Implementation Program - Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245673.pdf
Attachment 2 - 2025 - 2027 Near-Term Implementation Program - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245696.pdf
Attachment 3 - Major City-Wide Cycling Routes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245674.pdf
Attachment 4 - Cycling Network Near-Term Implementation Prioritization Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245675.pdf
Attachment 5 - Cycling Impact Analysis - Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245676.pdf
Attachment 5 - Cycling Impact Analysis - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245679.pdf
Attachment 5 - Cycling Impact Analysis - Part 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245680.pdf
Attachment 6 - Project-specific Council Request Responses
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245677.pdf
Speakers
Michael Longfield, Cycle Toronto
Eric Kennedy
Arkady Arkhangorodsky
Ilya Kreynin
Yael Boyd
Gil Penalosa, Toronto for Everyone
Joel Gilbert Anderson, Danforth Kingston 4 All
Ian McVey
Michelle Grospe
Misha Perozak, Scarborough Junction Community, Danforth Gardens Neighbourhood Association
Jay Brown, Etobicoke Cycling Club
Robert Zaichkowski, Community Bikeways (TCBC)
Dan Medlyn
Elliot Van Woudenberg
Tristan Ridley, Danforth-Kingston4All
Hamish Wilson
Ingrid Buday
Mauricio Argote-Cortes
Sam Pappas
Taysir Alam
Marc Collins
Ted Turner, DanforthKingston4All
Ron Sedran, Canaccord Genuity Corp.
Dennis Guye
Sean Cooper, Danforth Kingston 4 All
Dana Snell
Peter Triantafillou
Anthony Kyriakopoulos
Anne Keary
Andre McEvenue
Mary Bredin
Simon Nyilassy, Balance on Bloor
Tom O'Reilly
Malcolm Kennedy
Marvin Macaraig
Cody MacRae, Balance On Bloor
Robin Richardson, Yonge4All
Linda Nicolson
Jessica Spieker, Friends and Families for Safe Streets
Teresa Kelly, Sunnyside Community Association
Anne Christie
Steven Fistell
Trevor Townsend
Councillor Stephen Holyday
Councillor Parthi Kandavel
Councillor Gord Perks
Communications (Committee)
(May 21, 2024) E-mail from Adam Rodgers (IE.Main)
(May 22, 2024) E-mail from Dan Medlyn (IE.Supp)
(May 22, 2024) E-mail from Thomas Blennerhassett (IE.Supp)
(May 22, 2024) E-mail from Michael Hoffman (IE.Supp)
(May 23, 2024) E-mail from Daniel Di Camillo (IE.Supp)
(May 23, 2024) E-mail from Colleen Johnston (IE.Supp)
(May 23, 2024) Submission from Michael Longfield, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179831.pdf
(May 24, 2024) E-mail from Jonathan Schmidt on behalf of the Scarborough Junction Community (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179875.pdf
(May 24, 2024) E-mail from Sully Syed (IE.Supp)
(May 24, 2024) E-mail from Eric Stark (IE.Supp)
(May 25, 2024) E-mail from Megan Davies (IE.Supp)
(May 25, 2024) E-mail from Eberhardt-Butler (IE.Supp)
(May 25, 2024) E-mail from Hamid Hosseini (IE.Supp)
(May 25, 2024) E-mail from Krissan Veerasingam (IE.Supp)
(May 25, 2024) E-mail from Vincent Yeh (IE.Supp)
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (IE.Supp)
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Deb Baumgarten (IE.Supp)
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Paul Vincent (IE.Supp)
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Jackie Guan (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Luis Ledesma (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Elana Sone (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Jacky Kennedy, Holly Reid, and Marjorie Nichol, Cycle55+ (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179933.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Spencer Craddock (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from David Simor, Director, the Centre for Active Transportation (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179975.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Faraz Gholizadeh, Co-Chair, Safe Parkside (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179977.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Submission from Rob Blakely (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Gideon Forman, Climate Change and Transportation Policy Analyst, David Suzuki Foundation (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179979.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Albert Koehl, Coordinator, Toronto Community Bikeways Coalition (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179980.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Simon Nyilassy, Director, Balance on Bloor (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179970.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Eddy O’Toole (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Piotr Sepski (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Susan Bakshi (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Matt Welke (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Peter Low (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Robin Richardson on behalf of Yonge4All (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179989.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Jessica Spieker, Chair, Friends and Families for Safe Streets (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180017.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Jay Brown, Director, Etobicoke Cycling Club (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180023.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Ryan Clarke (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Teresa Kelly, Member of the Sunnyside Community Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180025.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Graeme Kennedy Senior Associate, Tenblock (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180037.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Kim Stanton (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Sharon Bider (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Lyn Adamson, Co-Chair, ClimateFast (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180056.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Christine Panowyk (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Rhoda Potter, President, Agincourt Village Community Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180062.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Michael Marmoreo (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Steven Glassman (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Karen Kelly Archer (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Dana Singer (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Peter Low (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Jennifer Alexander (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Submission from Rob Blakely (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180120.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Multiple Communications from 120 Individuals on Cycling Network Plan were received from May 23, 2024 2:57 p.m. to May 27, 2024 10:07 p.m. (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179861.pdf
(May 28, 2024) Multiple Communications from 25 Individuals on Scarborough West Trail were received from May 24, 2024 10:54 a.m. to May 28, 2024 9:28 a.m. (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180061.pdf
(May 28, 2024) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180064.pdf
(May 28, 2024) E-mail from Peter Triantafillou on behalf of Paulo Joao Costa (IE.Supp)
(May 28, 2024) Multiple Communications from 57 Individuals on Danforth Kingston Complete Street were received from May 23, 2024 6:31 p.m. to May 28, 2024 1:36 p.m. (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179895.pdf
(May 28, 2024) Multiple Communications from 107 Individuals on Midtown Yonge Complete Street were received from May 26, 2024 4:22 p.m. to May 28, 2024 3:59 p.m. (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179915.pdf
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181108.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Lanrick Bennett Jr., Bicycle Mayor of Toronto TO (CC.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-180272.pdf
(May 28, 2024) E-mail from A Salamanca (CC.Main)
(May 28, 2024) E-mail from Elisabeth Foerster (CC.Main)
(May 29, 2024) E-mail from Joseph Pauker (CC.Main)
(May 29, 2024) E-mail from Lisa Kristensen (CC.Main)
(May 30, 2024) E-mail from Sini Maury (CC.Main)
(May 30, 2024) E-mail from Jeremy Lempert (CC.Main)
(May 30, 2024) E-mail from Jacqueline Horne (CC.Main)
(May 30, 2024) E-mail from Tanya Bruce (CC.Main)
(May 31, 2024) E-mail from Daniel Baum (CC.Main)
(May 31, 2024) E-mail from Claus Lensbøl (CC.Main)
(June 3, 2024) E-mail from Melissa Avila (CC.Main)
(June 4, 2024) E-mail from Peter Wilson (CC.Main)
(June 4, 2024) E-mail from Matthew Lawson (CC.Main)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Adam Rodgers (CC.Main)
(June 6, 2024) E-mail from Aaron Matthews (CC.Main)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Despina Melohe (CC.Main)
(June 19, 2024) Letter from Holly Reid, Executive, Cycle Don Valley Midtown (CC.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181129.pdf
(June 24, 2024) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Michael Longfield (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) Letter from Giles Gherson, President and CEO, Toronto Region Board of Trade (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181193.pdf
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Mauricio Argote-Cortes (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Ian Ptolemy (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Chris Garbutt (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Steven Fistell (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Ian Worling (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) Multiple Communications from from 235 Individuals (from June 25 to June 27, 2024) (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181232.pdf
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Davis and Rhonda Costas-Mirza (CC.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Jay Brown (CC.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Martin Gagne (CC.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Peter Breton (CC.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Kristina Stockwood (CC.New)
IE14.4 - Cycling Network Plan - 2024 Cycling Infrastructure and Missing Sidewalk Installation - Third Quarter Update
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 2 - Etobicoke Centre, 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 6 - York Centre, 8 - Eglinton - Lawrence, 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 13 - Toronto Centre, 14 - Toronto - Danforth, 16 - Don Valley East, 19 - Beaches - East York
Bills 647, 669, 670, 671 and 672 have been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of the following bikeway projects on:
a. Avenue Road from Bloor Street West to Davenport Road, uni-directional cycle track;
b. Elm Ridge Drive from Newgate Road to the western limit of the Elm Ridge Drive Bridge, bi-directional cycle track;
c. Marlee Avenue from Castlefield Avenue to Roselawn Avenue, cycle track, and Roselawn Avenue to Eglinton Avenue West, bi-directional cycle track;
d. Mill Road from Rathburn Road to Burnhamthorpe Road, bi-directional cycle track;
e. Burnhamthorpe Road from Mill Road to the Toronto City Limit, multi-use trail;
f. O'Connor Drive from Hopedale Avenue to Broadview Avenue, uni-directional cycle track;
g. Broadview Avenue from O'Connor Drive to Cosburn Avenue, uni-directional cycle track;
h. Adelaide Street East from Parliament Street to Power Street, uni-directional cycle track;
i. Richmond Street East from Parliament Street to Power Street, uni-directional cycle track;
j. Power Street from Adelaide Street East to Richmond Street East, uni-directional cycle track;
k. Sudbury Street from Queen Street West to Abell Street, contra-flow bike lane;
l. Steeprock Drive from Chesswood Drive to Dufferin Street, uni-directional cycle track;
m. Whitehorse Road from Steeprock Drive to Rimrock Road, bike lane;
n. Rimrock Road from Whitehorse Road to W.R. Allen Road, bike lane;
o. Whitehorse Road from Steeprock Drive to Rimrock Road, bike lane;
p. Glendale Avenue from The Queensway to Parkdale Road, contra-flow bike lane and bike lane;
q. Parkdale Road from Glendale Avenue (south leg) to Sunnyside Avenue, contra-flow bike lane and bike lane;
r. Sunnyside Avenue from Galley Avenue to Pearson Avenue, contra-flow bike lane and bike lane;
s. Galley Avenue from Sunnyside Avenue to Macdonell Avenue, contra-flow bike lane;
t. Macdonell Avenue from Rideau Avenue to Seaforth Avenue, shared two-way cycling condition;
u. Seaforth Avenue from Macdonell Avenue to Brock Avenue, contra-flow bike lane and shared two-way cycling condition;
v. Harbour Street from Lower Simcoe Street to 130 metres east of Lower Simcoe Street, bi-directional cycle track;
w. Lake Shore Boulevard West from 15 metres west of Lower Simcoe Street to Lower Simcoe Street, bi-directional cycle track;
x. Davenport Road from Wychwood Park to Albany Avenue, uni-directional cycle track; and
y. Davenport Road from Marchmount Road to Winona Drive, uni-directional cycle track.
2. City Council delegate, despite any City of Toronto By-law to the contrary, to the General Manager, Transportation Services, until November 1, 2027, for the purposes of implementing and then addressing operational and safety issues that may arise in relation to the projects identified in Recommendation 1, the authority to implement changes and process and submit directly to Council any necessary bills for by-law amendments to the schedules to City of Toronto Code Chapters on the streets and within the parameters as identified in Attachment 2 to the report (May 13, 2024) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, and that such by-laws submitted be made permanent on November 1, 2027.
3. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signal 50 metres west of the intersection of Jonesville Crescent and Eglinton Avenue East
4. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signal at the intersection of Hopedale Avenue and O’Connor Drive.
5. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signal at the intersection of Roncesvalles Avenue and Galley Avenue.
6. Subject to approval of Recommendation 5 above, City Council authorize removal of the existing pedestrian crossover on Roncesvalles Avenue, immediately north of Galley Avenue in conjunction with the installation of traffic control signals at Roncesvalles Avenue and Galley Avenue.
7. City Council reduce the speed limit from 50 kilometres per hour to 40 kilometres per hour on Steeprock Drive, between Chesswood Drive and Dufferin Street.
8. City Council reduce the speed limit from 50 kilometres per hour to 40 kilometres per hour on Whitehorse Road, between Steeprock Drive and Rimrock Road.
9. City Council authorize an all-way compulsory stop control at the intersection of Sunnyside Drive and Pearson Avenue.
10. City Council authorize an all-way compulsory stop control at the intersection of Pearson Avenue and Fuller Avenue.
11. City Council authorize an all-way compulsory stop control at the intersection of Galley Avenue and Sorauren Avenue.
12. City Council authorize an all-way compulsory stop control at the intersection of Macdonell Avenue and Fern Avenue.
13. City Council amend cycling, traffic and parking regulations required in Chapter 886, Chapter 903, Chapter 910, and Chapter 950, as generally described in Attachment 3 - Technical Amendments to the report (May 13, 2024) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, for previously approved projects by City Council that have been enacted in phases aligned with the timing of implementation of the appropriate segments of the respective projects over 2024 to 2025 and by-law accuracy.
14. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to continue with the planned delivery of the sidewalk on Westgate Boulevard between Armour Boulevard and Earl Bales trail.
15. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 886, Footpaths, Pedestrian Ways, Bicycle Paths, Bicycle Lanes and Cycle Tracks, as follows:
a. insert a new Section 886-14.2 to read as follows:
"§ 886-14.2 Bicycle operation at a curb lane café where pedestrians access a curb lane café area.
Where a person in charge of a bicycle or a large cargo power-assisted bicycle on a cycle track approaches a curb lane café permit area, where part of the cycle track is marked for pedestrian use in crossing between the sidewalk and the curb lane café permit area and an authorized sign is posted, the person on a bicycle or a large cargo power-assisted bicycle (1) shall stop before the area marked for pedestrian use, (2) shall yield to pedestrians crossing in the area marked for pedestrian use and (3) shall not proceed until all pedestrians have crossed the cycle track."
16. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bills to give effect to City Council's decision and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make any necessary clarifications, refinements, minor modifications, technical amendments, or By-law amendments as may be identified by the City Solicitor, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services in order to give effect to Recommendation 15 above.
17. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to ensure, where feasible, that all work-zone permits to encroach into the right-of-way on Avenue Road between Bloor Street West and Davenport Road preserve at least 0.6 metres of the curb lane to provide sufficient space for cycle track protection and winter maintenance.
18. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to maintain the right-turn on red movement at the intersection of Mill Road and Burnhamthorpe Road and monitor for safety concerns post installation and report any recommended adjustments, as needed.
19. City Council request that the General Manager, Transportation Services make minor design adjustments to Mill Road based on local Councillor and public consultation feedback to ensure safe operations and to monitor for safety concerns post installation and make adjustments, as needed.
20. City Council request that the General Manager, Transportation Services post on the project website a summary of consultation with Toronto Fire Services and Toronto Paramedic Service regarding emergency response times on Mill Road.
Origin
Summary
This report seeks City Council authority to install bikeway projects identified in the Cycling Network Plan Near-Term Implementation Program (2022-2024), as well as one missing sidewalk project and an adjustment to Chapter 886.
Cycling Network Plan Projects
The Cycling Network Plan and the associated Near Term Implementation Plan, adopted by City Council in December 2021, seeks to build on the existing network of cycling routes to Connect gaps in the current network, Grow the network into new parts of the city, and Renew existing parts of the network to improve safety. Through this report, Transportation Services is seeking authority for bikeway projects that are proposed to be installed in the near term (2022-2024) for which design and consultation have been completed.
This report seeks Council authority to install 7.23 centreline kilometres of new bikeways associated with eight projects on the following streets:
- Avenue Road: Bloor Street West to Davenport Road (cycle track, Ward 11)
- Beltline Gap Connections
- Roselawn Avenue / Elm Ridge Drive: Allen Greenway to Marlee Avenue (bi-directional cycle track and multi-use trail, Ward 8)
- Marlee Avenue: Castlefield Avenue to Roselawn Avenue (cycle track, Ward 8) and Roselawn Avenue to Eglinton Avenue West (bi-directional cycle track, Ward 8)
- Allen Greenway: Elm Ridge Drive to Wembley Road (multi-use trail, Ward 8)
- Centennial Park Cycling Connections
- Mill Road: Rathburn Road to Burnhamthorpe Road (bi-directional cycle track, Ward 2)
- Burnhamthorpe Road: Mill Road to Etobicoke Creek (multi-use trail, Ward 2)
- Leaside Bridge to Danforth Avenue Cycling Connections
- O'Connor Drive: Hopedale Avenue to Broadview Avenue (cycle track, Ward 14)
- Broadview Avenue: O'Connor Drive to Cosburn Road (cycle track, Ward 14)
- Power Street Project
- Adelaide Street East: Parliament Street to Power Street (cycle track, Ward 13)
- Richmond Street East: Parliament Street to Power Street (cycle track, Ward 13)
- Power Street: Adelaide Street East to Richmond Street East (cycle track, Ward 13)
- Sudbury Street: Queen Street West to Abell Street (contra-flow bike lane, Ward 9)
- Steeprock-Bathurst Manor Cycling Connections
- Steeprock Drive: Chesswood Drive to Dufferin Street (cycle track, Ward 6)
- Whitehorse Road: Steeprock Drive to Rimrock Road (bike lane, Ward 6)
- Rimrock Road: Whitehorse Road to W.R. Allen Road (bike lane, Ward 6)
- West Parkdale Cycling Connections
- Glendale Avenue: The Queensway to Parkdale Road (contra-flow bike lane and bike lane, Ward 4)
- Parkdale Road: Glendale Avenue (south leg) to Sunnyside Avenue (contra-flow bike lane, bike lane, and shared-condition bikeway Ward 4)
- Sunnyside Avenue: Galley Avenue to Pearson Avenue (contra-flow bike lane and bike lane, Ward 4)
- Galley Avenue: Sunnyside Avenue to Macdonell Avenue (contra-flow bike lane, Ward 4)
- Macdonell Avenue: Rideau Avenue to Seaforth Avenue (shared-condition two-way cycling, Ward 4)
- Seaforth Avenue: Macdonell Avenue to Brock Avenue (contra-flow bike lane and shared-condition two-way cycling, Ward 4)
This report seeks Council authority to make by-law amendments associated with improvements to 0.75 centreline kilometres of existing bikeways on the following streets:
- Harbour Street: Lower Simcoe Street and 130 metres east of Lower Simcoe Street (multi-use trail to cycle track and sidewalk, Ward 10)
- Lake Shore Boulevard West: 15 metres west of Lower Simcoe Street and Lower Simcoe Street (multi-use trail to cycle track and sidewalk, Ward 10)
- Davenport Road: Wychwood Park and Albany Avenue (traffic and parking, Ward 12)
- Davenport Road: Marchmount Road and Winona Drive (traffic and parking, Ward 12)
Further, as part of this report, Transportation Services is seeking Council authority to install a new traffic control signal 50 metres west of the Jonesville Crescent and Eglinton Avenue East intersection to prepare for a new trail connection south of Eglinton Avenue East.
Transportation Services is continuing to utilize the streamlined reporting process for by-law amendment submissions associated with cycling infrastructure projects approved by Council for implementation. Once projects are approved by Council, the streamlined process involves delegation of authority to submit bills directly to Council for a discrete period of time after project implementation, which enables Transportation Services to make minor adjustments to constructed conditions without delay and based on local Councillor and public feedback, such as parking adjustments to improve sightlines, adjustments or addition of accessible loading areas, and similar modifications.
The changes proposed as part of the projects identified above would improve both safety and mobility options by providing improved cycling connections to transit, parks, local schools, businesses, and residences. Pedestrian improvements have also been included in the projects, wherever feasible, including curb extensions, new sidewalk installations, pedestrian head start signals, and motor vehicle lane adjustments.
In addition, this report seeks to make minor housekeeping amendments to existing bikeways and their associated traffic and parking by-laws on the following streets:
- Danforth Avenue at Thyra Avenue (traffic and parking, Ward 19)
- Davenport Road: Bedford Road to Dupont Street (traffic and parking, Ward 9 and 11)
- University Avenue: College Street to Dundas Street Avenue (traffic and parking, Ward 10 and 11)
- Silverthorn Avenue: Rogers Road to St. Clair Avenue (traffic and parking, Ward 9)
As part of this report, Transportation Services is recommending a one-block extension of missing sidewalk on Westgate Boulevard between Armour Boulevard and the connection to the Earl Bales Park Trail to align with the Basement Flooding Protection Program construction.
A map of the Cycling Network and Missing Sidewalk projects proposed in this report is included as Attachment 1.
Finally, this report recommends the addition of a new offence provision for CaféTO curb lane patios adjacent to cycle tracks. The new offence provision would make clear that people cycling in a cycle track must yield to people actively entering or exiting a CaféTO curb lane patio.
This new offence provision would be similar to that found in Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 886- Sections 14 and 14.1 which address bicycle operation at transit stops and accessible loading areas which prohibits people cycling in a cycle track from, among other things, passing a Toronto Transit Commission bus which is stationary for the purpose of taking on or discharging a passenger and that people cycling must yield to people actively utilizing accessible loading areas, respectively.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245712.pdf
Attachment 1 - Proposed Third Quarter 2024 Project Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245713.pdf
Attachment 2 - Streamlined Reporting Process
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245714.pdf
Attachment 3 - Technical Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245715.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245716.pdf
Speakers
Michael Longfield, Cycle Toronto
Marc Collins
Tom O'Reilly
Cody MacRae, Balance On Bloor
Robin Richardson, Yonge4All
Linda Nicolson
Katheryn Boyd
Kenneth Brown, Cycle Toronto Midtown
André Fabierkiewicz
Evan Bond
Catherine Taylor
Ana-Maria Klizs
Dana McKiel, Downtown Concerned Citizens Organization
Jamie Khan
Kim Hinton, St. Clare’s Multifaith Housing Society
Paul Clarke
Heather Johnston
Albert Koehl, Community Bikeways
Gail Shillingford, B+H Planning & Landscape
Brock Howes
Mary-Helen Spence
Councillor Stephen Holyday
Councillor Parthi Kandavel
Councillor Gord Perks
Communications (Committee)
(May 17, 2024) E-mail from Rod Colmer (IE.Main)
(May 21, 2024) E-mail from Jessica Kushner (IE.Main)
(May 21, 2024) E-mail from Adam Rodgers (IE.Supp)
(May 22, 2024) E-mail from Leon Kushner (IE.Supp)
(May 22, 2024) E-mail from Thom Pratt (IE.Supp)
(May 22, 2024) E-mail from Lee Pham (IE.Supp)
(May 22, 2024) E-mail from Dan Robson and Jayme Poisson (IE.Supp)
(May 22, 2024) Submission from Jeffrey Stutz on behalf of the Cedarvale Upper Village Community Group (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179819.pdf
(May 22, 2024) E-mail from Deborah Green (IE.Supp)
(May 23, 2024) E-mail from Emily McNamee (IE.Supp)
(May 23, 2024) E-mail from Mel Kushner (IE.Supp)
(May 23, 2024) E-mail from Marion Wehner (IE.Supp)
(May 23, 2024) E-mail from Michelle Woodruff (IE.Supp)
(May 23, 2024) E-mail from Kim Sandford (IE.Supp)
(May 23, 2024) Letter from Debbie Green on behalf of Parkdale High Park 4 Climate Action (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179988.pdf
(May 24, 2024) E-mail from Julian Laywine (IE.Supp)
(May 24, 2024) E-mail from Evan Bond (IE.Supp)
(May 24, 2024) E-mail from John Corso (IE.Supp)
(May 24, 2024) E-mail from Christopher Dunn (IE.Supp)
(May 24, 2024) Letter from Kim Hinton, Director, Community and Partnership, St. Clare's Multifaith Housing Society (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179930.pdf
(May 24, 2024) Letter from Ian Carmichael, The ABC Residents Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179934.pdf
(May 24, 2024) E-mail from Derek Tsang (IE.Supp)
(May 25, 2024) Letter from Christine Dingemans, President, on behalf of Bay Cloverhill Community Association Executive (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179832.pdf
(May 25, 2024) Letter from Kenneth Brown, on behalf of Cycle Toronto Midtown (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179884.pdf
(May 25, 2024) E-mail from Isaac Berman (IE.Supp)
(May 25, 2024) E-mail from Sarah Marangoni and Giancarlo D'Andrade (IE.Supp)
(May 25, 2024) E-mail from Michael Conradi (IE.Supp)
(May 25, 2024) Letter from Robert Zaichkowski (IE.Supp)
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Deb Baumgarten (IE.Supp)
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Lori McIndoe (IE.Supp)
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Marta White (IE.Supp)
(May 26, 2024) Letter from Arlene Desjardins and MH Spence, on behalf of the Avenue Road Safety Coalition (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179869.pdf
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Anthony Watts (IE.Supp)
(May 26, 2024) Letter from Michael and Ana-Maria Klizs (IE.Supp)
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Justin Martin (IE.Supp)
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Frank Mara (IE.Supp)
(May 26, 2024) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chairs, FoNTRA (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179929.pdf
(May 26, 2024) Letter from Dylan Reid, Walk Toronto (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179909.pdf
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Christine Skobe (IE.Supp)
(May 26, 2024) Letter from Christine Skobe, President of the Brentwood Towers Tenants’ Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179913.pdf
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from John Ritchie (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Luis Ledesma (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Laura Watts (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Pym Buitenhuis and Murray Campbell (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Adrian and Pamela Pettyan (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Josef Zankowicz and Teresa Brzozowski (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Andrew Brock Howes (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Andrea Goldfarb, Principal, Brown Junior Public School (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179922.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Frank Marshall (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Bruce Cowley (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Matthew Lamb (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Report from Alan Baker, President, and Paul Bedford, Director, Community Planning, Greater Yorkville Residents’ Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179964.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Bryan Bullen (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Melissa Slatkoff (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Rose Ker (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Albert Koehl, Coordinator, Toronto Community Bikeways Coalition (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179981.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Kathryn Peck (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from James Young (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Faraz Gholizadeh, Co-Chair, Safe Parkside (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179972.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Rita Bilerman, Chair, Annex Residents’ Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179973.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Justin Martin (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Linda Brett, President, BENA (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179995.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Elizabeth Anton (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from George Pinto (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Helen Garland (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Alexander J. Suriano, Aird & Berlis LLP (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179985.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Susan Bakshi (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Lora Sloan (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from John Vis (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Robin Richardson on behalf of Yonge4All (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179987.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Véronique Claassen (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Kristen Petersen (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Stasia Bogdan, Director-Capital Planning, Unity Health Toronto (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Amanda Drinkwalter (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Fraser McIndoe (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Scott Keeling (IE.New)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from David Wells (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Moira Cohen (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from David Condotta (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Gideon Forman, Climate Change and Transportation Policy Analyst, The David Suzuki Foundation (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180034.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Graeme Kennedy, Senior Associate, Tenblock (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180035.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Elaine Peritz (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from David Halporn (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Alana Boychuk (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Michele Mary (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Kent Aggus (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Graeme Drinkwalter (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Briana Mirabelli (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Heather Johnston (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Arkady Arkhangorodsky (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Angela Stewart (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Piotr Sepski (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Sharon Bider (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Anne Karpynczyk (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Lyn Adamson, Co-Chair, ClimateFast (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180057.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Amanda Elvidge and Vigny Muzac (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Derek Coss, Chief Development Officer, Amica Senior Lifestyles (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180126.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Philipp S. Angermeyer (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Jamie Khan (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Jarek Piorkowski (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Helen Garland (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Aaron Boros (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Rita Bijons (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Elias Barkley (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Submission from Gail Shillingford, Director, Urban Development, B+H Planning & Landscape (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Carla Hindman (IE.Supp)
(May 28, 2024) Letter from Councillor Stephen Holyday (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180058.pdf
(May 28, 2024) E-mail from Tony Cohen (IE.Supp)
(May 28, 2024) E-mail from David Taylor (IE.Supp)
(May 28, 2024) E-mail from Andrea McBride (IE.Supp)
(May 28, 2024) E-mail from Wayne Banon (IE.Supp)
(May 28, 2024) E-mail from Andrew Himel (IE.Supp)
(May 28, 2024) Multiple Communications from 60 Individuals on Avenue Road Safety were received from May 26, 2024 4:21 p.m. to May 28, 2024 11:37 a.m. (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179921.pdf
Communications (City Council)
(May 28, 2024) E-mail from A Salamanca (CC.Main)
(May 28, 2024) E-mail from Elisabeth Foerster (CC.Main)
(May 29, 2024) E-mail from Haytham Bahoora (CC.Main)
(May 29, 2024) E-mail from Lisa Kristensen (CC.Main)
(May 29, 2024) E-mail from Patricia Mazzone (CC.Main)
(May 30, 2024) E-mail from Veronique Claassen (CC.Main)
(May 30, 2024) E-mail from Jeremy Lempert (CC.Main)
(May 30, 2024) E-mail from Jacqueline Horne (CC.Main)
(May 31, 2024) E-mail from Robert Clarke, Brown Public School Traffic Safety Community (CC.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-180278.pdf
(June 3, 2024) E-mail from Vincent Zacharko (CC.Main)
(June 3, 2024) E-mail from Stephanie Rowley (CC.Main)
(June 3, 2024) E-mail from Joel MacLeod (CC.Main)
(June 4, 2024) E-mail from Carolyn Black (CC.Main)
(June 4, 2024) Petition from Evan Bond containing the names of approximately 69 persons regarding Petition to Protect Fern Avenue and Oppose the Proposed Change to Convert Macdonell Avenue to a One Way North Starting at Garden Avenue (CC.Main)
(June 4, 2024) E-mail from Peter Wilson (CC.Main)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Brandon Sousa (CC.Main)
(June 6, 2024) E-mail from Aaron Matthews (CC.Main)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Sarah Zanon (CC.Main)
(June 9, 2024) E-mail from Charlotte Hefner (CC.Main)
(June 10, 2024) Letter from Eric Del Favero, Remington on the Queensway Inc. (CC.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-180926.pdf
(June 19, 2024) E-mail from Irena Cooney (CC.Main)
(June 19, 2024) E-mail from Irena Cooney (CC.Main)
(June 20, 2024) E-mail from Angelo Liolios (CC.Main)
(June 24, 2024) Letter from Alan Baker, President and Paul Bedford Director, Community Planning, Greater Yorkville Residents’ Association (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181139.pdf
(June 24, 2024) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Luis Ledesma (CC.New)
IE14.5 - On-Street Logistics Mini-Hub on St. George Street - Pilot Update and Next Steps
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the concept of On-Street Logistics Mini-Hubs as a permanent program, so that courier organizations / companies can apply to access an On-Street Logistics Mini-Hub where locations are deemed suitable by the General Manager, Transportation Services.
2. Should City Council approve Recommendation 1 of the report (May 13, 2024) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, City Council approve the On-Street Logistics Mini-Hub pilot location located on the west side of St. George Street between a point 88.7 metres north of Russell Street and a point 27.5 metres further north (in the vicinity of 60 St. George Street) for five (5) parking spaces, as a permitted installation to be operated by Purolator Incorporated and approve the amendment of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, Schedule XLVII: On-street Logistics Mini-hub Parking Areas to include this location.
3. City Council approve the amendments to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, to allow the permitting of On-Street Logistics Mini-Hub areas, generally as outlined in Attachment 1 to the report (May 13, 2024) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.
4. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Schedule 2 (Transportation Services) by creating and adding a new fee to "Appendix C" for the On-Street Logistics Mini-Hub non-refundable permit of $6,401.80 (plus Harmonized Sales Tax) per year, per parking space displaced, and adjusted yearly for inflation.
5. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Schedule 2 (Transportation Services) by creating and adding a new fee to "Appendix C" for the On-Street Logistics Mini-Hub non-refundable application fee of $218.20 (plus Harmonized Sales Tax) per Mini-Hub area requested, and adjusted yearly for inflation.
6. City Council establish new offences and establish new associated penalties and amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 610, Penalties, Administration of, generally as outlined in Attachment 2 to the report (May 13, 2024) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bills to give effect to City Council's decision and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make any necessary clarifications, refinements, minor modifications, technical amendments, or By-law amendments as may be identified by the City Solicitor, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services in order to give effect to Recommendations 2 to 6, inclusive, above.
Origin
Summary
On June 15 and 16, 2022, City Council approved a pilot project of up to eighteen (18) months for Toronto's first On-Street Logistics Mini-Hub, to further support and investigate last-mile deliveries in combination with electric cargo bike operations.
The Mini-Hub, which is a repurposed shipping container, was located within a parking layby on St. George Street within the University of Toronto's downtown campus. The multifunctional structure has been operated by Purolator Incorporated courier company and has served as a redistribution center for the pick-up and drop-off of packages by customers and a storage location for the company's large cargo e-bike delivery fleet.
Following the completion of the Mini-Hub's pilot period, which ended in April of this year, Transportation Services is reporting back to City Council to provide information about the outcome of the trial and recommend next steps. Given the findings from the pilot, which are detailed in this report, Transportation Services is seeking City Council's approval to allow the creation of an On-Street Logistics Mini-Hub program that can be rolled out in other areas of the city with other courier companies where locations are deemed suitable and to approve the continued operation of the Mini-Hub on St. George Street. In addition, the report also seeks Council's approval to establish an On-Street Logistics Mini-Hub permit fee ($6,401.80 per year, per parking space displaced) and an application fee for an On-Street Logistics Mini-Hub ($218.20 per request) that would be charged to courier companies wanting to participate in the program, including administrative penalty amounts for unauthorized vehicles parking, stopping and standing in the Mini-Hub area and courier companies do not properly display the permit issued for the Mini-Hub.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245710.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245711.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Committee)
IE14.6 - ReNew Golden Mile Environmental Assessment - Interim Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 16 - Don Valley East, 20 - Scarborough Southwest, 21 - Scarborough Centre
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council endorse the Preliminary Recommended Alignments and Designs included in Attachment 1 for the purposes of completing the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment’s mandatory phase 3 public consultation and request the General Manager, Transportation Services to report back on the feedback received from the consultation and any resulting refinements made as part of finalizing Preferred Alignments and Designs, where appropriate.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to report back no later than the December 17, 2024 meeting of City Council, through Infrastructure and Environment Committee, to request Council endorsement of the Preferred Designs and authority to prepare the Environmental Study Report and issue a Notice of Completion of Phase 3 and 4 of the ReNew Golden Mile Environmental Assessment in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Process.
3. City Council direct the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report back no later than the December 17, 2024 Meeting of City Council, through Planning and Housing Committee, on amendments to the Official Plan, and the Zoning By-law, where necessary or required to support and / or align with the ReNew Golden Mile Environmental Assessment.
4. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to coordinate to ensure the matters in Recommendation 2 and Recommendation 3 above are brought to the same meeting of Council for consideration.
5. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to coordinate with the landowners of 1911 - 1921 Eglinton Avenue East, 800 Warden Avenue and 1941 Eglinton Avenue East and further study options for the O’Connor Drive Extension between Lebovic Avenue and Birchmount Road, to determine whether any adjustments are required, where appropriate, to respond to the matters raised by these landowners, before reporting back to Council on the finalized Preferred Alignments and Designs.
Origin
Summary
The ReNew Golden Mile Environmental Assessment Study was initiated in 2022. The Environmental Assessment Study builds on the Golden Mile Secondary Plan and Golden Mile Transportation Master Plan approved by City Council in October 2020.
The Golden Mile area, generally consisting of lands located along Eglinton Avenue East and Craigton Drive, between Victoria Park Avenue and Birchmount Road, has been influenced by agricultural, industrial, and commercial eras of development. The area became known as the "Golden Mile of Industry" during the post-World War II era with the construction of large-scale manufacturing buildings along Eglinton Avenue East, between Pharmacy Avenue and Birchmount Road. Large-scale commercial development generally occurred during the 1990's, replacing many of the former industrial buildings that fronted onto Eglinton Avenue East.
The Golden Mile Secondary Plan advanced a vision for a new mixed-use community with a range of tall, mid-rise and some low-rise buildings to be constructed over the next 20+ years. There are 14 sites with active development applications within the Plan Area. City Council has approved or accepted settlement offers for 12 of the 14 sites. These approvals and accepted settlement offers, combined with the balance of development potential for other sites in the area is currently estimated to accommodate approximately 32,700 residential units, 54,000 to 56,000 residents and 19,000 jobs (including replacement jobs).
The Environmental Assessment Study is completing phases 3 and 4 of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process and establishing the alignments and designs of five new and reconfigured streets to support future development and growth. The process involves developing and evaluating alternative street alignments and designs for the following transportation infrastructure:
- A potential reconfiguration of O’Connor Drive, along with an extension to Birchmount Road
- A new east-west public street north of Eglinton Avenue East from Victoria Park Avenue to Birchmount Road (“Golden Mile Boulevard”)
- A realignment, widening and reconfiguration of Craigton Drive to directly connect to Ashtonbee Road
- A potential reconfiguration of Thermos Road and Sinnott Road at the Eglinton Avenue East intersection.
Additionally, the Environmental Assessment Study is exploring other corridor improvements along Jonesville Crescent and Ashtonbee Road to Birchmount Road that do not require completion of phases 3 and 4 of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. The corridor improvements will ensure these streets are complete streets to support existing and future residents and businesses.
This report provides an update on the status of the Environmental Assessment Study, key findings to date, including the preliminary evaluation, recommendations, and designs, and outlines next steps to finalize the Environmental Assessment Study.
This report recommends that City Council endorse the preliminary recommended alignments and designs for the purpose of consulting the public and completing the next stage of mandatory Municipal Class Environmental Assessment consultation requirements. This report also directs the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to bring forward a concurrent report on required Official Plan and / or Zoning By-law Amendments to support and / or align with the ReNew Golden Mile Environmental Assessment Final Report. This report was prepared in consultation with City Planning.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245665.pdf
Attachment 1 - Recommended Alignments and Designs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245666.pdf
Attachment 2 - Long-list of Alternative Alignments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245667.pdf
Attachment 3 - Alternative Cross-section Designs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245668.pdf
Attachment 5 - Evaluation Table Summaries
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245669.pdf
Speakers
Katarzyna Sliwa, Dentons Canada LLP
Mark Yarranton, KLM Planning Partners
Margaret Briegmann, BA Consulting Group Ltd.
Michael Cidylo, The Lakeshore Group
Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP
Kelly Martin, Choice Properties REIT
Councillor Parthi Kandavel
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179862.pdf
(May 24, 2024) Letter from Salima Kheraj, Vice President, Starlight Developments (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179923.pdf
(May 24, 2024) Letter from Sarah Craig, Development Manager, Dream Unlimited (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179986.pdf
(May 26, 2024) E-mail from Paul Lenneard (IE.Supp)
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Betty, Gus and Athanasia Petropoulos, Anastasia Investments Limited (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179912.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Alun S. Lloyd, Principal, BA Consulting Group Ltd. on behalf of the Golden Mile Landowner Group (GMLOG) (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180001.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Isaac Tang, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180005.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Meaghan Palynchuk (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180006.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Billy Caden, Mattamy Homes Canada (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179992.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from John Giannone, VP, Development, Choice Properties (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180018.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Submission from Michael Cidylo, Planner, The Lakeshore Group (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180055.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Nathan Vickers, Cassels (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180048.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Submission from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliot LLP (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180051.pdf
(May 27, 2024) Letter from Mark Flowers, LLP, Davies Howe Land Development Advocacy and Litigation (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180097.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Garrett Sun Cheong (IE.Supp)
(May 28, 2024) Submission from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliot LLP (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180066.pdf
IE14.7 - Circular Economy Road Map Strategy and Implementation Plan Development Update
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommend that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and the Executive Director, Environment and Climate to share the authorities previously granted by City Council in 2021.IE22.8 and 2023.IE9.3, and allow either Division head to separately enter into agreements to support the work of the City of Toronto’s Circular Economy and Innovation unit with those authorities.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this interim report is to provide an update on the status of work to develop a 10-year Circular Economy Road Map strategy and implementation plan (Circular Economy Road Map) for Toronto, including the project's planned community engagement and consultation milestones. This report describes the project governance structure developed by staff in response to Toronto City Council's endorsement of the targets and actions outlined in the 2021 TransformTO NetZero Strategy (NetZero Strategy). Specifically, City of Toronto (City) staff established a project governance approach based on NetZero Strategy direction for Solid Waste Management Services, with involvement and leadership from other City Divisions, to develop a City-wide governance structure, strategy and policy framework for the circular economy.
In recognition of the cross-corporate opportunities presented by the City's circular economy transition, this report also provides an update on transferring the City of Toronto's circular economy and innovation program from Solid Waste Management Services to the Environment and Climate. As such, this report recommends the sharing of certain existing authorities authorized by Council to the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services with the Executive Director, Environment and Climate. Although Solid Waste Management Services will remain a leading Division in the development and implementation of Toronto's Circular Economy Road Map, moving the program to the Environment and Climate under Corporate Services is expected to improve staff's ability to achieve Council's circular economy goals.
Working towards a circular economy is vital to achieving Council's climate action targets, enabling sustainable consumption choices, and fostering economic resilience and prosperity. However, the City's circular economy transition cannot be achieved by the City government alone. It will require the participation of others outside of Toronto's municipal government and must include residents, businesses, industry, local communities, and other governments. It will also require a transformation in how society currently thinks about waste: from a problem to be hidden from sight, to a resource that can be captured to provide value and positive outcomes for the planet, the City, and its residents. As with existing City of Toronto circular economy initiatives such as the Circular Food Innovator's Fund1, implementation of the circular economy program will continue to prioritize working with local businesses, other governments and partners, and key industry sectors to identify opportunities for economic prosperity.
1 The Circular Food Innovators Fund, launched in 2024, is a program aimed at supporting market-ready business solutions to enable the elimination of single-use and takeaway items in Toronto and help to achieve a more circular food system for Toronto residents and businesses.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245706.pdf
Attachment 1 - Circular Economy Road Map Governance - Co-Creating City Divisions and Strategic Alignments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245707.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Committee)
IE14.9 - Impact of Bill 165 and Gas Utility Use of Public Property in Toronto
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to amend O. Reg. 595/06, FEES AND CHARGES, to allow the City to charge gas utilities for their use of public lands as Edmonton, Calgary, Regina and Winnipeg do, in order to fund infrastructure resilience against the impacts of climate change.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to report back to Infrastructure and Environment Committee by the fourth quarter of 2024 on whether the current fees charged to gas utilities for pavement degradation resulting from utility cuts fully recover all short and long term related costs and damages incurred by the City.
3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Environment and Climate, to work with Clean Air Partnership and the Association of Municipalities of Ontario to explore a collective municipal approach to ensure a fair payment system for fossil fuel pipelines that use municipal property and how best to ensure a level playing field between fossil fuel and low carbon infrastructure investment, and to report back to Infrastructure and Environment Committee by the second quarter of 2025.
4. City Council write to the Auditor General of Ontario requesting an investigation of Bill 165 and its impact on Toronto residents.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
That Infrastructure and Environment Committee:
1. Requested the Executive Director, Environment and Climate, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to report directly to the June 26, 27 and 28 meeting of City Council with an analysis of Recommendations 1, 2 and 3 in the motion by Councillor Saxe, with the report to City Council to include considerations of staff resources required, the timelines to deliver on the directives, and any recommended change to the wording of the Recommendations.
Origin
Summary
Natural gas is a fossil fuel responsible for over half of Toronto’s annual greenhouse gas emissions as the primary energy source for heating buildings.
The TransformTO Net Zero Strategy aims to accelerate a rapid and significant reduction in natural gas use in buildings, identifying this as one of four "critical steps" to achieving City Council's goal of net zero emissions by 2040. This critical step is consistent with a worldwide energy transition away from fossil fuels because they are the main cause of climate change.
Enbridge Gas Inc. is the utility serving Toronto's consumption of natural gas through a network of transmission and distribution pipelines that connect to over 550,000 gas customers in Toronto.
While the City has clearly identified the need to reduce reliance on natural gas, its actions are limited by the jurisdiction provided in provincial legislation. Whether City Council could enact a by-law to ban the transmission, distribution, sale, or use of natural gas within Toronto depends on the scope of the City’s by-law authority under the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and related statutory authorities. Among other things, section 11 of City of Toronto Act, 2006 limits that authority to those City by-laws that do not conflict with a provincial or federal statute, regulation, order, license, approval or similar instrument. Additional information about this issue is included in Confidential Attachment 1 to the City Solicitor’s supplemental report on this item.
This report focuses on the matters raised in Council motion 2024.IE11.8, namely the City’s relationship with Enbridge regarding renewable natural gas projects, City staff’s recent comments on Bill 165 which deals with expanding new connections to the provincial natural gas grid, and Enbridge’s use of public property (especially the right of way).
Beyond these specific matters, the City has the ability to influence demand for natural gas through setting standards for greenhouse gas emissions and energy efficiency for new and existing buildings in Toronto. For new buildings, the City’s innovative Toronto Green Standard recommends energy efficiency and greenhouse gas intensity standards that are intended to become progressively more stringent over time for new residential (minimum 10 units) and non-residential developments. Toronto Green Standard consists of tiers of performance with Tier 1 being mandatory and applied through the planning approval process. It is intended that by May 2028, if adopted by Council, the Toronto Green Standard requirements for near zero greenhouse gas emissions will discourage new natural gas connections for heating or domestic hot water. City Council has also directed staff to develop an Emission Performance Standards by-law to address greenhouse gas emissions from existing buildings. If Council enacts a by-law requiring existing buildings to meet such emission standards, then property owners may need to take measures to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from their buildings, which may include reducing the use of natural gas.
Regarding the matters raised in Council motion 2024.IE11.8:
- Renewable Natural Gas - In collaboration with Enbridge, Solid Waste Management Services has developed Renewable Natural Gas production facilities at the City’s Organic Processing Facilities. While the City’s production of Renewable Natural Gas can play a useful role in the energy transition, it will be a limited role because production is itself limited by the amount of biogas and landfill gas available. Solid Waste Management Services is currently working with Enbridge towards development of an Renewable Natural Gas production facility at the City’s Green Lane Landfill
- Bill 165: In April the Executive Director of Environment and Climate made oral and written submissions to the Ontario Legislature’s Standing Committee on the Interior, pursuant to Council authority, detailing concerns about potential negative affordability and climate impacts for Toronto from Bill 165, the Keeping Energy Costs Down Act, 2024. The written submission is Attachment “A” to this report. The Environment and Climate Division is monitoring for consultation opportunities with the Government of Ontario on its forthcoming natural gas policy statement, announced by the Minister of Energy alongside Bill 165.1
- Enbridge Use of Public Property: Provincial regulation currently precludes the City from applying a land-based charge for Enbridge’s use of the right of way (same for a telecom company, electricity generator, or electricity transmitter or distributor). Municipalities outside Ontario can and do charge gas utilities for use of the right of way (including Edmonton, Calgary and Regina) generating revenue between $24 and $97 per capita annually. Were the Province to amend its regulation and City Council decided to apply a land-based charge to Enbridge’s use of the right of way, it could generate between $73 million and $293 million in total annual revenue based on the range of currently observed charges elsewhere. If City Council decided to apply a land-based charge it could also decide to reduce the amount by the amount Enbridge would otherwise pay in property taxes on its gas pipelines in a given year. City staff plan to engage with the province about potential for regulatory change.
Enbridge could seek to pass on the cost of any land-based charge for use of the right of way to natural gas ratepayers in Toronto. Whether Enbridge could do so would be subject to provincial laws and regulatory approval.
Applying a land-based charge could align with the need to transition away from fossil fuels and move toward lower carbon energy like electricity from Ontario’s relatively clean grid and local renewable generation. To the extent that Council directed any future revenues from a land-based charge for Enbridge’s use of the right of way (if permitted by law) toward adapting City infrastructure like roads, bridges and sewers to withstand the impacts of climate change caused by fossil fuels, such as more frequent and intense storms, this could amplify the climate-related benefits of the charge.
1https://news.ontario.ca/en/backgrounder/1004216/the-keeping-energy-costs-down-act
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245693.pdf
Attachment 1 - Letter from Executive Director, Environment and Climate to Standing Committee on the Interior re Bill 165
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245694.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-247182.pdf
Speakers
Linda Nicolson, ClimateFast
Gail Fairly
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180029.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Gaby Kalapos (IE.Supp)
(May 28, 2024) Letter from Lyn Adamson, Co-Chair, ClimateFast (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180065.pdf
IE14.10 - Authority to Ban Natural Gas in Toronto
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Confidential Attachment - The attachment to this report contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 13, 2024) from the City Solicitor, remain confidential in its entirety, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Origin
Summary
This supplementary report to the report from the Executive Director, Environment and Climate Division provides Council with confidential information for consideration in conjunction with the report requested by Council at its March meeting with respect to various issues affecting fuel utilities, including natural gas.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-245585.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Speakers
Don Booth
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-179871.pdf
(May 27, 2024) E-mail from Shelly Gordon, Seniors for Climate Action Now! (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/comm/communicationfile-180030.pdf
(May 28, 2024) Letter from Don Booth (IE.Supp)
IE14.15 - De Havilland 'Mossie' Park Underground Storage Tank
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 6 - York Centre
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Committee Recommendations
The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager Toronto Water to report to the City Council meeting scheduled for June 26, 27, 28, 2024 on when detailed design for project 16-03 will be completed and when construction will be commenced; and as an alternative solution to address local basement flooding in the Winston Park Neighbourhood to advance the upgrade of the STM Underground Storage Tank at De Havilland (Mossie) Park as per the directive that was adopted by City Council in July 2013 and July 2019 under item - 2019.EX7.26.
Origin
Summary
This motion seeks a further update and information on the status, roadmap, outcome, and project start based on the Class Environmental Assessment Study for Basement Flooding Study Area 16 which was completed in 2012. It recommended project 16-03 to help mitigate flooding risks in the area that includes the subject property (107 Whitley Avenue). After the completion of the preliminary design in 2015, project 16-03 was found to be within the council-adopted cost per benefitting property threshold required for a project to proceed to detailed design and construction.
The local Councillor has been advised that the project does not have a planned construction start year and that construction timing is influenced by factors such as design and construction timelines, infrastructure coordination opportunities, available budget envelopes, and the number of Basement Flooding Protection Program (BFPP) projects in the infrastructure planning and design process. Toronto Water has installed a water level sensor in a sewer on Whitley Avenue but at least one owner has argued that this will not solve the type of flooding that has occurred in the area. As the Environmental Assessment was completed 12 years ago, there is a feeling in the neighbourhood that this work is long overdue and homeowners have incurred flooding, property damage and ongoing worry about the consequences of the next extreme weather event.
On July 17, 2013, City Council directed the General Manager, Toronto Water to incorporate Project 16-03 in Toronto Water's forthcoming 2014 - 2018 update to the Basement Flooding Protection Program. In the same motion, City Council directed General Manager Toronto Water that if the cost per household threshold is exceeded, the underground storm storage tank planned for Anthony Park be separated out from "Project 16-03" and be considered for inclusion in the capital works 2014 budget for Toronto Water.
In July 2019, Council directed Toronto Water to upgrade the STM Underground Storage Tank at De Havilland (Mossie) Park to address issues with basement flooding in the Winston Park Neighbourhood, (as per item EX7.26).
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-246203.pdf
(May 24, 2024) Letter from Councillor James Pasternak on Reopening Item - 2019.EX7.26 - De Havilland 'Mossie' Park Underground Storage Tank
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-246131.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-247095.pdf
Speakers
Communications (City Council)
Planning and Housing Committee - Meeting 13
PH13.2 - Villiers Island Precinct - City-Initiated Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
A revised attachment 10 was submitted on this Item. A correction was made to a policy reference under the heading "Section 8 - Inclusive Communities" on page 5.
A revised attachment 11 was submitted on this Item. A correction was made to the following: exception numbers, Block Plan Diagrams from Diagram 5 to 4, Tower Areas Overlay on Map 7B, and mid-block language provisions.
A revised attachment 12 was submitted on this Item. A correction was made to the following: image and text of 3.9.8.2 Amendments to Section 3.6.7 View 2: Commissioners Stack on page 77, a few figure references, mid-block connection language, and most of the base maps.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Bills 675, 676 and 677 have been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for 2, 62, 65, 105, 155, 165, and 170 Villiers Street 16 Munitions Street; 39, 51, 54, 63, 75, 85, 95, 97, 99 and 130 Commissioners Street; 222, 238, 242, 256, 275, 281, 301, 309 and 312 Cherry Street, and 72 Polson Street, substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 10 to the report (June 3, 2024) from the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for 2, 62, 65, 105, 155, 165, and 170 Villiers Street; 16 Munitions Street; 39, 51, 54, 63, 75, 85, 95, 97, 99 and 130 Commissioners Street; and 222, 238, 242, 256, 281, and 312 Cherry Street, and 72 Polson Street, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 11 to the report (June 3, 2024) from the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
3. City Council amend Chapter 415 - Article III of the Toronto Municipal Code substantially in accordance with the draft By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 13 to the report (June 3, 2024) from the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
4. City Council adopt the Villiers Island Precinct Plan 2024 Amendment, as described in Attachment 12 to the report (June 3, 2024) from the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
5. City Council adopt the Villiers Island and Keating West Public Art Master Plan attached as Attachment 14 to the report (June 3, 2024) from the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
6. City Council request that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, together with Waterfront Toronto, CreateTO, and relevant Divisions, Agencies and Corporations:
a. Advance infrastructure and public realm design to align the Precinct Plan with the objectives of the City’s Reconciliation Action Plan, as well as the Villiers Island and Keating West Public Art Master Plan; and
b. Develop a “Meanwhile Use Strategy" and implementing guidelines to inform intermediate use proposals to activate and animate the development blocks prior to development.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment, draft Zoning By-law Amendment and draft Municipal Code amendment as may be required.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Director, Community Planning, the Director, Development Planning, Waterfront Toronto, and the Director, Housing Secretariat gave a presentation to the Planning and Housing Committee.
The Planning and Housing Committee held a statutory public meeting on June 13, 2024, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
The City of Toronto, together with CreateTO and Waterfront Toronto, is advancing a significant revitalization project for the Port Lands. The Port Lands is being transformed into a dynamic, inclusive mixed-use community, with housing at all levels of affordability combined with supportive community infrastructure. It will also continue as an employment hub, bolstering the City’s film, television, and creative sectors, alongside sustained port and industrial activities.
The new Island, currently using the working name "Villiers Island" and receiving a permanent Indigenous name in the Fall of 2024, will be the first mixed-use residential community emerging through this transformation; defined by the renaturalized Don River it will develop into a sustainable and complete community. The Island is part of Toronto's broader waterfront revitalization, building on two decades of a successful tri-government collaboration. This model has spurred long-term economic growth and prosperity by flood protecting and remediating contaminated land, and developing both market and affordable housing. Waterfront revitalization has also delivered award-winning parks, public spaces, and architectural advancements, all while setting higher standards in sustainable development. This approach attracts innovation-focused companies and enhances the waterfront's appeal as a destination for both Toronto residents and visitors.
Over a decade of planning and consultation has focused on the future development of the Island. In 2007, Waterfront Toronto held an urban design competition for the Lower Don Lands, which include the Island, resulting in Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates' (MMVA) winning design. In 2011, a refined plan proposed a slight realignment of the Don River and the river mouth. The 2010 Lower Don Lands Framework Plan envisioned four mixed-used residential communities that would be adjacent to the new Don River valley and mouth, connected by bridges.
As envisioned in the Lower Don Lands Framework Plan and the 2017 Villiers Island Precinct Plan (the "Precinct Plan"), the Island will be a central connection point for surrounding emerging waterfront precincts, and will have destination parks, a new naturalized Don River Valley, community facilities including a new neighbourhood library, and unique opportunities to experience the Keating Channel.
Eighty percent of the developable area on the Island is in public ownership (see Figure 2). The City, CreateTO and Waterfront Toronto have collaborated extensively to review the Precinct Plan and the density on public lands through a Density Study. The partnership sought to identify appropriate built form changes that could help contribute to the City’s ambitious housing and affordable housing goals. This comprehensive Density Study process was informed by a series of iterative design workshops, expert advice from professional planning and design consultants, due diligence studies, feedback from the Waterfront Design Review Panel, and the public feedback through consultations and focus groups.
This report recommends the approval of amendments to the Official Plan, Zoning By-law, and Precinct Plan that describe how the Island will develop, based upon the outcome of the Density Study. It also recommends an update to the Municipal Code regarding parkland dedication, and endorsement of the Villiers Island and Keating Channel West Public Art Master Plan. Taken together, these revisions update the planning framework for the Island in response to Toronto's Housing Action Plan, to permit a dense, inclusive, sustainable, and walkable urban community.
The proposed amendments contemplate towers with heights between 19 and 46 storeys, enabling an estimated 9,000 residential units and resulting in a net density of 7.7 times the area of the Island's development blocks (see Figure 1). Of the estimated 9,000 units, approximately 2,200 - 2,700 will be affordable housing, with a target of 30 percent affordable housing on public lands. These affordable units will be secured as long-term or permanently affordable housing aligned with the City's income-based definition of affordable housing. Achieving affordable housing will require an intergovernmental funding and financing strategy.
The amendments also permit a minimum of approximately 80,000 square metres of retail and office space, 7,850 square metres of community space, and a Toronto Public Library neighbourhood branch.
A Business and Implementation Plan for the first phase of development on the Island will be presented to City Council later this Fall or in early 2025. The Business and Implementation Plan will build on this report by outlining the proposed costs and funding strategies, implementation roles and responsibilities, and implementation milestones (including phased development and early activation) for this emerging Island community, ensuring the planned density and necessary infrastructure are coordinated for maximum benefit.
The redevelopment of the Island presents unique infrastructure challenges. Although close to the city, it requires replacing the existing infrastructure systems with contemporary ones, including stormwater management, water and wastewater systems. The public realm, established through the Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood Protection Environmental Assessment, the Lower Don Lands Infrastructure Master Plan Environmental Assessment and the Precinct Plan, including the planned grid of streets, blocks, and open spaces, will support increased density through generous sidewalks, cycle tracks, green infrastructure elements and future transit connections.
Upon completion, the Island will house more than 15,000 residents, part of the larger Port Lands area, which is projected to be home to nearly 40,000 people and 20,000 jobs. The Island will also be a waterfront destination – its infrastructure and amenities will serve a local population, downtown, and the region. The revitalization of the Island and Toronto's waterfront will not only contribute to achieving provincial and federal housing targets, but also support the housing commitments in the City's housing plans.
Revitalizing the Port Lands is one of the largest and most complex city-building projects
in the City. The recommendations in this report will allow the City, CreateTO, and Waterfront Toronto to advance implementation plans to enable more affordable housing to be built faster. Building on the success of the Port Lands Flood Protection Project and a generation of planning for Port Lands revitalization; the report's actions will take the next crucial steps to transform a vast industrial and underutilized waterfront area into a vibrant, mixed-use community, important destination, home to tens of thousands of future resident amid a growing cluster of production, interactive and creative uses, and the hustle and bustle of a working port.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246353.pdf
Attachment 10: Draft Official Plan Amendment - Port Lands Area Specific Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246354.pdf
Attachment 11: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246356.pdf
Attachment 12: Villiers Island Precinct Plan 2024 Amendment - Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246382.pdf
Attachment 12: Villiers Island Precinct Plan 2024 Amendment - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246383.pdf
Attachment 13: Draft Amendment Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 415 Article III (Parkland Dedication)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246384.pdf
Attachment 14: Villiers Island and Keating Channel West Public Art Master Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246385.pdf
Attachment 15: Public Art Master Plan - Appendix 1: Art Trail Location Detail Maps
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246387.pdf
Attachment 15: Public Art Master Plan - Appendix 2: Villiers Island & Keating West Permanent Public Art Budget and Appendix 3: Consultation Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246391.pdf
(May 21, 2024) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246277.pdf
Presentation from the Director Community Planning, the Director, Development Planning, Waterfront Toronto, and the Director Housing Secretariat
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246509.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246798.pdf
Revised Attachment 10 - Draft Official Plan Amendment - Port Lands Area Specific Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246800.pdf
Revised Attachment 11 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246801.pdf
Revised Attachment 12 - Villiers Island Precinct Plan 2024 Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246922.pdf
Speakers
Neil Betteridge, Gooderham and Worts Neighbourhood Association (GWNA)
Suzanne Kavanagh, St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Association (STLNA)
Edward Nixon, Waterfront for All
Michael Bethke, East Waterfront Community Association
Lynda Macdonald
Councillor Paula Fletcher
Communications (Committee)
(May 9, 2024) E-mail from Richard Vaughan (PH.Main)
(June 9, 2024) E-mail from Julie Beddoes (PH.New)
(June 10, 2024) Letter from Norm Lingard, Senior Consultant - Municipal Liaison Network Provisioning, Bell (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180448.pdf
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Cynthia Wilkey (PH.New)
(June 11, 2024) Letter from Stewart Linton, St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Association (STLNA) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180556.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Sidonia J. Tomasella, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of 2034055 Ontario Limited and 1337194 Ontario Inc. (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180594.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Hongyu Xiao, More Neighbours Toronto (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180599.pdf
(June 11, 2024) Letter from Neil Betteridge, President, Gooderham and Worts Neighborhood Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180602.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Kim Mullin, Wood Bull LLP, on behalf Lafarge Canada Inc. (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180605.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from RJ Steenstra, President and CEO, PortsToronto (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180611.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Michael Bethke, East Waterfront Community Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180613.pdf
(June 13, 2024) Letter from Craig McLuckie, President, Toronto Industry Network (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180618.pdf
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181158.pdf
(June 25, 2024) Letter from Jeff Dawson, Assistant Vice President, Operational Support, NAV CANADA (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181165.pdf
(June 25, 2024) Letter from Michael Deluce, Porter Airlines Inc (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181179.pdf
(June 26, 2024) Letter from Craig McLuckie, President, Toronto Industry Network (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181194.pdf
2a - Villiers Island Precinct - City-Initiated Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment - Supplementary Report on Maximizing Housing on the New Island
Origin
Summary
This Supplementary Report responds to MM18.26, City Council's request to review key numbers and figures related to redevelopment of the new Island, currently known as Villiers Island. The report addresses questions related to maximizing of housing on the new Island, including the provision of affordable housing on non-City owned lands, heights and densities, development blocks, road rights-of-way and the public realm.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246508.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246799.pdf
PH13.3 - 2444 Eglinton Avenue East - Zoning Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 21 - Scarborough Centre
Bill 650 has been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 2444 Eglinton Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (May 29, 2024) from the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council request the Board of Directors of CreateTO to direct the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO, in consultation with the President, Toronto Parking Authority, to work with the developer partners for the 2444 Eglinton Avenue East Housing Now site to undertake an analysis to explore feasible options to maximize the amount of public parking that could be made available either on site or within the surrounding area to offset the loss of the existing commuter parking lot due to this development.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Planning and Housing Committee held a statutory public meeting on June 13, 2024, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law for the lands at 2444 Eglinton Avenue East to permit the construction of a mixed use building consisting of 3 towers above a base building containing above grade parking and non-residential uses at grade.
The development would include a 31-storey condominium building above a 4 storey podium, along with two co-op buildings of 19 and 41-storeys atop a 5-storey podium. The two co-op buildings consist of 612 co-op housing units and the condominium building consists of 307 units. The tenure of the units includes, market condominium units (307), market co-op units (306) and affordable co-op units (306). The total gross floor area of the proposal is 64,143 square metres, inclusive of 1871 square meters of non-residential uses.
The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020). The proposed development also conforms to the City's Official Plan. The development is part of the City’s Housing Now Initiative to deliver affordable housing and mixed-income, mixed-use, transit-oriented communities on City-owned properties. This proposed development intensifies an underutilized site with a range of housing options in terms of tenure and affordability, while providing a mix of at-grade non-residential uses that will support and enhance the public realm. It is immediately adjacent to a multi-modal transit station with convenient connections to multiple transit lines and surface transit routes.
This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law subject to a Holding Provision required to address servicing matters.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246231.pdf
Attachment 5: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246232.pdf
(May 21, 2024) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-245922.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-247198.pdf
Attachment 1: Recommended Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-247183.pdf
Speakers
Howard Cohen, Civic Developments
William Molls, Co-operative Housing Federation of Toronto
Siddra Asif
Zane Oueja
Abraham Russom
Zakerie Farah, More Neighbours Toronto
Mark Richardson, HousingNowTO.com
Communications (Committee)
(June 11, 2024) Letter from Tom Clement, Executive Director, Co-operative Housing Federation of Toronto (CHFT) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180563.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Delta Sween, More Neighbours Toronto (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180583.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Amina Dibe, Senior Manager, Co-operative Housing Federation of Canada (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180604.pdf
(June 12, 2024) E-mail from Alex Sobolewski (PH.New)
(June 13, 2024) Letter from Mark J. Richardson, Technical Lead, HousingNowTO.com (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180589.pdf
PH13.5 - Modular Housing Initiative Phase 2: Update Report, and Amendments to Purchase Order Numbers 6052027 and 6052881 issued to NRB Inc. for Design-Build Services for Supportive Housing
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 18 - Willowdale, 21 - Scarborough Centre
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Confidential Attachment - The attachments to this report contain confidential information regarding a position, plan, procedure, criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by the City.
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council, in accordance with Section 71-11.1C of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 71 (Financial Control By-law), authorize the amendment of Purchase Order Number 6052027 issued to NRB Inc. for design-build services for the supportive housing building located at 175 Cummer Avenue, as set out in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the Chief Procurement Officer.
2. City Council, in accordance with Section 71-11.1C of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 71 (Financial Control By-law), authorize the amendment of Purchase Order Number 6052881 issued to NRB Inc. for design-build services for the supportive housing building located at 39 Dundalk Drive, as set out in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the Chief Procurement Officer.
3. City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the Chief Procurement Officer, following the conclusion of negotiations and issuance of the Purchase Order Amendments referenced in the report.
4. City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Attachment 2 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the Chief Procurement Officer, following completion of the projects referenced in the report.
5. City Council, authorize the award of contracts to NRB Inc. under the Request for Proposal No. 2020-053 for Modular Housing Design Build at 175 Cummer Avenue and 39 Dundalk Drive, in accordance with the requirements of the Request for Proposal Document and the CCDC-14 executed Agreements.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the Modular Housing Initiative Phase 2, and to request Council authority to enable City Divisions to restart and complete the projects at 175 Cummer Ave., and 39 Dundalk Dr., respectively, by approving Purchase Order Amendments for both projects to ensure funding is in place to complete required work.
In April 2020, as an urgent response to the Covid-19 pandemic and its disproportionate impact on people experiencing homelessness, the City launched the Modular Housing Initiative to rapidly create at least 250 new rent-geared-to-income and supportive homes using modular construction. Four of five projects have since been tenanted, providing a safe, affordable place to call home for over 200 residents formerly experiencing homelessness, with wrap-around support services to help them maintain their housing and improve their health and well-being.
The project at 175 Cummer Avenue was announced in Spring 2021 as part of Phase Two of the Modular Housing Initiative, along with 540 Cedarvale Ave. and 39 Dundalk Dr. While Cedarvale is complete and Dundalk is nearing completion with only landscaping and a review of costs escalations remaining, the project at 175 Cummer Ave was delayed, first because Council’s request for a Minister’s Zoning Order did not yield a response, and second because of an appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) of Council’s approval of the new zoning by-law for the development in August 2022.
A hearing of the appeal was held at the OLT on November 2, 2023. On January 2, 2024 the OLT released its decision, dismissing the appeal and ruling in the City’s favour. The appellants later requested a further review of the OLT’s decision on January 31, 2024, but this request was dismissed by the OLT on February 22, 2024. A motion for leave to appeal the OLT’s decision to Ontario Divisional Court was also denied on May 17, 2024. While the appellants have since made a judicial review application to the Divisional Court to challenge the OLT decision, the OLT decision stands, and zoning is in place to permit the proposed development to proceed.
This report requests authority to enable City Divisions to restart and complete the projects at 175 Cummer Ave., and 39 Dundalk Dr., respectively, by approving Purchase Order Amendments for both projects to ensure funding is in place to complete required work.
The Confidential Attachments include confidential information regarding the pricing for these projects under negotiation with the City’s supplier, estimated costs to complete the projects, and confidential information related to delivery of the project at 175 Cummer Ave.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246284.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1: Modular Housing Initiative - Revised Project Pricing
Confidential Attachment 2: Modular Housing Initiative - Project Delivery Details
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246985.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Modular Housing Initiative Phase 2 - Additional Information
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180623.pdf
Communications (City Council)
PH13.6 - Strategic Opportunity at 267 and 275 Merton Street
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Confidential Attachment - The attachments to this report contain information regarding a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the City of Toronto.
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
Land Considerations
1. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to negotiate and execute on behalf of the City the agreement of purchase and sale with Markee Missing Middle (Merton) GP Inc. and Markee Missing Middle (Merton) Limited Partnership (the "Vendor") in respect of 267 Merton Street and the lease with the Markee Missing Middle (Merton) Limited Partnership (the "Tenant") in respect of 267 Merton Street and 275 Merton Street, and any documents ancillary thereto, on forms approved by the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, following the completion of the developments contemplated in Confidential Attachment 2 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, at the discretion of the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.
Affordable Housing
3. City Council authorize the affordable rental housing units described in Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to be constructed on the lands known as 267 and 275 Merton Street, to be eligible for waivers of fees for planning applications, building permits, parkland dedication and development charges exemptions, unless already paid or exempted by provincial legislation.
4. City Council authorize an exemption from taxation for municipal and school purposes for 99 years for the affordable rental housing units described in Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to be located on 267 and 275 Merton Street.
5. City Council authorize City staff to cancel or refund any taxes paid after the effective date of the exemption from taxation for municipal and school purposes as set out in the Contribution Agreement.
6. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to negotiate and enter into, on behalf of the City, a municipal housing facility agreement (the "Contribution Agreement") with the Tenant for the development of affordable housing to be constructed on 267 and 275 Merton Street, to secure the financial assistance being provided and to set out the terms of the operation of the new affordable rental housing, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.
7. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to execute, on behalf of the City, any security or financing documents required by the Tenant to secure construction and conventional financing and subsequent refinancing, including any postponement, tripartite, confirmation of status, discharge or consent documents where and when required during the term of the Contribution Agreement, as required by normal business practices, and provided that such documents do not give rise to financial obligations on the part of the City that have not been previously approved by City Council.
8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to execute, postpone, confirm the status of, and discharge any City security documents registered as required by normal business practices.
Origin
Summary
This report provides City Council with information on a strategic opportunity to leverage the City-owned lands at 275 Merton Street (the "City Site") to create new purpose-built rental homes, including a minimum target of 30% affordable rental homes. Through negotiations led by CreateTO, in consultation with Corporate Real Estate Management and Housing Secretariat, staff have finalized the terms of a development partnership with Collecdev-Markee Limited Partnership (the “Developer”), which advance a development on the City Site, as well as the adjacent site, 267 Merton Street (the "Developer Site"), which is owned by a subsidiary of the Developer.
This report outlines the opportunity to leverage the City Site in a way that would deliver a substantial number of new affordable rental and rent-controlled market homes in support of the City's HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan targets to approve 65,000 new rent-controlled homes by 2030; and leverage underutilized City-owned properties to create new affordable housing. This report requests Council authority to proceed with the related real estate transactions required to advance this strategic development, along with additional City incentives to support affordable housing, as endorsed by the CreateTO Board on February 16, 2024, the details of which are outlined in Confidential Attachment 1.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246270.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - 267 and 275 Merton Street, Business Case Summary
Confidential Attachment 2 - Key Terms for Proposed Transaction
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180597.pdf
(June 12, 2024) E-mail from Alex Sobolewski (PH.New)
PH13.7 - Renovictions Policy Implementation: Review of Hamilton Renovation Licence and Tenant Relocation By-law and developing a Toronto Renovictions By-law
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
The Deputy City Manager, Development and Growth Services and the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services have submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PH13.7a) with recommendations.
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Confidential Attachment - An attachment to this item contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Chief Building Official and the Executive Director, Toronto Building, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, and Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, and other relevant divisions to report to the Planning and Housing Committee on October 30, 2024 with a proposed renovictions by-law and operational framework to implement the by-law.
2. City Council direct the Chief Building Official and the Executive Director, Toronto Building, the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, in consultation with the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to engage with impacted stakeholders on the draft by-law components and implementation plan that is generally in line with what is outlined in Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, and include the results of this engagement process with the report to the October 30, 2024 meeting of the Planning and Housing Committee.
3. City Council direct the Chief Building Official and the Executive Director, Toronto Building to establish a dedicated staff team (led by a Project Director) to work with senior staff across relevant City divisions to develop a renoviction by-law and its operational framework by the fourth quarter of 2024.
4. City Council direct the Chief Building Official and the Executive Director, Toronto Building, the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat in consultation with the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to report through the 2025 and 2026 budget processes on any additional budget and resource impacts of the renoviction by-law implementation.
5. City Council request the Province of Ontario to proclaim and bring into force Bill 97, Helping Homebuyers, Protecting Tenants Act, 2023, and/or related regulations to:
a. require that when landlords provide a notice to terminate a tenancy for repairs or renovations, that it be accompanied by a report from a qualified person confirming that the renovations/repairs are so extensive that they require vacant possession of the rental unit. A qualified person should include someone with professional qualifications who is licensed and required to meet professional and ethical obligations under provincial legislation (e.g. architects and professional engineers);
b. require landlords to provide tenants who have provided notice that they wish to have a right of first refusal to return to the unit with written notice of the estimated completion date, any changes to this date, and final notification once the renovations/repairs are completed;
c. require landlords to provide tenants with a grace period of at least 60 days after the rental unit is ready for occupancy, to allow tenants to move back in and provide the required 60-day notice to end their tenancy in their temporary accommodation; and
d. allow tenants whose landlords fail to provide the required written notices, the grace period and/or the right of first refusal to apply to the Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) for a remedy until the later of two years after the tenant moved out or six months after renovations/repairs are completed.
6. City Council reiterate its requests to the Province of Ontario to amend the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, and/or related regulations to:
a. reintroduce vacancy control legislation which ties rents to residential units rather than tenancies;
b. introduce rent control to cover units first occupied after November 15, 2018;
c. require landlords of residential units to be responsible for finding temporary accommodation or provide sufficient relocation assistance for their tenants for the duration of the renovations if tenants intend to return post-repair/renovation;
d. require landlords to obtain a building permit before issuing an N13 notice of termination, provide a copy of the applicable permit to tenants together with any N13 notice of termination, require evidence that the permit was delivered with the N13 notice of termination as part of any L2 application to end a tenancy filed on that basis, and require the approved permit be provided to the LTB as part of any L2 application to end a tenancy filed on the basis of an N13 notice of termination;
e. provide the same rights and compensation afforded to tenants in buildings with five (5) or more units to those in buildings with less than five (5) units;
f. increase the required compensation for tenants in no-fault evictions;
g. remove ex parte eviction orders for breached repayment agreements;
h. require landlords to attach a plain-language tenants’ rights information package to N13 eviction notices (similar to the City of Toronto's Eviction Prevention Handbook);
i. regulate N11s and buy-out agreements; and
j. amend Above Guideline Increase (AGI) rules to eliminate the eligibility of capital expenditures that constitute general repair and maintenance of the property; add a new subsection requiring landlords to save 10 percent of rental income to be accessed for capital expenditures; and require landlords to notify tenants of the decrease in advance of the date when rent is required to be reduced as specified in an order permitting an AGI related to eligible capital expenses.
7. City Council reiterate its requests to the Province of Ontario to make the following operational changes:
a. allow tenants the right to in-person LTB hearings to eliminate technological barriers for individuals who do not have access to digital devices or reliable internet connection;
b. simplify LTB notices with plain language so they are easily understood and ensure all forms include a tracking number that is linked to a public registry; and
c. establish a provincial rental registry that tracks building ownership, rental rates, AGIs and their expiry dates, and LTB eviction filings and their outcomes; and monitor data on N12 and N13 evictions.
8. City Council reiterate its requests to the federal and provincial governments to significantly increase their investment in the HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan which will increase the supply of new affordable and supportive homes, protect existing rental stock including through retrofit programs, and help residents across the city to maintain their existing homes.
9. City Council forward this report to the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) and Greater Toronto Hamilton Area municipalities for information, as they may be considering the development of similar strategies to address renovictions within their jurisdictions.
Adopt the recommendation in the Supplementary Report:
10. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 6, 2024) from the City Solicitor remain confidential in its entirety, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Planning and Housing Committee:
1. Directed the Deputy City Manager, Development and Growth, and the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services to report directly to City Council with updated recommendations that more clearly achieve a Hamilton style Renoviction By-law for Toronto including:
a. A renovation license or permit requirement for the landlord/property owner within a certain set timeframe of issuing of an N13 Eviction notice;
b. Application requirements for the renovation license or permit to include but not be limited to:
1. Confirmation that the owner/landlord has received all required building permits;
2. A comprehensive tenant rehousing and compensation plan submitted by the landlord/property owner;
3. Confirmation that the tenant has received all required notice including eviction prevention and rights information, and information on the right of first refusal; and
4. Third party verification that vacant possession of the unit is required to complete the renovations.
c. A structure of fines and fees; and,
d. Applying the by-law to all rental units in Toronto and identifying any types of housing that require further consideration for a phased approach.
2. Directed the Deputy City Manager, Development and Growth, and the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services to report directly to City Council with updated recommendations for consultations with stakeholders that are focused on the implementation of the by-law as set out in the above, Part 1 of the Decision Advice, recommendations to Council.
Origin
Summary
The HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan and Toronto Housing Charter, both adopted in 2019, commit the City to advancing the progressive realization of the right to adequate housing and set a number of strategic priorities related to protecting tenants, preserving affordable housing supply, and realizing a vision of a city where everyone has a safe, affordable place to call home. City Council has recently increased its housing targets under the HousingTO Plan, however, to ensure the City has sufficient affordable rental homes for low- and moderate-income residents, it is also vital to preserve existing affordable rental homes. As a result of factors impacting Toronto's housing market, including low rental vacancy rates, insufficient new rental homes, and the financialization of housing, over the past decade the Toronto region has lost more affordable and mid-range rental homes than have been built. These housing market pressures combined with gaps in provincial rent control requirements have resulted in increased rates of evictions, with disproportionate impacts on low-income and marginalized residents, including those from equity-deserving groups.
There have been reports of a growing trend of renovictions in Toronto, where a landlord illegitimately evicts a tenant by alleging that vacant possession of a rental unit is needed to undertake renovations or repairs. Renovictions can include refusing to allow a tenant who has exercised their right of first refusal to return post-renovation, illegally raising the rent on a returning tenant, or not undertaking major renovations after evicting renters. This results in the displacement of tenants, the permanent loss of affordable market rental housing, and contributes to rising homelessness in Toronto.
The Province of Ontario has jurisdiction over rent control policy and landlord-tenant matters through the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006. The most effective tools to protect tenants and deter renovictions reside at the provincial level. City Council has previously requested that the Province introduce measures to amend provincial legislation to protect tenants from renovictions, including but not limited to: introducing rent control that is maintained upon turnover of a unit, requiring landlords to provide temporary relocation assistance while renovations are taking place, and creating a centralized data system and registry for rental properties and eviction activities in Toronto.
In the absence of these changes, Toronto and other cities are considering steps to address the growing trend of renovictions within their authorities. On July 19, 2022, City Council, through Item PH35.18, adopted a Renovictions Policy as a framework to guide the development of a new renovictions by-law that would respond to growing trends in illegitimate evictions, protect tenants, and preserve affordable housing supply.
In January 2024, the City of Hamilton adopted a Renovation Licence and Tenant Relocation By-law (“Hamilton by-law") that aims to prevent renovictions and mitigate harms to tenants by requiring a licence to renovate tenanted rental units. The by-law includes several new requirements of landlords to achieve these objectives and establishes a dedicated investigation, compliance, and enforcement framework. The Hamilton by-law was enacted on April 10, 2024, and the administrative and enforcement framework are under development. The Hamilton by-law is expected to come into force January 1, 2025.
On February 28, 2024, the Planning and Housing Committee directed staff to include in this report consideration and analysis of the Hamilton by-law and how that approach could be adopted by Toronto. This report responds to this direction and provides staff’s analysis of implementation considerations related to the Hamilton by-law. Further comments respecting the by-law will be provided by the City Solicitor by way of a separate report. It also provides City Council with an update on actions underway to implement the renovictions policy and corresponding by-law, and provides necessary context regarding provincial policy and legislative changes impacting renovictions and tenants’ rights (including Provincial Bill 97, Helping Homebuyers, Protecting Tenants Act, 2023). Finally, the report provides Council with information on how the Hamilton by-law approach could be implemented in Toronto, should Council provide such direction.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246288.pdf
Attachment 1: City of Toronto Renovictions By-law Draft Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246463.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-247174.pdf
Speakers
Marcia Stone, Weston ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now)
Earl LaBlanc, East York ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now)
Patricia Edwards, Weston ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now)
Karly Wilson, Don Valley Community Legal Services
Miguel Avila-Velarde, Regent Park Neighborhood Association (RPNA)
Akasha Ara, Wingreen Tenants Association
Guled Arale
Caelen Nadeau, Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness
Laura Anonen, Don Valley Community Legal Services (DVCLS)
Melissa Goldstein
Geordie Dent, Federation of Metro Tenants' Associations
Councillor Paula Fletcher
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180606.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Douglas Kwan, Director of Advocacy and Legal Services, Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario (ACTO) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180610.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Karly Wilson, Staff Lawyer, Team Lead - Housing, on behalf of Don Valley Community Legal Services (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180615.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Jonella Evangelista, Right to Housing Toronto (R2HTO) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180616.pdf
(June 13, 2024) Letter from Bhumika Jhamb, Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180624.pdf
(June 13, 2024) Letter from Melissa Goldstein, City of Toronto Tenant Advisory Committee (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180588.pdf
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181156.pdf
7a - Renovictions Policy Implementation and Hamilton By-law - Supplementary Report
Confidential Attachment - The attachment to this report contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Origin
Summary
This report is supplementary to the report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat entitled Renovictions Policy Implementation: Review of Hamilton Renovation Licence and Tenant Relocation By-law and developing a Toronto Renovictions By-law dated May 30, 2024 (the "Renovictions Update Report"). This report provides legal advice on the City of Hamilton's Renovation Licence and Relocation By-law and the potential implementation of a similar by-law in Toronto.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246433.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Supplementary Report on Legal Issues Relating to the Proposed Draft Renovictions By-law Framework for Toronto
PH13.8 - Launching the Rental Housing Supply Program
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
The Executive Director, Housing Secretariat has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PH13.8a) with recommendations.
Bills 687 and 688 have been submitted on this Item.
Confidential Attachment - A position, plan, procedure, criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the City. Attachment 1 contains financial information, supplied in confidence to the City of Toronto and CreateTO, which, if disclosed, could reasonably be expected to significantly prejudice the competitive position or interfere significantly with the contractual or other negotiations of a person, group of persons, or organization.
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
New Rental Supply Housing Program
1. City Council approve the Rental Housing Supply Program, as outlined in this report, to assist the City in achieving its approved rent-controlled, affordable and rent-geared-to income rental housing targets.
2. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to provide City financial incentives to eligible rental housing units under the Rental Housing Supply Program, up to the number of rental housing units approved annually through the Housing Secretariat Budget, including exemptions from development charges, parkland dedication fees, community benefits charges, if not exempted by provincial legislation, and waivers of planning application and building permit fees, to eligible housing developments.
3. City Council direct Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to develop a review and evaluation process to assess the financial impact of Rental Housing Supply Program applications and recommend approval of financial incentives for Council approval.
4. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to launch a three-year Pilot Community Housing Pre-development Fund, to provide funding to Community Housing Providers for the purpose of undertaking pre-development activities in accordance with guidelines included in Attachment 3 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat.
5. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to approve projects eligible for the Pilot Community Housing Pre-development Fund, in accordance with guidelines included in Attachment 3 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, up to the number approved annually through the Housing Secretariat Budget.
6. City Council request the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to report to City Council annually on the results of the Rental Housing Supply Program and Pilot Community Housing Pre-Development Fund from the prior year, including any recommended modifications to the programs.
7. City Council adopt the updated Municipal Housing Facility By-law in Attachment 4 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, and repeal Municipal Housing Facility By-law 183-2022.
8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Municipal Housing Facility By-law as may be required.
Financial Support for Affordable Rental Housing Projects
9. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to provide capital funding to the projects listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, up to $260,000 per affordable rental unit, in a total amount not to exceed $351,515,142.
10. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to negotiate and execute, on behalf of the City, the following:
a. a municipal housing facility agreement ("Contribution Agreement") with eligible proponents for funding and financial incentives, and to set out the terms of the development and operation of affordable rental housing, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor;
b. a municipal housing facility agreement ("Contribution Agreement") or amendments to existing Contribution Agreements with the proponents listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, or related entities, for funding and financial incentives and to set out the terms of the development and operation of affordable rental housing, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor;
c. a pre-development funding agreement with eligible proponents approved under the Pilot Community Housing Pre-development Fund, including the projects outlined in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to secure the financial assistance and to set out the terms of the pre-development funding, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor; and,
d. to enter into agreements or other suitable arrangements with City of Toronto agencies and/or corporations, the Government of Ontario and/or its agencies, community agencies, private entities and/or individuals, as appropriate, to deliver projects approved under the Rental Housing Supply Program.
11. City Council direct the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, and the Executive Director, Financial Planning to develop an implementation plan to establish a revolving Affordable Housing Fund to be overseen and used by the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat in consultation with the Executive Director, Financial Planning to support future rent-geared-to-income and affordable rental housing projects.
Expediting Development Review and Legal Due-diligence
12. City Council request the Executive Director, Development Review Division, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to identify projects approved by the Rental Housing Supply Program that will be reviewed under the Priority Development Review Stream.
13. City Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for Legal Services Division by $0.166 million gross and $0 net, fully funded from the 2024-2033 Capital Budget and Plan for Housing Secretariat and increase the approved staff complement for Legal Services by two permanent positions to support a range of housing initiatives.
Intergovernmental Considerations
14. City Council request the Government of Ontario to support the implementation of the Rental Housing Supply Program, which is also necessary to support delivery of the Ontario's more Homes for Everyone plan targets, by:
a. urgently allocating land to develop new purpose-built affordable, rent-controlled and rent-geared-to-income homes and require that as part of any future Provincial land offerings, at least 30% of the gross floor area be allocated for affordable housing for 99 years;
b. partnering with the Federal Government on their Canada Builds program and the City of Toronto to launch an Ontario Builds housing program and:
1. allocate between $500 million and $800 million per year in grant funding to Toronto over the next seven years;
2. allocate between $6.5 billion and $8 billion in low-cost financing/re-payable loans to Toronto over the next seven years;
3. provide loan guarantees for non-profit, co-op and public led purpose-built affordable and market rental projects, as well as for affordable homeownership projects;
c. allowing zoning with conditions to enable the City of Toronto to secure purpose-built rental housing as part of individual site-specific zoning by-laws;
d. allowing for Inclusionary Zoning to be applied across the city and approve the City’s Protected Major Transit Station Areas delineations, and require the homes to meet the City’s income-based definition of affordable housing and ensure that affordability is secured for 99 years; and,
e. adopting the City of Toronto’s income-based definition of “affordable housing” and harmonizing all provincial housing programs to create certainty and predictability.
15. City Council request the Government of Canada to support the implementation of the Rental Housing Supply Program, in alignment with Canada’s Housing Plan, and the subsequent 2024 Federal Budget, by:
a. urgently allocating land to develop new purpose-built affordable, rent-controlled and rent-geared-to-income homes and require that as part of any future federal land offerings, at least 30% of the gross floor area be allocated for affordable housing for 99 years;
b. launch the Canada Builds program in partnership with the Province of Ontario and the City of Toronto to:
1. allocate between $500 million and $800 million per year in grant funding to Toronto over the next seven years;
2. allocate between $6.5 billion and $8 billion in low-cost financing/re-payable loans to Toronto over the next seven years; and,
3. provide loan guarantees for City-supported non-profit and public led purpose-built affordable and market rental projects.
16. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat remain confidential in its entirety as they: outline a position, plan, procedure, criteria or instruction to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the City; and contain financial information, supplied in confidence to the City of Toronto and CreateTO, which, if disclosed, could reasonably be expected to prejudice significantly the competitive position or interfere significantly with the contractual or other negotiations of a person, group of persons, or organization.
17. City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Development and Growth, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to consult with stakeholders including BILD, and report back to Planning and Housing Committee by the October 30, 2024 meeting with options on supporting the delivery of purpose-built rental homes, in partnership with both existing and potential funding and program supports from the federal and provincial governments.
Committee Decision Advice and Other Information
The Planning and Housing Committee:
1. Directed the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to report directly to the June 26 meeting of City Council with an intergovernmental request for additional funding and financing required to complement the City’s proposed capital funding of $351 million, referenced in Part 9, in advancing approximately 6,000 rent-controlled homes, including 2,600 affordable rental homes.
2. Requested the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to provide a supplementary report directly to City Council for the June 26, 2024 meeting reviewing the merits and rationale informing the rent-control provisions applying to the mid-range moderate rent units created through the proposed Rental Housing Supply Program, including:
a. An analysis of the feasibility of limiting rent increases to the provincial rent increase guideline under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 and the impact on the financial viability of the 30% of income-based affordable units within the contemplated projects and the financial viability of the contemplated projects as a whole;
b. An analysis of the affordability of the mid-range moderate rent units over time relative to the private housing market in the context of the rent-control provisions as contemplated in the report; and
c. A jurisdictional scan of the long-term viability of the not-for-profit and co-operative housing market in current market conditions and the sector’s resilience to withstand market fluctuations with regards to financing, debt servicing, and other relevant factors.
Origin
Summary
Toronto is facing two housing crises – one where there is a lack of deeply affordable and supportive housing for low-income marginalized and vulnerable residents; and a more recent one in which rising rents have made it increasingly unaffordable for middle income earners, key workers and professionals to live in the city. This was noted by the City’s Perspective on the Rental Housing Roundtable report in 2023. Urgent action across the entire housing continuum is required to prevent more residents, specifically renters, from experiencing housing instability and potentially homelessness; to avoid Toronto’s social service sector facing a deepening key worker staffing crisis; and to allow Toronto’s businesses to attract the workforce and labour supply they need to grow.
City Council has recognized the need to expand the City's HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan (HousingTO Plan) targets beyond affordable rental homes, to include rent-geared-to-income (RGI) and rent-controlled homes, thereby advancing a generational transformation of Toronto’s housing system by 2030. In support of the delivery of a full range of homes, City Council has further directed staff to recommend revisions to the Open Door Affordable Rental Housing program (Open Door program). This report responds to City Council’s request to review the Open Door program in light of the revised HousingTO Plan targets that include rent-geared-to-income, affordable rental, and rent-controlled homes (2023,EX9.3).
The Open Door program has been the City’s signature affordable rental housing initiative since its launch in 2016, and has provided City funding and incentives (including waivers of fees and charges, and property tax exemptions) to support the development of over 21,000 affordable rental homes on public, non-profit, co-op and private land.
The Open Door program has been able to support a healthy pipeline of affordable rental homes across Toronto, with 1,911 of these homes constructed and an additional 3,011 currently under construction. There are an additional 16,530 homes that are currently stuck in pre-development phases due to requiring additional support, including funding and financing, and acceleration of approvals, to move them into construction.
This report provides recommendations to transform the Open Door program into the Rental Housing Supply Program in light of the updated HousingTO Plan targets, recent legislative changes to the Development Charges Act (DCA) through the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill 23); the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019 (Bill 108), and the Affordable Homes and Good Jobs Act, 2023 (Bill 134); federal and provincial housing policy and funding changes; and the current macroeconomic context which is making it increasingly difficult to adequately scale-up the purpose-built rental housing supply in Toronto.
To respond to the housing and homelessness crises and support City Council’s new target for 65,000 rent-controlled homes, this report proposes:
1) Allocating capital funding to 18 affordable rental and rent-geared-to-income housing projects, outlined in Confidential Attachment 1, aimed at accelerating delivery of over 2,600 new affordable rental homes. Through this funding, non-viable projects will be able to move to construction start and secure financing. Staff estimate that in addition to unlocking over 2,600 affordable rental homes, a further 3,380 market and rent-controlled rental homes will enter construction for a total of almost 6,000 new rental homes.
2) Launching the new Rental Housing Supply Program which:
- Aligns the program definition of affordable rental housing with the City’s Official Plan income-based affordable housing definition and the provincial Affordable Residential Units Bulletin definition.
- Establishes a framework for prioritizing and recommending capital funding for affordable and rent-geared-to-income rental homes, up to a maximum of $260,000 per unit.
- Introduces a proposed program definition of rent-controlled homes where rent levels are higher than income-based affordable rents and at or below 150% of the average City of Toronto rent, by unit type, as reported annually by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. This new program definition is consistent with the Official Plan definition of mid-range moderate rents and will include limiting rent increases to the provincial rent increase guideline under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 plus 2%.
- Provides proposed incentives to not-for-profit corporations, non-profit housing co-operatives (co-ops), Indigenous housing providers, (collectively referred to as “Community Housing Providers” throughout this report), as well as the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) and the Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation (TSHC) to support the development of new rent-controlled homes.
3) Launching a Pilot Community Housing Pre-development Fund to support the intensification and re-development of Community Housing sites.
4) Working towards launching a sustainable and revolving Affordable Housing Fund to attract funding from government and non-government sources including financial institutions, philanthropic organizations, and private sector organizations (including large employers) to support a range of City-supported and City-led affordable rental housing projects.
These measures also complement the “Community Housing Modernization and Growth Strategy” (the Community Housing Strategy) report that is also to be considered by the Planning and Housing Committee at the same meeting on June 13, 2024. The Community Housing Strategy includes concrete measures to support long-term sustainability and affordability of the city's existing community housing stock over the next decade as they navigate expiry of mortgages, ending of land leases with the City, and escalating maintenance costs. The Community Housing Strategy also proposes a number of policy and planning measures aimed at increasing the community housing stock including enhancements to the Multi-Unit Residential Acquisition Program (MURA) to enable Community Housing Providers to better compete in the city’s speculative market and to acquire properties that can be operated as affordable rental housing in perpetuity.
The proposed new Rental Housing Supply Program aims to support a shift in Toronto's housing market, where purpose-built rentals are the most common form of rental housing but have contributed the least amount of new supply over the past 10 years. During this time, most new rental supply has derived from condominiums, which according to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Rental Market Report are generally more expensive and do not offer the same level of security of tenure for tenants. The proposed new Rental Housing Supply Program also aims to support a generational transformation of Toronto’s housing system to shift Toronto’s housing system and increase the supply of non-market, community housing.
Despite an increase in purpose-built rental housing starts in 2023, the rental housing supply is not forecast to keep up with demand. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) anticipates a decline in housing starts that will persist through 2024 and 2025, reflecting the lagged effect of higher interest rates, labour shortages, and supply chain issues. Toronto is continuing to face high rental demand driven by strong population growth and an increasing number of renter households squeezed out of homeownership market. The rental market in Toronto is expected to remain tight without significant action by all orders of government to facilitate the development of purpose-built rental housing. This proposal responds to stakeholder feedback in the City’s Perspective on the Rental Housing Roundtable report, which recommended that the City study additional means of incentivizing purpose-built rental housing supply beyond what is already available in the Open Door program, and recognize the vital role of the non-profit sector in providing affordable housing.
While the City is committed to taking every possible action within its jurisdictional and financial capacity to tackle the housing crisis, strengthened partnerships with the federal and provincial governments are needed to complement Toronto’s efforts. Recent federal and provincial measures introduced to support purpose-built rental construction, such as providing a 100% rebate on the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) on new purpose-built rental housing is an example of government policies aligning to advance collective housing objectives.
However, new and enhanced policy, program and financial tools are urgently needed to meet Toronto, Ontario and Canada’s respective housing supply targets. This includes a new fiscal deal to support the structural changes that will put Toronto on a path to long-term financial sustainability, as well as a commitment from the federal and provincial governments to invest in the HousingTO Plan.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246339.pdf
Attachment 4: Updated Municipal Housing Facility By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246340.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1: List of In-flight Housing Projects Recommended for New Funding
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-247170.pdf
(June 26, 2024) Presentation from the Housing Secretariat on Launching the Rental Housing Supply Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-247229.pdf
Speakers
Danielle Binder
Kizito Musabimana
S. Mwarigha , WoodGreen Community Services
Cheryll Case, CP Planning
Nicki Ward, City Park Co Op
Tom Clement, Co-operative Housing Federation of Toronto
Chiara Padovani, York South-Weston Tenant Union
Peter Frampton, The Learning Enrichment Foundation
Daryl Chong, Greater Toronto Apartment Association
Melissa Goldstein
Peter Martin, Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness (TAEH)
Mark Richardson, HousingNowTO.com
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180336.pdf
(June 8, 2024) Submission from Kizito Masabimana (PH.New)
(June 10, 2024) Letter from Aklilu Wendaferew, Executive Director, Good Shepherd Ministries (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180508.pdf
(June 11, 2024) Letter from S. Mwarigha, Vice President, WoodGreen Community Services (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180545.pdf
(June 11, 2024) Letter from Tom Clement, Executive Director, Co-operative Housing Federation of Toronto (CHFT) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180553.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Colleen Bailey, More Neighbours Toronto (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180584.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from David Wilkes, President and Chief Executive Officer, Building Industry and Land Development Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180603.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Amina Dibe, Senior Manager, Co-operative Housing Federation of Canada (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180608.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Peter G. Martin, Housing Solutions Manager, Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness (TAEH) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180612.pdf
(June 13, 2024) Letter from How-Sen Chong, Climate Campaigner, Toronto Environmental Alliance (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180614.pdf
(June 13, 2024) Letter from Judy Duncan, Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180617.pdf
(June 13, 2024) Letter from Melissa Goldstein, City of Toronto’s Tenant Advisory Committee (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180630.pdf
PH13.9 - Community Housing Sector Modernization and Growth Strategy
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
New Regulatory and Funding Framework
1. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to:
a. enter into new Service Agreements related to the administration and funding of Part VII.1 housing projects that comply with the requirements of Ontario Regulation 367/11 under the Housing Services Act (“HSA") and which address the matters set forth in Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, regarding Part VII housing projects with mortgages that have reached the end of their term, upon terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor; and
b. to provide notice as required by the Housing Services Act of each such agreement to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing.
2. City Council request the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to engage with all orders of government, financial institutions, Community Housing Providers, membership organizations and other organizations providing programs that support access to safe and affordable housing on opportunities for mortgage refinancing for Community Housing Providers in Toronto with expiring mortgages to assist these housing providers in leveraging their assets to access additional funding to repair and revitalize their housing stock.
Considerations for a New Lease Policy Framework with Community Housing Providers
3. City Council adopt the Lease Policy Framework (Attachment 2 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat) for extending, renewing or entering into new leases with non-profit housing corporations, non-profit housing co-operatives, and Indigenous housing providers (collectively referred to as "Community Housing Providers") providing social and affordable housing on City-owned land.
4. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to extend, renew or enter into, and thereafter administer and manage, leases that are in accordance with the terms set out in Attachment 2 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, and on other amended terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, with Community Housing Providers providing subsidized and affordable housing on City-owned land who meet the eligibility criteria set out in Attachment 2 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat.
5. City Council authorize severally each of the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the Director, Real Estate Services to execute leases pursuant to the Lease Policy Framework and any related documents on behalf of the City.
6. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, in consultation with the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to negotiate and execute on behalf of the City, operating agreements with Community Housing Providers providing subsidized and affordable housing on City-owned land in accordance with the Lease Policy Framework in Attachment 2 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
7. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to negotiate and execute on behalf of the City, an extension of the operating agreement and the date by which Woodgreen Community Housing Incorporated, or its successor, is obligated to re-convey the property at 444 Logan Avenue to the City, to August 1, 2026, to allow time for the City to negotiate the terms of the continued operation of this social housing project, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.
8. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to prioritize the negotiation and completion of new long-term ground leases with Beech Hall Housing Co-operative and Alexandra Park Housing Co-operative pursuant to the Lease Policy Framework and:
a. take any additional steps to successfully develop and negotiate a ground lease and operating agreement with Beech Hall Housing Co-operative and Alexandra Park Co-operative, including where necessary, commission building condition assessments;
b. that in such negotiations and finalizing of proposed community housing Service Agreements, the City recognize any existing mandates; and
c. report back by October 30, 2024 to Planning and Housing Committee on the status of lease negotiations with the Beech Hall Housing Co-operative and Alexandra Housing Co-operative and, should it be necessary, make recommendations to extend the current leases arrangements until such time as new leases are finalized.
9. City Council request the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to develop and formalize internal city processes to expedite, well in advance of the expiry of Community Housing Provider ground leases, the negotiation and extension of such leases and the development of new operating agreements in accordance with the Lease Policy Framework in Attachment 2 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat.
Enhancements to the Multi-Unit Residential Acquisitions Program (MURA)
10. City Council authorize a waiver of building permit fees and an exemption from taxation for municipal and school purposes for up to 500 new affordable rental or co-operative units annually to a maximum of 1,500 units to be secured by 2027 through the Multi-Unit Residential Acquisitions Program for 99-year terms by the municipal housing facility agreements (the City’s “Contribution Agreements”).
11. City Council authorize the Controller to refund any taxes paid after the effective date of the exemption from taxation for municipal and school purposes as set out in the Contribution Agreement.
12. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills to give effect to City Council’s decision.
13. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to amend the Multi-Unit Residential Acquisition program as follows:
a. Expand the eligibility criteria to enable the program to support not-for-profit housing providers (including community land trusts and co-operatives) and Indigenous housing providers with an exemption from taxation for municipal and school purposes and waivers of building permit fees where such not-for-profit and Indigenous housing providers are able to purchase properties using non-City acquisition programs, subject to the acquisition meeting the eligibility criteria under MURA and the not-for-profit and Indigenous housing providers agree to enter into a Contribution Agreement with the City, and provided these units are within the City Council approved maximum program limit set out in Part 10 above.
b. Expand the eligibility criteria to enable Multi-Unit Residential Acquisition to support not-for-profit housing providers (including community land trusts and co-operatives) and Indigenous housing providers with the purchase of condominium units to be operated as affordable rental housing, for a period of 99 years consistent with the Multi-Unit Residential Acquisition program requirements, in developments that will be completed within one year of applying for funding, and such further criteria, requirements, terms and conditions deemed necessary by the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat.
c. Revise the residential building requirements for eligible properties by removing the 6-unit minimum and 60-unit maximum limits provided that the City Council-approved maximum funding allocation limit of $200,000.00 per unit and up to $12,000,000.00 for the building is maintained.
14. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to issue a request for proposal on an annual basis and to select not-for-profit housing providers (including community land trusts and co-operatives) and Indigenous housing providers to purchase or establish long-term conventional financing, renovate and operate affordable rental or non-profit co-operative housing under the revised Multi-Unit Residential Acquisition program;
15. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to negotiate and enter into on behalf of the City, a municipal housing facility agreement for housing purposes for 99 years with the successful not-for profit housing provider (including community land trusts and co-operatives) and Indigenous housing providers selected through the request for proposal process under Part 14 above to secure the financial assistance being provided and to set out the terms of the operation of the affordable rental or non-profit co-operative housing (the “Contribution Agreement”) or any related agreement to facilitate the funding process, all on such terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.
16. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to execute on behalf of the City, any security or financing documents, including any postponement, confirmation of status, discharge or consent documents where and when required during the term of the Contribution Agreement, as required by normal business practices, and provided that such documents do not give rise to financial obligations on the part of the City that have not been previously approved by City Council.
Expediting the Development Review and Permitting Process
17. City Council direct the Executive Director, Development Review, in collaboration with the Chief Planner, and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, to consider a Community Housing priority stream to expedite the review and approval of development applications and building permits for new Community Housing projects, and to report back to Council by the fourth quarter of 2024 on the creation of this priority stream.
Strengthening the Capacity of Community Housing Providers
18. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to engage with Community Housing Providers and explore opportunities for mergers, acquisitions, and strategic partnerships to achieve enhanced economies of scale and/or the ability to leverage larger asset pools to improve sustainability, increase capacity to maintain and revitalize existing assets, and to support longer-term rental housing through redevelopment and/or acquisition.
19. City Council direct the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to establish a Community of Practice for the Multi-Unit Residential Acquisition program for Community Housing Providers and other interested organizations to help share best practices and to advise smaller organizations on responding to the annual Multi-Unit Residential Acquisition request for proposals.
Intergovernmental Considerations
20. City Council request the Government of Canada and the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) to consider enhancing its grant and financing programs, including the Affordable Housing Fund, to support the City’s achievement of housing targets and make them more accessible by Community Housing Providers through:
a. Aligning program requirements with the Ontario Building Code requirements for energy efficiency and accessibility when Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation has contributed less than other project partners.
b. Increasing the forgivable loan amount that non-profit organizations are eligible to receive based on the cost of repairs and renovations in the Toronto market.
c. Providing a direct funding allocation to municipalities to enable targeted outreach and support for Community Housing Providers with limited capacity who need help to repair, renew, and upgrade their existing portfolios.
21. City Council request the Government of Ontario to support the implementation of the Community Housing Strategy, which is also necessary to support delivery of the provincial More Homes Built Faster plan and the Community Housing Renewal Strategy targets, by:
a. allocating between $500 million and $800 million per year in grant funding to Toronto over the next seven years to develop new housing, including new community housing;
b. providing access to $6.5 billion to $8 billion in in low-cost financing/re-payable loans to Toronto over the next seven years;
c. allowing residents of community housing projects that are exempted from taxation for municipal and school purposes to be eligible for the Ontario Energy and Property Tax Credit component of the Ontario Trillium Benefit;
d. continuing to support improvements to the community housing stock to be in a better state of repair through programs such as the Canada-Ontario Community Housing Improvement Program;
e. enhancing funding commitments to sector support agencies such as the Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association and the Co-operative Housing Federation of Toronto to provide consulting services and support to Community Housing Providers to successfully transition to a new operating framework with the City of Toronto.
Origin
Summary
In Toronto, Community Housing (or non-market housing) refers to social and affordable housing that is owned and/or operated by non-profit housing organizations (including community land trusts), non-profit housing co-operatives ("Co-ops"), and Indigenous housing providers (collectively referred to as “Community Housing Providers”), along with the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) and the Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation (TSHC). Community Housing is typically developed and operated with publicly funded capital contributions, and ongoing rental subsidies. Furthermore, it is a critical segment of the housing continuum and provides rental housing options for low-and-moderate-income households.
In addition to over 57,500 homes provided by Toronto Community Housing Corporation and Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation, there are currently over 200 Community Housing Providers in Toronto that operate over 40,000 subsidized Rent-Geared-To-Income (RGI) and affordable homes. About 75% of this stock was built prior to 1987 utilizing federal and provincial funding programs. Action from all orders of government is urgently needed to preserve and modernize these aging homes.
Recognizing the need to accelerate efforts to maintain the city’s Community Housing stock, in March 2023, through Item - 2023.EX3.1, “Housing Action Plan 2022-2026 ("HAP") and in November 2023, through Item - 2023.EX9.3 - “Generational Transformation of Toronto’s Housing System to Urgently Build More Affordable Homes”, City Council directed staff to report back on a strategy to modernize and grow the Community Housing sector, and provide additional support for Community Housing Providers.
The report responds to Council’s requests and recommends a new Community Housing Sector Modernization and Growth Strategy ("the Strategy") aimed at:
- protecting the city's existing Community Housing stock through preserving the assets as well as maintaining affordability;
- creating net new Community Housing that will support the City in achieving its target of approving 65,000 rent-controlled homes by 2030; and
- improving access to housing opportunities for low-and-moderate income households, particularly Indigenous residents and those from equity-deserving groups.
The proposed Strategy, included as Attachment 1, encompasses six key initiatives to achieve these objectives, including:
1. A New Regulatory and Funding Framework to Maintain Homes Operated by Community Housing Providers Under Part VII.1 of the Housing Services Act – The new regulatory framework will allow the City, as Service Manager, to secure partnerships that will continue to offer affordable and deeply affordable housing with Community Housing Providers operating under Part VII of the Housing Services Act whose mortgages are expiring.
2. A New Policy Framework to Guide Ground Lease Arrangements Between the City of Toronto and Community Housing Providers – A number of Community Housing Providers operate buildings on land leased from the City and need a lease extension, renewal or a new lease in order to continue to operate, or to refinance buildings and complete required upgrades/major repairs/modernization. The City is also focused on offering more of its land, through long-term leases to the Community Housing sector to scale up the delivery of non-market homes. A new policy framework is proposed in Attachment 2 to guide lease arrangements and ensure a consistent approach for both the City and Community Housing Providers as it relates to new leases, extensions and renewals.
3. Program Enhancements and Additional Financial Support to Acquire and Create New Community Housing – This report recommends changes to the Multi-Unit Residential Acquisition (MURA) program that would enable Community Housing Providers to use Multi-Unit Residential Acquisition funding to acquire a wider range of housing types, including larger buildings (those with greater than 60 units), smaller buildings (those with less than 6 units) such as multi-tenant homes, and condominium units.
4. Encouraging Development and Intensification Opportunities – The City will work with organizations who own land to identify opportunities to create new Community Housing. In addition, staff will continue to advance a number of changes to the Official Plan, zoning by-laws, and planning guidelines through the Housing Action Plan that would result in greater as-of-right development permissions, making it more predictable, simpler and quicker to add new housing supply.
5. An Expedited Development and Permitting Review Process for Community Housing Applications – This report recommends considering the establishment of a Community Housing Priority Stream to expedite development and permitting review and approvals of eligible Community Housing projects, and the utilization of all available tools to expedite zoning approvals.
6. Partnerships to Support Community Housing Sector Action to Build New and Modernize Existing Homes – Enhancing the development, asset management and governance capacity of Community Housing Providers will entail working with sector partners to develop resources and provide advisory services, and to explore opportunities for mergers, acquisitions and strategic partnerships between organizations to achieve economies of scale and/or to be able to leverage a larger asset pool for accessing capital required for new developments and repairs that will support longer-term growth and sustainability. The City will leverage its existing relationships within the sector and explore new partnerships and collaboration opportunities with organizations that can provide advisory services and support to Community Housing Providers.
The measures in this report are complemented by the “Launching the Rental Housing Supply Program” report that is to be considered by the Planning and Housing Committee at the same meeting on June 13, 2024. This complementary report recommends additional financial support for new Community Housing through a proposed three-year, Community Housing Pre-Development Fund Pilot. Through this proposed pilot, Community Housing Providers can apply for financial assistance to cover the cost of pre-development activities that are crucial in supporting new community housing projects.
The Strategy recommended in this report takes a comprehensive approach to sustain, modernize and grow the Community Housing sector in Toronto. It was informed by engagement with Community Housing Providers, the Housing Secretariat’s Tenant Advisory Committee, and key sector organizations such as the Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association (ONPHA), the Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness (TAEH), the Co-op Housing Federation of Toronto (CHFT), and United Way Greater Toronto (UWGT).
While the Strategy is focused on City-specific initiatives, immediate and complementary action is urgently needed from the federal and provincial governments. This includes new and enhanced investments to: grow the Community Housing sector; support low- and-moderate-income households to access and maintain their homes; improve access to supports and services; and build new affordable rental, co-operative and Rent-Geared-To-Income homes within complete communities.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246333.pdf
Attachment 2: Policy Framework for Ground Leases with Community Housing Providers
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246334.pdf
Speakers
Melissa Goldstein
Nicki Ward, City Park Co Op
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180544.pdf
(June 11, 2024) Letter from Tom Clement, Executive Director, Co-operative Housing Federation of Toronto (CHFT) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180574.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Roger Suave, Beech Hall Housing Co-operative (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180571.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Sean Gadon, Action Advisor, Beech Hall Housing Co-operative (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180572.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Colleen Bailey, More Neighbours Toronto (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180585.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Letter from Marlene Coffey, Chief Executive Officer, Ontario Non-Profit Housing Association (ONPHA) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180600.pdf
(June 12, 2024) Submission from Melissa Goldstein, City of Toronto Tenant Advisory Committee (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180622.pdf
(June 13, 2024) Letter from Amina Dibe, Senior Manager, Co-operative Housing Federation of Canada (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/comm/communicationfile-180592.pdf
PH13.11 - 2024 Toronto Heritage Grant Awards
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- 2 - Etobicoke Centre, 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 11 - University - Rosedale, 13 - Toronto Centre, 19 - Beaches - East York
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the grant awards for the 2024 Toronto Heritage Grant Program for the following 10 heritage properties, to assist grant recipients in funding the scope of conservation work generally described in Attachment 1 to the report (May 21, 2024) from the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
288 Annette Street
407 Carlton Street
1 Heritage Place
16 Kimberley Avenue
69 Pembroke Street
231 Seaton Street
572-574 Spadina Avenue
550 Bayview Avenue
201 Cowan Avenue
384 Sunnyside Avenue
2. City Council direct that the use of the grant awards outlined in Recommendation 1 of the report (May 21, 2024) from the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning be limited to only the conservation work approved by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and that the issuing of the grant awards be subject to the grant recipient satisfying all conditions as set out in the Letter of Understanding between the City and the grant recipient.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends the approval of ten grants totalling $317,000.00 under the Toronto Heritage Grant Program. The recommended recipients will generate approximately $706,926.13 in private investment for work to conserve irreplaceable cultural heritage resources that contribute to the City's social and economic prosperity by maintaining Toronto's unique sense of place.
The Toronto Heritage Grant Program provides matching grant funds for eligible heritage conservation work on residential properties or tax-exempt properties in the City of Toronto designated under Part IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). Applicants may receive a grant once every five years for up to 50% of the cost of eligible conservation work. Owners of house form buildings may receive up to $10,000.00 or, if replacing an entire cedar or slate roof assembly, up to $20,000.00 every ten years.
Owners of non-house form buildings and any tax-exempt properties including house form buildings may be eligible for a grant equivalent to 50% of the cost of eligible conservation work, with no maximum limit.
The Toronto Heritage Grant Program has a budget of $317,000.00 in the City Planning 2024 Operating Budget and is administered by Heritage Planning, City Planning.
The properties that have been recommended for a grant award vary in size and location across Toronto. Several grant projects are at residential properties located in Heritage Conservation Districts (HCDs), including properties located within the Cabbagetown North, Garden District, and Harbord Village Phase II Heritage Conservation Districts. In addition, there are a few notable Part IV-designated properties benefitting from heritage grants this year, including Don Valley Brickworks and Epiphany and St. Mark, Parkdale.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-245951.pdf
11a - 2024 Toronto Heritage Grant Awards
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on June 5, 2024 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB19.6 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (May 21, 2024) from the Acting Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends the approval of ten grants totalling $317,000.00 under the Toronto Heritage Grant Program. The recommended recipients will generate approximately $706,926.13 in private investment for work to conserve irreplaceable cultural heritage resources that contribute to the City's social and economic prosperity by maintaining Toronto's unique sense of place.
The Toronto Heritage Grant Program provides matching grant funds for eligible heritage conservation work on residential properties or tax-exempt properties in the City of Toronto designated under Part IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). Applicants may receive a grant once every five years for up to 50 percent of the cost of eligible conservation work. Owners of house form buildings may receive up to $10,000.00 or, if replacing an entire cedar or slate roof assembly, up to $20,000.00 every ten years.
Owners of non-house form buildings and any tax-exempt properties including house form buildings may be eligible for a grant equivalent to 50 percent of the cost of eligible conservation work, with no maximum limit.
The Toronto Heritage Grant Program has a budget of $317,000.00 in the City Planning 2024 Operating Budget and is administered by Heritage Planning, City Planning.
The properties that have been recommended for a grant award vary in size and location across Toronto. Several grant projects are at residential properties located in Heritage Conservation Districts (HCDs), including properties located within the Cabbagetown North, Garden District, and Harbord Village Phase II HCDs. In addition, there are a few notable Part IV-designated properties benefitting from heritage grants this year, including Don Valley Brickworks and Epiphany and St. Mark, Parkdale.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246431.pdf
PH13.12 - 522 University Avenue - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Committee Recommendations
The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:
1. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 522 University Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance for 522 University Avenue (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 1 to the report (May 27, 2024) from the Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. If there are no objections to the designation, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the Bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 522 University Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value according to the Statement of Significance, including a description of Heritage Attributes, found in Attachment 1.
Located on the southwest corner of University Avenue and Elm Street, the property at 522 University Avenue contains a 15-storey office building constructed between 1971 and 1974. Designed by the prominent architect John C. Parkin for the National Life Assurance Company of Canada, the Modernist building is characterized by the uniform treatment of its tower façades in precast concrete, and a double-height, wedge-shaped colonnade at three sides which extend the public space along University Avenue, Elm Street and Simcoe Street. The building contributes to the monumental streetscape of University Avenue as developed in the post-WWII era and the site at 522 University Avenue represents the location of Toronto-based National Life Assurance Company of Canada's offices for nearly 95 years.
Staff have determined that the property at 522 University Avenue has cultural heritage value, meeting a total of 5 of 9 of the Ontario Regulation 9/06 criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. A property may be designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, if it meets two or more of the nine criteria.
As of July 1, 2021, Section 29(1.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act restricts City Council's ability to give notice of its intention to designate a property under the Act to within 90 days of a "Prescribed Event".
The property at 522 University Avenue is subject to a Prescribed Event. On August 30, 2022, the City received Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan applications related to the proposed redevelopment of the subject property (22 192156 STE 11 OZ and 22 192155 STE 11 SA). A Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report (CHER) authored by ERA Architects and dated January 10, 2024 was submitted in support of the application and concludes that the property at 522 University Avenue meets 4 of the 9 criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV.
The City Clerk sent a Notice of Complete Application on September 23, 2022.
The owner provided a waiver to extend the time period for Council to make a decision which expires on July 31, 2024. In order to meet prescribed timelines under the Ontario Heritage Act, Council must make a decision at its June 26-28, 2024 meeting to provide sufficient time for the City Clerk to issue a notice of intention to designate before the waiver expires.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246160.pdf
12a - 522 University Avenue - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on June 5, 2024 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB19.1 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (May 21, 2024) from the Acting Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 522 University Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value according to the Statement of Significance, including a description of Heritage Attributes, found in Attachment 1.
Located on the southwest corner of University Avenue and Elm Street, the property at 522 University Avenue contains a 15-storey office building constructed between 1971 and 1974. Designed by the prominent architect John C. Parkin for the National Life Assurance Company of Canada, the Modernist building is characterized by the uniform treatment of its tower façades in precast concrete, and a double-height, wedge-shaped colonnade at three sides which extend the public space along University Avenue, Elm Street and Simcoe Street. The building contributes to the monumental streetscape of University Avenue as developed in the post-WWII era and the site at 522 University Avenue represents the location of Toronto-based National Life Assurance Company of Canada's offices for nearly 95 years.
Staff have determined that the property at 522 University Avenue has cultural heritage value, meeting a total of 5 of 9 of the Ontario Regulation 9/06 criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. A property may be designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, if it meets two or more of the nine criteria.
As of July 1, 2021, Section 29(1.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act restricts City Council's ability to give notice of its intention to designate a property under the Act to within 90 days of a "Prescribed Event".
The property at 522 University Avenue is subject to a Prescribed Event. On August 30, 2022, the City received Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan applications related to the proposed redevelopment of the subject property (22 192156 STE 11 OZ and 22 192155 STE 11 SA). A Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report (CHER) authored by ERA Architects and dated January 10, 2024 was submitted in support of the application and concludes that the property at 522 University Avenue meets 4 of the 9 criteria under Ontario Regulation 9/06 criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV.
The City Clerk sent a Notice of Complete Application on September 23, 2022. The owner provided a waiver to extend the time period for Council to make a decision which expires on July 31, 2024. In order to meet prescribed timelines under the Ontario Heritage Act, Council must make a decision at its June 26-28, 2024 meeting to provide sufficient time for the City Clerk to issue a notice of intention to designate before the waiver expires.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-246430.pdf
Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 14
EY14.1 - Jane Finch Secondary Plan and Urban Design Guidelines - Final Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 7 - Humber River - Black Creek
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council adopt Official Plan Amendment 633, Jane Finch Secondary Plan, included as Attachment 1 to the report (February 7, 2024) titled Jane Finch Secondary Plan and Urban Design Guidelines – Final Report, from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, with the following amendments:
a. Policy 4.1.i): add the words ", supported by community service facilities." after the words "such as garden suites and multiplexes";
b. Policy 7.2.6.: delete the word "generally" and add the word "minimum" before the words "planned right-of-way widths";
c. Policy 8.1.4.: at the end of the policy, add the words "Not all sites or locations within a site can accommodate the maximum scale of development anticipated in each district while also supporting liveability and a vibrant public realm. Development will be required to demonstrate that its proposed scale satisfies applicable public realm and built form policies and guidelines.";
d. Policy 8.4.1.i) delete the words "tall buildings and mid-rise buildings." and replace with the words "mid-rise buildings, and tall buildings. Tall building heights will range generally from 15 to 45 storeys.";
e. Policy 8.4.2.e): delete the words "tall buildings, mid-rise buildings and low-rise buildings." and replace with the words "low-rise buildings, mid-rise buildings, and tall buildings. Tall building heights will range generally from 15 to 30 storeys.";
f. Policy 8.4.3.c): delete the words "tall buildings, mid-rise buildings and low-rise buildings." and replace with the words "low-rise buildings, mid-rise buildings, and tall buildings. Tall building heights will range generally from 15 to 25 storeys.";
g. Policy 8.4.4.b): delete the words "tall buildings, Jane Finch Pavilion buildings and mid-rise buildings." and replace with the words "mid-rise buildings, Jane Finch Pavilion buildings, and tall buildings. Tall building heights will range generally from 15 to 25 storeys.";
h. Policy 8.4.5.d): delete the words "will be in the form of tall buildings, Jane Finch Pavilion buildings and mid-rise buildings." and replace with the words "will consist of mid-rise buildings, Jane Finch Pavilion buildings, and tall buildings. Tall building heights will range generally from 15 to 35 storeys.";
i. Policy 8.4.6.b): delete the words "will be in the form of tall buildings, Jane Finch Pavilion buildings and mid-rise buildings." and replace with the words "will consist of mid-rise buildings, Jane Finch Pavilion buildings, and tall buildings. Tall building heights will range generally from 15 to 25 storeys.";
j. Replace Map 50-4 with the revised Map 50-4: Mobility Plan showing additional areas for school safety improvements, included in Attachment 2 to this report; and
k. Retitle Map 50-6 from "Map 50-6: Heights and Transitions" to "Map 50-6: Height Limits and Transitions" and change the corresponding reference within Policy 8.1.4. by replacing the words "Map 50-6: Heights and Transitions" to "Map 50-6: Height Limits and Transitions".
2. City Council adopt the Jane Finch Urban Design Guidelines, included as Attachment 2 to the report (February 7, 2024), from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
3. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to use the Jane Finch Secondary Plan and Jane Finch Urban Design Guidelines in the evaluation of all current and new development applications within the Secondary Plan area.
4. City Council adopt the Jane Finch Parks and Public Realm Strategy, included as Attachment 3 to the report (February 7, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District and direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to use the strategy to advance parks and public realm initiatives within the Jane Finch Initiative study area.
5. City Council adopt the Jane Finch Mobility and Transit Integration Strategy, included as Attachment 4 to the Supplementary Report (May 27, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District and direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to use the strategy to advance mobility initiatives in the Jane Finch Initiative study area.
6. City Council adopt the Jane Finch Community Service Facilities Strategy, included as Attachment 5, to the report (February 7, 2024), from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, and direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the General Manager, Children's Services, and the City Librarian, Toronto Public Library Board, in consultation with the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board, to use the strategy to inform future capital planning.
7. City Council adopt the Jane Finch Secondary Plan Servicing Capacity Assessment included as Attachment 7 to the report (February 7, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, and direct the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to use the study in the review of development applications.
8. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to bring forward amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013 containing regulatory and performance standards to implement the land uses for the Jane Finch Secondary Plan.
9. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to work with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to support a broad range of commercial uses and employment growth within the Jane Finch Secondary Plan area, particularly in implementing policies 5.1.2., 5.1.3. and 5.1.4. of the Jane Finch Secondary Plan, through the promotion and application of existing City of Toronto supports and incentive programs for retail and main street business development and employment growth.
10. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to take such necessary steps, as required, to implement City Council’s decision.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Etobicoke York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on February 26, 2024 that continued on June 3, 2024, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council adopt the recommended Jane Finch Secondary Plan and associated Urban Design Guidelines, to provide a comprehensive planning framework for the area around the intersection of Jane Street and Finch Avenue West.
This Official Plan Amendment (OPA) would leverage the significant public investment in new transit infrastructure through the Finch West Light Rail Transit (LRT) by directing development to appropriate locations, transforming the area to support walking, cycling and transit use, and identifying public realm improvements and community facilities necessary to meet the needs of existing and future residents and workers. It advances the vision of an inclusive, transit-supportive and climate-resilient complete community, with a strong mixed-use core where local-serving retail and service uses would continue to thrive. The Secondary Plan would facilitate the development of significant new housing, with policies that encourage a diversity of housing types, forms, tenures and affordability. The Secondary Plan centres equity with a focus on outcomes for Indigenous, Black and equity-deserving groups, including implementation policies that would minimize displacement of residents and businesses.
This report also recommends amendments to other Official Plan policies. These include extending the Avenues along the Finch West Light Rail Transit route, adjusting right-of-way widths for Jane Street and Finch Avenue West to support objectives for a complete street with a generous public realm, transit-priority measure and planned higher-order transit, redesignating certain lands close to Light Rail Transit stops to Mixed Use Areas and in one location to Apartment Neighbourhoods, and establishing locations for new streets to create developable blocks within the large mall, plaza and mixed-use sites in the study area. Two Site and Area Specific Policies are recommended for deletion to align plans for those sites with this updated policy context.
The Jane Finch Secondary Plan and Urban Design Guidelines are an outcome of the Jane Finch Initiative, which is an interdivisional three-phased project that began in 2020. A companion plan, the Jane Finch Community Development Plan, stewarded by Social Development Finance and Administration (SDFA) and Economic Development and Culture (EDC), is proceeding through Economic and Community Development Committee in the same City Council cycle. The Jane Finch Initiative was informed by a thorough public consultation process facilitated by the Jane/Finch Centre, concurrent review of development applications, and input of staff from various City Divisions, commenting agencies and key stakeholder organizations. Two previous reports to City Council presented various milestones of the planning study, the most recent being the adoption of the Ideas Report by City Council in May 2022. This staff report presents the results of the public consultation process for Phase 2 (on the Ideas Report) and for Phase 3 (on the proposed Secondary Plan and Urban Design Guidelines).
This recommended Official Plan Amendment is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms to A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) and the Greenbelt Plan (2017).
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-243793.pdf
Attachment 1: Jane Finch Secondary Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-243794.pdf
Attachment 2: Jane Finch Urban Design Guidelines
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-243795.pdf
Attachment 3: Parks and Public Realm Strategy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-243796.pdf
Attachment 4: Mobility and Transit Integration Strategy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-243797.pdf
Attachment 5: Community Service Facilities Strategy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-243798.pdf
Attachment 6: Historic Context Statement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-243799.pdf
Attachment 7: Jane Finch Servicing Capacity Assessment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-243791.pdf
Attachment 8: Community Engagement Summary Report for Phase 2 (Jane/Finch Centre) and Phase 3 Report Addendum
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-243792.pdf
Attachment 9: Indigenous Engagement Summary Report (Innovation Seven)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-243801.pdf
(January 30, 2024) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-243790.pdf
(February 26, 2024) Presentation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-243800.pdf
Speakers
(February 26, 2024) Christine Le
(February 26, 2024) David Mejia Monico
(February 26, 2024) Amar Singh
(February 26, 2024) Anna-Kay Brown
(June 3, 2024) Troy Budhu
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/comm/communicationfile-177933.pdf
(February 23, 2024) Letter from Amar Singh, Toronto Lands Corporation (EY.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/comm/communicationfile-177931.pdf
(February 23, 2024) Letter from Alison Stewart, Cycle Toronto (EY.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/comm/communicationfile-177934.pdf
(February 23, 2024) Letter from Richard Domes and Nikhail Dawan, Gagnon Walker Domes (EY.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/comm/communicationfile-177932.pdf
(February 23, 2024) Letter from Tyler Peck, Senior Associate, WND Associates on behalf of 1597181 Ontario Inc. (EY.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/comm/communicationfile-179644.pdf
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-180960.pdf
1a - Jane Finch Secondary Plan and Urban Design Guidelines - Supplementary Report
Origin
Summary
At its meeting of February 26, 2024, Etobicoke York Community Council (EYCC) convened the statutory public meeting to consider Official Plan Amendment (OPA) 633 for the Jane Finch Secondary Plan. The item was adjourned to the June 3 EYCC meeting. Staff were directed to conduct further public consultation on maximizing economic opportunities and job growth, with a focus on a potential cluster of businesses and institutions centred on Finch Avenue West and Norfinch Drive/Oakdale Road; and to undertake a review of building heights throughout the secondary plan area.
In response to the direction, staff conducted further community consultation at a public event held on April 18, 2024 at Yorkgate Mall. Staff also analyzed existing and recommended land uses centred on Finch Avenue West and Norfinch Drive/Oakdale Road and reviewed available City supports and incentive programs for retail and main street business development and employment growth. Staff then reviewed the proposed secondary plan policies and developed further recommendations, as outlined in this report, based on the analysis and consultation conducted since the plan was released.
The malls and other large sites near Finch West LRT stops, together with the infill potential along Jane Street, are opportunities to develop a significant number of new homes and additional affordable housing, within a transit-supportive complete community that has a strong commercial core as a community gathering space. City Council has adopted four Protected Major Transit Station Area delineations that apply to the Jane Finch Secondary Plan area and policies in the secondary plan support the achievement of minimum densities needed to implement inclusionary zoning. Policies also facilitate the achievement of the transit-supportive densities necessary to meet Toronto’s Housing Action Plan target of 285,000 homes by 2031.
It is recommended that secondary plan policies and related maps be refined to make it clear that the building heights set out in the plan are maximum limits that will not be able to be achieved on all sites. The policy intention is that, where tall buildings are permitted, they should be developed at a range of heights, including buildings below the maximum, and should meet the built form and liveability standards set out in policy and guidelines.
To maximize economic opportunities and job growth in the plan area, it is recommended that the implementation of the secondary plan's policies on replacement of non-residential gross floor area be undertaken in collaboration with Economic Development and Culture Division, with a focus on applying City supports and incentive programs for retail and main street business development and employment growth.
To include additional locations for school safety improvements in the plan area and fix some typographical errors, it is recommended that Map 50-4 Mobility Plan and the Jane Finch Mobility and Transit Integration Strategy be updated. Further revisions for clarity and ease of interpretation are recommended including clarifying that new Mixed Use Shared Streets will have minimum right-of-way widths of 18.5 metres.
The proposed revisions are described in the comments section and are itemized in the recommendations of this report. This supplementary report carries forward recommendations 2 and 4-9 from the report dated February 7, 2024, from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District. For clarity, the full text of the policies and the maps as amended are provided in Attachments 1 and 2 to this report.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-246193.pdf
Attachment 3: Jane Finch Initiative April 18, 2024 Public Engagement Event Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-246181.pdf
Attachment 4: Revised Jane Finch Mobility and Transit Integration Strategy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-246202.pdf
EY14.2 - 1911 Finch Avenue West (Jane Finch Mall) - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 7 - Humber River - Black Creek
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 1911 Finch Avenue West substantially-in-accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 9 to the report (March 19, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 1911 Finch Avenue West substantially-in-accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment, which includes a Holding Provision, attached as Attachment 10 to the report (March 19, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
3. City Council amend Zoning By-law 7625 for the lands at 1911 Finch Avenue West substantially-in-accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment, which includes a Holding Provision, attached as Attachment 11 to the report (March 19, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required, including any changes that would have the effect of incorporating the draft Official Plan Amendment (OPA 728) as a Site and Area Specific Policy of the Jane Finch Secondary Plan (OPA 633), if approved.
5. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and the City Solicitor to continue to work with the applicant to bring forward an in-kind community benefit offer, pursuant to 37(6) of the Planning Act, for the provision of new affordable rental housing and/or community service facilities, and to report back to City Council if an offer is made.
6. Prior to Site Plan Control approval for the development, City Council require the owner make efforts to secure funding and/or partnerships and/or beneficial financing arrangements in support of the provision of additional Affordable Housing through Federal (Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation or otherwise), Provincial, and/or municipal funding programs (such as Open Door or other) to maximize the provision of Affordable Rental Housing and/or Affordable Ownership Housing on-site.
7. City Council approve the acceptance of on-site parkland dedication, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances, and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.
8. Prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for Phase 1B, City Council require the owner shall convey to the City and in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act, an on-site parkland dedication having an approximate size of 3500 square metres, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor, and that the remaining parkland dedication required for Phase 2 and Phase 3 will be fulfilled through an on-site parkland dedication either through a Zoning By-law Amendment application for Phase 2 and Phase 3 or a Draft Plan of Subdivision application for the lands at 1911 Finch Avenue West, whichever is first.
9. City Council approve a Development Charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Development Charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of Development Charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time-to-time.
10. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Manager, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and the General Manager, Toronto Water, in consultation with other Divisions, as required, to evaluate options to bring the public square on the south side of Finch Avenue West, east of Jane Street into City ownership and include a strategy for programming, operations, and maintenance.
11. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with other Divisions, as required, to establish a Working Group with the applicant and residents and businesses in the surrounding area to inform the design, programming, and operations of the public square, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Etobicoke York Community Council commenced a statutory public meeting on April 8, 2024 that continued on June 3, 2024, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
The applications propose to amend the Official Plan and create a Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP), and amend city-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 1911 Finch Avenue West, the current site of the Jane Finch Mall.
The Official Plan Amendment would introduce new policies that would govern the long-term, multi-phased redevelopment of the entire site, including the location of new streets, blocks, parks and open spaces, commercial and residential uses, the delivery of new community service facilities, and the phasing of new development.
The rezoning would permit the development of Phase 1 fronting on Finch Avenue West between Jane Street and Driftwood Avenue. Six new towers are proposed, with heights ranging from 28 to 47 storeys. In total, Phase 1 proposes to deliver 2730 new residential units and 5668 square metres of non-residential gross floor area, consisting of retail spaces, community space, and a daycare, and a network of new streets, parks, and open spaces. During Phase 1, most of the Jane Finch Mall will be retained, with approximately 2500 square metres of the 22,509 square metres proposed to be demolished.
The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) (PPS) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) (Growth Plan). The proposed development also conforms to the City's Official Plan and delivers key city building priorities, including:
- focusing density and growth around transit in a compact urban form;
- supporting a mix of housing forms with units of varying sizes and types;
- creating an attractive public realm that supports gathering, walking, cycling, and transit;
- creating landmark public spaces and new parks;
- supporting the creation of spaces for businesses and jobs;
- supporting new community service facilities; and;
- supporting community engagement and decision-making within the planning process.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and the site-specific Zoning By-law with holding provisions.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-244836.pdf
Attachment 8: Draft Official Plan Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-244834.pdf
Attachment 9: Draft Zoning By-law 569-2013 Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-244835.pdf
Attachment 10: Draft Zoning By-law 7625 Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-244833.pdf
(March 18, 2024) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-244837.pdf
Speakers
(June 3, 2024) Troy Budhu
Communications (Community Council)
(April 5, 2024) Letter from Craig Lametti and Emily Reisman, Urban Strategies Inc., on behalf Brad-Jay Investments Ltd. (Owners of the Jane Finch Mall) (EY.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/comm/communicationfile-178776.pdf
(April 5, 2024) Letter from Jasmine Frolick, Sobeys Real Estate Development Manager (EY.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/comm/communicationfile-178777.pdf
2a - 1911 Finch Avenue West (Jane Finch Mall) - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Supplementary Report
Community Council Recommendations
The Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District recommends that:
1. The Etobicoke York Community Council amend Recommendation 4 of the report (March 19, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District by adding “including any changes that would have the effect of incorporating the draft Official Plan Amendment (OPA 728) as a Site and Area Specific Policy of the Jane Finch Secondary Plan (OPA 633), if approved” to the end of the recommendation, so that it now reads:
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required, including any changes that would have the effect of incorporating the draft Official Plan Amendment (OPA 728) as a Site and Area Specific Policy of the Jane Finch Secondary Plan (OPA 633), if approved.
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on April 8, 2024, Etobicoke York Community Council held and subsequently adjourned the statutory public meeting for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments applications for 1911 Finch Avenue West (Jane Finch Mall) (2024.EY12.2). Through a motion advanced by Councillor Perruzza, City Planning was requested to review the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-laws, in particular, the proposed building heights.
The Decision Report from the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, dated March 19, 2024, recommends approval of new policies that would govern the long-term, multi-phased redevelopment of the entire site and zoning regulations that would permit the development of Phase 1 fronting on Finch Avenue West between Jane Street and Driftwood Avenue. Phase 1 consists of six new towers, with heights ranging from 28 to 47 storeys.
In response to the motion, City Planning staff have reviewed the Official Plan and draft Jane Finch Secondary Plan policies, and design guidelines informing the development of the lands. City Planning staff also assisted in conducting further public consultation through the Jane Finch Initiative (JFI) on recommended built form and building heights at a public event.
This Supplementary Report summarizes the public's feedback from the additional community consultation event and provides a further response on the proposed building heights.
Also, through Recommendation 1, City Planning is also recommending that City Council amend Recommendation 4 of the Decision Report to authorize stylistic and technical amendments that would have the draft Official Plan Amendment (OPA 728) as a Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP) of the Jane Finch Secondary Plan, if approved.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-246194.pdf
EY14.3 - 2400 Eglinton Avenue West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 5 - York South - Weston
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 2400 Eglinton Avenue West substantially-in-accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 7 to the report (May 14, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 2400 Eglinton Avenue West substantially-in-accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report (May 14, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. City Council approve that, in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act, prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for the first building within Phase 5, the owner shall convey to the City, an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 3,208 square metres, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.
5. City Council approve the acceptance of the on-site parkland dedication, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances, and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition in accordance with Official Plan policies in force and effect at the time of parkland conveyance to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.
6. City Council approve that in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act, prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for the mixed-use building for Phase 1 and that is the subject of the Zoning By-law Amendment, the owner shall post Financial Security in the amount of the value of the parkland dedication owed for Phase 1 as appraised by the Executive Director, Corporate and Real Estate Management in the form of a Letter of Credit and such security shall not be released until the parkland is conveyed to the City in a manner satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, or, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation may elect, in 15 years' time following the issuance of the first above grade building permit for Phase 1, to draw on the Letter of Credit or to extend it; the Financial Security shall be paid in a form satisfactory to the City, and from the date the Financial Security is first paid to the City to such time as the parkland is conveyed to the City, be indexed annually in accordance with the appropriate Statistics Canada index, as secured through the Registration of Plan of Subdivision and all to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.
7. Before introducing the necessary Bill to City Council for the enactment of the Zoning By-law Amendment, City Council require the applicant to ensure that the submitted Noise and Vibration Impact Study prepared by RWDI, dated January 28, 2021 along with a supplementary letter dated September 20, 2023, have been peer reviewed by a third-party consultant retained by the City at the owner's expense, and the owner agrees to implement any necessary control measures and recommendations identified by the peer reviewer, with the control measures to be secured through the Site Plan Control process, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 3, 2024, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
In 2021, the applicant submitted a Zoning By-law Amendment (ZBA) application for the development of a 35-storey mixed-use building in the southwest corner of the property in isolation, without specifying how the remainder of the site would develop over time. City Planning staff required a higher level planning framework to ensure a good fit and to ensure proper integration between the 2021 proposal and future developments on the site. In response to this, the applicant submitted an Official Plan Amendment (OPA) application in 2023.
The Official Plan Amendment application (23 210768 WET 05 OZ) proposes to amend Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP) 31 for the entire property at 2400 Eglinton Avenue West (Block A of Site and Area Specific Policy 31) in line with the goals of Official Plan Amendment 253, to provide further definition for the location of development blocks, public and private streets, a park, and phasing for the orderly development of the existing Westside Mall site over time. Phase 1 of the redevelopment includes the lands on the southwest corner of the site.
The Zoning By-law Amendment application (21 111665 WET 05 OZ) proposes to amend city-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 for only the southwest corner of the property at 2400 Eglinton Avenue West (to realize Phase 1 of the SASP). The proposed zoning would permit a 35-storey mixed-use building with a residential Gross Floor Area (GFA) of 29,135 square metres, commercial Gross Floor Area of 1,300 square metres, and a total of 397 dwelling units. The overall height of the building would be 111 metres plus an additional five-metre mechanical penthouse. The proposal would include 73 vehicular parking spaces located in one level of underground parking, 798 square metres of indoor amenity space, 1,418 square metres of outdoor amenity space, and a 379 square metre Privately-Owned Publicly Accessible Space (POPS) located along the eastern side of the proposed building. Aside from the southwest corner of 2400 Eglinton Avenue West where this redevelopment would occur, the remainder of the Westside Mall including the existing commercial buildings, surface parking lot, drive aisles, and vehicular access from Eglinton Avenue West and Gabian Way are not changed with this Zoning By-law Amendment application.
The Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment will result in compatible redevelopment within the Mixed Use Areas designation with supportable building height, articulation, frontage, and setbacks in relation to the adjacent Eglinton Avenue West and Gabian Way rights-of-way. The redevelopment and intensification of the Westside Mall site is appropriate in view of the higher-order transit and related infrastructure that is currently under construction along the site's southern frontage associated with the Eglinton Crosstown. The proposed development will also support public investment in the nearby Caledonia Station and associated transit arrivals plaza.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-245823.pdf
Attachment 7: Draft Official Plan Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-245824.pdf
Attachment 8: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-245825.pdf
(May 10, 2024) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-245498.pdf
Speakers
Maurice Bygrave
Communications (Community Council)
EY14.4 - 40-60 St. Lawrence Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments Application - Appeal Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal to oppose the appeal of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments application for 40-60 St. Lawrence Avenue and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues.
2. If the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeals, in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Land Tribunal withhold the issuance of any final Order(s) until such time as the Ontario Land Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that:
a. The final form and content of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments are satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor;
b. The owner has submitted a Functional Servicing Report to determine the stormwater runoff, sanitary flow and water supply demand resulting from this development and whether there is adequate capacity in the existing municipal infrastructure to accommodate the proposed development, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;
c. The owner has made satisfactory arrangements with Engineering and Construction Services and has entered into the appropriate agreement(s) with the City for the design and construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support this development, according to the accepted Servicing Assessment Report accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;
d. The owner has addressed all outstanding issues identified in the Engineering and Construction Services’ correspondence, dated September 13, 2023, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;
e. The owner has provided a revised Transportation Impact Study to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services;
f. The owner has submitted a revised Hydrological Assessment Report and Hydrological Review Summary Form, Servicing Report Groundwater Summary Form, and Foundation Drainage Summary Form to determine the quality and quantity of groundwater that may be required to be discharged to the City sewage works as a result of the proposed development and comply with Foundation Drainage Policy and guidelines to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Toronto Water;
g. The owner has provided a revised Pedestrian Level Wind Study including a Wind Tunnel Study, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
h. The submitted Compatibility and Mitigation Studies, including the Transportation Noise and Vibration Assessment, dated May 5, 2023, prepared by Gradient Wind Engineering Inc., and the Air Quality and Land Use Compatibility Assessment, dated May 5, 2023, prepared by Gradient Wind Engineering Inc. have been peer-reviewed by a third-party consultant retained by the City at the owner's expense, and the owner agrees to implement any necessary control measures and recommendations identified by the peer review, with the control measures to be secured through the Site Plan Control process, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
i. The owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Urban Forestry, Tree Protection and Plan Review, as they relate to the application, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council’s decision.
Origin
Summary
In October 2014, two separate applications were submitted to amend the Site and Area Specific Policy 6 (“SASP 6”) of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 748-2006, as amended, of the former Etobicoke Zoning Code for 1061 The Queensway, which included the subject site. A Zoning By-law Amendment application for Phase 1 for the northern portion of the lands (for commercial buildings including a grocery store) and a combined Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment application for Phase 2 for the southern portion of the lands for a residential development were submitted.
In October 2017, an application for Consent to sever the property into two lots was approved and the Phase 2 lands, now addressed as 40-60 St. Lawrence Avenue, were sold to the current owners and are the subject of this report.
The 2014 proposal for the 40-60 St. Lawrence Avenue portion of the lands was for two residential buildings that were 22 and 27 storeys in height and connected by a four-storey base building. A total of 558 dwelling units were proposed.
The applicant made a resubmission in June 2023 to permit three mixed-use buildings that are 26, 34 and 43 storeys in height on a five-storey base building. A total of 1,166 condominium dwelling units are now proposed.
On April 4, 2024, the applicant appealed the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (“OLT”) citing City Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time period prescribed under the Planning Act. A Case Management Conference (“CMC”) has yet to be scheduled but is likely to take place in June. City staff require direction from City Council in advance of the CMC. An OLT hearing has not been scheduled at this time.
This report recommends that Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff, to attend the CMC and any future OLT hearing to oppose the application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-245822.pdf
EY14.5 - 1001, 1007, 1011 and 1037 The Queensway - Public Art Plan
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve 1001, 1007, 1011 and 1037 The Queensway Public Art Plan, attached as Attachment 1 to the report (May 14, 2024) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 1001, 1007, 1011 and 1037 The Queensway Public Art Plan (“The Plan”). The Plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art within a new park located on the site.
The Public Art Plan provides a framework and description of the commissioning of public art including: a development overview; context plan; public art location; method of artists selection; jury composition; mentorship program; public art budget; project timeline and role of the art consultant.
The attached Plan meets the objectives of the City's Percent for Public Art Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission (TPAC).
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-245792.pdf
Attachment 1: 1001, 1007, 1011 and 1037 The Queensway Public Art Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-245793.pdf
EY14.10 - Pritchard Avenue - Accessible Parking Space
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 5 - York South - Weston
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council designate an on-street accessible parking space to operate at all times on the north side of Pritchard Avenue, between a point 16 metres west of Mould Avenue and a point 5.5 metres further west.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Pritchard Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services is requesting approval for the installation of an on-street accessible parking space on the north side of Pritchard Avenue, west of Mould Avenue.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-245777.pdf
EY14.12 - 16-26 Earlington Avenue and 4161- 4169 Dundas Street West - Construction Staging Area
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Community Council Recommendations
The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the closure of the south sidewalk and a 2.5 metre wide portion of the eastbound curb lane on Dundas Street West, between Earlington Avenue and a point 51 metres west and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the eastbound curb lane, from July 1, 2024 to July 31, 2025, inclusive.
2. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the west side of Earlington Avenue, between Dundas Street West and a point 101 metres south.
3. City Council direct the applicant to sweep the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
4. City Council direct the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected and unobstructed walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices, for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit to the satisfaction of the City engineer and ensure it is compliant with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA).
5. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
6. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
7. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to maintain all sightlines to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
8. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
9. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
10. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
11. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
12. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
13. City Council direct the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the City Engineers, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance, and construction activities to municipal infrastructure within the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
14. City Council direct that Dundas Street West and Earlington Avenue be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Dundas Street West, City Council approval of this report is required.
Dunpar Developments Inc. has undertaken the construction of a 10-storey residential building and 10 townhouse units at 16-26 Earlington Avenue and 4161-4169 Dundas Street West. The site is located on the southwest corner of Dundas Street West and Earlington Avenue.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to close the south sidewalk and a 2.5 metre wide portion of the south side eastbound curb lane on Dundas Street West for a period of 13 months, from July 1, 2024 to July 31, 2025, to facilitate construction staging operations. Pedestrian movements on the south side of Dundas Street West, abutting the site, will be maintained in 1.9 metre wide covered and protected walkway.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-246246.pdf
(May 29, 2024) Letter from Councillor Amber Morley
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-246247.pdf
North York Community Council - Meeting 14
NY14.5 - 12 - 14, 18, 20 Bentworth Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 8 - Eglinton - Lawrence
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 12 - 14, 18 and 20 Bentworth Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (May 16, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 12 - 14, 18, and 20 Bentworth Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Revised Attachment 6 to the report (May 16, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District. The Zoning By-law will contain a Holding (H) symbol in order to address outstanding matters.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. City Council require the owner to provide and implement an acceptable Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, for Eligible Tenants of the existing 3 rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished, addressing financial compensation and other assistance to lessen hardship, including the provision of rent gap payments.
5. City Council require the owner to enter into an agreement or legal undertaking with the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, securing the implementation of the Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan required by Recommendation Number 4 above prior to the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan Approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 4, 2024, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to demolish the existing buildings at 12 - 14, 18, and 20 Bentworth Avenue in order to permit a 9-storey residential building comprised of up to 136 residential dwelling units.
The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms to A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020). The proposed development also conforms to the City's Official Plan, subject to addressing the issues that are the subject to the Holding (H) provision further described in this report.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law with a holding provision. The holding provision is proposed on the site until such time as engineering and infrastructure matters and technical reports have been finalized for the site, to address servicing, transportation, noise and air quality. The proposed development represents an appropriate level of intensification on the site given its neighbouring context as well as location within the Council-adopted Yorkdale MTSA Protected Major Transit Station Area (PMTSA). The proposed development is massed to fit within its existing context while providing appropriate transitions to the adjacent low-rise neighbourhood.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245874.pdf
Revised Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245983.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245885.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245875.pdf
Speakers
Isabella Montana
Qianqiao (Harry) Zhu, Arcadis Professional Services (Canada) Inc.
Nasko Ivanov, Ashford Calderdale Group
Paul Falsetti
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/comm/communicationfile-180199.pdf
(June 3, 2024) Letter from Joe and Isabella Montana (NY.Supp)
NY14.6 - 1802 Bayview Avenue - Official Plan Amendment - Decision Report - Refusal
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 15 - Don Valley West
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council refuse the application for an Official Plan Amendment (Application Number 24 120678 NNY 15 OZ) at 1802 Bayview Avenue for the reasons identified in the Report (May 6, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that, in the event of an appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal, the Tribunal withhold its final order, until the following conditions are met:
a. the final form and content of the draft Official Plan Amendment are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
b. the owner has satisfactorily addressed the Engineering and Construction Services matters in the Engineering and Construction Services Memorandum dated August 16, 2023, or as may be updated, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director;
c. the owner has satisfactorily addressed Transportation Services matters in the Transportation Services memo dated January 19, 2024, or as may be updated in response to further submissions filed by the Owner, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director; and
d. the owner has submitted a revised Transportation Demand Management Plan acceptable to, and to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Transportation Services and that matters arising from such Plan be secured, if required.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other appropriate staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend Map 21-3 of the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan (Official Plan Amendment 405) to remove the lands from the Secondary Zone of the Transit Nodes and add them instead to the Station Area Core. By doing so, this will help to facilitate a proposal for a 46-storey (148.6 metres, plus 8 metres mechanical penthouse for a total of 156.6 metres) residential building with 28,576 square metres of residential gross floor area representing 419 residential units, and 384 square metres of ground floor retail fronting onto Bayview Avenue, as the Station Area Core is intended to provide for more intensified development than the Secondary Zone. The development proposes a total gross floor area of 28,960 square metres with a floor space index of 20.5.
This report recommends refusal of the amendment as it would facilitate a greater level of intensification than what has been envisioned through the Plan’s policies and through the identification of specific transit nodes, which has area specific considerations.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245828.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/comm/communicationfile-180105.pdf
NY14.7 - 19 Poyntz Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 18 - Willowdale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 19 Poyntz Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (May 15, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 for the lands at 19 Poyntz Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (May 15, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 4, 2024, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to permit a three-storey (11.43 metres) residential building with eight dwelling units at 19 Poyntz Avenue. The building would have a gross floor area of 839.12 square metres and a density of 1.64 times the lot area.
The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020).
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. The proposed building represents an appropriate level of intensification, providing missing middle rental housing options near an existing subway station.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245842.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245839.pdf
Speakers
NY14.8 - 77 Erskine Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Application - Appeal Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 15 - Don Valley West
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal for the lands at 77 Erskine Avenue and to continue discussions with the Applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Land Tribunal withhold the issuance of any final Order(s) until such time as:
a. the final form and content of the draft Zoning By-law amendment is to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
b. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Urban Forestry, Tree Protection and Plan Review as they relate to the application, to the satisfaction of the Supervisor, Tree Protection and Plan Review;
c. the owner has provided a revised Transportation Impact Study (TIS), including acceptable Travel Demand Management (TDM) measures, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;
d. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Engineering and Construction Services, including a revised Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Report, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the General Manager, Toronto Water;
e. the owner has made satisfactory arrangements with the City and has entered into the appropriate agreement(s) for the design and construction of any improvements to municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades and / or road improvements are required to the infrastructure to support the development, according to the accepted Engineering Reports and Transportation Impact Study accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services; and
f. City Council has approved the Rental Housing Demolition Application Number 22 233227 NNY 15 RH in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to permit the demolition of the thirty seven (37) existing rental dwelling units at 77 Erskine Avenue, and the owner has entered into, and registered on title to the lands, one or more agreements with the City, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, securing all rental housing-related matters necessary to implement City Council's decision including:
a. replacement of the existing 37 rental housing units, including the same number of units, bedroom type and size and with similar rents; and
b. an acceptable Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan addressing the right for existing tenants to return to a replacement rental unit.
3. Should it be determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support the development according to the accepted Functional Servicing Report, City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to request that a Holding provision (H) be included in the final form of the site-specific Zoning By-law Amendment, not to be lifted until such time as the owner has made satisfactory arrangements, including entering into appropriate agreement(s) with the City, for the design and construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure and the provision of financial securities to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.
4. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor and City Staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
Origin
Summary
On September 20, 2022, a Zoning By-law Amendment application was submitted to permit the development of a 35-storey (112.95 metres, plus 6 metres for a mechanical penthouse) residential building containing 377 residential units (inclusive of 37 replacement rental dwelling units). The proposal consists of 23,973 square metres of residential gross floor area, resulting in a Floor Space Index of 13.8. A Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Application proposing to demolish and replace 37 rental housing units was also submitted and is currently under review.
On February 26, 2024, the Applicant appealed the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal ("OLT") due to Council not making a decision within the time frame prescribed in the Planning Act. A Case Management Conference is scheduled on May 8, 2024.
This report recommends that the City Solicitor with the appropriate City Staff attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing to oppose the application in its current form and to continue discussions with the Applicant to resolve outstanding issues.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245826.pdf
Speakers
Gregory Plant
Communications (Community Council)
(June 2, 2024) E-mail from Gregory Plant (NY.Supp)
NY14.9 - 8 and 10 Hyde Park Circle - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Appeal Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 15 - Don Valley West
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the current application regarding the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment appeal for the lands at 8-10 Hyde Park Circle and to continue discussions with the Applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the Official Plan Amendment and / or Zoning By-law Amendment appeal in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Land Tribunal withhold the issuance of any final Order(s) until such time as:
a. the final form and content of the draft Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law amendments are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
b. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Urban Forestry, Tree Protection and Plan Review as they relate to the application, to the satisfaction of the Supervisor, Tree Protection and Plan Review.
c. the owner has provided a revised Traffic Impact Study, including acceptable Transportation Demand Measures (TDM), to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;
d. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Engineering and Construction Services as they relate to the application, inclusive of sanitary sewer easement issues and storm overland easement issues, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Toronto Water; and,
e. the owner has made satisfactory arrangements with the City and has entered into the appropriate agreement(s) for the design and construction of any improvements to municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades and / or road improvements are required to the infrastructure to support the development, according to the accepted Engineering Reports and Traffic Impact Study accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services.
3. Should it be determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support the development according to the accepted Functional Servicing Report, City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to request that a Holding provision (H) be included in the final form of the site-specific Zoning By-law Amendment, not to be lifted until such time as the owner has made satisfactory arrangements, including entering into appropriate agreement(s) with the City, for the design and construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure and the provision of financial securities to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
Origin
Summary
On May 23, 2023, an application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law was submitted to permit the development of a 4-storey (15.9 metre plus 4.6 metres to mechanical penthouse) residential building containing 55 residential dwelling units with a gross floor area of 10,202 square metres (Floor Space Index of 1.4) on the lands known as 8 and 10 Hyde Park Circle. The development is proposed to have vehicular access off Post Road and loading access off Bayview Avenue.
On February 21, 2024, the Applicant appealed the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal ("OLT") due to Council not making a decision within the time frame prescribed in the Planning Act. A Case Management Conference was scheduled on May 2, 2024.
This report recommends that the City Solicitor with the appropriate City staff attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing to oppose the application in its current form and to continue discussions with the Applicant to resolve outstanding issues
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245592.pdf
NY14.10 - 172-202 Drewry Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 18 - Willowdale
Bill 645 has been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council:
1. Forwarded the item to City Council without recommendations.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 4, 2024, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes to construct forty-five new townhouse units in six blocks at 172-202 Drewry Avenue. The proposed townhouse units are 3-storeys and vary in height from 11.5 metres to 12.6 metres. The application proposes a total gross floor area of 7,476 square metres and a Floor Space Index of 0.76 times the lot area. The application includes the provision of a new 617 square metre public park on the southeast corner of the site fronting Drewry Avenue. Access to the units will be from a two-way six metre wide private laneway off Drewry Avenue. Two at-grade vehicular parking spaces per unit are provided for residents. The existing Place of Worship on the site would be demolished.
City Planning staff have reviewed the proposal and are recommending approval in an amended form. Amendments to the original proposal include changes to building setbacks including an increased setback of 3.5 metres from Block 1 to the new public park, an increased front yard setback for Block 1 of 4 metres, and a reduced rear yard setback of 6.2 metres for Block 4 and 6.4 metres for Block 5.
The recommended zoning by-law amendment is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020). The zoning by-law amendment also conforms to the City's Official Plan.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law in an amended form. The recommended Zoning By-law includes a Holding (H) provision on the lands to ensure that preliminary infrastructure matters are identified and addressed.
The application proposes to redevelop the site with a 3-storey townhouse infill development that optimizes existing municipal infrastructure while providing an appropriate level of residential intensification within the neighbourhood.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245857.pdf
Revised Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-246218.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245907.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245858.pdf
Speakers
William Maria, GHD Ltd.
Esther Wilcox
Lina Morrini
Margaret Lee
Communications (Community Council)
(May 31, 2024) E-mail from Margaret Lee (NY.Supp)
(June 3, 2024) Submission from Adam Layton, MCIP, RPP, Goldberg Group (NY.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/comm/communicationfile-180185.pdf
Communications (City Council)
NY14.11 - 7 - 15 Steeles Avenue East - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Decision Report - Refusal
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 18 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council refuse the applications for an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law (Application Number 23 167527 NNY 18 OZ) in their current form, for the lands municipally known as 7, 9 , 11, 13 and 15 Steeles Avenue East.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other appropriate staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
3. City Council approve that in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act prior to the first Above Grade Building Permit, the Owner shall convey to the City, an off-site parkland dedication to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.
4. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that, in the event of an appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal, the Tribunal withhold its final order, until the following conditions are met:
a. the final form and content of the draft Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment is satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor;
b. the owner has submitted revised architectural plans, and revised sun / shadow and wind studies reflecting the proposal as approved in whole or in part, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
c. the owner has submitted an updated and complete Toronto Green Standards Checklist and Statistics Template, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised in the Urban Forestry, Tree Protection and Plan Review Memorandum dated April 18, 2024, as they relate to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation;
e. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Parks Development Memorandum dated April 11, 2024, as they relate to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation;
f. the owner has satisfactorily addressed the matters in the Engineering and Construction Services Memorandum dated April 22, 2024, and any outstanding issues and requests arising from the ongoing technical review (including provision of acceptable reports and studies), as they relate to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services, and Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and
g. the Owner has provided a legal undertaking to the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to secure the required Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan pertaining to the four existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 50-storey (166.6 metres) mixed use building (the 'proposal') at 7 - 15 Steeles Avenue East (the 'subject lands'), as shown on Attachments 7 to 9B of this Report. The proposal contains 683 dwelling units, a residential gross floor area ('GFA') of 36,091 square metres and a non-residential Gross Floor Area of 171 square metres, for an overall density of 18.93 times the lot area.
The proposal is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and does not conform with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020. The proposal does not conform to the City's Official Plan, or the Council-adopted Yonge Street North Secondary Plan, which represents Council's vision for the area.
This Report reviews and recommends refusal of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application, particularly as it relates to the height of the proposal; the proposed building massing and intensity; the proposed setbacks and step backs; the required road and laneway widening; and the impact of the proposal on adjacent properties in the existing and planned context which may prevent an orderly development of the block. The refusal is also based on inadequate soil volumes; unconfirmed servicing capacity; non-compliance with the Toronto Green Standard; and the necessary expropriation of the subject lands as part of the Yonge North Subway Extension identified by Metrolinx.
The above outstanding issues could not be resolved within the legislated 120 day timeframe for a decision. If City Council does not make a decision within the legislated timeframe, the City may be subject to a request to refund all or part of the application fees. Further discussions with the applicant may take place to resolve these issues which may then lead to a positive outcome
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245664.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246797.pdf
Speakers
NY14.16 - Downsview Park Boulevard at Keele Street - Exclusive Right-Turn Lane Designation
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 6 - York Centre
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council designate the northerly westbound lane on Downsview Park Boulevard, between Keele Street and a point 30.5 metres east, for westbound right-turns only.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Downsview Park Boulevard, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services is recommending the designation of the northerly westbound lane on Downsview Park Boulevard, between Keele Street and a point 30.5 metres east, for westbound right-turns only. The lane designation will clearly define the traffic lane usage and eliminate confusion for motorists.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-245841.pdf
Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 14
SC14.3 - 528 and 530 Birchmount Road, and 118 and 120 Newlands Avenue - Zoning Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 20 - Scarborough Southwest
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 528 and 530 Birchmount Road, and 118 and 120 Newlands Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 4 to the report (May 27, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 12, 2024, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend current Residential Detached Zone (RD) development standards under Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, for the lands 528 and 530 Birchmount Road, and 118 and 120 Newlands Avenue.
The proposed rezoning would enable redevelopment of the four existing single detached residential properties with nine new single detached dwellings on smaller lots. The new lots are intended to be created through approval of a future consent application to sever the lands accordingly.
The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020).
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. The proposal represents a modest residential intensification of lands currently designated Neighbourhoods under the Official Plan and will contribute to the City's housing stock while fitting into the existing and planned context.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246205.pdf
(May 21, 2024) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246215.pdf
Speakers
SC14.4 - 3000, 3004, 3008, 3012 and 3020 Kennedy Road - Zoning Amendment - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 22 - Scarborough - Agincourt
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 3000, 3004, 3008, 3012 and 3020 Kennedy Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (May 27, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 12, 2024, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the construction of 171 residential units within three-storey stacked and back-to-back townhouse buildings, with a total gross floor area (GFA) of approximately 17,950 square metres. The townhouse buildings are organized into nine blocks, with a total of 175 at grade vehicular parking spaces and 48 bicycle parking spaces at 3000, 3004, 3008, 3012 and 3020 Kennedy Road.
The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020). The proposed development also conforms to the City's Official Plan.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law what will include a Holding provision (H). This Holding provision is to remain in place and restrict development on the site until such time as the owner, at its sole cost and expense, has resolved outstanding servicing and stormwater management issues.
This report also makes note that a Draft Plan of Subdivision application has been submitted for the subject site, which pertains to create a new public east-west road connecting Fort Dearborn Drive to Kennedy Road. At this time, this report is only recommending approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment as the Draft Plan of Subdivision submission is still under review.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246195.pdf
Attachment 5: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246208.pdf
(May 17, 2024) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246214.pdf
Speakers
Chris Pereira, M. Behar Planning + Design Limited
Communications (Community Council)
4a - 3000, 3004, 3008, 3012 and 3020 Kennedy Road - Zoning Amendment - Supplementary Report
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the feedback received from the community consultation meeting held on June 5, 2024.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246498.pdf
SC14.5 - 4201 to 4203 Kingston Road and 120 Galloway Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 24 - Scarborough - Guildwood
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 4201 to 4203 Kingston Road and a 2,076 square metre portion of 120 Galloway Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (May 27, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to secure through the Site Plan Control process for the proposed development, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, the owner’s obligation to:
a. continue to provide and maintain the existing 80 units at 4201 to 4203 Kingston Rd, as rental housing for a period of at least 20 years commencing from the date the Zoning By-law Amendments come into force and effect, with no application for demolition or conversion from residential rental use during the 20-year period, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; and
b. undertake improvements at its sole expense and at no cost to tenants, to the existing rental buildings at 4201 to 4203 Kingston Rd, as follows:
1. access to new outdoor amenities, and shared use of ground floor indoor amenities in the proposed new building for tenants of the existing rental apartment buildings and of the newly constructed building;
2. outdoor walkway improvements, including repaving;
3. replacement of identified patio doors and windows; and
4. improvements that may be identified through planned engagement with the project Design Committee and agreed to between the owner and City Planning staff.
c. develop a Construction Mitigation and Tenant Communication Plan, including an interim parking plan, to mitigate the impacts of construction of the development on tenants of the existing rental buildings, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 12, 2024, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the construction of a 4-storey apartment building at 4201 to 4203 Kingston Road and a portion of 120 Galloway Road at the southeast of the overall subject site.
The building would contain 68 affordable rental housing units with a total gross floor area of 4847 square metres, resulting in a density of 0.96 times the area of the site. A total of 54 one-bedroom units and 14 two-bedroom units are proposed. The proposed infill development site includes 2,076 square metres of Toronto District School Board (TDSB) lands located on 120 Galloway Road which were added to the proposed site through an approved consent application to the Committee of Adjustment on May 1, 2024 (Application no. B0006/24SC). The proposed development would be supported by a total of 5 vehicular parking spaces, as well as 57 bicycle parking spaces.
The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020). The proposed development also conforms to the City's Official Plan. The proposed development responds to the City’s affordable housing strategy and provides residential intensification on a site that benefits from frequent bus service in close proximity to the Guildwood GO Station.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246207.pdf
Attachment 5: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246209.pdf
(May 17, 2024) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-245889.pdf
Speakers
SC14.6 - 1680 Brimley Road - Public Art Plan
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 21 - Scarborough Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve 1680 Brimley Road Public Art Plan as attached Attachment 1 to the report (May 24, 2024) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 1680 Brimley Road - Public Art Plan (“The Plan”). The Plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art within a new Privately-Owned Public Space on the site.
The Public Art Plan provides a framework and description of the commissioning of public art including: a project overview; project background; city consultation and community considerations; proposed location; selection process; mentorship program; amending procedure; communication and education strategy; budget and schedule.
The attached Plan meets the objectives of the City's Percent for Public Art Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission (TPAC).
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246191.pdf
Attachment 1: 1680 Brimley Road - Public Art Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246192.pdf
SC14.7 - 25 Borough Drive, Scarborough- Public Art Plan
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 21 - Scarborough Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the Public Art Plan for 25 Borough Drive as attached Attachment 1 to the report (May 24, 2024) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the Public Art Plan (“The Plan”) for 25 Borough Drive. The Plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art within the privately-owned publicly accessible space (“POPS”) on the site.
The Plan provides a framework and description of the commissioning of public art including: introduction; site overview; potential collaborators; community context, art consultant role; the section 37 agreement; public art approach; public art objectives; public art location; art selection strategy; jury composition; mentorship opportunities; proposed public art budget; and timeline.
The attached Plan meets the objectives of the City's Percent for Public Art Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission (“TPAC”).
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246189.pdf
Attachment 1: 25 Borough Drive -Public Art Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246190.pdf
SC14.13 - 2265 Victoria Park Avenue - Application for a Clothing Drop Box Location permit
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 21 - Scarborough Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the application for the proposed Clothing Drop Box Location permit at 2265 Victoria Park Avenue.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this staff report is to report on the refusal to issue a permit by Municipal Licensing and Standards in the matter of an application for Clothing Drop Box Location permit at 2265 Victoria Park Avenue.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246002.pdf
Attachment 1: Site Plan of clothing drop box location
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246003.pdf
Attachment 2: Photo of clothing drop box
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246004.pdf
SC14.18 - Brimley Road and McNicoll Avenue - Intersection Safety Review
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 23 - Scarborough North
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council prohibit eastbound right turns on a red signal at all times at the intersection of Brimley Road and McNicoll Avenue.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Brimley Road and on McNicoll Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.
Scarborough Community Council directed Transportation Services to conduct a review of safety and operational concerns for road users at the intersection of Brimley Road and McNicoll Avenue. This report provides an overview of the assessments undertaken by Transportation Services.
Transportation Services is recommending an eastbound right turn on a red signal prohibition at Brimley Road and McNicoll Avenue, as well as other improvements to refresh/enhance the signs and pavement markings at the intersection.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246184.pdf
SC14.19 - Lawrence Avenue East and Danielle Moore Circle/Private Driveway - Traffic Control Signals
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 21 - Scarborough Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Lawrence Avenue East and Danielle Moore Circle/Private Driveway.
2. City Council authorize the removal of the existing traffic control signals at Lawrence Avenue East and a point 55 metres west of Marcos Boulevard, in conjunction with the installation of traffic control signals as set out in Recommendation 1 above.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Lawrence Avenue East, City Council approval of this report is required.
As per the conditions of approval for the development at 2740 Lawrence Avenue East, the existing midblock traffic control signals on Lawrence Avenue East, approximately 55 metres west of Marcos Boulevard, are to be removed and new traffic control signals are to be installed approximately 45 metres further west at the new intersection of Lawrence Avenue East and Danielle Moore Circle/Private Driveway.
Transportation Services is in support of the new traffic control signal installation at Lawrence Avenue East and Danielle Moore Circle/Private Driveway.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246204.pdf
SC14.21 - Dedication as Public Highway of Starfire Drive Extension (25 Starfire Drive and 50 Scarboro Road) and Authority to Allocate Funds to Complete Road Works
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park
Community Council Recommendations
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council dedicate as a public highway the Starfire Drive extension being the lands legally described as Parts 3, 7, 10, and 19 as shown on Reference Plan 66R-25863, Part 5 as shown on Reference Plan 66R-28624, Part 8 as shown on Reference Plan 66R-15294, and Part 15 as shown on Reference Plan 66R-19043 (the “Starfire Drive Extension Lands”).
2. City Council increase the 2024-2033 Capital Budget and Plan for Transportation Services by $94,000 for road work to complete the Starfire Drive extension (CTP324-01), fully funded by Letter of Credit secured as part of the development review process Consent to Sever Application Number B066/10SC).
3. Prior to the introduction of the necessary Bills to dedicate the Starfire Drive Extension Lands, City Council require the contractor retained to construct the Starfire Drive extension road works to provide a work schedule and require that the Starfire Drive extension road works be completed to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services.
4. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect to City Council’s decision.
Origin
Summary
The former owner of the lands municipally known as 25 Starfire Drive and 50 Scarboro Road was granted provisional consent to sever said lands in the matter of Application Number B066/10SC, to create five residential lots and to construct an extension of Starfire Drive, including all services and appurtenances thereto, so it connects with an existing section of Starfire Drive.
A Consent Agreement between the City of Toronto and the former owner, registered on July 12, 2012 as Instrument AT3072020, secured the Starfire Drive extension construction obligations. As of this motion, the Starfire Drive extension has not been completed and the remaining work includes topcoat asphalt, top curb, sidewalks, right-of-way landscaping and repairs on the base curb and base asphalt.
Authority from City Council is required to dedicate the Starfire Drive extension lands as public highway and to complete the remaining works for the Starfire Drive extension.
The estimated cost to bring the Starfire Drive extension to a state of good repair is $600,000. Should the motion be adopted by City Council, Transportation Services’ 2024-2033 Capital Budget and Plan will be increased by $94,000, which is an amount secured by the Consent Agreement in the form of a Letter of Credit provided by the former owner of the lands, and that amount will be expensed first to cover the costs of completing the outstanding works. The remaining funds for the Starfire Drive extension works will be temporarily accommodated from the Local Road Rehabilitation Program (CTP315-07) while City staff continue to pursue additional approaches to recovery in respect of the remaining costs for this work.
Funding is available for this capital project categorized as a state of good repair in the 2024-2033 Capital Budget and Plan for Transportation Services.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246210.pdf
Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 14
TE14.4 - 10-22 Pauline Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 10-22 Pauline Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the revised report (June 7, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District City Planning.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 10-22 Pauline Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the revised report (June 7, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District City Planning.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 11, 2024 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to construct a five-storey stacked townhouse residential building comprised of 34 residential units and 34 parking spaces at 10-22 Pauline Avenue.
The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020), and conforms to A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020). The proposed development also conforms to the City's Official Plan.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. The proposal represents an appropriately-scaled residential intensification of a site currently occupied by a place of worship and associated surface parking area, and two semi-detached house form buildings. The proposed built-form is compatible with the low-rise residential districts located to the north, east, and west, and is located in close proximity to the Dufferin TTC Station.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246464.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246143.pdf
(May 23, 2024) Report and Attachments 1-13 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 10-22 Pauline Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246044.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180421.pdf
(June 10, 2024) Letter from Alena Parkinson, More Neighbours Toronto (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180494.pdf
TE14.5 - 245-247 Davenport Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 245-247 Davenport Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (May 24, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council request that the owner make reasonable commercial efforts to convey off-site parkland to the City equal to the value of the on-site parkland dedication, in fulfilment of the parkland dedication requirements pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act, with the off-site parkland dedication to be acceptable to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and free and clear of any above or below grade encumbrances, with the exception of any encumbrances as may be otherwise approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to be conveyed prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit; and
a. in the event that the off-site parkland dedication is less than the value of the on-site parkland dedication, then the owner will pay cash-in-lieu of parkland to make up for the shortfall in parkland dedication, prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit;
b. in the event that the owner is unable to provide an acceptable off-site parkland dedication to the City, the owner will be required to satisfy the parkland dedication requirement through the payment of cash-in-lieu; and
c. the value of the cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication will be appraised through Real Estate Services and payment will be required prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit.
4. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to consider securing the following as part of the site plan agreement, as per the applicant’s written commitment in their letter of June 11, 2024:
a. an outdoor, publicly accessible source of drinking water;
b. outdoor seating, to be located within or adjacent to the public right-of-way for public use, in consultation with Transportation Services; and
c. low-carbon energy strategy as part of the site plan agreement that includes at least the following sustainability measures:
1. a highly energy-efficient building envelope;
2. low carbon building heating and cooling, including Energy Recovery Units that provide sensible and latent heat recovery from ventilation in each suite;
3. ample electrical outlets for bicycle charging in the interior bicycle parking area;
4. fixtures and appliances that are efficient in their use of water and energy;
5. electric-only appliances or fireplaces in the residential units;
6. accommodation for future solar photovoltaic system;
7. improved Stormwater Management Measures;
8. installation of outdoor (dark sky) downward lighting;
9. provision of indoor space dedication for household hazardous waste; and
10. Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment spaces for 100 percent of motor vehicle parking;
5. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 245-247 Davenport Road from Permit Parking.
6. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and the City Solicitor, to continue to work with the applicant to explore an in-kind community benefit package pursuant to 37(6) of the Planning Act and to report back to City Council for further instruction on any offer of in-kind community benefits made by the applicant.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 11, 2024 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 16-storey (64.69 metres, including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building with 67 residential units, and 300 square metres of commercial space on the ground floor.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246140.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246440.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246146.pdf
Speakers
Morgan Dundas, Sajeck Planning
Communications (Community Council)
(June 10, 2024) Letter from Alena Parkinson, More Neighbours Toronto (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180496.pdf
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Marc, Catherine and Edge Bernard (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) Submission from Morgan Dundas, Sajecki Planning (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180523.pdf
TE14.6 - 180-200 Dundas Street West, 123 Edward Street and 65 Centre Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 180-200 Dundas Street West, 123 Edward Street and 65 Centre Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (May 24, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 180-200 Dundas Street West, 123 Edward Street and 65 Centre Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 7 to the report (May 24, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to:
a. submit a revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and
b. enter into a Municipal Infrastructure Agreement to financially secure the construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the accepted Functional Servicing Report by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required.
5. City Council request that the owner make reasonable commercial efforts to convey off-site parkland to the City equal to the value of the on-site parkland dedication, in fulfilment of the parkland dedication requirements pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act, with the off-site parkland dedication to be acceptable to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and free and clear of any above or below grade encumbrances, with the exception of any encumbrances as may be otherwise approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to be conveyed prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit; and
a. in the event that the off-site parkland dedication is less than the value of the on-site parkland dedication, then the owner will pay cash-in-lieu of parkland to make up for the shortfall in parkland dedication, prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit;
b. in the event that the owner is unable to provide an acceptable off-site parkland dedication to the City, the owner will be required to satisfy the parkland dedication requirement through the payment of cash-in-lieu; and
c. the value of the cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication will be appraised through Real Estate Services and payment will be required prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit.
6. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to consider securing the following as part of the site plan agreement, as per the applicant’s written commitment in their letter of June 11, 2024 to provide:
a. an outdoor, publicly accessible source of drinking water;
b. outdoor seating, to be located within or adjacent to the public right-of-way for public use, in consultation with Transportation Services; and
c. low-carbon energy strategy as part of the site plan agreement that includes at least the following sustainability measures:
1. a highly energy-efficient building envelope;
2. low carbon building heating and cooling, including Energy Recovery Units that provide sensible and latent heat recovery from ventilation in each suite;
3. ample electrical outlets for bicycle charging in the interior bicycle parking area;
4. fixtures and appliances that are efficient in their use of water and energy;
5. provision of indoor space dedication for household hazardous waste;
6. Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment spaces for 100 percent of motor vehicle parking;
7. a dedicated elevator within the building, for access to the interior bicycle parking spaces;
8. electric-only appliances or fireplaces for the residential units;
9. no grates and/or vents within any Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Space at grade;
10. diversion from landfill of 75 percent of demolition waste; and
11. Toronto Green Standards, version 4, Tier 2, which the applicant has committed to use their best efforts to achieve.
7. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 180-200 Dundas Street West, 123 Edward Street and 65 Centre Avenue from Permit Parking.
8. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and the City Solicitor, to continue to work with the applicant to explore an in-kind community benefit package pursuant to 37(6) of the Planning Act and to report back to City Council for further instruction on any offer of in-kind community benefits made by the applicant.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 11, 2024 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to retain the existing 25-storey office building at the north west corner of Chestnut Street and Dundas Avenue West, and permit a new 59-storey and 53-storey linked mixed-use building (168.55 metres and 179.77 metres respectively, excluding mechanical penthouses), containing 1,551 dwelling units, 397 square metres of non-residential gross floor area, and a new 140 square metre Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Space (POPS). The 15-storey office building at 123 Edward Street and the 6-level parking garage is proposed to be demolished.
The Official Plan Amendment is required to allow for a reduction in non-residential gross floor area as required in the Downtown Secondary Plan Health Sciences District, and to permit the development to be partially visible to the side of the silhouette of City Hall, as protected in the City's Official Plan view policies.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246169.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246441.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246170.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180526.pdf
TE14.7 - 55-75 Brownlow Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 55-75 Brownlow Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (May 24, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council approve that in accordance with Section 42 of the Planning Act prior to the first above grade building permit, the owner shall convey to the City, an on-site parkland dedication, having a minimum size of 571 square metres, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.
4. City Council approve the acceptance of on-site parkland dedication, subject to the owner transferring the parkland to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances, and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition; the owner may propose the exception of encumbrances of tiebacks, where such an encumbrance is deemed acceptable by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the City Solicitor; and such an encumbrance will be subject to the payment of compensation to the City, in an amount as determined by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.
5. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
6. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application (File 22 214672 STE 12 RH) in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, which allows for the demolition of 121 existing rental dwelling units at 55 Brownlow Avenue, subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain 121 replacement rental dwelling units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied; during such time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement; and the 121 replacement rental dwelling units shall be comprised of 15 studio units, 76 one-bedroom units and 30 two-bedroom units, and shall collectively have a gross floor area of at least 7,445.9 square metres as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to the City Planning Division dated May 13, 2024, with any revision to these plans being to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
b. the owner shall, as part of the 121 replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 6.a. above, provide at least 1 two-bedroom unit at affordable rents, 6 studio units and 34 one-bedroom units at mid-range (affordable) rents, and 9 studio units, 42 one-bedroom units and 29 two-bedroom units at mid-range (moderate) rents, as currently defined in the Toronto Official Plan, all for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit; and rents shall not include additional charges for laundry or air conditioning;
c. the owner shall provide an acceptable Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan to all Eligible Tenants addressing the right to occupy one of the replacement rental dwelling units at similar rents and other assistance to lessen hardship; the Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan shall be developed in consultation with, and to the satisfaction of, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the owner shall provide tenants of all 121 replacement rental dwelling units with access to indoor and outdoor amenity space for the exclusive use of the tenants of the rental replacement units and equal access to outdoor amenities on the ground floor in the proposed development at no additional charge, and on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the development, without the need to prebook or pay a fee unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
e. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry in each replacement rental dwelling unit within the proposed development;
f. the owner shall provide central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit within the proposed development;
g. of the storage lockers allocated to the rental replacement units, the owner shall provide and make available storage lockers firstly to returning tenants whose lease agreements for the existing units include access to storage lockers on the same terms as such tenants previously paid, secondly to remaining returning tenants, and thirdly to new tenants of the replacement rental units; the terms and conditions for storage lockers for tenants who did not previously have a locker will be the same as any other resident of the development;
h. of the parking allocated to the rental replacement units, the owner shall provide and make available parking to returning tenants whose lease agreements for the existing units include parking on the same terms as tenants previously paid, secondly to remaining returning tenants, and thirdly to new tenants of the replacement rental units; terms and conditions for parking for tenants who did not previously have parking will be the same as any other resident of the development;
i. the owner shall provide tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units with access to all bicycle and visitor vehicular parking at no charge and on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the development;
j. the replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 6.a. above shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the proposed building, exclusive of the replacement rental units, are made available and ready for occupancy, subject to any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
k. the owner shall enter into and register on title to the lands at 55-75 Brownlow Avenue, an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 6.a. through 6.j. above, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
7. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the demolition 121 rental dwelling units at 55 Brownlow Avenue after all the following have occurred:
a. all conditions in Recommendation 6 above have been fully satisfied and secured;
b. the replacement rental units are available and ready for occupancy; and
c. the owner has confirmed, in writing, that all existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished are vacant.
8. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given the Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 7 above.
9. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 55 Brownlow Avenue after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given the Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 7 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 pursuant to Section 6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:
a. the owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition; and
b. the owner erects solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.
10. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to:
a. submit a revised Functional Servicing Report for review and acceptance to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;
b. enter into a financially secured agreement for the construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades and road improvements are required to support the development, according to the transportation report accepted by the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Functional Servicing Report accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and
c. submit a revised Arborist Report to the satisfaction of Urban Forestry, on behalf of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.
11. City Council allow the owner of 55-75 Brownlow Avenue to construct, finish, furnish, equip and convey to the City a non-profit licensed child care facility (the 'Child Care Facility') to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Children's Services as part of the development, as an in-kind contribution pursuant to subsection 37(6) of the Planning Act, in accordance with the following terms:
a. the Child Care Facility will accommodate a minimum of 62 children, including infants, toddlers and preschoolers;
b. the Child Care Facility will be comprised of an approximately 929 square metres (10,000 square feet) indoor area located on the ground floor of the proposed development and an approximately 344 square metres (3,704 square feet) outdoor area, located on the ground floor adjacent to the indoor area; the Child Care Facility shall be designed, constructed and delivered in accordance with the Child Care Early Years Act, 2014 and City of Toronto Child Care Design and Technical Guideline R1 (2016); and
c. the Child Care Facility will be provided in accordance with the terms to be set out in the In-Kind Contribution Agreement identified in Recommendation 13 below to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Children's Services and the City Solicitor.
12. City Council attribute a value to the in-kind contribution set out in Recommendation 7 above equal to 100 percent of 4 percent of the value of the land (net of any exclusions or exemptions authorized under the Community Benefits Charge By-law), as determined the day before the day the building permit is issued in respect of the development.
13. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to enter into an Agreement pursuant to subsection 37(7.1) of the Planning Act (the "In-kind Contribution Agreement") to address the provision of the in-kind contribution identified in Recommendation 11 above to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Children's Services and the City Solicitor, including that:
a. the owner will provide a letter of credit in an amount sufficient to guarantee 120 percent of the estimated cost of the design, construction and handover of the Child Care Facility, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Children's Services and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and will be provided to the City prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for the development, to secure the Child Care Facility; upon handover of the Child Care Centre to the City, the letter of credit shall be returned to the owner of 55-75 Brownlow Avenue; with such agreement to be registered on title to the Site, which agreement shall be evidence of arrangements for the provision of the in-kind contribution that are satisfactory to City Council.
14. As part of Phase 1, City Council require the owner to provide a Letter of Credit in an amount equivalent to the Community Benefits Charge that would have been payable for the value of the land proceeding as a first phase as determined the day before the day the first building permit is issued in respect of the development; this letter of credit will be returned to the owner only if and at the time the owner has provided, to the City the letter of credit, secured by the In-Kind Contribution Agreement, in an amount sufficient to guarantee 120 percent of the estimated cost of the design, construction and handover of the Child Care Facility.
15. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement and other related agreements.
16. City Council require that, in consultation with the local Councillor, the applicant consult with representatives from the Eglinton Jr. Public School and the Toronto District School Board, to address concerns related to student safety and dust emissions, as a part of consultation on the Construction Management Plan.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 11, 2024 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit two residential buildings at 59 and 55-storeys, with 1,374 dwelling units at 55-75 Brownlow Avenue. This report also reviews and recommends approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Application which includes 121 replacement rental units and a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan to assist tenants with moving to the replacement housing.
This application proposes to construct the development in two phases. Phase 1 will see the construction of the north tower (Tower 'A') which is to include the 121 rental replacement units. Tower 'A' is to be constructed prior to the existing rental housing being demolished, allowing existing tenants the opportunity to move directly to replacement housing. Phase 2 will see the demolition of the existing rental building and the construction of the south tower (Tower 'B') which includes a 929-square metre child care facility. The child care facility is proposed to be conveyed to the city as an in-kind community benefits contribution pursuant to subsection 37(6) of the Planning Act.
The proposal also includes a new 571-square metre public park along the north property line, fronting onto Brownlow Avenue, and provides a pedestrian walkway that will form a future mid-block connection between Brownlow Avenue and Mount Pleasant Road.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246157.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246460.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246166.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246167.pdf
Speakers
Miso Choi, No Demovictions
Annette Trevorrow-Gasher
Adam Brown, Brown Dryer Barristers & Solicitors
Bob Murphy
Geoff Hayworth
Michael Whitehead, No Demovictions
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180445.pdf
(June 10, 2024) Letter from Rebecca Gimmi, No Demovictions Organizer (TE.Supp)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Michael Whitehead (TE.New)
TE14.8 - 239-255 Dundas Street East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment, and Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 239-255 Dundas Street East substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment included as Attachment 5 to the report (May 24, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 239-255 Dundas Street East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment 6 to the report (May 24, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application (File 22 124320 STE 13 RH) in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, which allows for the demolition of 8 existing rental dwelling units located at 239-255 Dundas Street East, subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain 11 replacement rental dwelling units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied, and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement; the replacement rental dwelling units shall collectively have a total gross floor area of at least 747.1 square metres and be comprised of 3 studio units, 3 one-bedroom units, 4 two-bedroom units and 1 three-bedroom unit as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to the City Planning Division dated May 2, 2024; and any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
b. the owner shall, as part of the 11 replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 4.a. above, provide at least 3 studios, 1 one-bedroom unit and 2 two-bedroom units at affordable rents, 2 one-bedroom units, 2 two-bedroom units and 1 three-bedroom unit at mid-range (moderate) rents as currently defined in the City's Official Plan, all for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit; and rents shall not include additional charges for laundry or air conditioning;
c. the owner shall provide an acceptable Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan to all Eligible Tenants of the 8 existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished at 239-255 Dundas Street East, addressing the right to return to occupy one of the replacement rental dwelling units at similar rents, the provision of rent gap assistance, and other assistance to lessen hardship; the Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan shall be developed in consultation with, and to the satisfaction of, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the owner shall provide tenants of all 11 replacement rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed building at no additional charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
e. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry in each replacement rental dwelling unit;
f. the owner shall provide central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit;
g. the owner shall provide tenants of all replacement rental dwelling units with access to bicycle and visitor parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed building;
h. the replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 4.a. above shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the proposed development, exclusive of the replacement rental dwelling units, are made available and ready for occupancy, subject to any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
i. the owner shall enter into and register on title to the lands at 239-255 Dundas Street East, an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 4.a. through 4.h. above, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
5. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code for the demolition of the 8 existing rental dwelling units located at 239-255 Dundas Street East after all the following have occurred:
a. all conditions in Recommendation 4 above have been fully satisfied and secured;
b. the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments have come into full force and effect;
c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006;
d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits (conditional or full permit) for the approved development on the site; and
e. the owner has confirmed, in writing, that all existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished are vacant.
6. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 5 above.
7. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 239-255 Dundas Street East after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 5 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 pursuant to Section 6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:
a. the owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;
b. the owner erects solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
c. the owner erects the proposed building on site no later than four years from the date that demolition of the existing rental dwelling units commences, subject to the timeframe being extended to the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
d. should the owner fail to complete the proposed building within the time specified in Recommendation 7.c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, as with municipal property taxes, an amount equal to the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such amount shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the Residential Demolition Permit is issued.
8. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement and any other related agreements.
9. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and the City Solicitor, to continue to work with the applicant to explore the feasibility of providing an in-kind community benefit pursuant to Section 37(6) of the Planning Act in the development and to report back to City Council for further instruction if the applicant offers such an in-kind community benefit.
10. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to:
a. submit a Functional Servicing Report for review and acceptance to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; the report will determine whether the municipal water, sanitary and storm sewer systems can support the proposed development and whether upgrades or improvements of the existing municipal infrastructure are required;
b. enter into a financially secured agreement for the construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades and road improvements are required to support the development, according to the functional servicing report accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;
c. enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 239, 241-243, 247 and 251-255 Dundas Street East substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated December 8, 2023, prepared by Turner Fleischer and the Heritage Impact Assessment dated December 7, 2023, prepared by GBCA Architects Inc., subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 10.d. below, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;
d. provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment dated December 7, 2023 and supplementary memo dated 22 May, 2024, prepared by GBCA Architects Inc., to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
e. enter into an Agreement, or similar legal instrument, between the owner of 239-255 Dundas Street East, the owner of 48-50 Pembroke Street and the City, to be registered on title to 48-50 Pembroke Street that would prevent the erection of a tall building, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.
11. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to take such steps, as required, to implement City Council's decision.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 11, 2024 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 52-storey (163.6 metres, including the mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building at 239-255 Dundas Street East. The proposal includes 632 dwelling units and a minimum of 48.5 square meters of non-residential gross floor area on the ground floor. The application proposes to demolish the 8 existing rental units and replace them with 11 rental units representing 100.3% of the existing rental gross floor area.
The Official Plan Amendment is required to vary performance standards in Site and Area Specific Policy 461 relating to tower setbacks, angular plane, setbacks to Neighbourhoods, and retail frontages.
The site consists of 4 properties that are designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as part of the Garden District Heritage Conservation District and are identified as contributing properties. The proposed development includes the in-situ retention of the building facades fronting onto Dundas Street East and Pembroke Street.
The report recommends approval of the Rental Housing Demolition application, including a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan that addresses the right for existing tenants to return to a replacement rental dwelling unit at similar rents and financial compensation to lessen hardship.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246156.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246491.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246158.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246159.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Community Council)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Ed Van Ekeris (TE.New)
TE14.9 - 561 Jarvis Street and 102-120 Earl Place - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application (22 199096 STE 13 RH) under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to permit the demolition of 31 existing rental dwelling units at 561 Jarvis Street and 102-120 Earl Place, subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain 31 replacement rental dwelling units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental unit is first occupied and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement; the 31 replacement rental dwelling units shall collectively have a total gross floor area of at least 1,333.72 square metres and be comprised of 6 studio, 24 one-bedroom units and 1 three-bedroom unit, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to the City Planning Division dated April 29, 2024; and any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
b. the owner shall, as part of the 31 replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above, provide at least 6 studio and 15 one-bedroom units at affordable rents, 2 one-bedroom units at mid-range (affordable) rents, as currently defined in the Toronto Official Plan, all for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of the replacement rental units; and the remaining 7 one-bedroom units and 1 three-bedroom unit will have unrestricted rents; rents shall not include additional charges for laundry or air conditioning;
c. the owner shall provide an acceptable Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan to all Eligible Tenants, addressing the right to return to occupy one of the replacement rental dwelling units at similar rents, and other assistance to lessen hardship; the Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan shall be developed in consultation with, and to the satisfaction of, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the owner shall provide tenants of all 31 replacement rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed development at no additional charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the development, without the need to pre-book or pay a fee unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
e. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry in each replacement rental dwelling unit within the proposed development;
f. the owner shall provide central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit within the proposed development;
g. the owner shall provide tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units with access to bicycle and visitor vehicular parking at no additional charge and on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed development;
h. the 31 replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the proposed development, exclusive of the replacement rental dwelling units, are made available and ready for occupancy; and
i. the owner shall enter into and register on title to the lands at 561 Jarvis Street and 102-120 Earl Place an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 1.a. through 1.h. above, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the demolition of the 31 existing rental dwelling units at 561 Jarvis Street and 102-120 Earl Place after all the following have occurred:
a. all conditions in Recommendation 1 above have been fully satisfied and secured;
b. the Zoning By-law Amendment has come into full force and effect;
c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006;
d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits (conditional or full permits) for the approved development on the site; and
e. the owner has confirmed, in writing, that all existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished are vacant.
3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.
4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 561 Jarvis Street and 102-120 Earl Place after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 pursuant to section 6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:
a. the owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;
b. the owner erects solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building;
c. the owner erects the proposed building no later than 4 years from the date on which the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units commences, subject to the timeframe being extended to the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
d. should the owner fail to complete the proposed development containing 31 replacement rental dwelling units within the time specified in Recommendation 4.c. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, as with municipal property taxes, an amount equal to the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such amount shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the Residential Demolition Permit is issued.
5. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement and other related agreements.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 11, 2024 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
The application proposes to demolish a two-and-a-half-storey apartment building and row of townhouses containing 31 rental units located at 561 Jarvis Street and 102-120 Earl Place. The 31 rental units are proposed to be replaced as part of a new 58-storey building containing a total of approximately 708 dwelling units. The proposal includes a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
The properties are also the subject of a Zoning By-law Amendment application (22 185925 STE 13 OZ), which was appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT). The OLT issued a written decision on April 18, 2024 approving the Zoning By-law Amendment in principle, with the final order being withheld until all outstanding matters, including the rental housing matters and necessary agreements with the City, are secured.
This report recommends approval of the Rental Housing Demolition application under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions to replace the rental housing and provide Tenant Relocation and Assistance.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246163.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246164.pdf
Speakers
Delilah Rosier
Ruby Bush
Myron McShane
Communications (Community Council)
TE14.10 - 135 Isabella Street - Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 135 Isabella Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Revised Attachment 5 to the report (May 24, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Prior to introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to:
a. submit to the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services for review and acceptance, a Functional Servicing Report to determine the stormwater runoff, sanitary flow and water supply demand resulting from this development and whether there is adequate capacity in the existing municipal infrastructure to accommodate the proposed development; and
b. make satisfactory arrangements with Engineering and Construction Services and enter into the appropriate agreement with the City for the design and construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades are require to the infrastructure to support this development, according to the accepted Functional Servicing Report accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.
4. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition Application (File 23 158819 STE 13 RH) in accordance with Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, which allows for the demolition of 80 existing rental dwelling units located at 135 Isabella Street subject to the following conditions:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain 80 replacement rental dwelling units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years beginning from the date that each replacement rental dwelling unit is first occupied and, during which time, no application may be submitted to the City for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to a non-rental housing purpose, or for demolition without providing for replacement; the 80 replacement rental dwelling units shall be comprised of 2 studio units, 38 one-bedroom units and 40 two-bedroom units, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to the City Planning Division dated February 14, 2024; any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
b. the owner shall, as part of the 80 replacement rental dwelling units, provide at least 1 one-bedroom and 25 two-bedroom units at affordable rent, 2 studio and 19 one-bedroom units at mid-range (affordable) rents and 16 one-bedroom and 13 two-bedroom units at mid-range (moderate) rents as currently defined in the City's Official Plan, all for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of the replacement rental units; the rents of the remaining 4 replacement rental dwelling units shall be unrestricted; and rents shall not include additional charges for laundry or air conditioning;
c. the owner shall provide an acceptable Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan for all Eligible Tenants addressing the right to return to occupy one of the replacement rental dwelling units at similar rents, the provision of rent gap assistance, and other assistance to mitigate hardship; the Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan shall be developed in consultation with, and to the satisfaction of, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the owner shall provide tenant relocation and assistance to all Post Application Tenants, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
e. the owner shall provide tenants of all 80 replacement rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities at no additional charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;
f. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry in each replacement rental dwelling unit within the proposed residential building;
g. the owner shall provide central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit within the proposed residential building;
h. the owner shall provide tenants of the 80 replacement rental dwelling units with access to storage lockers and bicycle and visitor parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed residential building;
i. the owner shall provide and make available for rent at least 23 vehicle parking spaces to tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units; such parking spaces shall be made available firstly to returning tenants who previously rented a vehicle parking space, and at similar monthly parking charges that such tenants previously paid; and the remaining vehicle parking spaces shall be made available to tenants of the replacement rental units to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
j. the 80 replacement rental units shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which 70 percent of the new dwelling units in the proposed development, exclusive of the replacement rental units, are made available and ready for occupancy, subject to any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
k. the owner shall enter into, and register on title at 135 Isabella Street, an Agreement pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, to secure the conditions outlined above, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
5. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code for the demolition of the 80 existing rental dwelling units located at 135 Isabella Street after all the following have occurred:
a. all conditions in Recommendation 4 above have been fully satisfied and secured;
b. the Zoning By-law Amendment has come into full force and effect;
c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, or as otherwise authorized by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;
d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits (conditional or full permit) for the approved development on the site; and
e. the owner has confirmed, in writing, that all existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished are vacant.
6. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 5 above.
7. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Residential Demolition Permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 135 Isabella Street after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 5 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 pursuant to Section 6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:
a. the owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;
b. the owner erects the proposed building on the site no later than 4 years from the date on which the demolition of the existing rental dwelling units commences, subject to the timeframe being extended to the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and
c. should the owner fail to complete the proposed building within the time specified in Recommendation 7.b. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, as with municipal property taxes, an amount equal to the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such amount shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the Residential Demolition Permit is issued.
8. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement and other related agreements.
9. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review and report back on the feasibility of amending Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude the development located at 135 Isabella Street from Permit Parking.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 11, 2024 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act and City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 69-storey (219 metres excluding the mechanical penthouse) residential building at 135 Isabella Street. The proposal is comprised of 814 dwelling units, including 80 rental replacement dwelling units.
This report also reviews and recommends approval of the Rental Housing Demolition application to demolish 80 rental units. The proposal includes 80 rental replacement units and a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and financial compensation to mitigate hardship.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246100.pdf
Revised Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246499.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246165.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246142.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246144.pdf
Speakers
Miso Choi, No Demovictions
Megan Kee, No Demovictions
Geoff Hayworth, No Demovictions
Cynthia MacDougall, McCarthy Tetrault
Peter Duerr
Rebecca Gimmi, Organizer , No Demovictions
Patricia Johnston
Communications (Community Council)
(June 9, 2024) E-mail from Margaux Booth (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) Letter from David Wilson (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Ben Hishon (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) Letter from Rebecca Gimmi, No Demovictions Organizer (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Norman Cheesman (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) Submission from Nathalie Ai Rei Dooh-Tousignant (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) Letter from Cynthia MacDougall, Senior Counsel, McCarthy Tretrault on behalf of King Sett Capital (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180482.pdf
(June 10, 2024) Letter from Matthew Hastie (TE.New)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Eric Glavin (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Michael Whitehead (TE.New)
Communications (City Council)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Tanya Lemke (CC.New)
TE14.11 - 9 Benlamond Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Bill 686 has been submitted on this Item.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 9 Benlamond Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (May 24, 2024) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council require the owner to provide and implement an acceptable Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, for Eligible Tenants of the existing 4 rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished.
4. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to require the Owner to enter into an agreement or legal undertaking with the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, securing the implementation of the Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan required by Recommendation 3 above, prior to the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan Approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 11, 2024 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a four storey residential apartment building consisting of 16 residential units, nine underground vehicular parking spaces and 20 bicycle parking spaces at 9 Benlamond Avenue. In addition, the application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law to rezone the rear portion of the site from a Residential to Open Space and Natural Zone.
The residential apartment building is an appropriate scale for the site, fits with the character of the area and is adequately set back from the Glen Davis Ravine and Environmentally Significant Area. Additionally, the proposal contributes to the overall supply of larger housing units.
The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020). The proposal also conforms to the City's Official Plan.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246096.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246493.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246097.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-247256.pdf
Attachment 6: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-247257.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Community Council)
(June 10, 2024) Submission from Christian Chan, Planner, The Planning Agency Inc. (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180452.pdf
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Toby M (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) Letter from Rebecca Gimmi, No Demovictions Organizer (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Maureen Ashby (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Jason Jarvis (TE.New)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Colin Harris (TE.New)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Seamus Vaughan (TE.New)
Communications (City Council)
TE14.12 - 321-355 Symington Avenue and 350 Campbell Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Application - Appeal Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal to oppose the appeals of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications in their current forms for the lands at 321-355 Symington Avenue and 350 Campbell Avenue and City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to continue discussions with the applicant team in attempt to resolve the outstanding matters.
2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold issuance of its final Orders until such time as the City Solicitor advises that:
a. the final form and content of the draft Official Plan Amendment is to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor;
b. the final form and content of the draft Zoning By-law is to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; and
c. the owner has at its sole cost and expense:
i. submitted a revised Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report and Hydrogeological Review, including the Foundation Drainage Report or addendums, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Water;
ii. secured the design and provision of financial securities for any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Engineering Reports, to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements or upgrades are required to support the development;
iii. ensured the implementation of the accepted Engineering Reports does not require changes to the proposed amending By-laws or any such required changes have been made to the proposed amending By-laws, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor, including the use of a Holding ("H") By-law symbol regarding any new infrastructure or upgrades to existing municipal servicing infrastructure, as may be required;
iv. the owner has submitted a revised Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment, such report to be peer reviewed by a third-party consultant on behalf of the City and at the owner's expense, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; the Report shall determine the appropriate Area Class per Section B9 of NPC-300; and
v. necessary studies, including those related to pedestrian level wind impacts, sun shadow, rail safety and compatibility have been completed and their recommendations addressed to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other appropriate staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.
Origin
Summary
On January 13, 2023, a Zoning By-law Amendment application was received seeking permission for two towers being 36 and 39 storeys in height on a 6 storey shared podium, containing 817 dwelling units and 680 square metres of ground floor retail. On February 27, 2023, an Official Plan Amendment application was received for 350 Campbell Avenue to redesignate the lands from Core Employment Areas to Mixed Use Areas. The applicant appealed the applications to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) due to Council not making a decision within the time frame prescribed in the Planning Act.
This report recommends that the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the applications in their current form and continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-245972.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180497.pdf
TE14.13 - 40 Wabash Avenue - Inclusion on the Heritage Register
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council include 40 Wabash Avenue (including entrance address at 50 Wabash Avenue) on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) attached as Attachment 1 to the report (May 21, 2024) from the Acting Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council include 40 Wabash Avenue (including entrance address at 50 Wabash Avenue) on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register for its cultural heritage value and interest.
The subject property is an early-twentieth century, factory/warehouse type complex with Edwardian Classical detailing. Constructed in phases between 1910 and 1947, the brick and concrete frame complex includes a two-storey former office building on the west portion of the property, and a two and three-storey factory building with an adjoined one-storey structure at the base of a tall, brick smokestack on the east of the property.
Acquired by the City in 2000, the property at 40 Wabash Avenue is proposed to be adaptively re-used for a community centre. Detailed design of the community centre, including the re-use of the former industrial buildings, is now underway.
The property recommended for inclusion on the City’s Heritage Register has been researched and evaluated by staff using the criteria prescribed in Ontario Regulation 9/06 and meets one or more of the provincial criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest and is believed to be of cultural heritage value or interest.
On January 1, 2023, amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (the Act) through the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill 23) came into effect. Under the Act, as amended, a municipal heritage register may include properties that have not been designated but Council believes to be of “cultural heritage value or interest", and that meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining whether they are of cultural heritage value or interest. The Act now also limits listing to a period of two years.
As of January 1, 2023, should a property be subject to an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, properties must be listed on the heritage register prior to Part IV designation and before the occurrence of a prescribed event. A prescribed event is a point of time when the application for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application has been deemed complete and the City Clerk provides notice of that complete application to the public in accordance with the Planning Act.
The listing of non-designated properties on the municipal heritage register under the Act also extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Act should a development or demolition application be submitted.
Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed properties.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246027.pdf
13a - 40 Wabash Avenue - Inclusion on the Heritage Register
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on June 5, 2024 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB19.2 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (May 21, 2024) from the Acting Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council include 40 Wabash Avenue (including entrance address at 50 Wabash Avenue) on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register for its cultural heritage value and interest.
The subject property is an early-twentieth century, factory/warehouse type complex with Edwardian Classical detailing. Constructed in phases between 1910 and 1947, the brick and concrete frame complex includes a two-storey former office building on the west portion of the property, and a two and three-storey factory building with an adjoined one-storey structure at the base of a tall, brick smokestack on the east of the property.
Acquired by the City in 2000, the property at 40 Wabash Avenue is proposed to be adaptively re-used for a community centre. Detailed design of the community centre, including the re-use of the former industrial buildings, is now underway.
The property recommended for inclusion on the City’s Heritage Register has been researched and evaluated by staff using the criteria prescribed in Ontario Regulation 9/06 and meets one or more of the provincial criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest and is believed to be of cultural heritage value or interest.
On January 1, 2023, amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (the Act) through the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill 23) came into effect. Under the Act, as amended, a municipal heritage register may include properties that have not been designated but Council believes to be of “cultural heritage value or interest", and that meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining whether they are of cultural heritage value or interest. The Act now also limits listing to a period of two years.
As of January 1, 2023, should a property be subject to an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, properties must be listed on the heritage register prior to Part IV designation and before the occurrence of a prescribed event. A prescribed event is a point of time when the application for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application has been deemed complete and the City Clerk provides notice of that complete application to the public in accordance with the Planning Act.
The listing of non-designated properties on the municipal heritage register under the Act also extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Act should a development or demolition application be submitted.
Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed properties.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246455.pdf
TE14.14 - 263 Adelaide Street West - Alterations to and Demolition of Heritage Attributes of a Designated Property Under Part IV, Sections 33 and 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council consent to:
a. the application to alter the designated property at 263 Adelaide Street West, with conditions, under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a new mixed use building with the alterations to the designated heritage property being substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated May 9, 2017, prepared by Quadrangle Architects Limited, on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated July 28, 2017 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated April 17, 2024 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
b. the application to remove some of the heritage attributes of the designated property at 263 Adelaide Street West, with conditions, under Part IV, Section 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a new mixed use building with the removal of the specified heritage attributes on the designated heritage property being substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated May 9, 2017, prepared by Quadrangle Architects Limited, on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated July 28, 2017 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated April 17, 2024 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
2. City Council direct that its consent to the application to alter the designated property at 263 Adelaide Street West under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and that its consent to the application to remove the heritage attributes of the designated property at 263 Adelaide Street West under Part IV, Section 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act are also subject to the following conditions:
a. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 263 Adelaide Street West, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building, as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner of the subject property shall:
1. amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 263 Adelaide Street West substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated May 9, 2017, prepared by Quadrangle Architects Limited, on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated July 28, 2017 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated April 17, 2024 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including execution of such Agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;
2. provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describe how the exterior of the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such a plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
3. implement an Interpretation Plan for the subject property that is substantially in accordance with the Heritage Interpretation Plan by ERA Architects Inc. dated July 28, 2017 and re-issued on December 12, 2020, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
4. submit a Signage Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
5. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated April 17, 2024 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
6. provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan; and
b. prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 2.a.6. above, the owner shall:
1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation and Interpretation Plans and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
2. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in City Council to amend the Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 263 Adelaide Street West.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations to and demolition of attributes of the heritage property at 263 Adelaide Street West under Section 33 and Section 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with the development of the site. It is also recommended that the existing Heritage Easement Agreement is amended to reflect this proposal.
The proposal is in connection with the redevelopment of the site to allow for the construction of a 49-storey mixed-use building. The Ontario Municipal Board granted approval for this scheme in 2017. The approved scheme included the conservation of and alterations to the front façade of the historic Purman Building at 263 Adelaide Street West. In order to conserve this façade a retention frame was to be installed on the sidewalk in front of the heritage building.
Since 2017 the TTC has planned a detour of the 501 Queen Streetcar along this section of Adelaide Street West to allow for the construction of the Ontario Line along Queen Street. As a consequence of this, overhead support cables and streetcar power supply cables are being installed along the south side of Adelaide Street. The façade retention system as approved would interfere with the TTC streetcar power supply. It therefore needs to be narrowed and this means it cannot support the whole façade of the Purman Building.
A revised conservation strategy for the Purman Building is now proposed that takes into account the proximity of the TTC cables. The revised scheme includes the insitu retention of the first three floors of the heritage building with the panelization and removal of the top two floors to allow for the construction of a 49-storey mixed use building without interference with the TTC power supply. The panelized sections of the front façade would be reinstalled once the retained façade has been secured into the new building and a new parapet would be reinstated that is designed to match the original based on archival documentation.
The proposed alterations conserve the heritage values and attributes of the historic Purman Building property consistent with the existing policy framework and the impact of the new development is being appropriately mitigated.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246016.pdf
14a - 263 Adelaide Street West - Alterations to and Demolition of Heritage Attributes of a Designated Property Under Part IV, Sections 33 and 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on June 5, 2024 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB19.4 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (May 21, 2024) from the Acting Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations to and demolition of attributes of the heritage property at 263 Adelaide Street West under Section 33 and Section 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with the development of the site. It is also recommended that the existing Heritage Easement Agreement is amended to reflect this proposal.
The proposal is in connection with the redevelopment of the site to allow for the construction of a 49-storey mixed-use building. The Ontario Municipal Board granted approval for this scheme in 2017. The approved scheme included the conservation of and alterations to the front façade of the historic Purman Building at 263 Adelaide Street West. In order to conserve this façade a retention frame was to be installed on the sidewalk in front of the heritage building.
Since 2017 the TTC has planned a detour of the 501 Queen Streetcar along this section of Adelaide Street West to allow for the construction of the Ontario Line along Queen Street. As a consequence of this, overhead support cables and streetcar power supply cables are being installed along the south side of Adelaide Street. The façade retention system as approved would interfere with the TTC streetcar power supply. It therefore needs to be narrowed and this means it cannot support the whole façade of the Purman Building.
A revised conservation strategy for the Purman Building is now proposed that takes into account the proximity of the TTC cables. The revised scheme includes the insitu retention of the first three floors of the heritage building with the panelization and removal of the top two floors to allow for the construction of a 49-storey mixed use building without interference with the TTC power supply. The panelized sections of the front façade would be reinstalled once the retained façade has been secured into the new building and a new parapet would be reinstated that is designed to match the original based on archival documentation.
The proposed alterations conserve the heritage values and attributes of the historic Purman Building property consistent with the existing policy framework and the impact of the new development is being appropriately mitigated.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246429.pdf
TE14.15 - 98 Highland Avenue - Refusal of Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council refuse the alterations to the designated heritage property at 98 Highland Avenue, in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, for alterations including the new windows as outlined in the letter prepared by Daniel Buim and Jodi Ballet, dated March 12, 2024.
2. If the owner appeals City Council’s decision to refuse the application to alter the heritage property at 98 Highland Avenue under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the necessary City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing to oppose the appeal.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council refuse the alterations to the designated heritage property at 98 Highland Avenue under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The subject site is a "B-rated" property located in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD). The applicant is requesting retro-active approval for windows that have already been installed. The new windows detract from the architectural style and character of the building and do not comply with the policies in the North Rosedale HCD Plan or the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (the official document guiding planning and conservation of heritage properties in the City of Toronto). As such staff are recommending that this application be refused.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-245391.pdf
Speakers
Communications (Community Council)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Faryl Hausman (TE.New)
15a - 98 Highland Avenue - Refusal of Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on May 7, 2024 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB18.4 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (April 18, 2024) from the Acting Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council refuse the alterations to the designated heritage property at 98 Highland Avenue under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The subject site is a "B-rated" property located in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD). The applicant is requesting retro-active approval for windows that have already been installed. The new windows detract from the architectural style and character of the building and do not comply with the policies in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan or the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (the official document guiding planning and conservation of heritage properties in the City of Toronto). As such staff are recommending that this application be refused.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-245878.pdf
TE14.16 - 135 Roxborough Drive - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council forwards the Item to City Council without recommendation.
Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information
The Toronto and East York Community Council directed the City Solicitor to report directly to the June 26, 27 and 28, 2024 meeting of City Council on what steps the City can take to correct the building permit to remove the incorrect permission, given without delegated authority, to paint the front of 135 Roxborough Drive East.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council refuse the alterations to the designated heritage property at 135 Roxborough Drive under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
This is a C-rated property located in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD). The applicant is requesting approval for the painting of the masonry on the east and west facades of the two-storey house. These alterations do not comply with the policies in the North Rosedale HCD Plan or the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (the official document guiding planning and conservation of heritage properties in the City of Toronto). As such staff are recommending that this application is refused.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-245392.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-247116.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Attachment to Motion 2a by Councillor Dianne Saxe
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-247308.pdf
Attachment to Motion 1 by Councillor Brad Bradford
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-247309.pdf
Speakers
Rodney Gill, Goodmans LLP
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180596.pdf
Communications (City Council)
(June 21, 2024) E-mail from Melanie Shishler (CC.Supp)
(June 21, 2024) Letter from Bill and Joan Perdue (CC.Supp)
(June 21, 2024) Letter from Romy Hewitt (CC.Supp)
(June 22, 2024) Letter from Nora Smith (CC.Supp)
(June 22, 2024) E-mail from Michael Rodger (CC.Supp)
(June 22, 2024) Letter from Joan Law (CC.Supp)
(June 23, 2024) E-mail from Sue Howe (CC.Supp)
(June 23, 2024) Letter from Lynne Woollcombe (CC.Supp)
(June 23, 2024) E-mail from Ronald J McCloskey (CC.Supp)
(June 23, 2024) E-mail from Milla and Frank Liska (CC.Supp)
(June 23, 2024) E-mail from Meegan Hinds (CC.Supp)
(June 23, 2024) Letter from Catherine Orion (CC.Supp)
(June 23, 2024) E-mail from James Sloan (CC.Supp)
(June 23, 2024) E-mail from Donald Neal (CC.Supp)
(June 23, 2024) E-mail from Catherine Morton (CC.Supp)
(June 23, 2024) Letter from Tom Connell (CC.Supp)
(June 24, 2024) E-mail from Katherine MacMillan (CC.Supp)
(June 24, 2024) Submission from Alex Jenkins, Melanie Shishler and Faryl Hausman, North Rosedale Heritage Committee (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181126.pdf
(June 24, 2024) E-mail from James Bray (CC.Supp)
(June 24, 2024) E-mail from Elaine Kierans (CC.Supp)
(June 24, 2024) Submission from Katherine MacMillan (CC.Supp)
(June 24, 2024) E-mail from Normunds Mierins (CC.Supp)
(June 24, 2024) E-mail from Fran Bennett (CC.Supp)
(June 24, 2024) Letter from Graham Warren (CC.Supp)
(June 24, 2024) E-mail from Alix Stephenson (CC.Supp)
(June 24, 2024) Letter from Deb Crawford, Chair, Architectural Conservancy Ontario (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181150.pdf
(June 24, 2024) E-mail from Jane Shapiro (CC.Supp)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Volker Steininger (CC.Supp)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Kathy Falconi (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Gayane Mangassarian (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Sara D'Elia (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Co-chair, FoNTRA (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181163.pdf
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from James Morton (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Margaret D'Elia (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Domenic D'Elia (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Catherine Morton (CC.New)
(June 25, 2024) Letter from Monica Kuhn, on behalf of the Cabbagetown Heritage Conservation District (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181190.pdf
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Hosen MarJaee (CC.New)
16a - 135 Roxborough Drive - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on May 7, 2024 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB18.3 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (April 18, 2024) from the Acting Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council refuse the alterations to the designated heritage property at 135 Roxborough Drive under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The is a C-rated property located in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD). The applicant is requesting approval for the painting of the masonry on the east and west facades of the two-storey house. These alterations do not comply with the policies in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan or the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (the official document guiding planning and conservation of heritage properties in the City of Toronto). As such staff are recommending that this application is refused.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-245879.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Faryl Hausman (TE.Supp)
TE14.17 - 309 Cherry Street - Alterations to Heritage Attributes on a Designated Heritage Property Under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council forwards the Item to City Council without recommendation.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act proposed for the heritage property at 309 Cherry Street in connection with the redevelopment of the site. The subject property contains two detached buildings with the same municipal address situated at the northwest corner of the property. The first is a two-storey institutional building constructed in 1920 as a banking hall and offices for the Bank of Montreal while the second is a two-to-four-storey industrial building constructed in 1941 as an oil storage warehouse for Canadian Oil Companies Ltd.
The proposal involves the construction of four new buildings including three towers at 27, 39 and 49 storeys and a ten-storey midrise building. The two heritage buildings on the property are proposed to be fully retained and conserved with limited interventions for accessibility and integration with the new construction.
The proposed alterations conserve the heritage attributes of the properties, and the impact of the new development is sufficiently mitigated to be consistent with the existing policy framework.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246018.pdf
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181161.pdf
17a - 309 Cherry Street - Alterations to Heritage Attributes on a Designated Heritage Property Under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement
Origin
Summary
At its meeting on June 5, 2024 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB19.5 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (May 21, 2024) from the Acting Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act proposed for the heritage property at 309 Cherry Street in connection with the redevelopment of the site. The subject property contains two detached buildings with the same municipal address situated at the northwest corner of the property. The first is a two-storey institutional building constructed in 1920 as a banking hall and offices for the Bank of Montreal while the second is a two-to-four-storey industrial building constructed in 1941 as an oil storage warehouse for Canadian Oil Companies Ltd.
The proposal involves the construction of four new buildings including three towers at 27, 39 and 49 storeys and a ten-storey midrise building. The two heritage buildings on the property are proposed to be fully retained and conserved with limited interventions for accessibility and integration with the new construction.
The proposed alterations conserve the heritage attributes of the properties, and the impact of the new development is sufficiently mitigated to be consistent with the existing policy framework.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246428.pdf
TE14.31 - 2161 Yonge Street (Yonge Street and Soudan Avenue) - Construction Staging Area Time Extension
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the continuation of the closure of the north sidewalk and a 4 metre wide portion of the westbound curb lane on Soudan venue, between Yonge Street and a point 55 metres east, from July 1, 2024 to December 31, 2025, inclusive.
2. City Council authorize the continuation of the closure of the east sidewalk and a 2.7 metre-wide portion of the northbound curb lane on Yonge Street, between Soudan Avenue and a point 41 metres north, from July 1, 2024 to December 31, 2025, inclusive.
3. City Council authorize the continuation to amend the existing stopping prohibition in effect between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east side of Yonge Street, between Balliol Street and a point 30.5 metres north of Soudan Avenue to be in effect from Balliol Street and Soudan Avenue.
4. City Council authorize the continuation to prohibit stopping at all times on the east side of Yonge Street, between Soudan Avenue and a point 30.5 metres north.
5. City Council direct the applicant to continue to pressure wash or sweep (weather permitting) the construction site, adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
6. City Council direct the applicant to continue to install wash stations at all exits within the staging area to clean truck tires in order to eliminate dirt and mud from entering the municipal road network.
7. City Council direct the applicant to continue to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkways have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
8. City Council direct the applicant to continue to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvement Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.
9. City Council direct the applicant to continue to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrian, cyclist and motorist safety is considered at all times.
10. City Council direct the applicant to continue to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
11. City Council direct the applicant to continue to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
12. City Council direct the applicant to continue to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
13. City Council direct the applicant to continue to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
14. City Council direct the applicant to continue to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
15. City Council direct that Yonge Street and Soudan Street be returned to pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.
16. City Council direct that the occupation permit for construction staging on Yonge Street and Soudan Avenue continue to be conditional subject to there being no conflicts with Metrolinx transit project construction.
17. City Council direct the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance and construction activities to municipal infrastructure within the vicinity of the construction staging areas, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
Origin
Summary
As Yonge Street is classified as a major arterial street, City Council approval of this report is required.
Tribute Communities is constructing a 35-storey mixed-use building at 2161 Yonge Street. The site is located on the northeast corner of Yonge Street and Soudan Avenue. Currently, the north sidewalk and a 4 metre-wide portion of the westbound curb lane on Soudan Avenue, between Yonge Street and a point 55 metres east; and the east sidewalk and a 2.4 metre wide portion of the northbound curb lane on Yonge Street, between Soudan Avenue and a point 41 metres north are closed to facilitate construction staging operations.
City Council, at its meeting on July 14, 2021, approved the subject construction staging areas on Yonge Street and Soudan Avenue from July 16, 2021 to June 30, 2024. The developer has requested a time extension of the duration of the construction staging areas on Yonge Street and Soudan Avenue due to a number of construction delays, such as unforeseen underground water seepage, inclement weather and approvals to change building height from 35 to 38 storeys.
In view of the above, Transportation Services is requesting authorization to extend the duration of the construction staging areas on Yonge Street and on Soudan Street for an additional 18 months, from July 1, 2024 to December 31, 2025.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246084.pdf
TE14.32 - Construction Staging Area - Richmond Street East and Ontario Street (261-285 Queen Street East, 384-410 Richmond Street East and 90 Ontario Street)
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the closure of the west sidewalk and a 2.2 metre wide portion of the southbound lane on Ontario Street, between Queen Street East and a point 81.2 metres south, from June 27, 2024 to December 31, 2025, inclusive.
2. City Council authorize the closure of the north sidewalk and a 2.1 metre wide portion of the north cycle track on Richmond Street East, between Ontario Street and a point 109.4 metres, and a provision for a temporary 2.1 metre wide walkway and 1.5 metre wide cycle track in the adjacent eastbound traffic lane, from June 27, 2024 to December 31, 2025, inclusive.
3. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the west side of Ontario Street, between Queen Street East and a point 81.2 metres south, from June 27, 2024 to December 31, 2025, inclusive.
4. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the east side of Ontario Street, between Queen Street East and a point 49.4 metres south, from June 27, 2024 to December 31, 2025, inclusive.
5. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the west side of Ontario Street, between Queen Street East and a point 81.2 metres south.
6. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the east side of Ontario Street, between Queen Street East and a point 49.4 metres south.
7. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the south side of Queen Street East, between a point 79.6 metres west of Ontario Street and a point 9.1 metres further west.
8. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the south side of Queen Street East, between a point 79.6 metres west of Ontario Street and a point 9.1 metres further west.
9. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Saturday; 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday, at a rate of $2.75 per hour for a maximum period of three hours, on the south side of Queen Street East, between a point 79.6 metres west of Ontario Street and a point 9.1 metres further west.
10. City Council direct the applicant to sweep the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
11. City Council direct the applicant to construct and maintain a fully covered, protected and unobstructed walkway for all pedestrians, including for those with mobility devices, for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and ensure it is compliant with the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
12. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.
13. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas, resident associations and local school administration in advance of any physical road modifications.
14. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and request the applicant to install converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.
15. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
16. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and the Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.
17. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.
18. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
19. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.
20. City Council direct the applicant, in consultation with Transportation Services, to maintain any bicycle lanes and install appropriate signage to inform drivers and cyclists of any changes to the cycling lanes.
21. City Council direct that Queen Street East, Ontario Street and Richmond Street East be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.
22. City Council direct the applicant to cooperate with and provide all necessary assistance to the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, staff and representatives carrying out operation, maintenance and construction activities to municipal infrastructure with the vicinity of the construction staging area, and at no cost to the City to remove any staging to accommodate the necessary municipal infrastructure work.
23. City Council direct that the occupation permit for construction staging on Queen Street East, Ontario Street and Richmond Street East be conditional subject to there being no conflicts with Metrolinx transit project construction.
24. City Council direct the applicant to create a publicly accessible website with regular construction updates and post the website address on the construction site hoarding, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
25. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site, adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.
26. City Council direct the applicant to mitigate light pollution by installing a shield/barrier on any lighting standards in close proximity to adjacent residential properties, such as cranes.
27. City Council direct the applicant to establish a Construction Management Working Group that meets monthly and invite local stakeholders including Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto Buildings, adjacent neighbours, local resident groups, local Business Improvement Area Board of Management and local school administration.
28. City Council direct the applicant to email monthly construction progress reports to the local Councillor, local residents’ association and Business Improvement Area Board of Management.
Origin
Summary
As Richmond Street East is classified as a major arterial street, City Council approval of this report is required.
Tricon Residential is constructing a 24-storey and 33-storey buildings at 261-285 Queen Street East, 384-410 Richmond Street East and 90 Ontario Street, respectively. The site is bounded by Queen Street East to the north, Ontario Street to the east, Richmond Street East to the south and existing condominium buildings to the west.
Transportation Services is requesting authorization to temporarily close a portion of the southbound curb lane on Ontario Street and a portion of the uni-directional cycle track on north side on Richmond Street East for a period of 19 months, from June 27, 2024 to December 31, 2025 to accommodate construction staging operations. It should be noted that the construction staging area has been installed and is operating under a monthly Street Occupation Permit. Pedestrian operations are accommodated within the closed curb lane on Ontario Street. The dedicated uni-directional cycle track on Richmond Street East is maintained.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246168.pdf
TE14.38 - Avenue Road Study - Interim Update and Proposed Site-Specific Road Safety Improvements
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Bills 642 and 654 have been submitted on this Item.
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council forwards the Item to City Council without recommendation.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Avenue Road, City Council approval of this report is required.
As directed by City Council in 2019, the Area Transportation Planning unit in Transportation Services initiated a study of the Avenue Road corridor between Bloor Street West and St. Clair Avenue West, focused on improving pedestrian safety. The study’s two objectives are to develop a vision for the road that improves safety for all road users, and to identify near-term actions that can be taken to move toward the vision, in advance of full road reconstruction. Over the last four years, Transportation Services has made several changes to the roadway to improve road user safety and reduce motor vehicle speeding.
This report provides an interim update on the Avenue Road Study and proposes site-specific safety improvements focused on the 280 metre segment between Davenport Road and Dupont Street, targeted for implementation beginning in 2024. A final Avenue Road Study report will be presented at a future Infrastructure and Environment Committee meeting to provide recommendations on the long-term vision, and near-term plan for the segment of Avenue Road between Dupont Street and St. Clair Avenue West.
As part of this report, Transportation Services is continuing to utilize the streamlined reporting process for by-law amendment submissions associated with road safety projects approved by Council for implementation. Once projects are approved by Council, the streamlined process involves delegation of authority to submit bills directly to Council for a discreet period of time after project implementation which enables Transportation Services to make minor adjustments to constructed conditions without delay and based on local Councillor and public feedback such as parking adjustments to improve sight-lines, adjustments or addition of accessible loading areas, and similar modifications.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246364.pdf
(May 24, 2024) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Director, Planning, Design and Management, Transportation Services on Avenue Road Study - Interim Update and Proposed Site-Specific Road Safety Improvements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246147.pdf
Attachment 1 to motion 1b by Councillor Dianne Saxe
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246475.pdf
Attachment 2 to motion 1b by Councillor Dianne Saxe
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246476.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246796.pdf
Speakers
Joel Rubinovich
Kris Faibish
Trevor Townsend
Max Dublin
Kim Hinton
Richard Guy
Robin Richardson, Yonge4All
James Young
Alison Keller
Arlene Desjardins
Clifford M. Goldlist
Dylan Reid, Walk Toronto
Morgan Cann
Jeffrey Citron
Scott Sandler
David Leinster, The Planning Partnership
Mary Helen Spence
Cathie Macdonald, Deer Park Residents Group
Communications (Community Council)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Gideon Forman (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Anne Levenston (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Pym Buitenhuis and Murray Campbell, Co-presidents, Rathnelly Area Residents’ Association (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180311.pdf
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Mike Liebrock (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Andrew Fortier (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Max Dublin (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from John R. Mitchell (TE.Supp)
(June 6, 2024) E-mail from Joseph Vital (TE.Supp)
(June 6, 2024) E-mail from Edward Truant (TE.Supp)
(June 6, 2024) E-mail from James Mcleod (TE.Supp)
(June 6, 2024) E-mail from Stephanie Moy (TE.Supp)
(June 6, 2024) Letter from Graeme Kennedy, Tenblock (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180337.pdf
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Merrill Barber (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Sean Clarke (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Chris Oliver (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Judith Shaver (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Elliot Van Woundenberg (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Wilma Spence (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from James Barker (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Holly Reid (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Andreas Witz (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Barbara Nichol (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Nancy Neale (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Cathy Park (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Kate Wild (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Adrian Leemhuis (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from James Macfarlane (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Brydon Gombay (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Barbara Captijn (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Joost Captijn (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Julia Robinson (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Arthur Klimowicz (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Michael Carter (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Laura Brocklebank (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from David Brill (TE.Supp)
(June 6, 2024) E-mail from Jennifer Dickie (TE.Supp)
(June 6, 2024) E-mail from Piotr Sepski (TE.Supp)
(June 6, 2024) E-mail from Pearl Langer (TE.Supp)
(June 6, 2024) E-mail from George Hanus (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) Letter from Christine Dingemans, Marilyn Tait Mcclellan, Cathy Carnevali, Kathryn Holden, Bay Cloverhill Community Association Executive (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180368.pdf
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Maribeth Solomon (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Paul Doyle (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Al Manchee (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Jason Leopold (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Pauline Thompson (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from David C Rich (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Carol Gray (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Robert Feeley (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) Letter from Robin Richardson, Spokesperson for Yonge4All (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180345.pdf
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Burton Kramer (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) Letter from Kim Hinton, St. Clare's Multifaith Housing Society (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180376.pdf
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Sandra Hamilton (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Marjorie Dumbrell (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Jan Gould (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from William A Fillmore (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Patricia Farquharson (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Trevor Townsend (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Jay Gould (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Emma Burns (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Sheila Hockin (TE.Supp)
(June 5, 2024) E-mail from Susie Kacaba (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Rebecca Macdonald (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Michael Easterbrook (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Luben Blagoev (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Pauline Thompson (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Natasha Glossop (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Kim Enns (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Martti Paloheimo (TE.Supp)
(June 6, 2024) E-mail from Robert K. Schwartz (TE.Supp)
(June 9, 2024) E-mail from Wendy Basian (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Candace Seguinot (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Lorraine Dal Cin (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Anna Prodanou (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Mark Smith (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Susan Raphael (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Andrew Hurlbut (TE.Supp)
(June 3, 2024) Letter from Ian Carmichael, ABC Residents Association, Henry Wiercinski, Annex Residents Association, and Mary Helen Spence and Arlene Desjardin, Avenue Road Safety Coalition (ARSC) (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180402.pdf
(June 9, 2024) Letter from Dylan Reid, on behalf of Walk Toronto (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180415.pdf
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Liis Palmer (TE.Supp)
(June 9, 2024) E-mail from Martha Wilder (TE.Supp)
(June 9, 2024) Letter from Sam Vise (TE.Supp)
(June 9, 2024) E-mail from Adam Rodgers (TE.Supp)
(June 9, 2024) E-mail from Catherine Ann Kerwin (TE.Supp)
(June 9, 2024) Letter from Deborah Briggs, President, Summerhill Residents Association (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180404.pdf
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Katelyn Hermant (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Heather Cartwright (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Tracy Warne (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Michael Saban (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Susan Stock (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Richard J Guy (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from JG Bentley (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Lianne Miller (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Elliott Cappell (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from John and Jeanie Ritchie (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Chris Wallace (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Susan Stock (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Michele Chandler (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) Letter from Ian Carmichael and John Caliendo, Co-Chairs, The ABC Residents Association (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180438.pdf
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Sean Mccowan (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Natasha Moore (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Mark McQueen (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Jonathan Schwarz (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Donna Davey (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Norman Anderson (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Lorraine Dal Cin (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Anne Marie Crescenzi (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Barbara Murchie (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Nina Lester (TE.Supp)
(June 9, 2024) E-mail from Alice Court (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Burton and Irene Kramer (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Liis Palmer (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from James Mcleod (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Sue Thompson (TE.Supp)
(June 6, 2024) Letter from Derek Coss, AMICA Senior Lifestyles (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180465.pdf
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Robert Zaichkowski (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) Letter from Albert Koehl, Toronto Community Bikeways Coalition (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180432.pdf
(June 10, 2024) Letter from Cathie Macdonald, Deer Park Residents Group (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180466.pdf
(June 10, 2024) Letter from Scott Sandler (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Sarah Ferris (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Maribeth Solomon (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Susan Blanchard (TE.Supp)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Daniel and Amanda Owen (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Al Cummings (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Maribeth Solomon (TE.Supp)
(June 9, 2024) E-mail from Elizabeth Hallerman (TE.Supp)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Eve Giannini (TE.Supp)
(June 7, 2024) E-mail from Maria Makriyannis (TE.New)
(June 9, 2024) E-mail from Theo Makriyannis (TE.New)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Stephen Dembroski (TE.New)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Brock Howes (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Al Pearson (TE.New)
(June 8, 2024) E-mail from Chiara Fergusson (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from David Allgood (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) Submission from David Leinster, The Planning Partnership (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180513.pdf
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Peggy Molloy (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Emma Watson (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Alain Meloche (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Jimmy Molloy (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Beth Landau-Halpern (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Noelle Pepperall (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Karen Walsh (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Patrick Whitley (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Sam Vise (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Elizabeth Kaegi (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from David Bluestein, Ramsden Park Dog Owners Association (TE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/comm/communicationfile-180547.pdf
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from John Hogarth (TE.New)
(June 11, 2024) E-mail from Bruce McDougall (TE.New)
(June 10, 2024) E-mail from Liz Ridout (TE.New)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-180921.pdf
(June 24, 2024) Letter from Ian Carmichael and John Caliendo, Co-Chairs, The ABC Residents Association (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181216.pdf
(June 24, 2024) Letter from MH Spence and Arlene Dejardins, The Avenue Road Safety Coalition (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181110.pdf
(June 24, 2024) Letter from Rita Bilerman, Chair, Annex Residents’ Association (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181125.pdf
(June 24, 2024) Letter from Alan Baker, President and Paul Bedford Director, Community Planning, Greater Yorkville Residents’ Association (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181141.pdf
(June 24, 2024) E-mail from Grace McSorley, President, Rathnelly Area Residents' Association (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181142.pdf
(June 24, 2024) E-mail from John and Jeanie Ritchie (CC.Supp)
(June 25, 2024) Letter from Dylan Reid, on behalf of Walk Toronto (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181104.pdf
(June 25, 2024) Letter from Summerhill Residents Association (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181187.pdf
(June 25, 2024) Letter from Cathie Macdonald, President, Deer Park Residents Group (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181208.pdf
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Frank Marra (CC.New)
TE14.40 - Pedestrian Crossing Protection - Queen Street East and George Street
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Queen Street East and George Street.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Queen Street East, City Council approval of this report is required.
Transportation Services has reviewed the need for pedestrian crossing protection at Queen Street East and George Street. Based on the assessment undertaken, Transportation Services is recommending the installation of traffic control signals at Queen Street East and George Street. The traffic control signals will provide enhanced safety for vulnerable road users.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246141.pdf
TE14.42 - Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events - September 1, 2024 - April 30, 2025
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council grant permission to The Caribbean Scholarship Foundation, Toronto Vegetarian Association, City Cultural Events – City of Toronto, JDRF, Canada Running Series, Global Arts Cultural and Heritage Foundation, Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation, The Ontario Snow Resorts Association, and Celebrate Toronto, to operate a beer and wine Vintners Quality Alliance garden and to serve alcohol contingent upon the following conditions:
a. approval of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario;
b. approval of the Medical Officer of Health;
c. compliance with the City of Toronto’s Municipal Alcohol Policy; and
d. receipt of all the necessary permits associated with the production of the event i.e. building permits, noise By-law extension permit.
2. City Council grant permission to The Caribbean Scholarship Foundation, Myeloma Canada, Mexican Day Toronto, Toronto Vegetarian Association, Strategic Partnerships City Manager's Office – City of Toronto, Toronto Council Fire Native Cultural Centre, City Cultural Events – City of Toronto, JDRF, Canada Running Series, Strategic Protocol and External Relations – City of Toronto, Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation, Celebrate Toronto, Fast in the 6 Inc., Turkish Society of Canada, Vietnamese Association Toronto, and Ontario Sikhs and Gurdwara Council to solicit donations in support of their organizations.
3. City Council grant permission to The Caribbean Scholarship Foundation, Myeloma Canada, Mexican Day Toronto, Toronto Vegetarian Association, Strategic Partnerships City Manager’s Office – City of Toronto, Toronto Council Fire Native Cultural Centre, City Cultural Events – City of Toronto, JDRF, Canada Running Series, Strategic Protocol and External Relations – City of Toronto, Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation, The Ontario Snow Resorts Association, Turkish Society of Canada, and Ontario Sikhs and Gurdwara Council to engage in sports demonstrations.
4. City Council grant permission to allow for sound amplification by the organizations and at the times listed below, which extend beyond the accepted Nathan Phillips Square's amplification schedule policy hours, such policy only allowing for amplification of sound from Monday to Friday between 12:00 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. and between 4:30 p.m. and 11:00 p.m.
City Produced Events:
a. Strategic Partnerships City Manager's Office – City of Toronto on September 24, 2024 to present land acknowledgment and African Ancestral Acknowledgment, remarks by Deputy Mayor, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, and President of CUPE Local 4948, light exercise before the official run, band performance, closing remarks by emcee as part of the Civic Run event; and
b. Environment and Climate Division – City of Toronto in April 2025 (date to be confirmed) media scrum to make Clean Toronto announcements as part of the Clean Toronto Together event; and
Third-Party Community Produced Events:
a. Toronto Council Fire Native Cultural Centre from September 25 to October 1, 2024 to present indigenous music, dances, and inspirational talks as part of the Indigenous Legacy Gathering event;
b. JDRF on October 17, 2024 to present event announcements, motivational speakers, and music for stationary bikers as part of the Ride to Defeat Diabetes for JDRF;
c. Myeloma Canada on September 12-13, 2024 to present event announcements and music as part of the Over the Edge event;
d. Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation in January or February 2025 (date to be confirmed) to present event announcements and music as part of the Leaf’s Open Practice event;
e. The Ontario Snow Resorts Association in February 2025 (date to be confirmed) to present event announcements and music as part of the Go Skiing Go Snowboarding event; and
f. Celebrate Toronto in March 2025 (date to be confirmed) to present music, dances, band performances, event announcements and part of the Celebrate Toronto event;
all permissions would be contingent upon each applicant securing a Noise Bylaw Exemption permit through the Municipal Licensing and Standards Division and adhering to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 591, Noise, along with mandatory sound monitoring throughout the event to ensure compliance with schedules.
5. City Council grant permission to The Caribbean Scholarship Foundation, Toronto Council Fire Native Cultural Centre, City Cultural Events – City of Toronto, Global Arts Cultural and Heritage Foundation, Strategic Protocol and External Relations – City of Toronto, Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation, The Ontario Snow Resorts Association, Celebrate Toronto, and Fast in the 6 Inc., to use open flame as part of their event production.
6. City Council grant permission to the City Cultural Events – City of Toronto, Global Arts Cultural and Heritage Foundation, Celebrate Toronto, and Fast in the 6 Inc. to use special effects pyrotechnics as part of their event production.
7. City Council grant permission to the Toronto Council Fire Native Cultural Center, City Cultural Events – City of Toronto, Strategic Protocol and External Relations – City of Toronto, Global Arts Cultural and Heritage Foundation, and Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation, to place objects in the reflecting pool.
8. City Council grant permission to Myeloma Canada to rappel from the east and west towers of the City Hall.
9. City Council require that the various events compensate the City of Toronto, through the Corporate Real Estate Management Division, for all the City of Toronto costs associated with an event above the standard staffing complement.
Origin
Summary
The City of Toronto provides opportunities to access Nathan Phillips Square for eligible events through a permitting process administered by the Economic Development and Culture Division.
The purpose of this report is to request exemptions from Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 636, Public Squares, and former City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 237, Nathan Phillips Square, for events that are proposed to be held on Nathan Phillips Square from September 1, 2024 to April 30, 2025.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246099.pdf
TE14.45 - Nomination for Appointment to the Board of Directors of the Crescent Town Club Inc.
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council nominate Naseem Mithoowani and Azim Dewan for appointment to the Crescent Town Club Inc. Board of Directors for a four year term ending in June 2028.
Origin
Summary
The Crescent Town Community Centre is a non-City recreation centre that was established under a Borough of East York development agreement in 1971.
The City of Toronto is required to submit the names of two nominees to the Board of Directors, both for a four year term. The nominees are recommended by the Toronto East York Community Council. The names of the below nominees, once Community Council has made its decision, will be submitted by the City of Toronto to the Crescent Town Club.
Consideration of this letter by Toronto and East York Community Council is requested as the names of the City's nominees will be considered at the Crescent Town Club Inc. Annual General Meeting on June 27, 2024.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246162.pdf
TE14.53 - Implementation of Permit Parking in a Newly Designated Permit Parking Area for Regent Park
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Community Council Recommendations
The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council exempt the implementation of permit parking on the following streets from the requirements of subsection 925-4B of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, until such time as Toronto and East York Community Council considers a request for implementation of permit parking at that location:
a. Oak Street, between Parliament Street and River Street;
b. Cole Street, between Parliament Street and Sackville Street;
c. St Bartholomew Street, between Regent Street and Sackville Street;
d. Wyatt Avenue, between Sumach Street and River Street;
e. St David Street, between Regent Street and Sumach Street;
f. Sutton Avenue, between Regent Street and Sackville Street;
g. Arnold Avenue, between St David Street and Dundas Street East;
h. Dreamers Way, between Oak Street and Gerrard Street East;
i. Regent Street, between Shuter Street and Oak Street;
j. Pashler Avenue, between Dundas Street East and St Bartholomew Street;
k. Peaceful Way, between Shuter Street and Sutton Avenue;
l. Sackville Street, between Shuter Street and Gerrard Street East;
m. Regent Park Boulevard, between St David Street and Dundas Street East;
n. Sumach Street, between Shuter Street and Gerrard Street East;
o. Tubman Avenue, between Wyatt Avenue and Oak Street; and
p. Nicholas Avenue, between Shuter Street and Wyatt Avenue.
Origin
Summary
I am writing to take advantage of an opportunity for permit parking in the Regent Park neighbourhood. Prior to revitalization, Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) tenants in Regent Park had above ground parking lots with parking for their tenants. Through revitalization and with the start of Phases 4 and 5 construction, TCHC tenants have now lost this above ground parking. Limited underground parking within TCHC buildings has instead been made available. As the City begins to assume roads in Regent Park, this provides an opportunity to add overnight permit parking, while being intentional about using an equity lens to ensure those affordable parking spaces go to TCHC tenants.
Due to the immense population growth pressures in the downtown core and the fixed, extremely limited, street capacity, City Council’s practice of excluding all new developments in the downtown from being eligible for on-street permit parking remains necessary. In these very unique circumstances in Regent Park, I believe that making an exception for TCHC residents is an equity-driven and balanced approach.
This letter is required to exempt petition and polling requirements to implement permit parking on streets within Regent Park. A future report is expected that would properly implement permit parking on the noted streets and to exclude non-TCHC buildings from the new permit parking area.
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-246267.pdf
New Business - Meeting 19
CC19.1 - Declaring the Office of Councillor, Ward 15 - Don Valley West Vacant and Filling the Vacancy
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 15 - Don Valley West
Bill 680 has been submitted on this Item.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Clerk recommends that:
1. City Council declare a vacancy in the office of Councillor, Ward 15 - Don Valley West.
2. City Council adopt one of the following two options to fill the vacancy:
Option A - Appointment
a. Fill the vacancy by appointing a person qualified to hold office in the City of Toronto at a special meeting to be held on July 23, 2024 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chamber, in accordance with the following:
1. The City Clerk shall advertise the vacancy inviting any interested and qualified applicants to seek appointment to City Council;
2. Interested persons shall complete a Consent of Nominee and Declaration of Qualification and provide personal identification showing their name and qualifying address within the City of Toronto;
3. The deadline for submitting the required forms to the City Clerk shall be July 15, 2024 at 4:30 p.m.;
4. The City Clerk shall submit a report with the list of applicants for publication on the agenda of the July 23, 2024 City Council meeting;
5. Each applicant shall be provided the opportunity to address City Council for up to 5 minutes;
6. The order in which applicants address City Council shall be determined by lot drawn by the City Clerk when City Council begins its debate on the item;
7. Members of City Council shall be entitled to ask one question of each candidate;
8. City Council shall vote on the appointment by ballot in accordance with the Council Procedures; and
9. City Council shall enact a by-law confirming the appointment of the successful candidate to the office for the remainder of the term of the present Council.
OR
Option B - By-election
b. Fill the vacancy by requiring a by-election be held for Ward 15 - Don Valley West, as outlined in the draft bill in Appendix A, and:
1. Approve an in-year budget adjustment to increase the 2024 Operating Budget for the City Clerk's Office by $550,000 gross and $0 net, fully funded from the Election Reserve Fund (XR1017) to reflect the funds required to conduct the by-election.
Summary
Together, the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, prescribe rules and impose deadlines with respect to filling a vacancy in the office of a member of City Council.
This report identifies Council's two options for filling the vacancy in the office of Councillor for Ward 15 - Don Valley West resulting from the passing of Councillor Jaye Robinson.
City Council must declare this office vacant at its next meeting on June 26-28, 2024. Then, within 60 days of the office being declared vacant, Council must either fill the vacancy by appointment or pass a by-law requiring that a by-election be held.
The person appointed or elected to fill the vacancy will hold office for the remainder of the term, which ends on November 14, 2026.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246840.pdf
Communications
CC19.2 - Accelerating Construction of the Gardiner Expressway
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Origin
Recommendations
The Mayor recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to report back, based on the results of the industry expert workshops sessions held on June 11 and 12, 2024, as well as the negotiations with the current contractor, on the plan and tangible, implementable measures to advance the construction acceleration and congestion management measures, at the July 16, 2024 meeting of the Executive Committee.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to include the plan to accelerate work and minimize traffic and congestion impacts requested in Item 2024.MM18.5 in the report requested to Executive Committee in Recommendation 1 above.
Summary
Traffic in Toronto has become worse in recent months due to construction of critical infrastructure – like building new subways and housing, as well as rebuilding the 60-year-old Gardiner Expressway.
Being stuck on our congested streets is frustrating. That’s time taken away from friends and family. It’s time spent waiting rather than doing the things you need to do.
The impact on our economy cannot be understated. The Toronto Region Board of Trade estimates that congestion costs us $11 billion in productivity each year.
The ongoing rebuild of the Gardiner Expressway has added considerable travel time downtown. The original timeline of three years to complete construction is simply too long for this vital artery to have lane reductions. It’s clear we need to do better.
That’s why we’re working to accelerate the work on the Gardiner Expressway Section 2 between Dufferin Street and Strachan Avenue (Gardiner Section 2) construction. Some of the steps City staff have already taken to expedite construction and improve traffic flow include:
- Allowed for some overnight demolition work;
- Requested an acceleration proposal from the contractor;
- Modified over 60 signal timings, with continuous monitoring and changes based on traffic patterns; and
- Redesigned the traffic control set up for westbound traffic to allow for opening the Jameson Gate.
City staff are collaborating with industry experts and the current contractor to identify ways to accelerate the construction work and mitigate the impacts on traffic and congestion. A significant component of the collaboration with industry experts involved two workshops: a Congestion Management Workshop on June 11 and a Construction Acceleration Workshop on June 12.
City staff are reviewing the results from the Construction Acceleration Workshop and a proposal from the current Gardiner Section 2 Contractor to determine feasibility and the required budget. These measures include adding additional crews, extending work hours, supplying additional equipment and accelerating the production of materials, including the ongoing precast girder fabrication.
The Congestion Management Workshop identified some key areas for focus to improve traffic movement and reduce congestion including reassessing Gardiner on-ramp operations, improving traffic flow on north-south streets feeding into the Gardiner, and enhancing communication strategies to promote carpooling and transit use. Staff are now working to operationalize these focus areas into tangible measures that can be implemented.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246908.pdf
CC19.3 - Office of the Integrity Commissioner - 2023 Annual Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Origin
Recommendations
The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:
1. City Council receive the 2023 Annual Report of the Office of the Integrity Commissioner for information.
Summary
The Integrity Commissioner reports annually to City Council on the work of the Office. This Report for Action transmits to City Council the Commissioner's 2023 Annual Report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246865.pdf
Attachment 1 - Office of the Integrity Commissioner - 2023 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246866.pdf
CC19.4 - Ombudsman Toronto 2023 Annual Report
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Origin
Recommendations
The Ombudsman recommends that:
1. City Council receive the Ombudsman Toronto 2023 Annual Report for information.
Summary
Pursuant to section 173(2) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 3, the Ombudsman is required to submit an annual report on the activities of his office directly to City Council.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246887.pdf
Ombudsman Toronto 2023 Annual Report - Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246905.pdf
Ombudsman Toronto 2023 Annual Report - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246906.pdf
CC19.5 - Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto Hydro Board of Directors
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Toronto Hydro Board.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Corporations Nominating Panel.
The Corporations Nominating Panel recommends that:
1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Toronto Hydro Board of Directors, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on July 27, 2026, and until successors are appointed:
Sheila Block
Michael Eubanks
James Hinds
Joyce McLean
Ken Neumann
Ersilia Serafini
2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1a, 1b, and 2 to 4 to the report (May 30, 2024) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Hydro Board.
Summary
At its meeting on June 10, 12 and 14, 2024, the Corporations Nominating considered Item NC9.2 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (May 30, 2024) from the City Clerk:
The Corporations Nominating Panel will conduct interviews and recommend seven candidates, including a Chair, to City Council for appointment to the Toronto Hydro Board.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246809.pdf
(May 30, 2024) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto Hydro Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246810.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1a - List of Interview Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Toronto Hydro Board
Confidential Attachment 1b - List of Interview Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Toronto Hydro Board
Confidential Attachment 2 - Current Members' Interest in being Considered for Chair of the Toronto Hydro Board
Confidential Attachment 3 - Skills Matrix for the Toronto Hydro Board
Confidential Attachment 4 - Interview schedule for June 10 and 12, 2024
Revised Confidential Attachment 4 - Interview schedule for June 10, 12 and 14, 2024
CC19.6 - Appointment of Destination Toronto President and Chief Executive Officer to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable person who is being considered for appointment to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Corporations Nominating Panel.
The Corporations Nominating Panel recommends that:
1. City Council appoint Andrew Weir, President and Chief Executive Officer, Destination Toronto, to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending June 29, 2027, and until a successor is appointed.
2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (May 6, 2024) from the City Clerk remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about an identifiable individual being considered for appointment to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board.
Summary
At its meeting on May 15, 2024, the Corporations Nominating Panel considered Item NC8.1 and made recommendations to City Council.
Summary from the report (May 15, 2024) from the City Clerk:
The Corporations Nominating Panel will consider the appointment of the new President and Chief Executive Officer, Destination Toronto to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246226.pdf
(May 6, 2024) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Destination Toronto President and CEO to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246216.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Application for appointment from Andrew Weir to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board
CC19.7 - 778-788 King Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff contained in Confidential Attachment 1, Confidential Appendix A and Confidential Appendix B to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it is about litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
The purpose of this report is to request for instructions in respect of the proceedings before the Ontario Land Tribunal currently scheduled for July 22, 2024. The applicant appealed the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 778-788 King Street West to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act.
The property municipally known as 778 King Street West is designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246598.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information - made public on July 4, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246600.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - Confidential Information - made public on July 4, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246601.pdf
CC19.8 - 778 King Street West - Alterations and Demolition to Heritage Attributes at a Designated Property under Sections 33 and 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding litigation or potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council, at the discretion of the City Solicitor.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it is about litigation before the Ontario Land Tribunal and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
The owner appealed its Zoning By-law Amendment application for 778-788 King Street West to the Ontario Land Tribunal in the fall of 2023 due to Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act.
The original Zoning By-law Amendment application proposed an 18 storey (63.3 metres including mechanical penthouse) mixed use building, with approximately 373 residential dwelling units and retail uses at grade.
The focus of this report is the owner's application under Section 33 and 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act which requests City Council's consent to alterations and demolition of a heritage attribute to the property at 778 King Street West. Council requires the advice of the Toronto Preservation Board in respect of matters which may impact a designated heritage property.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246233.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Location Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246234.pdf
Public Attachment 2 - Photographs of Existing Building
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246235.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information - made public on July 2, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246237.pdf
(June 5, 2024) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on 778 King Street West - Alterations and Demolition to Heritage Attributes at a Designated Property under Sections 33 and 34(1)1 of the Ontario Heritage Act (CC19.8a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246432.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information
CC19.9 - 309 Cherry Street - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor, and Confidential Appendices A and B, if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
On March 5, 2012 and December 30, 2016, the City received a Zoning By-law Amendment application for the north block and south block respectively of the lands known as 309 Cherry Street (the "Site"). The Site is centrally located within Villiers Island in the Port Lands. The applications proposed mixed use development, with a 26-storey residential tower atop an 8-storey podium and the partial retention of existing heritage buildings on the north block, and an 11-storey building and 52-storey building atop a 4-12 storey 'u-shaped' podium.
The applicant appealed City Council's neglect or failure to make a decision on its application for the Zoning By-law Amendment to the predecessor Ontario Land Tribunal on October 31, 2014 for the north block and June 1, 2017 for the south block (the "Appeals"). In March 2023, the applicant submitted revised plans for the Site, proposing a tower on each of the north and south block with heights of 47 and 39 storeys respectively. On April 23, 2024, the applicant circulated further updated development plans to the Tribunal and other parties consisting of three residential towers of 27, 49 and 39 storeys, on podiums of various configurations ranging from 3 to 10 storeys. They also advised of their intention to provide 5 percent of the proposed residential units as affordable housing for a period of 25 years.
At a case management conference on June 4, 2024, a 15-day hearing was scheduled. The City Solicitor requires further directions for upcoming Ontario Land Tribunal hearings scheduled to commence July 7, 2025.
For reasons set out in Confidential Attachment 1, this item is urgent and cannot be deferred.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246592.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - April 2024 plans and email correspondence to the Ontario Land Tribunal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246593.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information - made public on July 4, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246595.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - Confidential Information - made public on July 4, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246596.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181160.pdf
(June 26, 2024) Letter from Mark J. Richardson, Technical Lead, HousingNowTO.com (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/comm/communicationfile-181217.pdf
CC19.10 - 21-53 Broadview Avenue, 344 Eastern Avenue and 18-34 and 40 Lewis Street - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and Appendices A and B to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
On September 16, 2021, Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications were submitted seeking to permit a 12-storey mixed-use building with an interior block of 15 three-storey townhouse units at 21-53 Broadview Avenue, 344 Eastern Avenue and 18-34 and 40 Lewis Street (the "Site"). A Site Plan Control application was submitted on July 5, 2022. A Rental Housing Demolition application was also submitted to permit the demolition of existing rental dwelling units on the site.
On March 29, 2023, the Applicant appealed the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications to the Ontario Land Tribunal because of City Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the timeframe legislated by the Planning Act.
A two-week hearing was scheduled to commence on June 10, 2024 but was adjourned to allow for further discussions with the Applicant. The City Solicitor requires further directions to prepare for an upcoming case management conference scheduled to commence on June 21, 2024. This matter is urgent and cannot be deferred.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246572.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix B - Confidential Information
CC19.11 - 630 The East Mall - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 2 - Etobicoke Centre
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Appendices A, B and C to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
On November 10, 2022, the City received a Zoning By-law Amendment application for 630 The East Mall (the "Site"), which application was subsequently revised on October 11, 2023 to permit the construction of residential buildings consisting of two 24-storey towers with a nine-storey base building and a 12 storey building (the "Application").
On December 1, 2023, the applicant appealed the Application to the Ontario Land Tribunal because of City Council's failure to make a decision within the timeframe set out in the Planning Act.
The City Solicitor requires further directions for the upcoming five-day Ontario Land Tribunal hearing scheduled to commence on November 4, 2024.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246760.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246782.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - Confidential Information - Part 1 - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246783.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - Confidential Information - Part 2 - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246932.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - Confidential Information - Part 3 - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246933.pdf
Confidential Appendix C - Confidential Information - Part 1 - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246934.pdf
Confidential Appendix C - Confidential Information - Part 2 - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246935.pdf
Confidential Attachment to Motion 1 by Councillor Stephen Holyday
CC19.12 - 300 Borough Drive, 1755 Brimley Road, 400 to 580 Progress Avenue and 350 Town Centre Court - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 21 - Scarborough Centre
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and the information contained in Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
On September 2, 2021, the City received an Official Plan Amendment application for 300 Borough Drive, 1755 Brimley Road, 400 to 580 Progress Avenue and 350 Town Centre Court (the "Site") to permit a long-term mixed use development plan for portions of the lands surrounding the Scarborough Town Centre Shopping Centre.
The applicant appealed City Council's neglect or failure to make a decision on its application for the Official Plan Amendment (the "Appeal") to the Ontario Land Tribunal on October 17, 2022.
The City Solicitor requires further directions in order to prepare for an upcoming Ontario Land Tribunal hearing scheduled to commence on October 15, 2024.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246822.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Revised Official Plan Amendment filed by Oxford Properties Group and the owner and operators of Scarborough Town Centre, including OMERS Realty Holdings (STC One) Inc., OMERS Realty Holdings (STC Two) Inc., OMERS Realty Holdings (STC Three) Inc. and ARI STC GP Inc./ARI STC Investments LP on May 16, 2024 with the City Solicitor
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246823.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information - made public on July 4, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246825.pdf
CC19.13 - 2, 7 and 10 Queen Elizabeth Boulevard, 506, 514, 516, 520 and 522 Royal York Road and 3, 5 and 15 Sinclair Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Appendix A, Confidential Appendix B and the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
On January 9, 2023, the City received a Zoning By-law Amendment application for 2, 7 and 10 Queen Elizabeth Boulevard, 506, 514, 516, 520 and 522 Royal York Road and 3, 5 and 15 Sinclair Street (the "Site") to permit a mixed-use development with a 10-storey mid-rise building and three towers with heights ranging from 17-35 storeys with a total of 1,000 square metres of non-residential gross floor area and 5,000 square metres of non-residential (employment-industrial) gross floor area. The proposal includes a 646.5 square metre encumbered outdoor open space with frontage on Queen Elizabeth Boulevard. The development would have a total gross floor area of 86,602 square metres with a Floor Space Index of 6.1.
The applicant appealed City Council's neglect or failure to make a decision on its application for the Zoning By-law Amendment (the "Appeal"), to the Ontario Land Tribunal on June 19, 2023.
The City Solicitor requires further directions for an upcoming Ontario Land Tribunal hearing scheduled to commence on August 6, 2024. Given imminent procedural filing dates, this matter is urgent and cannot be deferred.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246759.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information - made public on July 4, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246757.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - Confidential Information - made public on July 4, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246758.pdf
CC19.14 - 393 Sorauren Avenue and 1947 Dundas Street West - Official Plan Amendment 231 - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and the entirety of Confidential Appendix A to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
City Council adopted Official Plan Amendment 231 on December 18, 2013 following the Five-Year Official Plan and Municipal Comprehensive Reviews regarding employment lands. Official Plan Amendment 231 designates the lands municipally known as 393 Sorauren Avenue and 1947 Dundas Street West (the "Site") as Core Employment Areas. The owner of the lands appealed Official Plan Amendment 231 to the Ontario Land Tribunal.
The City Solicitor requires further directions for time-sensitive matters before the Ontario Land Tribunal. It should be considered urgent and should not be deferred.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246793.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information - made public on July 4, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246795.pdf
CC19.15 - 49 Jackes Avenue - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor, and Confidential Appendix A, if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
On December 8, 2020, the City received an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application for 49 Jackes Avenue (the "Site") to permit a 29-storey residential building with 217 dwelling units.
On April 23, 2021, the applicant appealed the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to Council not having made a decision within the statutory time frame.
At its meeting of October 1 and 4, 2021, City Council authorized City staff to attend before the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the Applications and to continue discussions with the Applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.
The City Solicitor requires further direction for the upcoming Ontario Land Tribunal hearing, which is scheduled to commence on September 23, 2024.
The matter is urgent and cannot be deferred because of hearing date obligations which commence prior to Council’s next regularly scheduled meeting. City Planning has been consulted in the preparation of this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246578.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246580.pdf
Confidential attachment to Motion by Councillor Dianne Saxe
CC19.16 - 2575 and 2625 Danforth Avenue, 2681 Danforth Avenue, and 2721 Danforth Avenue - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 19 - Beaches - East York
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Appendices A through F and the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.
3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
On August 26, 2022, the City received a Zoning By-law Amendment application for 2575 and 2625 Danforth Avenue to permit the construction of five new mixed-use buildings ranging in height from 15 to 55 storeys. The applicant appealed City Council's neglect or failure to make a decision on its application for the Zoning By-law Amendment, to the Ontario Land Tribunal on October 23, 2023.
On December 21, 2022, the City received Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications for 2681 Danforth Avenue to permit a mixed-use development with two towers at 44 and 33 storeys. The applicant appealed City Council's neglect or failure to make a decision on applications to the Ontario Land Tribunal on November 29, 2023.
On November 7, 2021, the City received Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications for 2721 Danforth Avenue to permit the construction of a mixed-use building containing two towers at 35 and 55 storeys. The applicant appealed City Council's neglect or failure to make a decision on its application for the application to the Ontario land Tribunal on March 6, 2023.
2575 and 2625 Danforth Avenue, 2681 Danforth Avenue, and 2721 Danforth Avenue (the "Sites") are all subject to Official Plan Amendment 478.
The City Solicitor requires further directions for upcoming Ontario Land Tribunal hearings for the Sites scheduled to commence on September 23, 2024, February 03, 2025, and February 24, 2025. Given imminent procedural filing dates and other deadlines addressed in Confidential Attachment 1, this matter is urgent and cannot be deferred.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246785.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Appendix A - Confidential Information - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246787.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - Confidential Information - Part 1 - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246788.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - Confidential Information - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246939.pdf
Confidential Appendix C - Confidential Information - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246789.pdf
Confidential Appendix D - Confidential Information - Part 1 - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246790.pdf
Confidential Appendix D - Confidential Information - Part 2 - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246940.pdf
Confidential Appendix D - Confidential Information - Part 3 - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246941.pdf
Confidential Appendix E - Confidential Information - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246791.pdf
Confidential Appendix F - Confidential Information - made public on July 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246792.pdf
CC19.17 - Expropriation of 300 Commissioners Street - Request for Directions Regarding Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.
Origin
Recommendations
The City Solicitor recommends that:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council direct that the entirety of Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Summary
On October 29-30, 2019, City Council authorized the expropriation of the property municipally known as 300 Commissioners Street (the "Property") which are lands comprised of approximately 1.83 hectares, for the purpose of the Broadview Avenue Extension into the Port Lands.
The Property is located in the Port Lands at the north-west corner of Commissioners Street and Bouchette Street. The Property is a part of a larger block bordered by Commissioners Street to the south, Bouchette Street to the east, Lake Shore Boulevard East to the north, and Saulter Street South to the east. At the time of the expropriation, the Property was designated General Industrial Areas by the former City of Toronto Official Plan. Since the expropriation, the Property has been redesignated by the Ontario Land Tribunal's approval of the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan and is now designated as Regeneration Area.
The Property was the subject of a ground lease at the time of expropriation. The expropriated tenant has served a claim for compensation on the City pursuant to the Expropriations Act. A four-week hearing at the Ontario Land Tribunal has been scheduled to commence on September 16, 2024.
This report deals with litigation that affects the City and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. The purpose of this report is to seek further direction regarding the litigation and any potential resolution of the subject claim for compensation and the information in this regard are being provided as confidential material.
Financial Impact
The financial impact is discussed in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246841.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
CC19.18 - 86 Mimico Avenue - Proposed Designation By-law Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Consideration of Objection
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Origin
Recommendations
The Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning recommends that:
1. City Council affirm its decision to state its intention to designate the property at 86 Mimico Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act as set out in Council Decision PH9.12 on March 20, 2024.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the Bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Summary
This report recommends Council affirm its decision of March 20, 2024 (Item PH9.12) stating its intention to designate the property at 86 Mimico Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. The City has received an objection on behalf of the property owner of 86 Mimico Avenue to the Notice of Intention to Designate for 86 Mimico Avenue within the statutory timeline, which is the subject of this report. The City did not receive objections for the properties at 78 and 80 Mimico Avenue and therefore the designation by-laws for 78 and 80 Mimico Avenue have been enacted.
The property is located on the northeast corner of Mimico Avenue and Station Road in Mimico. It was constructed between 1923 and 1924 for the Union Bank of Canada, before serving as a branch of the Royal Bank of Canada from 1925-1935. The property is the easternmost of a group of three properties constructed between 1920 and 1929 that display a remarkable level of visual cohesion, sharing architectural elements including two storey profile, cornices, parapets, storefronts and second storey apartments/offices.
The objector is of the opinion that 86 Mimico Avenue does not merit designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
City Council has until July 24, 2024, 90 days from the date of the end of the objection period, or 120 days from the issuance of the Notice of Intention to Designate, to make a decision on this objection as per the timeline under the Ontario Heritage Act.
Staff have reviewed the objections raised by the owner and are of the opinion that despite these objections, the property meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, under 3 of 9 criteria for its design/physical and contextual values.
As the property has cultural heritage value or interest and meets the prescribed criteria pursuant to Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, this property should be designated. Designation enables Council to review proposed alterations for the property, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246581.pdf
Attachment 1 - Letter of Objection - 86 Mimico Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246622.pdf
CC19.19 - 80-86 Lynn Williams Street - Proposed Designation By-law Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Consideration of Objection
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
Origin
Recommendations
The Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning recommends that:
1. City Council affirm its decision to state its intention to designate the property at 80 - 86 Lynn Williams Street (including the structure address of 130 East Liberty Street) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act as set out in Council Decision PH10.7 on March 20, 2024.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the Bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
Summary
This report recommends that Council affirm its decision of March 20, 2024 (Item PH10.7) stating its intention to designate the property at 80 - 86 Lynn Williams Street (including the structure address of 130 East Liberty Street) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. The City has received an objection on behalf of the property owner to the Notice of Intention to Designate within the statutory timeline. The Notice of Objection dated April 25, 2024, is included as Attachment 1 to this report.
The property at 80-86 Lynn Williams Street (including the structure address of 130 East Liberty Street) - the A. R. Williams Machinery Company Warehouse - is located in the Liberty Village neighbourhood, on the north side of Lynn Williams Street, mid-block between Hanna Avenue and Western Battery Road.
The property contains a 59-metre-long, brick warehouse building with a two-storey central mass flanked by one-storey wings constructed in 1928-29. The warehouse was constructed for the A. R. Williams Machinery Company which used the building as a warehouse and likely for manufacturing purposes until c.1946. By 1943 the west wing was being used by other companies as a welding shop and by 1948 the property had become the Liberty Storage Warehouse and operated in this capacity into the 1960s. In 2005, the south half of the central portion of the warehouse was renovated for office use. The north half of the warehouse is currently vacant.
Staff have reviewed the objections raised by the owner and are of the opinion that despite these objections, the property meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, under five of nine possible criteria for its design/physical, historical/associative, and contextual values.
City Council has until July 24, 2024, 90 days from the date of the end of the objection period, or 120 days from the issuance of the Notice of Intention to Designate, to make a decision on this objection as per the timeline under the Ontario Heritage Act.
As the property has cultural heritage value or interest and meets the prescribed criteria pursuant to Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, this property should be designated. Designation enables Council to review proposed alterations for the property, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance and refuse demolition.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246576.pdf
Attachment 1 - Letter of Objection - 80 - 86 Lynn Williams Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246577.pdf
CC19.20 - 239, 241-243 and 247-255 Dundas Street East - Alterations to Heritage Properties Designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
Origin
Recommendations
The Interim Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning recommends that:
1. City Council consent to the application to alter the designated heritage properties at 239, 241-243 and 247-255 Dundas Street East, with conditions, under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a 52-storey (plus mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building, with such alterations to the designated properties being substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated December 8, 2023, revised May 28, 2024, prepared by Turner Fleischer Architects Inc., and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by GBCA Architects, dated December 7, 2023, with addendums dated May 22, 2024, and May 27, 2024, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, all subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
2. City Council direct that its consent to the application to alter the designated properties at 239, 241-243 and 247-255 Dundas Street East, under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, is also subject to the following conditions:
a. the related Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment requiring the proposed alterations have been enacted by the City Council and have come into full force and effect;
b. prior to the introduction of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment bills to City Council, the owner shall provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 239, 241-243 and 247-255 Dundas Street East prepared by GBCA Architects, dated December 7, 2023, with addendums dated May 22, and 27, 2024, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
c. prior to the introduction of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment bills to City Council, the owner shall enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 239, 241-243 and 247-255 Dundas Street East substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated December 8, 2023, revised May 28, 2024, prepared by Turner Fleischer Architects Inc. and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by GBCA Architects, dated December 7, 2023, with addendums dated May 22 and 27, 2024, subject to and in accordance with the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.b. to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;
d. that prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 239, 241-243 and 247-255 Dundas Street East, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building, as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, the owner shall:
1. provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance their heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
2. provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject properties, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
3. submit a Signage Plan for the subject properties to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
4. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.b. including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;
5. provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan;
e. that prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 2.d. 5 the owner shall:
1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning; and
2. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take all necessary actions to implement City Council's decision.
Summary
This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the three heritage buildings at 239 Dundas Street East, 241-243 Dundas Street East, and 247-255 Dundas Street East (designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as part of the Garden District Heritage Conservation District) in connection with the development of the subject properties.
The development application proposes a 52-storey tower (plus mechanical penthouse) on the site that incorporates retained portions of the heritage buildings as part of the base building, as well as the introduction of a new base building along Pembroke Street. The retained facades of the corner building 247-255 Dundas Street East are proposed to be relocated within the site, closer to the intersection of Dundas Street East and Pembroke Street. All the retained heritage facades are proposed to be fully restored.
The proposed alterations conserve the onsite and adjacent heritage buildings. The proposal is consistent with the Heritage Conservation Districts' policy framework. Heritage Planning staff are of the opinion that the heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.
A Heritage Impact Assessment describing proposed conservation and mitigation measures designed to reduce the impact of the proposal was prepared by GBCA Architects, dated December 7, 2023. On May 22 and 27, 2024, the applicant's heritage consultant prepared addendums to the Heritage Impact Assessment to provide additional information and rationale regarding the conservation of the subject properties.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246623.pdf
(June 5, 2024) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on 239, 241-243 & 247-255 Dundas Street East - Alterations to Heritage Properties Designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act (CC19.20a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-246858.pdf
Member Motions - Meeting 19
MM19.1 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from the Development at 905 Don Mills Road for Park Improvements at Don Mills Collegiate Institute - by Councillor Jon Burnside, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 16 - Don Valley East
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Jon Burnside, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $90,000.00 gross, $0 net (Cost Centre: NP2161), fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained from the development at 905 Don Mills Road, secured for recreational facilities (Source Account: XR3026-3701134), for the purpose of providing one-time capital funding to the Toronto District School Board for installation of outdoor fitness equipment at Don Mills Collegiate Institute, subject to the Toronto District School Board entering into an acceptable Community Access Agreement with the City.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to participate in the preparation of the Community Access Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, provided acceptable terms can be agreed upon.
3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to execute on behalf of the City a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board for the capital improvements to the schoolyard at Don Mills Collegiate Institute, for a term of 10 years and on such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
4. City Council direct that if a mutually acceptable Community Access Agreement cannot be agreed upon that the funds will not be transferred to the Toronto District School Board and shall be made available for other community facilities in the local community.
Summary
This motion seeks approval to release Section 37 Funds in the amount of $90,000.00 to the Toronto District School Board to facilitate the inclusion of stationary fitness equipment at Don Mills Collegiate Institute.
Don Mills Collegiate Institute is undertaking a park project to rejuvenate the facilities offered. Support for this initiative is required to direct funds to facilitate the inclusion of stationary exercise equipment which will be enjoyed by all ages, including seniors.
The funds will be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the Toronto District
School Board has entered into a Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the improved facilities, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor, prepared in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246486.pdf
(June 26, 2024) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247210.pdf
MM19.2 - 14 Lacewood Crescent - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Jon Burnside, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 16 - Don Valley East
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to a Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing and has been deemed urgent.
Recommendations
Councillor Jon Burnside, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to uphold the Committee of Adjustment’s refusal of Application A0101/24NY, respecting 14 Lacewood Crescent.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt negotiating a resolution regarding Application A0101/24NY respecting 14 Lacewood Crescent, and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, after consulting with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
Summary
On April 25, 2024, the Committee of Adjustment (the "Committee") refused an application brought by the owner of 14 Lacewood Crescent for variances to City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 to demolish an existing dwelling and construct a new detached dwelling including 3-storeys and increased massing (the "Application").
On May 13, 2024, the owner appealed the Committee's Application refusal to the Toronto Local Appeal Body.
The Application presents outstanding concerns relating, but not limited to, height, and massing.
The Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing commences on August 26, 2024. This motion is before City Council as the Notice of Intention to be a Party deadline is June 24, 2024 — as such this motion is urgent. The Notice of Hearing is attached as Attachment 2.
This motion will authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing along with appropriate City staff to oppose the appeal. This motion also authorizes the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal and retain outside consultants as necessary.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246487.pdf
Attachment 1 - Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment (Application A0101/24NY)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246437.pdf
Attachment 2 - Notice of Hearing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246438.pdf
MM19.3 - Dogs Off Leash Area Criteria for Commercial Dog Walkers - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise, recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to develop criteria to determine sites acceptable for Commercial Dog Walkers and to propose a list of acceptable sites across the City, as part of the City-wide Dogs Off-Leash Area report due to City Council in the third quarter of 2024.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to prohibit Commercial Dog Walkers in Ramsden Park Dog Off-Leash Area, by posting appropriate signage as required under Municipal Code Chapter 608, §608-34.1.C.
Summary
In 2023, City Council adopted 2023.IE6.8 - Citywide Approach to Dogs Off-Leash Areas, directing staff to prepare a report on Dogs Off-Leash Areas for the third quarter of 2024. This valuable report will address many aspects of the growing need for dog off-leash areas in Toronto, especially in park deficient areas of downtown, and the equally pressing need to reduce conflicts between off-leash dogs, and other users of public space.
However, 2023.IE6.8 did not direct staff to develop criteria for determining which dog leash areas should be open to Commercial Dog Walkers, who typically handle multiple dogs at a time. Use of some Dogs Off-Leash Areas by Commercial Dog Walkers can create or exacerbate conflict between dogs and neighbouring residents, especially when the Dogs Off-Leash Area abuts homes without an intervening noise barrier.
At present, some Dogs Off-Leash Areas are permitted to Commercial Dog Walkers and others are not. Parks, Forestry and Recreation does not have any criteria for determining which Dogs Off-Leash Areas should be permitted to Commercial Dog Walkers. It would be appropriate to include such criteria in the forthcoming Dogs Off-Leash Areas report.
In the interim, heavy use of the Ramsden Park Dogs Off-Leash Area by Commercial Dog Walkers is creating multiple adverse effects for abutting residents, including noise, disturbance, and parking conflicts. These residents have been unsuccessfully requesting relief from these adverse effects for years. It is appropriate to temporarily close this Dogs Off-Leash Area to Commercial Dog Walkers until the criteria are developed.
Background Information
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/comm/communicationfile-181134.pdf
MM19.4 - Re-Opening and Amending Item 2024.CC17.5 - 151 and 161-181 Mulock Avenue and 6 Lloyd Avenue - Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing - Request for Directions - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 5 - York South - Weston
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item 2024.CC17.5. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.
Recommendations
Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:
1. City Council amend its previous decision on item 2024.CC17.5 by deleting Part 3.g. of the instructions to staff:
Part to be deleted:
3.g. the owner shall, at the owner's own expense, initiate the Metrolinx Deviation Process with Metrolinx and Metrolinx's Technical Advisor AECOM, and the owner has submitted requested information and makes required revisions noted in correspondence, dated July 17, 2023, from Metrolinx, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Technical Review, Metrolinx;
and adopting instead the following Part:
3.g. If required by Metrolinx, the owner shall, at the owner's own expense, initiate the Metrolinx Deviation Process with Metrolinx and Metrolinx's Technical Advisor AECOM, and, if required by Metrolinx the owner shall submit information and made revisions requested in correspondence, dated July 17, 2023, from Metrolinx, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Manager, Technical Review, Metrolinx;
Summary
A settlement report considered by City Council on April 17th, 2024, included one pre-condition to the issuance of the Ontario Land Tribunal Order, which the applicant does not agree with, because the process it requires may not be necessary. The pre-condition states:
3. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeals, in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of any final Order(s) be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that:
g. the owner shall, at the owner's own expense, initiate the Metrolinx Deviation Process with Metrolinx and Metrolinx's Technical Advisor AECOM, and the owner has submitted requested information and makes required revisions noted in correspondence, dated July 17, 2023, from Metrolinx, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Technical Review, Metrolinx;
City Solicitors working with City Planning, and the Appellant have agreed to a revised the condition that speaks to the possibility that Metrolinx may or may not require the applicant to enter into this process.
“If required by Metrolinx, the owner shall, at the owner's own expense, initiate the Metrolinx Deviation Process with Metrolinx and Metrolinx's Technical Advisor AECOM, and, if required by Metrolinx the owner shall submit information and made revisions requested in correspondence, dated July 17, 2023 from Metrolinx, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director and Manager, Technical Review, Metrolinx;”
It is the City’s position that this revised condition is necessary, and that staff have reasonably negotiated a more flexible approach to this pre-condition. The City Solicitor requires instructions from City Council to request the Tribunal to include this revised pre-condition in its decision and order.
Requires Re-opening
Item 2024.CC17.5 (April 17 and 18, 2024 City Council Meeting)
Background Information
MM19.5 - Requesting the Province to Support Family Physicians - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Board of Health. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Minister of Health to take immediate action to:
a. properly compensate family physicians with appropriate fee increases; and
b. reduce the administrative burden that the Province places on family doctors so they have more time to see their patients.
2. City Council forward City Council’s decision to the Premier of Ontario, the Minister of Health, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, and the municipal Clerks of Ontario's municipalities.
3. City Council request a direct response from the Minister of Health within 30 days.
Summary
On May 13, 2024, the City of Belleville set a good example by passing a resolution calling upon the provincial government to improve compensation and reduce administrative burden for Ontario’s family physicians. Toronto should do the same.
The Province of Ontario is responsible for providing quality health care to all residents of Ontario. Family medicine is the backbone of the healthcare system and providing timely access to a primary health care provider for everyone in Ontario, is essential and should be a top Provincial Government priority. Instead, the shortage of family physicians has reached a crisis point.
Millions of Ontario residents, and hundreds of thousands of Torontonians, do not have a family doctor. Studies show that patients without a primary care provider have poorer health outcomes while costing the health care system more. Meanwhile, hospitals, emergency rooms and clinics are overloaded by residents’ unmet health care needs.
The Province of Ontario could address this issue quickly and efficiently by paying fair wages to family physicians and by lessening the undue administrative burden this provincial government imposes on family doctors.
Background Information
MM19.6 - Honouring the Late Councillor Jaye Robinson by Naming a Landmark or Site in Don Valley West - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 15 - Don Valley West
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the General Manager, Transportation, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to review opportunities to name or rename an existing or planned location, such as a park, street, trail or other landmark in honour of the late Councillor Jaye Robinson and report back to North York Community Council with options by the end of 2024.
Summary
On Thursday, May 16, 2024, the City of Toronto was deeply saddened by the passing of Councillor Jaye Robinson. She served as a Toronto City Councillor for over 14 years representing the Don Valley West community. Jaye persevered as the local representative while fighting cancer since 2019. During her time in office, Jaye Robinson was appointed as Chair of the Toronto Transit Commission (from 2018 - 2022), to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee (from 2014 - 2018), and held numerous positions on other committees, including the FIFA World Cup 2026 Committee. She was a vigorous champion of Toronto's tree canopy, parks, road safety through Vision Zero and supporting a larger Toronto Police Service Hate Crimes Unit. Before her role as an elected official, Jaye Robinson held a management position in the City of Toronto’s Economic Development and Culture Division. During this period, she had a significant involvement in the development of several well-known events in Toronto including Nuit Blanche, Summerlicious, and Winterlicious. Naming a suitable site after Councillor Jaye Robinson is a fitting tribute to recognize her accomplishments and contributions to the City of Toronto. This would be sincerely appreciated by her family, friends, and colleagues at City Hall, and it will allow her legacy as a remarkable leader and mentor to live on.
Background Information
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/comm/communicationfile-181147.pdf
MM19.7 - Request to Rename an Existing or Planned Community Garden After the Late Estella Wheeler - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 6 - York Centre
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to review opportunities to name or rename a new or existing community garden in honour of the late Estella Wheeler, and report back to North York Community Council with options by the end of 2024.
Summary
In February 2024, Estella Wheeler, a teacher at the Africentric Alternative School tragically fell victim to domestic violence. Mrs. Wheeler was beloved by her family, students, colleagues, and the local community. She had an excellent relationship with students keeping their interests at heart, inspiring them, and always being available to support them with their studies. Since immigrating to Canada in 2008, Mrs. Wheeler taught at several Toronto District School Board schools including Brookview Middle School, Smithfield Middle School, Rockford Public School, Downsview Public School, and a 7-year tenure at the Africentric Alternative School.
An initiative was undertaken by the students and teachers at the Africentric Alternative School to request that an existing or planned community garden be named after Estella Wheeler in honour of her legacy and passion for gardening and plants. A petition on their behalf with over 800 signatures has been presented to Councillor Pasternak. A community garden could feasibly be developed in Brockwell Park behind the Africentric Alternative School. There are two naming suggestions where a community garden is already located, which are the Well Watered Garden in Downsview or the Four Winds Allotment Gardens.
Background Information
Communications
MM19.8 - Supporting the City of Toronto in Joining the Strong Cities Network and Hosting a Future Strong Cities Summit in October 2025 - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* A revised Motion was posted on June 24, 2024.
Recommendations
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that:
1. City Council request the City Manager to submit an application on behalf of the City of Toronto to join the Strong Cities Network.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development to report to the Executive Committee by the end of 2024 on the opportunity and feasibility of hosting the Strong Cities Summit in October 2025.
Summary
The Strong Cities Network is an independent, apolitical, global network of more than 220 cities dedicated to addressing all forms and manifestations of hate, extremism and polarisation that can lead to violence, within a human rights-based framework. In November 2023, City Council adopted MM12.12 - Endorsing Toronto as a Signatory of the Strong Cities Network Fourth Global Summit New York City Mayoral Declaration in Fighting Hate, Extremism and Polarisation. By joining the Strong Cities Network the City of Toronto will strengthen its work as an inclusive and welcoming city. Hosting a future summit in October 2025 would strengthen the City of Toronto’s relationship with other cities and further support our commitment to keeping the city safe from hate.
There are no expenses required for the City of Toronto to join the Strong Cities Network as a member but there would be some in kind and/or financial commitments to host the Strong Cities Summit in October 2025. There are conditions that must be agreed upon to become a member.
Background Information
MM19.9 - Requesting Alignment of the Independent Electricity System Operator Integrated Regional Resource Plan with the City’s 2040 Target of Net Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Independent Electricity System Operator to work with the City of Toronto and Toronto Hydro to align the Integrated Regional Resource Plan for Toronto’s electricity system, and broader energy system planning and procurement, with the City’s 2040 target of net zero greenhouse gas emissions by:
a. phasing out gas-fired electricity generation at the Portlands Energy Centre by 2035, except in extreme, exceptional and emergency circumstances totalling less than 88 hours per year;
b. rapidly increasing local renewable energy generation and storage, and maximizing cost-effective energy efficiency;
c. empowering Toronto Hydro to act as Toronto’s electric Distribution System Operator to support development, integration, and utilization of distributed energy resources; and
d. supporting a transformed electricity system that supplies Toronto with sufficient reliable, affordable, low-carbon electricity to meet present and future needs, including population growth and the electrification of buildings and transport.
Summary
In 2021, City Council adopted a target of net zero greenhouse gas emissions community-wide by 2040, and an interim target for 2030, through the TransformTO Net Zero Strategy.
The Independent Electricity System Operator is developing an Integrated Regional Resource Plan for the electricity system in the Toronto Area. The City has identified the need for all levels of government and utilities to work toward developing an aligned, low-carbon electricity system to enable the City of Toronto to meet its climate goals. The City of Toronto and Toronto Hydro continue to actively engage with the Independent Electricity System Operator as part of the Integrated Regional Resource Plan development process.
The City of Toronto’s TransformTO Net Zero Strategy indicates that meeting our climate goals and reaping the benefits to health, equity, prosperity and resilience, is heavily dependent on the availability of affordable, reliable low-carbon electricity (2021.IE26.16). The City identified the need for all parties to work together to transition Ontario’s electricity system away from natural gas to a resilient system focused on low-carbon energy sources, distributed local renewable energy generation, storage, and energy efficiency:
Clean Electricity Regulations
- City Council, in May 2023, urged the Government of Canada to, “enact and enforce strong and robust Clean Electricity Regulations consistent with a net-zero electricity grid and that enable broad decarbonization of all other sectors” (2023.IE3.3, Part 6a).
- The regulations will drive electricity producers to feed into a national zero emissions electricity grid by 2025.
- Comments were also provided to federal government at three stages of policy development over 2022-2024 by the Executive Director, Environment and Climate;
- Consultation on the Regulations closed in March 2024, with the final regulations expected to be published in the Canada Gazette, Part II, later this year.
Portlands Energy Centre
- City Council, in April 2024, requested the Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks to elevate Atura Power’s proposal to expand the capacity of the Portlands Energy Centre by 50 megawatts to a comprehensive environmental assessment (2024.MM17.9).
- City Council, in May 2023, stated its decision to, “oppose any new power generation proposal involving increased burning of fossil fuels, including natural gas, in the City” (2023.MM6.13, Part 1).
- Comments were provided to Atura Power on its Draft Screening report in January 2024 by the Executive Director, Environment and Climate.
Integrated Regional Resource Plan
- City staff are contributing to the Independent Electricity System Operator-led Integrated Regional Resource Plan process to ensure that the City’s climate goals are reflected via buildings and transportation electrification. Most recently, in May 2024, City staff provided written comments to the Independent Electricity System Operator on the Integrated Regional Resource Plan demand forecast methodology.
The proposed Council recommendation to the Independent Electricity System Operator builds on the City’s current and past advocacy and collaborative work to plan for a zero-carbon, resilient and affordable electricity system in Ontario that enables Toronto to meet its climate goals and enjoy the benefits of a net zero future.
Background Information
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/comm/communicationfile-181111.pdf
(June 25, 2024) Letter from Aakash Harpalani, Director, Clean Energy, The Atmospheric Fund (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/comm/communicationfile-181100.pdf
(June 25, 2024) Letter from Rick Green, Chair, Federation of South Toronto Residents’ Associations (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/comm/communicationfile-181189.pdf
MM19.10 - Supporting the Special Hockey International Tournament Coming to Toronto in 2026 - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Jon Burnside
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Jon Burnside, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, in consultation with appropriate Division Heads, to explore ways the City can provide support and assistance to the organizers and local hosts of the Special Hockey International Tournament, for the 2026 Special Hockey International Tournament taking place in Toronto.
Summary
The Special International Hockey Tournament is hosted on an annual basis in a different North American City. The 2026 tournament will be held in Toronto. The City of Toronto previously hosted this event in 2019. The 2026 tournament is expected to bring in about 60 teams from across Canada, the United States, and England. The tournament is scheduled to be hosted at the Scotiabank Pond Arena in Downsview Park and the Chesswood Arena located at 4000 Chesswood Drive on March 5, 6, and 7, 2026. The City of Toronto is actively involved in hosting international sporting events and is equipped with the resources and capacity to endorse this significant hockey event and ensure its success. Special Hockey is a community-based hockey program for the developmentally challenged that was founded in 1980 by the late Pat Flick. It is the first program of its kind that made it possible for those with developmental disabilities to participate in the sport of hockey. For over forty years players of all ages, both male and female, have learned new skills, learned teamwork, and developed confidence while staying physically fit. The main sponsoring host for Special Hockey International Tournament is the Grandravine Special Hockey team located in Downsview.
Background Information
MM19.11 - Strengthening and Improving the City-Wide Approach to Youth Violence Interventions - by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, seconded by Councillor Nick Mantas
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Vincent Crisanti, seconded by Councillor Nick Mantas, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to include in the SafeTO report an update on multi-sector community and youth violence prevention and intervention efforts in addition to providing an update on steps to improve current community and youth outreach methods and explore new strategies.
2. City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to include within SafeTO’s multi-sector gun violence reduction work planning and work groups, the engagement of community outreach organizations City-wide to exchange best practices, discuss areas of improvement, and devise innovative solutions aimed to serve diverse community needs and prevent violence.
Summary
There has been a troubling increase in gun violence in Toronto and it is deeply impacting neighbourhoods in Ward 1 and other communities around the city.
The City, through the SafeTO Community Safety and Wellbeing Plan, is undertaking several initiatives aimed at bringing together institutional partners, community organizations and residents to collectively address these issues. Gun violence reduction requires leveraging investments, tools and mandates across sectors and governments and working with communities to enhance violence prevention, intervention, response and recovery. The City of Toronto is working with community partners and other levels of government to steward integration of actions and services across sectors using a trauma informed public health approach.
There is more work to be done to ensure we address this challenge. In the upcoming SafeTO update report, City staff should include an update on youth violence prevention and intervention efforts in addition to exploring improved outreach mechanisms.
Background Information
MM19.12 - Amending Item 2021.MM37.24 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from the Development at 587 to 599 Yonge Street Development to the 519 Community Centre for Capital Improvements - by Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie, recommends that:
1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2021.MM37.24 by deleting the words “in the form of relocating their garbage storage area to an enclosed and secure area at the back of the building, replacing the overhead doors at the back, as well as creating a new access point on the northwest side of their building with wider windows, double doors, and a canopy (Cost Centre: NP0235)” so that the decision now reads as follows:
1. City Council increase the Association of Community Centre's Approved 2021 Operating Budget for The 519 Community Centre by $315,000.00, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits related to the development at 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 to 4 Dundonald Street, 7 to 9 Gloucester Street (Source Account: XR3026-3700894) for capital improvements.
Summary
The 519 Board of Management has made adjustments to their capital plan and have requested the funds that were previously released be permitted to be used for their revised plans.
The previous release of funds was very specific and does not allow for flexibility. The 519 still plans to follow through on their commitment to the local community to shift their garbage storage from the north side to the back of their building.
This ensures that while they aim for the intended outcomes, they can adjust as needed.
Background Information
MM19.13 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from the Development at 192A, 194, and 200 Bloor Street West to Support Annex Heritage Conservation - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for City Planning by $230,895 gross and $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 192A, 194, and 200 Bloor Street West, subject to the enactment of Bills to give effect to City Council’s decision on Item 2024.TE13.3 (Source Account XR3026-3700512) for the purpose of providing one-time funding to City Planning to undertake the West Annex Phase II Heritage Conservation District Study (Cost Centre: UR0007).
Summary
This motion recommends that City Council authorize the release of $230,895 in Section 37 funds to undertake the West Annex Phase II Heritage Conservation Study.
In 2010, $200,000 in Section 37 funding was earmarked for the Annex Residents Association (ARA) to prepare an Annex Heritage Conservation Study but these funds have remained dormant ever since and were never released to the Annex Residents Association. On May 22, 2024, City Council’s decision on Item TE 13.3, (https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2024.TE13.3), has unlocked these forgotten funds and allowed them to be put to use.
City Council no longer permits third parties to prepare Heritage Conservation Studies. Meanwhile, the provincial government has made heritage conservation dramatically more difficult, and there is a December 31, 2024, deadline for designating listed properties. After consultation with Heritage Planning and the Annex Residents Association, the Annex Residents Association wishes to have these dormant funds transferred to Heritage Planning, who will use the funds this year to undertake the West Annex Phase II Heritage Conservation Study, as directed by Item 2018.PG25.4.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246803.pdf
(June 26, 2024) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247219.pdf
MM19.14 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to the Toronto District School Board for Schoolyard Improvements at Dewson Street Junior Public School - by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 9 - Davenport
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $100,000.00 gross, $0 net, (Cost Centre: NP2161) fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 871 to 899 College Street, secured for park improvements (Source Account: XR3026-3701124), for the purpose of providing one-time capital funding to the Toronto District School Board for capital improvements to the schoolyard at Dewson Street Junior Public School, subject to the Toronto District School Board entering into an acceptable Community Access Agreement with the City.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to participate in the preparation of the Community Access Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, provided acceptable terms can be agreed upon.
3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to execute on behalf of the City a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board for the capital improvements to the schoolyard at Dewson Street Junior Public School, for a term of 20 years and on such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
4. City Council direct that if a mutually acceptable Community Access Agreement cannot be agreed upon that the funds will not be transferred to the Toronto District School Board and shall be made available for other community facilities in the local community.
Summary
This Motion seeks to contribute $100,000 of Section 37 funds towards the Dewson Street Junior Public School schoolyard revitalization project. The scope of the improvements includes a multi-use sports court, track and field, new playground, and outdoor learning spaces.
The Dewson Street Junior schoolyard is a valuable and heavily used green space. In the absence of a City playground nearby, the school grounds serve that purpose for the wider community. The Section 37 Implementation Guidelines (Section 5.7) approved by Council states:
"Cash contributions toward the capital improvement of school board playgrounds are eligible Section 37 community benefits where the playground serves as a local park, where the public will continue to have reasonable access for the foreseeable future, and where there is no local City-owned parkland performing a similar function in the same community that could otherwise benefit from the cash contribution."
Revitalizing the schoolyard will create a more usable, accessible, and vibrant green space that will benefit both the school’s students and the Davenport community.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246806.pdf
(June 26, 2024) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247220.pdf
MM19.15 - Re-Opening and Rescinding Council’s Decision on Item 2024.MM16.28 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to Revitalize Trans Flag-Coloured Pedestrian Crossings in the Village - by Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item 2024.MM16.28. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.
Recommendations
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie, recommends that:
1. City Council rescind its decision on Item 2024.MM16.28, headed "Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to Revitalize Trans Flag-Coloured Pedestrian Crossings in the Village".
Decision to be rescinded:
1. City Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $40,000.00, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits from the development at 355 Church Street (Source Account: XR3026-3700687) for the purpose of forwarding funds to the Church-Wellesley Village Business Improvement Area to be utilized for local streetscape improvements in the form of trans flag-coloured pedestrian crossing areas at the intersections of Hayden Street at Church Street and Wood Street at Church Street (Cost Centre: NP2161).
2. City Council direct that the $40,000.00 be forwarded to the Church-Wellesley Village Business Improvement Area, subject to the Business Improvement Area signing an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.
Summary
The Church Wellesley Village Business Improvement Area does not require these funds anymore as Transportation Services has taken care of touching up the paint for the Trans Flag and Rainbow Coloured Crosswalks before the Pride Festival weekend this year.
2024 marks the 25th anniversary of the blue, pink and white striped transgender flag and the deterioration of the painted crosswalks because of utility cuts and construction in the area warranted this touchup, which means a lot to the community.
I would like to thank the General Manager and their team at Transportation Services for prioritizing this work.
Requires Re-opening
Item 2024.MM16.28 (March 20 and 21, 2024 City Council Meeting)
Background Information
MM19.16 - Permitting a Seasonal Outdoor Patio at 460 Adelaide Street East - by Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 13 - Toronto Centre
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Chris Moise, seconded by Councillor Ausma Malik, recommends that:
1. City Council permit the owner or tenant of an at-grade and adjacent retail unit in Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation 2756 to operate a seasonal outdoor patio with associated obstructions on an portion of the Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Space (Instrument AT5116765) located at 424-460 Adelaide Street East, for a temporary period ending October 15, 2025, provided the same is in accordance with the following terms to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District:
a. the total area of the seasonal outdoor patio does not exceed 126 square metres;
b. any portion of the seasonal outdoor patio located within the Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Space is situated in the westerly portion of the Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Space and does not extend past 13.3 metres measured from the east property line;
c. the retail unit(s) within Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation 2756 operating the patio must have direct access to the patio area within the Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Space;
d. any fencing and patio furniture (including tables, chairs, and plants) are entirely removed from the Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Space during the "off-season period" (between October 15 and April 30) of each calendar year and no portion of the Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Space shall be used for storage of furniture or fencing during this "off-season" period;
e. no structure shall be erected on any portion of the Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Space to cover the seasonal outdoor patio;
f. the daily operation hours of the seasonal outdoor patio are limited to 10:00 a.m. to 10:30 p.m.; and
g. the patio area will be installed and maintained substantially in accordance with the seasonal outdoor patio plans prepared by Kirkor Architects & Planners and NAK Design Strategies, dated January 9, 2024, on file with City Planning.
Summary
The purpose of this motion is to permit the owner or tenant of an at grade and adjacent retail unit in Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation 2756 to operate a seasonal outdoor patio on a portion of the Privately-Owned Publicly Accessible Space located at 424-460 Adelaide Street East on a temporary basis until October 15, 2025.
The Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible was secured through a Section 37 Agreement, dated July 5, 2015 (Instrument AT3956752), associated with the redevelopment of 424-460 Adelaide Street East (By-law 811-2015). The Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Space area is described as Parts 10 and 52, Plan 66R-30479 in the associated registered easement (Instrument AT5116765).
The Section 37 Agreement states "… no trees, structures or obstruction will be placed or permitted to remain thereon unless the City in writing permits the same for such period as may be specified and upon written application by the Owner to the City." On February 26, 2024, the owner of at grade and adjacent retail units in Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation 2756 (TSCC 2756) submitted a written request to the City for permission to operate a seasonal outdoor patio that includes a portion of the POPS together with placement of associated obstructions, including removable patio furniture and fencing.
City Planning staff have advised that a seasonal outdoor patio on a portion of the Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Space is supported by Official Plan Policy 3.1.1.20(a), which states that POPS may include temporary commercial uses which animate the Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Space. The temporary permission to operate the Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Space until October 15, 2025 would allow the City to assess the potential impacts of the patio, and extension of the timeframe for which the seasonal outdoor patio use is permitted may be considered by City Council after October 15, 2025 upon request from the owner and recommendation from City Planning staff.
Background Information
MM19.17 - Amending Item 2022.TE34.40 to Secure Affordable Housing at 888 Dupont Street - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, recommends that:
1. City Council amend its previous decision on Item 2022.TE34.40, headed “888 Dupont Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report” by adopting the following new Part:
1. If the Committee of Adjustment approval of minor variance Application A0346/24TEY, regarding the property municipally known as 888 Dupont Street, is not appealed or, if an appeal, is upheld by the Toronto Local Appeal Body, City Council require the Owner, as a condition of approval for Application A0346/24TEY, to amend the draft Section 37 Agreement, pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act (as it read the day before the date Section 1 of Schedule 17 of the COVID-19 Economic Recovery Act, 2020 came into force), so as to implement the Committee’s decision in a manner, content, and form satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
Summary
On July 19, 2022, City Council approved Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments for the property known municipally as 888 Dupont Street (File 19 243242 STE 11 OZ), approving the re-development of the subject property (the “development approval”). City Council’s approval permitted increased height and density, et. al. for a 14-storey mixed-use building with live/home occupation permissions, including 20 affordable housing units and 2,028 square metres of non-residential uses, including retail, commercial, and light industrial uses.
A set of Section 37 Planning Act, community benefits were secured. The Owner’s provision of twenty new affordable rental housing dwelling units was one of the primary Section 37 community benefits to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement and in the site-specific Zoning By-law Amendment for the re-development. The Section 37 Agreement has not yet been executed by the parties nor registered on title.
Additionally, City Council approved the delivery of financial contributions, under the City’s Open Door Housing Program, of approximately $1,576,595.00 to assist the Owner to deliver the 20 affordable rental dwelling units. This financial incentive was approved to secure the affordability period of those 20 units for 40 years as opposed to 25 years (which would have been the affordability period if those units were secured solely through the Section 37 Agreement).
To accommodate refinements to the proposed building’s design, the Owner submitted a minor variance application, under Section 45 of the Planning Act, to the Committee of Adjustment seeking variances to the existing site-specific Amending Zoning By-law. The City Planning staff report to the Committee, attached as Attachment 1 advised the Committee that Planning staff along with Housing staff are satisfied with the proposed minor variances. It is Community Planning staff’s opinion that the revisions improve the previous wind conditions, and the public realm.
The Committee approved the application on June 5, 2024. The notice of decision is dated June 11, 2024. The proposed minor variances will allow the Owner to provide the affordable housing units within the proposed building. The Committee accepted Community Planning staff’s recommendation to impose the following condition which authorizes amendments to the Section 37 Agreement previously authorized by Council:
“The Owner shall obtain approval from City Council for any changes required to the draft Section 37 Agreement and for a final Section 37 Agreement to be entered into and registered on title to the lands to the satisfaction of the Executive Director and Chief Planner, City Planning and the City Solicitor.”
This means that City Council must amend its previous Council recommendations to authorize amendments to the draft Section 37 Agreement.
The proposed changes to the draft Section 37 Agreement are: to delete the requirement of a percentage of the total residential gross floor area to determine the total number of new affordable rental housing units, and maintain the provision for 20 new affordable rental housing units; to delete the requirement to provide new affordable rental housing units at prescribed minimum unit sizes, and maintain the requirement to provide new affordable rental housing units at prescribed average unit sizes; and reduce the required car share spaces from three to two spaces.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246844.pdf
Attachment 1 - Planning Staff Report dated May 17, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246846.pdf
Attachment 2 - Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment regarding Application A0346/24TEY dated June 11, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246845.pdf
MM19.18 - Ensuring Increased Access for All Toronto Residents to the Toronto Islands While Saving Toronto Taxpayers Money - by Councillor Jon Burnside, seconded by Councillor Parthi Kandavel
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Jon Burnside, seconded by Councillor Parthi Kandavel, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services and the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services, to consider the option of a fixed link to the Toronto Islands and to report on the cost of a fixed link compared to the cost of continued ferry fleet service to the Toronto Island, such report to include the number of pedestrians and cyclists that could be accommodated year-round, and report to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee prior to Standing Committee or City Council consideration of the next ferry procurement contract.
Summary
This motion seeks to have City staff look at additional options, including a fixed link, to replace the City’s current four ferries. The City is in the process of replacing those ferries, but the costs have skyrocketed. Torontonians value their parks and greenspace but were recently told not to visit the Islands due to excessive demands on the ferries.
The area east of Ward’s Island was identified in a recent Toronto Star article as being only 250 metres from the Portlands. This location could provide reliable year-round low-cost access for pedestrians, cyclists and emergency vehicles.
Background Information
Communications
(June 24, 2024) E-mail from George Bell (MM.Supp)
(June 24, 2024) E-mail from Sean Cooper (MM.Supp)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from April Engelberg (MM.Supp)
(June 27, 2024) E-mail from George Bell (MM.New)
MM19.19 - Request to Implement Measures for Mandatory Lead Disclosure and Mitigation in Multi-Residential Housing - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, in consultation with other appropriate Division Heads, to report to the December 5, 2024, meeting of the Planning and Housing Committee on options and feasibility of requiring that:
a. landlords of leased residential properties constructed prior to 1950 with six or fewer units determine if their properties have a lead water service pipe through water testing, visual inspection by a plumber, or requesting records check through 311;
b. landlords of leased residential properties with lead water service pipes disclose the presence of the pipes to tenants; and
c. landlords of leased residential properties with lead water services pipes replace them or provide tenants with an NSF-053 certified filter and replacement cartridges as needed.
Summary
Lead poisoning poses a serious risk to the wellbeing of Torontonians, especially children and people who are pregnant. Exposure to even small amounts of lead can impede kids’ ability to learn, cause adults nerve and brain damage, and lead to miscarriages. In Toronto, upwards of 20,000 households have City-owned lead water services pipes, and likely more have privately-owned lead pipes, from which lead can leach into drinking water.
Through the Priority Lead Water Service Replacement Program and Capital Water Service Replacement Program, the City of Toronto has taken important steps to eliminate lead pipes. However, landlords currently have no obligation to replace dangerous lead pipes on their properties, nor inform potentially vulnerable tenants that they are present.
Tenants must not be kept in the dark. This motion seeks to protect tenants, especially those who are pregnant or have young children, by requesting that staff investigate requiring landlords to inspect their property for lead pipes, disclose the presence of lead pipes if they are found, and take action to prevent lead poisoning, either by replacing the pipes or providing their tenants with a high-quality filter. Currently, the City of Toronto provides a rebate for these filters for families with young children or pregnant women who earn under $50,000 – a lead poisoning prevention By-law would protect the right of every tenant to clean water while minimizing expense to the City.
Implementing this By-law would make Toronto a leader in lead poisoning prevention as one of the first cities in Canada to require both disclosure and mitigation or replacement of lead pipes. However, the By-law would not be unprecedented – the Regina, Saskatchewan City Council approved requiring property owners to replace the private portion of lead water pipes in conjunction with city repairs when they take place in 2021.
Whether they own or rent their homes, Torontonians should feel safe turning on their faucets. Through a lead poisoning prevention By-law, the City can ensure that no tenant feels uninformed or helpless when it comes to the critical threat of lead poisoning.
Background Information
MM19.20 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from Various Developments to Support Toronto Transit Commission Station Upgrades in Ward 11, University-Rosedale - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Jamaal Myers, recommends that:
1. Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for the Toronto Transit Commission by $915,000.00 gross and $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the developments at 86-100 Bloor Street West, subject to the enactment of Bills to give effect to City Council’s decision on Item 2024.TE13.3 for the purpose of providing one-time funding to the TTC for capital upgrades at subway stations within Ward 11, University-Rosedale:
a. installation of Indigenous public art in the Spadina Station walkway; and
b. tile upgrades to walls and floors at Dupont Station.
Development Location |
Source Account (XR3026) |
Amount |
86-100 Bloor Street West |
3700153 |
$503,451.01 |
13-21 Balmuto Street |
3700188 |
$219,735.67 |
4,6,8 St. Thomas Street, and 100-110 Charles Street West |
3700641
|
$191,813.32
|
Summary
This motion recommends that City Council authorize the release of $915,000 in Section 37 funds to support Toronto Transit Commission subway station upgrades within Ward 11, University-Rosedale.
In 1999, 2007 and 2008, $915,000 in Section 37 funding were earmarked for various Toronto Transit Commission station improvements in Ward 11, University-Rosedale, but these funds remained dormant and were never released to the Toronto Transit Commission. On May 22, 2024, by TE13.3, (https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2024.TE13.3), City Council unlocked these forgotten funds and allowed them to be put to some of the Toronto Transit Commission’s many current priorities. This unlocking will become final and binding upon the expiry of the appeal period from TE13.3.
After extensive consultations with affected communities and the Section 37 office, the Toronto Transit Commission wishes to proceed with capital upgrades at the Spadina and Dupont Stations to make these stations more attractive and welcoming and (in the case of Spadina) to promote reconciliation in an area of significant importance to Toronto’s Indigenous communities. Increasing the visibility of Indigenous art and heritage in the Bloor-Spadina area is a priority for at least one of the abutting residents’ associations and for local Indigenous organizations.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246849.pdf
(June 26, 2024) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247221.pdf
MM19.21 - Fostering Belonging, Community and Inclusion, and Combating Hate in Toronto - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, Councillor Mike Colle, Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, and Councillor Amber Morley
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Mayor Olivia Chow, Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, Councillor Mike Colle, Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, and Councillor Amber Morley, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, the Director, Equity, Diversity and Human Rights, and the Chief Communications Officer, to re-launch the Toronto for All public education campaign, and leverage existing opportunities such as the City’s street furniture network to deliver a unifying message against hate.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, the General Manager Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to coordinate a joint task force to review urban design guidelines and other relevant planning guidelines to provide best practices for applicants to maximize safety through urban design.
3. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to review the Graffiti Management Plan to respond to hate graffiti plan and ensure service levels are being met, particularly as it relates to rapid response to hate graffiti.
4. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report back through the 2025 Budget process on the feasibility of restoring local ‘gathering space’ funding to support the development of community gathering spaces such as community gardens, chairs and benches, and other public assets that help foster a feeling of belonging, community and engagement.
Summary
For so many, Toronto is a place of hope and our diversity is a beacon to millions around the world. And yet we know there is work to continue to do to ensure that all Torontonians feel safe to be who they are, celebrate their culture, celebrate their identity, and worship freely, without fear of discrimination or hate. As a City, we must foster a sense of belonging, community and inclusion across Toronto for all Torontonians, so that we are all safe from hate.
The Toronto Foundation’s most recent Vital Signs report underscores a troubling pattern emerging in Toronto of social isolation and lack of connection. To continue to be a caring city, where all are welcome, and to reverse the erosion of connection in our city, we must be unwavering in our message that hate has no place in Toronto. By investing in building welcoming community spaces and promoting a message against hate and in support of inclusion, we can build the connections that stop hate from taking hold.
Background Information
MM19.22 - 15 and 35 Trehorne Drive Encroachment Agreement - by Councillor Stephen Holyday, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 2 - Etobicoke Centre
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Stephen Holyday, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to negotiate and enter into an Encroachment Agreement with the property owner at 15 and 35 Trehorne Drive to maintain a private manhole in the municipal boulevard abutting the Royal York Road frontage of the property after the land has been conveyed.
Summary
Scarlett Heights (15 Trehorne Drive), a former high school site, was declared surplus by the Toronto District School Board on June 29, 2022. The Toronto Catholic District School Board provided an expression of interest on February 10, 2023, to acquire the Scarlett Heights building and property to address its student accommodation needs, including the establishment of a new high school.
As part of the process, the Board decided that new property lines be established for the property containing the Scarlett Heights school building and Hilltop Middle School (35 Trehorne Drive) to create two parcels; allowing the east parcel containing the former high school to be declared surplus and sold.
The Etobicoke York Committee of Adjustment approved the Consent Application on Condition on August 2, 2023, under file B0004/23EYK.
Among the conditions is a requirement to convey land to the City:
The owner shall convey to the City, at nominal cost, a 0.40 metre wide strip of land along the Royal York Road frontage of the property in order to satisfy the requirements of a 27 metre wide future right-of-way in fee simple, such lands to be free and clear of all physical and title encumbrances, and subject to a right-of-way for access in favour of the Grantor until such time as said lands have been dedicated as a public highway, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer & Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the City Solicitor.
A manhole which provides access to the site stormwater connection has been found to be located on the edge of the site, within the 0.40 metre wide strip of land to be conveyed to the City as part of the conditions for consent. The manhole is considered a private encumbrance, and must be addressed in order to satisfy the condition.
The purpose of this motion is to provide City Staff with the authority to enter an encroachment agreement for the manhole, an administrative process which requires approval from City Council.
Compliance with the conditions of consent are time sensitive. Moreover, completion of the surplus and sale of lands for a high school site are of civic importance, and any delay can have material impact to the community and to the school boards.
Background Information
MM19.23 - 290 Lake Promenade - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Amber Morley, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to a Toronto Local Appeal Body and has been deemed urgent.
Recommendations
Councillor Amber Morley, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body, with appropriate City staff, in order to oppose the Appeal regarding 290 Lake Promenade (Application A0533/19EYK).
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the Appeal for 290 Lake Promenade (Application A0533/19EYK) and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City, at the City Solicitor’s discretion, after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
Summary
The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment requesting variances from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 relating to floor space index, dwelling height, number of platforms at or above the second storey on the front wall, and area of each platform at or above the second storey (Application A0533/19EYK) (the “Application”). The Application seeks to construct a new detached dwelling with an attached garage, two second storey front balconies, a third storey rear platform, and a deck in the rear yard.
On April 11, 2024, the Etobicoke York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment refused the Application (the “Decision”). A copy of the Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment is attached. The applicant has appealed the refusal to the Toronto Local Appeal Body (the “Appeal”).
In a report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District dated April 3, 2024, Community Planning Staff raised concerns with respect to the Application and recommended that the Application be refused. Planning Staff opined that the requested variances are not minor in nature, do not meet the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and are not desirable for the appropriate development of the land. In particular, Planning Staff identified concerns with the proposed floor space index and height. Planning Staff also opined that the requested variances do not respect and reinforce the neighbourhood character or have regard for the Long Branch Neighbourhood Character Guidelines. A copy of the Planning Report is attached.
This Motion will authorize and direct the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body, along with appropriate City staff, in order to oppose the Appeal. This Motion will also authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, at the City Solicitor’s discretion, after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
This Motion is urgent as the Toronto Local Appeal Body has issued a Notice of Hearing for this matter. The deadline for the City to seek party status for this matter is July 8, 2024, and the hearing is scheduled to proceed on September 6, 2024. The Notice of Hearing is attached.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246883.pdf
Attachment 1 - Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment (Application No. A0533/19EYK)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246885.pdf
Attachment 2 - Planning Staff Report dated April 3, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246888.pdf
Attachment 3 - Toronto Local Appeal Body Notice of Hearing issued June 6, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246889.pdf
MM19.24 - Review of Major Events Policy - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
*A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, recommends that:
1. City Council request the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to review the Major Events Policy to streamline financial support for major attractions in the City and report back to the October 23, 2024, meeting of the Economic and Community Development Committee.
Summary
This proposes a review of the City of Toronto's financial support system for major events. The objective is to assess whether streamlining the allocation of funding and would benefit both the City and event organizers.
The review would explore transitioning from the current annual application process to a system of predictable, ongoing annual support for major attractions. This change aims to achieve the following:
- Enhanced Stability: Consistent funding would allow event organizers to engage in long-term planning, invest in improvements, and ultimately deliver a more sustainable visitor experience.
- Improved Efficiency: The current application process can be time-consuming for both the city and the attractions. A streamlined system would free up resources for both parties.
- Promoted Transparency: Clear criteria for ongoing funding would ensure a fair and objective allocation of city resources.
By undertaking this review, all stakeholders, including the City and event organizers, may benefit from a more efficient and effective funding system.
I look forward to your support.
Background Information
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/comm/communicationfile-181221.pdf
MM19.25 - An Update on Work to Protect the Science Centre and Support Thorncliffe and Flemingdon Park - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Jon Burnside
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Jon Burnside, recommends that:
1. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with appropriate City Divisions and Agencies, to report to the July 16, 2024, meeting of the Executive Committee with an update regarding their work on the future of the Ontario Science Centre, including:
a. provincial requirements, if any, in the lease with the City to operate the Ontario Science Centre, or other public-facing attraction at the Don Mills and Eglinton site;
b. the feasibility of the City operating the Science Centre at its current location, including an assessment of potential revenues from event rentals; and
c. an analysis of the November 29, 2023 Provincial business case of the Ontario Science Centre relocation and the December 6, 2023, the Office of the Auditor General of Ontario Value-for-Money Audit: Science Centres (2023), which evaluated the November business case.
Summary
Last year, the Provincial Government announced their intention to move the Ontario Science Centre to a much smaller location at Ontario Place. This announcement was done without consultation with residents of Thorncliffe and Flemingdon Park who rely on the Centre for employment and education opportunities. The Science Centre is also part of a burgeoning cultural district that includes the Aga Khan Museum.
The cultural attraction is an important economic driver for the local community as it brings visitors from across the city and around the world to Don Mills and Eglinton. It would be a real blow to this community to lose the Science Centre just as the opening of the Eglinton Crosstown’s “Science Centre” station is about to make the attraction more accessible to the entire city. So far, over 21,500 letters regarding the importance of the Science Centre have been sent to Premier Ford through the Save Ontario Science Centre campaign.
The City of Toronto has an obligation to explore all possible means to keep the Science Centre at its current location. In July 2023, MM8.4 requested City Staff to explore avenues to have the Province continue operating the site Don Mills and Eglinton and the feasibility of the City operating the Science Centre as it does the Toronto Zoo. The financial impact statement attached to MM8.4 indicated that this work would take 9 to 12 months to complete. In the time since the motion, the Provincial government spent 1 million dollars on a business case regarding the science centre relocation, and the Auditor General of Ontario has released a value-for-money audit of the business case, concluding it was based on "preliminary and incomplete costs". This motion requests a status update on the initial work as well as supplemental analysis of the business case and value-for-money audit.
Background Information
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/comm/communicationfile-181162.pdf
(June 25, 2024) Letter from Katie Weber, Director of Marketing, Moriyama Teshima Architects (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/comm/communicationfile-181105.pdf
(June 25, 2024) Letter from Natasha Krickhan, Architect, Principal, HaNK Architecture + Interiors inc. (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/comm/communicationfile-181106.pdf
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Thoreau Colucci (MM.New)
(June 25, 2024) E-mail from Marie Colucci (MM.New)
(June 25, 2024) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Co-chair, FoNTRA (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/comm/communicationfile-181170.pdf
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Michele S. Myers (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from John Mighton (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Judy San (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Genevieve Anthony (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Anders Ross (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Nancy Sim (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Sandy Whitehouse (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Irene Polosecki (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Aileen Fong (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Azmina Dewji (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Shel Goldstein (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Ernesto Romero (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Echo Railton (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Ted Tibor Berger (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Daniel Rosenbluth (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Athena Niggenaber (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Adam Rodgers (MM.New)
(June 27, 2024) E-mail from Kristine Maitland (MM.New)
(June 27, 2024) Letter from Anne-Marie E. Branch, North York Community Preservation Panel (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/comm/communicationfile-181238.pdf
(June 27, 2024) E-mail from Jennifer Ryan (MM.New)
(June 27, 2024) E-mail from John Deacon (MM.New)
(June 27, 2024) E-mail from Laurie Maltby (MM.New)
MM19.26 - Towards a Beautiful City - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Parthi Kandavel
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
*A communication has been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Parthi Kandavel, recommends that:
1. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with all relevant City Divisions, to report back to Executive Committee by the fourth quarter of 2024, with a plan for the overall beautification of the public realm in the City of Toronto, including:
a. the feasibility of creating inter-divisional design standards for public realm and urban design on City of Toronto property, including roads, sidewalks, municipal buildings, and parks;
b. the feasibility of creating design standards for the public and urban design of new private developments, including streetscaping, frontage, and Privately-Owned Publicly Accessible Spaces; and
c. the feasibility of creating an Office of a City Designer and Architect, responsible for the design, coordination and implementation of these design standards and the overall beautification of the City’s public realm.
Summary
Toronto can be beautiful if we choose to make it so. But too often, our urban design strives for the height of mediocrity and even falls into disrepair. Our bike lanes are lined with broken flex-posts, our CaféTO patios are surrounded by construction hoarding, and our Astral garbage cans are broken and overflowing. Our public realm can be so much better – and Torontonians deserve that.
This motion seeks to create unified public realm design standards across City divisions and the public realm portions of private developments, so that our public spaces can match those in great cities around the world. Further, it explores the creation of a new position, a City Architect and Designer, responsible for implementing and coordinating these standards across every corner of our city.
When we move into a new home, the first thing we do is design it in a way we can be inspired by and proud of. We should treat our city the same way.
Background Information
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/comm/communicationfile-181144.pdf
MM19.27 - 65 Front St West - Temporary Outdoor Patio During "Union Summer" Event - by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, recommends that:
1. City Council exempt any application for the temporary physical extension of a liquor licence at the outdoor patio area operated by Union Chicken Front Limited Partnership, located at Union Station - 65 Front St West, from the 10 metre extended liquor licence adjacency requirement for patios, adopted by City Council in Item 2023.EX3.8, Amendment to Delegation of Authority for the Endorsement of Temporary Liquor Licences.
Summary
The patio for Union Chicken at 65 Front Street has been a longstanding feature of the Union Summer event taking place outside Union Station. While previously approved under the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario approval process, the application process has changed when transferring responsibility to the City, as Union Chicken's location within Union Station is not within 10 metres of the outdoor space. At this time an exemption is needed for this business to continue to take part in this event.
Background Information
MM19.28 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from Various Developments to Community Matters Toronto for Mural Art on Bell Utility Boxes in Eglinton-Lawrence - by Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 8 - Eglinton - Lawrence
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Recommendations
Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that:
1. City Council increase the 2024 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $28,000 gross, $0 net, for the purpose of providing one-time capital funding to Community Matters Toronto to complete 14 murals on Bell Boxes in various locations in Ward 8 Eglinton-Lawrence, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Fund) community benefits as follows (Cost Centre: NP2161):
-
$2,000 from the development at 2525 Bathurst Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701153);
-
$10,000 from the development at 2788 Bathurst Street and 515 Glencairn Avenue (Source Account: XR3026-3701210);
-
$2,000 from the development at 1580 Avenue Road (Source Account: XR3026-3701016); and
-
$14,000 from the development at 1705, 1717, 1719, 1743, 1745 Avenue Road (Source Account: XR3026-3700260).
2. City Council direct that the funds in Recommendation 1 above be forwarded to Community Matters Toronto upon the signing of an Undertaking that governs the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.
Summary
The Bell Box Murals Project is a program of Community Matters Toronto. Since 2009, artists from the Bell Boxes Murals Project have painted murals on Bell Canada outdoor utility boxes throughout Toronto, Southern Ontario and Quebec.
The project is an innovative collaboration between private businesses, community organizations, local artists and local governments that benefits all members of the community as it aims to:
- Replace graffiti and vandalism with original works of art
- Make the streets more inviting to residents and visitors
- Provide a public art forum to reflect local culture and heritage
- Enhance residents’ sense of community
- Make art accessible to everyone, regardless of income or social stature
- Provide income and visibility for local artists
This Motion seeks to paint murals on 14 Bell Canada outdoor utility boxes in neighbourhoods within Eglinton-Lawrence.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246907.pdf
(June 26, 2024) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247211.pdf
MM19.29 - 17 Boothroyd Avenue - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 14 - Toronto - Danforth
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to a Toronto Local Appeal Body and has been deemed urgent.
*Communications have been submitted on this Item.
Recommendations
Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decisions regarding 17 Boothroyd Avenue (Applications A1008/23TEY, A1009/23TEY and B0070/23TEY) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body, with appropriate City staff, to oppose the minor variances and consent requested in Applications A1008/23TEY, A1009/23TEY and B0070/23TEY regarding 17 Boothroyd Avenue.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution regarding Applications A1008/23TEY, A1009/23TEY and B0070/23TEY respecting 17 Boothroyd Avenue and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, at the City Solicitor's discretion, after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
Summary
The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain consent to sever the property into two undersized residential lots (Application B0070/23TEY) and to request variances from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 with respect to minimum front lot lines (Applications A1008/23TEY and A1009/23TEY) to construct new three-storey detached dwellings on each of the proposed lots (the “Applications”).
The Toronto Local Appeal Body previously approved a 2020 Committee of Adjustment application (File 20 212449 STE 14 MV) for the property for variances relating to parking spaces, depth, floor space index, and landscaping to convert the existing two-storey detached triplex into a six-unit apartment building.
On May 15, 2024, the Toronto and East York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment considered and approved new Applications, subject to conditions (the “Decisions”). A copy of the Notices of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment for the Applications is attached.
In a report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District dated May 7, 2024, Community Planning Staff raised concerns with respect to the new Applications and recommended that the new Applications be refused. Planning Staff raised concerns that the front lot lines are not sufficient widths for the proposed severance and are not consistent with the existing front lot lines in the surrounding context. Planning Staff also noted that the proposed front lot lines will not allow for adequate access to the northern lot. Planning Staff opined that the requested variances fail to meet the intent of the Zoning By-law and the Official Plan, are not minor in nature, and are not desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land. A copy of the Planning Report is attached.
Planning did not oppose the 2020 application to convert the existing two-storey detached triplex into a six-unit apartment building.
There are also concerns that the Applications would result in the demolition of existing rental units on the property and accordingly appropriate tenant assistance should be provided in accordance with Policy 3.2.1.12 of the City of Toronto’s Official Plan.
In order to preserve the City's right of appeal, the City Solicitor appealed the Committee of Adjustment’s Decisions to the Toronto Local Appeal Body on June 3, 2024.
This Motion will give the City Solicitor authority to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's Decisions respecting 17 Boothroyd Avenue and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body, along with appropriate City Staff, in order to oppose the Applications. This Motion will also give the City Solicitor authority to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, at the City Solicitor's discretion, after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the City Solicitor has already appealed the Decisions to the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to preserve the City’s statutory right and requires instructions to appeal and attend the hearing for this matter.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246902.pdf
Attachment 1 - Notices of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment (Application Nos. A1008/23TEY, A1009/23TEY and B0070/23TEY)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246903.pdf
Attachment 2: Planning Staff Report dated May 7, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-246904.pdf
Communications
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Daniel Foch (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Kailyn Perchalski (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Ramsey Kilani (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Philip Hoyt (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Jacob Rothberg (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Joseph Karim (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Paul Genyk-Berezowsky (MM.New)
(June 26, 2024) E-mail from Paul Dowsett (MM.New)
(June 27, 2024) E-mail from Geoff Hales (MM.New)
(June 27, 2024) E-mail from The CR Team, Craig Race Architecture (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/comm/communicationfile-181249.pdf
(June 27, 2024) Report from The CR Team, Craig Race Architecture (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/comm/communicationfile-181250.pdf
(June 27, 2024) E-mail from Martin Concagh (MM.New)
(June 27, 2024) E-mail from Alex Sharpe (MM.New)
MM19.30 - 2057 Dundas Street West - Liquor Licence Application - High Notes Coffee and Vinyl Licence 2554413 - by Councillor Gord Perks seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
Recommendations
Councillor Gord Perks seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the issuance of a liquor licence for High Notes Coffee and Vinyl, 2057 Dundas Street West (the "Premises") is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents unless conditions are placed on the licence, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.
2. City Council request that the Licence Appeal Tribunal provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to High Notes Coffee and Vinyl, 2057 Dundas Street West.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in the matter of High Notes Coffee and Vinyl, 2057 Dundas Street West, and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
Summary
An application has been submitted to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for a liquor licence at the premises at 2057 Dundas Street West operating under the name High Notes Coffee and Vinyl (the "Premises"). The application is for an indoor area. This Motion requests that City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.
This Premises is located in close proximity to residential units. There are concerns related to noise, litter, safety, and other potential disturbances to residents in the area. If conditions are put in place, these concerns may be mitigated. Under no circumstance should the establishment be granted a liquor sales license without conditions attached.
This matter is considered urgent as the deadline for objections is April 16, 2024.
Background Information
MM19.31 - Authorization to Repatriate Two Specified Objects from the City of Toronto’s Museum Collection to the Métis National Council - by Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
Recommendations
Mayor Olivia Chow, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to repatriate the following two objects of historical and community significance to the Métis people from the City of Toronto’s Museum Collection to the Métis National Council during the Back to Batoche Festival scheduled for July 18 to 21, 2024, in Saskatchewan:
a. a tobacco pouch beaded in a traditional Métis style and dated to circa 1890; and
b. a letter initially thought to be written by Louis Riel on May 6, 1885.
Summary
On August 31, 2023, City staff received a formal repatriation claim from the Métis National Council regarding two objects of significance to Métis history and culture that are currently held by the City of Toronto’s Museum Collection.
The first object is a tobacco pouch beaded in a traditional Métis style and dated to circa 1890. In August 2022, the authenticity and origin of the pouch were verified by a leading Métis material history expert. The second object is a letter initially thought to be written by Louis Riel on May 6, 1885, two days before the Battle of Batoche. Further research on the letter uncovered evidence of a period forgery, but the object remains part of Louis Riel’s story and holds importance to the Métis nation.
On April 4, 2024, City staff met with the Métis National Council President and Chief of Staff, who reaffirmed the Métis National Council’s repatriation claim and extended an invitation to City staff to repatriate the tobacco pouch and the letter to the Métis people at the Back to Batoche Festival, which is scheduled for July 18 to 21, 2024 in Saskatchewan. Subject to the authorization by City Council, this would be the first repatriation of sacred objects from the City of Toronto’s Museum Collection.
2013.ED27.6 - Policies for City of Toronto Museum Collections addresses repatriation under Deaccessioning and Disposal. Under Criterion 3.1.1(h), “an artifact may be deaccessioned if it is the subject of a successful claim for repatriation.” Both objects have been subject to a claim of repatriation and have been approved for deaccession as neither fits the City’s collecting mandate.
The Director, Indigenous Affairs Office has signalled her support for this experience to be used by the City as an opportunity to learn and engage with community on the development of a corporate Repatriation Policy, which is currently under development and will be forthcoming to City Council in early 2025.
Financial implications associated with this repatriation will be minimal and can be absorbed within the Economic Development and Culture Division’s 2024 budget. Expenditures arising from the repatriation are anticipated to be less than $3,000. The funds will be used to cover the cost of one staff member from the Museums and Heritage Services team from Economic Development and Culture to travel to the Back to Batoche Festival, where the repatriation will take place.
This motion is urgent because the repatriation event is taking place July 18, prior to the next Council meeting.
Background Information
MM19.32 - Toronto International Pizza Festival - by Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
Recommendations
Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with appropriate City Divisions, the Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas, and relevant culinary industry partners, to report back to the July 24, 25, and 26, 2024, meeting of City Council on how the City can support a celebration of Toronto’s culinary excellence through the creation of a Toronto International Pizza Festival, to be held in November 2024.
Summary
Toronto is well-known for our incredible food scene, and for our residents' long held and strong opinions for where to get their favourite dishes.
In an effort to support our small businesses, Business Improvement Areas, and to encourage Torontonians in celebrating their favourite restaurants — the City should host the first ever Toronto International Pizza Festival.
Our City has incredible street festivals and food-related events that draw hundreds of thousands of visitors to locations across Toronto in order to experience the culinary excellence of Toronto. With thousands of pizzerias and related restaurants this festival provides a unique opportunity to encourage Torontonians to support small and local businesses, while also giving residents the opportunity to promote the many traditional and unique styles of pizza that can be found across Toronto.
The reason for urgency is to ensure that City staff has sufficient time to process this request by the September meeting of City Council.
Background Information
MM19.33 - Direction to Install a Pride-Coloured Pedestrian Crossing near University of St. Michael’s College - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
Recommendations
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Chris Moise, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation, to paint a Pride crosswalk with rainbow colours between the John M. Kelly Library, and Elmsley Place on St. Joseph Street, adjacent to the University of St. Michael’s College, to be fully funded by the University of St. Michael’s College.
Summary
The University of St. Michael’s College has requested the City to paint a Pride crosswalk with rainbow colours adjacent to its campus and has given a commitment to cover all costs. The crosswalk will be a visible public testament to the welcoming spirit of the University, and a pledge of its commitment to deep appreciation for diversity in all its forms.
The motion is urgent because Pride celebrations are about to take place.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247098.pdf
Attachment 1 - Letter from David G. Sylvester, President and Vice-Chancellor, St. Michael’s College Student Union, to Councillor Dianne Saxe
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247099.pdf
MM19.34 - 222 Rosedale Heights Drive - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
Recommendations
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, recommends that:
1. That City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment’s decision regarding 222 Rosedale Heights Drive (Application A0257/24TEY) and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the development proposed in application A0257/24TEY.
2. That City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.
3. That City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal, and that the City Solicitor be authorized to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, in the City Solicitor's discretion, after consulting with the Ward Councillor and the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
Summary
This Motion will give the City Solicitor authority to appeal the Committee of Adjustment’s decision approving the minor variance application at 222 Rosedale Heights Drive (A0257/24TEY); to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the development proposed in Application A0257/24TEY; to retain outside consultants as necessary; and to negotiate a settlement of the appeal.
On June 11, 2024, the Committee of Adjustment approved an application brought by the agent of the owner of 222 Rosedale Heights Drive for a proposal to alter the existing two-storey detached dwelling on the site, and for which three minor variances from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 were sought. A copy of the Committee of Adjustment’s decision on this application is attached as Attachment 1.
The proposed development at 222 Rosedale Heights Drive contemplates encroachment into the minimum Tree Protection Zone of a mature private tree located on a neighbouring property, 11 Harper Avenue, and which is in very close proximity to another neighbouring property, 15 Harper Avenue. The proposed development’s extension of the two-storey addition may also result in impacts to the tree’s crown. The cumulative effects of these impacts to the tree may result in the death of the tree.
To preserve the City’s right of appeal, the City Solicitor appealed the Committee of Adjustment’s decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body on June 25, 2024.
This matter is time-sensitive and urgent as the City Solicitor has already appealed the decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body in order to preserve the City’s statutory right of appeal. Thus, the City Solicitor requires instructions to appeal and to attend the hearing for this matter.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247197.pdf
Attachment 1 - Notice of Decision of the Committee regarding Application A0257/24TEY, dated June 11, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247180.pdf
MM19.35 - Construction Management Agreement for the creation of Chimney Swift Replacement Habitat in Budd Sugarman Park - 906 Yonge Street and 25 McMurrich Street - by Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 11 - University - Rosedale
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
Recommendations
Councillor Dianne Saxe, seconded by Councillor Amber Morley, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to enter into and execute on behalf of the City a Construction Management Agreement with 906 Yonge Street Development Inc. for the construction of two Chimney Swift habitats within Budd Sugarman Park, on terms and conditions deemed necessary and appropriate by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and in accordance with City policies applicable to capital projects.
2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to enter into and execute on behalf of the City any other ancillary agreements necessary to complete construction of the Chimney Swift habitats, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Summary
In a decision dated January 30, 2024, the Ontario Land Tribunal approved an application to amend the zoning by-law at 906 Yonge Street and 25 McMurrich Street. As part of the approved development at 906 Yonge Street and 25 McMurrich Street, an existing chimney on the property is proposed to be removed. In 2023, the applicant approached City staff and the Councillor’s office to inform them that the chimney contained evidence of Chimney Swifts, a species identified on the Species at Risk in Ontario list. Under the provincial Endangered Species Act, 2007, anyone requesting to damage or destroy the habitat of an endangered species must construct replacement habitat before the existing habitat is impacted.
In this instance, staff and the local Councillor agreed to allow replacement habitat to be constructed in a nearby City park, Budd Sugarman Park, provided the developer replace the chimney habitat at a ratio of 2 to 1 and agree to any terms and conditions deemed necessary and appropriate by City staff. A construction Management Agreement is required between the City and the builder to allow the chimneys to be constructed in Budd Sugarman Park.
At its meeting on February 6, 2024, City Council directed City staff to review and report on applicable policies concerning the use of City property to create replacement habitat for the purposes of the Endangered Species Act, 2007. A report is anticipated in the third quarter of 2024.
Background Information
MM19.36 - 2267 Dundas Street West - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
Recommendations
Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to uphold the Committee of Adjustment’s refusal of Application A0319/24TEY respecting 2267 Dundas Street West.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt negotiating a resolution regarding Application A0319/24TEY respecting 2267 Dundas Street West, and that the City Solicitor be authorized to resolve the matter on behalf of the City, in her discretion, after consulting with the Ward Councillor and the Director, Toronto and East York District Community Planning.
Summary
On June 5, 2024, the Committee of Adjustment (the "Committee") refused an application brought by the owner of 2267 Dundas Street West for variances to City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 to convert the existing three-storey mixed-use semi-detached building into a total of five
residential dwelling units (the "Application"). A copy of the Committee's decision is attached as Attachment 1.
On June 24, 2024, the owner appealed the Committee's Application refusal to the Toronto Local Appeal Body).
The Application presents outstanding concerns including, but not limited to, the inappropriate conversion of retail space for residential use.
A Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing is expected to be scheduled imminently — as such this motion is urgent.
This motion will authorize the City Solicitor to seek party status attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing along with appropriate City staff to oppose the appeal. This motion also authorizes the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal and retain outside consultants as necessary.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247192.pdf
Attachment 1 - Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment regarding Application A0319/24TEY dated June 5, 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247193.pdf
MM19.37 - Authorization to provide property tax relief for community non-profit affordable rental housing at 26 Maynard Avenue - by Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 4 - Parkdale - High Park
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
Recommendations
Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to negotiate and enter into a municipal capital facility agreement between the City and the Neighbourhood Land Trust in respect of the property at 26 Maynard Avenue for the provision of a tax exemption for municipal and school purposes to secure the property as affordable rental housing for the remaining 94 years of the 99 year affordability term as set out in the Existing Funding Agreement (the " Municipal Capital Facility Agreement') with the Neighbourhood Land Trust, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council enact a site specific by-law amending the criteria for "Affordable Housing" in the Municipal Housing Facility By-law 183-2022 or its successor by-law, to exempt the 15 affordable rental housing units at 26 Maynard Avenue to be operated by the Neighbourhood Land Trust from the restriction that affordable rental housing units be “new” to meet the definition of “Affordable Housing” in Municipal Housing Facility By-law 183-2022 or its successor by-law.
3. City Council, conditional on the enacting of the site-specific by-law amendment referred to in Part 2 above, exempt the 15 affordable rental units at 26 Maynard Avenue from taxation for municipal and school purposes for the remaining 94 years of the 99 year affordability term set out in the Existing Funding Agreement.
4. City Council authorize the Controller to cancel or refund any taxes paid after the effective date set out in the Municipal Capital Facility Agreement.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills to give effect to City Council’s decision.
6. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to execute, on behalf of the City, any security or financing documents required by the Neighbourhood Land Trust, including any postponement, confirmation of status, discharge or consent documents where and when required during the term of the Municipal Capital Facility Agreement, , as required by normal business practices, and provided that such documents do not give rise to financial obligations on the part of the City that have not been previously approved by City Council.
Summary
This Motion seeks authority to provide property tax relief for the fifteen-unit affordable rental housing building at 26 Maynard Avenue owned by the non-profit community housing provider, the Neighbourhood Land Trust (NLT).
In 2019, City Council approved the provision of financial assistance and benefits to the Neighbourhood Land Trust for the acquisition, renovation and operation of the property as affordable rental housing and approved the City entering into a Toronto Renovates and Rooming House Acquisition Funding Agreement with the Neighbourhood Land Trust. Based in part on the success of The Neighbourhood Land Trust’s acquisition of 26 Maynard Avenue under the City pilot project, the City launched the Multi-Unit Residential Acquisition Program (MURA) in 2021. The Multi-Unit Residential Acquisition Program provides funding and incentives, including property tax relief, for non-profit groups to acquire existing rental housing.
As the City’s 2019 financial contribution to the Neighbourhood Land Trust’s acquisition of 26 Maynard Avenue did not include the property tax relief now provided by the Multi-Unit Residential Acquisition Program, the Neighbourhood Land Trust has requested tax relief from the City to support the operation and affordability of the property.
Under the terms of an existing 2019 funding agreement between the City and the Neighbourhood Land Trust (the “Existing Funding Agreement”), the Neighbourhood Land Trust has committed to providing affordable homes at 26 Maynard Avenue for 99 years. The property tax exemption proposed by this Motion would contribute to the financial viability of the property as long-term affordable housing. The proposed annual tax savings would offset rising operating expenses and assist in maintaining the building in a good state of repair.
The City’s 2024 property tax for 26 Maynard Avenue is $12,389 and the net present value of the proposed tax relief for the remaining 94 years of the 99-year affordability term, as set out in the Existing Funding Agreement, is an estimated $387,303.
Reason for Urgency:
The Neighbourhood Land Trust operates the project with deeply affordable rent levels for lower-income residents.
The property tax relief recommended by this motion will contribute to the financial stability of the project by alleviating these operating pressures, while maintaining service levels for residents and ensuring the building can be maintained in a good state of repair.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247201.pdf
(June 27, 2024) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2024/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-247280.pdf
MM19.38 - Review of Traffic Impacts of Ontario Place Redevelopment and Proposed Ontario Science Centre Relocation - by Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 10 - Spadina - Fort York
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
Recommendations
Deputy Mayor Ausma Malik, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to provide a summary of the anticipated traffic impacts on Lake Shore Boulevard West related to Ontario Place redevelopment including the Therme spa, Live Nation renovations and new Ontario Science Centre and report back to Toronto East York Community Council in the fourth quarter of 2024.
Summary
The Ontario Place Redevelopment would bring significant changes in traffic movement on Lake Shore Boulevard West and area.
As a busy transportation corridor, Lake Shore Blvd experiences large amounts of traffic. The site is also close to Exhibition Place which in addition to its trade shows and conventions hosts sporting events and signature events such as the Canadian National Exhibition, Honda Indy, and Toronto Caribbean Festival that generate enormous peak levels of traffic that affect Lake Shore Blvd West.
A staff analysis of traffic impacts related to Ontario Place redevelopment is needed to update work that began with the formal development application for Ontario Place that included a proposed relocation of a reduced Ontario Science Centre.
This motion is urgent as site servicing work at the Ontario Place site has begun and the Province has recently announced the immediate closure of the current Ontario Science Centre.
Background Information
MM19.39 - Appointment of a Public Member to the Toronto Police Service Board - by Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded Councillor Amber Morley
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual being considered for appointment to the Toronto Police Service Board.
Recommendations
Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded Councillor Amber Morley, recommends that:
1. City Council rescind the appointment of Nadine Spencer to the Toronto Police Service Board effective immediately.
2. City Council appoint Chris Brillinger to the Toronto Police Services Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 14, 2026, and until a successor is appointed.
3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to this motion remain confidential in its entirety as it pertains to personal matters about an identifiable individual being considered for appointment to the Toronto Police Service Board.
Summary
We are recommending Chris Brillinger be appointed to the Toronto Police Service Board in place of Nadine Spencer.
Chris Brillinger worked for the City of Toronto for 31 years, including nine years as Executive Director of Social Development Finance and Administration. He has been instrumental in much of the work of the City of Toronto to create safer, more caring communities, including our youth equity strategy, poverty reduction strategy, and strong neighbourhood strategy. Mr. Brillinger is currently the Executive Director of Family Services Toronto where he leads Family Services Toronto in their work with individuals, families and communities destabilized by precarious mental health and/or socioeconomic circumstances, to achieve greater resilience, stability and equity.
Under new provisions of the Community Safety and Policing Act, City Council must consider the results of an appointee’s police record check. Mr. Brillinger has submitted a police record check to the City Clerk who has attached confidential advice to this motion.
Reason for urgency: so that a new member is appointed and onboarded in time for the next meeting of the Toronto Police Service Board.
Background Information
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
MM19.40 - Non-Competitive Bridge Contract with Kodiak Group Holdings Co. Operating as Work Authority for Various Safety Footwear - by Councillor Jon Burnside, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 16 - Don Valley East
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
Recommendations
Councillor Jon Burnside, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:
1. City Council, in accordance with the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 195, Purchasing, Section 7.3(D) and Section 11.1(C) of Chapter 71, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 71, Financial Control, grant authority for the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services to negotiate and enter into a contract with Kodiak Group Holdings Co. o/a Work Authority, for the non-exclusive supply and fitting of Various Safety Footwear, Occupational Footwear, and Galoshes for employees for the approximately 30 separate City of Toronto Divisions as specified in Table 1 in the May 15, 2023, Report, of the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services and Chief Procurement Officer, (the “Deliverables”) as previously authorized by item GG4.14 - Non-Competitive Bridge Contract with Kodiak Group Holdings Co. Operating as Work Authority for Various Safety Footwear adopted by City's General Government Committee, at its meeting of May 30, 2023, as amended to reflect an eighteen (18) month term of July 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024, rather than the previously authorized twelve (12) month term of July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024, and a corresponding increase of $255,850.00 to the maximum value of the Deliverables provided under the agreement, resulting in a change the cumulative maximum value of the Work from $1,951,161.00 to $2,207,011.00, exclusive of HST but inclusive of all other applicable taxes.
Summary
The City entered into a contract with Kodiak Group Holdings Co. operating as (o/a) Work Authority (“Work Authority”) under Request for Quotation No. 0114-18-008 for the non-exclusive supply of various safety footwear, occupational footwear, and galoshes for employees of various City of Toronto Divisions. On May 30, 2023, the General Government Committee approved the award of a non-competitive bridging contract to Work Authority under the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 195, Purchasing, Section 7.3(D) and Section 11.1(C) of Chapter 71, Financial Control, for a 12 month term (June 30, 2023-July 1, 2024) for $1,985,502.
An extension of the non-competitive bridging contract with Work Authority is required for a further 6-month term, valued at an additional $255,850 to complete the competitive solicitation. The current non-competitive bridging contract will expire on June 30, 2024. Council approval is requested to reflect an amended eighteen (18) month term of July 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024, rather than the previously authorized twelve (12) month term of July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024, and the corresponding increase in the contract value.
Background Information
MM19.41 - Re-opening and Amending Item 2023.TE6.16 - 170 Roehampton Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Decision Report - Approval to Move Forward With Rental Housing at 170 Roehampton Avenue - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item 2023.TE6.16. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.
Recommendations
Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, recommends that:
1. City Council amend its previous decision on item 2023.TE6.16, headed "170 Roehampton Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - Decision Report - Approval" by deleting Parts 5.c. and 5.d.:
5. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the demolition of 15 rental dwelling units at 170 Roehampton Avenue after all the following have occurred:
Parts to be deleted:
c. the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006; and
d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits (conditional or full permits) for the approved development on the site;
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend the registered Section 111 Agreement as necessary to implement the change in requirements for issuance of Preliminary Approval of the Rental Housing Demolition Permit.
Summary
At its meeting of July 19 and 20, 2023, Toronto City Council adopted Item 2023.TE6.16 approving a Rental Housing Demolition Application to demolish 15 rental dwelling units located at 170 Roehampton Avenue, which included conditions that must be met prior to issuance of the rental housing demolition permit and residential demolition permit. These pre-conditions included a requirement for the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval and permits for excavation and shoring for the approved development on the site.
Due to timing of the proposed development, the applicant would like to demolish the 15 rental dwelling units located at 170 Roehampton before the issuance of Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan and excavation and shoring permits for the approved development. The tenants of 170 Roehampton have moved out and received tenant assistance and compensation, and the rental units are currently vacant. The applicant has also indicated that they intend to move forward with this project as a rental housing project.
This motion is urgent as it will enable the earlier demolition of 170 Roehampton to allow more expedited timeline for the project, which will assist the applicant in converting the project from a condominium to much needed rental housing.
Background Information
MM19.42 - Seeking Council Direction to Conclude Negotiations between Ontario Tennis Association and the City of Toronto for the building of a Multi-purpose Sports Complex in the Allen East District - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Lily Cheng
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Ward:
- 6 - York Centre
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.
Recommendations
Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Lily Cheng, recommends that:
1. City Council direct the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to bring forward a Municipal Capital Facility designation for the Ontario Tennis Association facility to be built on City-owned property as part of the Allen East District Plan located east of Allen Road and south of Sheppard Avenue West (the "Property") provided the facility meets the criteria for Municipal Capital Facility related to the provision of City facilities used for recreational purposes.
2. City Council direct the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer , in consultation with the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management report back and seek necessary authority to exempt the Property from taxation for municipal and school purposes, with the tax exemption to be effective from the date when the Property begins to be operational for recreational purposes by the Ontario Tennis Association and meets the Municipal Capital Facility criteria.
3. City Council direct the Director, Children's Services and the Chief Planner to work with the Ontario Tennis Association in constructing a licenceable day care centre as part of their construction of the multipurpose sports facility as part of the Allen East District Plan.
4. City Council direct Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to work with the Ontario Tennis Association to incorporate into their Public Access Agreement the key principles of the Downsview Community Development Plan.
Summary
On October 1 to 4, 2021, Toronto City Council adopted the Final Report Allen East District Plan. Included in this plan was an understanding between the City of Toronto and the Ontario Tennis Association (OTA) that the latter would build a multi-purpose sports facility at their cost. A land lease is currently being negotiated between the City of Toronto and the Ontario Tennis Association. It is important for Council to give direction on the Municipal Capital Facility, a licenceable day care and a Public Access Agreement that aligns with the Downsview Community Service Agreement. Authority to negotiate an agreement was supported by City Council at the July 19 to 22, 2022, meeting. These motions are to support city staff and give them the authority and tools to continue the negotiations and secure the agreement.
As part of the Allen East District Plan (Adopted by Toronto City Council in October 2021) a multi-purpose/sports facility is to be built by the Ontario Tennis Association on leased City of Toronto lands. Negotiations between the Ontario Tennis Association and the City of Toronto to execute a land lease and build a 15,000 square foot multi-purpose sports facility is nearing completion. It is crucial that we seek Council direction to take concrete steps to designate the facility a Municipal Capital Facility, potentially require the building of a day care, and that the facility Public Access Agreement adhere to the key principles of the Downsview Community Development Plan.
This is urgent due to the desire by both parties to finalize the agreement by Summer, 2024.
Background Information
Bills and By-laws - Meeting 19
BL19.1 - Introduction of General Bills and Confirming Bills
- Consideration Type:
- ACTION
- Wards:
- All
Summary
City Council will introduce General Bills and Confirming Bills.