Decisions
Public Works and Infrastructure Committee
- Meeting No.:
- 25
- Contact:
- Candy Davidovits, Committee Administrator
- Meeting Date:
- Friday, September 20, 2013
- Phone:
- 416-338-5089
- Start Time:
- 9:30 AM
- E-mail:
- pwic@toronto.ca
- Location:
- Committee Room 1, City Hall
- Chair:
- Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong
PW25.1 - Canadian Water and Wastewater Association - Scholarship Award
- Decision Type:
- Presentation
- Status:
- Received
Committee Decision
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee received the item for information.
Decision Advice and Other Information
On behalf of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee, Councillor Minnan-Wong, Chair, and the General Manager, Toronto Water, presented the Canadian Water and Wastewater Association Steve Bonk Scholarship certificate to Ms. Christine Nassif, and extended best wishes to Ms. Nassif in her continued studies.
Summary
Each year the Canadian Water and Wastewater Association (CWWA) presents the Steve Bonk Scholarship Award to a student pursuing a career related to the municipal water or wastewater sector. One of the requirements is that the student applying must either be a resident of a current CWWA Municipal Member, or attend college or university in a municipality that is itself a CWWA Member. This year's winner is Ms. Christine Nassif.
PW25.2 - Bloor Street West Bike Lanes
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Referred
- Wards:
- 14 - Parkdale-High Park, 18 - Davenport, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Committee Decision
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee referred the item to the General Manager, Transportation Services, for a report to the October 21, 2013 Public Works and Infrastructure Committee meeting.
Origin
Summary
Councillors Ana Bailão, Mike Layton, Pam McConnell, Gord Perks, Adam Vaughan and Kristyn Wong-Tam requesting that the City staff include plans to resume work on Bloor Street bike lanes, including restarting the Environmental Assessment, in the Transportation Services 2014 budget and workplan.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-59920.pdf
Communications
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Lynda Young (PW.Main.PW25.2.2)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Peter Yu (PW.Main.PW25.2.3)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Eric Mills (PW.Main.PW25.2.4)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Sam Bootsma (PW.Main.PW25.2.5)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Chris A. Jacobs (PW.Main.PW25.2.6)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from James Chan (PW.Main.PW25.2.7)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Cameron MacLeod (PW.Main.PW25.2.8)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Danielle Robichaud (PW.Main.PW25.2.9)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (PW.Main.PW25.2.10)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Chris Caputo, Annex Residents Association (PW.Main.PW25.2.11)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Jared Kolb, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto (PW.Main.PW25.2.12)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from James Davis (PW.Main.PW25.2.13)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Liz Sutherland (PW.Main.PW25.2.14)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Nancy Smith Lea, Director, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (TCAT) Clean Air Partnership (PW.Main.PW25.2.15)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Val Jacko (PW.Main.PW25.2.16)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Heather Schramm, Cycling Liaison, Palmerston Area Residents' Association (PARA) (PW.Main.PW25.2.17)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Michael Black, Cycle Toronto Midtown (PW.Main.PW25.2.18)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Laura Pin (PW.Main.PW25.2.19)
(September 17, 2013) E-mail from Neil McDermott, Captain Ward 21 Advocacy Group, Cycle Toronto (PW.New.PW25.2.20)
(September 17, 2013) E-mail from Robert Wallis, Co-Captain, Ward 32 Spokes, Cycle Toronto (PW.New.PW25.2.21)
(September 18, 2013) Submission from John Burt, Past President and Linda Brett, President, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association (PW.New.PW25.2.22)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/comm/communicationfile-39858.pdf
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Tom Howell (PW.New.PW25.2.23)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Liam Kearney (PW.New.PW25.2.24)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Denise Ing (PW.New.PW25.2.25)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Stuart Basden (PW.New.PW25.2.26)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Susan Hammond (PW.New.PW25.2.27)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Graham Lavender (PW.New.PW25.2.28)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Jacob Nigro (PW.New.PW25.2.29)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Kevin Keane (PW.New.PW25.2.30)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Jessica Dee Humphreys (PW.New.PW25.2.31)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Arcady Genkin (PW.New.PW25.2.32)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Wendy Banks (PW.New.PW25.2.33)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Sonja Greckol (PW.New.PW25.2.34)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Patrick DeRochie (PW.New.PW25.2.35)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Patrick Dinnen (PW.New.PW25.2.36)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Ken MacDonald (PW.New.PW25.2.37)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Bernardo Galvao-Sousa (PW.New.PW25.2.38)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Brendan Morrissey (PW.New.PW25.2.39)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Trevor McLeod (PW.New.PW25.2.40)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Lyle Jones (PW.New.PW25.2.41)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Laura Krahn (PW.New.PW25.2.42)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Susan Toth (PW.New.PW25.2.43)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Jonathan Deshman (PW.New.PW25.2.44)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Adam Muirhead (PW.New.PW25.2.45)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Michael Polanyi (PW.New.PW25.2.46)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Andrew Trachsell (PW.New.PW25.2.47)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Blair O'Connor (PW.New.PW25.2.48)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Mark Pomerantz (PW.New.PW25.2.49)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Douglas Yardley (PW.New.PW25.2.50)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (PW.New.PW25.2.51)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Angela Bischoff (PW.New.PW25.2.52)
(September 19, 2013) Letter from Nancy Smith Lea, Director, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (TCAT), Clean Air Partnership (PW.New.PW25.2.53)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/comm/communicationfile-39949.pdf
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Murray D. Lumley (PW.New.PW25.2.54)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Francois Routhier (PW.New.PW25.2.55)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Chris Cavacuiti (PW.New.PW25.2.56)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Vivien Leong (PW.New.PW25.2.57)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Tom Wright (PW.New.PW25.2.58)
(September 20, 2013) E-mail from Michael Holloway (PW.New.PW25.2.59)
(September 20, 2013) E-mail from Brandon Quigley (PW.New.PW25.2.60)
(September 20, 2013) E-mail from John Tabone (PW.New.PW25.2.61)
PW25.3 - Extending the Bay Street Bicycle Lanes
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Committee Recommendations
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council receive the report (May 16, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, for information.
Origin
Summary
The reconstruction of Bay Street, from Bloor Street West to Davenport Road provides an opportunity to close a gap in the Bikeway Network on Bay Street. The existing bicycle lanes on Bay Street are being extended south from Cumberland Street to a point 30 metres south of Bloor Street West to provide a continuous, connected bikeway on Bay Street.
City Council, at its meeting of February 20 and 21, 2013, adopted as amended the staff report, titled "Road Alteration – Bay Street, Between Davenport Road and Bloor Street West" (TE21.58), authorising the road alterations necessary for the reconstruction of Bay Street, between Bloor Street West and Davenport Road as part of the 2013 Capital Works Program. The purpose of this report is to obtain Council approval to implement bicycle lanes on Bay Street from Cumberland Street to a point 30 metres south of Bloor Street West.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-59918.pdf
Communications
(June 16, 2013) E-mail from Paul R. Davis (PW.Main.PW25.3.2)
(June 16, 2013) E-mail from Lynda Young (PW.Main.PW25.3.3)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Sheila Miller (PW.Main.PW25.3.4)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Matthew Fortier (PW.Main.PW25.3.5)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Richard Shekter, President, TSCC 1519 (PW.Main.PW25.3.6)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Joel Carman, Over the Rainbow Ltd. (PW.Main.PW25.3.7)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Simon Parry (PW.Main.PW25.3.8)
(June 17, 2013) Letter from Dr. David Homer, Traffic Committee Chair, Bloor-Yorkville Business Improvement Area (PW.Main.PW25.3.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/comm/communicationfile-38654.pdf
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Len Tokey (PW.Main.PW25.3.10)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from André Martin (PW.Main.PW25.3.11)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Dawn Golding, Markio Designs Inc. (PW.Main.PW25.3.12)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Larry Rosen, Chairman & CEO, Harry Rosen (PW.Main.PW25.3.13)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Blair O'Connor (PW.Main.PW25.3.14)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Craig Dellio, Vice President, Perry's (Yorkville) Ltd. (PW.Main.PW25.3.15)
(June 18, 2013) Letter from Rick Whitten-Stovall, External Vice-President, Bay Cloverhill Community Association (PW.Main.PW25.3.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/comm/communicationfile-38667.pdf
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Dr. P.A. Adamson (PW.Main.PW25.3.17)
(June 18, 2013) Letter from Nancy Smith Lea, Director, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (TCAT) Clean Air Partnership (PW.Main.PW25.3.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/comm/communicationfile-38668.pdf
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Gee Chung, President, The Greater Yorkville Residents' Association (GYRA) (PW.Main.PW25.3.19)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/comm/communicationfile-38663.pdf
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Michael Black, Member, Cycle Toronto Midtown (PW.Main.PW25.3.20)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Joel Greenberg, President, MTCC 562 (PW.Main.PW25.3.21)
(June 19, 2013) E-mail from Dr. Vera Varadi (PW.Main.PW25.3.22)
(August 2, 2013) Letter from Robert Filler, President, 1166 Bay, Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 555 (PW.Main.PW25.3.23)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/comm/communicationfile-39710.pdf
(September 16, 2013) E-mail from Nadine Lessio (PW.New.PW25.3.24)
(September 17, 2013) Letter from Dr. David Homer, Traffic Committee Chair, Bloor-Yorkville Business Improvement Area (PW.New.PW25.3.25)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/comm/communicationfile-39852.pdf
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Laura Krahn (PW.New.PW25.3.26)
(September 19, 2013) Letter from Jared Kolb, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto (PW.New.PW25.3.27)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/comm/communicationfile-39931.pdf
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (PW.New.PW25.3.28)
(September 19, 2013) Letter from Nancy Smith Lea, Director, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (TCAT), Clean Air Partnership (PW.New.PW25.3.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/comm/communicationfile-39950.pdf
Speakers
3a - Supplementary Report - Extending the Bay Street Bicycle Lanes
Origin
Summary
Public Works and Infrastructure Committee, at its meeting on June 19, 2013, deferred consideration of bicycle lanes and removing the northbound and southbound left turn lanes on Bay Street at the intersection of Bloor Street West, so that staff could consult further with the community. A community consultation meeting was held on July 31, 2013 to seek further input on the proposed bicycle lanes, removal of left turn lanes and the results of an evaluation of the pedestrian priority phase (pedestrian scramble) at the Bay Street and Bloor Street West intersection. In addition, staff met separately with the ABC Residents Association, the Greater Yorkville Residents Association,
Significant concerns were raised by area residents and businesses regarding the proposed loss of access to Bloor Street, as a result of the removal of the northbound and southbound left turn lanes and the restriction of those turning movements. As a result, staff have re-evaluated the proposal and have developed an alternative pavement marking plan to widen the southbound curb lane accompanied by sharrows (shared lane markings) and maintain the northbound and southbound left turn lanes. The sharrow treatment will be generally consistent with the design being implemented between Bloor Street West and College Street.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61461.pdf
PW25.4 - Solid Waste Management Services, Collections - Operations Quarterly Report - April to June 2013
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- 7 - York West, 8 - York West, 9 - York Centre, 10 - York Centre, 11 - York South-Weston, 12 - York South-Weston, 13 - Parkdale-High Park, 14 - Parkdale-High Park, 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 17 - Davenport, 18 - Davenport, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 21 - St. Paul's, 22 - St. Paul's, 23 - Willowdale, 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Committee Decision
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee received the item for information.
Origin
Summary
The Curbside Collection contract for garbage, recycling, organic materials and other waste in District 2 was awarded to Green For Life Environment East Corporation by City Council on October 24 and 25, 2011. Collection by the contracted service provider commenced on August 7, 2012.
As per City Council direction, this report provides quarterly updated information on the number of 311 complaints received and open tickets concerning waste/recycling curbside collection in the four collection districts in the City between April and June 2013.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-60641.pdf
PW25.5 - Sewers and Water Supply By-laws 2012 Compliance and Enforcement
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
Committee Decision
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee requested the General Manager, Toronto Water, to report to the November 20, 2013 Public Works and Infrastructure Committee meeting with an update on the implementation of the Downspout Disconnect Program and compliance with provisions and phasing contained in the Sewer Use Bylaw.
Origin
Summary
This report provides highlights of the activities performed by Toronto Water in 2012 with respect to compliance and enforcement of Municipal Code Chapter 681-Sewers (the “Sewers By-law”).
In order to provide a comprehensive and inclusive update on associated activities performed by Toronto Water on By-law compliance and enforcement in 2012, this report also provides highlights regarding Municipal Code Chapter 851-Water Supply (the "Water Supply By-law") and the Backflow Prevention Program.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61163.pdf
PW25.6 - Highland Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Management Update
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council approve the preparation of a Schedule B Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) that will examine all reasonable and feasible biosolids management alternatives for the Highland Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.
2. City Council direct Toronto Water to issue and award a Request for Proposal for the preparation of the Class EA that includes the Scope of Work set out in Attachment 2 to the report (September 11, 2013) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, jointly prepared with the input of Toronto Public Health and Environment and Energy Office.
3. City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, to ensure that all regular public meetings of the Highland Creek Treatment Plant Neighbourhood Liaison Committee are held in a suitable public venue readily accessible to area residents including by public transportation, and that they are advertised, prior to them being held, in a timely manner on the City of Toronto's website.
4. City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water, to post the Terms of Reference for the Highland Creek Neighbourhood Liaison Committee on the Toronto Water portion of the City of Toronto website.
5. City Council direct that the public notices for any community consultation regardless of their format and distribution clearly state all options being examined for disposal of biosolids at the Highland Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.
6. City Council request that the General Manager, Toronto Water, regularly review the Terms of Reference of each of the Neighbourhood Liaison Committees under the purview of Toronto Water and report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee with any recommendations for change.
7. City Council receive the report (September 11, 2013) from the City Solicitor for information.
8. City Council direct that the confidential information in Attachment 1 to the report (September 11, 2013) from the City Solicitor remain confidential as it is subject to solicitor-client privilege and concerns potential litigation which affects the City.
Origin
Summary
This is to provide an update on actions taken since the May 2011 direction from Council to implement Beneficial Use as the primary biosolids management strategy and Landfill Disposal as a contingency option for the Highland Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (HCTP).
In March 2012, staff released a Request for Proposal (RFP) to retain Consulting services to prepare a conceptual design for the infrastructure necessary to implement the Council directed biosolids management program for HCTP. A Conceptual Design Report is now complete and provides details on the requirements and costs associated with constructing a truck loading facility including the necessary odour controls as well as additional digesters to ensure biosolids meet regulatory standards for agricultural land application in Ontario.
The November 2012 Staff Report to PWIC advised of the need to undertake a Schedule B Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) in order to pursue Council's direction. The Staff Report advised that this course of action was chosen after consultation with the Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) and addresses the risk of Part II Orders if the December 2009 Biosolids Master Plan is used as the approval document to implement Council direction. The Environmental Assessment Act allows any interested parties to make a request to the MOE for a higher level of assessment for a Class EA project if they feel there are significant outstanding issues that have not been adequately addressed and could be addressed through an individual environmental assessment process. This is known as a Part II Order Request.
The RFP for the Schedule B Class EA was developed with the input of Toronto Public Health (TPH) and the Toronto Energy and Environment Office (EEO). TPH wrote the terms of reference and will oversee the development of the Health Impact Assessments for the alternatives under study. The Toronto Energy and Environment Office wrote the requirements for Cumulative Impact Assessment regarding air emissions incorporating the City's in-house developed air model.
A RFP to retain consulting services for the Schedule B Class EA was released April 19, 2013 but was subsequently withdrawn pending Council approval of this Staff Report. It is anticipated that the EA will take approximately 12 months to complete from the execution date of a consulting services agreement and will cost approximately $500,000. Costs could rise depending on the degree of stakeholder input and consultation as well as Part II Orders.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61360.pdf
(September 11, 2013) Attachment 1 - Executive Summary of HCTP Biosolids Truck Loading Facility Conceptual Design Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61483.pdf
(September 11, 2013) Attachment 2 - Scope of Work for Highland Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Management Schedule B Environmental Assessment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61494.pdf
Communications
(September 17, 2013) E-mail from Per-Inge and Victoria Schei (PW.New.PW25.6.2)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Brian Steen (PW.New.PW25.6.3)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Frank Moir (PW.New.PW25.6.4)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Alan Park (PW.New.PW25.6.5)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Jim Wakefield (PW.New.PW25.6.6)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Barbara McElgunn (PW.New.PW25.6.7)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Desmond Vandenberg (PW.New.PW25.6.8)
(September 20, 2013) Submission from Karen Buck (PW.New.PW25.6.9)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Kimberley Milliard (PW.New.PW25.6.10)
(September 20, 2013) E-mail from Nadia Heyd (PW.New.PW25.6.11)
(September 20, 2013) E-mail from Penelope Corrin (PW.New.PW25.6.12)
(September 20, 2013) Submission from Allen Elias (PW.New.PW25.6.13)
Speakers
Allen Elias, Member, Highland Creek Treatment Plant Neighbourhood Liasion Committee
Heather Marshall, DeTOx Toronto Campaigner, Toronto Environmental Alliance
Barbara McElgunn, Highland Creek Treatment Plant Neighbourhood Liasion Committee
Frank Moir, Highland Creek Treatment Plant Neighbourhood Liaison Committee
Karen Buck
Councillor Paul Ainslie
Councillor Ron Moeser
6a - Highland Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Management Update
Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and is about potential litigation that affects the City
Origin
Summary
This report should be read in conjunction with the report from the General Manager, Toronto Water which provides an update on developments since the May 2011 direction from Council to implement Beneficial Use as the primary biosolids management strategy and Landfill Disposal as a contingency for the Highland Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant ("HCTP"). This report has been prepared to ensure that Committee and Council have the related legal advice for consideration along with the General Manager's report.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61324.pdf
(September 11, 2013) Confidential Attachment 1 - Highland Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Management Update
PW25.7 - Impact of July 8, 2013 Storm on the City's Sewer and Stormwater Systems
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, to report back during the 2014 budget process on the capital and operating budget impacts of expanding the Basement Flooding Protection Program on a city-wide basis beyond the existing 34 priority study areas, including methodologies for setting priorities and resource implications, so that the program continues to address urban flooding risks in a fair, well-organized, and efficient manner.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, to report through the 2014 budget process with a plan for enforcement of the Mandatory Downspout Disconnect Program Phase 1 (combined sewer areas) and implementation of Phase 2 (basement flooding areas) as set out in Municipal Code Chapter 681, as part of the Basement Flooding Protection Program.
3. City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, to report through the 2014 budget process with a multi-year capital plan to meet the Green Parking lot standards for Toronto Water properties.
4. City Council request General Manager, Toronto Water, the General Manager, Transportation Services, the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director to work together to develop "green infrastructure" standards for the public right-of-way for implementation in Transportation Services and Toronto Water capital projects with a target implementation date for the 2015 construction season.
5. City Council request the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to forward to the General Manager, Toronto Water, information on houses within the flood plain that are most vulnerable to flooding from the Black Creek Watershed and that the General Manager, Toronto Water, provide this information in a report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in February 2014.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to advise City Council on the condition of the sewer systems within the areas of the City most affected by the July 8, 2013 storm. The report also seeks Council direction on a proposal to expand, across the entire City, a systematic review of the sanitary and storm sewer systems as they are or may be impacted by severe storm events with a view to reduce the number of basements that may flood.
On the afternoon and evening of July 8, 2013, severe thunderstorms and heavy rains flooded many parts of the City, causing damage to public and private property and infrastructure, stranding thousands of commuters, and leaving tens of thousands of residents and businesses without electricity. More than 4,700 basement flooding complaints were received during and immediately following the storm.
The majority of these complaints came from residents living in the Etobicoke and York areas of the City. Many of the impacted homes are outside of the existing Basement Flooding Protection Program's 34 priority study areas. A preliminary review of the existing sewer drainage systems in Etobicoke and York indicate they have been designed to accommodate typical operating conditions, with sanitary sewer systems being sized to accommodate sanitary flow contributions from residents and businesses, and with storm sewers being designed to collect and convey storm runoff from rainfall and/or snowmelt. It is apparent that incidents of flooding occur where there is a combination of heavy rainfall and local low lying areas and that this can potentially occur at any location across the City.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61363.pdf
Communications
(September 20, 2013) Letter from Councillor Frances Nunziata, Ward 11 - York South-Weston (PW.New.PW25.7.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/comm/communicationfile-39917.pdf
(September 20, 2013) Submission from Mike Mattos (PW.New.PW25.7.3)
Speakers
Terri Mercer
Hamish Wilson
Councillor Frances Nunziata
Councillor Ron Moeser
PW25.8 - Transportation Master Plan for Park Lawn Road and Lake Shore Boulevard West Area
- Decision Type:
- Information
- Status:
- Received
- Ward:
- 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Committee Decision
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee received the item for information.
Origin
Summary
City Council, at its meeting of November 27, 28, and 29, 2012, directed that "the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, report to (PWIC) in early 2013 on the scope, timing, costs and any other implications of undertaking a Comprehensive Transportation Master Plan (TMP) for Park Lawn Road and Lake Shore Boulevard West area, which would take into consideration the traffic implications of potential development in this area."
A TMP is needed to set out a cohesive and integrated multi-modal transportation plan that brings together previously planned and approved (but unbuilt) infrastructure projects, development plans, one-time infrastructure opportunities, and the needs of the people who will live, work, visit and pass through the area for decades to come. The TMP will meet the requirements of Phases 1 and 2 of the Municipal Class EA and will set out any subsequent planning, design, and approval steps needed for the Plan's various components.
The TMP will be led by City staff, who will retain consulting services to supplement in-house expertise. The study will be initiated in 2014 and be completed by the end of the year. A staff report will be submitted to Committee and Council for consideration at the first opportunity afterwards.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61200.pdf
Communications
PW25.9 - Allen Road Environmental Assessment Study - Terms of Reference
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- 9 - York Centre, 10 - York Centre, 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 21 - St. Paul's
Committee Recommendations
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager of Transportation Services to issue a Notice of Completion for the Terms of Reference for the Allen Road Environmental Assessment, and to submit the Terms of Reference document for the Allen Road Environmental Assessment to the Ministry of the Environment of Ontario for agency and public review and approval in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Assessment Act of Ontario.
2. Pending Provincial approval of the Individual EA Terms of Reference, City Council direct the General Manager of Transportation Services to include for consideration in the 2014 Capital Budget for Transportation Services as a new project, $2.5 million in new capital funding in order retain consulting expertise and to initiate in 2014 the Individual Environmental Assessment for Allen Road between Transit Road and Eglinton Avenue West.
3. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.
Origin
Summary
City Council, at its meeting of July 5-7, 2010, endorsed the Lawrence-Allen Revitalization Plan (LARP) and, in so doing, directed the General Manager, Transportation Services, to initiate the Allen Road Individual Environmental Assessment (EA) Terms of Reference (ToR). The purpose of this report is to inform City Council of the EA study progress to date and to receive authorization for the submission of the ToR to the Ontario Minister of Environment for review and approval.
The Draft ToR describes the broad procedures to be followed in carrying out the EA Study, including the study objectives, the types of alternatives to be evaluated, the evaluation process, and the public and agency consultation plan. Following the receipt of City Council authority, City staff will submit the ToR to the Minister for formal government review, which will include a request for public comments. It is anticipated that the Minister will provide a decision on the ToR in late 2013, allowing the EA Study to commence in early 2014.
The ToR phase of the EA was carried out in full consultation with the community and technical stakeholders, and there is widespread support for the proposed work plan for the future EA for Allen Road. The EA study will define the long-term future of Allen Road and its surroundings, as future infrastructure investment, development and redevelopment will proceed on the basis of the approved EA plan. In that respect, the EA study is an essential component of urban planning and City building in the study area.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61472.pdf
PW25.10 - Traffic Control Signals Installation: Dufferin Street at Eversfield Road and Dufferin Street at Bloem Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 17 - Davenport
Committee Recommendations
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council deny the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Dufferin Street at Eversfield Road and Dufferin Street at Bloem Avenue.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to report to City Council on the request for installation of traffic control signals at the intersections of Dufferin Street and Eversfield Road and Dufferin Street and Bloem Avenue. This report is submitted to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee, as the matter is a shared boundary issue between the North York Community Council and the Etobicoke York Community Council.
Traffic studies reveal that traffic control signals are not warranted at these locations.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61473.pdf
(August 26, 2013) Map 1 - Dufferin Street at Eversfield Road and Dufferin Street and Bloem Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61474.pdf
PW25.11 - Motorcycle Parking - Short-Term On-Street Parking and Overnight On-Street Permit Parking
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council request that Transportation Services and the Toronto Parking Authority create designated on-street motorcycle parking spaces on a pilot basis, and maintain the exemption from the requirement to pay until Pay-by-Plate technology can be deployed.
2. City Council maintain the existing exemption for motorcycles from the requirement to pay for overnight parking permits in designated on-street permit parking areas.
Origin
Summary
This report responds to City Council's directive that the General Manager, Transportation Services, report back through the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on a proposal to require payment when motorcycles and motor scooters park at on-street parking meter/machine locations and in designated permit parking areas. This report also addresses concerns about motorcycle parking on sidewalks and in other illegal locations.
On-street meter/machine parking: Exemptions to on-street meter/machine parking fees for motorcycles were implemented in 2005 to address complaints from motorcyclists who received parking tickets after their Pay-and-Display receipts were stolen or blew away, and to promote the use of motorcycles rather than larger personal vehicles. Despite this exemption, the City receives frequent complaints about motorcycles parked in illegal locations (e.g. on boulevards, on sidewalks, in "No Parking" zones, and within corner parking restrictions).
Transportation Services recommends developing an on-street motorcycle parking pilot to provide safe, convenient parking in designated motorcycle parking spaces. The creation of designated motorcycle parking spaces would be paired with education and enforcement to limit illegal motorcycle parking.
Motorcycles would be offered free parking in these spaces for a limited time, until Toronto Parking Authority has the technology to address concerns about securing receipts to motorcycles. Once Toronto Parking Authority is ready to offer Pay-by-Plate payment options that do not involve physical receipts, the City could then consider charging motorcycles hourly rates that are proportional to the space they occupy.
This program would generate projected annual revenues in the range of $125,000 to $250,000. The one-time costs of developing a program with 300 motorcycle parking spaces and Pay-by-Plate payment options are approximately $250,000. Annual maintenance costs of approximately $30,000 per year are also anticipated. The appropriate number and location of spaces remains to be determined based on parking surveys.
Permit parking: Exemptions to on-street permit parking fees for motorcycles were implemented in 2006 to promote the use of motorcycles rather than larger personal vehicles. Though the costs of removing the exemption are negligible, minimal revenue would be generated from removing the exemption; staff estimates that the change would generate less than $10,000 in annual revenues.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61471.pdf
Communications
PW25.12 - Supporting Improved Parking for Mopeds and Scooters
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Referred
- Wards:
- All
Committee Decision
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee referred the item to the General Manager, Transportation Services, for a report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee.
Origin
Summary
City Council on July 16, 17, 18 and 19, 2013, referred Motion MM37.3 to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee.
In recent years, the popularity of motor-assisted bicycles (mopeds) and limited-speed motorcycles (scooters) has greatly increased and they are now a common sight on many streets. The City of Toronto should be encouraging the use of mopeds and scooters because, in a city challenged by gridlock, they take up less road and parking space and they use less fossil fuel.
However, our current rules and regulations for parking mopeds and scooters predate their reclassification by the Province of Ontario as types of motor vehicle and this has created some negative impacts. Unlike bicycles, they must be parked on the street where they are vulnerable to theft or damage and occupy valuable paid-parking spaces that fund important services like parks, libraries, and road maintenance. Riders who park on the sidewalk and block pedestrians or use City bicycle locks are currently fined by City of Toronto parking enforcement officers.
It is time to use common sense to bring our regulations into the twenty-first century and reap the rewards of increased moped and scooter ridership without reducing road safety or pedestrian comfort.
(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.3)
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-60535.pdf
Communications
(September 16, 2013) E-mail from Boris Antonic (PW.New.PW25.12.2)
(September 17, 2013) E-mail from Linda Quattrin (PW.New.PW25.12.3)
(September 18, 2013) E-mail from Ian Chamandy (PW.New.PW25.12.4)
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Martin Katz (PW.New.PW25.12.5)
(September 20, 2013) E-mail from Matt Faulknor (PW.New.PW25.12.6)
Speakers
Councillor Josh Matlow
PW25.13 - Eglinton Avenue East High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 35 - Scarborough Southwest
Committee Decision
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee requested the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review the impact of the removal of the High Occupancy Vehicle lanes along Eglinton Avenue East and report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee at the January 2014 meeting.
Origin
Summary
The primary objective of transportation planning should be the efficient, safe and effective movement of commuters along thoroughfares using a variety of transportation options.
The installation of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes has been touted as a means to more effectively facilitate the movement of public transit vehicles, multiple occupant vehicles and high efficiency vehicles including bicycles. However, the overall objective is the improvement of transportation flow along the routes where HOV lanes are installed.
In the case of Eglinton Avenue East the beneficial impacts of HOV lanes is more than outweighed by the significantly negative impact upon non-HOV users and the traffic gridlock that has resulted. In view of these significant traffic impacts and the resulting gridlock, it is imperative that a review be undertaken of the HOV lanes along Eglinton Avenue East to determine whether it would be more beneficial to traffic flow to have them removed.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-60591.pdf
Communications
PW25.14 - Crescent Town Bridge to Victoria Park Station
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 31 - Beaches-East York
Committee Recommendations
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council authorize the General Managers, Transportation Services, and Parks, Forestry and Recreation to undertake a preliminary design and feasibility study of a permanent, rather than temporary, access to Victoria Park Avenue as part of the Crescent Town/ Victoria Park Bridge Rehabilitation Project for consideration in the 2015 Transportation Services Capital plan and any other divisional budgets, as required.
Origin
Summary
Letter from Councillor Janet Davis seeking City Council approval to give Transportation Services the authority to undertake a study to determine the feasibility and costs of building a more permanent access to Victoria Park Avenue as part of an existing capital project.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61346.pdf
Speakers
PW25.15 - Reserved Streetcar Lanes on King Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- 14 - Parkdale-High Park, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 30 - Toronto-Danforth
Committee Recommendations
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to prepare a joint City-TTC report on the feasibility and merits of implementing morning rush hour reserved streetcar lanes on King Street, including details pertaining to extent/boundaries of the lanes, means of designation or separation of the lanes, means of enforcement, means of monitoring effectiveness of the lanes, cost of implementing such lanes, and effects on other traffic in the corridor, as well as study of traffic management measures to mitigate delays at other pinch-points on the King Street route, and report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee as soon as possible.
2. City Council direct that any costs associated with the preparation of the joint report referred to in Part 1 above be shared equally between the City and the Toronto Transit Commission.
Origin
Summary
The Toronto Transit Commission on June 24, 2013, requested that the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee direct Transportation Services to prepare a joint City-TTC report on the feasibility and merits of implementing morning rush hour reserved streetcar lanes on King Street.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61168.pdf
Communications
(September 19, 2013) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (PW.New.PW25.15.2)
Speakers
PW25.16 - 2014 Service Level Review - Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Programs
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Referred
Committee Decision
The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee referred the following motions to the Budget Committee, the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer for consideration as part of the 2014 Budget process:
Motion 1 by Councillor Layton:
“City Council direct that the following service standards be included in the 2014 Service Standards for Transportation Services, and direct the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to include the necessary resources in the 2014 recommended budget:
a. snow removal in bike lanes, within 10 hours;
b. snow removal at bus stops within 13 hours;
c. asphalt/pothole repair in designated bike lanes within 4-6 days;
d. manual sweeping on streets without alternating parking at minimum 1-2 times per month;
e. intersection safety review completed 90 percent within one year; and
f. new signal or signal timing review completed 90 percent within one year.”
Motion 2 by Councillor Davis:
“City Council direct that the following service standards be included in the 2014 Service Standards for Solid Waste Management Services, and direct the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to include the necessary resources in the 2014 recommended budget:
a. residential diversion rate for 2014 be 60 percent or 600,000 tons of solid waste; and
b. 4,000 multi-residential buildings on green program, producing 17,500 tons of Source Separated Organics.”
Motion 3 by Councillor Davis:
“City Council direct that the following service standards be included in the 2014 Service Standards for Toronto Water, and direct the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to include the necessary resources in the 2014 recommended budget:
a. 2 year cycle of catch basin cleaning for local streets and 1 year for arterial roads;
b. treatment and supply of 454 billion liters of water (includes York Region);
c. connection and treatment of 438 billion litres of wastewater;
d. replacement of 5,000 sub-standard water services (approximately 3,500 of which are lead);
e. response to and clearing of 10,000 blocked sewer connections; and
f. repair of approximately 1,500 broken watermains.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The following made presentations to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee:
- Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on the Overview of the Service Level Review;
- Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, on Engineering and Construction Services 2013 Service Level Review;
- General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, on Solid Waste Management Services 2013 Service Level Review;
- General Manager, Toronto Water, on Toronto Water 2013 Service Level Review; and
- General Manager, Transportation Services, on Transportation Services 2013 Service Level Review.
Summary
City Council on July 16, 17, 18 and 19, 2013, in adopting Item EX33.29, approved the review of divisional service levels and activities for City Programs at appropriate Standing Committees in September 2013 (http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?Item=2013.EX33.29)
Staff will make presentations to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on the following:
- Engineering and Construction Services
- Policy, Planning, Finance and Administration (Major Capital Infrastructure Co-ordination only)
- Solid Waste Management Services
- Toronto Water
- Transportation Services
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61458.pdf
(September 20, 2013) Presentation from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, on Engineering and Construction Services 2013 Service Level Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61659.pdf
(September 20, 2013) Presentation from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, on Solid Waste Management Services 2013 Service Level Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61661.pdf
(September 20, 2013) Presentation from the General Manager, Toronto Water, on Toronto Water 2013 Service Level Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61639.pdf
(September 20, 2013) Presentation from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Transportation Services 2013 Service Level Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-61662.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/comm/communicationfile-40010.pdf
Speakers
Meeting Sessions
| Session Date | Session Type | Start Time | End Time | Public or Closed Session |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-09-20 | Morning | 9:38 AM | 12:30 PM | Public |
| 2013-09-20 | Afternoon | 1:40 PM | 1:42 PM | Public |
| 2013-09-20 | Afternoon | 1:43 PM | 2:24 PM | Closed |
| 2013-09-20 | Afternoon | 2:30 PM | 5:40 PM | Public |
Attendance
| Date and Time | Quorum | Members |
|---|---|---|
| 2013-09-20 9:38 AM - 12:30 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Michelle Berardinetti, Janet Davis, Mark Grimes, Mike Layton, Denzil Minnan-Wong (Chair), John Parker Also present (non-members): Paul Ainslie, Ron Moeser, Frances Nunziata |
| 2013-09-20 1:40 PM - 1:42 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Michelle Berardinetti, Janet Davis, Mike Layton, Denzil Minnan-Wong (Chair), John Parker Not Present: Mark Grimes Also present (non-members): Paul Ainslie, Ron Moeser, Frances Nunziata |
| 2013-09-20 1:43 PM - 2:24 PM (Closed Session) |
Present |
Present: Michelle Berardinetti, Janet Davis, Mike Layton, Denzil Minnan-Wong (Chair), John Parker Not Present: Mark Grimes Also present (non-members): Paul Ainslie, Ron Moeser |
| 2013-09-20 2:30 PM - 5:40 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Michelle Berardinetti, Janet Davis, Mike Layton, Denzil Minnan-Wong (Chair), John Parker Not Present: Mark Grimes Also present (non-members): Paul Ainslie, Josh Matlow, Frances Nunziata |