Decisions
North York Community Council
- Meeting No.:
- 34
- Contact:
- Francine Adamo, Committee Administrator
- Meeting Date:
- Tuesday, August 12, 2014
- Phone:
- 416-395-0480
- Start Time:
- 9:30 AM
- E-mail:
- nycc@toronto.ca
- Location:
- Council Chamber, North York Civic Centre
- Chair:
- Councillor Maria Augimeri
NY34.1 - Fence Exemption Request - Front and Flankage Yards - 237 Glengrove Avenue West
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the exemption from Chapter 447 - Fences, for the property at 237 Glengrove Avenue, with the following condition:
a. that when the fence is replaced, it be constructed in compliance with Chapter 447 or its successor by-law.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws. The subject matter is an application for an exemption to Chapter 447 of the Toronto Municipal Code, Fences, to permit the existing fencing in the front and flankage yards which is in violation of the By-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71793.pdf
Attachment 1 - Iview Map of 237 Glengrove Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71835.pdf
Attachment 2 - Aerial Photo of 237 Glengrove Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71836.pdf
Attachment 3 - Photo of the Front Yard of 237 Glengrove Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71837.pdf
Attachment 4 - Photo of the Flankage Yard and TTC Bus Stop at 237 Glengrove Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71840.pdf
Speakers
NY34.2 - Fence Exemption Request - Front Yard - 10 Brookview Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the exemption from Chapter 447 - Fences, for the property at 10 Brookview Drive, with the following condition:
a. that when the fence is replaced, it be constructed in compliance with Chapter 447 or its successor by-law.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws. The subject matter is an application for an exemption to Chapter 447 of the Toronto Municipal Code, Fences, to permit fencing in the front and flankage yard which would be in violation of the By-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71792.pdf
Attachment 1 - Iview Map of 10 Brookview Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71815.pdf
Attachment 2 - Proposed drawing of Fence at 10 Brookview Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71816.pdf
Attachment 3 - Photos of Front and FlankageYards at 10 Brookview Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71817.pdf
Attachment 4 - Photos of Front and FlankageYards at 10 Brookview Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71818.pdf
Attachment 5 - Letter from neighbour at 29 Kirkland Avenue
NY34.3 - Fence Exemption Request - Rear Yard - 80 Tycos Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the report (July 23, 2014) from the District Manager, Municipal Licensing and Standards, North York District, to the first meeting of the North York Community Council in January 2015.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws. The subject matter is an application for an exemption to Chapter 447 of the Toronto Municipal Code, Fences, to permit fencing in the rear yard which is in violation of the By-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71790.pdf
Attachment 1 - GIS map of 80 Tycos Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71823.pdf
Attachment 2 - Site Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71824.pdf
Attachment 3 - Fence Diagram
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71825.pdf
Attachment 4 - Wood Fence Details
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71826.pdf
Attachment 5 - Wood Fence Elevation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71827.pdf
Attachment 6 - Photos
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71828.pdf
Communications
(July 27, 2014) E-mail from Gina Cianchetti (NY.New.NY34.3.2)
NY34.4 - Fence Exemption Request - Front Yard - 16 Daleena Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 34 - Don Valley East
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the exemption from Chapter 447-Fences for the property at 16 Daleena Drive, subject to the following condition:
a. the fence shall be constructed so that one can see through it for the full height of the fence on the south and east elevations and the applicant shall plant a live hedge along the south and east exteriors of the fence.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws. The subject matter is an application for an exemption to Chapter 447 of the Toronto Municipal Code, Fences, to permit the existing fencing in the front and flankage yards which is in violation of the By-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71789.pdf
Attachment 1 - Iview Map of 16 Daleena Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71820.pdf
Attachment 2 - Aerial Photo of 16 Daleena Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71821.pdf
Attachment 3 - Drawing of the proposed location of the fence at 16 Daleena Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71822.pdf
Speakers
NY34.5 - Fence Appeal - 2 McGillivray Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation of the 1.8 metre high fence within the public right of way at 2 McGillivray Avenue on the flanking roadway, Kelso Avenue, subject to the following:
a. the property owner enter into an encroachment agreement with the City of Toronto assuming all costs, liability and damages related to the maintenance of the encroachment;
b. the property owner to maintain valid property insurance in case there are any claims initiated due to the encroachment maintenance; and
c. the property owner accepting that the City and/or utility companies may remove the encroachment in order to install or maintain services within the affected public right of way.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 2 McGillivray Avenue to install a 1.8 metre high wooden fence on the flankage of the residence which faces Kelso Avenue. The provisions of Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use of, permits a maximum height of 1 metre measured from the roadway grade for a fence installed within 70 metres of an intersection of two or more roadways.
A site inspection determined that the location of the fence will not have a negative impact on the public right of way as it will not impede traffic sightlines at the intersection or adversely affect driveways in the vicinity.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71741.pdf
Attachment 1 - Site Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71742.pdf
Attachment 1 - Location Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71743.pdf
Attachment 3 - Site Picture
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71744.pdf
Speakers
NY34.6 - Boulevard Cafe Request - 5025 Yonge Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the application for a boulevard café permit at 5025 Yonge Street, with the following conditions:
a. that the City of Toronto business licence be amended by the applicant to include an 'outside patio';
b. that the area of the boulevard café located on the City of Toronto right-of-way be no greater than 11.49 metres along Elmwood Avenue extending 0.71 metres from the property line. The total area of the boulevard café calculated in two portions is 7.2 square metres.
c. that the boulevard café license be renewable on an annual basis with the appropriate insurance in place and the required fee being paid;
d. that no claims will be made against the City by the owner(s) for damages occurring to the patio, equipment, enclosure or its elements during snow removal;
e. that the occupancy permitted by the license is to be removed by the owner, at the expense of the licensee, within 30 days of receiving written notice from the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards;
f. the licensee agrees that the City, or any gas, telephone, telegraph, electric light or other public utility company, shall have the right at all times to enter upon the permitted encroachment for the purpose of constructing, repairing, maintaining, replacing or removing any sewer, mains, culverts, drains, water pipes, pole wires or other underground services and installations. The licensee shall not be entitled to any damages or compensation by reason of the exercise of the City and utility company’s rights; and the licensee, at his own expense, shall carry out such alterations or removal of the encroachment as may be directed by the City;
g. in default of the removal not occurring as directed, the City may carry out the removal, at the expense of the licensee, and may recover the costs incurred by legal action or in a like manner as municipal taxes;
h. the indemnification of the City by the owner(s) of the encroachments for all liability relating in any way to the encroachment and providing of an insurance policy for such liability for the lifetime of the Agreement in a form as approved by the City Solicitor in an amount not less than $2,000,000 or such greater amount as the City Solicitor may require;
i. the licensee will, at his expense and to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards, keep and maintain the boulevard café enclosure and all or any of its components in a good and proper state of repair and safety, and will not make any additions or modifications beyond what is allowed pursuant to the terms of the License permit; and
j. the licensee pays the appropriate annual leasing rate, established by the City of Toronto, Corporate Services, Facilities and Real Estate Division.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that the Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws. The subject matter is an application for a boulevard café permit.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71796.pdf
Attachment 1 - Patio Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71834.pdf
Speakers
NY34.7 - Refusal of a Boulevard Café Permit Application - 2 Broadway Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 25 - Don Valley West
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Denied the application for the proposed boulevard café permit at 2 Broadway Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which the North York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
To report on the refusal to issue a permit by Municipal Licensing & Standards in the matter of an application for a boulevard café permit located at 2 Broadway Avenue.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71976.pdf
Attachments 1 and 2 - Sketch of Boulevard Café and Photos of Proposed Café Area
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71977.pdf
Speakers
Cindy Visser
Sean Boulton
NY34.8 - Permanent Closure of Part of the Public Highway Known as Zachary Court
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the permanent closure of the portion of the public highway known as Zachary Court designated as Part 1 on 66R-27012, Sketch No. PS-2014-064 attached as Attachment 2 to the report (June 24, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District.
2. City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Attachment 1 to the report (June 24, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a public meeting in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and notice of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was posted on the Public Notices Page of the City’s website in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162. No one addressed the North York Community Council on August 12, 2014.
Origin
Summary
Transportation Services recommends that a portion of the public highway know as Zachary Court be permanently closed. Zachary Court will be replaced with a new public highway as part of Phase I of the Lawrence Heights Revitalization Project.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71869.pdf
Attachment 1 - Draft By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71870.pdf
Attachment 2 - Sketch No. PS-20014-064
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71871.pdf
Declared Interests
Councillor David Shiner - as his father owns a house in the immediate area
NY34.9 - Proposed Closure to Vehicular Traffic, Portions of the Public Lane at the rear of 5571 and 5575 Yonge Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the closure to vehicular traffic, portions of the public lane at the rear of 5571 and 5575 Yonge Street, designated as Part 8 on Reference Plan 64R-14258 and Part 1 on Reference Plan 66R-27540, and shown as Parts 1 and 2 respectively on Sketch No. PS-20014-077 (the "Lanes") attached as Attachment 2 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District.
2. City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Attachment 1 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a public meeting in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and notice of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was posted on the Public Notices Page of the City’s website in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162. No one addressed the North York Community Council on August 12, 2014.
Origin
Summary
Transportation Services recommends that portions of the public lane at the rear of 5571 and 5575 Yonge Street be close by by-law to restrict access to vehicular traffic.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71964.pdf
Attachment 1 - Sketch No. PS-2014-077
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71965.pdf
Attachment 2 - Draft By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71966.pdf
NY34.10 - Permanent Closure of two Public Lanes in the Block Bounded by Laird Drive, Vanderhoof Avenue, Vaughan Street and Wicksteed Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 26 - Don Valley West
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the permanent closure of the two public lanes in the block bounded by Laird Drive, Vanderhoof Avenue, Vaughan Street and Wicksteed Avenue, shown as Parts 1 and 2 on Sketch No. PS-2012-079 (the "Lanes") attached as Attachment 2 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District.
2. City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Attachment 1 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District, conditional upon the City entering into an agreement with Leaside Shopping Centres Limited, (the "Purchaser"), wherein the Applicant agrees to purchase the Lanes from the City on terms satisfactory to the City.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a public meeting in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and notice of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was posted on the Public Notices Page of the City’s website in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162. No one addressed the North York Community Council on August 12, 2014.
Origin
Summary
Transportation Services recommends that the two public lanes in the block bounded by Laird Drive, Vanderhoof Avenue, Vaughan Street and Wicksteed Avenue be permanently closed.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71973.pdf
Attachment 1 - Draft By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71974.pdf
Attachment 2 - Sketch No. PS-2012-079
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71975.pdf
NY34.11 - Naming of Public Lane located South of Eglinton Avenue West and extending easterly from Oakwood Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the name "Reggae Lane" to identify the public lane south of Eglinton Avenue West and extending easterly from Oakwood Avenue.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a meeting in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and notice of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was posted on the Public Notices Page of the City's website in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162. No one addressed the North York Community Council on August 12, 2014.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that the name "Reggae Lane" be approved to identify a public lane located south of Eglinton Avenue West and extending easterly from Oakwood Avenue.
Community Councils have delegated authority to decide street naming matters which comply with the City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71609.pdf
NY34.12 - Naming of Proposed Public Street at 2205 Sheppard Avenue East
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 33 - Don Valley East
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the name "Ann O'Reilly Road" to identify the proposed public street at 2205 Sheppard Avenue East.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a meeting in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and notice of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was posted on the Public Notices Page of the City's website in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162. No one addressed the North York Community Council on August 12, 2014.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that the name "O'Reilly Road" be approved to identify a proposed public street for a re-development at 2205 Sheppard Avenue East.
Community Councils have delegated authority to decide street naming matters which comply with the City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71587.pdf
Speakers
NY34.13 - Front Yard Parking Appeal - 195 Roslin Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 25 - Don Valley West
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Denied the request for front yard parking at 195 Roslin Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
Transportation Services has assessed an appeal from the owner of 195 Roslin Avenue for front yard parking. Front yard parking at this location is not recommended because it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70949.pdf
Appendix A - Sketch
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70950.pdf
Appendix B - Property Data Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70951.pdf
Appendix C - Photo
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70952.pdf
Appendix D - Applicant’s Landscape Proposal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70953.pdf
Appendix E - Sketch showing proposed barriers to be installed
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70954.pdf
NY34.14 - Encroachment Appeal - 221 Elmwood Ave
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the request to install and maintain a 1.8 metre high fence enclosing the backyard subject to the following conditions:
a. the property owner to enter into an encroachment agreement with the City of Toronto at the applicant's expense and assume all liability and damages related to maintenance of the encroachment;
b. the property owner obtains a permit to construct the fence within the public right of way;
c. the property owner must maintain, as long as the encroachments are maintained, valid property insurance in case there are any claims initiated due to the encroachments;
d. the property owner accepts that the City and/or utility companies may remove the encroachments in order to install or maintain services within the affected public right of way; and
e. construction of the fence shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director, Transportation Services, North York District, and at no cost to the City.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To approve the installation of a proposed fence at 221 Elmwood Avenue.
Although, it does not meet the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use of, our review of the proposed fence installation indicates that it does not negatively impact the public right of way, and does not create a sight obstruction. The owner will be given an opportunity to make a deputation before Community Council.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71786.pdf
Attachment 1 - Site Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71787.pdf
Attachment 2 - Fence cross-section
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71788.pdf
NY34.15 - Renewal of Encroachment Agreement with Bell Mobility Inc. - 226 Wilson Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Granted authority to renew the Encroachment Agreement with Bell Mobility Inc. regarding the Encroachment substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix "A" of the report (July 24, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, with such revisions thereto, and such other terms and conditions acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer, or designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.
2. Authorized the Chief Corporate Officer, or designate, to administer and manage the Encroachment Agreement, including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matter (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to obtain authority to renew an encroachment agreement between the City of Toronto and Bell Mobility Inc. (the "Licensee") to permit an encroachment on the City owned land and adjacent lands over which the City has an easement. The encroachment is required for the location of underground cables, and comprises a land area of 99 sq.m., being a 3.0 m wide strip centered on the cable location (the "Encroachment"), as outlined in Appendix "B." Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision with respect to encroachments.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72072.pdf
Appendix A - Major terms and conditions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72073.pdf
Appendix B - Location Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72074.pdf
NY34.16 - Residential Demolition Application - 383 Glen Park Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the application to demolish the single family dwelling at 383 Glen Park Avenue with the following conditions:
a. that a construction fence be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article III, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official;
b. that all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
c. that sod be laid on the site and be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 623-5, and 629-10, paragraph B; and
d. that any holes on the property be backfilled with clean fill.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Planning Act and the former City of Toronto Municipal Code Ch. 363, Article II "Demolition Control", the application for the demolition of a single family dwelling at 383 Glen Park Avenue is referred to the North York Community Council to refuse or to grant the application as a building permit has not been issued for a replacement building.
If the North York Community Council grants issuance of the demolition permit, it may impose conditions if any, to be attached to the demolition permit.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71807.pdf
Attachment 2 - Applicant's Letter
NY34.17 - Residential Demolition Application - 31 Montgomery Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the application to demolish the single family dwelling at 31 Montgomery Avenue with the following conditions:
a. that a construction fence be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article III, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official;
b. that all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
c. that sod be laid on the site and be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 623-5, and 629-10, paragraph B; and
d. that any holes on the property be backfilled with clean fill.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Planning Act and the former City of Toronto Municipal Code Ch. 363, Article II “Demolition Control”, the application for the demolition of a vacant single family dwelling at 31 Montgomery Avenue is referred to the North York Community Council to refuse or to grant the application as a building permit has not been issued for a replacement building.
If the North York Community Council grants issuance of the demolition permit, it may impose conditions if any, to be attached to the demolition permit.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71809.pdf
NY34.18 - Residential Demolition Application - 238, 240, 242, 244, 250, 252, 254, 256 and 258 Finch Avenue East
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the applications to demolish the 9 existing single family dwellings at 238, 240, 242, 244, 250, 252, 254, 256 and 258 Finch Avenue East, with the following conditions:
a. that a construction fence be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article III, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official;
b. that all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
c. that sod be laid on the site and be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 623-5, and 629-10, paragraph B;
d. that any holes on the properties be backfilled with clean fill; and
e. that no privately owned street trees measuring 30 cm or greater in diameter are to be removed without the approval of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry, and Recreation.
4. Authorized the Chief Building Official to issue a demolition permit only if a permit under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, has been issued, pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 667 or if final building permits for the replacement buildings have been issued.
Origin
Summary
The applications for the demolition of 7 vacant single family dwellings on Finch Avenue East is a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Planning Act and the former City of Toronto Municipal Code Ch. 363, Article II "Demolition Control", the applications for the demolition of more than 6 units are referred to the North York Community Council to refuse or to grant the applications as building permits have not yet been issued for the replacement buildings.
If the North York Community Council grants issuance of the demolition permits, it may
impose conditions, if any, to be attached to the demolition permit.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71708.pdf
Speakers
NY34.19 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 251 McKee Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree at the rear of 251 McKee Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at the rear of 251 McKee Avenue. The owner is requesting removal of this tree due to the required maintenance, the emission of juglone (a substance produced by walnut trees that can be toxic to some plants), and the damage the tree could cause if it failed and fell onto nearby dwellings and properties.
The subject tree is a black walnut (Juglans nigra) measuring 59 cm in diameter that tree is in good condition. Urban Forestry does not support removal of this tree.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71680.pdf
Communications
Speakers
NY34.20 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 2384 Yonge Street (Postal Station K)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the alteration of the heritage property at 2384 Yonge Street in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for the construction of a 27-storey residential tower and the adaptive re-use of the former Postal Station K building for commercial/retail use, provided that 2384 Yonge Street is designated and subject to a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City, with such alterations to the property to be substantially in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment, prepared by ERA Architects dated June 2, 2014 and the drawings prepared by RAW Design, dated May 21, 2014 and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following conditions:
a. that the related Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations have been enacted by the City Council and have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
b. that prior to the introduction of bills for the Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall have:
i. entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 2384 Yonge Street in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects dated June 2, 2014, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and the City Solicitor; and
ii. completed and entered into a Section 37 Agreement (pursuant to the Planning Act) to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services.
c. that prior to Site Plan Approval for the property at 2384 Yonge Street the owner shall have:
i. provided a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for 2384 Yonge Street prepared by ERA Architects, dated June 2, 2014 and all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and
ii. provided Final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
d. that prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 2384 Yonge Street, excluding the portion of the lot known municipally in the year 2014, as 31 Montgomery Avenue, including pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act and the Building Code Act and including any permit for excavation and shoring or foundation, but excluding a permit for the removal of the one storey addition to the rear of the heritage structure, a rental/sales centre, repairs, maintenance and usual and minor repairs and maintenance of the existing heritage building the owner shall:
i. obtain final approval for the necessary by-law amendment required for the alterations to the property at 2384 Yonge Street, such amendments to have been enacted by City Council and to have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council as determined by the Chief Planner, and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
ii. have obtained Final Site Plan Approval for such property issued by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, for an above-grade permit only;
iii. provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, except in the case of any below grade permit, only the subject building permit drawings are to be provided;
iv. provide a Lighting Plan that describes how Postal Station K will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, for an above grade permit only;
v. provide an Interpretation Plan for Postal Station K, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, for an above grade permit only; and
vi. provide a Letter of Credit, including provisions for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and the Interpretation Plan; and
e. that prior to the release of the Letter of Credit the owner shall:
i. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work and the interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and the approved Interpretation Plan, and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and
ii. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that City Council endorse the conservation strategy generally described in this report for the former Postal Station K building at 2384 Yonge Street (entrance address for 2388 Yonge Street) which is located north of Helendale Avenue. Postal Station K was listed on the City of Toronto's Inventory of Heritage Properties on February 6, 1974 and will be subject to a Notice of Intention to Designate under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act should City Council approve recommendations contained in an August 21, 2013 report from the Acting Director, Urban Design which will be considered at the July 8-9, 2014 Council meeting.
The property is the subject of an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment that proposes the full retention of the two-storey Postal Station K building and the construction of a 27-storey tower. The long term protection of Postal Station K will be secured through the registration of a heritage easement agreement on the title of the property.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71509.pdf
Attachment 1- Location Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71510.pdf
Attachment 2 -Photograph
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71511.pdf
Attachment 3 - Photograph
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71512.pdf
Attachment 4 - Proposed Site Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71513.pdf
Attachment 5 - Proposed Elevations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71514.pdf
Attachment 6 - Proposed Elevations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71515.pdf
Attachment 7 - Proposed Rendering
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71516.pdf
20a - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 2384 Yonge Street (Postal Station K)
Origin
Summary
The Toronto Preservation Board on July 17, 2014, considered a report (June 26, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 2384 Yonge Street (Postal Station K).
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72038.pdf
NY34.21 - 40 km/h Speed Zone Review - Four Winds Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 8 - York West
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the reduction of the speed limit on Four Winds Drive between Sentinel Road and Keele Street to 40 kilometres per hour.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To deny the request to amend the speed limit to 40 km/h on Four Winds Drive between Sentinel Road and Keele Street.
The existing traffic and roadway conditions do not warrant the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Four Winds Drive.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71763.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Four Winds Drive - Speed Limit Reduction
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71764.pdf
NY34.22 - Lane Designation - Finch Avenue West Between Dufferin Street and Alness Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 8 - York West
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the designation of a two-way centre left turn lane on Finch Avenue West from a point 130 metres west of Dufferin Street to a point 110 metres further west.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Finch Avenue West City Council approval of this report is required.
To approve the installation of a "Two-way centre left turn lane" on Finch Avenue West from a point 130 metres west of Dufferin Street to 110 metres further west.
The designation of the two-way centre left turn lane and subsequent implementation of the required pavement markings on Finch Avenue West between Dufferin Street and Alness Street will provide a positive guidance to motorists on this section of roadway when accessing the multiple driveway accesses.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71686.pdf
Attachment 1- Map - Finch Avenue - Lane Designation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71687.pdf
NY34.23 - 40 km/h Speed Zone - Diana Drive, Appletree Court, Maryport Avenue and Jennifer Court
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 9 - York Centre
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the implementation of a 40 km/h speed limit zone on Diana Drive from Keele Street to the west end of Diana Drive.
2. Approved the implementation of a 40 km/h speed limit zone on Appletree Court from Diana Drive to the north end of Appletree Court.
3. Approved the implementation of a 40 km/h speed limit zone on Maryport Avenue from Diana Drive to Keele Street.
4. Approved the implementation of a 40 km/h speed limit zone on Jennifer Court from Maryport Avenue to the south end of Jennifer Court.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to amend the existing speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Diana Drive, Appletree Court, Maryport Avenue and Jennifer Court.
The amendments to the regulatory speed limit will address the residents' request with regards to vehicle speeds.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71678.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - 40 km/h Speed Zone - 40 km/h Speed Zone - Diana Dr, Appletree Crt, Maryport Ave and Jennifer Crt
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71679.pdf
NY34.24 - All Way Stop Controls - Ancaster Community
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 9 - York Centre
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council deny the installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Garratt Boulevard and Katherine Road.
2. City Council deny the installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Garratt Boulevard and Plewes Road.
3. City Council deny the installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Ancaster Road and Home Road.
4. City Council deny the installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Murray Road and Katherine Road.
5. City Council deny the installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Murray Road and Plewes Road.
6. City Council approve the installation of a Pedestrian Crossover at the intersection of Garratt Boulevard and Katherine Road, to address the concerns of the residents with regards to the uncontrolled pedestrian (school age children) crossing activity at this intersection during the arrival and dismissal times for Ancaster Public School and St. Norbert Catholic School located in the immediate area.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Garratt Boulevard, City Council approval of this report is required.
To deny the request for the installation of All Way Stop Controls at the following intersections:
- Garratt Boulevard at Katherine Road;
- Garratt Boulevard at Plewes Road;
- Ancaster Road at Home Road;
- Murray Road at Katherine Road; and
- Murray Road at Plewes Road
Staffs review of the above noted intersections has concluded that the existing traffic controls at each intersection is adequately controlling the movement of vehicular and pedestrian traffic.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71953.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - All Way Stop Controls - Ancaster Community
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71954.pdf
NY34.25 - Through Traffic Restriction - Kennard Avenue and William R. Allen Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 10 - York Centre
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council deny the installation of a westbound through prohibition, cyclists excepted, from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday at the intersection of Kennard Avenue and W.R. Allen Road.
2. City Council approve the construction of the road widening conditional upon funding, design and construction from Rimrock Plaza Inc. (Herefordshire Capital Corporation).
3. City Council direct Transportation Services to request the City's Legal Division to introduce the appropriate Road Alterations By-law to permit the construction of a road widening on Kennard Avenue, west of Dufferin Street/W.R. Allen Road to facilitate a four lane cross section, three outbound lanes (left, through and right turn lanes) and one inbound lane.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates transit services on Kennard Avenue and William R. (W.R.) Allen Road, City Council approval of this report is required.
To obtain approval to prohibit westbound through movements from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, at the intersection of Kennard Avenue and W.R. Allen Road.
The installation of the westbound through prohibitions at this intersection will address the concerns of road users with respect to the increasing delay to the westbound right turning movement due to the low volume of through traffic holding up the westbound right turns, specifically during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70955.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Through Traffic Restriction - Kennard Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70956.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-48381.pdf
(August 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Pasternak (NY.New.NY34.25.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49079.pdf
NY34.26 - 40 km/h Speed Zone - Delhi Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - York Centre
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the deletion of a 40 km/h speed limit zone on Delhi Avenue between Westgate Boulevard and Ridley Boulevard.
2. Approved the implementation of a 40 km/h speed limit zone on Delhi Avenue between Bathurst Street and Ridley Boulevard.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to amend the speed limit to 40 km/h on Delhi Avenue between Bathurst Street and Ridley Boulevard.
The extension of the existing 40 km/h speed limit zone on Delhi Avenue will facilitate a consistent speed limit on Delhi Avenue and will address the residents' concerns with regards to vehicle speeds.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71758.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - 40 km/h Speed Zone - Delhi Ave
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71759.pdf
NY34.27 - 40 km/h Speed Zone - Westgate Boulevard
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - York Centre
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the deletion of a 40 km/h speed limit zone on Westgate Boulevard between Southbourne Avenue and Delhi Avenue.
2. Approved the implementation of a 40 km/h speed limit zone on Westgate Boulevard between Southbourne Avenue and the north limit of Westgate Boulevard.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to amend the speed limit to 40 km/h on Westgate Boulevard between Southbourne Avenue and the northern leg.
The extension of the existing 40 km/h speed limit zone on Westgate Boulevard will facilitate a consistent speed limit on Westgate Boulevard and will address the residents' concerns with regards to vehicle speeds.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71761.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - 40 km/h Speed Zone - Westgate Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71762.pdf
NY34.28 - All Way Stop Control - Overbrook Place and Shaftesbury Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - York Centre
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Overbrook Place and Shaftesbury Street.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To deny the request for the installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Overbrook Place and Shaftesbury Street.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71756.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Overbrook Place and Shaftesbury Street - All Way Stop
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71757.pdf
Communications
(August 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Pasternak and petition containing 74 names of residents (NY.New.NY34.28.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49141.pdf
NY34.29 - Parking Prohibitions - Yeomans Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - York Centre
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation of no parking on the east side of Yeomans Road from Sheppard Avenue West to Alexis Boulevard from Monday to Friday, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to install no parking anytime on Yeomans Road from Sheppard Avenue West to Alexis Boulevard.
The installation of no parking anytime on Yeomans Road will address the concerns of the local residents regarding the safe flow of two way traffic.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71745.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Yeomans Road and Alexis Boulevard - No Parking
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71746.pdf
NY34.30 - Parking Regulations - Hove Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - York Centre
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the deletion of No Parking Anytime on the east side of Hove Street from Sheppard Avenue West to a point 183 metres north of Sheppard Avenue West.
2. Approved the installation of One Hour Permitted Parking on the east side of Hove Street from Sheppard Avenue West to Cocksfield Avenue (north intersection).
3. Approved the installation of No Parking from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday on the west side of Hove Street from Cocksfield Avenue (north intersection) to Codsell Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to amend the existing parking regulations on Hove Street between Sheppard Avenue West and Codsell Avenue.
The amendments to the existing parking regulations on Hove Street will address the concerns of the local residents regarding access/egress to their driveways and the safe flow of two way traffic.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71778.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Parking Regulations - Hove Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71779.pdf
NY34.31 - School Bus Loading Zone - Raeburn Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - York Centre
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the removal of no parking anytime, on the south side of Raeburn Avenue from Bathurst Street to a point 91.5 metres east of Bathurst Street.
2. Approved the installation of no parking anytime, on the south side of Raeburn Avenue from a point 30 metres east of Bathurst Street to a point 61.5 metres further east.
3. Approved the installation of a school bus loading zone at all times on the south side of Raeburn Avenue from a point 9 metres east of Bathurst Street to a point 21 metres further east.
4. Approved the installation of no stopping anytime on the south side of Raeburn Avenue from Bathurst Street to a point 30 metres east.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to install a school bus loading zone on the south side of Raeburn Avenue.
The installation of the school bus loading zone on the south side of Raeburn Avenue will address the needs of the private school located at 3995 Bathurst Street.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71883.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Raeburn Avenue - School Bus Loading Zone
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71884.pdf
NY34.32 - Turn Prohibition - Marlee Avenue at Glencairn Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the deletion of the northbound left turn, from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday prohibition at Glencairn Avenue and Marlee Avenue.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Marlee Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.
To obtain approval to remove the northbound left turn prohibition, from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday at the intersection of Marlee Avenue and Glencairn Avenue.
The deletion of the northbound left turn prohibition will provide the community to the west of Marlee Avenue an alternate access route to their homes without unduly impacting the operations of the intersection.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71905.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Marlee Avenue at Glencairn Avenue Northbound Left Turn
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71906.pdf
NY34.33 - Turn Prohibition - Tillplain Road (William Lyon Mackenzie Collegiate Institute)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - York Centre
Community Council Decision
North York Community Coucil:
1. Deferred consideration of the report (July 10, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District, to the first meeting of the North York Community Council in 2015.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to install a northbound left turn prohibition from Tillplain Road, at the driveway access leading into William Lyon Mackenzie Collegiate Institute, located on the west side of Tillplain Road.
The implementation of the northbound left turn prohibition will eliminate the queuing of northbound vehicles on Tillplain Road, blocking the egress driveway as well as allowing unrestricted two-way traffic flow on the roadway.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71918.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - William Lyon Mackenzie Collegiate Institute - Northbound Left Turn Restriction
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71919.pdf
NY34.34 - Turn Restrictions - Cedar Springs Grove (Charles H. Best Middle School)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 10 - York Centre
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation of a westbound left turn anytime prohibition on Cedar Springs Grove to 285 Wilmington Avenue (Charles H. Best Middle School) from a point 70 metres east of Wilmington Avenue.
2. Approved the installation of an eastbound right turn anytime prohibition on Cedar Springs Grove to 285 Wilmington Avenue (Charles H. Best Middle School) from a point 70 metres east of Wilmington Avenue.
3. Approved the installation of a westbound right turn anytime prohibition from 285 Wilmington Avenue (Charles H. Best Middle School), to Wilmington Avenue from a point 26 metres south of Cedar Springs Grove.
4. Approved the installation of a westbound left turn anytime prohibition from 285 Wilmington Avenue (Charles H. Best Middle School), to Wilmington Avenue from a point 26 metres south of Cedar Springs Grove.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to install turn restrictions at the two access and egress driveways to Charles H. Best Middle School.
The installation of turn restrictions will reduce delays for parents and administrative staff attempting to enter and exit Charles H. Best Middle School.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71926.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Charles H. Best Middle School - Turn Restrictions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71927.pdf
NY34.35 - 40 km/h Speed Zone - Castlefield Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the implementation of a 40 km/h speed limit zone on Castlefield Avenue between Dufferin Street and Roselawn Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to amend the speed limit to 40 km/h on Castlefield Avenue between Dufferin Street and Roselawn Avenue.
The extension of the existing 40 km/h speed limit zone from Roselawn Avenue westerly to include the section of Castlefield Avenue between Roselawn Avenue and Dufferin Street will facilitate a consistent speed limit on both roadways between Dufferin Street and Marlee Avenue as well as address the residents' concerns with regards to vehicle speeds and school bus activity along this roadway.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71769.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - 40 km/h Speed Zone - Castlefield Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71770.pdf
NY34.36 - School Bus Loading Zone - Highland Hill - Lawrence Heights Middle School
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation of a school bus loading zone at all times on the west side of Highland Hill from a point 2 metres south of Stockton Road to a point 41 metres further south.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to relocate the school bus loading zone on the west side of Highland Hill.
The installation of the school bus loading zone on the west side of Highland Hill will address the concerns of the Principal of Lawrence Heights Middle School regarding drop- off and pick-up activity at this location.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71874.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Highland Hill - School Bus Loading Zone
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71875.pdf
NY34.37 - Installation of Pay and Display Parking Machines - Burnaby Boulevard
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the removal of No Parking Anytime on the south side of Burnaby Boulevard from Castle Knock Road to Heddington Avenue.
2. Approved the installation of No Parking Anytime on the south side of Burnaby Boulevard from a point 130 metres west of Castle Knock Road to Heddington Avenue.
3. Approved the installation of pay and display machines on the south side of Burnaby Boulevard from Castle Knock Road to a point 130 metres further west to operate between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday; for a fee of $2.25 per hour, for a maximum of 3 hours.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to install Pay and Display Machines on Burnaby Boulevard from Castle Knock to a point 130 metres further west.
A review by Transportation Services and Toronto Parking Authority staff concluded that the south side of Burnaby Boulevard between Heddington Avenue and Castle Knock Road can accommodate approximately twenty pay and display parking spaces.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72239.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Burnaby Boulevard - Pay and Display Parking
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72240.pdf
NY34.38 - Installation of Pay and Display Parking Machines - Avenue Road, south of Burnaby Boulevard
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the removal of No Parking from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east of Avenue Road between Burnaby Boulevard and College View Avenue.
2. City Council approve the installation of No Parking from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east of Avenue Road between a point 30.5 metres south of Burnaby Boulevard and College View Avenue.
3. City Council approve the removal of permitted parking for 1 hour from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east side of Avenue Road from Burnaby Boulevard to point 30.5 metres south.
4. City Council approve the installation of pay and display machines on the east side of Avenue Road from Burnaby Boulevard to a point 30.5 metres further south to operate between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday; for a fee of $2.25 per hour, for a maximum of 3 hours.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Avenue Road City Council approval of this report is required.
To obtain approval to install a Pay and Display Machines on the east side of Avenue Road, south of Burnaby Boulevard.
A review by Transportation Services and Toronto Parking Authority staff concluded that the west side of Avenue Road, immediately south of Burnaby Boulevard, can accommodate three pay and display parking spaces.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71754.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Avenue Road - Pay and Display Parking
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71755.pdf
NY34.39 - 40 km/h Speed Zone - Glengrove Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the implementation of a 40 km/h speed limit zone on Glengrove Avenue between Bathurst Street and Glen Rush Boulevard.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to amend the speed limit to 40 km/h on Glengrove Avenue between Bathurst Street and Glen Rush Boulevard.
The amendments to the regulatory speed limit will address the residents' request with regards to vehicle speeds.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71736.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - 40 km/h Speed Zone on Glengrove Ave
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71737.pdf
NY34.40 - Installation of Pay and Display Parking Machines - Oriole Parkway
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the removal of No Parking Anytime on the both sides of Oriole Parkway from Eglinton Avenue West to Burnaby Boulevard.
2. Approved the installation of No Parking Anytime on the west side of Oriole Parkway from a point 30 metres north of Eglinton Avenue West to Burnaby Boulevard.
3. Approved the installation of No Parking Anytime on the east side of Oriole Parkway from a point 26 metres north of Eglinton Avenue West to Burnaby Boulevard.
4. Approved the installation of pay and display machine on the west side of Oriole Parkway from a point 15 metres north of Eglinton Avenue West to a point 15 metres further north to operate between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday; for a fee of $2.25 per hour, for a maximum of 3 hours.
5. Approved the installation of pay and display machines on the east side of Oriole Parkway from a point 15 metres north of Eglinton Avenue West to a point 11metres further north to operate between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday; for a fee of $2.25 per hour, for a maximum of 3 hours.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to install Pay and Display Machines on both sides of Oriole Parkway from Eglinton Avenue West to a point 30 metres north.
A review by Transportation Services and Toronto Parking Authority staff concluded that both sides of Oriole Parkway, immediately north of Eglinton Avenue, can accommodate approximately five pay and display parking spaces.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71684.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Oriole Parkway - Pay and Display Parking
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71685.pdf
NY34.41 - 40 km/h Speed Zone - Yorkview Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the removal of 40 km/h speed limit zone on Yorkview Drive between Fleetwell Court and a point 90 metres east of Bevdale Road (south intersection).
2. Approved the installation of a 40 km/h speed limit zone on Yorkview Drive between Bathurst Street and Senlac Road.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to amend the existing speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Yorkview Drive between Bathurst Street and Senlac Road.
The amendments to the regulatory speed limit will address the residents' concerns with regards to vehicle speeds.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71773.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - 40 km/h Speed Zone - Yorkview Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71774.pdf
NY34.42 - All Way Stop Control - Longmore Street and Greenfield Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation of an all way stop control at the intersection of Longmore Street and Greenfield Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to install an all way stop control at the intersection of Longmore Street and Greenfield Avenue.
The installation of an all way stop control at the intersection of Longmore Street and Greenfield Avenue will address the existing right-of-way conflicts for motorists and pedestrians, specifically the visitors of Maplehurst Park located at the southwest corner of the intersection.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71752.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - All Way Stop Control - Longmore St and Greenfield Ave
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71753.pdf
NY34.43 - Parking Prohibition - Tamworth Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the deletion of No Parking from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east side of Tamworth Road between Park Home Avenue and Horsham Avenue.
2. Approved the deletion of No Parking from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Tamworth Road between Ellerslie Avenue and Horsham Avenue.
3. Approved the installation of No Parking from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east sides of Tamworth Road between Park Home Avenue and Holcolm Road.
4. Approved the installation of No Parking from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Tamworth Road between Ellerslie Avenue and Holcolm Road.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to prohibit parking from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on both sides of Tamworth Road between Horsham Avenue and Holcolm Road.
The installation of the parking prohibition will address the residents' concern with regards to restricted access/egress to residential driveways and the restricted flow of two-way traffic on Tamworth Road.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71723.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Parking Prohibitions - Tamworth Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71724.pdf
NY34.44 - Parking Prohibition - Lorraine Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the removal of No Parking from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday on the south side of Lorraine Drive between a point opposite the easterly limit of Madeline Road and a point opposite the easterly limit of Blakeley Road.
2. Approved the installation of No Parking Anytime on the east and north sides of Lorraine Drive between Finch Avenue West and Blakeley Road.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to install no parking anytime, on the north and east side of Lorraine Drive between Finch Avenue West and Blakeley Road.
The installation of the no parking anytime on the north and east side of Lorraine Drive will address concerns of the safe flow of two-way traffic on Lorraine Drive.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71716.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Parking Prohibition - Lorraine Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71717.pdf
NY34.45 - Parking Prohibitions - Burnett Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation of No Parking Anytime prohibitions on the south side of Burnett Avenue between Addington Avenue and a point 57 metres west.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to install No Parking Anytime prohibitions on the south side of Burnett Avenue between Addington Avenue and a point 57 metres west (west limit of 52 Addington Avenue).
The installation of No Parking Anytime prohibitions on the south side of Burnett Avenue, west of Addington Avenue, will address the concerns of the local residents regarding parking issues within the neighbourhood.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71738.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Parking Prohibition - Burnett Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71739.pdf
NY34.46 - 40 km/h Speed Limit - Tefley Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the implementation of a 40 km/h speed limit zone on Tefley Road between Grantbrook Street and the east end of Tefley Road.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to amend the existing speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Tefley Road between Grantbrook Street and the east end of Tefley Road.
Amendments to the regulatory speed limit will address the residents' concern with regards to vehicle speeds.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71767.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - 40 km/h - Tefley Rd
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71768.pdf
NY34.47 - Parking Regulations - Threadneedle Crescent
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation of no parking from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east and south sides of Threadneedle Crescent between Dexter Boulevard and Myers Lane.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to install no parking from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east and south sides of Threadneedle Crescent between Dexter Boulevard and Myers Lane.
The installation of no parking during the day on Threadneedle Crescent will address the concerns of the local residents regarding long term daily parking by commuters.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71782.pdf
Attachment - Location Map - Parking Prohibitions - Threadneedle Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71783.pdf
NY34.48 - All Way Stop Control - Pheasant Road and Wedgewood Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation of an all way stop control at the intersection of Pheasant Road and Wedgewood Drive.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To approve the installation of an all way stop control at the intersection of Pheasant Road and Wedgewood Drive.
The existing traffic and roadway conditions satisfy the warrant for the introduction of an all way stop control at the above-noted intersection.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71747.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - All Way Stop Control - Pheasant Rd and Wedgewood Dr
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71748.pdf
NY34.49 - Parking Prohibitions - Doncliffe Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 25 - Don Valley West
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the report (May 14, 2013) from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, North York District, to the first meeting of North York Community Council in 2015.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to prohibit parking at anytime on the south side of Doncliffe Drive, from a point 45.8 metres east of Forest Glen Crescent to Mount Pleasant Road.
The installation of no parking at anytime prohibitions on the south side of Doncliffe Drive will address the residents’ concern regarding the difficulty experienced when accessing their driveways and the unsafe two-way traffic operation along this roadway.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71482.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Parking Prohibitions - Doncliffe Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71483.pdf
NY34.50 - Parking Prohibitions - Forest Glen Crescent
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 25 - Don Valley West
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the report (May 21, 2013) from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, North York District, to the first meeting of North York Community Council in 2015.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to prohibit parking at anytime on the south side of Forest Glen Crescent between Doncliffe Drive and Mount Pleasant Road.
The installation of no parking at anytime prohibitions on the south side of Forest Glen Crescent will address the residents’ concern regarding parked vehicles restricting access/egress to driveways and the restricted flow of two-way traffic.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71480.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Parking Prohibition - Forest Glen Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71481.pdf
NY34.51 - All Way Stop Control - Hanna Road and Crandall Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 26 - Don Valley West
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation of an all way stop control at the intersection of Hanna Road and Crandall Road.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to install an all way stop control at the intersection of Hanna Road and Crandall Road.
The installation of an all way stop control at the intersection of Hanna Road and Crandall Road will facilitate right-of-way movement and protected crossing of motorists and pedestrians, specifically for the students of Bessborough Elementary and Middle School which is located at the west approach of the intersection.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71734.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - All Way Stop Control - Hanna Rd & Crandall Rd
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71735.pdf
NY34.52 - Installation of Traffic Control Signals and Stop Control - Helen Lu Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 33 - Don Valley East
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the deletion of the through highway on Forest Manor Road between the west side of Parkway Forest Drive and the north side of Parkway Forest Drive.
2. Approved the installation of the through highway on Forest Manor Road between Parkway Forest Drive and Helen Lu Road.
3. Approved the installation of northbound compulsory stop at Helen Lu Road on Forest Manor Road.
Origin
Summary
During the Review of the Order Paper at the City Council meeting on July 8, 2014, Speaker Nunziata ruled that Recommendations 1-3 of Item NY33.35 were not properly before City Council, as Recommendations 1-3 (of the four put forward to City Council) were delegated traffic matters that must be decided by the North York Community Council.
Speaker Nunziata ruled that the Recommendations 1-3 be resubmitted to the North York Community Council.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71876.pdf
(May 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District, on the Installation of Traffic Control Signals and Stop Control at Helen Lu Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71879.pdf
(May 16, 2014) Attachment 1 - Map - Traffic Control Signals and Stop Control at Helen Lu Rd
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71882.pdf
NY34.53 - All Way Stop Control - Helen Lu Road and Forest Manor Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 33 - Don Valley East
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation of an all way stop control at the intersection of Helen Lu Road and Forest Manor Road.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
To obtain approval to install an all way stop control at the intersection of Helen Lu Road and Forest Manor Road.
The installation of an all way stop control at the intersection of Helen Lu Road and Forest Manor Road will facilitate right-of-way movement and protected crossing of motorists and pedestrians, specifically patrons of Parkway Forest Park and Forest Manor Public School which are located adjacent to the east side of the intersection.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72090.pdf
NY34.54 - All Way Stop Control - Teak Avenue and Carnforth Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 34 - Don Valley East
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Teak Avenue and Carnforth Road.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Teak Avenue and Carnforth Road, City Council approval of this report is required.
To obtain approval to install an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Teak Avenue and Carnforth Road.
The installation of an All Way Stop Control at the intersection of Teak Avenue and Carnforth Road will address the existing right-of-way concerns for motorists and pedestrians at the intersection.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71749.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - AWSC - Teak Ave and Carnforth Rd
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71750.pdf
NY34.55 - Traffic Control Signal - Eglinton Avenue East and Jonesville Crescent
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Ward:
- 34 - Don Valley East
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the report (July 9, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District, to the second meeting of the North York Community Council in 2015.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Eglinton Avenue East, City Council approval of this report is required.
To obtain approval to install a traffic control signal on Eglinton Avenue East at a location 55 metres west of Jonesville Crescent.
The installation of a traffic control signal on Eglinton Avenue East at a location 55 metres west of Jonesville Crescent would allow trail users to safely cross Eglinton Avenue East and continue along the Pan Am Path.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71891.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Traffic Control Signal - Eglinton Ave E and Jonesville Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71892.pdf
NY34.56 - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1800 O'Connor Drive and 75-89 Gosford Boulevard
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- 8 - York West, 34 - Don Valley East
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes:
a. 1800 O'Connor Drive; and
b. 75-89 Gosford Boulevard.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
Origin
Summary
To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.
Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71623.pdf
Attachment - Amendment of Chapter 880 Fire Routes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71624.pdf
NY34.57 - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - To amend the address range of the private roadway located at the property currently listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes as 2699-2791 Jane Street to 2699-2721 Jane Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 9 - York Centre
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes, to amend the address range of the private roadway located at the property currently listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes as 2699-2791 Jane Street to 2699-2721 Jane Street.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
Origin
Summary
To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to amend the designation a certain portion of the property municipally known as 2699-2721 Jane Street as a fire route within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended. The fire route in question has a typo in the address listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes Chapter 880, and requires correcting.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72024.pdf
Attachment - Amendment of Chapter 880 Fire Routes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72025.pdf
NY34.58 - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - to amend the address of the private roadway located at the property currently listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes as 1 Anndale Drive to 17 Anndale Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes, to amend the address of the private roadway located at the property currently listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes as 1 Anndale Drive to 17 Anndale Drive.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
Origin
Summary
To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to amend the designation a certain portion of the property municipally known as 17 Anndale Drive as a fire route within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended. The fire route in question was applied for by the owner with the incorrect municipal address 1 Anndale Drive. As a result the address listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes Chapter 880 requires correcting.
Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72018.pdf
Attachment - Amendment of Chapter 880 Fire Routes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72019.pdf
NY34.59 - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - To repeal the designation of a certain portion of the property municipally known as 939 Lawrence Avenue E (Part A) and 939 Lawrence Avenue E (Part B)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 25 - Don Valley West
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Coucil recommends that:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes, to repeal the designation of the private road located at the property formerly municipally known as 939 Lawrence Avenue East, and delete 939 Lawrence Avenue E (Part A) and 939 Lawrence Avenue E (Part B) from Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
Origin
Summary
To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes, to repeal the designation of a certain portion of the property municipally known as 939 Lawrence Avenue E (Part A) and 939 Lawrence Avenue E (Part B) as fire routes within the meaning of Chapter 880, Fire Routes. The municipal address for the entire property was changed to 1090 Don Mills Road in 2008 in conjunction with redevelopment of the property.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71984.pdf
Attachment - Address change letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71985.pdf
NY34.60 - Assumption of Services - Plans 66M-2456, 66M-2492, and 66M-2494 - Avonshire Project - Oakburn Crescent/Harrison Garden Boulevard
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Coumcil recommends that:
1. City Council assume the services installed within Oakburn Crescent and Harrison Garden Boulevard and that the City formally assume these roads which are shown on Registered Plans of Subdivision 66M-2456, 66M-2492 and 66M-2494.
2. City Council authorize the Director, Engineering Review to release the performance guarantee held with respect to the municipal services in accordance with the Subdivision Agreements.
3. City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highways and municipal services within the Registered Plans of Subdivision 66M-2456, 66M-2492 and 66M-2494.
4. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the Owner.
5. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting systems constructed within Registered Plans of Subdivision 66M-2456, 66M-2492 and 66M-2494 to Toronto Hydro.
6. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.
Origin
Summary
This report requests Council's authority for the City to assume the municipal roads and services within Oakburn Crescent and Harrison Garden Boulevard, in accordance with the terms of the Subdivision Agreements for Plan 66M-2456, dated May 26, 2008; Plan 66M-2492, dated November 22, 2011; and Plan 66M-2494, dated December 13, 2011 between K&G Oakburn Apartments Ltd. and the City of Toronto.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72258.pdf
NY34.61 - Proposal to Name New Art Park - "Lee Lifeson Art Park"
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Officially named the new art park, located between Hillcrest Avenue and Princess Avenue, immediately east of Gladys Allison Place, "Lee Lifeson Art Park" in honour of two world famous Willowdale musicians.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The Parks, Forestry, and Recreation Division reviewed this naming proposal and acknowledges the significant contributions of Geddy Lee and Alex Lifeson, to the music world, the Willowdale neighbourhood and the City of Toronto. In researching this naming proposal, Parks, Forestry and Recreation reviewed the Council-approved Honourific and Street Naming Policy and found that this naming proposal met policy criteria.
Parks, Forestry, and Recreation is recommending naming the new park, currently a section of an existing linear park called "Willowdale Park" and located between Hillcrest Avenue and Princess Avenue, immediately east of Gladys Allison Place, as the "Lee-Lifeson Art Park".
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72029.pdf
Attachment 1 - Site Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72030.pdf
NY34.62 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 28 Hedgewood Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 25 - Don Valley West
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the consent and minor variance applications related to 28 Hedgewood Road (B059/13NY, A741/13NY and A742/13NY) and, if necessary, to retain outside planners and experts.
Origin
Summary
Consent and minor variance applications related to 28 Hedgewood Road were refused by the Committee of Adjustment on March 19, 2014. The applications entailed the demolition of an existing house and the construction of two new two-storey houses.
The applicant appealed the Committee of Adjustment's decisions to the Ontario Municipal Board, and a hearing has been scheduled for October 1, 2014.
If approved, the resulting lots and houses would be inconsistent with the surrounding streetscape, which is characterized by large lots with significant canopy coverage and green space. Ultimately, the proposed homes do not fit the unique look and feel of the neighbourhood.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72118.pdf
Attachment - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decisions - Minor Variance and Consent Applications - 28 Hedgewood Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72119.pdf
NY34.63 - Preliminary Report - Southwest Precinct Plan, Plan of Subdivision, Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment - 4700 Keele Street, at the S/E Corner of The Pond Road and Sentinel Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 8 - York West
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council directed that:
1. City Planning staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at the south-east corner of The Pond Road and Sentinel Road together with the Ward Councillor.
2. City Planning staff give notice for the community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site and that the notice area of the community consultation meeting be extended to include, in addition to the 120 metre notice area, all landowners and residents in the area from Finch Avenue West to the south, the Go Rail Line to the east, Steeles Avenue West to the north, and Black Creek to the west; and that the applicant pay the City for the costs associated with extending the notice area.
3. City Clerk's staff give notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act according to the regulations under the Planning Act.
4. City Planning staff be directed to review the development applications in the context of the Southwest Precinct Plan Review. Staff also be directed not to submit Final Reports on development applications in the Southwest Precinct until such a time as the review of the Southwest Precinct Plan has been considered by Council.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes the construction of three buildings, including two 6-storey residential buildings with commercial uses at grade and a 2-storey commercial building on the south-east corner of The Pond Road and Sentinel Road, south of the York University Campus Core. The proposed residential buildings would contain approximately 474 units (800 beds) marketed to students, for a total residential gross floor area of 28,935m2 and floor space index of 1.59. A total of 4,648m2 of retail and 295m2 of office space is also proposed.
Being processed concurrently is the York University Southwest Precinct Plan. The Precinct Plan includes a proposed vision and framework to guide future development within the Southwest Precinct. The York University Secondary Plan requires the preparation of a Precinct Plan prior to the approval of non-university development in the Edge Precincts.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted applications and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the applications and on the community consultation process.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71705.pdf
NY34.64 - Preliminary Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 195 Exbury Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 9 - York Centre
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council directed that:
1. City Planning staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 195 Exbury Road together with the Ward Councillor.
2. City Planning staff give notice for the community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.
3. City Clerk's staff give notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act according to the regulations of the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 and the new City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 to permit the development of 10 street townhouse units with integral at-grade garages at 195 Exbury Road on the site of an existing "tower in the park" 20-storey apartment building.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the application and on the community consultation process.
A Final Report and Public Meeting under the Planning Act to consider this application is targeted for the second quarter of 2015 provided all required information is submitted by the applicant in a timely manner.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71951.pdf
NY34.65 - Preliminary Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 12, 14, 16 and 18 Marquette Avenue and 7 Carhartt Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council directed that:
1. City Planning staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 12, 14, 16 and 18 Marquette Avenue and 7 Carhartt Avenue together with the Ward Councillor.
2. City Planning staff give notice for the community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site and that the notice area of the community consultation meeting be extended to include, in addition to the 120 metre notice area, all landowners and residents in the area bounded by Highway 401 to the north; Bathurst Street to the east; Neptune Drive to the south, including 2 to 88 Neptune Drive; and the westernmost extremity of Marquette Avenue to the west; and that the applicant pay the City for the costs associated with extending the notice area.
3. City Clerk's staff give notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act according to the regulations of the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 and new City-wide By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 12, 14, 16 and 18 Marquette Avenue and 7 Carhartt Street, to permit a 4-storey stacked townhouse development containing 48 residential units and 49 car parking spaces in 1 level of underground parking.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the application and on the community consultation process.
A community consultation meeting will be scheduled in consultation with the Ward Councillor. A Final Report and Public Meeting under the Planning Act to consider this application is targeted for mid of 2015 provided all required information is submitted by the applicant in a timely manner.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71704.pdf
NY34.66 - Preliminary Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 2433 Dufferin Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council directed that:
1. City Planning staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 2433 Dufferin Street together with the Ward Councillor.
2. City Planning staff give notice for the community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site and that the notice area of the community consultation meeting be extended to include, in addition to the 120 metre notice area, all landowners and residents in the area bounded by Castlefield Avenue to the north; Locksley Avenue to the east; Belgravia Avenue/Ramsden Road to the south and Fairbank Avenue to the west; and that the applicant pay the City for the costs associated with extending the notice area.
3. City Clerk's staff give notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act according to the regulations of the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 for the lands at 2433 Dufferin Street to permit the development of a five-storey, 18.5 metre high mixed use building containing 50 residential units and 197 square metres for grade related retail. The site currently contains an auto repair facility.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's direction on further processing of the application and on the community consultation process.
A community consultation meeting will be scheduled in consultation with the Ward Councillor. A Final Report and Public Meeting under the Planning Act to consider this application is targeted for the second quarter of 2015 provided all required information is submitted by the applicant in a timely manner.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71923.pdf
NY34.67 - Preliminary Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 2444 Yonge Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council directed that:
1. City Planning staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 2444 Yonge Street together with the Ward Councillor.
2. City Planning staff give notice for the community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.
3. City Clerk's staff give notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act according to the regulations of the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend the former City of Toronto By-law 438-86 and new City-wide By-law 569-2013 to permit a 5-storey commercial development consisting of 3,417.5 square metres of retail gross floor area on the first three floors and a 1,496.5 square metre restaurant on the fourth and fifth floor, including outdoor patio at 2444 Yonge Street. The proposed development would also incorporate of part of the existing Bank of Montreal 2-storey building in the Yonge Street frontage of the proposed building.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the applications and on the community consultation process.
Should the applicant provide any additional required information in a timely manner and address any issues identified as a result of review of this application, it is anticipated the Final Report will be presented to Community Council in the second quarter 2015.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72052.pdf
NY34.68 - Preliminary Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 2088 Avenue Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council directed that:
1. City Planning staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 2088 Avenue Road together with the Ward Councillor.
2. City Planning staff give notice for the community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.
3. City Clerk's staff give notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act according to the regulations under the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
An application for a Zoning By-law Amendment has been submitted for the lands located at 2088 Avenue Road. The application is to permit a 5-storey mixed-use development, consisting of ground floor retail space, office space in the two-storeys above, and 2 residential units on the upper two-storeys.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the application and on the community consultation process.
This report recommends that a community consultation meeting be scheduled by City planning staff in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
A Final Report and a Public Meeting under the Planning Act is targeted for the second quarter of 2015, provided the applicant submits all required information in a timely manner.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71627.pdf
NY34.69 - Preliminary Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 146-150 Laird Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 26 - Don Valley West
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council directed that:
1. City Planing staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 146-150 Laird Drive together with the Ward Councillor.
2. City Planning staff give notice for the community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site and that the notice area of the community consultation meeting be extended to include, in addition to the 120 metre notice area, all landowners and residents in the area from Laird Drive on the east, Southvale Drive and Moore Avenue on the south, Bayview Avenue on the west (but not including properties on Bayview Avenue), and Eglinton Avenue on the north (but not including properties fronting on Eglinton Avenue); and that the applicant pay the City for the costs associated with extending the notice area.
3. City Clerk's staff give notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act according to the regulations of the Planning Act.
4. Heritage Preservation Services staff, City Planning Division, report on an assessment of the heritage listing/designation for both 146 and 150 Laird Drive.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a phased development with an eight-storey rental retirement building (Phase 1) with 175 units and a seven-storey condominium for seniors (Phase 2) with 109 units at 146-150 Laird Drive. The overall development would have 284 units with a Floor Space Index of approximately 3.45 and 183 parking spaces provided in an underground parking garage. The second phase includes additions to a listed heritage building.
This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the application and on the community consultation process.
This report recommends that a community consultation meeting be held to present the proposal to the public and obtain public input. Assuming the applicant provides all required information in a timely manner, a Final Report could be prepared and a Public Meeting held in the second quarter of 2015.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71630.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49142.pdf
NY34.70 - Status Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 500 Sheppard Avenue East
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize City staff to continue discussions with the applicant on a revised proposal which addresses the issues set out in the report (July 23, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and any other issues that may be identified through the continuing review of the application, and to report back to North York Community Council prior to the start of the full Ontario Municipal Board hearing.
Origin
Summary
The application proposes a 29-storey mixed-use building, 91 metres high with 310 dwelling units (including 5 live-work units) and 2,998 square metres of commercial floor space at 500 Sheppard Avenue East. The gross floor area proposed is 27,295 square metres resulting in a proposed density of 4.76 times the area of the lot. The applicant has appealed the application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision within the prescribed period under the Planning Act. A prehearing was held on July 15, 2014. A full hearing is scheduled for March 2 to 15, 2015.
This report provides the status of the application including the issues identified to date by City staff and agencies through the review of the application.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72116.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49135.pdf
NY34.71 - Status Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - 5799-5915 Yonge Street, 45 & 53 Cummer Avenue, and 46 & 47 Averill Crescent
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council directed that:
1. City Planning staff continue discussions, in consultation with the local Councillor, with the applicant and other parties to the hearing, towards a revised application that appropriately addresses the issues identified in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and any others that may be identified through the continuing review of the application, and to report back to North York Community Council prior to the commencement of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing that may also include potential future mediation.
2. Neither the consultant's report on the Yonge Street North Planning Study nor the draft Official Plan Amendment be given any status by City staff in dealing with the Ontario Municipal Board Appeal for 5799-5915 Yonge Street, 45 and 53 Cummer Avenue, 46 and 47 Averill Crescent.
Origin
Summary
These applications propose to permit the redevelopment of the 'Newtonbrook Plaza' lands at 5799 to 5915 Yonge St. to a mixed use project with 1,674 residential units, at-grade retail uses and office uses in 3 blocks with four buildings of 28, 36, 36 and 44 storeys in height. The development applications propose to retain and utilize remaining density on the existing Lester B. Pearson Place apartment and Cummer Avenue United Church lands at 45 and 53 Cummer Avenue and also propose parkland on the existing houses at 46 and 47 Averill Crescent.
The applicant has appealed Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the timeframe established by the Planning Act. A pre-hearing was held on July 22, 2014 with a full hearing scheduled for September 15, 2015.
This report provides an update on the status of the application including issues identified to date by City Staff and agencies through the review process and recommends that staff report back to Council prior to the commencement of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing or any potential future mediation.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72236.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49369.pdf
NY34.72 - Status Report - Bayview Townhouse Design Guidelines
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 25 - Don Valley West
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct City Planning staff to hold a community consultation meeting to present the Guiding Principles and draft guidelines to the community and seek their input on the draft guidelines attached.
2. City Council direct that, following the community consultation meeting, City Planning staff continue to refine the draft guidelines and report to North York Community Council in the first quarter of 2015 with final guidelines.
3. City Council direct that City Planning staff use the Guiding Principles and draft guidelines in the review of applications for townhouse developments on corner lots and shallow mid-block sites along this stretch of Bayview Avenue prior to the final guidelines being adopted.
Origin
Summary
On December 16, 2013 City Council directed staff to undertake a study of Bayview Avenue between Highway 401 and Lawrence Avenue East "to review the appropriate development framework for the lots abutting Bayview Avenue". This report provides Council with information on the Guiding Principles developed through meetings with the community and other stakeholders and outlines draft guidelines for townhouse developments fronting along this stretch of Bayview Avenue. The Guiding Principles and draft guidelines are intended to inform the review of proposed townhouse developments along this part of Bayview Avenue ensuring that new development fits with the unique character of the area.
The report recommends that City Council direct staff to hold a community consultation meeting to present the draft guidelines, to continue to refine the guidelines based on further work and consultation and to use the Guiding Principles and draft guidelines in the review of development applications prior to the final guidelines being adopted.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72167.pdf
NY34.73 - Final Report - Part Lot Control Exemption Application - 55 Antibes Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 10 - York Centre
Community Council Recommendations
North York Cmmunity Council recommends that:
1. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to Blocks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 on Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2509 as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report dated July 17, 2014, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.
2. City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.
3. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.
Decision Advice and Other Information
Councillor James Pasternak asked that his opposition to the recommendations be noted in the record.
Origin
Summary
This application requests exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act to permit the creation of conveyable lots for 5 blocks of freehold townhouses at 55 Antibes Drive, totalling 41 units (Blocks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 on Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2509).
The proposal complies with the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. The lifting of Part Lot Control for a period of two years is considered appropriate for the orderly development of these lands.
This report reviews and recommends approval of Part Lot Control Exemption.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71654.pdf
NY34.74 - Final Report - Extension of By-law 1050-2010, Exempting Lands from Part Lot Control - 939 Lawrence Avenue East, 49 and 75 The Donway West
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 25 - Don Valley West
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council enact a By-law to extend the term of Part Lot Control Exemption By-law No. 1050-2010, to allow the lands municipally known as at 939 Lawrence Avenue East, 49 and 75 The Donway West to be exempt from Part Lot Control for an additional six year period from the expiry date of By-law No. 1050-2010, in accordance with the draft by-law in Attachment 2 to the report (July 15, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft by-law as may be required.
3. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to register the by-law on title.
Origin
Summary
On May 25, 2010, an application was submitted to permit exemption from Part Lot Control for 939 Lawrence Avenue East, and 49 and 75 The Donway West. The requested exemption was required to facilitate the financing and development of seven mixed-use buildings and associated permanent easements relating to an internal road system.
On August 27, 2010, Toronto City Council enacted By-law No. 1050-2010, exempting these lands from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act, for a period of four years.
This report recommends that By-law No. 1050-2012 be extended for an additional six years to allow for the completion of this project.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71666.pdf
NY34.75 - Final Report - Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Application - 3706 Bathurst Street and 3 Stadocona Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of common elements condominium for the lands at 3706 Bathurst Street and 3 Stadacona Drive, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York Distict, subject to:
a. the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York Distict, which except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration; and
b. any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.
2. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 3706 Bathurst Street and 3 Stadacona Drive as generally illustrated on Attachment 3 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York Distict, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.
3. City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.
4. Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner or her designate.
5. Prior to registration of the Condominium provide certification to the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services from the Professional Engineer who designed and supervised the construction confirming that the stormwater management facilities and site grading have been constructed in accordance with the accepted Stormwater Management Report by John Towle Associates Ltd, dated November 2009, with a supplementary letter dated June 27, 2014 by John Towle Associates Ltd. and the accepted Grading Plans titled Site Grading Plan drawing C-2, by John Towle Associates Ltd, dated Nov. 16, 2013.
6. Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to ensure compliance with the Site Plan Agreement, in particular the clearance to the parking areas, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner or her designate.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered.
8. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.
9. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to establish a driveway as a common element at 3706 Bathurst Street and 3 Stadacona Drive. The common elements condominium is required to provide legal vehicular access to eleven residential townhouse units and to ensure shared ownership and maintenance of the driveway by the condominium corporation.
The requested exemption from the Part Lot Control of the Planning Act is required to permit the creation of conveyable lots for the eleven residential townhouse units fronting Stadacona Drive.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption. In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to convey or mortgage any part of the lands without prior consent of the Chief Planner or her designate.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71631.pdf
Speakers
NY34.76 - Final Report - Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Application - 851 Millwood Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 26 - Don Valley West
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium for the lands at 851 Millwood Road, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1, Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium Plan, dated April 7, 2014, and revised May 29, 2014, subject to:
a. the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, which except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration; and
b. any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.
2. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 851 Millwood Road as generally illustrated on Attachment 3, Part Lot Control Exemption Plan, dated May 14, 2014, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.
3. City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.
4. Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner or his designate.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered.
6. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application for Draft Plan of Condominium proposes the creation of a common element condominium comprised of a driveway and a day-lighting triangle, associated with five townhouse units. A concurrent application proposes exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act to allow for the creation of conveyable lots for these five townhouse units.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and approval of the Part Lot Control exemption. In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to convey or mortgage any part of the lands without prior consent of the Chief Planner or her designate.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71644.pdf
Speakers
NY34.77 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 1970 Victoria Park Avenue and 9 Clintwood Gate
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 34 - Don Valley East
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 for the lands at 1970 Victoria Park Avenue and 9 Clintwood Gate substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 1970 Victoria Park Avenue and 9 Clintwood Gate substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. No one addressed the North York Community Council on August 12, 2014.
Origin
Summary
The rezoning application proposes to redevelop the site with 67 townhouse units in 3 storey buildings with a density of 1.2 FSI. This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71626.pdf
NY34.78 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 3052 Bayview Avenue and 351 McKee Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 7625, for the lands at 3052 Bayview Avenue and 351 McKee Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, with the following amendments:
a. That the provisions in the proposed by-law with regard to the single detached dewlling fronting on McKee Avenue be as follows:
i. The maximum width of the interior of the garage shall be 5.9 metres.
ii. The maximum width of the driveway shall be 6.1 metres.
b. That Schedule R3(20) in the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, be amended from 4.1 metres to .41 metres.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes six 3-storey townhouses facing Bayview Avenue and one single detached dwelling fronting on McKee Avenue, with vehicular access from McKee Avenue, at 3052 Bayview Avenue and 351 McKee Avenue.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71699.pdf
Speakers
NY34.79 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - 50 Kenton Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 7625, for the lands at 50 Kenton Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Prior to the enactment of the Bills to City Council, the owner shall enter into an Offer to Purchase agreement with the City, to purchase the Transwell Avenue walkway at market value, to the satisfaction of the Director of Real Estate Services.
4. In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the draft plan of subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment 6 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, subject to:
a. the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 6 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior final approval and the release of the plan of subdivision for registration; and
b. any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
These applications are to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 and for Draft Plan of Subdivision Approval. They propose fifteen (15) single detached dwellings and a new public road (cul-de-sac), with vehicular access from the eastern portion of Kenton Drive, on a former school yard at 50 Kenton Drive.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. This report also advises that the Chief Planner may approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71702.pdf
Communications
Speakers
NY34.80 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 220 McRae Drive and 327-329 Sutherland Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 26 - Don Valley West
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend former Town of Leaside Zoning By-law 1916, for the lands at 220 McRae Drive and 327-329 Sutherland Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 220 McRae Drive and 327-329 Sutherland Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend the former Town of Leaside By-law 1916 and City of Toronto By-law 569-2013 at 220 McRae Drive and 327-329 Sutherland Drive to permit eight, three-storey townhouse units fronting onto McRae Drive and a detached dwelling facing onto Sutherland Drive.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71681.pdf
Communications
(August 7, 2014) E-mail from Geoff Kettel and Carol Burtin-Fripp, Co-Presidents, Leaside Property Owners' Association Incorporated (NY.New.NY34.80.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49144.pdf
(August 9, 2014) E-mail from Gary Rollerson (NY.New.NY34.80.3)
(August 10, 2014) E-mail from Gary Rollerson and JoAnne Barkeski (NY.New.NY34.80.4)
Speakers
James Obright
Gary Rollerson
Wendy Nott, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited
NY34.81 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 293 Viewmount Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
The City Planning Division recommends that:
1. City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625, for the lands at 293 Viewmount Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 for a four-storey apartment building with 7 units and one level of below grade parking at 293 Viewmount Avenue.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72088.pdf
Communications
(August 8, 2014) E-mail from Carlos Lameiro (NY.New.NY34.81.2)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Joseph Figliomeni submitted by Ruth Rendon (NY.New.NY34.81.3)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from J. Nobrega, Wenderly Park Community Association (NY.New.NY34.81.4)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from J. Nobrega, Wenderly Park Community Association (NY.New.NY34.81.5)
Speakers
Anthony Coiro
NY34.82 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - 57, 59, 61, and 63 Finch Avenue West
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Zoning By-law 7625 for the former City of North York substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District and as per the provisions outlined in the Section headed, "C. Draft Zoning By-law" contained on Pages 5 and 6 of the communication from Analogica dated August 10, 2014.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before the introduction of the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to obtain final Site Plan approval in accordance with Committee Recommendations 4 and 5 below, and to submit a letter of credit in order to secure improvements to the existing sanitary sewer in the amount of $114,100.00, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.
4. City Council approve in-principle the site plan as indicated on the drawings and conditions listed in Attachment to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and the plans be amended to include:
a. That general storage be provided at a minimum rate of 2m2 per unit.
b. That suite layouts, demonstrating that each unit contain appropriate residential amenities, be provided prior to final Site Plan approval.
c. That the applicant be required to move the rooftop mechanical units at least two metres northward, further away from the adjacent neighbourhood to the south.
d. That screening or other modifications be provided, as part of the final Site Plan, to minimize the potential for light pollution affecting adjacent single detached houses to the south and west.
e. That garbage be removed from the enclosed area no earlier than the morning of pick up and that the bins be placed back inside the enclosed area immediately following pickup.
5. City Council authorize the Chief Planner or her designate to give final approval to the site plan when the conditions to be satisfied prior to site plan approval as set out in Attachment 9 to the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District and Committee Recommendation 4, above, have been fulfilled in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
6. City Council require the applicant, prior to the issuance of the first building permit, to fund landscape improvements on neighbouring properties to provide additional screening of the development. That such funding be provided following the submission of screening/buffer plans to the applicant by the owners of 4 Elmview Avenue and 5 Madeline Road (up to a maximum of $8,000 each) and 1 and 3 Madeline Road (up to a maximum of $4,000 each).
7. City Council require the applicant, prior to the issuance of the first building permit, to enter into arrangements satisfactory to the Chief Building Official or his designate regarding structural encroachment under, structural integrity of, and liability insurance for potential damage to, the abutting multiple attached houses located at 65-69 Finch Avenue West and the single detached houses located at 1, 3 and 5 Madeline Road and at 4 Elmview Avenue.
8. City Council require the applicant, prior to the issuance of the first building permit, to provide a construction management plan to the satisfaction of the responsible City staff, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
9. City Council authorize cash-in-lieu instead of on-site parkland dedication for this development, subject to no subsequent application of any kind for an increase in the height density or unit count of the development approved by Council prior to payment of the cash-in-lieu amount as specified by City Staff, and direct that payment by certified cheque or bank draft be accepted no earlier than issuance of the first below grade foundation permit and required no later than issuance of the first above grade structural permit.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
These applications propose to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the redevelopment of the subject lands for a four-storey, 70 unit residential development with 68 underground parking spaces accessed via a private driveway from Elmview Avenue. The proposal is located on an assembly of 4 lots at 57, 59, 61, and 63 Finch Avenue West.
The proposal provides for a multiple-unit residential use that will enhance the vibrancy and active nature of the Finch Avenue streetscape consistent with the objectives of the Central Finch Area Secondary Plan. The proposed development reinforces the existing and planned built form context along Finch Avenue West and the building design will contribute to and enhance the public realm.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment application and approval in principle of the Site Plan Control Application subject to the conditions outlined in this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71700.pdf
Communications
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from George Belza, Partner, Analogica, on behalf of the Edithvale-Yonge Community Association (NY.New.NY34.82.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49175.pdf
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Natasha Klimov (NY.New.NY34.82.3)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Arnold Klimov (NY.New.NY34.82.4)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Elena DeBiaisio (NY.New.NY34.82.5)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Julia Cao (NY.New.NY34.82.6)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Remo Naccarato (NY.New.NY34.82.7)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Alexandre Barykin (NY.New.NY34.82.8)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Kathleen Zhang (NY.New.NY34.82.9)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from John Rosevear, submitted by Judy Rosevear (NY.New.NY34.82.10)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Primo Gazzoli (NY.New.NY34.82.11)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Tom Hansen (NY.New.NY34.82.12)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Rosemary Gazzoli (NY.New.NY34.82.13)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Carmela Alviani (NY.New.NY34.82.14)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Yu-Han Hwang (NY.New.NY34.82.15)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Alan Poon (NY.New.NY34.82.16)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Jian Yu Ma and JinXiu You (NY.New.NY34.82.17)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Kim Hansen (NY.New.NY34.82.18)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Jason Lim (NY.New.NY34.82.19)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Jianying Shi (NY.New.NY34.82.20)
(August 11, 2014) Letter from Gordon Chiu, Director, and Arik Klimov, Director, Toronto Common Elements Condominium Corporation #2053, on behalf of TCECC #2053, submitted by Gordon Chiu (NY.New.NY34.82.21)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Arnold Oslinger (NY.New.NY34.82.22)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Vincenzo Lamonica (NY.New.NY34.82.23)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Judith deBacker, submitted by William deBacker (NY.New.NY34.82.24)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Cindy Li (NY.New.NY34.82.25)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Daniel Klimov (NY.New.NY34.82.26)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Karen (NY.New.NY34.82.27)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Gerard ter Hofstede (NY.New.NY34.82.28)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Anthony De Chellis (NY.New.NY34.82.29)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Linda Wilson (NY.New.NY34.82.30)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Layal Arous (NY.New.NY34.82.31)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Christopher Pereira (NY.New.NY34.82.32)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Virginia Evans (NY.New.NY34.82.33)
Speakers
Judith deBacker
James McEvilly
Jason Lim
Joung Young Byun
Cindy Li
Jianyu Ma
George Belza, Anologica, on behalf of the Edithvale-Yonge Community Association
Gordon Chiu, on behalf of the Toronto Common Elements Condominium Corporation #2053
Kim Hansen
Anthony Dechellis
Philip Hsu
Ommid Faghani
NY34.83 - Final Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - 396-404 Hopewell Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 396-404 Hopewell Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council amend former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83, for the lands at 396-404 Hopewell Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to conduct and secure the following facilities, services and matters:
a. replace existing watermain on Hopewell Avenue with a new 200mm watermain from Times Road to Marlee Avenue in accordance with the accepted Functional Servicing Report and provide financial security in the amount of $600,000.00 and pay $33,900.00 for the engineering review fee.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into a voluntary Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, such agreement(s) to be registered against the title of the lands for the development to secure the following facilities, services, and matters:
a. the owner shall provide and maintain the construction of a non-exclusive public pedestrian walkway to the City on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Solicitor in a location generally described as a north/south access over the central portion of the site, with details of the design to be determined in the context of site plan approval for the development and such walkway lands to be maintained by the owner at its sole cost;
b. parkland improvements by the owner to the Beltline park, adjacent to the development site, as illustrated in the concept plan submitted by the applicant as part of the development application, as revised to reflect details and comments from City Planning and Parks, Forestry & Recreation, and such improvements to be financially secured to the satisfaction of the City.
c. the applicant enter into a memorandum of understanding to construct additional improvements to the York BeltlineTrail for extension of the trail east from the rear of 396-404 Hopewell Avenue to Marlee Avenue, to the approval of the Chief Planner and to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
These applications propose to amend the City of Toronto Official Plan and former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83 to permit the construction of a three storey stacked townhouse development arranged in four blocks on the site with a total of 81 dwelling at 396-404 Hopewell Avenue.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72207.pdf
Communications
NY34.84 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Application - 228 Wilson Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Without Recs
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
The application proposes to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 to permit a 17-storey (57 metre) condominium apartment building at 228 Wilson Avenue. The building will contain a total of 108 dwelling units which includes four 2-storey townhouses type units fronting Wilson Avenue. There are 130 parking spaces proposed within a 5 level below grade parking garage. Access to the site would be provided from a driveway off Wilson Avenue at the east end of the site.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the North York Zoning By-law 7625 and permit a 17-storey apartment building at 228 Wilson Avenue.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71682.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49208.pdf
(August 6, 2014) Letter from Michelle Collis (NY.New.NY34.84.2)
(August 6, 2014) E-mail from Marjorie Fainer Vaile (NY.New.NY34.84.3)
(August 6, 2014) E-mail from Deborah Ylanko (NY.New.NY34.84.4)
(August 7, 2014) E-mail from Brian Bennett (NY.New.NY34.84.5)
(August 7, 2014) Letter from Arto Tikiryan (NY.New.NY34.84.6)
(August 7, 2014) Letter from France Rochette (NY.New.NY34.84.7)
Speakers
Ann Martin, IBI Group
Fainer Vaile
Joseph Rouse
Susan Adaskin
NY34.85 - Final Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - 2384-2388 Yonge Street and 31 Montgomery Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 2384 and 2388 Yonge Street and 31 Montgomery Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 15 to report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 569-2014, for the lands at 31 Montgomery Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 16 to the report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District .
3. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 438-86, for the lands at 2384 and 2388 Yonge Street, and 31 Montgomery Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 17 to the report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District subject to the following additional amendments:
a. that section 9(i) of the draft Zoning By-law Amendment be amended to read as follows:
Parking spaces shall be provided and maintained on the lot in accordance with the following:
i. a minimum of 0.2 parking spaces per bachelor dwelling unit;
ii. a minimum of 0.4 parking spaces per one bedroom dwelling unit;
iii. a minimum of 0.6 parking spaces per two bedroom dwelling unit;
iv. a minimum of 0.8 parking spaces per three bedroom dwelling unit;
v. a minimum of 0.1 parking spaces per dwelling unit for visitors to the building;
b. that a new section be added to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment to allow for patio use on a portion of the lot that provides as follows:
i. none of the provisions of Zoning By-law No. 438-86 or this By-law shall apply to prevent a patio in the area identified as "Area A" on Map 2 of this By-law.
c. that Map 2 of the draft Zoning By-law Amendment, attached to the motion submitted by Councillor Stintz, be revised to allow for patio use on a portion of the lot.
d. that a new section be added to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment to provide that in the event of a future division of the ownership between the residential and non-residential components of the development, all maintenance obligations regarding the proposed park, shall be borne by the owner of the non-residential portion of the lot, while all the obligations with respect to the public walkway easement at the west end of the development, shall be borne by the owner of the residential portion of the lot.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By law Amendments as may be required.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act, for the property at 2384 and 2388 Yonge Street in accordance with the Heritage Impact Statement, prepared by ERA Architects dated June 2, 2014, such agreement to be subsequently registered against title to the lot, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor in consultation with the Manager Heritage Preservation Services.
6. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, such agreement(s) to be registered against the title of the lands for the development to secure the following facilities, services and matters:
a. the owner shall provide a letter of credit in the City standard form, prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, excluding a permit for demolition, rental/sales centre, maintenance and usual and minor works in association with the heritage structure, in the amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00), to guarantee the cost for public art on the lands, such public art to be provided by the owner, where such amount shall be the maximum public art contribution and such amount shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, where such indexing shall not commence until August 31, 2015, unless a letter of credit to secure such contribution has been provided prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, subject to the exclusions noted above and the necessary amendment to Appendix 1 (Section 37 Provisions) to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 17 to the report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District be amended accordingly. The owner shall submit a Public Art Plan that is in accordance with the City's Percent for Public Art Guidelines and details the public art process to the satisfaction of City Council.
b. the owner shall provide a letter of credit in the City standard form, prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, excluding a permit for demolition, rental/sales centre, maintenance and usual and minor works in association with the heritage structure, in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00), to guarantee the cost for streetscape improvements to be provided by the owner, to Yonge Street, Helendale Avenue and Montgomery Avenue abutting the site and parkland, such streetscape improvements in accordance with designs to be approved in connection with the Midtown in Focus, Parks, Open Space and Streetscape Master Plan Study for Yonge-Eglinton, the details of which to be determined in association with site plan approval, where such amount shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto where such indexing shall not commence until August 31, 2015, unless a letter of credit to secure such contribution has been provided prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit subject to the exclusions noted above. The owner may, in consultation with City Staff, increase the scope of the streetscape improvements so as to take advantage of Development Charge credits available therefor; Appendix 1 (Section 37 Provisions) of the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 17 to report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, be amended accordingly.
c. the owner shall provide a non-exclusive public pedestrian easement to the City on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Solicitor in a location generally described as a north/south access over the western portion of the site, with details of the location and final design to be determined in the context of site plan approval for the development and that such easement lands be maintained by the owner at its sole cost. The conveyance of the easement shall be for nominal consideration at no cost to the City to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the owner shall be responsible to prepare, submit to the City for approval and deposit all required reference plans to describe the easement.
d. the owner shall provide a minimum of four (4), three-bedroom units in the building.
e. the owner shall maintain the public park having an area of not less than 264 square metres, at its sole expense, after its conveyance to the City and subject to terms and conditions to be contained in the Section 37 agreement, to the satisfaction of the General Manager Parks, Forestry and Recreation together with provisions for protections and indemnification of the City to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor in connection with maintenance including but not limited to the regular year round maintenance of landscaping and landscape surfacing including removal of snow and ice, fixtures, irrigation, electrical, fences or other structures which form part of the park installations, and, arrangements with respect to inspection of the park and park installations by the City.
f. the following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. the owner shall enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act, for the property at 2384 and 2388 Yonge Street in accordance with the Heritage Impact Statement, prepared by ERA Architects dated June 2, 2014, such agreement to be subsequently registered against title to the lot, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor in consultation with the Manager Heritage Preservation Services.
ii. prior to the issuance of final Site Plan Approval for all or any portion of the lot through the Site Plan Approval process pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, the owner shall:
1. provide a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for 2384 and 2388 Yonge Street prepared by ERA Architects, dated June 2, 2014 and all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
2. provide final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.
iii. prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the lot, excluding the portion of the lot known municipally in the year 2014 as 31 Montgomery Avenue, including pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act and the Building Code Act and including any permit for excavation and shoring or foundation, but excluding a permit for the removal of the one storey addition to the rear of the heritage structure, a rental/sales centre, repairs, maintenance and usual and minor works acceptable to the Manager Heritage Preservation Services, the owner of the lot shall:
1. obtain final approval for the necessary by-law amendment required for the alterations to the property at 2384-2388 Yonge Street, such amendment to have been enacted by City Council and to have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council as determined by the Chief Planner, and Executive Director City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
2. have obtained final Site Plan Approval for such property, for an above-grade building permit only;
3. provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protection measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager Heritage Preservation Services, except in the case of any below-grade building permits, only the subject building permit drawings are to be provided;
4. provide a Lighting Plan that describes how the heritage structure will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, for an above-grade building permit only;
5. provide an Interpretation Plan for Postal Station K, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, for an above-grade building permit only; and
6. provide a letter of credit to the City in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager Heritage Preservation Services prior to the issuance of any permit pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act for all or any part of the lot, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and the approved Interpretation Plan, with such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date the letter of credit is provided.
iv. prior to the release of such letter of credit the owner shall:
1. provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work and the interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and the approved Interpretation Plan, and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Manager Heritage Preservation Services;
2. provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services.
v. the owner shall construct and convey to the City, within three years after the date of the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, excluding a permit for demolition, rental/sales centre, maintenance and usual and minor works in association with the heritage structure, for nominal consideration a public park having a minimum size of 264 square metres with such conveyance deemed to fully satisfy the parkland contribution requirements for the development as currently proposed, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of parkland conveyance as are set out in Attachment 14 to report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District with the following amendments:
1. allow the proposed parkland dedication to be subject to:
a. a 3.0 metre wide pedestrian access easement connecting Yonge Street to the front of the heritage building.
b. easements to provide, maintain, replace, etc, hydro and water for the Development, the terms of such easements to be satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry & Recreation, including the requirement that the Park will be reinstated with the materials and as per the approved Park Plan, at the owners expense should any services in the easements need to be replaced or repaired; but otherwise the conveyance to be free and clear, above and below grade easements, encumbrances and encroachments, including surface and subsurface easements unless approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry & Recreation.
The City shall accept the parkland dedication subject to the foregoing easements in complete fulfillment of the parkland dedication or cash in lieu thereof requirements of the Planning Act for the Development. So there is no uncertainty, Council consents to the above noted easements and encroachments or obstructions in the context of section 3.2.3 of the City of Toronto Official Plan, and confirms there shall be no requirement for additional cash in lieu payment(s) as a consequence thereof;
2. delete the requirement for indexing the letter of credit for the Above Base Park Improvements; and
3. appendix 1 (Section 37 Provisions) of the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 17 to the report (July 24, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District be amended accordingly.
7. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
8. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Roads and Related component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the streetscape Improvements in excess of the $100,000 amount referred to in Recommendation 3, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation. The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the above base streetscape Improvements in excess of the $100,000 amount referred to in Recommendation 6.b. above, and the Roads and Related component of Development Charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.
9. City Council, having regard to Section 3.2.3, Policy 8. (a) of the Official Plan, approves the acceptance of the conveyance of parkland for Montgomery Square subject to the pedestrian and service easements, referenced in Recommendations 6.f.v.1.a. and 6.f.v.1.b., above, and that no additional cash in lieu payments be payable in connection therewith.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on August 12, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
North York Community Council requested that the developer agree to meet for one meeting with representatives of the community to receive their input on the site plan by the end of August 2014.
Origin
Summary
The proposal conserves and adaptively reuses a historic site of national, provincial and municipal interest. The proposal reinforces the existing and planned built form context along Yonge Street consistent with the policies of the Official Plan and Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan. The proposal to dedicate on-site public parkland and the creation of a new civic square along Yonge Street - Montgomery Square will make a significant positive contribution to the public realm in Yonge –Eglinton. This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72238.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49215.pdf
(August 8, 2014) Letter from Tom Cohen, Chair, Eglinton Park Residents' Association (NY.New.NY34.85.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49216.pdf
(August 8, 2014) E-mail from Frank Peters, President, Avenue Road Eglinton Community Association (ARECA) (NY.New.NY34.85.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49264.pdf
(August 12, 2014) Submission from Councillor Stintz, forwarding a revised Map 2 of Draft Zoning By-law Amendment (NY.New.NY34.85.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49378.pdf
Speakers
Tom Cohen, Chair, Eglinton Park Residents' Association (EPRA)
Frank Peters, President, Avenue Road Eglinton Community Association (ARECA)
Michael Tucci, The Rockport Group, on behalf of the Applicant
NY34.86 - Refusal Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - 191 and 193 Empress Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council request the City Solicitor and City Planning staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board in opposition to the application for the reasons outlined in the report (July 18, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
Origin
Summary
Applications for Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment have been submitted for the lands located at 191 and 193 Empress Avenue. The applications are to permit a residential development consisting of 8, three-storey townhouse dwellings.
This report reviews and recommends refusal of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law and seek Council's direction for staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board in opposition to the development should the application be appealed.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71588.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49217.pdf
(August 8, 2014) E-mail from Edna and Robert Jardine (NY.New.NY34.86.2)
NY34.87 - Request for Direction Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Site Plan Applications - 719 Sheppard Avenue West
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 10 - York Centre
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing to support the Draft Official Plan Amendment (Attachment 6) and Draft Zoning By-law Amendment (Attachment 7), attached to the report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, with a holding provision ("H") placed on the site, due to outstanding sanitary capacity issues, to be lifted at such a time as the sanitary servicing solution is acceptable, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, North District.
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board not to issue its Order on the Site Plan appeal until such time as Notice of Approval Conditions (NOAC) have been finalized to the satisfaction to the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, North York District, and all pre-approval conditions, including entering into a Site Plan Agreement, have been met.
Origin
Summary
The applicant has appealed the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. A hearing has been set for September 22, 2014.
This application proposes a nine-storey (27.7-metre), 91-unit building on the south side of Sheppard Avenue West, immediately east of Harlock Boulevard. A total of 6,785m2 of gross floor area is proposed which would result in a density of 3.86 times the area of the lot. A total of 101 parking spaces are proposed on 3 underground levels, including 14 spaces for visitors.
The report recommends that City Council instruct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff, to attend the OMB hearing to support the position outlined in this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71829.pdf
Speakers
NY34.88 - Request for Direction Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - 591 and 593 Sheppard Avenue East
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council instruct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other City staff as appropriate, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing in opposition to the proposal in its current form.
2. City Council authorize City staff, in consultation with the local Councillor, to continue disscussions with the applicant to negotiate an appropriate development proposal which addresses the issues set out in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. As part of the continued discussions respecting the proposal, the issues set out in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, shall be addressed including:
a. revising the treatment of bulk and mass along the south elevation of the residential building so that the upper floors are stepped back from the main building wall and such floors include detailed elevation articulation such as material changes and/or glazing to address the 1:1 building height to street width ratio policy of the Secondary Plan and revise the design of the lower floors of the south elevation to include a stronger base expression to complement the scale of the place of worship;
b. providing a 5 metre wide landscaped pedestrian walkway along the entire west property line to accommodate a mid-block pedestrian connection between Sheppard Avenue East and the future east-west public street, and the northwest corner of the site be designed to include a "Gateway" feature in keeping with the objectives of the Southeast Bayview Node Context Plan;
c. the front yard setback of the place of worship increased to provide sufficient space for a forecourt, continuous weather protection, seating opportunities and main entrance as well as modifications to the building design to give the building a stronger civic presence;
d. providing common indoor and outdoor recreational amenity areas at a rate of 1.5 m² per dwelling unit;
e. the submission of a Heritage Impact Statement to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
f. the owner addressing the requirements outlined in the memorandum dated June 27, 2014 to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation;
g. the owner addressing the outstanding comments outlined in the memorandum dated July 16, 2014 from the Manager, Engineering and Construction Services, North York District;
h. a reduction in the gross floor area as a result of addressing the recommendations above; and
i. the owner addressing any further comments received from the revised submission and further processing of the application.
j. the applicant making every effort to reduce the maximum number of storeys of the proposed buildings to be no more than the neighbouring building immediately to the east of this site at Sheppard Avenue and Rean Drive.
4. In the event that the OMB allows the appeal on the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the OMB to withhold its Order until such time as:
a. an appropriate Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands is prepared to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and the City Solicitor. The implementing Zoning By-law should incorporate performance standards which include, but not be limited to, regulations on parking and bicycle parking spaces and loading, maximum building heights, maximum gross floor area, minimum building setbacks, maximum number of dwelling units and unit sizes, phasing, minimum common indoor and outdoor recreational amenity areas and appropriate Section 37 contributions;
b. the Owner has entered into an agreement with the City to secure community benefits pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and City Solicitor that are generally in keeping with other Section 37 contributions within the Secondary Plan area and which may involve a Site Specific Official Plan Amendment for the provision of specific uses and facilities not listed in Figure 4.3.3 Incentives in the Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan;
The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement in support of the development:
i. the gross floor area of the common indoor recreational amenity area exempted from the calculation of gross floor area;
ii. the gross floor area of the Place of Worship exempted from the calculation of gross floor area; and
iii. the Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009; and
c. the Board withholding its Order on the Site Plan Control application appeal until it has been advised by the City Solicitor that the City's Notice of Approval Conditions has been finalized and any pre-approval conditions satisfied.
5. Subject to the applicant addressing the issues raised in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and the parkland dedication requirements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of Above Base Park Improvements for a 406m² linear park to be conveyed to the City to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The development charge credit shall be an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law.
Origin
Summary
The applications propose an amendment to the Official Plan, the Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan and former City of North Zoning By-law No. 7625 to permit a mixed use development with residential, retail and office uses and a new place of worship at 591 and 593 Sheppard Avenue East. The proposal comprises a 6 to 10-storey mixed use building containing 186-units, two floors of 1,676m² of retail and office space along the Sheppard Avenue East frontage, a new free-standing 1,279m² place of worship to replace an existing facility on 593 Sheppard Avenue East, 267 parking spaces and 160 bicycle parking spaces. The total proposed is 18,513m² resulting in a density of 3.97 FSI.
On February 11, 2014 the applicant appealed the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the prescribed time frames set out in the Planning Act. On June 19, 2014 the applicant appealed associated Site Plan Control application to the OMB. A pre-hearing conference was held on July 14, 2014. A second prehearing is scheduled for September 26, 2014.
On June 11, 2014 the applications were formally revised and under review at the time of the appeals.
The report seeks Council's direction to oppose the applications in their current form.
The proposal does not address the 1:1 building height to street width ratio policy of the Secondary Plan, built form changes to the proposal are necessary to satisfy the on-site parkland dedication requirements and the potential impacts that the proposal may have on the heritage property immediately west of the site need to be assessed. The report also outlines concerns with the design of the proposed place of worship, the need to provide additional indoor and outdoor amenity spaces on the site, and the provision for a mid-block pedestrian connection through the site, and Section 37 contributions. The report also advises there are a number of outstanding technical matters that still need to be resolved to the satisfaction of Engineering and Construction Services.
Staff is recommending the City Solicitor and appropriate staff be authorized to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the issues raised in this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72190.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49218.pdf
(August 12, 2014) Submission from Leslie Mezei and Katherine Mezei (NY.New.NY34.88.2)
Speakers
Leslie Mezei (Submission Filed)
Mark Flowers, Solicitor, on behalf of the applicant
NY34.89 - Request for Direction Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Applications - 5, 7, 9, 11 & 15 Kenaston Gardens and 577 Sheppard Avenue East
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council instruct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other City staff as appropriate, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing in opposition to the proposal in its current form.
2. City Council authorize City staff to continue discussions, in consultation with the local Councillor, with the applicant to negotiate an appropriate development proposal which addresses the issues set out in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. As part of the continued discussions respecting the proposal, the issues set out in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, shall be addressed including:
a. the provision for a 20 metre wide public road along the southern portion of the site;
b. a reduction in the building height along the Kenaston Gardens frontage and relocating some of the floor area to the northwest corner of the site;
c. extending the built form along Sheppard Avenue East as well as the southerly building wing to the east property lines to create a zero lot line/grade party wall condition;
d. east building elevations designed to include detailed elevation articulation and/or building finishes that complement the architectural character of the main façade and a "Gateway" feature at the northwest corner of the site in keeping with the objectives of the Southeast Bayview Node Context Plan; and
e. an improved grade relationship between the finished ground floor elevation of the proposed development and the existing/proposed linear park.
4. In the event that the OMB allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Board withhold any Order to approve an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendments for the subject lands until such time as:
a. an appropriate Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands is prepared to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and the City Solicitor. The implementing Zoning By-law should incorporate performance standards which include, but not be limited to, regulations on parking and bicycle parking spaces and loading, maximum building heights, maximum gross floor area, minimum building setbacks, maximum number of dwelling units, minimum indoor and outdoor recreational amenity areas and appropriate Section 37 contributions;
b. the Owner has entered into an agreement with the City to secure community benefits pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and City Solicitor that are in generally keeping with other Section 37 contributions within the Secondary Plan area and which may involve a Site Specific Official Plan Amendment for the provision of specific uses and facilities not listed in Figure 4.3.3 Incentives in the Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan;
In addition to the above, the following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement in support of the development:
i. the gross floor area of the indoor private recreational amenity area exempted from the calculation of gross floor area;
ii. the Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009.
c. the Owner has submitted a Plan of Subdivision application to secure all matters relating to the public road and parkland including above base park improvements.
d. the Board withholding its Order on the Site Plan Control application appeal until it has been advised by the City Solicitor that the City's Notice of Approval Conditions has been finalized, and any pre-approval conditions have been satisfied;
e. the Owner has addressed the requirements outlined in the memorandums dated October 7, 2013 and May 21, 2014 to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation;
f. the Owner has addressed the requirements outlined in the memorandum dated June 19, 2014 to the satisfaction of the Manager, Engineering and Construction Services, North York District;
g. the owner addressing any further comments received on the most recent submission and through the further review of the application; and
h. the height being reduced to be more in keeping with the Southeast Bayview Node Context Plan.
5. Subject to addressing the issues raised in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and satisfying the comments outlined in the October 7, 2013 and May 21, 2014 comments from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the Owner of Above Base Park Improvements to a proposed 227 m² park to be conveyed to the City to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The development charge credit shall be an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law.
6 City Council direct that the City not issue a Limiting Distance Agreement along the property line adjacent to the Sheppard Avenue Linear Park.
Origin
Summary
The applications propose an amendment to the Official Plan, the Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan, the former City of North Zoning By-law No. 7625 and City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 to permit a mixed use development at 5, 7, 9, 11 and 15 Kenaston Gardens and 577 Sheppard Avenue East. The proposal comprises a 12-storey mixed use building with a gross floor area of 18,223 m² containing 245 dwelling units, 249 m² of grade related retail space, 212 parking spaces and 188 bicycle parking spaces. The proposal yields a density of 3.99 FSI.
On June 12, 2014 the applicant appealed the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications and the Site Plan Control application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the prescribed time frames set out in the Planning Act.
A hearing has been scheduled for November 5-7, 2014.
The report seeks Council's direction to oppose the applications in their current form.
Built form changes are required to address the 1:1 building height to street width ratio policy of the Secondary Plan along Kenaston Gardens and satisfy the requirements of Transportation Services to provide a public road on the southern portion of the site. The report also outlines concerns with the proposed grade relationship along the Sheppard Avenue East frontage of the site adjacent to the existing/future linear park as well as concerns with the design of the building along the east elevation at Sheppard Avenue East. The report also advises there are a number of outstanding technical matters that still need to be resolved to the satisfaction of Engineering and Construction Services.
Given the locational attributes of the site within this neighbourhood, its close proximity to the Bayview Subway Station and approved and/or built form context in the area, staff could support density beyond the maximum 3.0 FSI assigned in the Secondary Plan at this location, subject to the applicant addressing the issues raised in this report.
Staff is recommending the City Solicitor and appropriate staff be authorized to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the issues raised in this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72260.pdf
Communications
NY34.90 - Request for Direction Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan Control and Consent Applications - 103 Bayview Ridge
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 25 - Don Valley West
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing to oppose the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan Control and Consent applications in the current form.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to address the issues outlined in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. Should the OMB approve the applications, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the OMB to withhold its Order(s) approving the applications until such time as:
a. the Board has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments are in a form satisfactory to the City;
b. all pre-approval conditions have been met for the Site Plan Control application; and
c. all conditions of approval have been satisfied for the Consent application.
Origin
Summary
The applicant has appealed the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment Site Plan Control and Consent applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. A Preliminary Hearing has been set for August 20, 2014.
This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 to permit six townhouse units fronting onto Bayview Avenue and two detached dwellings fronting onto Bayview Ridge. The existing single-detached dwelling would be demolished.
The purpose of this report is to seek Council's direction for staff representation at the OMB.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72193.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49221.pdf
NY34.91 - Request for Direction Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan Control and Consent Applications - 108 Bayview Ridge
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 25 - Don Valley West
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing to oppose the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan Control and Consent applications in the current form.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to address the issues outlined in the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. Should the OMB approve the applications, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the OMB to withhold its Order(s) approving the applications until such time as:
a. the Board has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments are in a form satisfactory to the City;
b. all pre-approval conditions have been met for the Site Plan Control application; and
c. all conditions of approval have been satisfied for the Consent application.
Origin
Summary
The applicant has appealed the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment Site Plan Control and Consent applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. A Preliminary Hearing has been set for August 20, 2014.
This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 to permit five townhouse units fronting onto Bayview Avenue and two detached dwellings fronting onto Bayview Ridge. The existing single-detached dwelling would be demolished.
The purpose of this report is to seek Council's direction for staff representation at the OMB.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72117.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49138.pdf
NY34.92 - Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 55, 59, 60, 62, 70, 72 & 76 Forest Manor Road, 106 & 123 Parkway Forest Drive and 125 George Henry Boulevard
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 33 - Don Valley East
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council instruct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other City staff as appropriate, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing in opposition to the proposal in its current form.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the built form changes and design related matters raised in the report (August 6, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District and any issues that may arise from the further review.
3. As part of the continued discussions respecting the proposal, the issues set out in the report (August 6, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York, shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District, including:
a. the proposed floor area redeployed along the Forest Manor Road frontage above the entrance driveways so as to connect Buildings B2 and B3 and Buildings C2 and C3. As a minimum, the height of the proposed 3-storey bases on Buildings B3 and C3 should be increased to define the edge of the street as outlined in the Parkway Forest Context Plan;
b. sufficient information to confirm the ground floor uses for all buildings on Blocks B and C have views onto and, where possible, access to, adjacent streets;
c. a revised proposal that replaces the shared loading area proposed on Block C, at the corner of Helen Lu Road and Don Mills Road, with more active, at grade residential units that compliments the design proposed for Building B1 at the corner of George Henry Boulevard and Don Mills Road;
d. a revised submission that demonstrates an increased separation distance has been provided between Buildings B1 and B2 and Buildings C1 and C2 so as to improve views and privacy between the buildings as well as, to provide additional space for landscaping;
e. submit an updated phasing/master plan, such plan to be incorporated into an agreement, which sets out the remaining phases and number of dwelling units within each building to determine the number of dwelling units that would be associated with each of the remaining holding symbols;
f. the applicant addressing any further comments received from the revised submission and further processing of the application; and
g. the number of one bedroom units within the specified gross floor area be reduced by 25 and that the available square footage that results be dedicated to the construction of three bedroom units.
4. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal on the Zoning By-law Amendment application in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the OMB to withhold its Order until such time as:
a. an appropriate Zoning By-law amendment is prepared to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and the City Solicitor. The implementing Zoning By-law should incorporate performance standards which include, but not be limited to, regulations on parking and loading standards, maximum building heights, building transition, maximum building floor plates and envelopes, maximum gross floor area, minimum building setbacks, maximum number of dwelling units, phasing, minimum indoor and outdoor recreational amenity area, bicycle parking spaces, and appropriate Section 37 contributions;
b. the Owner has entered into an agreement with the City to secure community benefits pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and City Solicitor requiring the Owner to:
i. Provide a cash contribution of $500,000.00 to be used towards parks improvements to Parkway Forest Park;
ii Provide a cash contribution of $30,000.00 to assess the transportation effects of full build-out of the development for additional traffic monitoring in the area surrounding the development which will include all modes of transportation - vehicle, walking, cycling and transit;
The above contribution is to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the development, with such amounts to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.
The following matter is to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement in support of the development:
iii. the Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with the Tier 1 performance measure of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009;
c. the applicant addressing the requirements outlined in the memorandum dated June 25, 2014 to the satisfaction of the Engineering and Construction Services and at no cost to the City of Toronto.
5. City Council direct that the alternative parkland dedication calculations be finalized at the discretion of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the Chief Planner.
6. City Council direct that Section 2(ww)(xiv)(4) of By-law 865-2008 (OMB), which outlines that every first purchaser of each dwelling unit and each tenant relocated to a new rental replacement building receive a one annual 12-month subscription be deleted, and that City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend the March 1, 2008 S37 agreement accordingly.
7. City Council direct that the outcome of this meeting be communicated by City Planning staff to the community bordered by Sheppard Avenue East, Highway 401, Highway 404 and Leslie Street and that the associated costs be borne by the applicant.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes an amendment to site specific Zoning By-law No. 865-2008(OMB) zoning by-law to permit 600 additional dwelling units on lands in the Parkway Forest community municipally known as 55, 59, 60, 62, 70, 72 & 76 Forest Manor Road, 106 & 123 Parkway Forest Drive and 125 George Henry Boulevard. The proposed dwelling units would be accommodated in redesigned and reconfigured buildings on Blocks B and C located on the east side of Don Mills Road and on Blocks D (Buildings D2 and D4) and E (Building E2). No amendments are proposed with respect to gross floor area and density.
The application also proposes amendments to the three remaining holding ("H") symbols appended to site specific Zoning By-law No. 865-2008(OMB). The proposed amendments include changes to the maximum number of dwelling units associated with each holding symbol and the pre-conditions to be fulfilled for the removal of each of the remaining holding symbols.
The purpose of this report is to advise Council that on May 5, 2014 the applicant appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 55, 59, 60, 62, 70, 72 & 76 Forest Manor Road, 106 & 123 Parkway Forest Drive and 125 George Henry Boulevard to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) citing City Council's failure to make a decision within the prescribed time frames set out in the Planning Act, and to seek direction regarding staff representation at the upcoming OMB hearing. A 2-day hearing is scheduled to commence October 2, 2014.
The applications were under review at the time of the appeal. Since that time the applicant has been working with staff to address outstanding design matters and technical requirements. Revised submissions were received May 1, 2014, May 20, 2014, June 27, 2014 and July 4, 2014 and are currently under review.
The report seeks Council's direction to oppose the proposal in its current form. The report is recommending built form changes including a redeployment of proposed floor area to provide additional building mass along the Forest Manor Road frontages, an increased separation distance between the proposed mid-rise buildings along Don Mills Road and the proposed 24-storey apartment buildings on Blocks B and C and streetscape improvements along the south side of Helen Lu Road near Don Mills Road. The report also recommends the applicant provide information to confirm the ground floor uses for all buildings to address Official Plan policies regarding grade relationships.
Staff is recommending the City Solicitor and appropriate staff be authorized to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the matters outlined in this report and any issues that may arise from the further review.
Staff is also recommending City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the OMB to withhold its final Order approving the Zoning By-law Amendment until such time as the matters set out in the report are addressed.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72634.pdf
(July 24, 2014) Notice of Pending Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 55, 59, 60, 62, 70, 72 & 76 Forest Manor Road, 106 & 123 Parkway Forest Drive and 125 George Henry Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72237.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49237.pdf
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Cathy Reid (NY.New.NY34.92.2)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from June Mollenbeck, Treasurer, Parkway Forest Community Association (NY.New.NY34.92.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49239.pdf
Speakers
NY34.93 - Preliminary Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 90 Eglinton Avenue West
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council directed that:
1. City Planning staff continue the consultative public process recognizing that the site is not a mid-rise, however, pursuing reductions in height and density commensurate with the appropriate transitions settled upon for other developments having a sensitive relationship to nearby lower density neighbourhoods.
2. City Planning staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 90 Eglinton Avenue West together with the Ward Councillor.
3. City Planning staff give notice for the community consultation meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.
4. City Clerk's staff give notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act according to the regulations under the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes a 29-storey mixed-use building, 97.95 metres high (excluding mechanical penthouse and architectural feature) with 247 dwelling units and 3,451 square metres of commercial floor area at 90 Eglinton Avenue West. The total gross floor area proposed is 22,315 square metres representing a density of 12.24 times the area of the lot.
The site is situated within the Eglinton Connects Planning Study area. The Study has identified this site as appropriate for mid-rise buildings at a height of approximately 26 metres and 8 storeys.
This report provides information on the above-noted application and seeks Community Council's directions on further processing of the application.
Staff have identified significant concerns with the proposed development for a 29-storey building (97.95 metres) on this site. Revisions to the proposal including a reduction in height and density are needed to align the proposal with the Official Plan, Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan and the Eglinton Connects Planning Study.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72636.pdf
(July 17, 2014) Notice of Pending Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 90 Eglinton Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72635.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49261.pdf
NY34.94 - Refusal Report - Official Plan Amendment, Rental Housing Conversion under Municipal Code Chapter 667, and Draft Plan of Condominium Applications - 1477 Bayview Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 26 - Don Valley West
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council refuse Official Plan Amendment application 12 287930 NNY 26 OZ, Residential Rental Demolition and Conversion application 12 288059 NNY 26 RH, and Draft Plan of Condominium Application 12 288046 NNY 26 CD.
2. If the Official Plan Amendment and Draft Plan of Condominium applications are appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, City Council direct the City Solicitor together with other appropriate City staff to appear before the Board in opposition to any appeals filed in respect to these applications.
3. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.
Origin
Summary
The Official Plan Amendment, Residential Rental Housing Conversion, and Draft Plan of Condominium applications propose to convert the existing 10 rental residential buildings containing 104 rental units into a condominium.
This report reviews and recommends refusal of these three applications, and seeks Council's direction for staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board should any appeals be filed on the Official Plan Amendment and Draft Plan of Condominium applications. The Residential Rental Housing Conversion application is not appealable to the Ontario Municipal Board.
This report also sets out staff's comments on the applications and discusses the results of the public consultation.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71698.pdf
Communications
(August 7, 2014) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Edith Burtin-Fripp, Co-Presidents, Leaside Propert Owners' Association Incorporated (NY.New.NY34.94.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49147.pdf
(August 9, 2014) E-mail from Judith Waugh (NY.New.NY34.94.3)
(August 9, 2014) E-mail from Pat Poole (NY.New.NY34.94.4)
(August 9, 2014) E-mail from Bruce Raymond (NY.New.NY34.94.5)
(August 9, 2014) E-mail from Kathy Brown (NY.New.NY34.94.6)
(August 10, 2014) E-mail from John and Joan Turbach (NY.New.NY34.94.7)
(August 10, 2014) E-mail from Bev Ball (NY.New.NY34.94.8)
(August 10, 2014) E-mail from Thomas Donovan (NY.New.NY34.94.9)
(August 10, 2014) E-mail from Sheena D. Robertson (NY.New.NY34.94.10)
(August 10, 2014) E-mail from Bernie Gelfand (NY.New.NY34.94.11)
(August 10, 2014) E-mail from Kathie Droy (NY.New.NY34.94.12)
(August 10, 2014) E-mail from Jim and Margaret Taylor (NY.New.NY34.94.13)
(August 10, 2014) E-mail from Cheryl Gateman (NY.New.NY34.94.14)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Carole Supak submitted by Cheryl Gateman (NY.New.NY34.94.15)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Claire Seymour (NY.New.NY34.94.16)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Ron and Paula Forde (NY.New.NY34.94.17)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Susan Bell (NY.New.NY34.94.18)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Gwen Seymour (NY.New.NY34.94.19)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Mark Duffield (NY.New.NY34.94.20)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Martha Johnson (NY.New.NY34.94.21)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Michael D. Willson (NY.New.NY34.94.22)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Laurie Prockter (NY.New.NY34.94.23)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Cynthia Hawkins (NY.New.NY34.94.24)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Dr. John S. Arrowood (NY.New.NY34.94.25)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Kelly McCarten (NY.New.NY34.94.26)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Kevin Seymour (NY.New.NY34.94.27)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Margaret Christieson (NY.New.NY34.94.28)
Speakers
Martha Johnson
NY34.95 - Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 1100 Briar Hill Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to hire the necessary external consultants to defend the existing zoning by-laws on site, and direct all consultants together with any other appropriate City staff, to attend any Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the applicant’s appeal respecting Zoning By-law Amendment application City File No. 13 221087 NNY 15 OZ for 1100 Briar Hill Avenue.
2. City Council direct City staff to not negotiate with the Appellant/Applicant and all requesting Party Status entities prior to the Ontario Municipal Board hearing regarding Zoning By-law Amendment Application City File No. 13 221087 NNY 15OZ for 1100 Briar Hill Avenue.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to enter into minutes of settlement only if the proposed settlement plan substantially conforms with the current existing by-law permissions and a full settlement with all Parties is achieved.
4. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct staff to request that the Board withhold any order to approve a Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands until such time as a site plan agreement has been entered into between the City and the owner and in consultation with the local Councillor and local residents, and the site plan agreement be reported back to North York Community Council.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold any final Orders approving the Zoning By-law Amendment until such time as the Owner has entered into and registered a Section 37 Agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.
6. City Council request City staff to look at the feasibility of re-orientating the proposed on-site parkland dedication to encompass the registered archaeological site (Ak-GU89) where old school house foundation remains were located, and to incorporate the school foundation as a key feature of the park.
7. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board include in any Order that the owner of the subject property which is amended to Mixed Use Commercial Zone (C5) or any other Commercial Zone be required to erect a City approved “Precast Concrete Fence” along the entire north and east perimeter of the applicant’s/owner’s private property, where it adjoins the property of landowners of single-family detached dwellings residing in “One-Family Detached Dwelling Residential Density Zones” (R2 and R5).
8. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board in the matter of Case No. 140368, to reschedule the November 25, 2014 hearing date until such time as the landowners provincially directed investigation of the Stage 4 Archaeological Assessment (Ak-GU89 ) being undertaken of the site is completed and has been reviewed and commented on by City Planning Heritage Preservation Services and the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and Sport.
Origin
Summary
The applicant has appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. A hearing has been set for November 25, 2014. The Site Plan Control Application (file no. 13 221111 NNY 15 SA) has not been appealed by the applicant to the OMB.
The application proposes to amend both the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 and the former City of York Zoning By-law 1-83 to permit the development of 124 stacked back-to-back townhouse units and 4 commercial units with underground parking located at 1100 Briar Hill Avenue.
The report recommends that the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff, attend the OMB hearing in opposition to the current proposal. It also recommends that staff continue to work with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the outstanding issues and achieve a settlement.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72206.pdf
Communications
(August 5, 2014) E-mail from Maria Coiro (NY.New.NY34.95.2)
(August 7, 2014) E-mail from Grace Bianco (NY.New.NY34.95.3)
(August 8, 2014) Fax from Sam and Susan Pagano (NY.New.NY34.95.4)
(August 8, 2014) E-mail from Diep Dinh (NY.New.NY34.95.5)
(August 9, 2014) E-mail from Kim Sartor (NY.New.NY34.95.6)
(August 10, 2014) E-mail from Gustavo Macias Mosquera (NY.New.NY34.95.7)
(August 10, 2014) E-mail from Yuan Xu (NY.New.NY34.95.8)
(August 10, 2014) E-mail from Doug Warwick (NY.New.NY34.95.9)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Aldo Amoroso (NY.New.NY34.95.10)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Dennis and Luisa Trej (NY.New.NY34.95.11)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Michelle Zhang (NY.New.NY34.95.12)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Robert Bianchi (NY.New.NY34.95.13)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Lidia Worth and Victor Marques (NY.New.NY34.95.14)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Grace Matthies - Rhea Plesman (NY.New.NY34.95.15)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Angela Tocci (NY.New.NY34.95.16)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Ali Unlucay (NY.New.NY34.95.17)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Mary Maurini (NY.New.NY34.95.18)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Anna Scarano (NY.New.NY34.95.19)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Bruno DeAngelis (NY.New.NY34.95.20)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Granieri Family (NY.New.NY34.95.21)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Donato Tocci (NY.New.NY34.95.22)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Duke McKenzie (NY.New.NY34.95.23)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Joi Guttman-Young (NY.New.NY34.95.24)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Antonio Mare (NY.New.Ny34.95.25)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Dieu Guang and Anh Vuong (NY.New.Ny34.95.26)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Teresina Mantello (NY.New.NY34.95.27)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from P. Dasimonte (NY.New.NY34.95.28)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Rui Favas (NY.New.NY34.95.29)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Mary Polimeni (NY.New.NY34.95.30)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Gerrada Pappa (NY.New.Ny34.95.31)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Bruno Perrella (NY.New.NY34.95.32)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Shu Qing Jiang (NY.New.NY34.95.33)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Mary Vultaggio (NY.New.NY34.95.34)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Anna Amoroso (NY.New.NY34.95.35)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Deb Testani (NY.New.NY34.95.36)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Aldo Amoroso (NY.New.NY34.95.37)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Bosko Maric (NY.New.NY34.95.38)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Antonia D'Amario (NY.New.NY34.95.39)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Esterina Bonofiglio (NY.New.NY34.95.40)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Ron Matheson (NY.New.NY34.95.41)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Darla Matheson (NY.New.NY34.95.42)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Oleg Nesterenko (NY.New.NY34.95.43)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Grazia Lombarolo (NY.New.NY34.95.44)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Carlos Carvalho (NY.New.NY34.95.45)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Gina Grirolina (NY.New.NY34.95.46)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Maria Aguirre (NY.New.NY34.95.47)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Vishnu Radharrishnan (NY.New.NY34.95.48)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Maria Neiva (NY.New.NY34.95.49)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Blanca Cajamarla (NY.New.NY34.95.50)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Robert Leszeynsik (NY.New.NY34.95.51)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Giovanni Pizzonia (NY.New.NY34.95.52)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Franca Pizzonia (NY.New.NY34.95.53)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Romy Navarro (NY.New.NY34.95.54)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Fernando Ste Ane (NY.New.NY34.95.55)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Roberto Canedo (NY.New.NY34.95.56)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Brian Rose (NY.New.NY34.95.57)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Laura Rose (NY.New.NY34.95.58)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Estrella Ullero (NY.New.NY34.95.59)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Diep Dinh (NY.New.NY34.95.60)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Dorothy Lapell (NY.New.NY34.95.61)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Melisa Walasek (NY.New.NY34.95.62)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Jocelyn Best (NY.New.NY34.95.63)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Yolanda Viassone (NY.New.NY34.95.64)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Michele Abate (NY.New.NY34.95.65)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from A. Chiavaroli (NY.New.NY34.95.66)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Jhave Trinidad (NY.New.NY34.95.67)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Dusan Mijatovic (NY.New.NY34.95.68)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Elsa Dela Cruz (NY.New.NY34.95.69)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Cristeta Mendoza (NY.New.NY34.95.70)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Satha Viverananthan (NY.New.NY34.95.71)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Ana Cristina Chirila (NY.New.NY34.95.72)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Tudor Chirila (NY.New.NY34.95.73)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Felicidad Ullero (NY.New.NY34.95.74)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Larry Lopez (NY.New.NY34.95.75)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Fernando Escaro (NY.New.NY34.95.76)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Angeles Ullero (NY.New.NY34.95.77)
(August 10, 2014) Letter from Savitri Rose (NY.New.NY34.95.78)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Tony and Arlete Dias (NY.New.NY34.95.79)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Tony and Arlete Dias (NY.New.NY34.95.80)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from JN Nobrega (NY.New.NY34.95.81)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Josephine De Souza (NY.New.NY34.95.82)
(August 12, 2014) Submission from Maria Coiro (NY.New.NY34.95.83)
(August 12, 2014) Submission from Brian Rose (NY.New.NY34.95.84)
Speakers
Anthony Coiro
Maria Coiro (Submission Filed)
Tony Dias
Flavio Volpe, Co-Chair, Briar Hill Stayner Community Association
NY34.96 - Status Report - Dufferin Street Avenue Study
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct City Staff and the consultant to finalize the Transportation and Infrastructure Master Plans and that staff provide notification for public review and comment upon completion of the Master Plans in accordance with the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Process.
2. City Council direct City Staff to use the recommendations contained in the report (July 21, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and the Dufferin Street Avenue Study (DSAS) Final Report as a guide for drafting the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law to create site and area specific policies and new zoning provisions suited to this Avenue segment, and any other appropriate planning tools, that address the matters identified in this report, including, but not limited to: the appropriate mix of residential and non-residential uses; new streets and blocks, standards regulating built form, height, building setbacks and stepbacks, appropriate separation distances, appropriate transition in scale to Neighbourhoods and Employment Areas, angular planes, parking and bicycle and other performance measures for the segment; the community improvements that are needed to support growth and community benefits to be sought under Section 37 of the Planning Act; and the phasing of growth with transportation and servicing improvements.
3. City Council direct City Staff to conduct community consultation on a draft Official Plan Amendment, amendments to the Zoning By-laws, and other planning tools and necessary Implementation Strategies prior to bringing forward these planning tools and strategies to North York Community Council's consideration.
Origin
Summary
This report provides a summary of the Dufferin Street Avenue Study (DSAS) for the portion of Dufferin Street from Highway 401 to just south of Lawrence Avenue West. City staff, the Ward Councillor, the City's consultants, and members of the local community have worked together to develop a vision and framework for new development and the improvement of the public realm on this portion of Dufferin Street. Following from the Study's findings, the report outlines key issues and recommendations, as well as next steps in preparing draft amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.
The implementation of this study will include a site and area specific Official Plan policy, a new zoning regime suited to this Avenue segment, Urban Design Guidelines to guide development on this portion of Dufferin Street, a Parks and Open Space Strategy, a Community Services and Facilities Strategy, and a Transportation and Infrastructure Master Plan.
This report recommends that Council authorize staff to use the recommendations contained in this report and the consultant's Final Report as a guide to draft Official Plan policies and other appropriate planning tools, forming part of staff's final report to Council, and further community consultation in the second quarter of 2015.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-71691.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49242.pdf
NY34.97 - Final Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - 4917- 4975 Yonge Street, 23 Hollywood Avenue and 18 Spring Garden Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Deferred consideration of the item to the next regular meeting of the North York Community Council so that Council can give direction to City Staff regarding its position in relation to the applicant's appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board.
Origin
Summary
The proposal provides for a mix of uses that will increase the diversity, vitality and interest of the North York Centre consistent with the objectives of the North York Centre Secondary Plan. The proposed development reinforces the existing and planned built form context along Yonge Street in the Centre, and the building design and proposed landscape plazas along Yonge Street at the intersections of Hollywood Avenue and Spring Garden Avenue will contribute to and enhance the public realm.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law and the approval in principle of the Site Plan application subject to the conditions outlined in this report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70958.pdf
97a - Supplementary Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - 4917- 4975 Yonge Street, 23 Hollywood Avenue and 18 Spring Garden Avenue
Origin
Summary
At its meeting of June 14, 2014, North York Community Council (NYCC) deferred consideration of a final report on the application to amend the North York Centre Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law 7625 to permit a revised design for the previously approved 34-storey mixed-use building at 4917 to 4975 Yonge Street and amendments to Zoning By-law 7625 respecting the shared driveway between the existing apartment buildings at 23 Hollywood Avenue and 18 Spring Garden Avenue and the new mixed-use building proposed at 4917-4975 Yonge Street. NYCC requested that staff report back on two matters to the August 12, 2014 meeting of NYCC.
This report provides information on the status of the items requested by NYCC concerning the Royal Canadian Legion Branch 66 at 6 Spring Garden Avenue and the future views of the proposed building from the existing apartment building at 65 Spring Garden Avenue.
This report also advises that the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment application has been appealed by the applicant to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision within the prescribed period under the Planning Act. As a result of the appeal, the decision on the application is now within the jurisdiction of the OMB rather than Council.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72648.pdf
NY34.98 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 200 Ridley Boulevard
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend North York Zoning By-law No. 7625, for the lands at 200 Ridley Boulevard substantially in accordance with the revised draft Zoning By-law Amendment and list of Section 37 benefits as per Attachment No. 1 to the supplementary report (July 22, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, based on the outcome of the tenant consultation meeting held on July 9, 2014.
2. City Council approve the inclusion of the following additional items, received from residents at 200 Ridley Boulevard, in the list of Section 37 benefits to be incorporated as part of the revised draft Zoning By-law and in the Section 37 agreement:
a. Bike racks, including:
i. Bicycle Room/Garbage Room
1. To be moved indoors (bicycle room).
2. Entrance way to garage on north side of the building to be renovated to include accessibility requirements.
3. Garage ceiling leak repairs not yet finalized.
b. Boulder in front of the building with the address 200 Ridley, including:
i. Appropriate signage for the neighborhood esthetic: that a large decorative stone of boulder with "200 Ridley Boulevard" address engraved on it, such as to be visible from the street, be incorporated into the landscaping at the front southwest corner of Building "A", and that the stone be lit with appropriate lighting.
ii. Accommodations for grading, drainage, appropriate landscaping cover materials of the proposed amenity area on the northeast side of the building to mitigate the impact heavy shading has on the soil and grass during spring and summer rainfalls (does not dry-muck).
iii. Rooftop amenity space and garden that has accessibility to sunshine currently being diminished as a result of the proposed development.
iv. Lamp posts be painted around the circular driveway.
v. Replace driveway.
vi. That the landscaping for those portions of the lands running from the southeast corner to the northeast corner closest to Building "A" be landscaped with some combination of wood chips, periwinkle or such other materials so as to reflect the heavily shaded nature of the area, which currently renders much of it unusable due to muddy conditions in the early fall through late spring.
vii. That the existing chain link fence on the easterly boundary of the property be replaced with a wooden fence so as to block the view of the Cricket Club storage area.
viii. That the sub clause 2 (k), Parking and Loading, contained in the Draft By-law and the Site Plan be amended to reflect the total parking supply of 78 spaces consisting of 69 spaces for residents and 9 for visitors as reflected in the fourth paragraph on page 4 of the report (July 24, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
c. New hallway carpets and under padding, including:
i. Installation of stainless steel flashing-like colour galvanized rubber or other appropriate high resistance material in high traffic areas to prevent damage from high use/contact -elevator sidings, lobby. This should be expanded to include laundry rooms, west side of building stairs and stairwells, garage entry way to lobby, corners, etc.
ii. The walls surrounding the stairwells to be repainted.
d. Additional large capacity washing machines in each laundry room, including:
i. Renovated laundry rooms on the first floor including adequate folding tables, wash basins, working exhaust fans, painting, floor refinished and polished, doors refinished and polished, incremental washers and dryers of equal or more capacity.
e. Amenities common to all suites, including
i. Improvement of ventilation in bathrooms and kitchens and the vents be cleaned out annually.
ii. Installation of new door sweeps on all balcony doors and entrance doors to all suites.
iii. Installation of new screen doors.
iv. Installation of electric exhaust fans in bathrooms and kitchens.
v. Free Wi- Fi and cable in all suites.
vi. At least 70 per cent of all suites remain affordable housing to protect the vulnerable tenants (seniors, persons with disabilities, and immigrant families).
vii. New Fridge and stove in each unit. These should match the existing decors.
viii. Development and amenity enhancements proposals will require enhanced maintenance contracts to support both direct and downstream impact as of result of amenity changes:
a. Outdoor care: the revised landscaping configuration and increased hard ground cover, BBQ cleaning and maintenance, shared access to parking not enforced, etc.
b. Indoor care – parking garage, garbage in interior, increased vehicular density, increased pedestrian traffic from north new parking.
ix. These should include adjustments to maintenance as follows:
1. Snow removal (not plowing) - less ground space for excess snow storing due to development. The current snow plow protocol places snow storage in locations where parking is now being proposed, where the proposed development will exist and illegally onto the city street.
2. Window washing at least twice per year on south side of building due to garage exhaust and north side of building due to car exhaust resulting from incremental parking.
3. Bi-monthly carpet washing.
4. Private parking enforcement with contact information provided to tenants and ticketing at tenant request.
5. Amenity space cleaning and maintenance- BBQ, equipment, garden.
6. Garage floor power washing.
7. Item (vii) applies to the above.
8. Replacement of the front door, including:
i. Security cameras at all exits (4) and garage with cable/wireless feed to tenant suites/TV.
ii. The doors to the garage and hallways be replaced.
iii. Lighting provided to and from the original building will be a priority at all times for everyone.
f. Artwork in the lobby commemorating the old 200 Ridley Boulevard building, including:
i. Improvements to the lobby including new furniture and paint. This should include seating area for 6-10 adults, artwork, amount and type of glass mirroring being proposed, etc., with a view to creating an esthetic appropriate to the neighbourhood and a corresponding level of privacy balanced with an ability to view the driveway entry. All objects should be secured in a corresponding esthetic manner.
ii. Lobby doors should be replaced with appropriate building code security doors- auto lock, emergency panic handles/bar, secure locking mechanism embedded in door frame.
g. Tenants to provide consultation on a construction mitigation plan, including:
i. The proposal should be amended to include overall timing of capital expenditures to be delivered prior to the start of the construction period.
ii. The proposal should be clear on no pass through costs to tenants for any of the changes including:
1. User fees for the amenity use (bicycle charges, use of rooms); and
2. Increased maintenance costs as a result.
iii. That a date or dates for completion of all intended improvements be reflected.
h. As members of the community, the tenants are requesting the landlord and developer be required to make donations to communal, spiritual and educational gathering spaces of the tenants and their families. The leaders of these spaces are to be able to use these at their sole discretion amenity enhancements as a result of the increased density being proposed as follows:
i. Armour Heights Community Centre Day and Evening Programs $25,000.
ii. Armour Heights Toronto Public Library $25,000 (A request has been made from the library on needed amenities and a response is pending.)
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. the following matters are recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. the securing of the rental tenure of the existing 91 unit building municipally known as 200 Ridley Boulevard for a minimum of 20 years, commencing from the date of Council’s decision, as a 90 unit building, with no applications for demolition, or conversion from residential rental use to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning and the City Solicitor, while allowing one unit to be converted to an indoor amenity space as detailed below;
ii. prior to the issuance of a building permit for the new development on the lot, a Section 111 permit will be filed for the elimination of one ground-floor residential rental unit in Building A as shown on Schedule RM4(27) to enable the construction of an indoor amenity space for the use and enjoyment of the tenants of the rental building; the location and finishing of which shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner. Subject to compliance with all applicable laws including the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, S.O. 2006, c. 17, construction and conversion of a ground-floor residential unit to indoor amenity space will be done no later than 3 years from the date of building permit issuance for the new building. Should a suitable unit not naturally vacate within 3 years, in the third year, tenants in the selected units will be offered relocation to the first available unit of the same type and at the same rent, or the equivalent of three months' rent for vacating, and in either case, a moving allowance of $1000 as well;
iii. that the owner provide for Building A two extra washing and drying machines for the use and enjoyment of the current and future tenants to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning;
iv. that the owner upgrade the entrance to Building A with a new canopy, upgraded lighting, security cameras and improved accessibility to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning;
v. that the owner provide for the tenants of Building A a new bicycle storage area on the lot to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning;
vi. that the owner provide for the tenants of Building A upgraded landscaping, walkways, lighting and passive amenity spaces for the enjoyment of the tenants of that building to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning;
vii. that the owner provide, on the lot, an active recreation area primarily for the use of young children to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning;
viii. the design and materials of all improvements listed in a.i. to a.vii above will be secured via the site plan approval process and the costs of any such improvements as well as the costs of the development shall not be passed on in any form, including increases to the rents, to tenants of the existing rental building;
ix. prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the development, the owner shall provide, at its expense and to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning a construction mitigation plan and tenant communication strategy for the development, and agrees to implement same;
x. the Owner shall provide reciprocal access to the owners and/or tenants of Building A and Building B over all outdoor landscaped open space areas at grade, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning. Such areas include: the landscaped open space to the east of Building B fronting on to Ridley Boulevard; and areas to the southeast, east and northeast of Building A. Such access shall continue to be provided notwithstanding the sites future division into two or more parcels or multiple ownerships.
xi. that the Chief Planner, Executive Director of City Planning be authorized to enter into agreements on title to secure the above-listed improvements; and
xii. the Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting of October 26 and 27, 2009.
Origin
Summary
The application proposes to amend Zoning By-law No. 7625 to redevelop the front portion of the site with a new 4-storey apartment building consisting of 30 residential dwelling units. A total of 40 parking spaces are proposed in an underground garage with 34 spaces dedicated for residents and 6 for visitors. There is an existing 91 unit 4-storey residential rental apartment building with 99 associated parking spaces located at the north end of the site. Parking for the existing building would be reconfigured for a total of 78 spaces consisting of 69 spaces for residents and 9 for visitors. A two-way driveway located along the western portion of the site will replace the existing circular driveway and will provide access to the existing apartment building and proposed apartment building.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the draft by-law attached to this report for a 4-storey apartment building.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70957.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-48391.pdf
(June 5, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.New.NY34.98.2)
(June 8, 2014) E-mail from Rob Hong (NY.Main.NY34.98.3)
(June 10, 2014) E-mail from Frank Turco (NY.Main.NY34.98.4)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Kate Manning (NY.Main.NY34.98.5)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Rita DeLaurentis (NY.Main.NY34.98.6)
(June 14, 2014) E-mail from Sharon Elliston (NY.Main.NY34.98.7)
(June 16, 2014) Letter from Wm. J. Dolan, Wm. J. Dolan Planning Consultants Ltd. (NY.Main.NY34.98.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-48388.pdf
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Tiina Green (NY.Main.NY34.98.9)
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from Denise Belanger (NY.Main.NY34.98.10)
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.Main.NY34.98.11)
(June 17, 2014) Submission from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.Main.NY34.98.12)
(June 23, 2014) E-mail from Jennifer Lamb (NY.Main.NY34.98.13)
(June 24, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.Main.NY34.98.14)
(June 24, 2014) E-mail from Kate Manning (NY.Main.NY34.98.15)
(June 24, 2014) E-mail from Stephen Turvey (NY.Main.NY34.98.16)
(June 25, 2014) E-mail from David Bounsall (NY.Main.NY34.98.17)
(June 28, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.Main.NY34.98.18)
(June 29, 2014) E-mail from Mary DeLaurentis (NY.Main.NY34.98.19)
(June 29, 2014) E-mail from Alan Slavner (NY.Main.NY34.98.20)
(June 29, 2014) E-mail from Dr. Harry Vorps (NY.Main.NY34.98.21)
(July 4, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.Main.NY34.98.22)
(July 4, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architects (NY.Main.NY34.98.23)
(August 8, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect (NY.New.NY34.98.24)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Janet Nestico (NY.New.NY34.98.25)
(August 11, 2014) E-mail from Anthony Nestico (NY.New.NY34.98.26)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Kate Manning, submitted by Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect (NY.New.NY34.98.27)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Rita Delaurentis, submitted by Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect (NY.New.NY34.98.28)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Kate Manning, submitted by Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect (NY.New.NY34.98.29)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Bob Vorps, submitted by Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect (NY.New.NY34.98.30)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Pam Yoannou, submitted by Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect (NY.New.NY34.98.31)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect (NY.New.NY34.98.32)
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Adam Tanel (NY.New.NY34.98.33)
(August 12, 2014) Letter from Wm. J. Dolan, Wm. J. Dolan Planning Consultants Ltd. (NY.New.NY34.98.34)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-49259.pdf
(August 12, 2014) E-mail from Adam Tanel (NY.New.NY34.98.35)
Speakers
(August 12, 2014) Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect
(August 12, 2014) Raffi Asailian
(June 17, 2014) Michael Goldberg, Goldberg Group
(June 17, 2014) Sandy Gladstone, Sander Gladstone Architect
(June 17, 2014) Raffi Asailian
(June 17, 2014) Shirley Marceniak
(June 17, 2014) Dr. Harry Vorps
Declared Interests
Councillor James Pasternak - as his spouse is an employee of the Toronto Public Library
98a - Supplemental Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application 200 Ridley Boulevard
Origin
Summary
On June 17, 2014, Community Council deferred consideration of the final staff report for the application at 200 Ridley Boulevard (dated May 29, 2014) to its meeting on August 12, 2014, and directed staff to meet with the tenants and applicants to build consensus on the Section 37 benefits and report back.
The purpose of this report is to advise Council the outcome of the meeting held on July 9, 2014, with the tenants of 200 Ridley Boulevard and the applicant which provided a revised list of Section 37 benefits.
This report recommends that the additional Section 37 benefits set out in this report be incorporated into the draft by-law permitting the development. The revised by-law is attached.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72046.pdf
NY34.99 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 134 Hanna Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 26 - Don Valley West
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision for 134 Hanna Road and to retain an outside planner and consultants, as necessary.
Origin
Summary
On June 25, 2014 the Committee of Adjustment denied the applicant's request for 8 variances relating to a proposal to redevelop the property at 134 Hanna Road.
The applicant has appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72730.pdf
Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Minor Variance Application - 134 Hanna Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72731.pdf
NY34.100 - Request for Traffic Calming on Wenderly Drive, from Dufferin Street to Corona Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council directed that:
1. The City Clerk conduct a poll of eligible residents living on Wenderly Drive, between Dufferin Street and Corona Street, in accordance with the City of Toronto Traffic Calming Policy.
2. Transportation Services develop and provide a Speed Hump plan to the City Clerk to be included with the poll.
3. The City Clerk convey the results of the survey to the respondents.
4. Subject to favourable results of the poll:
a. Transportation Services undertake the appropriate action to implement the installation of the traffic calming plan on Wenderly Drive, between Dufferin Street and Corona Street; and
b. Reduce the speed limit to 30/km/hr.
5. The appropriate City Officials be authorized to take whatever action is necessary to implement the foregoing, including the introduction in Council of any Bills that are required.
Origin
Summary
A petition has been submitted by area residents to the local Councillor's office to request the installation of speed humps on Wenderly Drive between Dufferin Street and Corona Street.
Wenderly Drive runs parallel to Lawrence Avenue West and is often used as a thoroughfare to bypass heavy traffic on surrounding arterial roads. With increased development and growth in the area and increased vehicular traffic, pedestrian safety has become a major concern.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72732.pdf
Declared Interests
Councillor David Shiner - as his father lives in the area
NY34.101 - Parking Prohibition on Willowdale Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of no parking at anytime on the east side of Willowdale Avenue between Elmwood Avenue and Hollywood Avenue.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Willowdale Avenue, City Council approval of this item is required.
The purpose of this motion is to obtain approval to prohibit parking at anytime on the east side of Willowdale Avenue between Hollywood Avenue and Elmwood Avenue. Residents have indicated concern that vehicles parked on the east side of Willowdale Avenue, north of Hollywood Avenue, create a sight obstruction for motorists exiting Hollywood Avenue.
Currently, parking is permitted for maximum periods of three hours on the east side of Willowdale Avenue between Hollywood Avenue and Elmwood Avenue. Parking is prohibited on the west side of Wilowdale Avenue from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, between Sheppard Avenue East and Parkview Avenue.
The installation of no parking at anytime on the east side of Willowdale Avenue between Hollywood Avenue and Parkview Avenue would improve access to the bus stop for TTC busses as well as improve the visibility of motorists exiting Hollywood Avenue.
It should be noted that all costs associated with the amendments to the parking regulations are included within the Transportation Services' 2014 Operating Budget.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72733.pdf
NY34.102 - No Right Turn on Red - Millwood Road and McRae Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 26 - Don Valley West
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve a northbound right turn on red signal prohibition from McRae Drive to Millwood Road in effect at all times.
2. City Council approve a southbound right turn on red signal prohibition from McRae Drive to Millwood Road in effect at all times.
3. City Council approve a westbound right turn on red signal prohibition from Millwood Road to McRae Drive in effect at all times.
4. City Council approve an eastbound right turn on red signal prohibition from Millwood Road to McRae Drive in effect at all times.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Millwood Road and McRae Drive, City Council approval of this motion is required.
The purpose of this motion is to obtain approval to address certain local concerns with regard to the safe operation at the intersection of Millwood Road and McRae Drive.
Millwood Road and McRae Drive are collector roads that intersect in the heart of the Leaside Community. The intersection is controlled by traffic control signals. Municipal sidewalks are located on both sides of each road. Transit service is provided on both Millwood Road and McRae Drive.
In the general vicinity of the Millwood Road/McRae Drive intersection are a number of residential dwellings, a church, and a park/community centre/children's playground/library. The nature of the area attracts a large number of children and families. Numerous children cross at least one of the roadways at the intersection on their way to and from school.
Therefore, in order to improve pedestrian and vehicular safety at the intersection of Millwood Road and McRae Drive, and to help address the other concerns described above, it is recommended that City Council adopt the following recommendations.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72755.pdf
NY34.103 - Report Request - Proposed 30 km/h Road Speed Limit Throughout Leaside
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 26 - Don Valley West
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
A. Instructed the Director, Transportation Services, North District, to investigate and report to the next regular meeting of North York Community Council on the feasibility of implementing a 30 km/h speed limit on the following roadways:
1. Parklea Drive between the west end of Parklea Drive and Laird Drive;
2. Vanderhoof Avenue between Rumsey Road and Laird Drive;
3. Crofton Road between Rumsey Road and Sutherland Drive;
4. Parkhurst Boulevard between Bayview Avenue and Laird Drive;
5. Sharron Drive between Cameron Crescent and Rumsey Road;
6. Crandall Road between Hanna Road and McRae Drive;
7. Field Avenue between Macnaughton Road and McRae Drive;
8. St. Cuthberts Road between Bayview Avenue and Bessborough Drive;
9. Markham Avenue between Airdrie Road and Laird Drive;
10. Lea Avenue between Airdrie Road and Laird Drive
11. Heath Road between Rumsey Road and Airdrie Road;
12. Donegall Drive between Millwood Road and Fleming Crescent;
13. Fleming Crescent between Bayview Avenue and Dongall Drive (north intersection);
14. Cameron Crescent between Donegall Drive and the north end of Cameron Crescent;
15. Bessborough Drive between Sutherland Drive and to the north end of Bessborough Drive (south of Eglinton Avenue East);
16. MacNaughton Road between Millwood Road and Cameron Crescent;
17. Hanna Road between Leacrest Road and Eglinton Avenue East;
18. Rumsey Road between Bessborough Drive and Eglinton Avenue East;
19. Airdrie Road between Bayview Avenue and Crofton Road;
20. Sutherland Drive between Millwood Drive and Eglinton Avenue East;
21. Randolph Road between Hanna Road and Parkhurst Boulevard;
22. Rolland Road between Bessborough Drive and Hanna Road;
23. Leadale Avenue between the south end of Leadale Avenue and Sutherland Drive;
24. Heather Road between Airdrie Avenue and McRae Drive;
25. Berney Crescent between St. Cuthberts Road and the north end of Berney Crescent;
26. Kenrae Road between Randolph Road and Laird Drive;
27. Rolph Road between Leacrest Road and Rumsey Road;
28. Malcolm Road between Millwood Road and Randolph Road;
29. Astor Avenue between Moore Avenue and Sutherland Drive;
30. Southlea Avenue between Moore Avenue and Sutherland Drive;
31. Glenvale Boulevard between Bayview Avenue and Brentcliffe Road;
32. Fairland Road between Laird Drive and Brentcliffe Road;
33. Annesley Avenue between Bessborough Drive and Hanna Road;
34. Broadway Avenue between Bayview Avenue and Rykert Crescent;
35. Craig Crescent between Bayview Avenue and Bessborough Drive;
36. Divadale Drive between Bessborough Drive and Rumsey Road;
37. Divadale Drive between Sutherland Drive and Brentcliffe Road;
38. Donlea Drive between Eglinton Avenue East and Brentcliffe Road;
39. Bessborough Drive between Eglinton Avenue East and Glenvale Boulevard;
40. Roxville Avenue between Annesley Avenue and Glenvale Boulevard;
41. Winsloe Avenue between Divadale Drive and Broadway Avenue;
42. Hanna Road between Eglinton Avenue East and Glenvale Boulevard;
43. Tanager Avenue between Broadway Avenue and Glenvale Boulevard;
44. Rumsey Road between Glenvale Boulevard and Eglinton Avenue East;
45. Beaufield Avenue between Broadway Avenue and Glenvale Boulevard;
46. Sutherland Drive between Eglinton Avenue East and the north end of Sutherland Drive;
47. Glenbrae Avenue between Broadway Avenue and Glenvale Boulevard;
48. Don Avon Drive between Eglinton Avenue East and Brentcliffe Road;
49. Laird Drive between Eglinton Avenue East and Glenvale Boulevard and;
50. Brentcliffe Road between Eglinton Avenue East and Broadway Avenue
51. Rykert Crescent between Thursfield Crescent and Broadway Avenue (west intersection);
52. Thursfield Crescent between Brentcliffe Road and Rykert Crescent;
53. Killdeer Crescent between Brentcliffe Road (south intersection) and Brentcliffe Road (north intersection);
54. Kilgour Road between Bayview Avenue and the east end of Kilgour Road; and
55. Burkebrook Place between Kilgour Road and the north end of Burkebrook Place.
Origin
Summary
Residents within the Leaside Community have expressed their concerns with regards to traffic infiltration and vehicle speeds within the local community.
The land uses within the Leaside Community consist of single family residential properties, schools, parks and green spaces. Installation of 30 km/h speed limit zones will improve pedestrian and motorist safety throughout the community.
Therefore, in view of the residents concern, I am requesting that North York Community Council approve the following recommendations.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72748.pdf
NY34.104 - Pedestrian Safety and Safe and Orderly Traffic Flow in Leaside
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 26 - Don Valley West
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Directed Toronto Police Services to increase enforcement of the stop control, speed limit, and general traffic regulation within the Leaside Community with particular emphasis at the intersection of Millwood Road and McRae Drive.
2. Approved the installation of an all way stop control at the intersection of Vanderhoof Avenue and Brian Peck Crescent.
3. Directed North District Transportation Services staff to report to the next regular meeting of North York Community Council on the feasibility of a pedestrian crossing or traffic control signal on Bayview Avenue at Sutherland Drive.
4. Directed North District Transportation Services staff to conduct a review of existing No Heavy Truck signage within the Leaside community and report their findings to the next regular meeting of North York Community Council.
5. Directed North District Transportation Services staff to study the feasibility of implementing turn prohibitions at the intersections of Laird Drive and Kenrae Road, Laird Drive and Lea Avenue, Laird Drive and Markham Avenue, Laird Drive and McRae Drive, Laird Drive and Parkhurst Boulevard and Laird Drive and Vanderhoof Avenue, during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday as measures intended to reduce rush hour traffic infiltration onto the streets of the Leaside community and report the results(s) of the turn prohibition study to the next regular meeting of North York Community Council.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this motion is to address local concerns with regard to certain matters of pedestrian safety and the safe and orderly flow of traffic on, and acceptable use of, roadways within the Leaside community.
Residents of Leaside have expressed concerns from time to time with respect to a perceived increase in traffic volumes on certain roadways within the community, including large vehicles as well as traffic infiltration from major roadways into local streets.
Therefore, in order to improve pedestrian and vehicular safety in the Leaside community and to help address the other concerns described above, it is recommended that North York Community Council adopt the following recommendations.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72776.pdf
NY34.105 - Parking on Hanna Road, in the Vicinity of Bessborough School
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 26 - Don Valley West
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation of No Stopping, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday on Hanna Road, east side between Field Avenue and Sharron Drive.
2. Directed that parking be permitted for a maximum duration of three hours adjacent to the school property opposite of the stopping prohibition on Hanna Road.
Origin
Summary
Bessborough Elementary and Middle School accommodates elementary and middle school students in Junior Kindergarten to Grade Eight. The front entrance to the school is located on Bessborough Drive between Field Avenue and Sharron Drive. The school also fronts onto Sharron Drive between Hanna Road and Bessborough Drive, Hanna Road between Sharron Drive, and Field Avenue and Field Avenue between Bessborough Drive and Hanna Road.
The school bus loading zone is located on the east side of Bessborough Drive between a point 54 metres south of Sharron Drive and a point 30 metres further south.
Sharron Drive, Hanna Road, Field Avenue, and Bessborough Drive are classified as local roadways with posted speed limits of 40 km/h adjacent to the school.
The traffic regulations for the above noted roadways are as follows:
- Bessborough Drive, parking is prohibited 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the east side of the roadway between Field Avenue and Sharron Drive.
- Sharron Drive, parking is prohibited 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the south side of the roadway between Bessborough Drive and Hanna Road.
- Hanna Road, parking is prohibited 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of the roadway between Field Avenue and Sharron Drive.
- Field Avenue, parking is prohibited 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the north side of the roadway between Bessborough Drive and Hanna Road.
Parking is permitted for a maximum duration of three hours opposite of the school property adjacent to the parking prohibition on Sharron Drive, Hanna Road, Field Avenue and Bessbororgh Drive.
In review of the existing traffic conditions on Sharron Drive, Hanna Road, Field Avenue, and Bessborough Drive, it has been noted that the existing prohibitions do not allow for parents to safely drop-off and pick-up students at the school, and encourages midblock crossing as parking is permitted for a maximum duration of three hours on the opposite side of the two streets adjacent to the school building (Bessborough Drive and Hanna Road).
In order to address the existing traffic conditions and the needs of the parents and residents of the community, Staff recommends amending the parking arrangements on Hanna Road to allow parking on that road adjacent to the school.
The recommendations below will increase the level of safety for pedestrians and motorists by regulating drop-off/pick-up activity adjacent to the school property.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72777.pdf
NY34.106 - Directional Signage - Aga Khan Museum and Ismaili Centre and Japanese Canadian Cultural Centre
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 26 - Don Valley West
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Directed the General Manager of Transportation Services to work with the Aga Khan Shia Ismaili Council for Canada and the Japanese Canadian Cultural Centre on implementing directional signage for their respective institutions on Wynford Drive and Garamond Court, respectively, and all associated costs to be borne by the applicants.
Origin
Summary
Councillor Parker's office has received requests from two highly respected cultural organizations in the Wynford Drive area for directional signage to be erected on the Don Valley Parkway and elsewhere guiding visitors to their respective institutions.
The institutions are the (existing) Japanese Canadian Cultural Centre and the (soon to be opened) Aga Khan Museum and Ismaili Centre. Both organizations are prepared to share space on the signage to be provided and to cover all associated costs on signs bearing their name.
The Aga Khan Museum and Ismaili Centre are due to open in September of this year. The groundbreaking ceremony took place approximately four years ago and was attended by His Highness the Aga Khan and the Prime Minister of Canada. Both spoke at length and the Prime Minister took the occasion to confer on His Highness the honorary Canadian citizenship that had been authorized by unanimous vote of parliament. It is expect that the formal opening in September will be marked by a similarly significant ceremony. Representatives of the Aga Khan Council have advised that having the requested signage in place prior to the opening would be greatly valued.
Transportation Services currently has a moratorium in place for directional signage, while it develops a Wayfinding Strategy, which is scheduled to be completed in the latter part of 2015. Both the Aga Khan Council and Japanese Canadian Cultural Centre have been made aware that if the signage is approved, it may be removed in the future with the rollout of the Wayfinding Strategy.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72783.pdf
NY34.107 - Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 265 and 267 Greenfield Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the City Planner to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the lot severance and associated variances for 265 and 267 Greenfield Avenue.
Origin
Summary
Applications for Consent and Minor Variance were submitted by Rubinoff Design Group, on behalf of Hesam Bahman-Bijari, to permit the severance of the subject properties into three residential building lots and the construction of a new two-storey dwelling on each of the proposed lots.
In their Staff Report, City Planning Staff recommended that the applications be refused on the grounds that "the subjects lots in their current form maintain and reinforce the stability and character of the neighbourhood and approval of a severance on a lot this size could risk weakening the character of the neighbourhood".
On July 9th, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment refused the consent applications on the grounds that the proposed land division does not conform to the policies of the official plan, the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it was to be subdivided was not demonstrated, and the suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots was not demonstrated. The associated variances were refused on the grounds that the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law was not being maintained, the variances were not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and, in the opinion of the Committee, the variances were not minor.
John Alati, on behalf of Hesam Bahman-Bijari, has appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72769.pdf
Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notices of Decision - Consent and Minor Variance Applications - 265 and 267 Greenfield Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72770.pdf
Attachment 2 - A copy of Memo from Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72771.pdf
Attachment 3 - Public Hearing Notice - Consent Application - 265 and 267 Greenfield Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72772.pdf
Attachment 4 - Public Hearing Notice - Minor Variance Application - 265 and 267 Greenfield Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72773.pdf
Attachment 5 - A copy of an email from Planning staff to Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72774.pdf
Attachment 6 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Applications for 265 and 267 Greenfield Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72775.pdf
NY34.108 - Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 16 Elynhill Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the City Planner to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the minor variances for 16 Elynhill Drive.
Origin
Summary
Application for Minor Variance was submitted by Sanju Mehta, on behalf of Sanju Mehta and Sharon Harrietha, to permit the construction of a new three-storey dwelling on the subject lot.
In their Staff Report, City Planning Staff recommended that the variance to permit a 3-storey dwelling be refused, on the grounds that it was not in keeping with the existing neighbourhood character. They also recommended that the proposed finished first floor height and the proposed area of the rear second storey balcony be reduced, in order to be more in keeping with the character of the neighbourhood.
On July 9th, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment refused the requested variances on the grounds that the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law was not being maintained, the variances were not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and, in the opinion of the Committee, the variances were not minor.
Sanju Mehta has appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72778.pdf
Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Minor Variance Application - 16 Elynhill Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72779.pdf
Attachment 2 - Public Hearing Notice - Minor Variance Application - 16 Elynhill Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72780.pdf
Attachment 3 - A copy of an email from Planning staff to Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72781.pdf
Attachment 4 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Applications for 16 Elynhill Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72782.pdf
NY34.109 - Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 144 Kingsdale Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the lot severance and associated variances for 144 Kingsdale Avenue.
Origin
Summary
Applications for Consent and Minor Variance were submitted by Rubinoff Design Group, on behalf of Xiuhua Guo, to permit the severance of the subject property into two residential building lots and the construction of a new two-storey dwelling on each of the proposed lots.
Severance of this lot had been sought previously in June 2005, and was refused by the Committee of Adjustment. It was then approved upon appeal by the Ontario Municipal Board in January 2006. However, this decision has since expired.
On June 25th, 2014, the Committee refused the consent application on the grounds that the proposed land division does not conform to the policies of the official plan, the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it was to be subdivided was not demonstrated, and the suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots was not demonstrated. The associated variances were refused on the grounds that the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law was not being maintained, the variances were not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and, in the opinion of the Committee, the variances were not minor.
In addition to creating two undersized lots, the application also requested a number of variances. This included reduced side yard setbacks and increased lot coverage, building height, finished first floor and main wall height. Changes to some of these variances were submitted to the Committee; however, as all the associated variances were refused, those changes are not binding.
Rubinoff Design Group, on behalf of Xiuhua Guo, has appealed the decision of the Committee to the Ontario Municipal Board.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72784.pdf
Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Consent Application - 144 Kingsdale Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72785.pdf
Attachment 2 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Consent Application - 144 Kingsdale Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72786.pdf
Attachment 3 - A copy of Memo from CouncillorJohn Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72787.pdf
Attachment 4 - A copy of Decision from Ontario Municipal Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72788.pdf
Attachment 5 - An Extract of the Committee of Adjustment Agenda Listing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72789.pdf
Attachment 6 - Maps and Plans
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72790.pdf
Attachment 7 - A copy of an email from Planning staff
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72791.pdf
Attachment 8 - A copy of an email from Planning staff
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72792.pdf
Attachment 9 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Applications for 144 Kingsdale Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72793.pdf
NY34.110 - Request for Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 252 Haddington Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff, or if necessary, retain outside planners and experts to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the Consent and Minor Variances for 252 Haddington Avenue.
Origin
Summary
On June 25, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment refused the above application for consent to sever a parcel of residential lands into two parts for conveyance purposes for the creation of two new undersized building lots and the minor variance applications to build a new dwelling with integral garage on each of the undersized lots.
Staff recommended that should the Committee approve the application for Consent that is be subject to the conditions as set out in the report. With respect to the Minor Variances, staff recommended that the proposed lot coverage and building heights be reduced to be more in keeping with the intent of the zoning by-law and Official Plan and further recommended that the height of all side exterior main walls facing a side lot line be reduced with respect with the application A299/14NY to be more in keeping with the intent of the zoning by-law and Official Plan.
The Committee of Adjustment refused the consent application on the following grounds:
- The proposed land division does not confirm to the policies of the Official Plan
- The suitability of the land for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided has not been demonstrated
- The suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots has not been demonstrated
- The variance/s are not minor
- The proposal/s are not minor
On July 14, 2014, the applicant appealed the decisions to the Ontario Municipal Board. A hearing has not been scheduled as yet.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72794.pdf
Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notices of Decision - Minor Variance and Consent Apllications - 252 Haddington Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72795.pdf
Attachment 2 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Applications for 252 Haddington Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72796.pdf
NY34.111 - Request for Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 176 and 178 Caribou Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff, or if necessary, retain outside planners and experts to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's Refusal of the Consent and Minor Variances for 176 and 178 Caribou Road.
Origin
Summary
On June 25, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment refused the above application for consent to sever a parcel of residential lands into three parts for conveyance purposes for the creation of three new undersized building lots and the minor variance applications to build three 3-storey dwellings with 2-car integral garages on each of the newly created lots related to 176 and 178 Caribou Road.
Staff recommended that the proposed Consent and associated Variance applications be refused.
The Committee of Adjustment refused the consent application on the following grounds:
- The proposed land division does not conform to the policies of the official plan.
- The suitability of the land for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided has not been demonstrated.
- The suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots has not been demonstrated.
And the three minor variance applications for:
- The variance(s) are not minor;
- The proposal(s) are not appropriate to the land and buildings in the area;
- The proposal(s) do not maintain the general intent of Zoning Code and By-laws;
- The proposal(s) do not maintain the general intent of the Official Plan.
On July 14, 2014, the applicant appealed the decisions to the Ontario Municipal Board. A hearing has not been scheduled as yet.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72797.pdf
Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notices of Decision - Consent and Minor Variance Applications - 176 and 178 Caribou Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72872.pdf
Attachment 2 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Applications for 176 and 178 Caribou Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72873.pdf
NY34.112 - Changes to On-Street Parking times on Railside Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 34 - Don Valley East
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the proposed changes for parking allowed on Railside Road to a maximum of three hours daily after 5:00 p.m. in the current permitted area.
Origin
Summary
Concern was expressed to my office about the one hour on-street parking restriction on sections of Railside Road. Enforcement of the one hour parking regulation has led the patrons of the business at 74 Railside Road to park illegally in neighbouring commercial lots. Businesses have expressed concerns with this situation and suggested a change be made to the on-street parking times.
A letter was circulated from my office for input from local businesses on the proposed changes to the existing parking restrictions. The results suggested the one hour time limit be amended to three hours daily after 5:00 p.m.
Currently, parking is allowed for one hour on the west, south and east sides of Railside Road between Lawrence Avenue East (west intersection) and a point 568 metres south of Lawrence Avenue (east intersection). As well, the East side of Railside Road allows one hour parking between Lawrence Avenue East (east intersection) and a point 490 meters south.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72757.pdf
NY34.113 - Proposed Amendment to City Council Resolution CC50.5 - Settlement - 51 Drewry Avenue and 8-28 Inez Court
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Without Recs
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council.
1. Requested the City Solicitor to report directly to the next meeting of City Council on August 25, 2014, regarding the revised settlement proposal as per the letter (August 6, 2014) from Yolanda Flanders' Development Consultant, to Councillor Filion.
Origin
Summary
On April 1, 2014, City Council endorsed Yolanda Flanders' settlement proposal, dated 20 March 2014, with respect to its development application at 51 Drewry Avenue and 8-28 Inez Court. Under the terms of the settlement, Yolanda Flanders is to withdraw its OMB Appeals (File Nos. PL111252 and PL111240) before submitting a revised zoning application substantively consistent with the site plan and project statistics attached to the settlement report dated March 25, 2014.
Following consultation with planning staff, Yolanda Flanders prepared a number of alternative site plans that were presented to the community at a community consultation meeting on Thursday, July 31, 2014.
"Option B" was the option that was most preferred by local residents, in preference to the original site plan (Option A), and Option B is also the preferred option of the local Ward Councillor.
On August 6, 2014, Yolanda Flanders' development consultant wrote to the Ward Councillor requesting that this matter be brought before City Council for a determination that Option B constitutes an acceptable alternative to Option A. Planning staff have been consulted and have no objection to this request.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72758.pdf
Attachment 1 to Memo from Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale - Letter dated August 6, 2014 from Yolanda Flanders' Development Consultant to Councillor John Filion
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72759.pdf
Attachment 2 to Memo from Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale - City Council Resolution CC50.5 from City Council Meeting on April 1, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72760.pdf
Attachment 3 to Memo from Councillor John Filion Ward 23 - Willowdale - Report dated March 25, 2014 from the City Solicitor on 51 Drewry Avenue, 8-28 Inez Court - OMB Hearing Proposed Settlement and Request for Direction
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72761.pdf
NY34.114 - Stopping Prohibition - 1 and 3 Rean Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation of no stopping anytime on the south side of Rean Drive from a point 56 metres east of Barberry Place and a point 50 metres further east.
Origin
Summary
Residents of 1 and 3 Rean Drive have expressed vehicular and pedestrian safety concerns with respect to obstructed access/egress to the condominium complex's driveways. Rean Drive is classified as a local road with municipal sidewalks located on both sides of the roadway.
Currently, parking is prohibited at all times on the north side of Rean Drive from a point 42 metres south of Sheppard Avenue East and Barberry Place. Parking is prohibited, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday on the south side of Rean Drive from a point 15 metres east of Barberry Place and a point 153 metres south of Sheppard Avenue East.
The residents are concerned that parked vehicles east and west of the driveway obstructs existing motorist's view of westbound traffic on Rean Drive and eastbound traffic on Barberry Place and Rean Drive.
The installation of stopping prohibitions on the south side of Rean Drive east and west of the driveway of 1 and 3 Rean Drive will improve access, sightlines to condominium complex's driveway and overall safety.
Your support for this request from neighbourhood residents would be appreciated.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72762.pdf
NY34.115 - Installation of Traffic Control Signals - Willowdale Avenue at Centre Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of a traffic control signal on Willowdale Avenue at Centre Avenue.
Origin
Summary
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Willowdale Avenue, City Council approval is required for the installation of a traffic control signal on Willowdale Avenue at Centre Avenue.
The installation of a traffic control signal on Willowdale Avenue at Centre Avenue would address concerns that at present there is no protection for pedestrians crossing at this location. Transportation Services staff advised that the installation of a pedestrian crossing at this location may not create a safe environment with turning vehicles and that a traffic control signal would be the better option to improve safety.
Willowdale Avenue is a four lane minor arterial road. The nearest protected crossing areas are at Otonabee Avenue located 325 metres to the north and at Cummer Avenue located 500 metres to the south. There are transit stops on Willowdale Avenue at Centre Avenue.
The installation of a traffic control signal on Willowdale Avenue at Centre Avenue would improve the pedestrian environment for residents on both sides of the residential communities adjacent to Willowdale Avenue.
Your support for this request from neighbourhood residents would be appreciated.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72763.pdf
NY34.116 - Staff Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board for 784 Sheppard Avenue East
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. Should the applicant appeal the refusal of Committee of Adjustment application A445/14NY for 784 Sheppard Avenue East, that City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to indicate that the City has no objection to the requested variances as they implement the plans which were approved by City Council under application 12 261537 NNY 24 OZ.
Origin
Summary
The applicant filed an application to amend Zoning By-law 7625 (file 12 261537 NNY 24 OZ) for a two-storey retail building and fifty stacked townhouse units. City Council approved the application and Site Specific By-law 144-2014 was enacted. No appeals were filed.
During a review of the applicant's building permit application, variances were identified. The applicant filed a minor variance application (file A445/14NY) to seek zoning compliance however the Committee of Adjustment refused the application. The plans submitted to the Committee of Adjustment implement the development considered and approved by City Council under application 12 261537 NNY 24 OZ.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72830.pdf
NY34.117 - Sheppard Avenue East Subway Corridor Traffic Review Study
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager of Transportation Services, in consultation with the Chief Planner, to issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) to undertake a Sheppard Avenue East Subway Corridor Traffic Study Review.
Origin
Summary
Congestion along Sheppard Ave. East has been identified as a major concern by residents along the corridor. The intersections of Leslie Street and Sheppard Ave. East, Bayveiw Avenue and Sheppard Ave. East, and Yonge St. and Sheppard Ave. East have all been identified as some of the most congested intersections in Toronto. To address these concerns, a study has been requested to identify current transportation constraints and issues and identify future transportation conditions issues under future redevelopment.
The main goal of this Study is to review the transportation efficiency and available capacity in the context of approved development in the Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan area.
Given the multiple magnitude of transportation concerns under existing conditions along the Sheppard Avenue Corridor, the study will undertake objective technical analyses that addresses both demand and operational considerations from multimodal capacity and connectivity.
Section 37 and 45 funds received for future traffic monitoring are available for this study, and if necessary, the balance of funding is to be considered through the budget process.
The limit of the study area will be Sheppard Avenue East, from Yonge Street to Don Mills Road. A briefing note with further detail is also is attached for your consideration.
Your support for this request would be appreciated.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72808.pdf
Attachment 1 - Sheppard Avenue East Subway Corridor Traffic Review Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72829.pdf
NY34.118 - Naming of a Proposed Public Street - Development at 1010-1019 Sheppard Avenue East
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the naming or renaming of the proposed public street extending southerly from Sheppard Avenue East as "Woodsy Park Lane".
Origin
Summary
Transportation Services has identified the need for a street name change on the draft M-plan for Concord Park Place - 1001 Sheppard Ave East. In order to get a stop control at the east/west leg and north/south leg of McMahon Drive, a new street name must be introduced at this intersection. As the east/west leg of McMahon has municipal addresses issued, the north/south leg which terminates at Sheppard Ave. East must be changed.
The proposed name for this road bordering the new park is in keeping with the plans for a heavily wooded park and woodland themes.
Your support for this request from neighbourhood residents would be appreciated.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72836.pdf
NY34.119 - 40 km/h Speed Limit - Park Home Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the implementation of a 40 km/h speed limit on Park Home Avenue between Senlac Road and Yonge Street.
Origin
Summary
The residents of Park Home Avenue have expressed their concerns with regards to vehicle speeds within the local community.
Park Home Avenue is classified as a collector road with a regulatory speed limit of 50 km/h. Municipal sidewalks are located on the south side of the road and the pavement width is approximately 8.5 metres wide.
Both sides of the roadway are comprised of single detached residential properties with schools, parks and green spaces within the community. Installation of 40 km/h speed limit will improve pedestrian and motorist safety throughout the community.
Therefore, in view of the residents concern, I am requesting that North York Community Council approve the following recommendations.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72831.pdf
NY34.120 - Parking Prohibition on Abitibi Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
Community Council Decision
North York Community Council:
1. Approved the installation of no parking from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the north side of Abitibi Avenue between Willowdale Avenue and Lillian Avenue.
Origin
Summary
Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision, provided that it is not amended so that it varies with City policy or by-laws.
The purpose of this motion is to obtain approval to prohibit parking from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the north side of Abitibi Avenue between Willowdale Avenue and Lillian Avenue. Residents have indicated concern that vehicles parked on both sides of Abitibi Avenue especially during school times, blocking the roadway and creating a dangerous situation for motorists on Abitibi Avenue.
Currently, parking is permitted for maximum periods of three hours on both sides of Abitibi Avenue between Willowdale Avenue and Lillian Street.
The installation of no parking from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the north side of Abitibi Avenue between Willowdale Avenue and Lillian Avenue will create a safer roadway for motorists including the school buses using that route.
It should be noted that all costs associated with the amendments to the parking regulations are included within the Transportation Services' 2014 Operating Budget.
Your support for this request from neighbourhood residents would be appreciated.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72832.pdf
NY34.121 - Rental Housing Demolition Application - 847-873 Sheppard Avenue West
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Without Recs
- Ward:
- 10 - York Centre
Community Council Recommendations
North York Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation.
Decision Advice and Other Information
North York Community Council:
1. Requested City Planning staff to report directly to City Council for its next meeting on August 25, 2014 on the Rental Housing Demolition Application for 847-873 Sheppard Avenue West.
Origin
Summary
The applicant has obtained approval for a mixed-use development from the OMB in a decision dated October 12, 2012. The applicant has applied for approval of an application for rental housing demolition and has agreed to provide seven (7) rental replacement units as recommended by City staff.
The applicant is prepared to enter into a Section 37 agreement with the City of Toronto for the OMB approved development and guarantee that such development would include the provision of seven (7) rental replacement units. The properties are currently experiencing a rodent infestation problem and area residents are fearful that they are a fire hazard.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72835.pdf
NY34.122 - Enactment of By-laws
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
Community Council Decision
General Bills
North York Community Council enacted By-laws 776-2014 to 806-2014.
Confirmatory Bill
North York Community Council passed a Confirmatory Bill as By-law 807-2014.
Summary
Introduction and consideration of bills for enactment as By-laws.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-72848.htm
Meeting Sessions
| Session Date | Session Type | Start Time | End Time | Public or Closed Session |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-08-12 | Morning | 9:38 AM | 12:30 PM | Public |
| 2014-08-12 | Afternoon | 1:37 PM | 5:02 PM | Public |
Attendance
| Date and Time | Quorum | Members |
|---|---|---|
| 2014-08-12 9:38 AM - 12:30 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Maria Augimeri (Chair), Shelley Carroll, Josh Colle, John Filion, Denzil Minnan-Wong, John Parker, James Pasternak, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Karen Stintz |
| 2014-08-12 1:37 PM - 5:02 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Maria Augimeri (Chair), Shelley Carroll, Josh Colle, John Filion, Denzil Minnan-Wong, John Parker, James Pasternak, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Karen Stintz |